HPF1/C4orf27 Is a PARP-1-Interacting Protein that Regulates PARP-1 ADP-Ribosylation Activity

PARP1 interacts with WDR5 to enhance target gene recognition and facilitate tumorigenesis

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) is a nuclear protein that attaches negatively charged poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) to itself and other target proteins. While its function in DNA damage repair is well established, its role in target chromatin recognition and regulation of gene expression remains to be better understood. This study showed that PARP1 interacts with SET1/MLL complexes by binding directly to WDR5. Notably, although PARP1 does not modulate WDR5 PARylation or the global level of H3K4 methylation, it exerts locus-specific effects on WDR5 binding and H3K4 methylation. Interestingly, PARP1 and WDR5 show extensive co-localization on chromatin, with WDR5 facilitating the recognition and expression of target genes regulated by PARP1. Furthermore, we demonstrated that inhibition of the WDR5 Win site impedes the interaction between PARP1 and WDR5, thereby inhibiting PARP1 from binding to target genes. Finally, the combined inhibition of the WDR5 Win site and PARP shows a profound inhibitory effect on the proliferation of cancer cells. These findings illuminate intricate mechanisms underlying chromatin recognition, gene transcription, and tumorigenesis, shedding light on previously unrecognized roles of PARP1 and WDR5 in these processes.

Specific and shared biological functions of PARP2 - is PARP2 really a lil' brother of PARP1?

PARP2, that belongs to the family of ADP-ribosyl transferase enzymes (ART), is a discovery of the millennium, as it was identified in 1999. Although PARP2 was described initially as a DNA repair factor, it is now evident that PARP2 partakes in the regulation or execution of multiple biological processes as inflammation, carcinogenesis and cancer progression, metabolism or oxidative stress-related diseases. Hereby, we review the involvement of PARP2 in these processes with the aim of understanding which processes are specific for PARP2, but not for other members of the ART family. A better understanding of the specific functions of PARP2 in all of these biological processes is crucial for the development of new PARP-centred selective therapies.

The Ser/Thr protein kinase FonKin4-poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase FonPARP1 phosphorylation cascade is required for the pathogenicity of watermelon fusarium wilt fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation), catalyzed by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) and hydrolyzed by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG), is a kind of post-translational protein modification that is involved in various cellular processes in fungi, plants, and mammals. However, the function of PARPs in plant pathogenic fungi remains unknown. The present study investigated the roles and mechanisms of FonPARP1 in watermelon Fusarium wilt fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. niveum (Fon). Fon has a single PARP FonPARP1 and one PARG FonPARG1. FonPARP1 is an active PARP and contributes to Fon pathogenicity through regulating its invasive growth within watermelon plants, while FonPARG1 is not required for Fon pathogenicity. A serine/threonine protein kinase, FonKin4, was identified as a FonPARP1-interacting partner by LC-MS/MS. FonKin4 is required for vegetative growth, conidiation, macroconidia morphology, abiotic stress response and pathogenicity of Fon. The S_TKc domain is sufficient for both enzyme activity and pathogenicity function of FonKin4 in Fon. FonKin4 phosphorylates FonPARP1 in vitro to enhance its poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activity; however, FonPARP1 does not PARylate FonKin4. These results establish the FonKin4-FonPARP1 phosphorylation cascade that positively contributes to Fon pathogenicity. The present study highlights the importance of PARP-catalyzed protein PARylation in regulating the pathogenicity of Fon and other plant pathogenic fungi.

DePARylation is critical for S phase progression and cell survival

Poly(ADP-ribose)ylation or PARylation by PAR polymerase 1 (PARP1) and dePARylation by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) are equally important for the dynamic regulation of DNA damage response. PARG, the most active dePARylation enzyme, is recruited to sites of DNA damage via pADPr-dependent and PCNA-dependent mechanisms. Targeting dePARylation is considered an alternative strategy to overcome PARP inhibitor resistance. However, precisely how dePARylation functions in normal unperturbed cells remains elusive. To address this challenge, we conducted multiple CRISPR screens and revealed that dePARylation of S phase pADPr by PARG is essential for cell viability. Loss of dePARylation activity initially induced S-phase-specific pADPr signaling, which resulted from unligated Okazaki fragments and eventually led to uncontrolled pADPr accumulation and PARP1/2-dependent cytotoxicity. Moreover, we demonstrated that proteins involved in Okazaki fragment ligation and/or base excision repair regulate pADPr signaling and cell death induced by PARG inhibition. In addition, we determined that PARG expression is critical for cellular sensitivity to PARG inhibition. Additionally, we revealed that PARG is essential for cell survival by suppressing pADPr. Collectively, our data not only identify an essential role for PARG in normal proliferating cells but also provide a potential biomarker for the further development of PARG inhibitors in cancer therapy.

Parthanatos: Mechanisms, modulation, and therapeutic prospects in neurodegenerative disease and stroke

Parthanatos is a cell death signaling pathway that has emerged as a compelling target for pharmaceutical intervention. It plays a pivotal role in the neuron loss and neuroinflammation that occurs in Parkinson's Disease (PD), Alzheimer's Disease (AD), Huntington's Disease (HD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), and stroke. There are currently no treatments available to humans to prevent cell death in any of these diseases. This review provides an in-depth examination of the current understanding of the Parthanatos mechanism, with a particular focus on its implications in neuroinflammation and various diseases discussed herein. Furthermore, we thoroughly review potential intervention targets within the Parthanatos pathway. We dissect recent progress in inhibitory strategies, complimented by a detailed structural analysis of key Parthanatos executioners, PARP-1, AIF, and MIF, along with an assessment of their established inhibitors. We hope to introduce a new perspective on the feasibility of targeting components within the Parthanatos pathway, emphasizing its potential to bring about transformative outcomes in therapeutic interventions. By delineating therapeutic opportunities and known targets, we seek to emphasize the imperative of blocking Parthanatos as a precursor to developing disease-modifying treatments. This comprehensive exploration aims to catalyze a paradigm shift in our understanding of potential neurodegenerative disease therapeutics, advocating for the pursuit of effective interventions centered around Parthanatos inhibition.

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of TIMELESS limits DNA replication stress and promotes stalled fork protection

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation), catalyzed mainly by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)1, is a key posttranslational modification involved in DNA replication and repair. Here, we report that TIMELESS (TIM), an essential scaffold of the replisome, is PARylated, which is linked to its proteolysis. TIM PARylation requires recognition of auto-modified PARP1 via two poly(ADP-ribose)-binding motifs, which primes TIM for proteasome-dependent degradation. Cells expressing the PARylation-refractory TIM mutant or under PARP inhibition accumulate TIM at DNA replication forks, causing replication stress and hyper-resection of stalled forks. Mechanistically, aberrant engagement of TIM with the replicative helicase impedes RAD51 loading and protection of reversed forks. Accordingly, defective TIM degradation hypersensitizes BRCA2-deficient cells to replication damage. Our study defines TIM as a substrate of PARP1 and elucidates how the control of replisome remodeling by PARylation is linked to stalled fork protection. Therefore, we propose a mechanism of PARP inhibition that impinges on the DNA replication fork instability caused by defective TIM turnover.

