Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: What Does the Primary Care Physician Need to Know?

User Engagement, Acceptability, and Clinical Markers in a Digital Health Program for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Prospective, Single-Arm Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common chronic liver disease in the world. Common comorbidities are central obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome. Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death among people with NAFLD, and lifestyle changes can improve health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the acceptability of a digital health program in terms of engagement, retention, and user satisfaction in addition to exploring changes in clinical outcomes, such as weight, cardiometabolic risk factors, and health-related quality of life.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, open-label, single-arm, 12-week study including 38 individuals with either a BMI >30, metabolic syndrome, or type 2 diabetes mellitus and NAFLD screened by FibroScan. An NAFLD-specific digital health program focused on disease education, lowering carbohydrates in the diet, food logging, increasing activity level, reducing stress, and healthy lifestyle coaching was offered to participants. The coach provided weekly feedback on food logs and other in-app activities and opportunities for participants to ask questions. The coaching was active throughout the 12-week intervention period. The primary outcome was feasibility and acceptability of the 12-week program, assessed through patient engagement, retention, and satisfaction with the program. Secondary outcomes included changes in weight, liver fat, body composition, and other cardiometabolic clinical parameters at baseline and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

In total, 38 individuals were included in the study (median age 59.5, IQR 46.3-68.8 years; n=23, 61% female). Overall, 34 (89%) participants completed the program and 29 (76%) were active during the 12-week program period. The median satisfaction score was 6.3 (IQR 5.8-6.7) of 7. Mean weight loss was 3.5 (SD 3.7) kg (P<.001) or 3.2% (SD 3.4%), with a 2.2 (SD 2.7) kg reduction in fat mass (P<.001). Relative liver fat reduction was 19.4% (SD 23.9%). Systolic blood pressure was reduced by 6.0 (SD 13.5) mmHg (P=.009). The median reduction was 0.14 (IQR 0-0.47) mmol/L for triglyceride levels (P=.003), 3.2 (IQR 0.0-5.4) µU/ml for serum insulin (s-insulin) levels (P=.003), and 0.5 (IQR -0.7 to 3.8) mmol/mol for hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (P=.03). Participants who were highly engaged (ie, who used the app at least 5 days per week) had greater weight loss and liver fat reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The 12-week-long digital health program was feasible for individuals with NAFLD, receiving high user engagement, retention, and satisfaction. Improved liver-specific and cardiometabolic health was observed, and more engaged participants showed greater improvements. This digital health program could provide a new tool to improve health outcomes in people with NAFLD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05426382; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05426382.

Making Sense of the Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Clinical Practice Guidelines: What Clinicians Need to Know

Standards of care summarized in clinical practice guidelines for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) offer clinicians a streamlined diagnostic and management approach based on the best available evidence. These recommendations have changed a great deal in recent years; today, there is a clear focus on screening for the early identification and risk stratification of patients at high risk of steatohepatitis and clinically significant fibrosis to promote timely referrals to specialty care when needed. This article reviews and provides the rationale for current guidelines for NAFLD screening, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring and addresses barriers to providing evidence-based NAFLD care and how to overcome them. The current paradigm of care calls for primary care clinicians and specialists to work together, within a multidisciplinary care team familiar with obesity and diabetes care, to provide comprehensive management of these complex patients.

Canagliflozin and Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: New Insights From CANVAS

CONTEXT

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is highly prevalent among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, there is still no approved pharmacological treatment. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been suggested to beneficially modify liver-related outcomes in patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the effects of the SGLT-2 inhibitor canagliflozin on liver-related outcomes in patients with advanced T2DM and high cardiovascular risk.

METHODS

We performed a secondary post hoc analysis of 2 large double-blind randomized controlled trials, CANVAS (NCT01032629) and CANVAS-R (NCT01989754), which included patients with T2DM and high cardiovascular risk who were randomized to receive either canagliflozin or placebo once daily. The primary endpoint was a composite of improvement of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels >30% or normalization of ALT levels. Secondary endpoints included change in noninvasive tests of fibrosis and weight reduction of >10%.

RESULTS

In total, 10 131 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 2.4 years (mean age 62 years; mean duration of diabetes 13.5 years; 64.2% male). Of those patients, 8967 (88.5%) had MAFLD according to hepatic steatosis index and 2599 (25.7%) exhibited elevated liver biochemistry at baseline. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 35.2% of patients receiving canagliflozin and in 26.4% with placebo (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.51; 95% CI, 1.38-1.64; P < .001). Canagliflozin led to improvements in some noninvasive tests of fibrosis (NFS, APRI, FNI). Significant weight reduction of >10% (within 6 years) was achieved in 12.7% with canagliflozin compared to 4.1% with placebo (aOR 3.45; 95% CI, 2.91-4.10; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with T2DM, treatment with canagliflozin vs placebo resulted in improvements in liver biochemistry and metabolism and might beneficially affect liver fibrosis.

