A retrospective cohort study of PD-L1 prevalence, molecular associations and clinical outcomes in patients with NSCLC: Results from the European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP) Lungscape Project

PD-L1 expression in resected lung adenocarcinoma: prevalence and prognostic significance in relation to the IASLC grading system

AIMS

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker for adjuvant immunotherapy and has been linked to poor differentiation in lung adenocarcinoma. However, its prevalence and prognostic role in the context of the novel histologic grade has not been evaluated.

METHODS

We analysed a cohort of 1233 patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma where PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (22C3 assay) was reflexively tested. Tumour PD-L1 expression was correlated with the new standardized International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) histologic grading system (G1, G2, and G3). Clinicopathologic features including patient outcome were analysed.

RESULTS

PD-L1 was positive (≥1%) in 7.0%, 23.5%, and 63.0% of G1, G2, and G3 tumours, respectively. PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with male sex, smoking, and less sublobar resection among patients with G2 tumours, but this association was less pronounced in those with G3 tumours. PD-L1 was an independent risk factor for recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 3.25, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 1.93-5.48, P < 0.001) and death (adjusted HR = 2.69, 95% CI = 1.13-6.40, P = 0.026) in the G2 group, but not in the G3 group (adjusted HR for recurrence = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.64-1.40, P = 0.778).

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression differs substantially across IASLC grades and identifies aggressive tumours within the G2 subgroup. This knowledge may be used for both prognostication and designing future studies on adjuvant immunotherapy.

PD-L1 expression and its correlation with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Little is known about the relationship between programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and histologic and genetic features in real-world Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients. From November 2017 to June 2019, tumor tissues were collected from 2674 non-small cell lung cancer patients. PD-L1 expression was detected with immunohistochemistry using the 22C3 and SP263 antibodies, and patients were stratified into subgroups based on a tumor proportion score of 1%, 1% to 49%, and ≥ 50%. Genetic alterations were profiled using targeted next-generation sequencing. In the total population, 50.5% had negative PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score < 1%), 32.0% had low-positive expression (1%-49%), and 17.5% had high-positive expression (≥50%). The PD-L1 positive rate was 39.0% in squamous cell carcinomas and 53.6% in adenocarcinomas. PD-L1 expression was higher in squamous cell carcinomas (P < .001) and lower in adenocarcinomas (P < .001). Of the overall patient population, 11.2% had Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) mutations, 44.9% had epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, 2.1% had BRAF V600E mutations, 0.3% had MET exon 14 skipping mutations, 5.4% had anaplastic lymphoma kinase translocations, and 0.9% had ROS proto-oncogene 1 translocations. Patients carrying ROS proto-oncogene 1 translocations (P = .006), KRAS (P < .001), and MET (P = .023) mutations had significantly elevated expression of PD-L1, while those harboring EGFR (P < .001) mutations had lower PD-L1 expression. In our study, PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in squamous cell carcinomas and lower in adenocarcinomas, and was positively associated with MET and KRAS mutations, as well as the wild-type EGFR gene state. Nonetheless, additional studies are needed to further validate those associations and determine the clinical significance for immune checkpoint inhibitors of these factors.

Comparison of PD-L1 (22C3) Expression in Paired Primary and Metastatic Breast Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) is being used as a predictive marker of the benefit derived from immunotherapy in several cancer types, including breast cancer. However, the insight gleaned of the prognostic and predictive value of PD-L1 status and its correlation with molecular characteristics during breast cancer progression remains limited.

METHODS

We performed an PD-L1 (22C3) assay in pre-treatment primary and metastatic tumor sections from 33 patients with breast carcinoma, matched for post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p-NACT). PD-L1 expression was evaluated using 3 scoring methods: immune cell (IC) and tumor cell (TC) with a 1% as the cutoff value, and combined positive scores (CPS) with a 1 as the cutoff value. Twenty-two samples from 11 patients had successful fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)-based molecular data available for analysis.

RESULTS

In the 33 pre-treatment primary tumors, PD-L1 IC, TC, and CPS showed positive correlation with stromal tumor infiltrate lymphocytes (sTIL), histological grade 3, and triple negative breast carcinoma (TNBC). In the matched metastatic tumors, only PD-L1 IC showed a positive correlation with sTIL. The primary tumors showed a higher PD-L1 expression than the matched metastatic tumors by IC and CPS. Negative to positive conversion by CPS was identified in the metastatic tumors from lung, pleura and liver. p-NACT tumors also showed a trend of lower PD-L1 expression compared to the pre-treatment tumors. Six patients had matched samples for molecular and PD-L1 comparison, and none of them showed consistent gene alterations or PD-L1 expression among the primary, p-NACT and metastatic tumors.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed a decrease in PD-L1 expression and disconnected molecular features during breast cancer progression. Repeating PD-L1 IHC testing could be considered in some specific metastatic sites if primary tumors were negative. Further studies are needed to identify other predictive factors for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in patients with breast carcinoma.

Characterization of 164 patients with NRAS mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND

NRAS mutations are observed in less than 1% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical data regarding this rare subset of lung cancer are scarce and response to systemic treatment such as chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has never been reported.

METHODS

All consecutive patients with an NRAS mutated NSCLC, diagnosed between August 2014 and November 2020 in 14 French centers, were included. Clinical and molecular data were collected and reviewed from medical records.

RESULTS

Out of the 164 included patients, 106 (64.6%) were men, 150 (91.5%) were current or former smokers, and 104 (63.4%) had stage IV NSCLC at diagnosis. The median age was 62 years, and the most frequent histology was adenocarcinoma (81.7%). NRAS activating mutations were mostly found in codon 61 (70%), while codon 12 and 13 alterations were observed in 16.5% and 4.9% of patients, respectively. Programmed death ligand-1 expression level <1%/1-49%/≥50% were respectively found in 30.8%/27.1%/42.1% of tumors. With a median follow-up of 12.5 months, median overall survival (OS) of stage IV patients was 15.3 months (95% CI 9.9-27.6). No significant difference in OS was found according to the type of mutation (codon 61 vs. other), HR = 1.12 (95% CI 0.65-1.95). Among stage IV patients treated with platinum-based doublet (n = 66), ICI (n = 48), or combination of both (n = 10), objective response rate, and median progression free survival were respectively 45% and 5.8 months, 35% and 6.9 months, 70% and 8.6 months.

CONCLUSION

NRAS mutated NSCLC are characterized by a high frequency of smoking history and codon 61 mutations. Further studies are needed to confirm the encouraging outcome of immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy.

