Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab with extended dosing up to every 16 weeks in patients with diabetic macular oedema (YOSEMITE and RHINE): two randomised, double-masked, phase 3 trials

Enhanced durability and evolution of retreatment criteria of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor agents for diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The increasing prevalence of diabetic macular edema (DME) necessitates an updated review of treatment modalities. While the shift from laser to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has transformed patient outcomes, benefits of these agents are not fully realized in real-world implementation relative to the setting of controlled clinical trials. This review outlines the evolution of intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment extension protocols for DME that reflect efforts to address treatment adherence challenges while optimizing visual outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies highlight the efficacy of extended-interval dosing with anti-VEGF agents in managing DME. Trials such as RISE/RIDE, VISTA/VIVID, and LUCIDATE have established the foundation of these regimens by demonstrating sustained visual gains with continuous treatment. However, newer trials including PROTOCOL T, KESTREL/KITE, YOSEMITE/RHINE, and PHOTON have furthered this concept, revealing that less frequent dosing of various anti-VEGF agents can maintain similar visual acuity and anatomical outcomes to traditional monthly injections.

SUMMARY

The reviewed findings suggest a paradigm shift in DME treatment toward less frequent anti-VEGF injections. This has significant implications for clinical practice, potentially leading to greater adherence to treatment regimens and sustained visual function in patients, while minimizing treatment burden and healthcare costs. Further investigation into the long-term effects of extended dosing intervals is required.

Diabetic Disease of the Eye in Canada: Consensus Statements from a Retina Specialist Working Group

Despite advances in systemic care, diabetic disease of the eye (DDE) remains the leading cause of blindness worldwide. There is a critical gap of up-to-date, evidence-based guidance for ophthalmologists in Canada that includes evidence from recent randomized controlled trials. Previous guidance has not always given special consideration to applying treatments and managing DDE in the context of the healthcare system. This consensus statement aims to assist practitioners in the field by providing a spectrum of acceptable opinions on DDE treatment and management from recognized experts in the field. In compiling evidence and generating consensus, a working group of retinal specialists in Canada addressed clinical questions surrounding the four themes of disease, patient, management, and collaboration. The working group reviewed literature representing the highest level of evidence on DDE and shared their opinions on topics surrounding the epidemiology and pathophysiology of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema; diagnosis and monitoring; considerations around diabetes medication use; strategic considerations for management given systemic comorbidities, ocular comorbidities, and pregnancy; treatment goals and modalities for diabetic macular edema, non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy, and retinal detachment; and interdisciplinary collaboration. Ultimately, this work highlighted that the retinal examination in DDE not only informs the treating ophthalmologist but can serve as a global index for disease progression across many tissues of the body. It highlighted further that DDE can be treated regardless of diabetic control, that a systemic approach to patient care will result in the best health outcomes, and prevention of visual complications requires a multidisciplinary management approach. Ophthalmologists must tailor their clinical approach to the needs and circumstances of individual patients and work within the realities of their healthcare setting.

Rationale and Design of VOYAGER: Long-term Outcomes of Faricimab and Port Delivery System with Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema in Clinical Practice

Purpose

To describe the rationale and design of the VOYAGER (NCT05476926) study, which aims to investigate the safety and effectiveness of faricimab and the Port Delivery System with ranibizumab (PDS) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or diabetic macular edema (DME) in clinical practice. VOYAGER also aims to understand drivers of clinical practice treatment outcomes by gaining novel insight into the intersection of treatment regimens, decisions, anatomic outcomes, and vision.

Design

Primary data collection, noninterventional, prospective, multinational, multicenter clinical practice study.

Participants

At least 5000 patients initiating/continuing faricimab or PDS for nAMD/DME (500 sites, 31 countries).

Methods

Management will be per usual care, with no mandated scheduled visits/imaging protocol requirements. Using robust methodologies, relevant clinical and ophthalmic data, including visual acuity (VA), and data on treatment clinical setting/regimens/philosophies, presence of anatomic features, and safety events will be collected. Routinely collected fundus images will be uploaded to the proprietary Imaging Platform for analysis. An innovative investigator interface will graphically display the patient treatment journey with the aim of optimizing treatment decisions.

Main Outcome Measures

Primary end point: VA change from baseline at 12 months per study cohort (faricimab in nAMD and in DME, PDS in nAMD). Secondary end points: VA change over time and per treatment regimens (fixed, treat-and-extend, pro re nata, and other) and number. Exploratory end points: VA change in relation to presence/location of anatomic features that impact vision (fluid, central subfield thickness, fibrosis, atrophy, subretinal hyperreflective material, diabetic retinopathy severity, and disorganization of retinal inner layers) and per treatment regimen/philosophies. The impact of regional and practice differences on outcomes will be assessed as will safety.

Results

Recruitment commenced in November 2022 and will continue until late 2027, allowing for up to 5 years follow-up. Exploratory interim analyses are planned annually.

Conclusions

VOYAGER is an innovative study of retinal diseases that will assess the effectiveness and safety of faricimab and PDS in nAMD and DME and identify clinician- and disease-related factors driving treatment outcomes in clinical practices globally to help optimize vision outcomes.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Cost-Effectiveness of Faricimab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Oedema (DMO): A UK Analysis

AIM

The aim of this work was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of faricimab against relevant therapeutic alternatives used in clinical practice for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in the UK.

METHODS

A state-transition (Markov) model, with health states based on visual acuity scores and treatment pathways, was developed to conduct cost-utility analysis of faricimab treat and extend (T&E) regimen versus ranibizumab pro re nata (PRN) and aflibercept PRN over a time horizon of 25 years. Comparison against bevacizumab PRN was considered in scenario analysis. Effectiveness data for faricimab was sourced from the pivotal YOSEMITE and RHINE double-blind randomised controlled trials, and from a network meta-analysis for comparators. Costs and (dis)utilities were taken from nationally published sources or literature. The base case included indirect costs (productivity gains, informal care) given the wider impacts of DMO on society. Sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

In the base case, faricimab T&E dominated ranibizumab PRN and aflibercept PRN, being more effective and resulting in cost savings (between 0.16 and 0.36 mean QALYs gained, and £5483-9655 mean cost savings). In scenario analysis, faricimab was more effective but costlier compared with bevacizumab, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £8898 per QALY gained. Considering only healthcare payer costs, the ICER of faricimab compared with ranibizumab PRN was £7991 per QALY gained and faricimab dominated aflibercept PRN.

CONCLUSIONS

Faricimab T&E has the potential to reduce the burden of vision loss on society, giving people living with DMO greater independence and contributing to increased healthcare system capacity. At a threshold of £20,000, faricimab T&E is cost-effective compared with relevant comparators, and potentially cost saving.

Exploring Current Molecular Targets in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration toward the Perspective of Long-Term Agents

Long-lasting anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents have become an option to reduce treatment frequency, with ongoing research exploring optimal responses and safety profiles. This review delves into molecular targets, pharmacological aspects, and strategies for achieving effective and enduring disease control in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The molecular pathways involved in macular neovascularization, including angiogenesis and arteriogenesis, are explored. VEGF, PlGF, Ang-1, and Ang-2 play crucial roles in regulating angiogenesis, influencing vessel growth, maturation, and stability. The complex interplay of these factors, along with growth factors like TGFβ and bFGF, contributes to the pathogenesis of neovascular membranes. Current anti-VEGF therapies, including bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab, and faricimab, are discussed with a focus on their pharmacokinetics and clinical applications. Strategies to achieve sustained disease control in AMD involve smaller molecules, increased drug dosages, and novel formulations. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the molecular targets and pharmacological aspects of neovascular AMD treatment.

Short-term outcomes of intravitreal faricimab for refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To assess the short-term outcomes of intravitreal faricimab (IVF) for previously treated refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A retrospective monocentric study including 44 eyes treated with an upload of 4 × monthly intravitreal injections (IVI) of faricimab 6 mg/0.05 mL and followed for 4 weeks after last IVI (16 W). Patients were switched to IVF after treatment with at least three other anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGF). Main outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and retinal fluid distribution.

RESULTS

44 eyes of 44 patients with previously treated refractory nAMD (63% males) were included. Mean age was 79 ± 7 years. The total number of previous anti-VEGF before switching to IVF was 32 ± 15 IVIs/eye. BCVA (logMAR) improved significantly from 0.65 ± 0.26 to 0.50 ± 0.23 at 16 W (p < 0.01). CMT (µm) decreased significantly from 422 ± 68 to 362 ± 47 at 16 W (p < 0.01). SFCT did not change significantly at 16 W (p = 0.06). The number of eyes with subretinal fluid (SRF) decreased significantly from 29 (65%) to 13 (29%) at 16 W (p = 0.001). There were no significant changes regarding the distribution of intraretinal fluid or pigment epithelial detachment (p > 0.05). A complete fluid resolution was achieved in 8 eyes (18%). No adverse events were noticed.

