Comparative analysis of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2.S SARS-CoV-2 vector vaccines

Host cell protein-mediated adjuvanticity and immunogenicity risks of biotherapeutics

Host cell proteins (HCPs) are process-related impurities of biotherapeutic production that might affect product quality and/or patient safety. In a few cases, adverse events were attributed to HCPs present in the administered biotherapeutic. HCP-associated immune risks include adjuvanticity and immunogenicity with potential cross-reactivity. Based on the published data, some HCPs can act as adjuvants increasing the immunogenicity of the biotherapeutic as a bystander effect. HCPs may also induce immunogenicity against themselves, resulting in anti-HCP T cell responses and anti-HCP antibody formation. Depending on sequence similarities, these anti-HCP immune responses might theoretically be cross-reactive to the biotherapeutic or human endogenous proteins. In this review, we examine HCP-associated immune-related risks reported from non-clinical and clinical studies. We also discuss the potential and limitations of in vitro and in silico methods to evaluate the adjuvanticity and immunogenicity potential of HCPs. A risk-based assessment of the safety impact of HCPs may include the identity of the HCP and similarity to the biotherapeutic and human proteins, as well as product, treatment-, and patient-related factors.

Comparison of vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis cases following two adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines

BACKGROUND

Vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) was first described after administration of adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines including Ad26.COV2.S and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. It is not known if the clinical characteristics and outcomes of VITT after Ad26.COV2.S and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination are different. We assessed demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory findings and outcomes in patients with VITT after each vaccine.

METHODS

Spontaneous postmarketing reports of VITT after Ad26.COV2.S were identified from Janssen's Global Safety Database and classified using NICE criteria (n = 86). Cases after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 were identified from a published case series (n = 220). The analysis is descriptive.

RESULTS

The median age of patients with definite/probable VITT after Ad26.COV2.S or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination is 43 and 48 years, respectively. Median time-to-onset is 11 days and 14 days post-vaccination, cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is present in 50.6% and 50%, and mortality is 30% and 22% of patients, respectively. Women make up 55.3% of cases after Ad26.COV2.S and 55% after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, 74%/60% of CVT cases and 68%/62.5% of deaths. Patients present with severe thrombocytopenia, grossly elevated D-dimer, and most test positive for anti-platelet factor-4 antibodies. Patients with preexisting rare autoimmune diseases are observed despite the small sample sizes.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the data, our study finds no strong evidence for a clinically relevant difference in VITT occurring after Ad26.COV2.S or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Observed differences in some parameters likely result from the demographic of the populations vaccinated, and the situational and reporting differences in how, when, and where patients were identified and treated.

Integrating Affinity Chromatography in the Platform Process for Adenovirus Purification

Adenoviral vectors (AdVs) are gaining prominence in cancer therapy and vaccine development, posing the need for a modern AdV manufacturing platform. Current AdV purification by ion-exchange chromatography indeed struggles to achieve the product's yield and purity of processes that employ affinity technologies. Addressing these challenges, this study presents the first affinity-based process that delivers high product yield and clearance of host cell proteins and DNA (HCPs and hcDNA) in two chromatography steps. The affinity capture utilizes resins functionalized with peptide ligands that target AdV hexon proteins (AEFFIWNA and TNDGPDYSSPLTGSG), and provide high capacity (> 5·1010 vp/mL of resin) and yield under mild elution conditions (~50% at pH 8.0). Peptide-functionalized adsorbents prepared using different matrices (polymethylmethacrylate vs. agarose) were initially tested to compare the purification performance. AEFFIWNA-SulfoLink resin was selected for its yield of cell-transducing AdVs (~50%) and removal of HCPs and hcDNA (144-fold and 56-fold). Similarly, TNDGPDYSSPLTGSG-Toyopearl resin afforded ~50% yield and > 50-fold reduction of impurities. Additional gains in product purity were achieved by optimizing the washing step, which removed free hexon proteins and additional HCPs. All peptide-functionalized resins maintained their purification performance for 10 cycles upon regeneration at pH ~2.0. The purification process was assembled to include clarification, affinity capture in bind-and-elute mode using AEFFIWNA-SulfoLink resin, and polishing in flow-through mode using mixed-mode resins. The optimized process provided a yield ~50% of cell-infecting units (IFU) and a product titer ~107 IFU/mL, along with residual HCP and hcDNA levels (8.76 ng/mL and 44 ng per dose, respectively) that meet clinical requirements.

A new era in nephrology: the role of super-resolution microscopy in research, medical diagnostic, and drug discovery

For decades, electron microscopy has been the primary method to visualize ultrastructural details of the kidney, including podocyte foot processes and the slit diaphragm. Despite its status as the gold standard, electron microscopy has significant limitations: it requires laborious sample preparation, works only with very small samples, is mainly qualitative, and is prone to misinterpretation because of section angle bias. In addition, combining imaging and protein staining with antibodies poses a challenge, limiting electron microscopy's integration into routine research and diagnostic workflows. As imaging technology advances, super-resolution microscopy, with an optical resolution below 100 nm, presents a promising alternative for detailed insights into glomerular ultrastructure. This review explores various super-resolution techniques, particularly 3-dimensional structured illumination microscopy, and demonstrates how they can be applied to standard histological sections. The 3-dimensional structured illumination microscopy-based measurement procedure-podocyte exact morphology measurement procedure-offers a novel approach to quantifying podocyte foot process morphology and can detect podocyte foot process changes even before proteinuria is present. Furthermore, the podocyte exact morphology measurement procedure can be combined with mRNA detection, multiplex staining, and deep learning algorithms, making it a powerful tool for kidney research, preclinical studies, and personalized diagnostics. This advancement has the potential to accelerate drug development and enhance therapeutic precision, heralding a new era of high-precision nephrology.

Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Two Years Later: Should It Still Be on the Scientific Agenda?

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) was recognized around 2 years ago, at the beginning of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) vaccination campaign, as a rare but life-threatening complication of adenoviral vector vaccines. Two years later, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been tamed, although not defeated, and the vaccines provoking VITT have been abandoned in most high-income countries, thus why should we still speak about VITT? Because a significant fraction of the world population has not been vaccinated yet, especially in low/middle-income countries that can only afford adenoviral vector-based vaccines, because the adenoviral vector platform is being used for the development of a large series of new vaccines for other transmissible diseases, and lastly because there are some clues suggesting that VITT may not be exclusive to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Therefore, a deep understanding of this new syndrome is highly warranted as well as the awareness that we still miss some crucial insight into its pathophysiology and on some aspects of its management. This snapshot review aims to portray our knowledge on VITT, focusing on its clinical presentation, pathophysiological insight, diagnostic and management strategies, and to pinpoint the main unmet needs, highlighting the aspects on which research should focus in the near future.

Randomizing the human genome by engineering recombination between repeat elements

We lack tools to edit DNA sequences at scales necessary to study 99% of the human genome that is noncoding. To address this gap, we applied CRISPR prime editing to insert recombination handles into repetitive sequences, up to 1697 per cell line, which enables generating large-scale deletions, inversions, translocations, and circular DNA. Recombinase induction produced more than 100 stochastic megabase-sized rearrangements in each cell. We tracked these rearrangements over time to measure selection pressures, finding a preference for shorter variants that avoided essential genes. We characterized 29 clones with multiple rearrangements, finding an impact of deletions on expression of genes in the variant but not on nearby genes. This genome-scrambling strategy enables large deletions, sequence relocations, and the insertion of regulatory elements to explore genome dispensability and organization.

Automated, Quantitative Capillary Western Blots to Analyze Host Cell Proteins in COVID-19 Vaccine Produced in Vero Cell Line

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Host cell protein (HCP) content is a major attribute for biological and vaccine products that must be extensively characterized prior to product licensure. Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Mass Spectrometry (MS) are conventional methods for quantitative host cell protein analysis in biologic and vaccine products. Both techniques are usually very tedious, labor-intensive, and challenging to transfer to other laboratories. In addition, the ELISA methodology requires 2D SDS PAGE and 2D western blot antibody reagent validation to establish reagent coverage. This reagent coverage provides a rather weak link that is currently accepted, as the western blot is run under denaturing conditions and the ELISA is run under native conditions. Simple Western™ is a relatively new, automated, capillary western blot-based technology that allows for the separation, blotting, and detection of proteins. But, unlike traditional western blots, Simple Western™ is quantitative, allowing for the quantification of HCP content in biologic and vaccine samples. Antibody reagent validation is much more straightforward, as the reagent coverage can be directly linked between the 2D methodology and Simple Western™, as they are both run under denatured and reduced conditions.

METHODS

Herein we describe the development of a capillary western blot method to quantify the HCP content in samples generated using a Vero cell line for the production of an investigational live virus vaccine candidate (V590) for Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). The HCP content in COVID-19 vaccine samples was evaluated using three methods: the new capillary western, the gold standard ELISA, and SDS-PAGE.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

Strong agreement was observed in the HCP content data between the capillary western and SDS PAGE methods, whereas the ELISA HCP data were outliers, suggesting that the capillary western is generating HCP concentrations closer to the true concentration. This is the first report of using capillary western technology in analyzing HCP in vaccine samples.

Identification of cross reactive T cell responses in adenovirus based COVID 19 vaccines

Vaccination has proven to be a valuable tool to combat SARS-CoV-2. However, reports of rare adverse reactions such as thrombosis/thrombocytopenia syndrome after ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination have caused scientific, public and media concern. ChAdOx1 was vectorised from the Y25 chimpanzee adenovirus, which was selected due to low human seroprevalence to circumvent pre-existing immunity. In this study, we aimed to explore patterns of T-cell activation after SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccine exposure in vitro using PBMCs collected from pre-pandemic ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 naïve healthy donors (HDs), and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Pfizer vaccinated controls. PBMCs were assessed for T-cell proliferation using the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) following exposure to SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 vaccines. Cytokine analysis was performed via intracellular cytokine staining, ELISpot assay and LEGENDplex immunoassays. T-cell assays performed in pre-pandemic vaccine naïve HDs, revealed widespread lymphocyte stimulation after exposure to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (95%), ChAdOx-spike (90%) and the Ad26.COV2. S vaccine, but not on exposure to the BNT162b2 vaccine. ICS analysis demonstrated that CD4+ CD45RO+ memory T-cells are activated by ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 in vaccine naïve HDs. Cytometric immunoassays showed ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 exposure was associated with the release of proinflammatory and cytotoxic molecules, such as IFN-γ, IL-6, perforin, granzyme B and FasL. These studies demonstrate a ubiquitous T-cell response to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2. S in HDs recruited prior to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with T-cell stimulation also identified in vaccinated controls. This may be due to underlying T-cell cross-reactivity with prevalent human adenoviruses and further study will be needed to identify T-cell epitopes involved.