Real-world prevalence of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: an Australia-wide multi-centre retrospective observational study

An investigator-initiated, Australia-wide multi-centre retrospective observational study was undertaken to investigate the real-world prevalence of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Multiple centres around Australia performing PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) were invited to participate. Histologically confirmed NSCLC of any stage with a PD-L1 IHC test performed for persons aged ≥18 years between 1 January 2018 and 1 January 2020, and eligible for review, were identified at each centre, followed by data extraction and de-identification, after which data were submitted to a central site for collation and analysis. In total data from 6690 eligible PD-L1 IHC tests from histologically (75%) or cytologically (24%) confirmed NSCLC of any stage were reviewed from persons with a median age of 70 years, 43% of which were female. The majority (81%) of tests were performed using the PD-L1 IHC SP263 antibody with the Ventana BenchMark Ultra platform and 19% were performed using Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay. Reported PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS) was ≥50% for 30% of all tests, with 62% and 38% scoring PD-L1 ≥1% and <1%, respectively. Relative prevalence of clinicopathological features with PD-L1 scores dichotomised to <50% and ≥50%, or to <1% and ≥1%, were examined. Females scored ≥1% slightly more often than males (64% vs 61%, respectively, p=0.013). However, there was no difference between sexes or age groups (<70 or ≥70 years) where PD-L1 scored ≥50%. Specimens from patients with higher stage (III/IV) scored ≥1% or ≥50% marginally more often compared to specimens from patients with lower stage (I/II) (p≤0.002). Proportions of primary and metastatic specimens did not differ where PD-L1 TPS was ≥1%, however more metastatic samples scored TPS ≥50% than primary samples (metastatic vs primary; 34% vs 27%, p<0.001). Cytology and biopsy specimens were equally reported, at 63% of specimens, to score TPS ≥1%, whereas cytology samples scored TPS ≥50% slightly more often than biopsy samples (34% vs 30%, respectively, p=0.004). Resection specimens (16% of samples tested) were reported to score TPS ≥50% or ≥1% less often than either biopsy or cytology samples (p<0.001). There was no difference in the proportion of tests with TPS ≥1% between PD-L1 IHC assays used, however the proportion of tests scored at TPS ≥50% was marginally higher for 22C3 compared to SP263 (34% vs 29%, respectively, p<0.001). These real-world Australian data are comparable to some previously published global real-world data, with some differences noted.

To be, or not to be: the dilemma of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer harboring various driver mutations

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is one of primary cancer type with high incidence and mortality, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cncer. For advanced lung cancer, traditional chemotherapy and targeted therapy become difficult to solve the dilemma of further progress. In recent years, with the clinical application of immunotherapy, the therapeutic strategy of lung cancer has changed dramatically. At present, immunotherapy has shown conspicuous efficacy in NSCLC patients with high expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and high tumor mutational burden (TMB). The discovery of driver mutations brings delightful hope for targeted cancer therapy. However, it remains controversial whether immunotherapy can be used in NSCLC patients with these specific driver mutations.

METHOD

This article summarized the latest research progresses of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC. We paid close attention to the relevance of various driver mutations and immunotherapy in NSCLC patients, and summarized the predictive effects of several driver mutations and immunotherapy.

RESULTS

The mutations of KRAS, KRAS+TP53, EPHA (especially EPHA5), ZFHX3, ZFHX3+TP53, NOTCH, BRAF and LRP1B+FAT3 have potential to be used as biomarkers to predict the positive effectiveness of immunotherapy. ZFHX3, ZFHX3+TP53, STKII/LKB1+KEAP1+SMARCA4+PBRM1 mutations in LUAD patients get more positive effect in immunotherapy. While the mutations of EGFR, KEAP1, STKII/LKB1+KRAS, EML4-ALK, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, PBRM1, STKII/LKB1+KEAP1+SMARCA4+PBRM1, ERBB2, PIK3CA and RET often indicate poor benefit from immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Many gene mutations have been shown to be associated with immunotherapy efficacy. Gene mutations should be combined with PD-L1, TMB, etc. to predict the effect of immunotherapy.

PD-L1 (22C3) Expression Correlates with Clinical and Molecular Features of Lung Adenocarcinomas in Cytological Samples

INTRODUCTION

PD-L1 expression is the most widely used predictive marker for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. However, the current understanding of the association between PD-L1 expression and treatment response is suboptimal. A significant percentage of patients have only a cytological specimen available for clinical management. Therefore, it is relevant to examine the impact of molecular features on PD-L1 expression in cytological samples and how it might correlate with a therapeutic response.

METHODS

We evaluated patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the lung who had both in-house targeted next-generation sequencing analysis and paired PD-L1 (22C3) immunohistochemical staining performed on the same cell blocks. We explored the association between molecular features and PD-L1 expression. In patients who underwent ICIs therapy, we assessed how a specific gene mutation impacted a therapeutic response.

RESULTS

145 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were included in this study. PD-L1-high expression was found to be more common in pleural fluid than in other sample sites. Regional lymph node samples showed a higher proportion of PD-L1-high expression (29%) compared with lung samples (6%). The predictive value of PD-L1 expression was retained in cytological samples. Mutations in KRAS were also associated with a PD-L1-high expression. However, tumors with TP53 or KRAS mutations showed a lower therapy response rate regardless of the PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

Cytological samples maintain a predictive value for PD-L1 expression in patients with lung adenocarcinoma as regards the benefit of ICI treatment. Specific molecular alterations additionally impact PD-L1 expression and its predictive value.

Targeting the Tumor-Tumor Microenvironment Crosstalk

INTRODUCTION

Cancer development and progression is a complex process influenced by co-evolution of the cancer cells and their microenvironment. However, traditional anti-cancer therapy is mostly targeted toward cancer cells. To improve the efficacy of cancer drugs, the complex interactions between the tumor (T) and the tumor microenvironment (TME) should be considered while developing therapeutics.

AREAS COVERED

The present review article will discuss the components of T-TME as well as the potential to co-target these two distinct elements. We document that these approaches have resulted in success in preventing tumor progression and metastasis, albeit in animal models in some cases. Lastly, it is important to consider the tissue context and tumor type as these could significantly modify the role of these molecules/pathways and hence the overall likelihood of response. Furthermore, we discuss the potential strategies to target the components of tumor microenvironment in anti-cancer therapy. PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov was searched through May 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

The tumor-tumor microenvironment cross talk and heterogeneity are major mechanisms conferring resistance to standard of care. Better understanding of the tissue specific T-TME interactions and dual targeting has the promise of improving cancer control and clinical outcomes.

Assessment of RANK/RANK-L prevalence and clinical significance in NSCLC European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape cohort and SPLENDOUR randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical significance of RANK/L expression, in both a retrospective cohort of surgically resected stage I-III NSCLC (Lungscape) and a randomized clinical trial-cohort (SPLENDOUR) of advanced NSCLC treated with chemotherapy alone or in combination with denosumab.

METHODS

RANK-L expression was assessed on tissue microarrays (TMAs) in Lungscape and whole sections in SPLENDOUR, using immunohistochemistry, with H-scores values > 0 indicating positivity. Prevalence of RANK positivity and its association with clinicopathological characteristics, and patient outcome was explored in a subset of the ETOP Lungscape cohort and in SPLENDOUR. Also investigated were the prevalence of RANK overexpression (proportion of positive cancer cells ≥ 50%) in the Lungscape cohort, and RANK-L in the SPLENDOUR trial.