Towards an adiposity-related disease framework for the diagnosis and management of obesities

Obesity is a complex disease that relapses frequently and associates with multiple complications that comprise a worldwide health priority because of its rising prevalence and association with numerous complications, including metabolic disorders, mechanic pathologies, and cancer, among others. Noteworthy, excess adiposity is accompanied by chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, insulin resistance, and subsequent organ dysfunction. This dysfunctional adipose tissue is initially stored in the visceral depot, overflowing subsequently to produce lipotoxicity in ectopic depots like liver, heart, muscle, and pancreas, among others. People living with obesity need a diagnostic approach that considers an exhaustive pathophysiology and complications assessment. Thus, it is essential to warrant a holistic diagnosis and management that guarantees an adequate health status, and quality of life. The present review summarizes the different complications associated with obesity, at the same time, we aim to fostering a novel framework that enhances a patient-centered approach to obesity management in the precision medicine era.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Liver Disease: Across the Gut-Liver Axis from Fibrosis to Cancer

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a widespread disease worldwide, and is one of the cornerstones of metabolic syndrome. The existence of a strong relationship between diabetes and the progression of liver fibrosis has been demonstrated by several studies, using invasive and noninvasive techniques. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) show faster progression of fibrosis than patients without diabetes. Many confounding factors make it difficult to determine the exact mechanisms involved. What we know so far is that both liver fibrosis and T2DM are expressions of metabolic dysfunction, and we recognize similar risk factors. Interestingly, both are promoted by metabolic endotoxemia, a low-grade inflammatory condition caused by increased endotoxin levels and linked to intestinal dysbiosis and increased intestinal permeability. There is broad evidence on the role of the gut microbiota in the progression of liver disease, through both metabolic and inflammatory mechanisms. Therefore, dysbiosis that is associated with diabetes can act as a modifier of the natural evolution of NAFLD. In addition to diet, hypoglycemic drugs play an important role in this scenario, and their benefit is also the result of effects exerted in the gut. Here, we provide an overview of the mechanisms that explain why diabetic patients show a more rapid progression of liver disease up to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), focusing especially on those involving the gut-liver axis.

High Prevalence of Severe Hepatic Fibrosis in Type 2 Diabetic Outpatients Screened for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a highly frequent condition in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the identification of subjects at higher risk of developing the more severe forms remains elusive in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and severity of liver fibrosis and its predictive factors in T2D outpatients without a known history of chronic liver disease by using recommended non-invasive methods.

METHODS

Consecutive T2D outpatients underwent a set of measurements of clinical and laboratory parameters, FIB-4 score (Fibrosis-4 index), and liver stiffness with controlled attenuation-parameter (CAP) performed by transient elastography (FibroScan) after excluding previous causes of liver disease.

RESULTS

Among the 205 T2D outpatients enrolled in the study (median age: 64 years, diabetes duration: 11 years, HbA1c: 7.4%, and BMI: 29.6 kg/m²), 54% had high ALT and/or AST levels, 15.6% had liver stiffness value > 10.1 kPa (severe fibrosis), 55.1% had CAP values > 290 dB/m (severe steatosis), and FIB-4 score was >2 in 11.2% of subjects (>2.67 in 15 subjects). Moreover, 49 (23.9%) T2D patients had clinically meaningful liver harm, with either a FIB-4 score > 2 and/or FibroScan > 10.1 kPa. At regression analysis, BMI, HbA1c, creatinine, and triglycerides values were independent predictors of liver fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver fibrosis is a frequent finding in T2D outpatients without a known history of liver disease, especially in those with obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, worse glycemic control, and high creatinine levels.

Interfering with lipid metabolism through targeting CES1 sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma for chemotherapy

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common lethal form of liver cancer. Apart from surgical removal and transplantation, other treatments have not yet been well established for patients with HCC. In this study, we found that carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) is expressed at various levels in HCC. We further revealed that blockage of CES1 by pharmacological and genetical approaches leads to altered lipid profiles that are directly linked to impaired mitochondrial function. Mechanistically, lipidomic analyses indicated that lipid signaling molecules, including polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), which activate PPARα/γ, were dramatically reduced upon CES1 inhibition. As a result, the expression of SCD, a PPARα/γ target gene involved in tumor progression and chemoresistance, was significantly downregulated. Clinical analysis demonstrated a strong correlation between the protein levels of CES1 and SCD in HCC. Interference with lipid signaling by targeting the CES1-PPARα/γ-SCD axis sensitized HCC cells to cisplatin treatment. As a result, the growth of HCC xenograft tumors in NU/J mice was potently slowed by coadministration of cisplatin and CES1 inhibition. Our results, thus, suggest that CES1 is a promising therapeutic target for HCC treatment.

Identifying Patients at Risk for Fibrosis in a Primary Care NAFLD Cohort

GOALS AND BACKGROUND

Using natural language processing to create a nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) cohort in primary care, we assessed advanced fibrosis risk with the Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS) and evaluated risk score agreement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study of adults with radiographic evidence of hepatic steatosis, we calculated patient-level FIB-4 and NFS scores and categorized them by fibrosis risk. Risk category and risk score agreement was analyzed using weighted κ, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman analysis. A multinomial logistic regression model evaluated associations between clinical variables and discrepant FIB-4 and NFS results.

RESULTS

Of the 767 patient cohorts, 71% had a FIB-4 or NFS score in the indeterminate-risk or high-risk category for fibrosis. Risk categories disagreed in 43%, and scores would have resulted in different clinical decisions in 30% of the sample. The weighted κ statistic for risk category agreement was 0.41 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36-0.46] and the Pearson correlation coefficient for log FIB-4 and NFS was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.62-0.70). The multinomial logistic regression analysis identified black race (odds ratio=2.64, 95% CI: 1.84-3.78) and hemoglobin A1c (odds ratio=1.37, 95% CI: 1.23-1.52) with higher odds of having an NFS risk category exceeding FIB-4.

CONCLUSIONS

In a primary care NAFLD cohort, many patients had elevated FIB-4 and NFS risk scores and these risk categories were often in disagreement. The choice between FIB-4 and NFS for fibrosis risk assessment can impact clinical decision-making and may contribute to disparities of care.