CONCLUSION

In the short term, IVF led to a significant decrease in CMT as well as a significant improvement of BCVA and thus appears to be an effective treatment option for previously treated refractory nAMD without relevant adverse effects.

Evaluating photodynamic therapy versus brolucizumab as a second-line treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

To compare the one-year outcomes between intravitreal brolucizumab (IVBr) monotherapy and photodynamic therapy (PDT) as a second-line treatment in patients with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) who did not respond to first-line therapy.

METHODS

This case-control study included eyes with PCV that do not respond to aflibercept or ranibizumab. The patients were retrospectively registered. We compared outcomes, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), anatomical results, and the need for additional treatments, between IVBr and a combination therapy using PDT as second-line treatments for refractory PCV, after adjusting for potential confounders. We analyzed E-values to evaluate the robustness of the results against unmeasured confounders.

RESULTS

Twenty-two eyes received IVBr, and twenty-four underwent PDT. No apparent differences were observed in BCVA and central macular thickness (CMT) changes from baseline between the groups (IVBr vs. PDT: BCVA, 0.01 ± 0.47 logMAR vs. 0.04 ± 0.18 logMAR, P-value = 0.756; CMT: - 36.3 ± 99.4 μm vs. - 114.7 ± 181.4 μm, P-value = 0.146). Only in the PDT group, five eyes (20.8%) did not require additional treatment after the second-line treatment, the adjusted odds ratio indicating no further treatment needed was 11.98 (95% confidence interval: 1.42-2070.07, P-value = 0.019). The E-value for the adjusted odds ratio was 23.44.

CONCLUSIONS

Both second-line treatments for PCV exhibited similar visual and anatomical outcomes. Only in the PDT-treated eyes were there some patients who did not require further treatment after second-line therapy.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs combined with laser photocoagulation maintain retinal ganglion cell integrity in patients with diabetic macular edema: study protocol for a prospective, non-randomized, controlled clinical trial

The integrity of retinal ganglion cells is tightly associated with diabetic macular degeneration that leads to damage and death of retinal ganglion cells, affecting vision. The major clinical treatments for diabetic macular edema are anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs and laser photocoagulation. However, although the macular thickness can be normalized with each of these two therapies used alone, the vision does not improve in many patients. This might result from the incomplete recovery of retinal ganglion cell injury. Therefore, a prospective, non-randomized, controlled clinical trial was designed to investigate the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs combined with laser photocoagulation on the integrity of retinal ganglion cells in patients with diabetic macular edema and its relationship with vision recovery. In this trial, 150 patients with diabetic macular edema will be equally divided into three groups according to therapeutic methods, followed by treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs, laser photocoagulation therapy, and their combination. All patients will be followed up for 12 months. The primary outcome measure is retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness at 12 months after treatment. The secondary outcome measures include retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness before and 1, 3, 6, and 9 months after treatment, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, best-corrected visual acuity, macular area thickness, and choroidal thickness before and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment. Safety measure is the incidence of adverse events at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment. The study protocol hopes to validate the better efficacy and safety of the combined treatment in patients with diabetic macula compared with the other two monotherapies alone during the 12-month follow-up period. The trial is designed to focus on clarifying the time-effect relationship between imaging measures related to the integrity of retinal ganglion cells and best-corrected visual acuity. The trial protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University with approval No. (2023)(26) on April 25, 2023, and was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2300072478, June 14, 2023, protocol version: 2.0).

Severe Intraocular Inflammation Following Intravitreal Faricimab

Importance

Monitoring for and reporting potential cases of intraocular inflammation (IOI) in clinical practice despite limited occurrences in clinical trials, including experiences with relatively new intravitreal agents, such as brolucizumab, pegcetacoplan, or faricimab, helps balance potential benefits and risks of these agents.

Objective

To provide descriptions of 3 initially culture-negative cases of acute, severe, posterior-segment IOI events occurring within the same month following intravitreal faricimab injections at a single institution.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this case series, 3 patients manifesting acute, severe IOI following intravitreal injection of faricimab were identified between September 20, 2023, and October 20, 2023.

Exposure

Faricimab, 6 mg (0.05 mL of 120 mg/mL solution), for neovascular age-related macular degeneration among patients previously treated with aflibercept; 1 patient also had prior exposure to bevacizumab.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Visual acuity, vitreous taps for bacterial or fungal cultures, and retinal imaging.

Results

All 3 patients received intravitreal faricimab injections between September 20 and October 20, 2023, from 2 different lot numbers (expiration dates, July 2025) at 3 locations of 1 institution among 3 of 19 retina physicians. Visual acuities with correction were 20/63 OS for patient 1, 20/40 OD for patient 2, and 20/20 OS for patient 3 prior to injection. All 3 patients developed acute, severe inflammation involving the anterior and posterior segment within 3 to 4 days after injection, with visual acuities of hand motion OS, counting fingers OD, and hand motion OS, respectively. Two patients were continuing faricimab treatment while 1 patient was initiating faricimab treatment. All received intravitreal ceftazidime, 2.2 mg/0.1 mL, and vancomycin, 1 mg/0.1 mL, immediately following vitreous taps. All vitreous tap culture results were negative. One patient underwent vitrectomy 1 day following presentation. Intraoperative vitreous culture grew 1 colony of Staphylococcus epidermidis, judged a likely contaminant by infectious disease specialists. All symptoms resolved within 1 month; visual acuities with correction were 20/100 OS for patient 1, 20/50 OD for patient 2, and 20/30 OS for patient 3.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this case series, 3 patients with acute, severe IOI within 1 month at 3 different locations among 3 ophthalmologists of 1 institution following intravitreal faricimab could represent some unknown storage or handling problem. However, this cluster suggests such inflammatory events may be more common than anticipated from faricimab trial reports, emphasizing the continued need for vigilance to detect and report such cases following regulatory approval.

Clinical proof of concept for anti-FGF2 therapy in exudative age-related macular degeneration (nAMD): phase 2 trials in treatment-naïve and anti-VEGF pretreated patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are the first-line treatment for exudative age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Due to the limitations of these standard therapies, targeting alternative mechanisms of action may be helpful for treatment of this very common disease. Here, we investigated an anti-fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) aptamer, umedaptanib pegol, a next generation therapeutic for the treatment of nAMD.

METHODS

Three phase 2 studies were designed. First, a multicentre, randomized, double-masked TOFU study assessed the efficacy of intravitreal injections of umedaptanib pegol monotherapy or in combination with aflibercept, compared to aflibercept monotherapy in 86 subjects with anti-VEGF pretreated nAMD. Second, 22 subjects who had exited the TOFU study received 4 monthly intravitreal injections of umedaptanib pegol (extension, RAMEN study). Third, as an investigator-sponsored trial (TEMPURA study), a single-center, open-label, 4-month study was designed to evaluate the safety and treatment efficacy of umedaptanib pegol in five naïve nAMD patients who had not received any prior anti-VEGF treatment.

RESULTS

The TOFU study demonstrated that umedaptanib pegol alone or in combination with aflibercept did not improve best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) over aflibercept alone. However, the change in BCVA and CST at primary endpoint was marginal in all the three treatment groups, suggesting that umedaptanib pegol is effective to prevent the disease progression. The RAMEN study confirmed the cessation of disease progression. In the TEMPURA study, naïve nAMD patients showed improvement and no further macular degeneration, with striking improvement of visual acuity and central subfield thickness in some of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate, for the first time, clinical proof of concept for aptamer based anti-FGF2 therapy of nAMD.

KESTREL and KITE Phase 3 Studies: 100-Week Results With Brolucizumab in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema

PURPOSE

To report the 100-week outcomes from the KESTREL and KITE trials.

DESIGN

Two phase 3, double-masked, active-controlled, randomized trials.

METHODS

Patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) were randomized 1:1:1 to brolucizumab 3 mg/6 mg (BRO3/BRO6) or aflibercept 2 mg (AFL) in KESTREL (N = 566) or 1:1 to BRO6 or AFL in KITE (N = 360). BRO3/BRO6 arms received 5 loading doses every 6 weeks (q6w) followed by q12w dosing, with an option to adjust to q8w at predefined disease activity assessment visits. In KITE, at week 72, based on the disease stability assessment, treatment intervals could be extended by 4 weeks in the BRO6 arm. AFL arms received 5 monthly loading doses followed by fixed q8w dosing.

