Locoregional Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intraluminal brachytherapy using 125I seed strand combined with PTBD and Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for unresectable Bismuth-Corlette III and IV stage hilar cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 125I seed strand combined with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for unresectable Bismuth-Corlette III and IV stage hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA).

METHODS

From January 2018 to December 2021, a total of 128 Bismuth-Corlette III and IV stage HCCA patients with obstructive jaundice were included in this single-center retrospective study. Forty-eight patients underwent 125I seed strand combined with PTBD and HAIC (group A). The mean intended dose (r = 10 mm; z = 0; 240 days) in group A was 63.8 ± 0.6 Gy. Eighty cases underwent PTBD plus HAIC (group B). Median overall survival (OS) and median bile duct patency time (BDPT) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In the propensity-score matched (PSM) cohort, the median OS and median BDPT were significantly longer in group A than in group B (44 PSM pairs; OS, 13.6 ± 0.4 vs. 8.7 ± 1.4 months, p < 0.001; BDPT, 12.1 ± 0.5 vs. 6.4 ± 0.7 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the treatment regimen was an independent prognostic factor of OS. There were no serious complications related to 125I seed strand implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

125I seed strand combined with PTBD and HAIC for unresectable Bismuth-Corlette III and IV stage HCCA is safe and effective.

Conversion treatment for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Opportunities and challenges

The prevalence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is increasing globally. Despite advancements in comprehending this intricate malignancy and formulating novel therapeutic approaches over the past few decades, the prognosis for ICC remains poor. Owing to the high degree of malignancy and insidious onset of ICC, numerous cases are detected at intermediate or advanced stages of the disease, hence eliminating the chance for surgical intervention. Moreover, because of the highly invasive characteristics of ICC, recurrence and metastasis postresection are prevalent, leading to a 5-year survival rate of only 20%-35% following surgery. In the past decade, different methods of treatment have been investigated, including transarterial chemoembolization, transarterial radioembolization, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and combination therapies. For certain patients with advanced ICC, conversion treatment may be utilized to facilitate surgical resection and manage disease progression. This review summarizes the definition of downstaging conversion treatment and presents the clinical experience and evidence concerning conversion treatment for advanced ICC.

Efficacy and safety of arterial FOLFOX chemotherapy plus anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy as a first-line treatment for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

Given the limited efficacy of current first-line therapies, there is an urgent need to develop novel treatment strategies to improve the prognosis of patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimens (HAIC-FO) plus anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 immunotherapy [αPD-(L)1] antibody [HAIC+αPD-(L)1] compared to systemic chemotherapy (SYS) plus αPD-(L)1 antibody [SYS+αPD-(L)1] as a first-line treatment for patients with uICC.

Methods

In this retrospective study, treatment-naive uICC patients who were treated with HAIC+αPD-(L)1 or SYS+αPD-(L)1 were included. The clinical characteristics, therapeutic outcomes, and adverse events (AEs) of the patients in the two groups were compared. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize biases between groups.

Results

From January 2019 to January 2023, a total of 182 patients were enrolled; 147 patients were included in the HAIC+αPD-(L)1 group and 35 patients were included in the SYS+αPD-(L)1 group. After PSM, 61 and 26 patients were included in the HAIC+αPD-(L)1 and SYS+αPD-(L)1 groups, respectively. The HAIC+αPD-(L)1 group had longer median overall survival (mOS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median intrahepatic PFS (mIPFS) than did the SYS+αPD-(L)1 group (mOS: 14.5 vs. 10.5 months, P=0.02; mPFS: 10.4 vs. 6.4 months, P=0.02; mIPFS: 11.4 vs. 6.5 months, P<0.001). The overall incidence of AEs was comparable between the two groups, but the HAIC+αPD-(L)1 group had a lower incidence of grade 3-4 AEs related to anemia, leukopenia, weight loss, and fatigue.

