1
|
Iskander O. An outline of the management and prevention of postoperative ileus: A review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e38177. [PMID: 38875379 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000038177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Postoperative ileus (POI) is a prevalent surgical complication, which results in prolonged hospitalization, patient distress, and substantial economic burden. The literature aims to present a brief outline of interventions for preventing and treating POI post-surgery. Data from 2014 to 2023 were gathered from reputable sources like PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, Research Gate, and Science Direct. Inclusion criteria focused on studies exploring innovative treatments and prevention strategies for POI, using keywords such as novel POI treatments, non-pharmacological prevention, POI incidence rates, POI management, and risk factors. The findings revealed that integration of preventive measures such as coffee consumption, chewing gum, probiotics, and use of dikenchuto within enhanced recovery programs has significantly reduced both the frequency and duration of POI, without any adverse effects, with minimally invasive surgical approaches showing promise as an additional preventive strategy. While treatment options such as alvimopan, NSAIDs, and acupuncture have demonstrated efficacy, the use of lidocaine has raised concerns due to associated adverse effects. The ongoing exploration of novel therapeutic strategies such as targeting the mast cells, vagal nerve stimulation and tight junction protein, and prokinetic-mediated instigation of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory trail not only holds promise for enhanced treatment but also deepens the understanding of intricate cellular and molecular pathways underlying POI. POI presents a complex challenge in various surgical specialties, necessitating a multifaceted management approach. The integration of preventive and treatment measures within enhanced recovery programs has significantly reduced POI frequency and duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Othman Iskander
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aljohani A, Rashwan N, Vasani S, Alkhawashki A, Wu TT, Lu X, Castillo DA, Xiao J. The Health Benefits of Probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2024:10.1007/s12602-024-10287-3. [PMID: 38816672 DOI: 10.1007/s12602-024-10287-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
To ensure effective administration of probiotics in clinical practice, it is crucial to comprehend the specific strains and their association with human health. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the scientific evidence on the impact of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum probiotic consumption on human health. Out of 11,831 records, 135 studies were assessed qualitatively, and 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. This systematic review demonstrated that probiotic supplementation with L. plantarum, either alone or in combination, can significantly improve outcomes for patients with specific medical conditions. Meta-analysis revealed notable benefits in periodontal health, evidenced by reduced pocket depth and bleeding on probing (p < 0.001); in gastroenterological health, marked by significant reductions in abdominal pain (p < 0.001); and in infectious disease, through a reduction in C-reactive protein levels (p < 0.001). Cardiovascular benefits included lowered total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the L. plantarum intervention group (p < 0.05). Our study's clinical significance highlights the importance of considering probiotic strain and their application to specific diseases when planning future studies and clinical interventions, emphasizing the need for further research in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amal Aljohani
- Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Noha Rashwan
- Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Shruti Vasani
- Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Ahmed Alkhawashki
- Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
- Pediatrics, King Fahd Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tong Tong Wu
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
| | - Xingyi Lu
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA
| | - Daniel A Castillo
- Miner Library, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Jin Xiao
- Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cui Y, Zhang C, Zhang H, Zhang X, Tang Y, Wu Z, Wang T, Chen Q, Meng Y, Wang B, Liu M, Yi J, Shi Y, Li R, Pan H. Effect evaluation of different preventive measures for ileus after abdominal operation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Heliyon 2024; 10:e25412. [PMID: 38370213 PMCID: PMC10867618 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Different approaches to the prevention of postoperative ileus have been evaluated in numerous randomized controlled trials. This network meta-analysis aimed to investigate the relative effectiveness of different interventions in preventing postoperative ileus. Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTS) on the prevention of postoperative ileus were screened from Chinese and foreign medical databases and compared. STATA software was used for network meta-analysis using the frequency method. Random-effects network meta-analysis was also used to compare all schemes directly and indirectly. Results A total of 105 randomized controlled trials with 18,840 participants were included in this report. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that intravenous analgesia was most effective in preventing the incidence of postoperative ileus, the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) is 90.5. The most effective intervention for reducing the first postoperative exhaust time was postoperative abdominal mechanical massage (SUCRA: 97.3), and the most effective intervention for reducing the first postoperative defecation time was high-dose opioid antagonists (SUCRA: 84.3). Additionally, the most effective intervention for reducing the time to initiate a normal diet after surgery was accelerated rehabilitation (SUCRA: 85.4). A comprehensive analysis demonstrated the effectiveness and prominence of oral opioid antagonists and electroacupuncture (EA) combined with gum. Conclusion This network meta-analysis determined that oral opioid antagonists and EA combined with chewing gum are the most effective treatments and optimal interventions for reducing the incidence of postoperative ileus. However, methods such as abdominal mechanical massage and coffee require further high-quality research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Cui
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
- Key Laboratory of Gansu Provincial Prescription Mining and Innovative Translational Laboratory, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Chengzu Zhang
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Xuan Zhang
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Yuan Tang
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Zhihang Wu
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Tianming Wang
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Quanxin Chen
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Ying Meng
- Department of Pharmacy, Expo High-tech Hospital, Zibo, Shandong, China
| | - Bo Wang
- School of Nursing, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Mei Liu
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
- Gansu Provincial Traditional Chinese Medicine New Product Creation Engineering Laboratory, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Jianfeng Yi
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Yuhong Shi
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Richeng Li
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Haibang Pan
- First School of Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Buscail E, Planchamp T, Le Cosquer G, Bouchet M, Thevenin J, Carrere N, Muscari F, Abbo O, Maulat C, Weyl A, Duffas JP, Philis A, Ghouti L, Canivet C, Motta JP, Vergnolle N, Deraison C, Shourick J. Postoperative ileus after digestive surgery: Network meta-analysis of pharmacological intervention. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2024; 90:107-126. [PMID: 37559444 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Several medicinal treatments for avoiding postoperative ileus (POI) after abdominal surgery have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This network meta-analysis aimed to explore the relative effectiveness of these different treatments on ileus outcome measures. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed to identify RCTs comparing treatments for POI following abdominal surgery. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. Direct and indirect comparisons of all regimens were simultaneously compared using random-effects network meta-analysis. RESULTS A total of 38 RCTs were included in this network meta-analysis reporting on 6371 patients. Our network meta-analysis shows that prokinetics significantly reduce the duration of first gas (mean difference [MD] = 16 h; credible interval -30, -3.1; surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] 0.418), duration of first bowel movements (MD = 25 h; credible interval -39, -11; SUCRA 0.25) and duration of postoperative hospitalization (MD -1.9 h; credible interval -3.8, -0.040; SUCRA 0.34). Opioid antagonists are the only treatment that significantly improve the duration of food recovery (MD -19 h; credible interval -26, -14; SUCRA 0.163). CONCLUSION Based on our meta-analysis, the 2 most consistent pharmacological treatments able to effectively reduce POI after abdominal surgery are prokinetics and opioid antagonists. The absence of clear superiority of 1 treatment over another highlights the limits of the pharmacological principles available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne Buscail
- Digestive Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
- INSERM, U1220, University of Toulouse, Digestive Health Research Institute (IRSD), Toulouse, France
| | - Thibault Planchamp
- INSERM, U1220, University of Toulouse, Digestive Health Research Institute (IRSD), Toulouse, France
- Paediatric Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Guillaume Le Cosquer
- INSERM, U1220, University of Toulouse, Digestive Health Research Institute (IRSD), Toulouse, France
- Gastroenterology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Manon Bouchet
- Digestive Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Julie Thevenin
- INSERM, U1220, University of Toulouse, Digestive Health Research Institute (IRSD), Toulouse, France
| | - Nicolas Carrere
- Digestive Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Fabrice Muscari
- Digestive Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Olivier Abbo
- Paediatric Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Charlotte Maulat
- Digestive Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Ariane Weyl
- Gynaecological Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean Pierre Duffas
- Digestive Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Antoine Philis
- Digestive Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Laurent Ghouti
- Digestive Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Cindy Canivet