RESULTS

At week 100, change from baseline in BCVA (letters) was +8.8 for BRO6 and +10.6 for AFL in KESTREL; and +10.9 for BRO6 and +8.4 for AFL in KITE. In both studies, fewer BRO6 subjects had intraretinal fluid and/or subretinal fluid than AFL subjects. Results were achieved with 32.9% (KESTREL) and 47.5% (KITE) of BRO6 subjects maintained on q12w and q12w/q16w dosing, respectively. Intraocular inflammation rates for BRO6 vs AFL were 4.2% vs 1.1% (KESTREL) and 2.2% vs 1.7% (KITE), of which retinal vasculitis rates were 0.5% vs 0% in KESTREL, with no cases in KITE. Retinal vascular occlusion rates were 1.6% vs 0.5% (KESTREL) and 0.6% in both treatment arms in KITE.

CONCLUSIONS

Results show the long-term efficacy and durability of brolucizumab in improving visual and anatomical outcomes in DME; the overall safety profile of brolucizumab remained unchanged through year 2.

Global experience of faricimab in clinical settings - a review

INTRODUCTION

Faricimab is a bispecific antibody that acts to reduce neoangiogenesis in exudative retinal vascular disorders. It is approved for use in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema. We review the published efficacy and safety of faricimab in clinical settings.

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive literature review was conducted. Based on the 14 published real-world studies, 1127 patients (1204 eyes) were treated with faricimab. The majority of studies (14) included pre-treated patients. Most studies (13) showed central macular thickness improvement. However visual acuity improved in only half of the studies analyzed. Four studies demonstrated an extension of the treatment. Only 4 eyes (0.33%) reported intraocular inflammation and 3 eyes (0.24%) reported retinal pigment epithelial tear.

EXPERT OPINION

The clinical experience with faricimab to date has the potential to provide a stable visual outcome with reduced treatment burden in cases that are resistant to other approved anti-VEGF agents. There are no major safety concerns based on this data analysis.

An eye on equity: faricimab-driven health equity improvements in diabetic macular oedema using a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis from a UK societal perspective

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is a leading cause of blindness in developed countries, with significant disease burden associated with socio-economic deprivation. Distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (DCEA) allows evaluation of health equity impacts of interventions, estimation of how health outcomes and costs are distributed in the population, and assessments of potential trade-offs between health maximisation and equity. We conducted an aggregate DCEA to determine the equity impact of faricimab.

METHODS

Data on health outcomes and costs were derived from a cost-effectiveness model of faricimab compared with ranibizumab, aflibercept and off-label bevacizumab using a societal perspective in the base case and a healthcare payer perspective in scenario analysis. Health gains and health opportunity costs were distributed across socio-economic subgroups. Health and equity impacts, measured using the Atkinson inequality index, were assessed visually on an equity-efficiency impact plane and combined into a measure of societal welfare.

RESULTS

At an opportunity cost threshold of £20,000/quality-adjusted life year (QALY), faricimab displayed an increase in net health benefits against all comparators and was found to improve equity. The equity impact increased the greater the concerns for reducing health inequalities over maximising population health. Using a healthcare payer perspective, faricimab was equity improving in most scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-acting therapies with fewer injections, such as faricimab, may reduce costs, improve health outcomes and increase health equity. Extended economic evaluation frameworks capturing additional value elements, such as DCEA, enable a more comprehensive valuation of interventions, which is of relevance to decision-makers, healthcare professionals and patients.

Deciphering perivascular macrophages and microglia in the retinal ganglion cell layers

Introduction: The classically defined two retinal microglia layers are distributed in inner and outer plexiform layers. Although there are some reports that retinal microglia are also superficially located around the ganglion cell layer (GCL) in contact with the vitreous, there has been a lack of detailed descriptions and not fully understood yet. Methods: We visualized the microglial layers by using CX3CR1-GFP (C57BL6) transgenic mice with both healthy and disease conditions including NaIO3-induced retinal degeneration models and IRBP-induced auto-immune uveitis models. Result: We found the GCL microglia has two subsets; peripheral (pph) microglia located on the retinal parenchyma and BAM (CNS Border Associated Macrophage) which have a special stretched phenotype only located on the surface of large retinal veins. First, in the pph microglia subset, but not in BAM, Galectin-3 and LYVE1 are focally expressed. However, LYVE1 is specifically expressed in the amoeboid or transition forms, except the typical dendritic morphology in the pph microglia. Second, BAM is tightly attached to the surface of the retinal veins and has similar morphology patterns in both the healthy and disease conditions. CD86+ BAM has a longer process which vertically passes the proximal retinal veins. Our data helps decipher the basic anatomy and pathophysiology of the retinal microglia in the GCL. Discussion: Our data helps decipher the basic anatomy and pathophysiology of the retinal microglia in the GCL.

Mechanisms of angiogenesis in tumour

Angiogenesis is essential for tumour growth and metastasis. Antiangiogenic factor-targeting drugs have been approved as first line agents in a variety of oncology treatments. Clinical drugs frequently target the VEGF signalling pathway during sprouting angiogenesis. Accumulating evidence suggests that tumours can evade antiangiogenic therapy through other angiogenesis mechanisms in addition to the vascular sprouting mechanism involving endothelial cells. These mechanisms include (1) sprouting angiogenesis, (2) vasculogenic mimicry, (3) vessel intussusception, (4) vascular co-option, (5) cancer stem cell-derived angiogenesis, and (6) bone marrow-derived angiogenesis. Other non-sprouting angiogenic mechanisms are not entirely dependent on the VEGF signalling pathway. In clinical practice, the conversion of vascular mechanisms is closely related to the enhancement of tumour drug resistance, which often leads to clinical treatment failure. This article summarizes recent studies on six processes of tumour angiogenesis and provides suggestions for developing more effective techniques to improve the efficacy of antiangiogenic treatment.

Intravitreal aflibercept 8 mg in diabetic macular oedema (PHOTON): 48-week results from a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 2/3 trial

BACKGROUND

A high-dose formulation of intravitreal aflibercept (8 mg) could improve treatment outcomes in diabetic macular oedema (DMO) by requiring fewer injections than the standard comparator, aflibercept 2 mg. We report efficacy and safety results of aflibercept 8 mg versus 2 mg in patients with DMO.

METHODS

PHOTON was a randomised, double-masked, non-inferiority, phase 2/3 trial performed at 138 hospitals and specialty retina clinics in seven countries. Eligible patients were adults aged 18 years or older with type 1 or 2 diabetes and centre-involved DMO. Patients were randomly assigned (1:2:1) to intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg every 8 weeks (2q8), aflibercept 8 mg every 12 weeks (8q12), or aflibercept 8 mg every 16 weeks (8q16), following initial monthly dosing. From week 16, dosing intervals for the aflibercept 8 mg groups were shortened if patients met prespecified dose regimen modification criteria denoting disease activity. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at week 48 (non-inferiority margin of 4 letters). Efficacy and safety analyses included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04429503).

FINDINGS

Between June 29, 2020, and June 28, 2021, 970 patients were screened for eligibility. After exclusions, 660 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive aflibercept 8q12 (n=329), 8q16 (n=164), or 2q8 (n=167); two patients were randomly assigned in error and did not receive treatment. 658 (99·7%) patients were treated and included in the full analysis set and safety analysis set (8q12 n=328, 8q16 n=163, and 2q8 n=167). Mean patient age was 62·3 years (SD 10·4). 401 (61%) patients were male. 471 (72%) patients were White. Aflibercept 8q12 and 8q16 demonstrated non-inferior BCVA gains to aflibercept 2q8 (BCVA mean change from baseline 8·8 letters [SD 9·0] in the 8q12 group, 7·9 letters [8·4] in the 8q16 group, and 9·2 letters [9·0] in the 2q8 group). The difference in least squares means was -0·57 letters (95% CI -2·26 to 1·13, p value for non-inferiority <0·0001) between 8q12 and 2q8 and -1·44 letters (-3·27 to 0·39, p value for non-inferiority 0·0031) between aflibercept 8q16 and 2q8. Proportions of patients with ocular adverse events in the study eye were similar across groups (8q12 n=104 [32%], 8q16 n=48 [29%], and 2q8 n=46 [28%]).

INTERPRETATION

Aflibercept 8 mg demonstrated efficacy and safety with extended dosing intervals and could decrease treatment burden in patients with DMO.

FUNDING

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Bayer.

