Family history of colorectal adenomatous polyps and increased risk for colorectal cancer

Improve the Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis Using Gut Microbiome Data

In the United States, colorectal cancer is the second largest cause of cancer death, and accurate early detection and identification of high-risk patients is a high priority. Although fecal screening tests are available, the close relationship between colorectal cancer and the gut microbiome has generated considerable interest. We describe a machine learning method for gut microbiome data to assist in diagnosing colorectal cancer. Our methodology integrates feature engineering, mediation analysis, statistical modeling, and network analysis into a novel unified pipeline. Simulation results illustrate the value of the method in comparison to existing methods. For predicting colorectal cancer in two real datasets, this pipeline showed an 8.7% higher prediction accuracy and 13% higher area under the receiver operator characteristic curve than other published work. Additionally, the approach highlights important colorectal cancer-related taxa for prioritization, such as high levels of Bacteroides fragilis, which can help elucidate disease pathology. Our algorithms and approach can be widely applied for Colorectal cancer prediction using either 16 S rRNA or shotgun metagenomics data.

Risk Factors for Colorectal Polyps and Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy in the U.S. and worldwide. Most CRC cases arise from precancerous adenomatous and serrated polyps. Established risk factors for conventional adenomas and CRC include age, male sex, family history, obesity and physical inactivity, and red meat intake. White race and tobacco and alcohol use are important risk factors for serrated polyps, which have a distinct risk factor profile compared to conventional adenomas. A history of abdominopelvic radiation, acromegaly, hereditary hemochromatosis, or prior ureterosigmoidostomy also increases CRC risk. Understanding these risk factors allows for targeted screening of high-risk groups to reduce CRC incidence.

The European cancer burden in 2020: Incidence and mortality estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers

INTRODUCTION

Europe is an important focus for compiling accurate and up-to-date world cancer statistics owing to its large share of the world's total cancer burden. This article presents incidence and mortality estimates for 25 major cancers across 40 individual countries within European areas and the European Union (EU-27) for the year 2020.

METHODS

The estimated national incidence and mortality rates are based on statistical methodology previously applied and verified using the most recently collected incidence data from 151 population-based cancer registries, mortality data and 2020 population estimates.

RESULTS

Estimates reveal 4 million new cases of cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) and 1.9 million cancer-related deaths. The most common cancers are: breast in women (530,000 cases), colorectum (520,000), lung (480,000) and prostate (470,000). These four cancers account for half the overall cancer burden in Europe. The most common causes of cancer deaths are: lung (380,000), colorectal (250,000), breast (140,000) and pancreatic (130,000) cancers. In EU-27, the estimated new cancer cases are approximately 1.4 million in males and 1.2 million in females, with over 710,000 estimated cancer deaths in males and 560,000 in females.

CONCLUSION

The 2020 estimates provide a basis for establishing priorities in cancer-control measures across Europe. The long-established role of cancer registries in cancer surveillance and the evaluation of cancer control measures remain fundamental in formulating and adapting national cancer plans and pan-European health policies. Given the estimates are built on recorded data prior to the onset of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), they do not take into account the impact of the pandemic.

Risk of colorectal cancer in first degree relatives of patients with colorectal polyps: nationwide case-control study in Sweden

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in first degree relatives (parents and full siblings) of patients with precursor lesions (polyps) for CRC.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Linkage to the multi-generation register and gastrointestinal ESPRESSO (Epidemiology Strengthened by histoPathology Reports in Sweden) histopathology cohort in Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

68 060 patients with CRC and 333 753 matched controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Multivariable adjusted odds ratios of CRC according to the number of first degree relatives with a colorectal polyp and the histology of polyps and age at diagnosis in first degree relatives. Subgroup analysis was also performed according to age at CRC diagnosis and evaluated the joint association of family history of colorectal polyps and family history of CRC.

RESULTS

After adjusting for family history of CRC and other covariates, having a first degree relative with a colorectal polyp (8.4% (5742/68 060) in cases and 5.7% (18 860/333 753) in controls) was associated with a higher risk of CRC (odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.35 to 1.45). The odds ratios ranged from 1.23 for those with hyperplastic polyps to 1.44 for those with tubulovillous adenomas. To better put this risk in perspective, the age specific absolute risk of colon and rectal cancers was estimated according to family history of polyps based on the 2018 national CRC incidence in Sweden. For example, the absolute risk of colon cancer in individuals aged 60-64 years with and without a family history of colorectal polyp was, respectively, 94.3 and 67.9 per 100 000 for men and 89.1 and 64.1 per 100 000 for women. The association between family history of polyps and CRC risk was strengthened by the increasing number of first degree relatives with polyps (≥2 first degree relatives: 1.70, 1.52 to 1.90, P<0.001 for trend) and decreasing age at polyp diagnosis (<50 years: 1.77, 1.57 to 1.99, P<0.001 for trend). A particularly strong association was found for early onset CRC diagnosed before age 50 years (≥2 first degree relatives: 3.34, 2.05 to 5.43, P=0.002 for heterogeneity by age of CRC diagnosis). In the joint analysis, the odds ratio of CRC for individuals with two or more first degree relatives with polyps but no CRC was 1.79 (1.52 to 2.10), with one first degree relative with CRC but no polyps was 1.70 (1.65 to 1.76), and with two or more first degree relatives with both polyps and CRC was 5.00 (3.77 to 6.63) (P<0.001 for interaction).

CONCLUSIONS

After adjusting for family history of CRC, the siblings and children of patients with colorectal polyps are still at higher risk of CRC, particularly early onset CRC. Early screening for CRC might be considered for first degree relatives of patients with polyps.

Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality After Colonoscopy Screening According to Individuals' Risk Profiles

BACKGROUND

It remains unknown whether the benefit of colonoscopy screening against colorectal cancer (CRC) and the optimal age to start screening differ by CRC risk-profile.

METHODS

Among 75,873 women and 42,875 men, we defined a CRC risk score (0-8) based on family history, aspirin, height, body mass index, smoking, physical-activity, alcohol, and diet. We calculated colonoscopy screening-associated hazard ratios (HRs) and absolute risk reductions (ARRs) for CRC incidence and mortality and age-specific CRC cumulative incidence according to risk score. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

During a median of 26 years' follow-up, we documented 2,407 CRC cases and 874 CRC deaths. While the screening-associated hazard ratio did not vary by risk score, the absolute risk reductions in multivariable-adjusted 10-year CRC incidence more than doubled for individuals with score 6-8 (ARR = 0.34%, 95% CI = 0.26% to 0.42%) compared to 0-2 (ARR = 0.15%, 95% CI = 0.12% to 0.18%; Ptrend<0.001). Similar results were found for CRC mortality (ARR = 0.22% [95% CI = 0.21% to 0.24%] vs. 0.08% [95% CI = 0.07% to 0.08%]; Ptrend<0.001). The absolute risk reduction in mortality of distal-colon and rectal cancers was four-fold higher for score 6-8 than 0-2 (distal-colon cancer: ARR = 0.08% [95% CI = 0.07% to 0.08%] vs. 0.02% [95% CI = 0.02% to 0.02%], Ptrend <0.001; rectal cancer: ARR = 0.08% [95% CI = 0.08% to 0.09%] vs. 0.02% [95% CI = 0.02% to 0.03%], Ptrend <0.001). When using age 45 years as the benchmark to start screening, individuals with risk score of 0-2, 3, 4, 5, and 6-8 attained the threshold CRC risk level (10-year cumulative risk of 0.47%) at age 51, 48, 45, 42, and 38 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The absolute benefit of colonoscopy screening is more than twice higher for individuals with the highest than lowest CRC risk profile. Individuals with a high and low risk profile may start screening up to 6-7 years earlier and later, respectively, than the recommended age 45 years.

Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Lung Transplant Recipients: The Need for an Enhanced Surveillance Protocol

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk for noncutaneous neoplasms, including colorectal cancer (CRC). We evaluated precancerous lesions detected by post-transplant surveillance colonoscopy to infer the rate at which new adenomas develop in this population.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed all patients who underwent lung transplant between January 2013 and August 2017 at our institution. Those with post-transplant survival <1 year, personal history of CRC, previous lung transplant, and lack of pretransplant colonoscopy were excluded.

RESULTS

During the study period, 411 patients underwent lung transplant; 237 met inclusion criteria. Median age at transplant was 63.6 (interquartile range [IQR] 59.2-68.3) years. Most recipients were immunosuppressed with a combination of prednisone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. At least 1 adenoma was found in 92 patients (38.8%) pretransplant and in 118 patients (49.8%) from 1 to 5 years post-transplant, with 68.6% identified at 1 year. Most adenomas were identified proximal to the splenic flexure. Multiple (≥3) adenomas were found in 31.4% of positive colonoscopies. Within 5 years after transplant, patients with a positive pretransplant colonoscopy had significantly more positive post-transplant colonoscopies than patients with a negative pretransplant colonoscopy (63.0% vs 41.4%, p < 0.001). No de novo CRC was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplant recipients have a significantly higher risk of adenoma formation than average-risk adults (25%-30% national detection rate). This increase occurs in the early post-transplant period (within 3 years). An enhanced CRC surveillance protocol for lung transplant recipients is needed.

An Overview of Gut Microbiota and Colon Diseases with a Focus on Adenomatous Colon Polyps

It is known and accepted that the gut microbiota composition of an organism has an impact on its health. Many studies deal with this topic, the majority discussing gastrointestinal health. Adenomatous colon polyps have a high prevalence as colon cancer precursors, but in many cases, they are hard to diagnose in their early stages. Gut microbiota composition correlated with the presence of adenomatous colon polyps may be a noninvasive and efficient tool for diagnosis with a high impact on human wellbeing and favorable health care costs. This review is meant to analyze the gut microbiota correlated with the presence of adenomatous colon polyps as the first step for early diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment.

Colorectal Cancer and Probiotics: Are Bugs Really Drugs?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide. There are many factors that predispose a patient to the disease such as age, family history, ethnicity, and lifestyle. There are different genetic factors and diseases that also increase a person’s risk for developing CRC. Studies have found associations between gut microbiome and the risk for developing versus protection against CRC. Normal gut microbiome aid in daily functions of the human body such as absorption, metabolism, detoxification, and regulation of inflammation. While some species of bacteria prevent CRC development and aid in therapeutic responses to various treatment regiments, other species seem to promote CRC pathogenesis. In this regard, many studies have been conducted to not only understand the biology behind these opposing different bacterial species; but also to determine if supplementation of these tumor opposing bacterial species as probiotics lends toward decreased risk of CRC development and improved therapeutic responses in patients with CRC. In this literature review, we aim to discuss the basics on colorectal cancer (epidemiology, risk factors, targets, treatments), discuss associations between different bacterial strains and CRC, and discuss probiotics and their roles in CRC prevention and treatment.

Prospective colonoscopic study to investigate risk of colorectal neoplasms in first-degree relatives of patients with non-advanced adenomas

OBJECTIVE

The risk associated with a family history of non-advanced adenoma (non-AA) is unknown. We determined the prevalence of colorectal neoplasms in subjects who have a first-degree relative (FDR) with non-AA compared with subjects who do not have an FDR with adenomas.

DESIGN

In a blinded, cross-sectional study, consecutive subjects with newly diagnosed non-AA were identified from our colonoscopy database. 414 FDRs of subjects with non-AA (known as exposed FDRs; mean age 55.0±8.1 years) and 414 age and sex-matched FDRs of subjects with normal findings from colonoscopy (known as unexposed FDRs; mean age 55.2±7.8 years) underwent a colonoscopy from November 2015 to June 2018. One FDR per family was recruited. FDRs with a family history of colorectal cancer were excluded. The primary outcome was prevalence of advanced adenoma (AA). Secondary outcomes included prevalence of all adenomas and cancer.

RESULTS

The prevalence of AA was 3.9% in exposed FDRs and 2.4% in unexposed FDRs (matched OR (mOR)=1.67; 95% CI 0.72 to 3.91; p=0.238 adjusted for proband sex and proband age). Exposed FDRs had a higher prevalence of any adenomas (29.2% vs 18.6%; mOR=1.87; 95% CI 1.32 to 2.66; p<0.001) and non-AA (25.4% vs 16.2%; mOR=1.91; 95% CI 1.32 to 2.76; p=0.001). A higher proportion of exposed FDRs than unexposed FDRs (4.3% vs 2.2%; adjusted mOR=2.44; 95% CI 1.01 to 5.86; p=0.047) had multiple adenomas. No cancer was detected in both groups.

CONCLUSION

A positive family history of non-AA does not significantly increase the risk of clinically important colorectal neoplasia. The data support current guidelines which do not advocate earlier screening in individuals with a family history of non-AA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT0252172.

Prevalence of pre-cancerous colon lesions in referred patients under patronage of a local relief foundation in Guilan province

Colon cancer is the most commonly diagnosed gastrointestinal cancers in developed countries with varied incidence and the onset age of disease worldwide. Overall, 161 participants who were under patronage of a local relief foundation and referred to the endoscopy ward of Razi Hospital affiliated to the Guilan University of Medical Sciences. These patients have been aged more than 50 or more than 40 years with history of colorectal cancer in their first-degree family were enrolled from March 2016–March 2017. Demographic information were collected. Colonoscopy was performed and histopathological evaluation of observed lesions and polyps was done. Most of participants were female (113 individuals, 70.2%) and aged 50–60 years (83 individuals, 51.6%). Seventy-four (46%) had certain lesions. Most of colonoscopy findings were observed in the ascending colon in which depressed polyps and diverticulum were most frequent. However, rectum showed the most histological findings. All polyps of descending and ascending colons were neoplastic, while most of rectal polyps were non-neoplastic. Male patients, who were aged more than 60 years and smokers had significant higher percentage of both lesions and polyps in their colon (p<0.05). Moreover, significant positive association was detected between exposure to harmful industries and having polyps (p=0.01). We found male gender, higher age, smoking, and exposure to harmful industries as important risk factors for having colorectal lesions, which must be confirmed in further studies.

Effect of the timing of discontinuation of last-line chemotherapy on patient prognosis in advanced and recurrent gastric cancer

The present study aimed to determine the effect of the timing of treatment discontinuation on the prognosis of patients with advanced and recurrent gastric cancer chemotherapy. Between July 2014 and March 2017, 127 patients who underwent chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer at Ogaki Municipal Hospital (Ogaki, Japan) were examined. To determine factors associated with survival, multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model, and hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. The reasons for discontinuation of last-line chemotherapy and the last hospitalization prior to mortality were surveyed. Age (≤51 years), number of treatment lines (≤1 line), and days between last dose of the final chemotherapy regimen and death (≤79 days) were independently and significantly associated with survival in the multivariate analysis. Compared with patients who did not receive chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life, those who received chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life days had a hazard ratio of 1.858 (95% CI, 1.059-3.261; P=0.031) for mortality. A decrease in the performance status was responsible for treatment discontinuation in 51 of 75 cases among patients who received chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life and 9 of 26 cases among patients who did not receive chemotherapy in this duration (P<0.001). Among patients who received chemotherapy in the last 79 days of life, 67 patients were hospitalized prior to mortality; among patients who did not receive chemotherapy in this duration, 15 patients were hospitalized prior to mortality (P<0.001). In conclusion, continuation of chemotherapy until just prior to mortality does not prolong the survival time in patients with advanced and recurrent gastric cancer.

