1
|
Wochnik A, Kajdrowicz T, Foltyńska G, Krzempek D, Krzempek K, Małecki K, Rydygier M, Swakoń J, Olko P, Kopeć R. Application of 3D-printed compensators for proton pencil beam scanning of shallowly localized pediatric tumors. Radiat Oncol 2025; 20:66. [PMID: 40301908 PMCID: PMC12042327 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02646-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2025] [Indexed: 05/01/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In modern proton radiotherapy facilities with pencil beam scanning technology, the lowest energy of a proton beam typically ranges between 60 and 100 MeV, corresponding to a proton range in water of 3.1-7.5 cm. The irradiation of superficial lesions usually requires the application of a range shifter (RS) to further reduce the proton range. A certain distance from the patient to the RS increases the spot size, causing worse plan conformity. As an alternative solution, a patient-specific 3D-printed proton beam compensator (BC) can be applied to reduce the air gap and beam scattering. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is based on treatment planning system simulations using retrospectively selected data from six pediatric patients with diagnosed sarcomas located in the head and neck area. For three of these patients, 3D-printed compensators were utilized during the treatment phase, prior to the retrospective analysis. Treatment plans for children with shallow lesions treated using RSs and BCs were compared. Planning target volume constraints (D98% >95%, D2%< 107%) and organs-at-risk (brainstem, spinal cord, visual organs, chiasm, cochlea) constraints (D2%, Dmax and DMean) were applied. The entire process of using a BCs in the treatment of pediatric superficial tumors is presented, including 3D printing procedure (via fused filament fabrication method), dosimetric verification of the material (Water Equivalent Ratio measurements) and assessment of its homogeneity, print quality and Hounsfield Unit specification. Beam parameters analysis including spot sizes and penumbras, were performed. Treatment plans were compared in terms of plan conformity and sparing of critical organs. RESULTS The application of BCs reduced the low-dose irradiation areas, improved conformity and reduced critical organs exposure. BCs decreased the lateral spot size by approximately 57% and the penumbras by 41-47% at different depths in the cube target. The variation in BC homogeneity was less than 3.5%, meeting the criteria for plan robustness evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Compared with RS placement at the nozzle, the placement of 3D-printed BCs in the near vicinity of the patient for the treatment of superficial tumors led to a more conformal dose distribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Wochnik
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Tomasz Kajdrowicz
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Gabriela Foltyńska
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Dawid Krzempek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Krzempek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Marzena Rydygier
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Jan Swakoń
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Paweł Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - Renata Kopeć
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Belchior A, Alves BC, Mendes E, Megre F, Alves LC, Santos P, Nishimura K, Nakamura H, Teixidor F, Viñas C, Sampaio JM, Marques F, Pinheiro T. Unravelling physical and radiobiological effects of proton boron fusion reaction with anionic metallacarboranes ([o-COSAN] -) in breast cancer cells. EJNMMI Res 2025; 15:13. [PMID: 39982528 PMCID: PMC11845649 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-025-01199-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2025] [Indexed: 02/22/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Protons, which are considered low-LET (Linear Energy Transfer) radiation, have an average RBE (relative biological effectiveness) of 1.1, with a range from 0.7 to 1.6. Thus, increasing biological effectiveness is of high interest in radiation oncology, and one way to enhance this is by using radiosensitizers. The present work investigates the effectiveness of the proton boron fusion reaction (PBFR) at the cellular level, using the sodium salt of metallacarborane [3,3'-Co(C2B9H11)2]- (Na[o-COSAN]) as the boron source, aiming to explore the potential of this type of boron clusters as a radiosensitizer for proton therapy. Therefore, the main goal was to test the hypothesis that loading the cells with boron will favour the PBFR at energies close to the Bragg peak. This would enhance the radiation-induced biological effects through the production of alpha-particles. RESULTS MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were used. Nuclear microscopy assessed [o-COSAN] uptake and distribution in single cells, while biodistribution was studied in tumor-bearing Balb/cSlc-nu/nu mice (MDA-MB-231 xenograft), with boron accumulation in target organs and tumor measured by ICP-OES. The cells were irradiated with a proton beam tuned to reach the PBFR resonance energy of 675 keV at the cell layer. DNA damage was assessed with the g-H2AX assay and cell survival with the clonogenic assay. Beam parameters and dose calibration curves using radiochromic films validated Monte Carlo dosimetry simulations. As expected, we observed higher biological damage in irradiated cells and the presence of [o-COSAN]- potentiated the damage. These results translate into a lower cellular viability, indicating that DNA damage imposed colonies smaller than their non-irradiated counterparts. This suggests that these damages either took longer time to be repaired or made the cells undergo less efficient survival mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS The radiosensitizing effect of [o-COSAN]- by strategic cellular 11B placement and proton irradiation intensifies the DNA damage, making the nucleus particularly susceptible and thus increasing the destructive capability of alpha-particles, generated in the nuclear fusion reaction, which may lead to increased cell mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Belchior
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal.
- Departamento de Engenharia e Ciências Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal.
| | - Bianca C Alves
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal
- Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Ernesto de Vasconcelos, Edifício C8, Lisboa, 1749-016, Portugal
| | - Edgar Mendes
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal
- iBB - Instituto de Bioengenharia e Biociências, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, Lisboa, 1049-001, Portugal
| | - Francisco Megre
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal
| | - Luís C Alves
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal
- Departamento de Engenharia e Ciências Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal
| | - Pedro Santos
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal
| | - Kai Nishimura
- School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259, Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama, 226-8503, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nakamura
- Laboratory for Chemistry and Life Science, Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institute of Technology, R1-13, 4259 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama, 226-8503, Japan
| | - Francesc Teixidor
- Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona (C.S.I.C.) Campus U.A.B, Bellaterra, Barcelona, 08193, Spain
| | - Clara Viñas
- Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona (C.S.I.C.) Campus U.A.B, Bellaterra, Barcelona, 08193, Spain
| | - Jorge Miguel Sampaio
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto 2, Lisboa, 1649-003, Portugal
- Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Rua Ernesto de Vasconcelos, Edifício C8, Lisboa, 1749-016, Portugal
| | - Fernanda Marques
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal
- Departamento de Engenharia e Ciências Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal
| | - Teresa Pinheiro
- Departamento de Engenharia e Ciências Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Estrada Nacional 10, Bobadela LRS, 2695-066, Portugal
- iBB - Instituto de Bioengenharia e Biociências, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, Lisboa, 1049-001, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ibraheem N, Abdelglil M, Wanees A, Aosmali AM, Shahid MH, Mithany RH. Innovations and Emerging Trends in Prostate Cancer Management: A Literature Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e73128. [PMID: 39512805 PMCID: PMC11542590 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is considered the second most diagnosed cancer in men worldwide. It remains a leading cause of cancer-related death. Recently, many modalities have been discovered and used in the diagnosis and management of PC, with the incorporation of many treatment options such as hormonal therapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and precision medicine. Robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) have further modified the diagnosis and management of PCs, improving the diagnosis accuracy and disease progression. This comprehensive review offers an in-depth exploration of the historical modalities of treatments, an evaluation of current therapeutic techniques, a discussion of the use of robotic surgery and AI, and an examination of ongoing clinical trials and emerging procedures. Additionally, this review also covers the challenges. By inspecting these aspects, the review may provide valuable information regarding future research and clinical practice directions in PC treatment, contributing to a thorough understanding of the complex and emerging context of PC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazeer Ibraheem
- Urology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, GBR
| | - Momen Abdelglil
