Efficacy of recombinant erythropoietin in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: a multicenter international study

Bloodless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Jehovah's Witness Patients: Contemporary Strategies and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Reported blood transfusion rates in total hip arthroplasty (THA) range between 3 and 22%. Jehovah's Witnesses (JW) do not accept blood transfusions and make conscience decisions to accept blood derivatives. This study reports on strategies and outcomes for bloodless THA.

METHODS

All JW patients undergoing primary THA at our institution between 2011 and 2022 were included in this study (94 of 110 THA). The indications for THA were osteoarthritis (92%), femoral neck fracture (6%), rheumatoid arthritis (1%), and failed open reduction and internal fixation (1%). Strategies used to optimize outcomes included erythropoietin, tranexamic acid, cell savers, intrailiac artery tourniquets, and minimizing phlebotomy.

RESULTS

The mean estimated blood loss was 201.2 ± 122.2 mL. Preoperative hemoglobin (Hgb) levels were 13.4 ± 1.4 g/dL, which decreased to 11.0 ± 1.3 g/dL on postoperative day 1 (POD1, P < 0.001), 10.3 ± 1.5 g/dL on POD2 (P = 0.001), and 9.8 ± 1.1 g/dL on POD3 (P = 0.171). The use of tranexamic acid significantly decreased Hgb drop on POD1 (P = 0.04). Subgroup analysis showed that preoperatively anemic patients (closed circuit, Hgb < 12 g/dL) had significantly less Hgb drop postoperatively (P = 0.003). No patients met the recommended transfusion threshold (Hgb < 7 g/dL). There were two 90-day readmissions due to falls. There was zero 90-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

A THA can be safely performed on JW patients. Preoperatively anemic patients had a decreased Hgb drop postoperatively. JW patients make a conscious decision to accept blood derivatives, which may be present in medications including erythropoietin. We recommend maintaining an Hgb above 11 g/dL prior to surgery, as a Hgb drop of 3.1 g/dL can be expected. These findings highlight the efficacy of a multimodal approach to optimizing bloodless primary THAs.

A Case of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Complicated by Secondary Evans Syndrome

Evans syndrome (ES) is a condition that describes the development of multiple cytopenias, including autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and autoimmune neutropenia (AIN). ES can be idiopathic or caused by an underlying condition, known as secondary ES. While secondary ES is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, any diagnosis of ES confers a poor prognosis. In this case report, we describe a young male patient diagnosed with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and secondary ES that was complicated by multiple relapses and subsequent infections, bleeding events, and thrombotic events that ultimately led to the passing of the patient.

Prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor desidustat attenuates autoimmune hemolytic anemia in mice

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a heterogeneous group of diseases mediated by autoantibody directed against RBCs causing hemolysis and anemia. AIHA develops rapidly or over time, depending on the triggering factor. Desidustat is a prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor clinically used for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD)-induced anemia. In this study, we investigated the effect of desidustat in preclinical model of AIHA. We used rat RBC for induction of AIHA in mice. These mice were then treated with desidustat (15 mg/kg, PO, once a day) for eight weeks. Desidustat treatment increased hemoglobin, RBC and hematocrit and decreased WBC and lymphocytes. This treatment suppressed serum LDH, oxidative stress in RBCs, antibody titer and antibody deposition on RBC surface, and increased RBC lifespan. Serum and spleen iron along with spleen mass and oxidative stress were decreased by desidustat. Bone marrow iron was increased and expression of CD71 (cell surface marker for early erythroid progenitor) and TER-119 (cell surface marker for late erythroid progenitor) in bone marrow were found to be elevated by desidustat by treatment. This treatment also suppressed deposition of membrane-bound antibody in late erythroid cells. The treatment showed reduction in total splenic cells, CD71 and TER-119 positive cells in the spleen. Thus, desidustat treatment increased erythropoiesis, early maturation of bone marrow erythroid cells having longer RBC life span due to decrease in the antibody-mediated lysis of RBCs and its progenitors leading to reduced oxidative stress. Thus, desidustat can be a good therapeutic option for treatment of AIHA.

Autoimmune haemolytic anaemias

Adult autoimmune haemolytic anaemias (AIHAs) include different subtypes of a rare autoimmune disease in which autoantibodies targeting autoantigens expressed on the membrane of autologous red blood cells (RBCs) are produced, leading to their accelerated destruction. In the presence of haemolytic anaemia, the direct antiglobulin test is the cornerstone of AIHA diagnosis. AIHAs are classified according to the isotype and the thermal optimum of the autoantibody into warm (wAIHAs), cold and mixed AIHAs. wAIHAs, the most frequent type of AIHAs, are associated with underlying conditions in ~50% of cases. In wAIHA, IgG autoantibody reacts with autologous RBCs at 37 °C, leading to antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and increased phagocytosis of RBCs in the spleen. Cold AIHAs include cold agglutinin disease (CAD) and cold agglutinin syndrome (CAS) when there is an underlying condition. CAD and cold agglutinin syndrome are IgM cold antibody-driven AIHAs characterized by classical complement pathway-mediated haemolysis. The management of wAIHAs has long been based around corticosteroids and splenectomy and on symptomatic measures and non-specific cytotoxic agents for CAD. Rituximab and the development of complement inhibitors, such as the anti-C1s antibody sutimlimab, have changed the therapeutic landscape of AIHAs, and new promising targeted therapies are under investigation.

Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Challenges in Diagnosis and Therapy

Background

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare disease due to increased destruction of erythrocytes by autoantibodies, with or without complement activation.