Precision Medicine Versus Population Medicine in Colon Cancer: From Prospects of Prevention, Adjuvant Chemotherapy, and Surveillance

With the advances of technologic revolution that provides new insights into human biology, genetics and cancer, as well as advantages of big data which amasses large amounts of information for us to approach cancer treatment and prevention, we are facing challenges of organically combining data from studies based on general population and information from individual testing and setting out precisional recommendations in cancer diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. We are obligated to accelerate the adaptation of new scientific discoveries into effective treatments and prevention for cancer. In this review, we introduce our opinions on bringing knowledge of precision and population medicine together to guide our clinical practice from the prospects of colorectal cancer prevention, stage III colon cancer adjuvant therapy, and postsurgery surveillance.

Screening of colorectal cancer: present and future

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in males and second in females, and the fourth most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Currently, about 60-70% of diagnosed cases in symptomatic patients are detected at an advanced stage of disease. Earlier stage detection through the use of screening strategies would allow for better outcomes in terms of reducing the disease burden. Areas covered: The aim of this paper is to review the current published evidence from literature which assesses the performance and effectiveness of different screening tests for the early detection of CRC. Expert commentary: Adequate screening strategies can reduce CRC incidence and mortality. In the last few decades, several tests have been proposed for CRC screening. To date, there is still insufficient evidence to identify which approach is definitively superior, and no screening strategy for CRC can therefore be defined as universally ideal. The best strategy would be the one that can be economically viable and to which the patient can adhere best to over time. The latest guidelines suggest colonoscopy every 10 years or annual fecal immuno-chemical test (FIT) for people with normal risk, while for individuals with high risk or hereditary syndromes specific recommendations are provided.

Adenomatous polyposis coli genotype-dependent toll-like receptor 4 activity in colon cancer

Toll-like receptors (TLRs)/NF-κB activation stimulated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) was associated with diverse biological response in colon cancer, but the underlying mechanism was largely unknown. In the current study, we reported cell proliferation was elevated in adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutated- and APC knockdown cell lines, while the proliferation was inhibited in APC wild-type cell lines. Besides, in vivo experiments showed that LPS promoted APC knockdown tumor growth while inhibited proliferation of APC wild type. Further study confirmed that activation of TLRs/NF-κB signaling pathway by LPS cross regulated with APC/GSK-3β/β-catenin pathway, which were depend on APC status of cell lines. Taken together, APC genotypes play a key role in LPS induced different colon cancer biological response by cross-regulating β-catenin and NF-κB, which may provide a novel strategy for carcinogenesis prevention.

Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia in Individuals With Self-Reported Family History: A Prospective Colonoscopy Study from 16 Asia-Pacific Regions

OBJECTIVES

We tested the hypothesis that the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACN), and colorectal adenoma among screening participants with different first-degree relatives (FDRs) affected by CRC was similar.

METHODS

A multi-center, prospective colonoscopy study involving 16 Asia-Pacific regions was performed from 2008 to 2015. Consecutive self-referred CRC screening participants aged 40-70 years were recruited, and each subject received one direct optical colonoscopy. The prevalence of CRC, ACN, and colorectal adenoma was compared among subjects with different FDRs affected using Pearson's χ² tests. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk of these lesions, controlling for recognized risk factors including age, gender, smoking habits, alcohol drinking, body mass index, and the presence of diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Among 11,797 asymptomatic subjects, the prevalence of CRC was 0.6% (none: 0.6%; siblings: 1.1%; mother: 0.5%; father: 1.2%; ≥2 members: 3.1%, P<0.001), that of ACN was 6.5% (none: 6.1%; siblings: 8.3%; mother: 7.7%; father: 8.7%; ≥2 members: 9.3%, P<0.001), and that of colorectal adenoma was 29.3% (none: 28.6%; siblings: 33.5%; mother: 31.8%; father: 31.1%; ≥2 members: 38.1%, P<0.001). In multivariate regression analyses, subjects with at least one FDR affected were significantly more likely to have CRC (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=2.02-7.89), ACN (AOR=1.55-2.06), and colorectal adenoma (AOR=1.31-1.92) than those without a family history. The risk of CRC (AOR=0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-2.35, P=0.830), ACN (AOR=1.07, 95% CI 0.75-1.52, P=0.714), and colorectal adenoma (AOR=0.96, 95% CI 0.78-1.19, P=0.718) in subjects with either parent affected was similar to that of subjects with their siblings affected.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of colorectal neoplasia was similar among subjects with different FDRs affected. These findings do not support the need to discriminate proband identity in screening participants with affected FDRs when their risks of colorectal neoplasia were estimated.

Determining the familial risk distribution of colorectal cancer: a data mining approach

This study was aimed to characterize the distribution of colorectal cancer risk using family history of cancers by data mining. Family histories for 10,066 colorectal cancer cases recruited to population cancer registries of the Colon Cancer Family Registry were analyzed using a data mining framework. A novel index was developed to quantify familial cancer aggregation. Artificial neural network was used to identify distinct categories of familial risk. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of colorectal cancer were calculated for each category. We identified five major, and 66 minor categories of familial risk for developing colorectal cancer. The distribution the major risk categories were: (1) 7% of families (SIR = 7.11; 95% CI 6.65-7.59) had a strong family history of colorectal cancer; (2) 13% of families (SIR = 2.94; 95% CI 2.78-3.10) had a moderate family history of colorectal cancer; (3) 11% of families (SIR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.12-1.36) had a strong family history of breast cancer and a weak family history of colorectal cancer; (4) 9 % of families (SIR = 1.06; 95 % CI 0.96-1.18) had strong family history of prostate cancer and weak family history of colorectal cancer; and (5) 60% of families (SIR = 0.61; 95% CI 0.57-0.65) had a weak family history of all cancers. There is a wide variation of colorectal cancer risk that can be categorized by family history of cancer, with a strong gradient of colorectal cancer risk between the highest and lowest risk categories. The risk of colorectal cancer for people with the highest risk category of family history (7% of the population) was 12-times that for people in the lowest risk category (60%) of the population. Data mining was proven an effective approach for gaining insight into the underlying cancer aggregation patterns and for categorizing familial risk of colorectal cancer.

Risk of Advanced Adenomas in Siblings of Individuals With Advanced Adenomas: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The risk of colorectal neoplasms among siblings of patients with advanced adenomas is not clear. We determined the prevalence of advanced adenomas in the siblings of patients with advanced adenomas and compared it with that of siblings of individuals without these lesions.

