1
|
van der Leest P, Rozendal P, Hinrichs J, van Noesel CJM, Zwaenepoel K, Deiman B, Huijsmans CJJ, van Eijk R, Speel EJM, van Haastert RJ, Ligtenberg MJL, van Schaik RHN, Jansen MPHM, Dubbink HJ, de Leng WW, Leers MPG, Tamminga M, van den Broek D, van Kempen LC, Schuuring E. External Quality Assessment on Molecular Tumor Profiling with Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Methodologies Routinely Used in Clinical Pathology within the COIN Consortium. Clin Chem 2024; 70:759-767. [PMID: 38484302 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvae014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of tumor-derived variants in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has potential as a sensitive and reliable surrogate for tumor tissue-based routine diagnostic testing. However, variations in pre(analytical) procedures affect the efficiency of ctDNA recovery. Here, an external quality assessment (EQA) was performed to determine the performance of ctDNA mutation detection work flows that are used in current diagnostic settings across laboratories within the Dutch COIN consortium (ctDNA on the road to implementation in The Netherlands). METHODS Aliquots of 3 high-volume diagnostic leukapheresis (DLA) plasma samples and 3 artificial reference plasma samples with predetermined mutations were distributed among 16 Dutch laboratories. Participating laboratories were requested to perform ctDNA analysis for BRAF exon 15, EGFR exon 18-21, and KRAS exon 2-3 using their regular circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) analysis work flow. Laboratories were assessed based on adherence to the study protocol, overall detection rate, and overall genotyping performance. RESULTS A broad range of preanalytical conditions (e.g., plasma volume, elution volume, and extraction methods) and analytical methodologies (e.g., droplet digital PCR [ddPCR], small-panel PCR assays, and next-generation sequencing [NGS]) were used. Six laboratories (38%) had a performance score of >0.90; all other laboratories scored between 0.26 and 0.80. Although 13 laboratories (81%) reached a 100% overall detection rate, the therapeutically relevant EGFR p.(S752_I759del) (69%), EGFR p.(N771_H773dup) (50%), and KRAS p.(G12C) (48%) mutations were frequently not genotyped accurately. CONCLUSIONS Divergent (pre)analytical protocols could lead to discrepant clinical outcomes when using the same plasma samples. Standardization of (pre)analytical work flows can facilitate the implementation of reproducible liquid biopsy testing in the clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul van der Leest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pim Rozendal
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - John Hinrichs
- Department of Pathology, Symbiant B.V., Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - Carel J M van Noesel
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karen Zwaenepoel
- Department of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Birgit Deiman
- Clinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
- Expert Center Clinical Chemistry Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J J Huijsmans
- Pathologie-DNA, Laboratory for Molecular Diagnostics, Location Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald van Eijk
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ernst Jan M Speel
- Department of Pathology, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rick J van Haastert
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Medical Innovation, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Ron H N van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maurice P H M Jansen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Laboratory of Translational Genomics, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hendrikus J Dubbink
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wendy W de Leng
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Mathie P G Leers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry & Hematology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Menno Tamminga
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Daan van den Broek
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Léon C van Kempen
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Korte B, Mathios D. Innovation in Non-Invasive Diagnosis and Disease Monitoring for Meningiomas. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:4195. [PMID: 38673779 PMCID: PMC11050588 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25084195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are tumors of the central nervous system that vary in their presentation, ranging from benign and slow-growing to highly aggressive. The standard method for diagnosing and classifying meningiomas involves invasive surgery and can fail to provide accurate prognostic information. Liquid biopsy methods, which exploit circulating tumor biomarkers such as DNA, extracellular vesicles, micro-RNA, proteins, and more, offer a non-invasive and dynamic approach for tumor classification, prognostication, and evaluating treatment response. Currently, a clinically approved liquid biopsy test for meningiomas does not exist. This review provides a discussion of current research and the challenges of implementing liquid biopsy techniques for advancing meningioma patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna Korte