Management of treatment-naïve diabetic macular edema patients: Review of real-world clinical data

The high prevalence of Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a real global health problem. Its complex pathophysiology involves different pathways. Over the last decade, the introduction of intravitreal treatments has dramatically changed the management and prognosis of DME. Among the different treatment options, inhibitors of vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and intravitreal steroids implants represent the first-line therapy of DME. We conducted a review of electronic databases to compile the available evidence about the clinical management of DME in a clinical setting, with a special focus on treatment-naïve patients. Anti-VEGF therapies represent a valuable option for treating DME patients. However, many patients do not respond properly to this treatment and, due to its administration regimen, many patients receive suboptimal treatment in real life. Current evidence demonstrated that in patients with DME, DEX-i improved significantly both anatomic and visual outcomes. Besides eyes with insufficient anti-VEGF respond or recalcitrant DME cases, DEX-i can be effectively and safely used in treatment-naïve DME patients as first line therapy. DEX-i may be considered first line therapy in different clinical scenarios, such as DME eyes with a greater inflammatory component, patients with cardiovascular events, vitrectomized eyes, or those requiring cataract surgery. In conclusion, there are still many points for improvement pending in the clinical management of the patient with DME. Since DME treatment must follow a patient-tailored approach, selecting the best therapeutic approach for each patient requires a good understanding of the pathophysiology of DME.

Trends in Research Payments for Diabetic Macular Edema from 2015 to 2021

Purpose

To evaluate characteristics of research payments for diabetic macular edema (DME) studies and correlations to current management trends.

Design

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Subjects

Research payments for DME.

Methods

Studies with keywords of "diabetic macular edema" or "DME" in the title were extracted from the Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments database from 2015 to 2021. Recipients, payors, and payment amounts were identified. Industry funding was compared with public research funding by the National Eye Institute (NEI).

Main Outcome Measures

Trends and total value of industry and public fundings for DME from 2015 to 2021.

Results

From 2015 to 2021, 451 beneficiaries received 6062 industry payments for a total of $120 148 997.41 for DME-related research. The total value of industry funding increased from $8 225 859.08 in 2015 to $50 092 778.45 in 2021. Of the 6062 industry payments, 5367 (88.5%) were reported by male recipients compared with 695 (11.5%) female beneficiaries. Payments to female recipients increased from 60 (7.1%) in 2015 to 335 (13.7%) in 2021. In comparison, public funding for DME-related research from the NEI was comprised of $18 863 266.00 to 17 principal investigators from 2015 to 2021. The total value of public funding increased from $973 590.00 in 2015 to $3 354 376.00 in 2021. Of 59 public research payments, 46 (78.0%) were reported by male recipients and 13 (22.0%) by female recipients. Payments to female recipients increased from 1 (25.0%) in 2015 to 3 (30.0%) in 2021. The most highly invested product by industry were anti-VEGF agents, accounting for $89 955 595.20 (74.9%) of total payment value.

Conclusions

There was an increase in both industry and public-sponsored funding for DME-related research from 2015 to 2021. There seemed to be a possible discrepancy in both industry and public funding based on sex for DME studies during the study period.

Financial Disclosures

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Next generation therapeutics for retinal neurodegenerative diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases affecting the visual system encompass glaucoma, macular degeneration, retinopathies, and inherited genetic disorders such as retinitis pigmentosa. These ocular pathologies pose a serious burden of visual impairment and blindness worldwide. Current treatment modalities include small molecule drugs, biologics, or gene therapies, most of which are administered topically as eye drops or as injectables. However, the topical route of administration faces challenges in effectively reaching the posterior segment and achieving desired concentrations at the target site, while injections and implants risk severe complications, such as retinal detachment and endophthalmitis. This necessitates the development of innovative therapeutic strategies that can prolong drug release, deliver effective concentrations to the back of the eye with minimal systemic exposure, and improve patient compliance and safety. In this review, we introduce retinal degenerative diseases, followed by a discussion of the existing clinical standard of care. We then delve into detail about drug and gene delivery systems currently in preclinical and clinical development, including formulation and delivery advantages/drawbacks, with a special emphasis on potential for clinical translation.

Two cases of diabetic macular edema with diminished areas of retinal non-perfusion and microaneurysms after intravitreal faricimab injections

Purpose

To report two cases of diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal faricimab injections (IVFs), including the assessment of retinal microaneurysms and extent of retinal capillary non-perfusion using fluorescein angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (IA).

Observations

Case 1: A 72-year-old man presented with aflibercept-resistant DME in the left eye, with a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/16. FA showed areas of retinal capillary non-perfusion and focal leakage in the macular area of the left eye. IA revealed numerous microaneurysms in the temporal region of the macula. Four consecutive monthly IVFs were administered to the left eye, and DME eventually diminished. After the loading phase, the BCVA was maintained at 20/16 with reduced visual distortion. FA showed improvement of macular leakage and stable retinal capillary non-perfusion areas, and the foveal avascular zone was clearly observed. The disappearance of numerous microaneurysms was confirmed on IA images.Case 2: An 80-year-old woman developed DME with macular vein occlusion in the left eye after panretinal laser photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The patient's BCVA was 20/32. DME was resistant to subtenon triamcinolone injections. FA revealed focal areas of retinal capillary non-perfusion and persistent leakage in the macular area of the left eye. IA revealed scattered microaneurysms within the retinal arcade. Four consecutive monthly IVFs were administered to the left eye, and DME eventually diminished. After the loading phase, the BCVA was maintained at 20/32. FA showed improvement of macular leakage and stable retinal capillary non-perfusion areas. The reduction of microaneurysms was confirmed on IA images.

Conclusions and importance

These case reports highlight the potential of faricimab as an alternative anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drug for treatment-resistant DME, including reduction of retinal microaneurysms and stabilization of the areas of retinal capillary non-perfusion. However, continuation of a robust treatment regimen may be required to achieve these objectives.

The Treatment of Diabetic Retinal Edema with Intravitreal Steroids: How and When

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common complication of diabetes mellitus and a leading cause of visual impairment worldwide. It is defined as the diabetes-related accumulation of fluid, proteins, and lipids, with retinal thickening, within the macular area. DME affects a significant proportion of individuals with diabetes, with the prevalence increasing with disease duration and severity. It is estimated that approximately 25-30% of diabetic patients will develop DME during their lifetime. Poor glycemic control, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes duration, and genetic predisposition are recognized as risk factors for the development and progression of DME. Although the exact pathophysiology is still not completely understood, it has been demonstrated that chronic hyperglycemia triggers a cascade of biochemical processes, including increased oxidative stress, inflammation, activation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cellular dysfunction, and apoptosis, with breakdown of the blood-retinal barriers and fluid accumulation within the macular area. Early diagnosis and appropriate management of DME are crucial for improving visual outcomes. Although the control of systemic risk factors still remains the most important strategy in DME treatment, intravitreal pharmacotherapy with anti-VEGF molecules or steroids is currently considered the first-line approach in DME patients, whereas macular laser photocoagulation and pars plana vitrectomy may be useful in selected cases. Available intravitreal steroids, including triamcinolone acetonide injections and dexamethasone and fluocinolone acetonide implants, exert their therapeutic effect by reducing inflammation, inhibiting VEGF expression, stabilizing the blood-retinal barrier and thus reducing vascular permeability. They have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing macular edema and improving visual outcomes in DME patients but are associated with a high risk of intraocular pressure elevation and cataract development, so their use requires an accurate patient selection. This manuscript aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathology, epidemiology, risk factors, physiopathology, clinical features, treatment mechanisms of actions, treatment options, prognosis, and ongoing clinical studies related to the treatment of DME, with particular consideration of intravitreal steroids therapy.

TENAYA and LUCERNE: Two-Year Results from the Phase 3 Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Trials of Faricimab with Treat-and-Extend Dosing in Year 2

PURPOSE

To evaluate 2-year efficacy, durability, and safety of the bispecific antibody faricimab, which inhibits both angiopoietin-2 and VEGF-A.

DESIGN

TENAYA (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03823287) and LUCERNE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03823300) were identically designed, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled phase 3 noninferiority trials.

PARTICIPANTS

Treatment-naive patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) 50 years of age or older.

METHODS

Patients were randomized (1:1) to intravitreal faricimab 6.0 mg up to every 16 weeks (Q16W) or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks (Q8W). Faricimab fixed dosing based on protocol-defined disease activity at weeks 20 and 24 up to week 60, followed up to week 108 by a treat-and-extend personalized treatment interval regimen.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Efficacy analyses included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline at 2 years (averaged over weeks 104, 108, and 112) and proportion of patients receiving Q16W, every 12 weeks (Q12W), and Q8W dosing at week 112 in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included ocular adverse events (AEs) in the study eye through study end at week 112.