METHODS

In a blinded, cross-sectional study, colonoscopies were performed (from 2010 through 2014), at 2 hospitals in Hong Kong on 200 asymptomatic siblings of patients with advanced adenomas (exposed; mean age, 58.2 ± 6.3 years; adenomas ≥10 mm, high-grade dysplasia, villous, or tubulovillous) and 400 age- and sex-matched siblings of subjects with normal findings from colonoscopies and no family history of colorectal cancer (unexposed; mean age, 58.1 ± 6 years). We recruited 1 sibling per family. The primary outcome was prevalence of advanced adenomas.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics (ie, aspirin use, smoking, body mass index, and metabolic diseases) did not differ significantly between exposed and unexposed individuals. The prevalence of advanced adenoma was 11.5% among the exposed subjects and 2.5% among the unexposed subjects (matched odds ratio [mOR] = 6.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.74-13.36; P < .001). The prevalence of adenomas ≥10 mm was higher among exposed than unexposed siblings (10.5% vs 1.8%; mOR = 8.59; 95% CI: 3.44-21.45; P < .001), as was the prevalence of villous adenomas (5.5% vs 1.3% in unexposed; mOR = 6.28; 95% CI: 2.02-19.53; P = .001) and all colorectal adenomas (39.0% vs 19.0% in unexposed; mOR = 3.29; 95% CI: 2.16-5.03; P < .001). Two cancers were detected in exposed siblings and none in unexposed siblings.

CONCLUSIONS

In a cross-sectional study of subjects undergoing colonoscopy in Hong Kong, siblings of individuals with at least 1 advanced adenoma had a 6-fold increased odds of advanced adenoma compared with subjects who had a sibling with a screening colonoscopy with no identified neoplasia. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT01593098.

Dual Energy Spectral CT Imaging for Colorectal Cancer Grading: A Preliminary Study

Objectives

To assess the diagnostic value of dual energy spectral CT imaging for colorectal cancer grading using the quantitative iodine density measurements in both arterial phase (AP) and venous phase (VP).

Methods

81 colorectal cancer patients were divided into two groups based on their pathological findings: a low grade group including well (n = 13) and moderately differentiated cancer (n = 24), and a high grade group including poorly differentiated (n = 42) and signet ring cell cancer (n = 2). Iodine density (ID) in the lesions was derived from the iodine-based material decomposition (MD) image and normalized to that in the psoas muscle to obtain normalized iodine density (NID). The difference in ID and NID between AP and VP was calculated.

Results

The ID and NID values of the low grade cancer group were, 14.65±3.38mg/mL and 1.70±0.33 in AP, and 21.90±3.11mg/mL and 2.05± 0.32 in VP, respectively. The ID and NID values for the high grade cancer group were 20.63±3.72mg/mL and 2.95±0.72 in AP, and 26.27±3.10mg/mL and 3.51±1.12 in VP, respectively. There was significant difference for ID and NID between the low grade and high grade cancer groups in both AP and VP (all p<0.001). ROC analysis indicated that NID of 1.92 in AP provided 70.3% sensitivity and 97.7% specificity in differentiating low grade cancer from high grade cancer.

Conclusions

The quantitative measurement of iodine density in AP and VP can provide useful information to differentiate low grade colorectal cancer from high grade colorectal cancer with NID in AP providing the greatest diagnostic value.

Association between Health Behaviors and a Family History of Cancer among Korean Women

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine the health-related behaviors related to a family history of cancer (FHCA) among Korean women underwent cancer screening.

Materials and Methods

A total of 8,956 women who underwent cancer screenings during 2001-2011 at the National Cancer Center, Korea, were analyzed. The association between health-related behaviors and a FHCA were assessed using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

Compared to women with no FHCA, women with FHCA were more likely to smoke (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.65), to be exposed to passive smoking (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65), and less likely to engage in regular exercise (aOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.41). Combined effects of selected health behaviors for FHCA were significant, although no statistically significant interactions were observed between selected health behaviors. Compared to women with no FHCA, women with FHCA were more likely to simultaneously smoke and be exposed to passive smoking (aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.31) and to simultaneously smoke and be physically inactive (aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.00 to 2.64).

Conclusion

The study found that women with a FHCA exhibited unhealthy behaviors compared to women without FHCA. Higher emphasis on lifestyle modifications using a new standardized tool is strongly recommended for those with a FHCA, as well as individuals who are at high risk, together with their family members.

Tailored telephone counseling increases colorectal cancer screening

To compare the efficacy of two interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening participation and forward stage movement of colorectal cancer screening adoption among first-degree relatives of individuals diagnosed with adenomatous polyps. One hundred fifty-eight first-degree relatives of individuals diagnosed with adenomatous polyps were randomly assigned to receive one of two interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening. Participants received either a tailored telephone counseling plus brochures intervention or a non-tailored print brochures intervention. Data were collected at baseline and 3 months post-baseline. Group differences and the effect of the interventions on adherence and stage movement for colorectal cancer screening were examined using t-tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. Individuals in the tailored telephone counseling plus brochures group were significantly more likely to complete colorectal cancer screening and to move forward on stage of change for fecal occult blood test, any colorectal cancer test stage and stage of the risk-appropriate test compared with individuals in the non-tailored brochure group at 3 months post-baseline. A tailored telephone counseling plus brochures intervention successfully promoted forward stage movement and colorectal cancer screening adherence among first-degree relatives of individuals diagnosed with adenomatous polyps.

Colonoscopy as a method of choice in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer

Introduction:

Epidemiological characteristics of colorectal cancer indicate that in the U.S. colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of death from malignancy, just behind lung cancer. In the 2000 there were approximately 130,200 new cases, of which 56,300 had lethal outcome. In the past 15 years, the incidence and mortality rate has been declining, especially in women. Colorectal cancer is mainly found in people older than 50 years. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is insufficiently specific for the early detection of the disease. Its normal value is less than 5 g/L in the serum. Elevated levels of CEA after surgery indicate a lack of radical surgery, residual neoplasm, hidden distant metastases or recurrent disease. Unfortunately, only 10-15% of patients with recurrent disease can be successfully re-operated (isolated metastases in the liver or lungs). Colorectal cancer is predominantly adenocarcinoma, the tumor has relatively slow growth. While symptoms occur relatively early, distant metastases have relatively late appearance.

Goals:

The goals of this study were to remind the fundamental facts about the nature of this disease, to stress the importance of early detection of BC-screening programs, to draw attention to contemporary attitudes in the field of diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer, and to show the experience in the treatment of this disease at the Surgical Departments of the General Hospital in Konjic.

Results:

In the period from 2008-2012 years, at the Surgical Department of the General Hospital in Konjic surgically treated are 34 patients who had colorectal malignancy. There were 21 (65 %) male and 13 females (35%). All patients belonged to the age group of 50-75 years. Only five patients or 15 % prior to admission to the hospital had been diagnosed with a malignant process. All others, or 85% of the total sample, were admitted to the hospital as emergency cases (erosive gastritis), and after, shorter preparation underwent surgery. Only five (15%) of patients were admitted electively, already diagnosed with colorectal tumors by colonoscopy. Total number of lethal outcomes at the department was 8 (24%). Three patients died due to cardio-respiratory failure and MOF, and 5 patients due to anastomotic failure and septic shock.

Conclusion:

In conclusion we can say that in our institution it is necessary to obtain the proper equipment (colonoscope) and educate personnel, so we can introduce colonoscopy as the mandatory screening method of examination, particularly for vulnerable groups.