Incidence and management of the main serious adverse events reported after COVID-19 vaccination

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2n first appeared in Wuhan, China in 2019. Soon after, it was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. The health crisis imposed by a new virus and its rapid spread worldwide prompted the fast development of vaccines. For the first time in human history, two vaccines based on recombinant genetic material technology were approved for human use. These mRNA vaccines were applied in massive immunization programs around the world, followed by other vaccines based on more traditional approaches. Even though all vaccines were tested in clinical trials prior to their general administration, serious adverse events, usually of very low incidence, were mostly identified after application of millions of doses. Establishing a direct correlation (the cause-effect paradigm) between vaccination and the appearance of adverse effects has proven challenging. This review focuses on the main adverse effects observed after vaccination, including anaphylaxis, myocarditis, vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and transverse myelitis reported in the context of COVID-19 vaccination. We highlight the symptoms, laboratory tests required for an adequate diagnosis, and briefly outline the recommended treatments for these adverse effects. The aim of this work is to increase awareness among healthcare personnel about the serious adverse events that may arise post-vaccination. Regardless of the ongoing discussion about the safety of COVID-19 vaccination, these adverse effects must be identified promptly and treated effectively to reduce the risk of complications.

The Biodistribution of the Spike Protein after Ad26.COV2.S Vaccination Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia

Ad26.COV2.S vaccination can lead to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), a rare but severe adverse effect, characterized by thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. The mechanism of VITT induction is unclear and likely multifactorial, potentially including the activation of platelets and endothelial cells mediated by the vaccine-encoded spike protein (S protein). Here, we investigated the biodistribution of the S protein after Ad26.COV2.S dosing in three animal models and in human serum samples. The S protein was transiently present in draining lymph nodes of rabbits after Ad26.COV2.S dosing. The S protein was detected in the serum in all species from 1 day to 21 days after vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S, but it was not detected in platelets, the endothelium lining the blood vessels, or other organs. The S protein S1 and S2 subunits were detected at different ratios and magnitudes after Ad26.COV2.S or COVID-19 mRNA vaccine immunization. However, the S1/S2 ratio did not depend on the Ad26 platform, but on mutation of the furin cleavage site, suggesting that the S1/S2 ratio is not VITT related. Overall, our data suggest that the S-protein biodistribution and kinetics after Ad26.COV2.S dosing are likely not main contributors to the development of VITT, but other S-protein-specific parameters require further investigation.

Biophysical studies do not reveal direct interactions between human PF4 and Ad26.COV2.S vaccine

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 vaccines have been widely used to control the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In individuals receiving replication-incompetent, adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccines (eg, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [AstraZeneca] or Ad26.COV2.S [Johnson & Johnson/Janssen] vaccines), a very rare but serious adverse reaction has been reported and described as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). The exact mechanism of VITT following Ad26.COV2.S vaccination is under investigation. Antibodies directed against human platelet factor 4 (PF4) are considered critical in the pathogenesis of VITT, suggesting similarities with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. It has been postulated that components of these vaccines mimic the role of heparin by binding to PF4, triggering production of these anti-PF4 antibodies.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the potential interaction between human PF4 and Ad26.COV2.S vaccine using several biophysical techniques.

METHODS

Direct interaction of PF4 with Ad26.COV2.S vaccine was investigated using dynamic light scattering, biolayer interferometry, and surface plasmon resonance. For both biosensing methods, the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine was immobilized to the sensor surface and PF4 was used as analyte.

RESULTS

No direct interactions between PF4 and Ad26.COV2.S vaccine could be detected using dynamic light scattering and biolayer interferometry. Surface plasmon resonance technology was shown to be unsuitable to investigate these types of interactions.

CONCLUSION

Our findings make it very unlikely that direct binding of PF4 to Ad26.COV2.S vaccine or components thereof is driving the onset of VITT, although the occurrence of such interactions after immunization (potentially facilitated by unknown plasma or cellular factors) cannot be excluded. Further research is warranted to improve the understanding of the full mechanism of this adverse reaction.

Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) and vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT): Brighton Collaboration case definitions and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunisation safety data

This is a revision of the online November 2021 Brighton thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) case definition and a new Brighton Collaboration case definition for vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT). These case definitions are intended for use in clinical trials and post-licensure pharmacovigilance activities to facilitate safety data comparability across multiple settings. They are not intended to guide clinical management. The case definitions were developed by a group of subject matter and Brighton Collaboration process experts as part of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI)-funded Safety Platform for Evaluation of vACcines (SPEAC). The case definitions, each with defined levels of diagnostic certainty, are based on relevant published evidence and expert consensus and are accompanied by specific guidelines for TTS and VITT data collection and analysis. The document underwent peer review by a reference group of vaccine safety stakeholders and haematology experts to ensure case definition useability, applicability and scientific integrity.