RESULTS

Of 1326 patients treated across TENAYA/LUCERNE, 1113 (83.9%) completed treatment (n = 555 faricimab; n = 558 aflibercept). The BCVA change from baseline at 2 years was comparable between faricimab and aflibercept groups in TENAYA (adjusted mean change, +3.7 letters [95% confidence interval (CI), +2.1 to +5.4] and +3.3 letters [95% CI, +1.7 to +4.9], respectively; mean difference, +0.4 letters [95% CI, -1.9 to +2.8]) and LUCERNE (adjusted mean change, +5.0 letters [95% CI, +3.4 to +6.6] and +5.2 letters [95% CI, +3.6 to +6.8], respectively; mean difference, -0.2 letters [95% CI, -2.4 to +2.1]). At week 112 in TENAYA and LUCERNE, 59.0% and 66.9%, respectively, achieved Q16W faricimab dosing, increasing from year 1, and 74.1% and 81.2%, achieved Q12W or longer dosing. Ocular AEs in the study eye were comparable between faricimab and aflibercept groups in TENAYA (55.0% and 56.5% of patients, respectively) and LUCERNE (52.9% and 47.5% of patients, respectively) through week 112.

CONCLUSIONS

Treat-and-extend faricimab treatment based on nAMD disease activity maintained vision gains through year 2, with most patients achieving extended dosing intervals.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Recent advances in the treatment and delivery system of diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a highly tissue-specific neurovascular complication of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus and is among the leading causes of blindness worldwide. Pathophysiological changes in DR encompass neurodegeneration, inflammation, and oxidative stress. Current treatments for DR, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, steroids, laser photocoagulation, and vitrectomy have limitations and adverse reactions, necessitating the exploration of novel treatment strategies. This review aims to summarize the current pathophysiology, therapeutic approaches, and available drug-delivery methods for treating DR, and discuss their respective development potentials. Recent research indicates the efficacy of novel receptor inhibitors and agonists, such as aldose reductase inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha agonists, and novel drugs in delaying DR. Furthermore, with continuous advancements in nanotechnology, a new form of drug delivery has been developed that can address certain limitations of clinical drug therapy, such as low solubility and poor penetration. This review serves as a theoretical foundation for future research on DR treatment. While highlighting promising therapeutic targets, it underscores the need for continuous exploration to enhance our understanding of DR pathogenesis. The limitations of current treatments and the potential for future advancements emphasize the importance of ongoing research in this field.

Beyond Population-Level Targets for Drug Concentrations: Precision Dosing Needs Individual-Level Targets that Include Superior Biomarkers of Drug Responses

The purpose of precision dosing is to increase the chances of therapeutic success in individual patients. This is achieved in practice by adjusting doses to reach precision dosing targets determined previously in relevant populations, ideally with robust supportive evidence showing improved clinical outcomes compared with standard dosing. But is this implicit assumption of translatable population-level precision dosing targets correct and the best for all patients? In this review, the types of precision dosing targets and how they are determined are outlined, problems with the translatability of these targets to individual patients are identified, and ways forward to address these challengers are proposed. Achieving improved clinical outcomes to support precision dosing over standard dosing is currently hampered by applying population-level targets to all patients. Just as "one-dose-fits-all" may be an inappropriate philosophy for drug treatment overall, a "one-target-fits-all" philosophy may limit the broad clinical benefits of precision dosing. Defining individual-level precision dosing targets may be needed for greatest therapeutic success. Superior future precision dosing targets will integrate several biomarkers that together account for the multiple sources of drug response variability.

Efficacy and Safety of Faricimab for Macular Edema due to Retinal Vein Occlusion: 24-Week Results from the BALATON and COMINO Trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the 24-week efficacy and safety of the dual angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A inhibitor faricimab versus aflibercept in patients with vein occlusion.

DESIGN

Phase 3, global, randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled trials: BALATON/COMINO (ClincalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT04740905/NCT04740931; sites: 149/192).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with treatment-naïve foveal center-involved macular edema resulting from branch (BALATON) or central or hemiretinal (COMINO) RVO.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to faricimab 6.0 mg or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary end point: change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 24. Efficacy analyses included patients in the intention-to-treat population. Safety analyses included patients who received ≥ 1 doses of study drug.

RESULTS

Enrollment: BALATON, n = 553; COMINO, n = 729. The BCVA gains from the baseline to week 24 with faricimab were noninferior versus aflibercept in BALATON (adjusted mean change, +16.9 letters [95.03% confidence interval (CI), 15.7-18.1 letters] vs. +17.5 letters [95.03% CI, 16.3-18.6 letters]) and COMINO (+16.9 letters [95.03% CI, 15.4-18.3 letters] vs. +17.3 letters [95.03% CI, 15.9-18.8 letters]). Adjusted mean central subfield thickness reductions from the baseline were comparable for faricimab and aflibercept at week 24 in BALATON (-311.4 μm [95.03% CI, -316.4 to -306.4 μm] and -304.4 μm [95.03% CI, -309.3 to -299.4 μm]) and COMINO (-461.6 μm [95.03% CI, -471.4 to -451.9 μm] and -448.8 μm [95.03% CI, -458.6 to -439.0 μm]). A greater proportion of patients in the faricimab versus aflibercept arm achieved absence of fluorescein angiography-based macular leakage at week 24 in BALATON (33.6% vs. 21.0%; nominal P = 0.0023) and COMINO (44.4% vs. 30.0%; nominal P = 0.0002). Faricimab was well tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile comparable with aflibercept. The incidence of ocular adverse events was similar between patients receiving faricimab (16.3% [n = 45] and 23.0% [n = 84] in BALATON and COMINO, respectively) and aflibercept (20.4% [n = 56] and 27.7% [n = 100], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate the efficacy and safety of faricimab, a dual Ang-2/VEGF-A inhibitor, in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Systemic Arterial and Venous Thrombotic Events Associated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections: A Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the risk of systemic arteriovenous thrombotic events between intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and sham injections.

DESIGN

Random-effects meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on OVID MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library from January 2005 to August 2023. Our inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on systemic arteriovenous events for standard dose intravitreal anti-VEGF agents for any indication.

RESULTS

A total of 20 RCTs reporting on 12,833 eyes were included. There was no significant difference in the risk of any thrombotic event between bevacizumab 1.25 mg and ranibizumab 0.5 mg (Risk ratio (RR) = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.52-1.75, P = .89). There was no significant difference between bevacizumab and ranibizumab when restricting to arterial thrombotic events (RR= 0.88, 95% CI = 0.60-1.30, P = .53) or venous thrombotic events (RR = 1.99, 95% CI =86 0.68-5.82], P = .21). The risk of arterial thrombotic events was similar between aflibercept and bevacizumab (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.60-2.07, P = .74), between aflibercept and ranibizumab (RR= 0.77, 95% CI = 0.49-1.21, P = .26), between brolucizumab and aflibercept (RR= 0.67, 95% CI = 0.32-1.38, P = .27), and between aflibercept and faricimab (RR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.43-2.17, P = .93). Compared to sham, neither dose of ranibizumab (0.5 mg or 0.3 mg) showed a higher risk of arterial thrombotic events.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a similar risk of systemic arteriovenous thrombotic adverse events between anti-VEGF agents and between ranibizumab and sham injections.