Colorectal cancer: screening and surveillance for high-risk individuals

Colorectal cancer is very common and is closely related to patient age. After age, the second most common risk factor is family history of colon cancer. In fact, it is one of the most hereditable cancers. Colon cancer is preventable and screening has demonstrated efficacy in the reduction of both the incidence and the mortality from colorectal cancer. Several screening techniques are currently available, including endoscopy and nonendoscopic-based techniques. Screening strategies vary according to the individual risk of colon cancer. This paper will focus on the screening recommendations for patients with high-risk colon cancer.

Risk of colorectal cancer and adenomas in the families of patients with adenomas: a population-based study in Utah

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend that individuals with a first-degree relative (FDR) diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) or advanced adenoma before age 60 years should undergo colonoscopy starting at age 40 years. The authors quantified the risk of adenomas and CRC in FDRs, second-degree relatives (SDRs), and third-degree relatives (TDRs) of patients diagnosed with adenomas and advanced adenomas.

METHODS

A population-based, retrospective, case-control study was performed of residents of the state of Utah aged 50 years to 80 years who underwent colonoscopy between 1995 and 2009 at Intermountain Healthcare or the University of Utah. Controls were selected from the population of colonoscopy patients who were free of adenomas or CRC and matched to each case based on sex and birth year. Colonoscopy results were linked with cancer and pedigree information from the Utah Population Database to investigate the familial aggregation of adenomas and CRC using Cox regression analysis. The unit of analysis was the relatives of cases and controls.

RESULTS

Of 126,936 patients who underwent colonoscopy, 43,189 had adenomas and 5563 had advanced adenomas and defined the case population. An elevated risk of CRC was found in FDRs (relative risk [RR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.25-1.46), SDRs (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.07-1.23) of adenoma cases, and in FDRs of advanced adenoma cases (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.29-2.18) compared with controls. Approximately 10% of CRCs diagnosed in relatives would have been missed if the current screening guidelines were strictly adhered to.

CONCLUSIONS

Relatives of colonoscopy patients with adenomas and advanced adenomas appear to have a significantly elevated risk of developing colorectal neoplasia. These data should be considered when establishing CRC screening guidelines for individuals and their families.

Histopathology analysis of benign colorectal diseases and colorectal cancer in Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the western world and also ranks as the fifth-leading malignancy and death in Thailand. This study aimed to provide a present outlook of colorectal diseases among Thai patients with special emphasis on CRC in Hatyai, Songkhla, southern Thailand.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study covered ten year data of CRC, benign colorectal tumors and non-colorectal tumors from the Department of Pathology in Hatyai Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand, between years 2003-2012. Incidence rates based on age, gender, ten year incidence trends, and distribution of histopathological characteristics of patients were calculated and demonstrated.

RESULTS

Out of 730 biopsies, 100 cases were benign colorectal tumors, 336 were CRC and 294 were non-colorectal tumors. Colorectal tumors (both benign and CRC) (60.1%) were more common than non-colorectal tumors (39.9%). CRC (77.1%) were more common than benign colorectal tumors (32.9%). Colorectal tumors were mainly found in patients aged over sixty whereas non-colorectal and benign colorectal tumors were found in those under sixty (P=0.01). sAmong CRC, adenocarcinoma contributed about 97.3% of all cases with well differentiated tumors being the most frequent (56.9%). Both benign colorectal tumors and CRC were more commonly found in males (63%) than females (37%). The incidence trend of CRC demonstrated increase from 2003-2012.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of CRC increased in Hatyai from 2003-2012. CRC tends to be more common in people older than sixty, thus, screening programs, cost-effective analysis of treatment modalities, and treatment protocols for the elderly should be examined. Proper implementation of preventive measures such as changing lifestyle factors might enhance control of colorectal disease.

Increased risk of advanced neoplasms among asymptomatic siblings of patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-most common cancer in Hong Kong. Relatives of patients with CRC have an increased risk of colorectal neoplasm. We assessed the prevalence of advanced neoplasms among asymptomatic siblings of patients with CRC.

METHODS

Patients with CRC were identified from the Prince of Wales Hospital CRC Surgery Registry from 2001 to 2011. Colonoscopies were performed for 374 siblings of patients (age, 52.6 ± 7.4 y) and 374 age- and sex-matched siblings of healthy subjects who had normal colonoscopies and did not have a family history of CRC (controls, 52.7 ± 7.4 y). We identified individuals with advanced neoplasms (defined as cancers or adenomas of at least 10 mm in diameter, high-grade dysplasia, with villous or tubulovillous characteristics).

RESULTS

The prevalence of advanced neoplasms was 7.5% among siblings of patients and 2.9% among controls (matched odds ratio [mOR], 3.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-6.3; P = .002). The prevalence of adenomas larger than 10 mm was higher among siblings of patients than in controls (5.9% vs 2.1%; mOR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.45-7.66; P = .004), as was the presence of colorectal adenomas (31.0% vs 18.2%; mOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.52-3.17; P < .001). Six cancers were detected among siblings of patients; no cancers were detected in controls. The prevalence of advanced neoplasms among siblings of patients was higher when their index case was female (mOR, 4.95; 95% CI, 1.81-13.55) and had distally located CRC (mOR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.34-7.14).

CONCLUSIONS

In Hong Kong, siblings of patients with CRC have a higher prevalence of advanced neoplasms, including CRC, than siblings of healthy individuals. Screening is indicated in this high-risk population. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00164944.

Colorectal cancer screening in patients at moderately increased risk due to family history

Patients with a positive family history have an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and, in many countries, more intensive screening regimens, sometimes involving the use of colonoscopy as opposed to sigmoidoscopy or fecal occult blood testing, are recommended. This review discusses current screening guidelines in the United States and other countries, data on the magnitude of CRC risk in the presence of a family history and the efficacy of recommended screening programs, as well as ancillary issues such as compliance, cost-effectiveness and accuracy of family history ascertainment. We focus on the relatively common “sporadic” family histories of CRC, which typically imparts a mild to moderate elevation in the risk for CRC development in the proband. Defined familial syndromes associated with extremely high risks of CRC, such as hereditary non-polyposis colorectal syndrome or familial adenomatous polyposis, require specialized management approaches and are beyond the scope of this article. We will also not discuss colonoscopic surveillance in patients with a personal history of adenomas or CRC.

Prevalence of adenomas and advanced adenomas in patients in the 40- to 49-year age group undergoing screening colonoscopy because of a family history of adenoma/polyp in a first-degree relative

BACKGROUND

Per current guidelines, patients with a first-degree relative (FDR) with adenomas should get screened at age 40. Data on the prevalence of adenomas and advanced adenomas (AAs) in these patients are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prevalence of adenomas and AAs in 40- to 49-year-old individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy because of a family history (FH) of polyps and to compare these data with those of a control population of similar age.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic medical center and Veterans Affairs medical center.

PATIENTS

Study subjects included all 40- to 49-year-old asymptomatic individuals undergoing initial screening colonoscopy at our institution from January 1, 2006, to June 1, 2009, because of an FDR with polyps. The control population consisted of all 40- to 49-year-old individuals who underwent their first colonoscopy during the same period because of abdominal pain, diarrhea, or constipation without an FH of polyps or colorectal cancer.

INTERVENTION

Colonoscopy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The prevalence of adenomas of any size, AAs, and risk factors associated with adenomas.

RESULTS

The prevalence of adenomas was greater in the FH of polyps group (n = 176) compared with the control sample (n = 178) (26.7% vs 13.5%; P = .002) but was not statistically greater for AAs (5.7% vs 3.4%; P = .3). After adjusting for confounders, FH of a polyp was associated with an increased prevalence of adenomas (odds ratio 2.8 [95% CI, 1.4-5.5]).