RESULTS

In the Lungscape cohort, RANK expression was assessed at a median follow-up of 46 months (N = 488 patients; 4 centers); 35% were female, 44/49/6% adenocarcinomas (AC)/squamous cell carcinomas (SCC)/other, 48/27/25% with stage I/II/III. Median RFS/TTR/OS were 58/Not reached/74 months. Prevalence of RANK expression was 31% (95%CI:27%-35%); significantly higher in AC: 50% (95%CI:43%-57%) vs SCC: 12% (95%CI:8%-16%) (p < 0.001); more frequent in females (42% vs 25%, p < 0.001) and tumors ≤ 4 cm (35.3% vs 23.3%, p = 0.0065). No association with outcome was found. In the SPLENDOUR trial (463 patients), the prevalence of membranous and cytoplasmic RANK positivity was 34% (95%CI:30%-38%) and 9% (95%CI:7%-12%), respectively, while prevalence for RANK-L was 5% (95%CI:3%-7%) and 36% (95%CI:31%-40%), respectively. Cytoplasmic RANK-L positivity was more common among females (47% vs 31%, p = 0.001) and in non-SCC histology (45% vs 10%, p < 0.0001). At the pre-specified 1% significance level, no prognostic or predictive effect was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Both cohorts indicate that RANK expression is more common in adenocarcinoma/non-squamous NSCLC and in female patients. No prognostic effect is found, and in the clinical trial involving addition of denosumab to chemotherapy no predictive effect is detected.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy for Older Patients with Oligometastases: A Proposed Paradigm by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group

The standard of care for metastatic disease is systemic therapy. A unique subset of patients with limited metastatic disease defined as distant involvement of five anatomic sites or less (oligometastases) have a better chance of remission or improved survival and may benefit from local treatments such as surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, to prevent further spread of disease, systemic treatment such as chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and hormonal therapy may be required. Older patients (70 years old or above) or physiologically frail younger patients with multiple co-morbidities may not be able to tolerate the conventional chemotherapy due to its toxicity. In addition, those with a good performance status may not receive optimal chemotherapy due to concern about toxicity. Recently, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has become a promising approach only in the management of program death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive tumors. Thus, a treatment method that elicits induction of PD-L1 production by tumor cells may allow all patients with oligometastases to benefit from immunotherapy. In vitro studies have demonstrated that high dose of radiotherapy may induce formation of PD-L1 in various tumors as a defense mechanism against inflammatory T cells. Clinical studies also corroborated those observations. Thus, SBRT, with its high precision to minimize damage to normal organs, may be a potential treatment of choice for older patients with oligometastases due to its synergy with immunotherapy. We propose a protocol combining SBRT to achieve a minimum radiobiologic equivalent dose around 59.5 Gy to all tumor sites if feasible, followed four to six weeks later by CPI for those cancer patients with oligometastases. All patients will be screened with frailty screening questionnaires to identify individuals at high risk for toxicity. The patients will be managed with an interdisciplinary team which includes oncologists, geriatricians, nurses, nutritionists, patient navigators, and social workers to manage all aspects of geriatric patient care. The use of telemedicine by the team may facilitate patient monitoring during treatment and follow-up. Preliminary data on toxicity, local control, survival, and progression-free survival may be obtained and serve as a template for future prospective studies.

Prognostic impact of tumour mutational burden in resected stage I and II lung adenocarcinomas from a European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape cohort

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate tumor mutational burden (TMB), its associations with selected clinicopathological and molecular characteristics as well as its clinical significance, in a retrospective cohort of surgically resected stage I-II lung adenocarcinomas, subset of the ETOP Lungscape cohort.

METHODS

TMB was evaluated on tumor DNA extracted from resected primary lung adenocarcinomas, based on FoundationOne®CDx (F1CDx) genomic profiling, centrally performed at the University Hospital Zurich. The F1CDx test sequences the complete exons of 324 cancer-related genes and detects substitutions, insertions and deletions (indels), copy number alterations and gene rearrangements. In addition, the genomic biomarkers TMB and microsatellite instability (MSI) are analyzed.

RESULTS

In the Lungscape cohort, TMB was assessed in 78 surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas from two Swiss centers (62 % males, 55 %/45 % stage I/II). Median TMB was 7.6 Muts/Mb, with TMB high (≥10 Muts/Mb) in 40 % of cases (95 %CI:29 %-52 %). The most frequently mutated genes were TP53/KRAS/EGFR/MLL2 detected in 58 %/38 %/33 %/30 % of samples, respectively. TMB was significantly higher among males (TMB high: 50 % vs 23 % in females, p = 0.032), as well as among current/former smokers (TMB high: 44 % vs 8 % in never smokers, p = 0.023). Furthermore, TMB was significantly higher in TP53 mutated than in non-mutated patients (TMB high: 60 % vs 12 %, p < 0.001), while it was higher in EGFR non-mutated patients compared to EGFR mutated (TMB high: 48 % vs 23 %, p = 0.049). At a median follow-up time of 56.1 months (IQR:38.8-72.0), none of the three outcome variables (OS, RFS, TTR) differed significantly by TMB status (all p-values > 5 %). This was also true when adjusting for clinicopathological characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

While presence of TP53 mutations and absence of EGFR mutations are associated with high TMB, increased TMB had no significant prognostic impact in patients with resected stage I/II lung adenocarcinoma beyond T and N classification, in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses.

Mutational Landscape and Expression of PD-L1 in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Genomic Alterations of the MET gene

Background

Mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 skipping mutations and MET gene amplification occur in 3–5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting MET alterations have shown promising results in these patients.

Objective

The aim of this study was to describe the genomic profile, PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological features of MET dysregulated NSCLC.

Patients and Methods

We identified 188 patients with advanced-stage NSCLC with data on MET expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC for PD-L1 expression was performed in 131 patient samples, and next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis was performed in 109 patient samples.

Results

MET exon 14 skipping alterations were identified in 16 (14.7%) samples, MET amplifications with cut-off ≥4 copy number variations were identified in 11 (10.1%) samples, and an oncogenic MET mutation (MET p.D1228N) was identified in 1 (0.9%) sample. 12/15 tumors (80.0%) harboring MET exon 14 alterations and 7/11 (63.6%) MET-amplified tumors expressed PD-L1 in ≥1% of tumor cells. Tumors harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations expressed PD-L1 more frequently than MET wild-type IHC-positive tumors (p = 0.045). Twenty-five percent of MET exon 14-altered cases and 33% of MET-amplified cases harbored potentially targetable oncogenic co-mutations in KRAS, BRAF, and EGFR. The most frequent co-occurring mutations in all MET-altered tumors were TP53, KRAS, BRAF, and CDK4.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that MET exon 14 skipping alterations and MET amplification are not mutually exclusive to other oncogenic co-mutations, and report the association of genomic MET alterations with PD-L1 expression. Since genomic MET alterations are emerging targets requiring upfront treatment, optimal understanding of the co-mutational landscape for this patient population is needed.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11523-022-00918-6.

Co-dependencies in the tumor immune microenvironment

Activated oncogenes and disrupted tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) not only endow aspiring cancer cells with new biological capabilities but also influence the composition and function of host cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). These non-cancer host cells can in turn provide cancer cells with growth support and protection from the anti-tumor immune response. In this ecosystem, geospatially heterogenous "subTME" adds to the complexity of the "global" TME which bestows tumors with increased tumorigenic ability and resistance to therapy. This review highlights how specific genetic alterations in cancer cells establish various symbiotic co-dependencies with surrounding host cells and details the cooperative role of the host cells in tumor biology. These essential interactions expand the repertoire of targets for the development of precision cancer treatments.