Summary

AIHA is usually classified in warm AIHA (wAIHA) and cold agglutinin disease (CAD), based on isotype and thermal amplitude of the autoantibody. The direct antiglobulin test (DAT) or Coombs test is the cornerstone of AIHA diagnosis, as it is positive with anti-IgG in wAIHA, and with anti-C3d/IgM antisera plus high titer cold agglutinins in CAD. Therapy is quite different, as steroids and rituximab are effective in the former, but have a lower response rate and duration in the latter. Splenectomy, which is still a good option for young/fit wAIHA, is contraindicated in CAD, and classic immunosuppressants are moving to further lines. Several new drugs are increasingly used or are in trials for relapsed/refractory AIHAs, including B-cell (parsaclisib, ibrutinib, rilzabrutinib), and plasma cell target therapies (bortezomib, daratumumab), bispecific agents (ianalumab, obexelimab, povetacicept), neonatal Fc receptor blockers (nipocalimab), and complement inhibitors (sutimlimab, riliprubart, pegcetacoplan, iptacopan). Clinically, AIHAs are highly heterogeneous, from mild/compensated to life-threatening/fulminant, and may be primary or associated with infections, neoplasms, autoimmune diseases, transplants, immunodeficiencies, and drugs. Along with all these variables, there are rare forms like mixed (wAIHA plus CAD), atypical (IgA or warm IgM driven), and DAT negative, where the diagnosis and clinical management are particularly challenging.

Key Messages

This article covers the classic clinical features, diagnosis, and therapy of wAIHA and CAD, and focuses, with the support of clinical vignettes, on difficult diagnosis and refractory/relapsing cases requiring novel therapies.

[Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of Evans syndrome (2024)]

Evans syndrome (ES) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by the presence of at least two autoimmune cytopenias (AIC), including immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), and autoimmune neutropenia (AIN). Secondary ES accounts for 21%-50% of cases. ES is characterized by recurrent relapses, serious complications such as thrombosis and infection, and high mortality. The management of ES is highly heterogeneous, necessitating treatment for AIC, the primary disease, as well as associated complications. However, there remains a lack of prospective evidence, randomized clinical trials for ES. To standardize the diagnosis and management of ES in China effectively, this consensus was developed by the Red Blood Cell Diseases (Anemia) Group under the Chinese Society of Hematology within the Chinese Medical Association. It aims to provide valuable guidance for diagnosing and managing ES in clinical practice based on international consensus and comprehensive review of both domestic and international literature.

Diagnosis and management of Evans syndrome in adults: first consensus recommendations

Evans syndrome is a rare disease marked by a severe clinical course, high relapse rate, infectious and thrombotic complications, and sometimes fatal outcome. Management is highly heterogeneous. There are several case reports but few large retrospective studies and no prospective or randomised trials. Here, we report the results of the first consensus-based expert recommendations aimed at harmonising the diagnosis and management of Evans syndrome in adults. After reviewing the literature, we used a fuzzy Delphi consensus method, with two rounds of a 42-item questionnaire that were scored by a panel of 13 international experts from five countries using a 7-point Likert scale. Panellists were selected by the core panel on the basis of their personal experience and previous publications on Evans syndrome and immune cytopenias; they met virtually throughout 2023. The panellists recommended extensive clinical and laboratory diagnostic tests, including bone marrow evaluation and CT scan, and an aggressive front-line therapy with prednisone (with or without intravenous immunoglobulins), with different treatment durations and tapering for immune thrombocytopenia and autoimmune haemolytic anaemias (AIHAs). Rituximab was strongly recommended as first-line treatment in cold-type AIHA and as second-line treatment in warm-type AIHA and patients with immune thrombocytopenia and antiphospholipid antibodies, previous thrombotic events, or associated lymphoproliferative diseases. However, rituximab was discouraged for patients with immunodeficiency or severe infections, with the same applying to splenectomy. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists were recommended for chronic immune thrombocytopenia and in the case of previous grade 4 infection. Fostamatinib was recommended as third-line or further-line treatment and suggested as second-line therapy for patients with previous thrombotic events. Immunosuppressive agents have been moved to third-line or further-line treatment. The panellists recommended the use of recombinant erythropoietin in AIHA in the case of inadequate reticulocyte counts, use of the complement inhibitor sutimlimab for relapsed cold AIHA, and the combination of rituximab plus bendamustine in Evans syndrome secondary to lymphoproliferative disorders. Finally, recommendations were given for supportive therapy, platelet or red blood cell transfusions, and thrombotic and antibiotic prophylaxis. These consensus-based recommendations should facilitate best practice for diagnosis and management of Evans syndrome in clinical practice.

The evolving management algorithm for the patient with newly diagnosed cold agglutinin disease

INTRODUCTION

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is driven by IgM autoantibodies reactive at <37°C and able to fix complement. The activation of the classical complement pathway leads to C3-mediated extravascular hemolysis in the liver and to intravascular hemolytic crises in case of complement amplifying conditions. C3 positivity at direct Coombs test along with high titer agglutins are required for the diagnosis. Treatment is less standardized.

AREAS COVERED

This review recapitulates CAD diagnosis and then focus on the evolving management of the disease. Both current approach and novel targeted drugs are discussed. Literature search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus from 2000 to 2024 using 'CAD' and 'autoimmune hemolytic anemia' as keywords.

EXPERT OPINION

Rituximab represents the frontline approach in patients with symptomatic anemia or disabling cold-induced peripheral symptoms and is effective in 50-60% of cases. Refractory/relapsing patients are an unmet need and may now benefit from complement inhibitors, particularly the anti-C1s sutimlimab, effective in controlling hemolysis thus improving anemia in >80% of patients, but not active on cold-induced peripheral symptoms. Novel drugs include long-acting complement inhibitors, plasma cells, and B-cell targeting agents (proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38, BTKi, PI3Ki, anti-BAFF). Combination therapy may be the future answer to CAD unmet needs.

Severe, Refractory Primary Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia Requiring 90 Erythrocyte Transfusions

A previously healthy 60-year-old man presented to the hospital with a hemoglobin of 3.5 g/dL. He was diagnosed with severe warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) with reticulocytopenia on hospital day 1 that was not responsive to steroids, immune globulin, and rituximab. Over a 42-day hospital stay, the patient remained continuously transfusion-dependent with a ninety red cell unit requirement for his refractory disease. He was trialed on therapeutic plasma exchange before ultimately undergoing inpatient splenectomy that led to a response within hours. He remains in complete remission at six months of follow-up.