APLF facilitates interstrand DNA crosslink repair and replication fork protection to confer cisplatin resistance

Replication stress converts the stalled forks into reversed forks, which is an important protection mechanism to prevent fork degradation and collapse into poisonous DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Paradoxically, the mechanism also acts in cancer cells to contribute to chemoresistance against various DNA-damaging agents. PARP1 binds to and is activated by stalled forks to facilitate fork reversal. Aprataxin and polynucleotide kinase/phosphatase-like factor (APLF) binds to PARP1 through the poly(ADP-ribose) zinc finger (PBZ) domain and is known to be involved in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). Here, we identify a novel function of APLF involved in interstrand DNA crosslink (ICL) repair and fork protection. We demonstrate that PARP1 activity facilitates the APLF recruitment to stalled forks, enabling the FANCD2 recruitment to stalled forks. The depletion of APLF sensitizes cells to cisplatin, impairs ICL repair, reduces the FANCD2 recruitment to stalled forks, and results in nascent DNA degradation by MRE11 nucleases. Additionally, cisplatin-resistant cancer cells show high levels of APLF and homologous recombination-related gene expression. The depletion of APLF sensitizes cells to cisplatin and results in fork instability. Our results reveal the novel function of APLF to facilitate ICL repair and fork protection, thereby contributing to cisplatin-resistant phenotypes of cancer cells.

DePARylation is critical for S phase progression and cell survival

Poly(ADP-ribose)ylation or PARylation by PAR polymerase 1 (PARP1) and dePARylation by poly(ADP-ribose) glycohydrolase (PARG) are equally important for the dynamic regulation of DNA damage response. PARG, the most active dePARylation enzyme, is recruited to sites of DNA damage via pADPr-dependent and PCNA-dependent mechanisms. Targeting dePARylation is considered an alternative strategy to overcome PARP inhibitor resistance. However, precisely how dePARylation functions in normal unperturbed cells remains elusive. To address this challenge, we conducted multiple CRISPR screens and revealed that dePARylation of S phase pADPr by PARG is essential for cell viability. Loss of dePARylation activity initially induced S phase-specific pADPr signaling, which resulted from unligated Okazaki fragments and eventually led to uncontrolled pADPr accumulation and PARP1/2-dependent cytotoxicity. Moreover, we demonstrated that proteins involved in Okazaki fragment ligation and/or base excision repair regulate pADPr signaling and cell death induced by PARG inhibition. In addition, we determined that PARG expression is critical for cellular sensitivity to PARG inhibition. Additionally, we revealed that PARG is essential for cell survival by suppressing pADPr. Collectively, our data not only identify an essential role for PARG in normal proliferating cells but also provide a potential biomarker for the further development of PARG inhibitors in cancer therapy.

Asymmetric nucleosome PARylation at DNA breaks mediates directional nucleosome sliding by ALC1

The chromatin remodeler ALC1 is activated by DNA damage-induced poly(ADP-ribose) deposited by PARP1/PARP2 and their co-factor HPF1. ALC1 has emerged as a cancer drug target, but how it is recruited to ADP-ribosylated nucleosomes to affect their positioning near DNA breaks is unknown. Here we find that PARP1/HPF1 preferentially initiates ADP-ribosylation on the histone H2B tail closest to the DNA break. To dissect the consequences of such asymmetry, we generate nucleosomes with a defined ADP-ribosylated H2B tail on one side only. The cryo-electron microscopy structure of ALC1 bound to such an asymmetric nucleosome indicates preferential engagement on one side. Using single-molecule FRET, we demonstrate that this asymmetric recruitment gives rise to directed sliding away from the DNA linker closest to the ADP-ribosylation site. Our data suggest a mechanism by which ALC1 slides nucleosomes away from a DNA break to render it more accessible to repair factors.

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation enhances nucleosome dynamics and organizes DNA damage repair components within biomolecular condensates

Nucleosomes, the basic structural units of chromatin, hinder recruitment and activity of various DNA repair proteins, necessitating modifications that enhance DNA accessibility. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) of proteins near damage sites is an essential initiation step in several DNA-repair pathways; however, its effects on nucleosome structural dynamics and organization are unclear. Using NMR, cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM), and biochemical assays, we show that PARylation enhances motions of the histone H3 tail and DNA, leaving the configuration of the core intact while also stimulating nuclease digestion and ligation of nicked nucleosomal DNA by LIG3. PARylation disrupted interactions between nucleosomes, preventing self-association. Addition of LIG3 and XRCC1 to PARylated nucleosomes generated condensates that selectively partition DNA repair-associated proteins in a PAR- and phosphorylation-dependent manner in vitro. Our results establish that PARylation influences nucleosomes across different length scales, extending from the atom-level motions of histone tails to the mesoscale formation of condensates with selective compositions.

PARP1 roles in DNA repair and DNA replication: The basi(c)s of PARP inhibitor efficacy and resistance

Genome integrity is under constant insult from endogenous and exogenous sources. In order to cope, eukaryotic cells have evolved an elaborate network of DNA repair that can deal with diverse lesion types and exhibits considerable functional redundancy. PARP1 is a major sensor of DNA breaks with established and putative roles in a number of pathways within the DNA repair network, including repair of single- and double-strand breaks as well as protection of the DNA replication fork. Importantly, PARP1 is the major target of small-molecule PARP inhibitors (PARPi), which are employed in the treatment of homologous recombination (HR)-deficient tumors, as the latter are particularly susceptible to the accumulation of DNA damage due to an inability to efficiently repair highly toxic double-strand DNA breaks. The clinical success of PARPi has fostered extensive research into PARP biology, which has shed light on the involvement of PARP1 in various genomic transactions. A major goal within the field has been to understand the relationship between catalytic inhibition and PARP1 trapping. The specific consequences of inhibition and trapping on genomic stability as a basis for the cytotoxicity of PARP inhibitors remain a matter of debate. Finally, PARP inhibition is increasingly recognized for its capacity to elicit/modulate anti-tumor immunity. The clinical potential of PARP inhibition is, however, hindered by the development of resistance. Hence, extensive efforts are invested in identifying factors that promote resistance or sensitize cells to PARPi. The current review provides a summary of advances in our understanding of PARP1 biology, the mechanistic nature, and molecular consequences of PARP inhibition, as well as the mechanisms that give rise to PARPi resistance.

DELTEX E3 ligases ubiquitylate ADP-ribosyl modification on nucleic acids

Although ubiquitylation had traditionally been considered limited to proteins, the discovery of non-proteinaceous substrates (e.g. lipopolysaccharides and adenosine diphosphate ribose (ADPr)) challenged this perspective. Our recent study showed that DTX2 E3 ligase efficiently ubiquitylates ADPr. Here, we show that the ADPr ubiquitylation activity is also present in another DELTEX family member, DTX3L, analysed both as an isolated catalytic fragment and the full-length PARP9:DTX3L complex, suggesting that it is a general feature of the DELTEX family. Since structural predictions show that DTX3L possesses single-stranded nucleic acids binding ability and given the fact that nucleic acids have recently emerged as substrates for ADP-ribosylation, we asked whether DELTEX E3s might catalyse ubiquitylation of an ADPr moiety linked to nucleic acids. Indeed, we show that DTX3L and DTX2 are capable of ubiquitylating ADP-ribosylated DNA and RNA synthesized by PARPs, including PARP14. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the Ub-ADPr-nucleic acids conjugate can be reversed by two groups of hydrolases, which remove either the whole adduct (e.g. SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 or PARP14 macrodomain 1) or just the Ub (e.g. SARS-CoV-2 PLpro). Overall, this study reveals ADPr ubiquitylation as a general function of the DELTEX family E3s and presents the evidence of reversible ubiquitylation of ADP-ribosylated nucleic acids.