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University Medical Campus, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Dimitrios Mathios
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University Medical Campus, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wever BMM, Steenbergen RDM. Unlocking the potential of tumor-derived DNA in urine for cancer detection: methodological challenges and opportunities. Mol Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38462745 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
High cancer mortality rates and the rising cancer burden worldwide drive the development of innovative methods in order to advance cancer diagnostics. Urine contains a viable source of tumor material and allows for self-collection from home. Biomarker testing in this liquid biopsy represents a novel approach that is convenient for patients and can be effective in detecting cancer at a curable stage. Here, we set out to provide a detailed overview of the rationale behind urine-based cancer detection, with a focus on non-urological cancers, and its potential for cancer diagnostics. Moreover, evolving methodological challenges and untapped opportunities for urine biomarker testing are discussed, particularly emphasizing DNA methylation of tumor-derived cell-free DNA. We also provide future recommendations for technical advancements in urine-based cancer detection and elaborate on potential mechanisms involved in the transrenal transport of cell-free DNA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit M M Wever
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Renske D M Steenbergen
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Imaging and Biomarkers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arthur C, Carlson LM, Svoboda J, Sandvik U, Jylhä C, Nordenskjöld M, Holm S, Tham E. Liquid biopsy guides successful molecular targeted therapy of an inoperable pediatric brainstem neoplasm. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:44. [PMID: 38388693 PMCID: PMC10884019 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00535-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Midline CNS tumors are occasionally inaccessible for surgical biopsies. In these instances, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) may serve as a viable alternative for molecular analysis and identification of targetable mutations. Here, we report a young child with an inoperable brainstem tumor in whom a stereotactic biopsy was deemed unsafe. The tumor progressed on steroids and after radiotherapy the patient developed hydrocephalus and received a ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Droplet digital PCR analysis of cfDNA from an intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid liquid biopsy revealed a BRAF V600 mutation enabling targeted treatment with MEK and BRAF inhibitors. The patient, now on trametinib and dabrafenib for 1 year, has had substantial tumor volume regression and reduction of contrast enhancement on MRIs and is making remarkable clinical progress. This case highlights that in a subset of CNS tumors, access to liquid biopsy analysis may be crucial to identify actionable therapeutic targets that would otherwise go undiscovered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Arthur
- Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Lena-Maria Carlson
- Pediatric Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Svoboda
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulrika Sandvik
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Neurosurgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Jylhä
- Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Nordenskjöld
- Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefan Holm
- Pediatric Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Emma Tham
- Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lauer EM, Riegler E, Mutter JA, Alig SK, Bleul S, Kuehn J, Ranganathan L, Klingler C, Demerath T, Würtemberger U, Rau A, Weiß J, Eisenblaetter M, Bamberg F, Prinz M, Finke J, Duyster J, Illerhaus G, Diehn M, Alizadeh AA, Schorb E, Reinacher PC, Scherer F. Improved early outcome prediction by MRI-based 3D tumor volume assessment in patients with CNS lymphomas. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:374-386. [PMID: 37713267 PMCID: PMC10836777 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Central nervous system lymphomas (CNSL) display remarkable clinical heterogeneity, yet accurate prediction of outcomes remains challenging. The IPCG criteria are widely used in routine practice for the assessment of treatment response. However, the value of the IPCG criteria for ultimate outcome prediction is largely unclear, mainly due to the uncertainty in delineating complete from partial responses during and after treatment. METHODS We explored various MRI features including semi-automated 3D tumor volume measurements at different disease milestones and their association with survival in 93 CNSL patients undergoing curative-intent treatment. RESULTS At diagnosis, patients with more than 3 lymphoma lesions, periventricular involvement, and high 3D tumor volumes showed significantly unfavorable PFS and OS. At first interim MRI during treatment, the IPCG criteria failed to discriminate outcomes in responding patients. Therefore, we randomized these patients into training and validation cohorts to investigate whether 3D tumor volumetry could improve outcome prediction. We identified a 3D tumor volume reduction of ≥97% as the optimal threshold for risk stratification (=3D early response, 3D_ER). Applied to the validation cohort, patients achieving 3D_ER had significantly superior outcomes. In multivariate analyses, 3D_ER was independently prognostic of PFS and OS. Finally, we leveraged prognostic information from 3D MRI features and circulating biomarkers to build a composite metric that further improved outcome prediction in CNSL. CONCLUSIONS We developed semi-automated 3D tumor volume measurements as strong and independent early predictors of clinical outcomes in CNSL patients. These radiologic features could help improve risk stratification and help guide future treatment approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza M Lauer
