1
|
Aleyadeh W, Verna EC, Elbeshbeshy H, Sulkowski MS, Smith C, Darling J, Sterling RK, Muir A, Akushevich L, La D, Terrault N, Fried MW, Feld JJ. Outcomes of early vs late treatment initiation in solid organ transplantation from hepatitis C virus nucleic acid test-positive donors to hepatitis C virus-uninfected recipients: Results from the HCV-TARGET study. Am J Transplant 2024; 24:468-478. [PMID: 37871798 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Curative hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy has increased transplantation from HCV-infected nucleic acid test-positive donors to HCV-uninfected recipients (D+/R-). We evaluated outcomes of early and late HCV treatment among D+/R- nonliver organ transplants. Patients received HCV regimens per local standard (n = 10 sites). Outcomes were compared between early and late treatments. Early treatment regimens (ETR) (n = 56) were initiated pretransplantation to day 7 posttransplant. Late treatment regimens (LTRs) (n = 102) began median 31 (range, 8-114) days posttransplant. There were 79 kidney, 50 lung, 23 heart, and 6 mixed transplants, similar between groups. HCV RNA was quantifiable in 98% of LTR versus 44.6% of ETR recipients (P < .001). Mean (range) days on treatment were 28 (7-93) ETR and 81 (51-111) LTR (P < .0001). There were no virological failures with ETR, but relapse (n = 3) and nonresponse (n = 2) in LTR (P = .16), including fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis postrelapse (n = 1). Sustained virological response was 100% (95% confidence interval, 93.4-100.0) in ETR (n = 54) and 94.9% (95% confidence interval, 88.5-98.3) in LTR (n = 98). Acute rejection occurred in 11 (19.6%) ETR and 25 (24.5%) LTR. In total, 11 HCV-unrelated deaths occurred: 8 ETR and 3 LTR. Organ transplantation from HCV-infected nucleic acid test-positive donors to HCV-uninfected recipients was safe. ETR led to fewer virological failures with shorter treatment duration, supporting recommendations to initiate treatment promptly posttransplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesam Aleyadeh
- Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Elizabeth C Verna
- Transplant Hepatology, Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Hany Elbeshbeshy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Mark S Sulkowski
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Coleman Smith
- Department of Transplant Hepatology, MedStar Georgetown University Transplant Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Jama Darling
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Richard K Sterling
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, VCU Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Andrew Muir
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lucy Akushevich
- Biometrics and Data Quality HCV-TARGET Data Coordinating Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Danie La
- Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Norah Terrault
- Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Disease, Keck School of Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Michael W Fried
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jordan J Feld
- Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Potluri V, Naqvi F, Goldberg DS, Shah M, Loupy A, Abt P, Blumberg E, Trofe-Clark J, Bloom R, Sawinski D, Chattergoon M, Segev DL, Bair-Marcantoni N, Durand CM, Reddy R, Levine M, Brown N, Mapchan S, Aubert O, Desai N, Reese PP. Longer-Term Clinical Outcomes From the THINKER and EXPANDER Trials of Transplantation of HCV-RNA+ Donor Kidneys Into Hepatitis C Virus-Negative Recipients. Kidney Int Rep 2023; 8:1460-1463. [PMID: 37441470 PMCID: PMC10334397 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Vishnu Potluri
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Fizza Naqvi
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David S. Goldberg
- Division of Digestive Health and Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Mital Shah
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Université de Paris, INSERM, Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France
| | - Peter Abt
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emily Blumberg
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jennifer Trofe-Clark
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roy Bloom
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Deirdre Sawinski
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Chattergoon
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Dorry L. Segev
- Department of Surgery, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Christine M. Durand
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rajender Reddy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Matthew Levine
- Department of Surgery, Transplant Division, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nicholas Brown
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shristi Mapchan
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Université de Paris, INSERM, Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France
| | - Niraj Desai
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Peter P. Reese
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Université de Paris, INSERM, Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Paris, France
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Bioinformatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schulz P, Wiginton A, Mahgoub A. Newly diagnosed hepatitis C infection after pancreas transplantation with multiple treatment failures. BMJ Case Rep 2023; 16:16/5/e254331. [PMID: 37137548 PMCID: PMC10163427 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2022-254331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
This case represents the first report of a detected hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection following a pancreas transplantation that failed two different sofosbuvir (SOF)-based treatments. We present the case of a woman in her 30s with a history of kidney transplantation, who developed viremic symptoms 3 months after pancreas transplantation and with two subsequent negative HCV antibody tests. Further work-up revealed a positive HCV RNA test (genotype 1A, treatment naive). Two different direct-acting antiviral agents regimes with SOF failed in our case, and the patient achieved a sustained virological response with a 16-week course of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Schulz
- Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine Permian Basin, Odessa, Texas, USA
| | - Ashley Wiginton
- Transplant Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Amar Mahgoub
- Transplant Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yuan Q, Hong S, Leya G, Roth E, Tsoulfas G, Williams WW, Madsen JC, Elias N. Analysis of the effects of donor and recipient hepatitis C infection on kidney transplant outcomes in the United States. World J Transplant 2023; 13:44-57. [PMID: 36908306 PMCID: PMC9993188 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i2.44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As Hepatitis C virus infection (HCV+) rates in kidney donors and transplant recipients rise, direct-acting antivirals (DAA) may affect outcomes.
AIM To analyze the effects of HCV+ in donors, recipients, or both, on deceased-donor (DD) kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes, and the impact of DAAs on those effects.
METHODS The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data of adult first solitary DD-KT recipients 1994-2019 were allocated into four groups by donor and recipient HCV+ status. We performed patient survival (PS) and death-censored graft survival (DCGS) pairwise comparisons after propensity score matching to assess the effects of HCV+ in donors and/or recipients, stratifying our study by DAA era to evaluate potential effect modification.
RESULTS Pre-DAA, for HCV+ recipients, receiving an HCV+ kidney was associated with 1.28-fold higher mortality (HR 1.151.281.42) and 1.22-fold higher death-censored graft failure (HR 1.081.221.39) compared to receiving an HCV- kidney and the absolute risk difference was 3.3% (95%CI: 1.8%-4.7%) for PS and 3.1% (95%CI: 1.2%-5%) for DCGS at 3 years. The HCV dual-infection (donor plus recipient) group had worse PS (0.56-fold) and DCGS (0.71-fold) than the dual-uninfected. Donor HCV+ derived worse post-transplant outcomes than recipient HCV+ (PS 0.36-fold, DCGS 0.34-fold). In the DAA era, the risk associated with HCV+ in donors and/or recipients was no longer statistically significant, except for impaired PS in the dual-infected vs dual-uninfected (0.43-fold).