Prognostic Significance of PD-L1 Expression and Standardized Uptake Values in the Primary Lesions of Stage IV Adenocarcinoma Lung Cancer

Background

This study evaluated the prognostic ability of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in patients with stage IV adenocarcinoma lung cancer to detect protein death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels.

Methods

In total, 86 patients with stage IV adenocarcinoma lung cancer underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging and PD-L1 expression evaluation before treatment from February 2019 to November 2020 at Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam. The assessed patient characteristics in this study included sex, age, smoking status, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, PD-L1 expression level, survival status, tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) stage, and metastasis locations.

Results

The average age was 62.23 ± 9.51 years, and men and women represented 67.4% and 32.6% of the population, respectively. The EGFR mutation rate was 36%. PD-L1 expression was negative (detected in <1% of the tumor) in 40.7% of cases and positive in 59.3% of cases (detected in 1–49% of the tumor in 32.6%; detected in ≥50% of the tumor in 26.7%). The mean maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) was 11.09 ± 3.94. SUV_max was significantly higher in PD-L1–positive tumors than in PD-L1–negative tumors (12.24 ± 4.01 and 9.43 ± 3.22, respectively; p = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of SUVmax was 0.681 (95% confidence interval 0.570–0.793, p = 0.004). Compared with PD-L1–negative cases, SUV_max was significantly different in all PD-L1–positive cases (p = 0.001), weakly PD-L1–positive cases (1–49%, p = 0.005), and strongly PD-L1–positive cases (≥50%, p = 0.003). PD-L1 expression levels were significantly associated with SUV_max (p = 0.001), tumor size (p = 0.022), and EGFR mutation status (p = 0.045).

Conclusions

SUV_max in the primary lesions was able to predict PD-L1 expression and may play a role in predicting PD-L1 immunotherapy efficacy in patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma.

Clinicopathological features of pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinoma: A descriptive analysis

BACKGROUND

Mucinous adenocarcinoma is a rare subtype of lung cancer characterized by abnormal mucin production. We sought to investigate the clinical and pathological features of pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinomas and to identify prognostic factors.

METHODS

This was a single-institution retrospective review of patients with pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinoma diagnosed between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020. Descriptive analysis included demographics, diagnostic data, and treatment modalities. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included in the study. Median age was 65 years (range: 26-84), 30 (54%) were female, 48 (86%) had a smoking history, and 41 (73%) patients had ECOG performance status 0-1. Nearly half (26, 46%) were stage IV at presentation, while 11 (20%) presented as stage I, 10 (18%) stage II, and 9 (16%) stage III. Biomarker testing increased through the study period. Where performed, 4/48 (8%) cases were ALK positive, but there were no EGFR cases identified (0/36). Only 3/20 cases had PD-L1 expression >50%. Curative intent therapy was performed in 23 patients (17 had surgery +/- chemotherapy/radiation, 4 had radiotherapy alone, 2 had chemoradiation). Median OS in the entire population was 16.1 months (m). OS by stage was 50.0m for stage I, not reached for stage II, 20.7m for stage III, and 8.1m for stage IV.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall prognosis of pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinoma appears similar to that of non-mucinous adenocarcinomas, with distinct differences noted in the incidence of oncogenic driver mutations, particularly an absence of EGFR mutations.

PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Specimens: Association with Clinicopathological Factors and Molecular Alterations

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) targeting programmed cell death-1 or its ligand (PD-L1) have improved outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). High tumor PD-L1 expression, detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) typically on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) histological specimens, is linked to better response. Following our previous investigation on PD-L1 in cytological samples, the aim of this study was to further explore the potential impacts of various clinicopathological and molecular factors on PD-L1 expression. Two retrospective NSCLC cohorts of 1131 and 651 specimens, respectively, were investigated for PD-L1 expression (<1%/1−49%/≥50%), sample type, sample site, histological type, and oncogenic driver status. In both cohorts, PD-L1 was positive (≥1%) in 55% of the cases. Adenocarcinomas exhibited lower PD-L1 expression than squamous cell carcinomas (p < 0.0001), while there was no difference between sample types, tumor locations, or between the two cohorts in multivariate analysis (all p ≥ 0.28). Mutational status correlated significantly with PD-L1 expression (p < 0.0001), with the highest expression for KRAS-mutated cases, the lowest for EGFR-mutated, and the KRAS/EGFR wild-type cases in between. There was no difference in PD-L1 levels between different prevalent KRAS mutations (all p ≥ 0.44), while mucinous KRAS-mutated adenocarcinomas exhibited much lower PD-L1 expression than non-mucinous (p < 0.0001). Our data indicate that cytological and histological specimens are comparable for PD-L1 evaluation. Given the impact of KRAS mutations and the mucinous growth pattern on PD-L1 expression, these factors should be further investigated in studies on ICI response.

The prevalence of tumour markers in malignant pleural effusions associated with primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study

Background

Oncological treatment of primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma (AC) includes drugs targeting the pathways involving programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). The aim of the study was to report the prevalence of these tumour markers in pleural fluid with cytology positive for pulmonary AC and the potential influence of volume pleural fluid tested.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed all thoracenteses performed in a two-year period at our interventional unit at Department of Respiratory Medicine at Zealand University Hospital Naestved, Denmark. ALK and PD-L1 testing was done using immunohistochemistry and EGFR testing using next-generation sequencing. We included pleural fluid specimens containing malignant cells originating from primary pulmonary AC and with at least one tumour marker requested by the clinicians.

Results

When screening 927 pleural fluid specimens, we identified 57 in accordance with the inclusion criteria. PD-L1, ALK and EGFR were obtained in 35/55 (64%), 38/57 (67%) and 26/47 (55%), respectively. The prevalence did not increase when analysing volumes > 50 mL (p = 0.21–0.58)

Conclusion

Tumour markers in pleural fluid specimens containing cells from pulmonary AC can be demonstrated in more than half of the cases. Therefore, supplementary invasive procedures than thoracentesis could potentially await these analyses.

Programmed death-ligand 1 expression and its associations with clinicopathological features, prognosis, and driver oncogene alterations in surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker of response to immunotherapies targeting programmed death-1/PD-L1 in advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological features, prognosis, and driver oncogene alterations in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated PD-L1 expression in 1,005 surgically resected lung adenocarcinoma specimens, by immunohistochemistry using the 22C3 antibody. PD-L1 positivity was defined based on the proportion of stained tumor cells (TPS) on tissue microarrays: <1% (negative), 1-49% (weakly positive), and ≥ 50% (strongly positive). Correlations between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological features, prognosis, and driver oncogene (EGFR, KRAS, ALK, ROS1, and RET) alterations in lung adenocarcinoma were analyzed.