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ella Riegler
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jurik A Mutter
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Divisions of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Sabine Bleul
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Julia Kuehn
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Lavanya Ranganathan
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christian Klingler
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Theo Demerath
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Urs Würtemberger
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Alexander Rau
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jakob Weiß
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michel Eisenblaetter
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Bamberg
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marco Prinz
- Institute of Neuropathology, Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Basics in NeuroModulation (NeuroModulBasics), Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Signalling Research Centres BIOSS and CIBSS, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Finke
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Justus Duyster
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Gerald Illerhaus
- Department of Hematology/Oncology and Palliative Care, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Maximilian Diehn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ash A Alizadeh
- Divisions of Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Elisabeth Schorb
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Peter C Reinacher
- Department of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute for Laser Technology (ILT), Aachen, Germany
| | - Florian Scherer
- Department of Medicine I, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Cite Freiburg and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Douville C, Lahouel K, Kuo A, Grant H, Avigdor BE, Curtis SD, Summers M, Cohen JD, Wang Y, Mattox A, Dudley J, Dobbyn L, Popoli M, Ptak J, Nehme N, Silliman N, Blair C, Romans K, Thoburn C, Gizzi J, Schoen RE, Tie J, Gibbs P, Ho-Pham LT, Tran BNH, Tran TS, Nguyen TV, Goggins M, Wolfgang CL, Wang TL, Shih IM, Lennon AM, Hruban RH, Bettegowda C, Kinzler KW, Papadopoulos N, Vogelstein B, Tomasetti C. Machine learning to detect the SINEs of cancer. Sci Transl Med 2024; 16:eadi3883. [PMID: 38266106 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adi3883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
We previously described an approach called RealSeqS to evaluate aneuploidy in plasma cell-free DNA through the amplification of ~350,000 repeated elements with a single primer. We hypothesized that an unbiased evaluation of the large amount of sequencing data obtained with RealSeqS might reveal other differences between plasma samples from patients with and without cancer. This hypothesis was tested through the development of a machine learning approach called Alu Profile Learning Using Sequencing (A-PLUS) and its application to 7615 samples from 5178 individuals, 2073 with solid cancer and the remainder without cancer. Samples from patients with cancer and controls were prespecified into four cohorts used for model training, analyte integration, and threshold determination, validation, and reproducibility. A-PLUS alone provided a sensitivity of 40.5% across 11 different cancer types in the validation cohort, at a specificity of 98.5%. Combining A-PLUS with aneuploidy and eight common protein biomarkers detected 51% of the cancers at 98.9% specificity. We found that part of the power of A-PLUS could be ascribed to a single feature-the global reduction of AluS subfamily elements in the circulating DNA of patients with solid cancer. We confirmed this reduction through the analysis of another independent dataset obtained with a different approach (whole-genome sequencing). The evaluation of Alu elements may therefore have the potential to enhance the performance of several methods designed for the earlier detection of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Douville
- Division of Quantitative Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Kamel Lahouel
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Early Detection, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Early Detection, City of Hope, Division of Mathematics for Cancer Evolution and Early Detection, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
- Division of Integrated Cancer Genomics, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Albert Kuo
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Haley Grant