ANP32B promotes colorectal cancer cell progression and reduces cell sensitivity to PRAP1 inhibitor through up-regulating HPF1

ANP32B, a member of the acidic leucine-rich nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family member B, is aberrantly expressed in various cancers, including colorectal cancer. However, the function and mechanism of action of ANP32B in colorectal cancer remain unclear. The present study therefore analyzed the expression of ANP32B and its activity in colorectal cancer patient samples and colorectal cancer cell lines. ANP32B expression was found to be significantly upregulated in colorectal cancer patient samples and cell lines. Upregulation of ANP32B enhanced colorectal cancer cell proliferation and migration, whereas downregulation of ANP32B suppressed colorectal cancer cell proliferation. RNA sequencing analysis of differentially expressed genes in ANP32B silenced colorectal cancer cells showed that histone PARylation factor 1 (HPF1), which protects against DNA damage by interacting with the anti-tumor target PARP1, was significantly downregulated. Luciferase promoter assays testing the regulatory association between ANP32B and HPF1 showed that ANP32B interacted with the HPF1 promoter. Analysis of colorectal cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas showed that ANP32B and HPF1 expression were positively correlated, and recovery assays showed that ANP32B promoted colorectal cancer progression by up-regulating HPF1. Overexpression of ANP32B also reduced the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to PARP1 inhibitor, consistent with the oncogenic role of ANP32B. ANP32B may alter the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to PARP1 inhibitor via a mechanism associated with the HPF1 gene. In summary, these findings showed that ANP32B acted as a tumor promoter, potentiating both colorectal cancer malignancy and drug resistance. Targeting the ANP32B/HPF1 axis may have benefit for patients with colorectal cancer.

Covalent PARylation of DNA base excision repair proteins regulates DNA demethylation

The intracellular ATP-ribosyltransferases PARP1 and PARP2, contribute to DNA base excision repair (BER) and DNA demethylation and have been implicated in epigenetic programming in early mammalian development. Recently, proteomic analyses identified BER proteins to be covalently poly-ADP-ribosylated by PARPs. The role of this posttranslational modification in the BER process is unknown. Here, we show that PARP1 senses AP-sites and SSBs generated during TET-TDG mediated active DNA demethylation and covalently attaches PAR to each BER protein engaged. Covalent PARylation dissociates BER proteins from DNA, which accelerates the completion of the repair process. Consistently, inhibition of PARylation in mESC resulted both in reduced locus-specific TET-TDG-targeted DNA demethylation, and in reduced general repair of random DNA damage. Our findings establish a critical function of covalent protein PARylation in coordinating molecular processes associated with dynamic DNA methylation.

HPF1 regulates tendon stem/progenitor cell senescence and tendon repair via PARP1-mediated poly-ADP ribosylation of HuR

BACKGROUND

Tendon stem/progenitor cells (TSPCs) play a vital role in tendon repair, regeneration and homeostasis. However, the specific mechanism of TSPCs aging is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the role and molecular mechanism of HPF1 in the aging of TSPCs.

METHODS

Young and aged TSPCs (Y-TSPCs and A-TSPCs) were acquired from 3 to 4 and 24-26-month-old Sprague-Dawley male rats, TSPCs (Y-TSPCs and A-TSPCs) were subjected to senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal))staining and telomerase activity detection, p16, p21, Scx, Tnmd, Col1, Col3HPF1 and PAPR1 expression levels were detected by Western blot or Reverse Transcription-quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR), Reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) was used to explore the interaction between HPF1 and PARP1. Ribonucleoprotein immunoprecipitation (RNP-IP) was used to analyze the binding of HuR to the senescence marker gene mRNAs, IP was used to perform HPF1 to the PARylation of HuR, and the half-life of p16 and p21 were detected. Finally, we established an in vivo model, and the tendon tissue was used to perform hematoxylin and eosin (HE) and masson's trichrome staining, as well as the immunohistochemical analysis of Col I and TNMD.

RESULTS

Compared with Y-TSPCs, A-TSPCs had significantly enhanced cell senescence and significantly reduced tendon differentiation ability, and significantly increased the expression of HPF1 and PARP1. In addition, HPF1 and PARP1 interacted and coordinated the senescence and differentiation of TSPCs, HPF1 could also regulate the expression of p21 and p21, the interaction of p16 or p21 with HuR, and the poly-ADP ribosylation of PARP1 to HuR. HPF1 overexpression and siHuR co-transfection significantly reduced the half-life of p16 and p21, and HPF1 and PARP1 regulated the mRNA levels of p16 and p21 through HuR. Finally, in vivo experiments have shown that HPF1 or PARP1 overexpression could both inhibit the ability of tendon differentiation and promote cell senescence.

CONCLUSIONS

HPF1 promoted the senescence of TSPCs and inhibits the tendon differentiation of TSPCs through PARP1-mediated poly-ADP ribosylation of HuR.

Germline HPF1 retrogene insertion in RB1 gene involved in cancer predisposition

About half of the human genome is composed of repeated sequences derived from mobile elements, mainly retrotransposons, generally without pathogenic effect. Familial forms of retinoblastoma are caused by germline pathogenic variants in RB1 gene. Here, we describe a family with retinoblastoma affecting a father and his son. No pathogenic variant was identified after DNA analysis of RB1 gene coding sequence and exon-intron junctions. However, RB1 mRNA analysis showed a chimeric transcript with insertion of 114 nucleotides from HPF1 gene inside RB1 gene. This chimeric transcript led to an insertion of 38 amino acids in functional domain of retinoblastoma protein. Subsequent DNA analysis in RB1 intron 17 revealed the presence of a full-length HPF1 retrogene insertion in opposite orientation. Functional assay shows that this insertion has a deleterious impact on retinoblastoma protein function. This is the first report of a full-length retrogene insertion involved in human Mendelian disease leading to a chimeric transcript and a non-functional chimeric protein. Some retrogene insertions may be missed by standard diagnostic genetic testing, so contribution of retrogene insertions to human disease may be underestimated. The increasing use of whole genome sequencing in diagnostic settings will help to get a more comprehensive view of retrogenes.

Polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase inhibitors: advances, implications, and challenges in tumor radiotherapy sensitization

Polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) is a key modifying enzyme in cells, which participates in single-strand break repair and indirectly affects double-strand break repair. PARP inhibitors have shown great potential in oncotherapy by exploiting DNA damage repair pathways, and several small molecule PARP inhibitors have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treating various tumor types. PARP inhibitors not only have significant antitumor effects but also have some synergistic effects when combined with radiotherapy; therefore they have potential as radiation sensitizers. Here, we reviewed the advances and implications of PARP inhibitors in tumor radiotherapy sensitization. First, we summarized the multiple functions of PARP and the mechanisms by which its inhibitors exert antitumor effects. Next, we discuss the immunomodulatory effects of PARP and its inhibitors in tumors. Then, we described the theoretical basis of using PARP inhibitors in combination with radiotherapy and outlined their importance in oncological radiotherapy. Finally, we reviewed the current challenges in this field and elaborated on the future applications of PARP inhibitors as radiation sensitizers. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanism, optimal dosing, long-term safety, and identification of responsive biomarkers remain key challenges to integrating PARP inhibition into the radiotherapy management of cancer patients. Therefore, extensive research in these areas would facilitate the development of precision radiotherapy using PARP inhibitors to improve patient outcomes.

