Monitoring of minimal residual disease in adult acute myeloid leukemia using peripheral blood as an alternative source to bone marrow

Impact of hemodilution on flow cytometry based measurable residual disease assessment in acute myeloid leukemia

Measurable residual disease (MRD) measured in the bone marrow (BM) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients after induction chemotherapy is an established prognostic factor. Hemodilution, stemming from peripheral blood (PB) mixing within BM during aspiration, can yield false-negative MRD results. We prospectively examined hemodilution by measuring MRD in BM aspirates obtained from three consecutive 2 mL pulls, along with PB samples. Our results demonstrated a significant decrease in MRD percentages between the first and second pulls (P = 0.025) and between the second and third pulls (P = 0.025), highlighting the impact of hemodilution. Initially, 39% of MRD levels (18/46 leukemia-associated immunophenotypes) exceeded the 0.1% cut-off, decreasing to 30% (14/46) in the third pull. Additionally, we assessed the performance of six published methods and parameters for distinguishing BM from PB samples, addressing or compensating for hemodilution. The most promising results relied on the percentages of CD16dim granulocytic population (scarce in BM) and CD117high mast cells (exclusive to BM). Our findings highlight the importance of estimating hemodilution in MRD assessment to qualify MRD results, particularly near the common 0.1% cut-off. To avoid false-negative results by hemodilution, it is essential to collect high-quality BM aspirations and preferably utilizing the initial pull for MRD testing.

Understanding differential technologies for detection of MRD and how to incorporate into clinical practice

Patient- and leukemia-specific factors assessed at diagnosis classify patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in risk categories that are prognostic for outcome. The induction phase with intensive chemotherapy in fit patients aims to reach a complete remission (CR) of less than 5% blasts in bone marrow by morphology. To deepen and sustain the response, induction is followed by consolidation treatment. This postremission treatment of patients with AML is graduated in intensity based on this favorable, intermediate, or adverse risk group classification as defined in the European Leukemia Network (ELN) 2022 recommendations. The increment of evidence that measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction can be superimposed on risk group at diagnosis is instrumental in tailoring further treatment accordingly. Several techniques are applied to detect MRD such as multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), quantitative (digital) polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and next-generation sequencing. The clinical implementation of MRD and the technique used differ among institutes, leading to the accumulation of a wide range of data, and therefore harmonization is warranted. Currently, evidence for MRD guidance is limited to the time point after induction using MFC or quantitative PCR for NPM1 and core binding factor abnormalities in intermediate-risk patients. The role of MRD in targeted or nonintensive therapies needs to be clarified, although some data show improved survival in patients achieving CR-MRD negativity. Potential application of MRD for selection of conditioning before stem cell transplantation, monitoring after consolidation, and use as an intermediate end point in clinical trials need further evaluation.

Liquid biopsies and minimal residual disease in myeloid malignancies

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment through blood component sampling by liquid biopsies (LBs) is increasingly being investigated in myeloid malignancies. Blood components then undergo molecular analysis by flow cytometry or sequencing techniques and can be used as a powerful tool for prognostic and predictive purposes in myeloid malignancies. There is evidence and more is evolving about the quantification and identification of cell-based and gene-based biomarkers in myeloid malignancies to monitor treatment response. MRD based acute myeloid leukemia protocol and clinical trials are currently incorporating LB testing and preliminary results are encouraging for potential widespread use in clinic in the near future. MRD monitoring using LBs are not standard in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) but this is an area of active investigation. In the future, LBs can replace more invasive techniques such as bone marrow biopsies. However, the routine clinical application of these markers continues to be an issue due to lack of standardization and limited number of studies investigating their specificities. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) could help simplify the complex interpretation of molecular testing and reduce errors related to operator dependency. Though the field is rapidly evolving, the applicability of MRD testing using LB is mostly limited to research setting at this time due to the need for validation, regulatory approval, payer coverage, and cost issues. This review focuses on the types of biomarkers, most recent research exploring MRD and LB in myeloid malignancies, ongoing clinical trials, and the future of LB in the setting of AI.

Association of hematologic response and assay sensitivity on the prognostic impact of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is associated with relapse and survival in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We aimed to quantify the impact of MRD on outcomes across clinical contexts, including its association with hematologic response and MRD assay sensitivity. We performed systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 48 studies that reported the association between MRD and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) in AML and provided information on the MRD threshold used and the hematologic response of the study population. Among studies limited to patients in complete remission (CR), the estimated 5-year OS for the MRD-negative and MRD-positive groups was 67% (95% Bayesian credible interval [CrI], 53-77%) and 31% (95% CrI, 18-44%), respectively. Achievement of an MRD-negative response was associated with superior DFS and OS, regardless of MRD threshold or analytic sensitivity. Among patients in CR, the benefit of MRD negativity was highest in studies using an MRD cutoff less than 0.1%. The beneficial impact of MRD negativity was observed across MRD assays and timing of MRD assessment. In patients with AML in morphological remission, achievement of MRD negativity is associated with superior DFS and OS, irrespective of hematologic response or the MRD threshold used.

Identification of critical hemodilution by artificial intelligence in bone marrow assessed for MRD analysis in acute myeloid leukemia: the Cinderella method

Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection is a strong predictor for survival and relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MRD can be either determined by molecular assessment strategies or via multiparameter flow cytometry. The degree of bone marrow (BM) dilution with peripheral blood (PB) increases with aspiration volume causing consecutive underestimation of the residual AML blast amount. In order to prevent false-negative MRD results, we developed Cinderella, a simple automated method for one-tube simultaneous measurement of hemodilution in BM samples and MRD level. The explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) Cinderella was trained and validated with the digital raw data of a flow cytometric "8-color" AML-MRD antibody panel in 126 BM and 23 PB samples from 35 patients. Cinderella predicted PB dilution with high accordance compared to the results of the Holdrinet formula (Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.94, R2 = 0.89, p < 0.001). Unlike conventional neuronal networks Cinderella calculated the distributions of 12 different cell populations that were assigned to true hematopoietic counterparts as a Human in the Loop (HIL) approach. Besides characteristic BM cells such as myelocytes and myeloid progenitor cells the XAI identified discriminating populations, which were not specific for BM or PB (e.g., T cell/ NK cell subpopulations, CD45 negative cells) and considered their frequency differences. Thus, Cinderella represents a HIL-XAI algorithm capable to calculate the degree of hemodilution in bone marrow samples with an AML MRD immunophenotype panel. It is explicable, transparent and paves a simple way to prevent false negative MRD reports. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The Minimal Residual Disease Using Liquid Biopsies in Hematological Malignancies