Bridging upstream and downstream for improved adenovirus 5 bioprocess

Adenoviruses are well-known viral vectors that have been previously used in gene therapy and as a vaccine-delivery vehicle for humans and animals. During the COVID-19 pandemic, it gained renewed attention, but at the same time, it raised concerns due to side effects observed with some of the resulting vaccines administered to patients. It has been indicated that these side effects might be attributed to impurities present in the final product. Therefore, constant enhancement of the vaccine purity and further improvement of impurity detection methods are needed. In this work, we showcase an example of industry-relevant adenovirus bioprocess optimization. Our data show the effect of upstream parameters on the bioburden introduced to the downstream process. We provide an example of process optimization using a combination of the PATfix analytical method, ddPCR, infectivity, total DNA, and total protein analyses to optimize cell density, multiplicity of infection, and length of production. Additionally, we provide data illustrating the robustness of the convective interaction media quaternary amine monolithic chromatography step. This anion exchange strategy was shown to remove over 99% of protein and DNA impurities, including those unable to be addressed by tangential flow filtration, while maintaining high adenovirus recoveries.

Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia: Clinicopathologic Features and New Perspectives on Anti-PF4 Antibody-Mediated Disorders

INTRODUCTION

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare yet severe adverse complication first identified during the global vaccination effort against SARS-CoV-2 infection, predominantly observed following administration of the ChAdOx1-S (Oxford-AstraZeneca) and Ad26.CoV2.S (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen) adenoviral vector-based vaccines. Unlike other anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody-mediated disorders, such as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), VITT arises with the development of platelet-activating anti-PF4 antibodies 4-42 days post-vaccination, typically featuring thrombocytopenia and thrombosis at unusual sites.

AIM

To explore the unique properties, pathogenic mechanisms, and long-term persistence of VITT antibodies in patients, in comparison with other anti-PF4 antibody-mediated disorders.

DISCUSSION

This review highlights the complexity of VITT as it differs in antibody behavior and clinical presentation from other anti-PF4-mediated disorders, including the high incidence rate of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) and the persistence of anti-PF4 antibodies, necessitating a re-evaluation of long-term patient care strategies. The nature of VITT antibodies and the underlying mechanisms triggering their production remain largely unknown.

CONCLUSION

The rise in awareness and subsequent prompt recognition of VITT is paramount in reducing mortality. As vaccination campaigns continue, understanding the role of adenoviral vector-based vaccines in VITT antibody production is crucial, not only for its immediate clinical implications, but also for developing safer vaccines in the future.

Thrombotic anti-PF4 immune disorders: HIT, VITT, and beyond

Antibodies against the chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4) occur often, but only those that activate platelets induce severe prothrombotic disorders with associated thrombocytopenia. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is the prototypic anti-PF4 disorder, mediated by strong activation of platelets through their FcγIIa (immunoglobulin G [IgG]) receptors (FcγRIIa). Concomitant pancellular activation (monocytes, neutrophils, endothelium) triggers thromboinflammation with a high risk for venous and arterial thrombosis. The classic concept of HIT is that anti-PF4/heparin IgG, recognizing antigen sites on (cationic) PF4 that form in the presence of (anionic) heparin, constitute the heparin-dependent antibodies that cause HIT. Accordingly, HIT is managed by anticoagulation with a nonheparin anticoagulant. In 2021, adenovirus vector COVID-19 vaccines triggered the rare adverse effect "vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia" (VITT), also caused by anti-PF4 IgG. VITT is a predominantly heparin-independent platelet-activating disorder that requires both therapeutic-dose anticoagulation and inhibition of FcγRIIa-mediated platelet activation by high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). HIT and VITT antibodies bind to different epitopes on PF4; new immunoassays can differentiate between these distinct HIT-like and VITT-like antibodies. These studies indicate that (1) severe, atypical presentations of HIT ("autoimmune HIT") are associated with both HIT-like (heparin-dependent) and VITT-like (heparin-independent) anti-PF4 antibodies; (2) in some patients with severe acute (and sometimes chronic, recurrent) thrombosis, VITT-like antibodies can be identified independent of proximate heparin exposure or vaccination. We propose to classify anti-PF4 antibodies as type 1 (nonpathogenic, non- platelet activating), type 2 (heparin dependent, platelet activating), and type 3 (heparin independent, platelet activating). A key concept is that type 3 antibodies (autoimmune HIT, VITT) require anticoagulation plus an adjunct treatment, namely high-dose IVIG, to deescalate the severe anti-PF4 IgG-mediated hypercoagulability state.

Intravenous Administration of Ad26.COV2.S Does Not Induce Thrombocytopenia or Thrombotic Events or Affect SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Bioavailability in Blood Compared with Intramuscular Vaccination in Rabbits

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a very rare but serious adverse reaction that can occur after Ad26.COV2.S vaccination in humans, leading to thrombosis at unusual anatomic sites. One hypothesis is that accidental intravenous (IV) administration of Ad26.COV2.S or drainage of the vaccine from the muscle into the circulatory system may result in interaction of the vaccine with blood factors associated with platelet activation, leading to VITT. Here, we demonstrate that, similar to intramuscular (IM) administration of Ad26.COV2.S in rabbits, IV dosing was well tolerated, with no significant differences between dosing routes for the assessed hematologic, coagulation time, innate immune, or clinical chemistry parameters and no histopathologic indication of thrombotic events. For both routes, all other non-adverse findings observed were consistent with a normal vaccine response and comparable to those observed for unrelated or other Ad26-based control vaccines. However, Ad26.COV2.S induced significantly higher levels of C-reactive protein on day 1 after IM vaccination compared with an Ad26-based control vaccine encoding a different transgene, suggesting an inflammatory effect of the vaccine-encoded spike protein. Although based on a limited number of animals, these data indicate that an accidental IV injection of Ad26.COV2.S may not represent an increased risk for VITT.

Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (VITT)-Insights from Clinical Cases, In Vitro Studies and Murine Models

An effective worldwide vaccination campaign started and is still being carried out in the face of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. While vaccines are great tools to confront the pandemic, predominantly adenoviral vector-based vaccines can cause a rare severe adverse effect, termed vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT), in about 1 in 100,000 vaccinated individuals. VITT is diagnosed 5-30 days post-vaccination and clinically characterized by thrombocytopenia, strongly elevated D-dimer levels, platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies and thrombosis, especially at atypical sites such as the cerebral venous sinus and/or splanchnic veins. There are striking similarities between heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and VITT. Both are caused by anti-PF4 antibodies, causing platelet and leukocyte activation which results in massive thrombo-inflammation. However, it is still to be determined why PF4 becomes immunogenic in VITT and which constituent of the vaccine triggers the immune response. As VITT-like syndromes are increasingly reported in patients shortly after viral infections, direct virus-PF4 interactions might be most relevant. Here we summarize the current information and hypotheses on the pathogenesis of VITT and address in vivo models, especially murine models for further studies on VITT.

Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome: A database review of clinical trial and post-marketing experience with Ad26.COV2.S

BACKGROUND

Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) is a very rare disorder described after vaccination with adenoviral vector-based COVID-19 vaccines. Co-occurring thrombosis with thrombocytopenia reported after vaccination can be a proxy for identification of TTS.

METHODS

Descriptive database review of all cases of co-occurring (within 42 days) thrombosis with thrombocytopenia in participants in Ad26.COV2.S clinical trials or recipients of Ad26.COV2.S in real-world clinical practice. Cases were retrieved from Janssens' clinical trial and Global Medical Safety databases.

RESULTS

There were 34 cases of co-occurring thrombosis with thrombocytopenia in Ad26.COV2.S recipients (46 per 100,000 person-years) and 15 after placebo (75 per 100,000 person-years) in clinical trials. Among Ad26.COV2.S recipients, mean age at the time of the event was 63 years (range 25-85), 82 % were male, mean time-to-onset 112 days (range 8-339) post-last Ad26.COV2.S dose, 26 events occurred post-dose-1, and 7 within a 28-day risk window post-vaccination. Diagnostic certainty was evaluated using Brighton Collaboration, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and European Medicines Agency Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee case definitions. One case met the highest level of diagnostic certainty for all 3 definitions. There were 355 spontaneous reports of co-occurring thrombosis with thrombocytopenia in the Global Medical Safety database, 47 % males, 85 % within 28-days after vaccination. Twenty-seven cases met the highest level of diagnostic certainty for all definitions, 21 female, 19 with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, age-range 18-68 years. Time-to-onset was 7-14 days post-vaccination in 20 cases. There were 8 fatalities.

CONCLUSION

TTS induced by Ad26.COV2.S is very rare. Most co-occurring thrombosis with thrombocytopenia does not constitute TTS.

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia: what do we know hitherto?

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), also known as thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, is a catastrophic and life-threatening reaction to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, which occurs disproportionately in response to vaccination with non-replicating adenovirus vector (AV) vaccines. The mechanism of VITT is not well defined and it has not been resolved why cases of VITT are predominated by vaccination with AV vaccines. However, virtually all VITT patients have positive platelet-activating anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody titers. Subsequently, platelets are activated and depleted in an Fcγ-receptor IIa (FcγRIIa or CD32a)-dependent manner, but it is not clear why or how the anti-PF4 response is mounted. This review describes the pathogenesis of VITT and provides insight into possible mechanisms that prompt the formation of a PF4/polyanion complex, which drives VITT pathology, as an amalgam of current experimental data or hypotheses.

A systems immunology study comparing innate and adaptive immune responses in adults to COVID-19 mRNA and adenovirus vectored vaccines

Identifying the molecular mechanisms that promote optimal immune responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is critical for future rational vaccine design. Here, we longitudinally profile innate and adaptive immune responses in 102 adults after the first, second, and third doses of mRNA or adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccines. Using a multi-omics approach, we identify key differences in the immune responses induced by ChAdOx1-S and BNT162b2 that correlate with antigen-specific antibody and T cell responses or vaccine reactogenicity. Unexpectedly, we observe that vaccination with ChAdOx1-S, but not BNT162b2, induces an adenoviral vector-specific memory response after the first dose, which correlates with the expression of proteins with roles in thrombosis with potential implications for thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), a rare but serious adverse event linked to adenovirus-vectored vaccines. The COVID-19 Vaccine Immune Responses Study thus represents a major resource that can be used to understand the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of these COVID-19 vaccines.

