1
|
Xie T, Meng J, Feng Z, Gao Y, Chen T, Chen Y, Geng J. Assessing patient information needs for new antidiabetic medications to inform shared decision-making: A best-worst scaling experiment in China. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14059. [PMID: 38689509 PMCID: PMC11061543 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making (SDM) is a patient-centred approach to improve the quality of care. An essential requirement for the SDM process is to be fully aware of patient information needs. OBJECTIVES Our study aimed to assess patient information needs for new antidiabetic medications using the best-worst scaling (BWS) experiment. METHODS BWS tasks were developed according to a literature review and the focus group discussion. We used a balanced incomplete block design and blocking techniques to generate choice sets. The final BWS contains 11 attributes, with 6-choice scenarios in each block. The one-to-one, face-to-face BWS survey was conducted among type 2 diabetic patients in Jiangsu Province. Results were analyzed using count-based analysis and modelling approaches. We also conducted a subgroup analysis to observe preference heterogeneity. RESULTS Data from 539 patients were available for analysis. The most desired information domain was the comparative effectiveness of new antidiabetic medications. It consists of the incidence of macrovascular complications, the length of extended life years, changes in health-related quality of life, the incidence of microvascular complications, and the control of glycated haemoglobin. Of all the attributes, the incidence of macrovascular complications was the primary concern. Patients' glycemic control and whether they had diabetes complications exerted a significant influence on their information needs. CONCLUSIONS Information on health benefits is of critical significance for diabetic patients. Patients have different information needs as their disease progresses. Personalized patient decision aids that integrate patient information needs and provide evidence of new antidiabetic medications are worthy of being established. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Before data collection, a pilot survey was carried out among diabetic patients to provide feedback on the acceptability and intelligibility of the attributes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tongling Xie
- Center for Evidence‐Based MedicineNantong University Medical SchoolNantongChina
- Information CenterThe People's Hospital of RugaoNantongChina
| | - Jingyi Meng
- Center for Evidence‐Based MedicineNantong University Medical SchoolNantongChina
| | - Zhe Feng
- Center for Evidence‐Based MedicineNantong University Medical SchoolNantongChina
| | - Yue Gao
- Hepatobiliary CenterThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityNanjingChina
| | - Tian Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Clinical MedicineMedical Institute of Taizhou Polytechnic CollegeTaizhouChina
| | - Yalan Chen
- Center for Evidence‐Based MedicineNantong University Medical SchoolNantongChina
| | - Jinsong Geng
- Center for Evidence‐Based MedicineNantong University Medical SchoolNantongChina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patterson JT, Parry JA, Working ZM, McKibben NA, Baca J, Duong A, Senior J, Kim A, Marchand LS, O'Hara N. Patient Preferences for Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of LC1 Pelvis Fracture: A Discrete Choice Experiment. J Orthop Trauma 2024; 38:291-298. [PMID: 38442188 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To quantify how patients with lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvis fracture value attributes of operative versus nonoperative treatment. METHODS DESIGN Discrete choice experiment. SETTING Three US Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA Adult survivors of an LC1 pelvis treated between June 2016 and March 2023 were identified from institutional registries. The choice experiment was administered as a survey from March through August 2023. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS Participants chose between 12 hypothetical comparisons of treatment attributes including operative or nonoperative care, risk of death, severity of pain, risk of secondary surgery, shorter hospital stay, discharge destination, and independence in ambulation within 1 month of injury. The marginal utility of each treatment attribute, for example, the strength of participants' aggregate preference for an attribute as indicated by their survey choices, was estimated by multinomial logit modeling with and without stratification by treatment received. RESULTS Four hundred forty-nine eligible patients were identified. The survey was distributed to 182 patients and collected from 72 patients (39%) at a median 2.3 years after injury. Respondents were 66% female with a median age of 59 years (IQR, 34-69 years). Before injury, 94% ambulated independently and 75% were working; 41% received operative treatment. Independence with ambulation provided the highest relative marginal utility (21%, P < 0.001), followed by discharge to home versus skilled nursing (20%, P < 0.001), moderate versus severe postdischarge pain (17%, P < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (16%, P < 0.001), secondary surgery (15%, P < 0.001), and mortality (10%, P = 0.02). Overall, no relative utility for operative versus nonoperative treatment was observed (2%, P = 0.54). However, respondents strongly preferred the treatment they received: operative patients valued operative treatment (utility, 0.37 vs. -0.37, P < 0.001); nonoperative patients valued nonoperative treatment (utility, 0.19 vs. -0.19, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS LC1 pelvis fracture patients valued independence with ambulation, shorter hospital stay, and avoiding secondary surgery and mortality in the month after their injury. Patients preferred the treatment they received rather than operative versus nonoperative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph T Patterson
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Joshua A Parry
- Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO
| | | | | | - Joseph Baca
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andrew Duong
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Joshua Senior
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Annabel Kim
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Nathan O'Hara
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Guzman KR, Smith AC, Snoswell CL. General practitioner preferences for telehealth consultations in Australia: a pilot survey and discrete choice experiment. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2024; 25:e28. [PMID: 38721700 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423624000136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM To identify and quantify general practitioner (GP) preferences related to service attributes of clinical consultations, including telehealth consultations, in Australia. BACKGROUND GPs have been increasingly using telehealth to deliver patient care since the onset of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. GP preferences for telehealth service models will play an important role in the uptake and sustainability of telehealth services post-pandemic. METHODS An online survey was used to ask GPs general telehealth questions and have them complete a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The DCE elicited GP preferences for various service attributes of telehealth (telephone and videoconference) consultations. The DCE investigated five service attributes, including consultation mode, consultation purpose, consultation length, quality of care and rapport, and patient co-payment. Participants were presented with eight choice sets, each containing three options to choose from. Descriptive statistics was used, and mixed logit models were used to estimate and analyse the DCE data. FINDINGS A total of 60 GPs fully completed the survey. Previous telehealth experiences impacted direct preferences towards telehealth consultations across clinical presentations, although in-person modes were generally favoured (in approximately 70% of all scenarios). The DCE results lacked statistical significance which demonstrated undiscernible differences between GP preferences for some service attributes. However, it was found that GPs prefer to provide a consultation with good quality care and rapport (P < 002). GPs would also prefer to provide care to their patients rather than decline a consultation due to consultation mode, length or purpose (P < 0.0001). Based on the findings, GPs value the ability to provide high-quality care and develop rapport during a clinical consultation. This highlights the importance of recognising value-based care for future policy reforms, to ensure continued adoption and sustainability of GP telehealth services in Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keshia R De Guzman
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Anthony C Smith
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Centaine L Snoswell
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quang Vo T, Vinh Tran Q, Phuong Ngoc Ta A, Thanh Nguyen B, Nguyen Thanh Phan V, Ho Nguyen Anh T, Nguyen Khanh Huynh T. The influence of attributes on community preferences regarding antibiotic treatment: evidence from a discrete choice model. PSYCHOL HEALTH MED 2024:1-18. [PMID: 38700271 DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2024.2342589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance (AR) rates in Vietnam are among the highest in Asia, and recent infections due to multi-drug resistance in the country have caused thousands of deaths each year. This study investigated a Vietnamese community's preferences for antibiotic treatment and its knowledge and attitudes regarding antibiotics. A discrete choice experiment-based survey was developed and administered to the population of interest. The respondents were given sociodemographic-, knowledge- and attitude-related items and 17 pairs of choice tasks. Two hypothetical options were included in each choice task. Latent class analysis was conducted to determine the differences among the respondents' preferences. Among 1,014 respondents, 805 (79.4%) gave valid questionnaires. A three-latent-class model with four covariates (age, healthcare-related education or career, occupation, and attitude classifications) was used in the analysis. All five attributes significantly influenced the respondents' decisions. The majority, including young employed respondents with non-healthcare-related work or education, found treatment failure more important. Older respondents who had healthcare-related education/careers and/or appropriate antibiotic use- and antibiotics resistance-related attitudes, regarded contribution to antibiotic resistance as an important attribute in selecting antibiotic treatments. Unemployed individuals with correct knowledge identified the cost of antibiotic treatment as the most essential decision-making factor. Findings suggest minimal antibiotic impact on resistance; only 7.83% view it as amajor concern. The respondents exhibited substantial preference heterogeneity, and the general Vietnamese public had poor knowledge of and attitudes toward antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance. This study emphasizes the need for individual responsibility for antibiotic resistance and appropriate antibiotic use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trung Quang Vo
- Department of Economic and Administrative Pharmacy (EAP), Faculty of Pharmacy, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Quang Vinh Tran
- Department of Economic and Administrative Pharmacy (EAP), Faculty of Pharmacy, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Anh Phuong Ngoc Ta
- Department of Economic and Administrative Pharmacy (EAP), Faculty of Pharmacy, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Binh Thanh Nguyen
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Management and Economics, Hanoi University of Pharmacy, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Van Nguyen Thanh Phan
- Faculty of Medicine, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Tuan Ho Nguyen Anh
- Faculty of Medicine, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Geng J, Li R, Wang X, Xu R, Liu J, Jiang H, Wang G, Hesketh T. Eliciting Older Cancer Patients' Preferences for Follow-Up Care to Inform a Primary Healthcare Follow-Up Model in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Patient 2024:10.1007/s40271-024-00697-4. [PMID: 38702574 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00697-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Increasing longevity and advances in treatment have increased the cancer burden in the elderly, resulting in complex follow-up care needs; however, in China, little is known about the follow-up care preferences of these patients. This study quantified older cancer patients' preferences for follow-up care and examined the trade-offs they are willing to make to accept an alternative follow-up model. METHODS A discrete choice experiment was conducted among inpatients aged over 60 years with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer, at two large tertiary hospitals in Nantong, China. Preference weights for follow-up care were estimated using mixed logit analysis. Subgroup analysis and latent class analysis were used to explore preference heterogeneity. RESULTS Complete results were obtained from 422 patients (144 with breast cancer, 133 with prostate cancer, 145 with colorectal cancer), with a mean age of 70.81 years. Older cancer patients stated a preference for follow-up by specialists over primary healthcare (PHC) providers ( β = -1.18, 95% confidence interval -1.40 to -0.97). The provider of follow-up care services was the most valued attribute among patients with breast cancer (relative importance [RI] 37.17%), while remote contact services were prioritized by patients with prostate (RI 43.50%) and colorectal cancer (RI 33.01%). The uptake rate of an alternative care model integrating PHC increased compared with the baseline setting when patients were provided with preferred services (continuity of care, individualized care plans, and remote contact services). CONCLUSION To encourage older cancer patients to use PHC-integrated follow-up care, alternative follow-up care models need to be based on patients' preferences before introducing them as a routine option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiawei Geng
- Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Institute of Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Ran Li
- Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Insititute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Xinyu Wang
- School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Rongfang Xu
- Department of Nursing, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Jibin Liu
- Institute of Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Haiyan Jiang
- Department of Health Management, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Gaoren Wang
- Institute of Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
| | - Therese Hesketh
- Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
- Insititute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Forcada-Segarra JA, Cuesta-Esteve I, García Pérez A, Sancho Martínez R, Rey Biel P, Carrera-Barnet G, Cuadra-Grande ADL, Casado MÁ, Drago G, Gómez-Barrera M, López-Belmonte JL. Nurses' preferences regarding MenACWY conjugate vaccines attributes: a discrete choice experiment in Spain. Public Health 2024; 230:163-171. [PMID: 38555685 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Immunisation against preventable diseases as meningitis is crucial from a public health perspective to face challenges posed by these infections. Nurses hold a great responsibility for these programs, which highlights the importance of understanding their preferences and needs to improve the success of campaigns. This study aimed to investigate nurses' preferences regarding Meningococcus A, C, W, and Y (MenACWY) conjugate vaccines commercialised in Spain. STUDY DESIGN A national-level discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted. METHODS A literature review and a focus group informed the DCE design. Six attributes were included: pharmaceutical form, coadministration evidence, shelf-life, package contents, single-doses per package, and package volume. Conditional logit models quantified preferences and relative importance (RI). RESULTS Thirty experienced primary care nurses participated in this study. Evidence of coadministration with other vaccines was the most important attribute (RI = 43.78%), followed by package size (RI = 22.17%), pharmaceutical form (RI = 19.07%), and package content (RI = 11.80%). There was a preference for evidence of coadministration with routine vaccines (odds ratio [OR] = 2.579, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 2.210-3.002), smaller volumes (OR = 1.494, 95%CI = 1.264-1.767), liquid formulations (OR = 1.283, 95%CI = 1.108-1.486) and package contents including only vial/s (OR = 1.283, 95%CI = 1.108-1.486). No statistical evidence was found for the remaining attributes. CONCLUSIONS Evidence of coadministration with routine vaccines, easy-to-store packages, and fully liquid formulations were drivers of nurses' preferences regarding MenACWY conjugate vaccines. These findings provide valuable insights for decision-makers to optimize current campaigns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Forcada-Segarra
- Asociación Nacional de Enfermería y Vacunas (ANENVAC), Valencia, Spain; Public Health Nurse, Valencia, Spain
| | - I Cuesta-Esteve
- Asociación Nacional de Enfermería y Vacunas (ANENVAC), Valencia, Spain; Nurse and Matron, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - A García Pérez
- Asociación Nacional de Enfermería y Vacunas (ANENVAC), Valencia, Spain; Primary Care Nurse, Cáceres, Spain
| | - R Sancho Martínez
- Asociación Nacional de Enfermería y Vacunas (ANENVAC), Valencia, Spain; Vaccinology, Public Health, Basque Government, San Sebastian, Spain
| | - P Rey Biel
- ESADE Business School, Universitat Ramón Llull, Spain
| | | | - A de la Cuadra-Grande
- Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Paseo Joaquín Rodrigo 4 e Letter I, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28224, Madrid, Spain.