Simple Summary

Monitoring the response to treatment in hematologic malignancies is essential in defining the best way to optimize patient management. In general, achieving a deeper response has been shown to lead to a better prognosis, and the techniques used to study the minimal residual disease (MRD) are becoming more precise. The use of liquid biopsies, that is, analyzing the presence of alterations in nucleic acids, usually in peripheral blood or other biological fluids, is being studied and optimized with increasingly innovative molecular techniques, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the monitoring of the MRD, avoiding, in many cases, more invasive tests in different hematological neoplasms. Currently, liquid biopsies are not standardized for the MRD monitoring, but there is increasing evidence of its correlation with other techniques to measure responses to treatments and patient outcomes.

Abstract

The study of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and other peripheral blood components (known as “liquid biopsies”) is promising, and has been investigated especially in solid tumors. Nevertheless, it is increasingly showing a greater utility in the diagnosis, prognosis, and response to treatment of hematological malignancies; in the future, it could prevent invasive techniques, such as bone marrow (BM) biopsies. Most of the studies about this topic have focused on B-cell lymphoid malignancies; some of them have shown that cfDNA can be used as a novel way for the diagnosis and minimal residual monitoring of B-cell lymphomas, using techniques such as next-generation sequencing (NGS). In myelodysplastic syndromes, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia, liquid biopsies may allow for an interesting genomic representation of the tumor clones affecting different lesions (spatial heterogeneity). In acute leukemias, it can be helpful in the monitoring of the early treatment response and the prediction of treatment failure. In chronic lymphocytic leukemia, the evaluation of cfDNA permits the definition of clonal evolution and drug resistance in real time. However, there are limitations, such as the difficulty in obtaining sufficient circulating tumor DNA for achieving a high sensitivity to assess the minimal residual disease, or the lack of standardization of the method, and clinical studies, to confirm its prognostic impact. This review focuses on the clinical applications of cfDNA on the minimal residual disease in hematological malignancies.

Technical Aspects of Flow Cytometry-based Measurable Residual Disease Quantification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Experience of the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party

Measurable residual disease (MRD) quantified by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is a strong and independent prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, several technical factors may affect the final read-out of the assay. Experts from the MRD Working Party of the European LeukemiaNet evaluated which aspects are crucial for accurate MFC-MRD measurement. Here, we report on the agreement, obtained via a combination of a cross-sectional questionnaire, live discussions, and a Delphi poll. The recommendations consist of several key issues from bone marrow sampling to final laboratory reporting to ensure quality and reproducibility of results. Furthermore, the experiences were tested by comparing two 8-color MRD panels in multiple laboratories. The results presented here underscore the feasibility and the utility of a harmonized theoretical and practical MFC-MRD assessment and are a next step toward further harmonization.

Molecular Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Initial induction chemotherapy to eradicate the bulk of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells results in complete remission (CR) in the majority of patients. However, leukemic cells persisting in the bone marrow below the morphologic threshold remain unaffected and have the potential to proliferate and re-emerge as AML relapse. Detection of minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) is a promising prognostic marker for AML relapse as it can assess an individual patients' risk profile and evaluate their response to treatment. With the emergence of molecular techniques, such as next generation sequencing (NGS), a more sensitive assessment of molecular MRD markers is available. In recent years, the detection of MRD by molecular assays and its association with AML relapse and survival has been explored and verified in multiple studies. Although most studies show that the presence of MRD leads to a worse clinical outcome, molecular-based methods face several challenges including limited sensitivity/specificity, and a difficult distinction between mutations that are representative of AML rather than clonal hematopoiesis. This review describes the studies that have been performed using molecular-based assays for MRD detection in the context of other MRD detection approaches in AML, and discusses limitations, challenges and opportunities.

AML/Normal Progenitor Balance Instead of Total Tumor Load (MRD) Accounts for Prognostic Impact of Flowcytometric Residual Disease in AML

Simple Summary

Measurable residual disease (MRD), taken as the percentage of white blood cells in acute myeloid leukemia, has important prognostic value, but false negatives and false positives can occur. Immature populations make up the most important part of MRD (now referred to as WBC-MRD). We explored the influence on prognostic impact of the two compartments of WBC-MRD: (1) the AML part of the total primitive/progenitor (CD34+, CD117+, CD133+) compartment (primitive marker MRD; PM-MRD) and (2) the total progenitor compartment (as % of WBC, PM%). Both are related as follows: WBC-MRD = PM-MRD × PM%. In the HOVON/SAKK study (H102; n = 300), using two objectively assessed cut-off points (2.34% and 10%), PM-MRD was found to be prognostically more discriminative than WBC-MRD. The PM% parameter had no prognostic impact and, moreover, resulted in WBC-MRD false positives/false negatives. Highly important for present clinical practice is the identification of a PM-MRD ≥ 10% but MRD^negative (MRD < 0.1, ELN consensus) poor prognosis subgroup. This suggests that a residual disease analysis using PM-MRD should be conducted.