Phenotypic effects of mutations observed in the neuraminidase of human origin H5N1 influenza A viruses

Global spread and regional endemicity of H5Nx Goose/Guangdong avian influenza viruses (AIV) pose a continuous threat for poultry production and zoonotic, potentially pre-pandemic, transmission to humans. Little is known about the role of mutations in the viral neuraminidase (NA) that accompanied bird-to-human transmission to support AIV infection of mammals. Here, after detailed analysis of the NA sequence of human H5N1 viruses, we studied the role of A46D, L204M, S319F and S430G mutations in virus fitness in vitro and in vivo. Although H5N1 AIV carrying avian- or human-like NAs had similar replication efficiency in avian cells, human-like NA enhanced virus replication in human airway epithelia. The L204M substitution consistently reduced NA activity of H5N1 and nine other influenza viruses carrying NA of groups 1 and 2, indicating a universal effect. Compared to the avian ancestor, human-like H5N1 virus has less NA incorporated in the virion, reduced levels of viral NA RNA replication and NA expression. We also demonstrate increased accumulation of NA at the plasma membrane, reduced virus release and enhanced cell-to-cell spread. Furthermore, NA mutations increased virus binding to human-type receptors. While not affecting high virulence of H5N1 in chickens, the studied NA mutations modulated virulence and replication of H5N1 AIV in mice and to a lesser extent in ferrets. Together, mutations in the NA of human H5N1 viruses play different roles in infection of mammals without affecting virulence or transmission in chickens. These results are important to understand the genetic determinants for replication of AIV in mammals and should assist in the prediction of AIV with zoonotic potential.

Mechanisms of Thrombosis in Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) are rare, iatrogenic immune-mediated conditions with high rates of thrombosis-related morbidity and mortality. HIT is a long-recognized reaction to the administration of the common parenterally administered anticoagulant heparin (or its derivatives), while VITT is a new, distinct syndrome occurring in response to adenovirus-based vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 and potentially other types of vaccines. A feature of both HIT and VITT is paradoxical thrombosis despite a characteristic low platelet count, mediated by the presence of platelet-activating antibodies to platelet factor 4. Several additional factors have also been suggested to contribute to clot formation in HIT and/or VITT, including monocytes, tissue factor, microparticles, endothelium, the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps, complement, procoagulant platelets, and vaccine components. In this review, we discuss the literature to date regarding mechanisms contributing to thrombosis in both HIT and VITT and explore the pathophysiological similarities and differences between the two conditions.

Super-Resolution Microscopy: A Technique to Revolutionize Research and Diagnosis of Glomerulopathies

Background

For decades, knowledge about glomerular (patho)physiology has been tightly linked with advances in microscopic imaging technology. For example, the invention of electron microscopy was required to hypothesize about the mode of glomerular filtration barrier function.

Summary

Super-resolution techniques, defined as fluorescence microscopy approaches that surpass the optical resolution limit of around 200 nm, have been made available to the scientific community. Several of these different techniques are currently in use in glomerular research. Using three-dimensional structured illumination microscopy, the exact morphology of the podocyte filtration slit can be morphometrically analyzed and quantitatively compared across samples originating from animal models or human biopsies.

Key Messages

Several quantitative image analysis approaches and their potential influence on glomerular research and diagnostics are discussed. By improving not only optical resolution but also information content and turnaround time, super-resolution microscopy has the potential to expand the diagnosis of glomerular disease. Soon, these approaches could be introduced into glomerular disease diagnosis.

Immunvermittelte Sinus- und Hirnvenenthrombosen: VITT und prä-VITT als Modellerkrankung

In diesem Übersichtsartikel beschreiben wir die klinischen und paraklinischen Charakteristika der Vakzin-induzierten immunthrombotischen Thrombozytopenie (VITT) und fassen den gegenwärtigen Kenntnisstand zur Pathogenese zusammen. Bei der VITT bilden sich 5–20 Tage nach einer Impfung mit einem Adenovirus-vektorbasiertem SARS-CoV-2-Vakzin (AstraZeneca oder Johnson & Johnson) lebensbedrohliche Thrombosen aus, vor allem in den zerebralen Sinus und Hirnvenen. Laborchemisch zeigt sich eine typische Thrombozytopenie mit erhöhten D-Dimeren. Der Pathogenese liegen immunologische Prozesse zugrunde, die Ähnlichkeiten mit der Heparin-induzierten Thrombozytopenie aufweisen: so geht die VITT mit hochtitrigem Immunoglobulin G gegen das thrombozytäre Protein Plättchenfaktor 4 (PF4) einher. Durch die Interaktion mit dem Impfstoff wird PF4 so verändert, dass es von Antikörper-produzierenden Zellen des Immunsystems erkannt wird. Die so produzierten Anti-PF4-Antikörper führen über thrombozytäre FcγIIa-Rezeptoren zu einer Plättchenaktivierung. Der Nachweis plättchenaktivierender Anti-PF4-Antikörper bestätigt die Diagnose einer VITT. Antikoagulanzien, die die Bildung von Thrombin oder Thrombin selbst blockieren und hochdosiertes i. v.-Immunglobulin G, das die Fcγ-Rezeptor-vermittelte Zellaktivierung inhibiert, stellen die wirksame und kausale Behandlung der VITT dar. Bei Patienten mit katastrophalem Verlauf kann ein Plasmaaustausch versucht werden. Bei einigen Patienten ist ein prä-VITT Syndrom als Prodromalstadium zu beoachten, das sich typischerweise mit Kopfschmerzen manifestieren kann und dessen frühe Behandlung hilft, thrombotische Komplikationen zu vermeiden. Die spezifische Dynamik der VITT-assozierten Immunreaktion entspricht einer transienten, sekundären Immunantwort. Aktuelle Studien gehen der Frage nach, wie PF4 an unterschiedliche adenovirale Proteine bindet und beleuchten die Rolle von anderen Impfstoff-Bestandteilen als potentielle Liganden für die PF4-Bindung. Einige dieser Faktoren sind auch an der Etablierung eines proinflammatorischen Milieus („danger signal“) beteiligt, das unmittelbar nach der Impfung die 1. Phase der VITT-Pathogenese triggert. Sobald in der 2. Phase der VITT-Pathogenese hohe Titer von Anti-PF4-Antikörper gebildet sind, aktivieren diese neben Thrombozyten auch Granulozyten. In einem als NETose (von „neutrophil extracellular traps“) bezeichneten Prozess setzen aktivierte Granulozyten dabei DNA frei, mit der PF4 weitere Komplexe bildet, an die Anti-PF4-Antikörper binden. Dies verstärkt die Fcγ-Rezeptor-vermittelte Zellaktivierung weiter mit der Folge einer ausgeprägten Thrombin-Bildung. Zum Ende des Artikels geben wir einen Ausblick, welchen Einfluss die bisherigen Erkenntnisse zur VITT auf weitere globale Impfkampagnen gegen SARS-CoV-2 haben und beleuchten, wie Anti-PF4-Antikörper jenseits von VITT und HIT auch eine Rolle bei seltenen Erkrankungen spielen, die mit rezidivierenden venösen und arteriellen Thrombosen einhergehen.

