Development and Assessment of a Pooled Serum as Candidate Standard to Measure Influenza A Virus Group 1 Hemagglutinin Stalk-Reactive Antibodies

Recombinant parainfluenza virus 5 expressing clade 2.3.4.4b H5 hemagglutinin protein confers broad protection against H5Ny influenza viruses

The global circulation of clade 2.3.4.4b H5Ny highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) in poultry and wild birds, increasing mammal infections, continues to pose a public health threat and may even form a pandemic. An efficacious vaccine against H5Ny HPAIVs is crucial for emergency use and pandemic preparedness. In this study, we developed a parainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5)-based vaccine candidate expressing hemagglutinin (HA) protein of clade 2.3.4.4b H5 HPAIV, termed rPIV5-H5, and evaluated its safety and efficacy in mice and ferrets. Our results demonstrated that intranasal immunization with a single dose of rPIV5-H5 could stimulate H5-specific antibody responses, moreover, a prime-boost regimen using rPIV5-H5 stimulated robust humoral, cellular, and mucosal immune responses in mice. Challenge study showed that rPIV5-H5 prime-boost regimen provided sterile immunity against lethal clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 virus infection in mice and ferrets. Notably, rPIV5-H5 prime-boost regimen provided protection in mice against challenge with lethal doses of heterologous clades 2.2, 2.3.2, and 2.3.4 H5N1, and clade 2.3.4.4h H5N6 viruses. These results revealed that rPIV5-H5 can elicit protective immunity against a diverse clade of highly pathogenic H5Ny virus infection in mammals, highlighting the potential of rPIV5-H5 as a pan-H5 influenza vaccine candidate for emergency use.IMPORTANCEClade 2.3.4.4b H5Ny highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIVs) have been widely circulating in wild birds and domestic poultry all over the world, leading to infections in mammals, including humans. Here, we developed a recombinant PIV5-vectored vaccine candidate expressing the HA protein of clade 2.3.4.4b H5 virus. Intranasal immunization with rPIV5-H5 in mice induced airway mucosal IgA responses, high levels of antibodies, and robust T-cell responses. Importantly, rPIV5-H5 conferred complete protection in mice and ferrets against clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 virus challenge, the protective immunity was extended against heterologous H5Ny viruses. Taken together, our data demonstrate that rPIV5-H5 is a promising vaccine candidate against diverse H5Ny influenza viruses in mammals.

The antibody landscapes following AS03 and MF59 adjuvanted H5N1 vaccination

Current seasonal and pre-pandemic influenza vaccines induce short-lived predominantly strain-specific and limited heterosubtypic responses. To better understand how vaccine adjuvants AS03 and MF59 may provide improved antibody responses to vaccination, we interrogated serum from subjects who received 2 doses of inactivated monovalent influenza A/Indonesia/05/2005 vaccine with or without AS03 or MF59 using hemagglutinin (HA) microarrays (NCT01317758 and NCT01317745). The arrays were designed to reflect both full-length and globular head HA derived from 17 influenza A subtypes (H1 to H16 and H18) and influenza B strains. We observed significantly increased strain-specific and broad homo- and heterosubtypic antibody responses with both AS03 and MF59 adjuvanted vaccination with AS03 achieving a higher titer and breadth of IgG responses relative to MF59. The adjuvanted vaccine was also associated with the elicitation of stalk-directed antibody. We established good correlation of the array antibody responses to H5 antigens with standard HA inhibition and microneutralization titers.

Principles and practical applications of structure-based vaccine design

Viral proteins fold into a variety of structures as they perform their functions. Structure-based vaccine design aims to exploit knowledge of an antigen’s architecture to stabilize it in a vulnerable conformation. We summarize the general principles of structure-based vaccine design, with a focus on the major types of sequence modifications: proline, disulfide, cavity-filling, electrostatic and hydrogen-bond substitution, as well as domain deletion. We then review recent applications of these principles to vaccine-design efforts across five viral families: Coronaviridae, Orthomyxoviridae, Paramyxoviridae, Pneumoviridae, and Filoviridae. Outstanding challenges include continued application of proven design principles to pathogens of interest, as well as development of new strategies for those pathogens that resist traditional techniques.

Interlaboratory Reproducibility of Standardized Hemagglutination Inhibition Assays

The hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay is a prominent and commonly accepted method used to determine quantitative antibody titers for influenza virus. However, the reproducibility and consistency of this assay may be affected by several factors, including its reliance on biological reagents that are difficult to standardize, such as red blood cells. This report assesses HI assay performance across three accredited, global laboratories when using test virus and a human serum panel aliquoted and distributed from a centrally located reagent stock. The panel of human sera comprised samples with expected low, medium, and high HI titers against two influenza viruses: A/H1N1/California/07/2009 and B/Victoria/Brisbane/60/2008. HI analysis followed a consensus test protocol. Overall, the HI assay reproducibility within each laboratory was high for both influenza strains, with a within-assay run and intraday precision of 100%. Interlab reproducibility was assessed by comparing the geometric mean titer (GMT) of each sample at each laboratory to the consensus GMT of the sample. A/H1N1 had 100% interlab reproducibility, and none of the individual laboratory GMT values exceeded a 2-fold difference compared to the consensus GMT in any tested sample. B/Victoria had an overall reproducibility of 83%. The results demonstrate that with standardization of key reagents and the use of a common protocol by trained staff, the biologically based HI assay can provide similar results between geographically dispersed laboratories. IMPORTANCE Licensure of influenza vaccines relies on the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay as the primary method to determine quantitative functional antibody titers. The HI assay is also widely used for influenza virus surveillance, characterization, and epidemiology studies. However, the HI assay has a notable lack of reproducibility and consistency. If serology results are required from multiple concurrent studies supporting the development and regulatory approval of a product, the testing capacity of any given testing laboratory may be exceeded and data from more than one testing laboratory included in regulatory filings. Thus, understanding the reproducibility of HI assay results over time and between testing laboratories is necessary to support a robust clinical trial serology data set. Our results demonstrate that with standardization of key reagents and use of a common protocol by experienced and trained staff, the biologically based HI assay can provide similar results between geographically dispersed laboratories.

Antibody Responsiveness to Influenza: What Drives It?

The induction of a specific antibody response has long been accepted as a serological hallmark of recent infection or antigen exposure. Much of our understanding of the influenza antibody response has been derived from studying antibodies that target the hemagglutinin (HA) protein. However, growing evidence points to limitations associated with this approach. In this review, we aim to highlight the issue of antibody non-responsiveness after influenza virus infection and vaccination. We will then provide an overview of the major factors known to influence antibody responsiveness to influenza after infection and vaccination. We discuss the biological factors such as age, sex, influence of prior immunity, genetics, and some chronic infections that may affect the induction of influenza antibody responses. We also discuss the technical factors, such as assay choices, strain variations, and viral properties that may influence the sensitivity of the assays used to measure influenza antibodies. Understanding these factors will hopefully provide a more comprehensive picture of what influenza immunogenicity and protection means, which will be important in our effort to improve influenza vaccines.