Abstract

Measurable residual disease (MRD) in AML, assessed by multicolor flow cytometry, is an important prognostic factor. Progenitors are key populations in defining MRD, and cases of MRD involving these progenitors are calculated as percentage of WBC and referred to as white blood cell MRD (WBC-MRD). Two main compartments of WBC-MRD can be defined: (1) the AML part of the total primitive/progenitor (CD34+, CD117+, CD133+) compartment (referred to as primitive marker MRD; PM-MRD) and (2) the total progenitor compartment (% of WBC, referred to as PM%), which is the main quantitative determinant of WBC-MRD. Both are related as follows: WBC-MRD = PM-MRD × PM%. We explored the relative contribution of each parameter to the prognostic impact. In the HOVON/SAKK study H102 (300 patients), based on two objectively assessed cut-off points (2.34% and 10%), PM-MRD was found to offer an independent prognostic parameter that was able to identify three patient groups with different prognoses with larger discriminative power than WBC-MRD. In line with this, the PM% parameter itself showed no prognostic impact, implying that the prognostic impact of WBC-MRD results from the PM-MRD parameter it contains. Moreover, the presence of the PM% parameter in WBC-MRD may cause WBC-MRD false positivity and WBC-MRD false negativity. For the latter, at present, it is clinically relevant that PM-MRD ≥ 10% identifies a patient sub-group with a poor prognosis that is currently classified as good prognosis MRD^negative using the European LeukemiaNet 0.1% consensus MRD cut-off value. These observations suggest that residual disease analysis using PM-MRD should be conducted.

MRD Tailored Therapy in AML: What We Have Learned So Far

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous clonal disease associated with a dismal survival, partly due to the frequent occurrence of relapse. Many patient- and leukemia-specific characteristics, such as age, cytogenetics, mutations, and measurable residual disease (MRD) after intensive chemotherapy, have shown to be valuable prognostic factors. MRD has become a rich field of research where many advances have been made regarding technical, biological, and clinical aspects, which will be the topic of this review. Since many laboratories involved in AML diagnostics have experience in immunophenotyping, multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) based MRD is currently the most commonly used method. Although molecular, quantitative PCR based techniques may be more sensitive, their disadvantage is that they can only be applied in a subset of patients harboring the genetic aberration. Next-generation sequencing can assess and quantify mutations in many genes but currently does not offer highly sensitive MRD measurements on a routine basis. In order to provide reliable MRD results, MRD assay optimization and standardization is essential. Different techniques for MRD assessment are being evaluated, and combinations of the methods have shown promising results for improving its prognostic value. In this regard, the load of leukemic stem cells (LSC) has also been shown to add to the prognostic value of MFC-MRD. At this moment, MRD after intensive chemotherapy is most often used as a prognostic factor to help stratify patients, but also to select the most appropriate consolidation therapy. For example, to guide post-remission treatment for intermediate-risk patients where MRD positive patients receive allogeneic stem cell transplantation and MRD negative receive autologous stem cell transplantation. Other upcoming uses of MRD that are being investigated include: selecting the type of allogeneic stem cell transplantation therapy (donor, conditioning), monitoring after stem cell transplantation (to allow intervention), and determining drug efficacy for the use of a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials.

Association of Measurable Residual Disease With Survival Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Measurable residual disease (MRD) refers to neoplastic cells that cannot be detected by standard cytomorphologic analysis. In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), determining the association of MRD with survival may improve prognostication and inform selection of efficient clinical trial end points.

Objective

To examine the association between MRD status and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with AML using scientific literature.

Data Sources

Clinical studies on AML published between January 1, 2000, and October 1, 2018, were identified via searches of PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE.

Study Selection

Literature search and study screening were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Studies that assessed DFS or OS by MRD status in patients with AML were included. Reviews, non-English-language articles, and studies reporting only outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplantation or those with insufficient description of MRD information were excluded.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Study sample size, median patient age, median follow-up time, MRD detection method, MRD assessment time points, AML subtype, specimen source, and survival outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed separately for DFS and OS using bayesian hierarchical modeling.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Meta-analyses of survival probabilities and hazard ratios (HRs) were conducted for OS and DFS according to MRD status.

Results

Eighty-one publications reporting on 11 151 patients were included. The average HR for achieving MRD negativity was 0.36 (95% bayesian credible interval [CrI], 0.33-0.39) for OS and 0.37 (95% CrI, 0.34-0.40) for DFS. The estimated 5-year DFS was 64% for patients without MRD and 25% for those with MRD, and the estimated OS was 68% for patients without MRD and 34% for those with MRD. The association of MRD negativity with DFS and OS was significant for all subgroups, with the exception of MRD assessed by cytogenetics or fluorescent in situ hybridization.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that achievement of MRD negativity is associated with superior DFS and OS in patients with AML. The value of MRD negativity appears to be consistent across age groups, AML subtypes, time of MRD assessment, specimen source, and MRD detection methods. These results support MRD status as an end point that may allow for accelerated evaluation of novel therapies in AML.

Current strategies for detection and approach to measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia

Baseline cytogenetic/genetic features have been widely recognized to play a critical prognostic role in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and have proven useful in designing risk-adapted treatment strategies. Nevertheless, to improve further the outcome of AML patients we are still in need of accurate methods to explore the quality of response and to adequately discriminate patients who are likely to relapse over time from those who are in deep and stable remission. In this view, is it well established that measurement of leukemic cells surviving chemotherapy (called measurable residual disease, MRD) during the course of treatment may be a reliable biomarker in predicting relapse. Detection of MRD relies on highly sensitive techniques, such as quantitative polymerase chain reaction and multiparametric flow cytometry, which, due to their levels of specificity and sensitivity, are increasingly included in the decision-making process of AML treatment. In the present manuscript, we will review the current techniques of MRD investigation and their clinical contribution to AML management.

Detection and management of acute myeloid leukemia measurable residual disease: is it standard of care?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the present manuscript, we will review the current approaches to investigate measurable residual disease (MRD) and its clinical applications in AML management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the last decades, several methods have been developed to trace MRD, with flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) being the most reliable. However, new technologies, such as digital PCR and Next-Generation Sequencing are emerging as particularly useful in AML. The 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations have incorporated MRD assessment to define the response criteria to therapy, and more recently, the ELN MRD Working Party has published guidelines for the use of MRD in clinical practice.