HTS discovery of PARP1-HPF1 complex inhibitors in cancer

PARP1/2 inhibitors (PARPi) are effective clinically used drugs for the treatment of cancers with BRCA deficiencies. PARPi have had limited success and applicability beyond BRCA deficient cancers, and their effect is diminished by resistance mechanisms. The recent discovery of Histone PARylation Factor (HPF1) and the role it plays in the PARylation reaction by forming a shared active site with PARP1 raises the possibility that novel inhibitors that target the PARP1-HPF1 complex can be identified. Herein we describe a simple and cost-effective high-throughput screening (HTS) method aimed at discovering inhibitors of the PARP1-HPF1 complex. Upon HTS validation, we first applied this method to screen a small PARP-focused library of compounds and then scale up our approach using robotic automation to conduct a pilot screen of 10,000 compounds and validating >100 hits. This work demonstrates for the first time the capacity to discover potent inhibitors of the PARP1-HPF1 complex, which may have utility as probes to better understand the DNA damage response and as therapeutics for cancer.

ADP-ribose contributions to genome stability and PARP enzyme trapping on sites of DNA damage; paradigm shifts for a coming-of-age modification

ADP-ribose is a versatile modification that plays a critical role in diverse cellular processes. The addition of this modification is catalyzed by ADP-ribosyltransferases, among which notable poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzymes are intimately involved in the maintenance of genome integrity. The role of ADP-ribose modifications during DNA damage repair is of significant interest for the proper development of PARP inhibitors targeted toward the treatment of diseases caused by genomic instability. More specifically, inhibitors promoting PARP persistence on DNA lesions, termed PARP "trapping," is considered a desirable characteristic. In this review, we discuss key classes of proteins involved in ADP-ribose signaling (writers, readers, and erasers) with a focus on those involved in the maintenance of genome integrity. An overview of factors that modulate PARP1 and PARP2 persistence at sites of DNA lesions is also discussed. Finally, we clarify aspects of the PARP trapping model in light of recent studies that characterize the kinetics of PARP1 and PARP2 recruitment at sites of lesions. These findings suggest that PARP trapping could be considered as the continuous recruitment of PARP molecules to sites of lesions, rather than the physical stalling of molecules. Recent studies and novel research tools have elevated the level of understanding of ADP-ribosylation, marking a coming-of-age for this interesting modification.

PAR recognition by PARP1 regulates DNA-dependent activities and independently stimulates catalytic activity of PARP1

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation is predominantly catalyzed by Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) in response to DNA damage, mediating the DNA repair process to maintain genomic integrity. Single-strand (SSB) and double-strand (DSB) DNA breaks are bona fide stimulators of PARP1 activity. However, PAR-mediated PARP1 regulation remains unexplored. Here, we report ZnF3, BRCT, and WGR, hitherto uncharacterized, as PAR reader domains of PARP1. Surprisingly, these domains recognize PARylated protein with a higher affinity compared with PAR but bind with weak or no affinity to DNA breaks as standalone domains. Conversely, ZnF1 and ZnF2 of PARP1 recognize DNA breaks but bind weakly to PAR. In addition, PAR reader domains, together, exhibit a synergy to recognize PAR or PARylated protein. Further competition-binding studies suggest that PAR binding releases DNA from PARP1, and the WGR domain facilitates DNA release. Unexpectedly, PAR showed catalytic stimulation of PARP1 but hampered the DNA-dependent stimulation. Altogether, our work discovers dedicated high-affinity PAR reader domains of PARP1 and uncovers a novel mechanism of allosteric regulation of DNA-dependent and DNA-independent activities of PARP1 by its catalytic product PAR.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 and neurodegenerative diseases: Past, present, and future

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) is a first responder that recognizes DNA damage and facilitates its repair. Neurodegenerative diseases, characterized by progressive neuron loss driven by various risk factors, including DNA damage, have increasingly shed light on the pivotal involvement of PARP1. During the early phases of neurodegenerative diseases, PARP1 experiences controlled activation to swiftly address mild DNA damage, thereby contributing to maintain brain homeostasis. However, in late stages, exacerbated PARP1 activation precipitated by severe DNA damage exacerbates the disease condition. Consequently, inhibition of PARP1 overactivation emerges as a promising therapeutic approach for neurodegenerative diseases. In this review, we comprehensively synthesize and explore the multifaceted role of PARP1 in neurodegenerative diseases, with a particular emphasis on its over-activation in the aggregation of misfolded proteins, dysfunction of the autophagy-lysosome pathway, mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, and blood-brain barrier (BBB) injury. Additionally, we encapsulate the therapeutic applications and limitations intrinsic of PARP1 inhibitors, mainly including limited specificity, intricate pathway dynamics, constrained clinical translation, and the heterogeneity of patient cohorts. We also explore and discuss the potential synergistic implementation of these inhibitors alongside other agents targeting DNA damage cascades within neurodegenerative diseases. Simultaneously, we propose several recommendations for the utilization of PARP1 inhibitors within the realm of neurodegenerative disorders, encompassing factors like the disease-specific roles of PARP1, combinatorial therapeutic strategies, and personalized medical interventions. Lastly, the encompassing review presents a forward-looking perspective along with strategic recommendations that could guide future research endeavors in this field.

ADP-ribosylation from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic implications

ADP-ribosylation is a ubiquitous modification of biomolecules, including proteins and nucleic acids, that regulates various cellular functions in all kingdoms of life. The recent emergence of new technologies to study ADP-ribosylation has reshaped our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern the establishment, removal, and recognition of this modification, as well as its impact on cellular and organismal function. These advances have also revealed the intricate involvement of ADP-ribosylation in human physiology and pathology and the enormous potential that their manipulation holds for therapy. In this review, we present the state-of-the-art findings covering the work in structural biology, biochemistry, cell biology, and clinical aspects of ADP-ribosylation.

Allosteric crosstalk in modular proteins: Function fine-tuning and drug design

Modular proteins are regulatory proteins that carry out more than one function. These proteins upregulate or downregulate a biochemical cascade to establish homeostasis in cells. To switch the function or alter the efficiency (based on cellular needs), these proteins require different facilitators that bind to a site different from the catalytic (active/orthosteric) site, aka 'allosteric site', and fine-tune their function. These facilitators (or effectors) are allosteric modulators. In this Review, we have discussed the allostery, characterized them based on their mechanisms, and discussed how allostery plays an important role in the activity modulation and function fine-tuning of proteins. Recently there is an emergence in the discovery of allosteric drugs. We have also emphasized the role, significance, and future of allostery in therapeutic applications.

The interplay of TARG1 and PARG protects against genomic instability

The timely removal of ADP-ribosylation is crucial for efficient DNA repair. However, much remains to be discovered about ADP-ribosylhydrolases. Here, we characterize the physiological role of TARG1, an ADP-ribosylhydrolase that removes aspartate/glutamate-linked ADP-ribosylation. We reveal its function in the DNA damage response and show that the loss of TARG1 sensitizes cells to inhibitors of topoisomerase II, ATR, and PARP. Furthermore, we find a PARP1-mediated synthetic lethal interaction between TARG1 and PARG, driven by the toxic accumulation of ADP-ribosylation, that induces replication stress and genomic instability. Finally, we show that histone PARylation factor 1 (HPF1) deficiency exacerbates the toxicity and genomic instability induced by excessive ADP-ribosylation, suggesting a close crosstalk between components of the serine- and aspartate/glutamate-linked ADP-ribosylation pathways. Altogether, our data identify TARG1 as a potential biomarker for the response of cancer cells to PARP and PARG inhibition and establish that the interplay of TARG1 and PARG protects cells against genomic instability.