CONCLUSION Prior to DAA introduction, donor HCV+ negatively influenced kidney transplant outcomes in all recipients, while recipient infection only relatively impaired outcomes for uninfected donors. These adverse effects disappeared with the introduction of DAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qing Yuan
- Department of Urology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
- Transplant Center and Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Shanjuan Hong
- Transplant Center and Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Gregory Leya
- Transplant Center and Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Eve Roth
- Transplant Center and Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Georgios Tsoulfas
- Department of Surgery, Aristototle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 541 24, Greece
| | - WW Williams
- Transplant Center and Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Joren C Madsen
- Transplant Center and Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Nahel Elias
- Transplant Center and Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Varnell CD, Rich KL, Modi AC, Hooper DK, Eckman MH. A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Adherence Promotion Strategies to Improve Rejection Rates in Adolescent Kidney Transplant Recipients. Am J Kidney Dis 2022; 80:330-340. [PMID: 35227823 PMCID: PMC9398956 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Nonadherence to medical regimens increases the risk of graft loss among adolescent and young adult recipients of kidney transplants. Interventions that improve adherence may decrease rejection rates, but their perceived costs are a barrier to clinical implementation. We developed a model to assess the cost-effectiveness of an adherence promotion strategy, the Medication Adherence Promotion System (MAPS). STUDY DESIGN Simulation-based. Data sources included published articles indexed in Medline or referenced in bibliographies of relevant English-language articles. Data on costs and outcomes were taken from a single clinical center. SETTING & POPULATION US adolescent patients after their first kidney transplant. INTERVENTION Usual posttransplant care versus usual care plus MAPS. OUTCOME Effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and costs measured in 2020 US dollars. MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, & TIMEFRAME Markov state transition decision model. We used a health care system perspective with a lifelong time horizon. RESULTS In the base-case analysis, MAPS was more effective and less costly than usual care. MAPS cost $9,106 per patient less than usual care and resulted in a gain of 0.32 QALYs. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, MAPS was cost saving 100% of the time. Extending results to a program level with 100 patients, any adherence promotion intervention similar in effectiveness to MAPS would cost less than $50,000/QALY if the start-up costs were <$2.5 million and annual costs <$188,000. Strategies with costs similar to MAPS that reduce the risk of rejection by as little as 3% would also have similar cost-effectiveness. LIMITATIONS Estimates of components and costs for MAPS were based on a single center. CONCLUSIONS Adherence promotion strategies with costs similar to MAPS can be cost-effective as long as they reduce rejection rates by at least 3%. This model can be applied to study the cost-effectiveness of adherence promotion strategies with varying costs and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles D Varnell
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| | - Kristin L Rich
- Division of Behavioral and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Avani C Modi
- Division of Behavioral and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - David K Hooper
- Division of Nephrology & Hypertension, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Mark H Eckman
- Division of General Internal Medicine and the Center for Clinical Effectiveness, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Eckman MH, Adejare AA, Duncan H, Woodle ES, Thakar CV, Alloway RR, Sherman KE. Incorporating Patients' Values and Preferences Into Decision Making About Transplantation of HCV-Naïve Recipients With Kidneys From HCV-Viremic Donors: A Feasibility Study. MDM Policy Pract 2021; 6:23814683211056537. [PMID: 34734119 PMCID: PMC8558609 DOI: 10.1177/23814683211056537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. While use of (hepatitis C virus) HCV-viremic kidneys may result in net benefit for the average end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patient awaiting transplantation, patients may have different values for ESKD-related health states. Thus, the best decision for any individual may be different depending on the balance of these factors. Our objective was to explore the feasibility of sampling health utilities from hemodialysis patients in order to perform patient-specific decision analyses considering various transplantation strategies. Study Design. We assessed utilities on a convenience sample of hemodialysis patients for health states including hemodialysis, and transplantation with either an HCV-uninfected kidney or an HCV-viremic kidney. We performed patient-specific decision analyses using each patient's age, race, gender, dialysis vintage, and utilities. We used a Markov state transition model considering strategies of continuing hemodialysis, transplantation with an HCV-unexposed kidney, and transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney and HCV treatment. We interviewed 63 ESKD patients from four dialysis centers (Dialysis Clinic Inc., DCI) in the Cincinnati metropolitan area. Results. Utilities for ESKD-related health states varied widely from patient to patient. Mean values were highest for -transplantation with an HCV-uninfected kidney (0.89, SD: 0.18), and were 0.825 (SD: 0.231) and 0.755 (SD: 0.282), respectively, for hemodialysis and transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney. Patient-specific decision analyses indicated 37 (59%) of the 63 ESKD patients in the cohort would have a net gain in quality-adjusted life years from transplantation of an HCV-viremic kidney, while 26 would have a net loss. Conclusions. It is feasible to gather dialysis patients' health state utilities and perform personalized decision analyses. This approach could be used in the future to guide shared decision-making discussions about transplantation strategies for ESKD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark H. Eckman
- Division of General Internal Medicine and the Center for Clinical Effectiveness, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Adeboye A. Adejare
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Heather Duncan
- Division of Nephrology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - E. Steve Woodle
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | | - Rita R. Alloway
- Division of Nephrology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Kenneth E. Sherman
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Eckman MH, Woodle ES, Thakar CV, Alloway RR, Sherman KE. Cost-effectiveness of Using Kidneys From HCV-Viremic Donors for Transplantation Into HCV-Uninfected Recipients. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 75:857-867. [PMID: 32081494 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Less than 4% of patients with kidney failure receive kidney transplants. Although discard rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic kidneys are declining, ~39% of HCV-viremic kidneys donated between 2018 and 2019 were discarded. Highly effective antiviral agents are now available to treat chronic HCV infection. Thus, our objective was to examine the cost-effectiveness of transplanting kidneys from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-uninfected recipients. STUDY DESIGN Markov state transition decision model. Data sources include Medline search results, bibliographies from relevant English language articles, Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, and the US Renal Data System. SETTING & POPULATION US patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who are on kidney transplant waiting lists. INTERVENTION(S) Transplantation with an HCV-unexposed kidney versus transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney and HCV treatment. OUTCOMES Effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life-years and costs measured in 2018 US dollars. MODEL, PERSPECTIVE, AND TIMEFRAME We used a health care system perspective with a lifelong time horizon. RESULTS In the base-case analysis, transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney was more effective and less costly than transplantation with an HCV-unexposed kidney because of the longer waiting times for HCV-unexposed kidneys, the substantial excess mortality risk while receiving dialysis, and the high efficacy of direct-acting antiviral agents for HCV infection. Transplantation with an HCV-viremic kidney was also preferred in sensitivity analyses of multiple model parameters. The strategy remained cost-effective unless waiting list time for an HCV-viremic kidney exceeded 3.1 years compared with the base-case value of 1.56 year. LIMITATIONS Estimates of waiting times for patients willing to accept an HCV-viremic kidney were based on data for patients who received HCV-viremic kidney transplants. CONCLUSIONS Transplanting kidneys from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-uninfected recipients increased quality-adjusted life expectancy and reduced costs compared with a strategy of transplanting kidneys from HCV-unexposed donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark H Eckman
- Division of General Internal Medicine and the Center for Clinical Effectiveness, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.