Management of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia in low-to-middle income countries: current challenges and the way forward

Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) is a common term for several disorders that differ from one another in terms of aetiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment. Therapy is becoming increasingly differentiated and evidence-based, and several new established and investigational therapeutic approaches have appeared during recent years. While this development has resulted in therapeutic improvements, it also carries increased medical and financial requirements for optimal diagnosis, subgrouping, and individualization of therapy, including the use of more advanced laboratory tests and expensive drugs. In this brief Viewpoint review, we first summarize the diagnostic workup of AIHA subgroups and the respective therapies that are currently considered optimal. We then compare these principles with real-world data from India, the world's largest nation by population and a typical low-to-middle income country. We identify major deficiencies and limitations in general and laboratory resources, real-life diagnostic procedures, and therapeutic practices. Incomplete diagnostic workup, overuse of corticosteroids, lack of access to more specific treatments, and poor follow-up of patients are the rule more than exceptions. Although it may not seem realistic to resolve all challenges, we try to outline some ways towards an improved management of patients with AIHA.

Recombinant erythropoietin in autoimmune hemolytic anemia with inadequate bone marrow response: a prospective analysis

ABSTRACT

Up to 30% of patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) show inadequate bone marrow (BM) compensatory response with inappropriately low levels of reticulocytes and endogenous erythropoietin. Ineffective BM compensation is associated with more severe anemia, transfusion need, and hospital admission, and treatment with recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) may be beneficial. Here, we prospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of rEPO in a single-center cohort of 47 patients with AIHA with inadequate reticulocytosis and endogenous erythropoietin at baseline. Epoetin alpha 40 000 international units per week were administered subcutaneously until hemoglobin (Hb) >11 g/dL and then tapered off. Overall response was 55% at 15 days, 74% at 1 month, 74% at 3 months, 80% at 6 months, and 91% at 12 months. Consistently, Hb values significantly increased from baseline to each subsequent time point (P<.001) with a median increase of +1.4, +2.4, +3.4, +3.8, and +4.4 g/dL, respectively. Transfusion needs reduced from 30% to <10% at 15 days and thereafter (P < .001). Concomitant medications included prednisone or methylprednisolone (N = 40, stable since >2 weeks from enrollment), mycophenolate mofetil (N = 1, ongoing since >3 months from enrollment), and rituximab (N = 7 patients with cold agglutinin disease from day 8). No association between concomitant medications and response to rEPO was found. Treatment was generally safe without rEPO-related severe adverse events. The comparison with an AIHA population not treated with rEPO showed a significant benefit of rEPO at 15 days and 1 month on response and Hb increase. These data support the use of rEPO as an add on to standard immunosuppression in AIHA with inadequate BM compensation. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT05931718.

Transfusions in autoimmune hemolytic anemias: Frequency and clinical significance of alloimmunization

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) may be associated with transfusion reactions and risk of alloimmunization.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the transfusion policy and rate of alloimmunization and its clinical significance in AIHA.

METHODS

Data from 305 AIHA patients followed at a reference hematologic Center in Milan, Italy from 1997 to 2022 were retrospectively/prospectively collected (NCT05931718).

RESULTS

Overall, 33% patients required transfusions with a response rate of 83% and eight transfusion reactions (7%), none hemolytic. Alloantibodies were detected in 19% of patients, being associated with higher transfusion burden (p = 0.01), lower Hb increase post-transfusion (p = 0.05), and transfusion reactions (p = 0.04). Along decades, the rate of RBC transfusions decreased from 53% to 20% and that of alloimmunization dropped from 30% to 6% likely due to the adoption of prestorage leukoreduction, the use of more restrictive Hb thresholds, and the implementation of molecular typing.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe symptomatic AIHA may be safely transfused provided appropriate matching of patients and donors.

Cytokine polymorphisms in patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is due to autoantibodies with or without complement activation and involves cellular and cytokine dysregulation. Here, we investigated cytokine single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of TNF-α, TGF-β1, IL-10, IL-6, and IFN-γ, along with their serum levels. The former were related to hematological parameters, therapy, and clinical outcome. The study included 123 consecutive patients with primary AIHA [77 warm AIHA and 46 cold agglutinin disease (CAD)], followed up for a median of 49 months. Results show that the allelic frequency of TNF-α -308 G/A polymorphisms was significantly lower in patients versus controls. Moreover, the genotypic frequency of TNF-α -308G/A and TGF-β gene codon 25 G/C genotypes was significantly lower in patients versus controls. Considering cytokine SNP genotypes associated with different gene expression levels, TNF-α high gene expression was significantly more frequent in patients, TGF-β and IL-10 high gene expression was higher in patients with more severe anemia, and TGF-β high gene expression was higher in patients with active disease. Considering treatment, TNF-α and TGF-β high gene expression was more frequent in multitreated patients and particularly in CAD. It may be speculated that this genetic predisposition to a stronger inflammatory response may result in a greater immune dysregulation and in a relapsed/refractory disease. Regarding cytokine serum levels, TNF-α and TGF-β were significantly lower, and IL-10 and IL-6 were significantly higher in patients versus controls, underlying the complex interplay between genetic background and disease features.

Severe autoimmune hemolytic anemia; epidemiology, clinical management, outcomes and knowledge gaps

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is an acquired hemolytic disorder, mediated by auto-antibodies, and has a variable clinical course ranging from fully compensated low grade hemolysis to severe life-threatening cases. The rarity, heterogeneity and incomplete understanding of severe AIHA complicate the recognition and management of severe cases. In this review, we describe how severe AIHA can be defined and what is currently known of the severity and outcome of AIHA. There are no validated predictors for severe clinical course, but certain risk factors for poor outcomes (hospitalisation, transfusion need and mortality) can aid in recognizing severe cases. Some serological subtypes of AIHA (warm AIHA with complement positive DAT, mixed, atypical) are associated with lower hemoglobin levels, higher transfusion need and mortality. Currently, there is no evidence-based therapeutic approach for severe AIHA. We provide a general approach for the management of severe AIHA patients, incorporating monitoring, supportive measures and therapeutic options based on expert opinion. In cases where steroids fail, there is a lack of rapidly effective therapeutic options. In this era, numerous novel therapies are emerging for AIHA, including novel complement inhibitors, such as sutimlimab. Their potential in severe AIHA is discussed. Future research efforts are needed to gain a clearer picture of severe AIHA and develop prediction models for severe disease course. It is crucial to incorporate not only clinical characteristics but also biomarkers that are associated with pathophysiological differences and severity, to enhance the accuracy of prediction models and facilitate the selection of the optimal therapeutic approach. Future clinical trials should prioritize the inclusion of severe AIHA patients, particularly in the quest for rapidly acting novel agents.