- Digestive Surgery Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
- Gastroenterology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean Paul Motta
- INSERM, U1220, University of Toulouse, Digestive Health Research Institute (IRSD), Toulouse, France
| | - Nathalie Vergnolle
- INSERM, U1220, University of Toulouse, Digestive Health Research Institute (IRSD), Toulouse, France
| | - Celine Deraison
- INSERM, U1220, University of Toulouse, Digestive Health Research Institute (IRSD), Toulouse, France
| | - Jason Shourick
- Epidemiology and Public Health Department, UMR 1027 INSERM, Toulouse University Hospital, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lloyd AJ, Hardy NP, Jordan P, Ryan EJ, Whelan M, Clancy C, O'Riordan J, Kavanagh DO, Neary P, Sahebally SM. Efferent limb stimulation prior to loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2023; 28:15. [PMID: 38095756 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02875-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative ileus (POI) remains a common phenomenon following loop ileostomy closure. Our aim was to determine whether preoperative physiological stimulation (PPS) of the efferent limb reduced POI incidence. METHODS A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis searching PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases was performed. The last search was carried out on 30 January 2023. All randomized studies comparing PPS versus no stimulation were included. The primary endpoint was POI incidence. Secondary endpoints included the time to first passage of flatus/stool, time to resume oral diet, need for nasogastric tube (NGT) placement postoperatively, length of stay (LOS) and other complications. Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. Trial sequential analyses (TSA) were also performed. RESULTS Three randomized studies capturing 235 patients (116 PPS, 119 no stimulation) were included. On random effects analysis, PPS was associated with a quicker time to resume oral diet (MD - 1.47 days, 95% CI - 2.75 to - 0.19, p = 0.02), shorter LOS (MD - 1.47 days, 95% CI - 2.47 to - 0.46, p = 0.004) (MD - 1.41 days, 95% CI - 2.32 to - 0.50, p = 0.002, I2 = 56%) and fewer other complications (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.01, p = 0.05). However, there was no difference in POI incidence (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.21, p = 0.10), the requirement for NGT placement (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.20, p = 0.12) or time to first passage of flatus/stool (MD - 0.60 days, 95% CI - 1.95 to 0.76, p = 0.39). TSA revealed imprecise estimates for all outcomes (except LOS) and further studies are warranted to meet the required information threshold. CONCLUSIONS PPS prior to stoma closure may reduce LOS and postoperative complications albeit without a demonstrable beneficial effect on POI. Further high-powered studies are required to confirm or refute these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Lloyd
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin , Ireland.
| | - N P Hardy
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - P Jordan
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - E J Ryan
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Whelan
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Clancy
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J O'Riordan
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D O Kavanagh
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgical Affairs, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - P Neary
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - S M Sahebally
- Department of Surgery, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martinelli S, Lamminpää I, Dübüş EN, Sarıkaya D, Niccolai E. Synergistic Strategies for Gastrointestinal Cancer Care: Unveiling the Benefits of Immunonutrition and Microbiota Modulation. Nutrients 2023; 15:4408. [PMID: 37892482 PMCID: PMC10610426 DOI: 10.3390/nu15204408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are a group of highly prevalent malignant tumors affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Globally, one in four cancer cases and one in three cancer deaths are estimated to be GI cancers. They can alter digestive and absorption functions, leading to severe malnutrition which may worsen the prognosis of the patients. Therefore, nutritional intervention and monitoring play a fundamental role in managing metabolic alterations and cancer symptoms, as well as minimizing side effects and increasing the effectiveness of chemotherapy. In this scenario, the use of immunonutrients that are able to modulate the immune system and the modification/regulation of the gut microbiota composition have gained attention as a possible strategy to improve the conditions of these patients. The complex interaction between nutrients and microbiota might contribute to maintaining the homeostasis of each individual's immune system; therefore, concurrent use of specific nutrients in combination with traditional cancer treatments may synergistically improve the overall care of GI cancer patients. This work aims to review and discuss the role of immunonutrition and microbiota modulation in improving nutritional status, postoperative recovery, and response to therapies in patients with GI cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Martinelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (S.M.); (I.L.)
| | - Ingrid Lamminpää
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (S.M.); (I.L.)
| | - Eda Nur Dübüş
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey; (E.N.D.); (D.S.)
| | - Dilara Sarıkaya
- Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, 06560 Ankara, Turkey; (E.N.D.); (D.S.)