- Pediatric Surgery, Mansoura University Children Hospital, Mansoura, EGY
| | - Andrew Wanees
- General Surgery, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, EGY
| | - Ahmed M Aosmali
- Trauma and Emergency Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, GBR
| | | | - Reda H Mithany
- Colorectal Surgery, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fadlallah H, El Masri J, Fakhereddine H, Youssef J, Chemaly C, Doughan S, Abou-Kheir W. Colorectal cancer: Recent advances in management and treatment. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:1136-1156. [PMID: 39351451 PMCID: PMC11438855 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i9.1136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide, and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. In 2020, the estimated number of deaths due to CRC was approximately 930000, accounting for 10% of all cancer deaths worldwide. Accordingly, there is a vast amount of ongoing research aiming to find new and improved treatment modalities for CRC that can potentially increase survival and decrease overall morbidity and mortality. Current management strategies for CRC include surgical procedures for resectable cases, and radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, in addition to their combination, for non-resectable tumors. Despite these options, CRC remains incurable in 50% of cases. Nonetheless, significant improvements in research techniques have allowed for treatment approaches for CRC to be frequently updated, leading to the availability of new drugs and therapeutic strategies. This review summarizes the most recent therapeutic approaches for CRC, with special emphasis on new strategies that are currently being studied and have great potential to improve the prognosis and lifespan of patients with CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiba Fadlallah
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Jad El Masri
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Hiam Fakhereddine
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Joe Youssef
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Chrystelle Chemaly
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Samer Doughan
- Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Wassim Abou-Kheir
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stolen E, Fullarton R, Hein R, Conner RL, Jacobsohn LG, Collins-Fekete CA, Beddar S, Akgun U, Robertson D. High-Density Glass Scintillators for Proton Radiography-Relative Luminosity, Proton Response, and Spatial Resolution. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:2137. [PMID: 38610351 PMCID: PMC11014246 DOI: 10.3390/s24072137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
Proton radiography is a promising development in proton therapy, and researchers are currently exploring optimal detector materials to construct proton radiography detector arrays. High-density glass scintillators may improve integrating-mode proton radiography detectors by increasing spatial resolution and decreasing detector thickness. We evaluated several new scintillators, activated with europium or terbium, with proton response measurements and Monte Carlo simulations, characterizing relative luminosity, ionization quenching, and proton radiograph spatial resolution. We applied a correction based on Birks's analytical model for ionization quenching. The data demonstrate increased relative luminosity with increased activation element concentration, and higher relative luminosity for samples activated with europium. An increased glass density enables more compact detector geometries and higher spatial resolution. These findings suggest that a tungsten and gadolinium oxide-based glass activated with 4% europium is an ideal scintillator for testing in a full-size proton radiography detector.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Stolen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA;
| | - Ryan Fullarton
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (R.F.); (C.-A.C.-F.)
| | - Rain Hein
- Department of Physics, Coe College, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402, USA; (R.H.); (U.A.)
| | - Robin L. Conner
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA; (R.L.C.); (L.G.J.)
| | - Luiz G. Jacobsohn
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA; (R.L.C.); (L.G.J.)
| | - Charles-Antoine Collins-Fekete
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; (R.F.); (C.-A.C.-F.)
| | - Sam Beddar
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Ugur Akgun
- Department of Physics, Coe College, Cedar Rapids, IA 52402, USA; (R.H.); (U.A.)
| | - Daniel Robertson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Juvkam IS, Zlygosteva O, Sitarz M, Thiede B, Sørensen BS, Malinen E, Edin NJ, Søland TM, Galtung HK. Proton Compared to X-Irradiation Induces Different Protein Profiles in Oral Cancer Cells and Their Derived Extracellular Vesicles. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:16983. [PMID: 38069306 PMCID: PMC10707519 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242316983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-bound particles released from cells, and their cargo can alter the function of recipient cells. EVs from X-irradiated cells have been shown to play a likely role in non-targeted effects. However, EVs derived from proton irradiated cells have not yet been studied. We aimed to investigate the proteome of EVs and their cell of origin after proton or X-irradiation. The EVs were derived from a human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell line exposed to 0, 4, or 8 Gy from either protons or X-rays. The EVs and irradiated OSCC cells underwent liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for protein identification. Interestingly, we found different protein profiles both in the EVs and in the OSCC cells after proton irradiation compared to X-irradiation. In the EVs, we found that protons cause a downregulation of proteins involved in cell growth and DNA damage response compared to X-rays. In the OSCC cells, proton and X-irradiation induced dissimilar cell death pathways and distinct DNA damage repair systems. These results are of potential importance for understanding how non-targeted effects in normal tissue can be limited and for future implementation of proton therapy in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Solgård Juvkam
- Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway; (I.S.J.); (T.M.S.)
- Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Olga Zlygosteva
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, 0371 Oslo, Norway; (O.Z.); (N.J.E.)
| | - Mateusz Sitarz
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (M.S.); (B.S.S.)
| | - Bernd Thiede
- Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, 0371 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Brita Singers Sørensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (M.S.); (B.S.S.)
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Radiation Biology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0379 Oslo, Norway;
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, 0371 Oslo, Norway; (O.Z.); (N.J.E.)
| | - Nina Jeppesen Edin
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, 0371 Oslo, Norway; (O.Z.); (N.J.E.)
| | - Tine Merete Søland
- Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway; (I.S.J.); (T.M.S.)
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Kanli Galtung
- Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, 0372 Oslo, Norway; (I.S.J.); (T.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zlygosteva O, Juvkam IS, Arous D, Sitarz M, Sørensen BS, Ankjærgaard C, Andersen CE, Galtung HK, Søland TM, Edin NJ, Malinen E. Acute normal tissue responses in a murine model following fractionated irradiation of the head and neck with protons or X-rays. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1574-1580. [PMID: 37703217 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2254481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate acute normal tissue responses in the head and neck region following proton- or X-irradiation of a murine model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Female C57BL/6J mice were irradiated with protons (25 or 60 MeV) or X-rays (100 kV). The radiation field covered the oral cavity and the major salivary glands. For protons, two different treatment plans were used, either with the Bragg Peak in the middle of the mouse (BP) or outside the mouse (transmission mode; TM). Delivered physical doses were 41, 45, and 65 Gy given in 6, 7, and 10 fractions for BP, TM, and X-rays, respectively. Alanine dosimetry was used to assess delivered doses. Oral mucositis and dermatitis were scored using CTC v.2.0-based tables. Saliva was collected at baseline, right after end of irradiation, and at day 35. RESULTS The measured dose distribution for protons (TM) and X-rays was very similar. Oral mucositis appeared earlier, had a higher score and was found in a higher percentage of mice after proton irradiation compared to X-irradiation. Dermatitis, on the other hand, had a similar appearance after protons and X-rays. Compared to controls, saliva production was lower right after termination of proton- and X-irradiation. The BP group demonstrated saliva recovery compared to the TM and X-ray group at day 35. CONCLUSION With lower delivered doses, proton irradiation resulted in similar skin reactions and increased oral mucositis compared to X-irradiation. This indicates that the relative biological effectiveness of protons for acute tissue responses in the mouse head and neck is greater than the clinical standard of 1.1. Thus, there is a need for further investigations of the biological effect of protons in normal tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Zlygosteva
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inga Solgård Juvkam
- Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Delmon Arous
- Department of Medical Physics, Cancer Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mateusz Sitarz