RESULTS

PD-L1 expression was negative in 726 (72%) of 1,005 tumors, weakly positive in 161 (16%), and strongly positive in 118 (12%). Male sex, smoking, elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, advanced pathological stages, high-grade tumors, predominantly solid tumors, tumors with lymphatic permeation or vascular or pleural invasion, tumors without EGFR mutations, and tumors with KRAS mutations were more common in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors (TPS ≥ 1%) than in those with PD-L1-negative tumors (TPS < 1%). PD-L1 positivity was not associated with ALK, ROS1, or RET fusion status. Although PD-L1 positivity was associated with poor overall survival and poor relapse-free survival in all patients, this was not statistically significant after adjusting for prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. In the subgroup analysis according to driver oncogene alterations, PD-L1 positivity was associated with poor relapse-free survival only in patients with EGFR-mutated tumors.

CONCLUSION

Surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas with increased PD-L1 expression were biologically aggressive tumors that frequently occurred in male smokers. PD-L1 expression and its prognostic significance differed according to driver oncogene alterations.

Prospective trial of immuno(chemo)therapy before resection, definitive chemoradiotherapy or palliative therapy in patients with locally advanced or oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer without a primary curative option

BACKGROUND

Recent phase II-III trials of immuno(chemo)therapy before resection in locally advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) report high rates of pathological response and promising survival. However, primarily, patients who did not undergo resection were excluded from these studies. Moreover, there are no data on chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after immuno(chemo)therapy in patients who are primarily not amenable to CRT. We hypothesised that induction immuno(chemo)therapy may enable patients with NSCLC with a potentially curative stage (III-IVA), for whom primary curative treatment (either resection or CRT) is not possible for anatomical or functional reasons, to receive curative treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 35 patients with NSCLC with aforementioned characteristics into a prospective real-world trial of induction immuno(chemo)therapy followed by morphologic and metabolic reassessment and multidisciplinary board-guided curative treatment (resection [preferred] or CRT) or palliative therapy. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients receiving curative treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (91%) received curative treatment (11 resections and 21 CRT). 73% and 64% of patients who underwent resection had a major or complete pathological response, respectively. There were 14 recurrences: 2 (18%) in patients who underwent resection, 9 (43%) in patients who received CRT and 3 (100%) in patients who received palliative therapy (median follow-up 17 months). Eight tumour-related deaths occurred: 5 (24%) in patients who received CRT; and 3 (100%) in patients who received palliative therapy. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

In locally advanced or oligometastatic NSCLC without a primary curative option, induction immuno(chemo)therapy results in a high rate of curative treatment with promising early survival data. patients who underwent resection achieved a high rate of prognostically favourable pathological response.

Combining PD-L1 Expression and Standardized Uptake Values in FDG-PET/CT Can Predict Prognosis in Patients With Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background

This study aimed to determine the relationship of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and standardized uptake values in fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) with prognosis in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 328 NSCLC patients who underwent lobectomy/segmentectomy with lymph node dissection. PD-L1 expression was detected by immunohistochemically stained using the murine monoclonal antibody clone 22C3. The preoperative maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) of FDG-PET/CT at the primary lesion; pathological factors including histological type, microscopic lymphatic, venous, and pleural invasion; and lymph node metastases in resected specimens was determined. Significant prognostic clinicopathologic factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

PD-L1 expression was higher in men, smokers, squamous cell carcinoma, advanced pathologic stages, positive venous invasion, positive pleural invasion, and high preoperative SUV_max (≥3). Postoperative survival analysis showed that both PD-L1 expression and preoperative SUV_max were significantly negative prognostic factors in univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) (P = 0.0123 and P < 0.0001) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.0012 and P < 0.0001). Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed that the OS and RFS were the best in patients with negative PD-L1 expression and SUV_max < 3, intermediate in patients with positive PD-L1 expression and SUV_max < 3 and those with negative PD-L1 expression and SUV_max ≥ 3, and poor in patients with positive PD-L1 expression and SUV_max ≥ 3.

Conclusion

Combining PD-L1 expression and preoperative FDG-PET/CT SUV_max in primary tumor might help in accurate prediction of postoperative prognosis in NSCLC patients.

Prognostic value of programmed death-ligand 1 status in Japanese patients with renal cell carcinoma

Background

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity is associated with poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Because the prognostic impact and effect of confounding factors are less known, we investigated the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression in Japanese patients with recurrent/metastatic RCC who started systemic therapy in 2010–2015.

Methods

This multicenter, retrospective study recruited patients from 29 Japanese study sites who had prior systemic therapy for RCC (November 2018 to April 2019) and stored formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary lesion samples. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) by PD-L1 expression. Secondary outcomes included OS in subgroups and duration of first- and second-line therapies by PD-L1 expression. OS distributions were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methodology.

Results

PD-L1 expression (on immune cells [IC] ≥ 1%) was observed in 315/770 (40.9%) patients. PD-L1 positivity was more prevalent in patients with poor risk per both Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center [MSKCC] and International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium, and high-risk pathological features (higher clinical stage, nuclear grade and sarcomatoid features). Median OS for PD-L1–positive patients was 30.9 months (95% CI 25.5–35.7) versus 37.5 months (95% CI 34.0–42.6) for PD-L1–negative patients (HR 1.04 [90% CI 0.89–1.22, p = 0.65]; stratified by MSKCC risk and liver metastases). Propensity score weight (PSW)-adjusted OS was similar between PD-L1–positive and –negative patients (median 34.4 versus 31.5 months; estimated PSW-adjusted HR 0.986).

Conclusions

This study suggests PD-L1 status was not an independent prognostic factor in recurrent/metastatic RCC during the study period because PD-L1 positivity was associated with poor prognostic factors, especially MSKCC risk status.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10147-021-01993-x.

Prognostic Impact of KRAS G12C Mutation in Patients With NSCLC: Results From the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape Project

INTRODUCTION

KRAS mutations, the most frequent gain-of-function alterations in NSCLC, are currently emerging as potential predictive therapeutic targets. The role of KRAS-G12C (Kr_G12C) is of special interest after the recent discovery and preclinical analyses of two different Kr_G12C covalent inhibitors (AMG-510, MRTX849).

METHODS

KRAS mutations were evaluated in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections by a microfluidic-based multiplex polymerase chain reaction platform as a component of the previously published European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape 003 Multiplex Mutation study, of clinically annotated, resected, stage I to III NSCLC. In this study, -Kr_G12C mutation prevalence and its association with clinicopathologic characteristics, molecular profiles, and postoperative patient outcome (overall survival, relapse-free survival, time-to-relapse) were explored.

RESULTS

KRAS gene was tested in 2055 Lungscape cases (adenocarcinomas: 1014 [49%]) with I or II or III stage respective distribution of 53% or 24% or 22% and median follow-up of 57 months. KRAS mutation prevalence in the adenocarcinoma cohort was 38.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 35.0% to 41.0%), with Kr_G12C mutation representing 17.0% (95% CI: 14.7% to 19.4%). In the "histologic-subtype" cohort, Kr_G12C prevalence was 10.5% (95% CI: 9.2% to 11.9%). When adjusting for clinicopathologic characteristics, a significant negative prognostic effect of Kr_G12C presence versus other KRAS mutations or nonexistence of KRAS mutation was identified in the adenocarcinoma cohort alone and in the "histologic-subtype" cohort. For overall survival in adenocarcinomas, hazard ratio (HR)_{G12C versus other KRAS} is equal to 1.39 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.89, p = 0.031) and HR_{G12C versus no KRAS} is equal to 1.32 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.69, p = 0.028) (both also significant in the "histologic-subtype" cohort). For time-to-relapse, HR_{G12C versus other KRAS} is equal to 1.41 (95% CI: 1.03 to 1.92, p = 0.030). In addition, among all patients, for relapse-free survival, HR_{G12C versus no KRAS} is equal to 1.27 (95% CI: 1.04 to 1.54, p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, clinically annotated stage I to III NSCLC cohort, the specific Kr_G12C mutation is significantly associated with poorer prognosis (adjusting for clinicopathologic characteristics) among adenocarcinomas and in unselected NSCLCs.