Conclusions

HAIC+αPD-(L)1 had acceptable toxic effects and might improve outcomes compared to SYS+αPD-(L)1 as a first-line treatment for patients with uICC.

Effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization combined with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and lenvatinib in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (uICC).

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study screened patients with uICC who underwent TACE in combination with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib between January 2019 and June 2023. Tislelizumab or camrelizumab (200 mg) was intravenously administered every three weeks. The daily dose of lenvatinib was 8 mg for patients weighing < 60 kg and 12 mg for those weighing ≥ 60 kg. In cases of disease progression, the therapeutic strategy was adjusted based on the clinical condition and individual patient's treatment preferences. Options included transitioning to standard or supportive care or continuing treatment with TACE in combination with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients with uICC were included. Over a median follow-up period of 32.3 months, the median OS and PFS were 25.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.9-33.7) and 9.5 months (95% CI: 7.9-11.0), respectively. The ORR was 55.9%, and the DCR was 96.6%. Grade 3 or four AEs were observed in 15 of 59 patients (25.4%).

CONCLUSION

TACE combined with PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib demonstrated a promising therapeutic potential with a manageable safety profile for patients with uICC.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The combination of TACE, PD-1 inhibitors, and lenvatinib represents a novel therapeutic option for patients with uICC.

KEY POINTS

TACE plus PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib represent a promising therapeutic strategy for uICC. The safety profile of TACE plus PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib was manageable. This study demonstrated improved outcomes compared to prior standard-of-care treatments.

The Efficacy and Safety of Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy Combined with Lenvatinib and Programmed Death (PD)-1 Inhibitors for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Retrospective Study

Objectives: Although systemic chemotherapy (SC) is the mainstay for treating unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), its efficacy is limited and it causes severe systemic side effects. This study focuses on evaluating the effectiveness and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in combination with lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (HLP), compared to SC in combination with lenvatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors (SCLP) for unresectable ICC. Methods: We analyzed patients initially diagnosed with unresectable ICC at our center between March 2021 and December 2023, classifying them into HLP and SCLP groups according to treatment regimen. This study assessed and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and safety outcomes across the two treatment groups. Results: This study enrolled 53 subjects in total; 25 were treated with HLP and 28 with SCLP. The two groups showed well-matched baseline characteristics. The HLP group reported an extended median OS (12.8 vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.310) and a prolonged median PFS (8.8 vs. 6.4 months, p = 0.043), compared to the SCLP group. The HLP group had a better objective response rate (ORR) (52% vs. 25%, p = 0.043) and disease control rate (DCR) (96% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.104). Based on OS (p = 0.019) and PFS (p = 0.032) results, those without extrahepatic metastasis seemed to benefit more significantly from the HLP regimen than from the SCLP regimen. The HLP group experienced fewer grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) than the SCLP group. Conclusions: The HLP regimen for unresectable ICC is an effective and safe strategy and is potentially better suited for patients without extrahepatic metastases.

Precision oncology: The role of minimally-invasive ablation therapy in the management of solid organ tumors

Solid organ tumors present a significant healthcare challenge, both economically and logistically, due to their high incidence and treatment complexity. In 2023, out of the 1.9 million new cancer cases in the United States, over 73% were solid organ tumors. Ablative therapies offer minimally invasive solutions for malignant tissue destruction in situ, often with reduced cost and morbidity compared to surgical resection. This review examines the current Food and Drug Administration-approved locoregional ablative therapies (radiofrequency, microwave, cryogenic, high-intensity focused ultrasound, histotripsy) and their evolving role in cancer care. Data were collected through a comprehensive survey of the PubMed-indexed literature on tumor ablation techniques, their clinical indications, and outcomes. Over time, emerging clinical data will help establish these therapies as the standard of care in solid organ tumor treatment, supported by improved long-term outcomes and progression-free survival.