The Role of the Spleen and the Place of Splenectomy in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia-A Review of Current Knowledge

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare, very heterogeneous, and sometimes life-threatening acquired hematologic disease characterized by increased red blood cell (RBC) destruction by autoantibodies (autoAbs), either with or without complement involvement. Recent studies have shown that the involvement of T- and B-cell dysregulation and an imbalance of T-helper 2 (Th2) and Th17 phenotypes play major roles in the pathogenesis of AIHA. AIHA can be primary (idiopathic) but is more often secondary, triggered by infections or drug use or as a part of other diseases. As the location of origin of autoAbs and the location of autoAb-mediated RBC clearance, as well as the location of extramedullary hematopoiesis, the spleen is crucially involved in all the steps of AIHA pathobiology. Splenectomy, which was the established second-line therapeutic option in corticosteroid-resistant AIHA patients for decades, has become less common due to increasing knowledge of immunopathogenesis and the introduction of targeted therapy. This article provides a comprehensive overview of current knowledge regarding the place of the spleen in the immunological background of AIHA and the rapidly growing spectrum of novel therapeutic approaches. Furthermore, this review emphasizes the still-existing expediency of laparoscopic splenectomy with appropriate perioperative thromboprophylaxis and the prevention of infection as a safe and reliable therapeutic option in the context of the limited availability of rituximab and other novel therapies.

Monoclonal antibodies for treatment of cold agglutinin disease

INTRODUCTION

Cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a difficult-to-treat autoimmune hemolytic anemia and B cell lymphoproliferative disorder associated with fatigue, acrocyanosis and a risk of thromboembolic events. Cold-induced binding of autoantibodies agglutinates red blood cells and triggers the classical complement pathway, leading to predominantly extravascular hemolysis.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes clinical and experimental antibody-based treatments for CAD and analyzes the risks and benefits of B cell and complement directed therapies, and discusses potential future treatments for CAD.

EXPERT OPINION

Conventional treatment of CAD includes a B cell targeted treatment approach with rituximab, yielding only limited treatment success. Addition of a cytotoxic agent (e.g. bendamustine) increases efficacy but this is accompanied by an increased risk of neutropenia and infection. Novel complement-directed therapies have emerged and were shown to have a good efficacy against hemolysis and safety profile but are expensive and unable to address circulatory symptoms. Complement inhibition with sutimlimab may be used as a bridging strategy until B cell directed therapy with rituximab takes effect or continued indefinitely if needed. Future antibody-based treatment approaches for CAD involve the further development of complement-directed antibodies, combination of rituximab and bortezomib, and daratumumab. Non-antibody based prospective treatments may include the use of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is defined by increased erythrocyte turnover mediated by autoimmune mechanisms. While corticosteroids remain first-line therapy in most cases of warm-antibody AIHA, cold agglutinin disease is treated by targeting the underlying clonal B-cell proliferation or the classical complement activation pathway. Several new established or investigational drugs and treatment regimens have appeared during the last 1-2 decades, resulting in an improvement of therapy options but also raising challenges on how to select the best treatment in individual patients. In severe warm-antibody AIHA, there is evidence for the upfront addition of rituximab to prednisolone in the first line. Novel agents targeting B-cells, extravascular hemolysis, or removing IgG will offer further options in the acute and relapsed/refractory settings. In cold agglutinin disease, the development of complement inhibitors and B-cell targeting agents makes it possible to individualize therapy, based on the disease profile and patient characteristics. For most AIHAs, the optimal treatment remains to be found, and there is still a need for more evidence-based therapies. Therefore, prospective clinical trials should be encouraged.

[Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia]

Autoimmune haemolytic anaemias (AIHA) are acquired haematological disorders caused by increased peripheral erythrocyte destruction mediated by autoantibodies against erythrocyte antigens. They classified according to aetiology into primary and secondary, and according to the type of antibody and reaction temperature into AIHA due to warm antibodies (w-AIHA) and AIHA due to cold antibodies (c-AIHA). The mainstay of management in w-AIHA remains glucocorticoid therapy, and the early addition of rituximab has shown good results in recent studies. Primary c-AIHA is mainly treated with rituximab, alone or in combination with chemotherapy. New drugs such as Syk inhibitors, anti-FcRn Ig and complement inhibitors are in advanced development and will expand the therapeutic arsenal, especially in refractory or relapsed cases.

Cold AIHA and the best treatment strategies

Cold-reactive autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is rare among the hemolytic anemias. It results when 1 of a variety of processes causes the generation of immunoglobulin M (IgM) autoantibodies against endogenous erythrocytes, resulting in complement activation and predominantly intravascular hemolysis. Cold AIHA is typically a primary lymphoproliferative disorder with marrow B-cell clones producing pathogenic IgM. More rarely, secondary cold AIHA (cAIHA) can develop from malignancy, infection, or other autoimmune disorders. However, in children cAIHA is typically post infection, mild, and self-limited. Symptoms include a sequelae of anemia, fatigue, and acrocyanosis. The severity of disease is variable and highly dependent on the thermal binding range of the autoantibody. In adults, treatment has most commonly focused on reducing antibody production with rituximab-based regimens. The addition of cytotoxic agents to rituximab improves response rates, but at the expense of tolerability. Recent insights into the cause of cold agglutinin disease as a clonal disorder driven by complement form the basis of newer therapeutic options. While rituximab-based regimens are still the mainstay of therapy, options have now expanded to include complement-directed treatments and other B-cell-directed or plasma-cell-directed therapies.

Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia and the best treatment strategies

Warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) is characterized by evidence of red blood cell (RBC) hemolysis and a direct antiglobulin test positive for IgG and sometimes complement. While varying with the extent of the compensatory increase in RBC production, symptoms of anemia predominate, as does jaundice, the latter often exacerbated by concurrent Gilbert's syndrome. Initial treatment with corticosteroids is highly effective, with over 85% of patients responding but with less than one-third maintaining that response upon weaning. Subsequent rituximab administration in those failing corticosteroids provides complete remission in over 75% of patients and may be long-lasting. Over 50% of patients failing rituximab respond to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents or immunosuppressive agents. Splenectomy is best deferred if possible but does offer long-term remission in over two-thirds of patients. A number of new treatments for wAIHA (fostamatinib, rilzabrutinib, and FcRn inhibitors) show promise. A treatment algorithm for wAIHA is proposed to avoid the excessive use of corticosteroids.

Exploring the protective mechanisms of total tannins from Geum japonicum var. chinense F.Bolle in mice with hematopoietic dysfunction via the JAK2/STAT3/5 signaling pathway

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Geum japonicum var. chinense F.Bolle (Rnglish name Gei herba, GH), a traditional Miao medicine, promotes hematopoiesis. Emerging evidence shows that total tannins of GH (TGH) can treat ischemic diseases.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To explore the protective mechanism of TGH in hematopoietic dysfunction (HD) mice.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Forty-eight female mice were randomly assigned to 6 groups: control, model, Zhenqi Fuzheng positive, and three doses TGH. Cyclophosphamide was injected in mice to establish an HD model. Spleen tissue was examined histomorphologically, peripheral hemograms and organ index were calculated, and serum hematopoietic factor levels were determined. The expression of proteins in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)/transcription 3/5 (STAT3/5) pathway, as well as upstream and downstream proteins, was examined using western blot to elucidate the underlying protective mechanisms of TGH.

RESULTS

TGH could effectively alleviate spleen tissue damage in HD mice, improve peripheral hemogram and antagonize organ atrophy, and increase levels of Granulocyte-macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) and Erythropoietin (EPO) in HD mouse serum. Furthermore, after TGH treatment, the protein expression levels of P-JAK2, P-STAT3, P-STAT5, M-CSF, G-CSF, Bcl-2, and Bcl-xL were significantly higher than in the model group. At the same time, following TGH treatment, the protein expression levels of LC3 A/B, Beclin1, ATG5, and ATG7 were significantly lower than in the model group.

CONCLUSIONS

TGH has been shown to protect HD mice through a mechanism linked to the activation of the JAK2/STAT3/5 pathway, as well as autophagy inhibition and apoptosis activation.

Erythropoietin in children with hemolytic uremic syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in sparing red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in children with hemolytic uremic syndrome related to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC-HUS) is uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted a pilot randomized controlled open trial between December 2018 and January 2021. Children were randomized to the intervention (subcutaneous rHuEPO 50 U/kg three times weekly until discharge + RBC transfusion if hemoglobin ≤ 7 g/dL and/or hemodynamic instability) or to the control arm (RBC transfusion if hemoglobin ≤ 7 g/dL and/or hemodynamic instability). Primary outcome was the number of RBC transfusions received during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were to explore whether baseline EPO levels were adequate to the degree of anemia, to correlate selected acute phase parameters with the number of RBC transfusions, and to assess possible adverse events.

RESULTS

Twelve patients per arm were included; they were comparable at recruitment and throughout the disease course. Median number of RBC transfusions was similar between groups (1.5, p = 0.76). Most patients had baseline EPO levels adequate to the degree of anemia, which did not correlate with the number of transfusions (r = 0.19, p = 0.44). Conversely, baseline (r = 0.73, p = 0.032) and maximum lactic dehydrogenase levels (r = 0.78, p = 0.003), creatinine peak (r = 0.71, p = 0.03) and dialysis duration (r = 0.7, p = 0.04) correlated significantly with RBC requirements. No side effects were recorded.

CONCLUSION

In children with STEC-HUS, the administration of rHuEPO did not reduce the number of RBC transfusions. Larger studies addressing higher doses and similar severity of kidney failure at rHuEPO initiation (e.g. at start of dialysis) are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03776851. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

New Therapies for the Treatment of Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

In this review article we provide a critical insight into recent reports evaluating innovative therapies for warm type autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA). Among published articles, we selected two reports on the use of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in association with dexamethasone or rituximab, one study on the spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor fostamatinib, and a retrospective study on recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO). Among recent scientific communications, we discussed a report on the phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta inhibitor (PI3Kδi) parsaclisib. All studies highlighted a good efficacy although to be confirmed in larger trials and with limitations due to the heterogeneity of wAIHA patients enrolled, the small number of subjects, the concomitant medications allowed, and the short follow-up. Ongoing trials include new B-cell/plasma-cell targeting agents such as the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors ibrutinib and rilzabrutinib, and the anti-CD38 MoAbs daratumumab and its analogue isatuximab. Further drugs in clinical trials target the complement cascade in wAIHA with complement activation, such as the C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan and the C1q inhibitor ANX005. Finally, an interesting and non-immuno-toxic strategy is to remove the pathogenic autoantibodies via blocking the neonatal Fc receptor, by intravenous nipocalimab and subcutaneous RVT-1401. Such novel agents targeting the several immunopathological mechanisms acting in wAIHA and their possible combination, will increase the therapeutic armamentarium and possibly fill the gap of wAIHA relapsed after/refractory to rituximab. Moreover, these new target therapies may represent a tool for the unmet need of very acute cases.

Severe hemolysis with negative direct antiglobulin test: A case report

A 49-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) presented to the emergency department. Her examination showed marked pallor, exhaustion, lethargy, yellowish eyes, anorexia, nausea and vomiting.

Hematuria; negative standard direct antiglobulin test (DAT); normal glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD); hemoglobin (Hb), 4.8 g/dl; Mean cell volume (MCV), 91fl; platelet count, 233 × 10⁶/L; Total bilirubin, 7.0 mg/dl; Glucose, 316 mg/dl; lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), 1750U/L. Undoubtedly, therapeutic panel should have been used for hemolytic anemia. Intravenous (IV) fluids and 2 units of packed cell were transfused. Methylprednisolone with rituximab were started for the patient. After 3 weeks of the patient admission, she was discharged home with stable vital signs and Hb, 10 g/dl. We concluded in the cases that presented along with a severe drop in Hb and evidence of hemolysis which non immune hemolytic anemia is excluded in spite of negative standard DAT limited transfusion besides corticosteroids combined with rituximab, could be helpful in saving the patient.