Change lifestyle modification plan/transtheoretical model in non-alcoholic simple fatty liver disease: a pilot randomized study

BACKGROUND

Non-alcoholic simple fatty liver disease patients have very low compliance with almost all types of physical activities. A transtheoretical model-oriented lifestyle modification plan awakens the patient's consciousness in the pre-intention stage. Aim to evaluate whether a management by stages of change plan based on the Transtheoretical Model and Stages of Change promoted behavior change for patients with non-alcoholic simple fatty liver disease.

METHODS

Patients with simple fatty liver diagnosed from July to December 2019 were randomly divided into the transtheoretical model and non-transtheoretical model groups. Primary outcome was change in health belief and health behavior based on questionnaires. Secondary outcomes included changes in blood lipids, body mass indexes, and waist circumference 12-months after intervention.

RESULTS

Of 200 enrolled patients 194 were analyzed (non-transtheoretical model group n = 98, transtheoretical model group n = 96). After intervention, total health belief scores (120.91 ± 4.94 vs. 118.82 ± 5.48) and total health behavior scores (131.71 ± 5.87 vs. 119.96 ± 7.12) were higher in the transtheoretical model group (all P < 0.05). Blood lipids, body mass index, and waist circumference more obviously improved in the transtheoretical model group (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A transtheoretical model-based lifestyle modification intervention can be effectively applied to patients with non-alcoholic simple fatty liver.

CLINICAL RESEARCH REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100049354. The registration date is August 1, 2021.

Adipose Tissue Insulin Resistance Predicts the Severity of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and NAFLD

CONTEXT

While T2D is a risk factor for liver fibrosis in NAFLD, the specific contribution of insulin resistance (IR) relative to other factors is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the impact on liver fibrosis in NAFLD of adipose tissue (Adipo-IR) and liver (HOMA-IR) IR in people with T2D and NAFLD.

DESIGN

Participants were screened by elastography in the outpatient clinics for hepatic steatosis and fibrosis, including routine metabolites, cytokeratin-18 (marker of hepatocyte apoptosis/steatohepatitis), and HOMA-IR/Adipo-IR.

SETTING

University ambulatory care practice.

PARTICIPANTS

483 participants with T2D.

INTERVENTION

Screening for steatosis and fibrosis with elastography.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Liver steatosis (CAP) and fibrosis (LSM) and measurements of IR (Adipo-IR, HOMA-IR) and fibrosis (cytokeratin-18).

RESULTS

Clinically significant liver fibrosis (stage F ≥ 2= LSM ≥8.0 kPa) was found in 11%, having more features of the metabolic syndrome, lower adiponectin, and higher AST, ALT, liver fat and cytokeratin-18 (p < 0.05-0.01). In multivariable analysis including just clinical variables (model 1), obesity (BMI) had the strongest association with fibrosis (OR: 2.56, CI:1.87-3.50; p < 0.01). When metabolic measurements and cytokeratin-18 were included (model 2), only BMI, AST and liver fat remained significant. When fibrosis stage was adjusted for BMI, AST, and steatosis (model 3), only adipo-IR remained strongly associated with fibrosis (OR: 1.51, CI:1.05-2.16; p = 0.03), but not BMI, hepatic IR or steatosis.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings pinpoint to the central role of dysfunctional, insulin-resistant adipose tissue to advanced fibrosis in T2D, beyond simply BMI or steatosis. The clinical implication is that targeting adipose tissue should be the priority of treatment in NAFLD.

Cardiometabolic characterization in metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease

Background

To better understand the patient's heterogeneity in fatty liver disease (FLD), metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was proposed by international experts as a new nomenclature for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular risk, assessed through coronary artery calcium (CAC) and epicardial adipose tissue (EAT), of patients without FLD and patients with FLD and its different subtypes.

Methods

Cross sectional study of 370 patients. Patients with FLD were divided into 4 groups: FLD without metabolic dysfunction (non-MD FLD), MAFLD and the presence of overweight/obesity (MAFLD-OW), MAFLD and the presence of two metabolic abnormalities (MAFLD-MD) and MAFLD and the presence of T2D (MAFLD-T2D). MAFLD-OW included two subgroups: metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) and metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUHO). The patients without FLD were divided into 2 groups: patients without FLD and without MD (non-FLD nor MD; reference group) and patients without FLD but with MD (non-FLD with MD). EAT and CAC (measured through the Agatston Score) were determined by computed tomography.

Results

Compared with the reference group (non-FLD nor MD), regarding EAT, patients with MAFLD-T2D and MAFLD-MUHO had the highest risk for CVD (OR 15.87, 95% CI 4.26-59.12 and OR 17.60, 95% CI 6.71-46.20, respectively), patients with MAFLD-MHO were also at risk for CVD (OR 3.62, 95% CI 1.83-7.16), and patients with non-MD FLD did not have a significantly increased risk (OR 1.77; 95% CI 0.67-4.73). Regarding CAC, patients with MAFLD-T2D had an increased risk for CVD (OR 6.56, 95% CI 2.18-19.76). Patients with MAFLD-MUHO, MAFLD-MHO and non-MD FLD did not have a significantly increased risk compared with the reference group (OR 2.54, 95% CI 0.90-7.13; OR 1.84, 95% CI 0.67-5.00 and OR 2.11, 95% CI 0.46-9.74, respectively).