Detection of programmed cell death-ligand 1 using 22C3 antibody in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The expression of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a biomarker for administering immune check point inhibitors in patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer. Although the consolidation therapy of durvalumab after definitive chemoradiotherapy has become the new standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer, the prevalence and prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in this population remain unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer who received definitive chemoradiotherapy at our institution between 2012 and 2017. Levels of PD-L1 were assessed using 22C3 antibody, and associations of progression-free and overall survival rates with PD-L1 statuses at a tumor proportion score cutoff of 1% were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 104 patients enrolled, PD-L1 statuses were as follows: tumor proportion score < 1%, 73 (70.2%); 1-49%, 21 (20.2%); and ≥ 50%, 10 (9.6%). The number of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer with pretreatment PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 1% was less than the number with advanced stage disease. There was no association between patient characteristics and PD-L1 status, and no significant differences were observed in progression-free and overall survival rates relative to PD-L1 status.

CONCLUSION

Expression of PD-L1 in patients with stage III non-small cell cancer before chemoradiotherapy should be assessed because of the low prevalence of tumors with tumor proportion scores ≥ 1%. Further studies are needed to clarify whether durvalumab improves survival after definitive chemoradiotherapy, irrespective of tumor PD-L1 expression.

Incidental Detection of Lung Adenocarcinoma Presenting as an Anterior Mediastinal Mass on 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT in a Patient With Primary Prostate Cancer

F-fluciclovine is a PET radiotracer approved for detection of recurrent prostate cancer, with utility in other malignancies being investigated. We present the case of a 71-year-old man with high-risk primary prostate cancer (Gleason score 9, prostate-specific antigen 34 ng/mL) and newly diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma. As part of a clinical trial (NCT03081884), preoperative F-fluciclovine PET/CT showed localized abnormal uptake in the prostate gland with extracapsular extension. Additionally, an incidental anterior mediastinal mass measuring 2.2 × 1.8 cm demonstrated abnormal radiotracer uptake. Biopsy of the mediastinal mass confirmed invasive lung adenocarcinoma with solid and acinar patterns and high programmed death 1 ligand expression.

Prognostic value of PD-L1 expression in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

Background

Expression of PD-L1 is the most investigated predictor of benefit from immune checkpoint blockade in advanced NSCLC but little is known about the association of PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological parameters of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Methods

National registry data was searched for medical records of consecutive inoperable stage III NSCLC patients treated with ChT and RT from January 2012 to December 2017. Totally 249 patients were identified that met inclusion criteria and of those 117 patients had sufficient tissue for PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining.

Results

Eighty patients (68.4%) expressed PD-L1 of ≥ 1% and 29.9% of more than 50%. Median PFS was 15.9 months in PD-L1 negative patients and 16.1 months in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1% (p = 0.696). Median OS in PD-L1 negative patients was 29.9 months compared to 28.5 months in patients with PD-L1 expression ≥ % (p = 0.888). There was no difference in median OS in patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥ 50%) with 29.8 months compared to 29.9 months in those with low (1–49%) or no PD-L1 expression (p = 0.694). We found that patients who received a total dose of 60 Gy or more had significantly better median OS (32 months vs. 17.5 months, p < 0.001) as well as patients with PS 0 (33.2 vs. 20.3 months, p = 0.005).

Conclusions

In our patients PD-L1 expression had no prognostic value regarding PFS and OS. Patients with good performance status and those who received a total radiation dose of more than 60 Gy had significantly better mOS.

Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Expression in Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Recently, anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapies have yielded promising outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and led to great interest in applying these agents to treat resectable early-stage NSCLC. The objective of our study was to evaluate PD-L1 protein expression in resectable early-stage NSCLC specimens from a large Northern European cohort, examine the relationship to clinical characteristics, and demonstrate the prognostic role in resected NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A large cohort of 875 NSCLC tumors consisted of 337 patients from Sweden and 538 patients from Norway was studied. All the patients had undergone pulmonary resection, and most patients had had early-stage NSCLC. PD-L1 protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry using the Dako PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx kit. The tumor proportion score for PD-L1 protein expression was compared with comprehensive demographic and clinicopathologic data.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of PD-L1 protein expression in the resectable NSCLC cohort was 9.5% at a tumor proportion score cutoff of ≥ 50%. Stage I NSCLC had lower PD-L1 expression compared with that of the other stages (P = .0012). PD-L1 expression correlated with wild-type EGFR gene expression (P = .0156) and mutated KRAS gene expression (P = .0004). No significant association was found between PD-L1 expression and mortality after multivariable adjustment for clinical characteristics, although the survival curves showed PD-L1 expression significantly correlated with a poor prognosis in the total NSCLC cohort and in the adenocarcinoma subgroup.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression in the present large cohort of resectable NSCLC was relatively low compared with data from clinical trials of advanced NSCLC. PD-L1 expression correlated positively with tumor stage, wild-type EGFR, and KRAS mutation. PD-L1 expression was not found as an independent prognostic factor in the present study. These findings could be important in the future when evaluating the role of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in the setting of neoadjuvant or adjuvant trials for early-stage resectable NSCLC.

Study and analysis of antitumor resistance mechanism of PD1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blocker

Immunocheckpoint proteins of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes play an important role in tumor prognosis in the course of tumor clinicopathology. PD‐1 (Programmed cell death protein 1) is an important immunosuppressive molecule. By binding to PD‐L1 (programmed cell death‐ligand 1), it blocks TCR and its costimulus signal transduction, inhibits the activation and proliferation of T cells, depletes the function of effector T cells, and enables tumor cells to achieve immune escape. In recent years, immunocheckpoint blocking therapy targeting the PD‐1/PD‐L1 axis has achieved good results in a variety of malignant tumors, pushing tumor immunotherapy to a new milestone, such as anti‐PD‐1 monoclonal antibody Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, and anti‐PD‐L1 monoclonal antibody Atezolizumab, which are considered as potential antitumor drugs. It was found in clinical use that some patients obtained long‐term efficacy, but most of them developed drug resistance recurrence in the later stage. The high incidence of drug resistance (including primary and acquired drug resistance) still cannot be ignored, which limited its clinical application and became a new problem in this field. Due to tumor heterogeneity, current limited research shows that PD‐1 or PD‐L1 monoclonal antibody drug resistance may be related to the following factors: mutation of tumor antigen and antigen presentation process, multiple immune checkpoint interactions, immune microenvironment changes dynamically, activation of oncogenic pathways, gene mutation and epigenetic changes of key proteins in tumors, tumor competitive metabolism, and accumulation of metabolites, etc, mechanisms of resistance are complex. Therefore, it is the most urgent task to further elucidate the mechanism of immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance, discover multitumor universal biomarkers, and develop new target agents to improve the response rate of immunotherapy in patients. In this study, the mechanism of anti‐PD‐1/PD‐L1 drug resistance in tumors, the potential biomarkers for predicting PD‐1 acquired resistance, and the recent development of combination therapy were reviewed one by one. It is believed that, based on the complex mechanism of drug resistance, it is of no clinical significance to simply search for and regulate drug resistance targets, and it may even produce drug resistance again soon. It is speculated that according to the possible tumor characteristics, three types of treatment methods should be combined to change the tumor microenvironment ecology and eliminate various heterogeneous tumor subsets, so as to reduce tumor drug resistance and improve long‐term clinical efficacy.