PARP14 is a PARP with both ADP-ribosyl transferase and hydrolase activities

PARP14 is a mono-ADP-ribosyl transferase involved in the control of immunity, transcription, and DNA replication stress management. However, little is known about the ADP-ribosylation activity of PARP14, including its substrate specificity or how PARP14-dependent ADP-ribosylation is reversed. We show that PARP14 is a dual-function enzyme with both ADP-ribosyl transferase and hydrolase activity acting on both protein and nucleic acid substrates. In particular, we show that the PARP14 macrodomain 1 is an active ADP-ribosyl hydrolase. We also demonstrate hydrolytic activity for the first macrodomain of PARP9. We reveal that expression of a PARP14 mutant with the inactivated macrodomain 1 results in a marked increase in mono(ADP-ribosyl)ation of proteins in human cells, including PARP14 itself and antiviral PARP13, and displays specific cellular phenotypes. Moreover, we demonstrate that the closely related hydrolytically active macrodomain of SARS2 Nsp3, Mac1, efficiently reverses PARP14 ADP-ribosylation in vitro and in cells, supporting the evolution of viral macrodomains to counteract PARP14-mediated antiviral response.

The dynamic process of covalent and non-covalent PARylation in the maintenance of genome integrity: a focus on PARP inhibitors

Poly(ADP-ribosylation) (PARylation) by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) is a highly regulated process that consists of the covalent addition of polymers of ADP-ribose (PAR) through post-translational modifications of substrate proteins or non-covalent interactions with PAR via PAR binding domains and motifs, thereby reprogramming their functions. This modification is particularly known for its central role in the maintenance of genomic stability. However, how genomic integrity is controlled by an intricate interplay of covalent PARylation and non-covalent PAR binding remains largely unknown. Of importance, PARylation has caught recent attention for providing a mechanistic basis of synthetic lethality involving PARP inhibitors (PARPi), most notably in homologous recombination (HR)-deficient breast and ovarian tumors. The molecular mechanisms responsible for the anti-cancer effect of PARPi are thought to implicate both catalytic inhibition and trapping of PARP enzymes on DNA. However, the relative contribution of each on tumor-specific cytotoxicity is still unclear. It is paramount to understand these PAR-dependent mechanisms, given that resistance to PARPi is a challenge in the clinic. Deciphering the complex interplay between covalent PARylation and non-covalent PAR binding and defining how PARP trapping and non-trapping events contribute to PARPi anti-tumour activity is essential for developing improved therapeutic strategies. With this perspective, we review the current understanding of PARylation biology in the context of the DNA damage response (DDR) and the mechanisms underlying PARPi activity and resistance.

Whole-genome sequencing reveals adaptations of hairy-footed jerboas (Dipus, Dipodidae) to diverse desert environments

BACKGROUND

Environmental conditions vary among deserts across the world, spanning from hyper-arid to high-elevation deserts. However, prior genomic studies on desert adaptation have focused on desert and non-desert comparisons overlooking the complexity of conditions within deserts. Focusing on the adaptation mechanisms to diverse desert environments will advance our understanding of how species adapt to extreme desert environments. The hairy-footed jerboas are well adapted to diverse desert environments, inhabiting high-altitude arid regions, hyper-arid deserts, and semi-deserts, but the genetic basis of their adaptation to different deserts remains unknown.

RESULTS

Here, we sequenced the whole genome of 83 hairy-footed jerboas from distinct desert zones in China to assess how they responded under contrasting conditions. Population genomics analyses reveal the existence of three species in hairy-footed jerboas distributed in China: Dipus deasyi, Dipus sagitta, and Dipus sowerbyi. Analyses of selection between high-altitude desert (elevation ≥ 3000m) and low-altitude desert (< 500m) populations identified two strongly selected genes, ATR and HIF1AN, associated with intense UV radiation and hypoxia in high-altitude environments. A number of candidate genes involved in energy and water homeostasis were detected in the comparative genomic analyses of hyper-arid desert (average annual precipitation < 70mm) and arid desert (< 200mm) populations versus semi-desert (> 360mm) populations. Hyper-arid desert animals also exhibited stronger adaptive selection in energy homeostasis, suggesting water and resource scarcity may be the main drivers of desert adaptation in hairy-footed jerboas.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study challenges the view of deserts as homogeneous environments and shows that distinct genomic adaptations can be found among desert animals depending on their habitats.

Updated protein domain annotation of the PARP protein family sheds new light on biological function

AlphaFold2 and related computational tools have greatly aided studies of structural biology through their ability to accurately predict protein structures. In the present work, we explored AF2 structural models of the 17 canonical members of the human PARP protein family and supplemented this analysis with new experiments and an overview of recent published data. PARP proteins are typically involved in the modification of proteins and nucleic acids through mono or poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation, but this function can be modulated by the presence of various auxiliary protein domains. Our analysis provides a comprehensive view of the structured domains and long intrinsically disordered regions within human PARPs, offering a revised basis for understanding the function of these proteins. Among other functional insights, the study provides a model of PARP1 domain dynamics in the DNA-free and DNA-bound states and enhances the connection between ADP-ribosylation and RNA biology and between ADP-ribosylation and ubiquitin-like modifications by predicting putative RNA-binding domains and E2-related RWD domains in certain PARPs. In line with the bioinformatic analysis, we demonstrate for the first time PARP14's RNA-binding capability and RNA ADP-ribosylation activity in vitro. While our insights align with existing experimental data and are probably accurate, they need further validation through experiments.

Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase-1 Lacking Enzymatic Activity Is Not Compatible with Mouse Development

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) binds DNA lesions to catalyse poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation (PARylation) using NAD+ as a substrate. PARP1 plays multiple roles in cellular activities, including DNA repair, transcription, cell death, and chromatin remodelling. However, whether these functions are governed by the enzymatic activity or scaffolding function of PARP1 remains elusive. In this study, we inactivated in mice the enzymatic activity of PARP1 by truncating its C-terminus that is essential for ART catalysis (PARP1ΔC/ΔC, designated as PARP1-ΔC). The mutation caused embryonic lethality between embryonic day E8.5 and E13.5, in stark contrast to PARP1 complete knockout (PARP1-/-) mice, which are viable. Embryonic stem (ES) cell lines can be derived from PARP1ΔC/ΔC blastocysts, and these mutant ES cells can differentiate into all three germ layers, yet, with a high degree of cystic structures, indicating defects in epithelial cells. Intriguingly, PARP1-ΔC protein is expressed at very low levels compared to its full-length counterpart, suggesting a selective advantage for cell survival. Noticeably, PARP2 is particularly elevated and permanently present at the chromatin in PARP1-ΔC cells, indicating an engagement of PARP2 by non-enzymatic PARP1 protein at the chromatin. Surprisingly, the introduction of PARP1-ΔC mutation in adult mice did not impair their viability; yet, these mutant mice are hypersensitive to alkylating agents, similar to PARP1-/- mutant mice. Our study demonstrates that the catalytically inactive mutant of PARP1 causes the developmental block, plausibly involving PARP2 trapping.

Slow Dissociation from the PARP1-HPF1 Complex Drives Inhibitor Potency

PARP1, upon binding to damaged DNA, is activated to perform poly ADP-ribosylation (PARylation) on itself and other proteins, which leads to relaxation of chromatin and recruitment of DNA repair factors. HPF1 was recently discovered as a protein cofactor of PARP1 that directs preferential PARylation of histones over other targets by contributing to and altering the PARP1 active site. Inhibitors of PARP1 (PARPi) are used in the treatment of BRCA-/- cancers, but the basis for their potency in cells, especially in the context of HPF1, is not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate the simple one-step association for eight different PARPi to PARP1 with measured rates of association (kon) of 0.8-6 μM-1 s-1. We find only minor differences in these on rates when comparing PARP1 with the PARP1-HPF1 complex. By characterizing the rates of dissociation (koff) and the binding constants (KD) for two more recently discovered PARPi, we find, for example, that saruparib has a half-life for dissociation of 22.5 h and fluzoparib has higher affinity for PARP1 in the presence of HPF1, just like the structurally related compound olaparib. By using the measured KD and kon to calculate koff, we find that the potency of PARPi in cells correlates best with the koff from the PARP1-HPF1 complex. Our data suggest that dissociation of a drug compound from the PARP1-HPF1 complex should be the parameter of choice for guiding the development of next-generation PARPi.