| | - Elena Niccolai
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Firenze, Italy; (S.M.); (I.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sun Q, Shi Y, Liang X, Lu H, Huang Y, Zhu L, Wang W, Zhang W, Hu Z, Li X. Interaction between the intestinal flora and the severity of diversion colitis after low anterior resection of rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1001819. [PMID: 36998438 PMCID: PMC10043175 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1001819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundDiversion colitis (DC) is nonspecific inflammation of the distal intestinal mucosa following disruption of colonic continuity with colonic dysfunction. The colonscopic score is a good tool for differentiating the severity of patients with DC. At present, no studies have analyzed the pathogenesis of DC from the perspective of the diversity and and differences of intestinal flora.MethodsRetrospective study: Clinical information were collected from patients with low rectal cancer admitted to the Department of Anorectal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, from April 2017 to April 2019. These patients underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR) combined with terminal ileum enterostomy (dual-chamber). We used chi-square test to comparethe clinical baseline information, clinical symptoms, and colonscopic characteristics between different severity of DC. Propsective oberservational study: We recruited 40 patients with laparoscopic anterior low resection combined with terminal ileum enterostomy and they were further classified into mild group and severe group according to the scores of colonscopic examinations for DC. 16s-rDNA sequencing was carried out to analyze the diversity and and differences of intestinal flora in the intestinal lavage fluid of the two groups.ResultsIn retrospective study, we found that age, BMI, history of diabetes, and symptoms associated with the stoma state were the independent risk factors that affect DC severity (P<0.05). Meanwhile, age, BMI, history of diabetes and colonscopic score were found to be independent risk factors affecting the severity of diarrhea after ileostomy closure surgery(P<0.05), which was consistent with our results of differentiating the severity of DC under endoscopy; In propsective oberservational study, 40 patients with low rectal cancer recruited by sample size calculation, 23 were in the mild group and 17 in the severe group. The results of 16s-rDNA sequencing showed that intestinal flora with high enrichment values primarily consisted of Bifidobacteriales and Prevotella in mild group, whereas that in the severe group consisted of Providencia and Dorea. The functional predictions on such two types of intestinal flora were mainly focused on lipid synthesis, glycan synthesis, metabolism, and amino acid metabolism pathways.ConclusionAfter ileostomy closure surgery, a series of severe clinical symptoms might appear in DC patients. There are significant differences in local and systemic inflammatory responses, composition of intestinal flora between DC patients with different colonscopic scores, which provide a basis for the clinical interventional treatment for DC in patients with permanent stoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Sun
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China
- Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yunjie Shi
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaoben Liang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Children’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Lu
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Huang
- Department of General Surgery, No.903 Hospital of PLA Joint Logistic Support Forcel, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lin Zhu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China
| | - Wenqiang Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiqian Hu
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China
- Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Zhiqian Hu, ; Xinxing Li,
| | - Xinxing Li
- Department of General Surgery, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
- *Correspondence: Zhiqian Hu, ; Xinxing Li,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rectal stimulation with prebiotics and probiotics before ileostomy reversal: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24:31. [PMID: 36647079 PMCID: PMC9843864 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07065-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ileostomy closure is associated with a high rate of postoperative morbidity, and adynamic ileus is the most common complication, with an incidence of up to 32%. This complication is associated with delayed initiation of oral diet intake, abdominal distention, prolonged hospital stay, and more significant patient discomfort. The present study aims to evaluate the rectal stimulus with prebiotics and probiotics before ileostomy reversal. METHODS This is a protocol study for an open-label randomized controlled clinical trial. Ethical approval was received (CAAE: 56551722.6.0000.0071). The following criteria will be used for inclusion: adult patients with rectal cancer stages cT3/4Nx or cTxN+ that underwent loop protection ileostomy, patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic total mesorectal excision. Patients will be randomized to one of two groups. The intervention group (with rectal stimulus): the patients will apply 500 ml of saline solution with 6 g of Simbioflora® rectally, once a day, for 15 days before ileostomy closure. The control group (without rectal stimulation): the patients will close the ileostomy with no previous rectal stimulus. The primary outcomes will be the adynamic ileus (need for postoperative nasogastric tube insertion; nausea/vomiting; or intolerance to oral feedings within the first 72 h) and intestinal transit (time to first evacuation/flatus). RESULTS The patient's enrollment starts in January 2023. We expect to finish in July 2025. DISCUSSION The findings of this randomized clinical study may have important implications for managing patients undergoing ileostomy reversal. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is registered in the Brazilian Trial Registry (ReBEC) under RBR-366n64w. Registration date: 19/07/2022.