LIMITATIONS

Limited data on polyp histology in FDRs and limited sample size.

CONCLUSIONS

Among 40- to 49-year-old patients undergoing screening colonoscopy because of an FDR with polyps, the prevalence of adenomas was greater than in a control population. Prospective research is needed to quantify the prevalence of AAs in this group and to determine whether these individuals should undergo screening colonoscopy at age 40.

Poor patient knowledge regarding family history of colon polyps: implications for the feasibility of stratified screening recommendations

BACKGROUND

In 2008, the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) modified its colorectal screening guidelines regarding patients with family histories of colorectal polyps, specifically highlighting the importance of obtaining detailed history that includes the number, type, and size of adenomas found in a patient's relative. This information is then used to guide screening recommendations for these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the proportion of patients undergoing screening colonscopy for a family history of polyps who have knowledge of their family members' colonoscopy findings.

DESIGN

Retrospective, single-center cohort pilot study.

SETTING

Tertiary care medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients who presented for screening colonoscopy between 2008 and 2010 with an indication of family history of polyps.

INTERVENTIONS

Obtain detailed history regarding patient's family history of polyps, including which family member, age of family member at diagnosis, size, type and number of polyps found.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Knowledge of family history.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were included in the study. Their knowledge of their family histories of polyps showed the following: 23.2% (17/73; 95% CI, 14%-35%) did not know which family member had polyps, 42.5% (31/73; 95% CI, 31%-55%) did not know the age at diagnosis, 71.2% (52/73; 95% CI, 59%-81%) did not know the polyp type, 90.4% (66/73; 95% CI, 81%-96%) did not know the number of polyps found, and 97.3% (71/73; 95% CI, 90%-100%) did not know the polyp size.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study at a single tertiary referral center.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' knowledge regarding the details of their family histories of polyp data appears often unknown or incomplete. Thus, at present, it may not appear feasible or practical to incorporate this level of information in colon cancer screening guidelines.

Quality evaluation of guidelines on genetic screening, surveillance and management of hereditary colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

We examined the methodological quality of guidelines on colorectal cancer genetic susceptibility syndromes.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Google were searched up to July 2010. Adjourned guidelines in English were included. The Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument was used to assess their quality, and the reported evidence base of the guidelines was evaluated.

RESULTS

The search yielded 17 eligible guidelines: 11 were developed by independent associations, while 6 had national\state endorsement. Only three guidelines performed satisfactorily, achieving a score >50% in all 6 AGREE domains. Mean standardized scores for the 6 AGREE domains were: 'scope and purpose', 83.9 ± 22.5%; 'stakeholder involvement', 35.6 ± 24.9%; 'rigour of development', 48.6 ± 25.3%; 'clarity and presentation', 71.6 ± 19.3%; 'applicability', 33.8 ± 30.1%; 'editorial independence', 42.2 ± 39.7%. Guidelines with national endorsement performed better in all the domains, with a statistically significant difference in three domains. Fifteen guidelines out of 17 were found to be based on research evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

There is scope, in many areas, for improving the guidelines analysed, among which are the involvement of various professional figures and patients' representatives, and policies for their application. The AGREE instrument is a useful tool and could also be used profitably by guideline developers to improve the quality of recommendations.

Are colorectal cancer screening recommendations for first-degree relatives of patients with adenomas too aggressive?

Consensus guidelines of the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology recommend first-degree relatives of individuals diagnosed with an adenoma before age 60 should be screened every 5 years with colonoscopy starting at age 40. This is the identical recommendation for those with a first-degree relative diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) before age 60. There is good evidence that first-degree relatives of individuals diagnosed with CRC before age 60 are at substantially increased risk for developing cancer at a young age. However, it is unclear whether an individual with a first-degree relative with an adenoma diagnosed before age 60 is at increased risk of CRC. Because not all adenomas portend the same cancer risk in the individual who has the adenoma, they would not be expected to portend the same risk in their first-degree relatives. Because of these uncertainties, the US Preventive Services Task Force does not recommend more aggressive screening of first-degree relatives of individuals with an adenoma. The adenoma detection rate for individuals 50 to 59 years old without a first-degree relative with CRC is sufficiently high (approximately 25%-30%) that almost half the population would be high risk on the basis of one first-degree relative having an adenoma. Given the weakness of evidence supporting the guidelines, suboptimal levels of screening in the general population, and lack of resources to comply with the recommendation, first-degree relatives of individuals with adenomas should be screened as average-risk persons until more compelling data are available to justify more aggressive screening.

Prevalence and risk of colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic, average-risk screenees 40 to 49 years of age

BACKGROUND

A paucity of information exists regarding colorectal neoplasm in asymptomatic, average-risk individuals 40 to 49 years of age.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of colorectal neoplasms in those in their 40s.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Results offered to subjects of a health care provider that offers screening services as part of an employer-provided wellness program.

PATIENTS

A consecutive series of 1761 asymptomatic, average-risk screenees 40 to 59 years of age.

INTERVENTION

First screening colonoscopy.

RESULTS

The prevalence of overall colorectal neoplasm in subjects of ages 40 to 44 years, 45 to 49 years, 50 to 54 years, and 55 to 59 years increased significantly with increasing age (13.7%, 20.2%, 21.0%, and 23.8%, respectively; P < .001). The prevalence of advanced adenomas in subjects of ages 40 to 44 years, 45 to 49 years, 50 to 54 years, and 55 to 59 years increased significantly with age (1.9%, 3.0%, 3.2%, and 5.9%, respectively; P = .004). Multivariate analysis of data from the 40- to 49-year age group identified an increased risk of colorectal neoplasm associated with ages 45 years and older (odds ratio [OR], 1.68; 95% CI, 1.20-2.35), male sex (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.15-2.69), presence of abdominal obesity (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.12-2.21), and metabolic syndrome (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.03-2.35), whereas for advanced adenomas, abdominal obesity (OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.06-5.27) and metabolic syndrome (OR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.23-6.53) were the independent risk factors.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center study and the cohort composed of ethnic Korean subjects who lived in the same geographic region.

CONCLUSION

In average-risk individuals 40 to 49 years of age, men with abdominal obesity or metabolic syndrome might benefit from screening colonoscopy starting at 45 years of age to detect colorectal neoplasm.

Genotype frequencies of the Val384Asp missense mutation in the hMLH1 gene in patients with familial gastric cancer

AIM: To investigate the etiological role of the missense mutation, Val384Asp, in the human mutL homolog 1 (hMLH1) gene in familial gastric cancer (FGC) based on a Chinese population in Jiangsu Province.

METHODS: A case-control study was conducted. One hundred newly diagnosed or suspected FGC patients and 180 healthy controls were included in the study. Peripheral white blood cells were obtained from all subjects for DNA extraction. The Val384Asp missense mutation was detected using PCR-based denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and verified by DNA sequencing. Bioinformatic software was then used to analyze the etiological mechanism of the Val384Asp missense mutation.

RESULTS: About 5% healthy individuals were Val384Asp carriers. Significant differences were noted for the following comparisons: patients with newly diagnosed or suspected FGC vs healthy controls (OR = 2.84, 95%CI: 1.07-7.81, P < 0.05), patients with an onset age ≥ 50 vs healthy controls (P < 0.05), patients with precancerous disease history vs healthy controls (P < 0.01), and patients having a high-risk family history of GC vs healthy controls (P < 0.05). Bioinformatic analysis showed that the Val384Asp missense mutation might destroy the structure of hMLH1 protein and impair its function. Besides, the conversion of T→A may disrupt pre-mRNA splicing.