Conclusion

MAFLD–T2D and MAFLD–OW phenotypes had a significant risk for CVD. MAFLD new criteria reinforced the importance of identifying metabolic phenotypes in populations as it may help to identify patients with higher CVD risk and offer a personalized therapeutic management in a primary prevention setting.

The Association of Fibrosis-4 Index Scores with Severe Liver Outcomes in Primary Care

BACKGROUND

The Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4)non-invasively assesses fibrosis risk in chronic liver disease (CLD), but underdiagnosis limits FIB-4's application in primary care.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of FIB-4 risk with hazard of severe liver outcomes in primary care patients with and without diagnosed CLD.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of primary care data from 2007 to 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients with qualifying aminotransferase and platelet count results were included and a single FIB-4 score was calculated for each patient using the first of these values. Patients with a CLD diagnosis or outcome prior to their FIB-4 score were excluded.

MEASURES

FIB-4 advanced fibrosis risk categorization (low, indeterminate, and high) was the primary predictor variable. Patients were followed from FIB-4 score to a severe liver outcome, a composite of cirrhosis, liver transplantation, and hepatocellular carcinoma. We analyzed the association of FIB-4 risk categories with hazard risk of a severe liver outcome using stratified Cox regression models, stratifying patients by known CLD.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 20,556 patients were followed for a mean 2,978 days (SD 1,201 days), and 4% of patients experienced a severe liver outcome. Of patients with low-, indeterminate-, and high-risk FIB-4 scores, 2%, 4%, and 20% suffered a severe liver outcome, respectively. In the overall adjusted model, high-risk FIB-4 scores were associated with hazard of severe liver disease (HR 6.64; 95% CI 5.58-7.90). High-risk FIB-4 scores were associated with severe liver outcomes for patients with known NAFLD (HR 7.32; 95% CI 3.44-15.58), other liver disease (HR 11.39; 95% CI 8.53-15.20), and no known CLD (HR 4.05; 95% CI 3.10-5.28).

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk FIB-4 scores were strongly associated with risk of severe liver outcomes in patients with and without known CLD. Comprehensive FIB-4 application in primary care may signal silently advancing liver fibrosis.

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Review of Management for Primary Care Providers

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease in the United States and worldwide. The progressive form of NAFLD, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), is a leading indication for liver transplant. Comorbidities associated with NAFLD development and NASH include type 2 diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and dyslipidemia. Extrahepatic morbidity and mortality are considerable as NAFLD is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. Once NAFLD is diagnosed, the presence of liver fibrosis is the central determinant of hepatic prognosis. Severe liver fibrosis requires aggressive clinical management. No pharmacologic agents have regulatory approval in the United States for the treatment of NAFLD or NASH. Management is centered on efforts to reduce underlying obesity (lifestyle, medications, surgical or endoscopic interventions) and metabolic derangements (prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and others). Current pharmacologic therapy for NAFLD is limited mainly to the use of vitamin E and pioglitazone, although other agents are being investigated in clinical trials. Cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors must also be assessed and managed. Here, NAFLD evaluation, diagnosis, and management are considered in the primary care setting and endocrinology clinics.

Transient elastography and serum markers of liver fibrosis associate with epicardial adipose tissue and coronary artery calcium in NAFLD

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with cardiovascular disease morbimortality. However, it is not clear if NAFLD staging may help identify early or subclinical markers of cardiovascular disease. We aimed to evaluate the association of liver stiffness and serum markers of liver fibrosis with epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and coronary artery calcium (CAC) in an observational cross-sectional study of 49 NAFLD patients that were seen at Clínica Universidad de Navarra (Spain) between 2009 and 2019. Liver elastography and non-invasive fibrosis markers were used to non-invasively measure fibrosis. EAT and CAC, measured through visual assessment, were determined by computed tomography. Liver stiffness showed a direct association with EAT (r = 0.283, p-value = 0.049) and CAC (r = 0.337, p-value = 0.018). NAFLD fibrosis score was associated with EAT (r = 0.329, p-value = 0.021) and CAC (r = 0.387, p-value = 0.006). The association of liver stiffness with CAC remained significant after adjusting for metabolic syndrome features (including carbohydrate intolerance/diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, visceral adipose tissue, and obesity). The evaluation of NAFLD severity through liver elastography or non-invasive liver fibrosis biomarkers may contribute to guide risk factor modification to reduce cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic patients. Inversely, subclinical cardiovascular disease assessment, through Visual Scale for CAC scoring, may be a simple and effective measure for patients with potential liver fibrosis, independently of the existence of other cardiovascular risk factors.

Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) Increases the Risk of Systemic Complications and Mortality. A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of 12,620,736 Individuals

INTRODUCTION

The recent introduction of the definition "metabolic associated fatty liver disease" (MAFLD) sought to reclassify non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). MAFLD is thought to improve the encapsulation of metabolic dysregulation. However, recent evidence has found significant differences between MAFLD and NAFLD and prevailing knowledge has largely arisen from studies in NAFLD. Hence, we conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review on the outcomes associated with MAFLD.

METHODS

Medline and Embase database were searched for articles relating to outcomes in MAFLD. Analysis was conducted in random effects with hazard ratios to account for longitudinal risk assessment of mortality and systemic complications.