Collapse
|
9
|
Zheng Z, Hu Y, Tang J, Xu W, Zhu W, Zhang W. The implication of gut microbiota in recovery from gastrointestinal surgery. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023; 13:1110787. [PMID: 36926517 PMCID: PMC10011459 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1110787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Recovery from gastrointestinal (GI) surgery is often interrupted by the unpredictable occurrence of postoperative complications, including infections, anastomotic leak, GI dysmotility, malabsorption, cancer development, and cancer recurrence, in which the implication of gut microbiota is beginning to emerge. Gut microbiota can be imbalanced before surgery due to the underlying disease and its treatment. The immediate preparations for GI surgery, including fasting, mechanical bowel cleaning, and antibiotic intervention, disrupt gut microbiota. Surgical removal of GI segments also perturbs gut microbiota due to GI tract reconstruction and epithelial barrier destruction. In return, the altered gut microbiota contributes to the occurrence of postoperative complications. Therefore, understanding how to balance the gut microbiota during the perioperative period is important for surgeons. We aim to overview the current knowledge to investigate the role of gut microbiota in recovery from GI surgery, focusing on the crosstalk between gut microbiota and host in the pathogenesis of postoperative complications. A comprehensive understanding of the postoperative response of the GI tract to the altered gut microbiota provides valuable cues for surgeons to preserve the beneficial functions and suppress the adverse effects of gut microbiota, which will help to enhance recovery from GI surgery.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ocaña J, García-Pérez JC, Labalde-Martínez M, Rodríguez-Velasco G, Moreno I, Vivas A, Clemente-Esteban I, Ballestero A, Abadía P, Ferrero E, Fernández-Cebrián JM, Die J. Can physiological stimulation prior to ileostomy closure reduce postoperative ileus? A prospective multicenter pilot study. Tech Coloproctol 2022; 26:645-653. [PMID: 35596903 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02620-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the impact of ileostomy closure following preoperative physiological stimulation (PPS) on postoperative ileus (POI) in patients with loop ileostomy after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. METHODS Patients who underwent ileostomy closure between January 2017 and February 2020 in two tertiary referral centers were prospectively included. PPS stimulation was compared to standard treatment. Stimulation was carried out daily during the 15 days prior to ileostomy closure by the patient's self-instillation of 200 ml of fecal contents from the ileostomy bag via the efferent loop, using a rectal catheter. Standard treatment (ST) consisted of observation. Outcomes measures were POI, morbidity, stimulation feasibility, and predictors to ileus. RESULTS A total of 58 patients were included [42 males and 16 females, median age 67 (43-85) years]. PPS was used in 24 patients, who completed the entire stimulation process, and ST in 34 patients. No differences in preoperative factors were found between the two groups. POI was significantly lower in the PPS group (4.2%) vs the ST group (32.4%); p < 0.01, OR: 0.05 (CI 95% 0.01-0.65). The PPS group had a shorter time to restoration of bowel function (1 day vs 3 days) p = 0.02 and a shorter time to tolerance of liquids (1 day vs 2 days), p = 0.04. Age (p = 0.01), open approach at index surgery, p = 0.03, adjuvant capecitabine (p = 0.01). and previous abdominal surgeries (p = 0.02) were associated with POI in the multivariate analysis. C-reactive-protein values on the 3rd (p = 0.02) and 5th (p < 0.01) postoperative day were also associated with POI. CONCLUSIONS PPS for patients who underwent ileostomy closure after low anterior resection for rectal cancer is feasible and might reduce POI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ocaña
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
| | - J C García-Pérez
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Labalde-Martínez
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Rodríguez-Velasco
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Moreno
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Vivas
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - A Ballestero
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - P Abadía
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Ferrero
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - J M Fernández-Cebrián
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Die
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Ctra. Colmenar Viejo, Km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ma H, Li X, Yang H, Qiu Y, Xiao W. The Pathology and Physiology of Ileostomy. Front Nutr 2022; 9:842198. [PMID: 35529469 PMCID: PMC9072868 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.842198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
An ileostomy is a surgery that is commonly performed to protect low pelvic anastomoses or prevent high-risk anastomotic leakages. However, various postoperative complications remain of major concern. After an ileostomy, the distal intestinal segment is left open for an extended period and is in a non-functional state. Consequently, the intestinal mucosa, smooth muscle, and microbiota undergo significant changes that are closely related to postoperative recovery and complications. A systematic description of these changes is necessary to understand the relationship among them and take more effective measures for postoperative intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitao Ma
- Department of General Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiaolong Li
- Department of General Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Hua Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuan Qiu
- Department of General Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Weidong Xiao