Association between clinicopathological features and prognosis significance of PD-L1 expression in small cell lung cancer patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) has been identified as an established biomarker for predicting response to immunotherapy in a variety types of cancer. However, the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of this protein in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients remains controversial.

METHODS

Eligible studies extracted from the databases of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and CNKI databases were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 11.2 software.

RESULTS

A total of 483 PD-L1+ cases and 570 controls from 11 publications were extracted. Either overall analysis or subcategory analysis showed that no significant association between higher PD-L1 expression and gender (n=8, OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.73-1.61, P=0.704, I²=0.0%), tumor stage (n=5, OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.20-2.56, P=0.599, I²=86.5%), smoking status (n=4, OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.41-1.73, P=0.646, I²=0.0%), and the level of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (n=4, OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.48-1.20, P=0.241, I²= 21.6%). PD-L1 expression had no positive correlation with overall survival (OS) (n=11, HR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.61-1.56, P=0.904, I²= 83.2%) in overall analysis. However, the stratified analysis showed that increased expression of PD-L1 predicted a significantly better OS in monoclonal antibody (mAb) subgroup and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved antibody clone specification (22C3/28-8/SP142/SP263) subgroup without significant heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

PD-L1 is not an important predictor of most clinicopathological features of SCLC patients, but it can predict an improved survival when using mAb or FDA approved clone specifications in IHC assays.

Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for PD-L1 Testing in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on cancer cells is a clinically important biomarker to select patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for treatment with programmed death-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Clinical trials of immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC have required histologic evidence for PD-L1 testing; in clinical practice, cytologic samples commonly are acquired in patients with advanced disease.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study aims to investigate whether endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) samples are adequate for PD-L1 testing in NSCLC.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This study investigates the sampling adequacy of EBUS-TBNA for PD-L1 testing when compared with other methods. Furthermore, the relationship between clinicopathologic characteristics and PD-L1 expression in the study population have been examined. Five hundred seventy-seven NSCLC specimens were analyzed from consecutive patients with NSCLC across six centers in the United Kingdom and one center in the United States between January 2015 and December 2016.

RESULTS

In the EBUS-TBNA group (189 specimens), the overall percentage of patients with successful PD-L1 testing was 94.7%. There was no significant difference in sampling adequacy with other methods of tissue acquisition. Older patients had higher failure rates of PD-L1 testing (OR, 1.06; P = .008). In multivariate analysis, advanced N-stage (P = .048) and presence of brain metastasis (P < .001) were associated with high PD-L1 expression.

INTERPRETATION

This large multicenter study shows that EBUS-TBNA provides samples adequate for PD-L1 testing and that advanced N stage and the presence of brain metastasis are associated with high PD-L1 expression.

Programmed death-ligand 1 expression influenced by tissue sample size. Scoring based on tissue microarrays' and cross-validation with resections, in patients with, stage I-III, non-small cell lung carcinoma of the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape cohort

PD-L1, as assessed by immunohistochemistry, is a predictive biomarker for immuno-oncology treatment in lung cancer. Different scoring methods have been used to assess its status, resulting in a wide range of positivity rates. We use the European Thoracic Oncology Platform Lungscape non-small cell lung carcinoma cohort to explore this issue. PD-L1 expression was assessed via immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays (up to four cores per case), using the DAKO 28-8 immunohistochemistry assay, following a two-round external quality assessment procedure. All samples were analyzed under the same protocol. Cross-validation of scoring between tissue microarray and whole sections was performed in 10% randomly selected samples. Cutoff points considered: ≥1, 50 (primarily), and 25%. At the two external quality assessment rounds, tissue microarray scoring agreement rates between pathologists were: 73% and 81%. There were 2008 cases with valid immunohistochemistry tissue microarray results (50% all cores evaluable). Concordant cases at 1, 25, and 50% were: 85, 91, and 93%. Tissue microarray core results were identical for 70% of cases. Sensitivity of the tissue microarray method for 1, 25, and 50% was: 80, 78, and 79% (specificity: 90, 95, 98%). Complete agreement between tissue microarrays and whole sections was achieved for 60% of the cases. Highest sensitivity rates for 1% and 50% cutoffs were detected for higher number of cores. Underestimation of PD-L1 expression on small samples is more common than overestimation. We demonstrated that classification of PD-L1 on small biopsy samples does not represent the overall expression of PD-L1 in all non-small cell cancer carcinoma cases, although the majority of cases are 'correctly' classified. In future studies, sampling more and larger biopsies, recording the biopsy size and tumor load may permit further refinement, increasing predictive accuracy.

Clinical and molecular correlates of PD-L1 expression in patients with lung adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is the only FDA-approved biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, but sensitivity is modest. Understanding the impact of molecular phenotype, clinical characteristics, and tumor features on PD-L1 expression is largely unknown and may improve prediction of response to ICI.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated patients with lung adenocarcinoma for whom PD-L1 testing and targeted next-generation sequencing (using MSK-IMPACT) was performed on the same tissue sample. Clinical and molecular features were compared across PD-L1 subgroups to examine how molecular phenotype associated with tumor PD-L1 expression. In patients treated with anti-PD-(L)1 blockade, we assessed how these interactions impacted efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 1586 patients with lung adenocarcinoma had paired PD-L1 testing and targeted next-generation sequencing. PD-L1 negativity was more common in primary compared to metastatic samples (P < 0.001). The distribution of PD-L1 expression (lymph nodes enriched for PD-L1 high; bones predominantly PD-L1 negative) and predictiveness of PD-L1 expression on ICI response varied by organ. Mutations in KRAS, TP53, and MET significantly associated with PD-L1 high expression (each P < 0.001, Q < 0.001) and EGFR and STK11 mutations associated with PD-L1 negativity (P < 0.001, Q = 0.01; P = 0.001, Q < 0.001, respectively). WNT pathway alterations also associated with PD-L1 negativity (P = 0.005). EGFR and STK11 mutants abrogated the predictive value of PD-L1 expression on ICI response.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression and association with ICI response vary across tissue sample sites. Specific molecular features are associated with differential expression of PD-L1 and may impact the predictive capacity of PD-L1 for response to ICIs.