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Bracha Erlanger Avigdor
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Samuel D Curtis
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Mahmoud Summers
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Joshua D Cohen
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Yuxuan Wang
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Austin Mattox
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Jonathan Dudley
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Lisa Dobbyn
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Maria Popoli
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Janine Ptak
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Nadine Nehme
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Natalie Silliman
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Cherie Blair
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Katharine Romans
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Christopher Thoburn
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Jennifer Gizzi
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Robert E Schoen
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Jeanne Tie
- Division of Personalized Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Division of Personalized Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Lan T Ho-Pham
- BioMedical Research Center, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City 72510, Vietnam
- Clinical Genetics Research Group, Saigon Precision Medicine Research Center, Ho Chi Minh City 72512, Vietnam
| | - Bich N H Tran
- Saigon Precision Medicine Research Center, Ho Chi Minh City 72512, Vietnam
| | - Thach S Tran
- Saigon Precision Medicine Research Center, Ho Chi Minh City 72512, Vietnam
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
| | - Tuan V Nguyen
- Saigon Precision Medicine Research Center, Ho Chi Minh City 72512, Vietnam
- School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
- Tâm Anh Research Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Centre for Health Technologies, University of Technology, NSW 2007, Australia
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, NSW 2003, Australia
| | - Michael Goggins
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | | | - Tian-Li Wang
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Ie-Ming Shih
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Anne Marie Lennon
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Ralph H Hruban
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Kenneth W Kinzler
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Nickolas Papadopoulos
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Bert Vogelstein
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Ludwig Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Cristian Tomasetti
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Early Detection, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Early Detection, City of Hope, Division of Mathematics for Cancer Evolution and Early Detection, Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, Beckman Research Institute, City of Hope, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
- Division of Integrated Cancer Genomics, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moser T, Heitzer E. Surpassing sensitivity limits in liquid biopsy. Science 2024; 383:260-261. [PMID: 38236970 DOI: 10.1126/science.adn1886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Attenuation of cell-free DNA clearance in vivo is an alternative strategy to maximize recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tina Moser
- Institute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Liquid Biopsies for Early Detection of Cancer, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ellen Heitzer
- Institute of Human Genetics, Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Christian Doppler Laboratory for Liquid Biopsies for Early Detection of Cancer, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van der Leest P, Schuuring E. Critical Factors in the Analytical Work Flow of Circulating Tumor DNA-Based Molecular Profiling. Clin Chem 2024; 70:220-233. [PMID: 38175597 DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvad194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liquid biopsy testing, especially molecular tumor profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in cell-free plasma, has received increasing interest in recent years as it serves as a reliable alternative for the detection of tumor-specific aberrations to guide treatment decision-making in oncology. Many (commercially available) applications have been developed, however, broad divergences in (pre)analytical work flows and lack of universally applied guidelines impede routine clinical implementation. In this review, critical factors in the blood-based ctDNA liquid biopsy work flow are evaluated. CONTENT In the preanalytical phase, several aspects (e.g., blood collection tubes [BCTs], plasma processing, and extraction method) affect the quantity and quality of the circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) applicable for subsequent molecular analyses and should meet certain standards to be applied in diagnostic work flows. Analytical considerations, such as analytical input and choice of assay, might vary based on the clinical application (i.e., screening, primary diagnosis, minimal residual disease [MRD], response monitoring, and resistance identification). In addition to practical procedures, variant interpretation and reporting ctDNA results should be harmonized. Collaborative efforts in (inter)national consortia and societies are essential for the establishment of standard operating procedures (SOPs) in attempts to standardize the plasma-based ctDNA analysis work flow. SUMMARY Development of universally applicable guidelines regarding the critical factors in liquid biopsy testing are necessary to pave the way to clinical implementation for routine diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul van der Leest