| | - E Steve Woodle
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Charuhas V Thakar
- Division of Nephrology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Rita R Alloway
- Division of Nephrology, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Kenneth E Sherman
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morgan TR. Hepatitis C Guidance 2019 Update: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-Infectious Diseases Society of America Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Hepatology 2020; 71:686-721. [PMID: 31816111 PMCID: PMC9710295 DOI: 10.1002/hep.31060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 440] [Impact Index Per Article: 110.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timothy R. Morgan
- Chief of Hepatology Veterans Affairs Long Beach Healthcare System Long Beach CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Opioid use in the United States and in many parts of the world has reached epidemic proportions. This has led to excess mortality as well as significant changes in the epidemiology of liver disease. Herein, we review the impact of the opioid epidemic on liver disease, focusing on the multifaceted impact this epidemic has had on liver disease and liver transplantation. In particular, the opioid crisis has led to a significant shift in incident hepatitis C virus infection to younger populations and to women, leading to changes in screening recommendations. Less well characterized are the potential direct and indirect hepatotoxic effects of opioids, as well as the changes in the incidence of hepatitis B virus infection and alcohol abuse that are likely rising in this population as well. Finally, the opioid epidemic has led to a significant rise in the proportion of organ donors who died due to overdose. These donors have led to an overall increase in donor numbers, but also to new considerations about the better use of donors with perceived or actual risk of disease transmission, especially hepatitis C. Clearly, additional efforts are needed to combat the opioid epidemic. Moreover, better understanding of the epidemiology and underlying pathophysiology will help to identify and treat liver disease in this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C. Verna
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Aaron Schluger
- Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Robert S. Brown
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liyanage L, Muzaale AD, Henderson ML, Durand CM. Living kidney donation in individuals with hepatitis C and HIV infection: rationale and emerging evidence. Curr Transplant Rep 2019; 6:167-176. [PMID: 32855901 PMCID: PMC7449146 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-019-00242-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW HIV-infected (HIV+) and hepatitis C virus-infected (HCV+) individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have decreased access to kidney transplantation. With new opportunities provided by the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act and direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for HCV, we explore the potential risks and benefits of living donor kidney transplantation from HIV+ or HCV+ donors, from the perspective of both donor health and recipient outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS The HOPE Act permits organ donation from both deceased and living HIV+ persons to HIV+ recipients; however, there is only clinical experience with HIV+ deceased donors to date. Empirical evidence demonstrates a low but acceptable risk of ESRD in potential HIV+ living donors without comorbidities who have well-controlled infection in the absence of donation. With the availability of potent DAAs for eradication of HCV infection, growing evidence shows good outcomes with HCV seropositive and/or viremic deceased kidney donors, providing rationale to consider HCV+ living donors. SUMMARY HIV+ and HCV+ living donor kidney transplantation may improve access to transplant for vulnerable ESRD populations. Careful evaluation and monitoring are warranted to mitigate potential risks to donors and recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luckmini Liyanage
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Abimereki D. Muzaale
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Macey L. Henderson
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christine M. Durand
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liapakis A, Formica RN, Levitsky J. Solid organ transplantation of viral hepatitis C positive donor organs into viral hepatitis C negative recipients. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2018; 23:257-63. [PMID: 29432255 DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Strategies are needed to reduce waitlist mortality and increase transplantation rates. Advances in hepatitis C therapy has allowed the transplant community to look toward utilization of grafts from hepatitis C viremic donors to expand the organ pool. Use of such grafts for hepatitis C-negative patients is being evaluated and debated, and early trial data are emerging. RECENT FINDINGS Both hepatitis C antibody-positive/nucleic acid test-negative and viremic donors are currently underutilized. Outcomes for viral hepatitis C (HCV) viremic transplant recipients are improving in the setting of direct-acting antiviral therapy. Optimization of graft utilization from HCV 'positive' donors and expansion to use of viremic donors for HCV-negative recipients will likely reduce waitlist mortality and result in net overall reduction in healthcare expenditures. SUMMARY Herein, we provide a review of recent advancements relating to hepatitis C in solid organ transplant and outline future directions. A primary future focus will be data collection of outcomes of transplantation of grafts from HCV 'viremic' donors to nonviremic recipients in formal clinical trial protocols.
Collapse
|
12
|
Avery RK, Yen-Lieberman B. Viral Diagnostics. Principles and Practice of Transplant Infectious Diseases 2019. [PMCID: PMC7115029 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9034-4_49] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
This chapter discusses recent developments in diagnostics for cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), BK virus (BKV), community respiratory viruses (CRVs), parvovirus, hepatitis viruses, HIV, and other viral agents of importance in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Collapse
|
13
|
Minutolo R, Aghemo A, Chirianni A, Fabrizi F, Gesualdo L, Giannini EG, Maggi P, Montinaro V, Paoletti E, Persico M, Perticone F, Petta S, Puoti M, Raimondo G, Rendina M, Zignego AL. Management of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with chronic kidney disease: position statement of the joint committee of Italian association for the study of the liver (AISF), Italian society of internal medicine (SIMI), Italian society of infectious and tropical disease (SIMIT) and Italian society of nephrology (SIN). Intern Emerg Med 2018; 13:1139-1166. [PMID: 30255464 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-018-1940-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now considered a systemic disease due to the occurrence of extra-hepatic manifestations. Among these, the renal involvement is frequent. HCV infection, in fact, is strongly associated with proteinuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and negatively affects the prognosis of renal patients. In the last few years, availability of more specific and effective drugs against HCV has dramatically changed the clinical course of this disease. These drugs may provide further advantages in the CKD population as a whole by reducing progression of renal disease, mortality rate and by increasing the survival of graft in renal transplant recipients. The strict pathogenetic and prognostic link between HCV infection and CKD requires an ongoing relationship among the healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of both HCV infection and CKD. Therefore, Scientific Societies involved in the care of this high-risk population in Italy have organized a joint expert panel. The aim of the panel is to produce a position statement that can be used in daily clinical practice for the management of HCV infected patients across the whole spectrum of renal disease, from the conservative phase to renal replacement treatments (dialysis and transplantation). Sharing specific evidence-based expertise of different professional healthcare is the first step to obtain a common ground of knowledge on which to instate a model for multidisciplinary management of this high-risk population. Statements cover seven areas including epidemiology of CKD, HCV-induced glomerular damage, HCV-related renal risk, staging of liver disease in patients with CKD, prevention of transmission of HCV in hemodialysis units, treatment of HCV infection and management of HCV in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Minutolo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche, Neurologiche, Metaboliche e dell'Invecchiamento, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via M. Longo 50, 80138, Naples, Italy.