SUMMARY

Morphologic complete remission (mCR) after induction therapy, has been consistently shown not only to have a critical prognostic role but also to fail in predicting relapse on an individual basis. Major attempts to improve our prediction capability have been made by measuring the residual levels of leukemic cells that persist in the bone marrow after chemotherapy. This number of cells, also called MRD, harbors in the bone marrow below the threshold of morphology and is responsible for leukemia recurrence. Therefore, the detection of MRD promises to help predict the risk of relapse, allowing a more proper patients' risk-stratification and the use of risk-tailored therapeutic strategy.

Targeted next-generation sequencing of circulating cell-free DNA vs bone marrow in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) allows for noninvasive peripheral blood sampling of cancer-associated mutations and has established clinical utility in several solid tumors. We performed targeted next-generation sequencing of ccfDNA and bone marrow at the time of diagnosis and after achieving remission in 22 patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Among 28 genes sequenced by both platforms, a total of 39 unique somatic mutations were detected. Five mutations (13%) were detected only in ccfDNA, and 15 (38%) were detected only in bone marrow. Among the 19 mutations detected in both sources, the concordance of variant allelic frequency (VAF) assessment by both methods was high (R2 = 0.849). Mutations detected in only 1 source generally had lower VAF than those detected in both sources, suggesting that either method may miss small subclonal populations. In 3 patients, sequencing of ccfDNA detected new or persistent leukemia-associated mutations during remission that appeared to herald overt relapse. Overall, this study demonstrates that sequencing of ccfDNA in patients with AML can identify clinically relevant mutations not detected in the bone marrow and may play a role in the assessment of measurable residual disease. However, mutations were missed by both ccfDNA and bone marrow analyses, particularly when the VAF was <10%, suggesting that ccfDNA and bone marrow may be complementary in the assessment and monitoring of patients with AML.

Multiplex accurate sensitive quantitation (MASQ) with application to minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia

Measuring minimal residual disease in cancer has applications for prognosis, monitoring treatment and detection of recurrence. Simple sequence-based methods to detect nucleotide substitution variants have error rates (about 10⁻³) that limit sensitive detection. We developed and characterized the performance of MASQ (multiplex accurate sensitive quantitation), a method with an error rate below 10⁻⁶. MASQ counts variant templates accurately in the presence of millions of host genomes by using tags to identify each template and demanding consensus over multiple reads. Since the MASQ protocol multiplexes 50 target loci, we can both integrate signal from multiple variants and capture subclonal response to treatment. Compared to existing methods for variant detection, MASQ achieves an excellent combination of sensitivity, specificity and yield. We tested MASQ in a pilot study in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who entered complete remission. We detect leukemic variants in the blood and bone marrow samples of all five patients, after induction therapy, at levels ranging from 10⁻² to nearly 10⁻⁶. We observe evidence of sub-clonal structure and find higher target variant frequencies in patients who go on to relapse, demonstrating the potential for MASQ to quantify residual disease in AML.

Measurable residual disease assessment by qPCR in peripheral blood is an informative tool for disease surveillance in childhood acute myeloid leukaemia

Serial assessments of measurable (or minimal) residual disease (MRD) by qPCR may identify nascent relapse in children with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and enable pre-emptive therapy. We investigated the kinetics and prognostic impact of recurrent fusion transcripts (RUNX1-RUNX1T1, CBFB-MYH11, KMT2A-MLLT3 or KMT2A-ELL) in 774 post-induction samples from bone marrow (BM, 347) and peripheral blood (PB, 427) from 75 children with AML. BM MRD persistence during consolidation did not increase the risk of relapse, and MRD at therapy completion did not correlate to outcome (HR = 0·64/MRD log reduction (CI: 0·32-1·26), P = 0·19). In contrast, 8/8 patients with detectable MRD in PB after first consolidation relapsed. Persistence (n = 4) and shifting from negative to positive (n = 10) in PB during follow-up predicted relapse in 14/14 patients. All 253 PB samples collected during follow-up from 36 patients in continuous complete remission were MRD negative. In core-binding factor AML, persistent low-level MRD positivity in BM during follow-up was frequent but an increment to above 5 × 10^-4 heralded subsequent haematological relapse in 12/12 patients. We demonstrate that MRD monitoring in PB after induction therapy is highly informative and propose an MRD increment above 5 × 10^-4 in PB and BM as a definition of molecular relapse since it always leads to haematological relapse.

Use of Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Therapy

OPINION STATEMENT

The expanding availability of minimal or more precisely measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with its possible implications for therapeutic decisions is of high interest to clinicians treating AML patients. A variety of mostly retrospective studies have shown that AML patients with a positive MRD test, assessed by different techniques at defined cutoffs and time-points, are at significantly higher risk of relapse and experience shorter overall survival compared to MRD-negative patients. How this valuable information may be adapted in the daily routine of patients' treatment to distinguish individuals who need more aggressive therapy from the ones who can be spared additional therapy to avoid treatment-related toxicities is still being investigated. With the exception of MRD analyses in acute promyelocitic leukemia (APL), the clinical implications of MRD tests for the individual AML patient are still mostly unknown. We currently lack hard evidence that MRD-based therapy modulation during treatment or pre-emptive intervention in MRD-positive patients after therapy would improve outcomes in non-APL AML patients. These questions will be evaluated in prospective randomized clinical trials. Today, however, some conclusions with regard to MRD assessment in AML can be drawn from the published data and are reviewed in this article.

MRD evaluation of AML in clinical practice: are we there yet?