The CSB chromatin remodeler regulates PARP1- and PARP2-mediated single-strand break repair at actively transcribed DNA regions

Efficient repair of oxidized DNA is critical for genome-integrity maintenance. Cockayne syndrome protein B (CSB) is an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler that collaborates with Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase I (PARP1) in the repair of oxidative DNA lesions. How these proteins integrate during DNA repair remains largely unknown. Here, using chromatin co-fractionation studies, we demonstrate that PARP1 and PARP2 promote recruitment of CSB to oxidatively-damaged DNA. CSB, in turn, contributes to the recruitment of XRCC1, and histone PARylation factor 1 (HPF1), and promotes histone PARylation. Using alkaline comet assays to monitor DNA repair, we found that CSB regulates single-strand break repair (SSBR) mediated by PARP1 and PARP2. Strikingly, CSB's function in SSBR is largely bypassed when transcription is inhibited, suggesting CSB-mediated SSBR occurs primarily at actively transcribed DNA regions. While PARP1 repairs SSBs at sites regardless of the transcription status, we found that PARP2 predominantly functions in actively transcribed DNA regions. Therefore, our study raises the hypothesis that SSBR is executed by different mechanisms based on the transcription status.

PARP-nucleic acid interactions: Allosteric signaling, PARP inhibitor types, DNA bridges, and viral RNA surveillance

PARP enzymes create ADP-ribose modifications to regulate multiple facets of human biology, and some prominent PARP family members are best known for the nucleic acid interactions that regulate their activities and functions. Recent structural studies have highlighted PARP interactions with nucleic acids, in particular for PARP enzymes that detect and respond to DNA strand break damage. These studies build on our understanding of how DNA break detection is linked to the catalysis of ADP-ribose modifications, provide insights into distinct modes of DNA interaction, and shed light on the mechanisms of PARP inhibitor action. PARP enzymes have several connections to RNA biology, including the detection of the genomes of RNA viruses, and recent structural work has highlighted how PARP13/ZAP specifically targets viral genomes enriched in CG dinucleotides.

The Role of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase 1 in Nuclear and Mitochondrial Base Excision Repair

Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) Polymerase 1 (PARP-1), also known as ADP-ribosyl transferase with diphtheria toxin homology 1 (ARTD-1), is a critical player in DNA damage repair, during which it catalyzes the ADP ribosylation of self and target enzymes. While the nuclear localization of PARP-1 has been well established, recent studies also suggest its mitochondrial localization. In this review, we summarize the differences between mitochondrial and nuclear Base Excision Repair (BER) pathways, the involvement of PARP-1 in mitochondrial and nuclear BER, and its functional interplay with other BER enzymes.

Regulation of Biomolecular Condensates by Poly(ADP-ribose)

Biomolecular condensates are reversible compartments that form through a process called phase separation. Post-translational modifications like ADP-ribosylation can nucleate the formation of these condensates by accelerating the self-association of proteins. Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) chains are remarkably transient modifications with turnover rates on the order of minutes, yet they can be required for the formation of granules in response to oxidative stress, DNA damage, and other stimuli. Moreover, accumulation of PAR is linked with adverse phase transitions in neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. In this review, we provide a primer on how PAR is synthesized and regulated, the diverse structures and chemistries of ADP-ribosylation modifications, and protein-PAR interactions. We review substantial progress in recent efforts to determine the molecular mechanism of PAR-mediated phase separation, and we further delineate how inhibitors of PAR polymerases may be effective treatments for neurodegenerative pathologies. Finally, we highlight the need for rigorous biochemical interrogation of ADP-ribosylation in vivo and in vitro to clarify the exact pathway from PARylation to condensate formation.

The function and regulation of ADP-ribosylation in the DNA damage response

ADP-ribosylation is a post-translational modification involved in DNA damage response (DDR). In higher organisms it is synthesised by PARP 1-3, DNA strand break sensors. Recent advances have identified serine residues as the most common targets for ADP-ribosylation during DDR. To ADP-ribosylate serine, PARPs require an accessory factor, HPF1 which completes the catalytic domain. Through ADP-ribosylation, PARPs recruit a variety of factors to the break site and control their activities. However, the timely removal of ADP-ribosylation is also key for genome stability and is mostly performed by two hydrolases: PARG and ARH3. Here, we describe the key writers, readers and erasers of ADP-ribosylation and their contribution to the mounting of the DDR. We also discuss the use of PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy and the ways to tackle PARPi treatment resistance.

Chemoenzymatic and Synthetic Approaches To Investigate Aspartate- and Glutamate-ADP-Ribosylation

We report here chemoenzymatic and fully synthetic methodologies to modify aspartate and glutamate side chains with ADP-ribose at specific sites on peptides. Structural analysis of aspartate and glutamate ADP-ribosylated peptides reveals near-quantitative migration of the side chain linkage from the anomeric carbon to the 2″- or 3″-ADP-ribose hydroxyl moieties. We find that this linkage migration pattern is unique to aspartate and glutamate ADP-ribosylation and propose that the observed isomer distribution profile is present in biochemical and cellular environments. After defining distinct stability properties of aspartate and glutamate ADP-ribosylation, we devise methods to install homogenous ADP-ribose chains at specific glutamate sites and assemble glutamate-modified peptides into full-length proteins. By implementing these technologies, we show that histone H2B E2 tri-ADP-ribosylation is able to stimulate the chromatin remodeler ALC1 with similar efficiency to histone serine ADP-ribosylation. Our work reveals fundamental principles of aspartate and glutamate ADP-ribosylation and enables new strategies to interrogate the biochemical consequences of this widespread protein modification.

Serine ADP-ribosylation in Drosophila provides insights into the evolution of reversible ADP-ribosylation signalling

In the mammalian DNA damage response, ADP-ribosylation signalling is of crucial importance to mark sites of DNA damage as well as recruit and regulate repairs factors. Specifically, the PARP1:HPF1 complex recognises damaged DNA and catalyses the formation of serine-linked ADP-ribosylation marks (mono-Ser-ADPr), which are extended into ADP-ribose polymers (poly-Ser-ADPr) by PARP1 alone. Poly-Ser-ADPr is reversed by PARG, while the terminal mono-Ser-ADPr is removed by ARH3. Despite its significance and apparent evolutionary conservation, little is known about ADP-ribosylation signalling in non-mammalian Animalia. The presence of HPF1, but absence of ARH3, in some insect genomes, including Drosophila species, raises questions regarding the existence and reversal of serine-ADP-ribosylation in these species. Here we show by quantitative proteomics that Ser-ADPr is the major form of ADP-ribosylation in the DNA damage response of Drosophila melanogaster and is dependent on the dParp1:dHpf1 complex. Moreover, our structural and biochemical investigations uncover the mechanism of mono-Ser-ADPr removal by Drosophila Parg. Collectively, our data reveal PARP:HPF1-mediated Ser-ADPr as a defining feature of the DDR in Animalia. The striking conservation within this kingdom suggests that organisms that carry only a core set of ADP-ribosyl metabolising enzymes, such as Drosophila, are valuable model organisms to study the physiological role of Ser-ADPr signalling.