Potential mechanisms of vaccine-induced thrombosis

Vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) is a rare syndrome characterized by high-titer anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies, thrombocytopenia and arterial and venous thrombosis in unusual sites, as cerebral venous sinuses and splanchnic veins. VITT has been described to occur almost exclusively after administration of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2.S adenovirus vector- based COVID-19 vaccines. Clinical and laboratory features of VITT resemble those of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). It has been hypothesized that negatively charged polyadenylated hexone proteins of the AdV vectors could act as heparin to induce the conformational changes of PF4 molecule that lead to the formation of anti-PF4/polyanion antibodies. The anti-PF4 immune response in VITT is fostered by the presence of a proinflammatory milieu, elicited by some impurities found in ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, as well as by soluble spike protein resulting from alternative splice events. Anti-PF4 antibodies bind PF4, forming immune complexes which activate platelets, monocytes and granulocytes, resulting in the VITT's immunothrombosis. The reason why only a tiny minority of patents receiving AdV-based COVID-19 vaccines develop VITT is still unknown. It has been hypothesized that individual intrinsic factors, either acquired (i.e., pre-priming of B cells to produce anti-PF4 antibodies by previous contacts with bacteria or viruses) or inherited (i.e., differences in platelet T-cell ubiquitin ligand-2 [TULA-2] expression) can predispose a few subjects to develop VITT. A better knowledge of the mechanistic basis of VITT is essential to improve the safety and the effectiveness of future vaccines and gene therapies using adenovirus vectors.

Thrombotic events with or without thrombocytopenia in recipients of adenovirus-based COVID-19 vaccines

COVID-19, the severe acute respiratory syndrome, is one of the major emergencies that have affected health care systems. Drugs and oxygen are only partially effective in saving lives in patients with severe COVID-19, and the most important protection from death is vaccination. The widespread use of COVID-19 adenovirus-based vaccines has provided evidence for the occurrence of rare venous thrombotic events including cerebral venous thrombosis and splanchnic venous thrombosis in recipients of Vaxzevria and Jcovden vaccines and the review focus on them. One year ago, thromboses in Vaxzevria recipients have been associated with thrombocytopenia in the presence of antibodies to platelet factor 4 and have been called vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). The incidence of VITT is equal to 9-31 events per one million doses of vaccines as evaluated by health agencies worldwide and is higher in female and young vaccine recipients. More recently, by using the European EudraVigilance database, it has been demonstrated that the incidence of thrombosis in recipients of adenovirus-based vaccines is 5–10 fold higher than that of VITT and 7–12 fold higher than observed in the recipients of Comirnaty, an mRNA-based vaccine, suggesting that adenovirus-based vaccines cause not only VITT but also thrombosis without thrombocytopenia (non-VITT thrombosis). The incidence of the vaccine-dependent non-VITT thrombosis is different in the adenovirus-based vaccines and the VITT/non-VITT incidence ratio depends on the severity of thrombosis and is inversely related to the age of the recipients. The possible causes and clinical implications of non-VITT thrombosis in vaccine recipients are discussed.

Safety and immune response kinetics of GRAd-COV2 vaccine: phase 1 clinical trial results

Despite the successful deployment of efficacious vaccines and therapeutics, the development of novel vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 remains a major goal to increase vaccine doses availability and accessibility for lower income setting. We report here on the kinetics of Spike-specific humoral and T-cell response in young and old volunteers over 6 months follow-up after a single intramuscular administration of GRAd-COV2, a gorilla adenoviral vector-based vaccine candidate currently in phase-2 of clinical development. At all three tested vaccine dosages, Spike binding and neutralizing antibodies were induced and substantially maintained up to 3 months, to then contract at 6 months. Potent T-cell responses were readily induced and sustained throughout the study period, with only minor decline. No major differences in immune response to GRAd-COV2 vaccination were observed in the two age cohorts. In light of its favorable safety and immunogenicity, GRAd-COV2 is a valuable candidate for further clinical development and potential addition to the COVID-19 vaccine toolbox to help fighting SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