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Brita Singers Sørensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Claus E Andersen
- Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Hilde Kanli Galtung
- Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tine Merete Søland
- Institute of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nina Jeppesen Edin
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Physics, Cancer Clinic, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cohilis M, Souris K, Buti G, Chang CW, Lin L, Lee JA, Sterpin E. A spot-specific range uncertainty framework for robust optimization of proton therapy treatments. Med Phys 2023; 50:6554-6568. [PMID: 37676906 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE An accurate estimation of range uncertainties is essential to exploit the potential of proton therapy. According to Paganetti's study, a value of 2.4% (1.5 standard deviation) is currently recommended for planning robust treatments with Monte Carlo dose engines. This number is based on a dominant contribution from the mean excitation energy of tissues. However, it was recently shown that expressing tissues as a mixture of water and "dry" material in the CT calibration process allowed for a significant reduction of this uncertainty. We thus propose an adapted framework for pencil beam scanning robust optimization. First, we move towards a spot-specific range uncertainty (SSRU) determination. Second, we use the water-based formalism to reduce range uncertainties and, potentially, to spare better the organs at risk. METHODS The stoichiometric calibration was adapted to provide a molecular decomposition (including water) of each voxel of the CT. The SSRU calculation was implemented in MCsquare, a fast Monte Carlo dose engine dedicated to proton therapy. For each spot, a ray-tracing method was used to propagate molecular I-values uncertainties and obtain the corresponding effective range uncertainty. These were then combined with other sources of range uncertainties, according to Paganetti's study of 2012. The method was then assessed on three head-and-neck patients. Two plans were optimized for each patient: the first one with the classical 2.4% flat range uncertainty (FRU), the second one with the variable range uncertainty. Both plans were then compared in terms of target coverage and OAR mean dose reduction. Robustness evaluations were also performed, using the SSRU for both plans in order to simulate errors as realistically as possible. RESULTS For patient 1, it was found that the median SSRU was 1.04% (1.5 standard deviation), yielding, therefore, a very large reduction from the 2.4% FRU. All three SSRU plans were found to have a very good robustness level at a 90% confidence interval while sparing OAR better than the classical plan. For instance, in nominal cases, average reductions in the mean dose of 15.7, 8.4, and 13.2% were observed in the left parotid, right parotid, and pharyngeal constrictor muscle, respectively. As expected, the classical plans showed a higher but unnecessary level of robustness. CONCLUSIONS Promising results of the SSRU framework were observed on three head-and-neck cases, and more patients should now be considered. The method could also benefit to other tumor sites and, in the long run, the variable part of the range uncertainty could be generalized to other sources of uncertainty in order to move towards more and more patient-specific treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Cohilis
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, UCLouvain, MIRO Lab, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kevin Souris
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, UCLouvain, MIRO Lab, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gregory Buti
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, UCLouvain, MIRO Lab, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Chih-Wei Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - John A Lee
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, UCLouvain, MIRO Lab, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Edmond Sterpin
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Research, UCLouvain, MIRO Lab, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Leuven, Belgium
- Particle Therapy Interuniversity Center Leuven-PARTICLE, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang X, Yu J, Wen H, Yan J, Peng K, Zhou H. Antioxidative stress protein SRXN1 can be used as a radiotherapy prognostic marker for prostate cancer. BMC Urol 2023; 23:148. [PMID: 37726767 PMCID: PMC10507967 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-023-01319-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the mechanisms of radiotherapy resistance and search for prognostic biomarkers for prostate cancer. METHODS The GSE192817 and TCGA PRAD datasets were selected and downloaded from the GEO and UCSC Xena databases. Differential expression and functional annotation analyses were applied to 52 tumour cell samples from GSE192817. Then, the ssGSEA or GSVA algorithms were applied to quantitatively score the biological functional activity of samples in the GSE192817 and TCGA PRAD datasets, combined with specific gene sets collected from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB). Subsequently, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare the differences in ssGSEA or GSVA scores among cell types or PRAD patients. Moreover, radiotherapy resistance-associated gene screening was performed on DU145 and PC3 cells (prostate cancer cells), and survival analysis was used to evaluate the efficacy of these genes for predicting the prognosis of PRAD patients. RESULTS A total of 114 genes that were differentially expressed in more than two different cancer cell types and associated with either sham surgery or radiotherapy treatment (X-ray or photon irradiation) were detected in cancer cells from GSE192817. Comparison of DNA damage-related ssGSEA scores between sham surgery and radiotherapy treatment in prostate cancer cells (DU145 and PC3) showed that photon irradiation was potentially more effective than X-ray treatment. In the TCGA PRAD dataset, patients treated with radiotherapy had much higher "GOBP_CELLULAR_RESPONSE_TO_DNA_DAMAGE_STIMULUS", "GOBP_G2_DNA_DAMAGE_CHECKPOINT" and "GOBP_INTRA_S_DNA_DAMAGE_CHECKPOINT" GSVA scores, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test p values were 0.0005, 0.0062 and 0.0800, respectively. Furthermore, SRXN1 was upregulated in DU145 cells (resistant to X-ray irradiation compared to PC3 cells) after radiotherapy treatment, and low SRXN1 expression in patients was beneficial to radiotherapy outcomes. The log-rank test p value for PFS was 0.0072. CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy can damage DNA and induce oxidative stress to kill tumour cells. In this study, we found that SRXN1, as an antioxidative stress gene, plays an important role in radiotherapy for prostate cancer treatment, and this gene is also a potential biomarker for predicting the prognosis of patients treated with radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing Wang
- Department of Urology, Zhejiang Hospital, # 1229, Gudun Road, Hangzhou, 310030, China
| | - Jiandi Yu
- Department of Urology, Zhejiang Hospital, # 1229, Gudun Road, Hangzhou, 310030, China
| | - Huali Wen
- Department of Urology, Zhejiang Hospital, # 1229, Gudun Road, Hangzhou, 310030, China
| | - Junfeng Yan
- Department of Urology, Zhejiang Hospital, # 1229, Gudun Road, Hangzhou, 310030, China
| | - Kun Peng
- Department of Urology, Zhejiang Hospital, # 1229, Gudun Road, Hangzhou, 310030, China
| | - Haiyong Zhou
- Department of Urology, Zhejiang Hospital, # 1229, Gudun Road, Hangzhou, 310030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lassaletta Á, Morales JS, Valenzuela PL, Esteso B, Kahalley LS, Mabbott DJ, Unnikrishnan S, Panizo E, Calvo F. Neurocognitive outcomes in pediatric brain tumors after treatment with proton versus photon radiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Pediatr 2023; 19:727-740. [PMID: 37154861 PMCID: PMC10348930 DOI: 10.1007/s12519-023-00726-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in cancer treatments, particularly the development of radiation therapy, have led to improvements in survival outcomes in children with brain tumors. However, radiation therapy is associated with significant long-term neurocognitive morbidity. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the neurocognitive outcomes of children and adolescents with brain tumors treated with photon radiation (XRT) or proton therapy (PBRT). METHODS A systematic search was conducted (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science from inception until 02/01/2022) for studies comparing the neurocognitive outcomes of children and adolescents with brain tumors treated with XRT vs. PBRT. The pooled mean differences (expressed as Z scores) were calculated using a random effects method for those endpoints analyzed by a minimum of three studies. RESULTS Totally 10 studies (n = 630 patients, average age range: 1-20 years) met the inclusion criteria. Patients who had received PBRT achieved significantly higher scores (difference in Z scores ranging from 0.29-0.75, all P < 0.05 and significant in sensitivity analyses) after treatment than those who had received XRT for most analyzed neurocognitive outcomes (i.e., intelligence quotient, verbal comprehension and perceptual reasoning indices, visual motor integration, and verbal memory). No robust significant differences (P > 0.05 in main analyses or sensitivity analyses) were found for nonverbal memory, verbal working memory and working memory index, processing speed index, or focused attention. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric brain tumor patients who receive PBRT achieve significantly higher scores on most neurocognitive outcomes than those who receive XRT. Larger studies with long-term follow-ups are needed to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Lassaletta
- Radiation Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Calle Marquesado de Santa Marta 1, 28027, Madrid, Spain.
- Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Javier S Morales
- MOVE-IT Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Cadiz, Cádiz, Spain
- Biomedical Research and Innovation Institute of Cádiz (INiBICA) Research Unit, Puerta del Mar University Hospital, University of Cádiz, Cádiz, Spain
| | - Pedro L Valenzuela
- Physical Activity and Health Research Group (PaHerg), Research Institute of the Hospital 12 de Octubre ('imas12'), Madrid, Spain
- Systems Biology Department, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | - Borja Esteso
- Clinical Neuropsychology Unit, Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lisa S Kahalley
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
- Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Donald J Mabbott
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Elena Panizo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Calle Marquesado de Santa Marta 1, 28027, Madrid, Spain
| | - Felipe Calvo
- Radiation Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Calle Marquesado de Santa Marta 1, 28027, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nelson NP, Culberson WS, Hyer DE, Geoghegan TJ, Patwardhan KA, Smith BR, Flynn RT, Yu J, Gutiérrez AN, Hill PM. Dosimetric delivery validation of dynamically collimated pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:055003. [PMID: 36706460 PMCID: PMC9940016 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acb6cd] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy target dose conformity can be improved with energy layer-specific collimation. One such collimator is the dynamic collimation system (DCS), which consists of four nickel trimmer blades that intercept the scanning beam as it approaches the lateral extent of the target. While the dosimetric benefits of the DCS have been demonstrated through computational treatment planning studies, there has yet to be experimental verification of these benefits for composite multi-energy layer fields. The objective of this work is to dosimetrically characterize and experimentally validate the delivery of dynamically collimated proton therapy with the DCS equipped to a clinical PBS system.Approach. Optimized single field, uniform dose treatment plans for 3 × 3 × 3 cm3target volumes were generated using Monte Carlo dose calculations with depths ranging from 5 to 15 cm, trimmer-to-surface distances ranging from 5 to 18.15 cm, with and without a 4 cm thick polyethylene range shifter. Treatment plans were then delivered to a water phantom using a prototype DCS and an IBA dedicated nozzle system and measured with a Zebra multilayer ionization chamber, a MatriXX PT ionization chamber array, and Gafchromic™ EBT3 film.Main results. For measurements made within the SOBPs, average 2D gamma pass rates exceeded 98.5% for the MatriXX PT and 96.5% for film at the 2%/2 mm criterion across all measured uncollimated and collimated plans, respectively. For verification of the penumbra width reduction with collimation, film agreed with Monte Carlo with differences within 0.3 mm on average compared to 0.9 mm for the MatriXX PT.Significance. We have experimentally verified the delivery of DCS-collimated fields using a clinical PBS system and commonly available dosimeters and have also identified potential weaknesses for dosimeters subject to steep dose gradients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas P Nelson
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America,Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | - Wesley S Culberson
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, United States of America
| | - Daniel E Hyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Theodore J Geoghegan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Kaustubh A Patwardhan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Blake R Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Ryan T Flynn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, United States of America
| | - Jen Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 N. Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 33176, United States of America
| | - Alonso N Gutiérrez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, 8900 N. Kendall Drive, Miami, FL, 33176, United States of America
| | - Patrick M Hill
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin—Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Russ E, Davis CM, Slaven JE, Bradfield DT, Selwyn RG, Day RM. Comparison of the Medical Uses and Cellular Effects of High and Low Linear Energy Transfer Radiation. TOXICS 2022; 10:toxics10100628. [PMID: 36287908 PMCID: PMC9609561 DOI: 10.3390/toxics10100628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Exposure to ionizing radiation can occur during medical treatments, from naturally occurring sources in the environment, or as the result of a nuclear accident or thermonuclear war. The severity of cellular damage from ionizing radiation exposure is dependent upon a number of factors including the absorbed radiation dose of the exposure (energy absorbed per unit mass of the exposure), dose rate, area and volume of tissue exposed, type of radiation (e.g., X-rays, high-energy gamma rays, protons, or neutrons) and linear energy transfer. While the dose, the dose rate, and dose distribution in tissue are aspects of a radiation exposure that can be varied experimentally or in medical treatments, the LET and eV are inherent characteristics of the type of radiation. High-LET radiation deposits a higher concentration of energy in a shorter distance when traversing tissue compared with low-LET radiation. The different biological effects of high and low LET with similar energies have been documented in vivo in animal models and in cultured cells. High-LET results in intense macromolecular damage and more cell death. Findings indicate that while both low- and high-LET radiation activate non-homologous end-joining DNA repair activity, efficient repair of high-LET radiation requires the homologous recombination repair pathway. Low- and high-LET radiation activate p53 transcription factor activity in most cells, but high LET activates NF-kB transcription factor at lower radiation doses than low-LET radiation. Here we review the development, uses, and current understanding of the cellular effects of low- and high-LET radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Russ
- Graduate Program of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Catherine M. Davis
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - John E. Slaven
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Dmitry T. Bradfield
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - Reed G. Selwyn
- Department of Radiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
| | - Regina M. Day
- Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Clinical Outcomes Following Proton and Photon Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174152. [PMID: 36077688 PMCID: PMC9454659 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The current study reports the clinical outcomes of proton and photon stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer. Out of 202 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 34 received proton SBRT and 168 received photon SBRT. Patients at high risk of developing post-SBRT radiation pneumonitis tended to receive proton SBRT. Oncologic outcomes and toxicity profiles were comparable between treatment modalities. Proton SBRT could be considered for patients with high risk of radiation pneumonitis. Abstract We aimed to report the clinical outcomes following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using photon or proton equipment in early-stage lung cancer. We retrospectively reviewed 202 cT1-2N0M0 lung cancer patients who underwent SBRT with 60 Gy in four consecutive fractions between 2010 and 2019 at our institution: 168 photon SBRT and 34 proton SBRT. Patients who underwent proton SBRT had relatively poor baseline lung condition compared to those who underwent photon SBRT. Clinical outcomes were comparable between treatment modalities: 5-year local control (90.8% vs. 83.6%, p = 0.602); progression-free survival (61.6% vs. 57.8%, p = 0.370); overall survival (51.7% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.475); and cause-specific survival (70.3% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.618). There was no statistically significant difference in grade ≥ 2 toxicities: radiation pneumonitis (19.6% vs. 26.4%, p = 0.371); musculoskeletal (13.7% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.264); and skin (3.6% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.604). In the binary logistic regression analysis of grade ≥3 radiation pneumonitis, poor performance status and poor baseline diffusion capacity of lung for carbon monoxide were significant. To summarize, though patients with high risk of developing lung toxicity underwent proton SBRT more frequently, the SBRT techniques resulted in comparable oncologic outcomes with similar toxicity profiles. Proton SBRT could be considered for patients at high risk of radiation pneumonitis.