| | - M Á Casado
- Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Paseo Joaquín Rodrigo 4 e Letter I, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28224, Madrid, Spain
| | - G Drago
- Medical Advisor Vaccines, Sanofi, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Gómez-Barrera
- Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Paseo Joaquín Rodrigo 4 e Letter I, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28224, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ozdemir S, Quaife M, Mohamed AF, Norman R. An Overview of Data Collection in Health Preference Research. Patient 2024:10.1007/s40271-024-00695-6. [PMID: 38662323 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00695-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
This paper focuses on survey administration and data collection methods employed for stated-preference studies in health applications. First, it describes different types of survey administration methods, encompassing web-based surveys, face-to-face (in-person) surveys, and mail surveys. Second, the concept of sampling frames is introduced, clarifying distinctions between the target population and survey frame population. The discussion then extends to different types of sampling methods, such as probability and non-probability sampling, along with an evaluation of potential issues associated with different sampling methods within the context of health preference research. Third, the paper provides information about different recruitment methods, including web-surveys, leveraging patient groups, and in-clinic recruitment. Fourth, a crucial aspect addressed is the calculation of response rate, with insights into determining an adequate response rate and strategies to improve response rates in stated-preference surveys. Lastly, the paper concludes by discussing data management plans and suggesting insights for future research in this field. In summary, this paper examines the nuanced aspects of survey administration and data collection methods in stated-preference studies, offering valuable guidance for researchers and practitioners in the health domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Ozdemir
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| | | | | | - Richard Norman
- Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhong Y, Guo X, Liu Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Song Y, Lu R. Old people's preference for nursing homes in East China: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Nurs 2024; 23:254. [PMID: 38649875 PMCID: PMC11034096 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-01907-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aged people who live in nursing home are predicted to keep growing in the following decades. There are both quantitative imbalance and structural imbalance in the utilization of nursing homes in China. This study aimed to analyze old people's preference for nursing homes and help the government optimize resource allocation. METHODS A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted and six attributes of nursing homes including monthly fee, distance from home, geographical location, medical facilities, environment of nursing homes and nursing staff were determined. Respondents were recruited from Nantong and Yangzhou city, China. In each city, two communities or villages were randomly selected. In each community/village, about 65 old people were randomly selected. Analysis was conducted using mixed logit regression models to determine preferences for potential attributes. RESULTS A total of 233 old people were included in the analysis. The findings indicated that all six attributes were statistically significant factors for participants. "Professional nursing staff" was the most important characteristic to participants, followed by "Medical facilities". Compared with female, the males preferred professional nursing staff (β = 2.939 vs. β = 2.643, P < 0.001), medical facilities (β = 1.890 vs. β = 1.498, P < 0.001), and the environment (β = 0.752, P < 0.01). For different age groups, participants aged 60-69 didn't pay attention to distance and location, while those aged 80 and above only paid attention to professional nursing staff and medical facilities. CONCLUSIONS The present study provides important insights into the characteristics of nursing home that are most preferred by old people. Authorities should take into account old people's preference in the planning, design and evaluation of nursing homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaqin Zhong
- School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Xiaojun Guo
- School of Science, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Yitong Liu
- School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Yaning Wang
- School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Yanan Wang
- School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Yan Song
- School of Nursing, Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Rujian Lu
- Third Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
- Nantong Third People's Hospital, Nantong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chuang LH, Zhang H, Hong T, Xie S. Evaluating the Preferences and Willingness-to-Pay for Oral Antidiabetic Drugs Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Patient 2024:10.1007/s40271-024-00694-7. [PMID: 38642244 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-024-00694-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To quantify the preferences for an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in China. METHODS A discrete choice experiment (DCE) with hypothetical OAD profiles was performed among patients with T2DM recruited from both online and offline sources. Each patient completed 12 DCE choice tasks. The attributes, elicited through mixed methods, include blood glucose level decrease, blood glucose level stability, frequency of medication, gastrointestinal side effects, dose adjustment and out-of-pocket expense. The conditional logit regression model was used to analyze the data. Patients' willingness-to-pay (WTP) was also calculated. Subgroup analyses based on patient characteristics were also conducted. RESULTS A total of 741 respondents were included in the analysis sample, covering 456 respondents online and 285 offline. The result showed that all attributes and levels were statistically significant, except one level "dose adjustment required for patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency" in the attribute of dose adjustment. WTP results showed that patients were willing to pay 12.06 and 23.20 yuan, respectively to reduce the frequency of medication from "once per day" and "three times per day" to "once every 2 weeks", respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that the frequency of medication (once versus two to three times per day) had the largest impact and influenced most coefficient estimates. CONCLUSION The results suggest that Chinese patients with T2DM prioritized better efficacy, less frequency of medication, lower gastrointestinal side effects, no dose adjustment required for patients with hepatic or renal insufficiency, and less out-of-pocket expense of OAD treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling-Hsiang Chuang
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- GongJing Healthcare (Nanjing) Co. Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Huanlan Zhang
- GongJing Healthcare (Nanjing) Co. Ltd, Nanjing, China
| | - Tianqi Hong
- School of Biomedical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Shitong Xie
- School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
- Center for Social Science Survey and Data, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Reynolds RM, Popova L, Ashley DL, Henderson KC, Ntansah CA, Yang B, Hackworth EE, Hardin J, Thrasher J. Messaging about very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs) to influence policy attitudes, harm perceptions and smoking motivations: a discrete choice experiment. Tob Control 2024; 33:325-332. [PMID: 36171147 PMCID: PMC10043050 DOI: 10.1136/tc-2022-057577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To reduce smoking and the harms it causes, countries, including the USA, are considering policies to reduce nicotine in combustible tobacco to minimally addictive levels. Effective messages about very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs) and this policy are crucial in combating misperceptions threatening the policy's effectiveness. DATA AND METHODS A discrete choice experiment assessed messages about VLNCs. Participants were 590 adults who smoked exclusively, 379 adults who both smoked and used e-cigarettes, 443 adults who formerly smoked and 351 young adults who never smoked (total n=1763). Seven message attributes were varied systematically (source, harm, chemicals, nicotine, satisfaction, addictiveness and quitting efficacy). Outcomes were selection of messages that generated the most positive attitude towards reduced nicotine policy, the greatest perceived harmfulness of VLNCs, and most strongly motivated quitting and initiating behaviour for VLNCs. RESULTS Information about specific harms and chemicals of VLNCs had the largest effects on selection of messages as eliciting more negative attitudes towards VLNCs policy, increasing perceived VLNC harmfulness, increasing motivation to quit VLNCs and decreasing motivation to try VLNCs. Messages with information about quitting efficacy were selected as more motivating to quit among those who smoke, but also more motivating to try VLNCs among those who do not smoke. CONCLUSION Harm and chemical information can be prioritised to ensure VLNCs are not misperceived as less harmful than regular cigarettes. Messages about increased quitting efficacy and reduced addictiveness associated with VLNCs may backfire if presented to those who do not smoke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reed M Reynolds
- Communication Department, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lucy Popova
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David L Ashley
- School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Charity A Ntansah
- Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Communication, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Emily E Hackworth
- Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - James Hardin
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - James Thrasher
- Department of Health Promotion, Education and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martin S, Angolini E, Audi J, Bertini DE, Bruno LP, Coulter J, Ferlini A, Fortunato F, Frankova V, Garnier N, Grauman Å, Gross E, Hauber B, Hansson M, Kirschner J, Knieling F, Kyosovksa G, Ottombrino S, Novelli A, Raming R, Sansen S, Saier C, Veldwijk J. Patient preferences in genetic newborn screening for rare diseases: study protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081835. [PMID: 38643010 PMCID: PMC11056621 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rare diseases (RDs) collectively impact over 30 million people in Europe. Most individual conditions have a low prevalence which has resulted in a lack of research and expertise in this field, especially regarding genetic newborn screening (gNBS). There is increasing recognition of the importance of incorporating patients' needs and general public perspectives into the shared decision-making process regarding gNBS. This study is part of the Innovative Medicine Initiative project Screen4Care which aims at shortening the diagnostic journey for RDs by accelerating diagnosis for patients living with RDs through gNBS and the use of digital technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning. Our objective will be to assess expecting parent's perspectives, attitudes and preferences regarding gNBS for RDs in Italy and Germany. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A mixed method approach will assess perspectives, attitudes and preferences of (1) expecting parents seeking genetic consultation and (2) 'healthy' expecting parents from the general population in two countries (Germany and Italy). Focus groups and interviews using the nominal group technique and ranking exercises will be performed (qualitative phase). The results will inform the treatment of attributes to be assessed via a survey and a discrete choice experiment (DCE). The total recruitment sample will be 2084 participants (approximatively 1000 participants in each country for the online survey). A combination of thematic qualitative and logit-based quantitative approaches will be used to analyse the results of the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by the Erlangen University Ethics Committee (22-246_1-B), the Freiburg University Ethics Committee (23-1005 S1-AV) and clinical centres in Italy (University of FerraraCE: 357/2023/Oss/AOUFe and Hospedale Bambino Gesu: No.2997 of 2 November 2023, Prot. No. _902) and approved for data storage and handling at the Uppsala University (2022-05806-01). The dissemination of the results will be ensured via scientific journal publication (open access).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Martin
- Center for Research and Bioethics, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Emanuele Angolini
- Research Unit of Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Disease, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Jennifer Audi
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Opfikon, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Dr Enrico Bertini
- Research Unit of Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Disease, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Lucia Pia Bruno
- Medical Genetics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
- Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | | | - Alessandra Ferlini
- Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Fernanda Fortunato
- Medical Genetics Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Vera Frankova
- Institute for Medical Humanities, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Åsa Grauman
- Center for Research and Bioethics, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | - Mats Hansson
- Center for Research and Bioethics, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Janbernd Kirschner
- Department of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Silvia Ottombrino
- Research Unit of Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Disease, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Antonio Novelli
- Research Unit of Neuromuscular and Neurodegenerative Disease, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | - Roman Raming
- Erlangen University Hospital, Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
| | | | - Christina Saier
- Department of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Skolarus TA, Hawley ST, Forman J, Sales AE, Sparks JB, Metreger T, Burns J, Caram MV, Radhakrishnan A, Dossett LA, Makarov DV, Leppert JT, Shelton JB, Stensland KD, Dunsmore J, Maclennan S, Saini S, Hollenbeck BK, Shahinian V, Wittmann DA, Deolankar V, Sriram S. Unpacking overuse of androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer to inform de-implementation strategies. Implement Sci Commun 2024; 5:37. [PMID: 38594740 PMCID: PMC11005280 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00576-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many men with prostate cancer will be exposed to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). While evidence-based ADT use is common, ADT is also used in cases with no or limited evidence resulting in more harm than benefit, i.e., overuse. Since there are risks of ADT (e.g., diabetes, osteoporosis), it is important to understand the behaviors facilitating overuse to inform de-implementation strategies. For these reasons, we conducted a theory-informed survey study, including a discrete choice experiment (DCE), to better understand ADT overuse and provider preferences for mitigating overuse. METHODS Our survey used the Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time (AACTT) framework, the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) Model, and a DCE to elicit provider de-implementation strategy preferences. We surveyed the Society of Government Service Urologists listserv in December 2020. We stratified respondents based on the likelihood of stopping overuse as ADT monotherapy for localized prostate cancer ("yes"/"probably yes," "probably no"/"no"), and characterized corresponding Likert scale responses to seven COM-B statements. We used multivariable regression to identify associations between stopping ADT overuse and COM-B responses. RESULTS Our survey was completed by 84 respondents (13% response rate), with 27% indicating "probably no"/"no" to stopping ADT overuse. We found differences across respondents who said they would and would not stop ADT overuse in demographics and COM-B statements. Our model identified 2 COM-B domains (Opportunity-Social, Motivation-Reflective) significantly associated with a lower likelihood of stopping ADT overuse. Our DCE demonstrated in-person communication, multidisciplinary review, and medical record documentation may be effective in reducing ADT overuse. CONCLUSIONS Our study used a behavioral theory-informed survey, including a DCE, to identify behaviors and context underpinning ADT overuse. Specifying behaviors supporting and gathering provider preferences in addressing ADT overuse requires a stepwise, stakeholder-engaged approach to support evidence-based cancer care. From this work, we are pursuing targeted improvement strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03579680.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ted A Skolarus
