Skeletal muscle major histocompatibility complex class I and II expression differences in adult and juvenile dermatomyositis

The Role of Repeat Skeletal Muscle Biopsy: Indications, Yield and Outcomes

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Muscle biopsy performed to investigate weakness and/or pain may be nondiagnostic and prompt repeat biopsy. We determined the indications and yield of rebiopsy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent > 1 muscle biopsy (South Australia, 2000-2023) were identified. Biopsy indication and histological diagnosis at initial (B1) and subsequent (B2) biopsy were documented. Two histological outcomes were defined: change from non-specific (B1) to specific diagnosis (B2) (Outcome 1) or change in specific diagnosis (Outcome 2). Clinical records were reviewed to determine if rebiopsy affected clinical decision making.

RESULTS

Repeat biopsies accounted for 112/3089 (3.6%) of biopsies. The main indications for repeating a biopsy were specific diagnostic query (36/112, 32.1%), most commonly inclusion body myositis (IBM) or genetic myopathy, and unexpected clinical trajectory (74/112, 66.1%). Almost half of rebiopsies (48/112, 42.9%) met Outcome 1 (31/48) or 2 (17/48). Altered histological diagnosis impacted clinical decision-making in 17/22 (77.3%) patients. 21/34 (61.8%) with an initial non-specific myopathy achieved Outcome 1. B2 showed prominent atrophy in seven patients; 3/7 had non-specific myopathy on B1. Open biopsy method for repeat biopsy was associated with Outcome 1 or 2 (OR 4.3 [IQR 1.6-11.5], p = 0.004).

DISCUSSION

Repeat muscle biopsy achieved a specific diagnosis in 43% of cases and frequently impacted clinical decision-making. The highest yield was when IBM was suspected clinically, or when B1 showed non-specific myopathy. Non-specific myopathy may progress to histological atrophy; the role of untreated inflammation in driving this is unclear.

Contribution of major histocompatibility complex class II immunostaining in distinguishing idiopathic inflammatory myopathy subgroups: A histopathological cohort study

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are rare, acquired muscle diseases; their diagnosis of is based on clinical, serological, and histological criteria. MHC-I-positive immunostaining, although non-specific, is used as a marker for IIM diagnosis; however, the significance of major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-II immunostaining in IIM remains debated. We investigated patterns of MHC-II immunostaining in myofibers and capillaries in muscle biopsies from 103 patients with dermatomyositis ([DM], n = 31), inclusion body myositis ([IBM], n = 24), anti-synthetase syndrome ([ASyS], n = 10), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy ([IMNM], n = 18), or overlap myositis ([OM], n = 20). MHC-II immunostaining of myofibers was abnormal in 63/103 of patients (61%) but the patterns differed according to the IIM subgroup. They were diffuse in IBM (96%), negative in IMNM (83%), perifascicular in ASyS (70%), negative (61%) or perifascicular (32%) in DM, and either clustered (40%), perifascicular (30%), or diffuse heterogeneous (15%) in OM. Capillary MHC-II immunostaining also identified quantitative (capillary dropout, n = 47/88, 53%) and qualitative abnormalities, that is, architectural abnormalities, including dilated and leaky capillaries, (n = 79/98, 81%) in all IIM subgroups. Thus, MHC-II myofiber expression patterns allow distinguishing among IIM subgroups. We suggest the addition of MHC-II immunostaining to routine histological panels for IIM diagnosis.

Relapse risk factors and clinical characteristics of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in 105 patients

OBJECTIVE

To identify the risk factors for relapse of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs).

METHODS

Patients who were newly diagnosed with IIMs and underwent muscle biopsy between 2000 and 2017 at Asan Medical Center were retrospectively reviewed. The relapse of IIMs was defined as the recurrence of muscle or cutaneous manifestations with a ≥50% increase in glucocorticoid dosage after reaching the low-dose glucocorticoid phase with clinically significant improvement. The factors associated with the relapse of IIMs were investigated by Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS

Of 105 patients with IIMs, relapse was observed in 65 patients (62%). The titer of antinuclear antibody (ANA) was higher in the relapse group than in the non-relapse group (P = 0.033). Multivariable analysis showed that the relapse of IIMs was significantly associated with histopathologic features consistent with IIMs (hazard ratio [HR], 1.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.83, P = 0.045) and the use of immunosuppressants before relapse (HR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.29-0.86, P = 0.013). Doubling of ANA titer was also associated with relapse, albeit without statistical significance (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.00-1.27, P = 0.052).