PARP3 Affects Nucleosome Compaction Regulation

Genome compaction is one of the important subject areas for understanding the mechanisms regulating genes' expression and DNA replication and repair. The basic unit of DNA compaction in the eukaryotic cell is the nucleosome. The main chromatin proteins responsible for DNA compaction have already been identified, but the regulation of chromatin architecture is still extensively studied. Several authors have shown an interaction of ARTD proteins with nucleosomes and proposed that there are changes in the nucleosomes' structure as a result. In the ARTD family, only PARP1, PARP2, and PARP3 participate in the DNA damage response. Damaged DNA stimulates activation of these PARPs, which use NAD⁺ as a substrate. DNA repair and chromatin compaction need precise regulation with close coordination between them. In this work, we studied the interactions of these three PARPs with nucleosomes by atomic force microscopy, which is a powerful method allowing for direct measurements of geometric characteristics of single molecules. Using this method, we evaluated perturbations in the structure of single nucleosomes after the binding of a PARP. We demonstrated here that PARP3 significantly alters the geometry of nucleosomes, possibly indicating a new function of PARP3 in chromatin compaction regulation.

Modular antibodies reveal DNA damage-induced mono-ADP-ribosylation as a second wave of PARP1 signaling

PARP1, an established anti-cancer target that regulates many cellular pathways, including DNA repair signaling, has been intensely studied for decades as a poly(ADP-ribosyl)transferase. Although recent studies have revealed the prevalence of mono-ADP-ribosylation upon DNA damage, it was unknown whether this signal plays an active role in the cell or is just a byproduct of poly-ADP-ribosylation. By engineering SpyTag-based modular antibodies for sensitive and flexible detection of mono-ADP-ribosylation, including fluorescence-based sensors for live-cell imaging, we demonstrate that serine mono-ADP-ribosylation constitutes a second wave of PARP1 signaling shaped by the cellular HPF1/PARP1 ratio. Multilevel chromatin proteomics reveals histone mono-ADP-ribosylation readers, including RNF114, a ubiquitin ligase recruited to DNA lesions through a zinc-finger domain, modulating the DNA damage response and telomere maintenance. Our work provides a technological framework for illuminating ADP-ribosylation in a wide range of applications and biological contexts and establishes mono-ADP-ribosylation by HPF1/PARP1 as an important information carrier for cell signaling.

Copy number variants and fetal growth in stillbirths

BACKGROUND

Fetal growth abnormalities are associated with a higher incidence of stillbirth, with small and large for gestational age infants incurring a 3 to 4- and 2 to 3-fold increased risk, respectively. Although clinical risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension, and placental insufficiency have been associated with fetal growth aberrations and stillbirth, the role of underlying genetic etiologies remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the relationship between abnormal copy number variants and fetal growth abnormalities in stillbirths using chromosomal microarray.

STUDY DESIGN

A secondary analysis utilizing a cohort study design of stillbirths from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network was performed. Exposure was defined as abnormal copy number variants including aneuploidies, pathogenic copy number variants, and variants of unknown clinical significance. The outcomes were small for gestational age and large for gestational age stillbirths, defined as a birthweight <10th percentile and greater than the 90th percentile for gestational age, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 393 stillbirths with chromosomal microarray and birthweight data, 16% had abnormal copy number variants. The small for gestational age outcome was more common among those with abnormal copy number variants than those with a normal microarray (29.5% vs 16.5%; P=.038). This finding was consistent after adjusting for clinically important variables. In the final model, only abnormal copy number variants and maternal age remained significantly associated with small for gestational age stillbirths, with an adjusted odds ratio of 2.22 (95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.18). Although large for gestational age stillbirths were more likely to have an abnormal microarray: 6.2% vs 3.3% (P=.275), with an odds ratio of 2.35 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-7.90), this finding did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Genetic abnormalities are more common in the setting of small for gestational age stillborn fetuses. Abnormal copy number variants not detectable by traditional karyotype make up approximately 50% of the genetic abnormalities in this population.

HPF1-dependent histone ADP-ribosylation triggers chromatin relaxation to promote the recruitment of repair factors at sites of DNA damage

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) activity is regulated by its co-factor histone poly(ADP-ribosylation) factor 1 (HPF1). The complex formed by HPF1 and PARP1 catalyzes ADP-ribosylation of serine residues of proteins near DNA breaks, mainly PARP1 and histones. However, the effect of HPF1 on DNA repair regulated by PARP1 remains unclear. Here, we show that HPF1 controls prolonged histone ADP-ribosylation in the vicinity of the DNA breaks by regulating both the number and length of ADP-ribose chains. Furthermore, we demonstrate that HPF1-dependent histone ADP-ribosylation triggers the rapid unfolding of chromatin, facilitating access to DNA at sites of damage. This process promotes the assembly of both the homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining repair machineries. Altogether, our data highlight the key roles played by the PARP1/HPF1 complex in regulating ADP-ribosylation signaling as well as the conformation of damaged chromatin at early stages of the DNA damage response.

PARPs and ADP-ribosylation: Deciphering the complexity with molecular tools

PARPs catalyze ADP-ribosylation-a post-translational modification that plays crucial roles in biological processes, including DNA repair, transcription, immune regulation, and condensate formation. ADP-ribosylation can be added to a wide range of amino acids with varying lengths and chemical structures, making it a complex and diverse modification. Despite this complexity, significant progress has been made in developing chemical biology methods to analyze ADP-ribosylated molecules and their binding proteins on a proteome-wide scale. Additionally, high-throughput assays have been developed to measure the activity of enzymes that add or remove ADP-ribosylation, leading to the development of inhibitors and new avenues for therapy. Real-time monitoring of ADP-ribosylation dynamics can be achieved using genetically encoded reporters, and next-generation detection reagents have improved the precision of immunoassays for specific forms of ADP-ribosylation. Further development and refinement of these tools will continue to advance our understanding of the functions and mechanisms of ADP-ribosylation in health and disease.

Clinical PARP inhibitors allosterically induce PARP2 retention on DNA

PARP1 and PARP2 detect DNA breaks, which activates their catalytic production of poly(ADP-ribose) that recruits repair factors and contributes to PARP1/2 release from DNA. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are used in cancer treatment and target PARP1/2 catalytic activity, interfering with repair and increasing PARP1/2 persistence on DNA damage. In addition, certain PARPi exert allosteric effects that increase PARP1 retention on DNA. However, no clinical PARPi exhibit this allosteric behavior toward PARP1. In contrast, we show that certain clinical PARPi exhibit an allosteric effect that retains PARP2 on DNA breaks in a manner that depends on communication between the catalytic and DNA binding regions. Using a PARP2 mutant that mimics an allosteric inhibitor effect, we observed increased PARP2 retention at cellular damage sites. The PARPi AZD5305 also exhibited a clear reverse allosteric effect on PARP2. Our results can help explain the toxicity of clinical PARPi and suggest ways to improve PARPi moving forward.