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hu Q, Chen L, Li K, Liu R, Sun L, Han T. Circulating tumor DNA: current implementation issues and future challenges for clinical utility. Clin Chem Lab Med 2023; 0:cclm-2023-1157. [PMID: 38109307 DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2023-1157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
Over the past decades, liquid biopsy, especially circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), has received tremendous attention as a noninvasive detection approach for clinical applications, including early diagnosis of cancer and relapse, real-time therapeutic efficacy monitoring, potential target selection and investigation of drug resistance mechanisms. In recent years, the application of next-generation sequencing technology combined with AI technology has significantly improved the accuracy and sensitivity of liquid biopsy, enhancing its potential in solid tumors. However, the increasing integration of such promising tests to improve therapy decision making by oncologists still has complexities and challenges. Here, we propose a conceptual framework of ctDNA technologies and clinical utilities based on bibliometrics and highlight current challenges and future directions, especially in clinical applications such as early detection, minimal residual disease detection, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. We also discuss the necessities of developing a dynamic field of translational cancer research and rigorous clinical studies that may support therapeutic strategy decision making in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qilin Hu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, P.R. China
| | - Lujun Chen
- The General Hospital of Northern Theater Command Training Base for Graduate, China Medical University, Shenyang, P.R. China
| | - Kerui Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, P.R. China
| | - Ruotong Liu
- Clinical Medicine, Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, P.R. China
| | - Lei Sun
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, P.R. China
| | - Tao Han
- Department of Medical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Azad TD, Ran KR, Liu J, Vattipally VN, Khela H, Leite E, Materi JD, Davidar AD, Bettegowda C, Theodore N. A future blood test for acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Biomarkers 2023; 28:703-713. [PMID: 38126897 DOI: 10.1080/1354750x.2023.2298650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) requires prompt diagnosis and intervention to minimize the risk of permanent neurologic deficit. Presently, SCI diagnosis and interventional planning rely on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is not always available or feasible for severely injured patients. Detection of disease-specific biomarkers in biofluids via liquid biopsy may provide a more accessible and objective means of evaluating patients with suspected SCI. Cell-free DNA, which has been used for diagnosing and monitoring oncologic disease, may detect damage to spinal cord neurons via tissue-specific methylation patterns. Other types of biomarkers, including proteins and RNA species, have also been found to reflect neuronal injury and may be included as part of a multi-analyte assay to improve liquid biopsy performance. The feasibility of implementing liquid biopsy into current practices of SCI management is supported by the relative ease of blood sample collection as well as recent advancements in droplet digital polymerase chain reaction technology. In this review, we detail the current landscape of biofluid biomarkers for acute SCI and propose a framework for the incorporation of a putative blood test into the clinical management of SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tej D Azad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kathleen R Ran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jiaqi Liu
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Harmon Khela
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Enzo Leite
- Faculdade Pernambucana de Saúde (FPS), Recife, PE, Brazil
| | - Joshua D Materi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - A Daniel Davidar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nicholas Theodore
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ntzifa A, Lianidou E. Pre-analytical conditions and implementation of quality control steps in liquid biopsy analysis. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2023; 60:573-594. [PMID: 37518938 DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2023.2230290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