CONCLUSION

In patients with IIMs, the use of immunosuppressants had a significant negative association with relapse. Administering immunosuppressants from the early period during the initial glucocorticoid tapering phase may be useful in reducing the risk of relapse in patients with IIMs. Key Points • Since idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) have a low prevalence, it is poorly understood which factors are associated with the relapse of IIMs. • In this study, about two-thirds of 105 patients with IIMs experienced a relapse of IIMs. • The risk of relapse in patients with IIMs was negatively associated with the use of immunosuppressants during glucocorticoid tapering and low-dose glucocorticoid phase. • Even in less severe cases, the use of immunosuppressants might be a good option for the management of IIMs.

Personalised medicine in juvenile dermatomyositis: From novel insights in disease mechanisms to changes in clinical practice

Juvenile dermatomyositis is characterized by childhood-onset chronic inflammation of the muscles and skin, with potential involvement of other organs. Patients are at risk for long-term morbidity due to insufficient disease control and steroid-related toxicity. Personalised treatment is challenged by a lack of validated tools that can reliably predict treatment response and monitor ongoing (subclinical) inflammation, and by a lack of evidence regarding the best choice of medication for individual patients. A better understanding of the involved disease mechanisms could reveal potential biomarkers and novel therapeutic targets. In this review, we highlight the most relevant immune and non-immune mechanisms, elucidating the effects of interferon overexpression on tissue alongside the interplay between the interferon signature, mitochondrial function, and immune cells. We review mechanism-based biomarkers that are promising for clinical implementation, and the latest advances in targeted therapy development. Finally, we discuss key steps needed for translating these discoveries into clinical practice.

Expression of CD163 and major histocompatibility complex class I as diagnostic markers for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

BACKGROUND

To develop an inflammation-related immunohistochemistry marker-based algorithm that confers higher diagnostic ability for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) than IIM-related histopathologic features.

METHODS

Muscle biopsy tissues from 129 IIM patients who met the 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria and 73 control tissues from patients with non-inflammatory myopathies or healthy muscle specimens were evaluated for histological features and immunostaining results of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, CD163, MX1, MHC class I, MHC class II, and HLA-DR. Diagnostic algorithms for IIM were developed based on the results of the classification and regression tree (CART) analysis, which used immunostaining results as predictor variables for classifying patients with IIMs.

RESULTS

In the analysis set (IIM, n = 129; control, n = 73), IIM-related histopathologic features had a diagnostic accuracy of 87.6% (sensitivity 80.6%; specificity 100.0%) for IIMs. Notably, muscular expression of CD163 (99.2% vs. 20.8%, p < 0.001) and MHC class I (87.6% vs. 23.1%, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the IIM group than in controls. Based on the CART analysis results, we developed an algorithm combining CD163 and MHC class I expression that conferred a diagnostic accuracy of 95.5% (sensitivity 96.1%; specificity 94.5%). In addition, our algorithm was able to correctly diagnose IIM in 94.1% (16/17) of patients who did not meet the 2017 EUALR/ACR criteria but were diagnosed as having IIMs by an expert physician.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of CD163 and MHC class I muscular expression may be useful in diagnosing IIMs.

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Are Associated with Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis-A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Background and Objectives: Polymyositis and dermatomyositis (PM/DM) are classified as polygenic autoimmune diseases, whereas inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is considered a polygenic autoinflammatory disease. In the literature, several cases exist reporting the co-occurrence of both conditions. At the molecular level, PM/DM and IBD share common genetic determinants including interferon regulatory factor and vitamin D receptor susceptibility loci. Accumulating evidence underline several indicators that confer poor prognosis in IBD, including antinuclear antibody positivity and the presence of other autoimmune diseases, therefore the aim of this study is to assess the association between these entities. Materials and Methods: This is a population-based retrospective study using data retrieved from a large electronic medical record in Israel, the Clalit health registry. The sample included PM/DM patients and age- and sex-frequency matched controls. The prevalence of IBD in PM/DM was compared between the two groups and logistic regression was applied to control for confounding variables. Predictors of IBD in patients with PM/DM were also explored. Results: Our study included 12,278 subjects with 2085 PM/DM patients and 10,193 age- and sex- frequency-matched controls. The incidence of IBD in patients with PM/DM was significantly higher even after controlling for various confounding variables (OR of 1.73, 95% CI 1.05-2.86, p-value = 0.033). Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) positivity was found to be an independent predictor for IBD diagnosis in patients with PM/DM (OR 3.67, 95% CI 1.01-13.36, p = 0.048). Conclusion: Our analysis reports an association between IBD and PM/DM. Such association could point towards a common pathophysiological background. Further research is needed to further describe the clinical courses and whether a unique therapeutic approach is warranted.

Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM): A myopathological challenge

This review is focused on the myopathological spectrum of immune mediated necrotizing myopathies (IMNMs) and its differentiation with other, potentially mimicking, inflammatory and non-inflammatory myopathies. IMNMs are a subgroup of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) characterized by severe clinical presentation with rapidly progressive muscular weakness and creatine kinase elevation, often requiring early aggressive immunotherapy, associated to the presence of muscle specific autoantibodies (MSA) against signal recognition particle (SRP) or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR). Muscle biopsy usually shows unspecific features consisting in prominent necrosis and regeneration of muscle fibres with mild or absent inflammatory infiltrates, inconstant and faint expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and variable deposition of C5b-9 on sarcolemma. Several conditions could present similar histopathological findings leading to possible misdiagnosis of IMNM with other IIMs or non-inflammatory myopathies (nIMs) and viceversa. This review analyses the muscle biopsy data in IMNMs through a systematic revision of the literature from the last five decades. Several histopathological variables have been considered in both SRP- and HMGCR-IMNM, and compared to other IIMs - as dermatomyositis (DM) and anti-synthethase syndrome (ASS) - or other nIMs -as toxic myopathies (TM), critical illness myopathy (CIM) and muscular dystrophy (MD) - to elucidate similarities and differences among these potentially mimicking conditions. The major histopathological findings of IMNMs were: very frequent necrosis and regeneration of muscle fibres (93%), mild inflammatory component mainly constituted by scattered isolated (65%) CD68-prevalent (68%) cells, without CD8 invading/surrounding non-necrotic fibres, variable expression of MHC-I in non-necrotic fibres (56%) and constant expression of sarcoplasmic p62, confirming those that are widely considered the major histological characteristics of IMNMs. Conversely, only 42% of biopsies showed a sarcolemmal deposition of C5b-9 component. Few differences between SRP and HMGCR IMNMs consisted in more severe necrosis and regeneration in SRP than in HMGCR (p = 0.01); more frequent inflammatory infiltrates (p = 0.007) with perivascular localization (p = 0.01) and clustered expression of MHC-I (p = 0.007) in HMGCR; very low expression of sarcolemmal C5b-9 in SRP (18%) compared to HMGCR (56%) (p = 0.0001). Milder necrosis and regeneration, detection of perifascicular pathology, presence of lymphocytic inflammatory infiltrates and myofibre expression of MxA help to distinguish DM or ASS from IMNM. nIMs can present signs of inflammation at muscle biopsy. Low fibre size variability with overexpression of both MHC-I and II, associated with C5b-9 deposition, could could be observed in CIM, while increased connective tissue should lead to consider MD, or TM in absence of C5b-9 deposition. Nevertheless, these features are not constantly detected and muscle biopsy could not be diriment. For this reason, muscle biopsy should always be critically considered in light of the clinical context before concluding for a definite diagnosis of IMNM, only based on histopathological findings. More rigorous collection and analysis of muscle biopsy is warranted to obtain a higher quality and more homogeneous histopathological data in inflammatory myopathies.