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Department of Urology, Dow Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Urology Section, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
| | - Sarah T Hawley
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jane Forman
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Anne E Sales
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Sinclair School of Nursing and Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Jordan B Sparks
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Tabitha Metreger
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer Burns
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Megan V Caram
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Archana Radhakrishnan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Department of Surgery, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Danil V Makarov
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System and NYU School of Medicine Departments of Urology and Population Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - John T Leppert
- Surgical Service, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jeremy B Shelton
- VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Kristian D Stensland
- Department of Urology, Dow Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer Dunsmore
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Steven Maclennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
| | - Sameer Saini
- VA HSR&D Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Vahakn Shahinian
- Department of Urology, Dow Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniela A Wittmann
- Department of Urology, Dow Division of Health Services Research, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Varad Deolankar
- Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - S Sriram
- Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Coronado-Montoya S, Abdel-Baki A, Crockford D, Côté J, Dubreucq S, Dyachenko A, Fischer B, Lecomte T, L'Heureux S, Ouellet-Plamondon C, Roy MA, Tibbo P, Villeneuve M, Jutras-Aswad D. Preferences of Young Adults With Psychosis for Cannabis-Focused Harm Reduction Interventions: A Cross-Sectional Study: Préférences des jeunes adultes souffrant de psychose pour les interventions de réduction des méfaits axées sur le cannabis : une étude transversale. Can J Psychiatry 2024:7067437241242395. [PMID: 38571478 DOI: 10.1177/07067437241242395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cannabis use is common in people with early-phase psychosis (EP) and is associated with worse treatment outcomes. Few targeted interventions for cannabis use behaviour in this population exist, most focusing on abstinence, none focusing on harm reduction. Many people with EP will not seek treatment for their cannabis use with current therapeutic options. Understanding preferences for cannabis-focused harm reduction interventions may be key to improving outcomes. This study aimed to determine preferences of young adults with EP who use cannabis for cannabis-focused harm reduction interventions. METHODS Eighty-nine young adults across Canada with EP interested in reducing cannabis-related harms were recruited. An online questionnaire combining conventional survey methodology and two unique discrete choice experiments (DCEs) was administered. One DCE focused on attributes of core harm reduction interventions (DCE 1) and the second on attributes of boosters (DCE 2). We analysed these using mixed ranked-ordered logistic regression models. Preference questions using conventional survey methodology were analysed using summary statistics. RESULTS Preferred characteristics for cannabis-focused harm reduction interventions (DCE 1) were: shorter sessions (60 min vs. 10 min, odds ratio (OR): 0.72; P < 0.001); less frequent sessions (daily vs. monthly, OR: 0.68; P < 0.001); shorter interventions (3 months vs. 1 month, OR: 0.80; P < 0.01); technology-based interventions (vs. in-person, OR: 1.17; P < 0.05). Preferences for post-intervention boosters (DCE 2) included opting into boosters (vs. opting out, OR: 3.53; P < 0.001) and having shorter boosters (3 months vs. 1 month, OR: 0.79; P < 0.01). Nearly half of the participants preferred to reduce cannabis use as a principal intervention goal (vs. using in less harmful ways or avoiding risky situations). CONCLUSIONS Further research is required to see if technology-based harm reduction interventions for cannabis featuring these preferences translate into greater engagement and improved outcomes in EP patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Coronado-Montoya
- Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Amal Abdel-Baki
- Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - David Crockford
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - José Côté
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Simon Dubreucq
- Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Alina Dyachenko
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Benedikt Fischer
- Centre for Applied Research in Addiction and Mental Health, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada
- Research & Graduate Studies Division, University of the Fraser Valley, Abbotsford, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Tania Lecomte
- Department of Psychology, University of Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Sophie L'Heureux
- Clinique Notre-Dame des Victoires, Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Soins et Services Sociaux de la Capitale Nationale, Québec, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Laval University, Québec, Canada
| | - Clairélaine Ouellet-Plamondon
- Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Marc-André Roy
- Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Laval University, Québec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec, Québec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche CERVO, Québec, Canada
| | - Philip Tibbo
- Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
| | - Marie Villeneuve
- Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Didier Jutras-Aswad
- Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Research Centre, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- University Institute on Addictions, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liu S, Xiang Y, Gu Y, Chen N, Fu P, Wei Y, Zhao P, Li Y, Du C, Mu W, Xia Z, Chen Y. Patient preferences and willingness to pay for central venous access devices in breast cancer: A multicenter discrete choice experiment. Int J Nurs Stud 2024; 152:104695. [PMID: 38301304 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite being a significant management decision in clinical or nursing practice, there is limited understanding of the preferences regarding risks, benefits, costs, and other attributes of patients with breast cancer when selecting peripherally inserted central catheters or totally implanted ports. The objective of this study is to investigate the preferences of patients with breast cancer who require chemotherapy when selecting an optimal central venous access device. METHODS Data on patients' preferences for central venous access devices were collected using a face-to-face discrete choice experiment from the oncology departments of three public hospitals in China representing the eastern (Zhejiang province), central (Henan province), and western (Sichuan province) regions. The study used six attributes to describe the preferences of breast cancer patients for central venous access devices, including out-of-pocket cost, limitations in activities of daily living, catheter maintenance frequency, risk of catheter-related thrombosis, risk of catheter-related infection, and size of incision. Data were analyzed using a conditional logit model and mixed logit model. The marginal willingness to pay (mWTP) was calculated by assessing the ratio of the preference for other attributes to the preference for out-of-pocket cost. RESULTS A total of 573 respondents completed the survey. The discrete choice experiment results showed that respondents strongly preferred a central venous access device with a catheter maintenance frequency of one time a month (vs four times a month, β = 1.188, p < 0.001), the lower risk of catheter-related thrombosis (2 % vs 10 %, β = 1.068; p < 0.001) and lower risk of catheter-related infection (2 % vs 8 % risk: β = 0.824; p < 0.001). Respondents were willing to pay CNY ¥11,968.1 (US$1776.5) for a central venous access device with a catheter maintenance frequency of one time a month rather than four times a month, ¥10,753.6 (US$1596.2) for a central venous access device with 2 % thrombosis risk over one with 10 %, and ¥8302.0 (US$1232.3) for a central venous access device with 2 % infection risk over one with 8 %. Respondents with longer travel time to the hospital, younger than 50 years old, and with urban employee basic medical insurance were willing to pay more for an improvement in the attributes. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that patients with breast cancer were mainly concerned with the out-of-pocket cost, catheter maintenance frequency, risk of catheter-related thrombosis and risk of catheter-related infection when choosing a central venous access device for the delivery of chemotherapy. In clinical or nursing practice, when making central venous access device recommendation for young patients and those who live far from hospitals, totally implanted ports may be a preferable choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shimeng Liu
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment (Fudan University), Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yuliang Xiang
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment (Fudan University), Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yuanyuan Gu
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Na Chen
- Department of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu 610500, China; Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University, Shaanxi 710038, China
| | - Peifen Fu
- Department of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, China
| | - Yanan Wei
- Department of Breast Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China
| | - Pei Zhao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450003, China
| | - Yinfeng Li
- Department of Nursing, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu 610042, China
| | - Chengyong Du
- Department of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310000, China
| | - Wenxuan Mu
- Department of Nursing, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu 610500, China
| | - Zhiyuan Xia
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment (Fudan University), Shanghai 200032, China.
| | - Yingyao Chen
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Health Technology Assessment (Fudan University), Shanghai 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Straatmijer T, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Ponsioen CY, van der Horst D, Scherpenzeel MP, Duijvestein M, van der Meulen-de Jong AE. Patient preferences in treatment options of ulcerative colitis: a discrete choice experiment. Scand J Gastroenterol 2024; 59:288-295. [PMID: 38042982 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2023.2286191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since the number of medical treatment options for Ulcerative Colitis (UC) has expanded over the last decades, patients and physicians face challenges regarding decisions about the medication options. We aimed to identify patients' preferences about their UC treatment options in the Netherlands. Furthermore, we assessed after how many failed treatment options, patients are willing to consider surgical treatment. METHODS We conducted a web-based, multicenter, discrete choice experiment (DCE) among adult UC patients. Patients were repeatedly asked to choose between two hypothetical medicinal treatment options. The choice tasks were based on administration route, administration location, chance of symptom reduction (on short and long term) and chances on infection and other adverse events. Data were analyzed by using Hierarchical Bayes estimation. RESULTS A total of 172 UC patients participated in the DCE. More than half were anti-TNF experienced (52.9%). The chance of symptom reduction after one year (relative importance (RI) 27.7 (95% CI 26.0-29.4)) was most important in choosing between medicinal treatments, followed by the chance of infection (RI 22.3 (21.4 - 23.3)) and chance of symptom reduction after eight weeks (RI 19.5 (18.3 - 20.6)). Considering surgical treatment, nineteen patients (14.3%) would not even consider surgery after failing eight treatment options without any new available therapies left. Nine patients would consider surgery before trying any treatment options. CONCLUSION We found that symptom reduction after one year was the most important attribute in choosing between treatments in UC patients. These outcomes can help understand the trade-offs and preferences of UC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Straatmijer
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Elske van den Akker-van Marle
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cyriel Y Ponsioen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism (AGEM) Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marjolijn Duijvestein
- Radboudumc, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jiang EX, Castle JP, Fisk FE, Taliaferro K, Pahuta MA. Calculating ex-ante Utilities From the Neck Disability Index Score: Quantifying the Value of Care For Cervical Spine Pathology. Global Spine J 2024; 14:526-534. [PMID: 35938309 PMCID: PMC10802524 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221114284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN General population utility valuation study. OBJECTIVE To develop a technique for calculating utilities from the Neck Disability Index (NDI) score. METHODS We recruited a sample of 1200 adults from a market research panel. Using an online discrete choice experiment (DCE), participants rated 10 choice sets based on NDI health states. A multi-attribute utility function was estimated using a mixed multinomial-logit regression model (MIXL). The sample was partitioned into a training set used for model fitting and validation set used for model evaluation. RESULTS The regression model demonstrated good predictive performance on the validation set with an AUC of .77 (95% CI: .76-.78). The regression model was used to develop a utility scoring rubric for the NDI. Regression results also revealed that participants did not regard all NDI items as equally important. The rank order of importance was (in decreasing order): pain intensity = work; personal care = headache; concentration = sleeping; driving; recreation; lifting; and lastly reading. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a simple technique for converting the NDI score to utilities and quantify the relative importance of individual NDI items. The ability to evaluate quality-adjusted life-years using these utilities for cervical spine pain and disability could facilitate economic analysis and aid in allocation of healthcare resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric X. Jiang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Joshua P. Castle
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Felicity E. Fisk
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Kevin Taliaferro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Markian A. Pahuta
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schneider P, Blankart K, Brazier J, van Hout B, Devlin N. Using the Online Elicitation of Personal Utility Functions Approach to Derive a Patient-Based 5-Level Version of EQ-5D Value Set: A Study in 122 Patients With Rheumatic Diseases From Germany. Value Health 2024; 27:376-382. [PMID: 38154596 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Traditional preference elicitation methods, such as discrete choice experiments or time trade-off, usually require large sample sizes. This can limit their applicability in patient populations, where recruiting enough participants can be challenging. The objective of this study was to test a new method, called the Online elicitation of Personal Utility Functions (OPUF) approach, to derive an EQ-5D-5L value set from a relatively small sample of patients with rheumatic diseases. METHODS OPUF is a new type of online survey that implements compositional preference elicitation techniques. Central to the method are 3 valuation steps: (1) dimension weighting, (2) level rating, and (3) anchoring. An English demo version of the OPUF survey can be accessed at https://valorem.health/eq5d5l. From the responses, a personal EQ-5D-5L utility function can be constructed for each participant, and a group-level value set can be derived by aggregating model coefficients across participants. RESULTS A total of 122 patients with rheumatic disease from Germany completed the OPUF survey. The survey was generally well received; most participants completed the survey in less than 20 minutes and were able to derive a full EQ-5D-5L value set. The precision of mean coefficients was high, despite the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that OPUF can be used to derive an EQ-5D-5L value set from a relatively small sample of patients. Although the method is still under development, we think that it has the potential to be a valuable preference elicitation tool and to complement traditional methods in several areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Schneider
- ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK; CINCH, University of Duisburg/Essen, Essen, Germany; Valorem Health, Bochum, Germany.