MRD technologies increase our ability to measure response in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) beyond the limitations of morphology. When applied in clinical trials, molecular and immunophenotypic MRD assays have improved prognostic precision, providing a strong rationale for their use to guide treatment, as well as to measure its effectiveness. Initiatives such as those from the European Leukemia Network now provide a collaborative knowledge-based framework for selection and implementation of MRD assays most appropriate for defined genetic subgroups. For patients with mutated-NPM1 AML, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) monitoring of mutated-NPM1 transcripts postinduction and sequentially after treatment has emerged as a highly sensitive and specific tool to predict relapse and potential benefit from allogeneic transplant. Flow cytometric MRD after induction is prognostic across genetic risk groups and can identify those patients in the wild-type NPM1 intermediate AML subgroup with a very high risk for relapse. In parallel with these data, advances in genetic profiling have extended understanding of the etiology and the complex dynamic clonal nature of AML, as well as created the opportunity for MRD monitoring using next-generation sequencing (NGS). NGS AML MRD detection can stratify outcomes and has potential utility in the peri-allogeneic transplant setting. However, there remain challenges inherent in the NGS approach of multiplex quantification of mutations to track AML MRD. Although further development of this methodology, together with orthogonal testing, will clarify its relevance for routine clinical use, particularly for patients lacking a qPCR genetic target, established validated MRD assays can already provide information to direct clinical practice.

Immunophenotypic Detection of Measurable Residual (Stem Cell) Disease Using LAIP Approach in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Half of the patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), who achieve complete remission after chemotherapy treatment, will ultimately experience a relapse. Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important post-treatment risk factor in AML, because it gives additional information about the depth of the remission. Within MRD, the small population of leukemic stem cells (LSCs) is thought to be at the base of the actual relapse. In this protocol, the flow cytometric detection of MRD and LSCs herein is outlined. We give a detailed overview of the sampling procedures for optimal multiparameter flow cytometry assessment of both MRD and LSC, using leukemia associated immunophenotypes (LAIPs) and LSC markers. Moreover, an overview of the gating strategies to detect LAIPs and LSC markers is provided. This protocol serves as guidance for flow cytometric detection of measurable residual (stem cell) disease necessary for proper therapeutic decision making in AML patients. © 2019 The Authors. Basic Protocol 1: Immunophenotypic LAIP detection for measurable residual disease monitoring Basic Protocol 2: Immunophenotypic detection of CD34+CD38- leukemic stem cells.

Clinical Challenges and Consequences of Measurable Residual Disease in Non-APL Acute Myeloid Leukemia

The ability to detect residual levels of leukemic blasts (measurable residual disease, MRD) has already been integrated in the daily routine for treatment of patients with chronic myeloid and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a variety of mostly retrospective studies have shown that individuals in AML remission who tested positive for MRD at specific time-points or had increasing MRD levels are at significantly higher risk of relapse and death compared to MRD-negative patients. However, these studies differ with respect to the "MRD-target", time-point of MRD determination, material analyzed, and method applied. How this probably very valuable MRD information in individual patients may be adapted in the daily clinical routine, e.g., to separate patients who need more aggressive therapies from those who may be spared additional-potentially toxic-therapies is still a work-in-progress. With the exception of MRD assessment in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), the lack of randomized, prospective trials renders MRD-based decisions and clinical implications in AML a difficult task. As of today, we still do not have proof that early intervention in MRD-positive AML patients would improve outcomes, although this is very likely. In this article, we review the current knowledge on non-APL AML MRD assessment and possible clinical consequences.

Measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia using flow cytometry: approaches for harmonization/standardization

Introduction: Measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rapidly evolving area with many institutes embarking on it, both in academic and pharmaceutical settings. However, there is a multitude of approaches to design, perform, and report flow cytometric MRD. Together with the long-term experience needed, this makes flow cytometric MRD in AML nonstandardized and time-consuming. Areas covered: This paper briefly summarizes critical issues, like sample preparation and transport, markers and fluorochromes of choice, but in particular focuses on the main issues, which includes specificity and sensitivity, hereby providing a new model that may circumvent the main disadvantages of the present approaches. New approaches that may add to the value of flow cytometric MRD includes assessment of leukemia stem cells, MRD in peripheral blood, and approaches to use multidimensional image analysis. Expert commentary: MRD in AML requires standardization/harmonization on many aspects, for which the present paper offers possible guidelines.

How close are we to incorporating measurable residual disease into clinical practice for acute myeloid leukemia?

Assessment of measurable residual disease, also called “minimal residual disease,” in patients with acute myeloid leukemia in morphological remission provides powerful prognostic information and complements pretreatment factors such as cytogenetics and genomic alterations. Based on data that low levels of persistent or recurrent residual leukemia are consistently associated with an increased risk of relapse and worse long-term outcomes, its routine assessment has been recommended by some experts and consensus guidelines. In addition to providing important prognostic information, the detection of measurable residual disease may also theoretically help to determine the optimal post-remission strategy for an individual patient. However, the full therapeutic implications of measurable residual disease are uncertain and thus controversy exists as to whether it should be routinely incorporated into clinical practice. While some evidence supports the use of allogeneic stem cell transplantation or hypomethylating agents for some subgroups of patients in morphological remission but with detectable residual leukemia, the appropriate use of this information in making clinical decisions remains largely speculative at present. To resolve this pressing clinical issue, several ongoing studies are evaluating measurable residual disease-directed treatments in acute myeloid leukemia and may lead to new, effective strategies for patients in these circumstances. This review examines the common technologies used in clinical practice and in the research setting to detect residual leukemia, the major clinical studies establishing the prognostic impact of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia, and the potential ways, both now and in the future, that such testing may rationally guide therapeutic decision-making.

The emerging role of measurable residual disease detection in AML in morphologic remission

Despite the increasing knowledge of the genomic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), prediction merely based on genetics fails to anticipate outcome, presumably due to the heterogeneous composition of the leukemic clone determining complex interactions between different genetic abnormalities. Therefore, the introduction of a post-treatment biomarker exploring the quality of response to therapy such as assessment of measurable (previously minimal) residual disease (MRD) may lead to refinements of the prognostic assessment in AML. In this view, the European LeukemiaNet has recently endorsed the achievement of a MRD negative morphologic complete remission as a purpose the treatment. Techniques like multiparametric flow cytometry and reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction have reached a level of sensitivity and specificity that make them ready for introduction in clinical practice. In the present review, we will give an update on the efforts in harmonization and/or standardization of MRD assessment in AML, focusing on the newest acquisitions in the clinical applications of MRD, and considering issues like relationship of MRD with leukemic stem cells or MRD assessment in peripheral blood.