Systemic and Tissue Inflammation in Juvenile Dermatomyositis: From Pathogenesis to the Quest for Monitoring Tools

Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM) is a systemic immune-mediated disease of childhood, characterized by muscle weakness, and a typical skin rash. Other organ systems and tissues such as the lungs, heart, and intestines can be involved, but may be under-evaluated. The inflammatory process in JDM is characterized by an interferon signature and infiltration of immune cells such as T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells into the affected tissues. Vasculopathy due to loss and dysfunction of endothelial cells as a result of the inflammation is thought to underlie the symptoms in most organs and tissues. JDM is a heterogeneous disease, and several disease phenotypes, each with a varying combination of affected tissues and organs, are linked to the presence of myositis autoantibodies. These autoantibodies have therefore been extensively studied as biomarkers for the disease phenotype and its associated prognosis. Next to identifying the JDM phenotype, monitoring of disease activity and disease-inflicted damage not only in muscle and skin, but also in other organs and tissues, is an important part of clinical follow-up, as these are key determinants for the long-term outcomes of patients. Various monitoring tools are currently available, among which clinical assessment, histopathological investigation of muscle and skin biopsies, and laboratory testing of blood for specific biomarkers. These investigations also give novel insights into the underlying immunological processes that drive inflammation in JDM and suggest a strong link between the interferon signature and vasculopathy. New tools are being developed in the quest for minimally invasive, but sensitive and specific diagnostic methods that correlate well with clinical symptoms or reflect local, low-grade inflammation. In this review we will discuss the types of (extra)muscular tissue inflammation in JDM and their relation to vasculopathic changes, critically assess the available diagnostic methods including myositis autoantibodies and newly identified biomarkers, and reflect on the immunopathogenic implications of identified markers.

Comparison between treatment naive juvenile and adult dermatomyositis muscle biopsies: difference of inflammatory cells phenotyping

BACKGROUND

Different inflammatory cells (i.e., CD4, CD8, CD20 and CD68) are involved in pathogenesis of DM muscle. In this context, the aim of this study was to assess and compare these inflammatory cell phenotyping in muscle samples of treatment naive juvenile and adult patients with dermatomyositis.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study, in which 28 untreated juvenile and 28 adult untreated dermatomyositis patients were included. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on serial frozen muscle sections. Inflammatory cell phenotyping was analyzed quantitatively in endomysium, perimysium, and perivascular (endomysium and perimysium) area.

RESULTS

Mean age at disease onset was 7.3 and 42.0 years in juvenile and adult dermatomyositis, respectively. Both groups had comparable time duration from symptom's onset to biopsy performance. CD4 and CD8 positive cells distributions were similar in both groups in all analyzed area, except for more predominance of CD4 in perimysium at juvenile muscle biopsies. The CD20 and CD68 positive cells were predominantly observed in adult muscle biopsy sections, when compared to juvenile samples, except for similar distribution of CD20 in perivascular endomysium, and CD68 in perimysium.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that the differences between juvenile and adult dermatomyositis may be restricted not only to patients' age, but also to different inflammatory cell distribution, particularly, in new-onset disease. Further studies are necessary to confirm the present study data and to analyze meaning of the different inflammatory cell phenotyping distribution finding in these both diseases.

Consensus-based recommendations for the management of juvenile dermatomyositis

BACKGROUND

In 2012, a European initiative called Single Hub and Access point for pediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) was launched to optimise and disseminate diagnostic and management regimens in Europe for children and young adults with rheumatic diseases. Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare disease within the group of paediatric rheumatic diseases (PRDs) and can lead to significant morbidity. Evidence-based guidelines are sparse and management is mostly based on physicians' experience. Consequently, treatment regimens differ throughout Europe.

OBJECTIVES

To provide recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of JDM.

METHODS

Recommendations were developed by an evidence-informed consensus process using the European League Against Rheumatism standard operating procedures. A committee was constituted, consisting of 19 experienced paediatric rheumatologists and 2 experts in paediatric exercise physiology and physical therapy, mainly from Europe. Recommendations derived from a validated systematic literature review were evaluated by an online survey and subsequently discussed at two consensus meetings using nominal group technique. Recommendations were accepted if >80% agreement was reached.

RESULTS

In total, 7 overarching principles, 33 recommendations on diagnosis and 19 recommendations on therapy were accepted with >80% agreement among experts. Topics covered include assessment of skin, muscle and major organ involvement and suggested treatment pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

The SHARE initiative aims to identify best practices for treatment of patients suffering from PRD. Within this remit, recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of JDM have been formulated by an evidence-informed consensus process to produce a standard of care for patients with JDM throughout Europe.

Major Histocompatibility Complex I and II Expression and Lymphocytic Subtypes in Muscle of Horses with Immune-Mediated Myositis

BACKGROUND

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) I and II expression is not normally detected on sarcolemma, but is detected with lymphocytic infiltrates in immune-mediated myositis (IMM) of humans and dogs and in dysferlin-deficient muscular dystrophy.