Association between PD-L1 expression and driver gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer patients: correlation with clinical data

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Recently, promising therapies have emerged based on PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors, which have been approved even as frontline treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We examined the association between PD-L1 expression and clinicopathological parameters as well as overall survival in 220 NSCLC patients. PD-L1 expression was estimated by immunohistochemistry using 22C3 PharmDx Dako assay and was defined as high, if TPS was ≥ 50%, low, if TPS was 1%-49%, and absent, if TPS was < 1%. EGFR mutations were detected by COBAS while KRAS and BRAF mutations by pyrosequencing. ROS1 and ALK rearrangements were estimated by immunohistochemistry with positive cases being confirmed by CISH and FISH, respectively. Data analysis was performed using SPSS v25.0. PD-L1 expression was positively correlated with KRAS mutations. Anti-PD-1 therapy (pembrolizumab) prolonged overall survival compared to any other treatment. This effect was more pronounced in KRAS-mutated cases compared to KRAS wild-type ones. Patients with positive PD-L1 expression - high or low - who had been treated with pembrolizumab, showed significant survival benefit compared to positive or negative PD-L1 expressors who did not receive immunotherapy. In multivariate analysis, PD-L1 status, stage and pembrolizumab treatment were independent variables for overall survival. PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 1%) by itself emerged as a poor prognostic factor, while treatment with pembrolizumab prolonged overall survival. KRAS mutations may affect tumour microenvironment and patient's response to immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors could represent an alternative therapeutic option particularly for KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients. Further investigation into this notion is warranted in order to validate this observation.

The prevalence of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in non-small cell lung cancer in an unselected, consecutive population

Little is known about prevalence of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells of unselected patients with all stages of non-small cell lung cancer. The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence of PD-L1 positivity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, to analyze the association between PD-L1 positivity and patients' clinicopathological characteristics, and to assess the use of immune-oncologic treatment in eligible patients. All non-small cell lung cancer patients diagnosed in a 10-month period in an unselected population of 1.7 million Caucasian inhabitants were evaluated with the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx kit. A total of 819 patients were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer. Samples analyzable for PD-L1 expression were obtained from 97% of patients. In a multivariate analysis with cut-off at tumor proportion score ≥50%, lower stage was associated with lower prevalence of PD-L1 positivity with an odds ratio of 0.31 for stage I vs. stage IV. A significant difference in PD-L1 expression between squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma was observed with odds ratio for adenocarcinoma 1.8. With cut-off tumor proportion score ≥1%, attenuated effects of the same direction were seen. For neither cut-off did type and location of material used for PD-L1 analysis, age, sex, smoking history, or performance status have statistically significant impact on the PD-L1 expression. Fifty four percent of the patients who were eligible for immune-oncologic treatment were actually treated in first-line with pembrolizumab monotherapy. In conclusion, 97% of the patients had material analyzable for PD-L1. If a patient in need of immuno-oncologic treatment has shifted stage, a negative or low positive PD-L1 test performed on a biopsy taken in a lower stage might not mirror the PD-L1 expression in the new metastatic lesion. Therefore, a re-biopsy should be considered.

PD-L1 Testing for Lung Cancer in 2019: Perspective From the IASLC Pathology Committee

The recent development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to promising advances in the treatment of patients with NSCLC and SCLC with advanced or metastatic disease. Most ICIs target programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis with the aim of restoring antitumor immunity. Multiple clinical trials for ICIs have evaluated a predictive value of PD-L1 protein expression in tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (ICs) by immunohistochemistry (IHC), for which different assays with specific IHC platforms were applied. Of those, some PD-L1 IHC assays have been validated for the prescription of the corresponding agent for first- or second-line treatment. However, not all laboratories are equipped with the dedicated platforms, and many laboratories have set up in-house or laboratory-developed tests that are more affordable than the generally expensive clinical trial-validated assays. Although PD-L1 IHC test is now deployed in most pathology laboratories, its appropriate implementation and interpretation are critical as a predictive biomarker and can be challenging owing to the multiple antibody clones and platforms or assays available and given the typically small size of samples provided. Because many articles have been published since the issue of the IASLC Atlas of PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Testing in Lung Cancer, this review by the IASLC Pathology Committee provides updates on the indications of ICIs for lung cancer in 2019 and discusses important considerations on preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical aspects of PD-L1 IHC testing, including specimen type, validation of assays, external quality assurance, and training.

External quality assessment demonstrates that PD-L1 22C3 and SP263 assays are systematically different

PD‐L1 inhibitors are part of first line treatment options for patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. PD‐L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays act as either a companion or a complementary diagnostic. The purpose of this study is to describe the experience of external quality assurance (EQA) provider UK NEQAS ICC and ISH with the comparison of different PD‐L1 assays used in daily practice. Three EQA rounds (pilot, run A and run B) were carried out using formalin fixed paraffin embedded samples with sample sets covering a range of epitope concentrations, including ‘critical samples’ near to clinical threshold cut‐offs. An expert panel (n = 4) evaluated all returned slides simultaneously and independently on a multi‐header microscope together with the participants own in‐house control material. The tonsil sample was evaluated as ‘acceptable’ or ‘unacceptable’, and for the other samples the percentage of PD‐L1 stained tumour cells were estimated in predetermined categories (<1%, 1 to <5%, 5 to <10%, 10 to <25%, 25 to <50%, 50 to <80%, 80 to 100%). In the pilot and the two subsequent runs the number of participating laboratories was 43, 69 and 76, respectively. The pass rate for the pilot run was 67%; this increased to 81% at run A and 82% at run B. For two ‘critical samples’, in runs A and B, 22C3 IHC had significantly higher PD‐L1 expression than SP263 IHC (p < 0.001), whilst the PD‐L1 scores for the other six samples were similar for all assays. In run A the laboratory developed tests (LDTs) using 22C3 scored lower than the commercial 22C3 tests (p = 0.01). After the initial testing, improvement in performance of PD‐L1 IHC is shown for approved and LDT PD‐L1 assays. Equivalency of approved PD‐L1 22C3 and SP263 assays cannot be assumed as the scores cross the clinically relevant thresholds of 1% and 50% PD‐L1 expression.

PTEN Alterations as a Potential Mechanism for Tumor Cell Escape from PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibition

The recent approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors drastically changed the standard treatments in many advanced cancer patients, but molecular changes within the tumor can prevent the activity of immunotherapy drugs. Thus, the introduction of the inhibitors of the immune checkpoint programmed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1), should prompt deeper studies on resistance mechanisms, which can be caused by oncogenic mutations detected in cancer cells. PTEN, a tumor suppressor gene, dephosphorylates the lipid signaling intermediate PIP₃ with inhibition of AKT activity, one of the main effectors of the PI3K signaling axis. As a consequence of genetic or epigenetic aberrations, PTEN expression is often altered, with increased activation of PI3K axis. Interestingly, some data confirmed that loss of PTEN expression modified the pattern of cytokine secretion creating an immune-suppressive microenvironment with increase of immune cell populations that can promote tumor progression. Moreover, PTEN loss may be ascribed to reduction of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), which can explain the absence of activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review describes the role of PTEN loss as a mechanism responsible for resistance to anti PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. Moreover, combinatorial strategies between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and PI3K/AKT targeting drugs are proposed as a new strategy to overcome resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition.