Infarct volume predicts critical care needs in stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis

Patterns and Outcomes of Intensive Care on Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients in the US

BACKGROUND

Up to 20% of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients may benefit from intensive care unit (ICU)-level care; however, there are few studies evaluating ICU availability for AIS. We aim to summarize the proportion of elderly AIS patients in the United States who are admitted to an ICU and assess the national availability of ICU-level care in AIS.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using de-identified Medicare inpatient datasets from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2019 for US individuals aged ≥65 years. We used validated International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes to identify AIS admission and interventions. ICU-level care was identified by revenue center code. AIS patient characteristics and interventions were stratified by receipt of ICU-level care, comparing differences through calculated standardized mean difference score due to large sample sizes.

RESULTS

From 2016 through 2019, a total of 952 400 admissions by 850 055 individuals met criteria for hospital admission for AIS with 19.9% involving ICU-level care. Individuals were predominantly >75 years of age (58.5%) and identified as white (80.0%). Hospitals on average admitted 11.4% (SD 14.6) of AIS patients to the ICU, with the median hospital admitting 7.7% of AIS patients to the ICU. The ICU admissions were younger and more likely to receive reperfusion therapy but had more comorbid conditions and neurologic complications. Of the 5084 hospitals included, 1971 (38.8%) reported no ICU-level AIS care. Teaching hospitals (36.9% versus 1.6%, P<0.0001) with larger AIS volume (P<0.0001) or in larger metropolitan areas (P<0.0001) were more likely to have an ICU available.

CONCLUSIONS

We found evidence of national variation in the availability of ICU-level care for AIS admissions. Since ICUs may provide comprehensive care for the most severe AIS patients, continued effort is needed to examine ICU accessibility and utility among AIS.

Anaesthetic and peri-operative management for thrombectomy procedures in stroke patients

PURPOSE

To provide recommendations for the anaesthetic and peri-operative management for thrombectomy procedure in stroke patients DESIGN: A consensus committee of 15 experts issued from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société Française d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, SFAR), the Association of French-language Neuro-Anaesthetists (Association des Neuro-Anesthésistes Réanimateurs de Langue Francaise, ANARLF), the French Neuro-Vascular Society (Société Francaise de Neuro-Vasculaire, SFNV), the French Neuro-Radiology Society (Société Francaise de Neuro-Radiologie, SFNR) and the French Study Group on Haemostasis and Thrombosis (Groupe Français d'Études sur l'Hémostase et la Thrombose, GFHT) was convened, under the supervision of two expert coordinators from the SFAR and the ANARLF. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the outset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline elaboration process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were required to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide their assessment of quality of evidence.

METHODS

Four fields were defined prior to the literature search: (1) Peri-procedural management, (2) Prevention and management of secondary brain injuries, (3) Management of antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatments, (4) Post-procedural management and orientation of the patient. Questions were formulated using the PICO format (Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes) and updated as needed. Analysis of the literature was then conducted and the recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

The SFAR/ANARLF/SFNV/SFNR/GFHT guideline panel drew up 18 recommendations regarding anaesthetic management of mechanical thrombectomy procedures. Due to a lack of data in the literature allowing to conclude with high certainty on relevant clinical outcomes, the experts decided to formulate these guidelines as "Professional Practice Recommendations" (PPR) rather than "Formalized Expert Recommendations". After two rounds of rating and several amendments, a strong agreement was reached on 100% of the recommendations. No recommendation could be formulated for two questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong agreement among experts was reached to provide a sizable number of recommendations aimed at optimising anaesthetic management for thrombectomy in patients suffering from stroke.

Shorter Intensive Care Unit Stay (12 Hours) Post Thrombolysis Is Safe and Reduces Length of Stay for Minor Stroke Patients

The current standard of practice for patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) requires critical monitoring for 24-hours post-treatment due to the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). This is a costly and resource intensive practice. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of this standard 24-hour ICU monitoring period compared with a shorter 12-hour ICU monitoring period for minor stroke patients (NIHSS 0-5) treated with tPA only. Stroke mimics and those who underwent thrombectomy were excluded. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay. Secondary outcome measures included sICH, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), pneumonia, favorable discharge to home or acute rehabilitation, readmission within 30 days, and favorable functional outcome defined as modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 0-2 at 90 days. Of the 122 patients identified, 77 were in the 24-hour protocol and 45 were in 12-hour protocol. There was significant difference in length of hospital stay for the 24-hour ICU protocol (2.8 days) compared with the 12-hour ICU protocol (1.8 days) ( P < 0.001). Although not statistically significant, the 12-hour group had favorable rates of sICH, 30-day readmission rates, favorable discharge disposition and favorable functional outcome. Rates of DVT, PE and aspiration pneumonia were identical between the groups. Compared with 24-hour ICU monitoring, 12-hour ICU monitoring after thrombolysis for minor acute ischemic stroke was not associated with any increase in adverse outcomes. A randomized trial is needed to verify these findings.