Review of real-world evidence of dual inhibition of VEGF-A and ANG-2 with faricimab in NAMD and DME

Management of vitreoretinal disorders (e.g., neovascular age-related macular degeneration [nAMD] and diabetic macular edema [DME]) have assumed the standard therapy of lifelong anti-VEGF injections with drugs like aflibercept, brolucizumab, ranibizumab and bevacizumab. However, the burden imposed on patients is a major deterrent for continual therapy and recovery. Faricimab, a bispecific antibody, blocking both VEGF-A and Ang-2 molecules, produces a comparable functional and anatomical results, with less injections, significantly reducing patient burden. Visual acuity, safety, adverse effects, and anatomical outcomes are discussed in the pivotal clinical trials (YOSEMITE/RHINE and TENAYA/LUCERNE), and early data from real-world studies (TRUCKEE, TAHOE, FARWIDE-DME, FARETINA and others). In YOSEMITE and RHINE, faricimab demonstrated non-inferior vision gains, better anatomical outcomes compared to aflibercept every 8 weeks. Faricimab in the personalized treatment interval (PTI), after week 96, achieved 12-week interval in 78.1% of the patients and 16-week interval in 62.3%. TENAYA and LUCERNE reported comparable best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement and better anatomic outcomes during head-to-head phase, parallel to aflibercept, at its 8-week treatment schedule. Faricimab in the PTI regimen, after week 96 achieved 12-week interval in 77.8% of the patients and 16-week interval in 63.1%. Safety of faricimab has been comparable to aflibercept in these pivotal trials. Real-world data supports the data from the pivotal studies regarding the efficacy and safety profile of faricimab in heterogenous real world patient population. Moreover, in previously treated patients, it also demonstrated a faster fluid resolution, good safety profile. Considering faricimab has demonstrated anatomic and durability benefit in the treatment of nAMD and DME, additional data from ongoing extension clinical trials, AVONELLE-X and RHONE-X will help understand longer term outcomes for patients treated with faricimab as well as patients switching from aflibercept to faricimab after finishing the pivotal trials. Longer term data from the real-world studies will also continue to contribute to our understanding of long-term efficacy, safety and durability in the real world patient population.

Optical coherence tomography in the management of diabetic macular oedema

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is the major cause of visual impairment in people with diabetes. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is now the most widely used modality to assess presence and severity of DMO. DMO is currently broadly classified based on the involvement to the central 1 mm of the macula into non-centre or centre involved DMO (CI-DMO) and DMO can occur with or without visual acuity (VA) loss. This classification forms the basis of management strategies of DMO. Despite years of research on quantitative and qualitative DMO related features assessed by OCT, these do not fully inform physicians of the prognosis and severity of DMO relative to visual function. Having said that, recent research on novel OCT biomarkers development and re-defined classification of DMO show better correlation with visual function and treatment response. This review summarises the current evidence of the association of OCT biomarkers in DMO management and its potential clinical importance in predicting VA and anatomical treatment response. The review also discusses some future directions in this field, such as the use of artificial intelligence to quantify and monitor OCT biomarkers and retinal fluid and identify phenotypes of DMO, and the need for standardisation and classification of OCT biomarkers to use in future clinical trials and clinical practice settings as prognostic markers and secondary treatment outcome measures in the management of DMO.

A pivotal decade for bispecific antibodies?

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are a class of antibodies that can mediate novel mechanisms of action compared to monospecific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Since the discovery of mAbs and their adoption as therapeutic agents in the 1980s and 1990s, the development of bsAbs has held substantial appeal. Nevertheless, only three bsAbs (catumaxomab, blinatumomab, emicizumab) were approved through the end of 2020. However, since then, 11 bsAbs received regulatory agency approvals, of which nine (amivantamab, tebentafusp, mosunetuzumab, cadonilimab, teclistamab, glofitamab, epcoritamab, talquetamab, elranatamab) were approved for the treatment of cancer and two (faricimab, ozoralizumab) in non-oncology indications. Notably, of the 13 currently approved bsAbs, two, emicizumab and faricimab, have achieved blockbuster status, showing the promise of this novel class of therapeutics. In the 2020s, the approval of additional bsAbs can be expected in hematological malignancies, solid tumors and non-oncology indications, establishing bsAbs as essential part of the therapeutic armamentarium.

Faricimab Treat-and-Extend for Diabetic Macular Edema: Two-Year Results from the Randomized Phase 3 YOSEMITE and RHINE Trials

PURPOSE

To evaluate the 2-year efficacy, durability, and safety of dual angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) A pathway inhibition with intravitreal faricimab according to a personalized treat-and-extend (T&E)-based regimen with up to every-16-week dosing in the YOSEMITE and RHINE (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers, NCT03622580 and NCT03622593, respectively) phase 3 trials of diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

Randomized, double-masked, noninferiority phase 3 trials.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults with visual acuity loss (best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] of 25-73 letters) due to center-involving DME.

METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to faricimab 6.0 mg every 8 weeks, faricimab 6.0 mg T&E (previously referred to as personalized treatment interval), or aflibercept 2.0 mg every 8 weeks. The T&E up to every-16-week dosing regimen was based on central subfield thickness (CST) and BCVA change.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Included changes from baseline in BCVA and CST, number of injections, durability, absence of fluid, and safety through week 100.

RESULTS

In YOSEMITE and RHINE (n = 940 and 951, respectively), noninferior year 1 visual acuity gains were maintained through year 2; mean BCVA change from baseline at 2 years (weeks 92, 96, and 100 average) with faricimab every 8 weeks (YOSEMITE and RHINE, +10.7 letters and +10.9 letters, respectively) or T&E (+10.7 letters and +10.1 letters, respectively) were comparable with aflibercept every 8 weeks (+11.4 letters and +9.4 letters, respectively). The median number of study drug injections was lower with faricimab T&E (YOSEMITE and RHINE, 10 and 11 injections, respectively) versus faricimab every 8 weeks (15 injections) and aflibercept every 8 weeks (14 injections) across both trials during the entire study. In the faricimab T&E arms, durability was improved further during year 2, with > 60% of patients receiving every-16-week dosing and approximately 80% receiving every-12-week or longer dosing at week 96. Almost 80% of patients who achieved every-16-week dosing at week 52 maintained every-16-week dosing without an interval reduction through week 96. Mean CST reductions were greater (YOSEMITE/RHINE weeks 92/96/100 average: faricimab every 8 weeks -216.0/-202.6 µm, faricimab T&E -204.5/-197.1 µm, aflibercept every 8 weeks -196.3/-185.6 µm), and more patients achieved absence of DME (CST < 325 μm; YOSEMITE/RHINE weeks 92-100: faricimab every 8 weeks 87%-92%/88%-93%, faricimab T&E 78%-86%/85%-88%, aflibercept every 8 weeks 77%-81%/80%-84%) and absence of intraretinal fluid (YOSEMITE/RHINE weeks 92-100: faricimab every 8 weeks 59%-63%/56%-62%, faricimab T&E 43%-48%/45%-52%, aflibercept every 8 weeks 33%-38%/39%-45%) with faricimab every 8 weeks or T&E versus aflibercept every 8 weeks through year 2. Overall, faricimab was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable with that of aflibercept.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically meaningful visual acuity gains from baseline, anatomic improvements, and extended durability with intravitreal faricimab up to every 16 weeks were maintained through year 2. Faricimab given as a personalized T&E-based dosing regimen supports the role of dual angiopoietin-2 and VEGF-A inhibition to promote vascular stability and to provide durable efficacy for patients with DME.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Uveitis Following Intravitreal Injections of Faricimab: A Case Report

PURPOSE

Faricimab, a novel pharmaceutical agent targeting both angiopoietin-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-A pathways, has gained approval for treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular oedema. While clinical trials have demonstrated its favorable safety profile, this research presents two cases of hypertensive uveitis following intravitreal Faricimab injections.

METHODS

Medical history, clinical findings and multimodal images were retrospectively collected.

RESULTS

The patients experienced elevated intraocular pressure, mutton-fat keratic precipitates, anterior and posterior segment inflammation shortly after faricimab administration.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases prompt further investigation into the potential risk of uveitis associated with faricimab and underscore the importance of continued monitoring and research to elucidate its real-world safety profile.

Comparative efficacy and safety of Faricimab and other anti-VEGF therapy for age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the efficacy and the overall safety of Faricimab compared with other anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and diabetic macular edema (DME).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search of a comprehensive electronic database was performed to identify randomized clinical trials published from January 2013 to January 2023 for Faricimab in AMD and DME. Weighted mean differences and risk ratios were used to integrate the different studies.

RESULTS

A total of 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1678 AMD patients and 3 RCTs with 20 DME patients were included in the meta-analysis.In patients with AMD, a significant difference was found in the number of injections between Faricimab and other anti-VEGF therapy (MD = -2.42, 95% CI [-3.93 to -0.90], P = .002).No significant difference was found for the change in best corrected visual acuity (BVCA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and gaining 15 or more letters. Similarly, no significant difference was found for adverse events.In patients with DME, a significant difference was observed for CST (MD = -22.41, 95% CI [-29.95 to -14.86], P < .00001) and the number of injections(MD = -0.93, 95% CI [-1.33 to -0.54], P < .00001). No significant difference was found for BVCA and gaining 15 or more letters, and no significant difference was found for adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Comprehensive evidence confirms that Faricimab achieves non-inferior or even better CST improvement than other anti-VEGF therapies with extended dosing intervals, but more long-term follow-up studies are needed to support our conclusions.