RESULTS

A total of 554 articles were identified and a final total of 17 articles were included. MAFLD resulted in an increase of overall mortality (HR 1.24, CI: 1.13 - 1.34), cancer related mortality (HR: 1.27, CI: 1.01 - 1.54) and CVD mortality (HR: 1.28, 1.03 - 1.53, p=0.04) compared to non MAFLD. MAFLD also increases the risk of cardiovascular events (HR: 1.49, CI: 1.34 - 1.64, p<0.01), stroke (HR: 1.55, CI: 1.37 - 1.73, p<0.01) and chronic kidney disease (HR: 1.53, CI: 1.38 - 1.68). The presence of MAFLD was also associated with an increased risk of heart failure, obstructive sleep apnoea and malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

MAFLD can significantly elevate the risk of systemic diseases and mortality. The care of MAFLD thus requires interdisciplinary collaboration and future clinical trials conducted in MAFLD should aim to reducing the incidence of end organ damage aside from improving liver histology.

The presence of diabetes impacts liver fibrosis and steatosis by transient elastography in a primary care population

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Noninvasive liver assessment in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in a primary care population identifies higher risk non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to evaluate the association of T2DM with liver fibrosis and steatosis by transient elastography (TE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of a TE referral program where primary care physicians were able to order TE. Patients with alcohol abuse were excluded. TE and Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) scores were obtained. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

28% had T2DM. The mean TE score in T2DM patients was 8.3 (±6) kilopascal (kPa) and 6.4 (±3.7) kPa in those without T2DM (p = 0.0001). Those with T2DM had a higher CAP (322 ± 51 dB/m vs. 296 ± 57 dB/m, p < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, T2DM was associated with TE score (β: 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.74-3.1, p = 0.001) and CAP (β: 2.8, 95% CI: 9.3-36.2, p = 0.001). Patients with T2DM had higher-risk TE scores and more steatosis by CAP.

CONCLUSION

T2DM is associated with liver fibrosis and steatosis by TE within a primary care population. A TE referral pathway may be utilized for T2DM patients who are at higher risk of NAFLD and its complications.

The Emerging Role of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists for the Management of NAFLD

CONTEXT

The burden of cirrhosis from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is reaching epidemic proportions in the United States. This calls for greater awareness among endocrinologists, who often see but may miss the diagnosis in adults with obesity or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) who are at the highest risk. At the same time, recent studies suggest that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are beneficial vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in this population. This minireview aims to assist endocrinologists to recognize the condition and recent work on the role of GLP-1RAs in NAFLD/NASH.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Evidence from observational studies, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Endocrinologists should lead multidisciplinary teams to implement recent consensus statements on NAFLD that call for screening and treatment of clinically significant fibrosis to prevent cirrhosis, especially in the high-risk groups (ie, people with obesity, prediabetes, or T2D). With no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved agents, weight loss is central to successful management, with pharmacological treatment options limited today to vitamin E (in people without T2D) and diabetes medications that reverse steatohepatitis, such as pioglitazone or GLP-1RA. Recently, the benefit of GLP-1RAs in NAFLD, suggested from earlier trials, has been confirmed in adults with biopsy-proven NASH. In 2021, the FDA also approved semaglutide for obesity management.

CONCLUSION

A paradigm change is developing between the endocrinologist's greater awareness about their critical role to curve the epidemic of NAFLD and new clinical care pathways that include a broader use of GLP-1RAs in the management of these complex patients.

Advanced liver fibrosis and the metabolic syndrome in a primary care setting

AIMS

The fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) are noninvasive and accessible methods for assessing advanced liver fibrosis risk in primary care. We evaluated the distribution of FIB-4 and NFS scores in primary care patients with clinical signals for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study of electronic record data between 2007 and 2018 included adults with at least one abnormal aminotransferase and no known (non-NAFLD) liver disease. We calculated patient-level FIB-4 and NFS scores, the proportion of patients with mean values exceeding advanced fibrosis thresholds (indeterminate risk: FIB-4 > 1.3, NFS > -1.455; high-risk: FIB-4 > 2.67, NFS > 0.676), and the proportion of patients with a NAFLD International Classification of Diseases-9/10 code. Logistic regression models evaluated the associations of metabolic syndrome (MetS) components with elevated FIB-4 and NFS scores.

RESULTS

The cohort included 6506 patients with a median of 6 (interquartile range: 3-13) FIB-4 and NFS scores per patient. Of these patients, 81% had at least two components of MetS, 29% had mean FIB-4 and NFS scores for indeterminate fibrosis risk, and 11% had either mean FIB-4 or NFS scores exceeding the high advanced fibrosis risk thresholds. Regression models identified associations of low high-density lipoprotein, hyperglycemia, Black race and male gender with high-risk FIB-4 and NFS values. Only 5% of patients had existing diagnoses for NAFLD identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Many primary care patients have FIB-4 and NFS scores concerning for advanced fibrosis, but rarely a diagnosis of NAFLD. Elevated FIB-4 and NFS scores may provide signals for further clinical evaluation of liver disease in primary care settings.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus increases the risk of hepatic fibrosis in individuals with obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with advanced fibrosis prevalence in adults with overweight or obesity in the United States.

METHODS

Participants (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES] 2015-2016 database) included 834 middle-aged patients with DM (21.7%) and 3,007 without DM (78.3%). NAFLD was defined by Fatty Liver Index (FLI) ≥ 60 or United States FLI (USFLI) ≥ 30. Moderate-to-high and high risk of advanced fibrosis was defined by fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) ≥ 1.67 and ≥ 2.67, respectively, and NAFLD fibrosis scores > 0.676 also indicated a high risk.