Minimal/measurable residual disease in AML: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party

Measurable residual disease (MRD; previously termed minimal residual disease) is an independent, postdiagnosis, prognostic indicator in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is important for risk stratification and treatment planning, in conjunction with other well-established clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular data assessed at diagnosis. MRD can be evaluated using a variety of multiparameter flow cytometry and molecular protocols, but, to date, these approaches have not been qualitatively or quantitatively standardized, making their use in clinical practice challenging. The objective of this work was to identify key clinical and scientific issues in the measurement and application of MRD in AML, to achieve consensus on these issues, and to provide guidelines for the current and future use of MRD in clinical practice. The work was accomplished over 2 years, during 4 meetings by a specially designated MRD Working Party of the European LeukemiaNet. The group included 24 faculty with expertise in AML hematopathology, molecular diagnostics, clinical trials, and clinical medicine, from 19 institutions in Europe and the United States.

Involvement of central nervous system in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: Incidence and impact on outcome

Incidence and effect on outcome of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is not clearly defined. To address this issue, 103 consecutive adult patients with newly diagnosed AML, regardless of neurologic symptoms, were submitted to a routine explorative lumbar puncture. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected from 65 males and 38 females. All 103 CSF samples were examined by conventional cytology (CC) whereas 95 (92%) also by flow cytometry (FCM). At diagnosis, 70 patients (68%) were CNS negative (CNS-), whereas 33 (32%) were CNS positive (CNS+). In 11 of 33 (33%), CNS infiltration was documented either by CC or FCM , in 21 (67%) only by FCM. CNS positivity was significantly associated with a M4-M5 phenotype of the underlying AML (P = .0003) and with high levels of lactate dehydrogenase (P = .006). Overall, 80 of 103 (78%) achieved complete remission with no significant differences between CNS+ and CNS- patients. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival were found to be shorter in CNS+ patients than in those CNS- (18% vs 50%, P = .006 and 19% vs 46%, P = .02, respectively). In multivariate analysis, CNS status and age were found to affect independently overall survival. In conclusion, the incidence of CNS involvement in adult patients with newly diagnosed AML is higher than expected. Regardless of neurologic symptoms, it should always be searched at diagnosis; CSF samples should routinely be investigated by FCM since a certain proportion of CNS involvements might remain undetected if examination is exclusively CC based.

Widespread use of measurable residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia practice

PURPOSE

Measurable residual disease (MRD) has prognostic importance for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). How leukemia providers incorporate MRD into routine practice remains undefined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A survey was developed and distributed to a large sample of leukemia physicians. Demographic information was collected along with details concerning MRD practices. A multivariable logistic regression model evaluated provider characteristics predictive of MRD utilization.

RESULTS

268 responses were received (response rate of 41%). 69% of providers reported routine use of MRD in management of AML, most commonly (90%) for its role in guiding therapy; providers who did not use MRD routinely most frequently cited inadequate resources (58%). Providers utilized flow cytometry- more than polymerase chain reaction-based assays with nucleophosmin-1 being the most common target with the latter. We found substantial variability in how MRD affected clinical decision making, particularly in pre- and post-transplant scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

MRD was frequently used in making treatment decisions and in estimating prognosis. However, there was lack of uniformity in these practices. Standardization of assays, adoption of requisite technology, and dissemination of data about the value of MRD use would likely increase usage of MRD in the care of patients with AML.

The CLEC12A receptor marks human basophils: Potential implications for minimal residual disease detection in acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND

The transmembrane receptor C-type lectin domain family 12, member A (CLEC12A) is known to be highly expressed on monocytes and neutrophils and is a reliable leukemia associated marker in acute myeloid leukemia. Consequently, detailed knowledge of the various normal cell types expressing this receptor is essential. We have observed CLEC12A to be expressed on CD45lowSSClowCD14-CD123+ basophils in peripheral blood (PB) and in this study, we aimed at verifying this observation and further delineate the CD45lowSSClowCD14-CD123 + CLEC12A+ subpopulation.

METHODS

We analyzed PB from 20 diagnostic chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) samples and eight healthy donors in a six-color multicolor flowcytometry (FCM) based assay. Furthermore, we performed fluorescence activated cell sorting on one CML sample to morphologically confirm the CD45lowSSClowCD14-CD123 + CLEC12A+ subset to be highly enriched for basophils. Finally, to further delineate the CD45lowSSClowCD14-CD123 + CLEC12A+ subpopulation in normal PB, we examined three healthy donors in a 10-color FCM assay enabling further separation of the cell subset into basophils and dendritic cells.

RESULTS

The CLEC12A receptor is expressed on basophils.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification and enumeration of basophils is of high relevance in diagnostic hematology and immunology. We here show that CLEC12A in a simple FCM assay consistently marks basophils. Importantly, as basophils are characterized by a CD45lowSSClow profile similar to the "blast-gate" used for the evaluation of hematological disorders, awareness of minor normal CLEC12A+ subpopulations is crucial when using CLEC12A as a minimal residual disease marker in myeloid malignancies. © 2017 International Clinical Cytometry Society.

Can Minimal Residual Disease Determination in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Be Used in Clinical Practice?

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is in complete remission, minimal residual disease (MRD) is presumed to be present, though not morphologically evident. Advances in diagnostics now permit the detection and quantification of MRD in AML by several techniques. The level of MRD after induction and consolidation therapy correlates with disease sensitivity to chemotherapy and has greater power to predict long-term survival than patient and disease characteristics that are available at diagnosis, including genetic information. A unique advantage of MRD is that it is an integrated measure of the impact and interaction of genetics, epigenetics, host immune milieu, bone marrow environment, and drug sensitivity on disease response to treatment. Here, we review the main techniques for MRD assessment in AML, including polymerase chain reaction, multiparameter flow cytometry, and next-generation sequencing, with a focus on method-specific and general limitations to the optimal employment of MRD techniques for the determination of AML prognosis. We also review the data that establish the prognostic and predictive value of MRD assessment in AML. Finally, we provide recommendations for the use of MRD in the care of patients with AML in clinical practice today, including whether it should influence treatment decisions.

Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Still a Work in Progress?

Minimal residual disease evaluation refers to a series of molecular and immunophenotypical techniques aimed at detecting submicroscopic disease after therapy. As such, its application in acute myeloid leukemia has greatly increased our ability to quantify treatment response, and to determine the chemosensitivity of the disease, as the final product of the drug schedule, dose intensity, biodistribution, and the pharmakogenetic profile of the patient. There is now consistent evidence for the prognostic power of minimal residual disease evaluation in acute myeloid leukemia, which is complementary to the baseline prognostic assessment of the disease. The focus for its use is therefore shifting to individualize treatment based on a deeper evaluation of chemosensitivity and residual tumor burden. In this review, we will summarize the results of the major clinical studies evaluating minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia in adults in recent years and address the technical and practical issues still hampering the spread of these techniques outside controlled clinical trials. We will also briefly speculate on future developments and offer our point of view, and a word of caution, on the present use of minimal residual disease measurements in “real-life” practice. Still, as final standardization and diffusion of the methods are sorted out, we believe that minimal residual disease will soon become the new standard for evaluating response in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Enhancing acute myeloid leukemia therapy - monitoring response using residual disease testing as a guide to therapeutic decision-making

INTRODUCTION

Current standards for monitoring the response of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are based on morphologic assessments of the bone marrow and recovery of peripheral blood counts. A growing experience is being developed to enhance the detection of small amounts of AML, or minimal residual disease (MRD). Areas covered: Available techniques include multi-color flow cytometry (MFC) of leukemia associated immunophenotypes (LAIP), quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) for detecting fusion and mutated genes (RUNX1-RUNX1T1, CBFB-MYH11, and NPM1), overexpression of genes such as WT1, and next generation sequencing (NGS) for MRD. Expert commentary: While MRD monitoring is standard of care in some leukemia subsets such as acute promyelocytic leukemia, this approach for the broader AML population does not universally predict outcomes as some patients may experience relapse in the setting of undetectable leukemia while others show no obvious disease progression despite MRD positivity. However, there are instances where MRD can identify patients at increased risk for relapse that may change recommended therapy. Currently, prospective investigations to define clinically relevant MRD thresholds are ongoing. Risk-adapted trials are needed to best define the use of MRD in the follow up of AML patients after initial induction therapy.

MRD in AML: does it already guide therapy decision-making?

Prognostic factors determined at diagnosis are predictive for outcome whereas achievement of morphological complete remission (CR) is still an important end point during treatment. Residual disease after therapy may reflect the sum of all diagnosis and postdiagnosis resistance mechanisms/factors; its measurement could hypothetically be very instrumental for guiding treatment. The possibility of defining residual disease (minimal residual disease [MRD]) far below the level of 5% blast cells is changing the landscape of risk classification. In this manuscript, the various methods, all different in sensitivity, specificity, and phase of development, to assess MRD are discussed. Currently, the 2 methods mostly used are flow cytometry-based immune MRD (multiparameter flow cytometry [MPFC]) and molecular MRD assessed by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Both have advantages and disadvantages that are summarized in detail. Many studies in children as well as adults already demonstrated that MRD detection by MPFC or molecular MRD provides strong prognostic information in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after both induction and consolidation. These studies are summarized in this review. The general conclusion of this review is that a better definition of disease burden than morphological CR is now emerging. MRD assessed by flow or molecular techniques should become standard in every clinical trial in AML. Harmonization of antibody panels, introduction of single-cell tube systems (for determination of residual leukemic stem cells), and standardized analytical programs will pave the way for individual risk assessment and become a surrogate end point for survival in studies investigating new drugs, hopefully resulting in faster drug approval in AML.

Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia of Adults: Determination, Prognostic Impact and Clinical Applications

Pretreatment assessment of cytogenetic/genetic signature of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been consistently shown to play a major prognostic role but also to fail at predicting outcome on individual basis, even in low-risk AML. Therefore, we are in need of further accurate methods to refine the patients’ risk allocation process, distinguishing more adequately those who are likely to recur from those who are not. In this view, there is now evidence that the submicroscopic amounts of leukemic cells (called minimal residual disease, MRD), measured during the course of treatment, indicate the quality of response to therapy. Therefore, MRD might serve as an independent, additional biomarker to help to identify patients at higher risk of relapse. Detection of MRD requires the use of highly sensitive ancillary techniques, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and multiparametric flow cytometry(MPFC). In the present manuscript, we will review the current approaches to investigate MRD and its clinical applications in AML management.

Minimal Residual Disease Detection and Evolved IGH Clones Analysis in Acute B Lymphoblastic Leukemia Using IGH Deep Sequencing

Acute B lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) is one of the most common types of childhood cancer worldwide and chemotherapy is the main treatment approach. Despite good response rates to chemotherapy regiments, many patients eventually relapse and minimal residual disease (MRD) is the leading risk factor for relapse. The evolution of leukemic clones during disease development and treatment may have clinical significance. In this study, we performed immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) repertoire high throughput sequencing (HTS) on the diagnostic and post-treatment samples of 51 pediatric B-ALL patients. We identified leukemic IGH clones in 92.2% of the diagnostic samples and nearly half of the patients were polyclonal. About one-third of the leukemic clones have correct open reading frame in the complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3) of IGH, which demonstrates that the leukemic B cells were in the early developmental stage. We also demonstrated the higher sensitivity of HTS in MRD detection and investigated the clinical value of using peripheral blood in MRD detection and monitoring the clonal IGH evolution. In addition, we found leukemic clones were extensively undergoing continuous clonal IGH evolution by variable gene replacement. Dynamic frequency change and newly emerged evolved IGH clones were identified upon the pressure of chemotherapy. In summary, we confirmed the high sensitivity and universal applicability of HTS in MRD detection. We also reported the ubiquitous evolved IGH clones in B-ALL samples and their response to chemotherapy during treatment.