Ginsenoside, a potential natural product against liver diseases: a comprehensive review from molecular mechanisms to application

Liver disease constitutes a significant cause of global mortality, with its pathogenesis being multifaceted. Identifying effective pharmacological and preventive strategies is imperative for liver protection. Ginsenosides, the major bioactive compounds found in ginseng, exhibit multiple pharmacological activities including protection against liver-related diseases by mitigating liver fat accumulation and inflammation, preventing hepatic fibrosis, and exerting anti-hepatocarcinogenic effects. However, a comprehensive overview elucidating the regulatory pathways associated with ginsenosides in liver disease remains elusive. This review aims to consolidate the molecular mechanisms through which different ginsenosides ameliorate distinct liver diseases, alongside the pathogenic factors underlying liver ailments. Notably, ginsenosides Rb1 and Rg1 demonstrate significantly effective in treating fatty liver, hepatitis, and liver fibrosis, and ginsenosides CK and Rh2 exhibit potent anti-hepatocellular carcinogenic effects. Their molecular mechanisms underlying these effects primarily involve the modulation of AMPK, NF-κB, TGF-β, NFR2, JNK, and other pathways, thereby attenuating hepatic fat accumulation, inflammation, inhibition of hepatic stellate cell activation, and promoting apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Furthermore, it provides insights into the safety profile and current applications of ginsenosides, thereby facilitating their clinical development. Consequently, ginsenosides present promising prospects for liver disease management, underscoring their potential as valuable therapeutic agents in this context.

Efficacy of microwave ablation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Data on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after microwave ablation (MWA) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are scarce. We conducted a systematic review of the safety and efficacy of MWA for ICC.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies reporting the outcomes of MWA for ICC. Meta-analyses of the pooled OS, PFS, technical success, technical efficacy, and complication rates were conducted. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) of common variables were calculated to identify the factors associated with OS.

Results

The analysis encompassed 168 entries, among which 8 observational studies comprising 
423 patients were deemed eligible. The pooled results were as follows: The median OS was 22.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 15.1-28.9], with the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates being 83.7% (95% CI: 
75.8-91.6%), 51.0% (95% CI: 41.1-60.9%), and 33.3% (95% CI: 14.1-52.4%), respectively. The median PFS was 12.5 months (95% CI: 8.3-16.7), and the 1-year PFS rate was 61.2% (95% CI: 36.5-85.9%). The technical success, technical efficacy, and major complication rates were 100% (95% CI: 99.5-100%), 99% (95% CI: 92.1-100%), and 2.8% (95% CI: 1.1-5.2%), respectively. A cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) level >37 U/mL was associated with a shorter OS (HR =1.4; 95% CI: 1.2-1.7; P=0.001).

Conclusions

MWA is a safe and effective alternative to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatments, especially for patients with a CA 19-9 level ≤37 U/mL, and potentially has advantages over RFA. However, further studies are required to validate these findings.

Percutaneous liver-directed therapies of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma is a hepatobiliary malignancy which can manifest anywhere along the biliary tree. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma occurs in the liver within or beyond the second order bile ducts. The prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is poor, even when successfully resected there is a very high rate of local recurrence. The available systemic therapies are currently limited and have high rates of toxicity. Percutaneous and transarterial liver-directed therapies can be used to treat intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with results comparable to current standard of care systemic therapies in some circumstances. This manuscript will review these the techniques and efficacy of percutaneous and transarterial liver-directed therapies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

A case report: deep and durable response to low-dose lenvatinib and tislelizumab in an elderly patient with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Background

Older patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma lack systemic therapy standards. These people have a high risk of chemotherapy, accompanied by adverse reactions and even discontinuation of treatment.

Case presentation

We report a 78-year-old female subject with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma presenting with unresectable lesions involving the hepatic veins, along with extensive metastatic lymph nodes. After the geriatric assessment, capecitabine was utilized for only one cycle owing to adverse events (AEs). Next, a combination of low-dose lenvatinib and tislelizumab was administrated as a second-line treatment, which resulted in remarkable early tumor shrinkage. The following individual lenvatinib taper enabled a manageable safety profile and durable deep response. A near-complete response was achieved, with the primary tumor significantly reducing from 5.6 cm × 4.7 cm to nearly complete disappearance, accompanied by complete regression of lymph nodes, and both progression-free survival and overall survival exceeding 24 months.