- Department of General Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tang G, Huang W, Tao J, Wei Z. Prophylactic effects of probiotics or synbiotics on postoperative ileus after gastrointestinal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0264759. [PMID: 35231076 PMCID: PMC8887765 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative ileus is a major problem following gastrointestinal cancers surgery, several randomized controlled trials have been conducted investigating the use of probiotics or synbiotics to reduce postoperative ileus, but their findings are controversial. Objective We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effect of probiotics or synbiotics on early postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Methods The Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of probiotics or synbiotics on postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function as of April 27, 2021. Outcomes included the time to first flatus, time to first defecation, days to first solid diet, days to first fluid diet, length of postoperative hospital stay, incidence of abdominal distension and incidence of postoperative ileus. The results were reported as the mean difference (MD) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results A total of 21 RCTs, involving 1776 participants, were included. Compared with the control group, probiotic and synbiotic supplementation resulted in a shorter first flatus (MD, -0.53 days), first defecation (MD, -0.78 days), first solid diet (MD, -0.25 days), first fluid diet (MD, -0.29 days) and postoperative hospital stay (MD, -1.43 days). Furthermore, Probiotic and synbiotic supplementation reduced the incidence of abdominal distension (RR, 0.62) and incidence of postoperative ileus (RR, 0.47). Conclusion Perioperative supplementation of probiotics or synbiotics can effectively promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function after gastrointestinal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gang Tang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Wang Huang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jie Tao
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhengqiang Wei
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Deng J, Su M, Hu J, Lin D, Li J, Liu W, Zhang J, Zhong Q, Guo X. A nomogram to predict risk factors of frequent defecation early after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:1595. [PMID: 34790801 PMCID: PMC8576722 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-4660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Defecation disorders after ileostomy reversal are among the most common complications for rectal cancer patients, and significantly diminish their quality of life. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with frequent defecation early after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients. Methods We retrospectively collected the data of rectal cancer patients who underwent ileostomy reversal from January 2018 to December 2019 at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. We divided patients into two groups: a no frequent defecation group (≤7 times/day) and a frequent defecation group (>7 times/day). Results Of the 264 included patients, 59 patients (22.35%) had frequent defecation within 1 month after ileostomy closure and were defined as the frequent defecation group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of gender, age, hypertension, and diabetes. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that proctitis (P=0.04) and anastomotic stenosis (P=0.02) were independent risk factors for frequent defecation. Four factors, including proctitis, anastomotic stenosis, hypertension, and age were included to construct the nomogram. The consistency index of the nomogram was 0.949 and the area under the curve value was 0.623. Conclusions For rectal cancer patients, proctitis and anastomotic stenosis were correlated with frequent defecation within 1 month after ileostomy closure. Surgeons should pay attention to the rectal examination before ileostomy reversal surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxin Deng
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mingli Su
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiancong Hu
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dezheng Lin
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiawei Zhang
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qinghua Zhong
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xuefeng Guo
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rodríguez-Padilla Á, Morales-Martín G, Pérez-Quintero R, Rada-Morgades R, Gómez-Salgado J, Ruiz-Frutos C. Diversion Colitis and Probiotic Stimulation: Effects of Bowel Stimulation Prior to Ileostomy Closure. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:654573. [PMID: 34249962 PMCID: PMC8267790 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.654573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Diversion colitis is a non-specific inflammation of a defunctionalised segment of the colon after a temporary stoma has been performed. This inflammation is associated with a change in the colonic flora. Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative stimulation of the efferent loop with probiotics prior to closure of the protective ileostomy in patients operated on colorectal carcinoma and its effect on diversion colitis. A prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled study is carried out. Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for colorectal carcinoma with protective ileostomy pending reconstructive surgery and with diversion colitis as diagnosis are included. Randomised and divided into two groups. Histological and endoscopic changes were evaluated after stimulation, after restorative surgery and during the short-term follow-up after surgery. Results: Patients in CG were distributed according to the endoscopic index of severity in pre-stimulation/post-stimulation as follows: severe n = 9/9 (25.7%), moderate n = 23/23 (65.7%), and mild n = 3/3 (8.6%); compared to the distribution in SG, severe n = 9/0 (26.5/0%), moderate n = 23/3 (67.6/8.8%), mild n = 2/19 (5.9/55.9%) and normal colonoscopy in 0/12 patients (0/35.3%). Conclusion: Probiotic stimulation of the efferent loop is a safe and effective method, managing to reduce both macroscopic and microscopic colitis, as well as a decrease in symptoms in the short term after reconstructive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Germán Morales-Martín
- Department of General Surgery, Infanta Elena University Clinical Hospital, Huelva, Spain
| | - Rocío Pérez-Quintero
- Department of General Surgery, Juan Ramón Jiménez University Clinical Hospital, Huelva, Spain
| | - Ricardo Rada-Morgades
- Department of General Surgery, Juan Ramón Jiménez University Clinical Hospital, Huelva, Spain
| | - Juan Gómez-Salgado
- Department of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain
- Safety and Health Postgraduate Programme, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Guayaquil, Ecuador
| | - Carlos Ruiz-Frutos
- Department of Sociology, Social Work and Public Health, Faculty of Labour Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain
- Safety and Health Postgraduate Programme, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Guayaquil, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|