| | | | - John Brazier
- ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Ben van Hout
- ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK; Open Health, York, England, UK
| | - Nancy Devlin
- University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ancillotti M, Huls SPI, Krockow EM, Veldwijk J. Prosocial Behaviour and Antibiotic Resistance: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment. Patient 2024; 17:191-202. [PMID: 38117400 PMCID: PMC10894120 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00666-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The health of a community depends on the health of its individuals; therefore, individual health behaviour can implicitly affect the health of the entire community. This is particularly evident in the case of infectious diseases. Because the level of prosociality in a community might determine the effectiveness of health programmes, prosocial behaviour may be a crucial disease-control resource. This study aimed to extend the literature on prosociality and investigate the role of altruism in antibiotic decision making. METHODS A discrete choice experiment was conducted to assess the influence of altruism on the general public's preferences regarding antibiotic treatment options. The survey was completed by 378 Swedes. Latent class analysis models were used to estimate antibiotic treatment characteristics and preference heterogeneity. A three-class model resulted in the best model fit, and altruism significantly impacted preference heterogeneity. RESULTS Our findings suggest that people with higher altruism levels had more pronounced preferences for treatment options with lower contributions to antibiotic resistance and a lower likelihood of treatment failure. Furthermore, altruism was statistically significantly associated with sex, education, and health literacy. CONCLUSIONS Antibiotic awareness, trust in healthcare systems, and non-discriminatory priority setting appear to be structural elements conducive to judicious and prosocial antibiotic behaviour. This study suggests that prosocial messages could help to decrease the demand for antibiotic treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirko Ancillotti
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Husargatan 3, BMC, SE 751 22, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Samare P I Huls
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eva M Krockow
- School of Psychology and Vision Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Jorien Veldwijk
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Richards JT, O’Hara NN, Healy K, Zingas N, McKibben N, Benzel C, Slobogean GP, O’Toole RV, Sciadini MF. Fix or Replace? Patient Preferences for the Treatment of Geriatric Lower Extremity Fractures: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2024; 15:21514593241236647. [PMID: 38426150 PMCID: PMC10903189 DOI: 10.1177/21514593241236647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction When considering treatment options for geriatric patients with lower extremity fractures, little is known about which outcomes are prioritized by patients. This study aimed to determine the patient preferences for outcomes after a geriatric lower extremity fracture. Materials and Methods We administered a discrete choice experiment survey to 150 patients who were at least 60 years of age and treated for a lower extremity fracture at a Level I trauma center. The discrete choice experiment presented study participants with 8 sets of hypothetical outcome comparisons, including joint preservation (yes or no), risk of reoperation at 6 months and 24 months, postoperative weightbearing status, disposition, and function as measured by return to baseline walking distance. We estimated the relative importance of these potential outcomes using multinomial logit modeling. Results The strongest patient preference was for maintained function after treatment (59%, P < .001), followed by reoperation within 6 months (12%, P < .001). Although patients generally favored joint preservation, patients were willing to change their preference in favor of joint replacement if it increased function (walking distance) by 13% (SE, 66%). Reducing the short-term reoperation risk (12%, P < .001) was more important to patients than reducing long-term reoperation risk (4%, P = .33). Disposition and weightbearing status were lesser priorities to patients (9%, P < .001 and 7%, P < .001, respectively). Discussion After a lower extremity fracture, geriatric patients prioritized maintained walking function. Avoiding short-term reoperation was more important than avoiding long-term reoperation. Joint preservation through fracture fixation was the preferred treatment of geriatric patients unless arthroplasty or arthrodesis provides a meaningful functional benefit. Hospital disposition and postoperative weightbearing status were less important to patients than the other included outcomes. Conclusions Geriatric patients strongly prioritize function over other outcomes after a lower extremity fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John T. Richards
- Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
| | - Nathan N. O’Hara
- Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
| | - Kathleen Healy
- Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
| | - Nicolas Zingas
- Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
| | - Natasha McKibben
- Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
| | - Caroline Benzel
- Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
| | - Gerard P. Slobogean
- Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
| | - Robert V. O’Toole
- Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Author’s name insert query plzJ. T. Richards is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties. Title 17 U.S.C.§105 provides that “Copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. §101 defined a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employees of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties. The opinions or assertions contained in this paper are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as reflecting the views, policy or positions of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense nor the US Government
| | - Marcus F. Sciadini
- Marcus F. Sciadini, MD, Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Veldwijk J, Smith IP, Oliveri S, Petrocchi S, Smith MY, Lanzoni L, Janssens R, Huys I, de Wit GA, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM. Comparing Discrete Choice Experiment with Swing Weighting to Estimate Attribute Relative Importance: A Case Study in Lung Cancer Patient Preferences. Med Decis Making 2024; 44:203-216. [PMID: 38178591 PMCID: PMC10865764 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231222421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Discrete choice experiments (DCE) are commonly used to elicit patient preferences and to determine the relative importance of attributes but can be complex and costly to administer. Simpler methods that measure relative importance exist, such as swing weighting with direct rating (SW-DR), but there is little empirical evidence comparing the two. This study aimed to directly compare attribute relative importance rankings and weights elicited using a DCE and SW-DR. METHODS A total of 307 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in Italy and Belgium completed an online survey assessing preferences for cancer treatment using DCE and SW-DR. The relative importance of the attributes was determined using a random parameter logit model for the DCE and rank order centroid method (ROC) for SW-DR. Differences in relative importance ranking and weights between the methods were assessed using Cohen's weighted kappa and Dirichlet regression. Feedback on ease of understanding and answering the 2 tasks was also collected. RESULTS Most respondents (>65%) found both tasks (very) easy to understand and answer. The same attribute, survival, was ranked most important irrespective of the methods applied. The overall ranking of the attributes on an aggregate level differed significantly between DCE and SW-ROC (P < 0.01). Greater differences in attribute weights between attributes were reported in DCE compared with SW-DR (P < 0.01). Agreement between the individual-level attribute ranking across methods was moderate (weighted Kappa 0.53-0.55). CONCLUSION Significant differences in attribute importance between DCE and SW-DR were found. Respondents reported both methods being relatively easy to understand and answer. Further studies confirming these findings are warranted. Such studies will help to provide accurate guidance for methods selection when studying relative attribute importance across a wide array of preference-relevant decisions. HIGHLIGHTS Both DCEs and SW tasks can be used to determine attribute relative importance rankings and weights; however, little evidence exists empirically comparing these methods in terms of outcomes or respondent usability.Most respondents found the DCE and SW tasks very easy or easy to understand and answer.A direct comparison of DCE and SW found significant differences in attribute importance rankings and weights as well as a greater spread in the DCE-derived attribute relative importance weights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Veldwijk
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Julius Centrum, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - I. P. Smith
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Julius Centrum, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - S. Oliveri
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - S. Petrocchi
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - M. Y. Smith
- Alexion AstraZeneca Rare Disease, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Regulatory and Quality Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - L. Lanzoni
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R. Janssens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - I. Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G. A. de Wit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Julius Centrum, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam & Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C. G. M Groothuis-Oudshoorn
- Health Technology and Services Research (HTSR), Faculty of Behavioural Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hamilton M, Christine Lin CW, Arora S, Harrison M, Tracy M, Nickel B, Shaheed CA, Gnjidic D, Mathieson S. Understanding general practitioners' prescribing choices to patients with chronic low back pain: a discrete choice experiment. Int J Clin Pharm 2024; 46:111-121. [PMID: 37882955 PMCID: PMC10831024 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01649-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although NSAIDs are recommended as a first line analgesic treatment, opioids are very commonly prescribed to patients with low back pain (LBP) despite risks of harms. AIM This study aimed to determine factors contributing to general practitioners' (GPs') prescribing choices to patients with chronic LBP in a primary care setting. METHOD This discrete choice experiment (DCE) presented 210 GPs with hypothetical scenarios of a patient with chronic LBP. Participants chose their preferred treatment for each choice set, either the opioid, NSAID or neither. The scenarios varied by two patient attributes; non-specific LBP or LBP with referred leg pain (sciatica) and number of comorbidities. The three treatment attributes also varied, being: the type of opioid or NSAID, degree of pain reduction and number of adverse events. The significance of each attribute in influencing clinical decisions was the primary outcome and the degree to which GPs preferred the alternative based on the number of adverse events or the amount of pain reduction was the secondary outcome. RESULTS Overall, GPs preferred NSAIDs (45.2%, 95% CI 38.7-51.7%) over opioids (28.8%, 95% CI 23.0-34.7%), however there was no difference between the type of NSAID or opioid preferred. Additionally, the attributes of pain reduction and adverse events did not influence a GP's choice between NSAIDs or opioids for patients with chronic LBP. CONCLUSION GPs prefer prescribing NSAIDs over opioids for a patient with chronic low back pain regardless of patient factors of comorbidities or the presence of leg pain (i.e. sciatica).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Hamilton
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Level 10 North, King George V Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (C39), Missenden Road, PO Box M179, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Chung-Wei Christine Lin
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Level 10 North, King George V Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (C39), Missenden Road, PO Box M179, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sheena Arora
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Harrison
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- The Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences (CHEOS) at St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Marguerite Tracy
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christina Abdel Shaheed
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Level 10 North, King George V Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (C39), Missenden Road, PO Box M179, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Danijela Gnjidic
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephanie Mathieson
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Level 10 North, King George V Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (C39), Missenden Road, PO Box M179, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ejebu OZ, Turnbull J, Atherton I, Rafferty AM, Palmer B, Philippou J, Prichard J, Jamieson M, Rolewicz L, Williams M, Ball J. What might make nurses stay? A protocol for discrete choice experiments to understand NHS nurses' preferences at early-career and late-career stages. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e075066. [PMID: 38307538 PMCID: PMC10836387 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Like many countries, England has a national shortage of registered nurses. Employers strive to retain existing staff, to ease supply pressures. Disproportionate numbers of nurses leave the National Health Services (NHS) both early in their careers, and later, as they near retirement age. Research is needed to understand the job preferences of early-career and late-career nurses working in the NHS, so tailored policies can be developed to better retain these two groups. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will collect job preference data for early-career and late-career NHS nurses, respectively using two separate discrete choice experiments (DCEs). Findings from the literature, focus groups, academic experts and stakeholder discussions will be used to identify and select the DCE attributes (ie, job features) and levels. We will generate an orthogonal, fractional factorial design using the experimental software Ngene. The DCEs will be administered through online surveys distributed by the regulator Nursing and Midwifery Council. For each group, we expect to achieve a final sample of 2500 registered NHS nurses working in England. For early-career nurses, eligible participants will be registered nurses who graduated in the preceding 5 years (ie, 2019-2023). Eligible participants for the late-career survey will be registered nurses aged 55 years and above. We will use conditional and mixed logit models to analyse the data. Specifically, study 1 will estimate the job preferences of early-career nurses and the possible trade-offs. Study 2 will estimate the retirement preferences of late-career NHS nurses and the potential trade-offs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the host research organisation Ethics Committees Research Governance (University of Southampton, number 80610) (https://www.southampton.ac.uk/about/governance/regulations-policies/policies/ethics). The results will be disseminated via conference presentations, publications in peer-reviewed journals and annual reports to key stakeholders, the Department of Health and Social Care, and NHS England/Improvement retention leaders. REGISTRATION DETAILS Registration on OSF http://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RDN9G.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ourega-Zoé Ejebu
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- National Institute for Health and Social Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC), Wessex, UK
| | - Joanne Turnbull
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Iain Atherton
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anne Marie Rafferty
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Julia Philippou
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jane Prichard
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Michelle Jamieson
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Jane Ball
- School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- National Institute for Health and Social Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC), Wessex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhou Q, Liu J, Zheng F, Wang Q, Zhang X, Li H, Tan L, Luo W. Nurses' preferences for interventions to improve infection prevention and control behaviors based on systems engineering initiative to patient safety model: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Nurs 2024; 23:29. [PMID: 38200529 PMCID: PMC10777601 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-01701-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The evidence of preferences for infection prevention and control (IPC) intervention from system perspective was lacked. This study aimed to elicit nurses' preferences for the intervention designed to improve IPC behaviors based on the Systems Engineering Initiative to Patient Safety (SEIPS) model using Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). METHODS A DCE was conducted among nurses who were on active duty and willing to participate from July 5th to 10th, 2021 in a tertiary hospital in Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, using convenience sampling. A self-administered questionnaire included scenarios formed by six attributes with varying levels based on SEIPS model: person, organization, tools and technology, tasks, internal environment and external environment. A conditional logit and latent class logit model were performed to analyze the data. RESULTS A total of 257 valid questionnaires were analyzed among nurses. The results from the latent class logit model show that nurses' preferences can be divided into three classes. For nurses in multifaceted-aspect-preferred class (41.9%), positive coefficients were obtained in those six attributes. For person-preferred class (19.7%), only person was positively significant. For environment-preferred class (36.4%), the most important attribute were tasks, tools and technology, internal environment and external environment. CONCLUSIONS This finding suggest that nurses have three latent-class preferences for interventions. Multifaceted interventions to improve IPC behaviors based on the SEIPS model are preferred by most nurses. Moreover, relevant measured should be performed targeted the latent class of person-preferred and external-environment-preferred nurses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Zhou
- Department of Hospital Infection Management, Wuhan Children's Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , No.100 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
| | - Junjie Liu
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Feiyang Zheng
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Qianning Wang
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Xinping Zhang
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Hui Li
- Children's Oncology Department, Wuhan Children's Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Li Tan
- Department of Hospital Infection Management, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No.1095 Jie Fang Avenue, 430030, Hankou, Wuhan, China.
| | - Wanjun Luo
- Department of Hospital Infection Management, Wuhan Children's Hospital (Wuhan Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology , No.100 Xianggang Rd, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Jiang MM, Xiao MF, Zhang JW, Yang MF. Middle-aged and older people's preference for medical-elderly care integrated institutions in China: a discrete choice experiment study. BMC Nurs 2024; 23:32. [PMID: 38200515 PMCID: PMC10777634 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01696-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the continuing impact of the aging population, medical-elderly care integrated institutions, as a way to bear the pressure of medical and elderly care, effectively ensure the quality of life of the elderly in their later years. OBJECTIVES To explore the preferences of medical-elderly care integrated institutions among Chinese middle-aged and older people and to provide a reference for establishing elderly-oriented development of medical-elderly care integrated institutions. METHODS In this study, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to investigate the preferences of people aged 45 years and older in medical-elderly care integrated institutions in China from October 20, 2022, to November 10, 2022. A mixed logit regression model was used to analyze the DCE data. Participants' willingness to pay for each attribute was also calculated. RESULTS Data from 420 participants who provided valid responses were included in the analysis. In terms of the choice preference, moderate service quality (vs. poor service quality: β = 1.707, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.343 ~ 2.071) and high medical technology level (vs. low medical technology level: β = 1.535, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.240 ~ 1.830) were the most important attributes to middle-aged and older people, followed by monthly cost, environmental facilities, the convenience of transportation, and entertainment activities. Regarding the willingness to pay, participants were more willing to pay for service quality and medical technology level than for other attributes. They were willing to pay $3156 and $2838 more for "poor service quality" and "low medical technology level," respectively, to receive "moderate service quality " (p = 0.007, 95% CI 963 ~ 5349) and "high medical technology level" (p = 0.005, 95% CI 852 ~ 4824). CONCLUSIONS The state should attach great importance to the development of medical-elderly care integrated services industry, actively optimize the model of the medical-elderly care integrated service, improve the facilities, and create a healthy environment. At the same time, give full play to the role of medical insurance, long-term care insurance, and commercial insurance, so as to improve the comprehensive quality of life of the elderly. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The design of the experimental selection was guided by 10 experts in the field, 5 Chinese government officials, and interviews and focus group discussions, without whose participation this study would not have been possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mao-Min Jiang
- School of Public Affairs, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian province, China
| | - Mei-Fang Xiao
- School of Nursing, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi province, China
| | - Jia-Wen Zhang
- Xiamen Institute of Software Technology, Xiamen, China, Fujian province.