| | - Alessio Aghemo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
- Division of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Chirianni
- Third Department of Infectious Diseases Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali dei Colli, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Fabrizi
- Division of Nephrology, Maggiore Hospital and IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Loreto Gesualdo
- Division of Nephrology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Edoardo G Giannini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Maggi
- Infectious Disease Clinic, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Montinaro
- Division of Nephrology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Ernesto Paoletti
- Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, University of Genoa and Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcello Persico
- Internal Medicine and Hepatology Unit, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Francesco Perticone
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University Magna Græcia, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Salvatore Petta
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Massimo Puoti
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Niguarda Cà Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Raimondo
- Department of Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Maria Rendina
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Anna Linda Zignego
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Interdepartmental Hepatology Center MaSVE, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brown KA, Hassan M. Utilizing Donors with Hepatitis C Antibody Positivity and Negative Nucleic Acid Testing. Curr Transpl Rep 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-018-0218-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
15
|
Heo NY, Mannalithara A, Kim D, Udompap P, Tan JC, Kim WR. Long-term Patient and Graft Survival of Kidney Transplant Recipients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection in the United States. Transplantation 2018; 102:454-60. [PMID: 28976413 DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common among kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. However, the impact of HCV infection on long-term graft and recipient survival after KTx from large-scale data remains to be determined. METHODS We used the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database to identify all adults undergoing KTx in 2004 to 2006 in the United States. A propensity score was created to match each HCV-positive recipient with an HCV-negative control for unbiased comparisons. Survival analysis was conducted to evaluate recipient and death-censored graft survival. RESULTS Out of 33 357 adult primary KTx recipients, 1470 (4.4%) were HCV-positive: 1364 HCV-positive and -negative pairs were selected by propensity score matching. Based on multivariable regression models, HCV is associated with a higher risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.28-1.75) and graft failure (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.47). Infection was a more common cause of death in HCV-positive patients than in HCV-negative recipients (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12-2.42). The incidence of death due to liver failure was 0.23% per year among HCV-positive recipients, whereas no HCV-negative recipients died from liver failure. Graft failure due to recurrent disease was higher in HCV-positive than in HCV-negative recipients (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.06-3.78). CONCLUSION HCV infection is associated with decreased long-term recipient and graft survival. Future studies are needed to examine whether recently available, safe, and effective antiviral therapy improves the long-term clinical outcome in these patients.
Collapse
|
16
|
Minutolo R, Aghemo A, Chirianni A, Fabrizi F, Gesualdo L, Giannini EG, Maggi P, Montinaro V, Paoletti E, Persico M, Perticone F, Petta S, Puoti M, Raimondo G, Rendina M, Zignego AL. Management of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with chronic kidney disease: position statement of the joint committee of Italian association for the study of the liver (AISF), Italian society of internal medicine (SIMI), Italian society of infectious and tropical disease (SIMIT) and Italian society of nephrology (SIN). Dig Liver Dis 2018; 50:1133-1152. [PMID: 30266305 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now considered a systemic disease due to the occurrence of extra-hepatic manifestations. Among these, the renal involvement is frequent. HCV infection, in fact, is strongly associated with proteinuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and negatively affects the prognosis of renal patients. In the last few years, availability of more specific and effective drugs against HCV has dramatically changed the clinical course of this disease. These drugs may provide further advantages in the CKD population as a whole by reducing progression of renal disease, mortality rate and by increasing the survival of graft in renal transplant recipients. The strict pathogenetic and prognostic link between HCV infection and CKD requires an ongoing relationship among the healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of both HCV infection and CKD. Therefore, Scientific Societies involved in the care of this high-risk population in Italy have organized a joint expert panel. The aim of the panel is to produce a position statement that can be used in daily clinical practice for the management of HCV infected patients across the whole spectrum of renal disease, from the conservative phase to renal replacement treatments (dialysis and transplantation). Sharing specific evidence-based expertise of different professional healthcare is the first step to obtain a common ground of knowledge on which to instate a model for multidisciplinary management of this high-risk population. Statements cover seven areas including epidemiology of CKD, HCV-induced glomerular damage, HCV-related renal risk, staging of liver disease in patients with CKD, prevention of transmission of HCV in hemodialysis units, treatment of HCV infection and management of HCV in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Minutolo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche, Neurologiche, Metaboliche e dvecchiamento, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via M. Longo 50, 80138 Naples, Italy.
| | - Alessio Aghemo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy; Division of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Chirianni
- Third Department of Infectious Diseases Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali dei Colli, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Fabrizi
- Division of Nephrology, Maggiore Hospital and IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Loreto Gesualdo
- Division of Nephrology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Edoardo G Giannini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Maggi
- Infectious Disease Clinic, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Montinaro
- Division of Nephrology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Ernesto Paoletti
- Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, University of Genoa and Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcello Persico
- Internal Medicine and Hepatology Unit, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Francesco Perticone
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University Magna Græcia, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Salvatore Petta
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Massimo Puoti
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Niguarda Cà Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Raimondo
- Department of Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Maria Rendina
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Anna Linda Zignego
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Interdepartmental Hepatology Center MaSVE, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Minutolo R, Aghemo A, Chirianni A, Fabrizi F, Gesualdo L, Giannini EG, Maggi P, Montinaro V, Paoletti E, Persico M, Perticone F, Petta S, Puoti M, Raimondo G, Rendina M, Zignego AL. Management of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with chronic kidney disease: position statement of the joint committee of Italian association for the study of the liver (AISF), Italian society of internal medicine (SIMI), Italian society of infectious and tropical disease (SIMIT) and Italian society of nephrology (SIN). Infection 2018; 47:141-168. [PMID: 30255389 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-018-1209-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now considered a systemic disease due to the occurrence of extra-hepatic manifestations. Among these, the renal involvement is frequent. HCV infection, in fact, is strongly associated with proteinuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and negatively affects the prognosis of renal patients. In the last few years, availability of more specific and effective drugs against HCV has dramatically changed the clinical course of this disease. These drugs may provide further advantages in the CKD population as a whole by reducing progression of renal disease, mortality rate and by increasing the survival of graft in renal transplant recipients. The strict pathogenetic and prognostic link between HCV infection and CKD requires an ongoing relationship among the healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of both HCV infection and CKD. Therefore, Scientific Societies involved in the care of this high-risk population in Italy have organized a joint expert panel. The aim of the panel is to produce a position statement that can be used in daily clinical practice for the management of HCV infected patients across the whole spectrum of renal disease, from the conservative phase to renal replacement treatments (dialysis and transplantation). Sharing specific evidence-based expertise of different professional healthcare is the first step to obtain a common ground of knowledge on which to instate a model for multidisciplinary management of this high-risk population. Statements cover seven areas including epidemiology of CKD, HCV-induced glomerular damage, HCV-related renal risk, staging of liver disease in patients with CKD, prevention of transmission of HCV in hemodialysis units, treatment of HCV infection and management of HCV in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Minutolo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche, Neurologiche, Metaboliche e dell'Invecchiamento, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via M. Longo 50, 80138, Naples, Italy.