Macrodomain Mac1 of SARS-CoV-2 Nonstructural Protein 3 Hydrolyzes Diverse ADP-ribosylated Substrates

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for a global pandemic that resulted in more than 6-million deaths worldwide. The virus encodes several non-structural proteins (Nsps) that contain elements capable of disrupting cellular processes. Among these Nsp proteins, Nsp3 contains macrodomains, e.g., Mac1, Mac2, Mac3, with potential effects on host cells. Mac1 has been shown to increase SARS-CoV-2 virulence and disrupt ADP-ribosylation pathways in mammalian cells. ADP-ribosylation results from the transfer of the ADP-ribose moiety of NAD ⁺ to various acceptors, e.g., proteins, DNA, RNA, contributing on a cell's biological processes. ADP-ribosylation is the mechanism of action of bacterial toxins, e.g., Pseudomonas toxins, diphtheria toxin that disrupt protein biosynthetic and signaling pathways. On the other hand, some viral macrodomains cleavage ADP-ribose-acceptor bond, generating free ADP-ribose. By this reaction, the macrodomain-containing proteins interfere ADP-ribose homeostasis in host cells. Here, we examined potential hydrolytic activities of SARS-CoV-2 Mac1, 2, and 3 on substrates containing ADP-ribose. Mac1 cleaved α-NAD ⁺ , but not β-NAD ⁺ , consistent with stereospecificity at the C-1" bond. In contrast to ARH1 and ARH3, Mac1 did not require Mg ²⁺ for optimal activity. Mac1 also hydrolyzed O -acetyl-ADP-ribose and ADP-ribose-1"-phosphat, but not Mac2 and Mac3. However, Mac1 did not cleave α-ADP-ribose-(arginine) and ADP-ribose-(serine)-histone H3 peptide, suggesting that Mac1 hydrolyzes ADP-ribose attached to O- and N-linked functional groups, with specificity at the catalytic site in the ADP-ribose moiety. We conclude that SARS-CoV-2 Mac1 may exert anti-viral activity by reversing host-mediated ADP-ribosylation. New insights on Nsp3 activities may shed light on potential SARS-CoV-2 therapeutic targets.

IMPORTANCE

SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, encodes 3 macrodomain-containing proteins, e.g., Mac1, Mac2, Mac3, within non-structural proteins 3 (Nsp3). Mac1 was shown previously to hydrolyze ADP-ribose-phosphate. Inactivation of Mac1 reduced viral proliferation. Here we report that Mac1, but not Mac2 and Mac3, has multiple activities, i.e., Mac1 hydrolyzed. α-NAD ⁺ and O -acetyl-ADP-ribose. However, Mac1 did not hydrolyze β-NAD ⁺ , ADP-ribose-serine on a histone 3 peptide (aa1-21), and ADP-ribose-arginine, exhibiting substrate selectivity. These data suggest that Mac1 may have multi-function as a α-NAD ⁺ consumer for viral replication and a disruptor of host-mediated ADP-ribosylation pathways. Understanding Mac1's mechanisms of action is important to provide possible therapeutic targets for COVID-19.

Complement factor D derived from epicardial adipose tissue participates in cardiomyocyte apoptosis after myocardial infarction by mediating PARP-1 activity

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is considered to be the main cause of congestive heart failure. The aim of this study was to provide an in-depth analysis of athophysiological processes and provide key targets for intervention in the occurrence of acute MI.

METHODS

A rat model of MI was established by ligation of left anterior descending branch. Heart tissue, epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) were collected. H9c2 cells were used to explore the mechanism of complement factor D (CFD) regulating cardiomyocyte apoptosis.

RESULTS

Myocardial apoptosis were observed in MI rat, and more EAT was found in the MI group in vivo. The conditioned medium prepared by EAT (EAT-CM) significantly reduced the activity of H9c2 cells. The content of CFD in EAT was significantly increased, and CFD promoted cardiomyocyte apoptosis in vitro and CFD-IN1 (a selective inhibitor of CFD) could revised this effect. CFD induced poly ADP-ribosepolymerase-1 (PARP-1) overactivation. Furthermore, the addition of pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD in the SAT-CM + CFD group couldn't affect H9c2 cell apoptosis. CFD induced cell apoptosis via PARP-1 activation and PARP-1 inhibitor 3-Aminobenzamide could revise this effect. The injection of CFD-IN1 in MI rat model confirmed that inhibition of CFD activity alleviated cardiomyocytes apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that EAT mediating cardiomyocyte apoptosis after MI through secretion of CFD and activation of PARP-1 activity.

Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and ovarian function

Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) plays an important role in DNA damage detection and repair. PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are a novel class of targeted agents used widely in the treatment of female cancer patients with BRCA mutations, including younger patients. However, the impact of PARPi on ovarian function remains a considerable problem in clinical practice. In this review article, we summarize the current understanding of PARPi's effects on the function of ovary and discuss their potential underlying mechanisms, highlighting the significance of further investigation on the criterion for ovarian failure and its preventive approaches during PARPi treatment.

Functional Analysis of Histone ADP-Ribosylation In Vitro and in Cells

Gene regulation in the nucleus requires precise control of the molecular processes that dictate how, when, and which genes are transcribed. The posttranslational modification (PTM) of histones in chromatin is an effective means to link cellular signaling to gene expression outcomes. The repertoire of histone PTMs includes phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, ubiquitylation, and ADP-ribosylation (ADPRylation). ADPRylation is a reversible PTM that results in the covalent transfer of ADP-ribose units derived from NAD+ to substrate proteins on glutamate, aspartate, serine, and other amino acids. Histones were the first substrate proteins identified for ADPRylation, over five decades ago. Since that time, histone ADPRylation has been shown to be a widespread and critical regulator of chromatin structure and function during transcription, DNA repair, and replication. Here, we describe a set of protocols that allow the user to investigate site-specific histone ADPRylation and its functional consequences in biochemical assays and in cells in a variety of biological systems. With the recent discovery that some cancer-causing histone mutations (i.e., oncohistone mutations) occur at functional sites of regulatory ADPRylation, these protocols may have additional utility in studies of oncology.

A Simple Method to Study ADP-Ribosylation Reversal: From Function to Drug Discovery

ADP-ribosylation is an ancient modification of proteins, nucleic acids, and other biomolecules found in all kingdoms of life as well as in certain viruses. The regulation of fundamental (patho)physiological processes by ADP-ribosylation, including the cellular stress response, inflammation, and immune response to bacterial and viral pathogens, has created a strong interest into the study of modification establishment and removal to explore novel therapeutic approaches. Beyond ADP-ribosylation in humans, direct targeting of factors that alter host ADP-ribosylation signaling (e.g., viral macrodomains) or utilize ADP-ribosylation to manipulate host cell behavior (e.g., bacterial toxins) were shown to reduce virulence and disease severity. However, the realization of these therapeutic potentials is thus far hampered by the unavailability of simple, high-throughput methods to study the modification "writers" and "erasers" and screen for novel inhibitors.Here, we describe a scalable method for the measurement of (ADP-ribosyl)hydrolase activity. The assay relies on the conversion of ADP-ribose released from a modified substrate by the (ADP-ribosyl)hydrolase under investigation into AMP by the phosphodiesterase NudT5 into bioluminescence via a commercially available detection assay. Moreover, this method can be utilized to study the role of nudix- or ENPP-type phosphodiesterases in ADP-ribosylation processing and may also be adapted to investigate the activity of (ADP-ribosyl)transferases. Overall, this method is applicable for both basic biochemical characterization and screening of large drug libraries; hence, it is highly adaptable to diverse project needs.

The Role of PARP1 and PAR in ATP-Independent Nucleosome Reorganisation during the DNA Damage Response

The functioning of the eukaryotic cell genome is mediated by sophisticated protein-nucleic-acid complexes, whose minimal structural unit is the nucleosome. After the damage to genomic DNA, repair proteins need to gain access directly to the lesion; therefore, the initiation of the DNA damage response inevitably leads to local chromatin reorganisation. This review focuses on the possible involvement of PARP1, as well as proteins acting nucleosome compaction, linker histone H1 and non-histone chromatin protein HMGB1. The polymer of ADP-ribose is considered the main regulator during the development of the DNA damage response and in the course of assembly of the correct repair complex.