Over the last decade, great advancements have been made in the field of liquid biopsy through extensive research and the development of new technologies that facilitate the use of liquid biopsy for cancer patients. This is shown by the numerous liquid biopsy tests that gained clearance by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in recent years. Liquid biopsy has significantly altered cancer treatment by providing clinicians with powerful and immediate information about therapeutic decisions. However, the clinical integration of liquid biopsy is still challenging and there are many critical factors to consider prior to its implementation into routine clinical practice. Lack of standardization due to technical challenges and the definition of the clinical utility of specific assays further complicates the establishment of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in liquid biopsy. Harmonization of laboratories to established guidelines is of major importance to overcome inter-lab variabilities observed. Quality control assessment in diagnostic laboratories that offer liquid biopsy testing will ensure that clinicians can base their therapeutic decisions on robust results. The regular participation of laboratories in external quality assessment schemes for liquid biopsy testing aims to promptly pinpoint deficiencies and efficiently educate laboratories to improve their quality of services. Accreditation of liquid biopsy diagnostic laboratories based on the ISO15189 standard in Europe or by CLIA/CAP accreditation procedures in the US is the best way to achieve the adaptation of liquid biopsy into the clinical setting by assuring reliable results for the clinicians and their cancer patients. Nowadays, various organizations from academia, industry, and regulatory agencies collaborate to set a framework that will include all procedures from the pre-analytical phase and the analytical process to the final interpretation of results. In this review, we underline several challenges in the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) concerning standardization of protocols, quality control assessment, harmonization of laboratories, and compliance to specific guidelines that need to be thoroughly considered before liquid biopsy enters the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aliki Ntzifa
- Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells Lab, Lab of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Evi Lianidou
- Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells Lab, Lab of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kim SY, Jeong S, Lee W, Jeon Y, Kim YJ, Park S, Lee D, Go D, Song SH, Lee S, Woo HG, Yoon JK, Park YS, Kim YT, Lee SH, Kim KH, Lim Y, Kim JS, Kim HP, Bang D, Kim TY. Cancer signature ensemble integrating cfDNA methylation, copy number, and fragmentation facilitates multi-cancer early detection. Exp Mol Med 2023; 55:2445-2460. [PMID: 37907748 PMCID: PMC10689759 DOI: 10.1038/s12276-023-01119-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing has demonstrated great potential for early cancer detection. However, most large-scale studies have focused only on either targeted methylation sites or whole-genome sequencing, limiting comprehensive analysis that integrates both epigenetic and genetic signatures. In this study, we present a platform that enables simultaneous analysis of whole-genome methylation, copy number, and fragmentomic patterns of cfDNA in a single assay. Using a total of 950 plasma (361 healthy and 589 cancer) and 240 tissue samples, we demonstrate that a multifeature cancer signature ensemble (CSE) classifier integrating all features outperforms single-feature classifiers. At 95.2% specificity, the cancer detection sensitivity with methylation, copy number, and fragmentomic models was 77.2%, 61.4%, and 60.5%, respectively, but sensitivity was significantly increased to 88.9% with the CSE classifier (p value < 0.0001). For tissue of origin, the CSE classifier enhanced the accuracy beyond the methylation classifier, from 74.3% to 76.4%. Overall, this work proves the utility of a signature ensemble integrating epigenetic and genetic information for accurate cancer detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Yujin Jeon
- IMBdx Inc., Seoul, 08506, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | - Dongin Lee
- Department of Chemistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Dayoung Go
- IMBdx Inc., Seoul, 08506, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Hyun Song
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Sanghoo Lee
- Seoul Clinical Laboratories Healthcare Inc., Yongin-si, Gyenggi-do, 16954, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Goo Woo
- Department of Physiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, 16499, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Ki Yoon
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Young Sik Park
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Tae Kim
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Se-Hoon Lee
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute of Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, 03063, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Hyun Kim
- Department of Urology, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, 07804, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoojoo Lim
- IMBdx Inc., Seoul, 08506, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Soo Kim
- IMBdx Inc., Seoul, 08506, Republic of Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Duhee Bang
- Department of Chemistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
| | - Tae-You Kim
- IMBdx Inc., Seoul, 08506, Republic of Korea.