| | - Alessio Aghemo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.,Division of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Chirianni
- Third Department of Infectious Diseases Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali dei Colli, Naples, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Fabrizi
- Division of Nephrology, Maggiore Hospital and IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Loreto Gesualdo
- Division of Nephrology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Edoardo G Giannini
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Paolo Maggi
- Infectious Disease Clinic, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Montinaro
- Division of Nephrology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Ernesto Paoletti
- Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, University of Genoa and Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marcello Persico
- Internal Medicine and Hepatology Unit, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Francesco Perticone
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University Magna Græcia, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Salvatore Petta
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Di.Bi.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - Massimo Puoti
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Niguarda Cà Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Raimondo
- Department of Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Maria Rendina
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, Bari, Italy
| | - Anna Linda Zignego
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Interdepartmental Hepatology Center MaSVE, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Minutolo R, Aghemo A, Chirianni A, Fabrizi F, Gesualdo L, Giannini EG, Maggi P, Montinaro V, Paoletti E, Persico M, Perticone F, Petta S, Puoti M, Raimondo G, Rendina M, Zignego AL; Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN)., Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF)., Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Disease (SIMIT)., Italian Society of Internal Medicine (SIMI). Management of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with chronic kidney disease: position statement of the joint committee of Italian association for the study of the liver (AISF), Italian society of internal medicine (SIMI), Italian society of infectious and tropical disease (SIMIT) and Italian society of nephrology (SIN). J Nephrol 2018; 31:685-712. [PMID: 30255440 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-018-0523-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is now considered a systemic disease due to the occurrence of extra-hepatic manifestations. Among these, the renal involvement is frequent. HCV infection, in fact, is strongly associated with proteinuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD) and negatively affects the prognosis of renal patients. In the last few years, availability of more specific and effective drugs against HCV has dramatically changed the clinical course of this disease. These drugs may provide further advantages in the CKD population as a whole by reducing progression of renal disease, mortality rate and by increasing the survival of graft in renal transplant recipients. The strict pathogenetic and prognostic link between HCV infection and CKD requires an ongoing relationship among the healthcare professionals involved in the treatment of both HCV infection and CKD. Therefore, Scientific Societies involved in the care of this high-risk population in Italy have organized a joint expert panel. The aim of the panel is to produce a position statement that can be used in daily clinical practice for the management of HCV infected patients across the whole spectrum of renal disease, from the conservative phase to renal replacement treatments (dialysis and transplantation). Sharing specific evidence-based expertise of different professional healthcare is the first step to obtain a common ground of knowledge on which to instate a model for multidisciplinary management of this high-risk population. Statements cover seven areas including epidemiology of CKD, HCV-induced glomerular damage, HCV-related renal risk, staging of liver disease in patients with CKD, prevention of transmission of HCV in hemodialysis units, treatment of HCV infection and management of HCV in kidney transplantation.
Collapse
|
19
|
Eckman MH, Woodle ES, Thakar CV, Paterno F, Sherman KE. Transplanting Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Versus Uninfected Kidneys Into Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Recipients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169:214-223. [PMID: 29987322 DOI: 10.7326/m17-3088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Direct-acting antiviral agents are now available to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). OBJECTIVE To examine whether it is more cost-effective to transplant HCV-infected or HCV-uninfected kidneys into HCV-infected patients. DESIGN Markov state-transition decision model. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE searches and bibliographies from relevant English-language articles. TARGET POPULATION HCV-infected patients with ESRD receiving hemodialysis in the United States. TIME HORIZON Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE Health care system. INTERVENTION Transplant of an HCV-infected kidney followed by HCV treatment versus transplant of an HCV-uninfected kidney preceded by HCV treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES Effectiveness, measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and costs, measured in 2017 U.S. dollars. RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS Transplant of an HCV-infected kidney followed by HCV treatment was more effective and less costly than transplant of an HCV-uninfected kidney preceded by HCV treatment, largely because of longer wait times for uninfected kidneys. A typical 57.8-year-old patient receiving hemodialysis would gain an average of 0.50 QALY at a lifetime cost savings of $41 591. RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Transplant of an HCV-infected kidney followed by HCV treatment continued to be preferred in sensitivity analyses of many model parameters. Transplant of an HCV-uninfected kidney preceded by HCV treatment was not preferred unless the additional wait time for an uninfected kidney was less than 161 days. LIMITATION The study did not consider the benefit of decreased HCV transmission from treating HCV-infected patients. CONCLUSION Transplanting HCV-infected kidneys into HCV-infected patients increased quality-adjusted life expectancy and reduced costs compared with transplanting HCV-uninfected kidneys into HCV-infected patients. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Merck Sharp & Dohme and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark H Eckman
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E., E.S.W., C.V.T., F.P., K.E.S.)
| | - E Steve Woodle
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E., E.S.W., C.V.T., F.P., K.E.S.)
| | - Charuhas V Thakar
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E., E.S.W., C.V.T., F.P., K.E.S.)
| | - Flavio Paterno
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E., E.S.W., C.V.T., F.P., K.E.S.)