- School of Education, Silliman University, Negros Oriental province, Dumaguete, Philippines.
| | - Mei-Fang Yang
- School of Nursing, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Luo N, Bai R, Sun Y, Li X, Liu L, Xu X, Liu L. Job preferences of master of public health students in China: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Med Educ 2024; 24:24. [PMID: 38178052 PMCID: PMC10768294 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04993-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The shortage of public health personnel and the uneven distribution between urban and rural areas are thorny issues in China. Master of public health (MPH) is an integral part of public health human resources in the future, and it is of far-reaching significance to discuss their work preferences. The present study wants to investigate the job preference of MPH, understand the relative importance of different job attributes, and then put forward targeted incentive measures. METHODS Discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to evaluate the job preference of MPHs in two medical colleges in Liaoning Province. Attributes include employment location, bianzhi, working environment, career development prospects, work value and monthly income. Thirty-six choice sets were developed using a fractional factorial design. Mixed logit models were used to analysis the DCE data. RESULTS The final sample comprised 327 MPHs. All the attributes and levels included in the study are statistically significant. Monthly income is the most important factor for MPHs. For non-economic factors, they value career development prospects most, followed by the employment location. Respondents' preferences are heterogeneous and influenced by individual characteristics. Subgroup analysis showed that respondents from different family backgrounds have different job preferences. Policy simulation suggested that respondents were most sensitive to a salary increase, and the combination of several non-economic factors can also achieve the same effect. CONCLUSIONS Economic factors and non-economic factors significantly affect the job preference of MPHs. To alleviate the shortage and uneven distribution of public health personnel, more effective policy intervention should comprehensively consider the incentive measures of the work itself and pay attention to the individual characteristics and family backgrounds of the target object.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nansheng Luo
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, China Medical University, No. 77 Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, 110122, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Ru Bai
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, China Medical University, No. 77 Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, 110122, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Yu Sun
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, China Medical University, No. 77 Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, 110122, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Xueying Li
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, China Medical University, No. 77 Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, 110122, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Libing Liu
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, China Medical University, No. 77 Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, 110122, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Xin Xu
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street, Heping District, 110004, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
| | - Li Liu
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Health Management, China Medical University, No. 77 Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, 110122, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Raghunandan R, Howard K. Research Note: Discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences for decision-making in physiotherapy. J Physiother 2024; 70:73-77. [PMID: 38072716 DOI: 10.1016/j.jphys.2023.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhee Raghunandan
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wright SJ, Vass CM, Ulph F, Payne K. Understanding the Impact of Different Modes of Information Provision on Preferences for a Newborn Bloodspot Screening Program in the United Kingdom. MDM Policy Pract 2024; 9:23814683241232935. [PMID: 38445047 PMCID: PMC10913504 DOI: 10.1177/23814683241232935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction. This study aimed to understand the impact of alternative modes of information provision on the stated preferences of a sample of the public for attributes of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) in the United Kingdom. Methods. An online discrete choice experiment survey was designed using 4 attributes to describe NBS (effect of treatment on the condition, time to receive results, whether the bloodspot is stored, false-positive rate). Survey respondents were randomized to 1 of 2 survey versions presenting the background training materials using text from a leaflet (leaflet version) or an animation (animation version). Heteroskedastic conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of mode of information provision on error variance. Results. The survey was completed by 1,000 respondents (leaflet = 525; animation = 475). Preferences for the attributes in the DCE were the same in both groups, but the group receiving the animation version had 9% less error variance in their responses. Respondents completing the animation version gave higher ratings compared with the leaflet version in terms of ease of perceived understanding. Subgroup analysis suggested that the animation was particularly effective at reducing error variance for women (20%), people with previous children (16.5%), and people between the ages of 35 and 45 y (11.8%). Limitations. This study used simple DCE with 4 attributes, and the results may vary for more complex choice questions. Conclusion. This study provides evidence that that supplementing the information package offered to parents choosing to take part in NBS with an animation may aid them their decision making. Further research would be needed to test the animation in the health system. Implications. Researchers designing DCE should carefully consider the design of their training materials to improve the quality of data collected. Highlights Prior to completing a discrete choice experiment about newborn bloodspot screening, respondents were shown information using either a leaflet-based or animated format.Respondents receiving information using an animation version reported that the information was slightly easier to understand and exhibited 9% less error variance in expressing their preferences for a newborn screening program.Using the animation version to present information appeared to have a larger impact in reducing the error variance of responses for specific respondents including women, individuals with children, individuals between the ages of 35 and 45 y, and individuals educated to degree level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart J. Wright
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Service Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Caroline M. Vass
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Service Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- RTI Health Solutions, The Pavilion, Towers Business Park, Didsbury, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Ulph
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Service Research and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
O'Hara NN, Sciadini MF. Using Discrete Choice Experiments to Quantify Patient Preferences. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024; 32:e9-e16. [PMID: 37647520 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-22-01125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Discrete choice experiments are a robust technique for quantifying preferences. With this method, respondents are presented with a series of hypothetical comparisons described by attributes with varying levels. The aggregated choices from respondents can be used to infer the relative importance of the described attributes and acceptable trade-offs between attributes. The data generated from discrete choice experiments can aid surgeons in aligning patient values with treatment decisions and support the design of research that is responsive to patient preferences. This article summarizes the application of discrete choice experiments to orthopaedics. We share best practices for designing discrete choice experiments and options for reporting study results. Finally, we suggest opportunities for this method within our field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan N O'Hara
- From the Department of Orthopaedics, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Capmas P, Panjo H, Artignan J, Babelhadj A, Benoist I, Decouzon J, Jarrige C, Leglise M, Renoncet V, Pelletier-Fleury N. Women's preferences for less active ectopic pregnancy treatment: A discrete choice experiment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 292:175-181. [PMID: 38035866 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Shared decision-making has become a hallmark of quality care and is increasingly spotlighted in practice guidelines. Little is known about women's views for treatment of less active ectopic pregnancy. What are the preferences of women for less active ectopic pregnancy treatment-related attributes? DESIGN A discrete choice model with 8 attributes depicting ectopic pregnancy treatment including varying levels of first-line treatment effectiveness, length of hospitalization, cost, length of sick leave, of convalescence, need for surgical management, for emergency care during convalescence and for tube removal was used. Childbearing aged women, i.e. those who might experience an ectopic pregnancy in the future, were recruited. They were asked to choose between hypothetical treatments in 18 choice tasks with different levels of all treatment attributes. A conditional logit McFadden's choice model was performed. The main outcome measure was preference weights for less active ectopic pregnancy treatment-related attributes. RESULTS A total of 5770 observations from 178 women were analysed. The attributes displaying the highest marginal impacts on women's decisions included: higher rate of first-line treatment effectiveness, lower rate of tube removal, lower rate of surgical management, shorter length of hospitalization and, to a lesser extent, but still significant, shorter length of convalescence, absence of risk of emergency care during convalescence and lower cost. CONCLUSIONS Trade-offs made by women between the attributes of less active ectopic pregnancy treatment suggest that no treatment option, either medical or surgical, is an obvious preferred option. These results encourage the promotion of shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perrine Capmas
- Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), UMR1018, Inserm, Paris Saclay University, Hôpital Paul Brousse, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier F-94816 Villejuif, France; Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, Bicetre Hospital, GHU Sud, AP-HP, 78 avenue du Général Leclerc, F-94276 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France; GyneSpri Participatory Research Group, Association GyneSpri, 28 rue Anatole France, 94300 Vincennes, France.
| | - Henri Panjo
- Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), UMR1018, Inserm, Paris Saclay University, Hôpital Paul Brousse, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier F-94816 Villejuif, France
| | - Juliette Artignan
- GyneSpri Participatory Research Group, Association GyneSpri, 28 rue Anatole France, 94300 Vincennes, France
| | - Aicha Babelhadj
- GyneSpri Participatory Research Group, Association GyneSpri, 28 rue Anatole France, 94300 Vincennes, France
| | - Inès Benoist
- GyneSpri Participatory Research Group, Association GyneSpri, 28 rue Anatole France, 94300 Vincennes, France
| | - Julie Decouzon
- GyneSpri Participatory Research Group, Association GyneSpri, 28 rue Anatole France, 94300 Vincennes, France
| | - Claire Jarrige
- GyneSpri Participatory Research Group, Association GyneSpri, 28 rue Anatole France, 94300 Vincennes, France
| | - Mylène Leglise
- GyneSpri Participatory Research Group, Association GyneSpri, 28 rue Anatole France, 94300 Vincennes, France
| | - Valérie Renoncet
- GyneSpri Participatory Research Group, Association GyneSpri, 28 rue Anatole France, 94300 Vincennes, France
| | - Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury
- Centre of Research in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), UMR1018, Inserm, Paris Saclay University, Hôpital Paul Brousse, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier F-94816 Villejuif, France; GyneSpri Participatory Research Group, Association GyneSpri, 28 rue Anatole France, 94300 Vincennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Heidenreich S, Trapali M, Krucien N, Tervonen T, Phillips-Beyer A. Two Methods, One Story? Comparing Results of a Choice Experiment and Multidimensional Thresholding From a Clinician Preference Study in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Value Health 2024; 27:61-69. [PMID: 37844661 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES An increasing number of methods are used to elicit health preference information. It is unclear whether different elicitation methods produce similar results and policy advice. Here, we compared the results from a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and multidimensional thresholding (MDT) that were conducted in the same sample. METHODS Clinicians (N = 350) completed a DCE and MDT to elicit their preferences for 4 attributes related to the medical management of subarachnoid hemorrhage after aneurysm repair. Preference weights were compared between the DCE and MDT using a complete combinatorial convolution test. Additionally, data from the DCE and MDT were used to compute preference-based net treatment values for 16 hypothetical treatment profiles versus 1000 simulated comparators. The implied treatment recommendations were compared between the DCE and MDT. RESULTS Preference weight distributions and median weights did not differ significantly between the DCE and MDT for any attribute: likelihood of delayed cerebral ischemia (medians 0.48 vs 0.40; P = .41), risk of lung complications (medians 0.27 vs 0.30; P = .52), risk of hypotension (medians 0.10 vs 0.11; P = .55), and risk of anemia (medians 0.07 vs 0.07; P = .50). The DCE and MDT produced similar treatment net value distributions (P > .05) and implied the same treatment recommendations in 82.3% of cases. CONCLUSIONS The DCE and MDT elicited similar preference distributions and produced the same treatment recommendations for most tested cases. However, the share of people supporting the average treatment recommendation differed. More research is needed to determine how these findings would compare with those in other populations (in particular, patients) and applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Myrto Trapali
- Department of Patient-Centered Research, Evidera, London, England, UK
| | - Nicolas Krucien
- Department of Patient-Centered Research, Evidera, London, England, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
van Krugten FCW, Jonker MF, Himmler SFW, Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Brouwer WBF. Estimating a Preference-Based Value Set for the Mental Health Quality of Life Questionnaire (MHQoL). Med Decis Making 2024; 44:64-75. [PMID: 37981788 PMCID: PMC10714713 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231208645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health economic evaluations using common health-related quality of life measures may fall short in adequately measuring and valuing the benefits of mental health care interventions. The Mental Health Quality of Life questionnaire (MHQoL) is a standardized, self-administered mental health-related quality of life instrument covering 7 dimensions known to be relevant across and valued highly by people with mental health problems. The aim of this study was to derive a Dutch value set for the MHQoL to facilitate its use in cost-utility analyses. METHODS The value set was estimated using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with duration that accommodated nonlinear time preferences. The DCE was embedded in a web-based self-complete survey and administered to a representative sample (N = 1,308) of the Dutch adult population. The matched pairwise choice tasks were created using a Bayesian heterogeneous D-efficient design. The overall DCE design comprised 10 different subdesigns, with each subdesign containing 15 matched pairwise choice tasks. Each participant was asked to complete 1 of the subdesigns to which they were randomly assigned. RESULTS The obtained coefficients indicated that "physical health,""mood," and "relationships" were the most important dimensions. All coefficients were in the expected direction and reflected the monotonic structure of the MHQoL, except for level 2 of the dimension "future." The predicted values for the MHQoL ranged from -0.741 for the worst state to 1 for the best state. CONCLUSIONS This study derived a Dutch value set for the recently introduced MHQoL. This value set allows for the generation of an index value for all MHQoL states on a QALY scale and may hence be used in Dutch cost-utility analyses of mental healthcare interventions. HIGHLIGHTS A discrete choice experiment was used to derive a Dutch value set for the MHQoL.This allows the use of the MHQoL in Dutch cost-utility analyses.The dimensions physical health, mood, and relationships were the most important.The utility values range from -0.741 for the worst state to 1 for the best state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédérique C. W. van Krugten
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam (ESHPM), Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre (ECMC), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel F. Jonker
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam (ESHPM), Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre (ECMC), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian F. W. Himmler
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam (ESHPM), Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre (ECMC), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam (ESHPM), Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Werner B. F. Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam (ESHPM), Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lv M, Shen Y, Li W, Wu J, Wen X, Zhu D, He P. Preferences of general practitioners for delivering adult vaccination: A discrete choice experiment. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2167439. [PMID: 36748594 PMCID: PMC10012943 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2167439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Preventive health workers rather than general practitioners (GPs) are the principal providers of vaccines in China, which may be a determinant of the unmet demand for vaccination, especially for adults, in recent years. GPs' preferences had a significant influence on alternative approaches to adult vaccination delivery. To better understand GP's preferences for adult vaccination services, we employed a discrete choice experiment with seven attributes: income, setting, information system, workshop, workload, performance measurement, and managerial support. Mixed logit models and latent class models were used for statistical analyses. In general, support from primary healthcare managers was the strongest driver of choice, followed by a 10% increase in workload, separate adult vaccination clinic, 5% increase in workload, and independent information system. Monthly income was significantly associated with provision of adult vaccination services. Based on the influence of latent factors, GPs fell into three classes that were correlated with GPs' years of practice, workload, income satisfaction, and knowledge-attitude-practicescore. Classes 1 and 2 valued the service setting and performance measurement differently, while Class 3 valued the service setting only (preferred separate adult vaccination clinics to provide service). This study generated actionable information to guide innovation in the adult vaccination delivery system in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Lv