Conclusion

The case provides valuable insights that could influence future treatment strategies for older patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma who are unsuitable for chemotherapy. The dose-individualized chemotherapy-free regime of lenvatinib and tislelizumab might be used in similar cases to improve their outcomes.

Applications of image-guided locoregional transarterial chemotherapy in patients with inoperable colorectal cancer: a review

With the development of comprehensive treatment, locoregional transarterial chemotherapy has become an alternative conversion therapy, palliative therapy, and neoadjuvant therapy for many solid malignant tumors. Locoregional transarterial chemotherapy, which is most frequently used for treating liver cancer, has the characteristics of high regional efficacy and few systemic adverse reactions. In recent years, the number of relevant reports of locoregional chemotherapy for treating initially inoperable colorectal cancer (CRC), including non-metastatic and metastatic CRC, has gradually increased. However, the specific treatment options for such locoregional therapy are not the same, and its indications, medication regimens and combined treatments have not reached any consensus. In this review, the application status of locoregional transarterial chemotherapy in primary and metastatic CRC patients has been reviewed and summarized to provide a reference for future clinical work and scientific research.

Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with biliary tract cancer

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC), published in late 2022 were adapted in December 2023, according to established standard methodology, to produce the Pan-Asian adapted (PAGA) ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of Asian patients with BTC. The adapted guidelines presented in this manuscript represent the consensus opinions reached by a panel of Asian experts in the treatment of patients with BTC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Indonesia (ISHMO), India (ISMPO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), the Philippines (PSMO), Singapore (SSO), Taiwan (TOS) and Thailand (TSCO), co-ordinated by ESMO and the Taiwan Oncology Society (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices, drug access restrictions and reimbursement decisions in the different regions of Asia. Drug access and reimbursement in the different regions of Asia are discussed separately in the manuscript. The aim is to provide guidance for the optimisation and harmonisation of the management of patients with BTC across the different countries and regions of Asia, drawing on the evidence provided by both Western and Asian trials, whilst respecting the differences in screening practices and molecular profiling, as well as age and stage at presentation. Attention is drawn to the disparity in the drug approvals and reimbursement strategies, between the different countries.

Advances in Image-Guided Ablation Therapies for Solid Tumors

Image-guided solid tumor ablation methods have significantly advanced in their capability to target primary and metastatic tumors. These techniques involve noninvasive or percutaneous insertion of applicators to induce thermal, electrochemical, or mechanical stress on malignant tissue to cause tissue destruction and apoptosis of the tumor margins. Ablation offers substantially lower risks compared to traditional methods. Benefits include shorter recovery periods, reduced bleeding, and greater preservation of organ parenchyma compared to surgical intervention. Due to the reduced morbidity and mortality, image-guided tumor ablation offers new opportunities for treatment in cancer patients who are not candidates for resection. Currently, image-guided ablation techniques are utilized for treating primary and metastatic tumors in various organs with both curative and palliative intent, including the liver, pancreas, kidneys, thyroid, parathyroid, prostate, lung, breast, bone, and soft tissue. The invention of new equipment and techniques is expanding the criteria of eligible patients for therapy, as now larger and more high-risk tumors near critical structures can be ablated. This article provides an overview of the different imaging modalities, noninvasive, and percutaneous ablation techniques available and discusses their applications and associated complications across various organs.