| | - Kenneth E Sherman
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E., E.S.W., C.V.T., F.P., K.E.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wigneswaran J, Van Wyck D, Pegues D, Gholam P, Nissenson AR. Hepatitis C virus infection in patients with end-stage renal disease. Hemodial Int 2018; 22:297-307. [DOI: 10.1111/hdi.12672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Revised: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David Pegues
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Pierre Gholam
- Liver Center of Excellence; University Hospitals of Cleveland; Cleveland Ohio USA
| | - Allen R. Nissenson
- DaVita, Inc.; Denver Colorado USA
- David Geffen School of Medicine; University of California; Los Angeles California USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Li AA, Cholankeril G, Cheng XS, Tan JC, Kim D, Toll AE, Nair S, Ahmed A. Underutilization of Hepatitis C Virus Seropositive Donor Kidneys in the United States in the Current Opioid Epidemic and Direct-Acting Antiviral Era. Diseases 2018; 6:E62. [PMID: 29996536 PMCID: PMC6165210 DOI: 10.3390/diseases6030062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, the opioid epidemic and new hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatments have changed the landscape of organ procurement and allocation. We studied national trends in solid organ transplantation (2000⁻2016), focusing on graft utilization from HCV seropositive deceased donors in the pre-2014 (2000⁻2013) versus current (2014⁻2016) eras with a retrospective analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database. During the study period, HCV seropositive donors increased from 181 to 661 donors/year. The rate of HCV seropositive donor transplants doubled from 2014 to 2016. Heart and lung transplantation data were too few to analyze. A higher number of HCV seropositive livers were transplanted into HCV seropositive recipients during the current era: 374 versus 124 liver transplants/year. Utilization rates for liver transplantation reached parity between HCV seropositive and non-HCV donors. While the number of HCV seropositive kidneys transplanted to HCV seropositive recipients increased from 165.4 to 334.7 kidneys/year from the pre-2014 era to the current era, utilization rates for kidneys remained lower in HCV seropositive than in non-HCV donors. In conclusion, relative underutilization of kidneys from HCV seropositive versus non-HCV donors has persisted, in contrast to trends in liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew A Li
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | - George Cholankeril
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | - Xingxing S Cheng
- Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | - Jane C Tan
- Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | - Donghee Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| | - Alice E Toll
- United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA 23219, USA.
| | - Satheesh Nair
- Department of Transplant Surgery, Methodist University Hospital, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38104, USA.
| | - Aijaz Ahmed
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To highlight the changing landscape of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the context of organ transplantation. This focuses on areas of controversy and future potential in the era of highly effective direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents. RECENT FINDINGS Since the advent of safe and highly effective DAA therapy, HCV infection is now curable in virtually all cases, including organ transplant recipients. Excellent drug tolerability and safety combined with high cure rates across all organ groups means that HCV is no longer a barrier to transplantation or its outcomes. Mounting data demonstrate the safety of using organs from HCV-infected donors with subsequent treatment of HCV in the recipient and a potential to expand the donor pool. Historical data demonstrating inferior survival in transplant recipients with HCV is of limited relevance in the DAA era. Virtually all transplant recipients with HCV infection can be cured, while early data also suggest excellent outcomes in recipients of organs from HCV viremic donors. The optimal timing of HCV therapy in relation to transplantation and the optimal use of organs from HCV viremic donors remain areas of controversy and ongoing research efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Somerville
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alberta, CSB 1-139, 11350 83 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada
| | - Karen Doucette
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alberta, CSB 1-139, 11350 83 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Treatment for chronic viral hepatitis C has advanced dramatically to current standard of care all-oral direct-acting antiviral regimens with relatively short treatment duration and high efficacy. Patients with comorbid end-stage renal disease have constituted a "special patient population" with data and treatment options lagging behind that of the broader population of patients with chronic hepatitis C until recently. Herein we review the current evidence base for direct-acting antiviral therapy in this population. We provide a suggested algorithm for the evaluation of such patients for therapy. We highlight special considerations in regards to the choice of regimen, duration, and timing in regards to potential kidney transplantation.
Collapse
|
24
|
Gonzalez SA, Trotter JF. The rise of the opioid epidemic and hepatitis C-positive organs: A new era in liver transplantation. Hepatology 2018; 67:1600-1608. [PMID: 29023920 DOI: 10.1002/hep.29572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The use of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive organs in liver transplantation (LT) has increased in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapy. A rising demand for organs, the increased ability to effectively treat HCV infection in the transplant setting, and an unprecedented increase in HCV-positive donors have all contributed to this trend. A recent abrupt rise in opioid use in the United States has resulted in a surge of injection drug use, transmission of HCV, and opioid-related overdose deaths. Geographical areas most affected by the opioid epidemic have experienced a rapid increase in recovery and utilization of HCV-positive donor organs, in which the proportion of deceased donor LTs in the United States from donors who are HCV positive has increased nearly 2-fold within the last 3 years. The prospect of expanding the organ donor pool with HCV-positive donors and achieving acceptable posttransplant outcomes has generated much interest in the areas of liver, kidney, and thoracic transplantation, including the potential for transplanting organs from HCV positive donors into HCV-negative recipients. Developing strategies to ensure appropriate selection of potential recipients of HCV-positive organs, initiating timely antiviral therapy, and defining associated risks will be critical in achieving optimal posttransplant outcomes in this setting. (Hepatology 2018;67:1600-1608).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stevan A Gonzalez
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX and Baylor All Saints Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX
| | - James F Trotter
- Annette C. and Harold C. Simmons Transplant Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX and Baylor All Saints Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Purpose of Review The prevalence of end-stage organ disease is increasing among HIV-infected (HIV+) individuals. Individuals with well-controlled HIV on antiretroviral therapy (ART), without active opportunistic infections or cancer, and with specified minimum CD4 cell counts are appropriate transplant candidates. Infectious disease clinicians can improve access to transplantation for these patients and optimize management pre- and post-transplant. Recent Findings Clinical trials and registry-based studies demonstrate excellent outcomes for select HIV+ kidney and liver transplant recipients with similar patient and graft survival as HIV-uninfected patients. Elevated allograft rejection rates have been observed in HIV+ individuals; this may be related to a dysregulated immune system or drug interactions. Lymphocyte-depleting immunosuppression has been associated with lower rejection rates without increased infections using national registry data. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection has been associated with worse outcomes, however improvements are expected with direct-acting antivirals. Summary Solid organ transplantation should be considered for HIV+ individuals with end-stage organ disease. Infectious disease clinicians can optimize ART to avoid pharmacoenhancers, which interact with immunosuppression. The timing of HCV treatment (pre- or post-transplant) should be discussed with the transplant team. Finally, organs from HIV+ donors can now be considered for HIV+ transplant candidates, within research protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashton A Shaffer
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
| | - Christine M Durand
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Advances in surgical technique and immunosuppression have significantly improved outcomes after pancreas transplantation, and as a result pancreas transplants increasingly are being performed for indications other than type 1 diabetes mellitus. This review summarizes the current literature on pancreas transplantation in unconventional recipient populations. RECENT FINDINGS An increasing body of work suggests that pancreas transplantation can be performed with good outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and those 50 years of age and older. Obesity appears detrimental to patient and pancreas graft survival, and bariatric surgery prior to transplantation may be of increasing interest and relevance. There are limited data yielding mixed outcomes on pancreas transplantation in patients with HIV or hepatitis C virus. However, rapidly improving antiviral therapies are prolonging survival in patients with HIV and chronic hepatitis C virus infections and may increase the number of candidates available for pancreas transplantation in these populations in the future. SUMMARY Despite limited literature in these patient populations, pancreas transplantation may be a viable treatment option for endocrine pancreas failure in appropriately selected patients regardless of disease cause or age.