- Institute for Immunization and Prevention, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Shen
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.,China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Wentao Li
- China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiang Wu
- Institute for Immunization and Prevention, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaojing Wen
- Institute for Immunization and Prevention, Beijing Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Beijing, China
| | - Dawei Zhu
- China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ping He
- China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Umar N, Hill Z, Schellenberg J, Sambo NU, Shuaibu A, Aliyu AM, Kulani KK, Abdullahi MU, Usman A, Mohammed H, Adamu H, Ibrahim M, Mohammed A, Abdulhamid A, Muhammed Z, Alfayo A, Marchant T. Understanding rural women's preferences for telephone call engagement with primary health care providers in Nigeria: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Glob Health 2023; 8:e013498. [PMID: 38148109 PMCID: PMC10753731 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the use of mobile phones to provide primary health care services and maintain continuity of care. This study aims to understand rural women's preferences for telephone call engagement with primary health care providers in Nigeria. METHODS A discrete choice experiment was conducted alongside an action research project that empowered primary health care workers to develop and implement a telephone call intervention to assess and enhance experiences with facility childbirth care. Between January and March 2022, 30 providers from 10 primary health care facilities implemented the choice experiment among rural women who had institutional childbirth to elicit service user preferences for telephone call engagement. The women were asked to express their preferred scenario for telephone call engagement with their primary health care providers. Generalised linear mixed models were used to estimate women's preferences. RESULTS Data for 460 women were available for the discrete choice experiment. The study showed that rural women have preferences for telephone call engagement with primary health care providers. Specifically, women preferred engaging with female to male callers (β=1.665 (95% CI 1.41, 1.93), SE=0.13, p<0.001), preferred call duration under 15 min (β=1.287 (95% CI 0.61, 1.96), SE=0.34, p<0.001) and preferred being notified before the telephone engagement (warm calling) (β=1.828 (95% CI 1.10, 2.56), SE=0.37, p<0.001). Phone credit incentive was also a statistically significant predictor of women's preferences for engagement. However, neither the availability of scheduling options, the period of the day or the day of the week predicts women's preferences. CONCLUSIONS The study highlights the importance of understanding rural women's preferences for telephone call engagement with healthcare providers in low-income and middle-income countries. These findings can inform the development of mobile phone-based interventions and improve acceptability and broader adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasir Umar
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Zelee Hill
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joanna Schellenberg
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Abdulrahman Shuaibu
- Office of the Executive Secretary, State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Gombe, Nigeria
| | | | | | | | - Ahmed Usman
- Gombe State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Gombe, Nigeria
| | - Hafsat Mohammed
- Gombe State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Gombe, Nigeria
| | - Hajara Adamu
- Gombe State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Gombe, Nigeria
| | - Maryam Ibrahim
- Gombe State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Gombe, Nigeria
| | - Adamu Mohammed
- Gombe State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Gombe, Nigeria
| | - Adama Abdulhamid
- Gombe State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Gombe, Nigeria
| | - Zainab Muhammed
- Gombe State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Gombe, Nigeria
| | - Afodiya Alfayo
- Gombe State Primary Health Care Development Agency, Gombe, Nigeria
| | - Tanya Marchant
- Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rivara AC, Galárraga O, Selu M, Arorae M, Wang R, Faasalele-Savusa K, Rosen R, Hawley NL, Viali S. Identifying patient preferences for diabetes care: A protocol for implementing a discrete choice experiment in Samoa. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0295845. [PMID: 38134044 PMCID: PMC10745180 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
In Samoa, adult Type 2 diabetes prevalence has increased within the past 30 years. Patient preferences for care are factors known to influence treatment adherence and are associated with reduced disease progression and severity. However, patient preferences for diabetes care, generally, are understudied, and other patient-centered factors such as willingness-to-pay (WTP) for diabetes treatment have never been explored in this setting. Discrete Choice Experiments (DCE) are useful tools to elicit preferences and WTP for healthcare. DCEs present patients with hypothetical scenarios composed of a series of multi-alternative choice profiles made up of attributes and levels. Patients choose a profile based on which attributes and levels may be preferable for them, thereby quantifying and identifying locally relevant patient-centered preferences. This paper presents the protocol for the design, piloting, and implementation of a DCE identifying patient preferences for diabetes care, in Samoa. Using an exploratory sequential mixed methods design, formative data from a literature review and semi-structured interviews with n = 20 Samoan adults living with Type 2 diabetes was used to design a Best-Best DCE instrument. Experimental design procedures were used to reduce the number of choice-sets and balance the instrument. Following pilot testing, the DCE is being administered to n = 450 Samoan adults living with diabetes, along with associated questionnaires, and anthropometrics. Subsequently, we will also be assessing longitudinally how preferences for care change over time. Data will be analyzed using progressive mixed Rank Order Logit models. The results will identify which diabetes care attributes are important to patients (p < 0.05), examine associations between participant characteristics and preference, illuminate the trade-offs participants are willing to make, and the probability of uptake, and WTP for specific attributes and levels. The results from this study will provide integral data useful for designing and adapting efficacious diabetes intervention and treatment approaches in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna C. Rivara
- Department of Epidemiology (Chronic Diseases), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Omar Galárraga
- Department of Health Services Policy and Practice, and International Health Institute, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
| | - Melania Selu
- Obesity Lifestyle and Genetic Adaptations (OLaGA) Research Center, Apia, Samoa
| | - Maria Arorae
- Obesity Lifestyle and Genetic Adaptations (OLaGA) Research Center, Apia, Samoa
| | - Ruiyan Wang
- Department of Epidemiology (Chronic Diseases), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | | | - Rochelle Rosen
- Centers for Behavioral and Preventative Medicine, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University, School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
| | - Nicola L. Hawley
- Department of Epidemiology (Chronic Diseases), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Satupaitea Viali
- Department of Epidemiology (Chronic Diseases), Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- School of Medicine, National University of Samoa, Apia, Samoa
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Poudel N, Ngorsuraches S. A Preference-Based Value Assessment of the Fear of COVID-19 Contagion. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:3435-3448. [PMID: 38143944 PMCID: PMC10746924 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s431148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the preference-based value of the fear of COVID-19 contagion. Patients and Methods We conducted a web-based, cross-sectional discrete choice experiment among 544 US adults. We used a Bayesian efficient design to generate choice sets. Each choice set comprised two hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine options characterized by seven attributes: chance of COVID-19 infection, chance of having severe symptoms from COVID-19 infection, vaccine protection duration, chance of mild to moderate adverse events from vaccination, chance of serious adverse events from vaccination, chance of future exposure to COVID-19 after vaccination, and out-of-pocket cost. We used mixed logit (ML) and latent class (LC) models to analyze data. Furthermore, we calculated the willingness-to-pay for eliminating the chance of future exposure to COVID-19, shedding light on the value attributed to the fear of contagion. Results The ML model demonstrated all attributes, including the chance of future exposure to COVID-19, were statistically significant. The participants were willing to pay approximately $13,046 to eliminate the chance of future exposure to COVID-19 or their fear of contagion when COVID-19 was still pandemic. The LC model unveiled two participant classes with distinct preference weights for the chance of future exposure to COVID-19 and out-of-pocket cost attributes. Nevertheless, the chance of future exposure to COVID-19 exposure held a significant degree of importance in both classes. Conclusion The chance of future exposure to COVID-19 exposure or fear of contagion was a significant element in the value assessment of COVID-19 vaccines. Further studies should be conducted to verify the value of fear of contagion and include it in the value assessment of healthcare technologies for infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabin Poudel
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| | - Surachat Ngorsuraches
- Department of Health Outcomes Research and Policy, Harrison College of Pharmacy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Humphrey J, Wanjama E, Carlucci JG, Naanyu V, Were E, Muli L, Alera M, McGuire A, Nyandiko W, Songok J, Wools-Kaloustian K, Zimet G. Preferences of Pregnant and Postpartum Women for Differentiated Service Delivery in Kenya. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2023; 94:429-436. [PMID: 37949446 PMCID: PMC10642693 DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000003303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differentiated service delivery models are implemented by HIV care programs globally, but models for pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV (PPWH) are lacking. We conducted a discrete choice experiment to determine women's preferences for differentiated service delivery. SETTING Five public health facilities in western Kenya. METHODS PPWH were enrolled from April to December 2022 and asked to choose between pairs of hypothetical clinics that differed across 5 attributes: clinic visit frequency during pregnancy (monthly vs. every 2 months), postpartum visit frequency (monthly vs. only with routine infant immunizations), seeing a mentor mother (each visit vs. as needed), seeing a clinician (each visit vs. as needed), and basic consultation cost (0, 50, or 100 Kenya Shillings [KSh]). We used multinomial logit modeling to determine the relative effects (β) of each attribute on clinic choice. RESULTS Among 250 PPWH (median age 31 years, 42% pregnant, 58% postpartum, 20% with a gap in care), preferences were for pregnancy visits every 2 months (β = 0.15), postpartum visits with infant immunizations (β = 0.36), seeing a mentor mother and clinician each visit (β = 0.05 and 0.08, respectively), and 0 KSh cost (β = 0.39). Preferences were similar when stratified by age, pregnancy, and retention status. At the same cost, predicted market choice for a clinic model with fewer pregnant/postpartum visits was 75% versus 25% for the standard of care (ie, monthly visits during pregnancy/postpartum). CONCLUSION PPWH prefer fewer clinic visits than currently provided within the standard of care in Kenya, supporting the need for implementation of differentiated service delivery for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Humphrey
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Esther Wanjama
- Department of Pediatrics, Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya
| | - James G. Carlucci
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Violet Naanyu
- Department of Sociology Psychology and Anthropology, Moi University School of Arts and Social Science, Eldoret, Kenya
- Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH), Eldoret, Kenya
| | - Edwin Were
- Department of Reproductive Health, Moi University College of Health Sciences, Eldoret, Kenya
| | - Lindah Muli
- Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH), Eldoret, Kenya
| | - Marsha Alera
- Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH), Eldoret, Kenya
| | - Alan McGuire
- Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN
- Health Services Research and Development, Richard L. Roudebush VAMC, Indianapolis, IN; and
| | - Winstone Nyandiko
- Department of Child Health and Pediatrics, Moi University College of Health Sciences, Eldoret, Kenya
| | - Julia Songok
- Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH), Eldoret, Kenya
- Department of Child Health and Pediatrics, Moi University College of Health Sciences, Eldoret, Kenya
| | | | - Gregory Zimet
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wang P, Huang Y, Li H, Xi X. Public preferences for online medical consultations in China: a discrete choice experiment. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1282387. [PMID: 38192546 PMCID: PMC10773767 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1282387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Online medical consultation (OMC) is significant to promote the utilization and accessibility of healthcare resources and save time on consultation. However, the usage and public acceptance rates of it are still low in China. Meanwhile, few studies have focused on consumers' demand of OMC services. This study aims to identify attributes that influence users' preference for OMC services, quantify the value of these characteristics, and compare their relative importance. Methods A nationwide discrete choice experiment was conducted to survey Chinese residents' preference choices for six attributes of OMC services. Conditional logit model and mixed logit model were used to analyze respondents' preference. Willingness to pay and heterogeneity were estimated by the mixed logit model. Results A total of 856 respondents completed the study, and 668 questionnaires passed the consistency test. All of 6 attributes in the study were statistically significant except for "Doctor's professional title - Associate Senior." When choosing OMC services, respondents preferred to spend as little time and money as possible on a large online medical platform to consult a high-rated physician with a senior title from a well-known Grade-A tertiary hospital. Besides, respondents valued doctor's evaluation score most and were willing to pay ¥107 to obtain the services of higher-scored doctors. Conclusion The study measured Chinese residents' preferences for six attributes of OMC and showed the heterogeneity of attributes among subgroups. Our findings suggested that OMC services providers should reduce the customers' waiting time, improve the quality of services and enhance professional skills to meet the customers' requirements. More research on preferences for OMC needs to be conducted in China, especially for key populations such as patients with chronic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Xiaoyu Xi
- The Research Center of National Drug Policy and Ecosystem, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wang B, McDonough J, Chen G, Ong JJ, Marshall H. Sociodemographic factors and attitudes associated with Australian parental acceptance of paediatric COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine 2023; 41:7608-7617. [PMID: 37996291 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 vaccine coverage among children in countries where COVID-19 vaccines are recommended has been suboptimal. Conflicting information in the media leads to parental anxiety and confusion around COVID-19 vaccination in children. The scepticism expressed by certain experts regarding the importance of COVID-19 vaccines in children has also had a negative impact on parental attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination. This study aimed to understand parental concerns and preferences for paediatric COVID-19 vaccination, and identify potential vaccination promotion ("nudge") interventions to optimise paediatric COVID-19 vaccine uptake. METHODS Mixed methods including Focus Group Discussions and a Discrete Choice Experiment survey were used. The Discrete Choice Experiment survey design was based on a literature review and the findings of Focus Group Discussions. The study was conducted on a nationally representative sample of parents in Australia. RESULTS In total, 1039 parents participated in the study. Parents showed strong preferences for a COVID-19 vaccine with lower risk of serious side effects and longer protection duration, followed by higher vaccine effectiveness and delivery via oral tablets. Promotion strategies were similarly preferred by parents. Latent class logit analysis identified three groups, interpretable as COVID-19 vaccine "accepters (35.3%)", "deliberators (31.7%)", and "rejecters (33.1%)". The "deliberators" composed of more parents, residing in metropolitan areas, having concerns about vaccine effectiveness, and believing that disease risks outweigh vaccine benefits than the "accepters". The "rejecters" were more likely to not be vaccinated themselves, and generally have less trust in vaccines than the "accepters". The "deliberators" and "rejecters" were less likely to be parents aged ≥25 years and complete final year of high school than the "accepters". CONCLUSIONS Parents' sociodemographic factors and vaccine perceptions were associated with different levels of acceptance toward paediatric COVID-19 vaccination, which may help to better understand how to "nudge" vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bing Wang
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Joshua McDonough
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gang Chen
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jason J Ong
- Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen Marshall