The Recent Trends of Systemic Treatments and Locoregional Therapies for Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a hepatic malignancy that has a rapidly increasing incidence. CCA is anatomically classified into intrahepatic (iCCA) and extrahepatic (eCCA), which is further divided into perihilar (pCCA) and distal (dCCA) subtypes, with higher incidence rates in Asia. Despite its rarity, CCA has a low 5-year survival rate and remains the leading cause of primary liver tumor-related death over the past 10-20 years. The systemic therapy section discusses gemcitabine-based regimens as primary treatments, along with oxaliplatin-based options. Second-line therapy is limited but may include short-term infusional fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) and oxaliplatin. The adjuvant therapy section discusses approaches to improve overall survival (OS) post-surgery. However, only a minority of CCA patients qualify for surgical resection. In comparison to adjuvant therapies, neoadjuvant therapy for unresectable cases shows promise. Gemcitabine and cisplatin indicate potential benefits for patients awaiting liver transplantation. The addition of immunotherapies to chemotherapy in combination is discussed. Nivolumab and innovative approaches like CAR-T cells, TRBAs, and oncolytic viruses are explored. We aim in this review to provide a comprehensive report on the systemic and locoregional therapies for CCA.

Unresectable biliary tract cancer: Current and future systemic therapy

For decades, treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) was confined to the use of chemotherapy. In recent years however, the number of therapeutic options available for patients with unresectable BTC have drastically increased, with immunotherapy and targeted treatment gradually joining the ranks of guideline-recommended treatment regimens. The aim of the present review is to summarise the current knowledge on unresectable BTC focusing on epidemiology, anatomical distribution and current strategies for systemic treatment. We further outline ongoing clinical trials and provide an outlook on future therapeutic interventions. In the realm of gastrointestinal malignancies, the increasing number of systemic treatment options for BTC is finally delivering on the longstanding commitment to personalised oncology. This emphasises the need for considering a comprehensive genomic-based pathology assessment right from the initial diagnosis to fully leverage the expanding array of therapeutic options that have recently become accessible.

Systemic chemotherapy plus transarterial chemoembolization versus systemic chemotherapy alone for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Systemic chemotherapy (SYS) is the first-line treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, the survival benefit of SYS is still limited. This study compared the efficacy and safety of patients with unresectable ICC treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus SYS to SYS alone.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥ 18 years old with pathologically diagnosed ICC. Patients with unmeasurable lesions, not receiving SYS treatment, Child-Pugh grade C, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 3 or higher, prior liver resection, incomplete medical information, or discontinuation of the first SYS treatment were excluded. Data collection was mainly from the hospital system, and the survival outcome of patients was obtained through follow-up. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio using the nearest neighbor matching algorithm was performed to reduce selection bias between the TACE plus SYS and SYS alone groups. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors associated with OS and to estimate their hazard ratios. Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria were utilized to evaluate the response of tumors to therapy.

RESULTS

Between June 2016 and February 2023, 118 unresectable ICC patients from three hospitals were included in this study. Of them, 37 were in the TACE plus SYS group and 81 were in the SYS alone group. The median OS in the combination group was 11.3 months, longer than the 6.4 months in the SYS alone group (P = 0.011). A greater objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were observed in the combination group than in the SYS alone group (ORR, 48.65 vs. 6.17%, P < 0.001; DCR, 89.19 vs. 62.96%, P = 0.004). There were 16 patients in each group after matching, and the matched results remained consistent regarding OS and tumor response. Adverse events (AEs) were similar in the two groups after matching.

CONCLUSION

Compared to SYS alone, the combination treatment of TACE plus SYS was more effective than SYS alone in improving OS, ORR, and DCR without any significant increase in AEs. TACE plus SYS may be a viable treatment option for patients with unresectable ICC.

Liver transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: who, when and how

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Using transplant oncology principles, selected patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) may achieve long-term survival after liver transplantation. Strategies for identifying and managing these patients are discussed in this review.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unlike initial reports, several modern series have reported positive outcomes after liver transplantation for iCCA. The main challenges are in identifying the appropriate candidates and graft scarcity. Tumor burden and response to neoadjuvant therapies have been successfully used to identify favorable biology in unresectable cases. New molecular biomarkers will probably predict this response in the future. Also, new technologies and better strategies have been used to increase graft availability for these patients without affecting the liver waitlist.