NETosis and thrombosis in vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare yet serious adverse effect of the adenoviral vector vaccines ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen) against COVID-19. The mechanisms involved in clot formation and thrombocytopenia in VITT are yet to be fully determined. Here we show neutrophils undergoing NETosis and confirm expression markers of NETs in VITT patients. VITT antibodies directly stimulate neutrophils to release NETs and induce thrombus formation containing abundant platelets, neutrophils, fibrin, extracellular DNA and citrullinated histone H3 in a flow microfluidics system and in vivo. Inhibition of NETosis prevents VITT-induced thrombosis in mice but not thrombocytopenia. In contrast, in vivo blockage of FcγRIIa abrogates both thrombosis and thrombocytopenia suggesting these are distinct processes. Our findings indicate that anti-PF4 antibodies activate blood cells via FcγRIIa and are responsible for thrombosis and thrombocytopenia in VITT. Future development of NETosis and FcγRIIa inhibitors are needed to treat VITT and similar immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia conditions more effectively, leading to better patient outcomes.

The mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) remain unclear. Here the authors show that anti-PF4 antibodies are responsible for the activation of platelets and neutrophils, and blockage of FcγRIIa or NETosis in vivo can prevent thrombosis.

Cytoskeleton Dependent Mobility Dynamics of FcγRIIA Facilitates Platelet Haptotaxis and Capture of Opsonized Bacteria

Platelet adhesion and spreading at the sites of vascular injury is vital to hemostasis. As an integral part of the innate immune system, platelets interact with opsonized bacterial pathogens through FcγRIIA and contribute to host defense. As mechanoscavangers, platelets actively migrate and capture bacteria via cytoskeleton-rich, dynamic structures, such as filopodia and lamellipodia. However, the role of human platelet FcγRIIA in cytoskeleton-dependent interaction with opsonized bacteria is not well understood. To decipher this, we used a reductionist approach with well-defined micropatterns functionalized with immunoglobulins mimicking immune complexes at planar interfaces and bacteriamimetic microbeads. By specifically blocking of FcγRIIA and selective disruption of the platelet cytoskeleton, we show that both functional FcγRIIA and cytoskeleton are necessary for human platelet adhesion and haptotaxis. The direct link between FcγRIIA and the cytoskeleton is further explored by single-particle tracking. We then demonstrate the relevance of cytoskeleton-dependent differential mobilities of FcγRIIA on bacteria opsonized with the chemokine platelet factor 4 (PF4) and patient-derived anti-PF4/polyanion IgG. Our data suggest that efficient capture of opsonized bacteria during host-defense is governed by mobility dynamics of FcγRIIA on filopodia and lamellipodia, and the cytoskeleton plays an essential role in platelet morphodynamics at biological interfaces that display immune complexes.

Epidemiology of VITT

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a life-threatening syndrome of aggressive thrombosis, often profound thrombocytopenia, and frequently overt disseminated intravascular coagulation. It has been associated with 2 adenovirus vector COVID-19 vaccines: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) and Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen). Unlike the myriad of other conditions that cause thrombosis and thrombocytopenia, VITT has an important distinguishing feature: affected individuals have platelet activating anti-PF4 antibodies that appear in a predictable time frame following vaccination. The reported incidence of VITT differs between jurisdictions; it is dependent on accurate ascertainment of cases and accurate estimates of the size of the vaccinated population. The incidence ranges from 1 case per 26,500 to 127,3000 first doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 administered. It is estimated at 1 case per 518,181 second doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 administered, and 1 case per 263,000 Ad26.COV2.S doses administered. There are no clear risk factors for VITT, including sex, age, or comorbidities. VITT is a rare event, but its considerable morbidity and mortality merit ongoing pharmacovigilance, and accurate case ascertainment.

Pathogenesis of vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT)

Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT; synonym, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, is associated with high-titer immunoglobulin G antibodies directed against platelet factor 4 (PF4). These antibodies activate platelets via platelet FcγIIa receptors, with platelet activation greatly enhanced by PF4. Here we summarize the current concepts in the pathogenesis of VITT. We first address parallels between heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and VITT, and provide recent findings on binding of PF4 to adenovirus particles and non-assembled adenovirus proteins in the 2 adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccines, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and Ad26.COV2.S. Further, we discuss the potential role of vaccine constituents such as glycosaminoglycans, EDTA, polysorbate 80, human cell-line proteins and nucleotides as potential binding partners of PF4. The immune response towards PF4 in VITT is likely triggered by a proinflammatory milieu. Human cell-line proteins, non-assembled virus proteins, and potentially EDTA may contribute to the proinflammatory state. The transient nature of the immune response towards PF4 in VITT makes it likely that-as in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia -marginal zone B cells are key for antibody production. Once high-titer anti-PF4 antibodies have been formed 5 to 20 days after vaccination, they activate platelets and granulocytes. Activated granulocytes undergo NETosis and the released DNA also forms complexes with PF4, which fuels the Fcγ receptor-dependent cell activation process, ultimately leading to massive thrombin generation. Finally, we summarize our initial observations indicating that VITT-like antibodies might also be present in rare patients with recurrent venous and arterial thrombotic complications, independent of vaccination.