Postremission sequential monitoring of minimal residual disease by WT1 Q-PCR and multiparametric flow cytometry assessment predicts relapse and may help to address risk-adapted therapy in acute myeloid leukemia patients

Risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients using prognostic parameters at diagnosis is effective, but may be significantly improved by the use of on treatment parameters which better define the actual sensitivity to therapy in the single patient. Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring has been demonstrated crucial for the identification of AML patients at high risk of relapse, but the best method and timing of MRD detection are still discussed. Thus, we retrospectively analyzed 104 newly diagnosed AML patients, consecutively treated and monitored by quantitative polymerase chain reactions (Q‐PCR) on WT1 and by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) on leukemia‐associated immunophenotypes (LAIPs) at baseline, after induction, after 1st consolidation and after 1st intensification. By multivariate analysis, the factors independently associated with adverse relapse‐free survival (RFS) were: bone marrow (BM)‐WT1 ≥ 121/10⁴ABL copies (P = 0.02) and LAIP ≥ 0.2% (P = 0.0001) (after 1st consolidation) (RFS at the median follow up of 12.5 months: 51% vs. 82% [P < 0.0001] and 57% vs. 81%, respectively [P = 0.0003]) and PB‐WT1 ≥ 16/10⁴ABL copies (P = 0.0001) (after 1st intensification) (RFS 43% vs. 95% [P < 0.0001]) Our data confirm the benefits of sequential MRD monitoring with both Q‐PCR and MFC. If confirmed by further prospective trials, they may significantly improve the possibility of a risk‐adapted, postinduction therapy of AML.

Diagnosing and following adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in the genomic age

The diagnosis and follow-up process of adult patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is challenging to clinicians and laboratory staff alike. While several sets of recommendations have been published over the years, the development of high throughput screening and characterization for both genetic and epigenetic events have evolved with astonishing speed. Here we attempt to provide a practical guide to diagnose and follow adult AML patients with a focus on how to balance the wealth of information on the one hand, with the restriction put on these processes in terms of time, feasibility and economy when caring for these patients, on the other.

Minimal residual disease testing in acute leukemia

SUMMARY Predictive/prognostic factors in acute leukemia continue to be sought, in order to refine treatment strategies. Minimal residual disease (MRD) testing has been shown to be a statistically significant factor by multivariate analysis in both acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia. Its utility in guiding therapy has been more extensively studied in pediatric ALL, with some protocols having instituted MRD testing into therapeutic algorithms. The clinical impact of MRD testing in ALL and acute myeloid leukemia will be presented, including both molecular and flow cytometric methodologies, with a more focused discussion of the strategy, methodology and interpretation of MRD testing by multiparametric flow cytometry.

Minimal residual disease detection defined as the malignant fraction of the total primitive stem cell compartment offers additional prognostic information in acute myeloid leukaemia

INTRODUCTION

Immunophenotypic detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in bone marrow (BM) of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients is of high prognostic relevance. Standard MRD percentage is assessed as a percentage of total white blood cells (WBCs) and is therefore highly dependent on WBC count. Peripheral blood (PB) contains more than five times lower MRD percentages. Therefore, PB in BM aspirates cause dilution of the MRD cells, possibly leading to false-negative results for BM MRD. The latter is avoided when relating the fraction of malignant primitive cells, identified by aberrant marker expression [aberrant primitive cells (aPC)], to the total population of primitive cells. Such a fraction may in addition reflect an important biological parameter.

METHODS

As this approach is thus independent of WBC count and the total size of the primitive compartment, we investigated the role of aPC fractions on overall and relapse-free survival (RFS) in 98 patients with AML under the age of 60.

RESULTS

We show that this approach identifies MRD-negative (as defined by % of WBC) but aPC-positive (as defined by % of primitive cells) patients with poor outcome after both first and second induction cycle of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

As a result, in cases with a primitive marker present, RFS is best predicted when combining standard MRD percentage with aPC fractions.

Prognostic impact of high ABC transporter activity in 111 adult acute myeloid leukemia patients with normal cytogenetics when compared to FLT3, NPM1, CEBPA and BAALC

ATP-binding cassette transporter (and specially P-glycoprotein) activity is a well known prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukemia, but when compared to other molecular markers its prognostic value has not been well studied. Here we study relationships between this activity, fms-like tyro-sine kinase 3(FLT3/ITD), nucleophosmin(NPM1), CAAT-enhancer binding protein alpha(CEBPα), and brain and acute leukemia cytoplasmic protein (BAALC), in 111 patients with normal cytogenetics who underwent the same treatment, and evaluate its prognostic impact. Independent factors for survival were age (P=0.0126), ATP-binding cassette transporter activity (P=0.018) and duplications in the fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (P=0.0273). In the 66 patients without fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 duplication and without nucleophosmin mutation, independent prognostic factors for complete remission achievement and survival were age and ATP-binding cassette transporter activity. In conclusion, ATP-binding cassette transporter activity remains an independent prognostic factor, and could assist treatment decisions in patients with no nucleophosmin mutation and no fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 duplication.

Prognostic and therapeutic implications of minimal residual disease detection in acute myeloid leukemia

The choice of either induction or postremission therapy for adults with acute myeloid leukemia is still largely based on the "one size fits all" principle. Moreover, pretreatment prognostic parameters, especially chromosome and gene abnormalities, may fail in predicting individual patient outcome. Measurement of minimal residual disease (MRD) is nowadays recognized as a potential critical tool to assess the quality of response after chemotherapy and to plan postremission strategies that are, therefore, driven by the individual risk of relapse. PCR and multiparametric flow cytometry have become the most popular methods to investigate MRD because they have been established as sensitive and specific enough to allow MRD to be studied serially. In the present review, we examine the evidence supporting the appropriateness of incorporating MRD detection into the AML risk assessment process. A comprehensive prognostic algorithm, generated by combining pretreatment cytogenetics/genetics and posttreatment MRD determination, should promote advances in development of personalized therapeutic approaches.