Collapse
|
14
|
Akolawala Q, Rovituso M, Versteeg HH, Rondon AMR, Accardo A. Evaluation of Proton-Induced DNA Damage in 3D-Engineered Glioblastoma Microenvironments. ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES 2022; 14:20778-20789. [PMID: 35442634 PMCID: PMC9100514 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.2c03706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating cancer of the brain with an extremely poor prognosis. For this reason, besides clinical and preclinical studies, novel in vitro models for the assessment of cancer response to drugs and radiation are being developed. In such context, three-dimensional (3D)-engineered cellular microenvironments, compared to unrealistic two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cell culture, provide a model closer to the in vivo configuration. Concerning cancer treatment, while X-ray radiotherapy and chemotherapy remain the current standard, proton beam therapy is an appealing alternative as protons can be efficiently targeted to destroy cancer cells while sparing the surrounding healthy tissue. However, despite the treatment's compelling biological and medical rationale, little is known about the effects of protons on GBM at the cellular level. In this work, we designed novel 3D-engineered scaffolds inspired by the geometry of brain blood vessels, which cover a vital role in the colonization mechanisms of GBM cells. The architectures were fabricated by two-photon polymerization (2PP), cultured with U-251 GBM cells and integrated for the first time in the context of proton radiation experiments to assess their response to treatment. We employed Gamma H2A.X as a fluorescent biomarker to identify the DNA damage induced in the cells by proton beams. The results show a higher DNA double-strand breakage in 2D cell monolayers as compared to cells cultured in 3D. The discrepancy in terms of proton radiation response could indicate a difference in the radioresistance of the GBM cells or in the rate of repair kinetics between 2D cell monolayers and 3D cell networks. Thus, these biomimetic-engineered 3D scaffolds pave the way for the realization of a benchmark tool that can be used to routinely assess the effects of proton therapy on 3D GBM cell networks and other types of cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qais Akolawala
- Department
of Precision and Microsystems Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628
CD Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Rovituso
- Holland
Proton Therapy Center (HollandPTC), Huismansingel 4, 2629 JH Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Henri H. Versteeg
- Einthoven
Laboratory for Vascular and Regenerative Medicine, Division of Thrombosis
and Hemostasis, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Araci M. R. Rondon
- Einthoven
Laboratory for Vascular and Regenerative Medicine, Division of Thrombosis
and Hemostasis, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Angelo Accardo
- Department
of Precision and Microsystems Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628
CD Delft, The Netherlands
- . Tel: +31 (0)15 27 81610
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Darne CD, Robertson DG, Alsanea F, Collins-Fekete CA, Beddar S. A novel proton-integrating radiography system design using a monolithic scintillator detector: experimental studies. NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH. SECTION A, ACCELERATORS, SPECTROMETERS, DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT 2022; 1027:166077. [PMID: 35221402 PMCID: PMC8872121 DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2021.166077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Research on proton-based imaging systems aims to improve treatment planning, internal anatomy visualization, and patient alignment for proton radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate a new proton radiography system design consisting of a monolithic plastic scintillator volume and two optical cameras for use with scanning proton pencil beams. Unlike the thin scintillating plates currently used for proton radiography, the plastic scintillator volume (20 × 20 × 20 cm3) captures a wider distribution of proton beam energy depositions and avoids proton-beam modulation. The proton imaging system's characteristics were tested using image uniformity (2.6% over a 5 × 5 cm2 area), stability (0.37%), and linearity (R2 = 1) studies. We used the light distribution produced within the plastic scintillator to generate proton radiographs via two different approaches: (a) integrating light by using a camera placed along the beam axis, and (b) capturing changes to the proton Bragg peak positions with a camera placed perpendicularly to the beam axis. The latter method was used to plot and evaluate relative shifts in percentage depth light (PDL) profiles of proton beams with and without a phantom in the beam path. A curvelet minimization algorithm used differences in PDL profiles to reconstruct and refine the phantom water-equivalent thickness (WET) map. Gammex phantoms were used to compare the proton radiographs generated by these two methods. The relative accuracies in calculating WET of the phantoms using the calibration-based beam-integration (and the PDL) methods were -0.18 ± 0.35% (-0.29 ± 3.11%), -0.11 ± 0.51% (-0.15 ± 2.64%), -2.94 ± 1.20% (-0.75 ± 6.11%), and -1.65 ± 0.35% (0.36 ± 3.93%) for solid water, adipose, cortical bone, and PMMA, respectively. Further exploration of this unique multicamera-based imaging system is warranted and could lead to clinical applications that improve treatment planning and patient alignment for proton radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chinmay D Darne
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Daniel G Robertson
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Fahed Alsanea
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | | | - Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Taunk N. The role of proton therapy in gynecological radiation oncology. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:414-420. [PMID: 35256431 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton beam therapy is an external beam radiotherapy modality that offers potentially similar efficacy and reduced toxicity compared with photon radiotherapy due to little to no exit dose of radiation beyond the intended target. Improvements in radiotherapy from two-dimensional, to three-dimensional, to intensity-modulated radiation therapy have offered comparable to improved efficacy of radiation therapy with progressive reductions in toxicity. Proton beam therapy may offer further improvements, with multiple dosimetric studies demonstrating potential reductions in exposure of normal tissue to radiation, particularly bowel and bone marrow. Proton beam therapy offers avenues for dose escalation or re-irradiation, which were previously not feasible with photon radiotherapy. Although early clinical data generally demonstrate safety, feasibility, and efficacy in a few series, prospective clinical trials are limited and needed to better define who might benefit from proton therapy. In this review, we discuss the history, dosimetry, available clinical data, and technical needs to deliver high-quality proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil Taunk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kowalchuk RO, Corbin KS, Jimenez RB. Particle Therapy for Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041066. [PMID: 35205814 PMCID: PMC8870138 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Particle therapy has received increasing attention in the treatment of breast cancer due to its unique physical properties that may enhance patient quality of life and reduce the late effects of therapy. In this review, we will examine the rationale for the use of proton and carbon therapy in the treatment of breast cancer and highlight their potential for sparing normal tissue injury. We will discuss the early dosimetric and clinical studies that have been pursued to date in this domain before focusing on the remaining open questions limiting the widespread adoption of particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman O. Kowalchuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (R.O.K.); (K.S.C.)
| | - Kimberly S. Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (R.O.K.); (K.S.C.)
| | - Rachel B. Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cavallone M, Prezado Y, De Marzi L. Converging Proton Minibeams with Magnetic Fields for Optimized Radiation Therapy: A Proof of Concept. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010026. [PMID: 35008189 PMCID: PMC8750079 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton MiniBeam Radiation Therapy (pMBRT) is a novel strategy that combines the benefits of minibeam radiation therapy with the more precise ballistics of protons to further optimize the dose distribution and reduce radiation side effects. The aim of this study is to investigate possible strategies to couple pMBRT with dipole magnetic fields to generate a converging minibeam pattern and increase the center-to-center distance between minibeams. Magnetic field optimization was performed so as to obtain the same transverse dose profile at the Bragg peak position as in a reference configuration with no magnetic field. Monte Carlo simulations reproducing realistic pencil beam scanning settings were used to compute the dose in a water phantom. We analyzed different minibeam generation techniques, such as the use of a static multislit collimator or a dynamic aperture, and different magnetic field positions, i.e., before or within the water phantom. The best results were obtained using a dynamic aperture coupled with a magnetic field within the water phantom. For a center-to-center distance increase from 4 mm to 6 mm, we obtained an increase of peak-to-valley dose ratio and decrease of valley dose above 50%. The results indicate that magnetic fields can be effectively used to improve the spatial modulation at shallow depth for enhanced healthy tissue sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Cavallone
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France
- Correspondence: (M.C.); (L.D.M.)