- Vaccinology and Immunology Research Trials Unit, Women's and Children's Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Robinson Research Institute and Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Govathson C, Long L, Moolla A, Mngadi-Ncube S, Ngcobo N, Mongwenyana C, Lince-Deroche N, Pascoe S. Understanding school-going adolescent's preferences for accessing HIV and contraceptive care: findings from a discrete choice experiment among learners in Gauteng, South Africa. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1378. [PMID: 38066547 PMCID: PMC10704722 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10414-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many Adolescents in Sub-Saharan Africa do not access HIV and reproductive health services optimally. To improve uptake of these services, it is important to understand the Learners' preferences for how services are delivered so that implementation strategies can reflect this. METHODS A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to elicit preferences. The DCE was completed between 07/2018 and 09/2019 and conducted in 10 high schools situated in neighbourhoods of varying socio-economic status (SES) in Gauteng (South Africa). Learners aged ≥ 15 years (Grades 9-12) were consented and enrolled in the DCE. Parental consent and assent were required if < 18 years old. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine preferred attributes for HIV and contraceptive service delivery. Results were stratified by gender and neighbourhood SES quintile (1 = Lowest SES; 5 = Highest SES). RESULTS 805 Learners were enrolled (67% female; 66% 15-17 years; 51% in grades 9-10). 54% of Learners in quintile 1 schools had no monthly income (family support, grants, part-time jobs etc.); 38% in quintile 5 schools had access to R100 ($7.55) per month. Preferences for accessing HIV and contraceptive services were similar for male and female Learners. Learners strongly preferred services provided by friendly, non-judgmental staff (Odds ratio 1.63; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.55-1.72) where confidentiality was ensured (1.33; 1.26-1.40). They preferred services offered after school (1.14; 1.04-1.25) with value-added services like free Wi-Fi (1.19; 1.07-1.32), food (1.23; 1.11-1.37) and youth-only waiting areas (1.18; 1.07-1.32). Learners did not have a specific location preference, but preferred not to receive services within the community (0.82; 0.74-0.91) or school (0.88; 0.80-0.96). Costs to access services were a deterrent for most Learners irrespective of school neighbourhood; female Learners were deterred by costs ≥$3.85 (0.79; 0.70-0.91); males by costs ≥ R100 ($7.55) (0.86; 0.74-1.00). CONCLUSIONS Preferences that encourage utilisation of services do not significantly differ by gender or school neighbourhood SES. Staff attitude and confidentiality are key issues affecting Learners' decisions to access HIV and contraceptive services. Addressing how healthcare providers respond to young people seeking sexual and reproductive health services is critical for improving adolescents' uptake of these services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Govathson
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 39 Empire Road, Parktown,, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa
| | - Lawrence Long
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aneesa Moolla
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 39 Empire Road, Parktown,, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa
| | - Sithabile Mngadi-Ncube
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 39 Empire Road, Parktown,, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa
| | - Nkosinathi Ngcobo
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 39 Empire Road, Parktown,, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa
| | - Constance Mongwenyana
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 39 Empire Road, Parktown,, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa
| | | | - Sophie Pascoe
- Health Economics and Epidemiology Research Office, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 39 Empire Road, Parktown,, Johannesburg, 2193, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Zhuge J, Zheng D, Li X, Nie X, Liu J, Liu R. Parental preferences for the procedural sedation of children in dentistry: a discrete choice experiment. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1132413. [PMID: 38116578 PMCID: PMC10728602 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1132413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to explore parental preferences for the procedural sedation of children in dentistry through a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to inform clinical decisions and oral health management. Methods Based on literature reviews, interviews with parents of pediatric dental patients, and expert consultation, six attributes, including fasting time, recovery time, sedative administration routes, adverse reactions, sedation depth and procedure cost, were incorporated into the DCE questionnaire. The DCE questionnaire collected data on parental preferences for pediatric dental sedation treatment from June to August 2022. A conditional logit model was used to analyze preference and willingness to pay (WTP) for each attribute and its level. Subgroup analyses assessing the impact of parents' dental anxiety on procedural sedation preferences were also conducted using conditional logit models. Results A total of 186 valid questionnaires were gathered. Parents' preferences for fewer adverse reactions, a milder sedation depth, lower out-of-pocket cost, shorter fasting and recovery times and administration by inhalation were significantly associated with their choice of sedation model. The conditional logit model showed that parents were most interested in treatments with no adverse reactions (0% vs. 15%) (Coef, 1.033; 95% CI, 0.833-1.233), followed by those providing minimal sedation (vs. deep sedation) (Coef, 0.609; 95% CI, 0.448-0.769). Moreover, the relative importance of adverse reactions and fasting time was higher among anxious than nonanxious parents. The study found a WTP threshold of ¥1,538 for reducing adverse reactions (15% to 0%). The WTP threshold for the best sedation procedure scenario (no fasting requirement, 10 min recovery time, administration by inhalation, 0% adverse reaction incidence and minimal sedation) was ¥3,830. Conclusion Reducing the adverse reactions and depth of sedation are predominant considerations for parents regarding procedural sedation in pediatric dentistry, followed by lower cost, shorter fasting and recovery times and inhalation sedation. Parents with dental anxiety had a stronger preference for options with a lower incidence of adverse reactions and shorter fasting time than parents without dental anxiety. This discovery is helpful for doctors and can promote collaborative decision-making among parents and doctors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinru Zhuge
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Dongyue Zheng
- Department of Nursing, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Xingwang Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Xin Nie
- Department of Stomatology, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Jiefan Liu
- Department of Stomatology, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Ruohai Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Varhol RJ, Norman R, Randall S, Man Ying Lee C, Trevenen L, Boyd JH, Robinson S. Public preference on sharing health data to inform research, health policy and clinical practice in Australia: A stated preference experiment. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290528. [PMID: 37972118 PMCID: PMC10653479 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate public willingness to share sensitive health information for research, health policy and clinical practice. METHODS A total of 1,003 Australian respondents answered an online, attribute-driven, survey in which participants were asked to accept or reject hypothetical choice sets based on a willingness to share their health data for research and frontline-medical support as part of an integrated health system. The survey consisted of 5 attributes: Stakeholder access for analysis (Analysing group); Type of information collected; Purpose of data collection; Information governance; and Anticipated benefit; the results of which were analysed using logistic regression. RESULTS When asked about their preference for sharing their health data, respondents had no preference between data collection for the purposes of clinical practice, health policy or research, with a slight preference for having government organisations manage, govern and curate the integrated datasets from which the analysis was being conducted. The least preferred option was for personal health records to be integrated with insurance records or for their data collected by privately owned corporate organisations. Individuals preferred their data to be analysed by a public healthcare provider or government staff and expressed a dislike for any private company involvement. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this study suggest that Australian consumers prefer to share their health data when there is government oversight, and have concerns about sharing their anonymised health data for clinical practice, health policy or research purposes unless clarity is provided pertaining to its intended purpose, limitations of use and restrictions to access. Similar findings have been observed in the limited set of existing international studies utilising a stated preference approach. Evident from this study, and supported by national and international research, is that the establishment and preservation of a social license for data linkage in health research will require routine public engagement as a result of continuously evolving technological advancements and fluctuating risk tolerance. Without more work to understand and address stakeholder concerns, consumers risk being reluctant to participate in data-sharing and linkage programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J. Varhol
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sean Randall
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Crystal Man Ying Lee
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Luke Trevenen
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - James H. Boyd
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Suzanne Robinson
- School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Du H, Han Q, Yang D, de Vries B, van Houten T. Data privacy and smart home energy appliances: A stated choice experiment. Heliyon 2023; 9:e21448. [PMID: 37954370 PMCID: PMC10637986 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Data privacy in smart homes is receiving increasing attention due to the growing adoption of smart appliances. Adoption of smart appliances can bring benefits, including energy consumption reduction. This study investigates how people made the trade-offs between sharing privacy-sensitive data and the potential environmental and economic benefits of smart home energy appliances using discrete choice modeling. The findings reveal that the trade-off is mainly affected by four product attributes: the type of data that is processed, the reason why this data is processed, the data sharing frequency, and the financial benefit gained from the smart home appliances. Specifically, individuals tend to share less data daily for their daily routine convenience and demand a (theoretical) financial compensation for the data sharing. The results also show that privacy attitudes are not related to data sharing preferences, while socio-demographics, including gender, age, and income, are. The results emphasize the gap between people's attitudes and behaviors regarding data privacy. This research serves as a foundation for further investigations and can be used by smart appliance retailers, manufacturers, and governments for designing research and development focus and energy reduction incentives, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua Du
- Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600, MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Qi Han
- Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600, MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Dujuan Yang
- Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600, MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Bauke de Vries
- Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600, MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas van Houten
- Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600, MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zhang J, Li Q, Zhang J, Zhao X, Jiang M, Huang X, Liu D, Yan Y, Li X, Chen J, Ma ZF, Zhang X, Ming WK, Wong TH, Yan G, Wu Y. Chinese university students' preferences for physical activity incentive programs: a discrete choice experiment. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1281740. [PMID: 38026342 PMCID: PMC10646335 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to explore and compare Chinese university students' preferences for various physical activity motivation programs. Patients and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in China from February 25 to March 25, 2022. Participants anonymously completed an online questionnaire based on a DCE. A total of 1,358 university students participated in the survey. The conditional logit model (CLM), willingness to accept (WTA), and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to assess college students' preferences for different attributes and levels of physical activity incentive programs. Results Respondents identified the number of bonus, exercise time, and academic rewards as the three most significant attributes of the athletic incentive program. The importance of each attribute varied based on individual characteristics such as gender and BMI. In CLM, college students displayed a preference for a "¥4" bonus amount (OR: 2.04, 95% CI 1.95-2.13), "20 min" of exercise time (OR: 1.85, 95% CI 1.79-1.92), and "bonus points for comprehensive test scores" as academic rewards (OR: 1.33, 95% CI 1.28-1.37). According to the WTA results, college students were willing to accept the highest cost to obtain academic rewards tied to composite test scores. Conclusion The number of bonus, exercise time, and academic rewards emerge as the three most crucial attributes of physical activity incentive programs. Furthermore, college students with different characteristics exhibit heterogeneity in their preferences for such programs. These findings can guide the development of programs and policies aimed at motivating college students to engage in physical activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingbo Zhang
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Qing Li
- School of Social Development and Public Policy, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Jinzi Zhang
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Xianqi Zhao
- School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Maomin Jiang
- School of Public Affairs, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Xincheng Huang
- School of Economics and Management, Beijing Institute of Graphic Communication, Beijing, China
| | - Diyue Liu
- International School of Public Health and One Health, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China
| | - Yupei Yan
- Department of Humanities, Arts and Media, Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China
| | - Xialei Li
- Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jiangyun Chen
- School of Health Management, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zheng Feei Ma
- Centre for Public Health and Wellbeing, School of Health and Social Wellbeing, College of Health, Science and Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Xiyue Zhang
- Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Wai-Kit Ming
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Tak-hap Wong
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Guanyun Yan
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yibo Wu
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Veldwijk J, DiSantostefano RL, Janssen E, Simons G, Englbrecht M, Schölin Bywall K, Radawski C, Raza K, Hauber B, Falahee M. Maximum Acceptable Risk Estimation Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment and a Probabilistic Threshold Technique. Patient 2023; 16:641-653. [PMID: 37647010 PMCID: PMC10570171 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-023-00643-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to empirically compare maximum acceptable risk results estimated using both a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and a probabilistic threshold technique (PTT). METHODS Members of the UK general public (n = 982) completed an online survey including a DCE and a PTT (in random order) measuring their preferences for preventative treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. For the DCE, a Bayesian D-efficient design consisting of four blocks of 15 choice tasks was constructed including six attributes with varying levels. The PTT used identical risk and benefit attributes. For the DCE, a panel mixed-logit model was conducted, both mean and individual estimates were used to calculate maximum acceptable risk. For the PTT, interval regression was used to calculate maximum acceptable risk. Perceived complexity of the choice tasks and preference heterogeneity were investigated for both methods. RESULTS Maximum acceptable risk confidence intervals of both methods overlapped for serious infection and serious side effects but not for mild side effects (maximum acceptable risk was 32.7 percent-points lower in the PTT). Although, both DCE and PTT tasks overall were considered easy or very easy to understand and answer, significantly more respondents rated the DCE choice tasks as easier to understand compared with those who rated the PTT as easier (7-percentage point difference; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Maximum acceptable risk estimate confidence intervals based on a DCE and a PTT overlapped for two out of the three included risk attributes. More respondents rated the DCE as easier to understand. This may suggest that the DCE is better suited in studies estimating maximum acceptable risk for multiple risk attributes of differing severity, while the PTT may be better suited when measuring heterogeneity in maximum acceptable risk estimates or when investigating one or more serious adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorien Veldwijk
- School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | - Gwenda Simons
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Matthias Englbrecht
- Freelance Healthcare Data Scientist, Greven, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine and Institute for Clinical Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - Karim Raza
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and Research into Inflammatory Arthritis Centre Versus Arthritis, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Brett Hauber
- Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington School or Pharmacy, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Marie Falahee
- Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bywall KS, Drevin J, Groothuis-Oudshoorn C, Veldwijk J, Nyholm D, Widner H, van Vliet T, Jiltsova E, Hansson M, Johansson JV. Patients accept therapy using embryonic stem cells for Parkinson's disease: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:83. [PMID: 37828462 PMCID: PMC10571417 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00966-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New disease-modifying ways to treat Parkinson's disease (PD) may soon become a reality with intracerebral transplantation of cell products produced from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). The aim of this study was to assess what factors influence preferences of patients with PD regarding stem-cell based therapies to treat PD in the future. METHODS Patients with PD were invited to complete a web-based discrete choice experiment to assess the importance of the following attributes: (i) type of treatment, (ii) aim of treatment, (iii) available knowledge of the different types of treatments, (iv) effect on symptoms, and (v) risk for severe side effects. Latent class conditional logistic regression models were used to determine preference estimates and heterogeneity in respondents' preferences. RESULTS A substantial difference in respondents' preferences was observed in three latent preference patterns (classes). "Effect on symptoms" was the most important attribute in class 1, closely followed by "type of treatment," with medications as preferred to other treatment alternatives. Effect on symptoms was also the most important attribute in class 2, with treatment with hESCs preferred over other treatment alternatives. Likewise for class 3, that mainly focused on "type of treatment" in the decision-making. Respondents' class membership was influenced by their experience in treatment, side effects, and advanced treatment therapy as well as religious beliefs. CONCLUSIONS Most of the respondents would accept a treatment with products emanating from hESCs, regardless of views on the moral status of embryos. Preferences of patients with PD may provide guidance in clinical decision-making regarding treatments deriving from stem cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Schölin Bywall
- School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Division of Health and Welfare Technology, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden.