Associations between cerebral magnetic resonance imaging infarct volume and acute ischemic stroke etiology

Background

Identifying ischemic stroke etiology is necessary for proper treatment and secondary prevention. We sought to define associations between infarct volume and stroke subtypes.

Materials and methods

Inclusion criteria necessitated a Johns Hopkins Hospital inpatient admission (2017–2019) for ischemic stroke with confirmatory brain magnetic resonance imaging. Infarct volume was calculated using MRIcron© by a masked reviewer. Ischemic strokes were adjudicated using TOAST classification. Multivariable/multinomial logistic regression determined associations between infarct volume and stroke subtypes with interaction terms for infarct number and location. Stepwise adjustment accounted for potential confounders.

Results

Patients (N = 150) were on average 61 years old, male (58%), and black (57%). Each 5mL increase in infarct volume was associated with cardioembolic (OR 1.07, 95%CI 1.01–1.14) and large-artery occlusions (OR 1.10, 95%CI 1.02–1.18), but lower odds of lacunar stroke (OR 0.18, 95%CI 0.06–0.55). There was no difference in risk of cardioembolic (base) and large-artery atherosclerotic strokes with increasing infarct volume (RRR 1.01, 95%CI 0.94–1.09), but risk of lacunar stroke was decreased (RRR 0.17, 95%CI 0.06–0.53). Infarct number (single vs multiple) modified the association between volume and subtype for large-artery occlusions (p-interaction 0.09).

Conclusions

In this study, larger volume infarcts were significantly associated with both cardioembolic and large-artery atherosclerotic strokes (no difference in the degree of association) and decreased odds of lacunar stroke. A single, large-volume stroke was associated with large-artery atherosclerosis, while multiple infarcts were associated with cardioembolism. Given the differential associations between volume, number of lesions, and stroke etiology, defining stroke subtypes in light of infarct volume might aid in clinical practice.

Practices and Patterns of Hourly Neurochecks: Analysis of 8,936 Patients With Neurological Injury

BACKGROUND

Patients experiencing acute neurological injury often receive hourly neurological assessments ("neurochecks") to capture signs of deterioration. While commonly utilized in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, little is known regarding practices (i.e., variations by age and ordering services) and patterns (i.e., duration and post-discontinuation plans) of hourly neurochecks. To inform future quality improvement intervention efforts, we performed an analysis of hourly neurochecks using an electronic health record-based dataset.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Our 75-month retrospective dataset consisted of all health system ICU patients who received hourly neurochecks. Variables included age, admission diagnosis category, ordering provider, post-discontinuation order, and discharge destination. Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate factors associated with hourly neurocheck duration.

RESULTS

We evaluated 9,513 first admission hourly neurocheck orders in 8,936 patients. The trauma, neurosurgery, and neurocritical care services were responsible for 4,067 (43%), 2,071 (22%) and 1,697 (18%) hourly neurocheck orders, respectively. Median (interquartile range) hourly neurocheck duration was 1.09 (0.69, 2.35) days, and was greater than 3 and 7 days, respectively, for 1,773 (19%) and 640 (7%) patients. Median hourly neurocheck duration ranged from 0.87 (0.65, 1.68) to 1.60 (0.83, 2.97) days for neurosurgical and non-neurological ICU services, respectively. Upon discontinuation, 2,225 (23%) of hourly neurochecks were transitioned to no neurochecks.

CONCLUSION

Substantial differences exist between ICU services and practice patterns surrounding hourly neurochecks. Understanding these differences will help inform intervention efforts aimed at streamlining hourly neurocheck practices and outcomes for patients with acute neurological injury.

Novel Score for Stratifying Risk of Critical Care Needs in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

To develop a risk prediction score identifying patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) at low risk for critical care.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of 451 patients with ICH between 2010 and 2018. The sample was randomly divided into a development and a validation cohort. Logistic regression was used to develop a risk score by weighting independent predictors of intensive care unit (ICU) needs according to strength of association. The risk score was tested in the validation cohort and externally validated in a dataset from another institution.

RESULTS

The rate of ICU interventions was 80.3%. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and ICH volume were independent predictors of critical care, resulting in the following point assignments for the Intensive Care Triaging in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage (INTRINSIC) score: SBP 160 to 190 mm Hg (1 point), SBP >190 mm Hg (3 points); GCS 8 to 13 (1 point), GCS <8 (3 points); ICH volume 16 to 40 cm3 (1 point), ICH volume >40 cm3 (2 points); and presence of IVH (1 point), with values ranging between 0 and 9. Among patients with a score of 0 and no ICU needs during their emergency department stay, 93.6% remained without critical care needs. In an external validation cohort of patients with ICH, the INTRINSIC score achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.823 (95% confidence interval 0.782-0.863). A score <2 predicted the absence of critical care needs with 48.5% sensitivity and 88.5% specificity, and a score <3 predicted the absence of critical care needs with 61.7% sensitivity and 83.0% specificity.

CONCLUSION

The INTRINSIC score identifies patients with ICH who are at low risk for critical care interventions.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that the INTRINSIC score identifies patients with ICH at low risk for critical care interventions.