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France;
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France
- Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO, 91898 Orsay, France
- Correspondence: (M.C.); (L.D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kumar G, Dutta P, Parihar VK, Chamallamudi MR, Kumar N. Radiotherapy and Its Impact on the Nervous System of Cancer Survivors. CNS & NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS-DRUG TARGETS 2021; 19:374-385. [PMID: 32640964 DOI: 10.2174/1871527319666200708125741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is routinely used for the treatment of nearly all brain tumors, but it may lead to progressive and debilitating impairments of cognitive function. The growing evidence supports the fact that radiation exposure to CNS disrupts diverse cognitive functions including learning, memory, processing speed, attention and executive functions. The present review highlights the types of radiotherapy and the possible mechanisms of cognitive deficits and neurotoxicity following radiotherapy. The review summarizes the articles from Scopus, PubMed, and Web of science search engines. Radiation therapy uses high-powered x-rays, particles, or radioactive seeds to kill cancer cells, with minimal damage to healthy cells. While radiotherapy has yielded relative success in the treatment of cancer, patients are often plagued with unwanted and even debilitating side effects from the treatment, which can lead to dose reduction or even cessation of treatment. Little is known about the underlying mechanisms responsible for the development of these behavioral toxicities; however, neuroinflammation is widely considered as one of the major mechanisms responsible for radiotherapy-induced toxicities. The present study reviews the different types of radiotherapy available for the treatment of various types of cancers and their associated neurological complications. It also summarizes the doses of radiations used in the variety of radiotherapy, and their early and delayed side effects. Special emphasis is given to the effects of various types of radiations or late side effects on cognitive impairments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gautam Kumar
- Department of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal-576104, Karnataka, India
| | - Priyadarshini Dutta
- Department of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal-576104, Karnataka, India
| | - Vipan K Parihar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697- 2695, United States
| | - Mallikarjuna R Chamallamudi
- Department of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal-576104, Karnataka, India
| | - Nitesh Kumar
- Department of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal-576104, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ackernley T, Casse G, Cristoforetti M. Proton path reconstruction for pCT using neural networks. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33735852 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abf00f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
The Most Likely Path formalism (MLP) is widely established as the most statistically precise method for proton path reconstruction in proton computed tomography (pCT). However, while this method accounts for small-angle Multiple Coulomb Scattering (MCS) and energy loss, inelastic nuclear interactions play an influential role in a significant number of proton paths. By applying cuts based on energy and direction, tracks influenced by nuclear interactions are largely discarded from the MLP analysis. In this work we propose a new method to estimate the proton paths based on a Deep Neural Network (DNN). Through this approach, estimates of proton paths equivalent to MLP predictions have been achieved in the case where only MCS occurs, together with an increased accuracy when nuclear interactions are present. Moreover, our tests indicate that the DNN algorithm can be considerably faster than the MLP algorithm.
Collapse
|
21
|
Wochnik A, Stolarczyk L, Ambrožová I, Davídková M, De Saint-Hubert M, Domański S, Domingo C, Knežević Ž, Kopeć R, Kuć M, Majer M, Mojżeszek N, Mares V, Martínez-Rovira I, Caballero-Pacheco MÁ, Pyszka E, Swakoń J, Trinkl S, Tisi M, Harrison R, Olko P. Out-of-field doses for scanning proton radiotherapy of shallowly located paediatric tumours-a comparison of range shifter and 3D printed compensator. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66:035012. [PMID: 33202399 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abcb1f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The lowest possible energy of proton scanning beam in cyclotron proton therapy facilities is typically between 60 and 100 MeV. Treatment of superficial lesions requires a pre-absorber to deliver doses to shallower volumes. In most of the cases a range shifter (RS) is used, but as an alternative solution, a patient-specific 3D printed proton beam compensator (BC) can be applied. A BC enables further reduction of the air gap and consequently reduction of beam scattering. Such pre-absorbers are additional sources of secondary radiation. The aim of this work was the comparison of RS and BC with respect to out-of-field doses for a simulated treatment of superficial paediatric brain tumours. EURADOS WG9 performed comparative measurements of scattered radiation in the Proteus C-235 IBA facility (Cyclotron Centre Bronowice at the Institute of Nuclear Physics, CCB IFJ PAN, Kraków, Poland) using two anthropomorphic phantoms-5 and 10 yr old-for a superficial target in the brain. Both active detectors located inside the therapy room, and passive detectors placed inside the phantoms were used. Measurements were supplemented by Monte Carlo simulation of the radiation transport. For the applied 3D printed pre-absorbers, out-of-field doses from both secondary photons and neutrons were lower than for RS. Measurements with active environmental dosimeters at five positions inside the therapy room indicated that the RS/BC ratio of the out-of-field dose was also higher than one, with a maximum of 1.7. Photon dose inside phantoms leads to higher out-of-field doses for RS than BC to almost all organs with the highest RS/BC ratio 12.5 and 13.2 for breasts for 5 and 10 yr old phantoms, respectively. For organs closest to the isocentre such as the thyroid, neutron doses were lower for BC than RS due to neutrons moderation in the target volume, but for more distant organs like bladder-conversely-lower doses for RS than BC were observed. The use of 3D printed BC as the pre-absorber placed in the near vicinity of patient in the treatment of superficial tumours does not result in the increase of secondary radiation compared to the treatment with RS, placed far from the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wochnik
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland
| | - L Stolarczyk
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland.,Skandionkliniken, von Kraemers Allé 26, Uppsala 752 37, Sweden.,Dansk Center for Partikelterapi, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 25, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - I Ambrožová
- Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague CZ-250 68 Řež, Czech Republic
| | - M Davídková
- Department of Radiation Dosimetry, Nuclear Physics Institute Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague CZ-250 68 Řež, Czech Republic
| | - M De Saint-Hubert
- Belgium Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), Boeretang 200, Mol BE-2400, Belgium
| | - S Domański
- National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk 05-400, Poland
| | - C Domingo
- Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra E-08193, Spain
| | - Ž Knežević
- Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička c. 54, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - R Kopeć
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland
| | - M Kuć
- National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock-Świerk 05-400, Poland
| | - M Majer
- Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička c. 54, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - N Mojżeszek
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland
| | - V Mares
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg 85764, Germany
| | - I Martínez-Rovira
- Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra E-08193, Spain
| | - M Á Caballero-Pacheco
- Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra E-08193, Spain
| | - E Pyszka
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland
| | - J Swakoń
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland
| | - S Trinkl
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg 85764, Germany.,Technische Universität München, Physik-Department, Garching 85748, Germany
| | - M Tisi
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Institute of Radiation Medicine, Ingolstädter Landstraße 1, Neuherberg 85764, Germany
| | - R Harrison
- University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, United Kingdom
| | - P Olko
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow 31-342, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kang M, Hasan S, Press RH, Yu F, Abdo M, Xiong W, Choi JI, Simone CB, Lin H. Using patient-specific bolus for pencil beam scanning proton treatment of periorbital disease. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 22:203-209. [PMID: 33369041 PMCID: PMC7856513 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose A unique mantle cell lymphoma case with bilateral periorbital disease unresponsive to chemotherapy and with dosimetry not conducive to electron therapy was treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. This patient presented treatment planning challenges due to the thin target, immediately adjacent organs at risk (OAR), and nonconformal orbital surface anatomy. Therefore, we developed a patient‐specific bolus and hypothesized that it would provide superior setup robustness, dose uniformity and dose conformity. Materials/Methods A blue‐wax patient‐specific bolus was generated from the patient's face contour to conform to his face and eliminate air gaps. A relative stopping power ratio (RSP) of 0.972 was measured for the blue‐wax, and the HUs were overridden accordingly in the treatment planning system (TPS). Orthogonal kV images were used for bony alignment and then to ensure positioning of the bolus through fiducial markers attached to the bolus and their contours in TPS. Daily CBCT was used to confirm the position of the bolus in relation to the patient's surface. Dosimetric characteristics were compared between (a) nonbolus, (b) conventional gel bolus and (c) patient‐specific bolus plans. An in‐house developed workflow for assessment of daily treatment dose based on CBCT images was used to evaluate inter‐fraction dose accumulation. Results The patient was treated to 24 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE) in 2 CGE daily fractions to the bilateral periorbital skin, constraining at least 50% of each lacrimal gland to under 20 Gy. The bolus increased proton beam range by adding 2–3 energy layers of different fields to help achieve better dose uniformity and adequate dose coverage. In contrast to the plan with conventional gel bolus, dose uniformity was significantly improved with patient‐specific bolus. The global maximum dose was reduced by 7% (from 116% to 109%). The max and mean doses were reduced by 6.0% and 7.7%, respectively, for bilateral retinas, and 3.0% and 13.9% for bilateral lacrimal glands. The max dose of the lens was reduced by 2.1%. The rigid shape, along with lightweight, and smooth fit to the patient face was well tolerated and reported as “very comfortable” by the patient. The daily position accuracy of the bolus was within 1 mm based on IGRT marker alignment. The daily dose accumulation indicates that the target coverage and OAR doses were highly consistent with the planning intention. Conclusion Our patient‐specific blue‐wax bolus significantly increased dose uniformity, reduced OAR doses, and maintained consistent setup accuracy compared to conventional bolus. Quality PBS proton treatment for periorbital tumors and similar challenging thin and shallow targets can be achieved using such patient‐specific bolus with robustness on both setup and dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Francis Yu
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Haibo Lin
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kumari S, Mukherjee S, Sinha D, Abdisalaam S, Krishnan S, Asaithamby A. Immunomodulatory Effects of Radiotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E8151. [PMID: 33142765 PMCID: PMC7663574 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21218151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT), an integral component of curative treatment for many malignancies, can be administered via an increasing array of techniques. In this review, we summarize the properties and application of different types of RT, specifically, conventional therapy with x-rays, stereotactic body RT, and proton and carbon particle therapies. We highlight how low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation induces simple DNA lesions that are efficiently repaired by cells, whereas high-LET radiation causes complex DNA lesions that are difficult to repair and that ultimately enhance cancer cell killing. Additionally, we discuss the immunogenicity of radiation-induced tumor death, elucidate the molecular mechanisms by which radiation mounts innate and adaptive immune responses and explore strategies by which we can increase the efficacy of these mechanisms. Understanding the mechanisms by which RT modulates immune signaling and the key players involved in modulating the RT-mediated immune response will help to improve therapeutic efficacy and to identify novel immunomodulatory drugs that will benefit cancer patients undergoing targeted RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharda Kumari
- Division of Molecular Radiation Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (S.K.); (D.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Shibani Mukherjee
- Division of Molecular Radiation Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (S.K.); (D.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Debapriya Sinha
- Division of Molecular Radiation Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (S.K.); (D.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Salim Abdisalaam
- Division of Molecular Radiation Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (S.K.); (D.S.); (S.A.)
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA;
| | - Aroumougame Asaithamby
- Division of Molecular Radiation Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA; (S.K.); (D.S.); (S.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Giant cell tumor of the sacrum is a rare primary tumor in a challenging anatomical location without clear consensus on treatment. We present a case of giant cell tumor of the sacrum and subsequent treatment with preoperative embolization, L5 to S4 laminectomy, partial sacrectomy, intraoperative thermal ablation, and L4 to pelvis stabilization and fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Rizkalla
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Brendan Holderread
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jonathan Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Al Mollabashy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ishaq Y Syed
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Reuvers TGA, Kanaar R, Nonnekens J. DNA Damage-Inducing Anticancer Therapies: From Global to Precision Damage. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2098. [PMID: 32731592 PMCID: PMC7463878 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
DNA damage-inducing therapies are of tremendous value for cancer treatment and function by the direct or indirect formation of DNA lesions and subsequent inhibition of cellular proliferation. Of central importance in the cellular response to therapy-induced DNA damage is the DNA damage response (DDR), a protein network guiding both DNA damage repair and the induction of cancer-eradicating mechanisms such as apoptosis. A detailed understanding of DNA damage induction and the DDR has greatly improved our knowledge of the classical DNA damage-inducing therapies, radiotherapy and cytotoxic chemotherapy, and has paved the way for rational improvement of these treatments. Moreover, compounds targeting specific DDR proteins, selectively impairing DNA damage repair in cancer cells, form a promising novel therapy class that is now entering the clinic. In this review, we give an overview of the current state and ongoing developments, and discuss potential avenues for improvement for DNA damage-inducing therapies, with a central focus on the role of the DDR in therapy response, toxicity and resistance. Furthermore, we describe the relevance of using combination regimens containing DNA damage-inducing therapies and how they can be utilized to potentiate other anticancer strategies such as immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thom G. A. Reuvers
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molenwaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.G.A.R.); (R.K.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molenwaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roland Kanaar
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molenwaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.G.A.R.); (R.K.)
- Oncode Institute, Office Jaarbeurs Innovation Mile (JIM), Jaarbeursplein 6, 3561 AL Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Julie Nonnekens
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molenwaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.G.A.R.); (R.K.)
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molenwaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Office Jaarbeurs Innovation Mile (JIM), Jaarbeursplein 6, 3561 AL Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hueso-González F, Bortfeld T. Compact Method for Proton Range Verification Based on Coaxial Prompt Gamma-Ray Monitoring: a Theoretical Study. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RADIATION AND PLASMA MEDICAL SCIENCES 2020; 4:170-183. [PMID: 32258856 PMCID: PMC7111431 DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2019.2930362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Range uncertainties in proton therapy hamper treatment precision. Prompt gamma-rays were suggested 16 years ago for real-time range verification, and have already shown promising results in clinical studies with collimated cameras. Simultaneously, alternative imaging concepts without collimation are investigated to reduce the footprint and price of current prototypes. In this manuscript, a compact range verification method is presented. It monitors prompt gamma-rays with a single scintillation detector positioned coaxially to the beam and behind the patient. Thanks to the solid angle effect, proton range deviations can be derived from changes in the number of gamma-rays detected per proton, provided that the number of incident protons is well known. A theoretical background is formulated and the requirements for a future proof-of-principle experiment are identified. The potential benefits and disadvantages of the method are discussed, and the prospects and potential obstacles for its use during patient treatments are assessed. The final milestone is to monitor proton range differences in clinical cases with a statistical precision of 1 mm, a material cost of 25000 USD and a weight below 10 kg. This technique could facilitate the widespread application of in vivo range verification in proton therapy and eventually the improvement of treatment quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Hueso-González
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America
| | - T Bortfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sharma AM, Kowalski E, McGovern N, Zhu M, Mishra MV. Proton Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: First Dosimetric Comparison for Total Scalp Irradiation. Int J Part Ther 2020; 6:19-26. [PMID: 32582811 PMCID: PMC7038914 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-19-00069.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 04/23/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Total scalp irradiation (TSI) is used to treat malignancies of the scalp and face, including angiosarcomas, nonmelanoma skin cancers, and cutaneous lymphomas. Owing to the irregularity of the scalp contour and the presence of underlying critical organs at risk (OARs), radiation planning is challenging and technically difficult. To address these complexities, several different radiation therapy techniques have been used. These include the combined lateral photon-electron technique (3DRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), helical tomotherapy (HT), and mold-based high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR BT). However, the use of proton radiation therapy (PRT) has never been documented. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 71-year-old, immunosuppressed man presented with recurrent nonmelanoma skin cancer of the scalp. He was successfully treated at our center with PRT to deliver TSI. A comparative VMAT treatment plan was generated and dose to critical OARs was compared. RESULTS We present the first clinical case report of PRT for TSI and dosimetric comparison to a VMAT plan. The PRT and VMAT plans provided equivalent target volume coverage; however, the PRT plan significantly reduced dose to the brain, hippocampi, and optical apparatus. CONCLUSION TSI planned with PRT is relatively straightforward from a planning perspective and does not require a bolus. It also has the potential to decrease radiation therapy-related toxicity. However, PRT is relatively expensive and not universally available. The uncertainty surrounding the end-range of the proton beam is a consideration. Although there are potential disadvantages to using PRT for TSI, its use should be considered by treating radiation oncologists and referring physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankur Markand Sharma