SUMMARY

Liver transplantation for the management of patients with unresectable iCCA is currently a reality under strict research protocols. Who is a candidate for transplantation, when to use neoadjuvant and locoregional therapies, and how to increase graft availability are the main topics of this review.

The Impact of Radiofrequency Ablation on Survival Outcomes and Stent Patency in Patients with Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Endoluminal biliary radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proposed as a palliative treatment for patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in order to improve stent patency and survival. However, the existing data on patients with inoperable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (eCCA) are conflicting. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing RFA plus stenting versus stenting alone in patients with inoperable eCCA. We searched for trials published in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases up to November 2023. Data extraction was conducted from published studies, and a quality assessment was carried out in accordance with the guidelines recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI were estimated from the trials. The primary endpoints of interest were overall survival and stent patency. Out of 275 results, 5 randomized trials and 370 patients were included. While overall survival was not different between the groups (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.36-1.07; p = 0.09; I2 = 80%;), the subgroup analysis of studies employing plastic stents showed a trend toward better survival in the RFA-treated group (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.22-0.80; p = 0.009; I2 = 72%). Stent patency was improved in patients receiving RFA (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.90; p = 0.01; I2 = 23%). Adverse events were not different between the groups (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.69-2.12; p = 0.50; I2 = 0%). Despite the promising results, high heterogeneity and potential biases in the included studies suggest the need for further high-quality randomized trials to explore the potential cumulative effects of RFA on CCA treatment outcomes.

Locoregional Therapies for Hepatobiliary Tumors: Contemporary Strategies and Novel Applications

A large majority of primary hepatobiliary tumors are hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC), with the remainer being cholangiocarcinoma. While surgical resection remains the gold standard treatment for hepatobiliary tumors, relatively few patients are operative candidates, and systemic treatments have limited effectiveness. Locoregional therapies offer significant promise in the management of HCC. Ablation and radioembolization may offer similar outcomes to surgery for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma while radioembolization and chemoembolization are valuable in the management of advanced disease. There is significantly less evidence for the role of locoregional therapy in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, although it appears to be well tolerated.

Locoregional Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: The Role of Intra-Arterial Therapies

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a rare disease with a rising incidence. While surgical resection is the only curative option, the disease process is often identified in advanced stages, as this malignancy often remains clinically silent in early development. Only one-third of patients are eligible for resection at the time of diagnosis. For patients who cannot undergo resection, intra-arterial therapies are reasonable palliative treatment options; in rare occasions, these may be bridging therapies, as well. The premise of bland embolization and most chemoembolization intra-arterial therapies is that the arterial supply of the tumor is occluded to induce tumor necrosis, while radioembolization utilizes the arterial flow of the tumor to deliver radiation therapy. In this review, we discuss the use of transarterial embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and selective internal radiation therapy for the treatment of ICC. Phase III randomized controlled clinical trials are difficult to tailor to this extremely rare and aggressive disease, but ultimately, further investigation should be pursued to define the patient population that will derive the greatest benefit from each modality.

Recent Advances in Image-Guided Locoregional Therapies for Primary Liver Tumors

Primary liver cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. with incidences predicted to rise over the next several decades. Locoregional therapies, such as radiofrequency or microwave ablation, are described as image-guided percutaneous procedures, which offer either a curative intent for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma or bridging/downstaging for surgical resection or transplantation. Catheter-driven locoregional therapies, such as transarterial chemoembolization and radioembolization, induce tumor hypoxia, can be palliative, and improve survival for early-to-intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma and unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of the antineoplastic mechanisms underpinning locoregional therapies, different treatment approaches, and the current state of the literature for the efficacy of locoregional therapies for primary liver cancer. We also discuss emerging advancements, such as the adjuvant use of immunotherapies and molecular targeting agents with locoregional therapy, for the treatment of primary liver cancer.