•

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is caused by increased erythrocyte destruction with autoantibodies directed against the person's own red blood cells and susceptible them to lyse and consequent insufficient number of red blood cells in the circulation.

•

A diagnosis of DAT-negative AIHA can be made following careful exclusion of alternative causes of hemolysis, and confirmation by a sensitive technique and by a response to steroid therapy.

Effect of ethanolic extract of rosella (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) on vital signs, kidney, and liver safety

Introduction: Rosella (Hibiscus sabdariffa L) extract is often used as immune-stimulant because it contains flavonoids, especially anthocyanin and quercetin with antioxidant activities.

Objective: This study aimed to determine the safety of the rosella extract consumed in the form of capsules on the vital signs, haematologic parameters as well as kidney and liver function.

Methods: This research was conducted using clinical trial pre- and post-test design in healthy participants. There were 21 healthy participants (52% male, age ranged 8–45) consuming rosella capsules for thirty days, in a dose of 500 mg extract daily. Leukocytes, lymphocytes, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT) and vital signs were consecutively evaluated on days 0, 31, and 45, respectively. The Wilcoxon and paired sample t-test were used to compare the parameters among the evaluated times.

Results: The result showed that no significant difference for all parameters among the three time points (p>0.05).

Conclusion: These findings suggested that the administration of ethanolic extract of rosella is potential safe and does not negatively affect the vital signs, haemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, BUN, SGOT, and SGPT.

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia: causes and consequences

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is classified according to the direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and thermal characteristics of the autoantibody into warm and cold forms, and in primary versus secondary depending on the presence of associated conditions.

AREAS COVERED

AIHA displays a multifactorial pathogenesis, including genetic (association with congenital conditions and certain mutations), environmental (drugs, infections, including SARS-CoV-2, pollution, etc.), and miscellaneous factors (solid/hematologic neoplasms, systemic autoimmune diseases, etc.) contributing to tolerance breakdown. Several mechanisms, such as autoantibody production, complement activation, monocyte/macrophage phagocytosis, and bone marrow compensation are implicated in extra-/intravascular hemolysis. Treatment should be differentiated and sequenced according to AIHA type (i.e. steroids followed by rituximab for warm, rituximab alone or in association with bendamustine or fludarabine for cold forms). Several new drugs targeting B-cells/plasma cells, complement, and phagocytosis are in clinical trials. Finally, thrombosis and infections may complicate disease course burdening quality of life and increasing mortality.

EXPERT OPINION

Beyond warm and cold AIHA, a gray-zone still exists including mixed and DAT negative forms representing an unmet need. AIHA management is rapidly changing through an increasing knowledge of the pathogenic mechanisms, the refinement of diagnostic tools, and the development of novel targeted and combination therapies.

Development of New Drugs for Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare disorder characterized by the autoantibody-mediated destruction of red blood cells, and treatments for it still remain challenging. Traditional first-line immunosuppressive therapy, which includes corticosteroids and rituximab, is associated with adverse effects as well as treatment failures, and relapses are common. Subsequent lines of therapy are associated with higher rates of toxicity, and some patients remain refractory to currently available treatments. Novel therapies have become promising for this vulnerable population. In this review, we will discuss the mechanism of action, existing data, and ongoing clinical trials of current novel therapies for AIHA, including B-cell-directed therapy, phagocytosis inhibition, plasma cell-directed therapy, and complement inhibition.

Hematological and Extra-Hematological Autoimmune Complications after Checkpoint Inhibitors

Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) represent a novel therapeutical strategy with a high efficacy both in solid and hematological cancers. They act by reactivating the immune system against neoplastic cells but may, in turn, cause immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) involving several organs with variable frequency and severity. Up to 10% of CPI-treated patients experience hematological IRAEs, mainly cytopenias. The differential diagnosis is challenging due to underlying disease, previous treatments and the variable liability of available tests (i.e., the direct antiglobulin test, anti-platelet antibodies, etc.). Among extra-hematological IRAEs, cutaneous and endocrine ones are the most frequent (up to 30-50%), ranging from mild (pruritus, eczema and thyroid dysfunctions) to severe forms (bullous disorders, hypophysitis and diabetes), mostly requiring topic or replacement therapy. Gastroenteric and kidney toxicities occur in about 5% of patients, biopsies may support the diagnosis, and immunosuppressive treatment is required in severe cases. Finally, neurologic and cardiologic IRAEs, although rare, may be life-threatening and require prompt intervention. By reviewing the most recent literature on post-CPI IRAEs, it emerged that clinical suspicion and monitoring of laboratory markers of organ damage is pivotal to a prompt diagnosis. In severe cases, CPI should be discontinued and immunosuppressive therapy started, whilst rechallenge is anecdotal and should be carefully evaluated.

Low-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome Revisited: Morphological, Autoimmune, and Molecular Features as Predictors of Outcome in a Single Center Experience

Low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS) are a very heterogeneous disease, with extremely variable clinical features and outcome. Therapeutic strategies are still limited and mainly consist of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and transfusion support. The contribution of molecular lesions and of autoimmune phenomena to pathogenesis and clinical course, including leukemic evolution, is a field of open investigation. We analyzed data from a cohort of 226 patients with LR-MDS followed at our center in the last 20 years, focusing on morphological, immunological (antiplatelets and anti-erythrocyte autoantibodies, anti-erythroblast antibodies), and molecular features. Hypoplastic bone marrow was found in 7% of the cases correlating with younger age, deeper cytopenia, lower dysplasia, and worse response to ESAs. A marker of autoimmunity was observed in 46% of the tested cases, who were younger, were less frequent dysplastic changes, and responded better to ESAs and steroids. Finally, 68% of the tested cases displayed at least one somatic mutation, most commonly SF3B1, TET2, ASXL1, and SRSF2, associated with older age, presence of neutropenia, and lower response to ESAs. Leukemic evolution (2.2%) was associated with presence of somatic mutations, and survival was favorably related to response to ESAs and transfusion independence. Overall, granular evaluation and re-evaluation are pivotal in LR-MDS patients to optimize clinical management.

Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Comprehensive Review

Simple Summary

This review analyzes the occurrence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic impact and treatment of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Autoimmune hemolytic anemia is observed in about 10% of CLL. Pathogenesis is multifactorial involving humoral, cellular, and innate immunity, so the different mechanisms are well described in this review which also focuses on drugs associated to CLL-AIHA and on difficulties to diagnose it. There is a comprehensive revision of the main published casistics and then of the treatments; in particular the paper analyzes the main chemo-immunotherapeutic agents used in this setting. Since the therapy depends on the presence and severity of clinical symptoms, disease status, and comorbidities, treatment is nowadays more individualized in CLL and also in CLL-AIHA. Patients not responding to corticosteroids and rituximab are treated with CLL-specific drugs as per current guidelines according to age and comorbidities and new targeted agents against BCR and BCL-2 which can be given orally and have few side effects, are very effective both in progressive CLL and in situations such as AIHA.

Abstract

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients have a greater predisposition to develop autoimmune complications. The most common of them is autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) with a frequency of 7–10% of cases. Pathogenesis is multifactorial involving humoral, cellular, and innate immunity. CLL B-cells have damaged apoptosis, produce less immunoglobulins, and could be responsible for antigen presentation and releasing inflammatory cytokines. CLL B-cells can act similar to antigen-presenting cells activating self-reactive T helper cells and may induce T-cell subsets imbalance, favoring autoreactive B-cells which produce anti-red blood cells autoantibodies. Treatment is individualized and it depends on the presence and severity of clinical symptoms, disease status, and comorbidities. Corticosteroids are the standardized first-line treatment; second-line treatment comprises rituximab. Patients not responding to corticosteroids and rituximab should be treated with CLL-specific drugs as per current guidelines according to age and comorbidities. New targeted drugs (BTK inhibitors and anti BCL2) are recently used after or together with steroids to manage AIHA. In the case of cold agglutinin disease, rituximab is preferred, because steroids are ineffective. Management must combine supportive therapies, including vitamins; antibiotics and heparin prophylaxis are indicated in order to minimize infectious and thrombotic risk.

Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia as a Complication of Congenital Anemias. A Case Series and Review of the Literature

Congenital anemias may be complicated by immune-mediated hemolytic crisis. Alloantibodies are usually seen in chronically transfused patients, and autoantibodies have also been described, although they are rarely associated with overt autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), a serious and potentially life-threatening complication. Given the lack of data on the AIHA diagnosis and management in congenital anemias, we retrospectively evaluated all clinically relevant AIHA cases occurring at a referral center for AIHA, hemoglobinopathies, and chronic hemolytic anemias, focusing on clinical management and outcome. In our cohort, AIHA had a prevalence of 1% (14/1410 patients). The majority were warm AIHA. Possible triggers were recent transfusion, infection, pregnancy, and surgery. All the patients received steroid therapy as the first line, and about 25% required further treatment, including rituximab, azathioprine, intravenous immunoglobulins, and cyclophosphamide. Transfusion support was required in 57% of the patients with non-transfusion-dependent anemia, and recombinant human erythropoietin was safely administered in one third of the patients. AIHA in congenital anemias may be challenging both from a diagnostic and a therapeutic point of view. A proper evaluation of hemolytic markers, bone marrow compensation, and assessment of the direct antiglobulin test is mandatory.

Rituximab Use in Warm and Cold Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia is a rare condition characterized by destruction of red blood cells with and without involvement of complement. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia, less than 50% of patients remain in long-term remission following initial steroid therapy and subsequent therapies are required. Cold agglutinin disease is a clonal hematologic disorder that requires therapy in the majority of patients and responds poorly to steroids and alkylators. Rituximab has a favorable toxicity profile and has demonstrated efficacy in autoimmune hemolytic anemia in first-line as well as relapsed settings. Rituximab is the preferred therapy for steroid refractory warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA) and as part of the first- and second-line treatment of cold agglutinin disease. This article reviews the mechanism of action of rituximab and the current literature on its role in the management of primary and secondary warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia and cold agglutinin disease.

Difficult Cases of Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: A Challenge for the Internal Medicine Specialist

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is diagnosed in the presence of anemia, hemolysis, and direct antiglobulin test (DAT) positivity with monospecific antisera. Many confounders of anemia and hemolytic markers should be included in the initial workup (i.e., nutrients deficiencies, chronic liver or kidney diseases, infections, and cancers). Besides classical presentation, there are difficult cases that may challenge the treating physician. These include DAT negative AIHA, diagnosed after the exclusion of other causes of hemolysis, and supported by the response to steroids, and secondary cases (infections, drugs, lymphoproliferative disorders, immunodeficiencies, etc.) that should be suspected and investigated through careful anamnesis physical examination, and specific tests in selected cases. The latter include autoantibody screening in patients with signs/symptoms of systemic autoimmune diseases, immunoglobulins (Ig) levels in case of frequent infections or suspected immunodeficiency, and ultrasound/ computed tomography (CT) studies and bone marrow evaluation to exclude hematologic diseases. AIHA occurring in pregnancy is a specific situation, usually manageable with steroids and intravenous (iv) Ig, although refractory cases have been described. Finally, AIHA may complicate specific clinical settings, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, reticulocytopenia, treatment with novel anti-cancer drugs, and transplant. These cases are often severe, more frequently DAT negative, and require multiple treatments in a short time.