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily Kowalski
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nathan McGovern
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mingyao Zhu
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mark Vikas Mishra
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sardaro A, Carbonara R, Petruzzelli MF, Turi B, Moschetta M, Scardapane A, Stabile Ianora AA. Proton therapy in the most common pediatric non-central nervous system malignancies: an overview of clinical and dosimetric outcomes. Ital J Pediatr 2019; 45:170. [PMID: 31881905 PMCID: PMC6935184 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-019-0763-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation therapy represents an important approach in the therapeutic management of children and adolescents with malignant tumors and its application with modern techniques – including Proton Beam Therapy (PBT) – is of great interest. In particular, potential radiation-induced injuries and secondary malignancies – also associated to the prolonged life expectancy of patients – are still questions of concern that increase the debate on the usefulness of PBT in pediatric treatments. This paper presents a literary review of current applications of PBT in non-Central Nervous System pediatric tumors (such as retinoblastoma, Hodgkin Lymphoma, Wilms tumor, bone and soft tissues sarcomas). We specifically reported clinical results achieved with PBT and dosimetric comparisons between PBT and the most common photon-therapy techniques. The analysis emphasizes that PBT minimizes radiation doses to healthy growing organs, suggesting for reduced risks of late side-effects and radiation-induced secondary malignancies. Extended follow up and confirms by prospective clinical trials should support the effectiveness and long-term tolerance of PBT in the considered setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Sardaro
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Roberta Carbonara
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - Maria Fonte Petruzzelli
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Barbara Turi
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Moschetta
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Arnaldo Scardapane
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, University of Bari, p.zza Giulio Cesare nr.11, 70124, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Müller C, De Prado Leal M, Dominietto MD, Umbricht CA, Safai S, Perrin RL, Egloff M, Bernhardt P, van der Meulen NP, Weber DC, Schibli R, Lomax AJ. Combination of Proton Therapy and Radionuclide Therapy in Mice: Preclinical Pilot Study at the Paul Scherrer Institute. Pharmaceutics 2019; 11:pharmaceutics11090450. [PMID: 31480730 PMCID: PMC6781294 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11090450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy (PT) is a treatment with high dose conformality that delivers a highly-focused radiation dose to solid tumors. Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT), on the other hand, is a systemic radiation therapy, which makes use of intravenously-applied radioconjugates. In this project, it was aimed to perform an initial dose-searching study for the combination of these treatment modalities in a preclinical setting. Therapy studies were performed with xenograft mouse models of folate receptor (FR)-positive KB and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive PC-3 PIP tumors, respectively. PT and TRT using 177Lu-folate and 177Lu-PSMA-617, respectively, were applied either as single treatments or in combination. Monitoring of the mice over nine weeks revealed a similar tumor growth delay after PT and TRT, respectively, when equal tumor doses were delivered either by protons or by β¯-particles, respectively. Combining the methodologies to provide half-dose by either therapy approach resulted in equal (PC-3 PIP tumor model) or even slightly better therapy outcomes (KB tumor model). In separate experiments, preclinical positron emission tomography (PET) was performed to investigate tissue activation after proton irradiation of the tumor. The high-precision radiation delivery of PT was confirmed by the resulting PET images that accurately visualized the irradiated tumor tissue. In this study, the combination of PT and TRT resulted in an additive effect or a trend of synergistic effects, depending on the type of tumor xenograft. This study laid the foundation for future research regarding therapy options in the situation of metastasized solid tumors, where surgery or PT alone are not a solution but may profit from combination with systemic radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Müller
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland.
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Maria De Prado Leal
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Marco D Dominietto
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Christoph A Umbricht
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Sairos Safai
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Rosalind L Perrin
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Martina Egloff
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Peter Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Physics, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Medical Physics and Medical Bioengeneering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nicholas P van der Meulen
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
- Laboratory of Radiochemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Roger Schibli
- Center for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Comparison of Proton and Photon Beam Irradiation in Radiation-Induced Intestinal Injury Using a Mouse Model. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20081894. [PMID: 30999572 PMCID: PMC6514697 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20081894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
When radiotherapy is applied to the abdomen or pelvis, normal tissue toxicity in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is considered a major dose-limiting factor. Proton beam therapy has a specific advantage in terms of reduced doses to normal tissues. This study investigated the fundamental differences between proton- and X-ray-induced intestinal injuries in mouse models. C57BL/6J mice were irradiated with 6-MV X-rays or 230-MeV protons and were sacrificed after 84 h. The number of surviving crypts per circumference of the jejunum was identified using Hematoxylin and Eosin staining. Diverse intestinal stem cell (ISC) populations and apoptotic cells were analyzed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) assay, respectively. The crypt microcolony assay revealed a radiation-dose-dependent decrease in the number of regenerative crypts in the mouse jejunum; proton irradiation was more effective than X-ray irradiation with a relative biological effectiveness of 1.14. The jejunum is the most sensitive to radiations, followed by the ileum and the colon. Both types of radiation therapy decreased the number of radiosensitive, active cycling ISC populations. However, a higher number of radioresistant, reserve ISC populations and Paneth cells were eradicated by proton irradiation than X-ray irradiation, as shown in the IHC analyses. The TUNEL assay revealed that proton irradiation was more effective in enhancing apoptotic cell death than X-ray irradiation. This study conducted a detailed analysis on the effects of proton irradiation versus X-ray irradiation on intestinal crypt regeneration in mouse models. Our findings revealed that proton irradiation has a direct effect on ISC populations, which may result in an increase in the risk of GI toxicity during proton beam therapy.
Collapse
|
31
|
Hoshina RM, Matsuura T, Umegaki K, Shimizu S. A Literature Review of Proton Beam Therapy for Prostate Cancer in Japan. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8010048. [PMID: 30621278 PMCID: PMC6352078 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8010048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2018] [Revised: 12/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Patients of proton beam therapy (PBT) for prostate cancer had been continuously growing in number due to its promising characteristics of high dose distribution in the tumor target and a sharp distal fall-off. Considering the large number of proton beam facilities in Japan, the further increase of patients undergoing this treatment is due to the emendations by Japanese National Health Insurance (NHI) and the development of medical equipment and technology, it is necessary to know what kind of research and advancements has been done on proton therapy for prostate cancer in the country. For these reasons, this literature review was conducted. The aim of this review is to identify and discuss research studies of proton beam therapy for prostate cancer in Japan. These include observational, interventional, and secondary data analysis of published articles. Method: A literature review on published works related to proton beam therapy for prostate cancer in Japan was conducted using articles that were gathered in the PubMed database of June 2018. We went through abstracts and manuscripts written in English with the keywords ‘proton beam therapy’, ‘prostate cancer’, and ‘Japan’. Results: A total of 23 articles were included. Fourteen articles were observational studies, most of which focused on the adverse effects of Proton Beam Therapy (PBT). Seven articles were interventional studies related on treatment planning, equipment parts, as well as target positioning. Two were secondary data analysis. The included studies were published in 13 different journals by different institutions using various equipment. Conclusion: Despite the favorable results of proton beam therapy, future research should include more patients and longer follow-up schedules to clarify the definitive role of PBT, yet, up to recent retrospective studies, included in this paper, concluded that PBT can be a suitable treatment option for localized prostate cancer. In addition, interventional studies were conducted by several institutions to further embellish proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rika Maglente Hoshina
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Santo Tomas, España, Manila 1002, Philippines.
| | - Taeko Matsuura
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
- Division of Quantum Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan.
| | - Kikuo Umegaki
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
- Division of Quantum Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan.
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo 060-8648, Japan.
- Global Station for Quantum Medical Science and Engineering, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|