Collapse
|
27
|
Levitsky J, Formica RN, Bloom RD, Charlton M, Curry M, Friedewald J, Friedman J, Goldberg D, Hall S, Ison M, Kaiser T, Klassen D, Klintmalm G, Kobashigawa J, Liapakis A, O'Conner K, Reese P, Stewart D, Terrault N, Theodoropoulos N, Trotter J, Verna E, Volk M. The American Society of Transplantation Consensus Conference on the Use of Hepatitis C Viremic Donors in Solid Organ Transplantation. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:2790-2802. [PMID: 28556422 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 236] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2017] [Revised: 05/12/2017] [Accepted: 05/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The availability of direct-acting antiviral agents for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has resulted in a profound shift in the approach to the management of this infection. These changes have affected the practice of solid organ transplantation by altering the framework by which patients with end-stage organ disease are managed and receive organ transplants. The high level of safety and efficacy of these medications in patients with chronic HCV infection provides the opportunity to explore their use in the setting of transplanting organs from HCV-viremic patients into non-HCV-viremic recipients. Because these organs are frequently discarded and typically come from younger donors, this approach has the potential to save lives on the solid organ transplant waitlist. Therefore, an urgent need exists for prospective research protocols that study the risk versus benefit of using organs for hepatitis C-infected donors. In response to this rapidly changing practice and the need for scientific study and consensus, the American Society of Transplantation convened a meeting of experts to review current data and develop the framework for the study of using HCV viremic organs in solid organ transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - R D Bloom
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - M Charlton
- Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - M Curry
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - J Friedman
- Optum Population Health Solutions, Minneapolis, MN
| | - D Goldberg
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - S Hall
- Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - M Ison
- Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - T Kaiser
- University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - D Klassen
- United Network of Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA
| | - G Klintmalm
- Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | - P Reese
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - D Stewart
- United Network of Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA
| | - N Terrault
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - J Trotter
- Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - E Verna
- Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - M Volk
- Loma Linda University, San Diego, CA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Brown
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Guberina H, Sava M, Witzke O. [Infectious diseases in immunocompromised patients]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 11:388-95. [PMID: 32288845 DOI: 10.1007/s11560-016-0098-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Immunkompromittierung birgt immer ein erhöhtes Risiko für die Entwicklung infektiöser Komplikationen. Patienten nach solider Organtransplantation sind besonders gefährdet – in dieser Patientengruppe bilden Infektionen die zweithäufigste Todesursache. Prophylaxe und Impfungen sollten daher konsequent eingesetzt werden. Infektionen bei Immunsupprimierten können mit atypischen klinischen Symptomen einhergehen, was die Diagnose und Therapie für den behandelnden Arzt erschwert. Vor allem virale und opportunistische Infektionen stellen dabei eine Herausforderung dar. Umso mehr ist eine Überwachung der Patienten hinsichtlich Infektionserkrankungen notwendig, um frühzeitig die erforderlichen Maßnahmen einleiten zu können.
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
The HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act now allows transplantation of organs from HIV-positive living and deceased donors to HIV-positive individuals with end-stage organ disease in the United States. Although clinical experience with such transplants is limited to a small number of deceased-donor kidney transplants from HIV-positive to HIV-positive persons in South Africa, unprecedented HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive liver transplantations and living-donor kidney transplantations are also now on the horizon. Initially, all HIV-positive-to-HIV-positive transplantations will occur under research protocols with safeguards and criteria mandated by the National Institutes of Health. Nevertheless, this historic change brings ethical opportunities and challenges. For HIV-positive individuals needing an organ transplant, issues of access, risk, and consent must be considered. For potential HIV-positive donors, there are additional ethical challenges of privacy, fairness, and the right to donate. Careful consideration of the ethical issues involved is critical to the safe and appropriate evaluation of this novel approach to transplantation.
Collapse
|
31
|
Theodoropoulos N, Ison MG. Donor-Derived Infections: Incidence, Prevention, and Management. Transplant Infections 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28797-3_8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Organ donors reflect the diverse US population, and there are an increasing number of donors born in, who have resided in, or who have traveled to underdeveloped areas of the world or areas with geographically restricted infections. As such, these donors are exposed to pathogens that can potentially be transmitted to recipients of the donor’s organs. Additionally, there are newer techniques to identify many pathogens that may be transmitted from the donor to the transplant recipients. Finally, high-profile reports of several donor-derived infections have heightened awareness of donor-derived infections and have likely contributed to increased recognition. In this chapter, the incidence, methods of identification and prevention, and management of unexpected donor-derived infections will be reviewed.