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nguyen VTC, Nguyen TH, Doan NNT, Pham TMQ, Nguyen GTH, Nguyen TD, Tran TTT, Vo DL, Phan TH, Jasmine TX, Nguyen VC, Nguyen HT, Nguyen TV, Nguyen THH, Huynh LAK, Tran TH, Dang QT, Doan TN, Tran AM, Nguyen VH, Nguyen VTA, Ho LMQ, Tran QD, Pham TTT, Ho TD, Nguyen BT, Nguyen TNV, Nguyen TD, Phu DTB, Phan BHH, Vo TL, Nai THT, Tran TT, Truong MH, Tran NC, Le TK, Tran THT, Duong ML, Bach HPT, Kim VV, Pham TA, Tran DH, Le TNA, Pham TVN, Le MT, Vo DH, Tran TMT, Nguyen MN, Van TTV, Nguyen AN, Tran TT, Tran VU, Le MP, Do TT, Phan TV, Nguyen HDL, Nguyen DS, Cao VT, Do TTT, Truong DK, Tang HS, Giang H, Nguyen HN, Phan MD, Tran LS. Multimodal analysis of methylomics and fragmentomics in plasma cell-free DNA for multi-cancer early detection and localization. eLife 2023; 12:RP89083. [PMID: 37819044 PMCID: PMC10567114 DOI: 10.7554/elife.89083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite their promise, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based assays for multi-cancer early detection face challenges in test performance, due mostly to the limited abundance of ctDNA and its inherent variability. To address these challenges, published assays to date demanded a very high-depth sequencing, resulting in an elevated price of test. Herein, we developed a multimodal assay called SPOT-MAS (screening for the presence of tumor by methylation and size) to simultaneously profile methylomics, fragmentomics, copy number, and end motifs in a single workflow using targeted and shallow genome-wide sequencing (~0.55×) of cell-free DNA. We applied SPOT-MAS to 738 non-metastatic patients with breast, colorectal, gastric, lung, and liver cancer, and 1550 healthy controls. We then employed machine learning to extract multiple cancer and tissue-specific signatures for detecting and locating cancer. SPOT-MAS successfully detected the five cancer types with a sensitivity of 72.4% at 97.0% specificity. The sensitivities for detecting early-stage cancers were 73.9% and 62.3% for stages I and II, respectively, increasing to 88.3% for non-metastatic stage IIIA. For tumor-of-origin, our assay achieved an accuracy of 0.7. Our study demonstrates comparable performance to other ctDNA-based assays while requiring significantly lower sequencing depth, making it economically feasible for population-wide screening.
Collapse
|
14
|
Safrastyan A, Zu Siederdissen CH, Wollny D. Decoding cell-type contributions to the cfRNA transcriptomic landscape of liver cancer. Hum Genomics 2023; 17:90. [PMID: 37798661 PMCID: PMC10552294 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-023-00537-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liquid biopsy, particularly cell-free RNA (cfRNA), has emerged as a promising non-invasive diagnostic tool for various diseases, including cancer, due to its accessibility and the wealth of information it provides. A key area of interest is the composition and cellular origin of cfRNA in the blood and the alterations in the cfRNA transcriptomic landscape during carcinogenesis. Investigating these changes can offer insights into the manifestations of tissue alterations in the blood, potentially leading to more effective diagnostic strategies. However, the consistency of these findings across different studies and their clinical utility remains to be fully elucidated, highlighting the need for further research in this area. RESULTS In this study, we analyzed over 350 blood samples from four distinct studies, investigating the cell type contributions to the cfRNA transcriptomic landscape in liver cancer. We found that an increase in hepatocyte proportions in the blood is a consistent feature across most studies and can be effectively utilized for classifying cancer and healthy samples. Moreover, our analysis revealed that in addition to hepatocytes, liver endothelial cell signatures are also prominent in the observed changes. By comparing the classification performance of cellular proportions to established markers, we demonstrated that cellular proportions could distinguish cancer from healthy samples as effectively as existing markers and can even enhance classification when used in combination with these markers. CONCLUSIONS Our comprehensive analysis of liver cell-type composition changes in blood revealed robust effects that help classify cancer from healthy samples. This is especially noteworthy, considering the heterogeneous nature of datasets and the etiological distinctions of samples. Furthermore, the observed differences in results across studies underscore the importance of integrative and comparative approaches in the future research to determine the consistency and robustness of findings. This study contributes to the understanding of cfRNA composition in liver cancer and highlights the potential of cellular deconvolution in liquid biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aram Safrastyan
- RNA Bioinformatics and High Throughput Analysis, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
- Leibniz Institute On Aging-Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Jena, Germany.
| | | | - Damian Wollny
- RNA Bioinformatics and High Throughput Analysis, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
- Leibniz Institute On Aging-Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI), Jena, Germany.