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES

To determine if sarcolemmal MHC is expressed in active IMM in horses, if MHC expression is associated with lymphocytic subtype, and if dysferlin is expressed in IMM.

ANIMALS

Twenty-one IMM horses of Quarter Horse-related breeds, 3 healthy and 6 disease controls (3 pasture myopathy, 3 amylase-resistant polysaccharide storage myopathy [PSSM]).

METHODS

Immunohistochemical staining for MHC I, II, and CD4+, CD8+, CD20+ lymphocytes was performed on archived muscle of IMM and control horses. Scores were given for MHC I, II, and lymphocytic subtypes. Immunofluorescent staining for dysferlin, dystrophin, and a-sarcoglycan was performed.

RESULTS

Sarcolemmal MHC I and II expression was detected in 17/21 and 15/21 of IMM horses, respectively, and in specific fibers of PSSM horses, but not healthy or pasture myopathy controls. The CD4+, CD8+, and CD20+ cells were present in 20/21 IMM muscles with CD4+ predominance in 10/21 and CD8+ predominance in 6/21 of IMM horses. Dysferlin, dystrophin, and a-sarcoglycan staining were similar in IMM and control muscles.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Deficiencies of dysferlin, dystrophin, and a-sarcoglycan are not associated with IMM. Sarcolemmal MHC I and II expression in a proportion of myofibers of IMM horses in conjunction with lymphocytic infiltration supports an immune-mediated etiology for IMM. The MHC expression also occured in specific myofibers in PSSM horses in the absence of lymphocytic infiltrates.

Dissociation of skeletal muscle for flow cytometric characterization of immune cells in macaques

The majority of vaccines and several treatments are administered by intramuscular injection. The aim is to engage and activate immune cells, although they are rare in normal skeletal muscle. The phenotype and function of resident as well as infiltrating immune cells in the muscle after injection are largely unknown. While methods for obtaining and characterizing murine muscle cell suspensions have been reported, protocols for nonhuman primates (NHPs) have not been well defined. NHPs comprise important in vivo models for studies of immune cell function due to their high degree of resemblance with humans. In this study, we developed and systematically compared methods to collect vaccine-injected muscle tissue to be processed into single cell suspensions for flow cytometric characterization of immune cells. We found that muscle tissue processed by mechanical disruption alone resulted in significantly lower immune cell yields compared to enzymatic digestion using Liberase. Dendritic cell subsets, monocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, B cells, T cells and NK cells were readily detected in the muscle by the classic human markers. The methods for obtaining skeletal muscle cell suspension established here offer opportunities to increase the understanding of immune responses in the muscle, and provide a basis for defining immediate post-injection vaccine responses in primates.

An analysis of the sensitivity and specificity of MHC-I and MHC-II immunohistochemical staining in muscle biopsies for the diagnosis of inflammatory myopathies

Although there have been several previous reports of immunohistochemical staining for MHC antigens in muscle biopsies, there appears to be a lack of consensus about its routine use in the diagnostic evaluation of biopsies from patients with suspected inflammatory myopathy. Positive MHC-I staining is nonspecific but is widely used as a marker for inflammatory myopathy, whilst the role of MHC-II staining is not clearly defined. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of MHC-I and MHC-II immunostaining for the diagnosis of inflammatory myopathy in a large group of biopsies from a single reference laboratory. Positive staining for MHC-I was found to have a high sensitivity in biopsies from patients with inflammatory myopathy but a very low specificity, as it was also common in other non-inflammatory myopathies and neurogenic disorders. On the other hand, MHC-II positivity had a much higher specificity in all major subgroups of inflammatory myopathy, especially inclusion body myositis. The findings indicate that the combination of MHC-I and MHC-II staining results in a higher degree of specificity for the diagnosis of inflammatory myopathy and that in biopsies with inflammation, positive MHC-II staining strongly supports the diagnosis of an immune-mediated myopathy. We recommend that immunohistochemical staining for both MHC-I and MHC-II should be included routinely in the diagnostic evaluation of muscle biopsies from patients with suspected inflammatory myopathy. However, as the sensitivity and interpretation of MHC staining may depend on the technique used, further studies are needed to compare procedures in different centres and develop standardised protocols.