Evans' Syndrome: From Diagnosis to Treatment

Evans' syndrome (ES) is defined as the concomitant or sequential association of warm auto-immune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), and less frequently autoimmune neutropenia. ES is a rare situation that represents up to 7% of AIHA and around 2% of ITP. When AIHA and ITP occurred concomitantly, the diagnosis procedure must rule out differential diagnoses such as thrombotic microangiopathies, anaemia due to bleedings complicating ITP, vitamin deficiencies, myelodysplastic syndromes, paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria, or specific conditions like HELLP when occurring during pregnancy. As for isolated auto-immune cytopenia (AIC), the determination of the primary or secondary nature of ES is important. Indeed, the association of ES with other diseases such as haematological malignancies, systemic lupus erythematosus, infections, or primary immune deficiencies can interfere with its management or alter its prognosis. Due to the rarity of the disease, the treatment of ES is mostly extrapolated from what is recommended for isolated AIC and mostly relies on corticosteroids, rituximab, splenectomy, and supportive therapies. The place for thrombopoietin receptor agonists, erythropoietin, immunosuppressants, haematopoietic cell transplantation, and thromboprophylaxis is also discussed in this review. Despite continuous progress in the management of AIC and a gradual increase in ES survival, the mortality due to ES remains higher than the ones of isolated AIC, supporting the need for an improvement in ES management.

New Insights in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: From Pathogenesis to Therapy Stage 1

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a highly heterogeneous disease due to increased destruction of autologous erythrocytes by autoantibodies with or without complement involvement. Other pathogenic mechanisms include hyper-activation of cellular immune effectors, cytokine dysregulation, and ineffective marrow compensation. AIHAs may be primary or associated with lymphoproliferative and autoimmune diseases, infections, immunodeficiencies, solid tumors, transplants, and drugs. The direct antiglobulin test is the cornerstone of diagnosis, allowing the distinction into warm forms (wAIHA), cold agglutinin disease (CAD), and other more rare forms. The immunologic mechanisms responsible for erythrocyte destruction in the various AIHAs are different and therefore therapy is quite dissimilar. In wAIHA, steroids represent first line therapy, followed by rituximab and splenectomy. Conventional immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine) are now considered the third line. In CAD, steroids are useful only at high/unacceptable doses and splenectomy is uneffective. Rituximab is advised in first line therapy, followed by rituximab plus bendamustine and bortezomib. Several new drugs are under development including B-cell directed therapies (ibrutinib, venetoclax, parsaclisib) and inhibitors of complement (sutimlimab, pegcetacoplan), spleen tyrosine kinases (fostamatinib), or neonatal Fc receptor. Here, a comprehensive review of the main clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and pathogenic mechanisms of AIHA are provided, along with classic and new therapeutic approaches.

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia: current knowledge and perspectives

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is an acquired, heterogeneous group of diseases which includes warm AIHA, cold agglutinin disease (CAD), mixed AIHA, paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria and atypical AIHA. Currently CAD is defined as a chronic, clonal lymphoproliferative disorder, while the presence of cold agglutinins underlying other diseases is known as cold agglutinin syndrome. AIHA is mediated by autoantibodies directed against red blood cells (RBCs) causing premature erythrocyte destruction. The pathogenesis of AIHA is complex and still not fully understood. Recent studies indicate the involvement of T and B cell dysregulation, reduced CD4+ and CD25+ Tregs, increased clonal expansions of CD8 + T cells, imbalance of Th17/Tregs and Tfh/Tfr, and impaired lymphocyte apoptosis. Changes in some RBC membrane structures, under the influence of mechanical stimuli or oxidative stress, may promote autohemolysis. The clinical presentation and treatment of AIHA are influenced by many factors, including the type of AIHA, degree of hemolysis, underlying diseases, presence of concomitant comorbidities, bone marrow compensatory abilities and the presence of fibrosis and dyserthropoiesis. The main treatment for AIHA is based on the inhibition of autoantibody production by mono- or combination therapy using GKS and/or rituximab and, rarely, immunosuppressive drugs or immunomodulators. Reduction of erythrocyte destruction via splenectomy is currently the third line of treatment for warm AIHA. Supportive treatment including vitamin supplementation, recombinant erythropoietin, thrombosis prophylaxis and the prevention and treatment of infections is essential. New groups of drugs that inhibit immune responses at various levels are being developed intensively, including inhibition of antibody-mediated RBCs phagocytosis, inhibition of B cell and plasma cell frequency and activity, inhibition of IgG recycling, immunomodulation of T lymphocytes function, and complement cascade inhibition. Recent studies have brought about changes in classification and progress in understanding the pathogenesis and treatment of AIHA, although there are still many issues to be resolved, particularly concerning the impact of age-associated changes to immunity.

The Changing Landscape of Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a greatly heterogeneous disease due to autoantibodies directed against erythrocytes, with or without complement activation. The clinical picture ranges from mild/compensated to life-threatening anemia, depending on the antibody's thermal amplitude, isotype and ability to fix complement, as well as on bone marrow compensation. Since few years ago, steroids, immunesuppressants and splenectomy have been the mainstay of treatment. More recently, several target therapies are increasingly used in the clinical practice or are under development in clinical trials. This has led to the accumulation of refractory/relapsed cases that often represent a clinical challenge. Moreover, the availability of several drugs acting on the different pathophysiologic mechanisms of the disease pinpoints the need to harness therapy. In particular, it is advisable to define the best choice, sequence and/or combination of drugs during the different phases of the disease. In particular relapsed/refractory cases may resemble pre-myelodysplastic or bone marrow failure syndromes, suggesting a careful use of immunosuppressants, and vice versa advising bone marrow immunomodulating/stimulating agents. A peculiar setting is AIHA after autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which is increasingly reported. These cases are generally severe and refractory to standard therapy, and have high mortality. AIHAs may be primary/idiopathic or secondary to infections, autoimmune diseases, malignancies, particularly lymphoproliferative disorders, and drugs, further complicating their clinical picture and management. Regarding new drugs, the false positivity of the Coombs test (direct antiglobulin test, DAT) following daratumumab adds to the list of difficult diagnosis, together with the passenger lymphocyte syndrome after solid organ transplants. Diagnosis of DAT-negative AIHAs and evaluation of disease-related risk factors for relapse and mortality, notwithstanding improvement in diagnostic approach, are still an unmet need. Finally, AIHA is increasingly described following therapy of solid cancers with inhibitors of immune checkpoint molecules. On the whole, the double-edged sword of new pathogenetic insights and therapies has changed the landscape of AIHA, both providing enthusiastic knowledge and complicating the clinical management of this disease.