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim YG, Park J, Park EY, Kim SM, Lee SY. Analysis of MicroRNA Signature Differentially Expressed in Pancreatic Islet Cells Treated with Pancreatic Cancer-Derived Exosomes. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:14301. [PMID: 37762604 PMCID: PMC10532014 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241814301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Since the majority of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) develop insulin resistance and/or diabetes mellitus (DM) prior to PC diagnosis, PC-induced diabetes mellitus (PC-DM) has been a focus for a potential platform for PC detection. In previous studies, the PC-derived exosomes were shown to contain the mediators of PC-DM. In the present study, the response of normal pancreatic islet cells to the PC-derived exosomes was investigated to determine the potential biomarkers for PC-DM, and consequently, for PC. Specifically, changes in microRNA (miRNA) expression were evaluated. The miRNA specimens were prepared from the untreated islet cells as well as the islet cells treated with the PC-derived exosomes (from 50 patients) and the healthy-derived exosomes (from 50 individuals). The specimens were subjected to next-generation sequencing and bioinformatic analysis to determine the differentially expressed miRNAs (DEmiRNAs) only in the specimens treated with the PC-derived exosomes. Consequently, 24 candidate miRNA markers, including IRS1-modulating miRNAs such as hsa-miR-144-5p, hsa-miR-3148, and hsa-miR-3133, were proposed. The proposed miRNAs showed relevance to DM and/or insulin resistance in a literature review and pathway analysis, indicating a potential association with PC-DM. Due to the novel approach used in this study, additional evidence from future studies could corroborate the value of the miRNA markers discovered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young-gon Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea; (Y.-g.K.); (S.-M.K.)
| | - Jisook Park
- Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea; (J.P.); (E.Y.P.)
| | - Eun Young Park
- Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea; (J.P.); (E.Y.P.)
| | - Sang-Mi Kim
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea; (Y.-g.K.); (S.-M.K.)
| | - Soo-Youn Lee
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea; (Y.-g.K.); (S.-M.K.)
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Meriranta L, Pitkänen E, Leppä S. Blood has never been thicker: Cell-free DNA fragmentomics in the liquid biopsy toolbox of B-cell lymphomas. Semin Hematol 2023; 60:132-141. [PMID: 37455222 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Liquid biopsies utilizing plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are anticipated to revolutionize decision-making in cancer care. In the field of lymphomas, ctDNA-based blood tests represent the forefront of clinically applicable tools to harness decades of genomic research for disease profiling, quantification, and detection. More recently, the discovery of nonrandom fragmentation patterns in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has opened another avenue of liquid biopsy research beyond mutational interrogation of ctDNA. Through examination of structural features, nucleotide content, and genomic distribution of massive numbers of plasma cfDNA molecules, the study of fragmentomics aims at identifying new tools that augment existing ctDNA-based analyses and discover new ways to profile cancer from blood tests. Indeed, the characterization of aberrant lymphoma ctDNA fragment patterns and harnessing them with powerful machine-learning techniques are expected to unleash the potential of nonmutant molecules for liquid biopsy purposes. In this article, we review cfDNA fragmentomics as an emerging approach in the ctDNA research of B-cell lymphomas. We summarize the biology behind the formation of cfDNA fragment patterns and discuss the preanalytical and technical limitations faced with current methodologies. Then we go through the advances in the field of lymphomas and envision what other noninvasive tools based on fragment characteristics could be explored. Last, we place fragmentomics as one of the facets of ctDNA analyses in emerging multiview and multiomics liquid biopsies. We pay attention to the unknowns in the field of cfDNA fragmentation biology that warrant further mechanistic investigation to provide rational background for the development of these precision oncology tools and understanding of their limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leo Meriranta
- Applied Tumor Genomics, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland; iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Esa Pitkänen
- Applied Tumor Genomics, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Helsinki, Finland; Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), HILIFE, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sirpa Leppä
- Applied Tumor Genomics, Research Programs Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland; iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|