RESULTS

NAFLD prevalence increased with BMI. Steatosis was higher in individuals with overweight with DM versus without DM (USFLI ≥ 30: 48.3% vs. 17.4%; p < 0.01) and in individuals with obesity with DM versus without DM (USFLI ≥ 30: 79.9% vs. 57.6%; p < 0.01). DM significantly increased the proportion of individuals at moderate-to-high risk of fibrosis (FIB-4 ≥ 1.67: 31.8% vs. 20.1%; p < 0.05). In the high risk of advanced fibrosis group (FIB-4 ≥ 2.67), the risk almost doubled (3.8% vs. 7.1%). Among individuals with obesity, DM increased the proportion of adults with moderate and high risk of fibrosis by 1.8- and 2.5-fold, respectively (p < 0.01 and p = 0.39, respectively, vs. without DM).

CONCLUSIONS

In this US cohort, DM modestly impacted steatosis, which was primarily obesity-driven. DM added a significant risk of fibrosis to individuals with overweight or obesity, suggesting that screening is imperative in adults with DM.

Prognostic impact of liver fibrosis and steatosis by transient elastography for cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes: the Rio de Janeiro Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM, which reflects fibrosis) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP, which reflects steatosis), two parameters derived from hepatic transient elastography (TE), have scarcely been evaluated as predictors of cardiovascular complications and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

METHODS

Four hundred type 2 diabetic patients with NAFLD had TE examination (by Fibroscan®) performed at baseline. Multivariate Cox analyses evaluated the associations between TE parameters and the occurrence of cardiovascular events (CVEs) and mortality. TE parameters were assessed as continuous variables and dichotomized at low/high values reflecting advanced liver fibrosis (LSM > 9.6 kPa) and severe steatosis (CAP > 296 or > 330 dB/m). Improvements in risk discrimination were assessed by C-statistic and by the relative Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) index.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 5.5 years, 85 patients died (40 from cardiovascular causes), and 69 had a CVE. As continuous variables, an increasing LSM was a risk marker for total CVEs (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01-1.08) and all-cause mortality (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07); whereas an increasing CAP was a protective factor for both outcomes (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89-0.98; and HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88-0.97; respectively). As dichotomized variables, a high LSM remained a risk marker of adverse outcomes (with HRs ranging from 2.5 to 3.0) and a high CAP was protective (with HRs from 0.3 to 0.5). The subgroup of individuals with low-LSM/high-CAP had the lowest risks while the opposite subgroup with high-LSM/low-CAP had the highest risks. Both LSM and CAP improved risk discrimination, with increases in C-statistics up to 0.037 and IDIs up to 52%.

CONCLUSIONS

Measured by hepatic TE, advanced liver fibrosis is a risk marker and severe steatosis is a protective factor for cardiovascular complications and mortality in individuals with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD.

Preparing for the NASH epidemic: A call to action

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are common conditions with a rising burden. Yet there are significant management gaps between clinical guidelines and practice in patients with NAFLD and NASH. Further, there is no single global guiding strategy for the management of NAFLD and NASH. The American Gastroenterological Association, in collaboration with 7 professional associations, convened an international conference comprising 32 experts in gastroenterology, hepatology, endocrinology, and primary care providers from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Conference content was informed by the results of a national NASH Needs Assessment Survey. The participants reviewed and discussed published literature on global burden, screening, risk stratification, diagnosis, and management of individuals with NAFLD, including those with NASH. Participants identified promising approaches for clinical practice and prepared a comprehensive, unified strategy for primary care providers and relevant specialists encompassing the full spectrum of NAFLD/NASH care. They also identified specific high-yield targets for clinical research and called for a unified, international public health response to NAFLD and NASH.

Preparing for the NASH Epidemic: A Call to Action

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are common conditions with a rising burden. Yet there are significant management gaps between clinical guidelines and practice in patients with NAFLD and NASH. Further, there is no single global guiding strategy for the management of NAFLD and NASH. The American Gastroenterological Association, in collaboration with 7 professional associations, convened an international conference comprising 32 experts in gastroenterology, hepatology, endocrinology, and primary care providers from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Conference content was informed by the results of a national NASH Needs Assessment Survey. The participants reviewed and discussed published literature on global burden, screening, risk stratification, diagnosis, and management of individuals with NAFLD, including those with NASH. Participants identified promising approaches for clinical practice and prepared a comprehensive, unified strategy for primary care providers and relevant specialists encompassing the full spectrum of NAFLD/NASH care. They also identified specific high-yield targets for clinical research and called for a unified, international public health response to NAFLD and NASH.

Preparing for the NASH Epidemic: A Call to Action

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are common conditions with a rising burden. Yet there are significant management gaps between clinical guidelines and practice in patients with NAFLD and NASH. Further, there is no single global guiding strategy for the management of NAFLD and NASH. The American Gastroenterological Association, in collaboration with 7 professional associations, convened an international conference comprising 32 experts in gastroenterology, hepatology, endocrinology, and primary care providers from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Conference content was informed by the results of a national NASH Needs Assessment Survey. The participants reviewed and discussed published literature on global burden, screening, risk stratification, diagnosis, and management of individuals with NAFLD, including those with NASH. Participants identified promising approaches for clinical practice and prepared a comprehensive, unified strategy for primary care providers and relevant specialists encompassing the full spectrum of NAFLD/NASH care. They also identified specific high-yield targets for clinical research and called for a unified, international public health response to NAFLD and NASH.