| | - Jennifer Drevin
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden
| | - Catharina Groothuis-Oudshoorn
- Health Technology and Services Research (HTSR), Faculty of Behavioural Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Jorien Veldwijk
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dag Nyholm
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, SE-751 85, Sweden
| | - Hakan Widner
- Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, SE-221 85, Sweden
| | - Trinette van Vliet
- Department of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, SE-221 85, Sweden
| | - Elena Jiltsova
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, SE-751 85, Sweden
| | - Mats Hansson
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden
| | - Jennifer Viberg Johansson
- Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, Uppsala, SE-751 22, Sweden
- The Institute for Future Studies, Holländargatan 13, 111 36, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
McKibben NS, Marchand LS, Demyanovich HK, Healey KM, Zingas N, O'Connor K, Slobogean GP, O'Toole RV, O'Hara NN. Patient preferences for physical therapy programs after a lower extremity fracture: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072583. [PMID: 37798021 PMCID: PMC10565336 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify patients' preferences for physical therapy programmes after a lower extremity fracture and determine patient factors associated with preference variation. DESIGN Discrete choice experiment. SETTING Level I trauma centre. PARTICIPANTS One hundred fifty-one adult (≥18 years old) patients with lower extremity fractures treated operatively. INTERVENTION Patients were given hypothetical scenarios and asked to select their preferred therapy course when comparing cost, mobility, long-term pain, session duration, and treatment setting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES A multinomial logit model was used to determine the relative importance and willingness to pay for each attribute. RESULTS Mobility was of greatest relative importance (45%, 95% CI: 40% to 49%), more than cost (23%, 95% CI: 19% to 27%), long-term pain (19%, 95% CI: 16% to 23%), therapy session duration (12%, 95% CI: 9% to 5%) or setting (1%, 95% CI: 0.2% to 2%). Patients were willing to pay US$142 more per session to return to their preinjury mobility level (95% CI: US$103 to US$182). Willingness to pay for improved mobility was higher for women, patients aged 70 years and older, those with bachelor's degrees or higher and those living in less-deprived areas. Patients were willing to pay US$72 (95% CI: US$50 to US$93) more per session to reduce pain from severe to mild. Patients were indifferent between formal and independent home therapy (willingness to pay: -US$12, 95% CI: -US$33 to US$9). CONCLUSIONS Patients with lower extremity fractures highly value recovering mobility and are willing to pay more for postoperative physical therapy programmes that facilitate returning to their pre-injury mobility level. These patient preferences might be useful when prescribing and designing new techniques for postoperative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha S McKibben
- Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Lucas S Marchand
- Orthopaedics, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Haley K Demyanovich
- Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Kathleen M Healey
- Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nicolas Zingas
- Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Katherine O'Connor
- Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Gerard P Slobogean
- Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Robert V O'Toole
- Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nathan N O'Hara
- Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Armeni P, Meregaglia M, Borsoi L, Callea G, Torbica A, Benazzo F, Tarricone R. Collecting Physicians' Preferences on Medical Devices: Are We Doing It Right? Evidence from Italian Orthopedists Using 2 Different Stated Preference Methods. Med Decis Making 2023; 43:886-900. [PMID: 37837325 PMCID: PMC10848602 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x231201805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Physician preference items (PPIs) are high-cost medical devices for which clinicians express firm preferences with respect to a particular manufacturer or product. This study aims to identify the most important factors in the choice of new PPIs (hip or knee prosthesis) and infer about the existence of possible response biases in using 2 alternative stated preference techniques. METHODS Six key attributes with 3 levels each were identified based on a literature review and clinical experts' opinions. An online survey was administered to Italian hospital orthopedists using type 1 best-worst scaling (BWS) and binary discrete choice experiment (DCE). BWS data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and conditional logit model. A mixed logit regression model was applied to DCE data, and willingness-to-pay (WTP) was estimated. All analyses were conducted using Stata 16. RESULTS A sample of 108 orthopedists were enrolled. In BWS, the most important attribute was "clinical evidence," followed by "quality of products," while the least relevant items were "relationship with the sales representative" and "cost." DCE results suggested instead that orthopedists prefer high-quality products with robust clinical evidence, positive health technology assessment recommendation and affordable cost, and for which they have a consolidated experience of use and a good relationship with the sales representative. CONCLUSIONS The elicitation of preferences for PPIs using alternative methods can lead to different results. The BWS of type 1, which is similar to a ranking exercise, seems to be more affected by acquiescent responding and social desirability than the DCE, which introduces tradeoffs in the choice task and is likely to reveal more about true preferences. HIGHLIGHTS Physician preference items (PPIs) are medical devices particularly exposed to physicians' choice with regard to type of product and supplier.Some established techniques of collecting preferences can be affected by response biases such as acquiescent responding and social desirability.Discrete choice experiments, introducing more complex tradeoffs in the choice task, are likely to mitigate such biases and reveal true physicians' preferences for PPIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrizio Armeni
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Meregaglia
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
| | - Ludovica Borsoi
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuditta Callea
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
| | - Aleksandra Torbica
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
- Department of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Benazzo
- Scuola Universitaria di Istruzione Superiore (IUSS), Pavia, Italy
- Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Rosanna Tarricone
- Research Centre on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Milan, Italy
- Department of Social and Political Science, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Scheres LMJ, Hiligsmann M, van Gorcom L, Essers BAB, Beckers HJM. Eliciting preferences in glaucoma management-a systematic review of stated-preference studies. Eye (Lond) 2023; 37:3137-3144. [PMID: 36944711 PMCID: PMC10564796 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02482-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In most cases, glaucoma patients require long-term medical and/or surgical treatment. Preference studies investigate how different aspects of glaucoma management, such as health or process outcomes, are valued and herewith help stakeholders make care more responsive to patients' needs. As, to our knowledge, no overview of these studies is currently available, this study aims to systematically review and critically appraise these studies. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted using keywords for stated-preference studies and glaucoma up to October 2021. Studies were included if they were original research and used a stated-preference methodology to investigate preferences in patients or healthcare professionals for different aspects of glaucoma management. Data were extracted and summarized. Furthermore, a quality appraisal of the included studies was performed using two validated checklists. RESULTS The search yielded 1214 articles after removal of duplicates. Of those, 11 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Studies aimed to elicit preferences for glaucoma treatment (27%), glaucoma related health state valuation (36%), and services (36%) from the patient (91%) or ophthalmologists' perspective (9%). Altogether studies included 69 attributes. The majority of attributes were outcome related (62%), followed by process (32%) and cost attributes (6%). Outcome attributes (e.g., effectiveness) were most often of highest importance to the population. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review provides an up-to-date and critical review of stated-preference studies in the field of glaucoma, suggesting that patients have preferences and are willing to trade-off between characteristics, and revealed that outcome attributes are the most influential characteristics of glaucoma management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M J Scheres
- University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - M Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - L van Gorcom
- University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - B A B Essers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - H J M Beckers
- University Eye Clinic Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Schawo S, Hoefman R, Reckers-Droog V, Lawerman-van de Wetering L, Kaminer Y, Brouwer W, Hakkaart-van Roijen L. Obtaining preference scores for an abbreviated self-completion version of the Teen-Addiction Severity Index (ASC T-ASI) to value therapy outcomes of systemic family interventions: a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Health Econ 2023:10.1007/s10198-023-01633-3. [PMID: 37755542 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01633-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic family interventions for adolescents with problems of substance use and/or delinquency are increasingly focused subject of economic evaluations. Treatment effects go beyond improvements in commonly measured health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The Teen-Addiction Severity Index (T-ASI) was identified as capable of capturing these broad outcomes. However, it lacks preference-based scores. An abbreviated self-completion version (ASC T-ASI) was created and validated, covering the T-ASI domains substance use, school, work, family, social relationships, justice, and mental health. This study aimed to obtain societal preference scores for the ASC T-ASI. METHODS Preferences were elicited in a sample of the Dutch general adult population (n = 1500), using a web-based Discrete Choice Experiment. Choice tasks included two unlabeled alternatives with attributes and levels corresponding to the domains and levels of the ASC T-ASI. A pilot study (n = 106) informed priors, optimal presentation, and number of choice tasks applied in the main study. Data were analyzed using a mixed multinomial logit model. RESULTS Preference scores were logically ordered, with lower scores for worse ASC T-ASI states. Scores were most influenced by reductions in problems concerning the domains substance use, mental health, justice, and family. Tariffs were calculated for each ASC T-ASI state, ranging from 0 (worst situation) to 1 (best situation). CONCLUSIONS The tariffs enable preference-based assessments of the broad effects of systemic family interventions for adolescents with problems of substance use and/or delinquency. The outcome reflects addiction-related rather than health-related utility and can be used next to generic HRQOL instruments in relevant economic evaluations. Given the source used for the preferences, interpretations and valuation of scores require attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saskia Schawo
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Renske Hoefman
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vivian Reckers-Droog
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Liesbet Lawerman-van de Wetering
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Yifrah Kaminer
- University of Connecticut School of Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, USA
| | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sharma P, Kularatna S, Abell B, Eagleson K, Vo LK, Halahakone U, Senanayake S, McPhail SM. Preferences in the Design and Delivery of Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up Care for Children: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:2325-2341. [PMID: 37745632 PMCID: PMC10517687 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s425578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Neurodevelopmental disorders are a significant cause of morbidity. Early detection of neurodevelopmental delay is essential for timely diagnosis and intervention, and it is therefore important to understand the preferences of parents and clinicians for engaging with neurodevelopmental surveillance and follow-up care. Discrete choice experiment (DCE) may be an appropriate method for quantifying these preferences. This review systematically examined how DCEs have been designed and delivered in studies examining neurodevelopmental care of children and identified the preferred attributes that have been reported. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Studies were included if they used DCE to elicit preferences for a neurodevelopmental follow-up program for children. Two independent reviewers conducted the title and abstract and full-text screening. Risk of bias was assessed using a DCE-specific checklist. Findings were presented using a narrative synthesis. A total of 6618 records were identified and 16 papers were included. Orthogonal (n=5) and efficient (n=5) experimental designs were common. There was inconsistent reporting of design-related features. Analysis was primarily completed using mixed logit (n=6) or multinomial logit (n=3) models. Several key attributes for neurodevelopmental follow-up care were identified including social, behavioral and emotional support, therapy, waiting time, and out-of-pocket costs. DCE has been successfully used as a preference elicitation method for neurodevelopmental-related care. There is scope for improvement in the design and analysis of DCE in this field. Nonetheless, attributes identified in these studies are likely to be important considerations in the design and implementation of programs for neurodevelopmental care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pakhi Sharma
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sanjeewa Kularatna
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Bridget Abell
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Karen Eagleson
- Queensland Paediatric Cardiac Service, Queensland Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Linh K Vo
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Ureni Halahakone
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sameera Senanayake
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Steven M McPhail
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Digital Health and Informatics Directorate, Metro South Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|