Collapse
|
32
|
Scalea JR, Barth RN, Munivenkatappa R, Philosophe B, Cooper M, Whitlow V, Lamattina JC. Shorter Waitlist Times and Improved Graft Survivals Are Observed in Patients Who Accept Hepatitis C Virus+ Renal Allografts. Transplantation 2015; 99:1192-6. [DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000000479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
33
|
Aguirre Valadez J, García Juárez I, Rincón Pedrero R, Torre A. Management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients with end-stage renal disease: a review. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2015; 11:329-38. [PMID: 25767389 PMCID: PMC4354469 DOI: 10.2147/tcrm.s74282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is highly prevalent in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, mainly in those on hemodialysis (HD). The seroprevalence of HCV in developing countries ranges between 7% and 40%. Risk factors for this infection in the CKD population include the number of blood transfusions, duration of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and prevalence of HCV in HD. Chronic HCV infection in patients with ESRD is associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality in the pre and post kidney transplant periods. The increase in mortality is directly associated with liver complications and an elevated cardiovascular risk in HCV-infected patients on hemodialysis. Antiviral treatment may improve the prognosis of patients with HCV, and standard interferon remains the cornerstone of treatment. Treatment of HCV in patients with CKD is complex, but achieving a sustained viral response may decrease the frequency of complications after transplantation. It appears that HCV-infected patients who remain on maintenance dialysis are at increased risk of death compared with HCV patients undergoing renal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Aguirre Valadez
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ignacio García Juárez
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Rodolfo Rincón Pedrero
- Department of Nephrology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Aldo Torre
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
|
35
|
Azmi AN, Tan SS, Mohamed R. Hepatitis C and kidney disease: An overview and approach to management. World J Hepatol 2015; 7:78-92. [PMID: 25624999 PMCID: PMC4295197 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v7.i1.78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2014] [Revised: 10/13/2014] [Accepted: 11/10/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatitis C infection and chronic kidney disease are major health burden worldwide. Hepatitis C infection is associated with a wide range of extra-hepatic manifestations in various organs including the kidneys. A strong association between hepatitis C and chronic kidney disease has come to light. Hemodialysis in supporting the end stage renal disease patients unfortunately carries a risk for hepatitis C infection. Despite much improvement in the care of this group of patients, the prevalence of hepatitis C infection in hemodialysis patients is still higher than the general population. Hepatitis C infection has a negative effect on the survival of hemodialysis and renal transplant patients. Treatment of hepatitis C in end stage renal disease patients using conventional or pegylated interferon with or without ribavirin remains a clinical challenge with low response rate, high dropout rate due to poor tolerability and many unmet needs. The approval of new direct acting antiviral agents for hepatitis C may dramatically change the treatment approach in hepatitis C infected patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. However it remains to be confirmed if the newer Hepatitis C therapies are safe in individuals with severe renal impairment. This review article discusses the relationship between hepatitis C and chronic kidney disease, describe the various types of renal diseases associated with hepatitis C and the newer as well as the existing treatments for hepatitis C in the context of this subpopulation of hepatitis C patients.
Collapse
|
36
|
Chan EY, Bhattacharya R, Eswaran S, Hertl M, Shah N, Fayek S, Cohen EB, Hollinger EF, Olaitan O, Jensik SC, Perkins JD. Outcomes after combined liver-kidney transplant vs. kidney transplant followed by liver transplant. Clin Transplant 2014; 29:60-6. [DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/30/2014] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Edie Y. Chan
- Department of General Surgery; Rush University Medical Center; Chicago IL USA
| | - Renuka Bhattacharya
- Department of Medicine; University of Washington Medical Center; Seattle WA USA
| | - Sheila Eswaran
- Department of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Chicago IL USA
| | - Martin Hertl
- Department of General Surgery; Rush University Medical Center; Chicago IL USA
| | - Nikunj Shah
- Department of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Chicago IL USA
| | - Sameh Fayek
- Department of General Surgery; Rush University Medical Center; Chicago IL USA
| | - Eric B. Cohen
- Department of Medicine; Rush University Medical Center; Chicago IL USA
| | - Edward F. Hollinger
- Department of General Surgery; Rush University Medical Center; Chicago IL USA
| | - Oyedolamu Olaitan
- Department of General Surgery; Rush University Medical Center; Chicago IL USA
| | - Stephen C. Jensik
- Department of General Surgery; Rush University Medical Center; Chicago IL USA
| | - James D. Perkins
- Department of Surgery; University of Washington Medical Center; Seattle WA USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Baid-Agrawal S, Pascual M, Moradpour D, Somasundaram R, Muche M. Hepatitis C virus infection and kidney transplantation in 2014: what's new? Am J Transplant 2014; 14:2206-20. [PMID: 25091274 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2014] [Revised: 05/15/2014] [Accepted: 05/16/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection remains an important health problem, which is associated with deleterious consequences in kidney transplant recipients. Besides hepatic complications, several extrahepatic complications contribute to reduced patient and allograft survival in HCV-infected kidney recipients. However, HCV infection should not be considered as a contraindication for kidney transplantation because patient survival is better with transplantation than on dialysis. Treatment of HCV infection is currently interferon-alpha (IFN-α) based, which has been associated with higher renal allograft rejection rates. Therefore, antiviral treatment before transplantation is preferable. As in the nontransplant setting, IFN-free treatment regimens, because of their greater efficacy and reduced toxicity, currently represent promising and attractive therapeutic options after kidney transplantation as well. However, clinical trials will be required to closely evaluate these regimens in kidney recipients. There is also a need for prospective controlled studies to determine the optimal immunosuppressive regimens after transplantation in HCV-infected recipients. Combined kidney and liver transplantation is required in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis. However, in patients with cleared HCV infection and early cirrhosis without portal hypertension, kidney transplantation alone may be considered. There is some agreement about the use of HCV-positive donors in HCV-infected recipients, although data regarding posttransplant survival rates are controversial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Baid-Agrawal
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Terrault NA, Stock PG. Management of hepatitis C in kidney transplant patients: on the cusp of change. Am J Transplant 2014; 14:1955-7. [PMID: 25307029 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2014] [Revised: 05/15/2014] [Accepted: 05/17/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- N A Terrault
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sayed BA, Turgeon NA. Pancreas Transplantation of Non-Traditional Recipients. Curr Transpl Rep 2014. [DOI: 10.1007/s40472-014-0011-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
40
|
Veroux M, Corona D, Sinagra N, Giaquinta A, Zerbo D, Ekser B, Giuffrida G, Caglià P, Gula R, Ardita V, Veroux P. Kidney transplantation from donors with hepatitis C infection. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:2801-2809. [PMID: 24659873 PMCID: PMC3961963 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i11.2801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2013] [Revised: 12/01/2013] [Accepted: 01/02/2014] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The increasing demand for organ donors to supply the increasing number of patients on kidney waiting lists has led to most transplant centers developing protocols that allow safe utilization from donors with special clinical situations which previously were regarded as contraindications. Deceased donors with previous hepatitis C infection may represent a safe resource to expand the donor pool. When allocated to serology-matched recipients, kidney transplantation from donors with hepatitis C may result in an excellent short-term outcome and a significant reduction of time on the waiting list. Special care must be dedicated to the pre-transplant evaluation of potential candidates, particularly with regard to liver functionality and evidence of liver histological damage, such as cirrhosis, that could be a contraindication to transplantation. Pre-transplant antiviral therapy could be useful to reduce the viral load and to improve the long-term results, which may be affected by the progression of liver disease in the recipients. An accurate selection of both donor and recipient is mandatory to achieve a satisfactory long-term outcome.
Collapse
|