Preparing for the NASH epidemic: A call to action

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are common conditions with a rising burden. Yet there are significant management gaps between clinical guidelines and practice in patients with NAFLD and NASH. Further, there is no single global guiding strategy for the management of NAFLD and NASH. The American Gastroenterological Association, in collaboration with 7 professional associations, convened an international conference comprising 32 experts in gastroenterology, hepatology, endocrinology, and primary care providers from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Conference content was informed by the results of a national NASH Needs Assessment Survey. The participants reviewed and discussed published literature on global burden, screening, risk stratification, diagnosis, and management of individuals with NAFLD, including those with NASH. Participants identified promising approaches for clinical practice and prepared a comprehensive, unified strategy for primary care providers and relevant specialists encompassing the full spectrum of NAFLD/NASH care. They also identified specific high-yield targets for clinical research and called for a unified, international public health response to NAFLD and NASH.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with increased risk of chronic kidney disease

Background and Aims

Whether non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with an increased risk of incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) independent of established cardio-renal risk factors remains controversial. We aimed to provide a quantitative estimate of the association and strength between NAFLD and risk of CKD after adjustment for multiple cardio-renal risk factors.

Methods

We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar) for studies published from database inception until 30 November 2020. Analysis included cohort studies that reported multivariable-adjusted risk ratios [including odds ratios, relative risks (RRs), or hazard ratios] and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CKD of NAFLD compared with individuals without NAFLD.

Results

A total of 11 cohort studies were included comprising 1,198,242 participants (46.3% women) for analysis. The median follow-up duration was 3.7 years, with 31,922 cases of incident CKD. Compared with individuals without NAFLD, unadjusted models showed that NAFLD was associated with a higher risk of CKD (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.38-1.71). After adjusting for multiple cardio-renal risk factors, the CKD risk was still significantly increased in patients with NAFLD (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.27-1.52). Compared with individuals without NAFLD, the adjusted absolute risk increase in NAFLD for CKD was 5.1 (95% CI 3.5-6.8) per 1000 person-years.

Conclusion

NAFLD is associated with an increased risk of incident CKD independent of established cardio-renal risk factors.

Diabetic Kidney Disease, Cardiovascular Disease and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A New Triumvirate?

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a highly prevalent disease worldwide with a renowned relation to cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. These diseases share a common pathophysiology including insulin resistance, oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, dysbiosis and genetic susceptibilities. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is especially prevalent and more severe in type 2 diabetes. Patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease should have liver fibrosis assessment in order to identify those at the highest risk of adverse outcomes so that appropriate management strategies can be implemented. Early diagnosis and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease could ameliorate the burden of cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease.

Advanced Liver Fibrosis Is Common in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Followed in the Outpatient Setting: The Need for Systematic Screening

OBJECTIVE

Assess the prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and of liver fibrosis associated with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in unselected patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 561 patients with T2DM (age: 60 ± 11 years; BMI: 33.4 ± 6.2 kg/m²; and HbA_1c: 7.5 ± 1.8%) attending primary care or endocrinology outpatient clinics and unaware of having NAFLD were recruited. At the visit, volunteers were invited to be screened by elastography for steatosis and fibrosis by controlled attenuation parameter (≥274 dB/m) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM; ≥7.0 kPa), respectively. Secondary causes of liver disease were ruled out. Diagnostic panels for prediction of advanced fibrosis, such as AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, were also measured. A liver biopsy was performed if results were suggestive of fibrosis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of steatosis was 70% and of fibrosis 21% (LSM ≥7.0 kPa). Moderate fibrosis (F2: LSM ≥8.2 kPa) was present in 6% and severe fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3-4: LSM ≥9.7 kPa) in 9%, similar to that estimated by FIB-4 and APRI panels. Noninvasive testing was consistent with liver biopsy results. Elevated AST or ALT ≥40 units/L was present in a minority of patients with steatosis (8% and 13%, respectively) or with liver fibrosis (18% and 28%, respectively). This suggests that AST/ALT alone are insufficient as initial screening. However, performance may be enhanced by imaging (e.g., transient elastography) and plasma diagnostic panels (e.g., FIB-4 and APRI).

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-to-advanced fibrosis (F2 or higher), an established risk factor for cirrhosis and overall mortality, affects at least one out of six (15%) patients with T2DM. These results support the American Diabetes Association guidelines to screen for clinically significant fibrosis in patients with T2DM with steatosis or elevated ALT.

A Review of the Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Efficacy of Anti-diabetic Drugs Used in the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

In recent years, epidemiological studies have consistently demonstrated that the coexistence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is strongly associated with increased mortality and morbidity related to hepatic- and extrahepatic causes. Indeed, compared with the general population, patients with T2DM are more likely to be diagnosed with more severe forms of NAFLD (i.e., nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with liver fibrosis). There is an ongoing debate whether NALFD is a consequence of diabetes or whether NAFLD is simply a component and manifestation of the metabolic syndrome, since liver fat (steatosis) and even more advanced stages of liver fibrosis can occur in the absence of diabetes. Nevertheless, insulin resistance is a key component of the mechanism of NAFLD development; furthermore, therapies that lower blood glucose concentrations also appear to be effective in the treatment of NAFLD. Here, we will discuss the pathophysiological and epidemiological associations between NAFLD and T2DM. We will also review currently available anti-diabetic agents with their regard to their efficacy of NAFLD/NASH treatment.

Development of a simple nonalcoholic fatty liver disease scoring system indicative of metabolic risks and insulin resistance

Background

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is estimated to affect approximately 30% population worldwide. However, there is yet a basic and generally implementable approach to define individuals at risk for NAFLD estimative of metabolic risk.