CONCLUSION: The Val384Asp missense mutation may be associated with genetic susceptibility to FGC. Detection of the Val384Asp missense mutation may be able to help identify individuals with increased risk of FGC.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor expression correlates with histologic grade and stage of colorectal cancer

Background

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the seventh-most common malignancy and is the main cause of death in Iraq. The incidence of this cancer has increased sharply after the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Aim

To estimate immunohistochemical expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in CRC in relation to other parameters, such as grade and stage of tumour.

Methods

Formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks from 52 patients (27 male and 25 female) with CRC were included in this study. A group of 22 patients with non-cancerous colonic tissues were included as a control group. Avidin–biotin complex method was employed for immunohistochemical detection of VEGF.

Results

VEGF immuno-expression was positive in 51.9% of CRC, while it was 18.2% in the normal colonic tissue (p <0.05). VEGF immunostaining was positively correlated with grade of colonic malignancy (p <0.05).

Conclusion

These findings provide further evidence for the role of VEGF in the carcinogenesis of CRC. However, VEGF could not be well correlated with stage of tumour and hence may be a poor prognostic parameter of state of malignancy of colonic carcinoma.

Correlation of iron and colon adenomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Better colon cancer screening guidelines are needed. This study was conducted to explore the relationship between serum transferrin saturation (as iron is a potential carcinogen) and presence of colon adenomas. This may aid to evolve better colon cancer screening guidelines.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of computer records. Patients who had colonoscopy and iron studies done between May 1996 and December 2003 were included in the study. The adjusted odds ratio, derived from multiple logistic regression analysis, was used to measure the association between transferrin saturation and colon adenomas.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 124 subjects. The adjusted odds ratio, for predicting the presence of polyp in those patients with transferrin saturation above the median was 10.9 (CI 4.0-29.5, P<0.001). A one percent increase in transferrin saturation was associated with a 1.07 increase the odds of adenoma (CI 1.03-1.11, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Iron levels are directly linked to presence of colon polyps, and might help in evolving better screening guidelines.

Past, present and future of colorectal cancer in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The crude frequency of colorectal cancer (CRC) is second to breast cancer in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). To assess the future burden of CRC in the country, we designed a model that takes into consideration the recent lifestyle pattern and the growth and aging of the population.

METHODS

We compared CRC statistics for KSA (using data from the National Cancer Registry) with that from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) databases of the United States of America (USA). We used the Joinpoint regression program to identify changes in secular trends, while the GLOBOCAN 2002 software was used to project future incidence and mortality.

RESULTS

Between 1994 and 2003, age-standardized rates (ASRs) for CRC in KSA almost doubled, as compared to a nonsignificant decline in USA. Between 2001 and 2003, while the annual percent change (APC) of CRC incidence in the USA showed a nonsignificant decrease in females, APC in Saudi females showed a nonsignificant rise of six percent. On the other hand, the rising incidence among Saudi males, during the years 1999 to 2003, was significant, with an APC of 20.5%. The projection model suggested that the incidence of CRC in KSA could increase fourfold in both genders by the year 2030.

CONCLUSIONS

In KSA, the present and expected increase in CRC rates is alarming. Pragmatic recommendations to face that challenge are discussed. The present work could serve as a model to study other prevalent types of cancer, particularly in developing countries.

Epidemiology and management options for colorectal cancer in children

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC), although primarily a disease of adulthood, accounts for 2% of malignancies in adolescents and has been reported in children as young as 9 months of age. Our knowledge of CRC in pediatrics is based on a handful of case series and case reports. Apart from one small clinical trial, there has been a lack of prospective clinical studies in this age group. Based on these published reports, most CRC in children is sporadic, but it can also arise in the setting of predisposing conditions, such as gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes, nonpolyposis familial cancer syndromes, and inflammatory bowel disease. Despite some similarities to adult disease, CRC in childhood may be intrinsically different biologically, because it differs from adult-onset CRC in several respects. Childhood CRC tends to be diagnosed at an advanced stage, is largely of mucinous histology, and (probably because of these features) tends to have a poorer outcome. As a result of its rarity in children and the lack of prospective pediatric studies, recommendations for therapy are primarily extrapolated from adult clinical trials. A review of pediatric case series in the English literature emphasizes the prognostic significance of stage of disease, as well as extent of surgical resection. As in adults, early detection is critical in an effort to capture the disease at less advanced stages. Complete surgical resection with aggressive lymph node dissection is essential for cure, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be used in an effort to render unresectable lesions resectable. Active agents in adults with CRC include fluorouracil, folinic acid (leucovorin), oxaliplatin, and irinotecan. Furthermore, newer targeted therapeutic agents, such as bevacizumab and cetuximab, have added additional efficacy to the standard chemotherapy backbone. Collaborative multi-institutional pediatric clinical trials are needed to evaluate the prognosis, optimal treatment response, and the basic biology of childhood onset CRC.

An effective educational strategy for improving knowledge, risk perception, and risk communication among colorectal adenoma patients

BACKGROUND

We have previously shown that most adenoma patients are unaware of the personal and familial implications of their diagnosis. Our goal was to determine whether a brief, computer-based educational program (CBEP) administered alone after polypectomy, or in combination with a personalized letter (PL), was more effective than standard care (SC) for heightening awareness and improving risk communication.

METHODS

Using a quasi-randomized design, adenoma-bearing subjects were assigned to the CBEP +PL (n=99), CBEP (n=96), or SC (n=120) arms. The CBEP was administered before discharge from the endoscopy unit. All subjects completed a phone survey 3 months postpolypectomy assessing knowledge, risk perception, and notification of first-degree relatives.

RESULTS

Composite knowledge scores were higher (P<0.05) for the CBEP+PL group than CBEP and SC groups. Subjects in the CBEP+PL group were more likely (P<0.05) than those in the SC group to know that adenomas but not hyperplastic polyps were precancerous, that patients with adenomas were at increased risk of future adenomas, and that the siblings and children of adenoma patients may be at increased colorectal cancer risk. Subjects in the CBEP+PL group were also more likely (P<0.05) to know their polyp's histology, perceive themselves and their siblings/children to be at increased risk of colorectal neoplasia, and notify a first-degree relative. These associations remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, and endoscopist. No differences were observed between the CBEP and SC groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The CBEP+PL intervention is an effective strategy for improving knowledge, risk perception, and risk communication among adenoma patients.

Colonoscopic screening of first-degree relatives of patients with large adenomas: increased risk of colorectal tumors

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The risk of developing colorectal neoplasia is not well established among family members of individuals with large adenomas, and screening strategies remain under debate in this population. This study aimed at quantifying the risk of colorectal adenomas and cancers using colonoscopic screening in first-degree relatives of patients with large adenomas.

METHODS

This case-control study was performed in 18 endoscopic units of French nonuniversity hospitals. A colonoscopy was offered to first-degree relatives of 306 index cases with adenomas > or =10 mm if they were alive, aged 40-75 years, and could be contacted by the index case. Among them, 168 were examined and matched for age, sex, and geographical area with 2 controls (n = 307). Controls were randomly selected from 1362 consecutive patients aged 40-75 years having undergone a colonoscopy for minor symptoms.