AAV2-antiVEGFscFv gene therapy for retinal neovascularization

Retinal neovascularization (NV) may lead to irreversible vision impairment, the main treatment for which is the inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Existing drugs show limited clinical benefits because of their high prices and short half-lives, which increase the financial burden and medical risks to patients. Gene therapy on the basis of adeno-associated viruses is a promising approach to overcome these limitations because of the nonintegrative nature, low immunogenicity, and potential long-term gene expression of adeno-associated viruses. In this study, we constructed a novel recombinant adeno-associated virus with the single-chain fragment variable (scFv) fragment of the anti-VEGF antibody, AAV2-antiVEGFscFv, consisting of the VH and VL structural domains of IgG. AAV2-antiVEGFscFv effectively inhibited NV, retinal leakage, and retinal detachment in oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) mice, Tet/opsin/VEGF double-transgenic mice, and VEGF-induced rabbit NV models. AAV2-antiVEGFscFv also significantly suppressed VEGF-induced inflammation. Furthermore, we showed that AAV2-antiVEGFscFv could be sustainably expressed for a prolonged period and exhibited low immunotoxicity in vivo. This study indicates that AAV2-antiVEGFscFv could be a potential approach for NV treatment and provides strong support for preclinical research.

Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: The KINGFISHER Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Despite the effectiveness of existing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies, a need remains for further treatment options to improve response rates and/or reduce injection or monitoring frequency in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab vs aflibercept dosed every 4 weeks in participants with DME.

Design, Participants, and Setting

This 52-week, double-masked, phase 3 randomized clinical trial included treatment-naive adults and adults who had previously received anti-VEGF therapy. Data were collected from September 2019 to March 2020, and data were analyzed from April 2020 to February 2021.

Intervention

Brolucizumab, 6 mg, intravitreal injection every 4 weeks or aflibercept, 2 mg, intravitreal injection every 4 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Participants were randomized 2:1 to brolucizumab, 6 mg, or aflibercept, 2 mg. The primary end point was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity at week 52. Secondary end points were the proportion of participants with a 2-step improvement or greater from baseline in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale score, the proportion of eyes with absence of both subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid, change from baseline in central subfield thickness, and safety at week 52.

Results

A total of 517 participants were randomized to brolucizumab (n = 346) or aflibercept (n = 171); 299 (57.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 60.7 (10.2) years. Brolucizumab was noninferior to aflibercept in best-corrected visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score) change from baseline at week 52 (brolucizumab, 12.2-letter improvement; aflibercept, 11.0-letter improvement; difference, 1.1; 95% CI, -0.6 to 2.9; noninferiority margin, 4; P < .001). Brolucizumab was superior to aflibercept for the proportion of eyes without subretinal and intraretinal fluid (brolucizumab, 144 of 346 [41.6%]; aflibercept, 38 of 171 [22.2%]; difference, 20.0%; 95% CI, 12.5to 28.6; P < .001) and mean central subfield thickness change from baseline at week 52 (brolucizumab, -237.8 μm; aflibercept, -196.5 μm; difference, -41.4; 95% CI, -58.9 to -23.8; P < .001). Incidence of intraocular inflammation was 4.0% (14 of 346) in the brolucizumab arm and 2.9% (5 of 171) in the aflibercept arm, incidence of retinal vasculitis was 0.9% (3 of 346) and 0.6% (1 of 171), respectively, and incidence of retinal vascular occlusion was 0.3% (1 of 346) and 0.6% (1 of 171). One participant in the brolucizumab arm had retinal artery occlusion.

Conclusions and Relevance

In these study participants with DME, no clinically meaningful differences in visual outcomes were noted between the brolucizumab and aflibercept arms; some superior anatomic improvements were noted in the brolucizumab arm. No new safety concerns were identified.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03917472.

Comparative Efficacy, Durability and Safety of Faricimab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

A systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy, durability and safety of faricimab, used in a Treat & Extend (T&E) regime with intervals up to every 16 weeks (Q16W), relative to other therapies currently in use for treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME). Of particular interest were anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies applied in flexible dosing regimens such as Pro re nata (PRN) and T&E, which are the mainstay in clinical practice.

METHODS

An SLR identifying randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published before August 2021 was conducted, followed by a Bayesian NMA comparing faricimab T&E treatment to aflibercept, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, dexamethasone and laser therapy. Outcomes included in the analysis were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in central subfield thickness (CST), injection frequency, ocular adverse events (AE) and all-cause discontinuation, all of which were evaluated at 12 months. Subgroup analyses including patients' naïve to anti-VEGF were conducted where feasible.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies identified in the SLR were included in the NMA. Most importantly for decision making in clinical practise, faricimab T&E was associated with a statistically greater (95% credible intervals exclude zero) and clinically meaningful decrease in retinal thickness compared to all other flexible dosing regimens (greater retinal drying by 55-125 microns). Anatomical outcomes determine treatment efficacy and retreatment of patients. The NMA also showed a statistically greater increase in mean change in BCVA for faricimab T&E vs. flexible regimens using ranibizumab and bevacizumab (increase of 4.4-4.8 letters) as well as a numerical improvement vs. aflibercept PRN (two letters, 95% credible intervals including zero). Accordingly, the injection frequency was numerically lower versus other treatments using flexible dosing regimens (decrease by 0.92-1.43 injections). The analyses also indicated that the safety profile of faricimab T&E was comparable to those of ranibizumab and aflibercept, which have well-established safety profiles, with similar results for the number of all-cause discontinuations.

CONCLUSION

Faricimab provides a new treatment option in DME with dual-pathway inhibition of VEGF and angiopoeitin-2 (Ang-2). To the authors' knowledge, this is the first indirect comparison of faricimab T&E in DME. The analyses indicate that faricimab T&E is associated with superior retinal drying along with numerically fewer injections compared to all other treatments given in flexible dosing regimens. It also showed superior visual acuity outcomes compared to ranibizumab and bevacizumab.

Transcriptional Comparison of Human and Murine Retinal Neovascularization

Purpose

Retinal neovascularization (RNV) is the leading cause of vision loss in diseases like proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). A significant failure rate of current treatments indicates the need for novel treatment targets. Animal models are crucial in this process, but current diabetic retinopathy models do not develop RNV. Although the nondiabetic oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) mouse model is used to study RNV development, it is largely unknown how closely it resembles human PDR.

Methods

We therefore performed RNA sequencing on murine (C57BL/6J) OIR retinas (n = 14) and human PDR RNV membranes (n = 7) extracted during vitrectomy, each with reference to control tissue (n=13/10). Differentially expressed genes (DEG) and associated biological processes were analyzed and compared between human and murine RNV to assess molecular overlap and identify phylogenetically conserved factors.

Results

In total, 213 murine- and 1223 human-specific factors were upregulated with a small overlap of 94 DEG (7% of human DEG), although similar biological processes such as angiogenesis, regulation of immune response, and extracellular matrix organization were activated in both species. Phylogenetically conserved mediators included ANGPT2, S100A8, MCAM, EDNRA, and CCR7.

Conclusions

Even though few individual genes were upregulated simultaneously in both species, similar biological processes appeared to be activated. These findings demonstrate the potential and limitations of the OIR model to study human PDR and identify phylogenetically conserved potential treatment targets for PDR.

New Drugs: Faricimab-svoa (Vabysmo™) for Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema and Omidenepag Isopropyl (Omlonti™) for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension

Two drugs are covered in this quarterly column. Faricimab-svoa (Vabysmo™) for Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema and Omidenepag Isopropyl (Omlonti™) for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.

Pharmaceutical compounding and storage of faricimab in a syringe for intravitreal injection do not impair stability and bi-specific binding properties

BACKGROUND

Intravitreal injection (IVI) of antibody biologics is a key treatment approach in ophthalmology. Pharmaceutical compounding and storage of prefilled syringes for IVI must take place without impairing the structure and function of the biologics. This study investigated the effect of withdrawing and storing the therapeutic antibody faricimab (Vabysmo, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in the Zero Residual silicone oil-free, 0.2-mL syringe (SJJ Solutions, The Hague, the Netherlands).

METHODS

To assess the effect of syringe withdrawal on faricimab, we compared samples from syringes prepared at day 0 with samples taken directly from faricimab vials. To assess the effect of syringe storage on faricimab, we kept prefilled syringes in the dark at 4 oC for 7, 14, or 37 days and compared samples from these syringes with day 0. We measured protein concentration (with spectrophotometry), stability and integrity (with sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), and melting temperature (Tm)), as well as binding of faricimab to its cognate antigens: vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) (with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)).