Lupeol Alleviates Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Correlation with Modulation of PI3K/Akt Pathway

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study aimed to investigate the effect and mechanism of lupeol on cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.

METHODS

The effects of lupeol on cerebral infarction, cerebral water content, neurological symptoms and cerebral blood flow in rats were evaluated. Nissl staining was carried out to assess the neuronal damage of ischemic brain after I/R in rats. Apoptosis of ischemic brain neurons after I/R was detected by TUNEL staining. Western blotting was carried out to detect the effects of lupeol on the expression of p-PDK1, p-Akt, pc-Raf, p-BAD, cleaved caspase-3 and p-PTEN.

RESULTS

Lupeol significantly increased cerebral blood flow after I/R in rats, reduced brain water content and infarct volume, and decreased neurological function scores. It significantly reduced neuronal damage after I/R in rats, and significantly reduced neuronal cell loss. PI3K inhibitor (LY294002) can eliminate the effect of lupeol on I/R in rats. In addition, lupeol significantly increased the protein expression of p-PDK1, p-Akt, pc-Raf, p-BAD, and down-regulated the expression of cleaved caspase-3. LY294002 reversed the effects of lupeol on the expression of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway-related proteins and cleaved caspase-3 after I/R in rats.

CONCLUSION

Lupeol had significant neuroprotective effects on brain I/R injury and neuronal apoptosis, and its mechanism may be related to the activation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.

Review of Post Ischemic Stroke Imaging and Its Clinical Relevance

In this day and age, multiple imaging modalities are available to the stroke physician in the post-treatment phase.The practical challenge for physicians who treat stroke is to evaluate the pros and cons of each technique and select the best choice for the situation. The choice of imaging modality remains contentious at best and varies among different institutions and centres. This is no simple task an there are many factors to consider, including the differential diagnosis which need to be evaluated, the availability and reliability of the imaging technique and time and expertise required to perform and interpret the scanning. Other ancillary competing interest also come into play such as the financial cost of the modality, the requirement for patient monitoring during the imaging procedure and patient comfort. In an effort to clear some of the ambiguity surrounding this topic we present some of the current techniques in use and others, which are still in the realm of research and have not yet transitioned into clinical practice.

Critical care in acute ischemic stroke

Most ischemic strokes are managed on the ward or on designated stroke units. A significant proportion of patients with ischemic stroke require more specialized care. Several studies have shown improved outcomes for patients with acute ischemic stroke when neurocritical care services are available. Features of acute ischemic stroke patients requiring intensive care unit-level care include airway or respiratory compromise; large cerebral or cerebellar hemisphere infarction with swelling; infarction with symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation; infarction complicated by seizures; and a large proportion of patients require close management of blood pressure after thrombolytics. In this chapter, we discuss aspects of acute ischemic stroke care that are of particular relevance to a neurointensivist, covering neuropathology, neurodiagnostics and imaging, blood pressure management, glycemic control, temperature management, and the selection and timing of antithrombotics. We also focus on the care of patients who have received intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. Complex clinical decision making in decompressive hemicraniectomy for hemispheric infarction and urgent management of basilar artery thrombosis are specifically addressed.

ICAT: a simple score predicting critical care needs after thrombolysis in stroke patients

Background

Patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke are at risk of developing complications, commonly necessitating admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). At present, most IVT is administered in the Emergency Department or in dedicated stroke units, but no evidence-based criteria exist that allow for early identification of patients at increased risk of developing ICU needs. The present study describes a novel prediction score aiming to identify a subpopulation of post-IVT patients at high risk for critical care interventions.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 301 patients undergoing IVT at our institutions during a 5-year period. Two hundred and ninety patients met inclusion criteria. The sample was randomly divided into a development and a validation cohort. Logistic regression was used to develop a risk score by weighting predictors of critical care needs based on strength of association.

Results

Seventy-two patients (24.8 %) required critical care interventions. Black race (odds ratio [OR] 3.81, p =0.006), male sex (OR 3.79, p =0.008), systolic blood pressure (SBP; OR 1.45 per 10 mm Hg increase in SBP, p <0.001), and NIH stroke scale (NIHSS; OR 1.09 per 1 point increase in NIHSS, p =0.071) were independent predictors of critical care needs. The optimal model for score development, predicting critical care needs, achieved an AUC of 0.782 in the validation group. The score was named the ICAT (Intensive Care After Thrombolysis) score, assigning the following points: black race (1 point), male sex (1 point), SBP (2 points if 160–200 mm Hg; 4 points if >200 mm Hg), and NIHSS (1 point if 7–12; 2 points if >12). Each 1-point increase in the score was associated with 2.22-fold increased odds for critical care needs (95 % CI 1.78–2.76, p <0.001). A score ≥2 was associated with over 13 times higher odds of critical care needs compared to a score <2 (OR 13.60, 95 % CI 3.23–57.19), predicting critical care with 97.2 % sensitivity and 28.0 % specificity.

Conclusion

The ICAT score, combining information about race, sex, SBP, and NIHSS, predicts critical care needs in post-IVT patients and may be helpful when triaging post-IVT patients to the appropriate monitoring environment.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1195-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.