RESULTS

The prevalence of large adenomas and cancers was 8.4% and 4.2%, in relatives and controls, respectively. Odds ratios (ORs) associated with a history of large adenomas in relatives were 2.27 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-5.09) for cancers or large adenomas, 1.21 (95% CI, 0.68-2.15) for small adenomas, and 1.56 (95% CI, 0.96-2.53) for all colorectal neoplasia. The risk of large adenomas and cancers was higher in relatives of index cases younger than 60 years (OR, 3.82; 95% CI, 0.92-15.87) and when the index case had large distal adenomas (OR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.27-7.73).

CONCLUSIONS

First-degree relatives of patients with large adenomas are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancers or large adenomas. This result has implications for screening in this high-risk population.

Increased cancer risk for individuals with a family history of prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, and melanoma and their associated screening recommendations and practices

Prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, and melanoma are three malignancies that appear to have strong genetic components that can confer additional risk to family members. Screening tools, albeit controversial, are widely available to potentially aide in early diagnosis. Family members are now more attuned to the risks and benefits of cancer screening, thus, it is imperative that physicians understand the screening tools and how to interpret the information they provide. We reviewed the current literature regarding the cancer risks for individuals with a family history of prostate cancer, colon cancer, and melanoma, the current screening recommendations for family members, and actual screening practices of individuals with a family history of these malignancies. This review should serve as a guide for physicians and cancer control planners when advising their patients and the public regarding screening decisions.

Impact of a family history of colorectal cancer on the prevalence of advanced adenomas of the rectosigmoid colon at flexible sigmoidoscopy in 3147 asymptomatic patients

Flexible sigmoidoscopy is advised as a screening test for colorectal cancer for persons with a family history of late-onset colorectal cancer. The expected outcome for this approach is not well established. We designed a large, prospective study of an unselected population to assess the impact of a family history of one first-degree relative with colorectal cancer on the prevalence of advanced adenomas at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. We evaluated 8121 patients referred for flexible sigmoidoscopy between 1997 and 1999 and 3147 patients met the inclusion criteria. The 3147 patients were divided into 210 with a family history of colorectal cancer and 2937 without a family history and analyzed for differences in the prevalence of advanced adenomas. Of the 210 with a family history, 3 had an advanced adenoma of the rectosigmoid colon (1.4%) Of the 2937 without a family history, 52 had an advanced adenoma of the rectosigmoid colon (1.8%), including 2 cancers. These differences were not significant. In conclusion, a family history of colorectal cancer had no impact on the prevalence of advanced adenomas in asymptomatic patients at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. The prevalence rates for advanced adenomas and carcinomas of the rectosigmoid colon were low.

Screening for colon cancer

Colorectal cancer screening reduces mortality in individuals 50 years and older. Each of the screening tests currently available has advantages and limitations, and there is no consensus as to which test or combination of tests is best. What is clear, however, is that the rates of colorectal cancer screening remain low. This review summarizes the clinical evidence supporting colorectal cancer screening in the average risk population and in high risk groups, discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the available screening tests, outlines the currently recommended guidelines for screening based on risk category, and discusses new and emerging technologies for colorectal cancer screening.

Risk stratification for colon neoplasia: screening strategies using colonoscopy and computerized tomographic colonography

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We developed a risk index to identify low-risk patients who may be screened for colorectal cancer with computerized tomographic colonography (CTC) instead of colonoscopy.

METHODS

Asymptomatic persons aged 50 years or older who had undergone screening colonoscopy were randomized retrospectively to derivation (n = 1512) and validation (n = 1493) subgroups. We developed a risk index (based on age, sex, and family history) from the derivation group. The expected results of 3 screening strategies--universal colonoscopy, universal CTC, and a stratified strategy of colonoscopy for high-risk and CTC for low-risk patients--were then compared. Outcomes for the 3 strategies were extrapolated from the known colonic findings in each patient, using sensitivity/specificity values for CTC from the medical literature. Results were validated in the validation subgroup.

RESULTS

In the derivation subgroup, universal colonoscopy detected 94% of advanced neoplasia and universal CTC detected only 70% and resulted in the largest total number of procedures and number of patients undergoing both procedures. The stratified strategy detected 92% of advanced neoplasia, requiring colonoscopy in 68% and CTC in 36% of patients, with only 4% having to undergo both procedures. In the validation subgroup, universal colonoscopy detected 94% and universal CTC detected 71% of advanced neoplasia, whereas the stratified strategy detected 89%, requiring colonoscopy in 64% and CTC in 40%. Unlike universal CTC, the stratified strategy was independent of assumptions for CTC sensitivity, specificity, and threshold for colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

The stratified strategy based on our risk index may optimize the yield of colonoscopic resources and reduce the number of patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Low compliance with colonoscopic screening in first-degree relatives of patients with large adenomas

BACKGROUND

Little is known about compliance with colonoscopy as a screening method in first-degree relatives of patients with large adenomas. Aims To evaluate the compliance with screening colonoscopy among this population, and its determinants.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the family part of the GEADE study, a study on genetic factors of colorectal adenomas. Index cases were 306 patients with adenomas > or = 10 mm. All living first-degree relatives aged 40-75 who could be contacted by the index case were asked to undergo a colonoscopy, unless they had had one in the previous 5 years.

RESULTS

Among 674 eligible relatives, 56 had had a colonoscopy within the preceding 5 years and 114 underwent a screening colonoscopy resulting in a compliance with screening colonoscopy of 18%. This was not related to most characteristics of index cases. Compliance was significantly lower when the index case lived in the Greater Paris area than when he/she lived in other areas (12% vs. 21%). It was higher in siblings (18%) and offspring (23%) than in parents (9%) and in relatives under 55 years old (22%) than in relatives aged 55 and over (15%).

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with colonoscopy was low in first-degree relatives of patients with large adenomas. The reasons for this should be determined and appropriate strategies developed to increase compliance.

The association of the DNA repair gene XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism with susceptibility to colorectal cancer in a Chinese population

Growing evidence suggests that the Thr241Met (T241M) polymorphism in the homologous recombination repair gene XRCC3 may alter DNA repair capacity and subsequent susceptibility to carcinogens. In a few studies of colorectal cancer (CRC), however, the results have been discrepant. A population-based nested case-control study including 140 cases and 280 cancer-free controls was conducted to evaluate the effect of XRCC3 polymorphism, environmental exposure, and family history (FH) on the risk of CRC. The variant allele frequency was low among the ethnic Han Chinese, but we observed a significant difference between cases (6.07%) and controls (2.32%). The analytic results of the unconditional logistic regression model adjusted by age, sex, alcohol intake, cigarette smoking, and FH of cancer in first-degree relatives showed a significantly increased risk of CRC (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-6.95, P = 0.005) as the T/M and M/M genotypes compared with the T/T genotype, which changed weakly in consideration of the subsite (adjusted OR = 4.80, 95%CI: 1.77-12.98, P = 0.002 in colon cancer, adjusted OR = 2.41, 95%CI: 0.93-6.25, P = 0.071 in rectal cancer, respectively). Combined with environmental factors such as alcohol intake and cigarette smoking, no significant interaction could be found. However, the results revealed a significant association between FH of cancer in first-degree relatives and the risk of CRC (adjusted OR = 2.24, 95%CI: 1.18-4.25, P = 0.014). These results also suggest that XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and FH of cancer may be risk factors for CRC, and the XRCC3 241Met allele may be an effective biomarker for genetic susceptibility to CRC. Larger studies are needed to confirm our findings and identify the underlying mechanisms.