RESULTS

Faricimab migrated in line with its expected molecular mass under both reducing and non-reducing conditions for all time points when analyzed with SDS-PAGE, without any sign of degradation products or aggregation. The SEC elution profiles were identical for all time points. There were slight variations in Tm for different time points compared to day 0 but without consistent relationship with storage time. ELISA did not detect differences in VEGF-A or Ang-2 binding between time points, and faricimab did not bind the neonatal Fc receptor.

CONCLUSIONS

Withdrawal and storage of faricimab in syringes for up to day 37 did not impair the structure and bi-specific binding properties of the therapeutic antibody.

From randomised controlled trials to real-world data: Clinical evidence to guide management of diabetic macular oedema

Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are generally considered the gold-standard for providing scientific evidence for treatments' effectiveness and safety but their findings may not always be generalisable to the broader population treated in routine clinical practice. RCTs include highly selected patient populations that fit specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Although they may have a lower level of certainty than RCTs on the evidence hierarchy, real-world data (RWD), such as observational studies, registries and databases, provide real-world evidence (RWE) that can complement RCTs. For example, RWE may help satisfy requirements for a new indication of an already approved drug and help us better understand long-term treatment effectiveness, safety and patterns of use in clinical practice. Many countries have set up registries, observational studies and databases containing information on patients with retinal diseases, such as diabetic macular oedema (DMO). These DMO RWD have produced significant clinical evidence in the past decade that has changed the management of DMO. RWD and medico-administrative databases are a useful resource to identify low frequency safety signals. They often have long-term follow-up with a large number of patients and minimal exclusion criteria. We will discuss improvements in healthcare information exchange technologies, such as blockchain technology and FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources), which will connect and extend databases already available. These registries can be linked with existing or emerging retinal imaging modalities using artificial intelligence to aid diagnosis, treatment decisions and provide prognostic information. The results of RCTs and RWE are combined to provide evidence-based guidelines.

Changing landscape of anti-angiogenic therapy: Novel approaches and clinical perspectives

Targeting angiogenesis has remained one of the important aspects in disease biology in general and cancer in particular. Currently (June 2023), over 593 clinical trials have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov having inference of term 'angiogenesis'. A panel of 14 anti-angiogenic drugs have been approved by FDA for the treatment of variety of cancers and other human ailments. Although the anti-angiogenic therapy (AAT) has gained significant clinical attention as a promising approach in the treatment of various diseases, particularly cancer, however, sizable literature has accumulated in the recent past describing the aggressive nature of tumours after the drug holidays, evolving drug resistance and off-target toxicities. Nevertheless, the emergence of inscrutable compensatory or alternative angiogenic mechanisms is limiting the efficacy of anti-angiogenic drugs and focussing the therapeutic regime as a puzzle of 'Lernaean hydra'. This review offers an overview of recent updates on the efficacy of antiangiogenic therapy and the current clinical performance of aaRTK inhibitors. Additionally, it also explores the changing application landscape of AAT, focusing on its role in diabetic nephropathy, age-related macular degeneration and other neovascular ocular disorders. Combination therapy with antiangiogenic drugs and immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as a potential strategy to enhance the therapeutic index of cancer immunotherapy. While clinical studies have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of this approach, they also highlight the complex and sometimes unpredictable adverse events associated with it. Normalizing tumour vasculature has been identified as a key factor in unlocking the full potential of ICIs, thereby providing hope for improved treatment outcomes. The future prospects and challenges of AAT have been described with special reference to integration of technological advances for enhancing its efficacy and applications beyond its discovery.

Liquid-biopsy proteomics combined with AI identifies cellular drivers of eye aging and disease in vivo

Single-cell analysis in living humans is essential for understanding disease mechanisms, but it is impractical in non-regenerative organs, such as the eye and brain, because tissue biopsies would cause serious damage. We resolve this problem by integrating proteomics of liquid biopsies with single-cell transcriptomics from all known ocular cell types to trace the cellular origin of 5,953 proteins detected in the aqueous humor. We identified hundreds of cell-specific protein markers, including for individual retinal cell types. Surprisingly, our results reveal that retinal degeneration occurs in Parkinson's disease, and the cells driving diabetic retinopathy switch with disease stage. Finally, we developed artificial intelligence (AI) models to assess individual cellular aging and found that many eye diseases not associated with chronological age undergo accelerated molecular aging of disease-specific cell types. Our approach, which can be applied to other organ systems, has the potential to transform molecular diagnostics and prognostics while uncovering new cellular disease and aging mechanisms.

Comparison between intravitreal brolucizumab and aflibercept in the treatment-naive central involved diabetic macular edema: One-year real-life case series

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal brolucizumab (IVB) and intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injections in the management of naive central involved diabetic macular edema (CIDME).

METHODS

This study included 45 treatment-naive eyes with CIDME. A complete ophthalmic examination, including BCVA and SD-OCT was performed. Patients were randomized to (IVB) or (IVA) groups. All participants received a loading phase of three consecutive intravitreal injections, then followed by a personalized treat and extend (T&E) regimen.

RESULTS

At 12-month follow-up, the mean numbers of injections in IVA and IVB groups were 7.25  ±  0.53 and 6.3  ±  0.45, respectively (P < 0.0001). The IVA group showed a significant increase of the mean BCVA from 0.66  ±  0.15 logMAR (50.9  ±  7.7 letters) to 0.41  ±  0.19 logMAR (63.7  ±  10.8 letters). Mean CFT decreased significantly from 441.2  ±  35.7 μm to 281.3  ±  18.4 μm. The IVB group showed a significant increase of mean BCVA from 0.65  ±  0.16 logMAR (52.1  ±  7.9 letters) to 0.39  ±  0.17 logMAR (65.3  ±  8.7 letters). Mean CFT decreased significantly from 437.2  ±  41.9 μm to 275.5  ±  21.7 μm.No significant difference between both groups in terms of the vision improvement and the reduction of CFT was reported, whereas a statistical difference was observed in terms of intravitreal injections (IVI) numbers. No ocular complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series highlights the effectiveness of both brolucizumab and aflibercept in the treatment of CIDME with a lower frequency of injection in brolucizumab group lowering the burden of IVI in this cohort.

An Update on Strategies to Deliver Protein and Peptide Drugs to the Eye

In the past few decades, advancements in protein engineering, biotechnology, and structural biochemistry have resulted in the discovery of various techniques that enhanced the production yield of proteins, targetability, circulating half-life, product purity, and functionality of proteins and peptides. As a result, the utilization of proteins and peptides has increased in the treatment of many conditions, including ocular diseases. Ocular delivery of large molecules poses several challenges due to their high molecular weight, hydrophilicity, unstable nature, and poor permeation through cellular and enzymatic barriers. The use of novel strategies for delivering protein and peptides such as glycoengineering, PEGylation, Fc-fusion, chitosan nanoparticles, and liposomes have improved the efficacy, safety, and stability, which consequently expanded the therapeutic potential of proteins. This review article highlights various proteins and peptides that are useful in ocular disorders, challenges in their delivery to the eye, and strategies to enhance ocular bioavailability using novel delivery approaches. In addition, a few futuristic approaches that will assist in the ocular delivery of proteins and peptides were also discussed.

Turnover of Microaneurysms After Intravitreal Injections of Faricimab for Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose

Microaneurysm (MA) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetic macular edema (DME) progression and response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy. This study aimed to investigate the effect of faricimab, a bispecific antibody against angiopoietin-2 and VEGF, on the number of MAs and their turnover in the treatment of DME.

Methods

We included that patients with DME who underwent three monthly injections of faricimab in one eye, with the other eye as control. We examined central retinal thickness (CRT) based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) and best-corrected visual acuity. Turnover, including loss and newly formed MAs, and the total number of MAs were counted based on merged images of the OCT map and fluorescein angiography.

Results

We enrolled 28 patients with DME. After 3 monthly injections of faricimab, CRT significantly improved, 66.0 ± 16.2% of MAs disappeared, and 6.71 ± 5.6% of new MAs were generated, resulting in total reduction to 40.7 ± 15.2%. In the treated eyes, MA disappearance (P < 0.0001) and turnover (P = 0.007) were significantly greater, and new formation was smaller (P < 0.0001) than in non-treated eyes. The size of the retained MAs decreased after treatment. Microaneurysm turnover was not significantly different between areas with and without edema before treatment.

Conclusions

In the process of improving edema in DME with faricimab, MAs shrink and disappear, and formation of MAs are inhibited, resulting in decreased total number of MAs. Intravitreal administration of faricimab suppresses vascular permeability and improves vascular structure.