Methods

Total of 3,634 general participants without history of liver disease and alcohol consumption who received the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2008 and 2010 were studied. Logistic regression was used to identify significant covariates indicative of NAFLD. Multivariable-adjusted logistic regression was carried out for evaluation on estimative impact of the derived score on metabolic risks.

Results

Sex [female; odd ratio (OR), 2.492; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.921–3.233; P<0.001], waist circumference (WC) (OR, 1.093; 95% CI, 1.077–1.110, P<0.001) systolic blood pressure (OR, 1.033; 95% CI, 1.025–1.040; P<0.001), fasting serum glucose (FSG) (OR, 1.032; 95% CI, 1.026–1.038; P<0.001), triglyceride (OR, 1.007; 95% CI, 1.006–1.009; P<0.001), and alanine aminotransferase (OR, 1.110; 95% CI, 1.097–1.124; P<0.001) were independently indicative of NAFLD, which constituted the derived scoring system. The system revealed a significant correlation with the NAFLD liver fat score, fatty liver index (FLI), body mass index, age, alanine aminotransferase, and triglycerides (BAAT) score, lipid accumulation product, and hepatic steatosis index. In addition, the derived score was significantly estimative of insulin resistance.

Conclusions

The developed score may be supportive of stratification of individuals at high risk of NAFLD, non-invasive fast diagnosis of NAFLD, and estimation of metabolic risk. Future studies that compare the derived score with standard diagnostic tests-validated data, such as ultrasonography of the liver, are needed.

Role of Agents for the Treatment of Diabetes in the Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an often unrecognized complication of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) associated with significant economic burden and poor long-term hepatic and extrahepatic outcomes. Our goal is to review evidence about the complex association between NAFLD and T2DM and highlight the potential for disease co-management with the available medications used for the treatment of diabetes.

RECENT FINDINGS

A milieu of metabolic factors such as insulin resistance, glucotoxicity, and lipotoxicity, as well as genetics and other factors, contribute to the pathogenesis and co-existence of NAFLD with T2DM. The presence of T2DM in patients with NAFLD increases the risk of disease progression to steatohepatitis (NASH) and advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, and even hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition to lifestyle modification, pioglitazone and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) both reduce the high cardiovascular risk and improve liver histology in patients with NAFLD. Sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT-2) inhibitors also appear to reverse metabolic abnormalities as well as liver disease in NAFLD, but their impact on liver histology has not been fully established. Lastly, metformin, dipeptidyl dipetidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and insulin appear to have modest to no effect on modifying the natural history of NAFLD. Early recognition of NAFLD and monitoring for NASH with advanced liver fibrosis in patients with T2DM are crucial. The presence of NASH in a patient with T2DM should call for taking advantage of antidiabetic medications with proven efficacy to improve cardiometabolic health and prevent liver disease progression.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with increased risk of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Whether nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with risk of incident atrial fibrillation (AF) independent of established cardiovascular risk factors remains controversial. We aimed to provide a quantitative estimate of the association between NAFLD and risk of AF after adjustment for cardiometabolic risk factors.

METHODS

In this study, we searched PubMed and Embase for studies published from database inception until January 31, 2020. Cohort studies reported adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for AF of NAFLD compared with non-NAFLD were included for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 6 cohort studies were included, comprising 614 673 individuals for analysis. The median follow-up duration was 10.0 years with 7271 cases of incident AF. Compared with non-NAFLD, minimally adjusted models without adjustment for cardiometabolic risk factors showed that NAFLD was associated with increased risk of AF (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.23-2.20, I²  = 63.0%). After adjustment for multiple cardiometabolic risk factors, the association between NAFLD and risk of AF was still higher than that in non-NAFLD (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.04-1.31, I²  = 54.0%). There was significant heterogeneity for the risk of AF between minimally and maximally adjusted models (I²  = 77.1%, P for heterogeneity = 0.04). Compared with non-NAFLD, the absolute risk increase in NAFLD for AF was 1.3 (95% CI 0.5-2.1) per 1000 person-years.

CONCLUSIONS

NAFLD is associated with increased risk of incident AF. The strength of the association between NAFLD and AF is partially attributed to the co-existing cardiometabolic risk factors.

Changing trajectories of serum uric acid and risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a prospective cohort study

Background

It is unclear the role of longitudinal trajectory of serum uric acid (SUA) on the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We aimed to determine whether longitudinal SUA trajectories are associated with the risk of new-onset NAFLD.

Methods

We explored the relationship between SUA trajectories and NAFLD in a cohort including 3822 participants. Individual’s SUA trajectories from 2012 to 2014 were defined using group-based trajectory modeling analysis in four distinct patterns: trajectory 1 (n = 991, 25.93%), trajectory 2 (n = 1421, 37.18%), trajectory 3 (n = 1156, 30.22%), and trajectory 4 (n = 254, 6.67%). The logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between SUA changing trajectories and subsequent NAFLD until 2016. Dose–response relationship between SUA changing trajectories and NAFLD risk was evaluated through the testing of trajectory groups as a continuous variable.

Results

The 2-year incidence of NAFLD was 13.27%. Compared with trajectory 1, the adjusted odds risk for NAFLD development was in a dose–response relationship as follows: 1.27 (95% CI 0.91–1.78) for trajectory 2, 1.89 (95% CI 1.29–2.75) for trajectory 3, and 2.34 (95% CI 1.43–3.83) for trajectory 4. And this dose–response relationship was not affected by age, sex, and abdominal obesity.

Conclusions

Higher SUA changing trajectory is a risk factor for NAFLD. This finding highlights the importance of paying attention to SUA changing trajectory on the detection and prevention of NAFLD.