Effect of metoclopramide dose on preventing emesis after oral administration of N-acetylcysteine for acetaminophen overdose

Should N-Acetylcysteine be Administered Orally or Intravenously for the Treatment of Paracetamol Overdose?

Introduction

Paracetamol is the most commonly used drug in deliberate poisoning. N-acetylcysteine is the standard antidote for significant acute paracetamol overdose, but the route of administration varies between countries. This review aimed to find and appraise those comparative studies which would help answer the following question: in patients who have taken an overdose of paracetamol requiring antidote, is there any difference between intravenous and oral N-acetylcysteine in mortality, hepatotoxicity, adverse drug reactions or cost?

Methods

A literature search was conducted using Medline and other databases. Relevant papers were identified and appraised.

Results

One animal study and seven comparative clinical studies were identified and appraised. The quality of the evidence was generally poor, and there was no clear difference in outcomes between the two routes of administration.

Conclusions

Without evidence of advantage for one route over the other, routine practice should not be changed. However, after 30 years experience, both routes appear to be effective and safe, and in countries where intravenous administration is the standard, it would be reasonable to consider the oral route as an alternative when intravenous access is problematic. There is a need for prospective, randomised trials to determine the relative effectiveness, safety and cost of intravenous and oral formulations of N-acetylcysteine.

Toxicologic emergencies in the intensive care unit: management using reversal agents and antidotes

PURPOSE

To review the most common drugs implicated in overdoses admitted to the intensive care unit focusing on antidotes and reversal agents used in their management.

SUMMARY

Poisonings and overdoses due to pharmaceutical agents result in more than 100 000 critical care unit admissions each year. Ingestion of toxic alcohols, calcium channel blockers, beta-adrenergic antagonists, benzodiazepines, opioids, acetaminophen, tricyclic antidepressants, and salicylates are associated with a high rate of morbidity and mortality. Reviewing the mechanism of toxicity due to specific agents along with the mechanism of action, dosing, and adverse effects of appropriate antidotes is important for the successful management of these patients within the critical care unit.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the most prevalent overdoses and their management using reversal agents and antidotes is essential to the overall treatment of these critically ill patients.

Reduction of adverse effects from intravenous acetylcysteine treatment for paracetamol poisoning: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Paracetamol poisoning is common worldwide. It is treated with intravenous acetylcysteine, but the standard regimen is complex and associated with frequent adverse effects related to concentration, which can cause treatment interruption. We aimed to ascertain whether adverse effects could be reduced with either a shorter modified acetylcysteine schedule, antiemetic pretreatment, or both.

METHODS

We undertook a double-blind, randomised factorial study at three UK hospitals, between Sept 6, 2010, and Dec 31, 2012. We randomly allocated patients with acute paracetamol overdose to either the standard intravenous acetylcysteine regimen (duration 20·25 h) or a shorter (12 h) modified protocol, with or without intravenous ondansetron pretreatment (4 mg). Masking was achieved by infusion of 5% dextrose (during acetylcysteine delivery) or saline (for antiemetic pretreatment). Randomisation was done via the internet and included a minimisation procedure by prognostic factors. The primary outcome was absence of vomiting, retching, or need for rescue antiemetic treatment at 2 h. Prespecified secondary outcomes included a greater than 50% increase in alanine aminotransferase activity over the admission value. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT01050270).

FINDINGS

Of 222 patients who underwent randomisation, 217 were assessable 2 h after the start of acetylcysteine treatment. Vomiting, retching, or need for rescue antiemetic treatment at 2 h was reported in 39 of 108 patients assigned to the shorter modified protocol compared with 71 of 109 allocated to the standard acetylcysteine regimen (adjusted odds ratio 0·26, 97·5% CI 0·13-0·52; p<0·0001), and in 45 of 109 patients who received ondansetron compared with 65 of 108 allocated placebo (0·41, 0·20-0·80; p=0·003). Severe anaphylactoid reactions were recorded in five patients assigned to the shorter modified acetylcysteine regimen versus 31 who were allocated to the standard protocol (adjusted common odds ratio 0·23, 97·5% CI 0·12-0·43; p<0·0001). The proportion of patients with a 50% increase in alanine aminotransferase activity did not differ between the standard (9/110) and shorter modified (13/112) regimens (adjusted odds ratio 0·60, 97·5% CI 0·20-1·83); however, the proportion was higher with ondansetron (16/111) than with placebo (6/111; 3·30, 1·01-10·72; p=0·024).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with paracetamol poisoning, a 12 h modified acetylcysteine regimen resulted in less vomiting, fewer anaphylactoid reactions, and reduced need for treatment interruption. This study was not powered to detect non-inferiority of the shorter protocol versus the standard approach; therefore, further research is needed to confirm the efficacy of the 12 h modified acetylcysteine regimen.

FUNDING

Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government.

Oral and Intravenous Acetylcysteine for Treatment of Acetaminophen Toxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

There are few reports summarizing the effectiveness of oral and intravenous (IV) acetylcysteine. We determined the proportion of acetaminophen poisoned patients who develop hepatotoxicity (serum transaminase > 1000 IU/L) when treated with oral and IV acetylcysteine.

METHODS

Studies were double abstracted by trained researchers. We determined the proportions of patients who developed hepatotoxicity for each route using a random effects model. Studies were further stratified by early and late treatment.

RESULTS

We screened 4,416 abstracts; 16 articles, including 5,164 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. The overall rate of hepatotoxicity for the oral and IV routes were 12.6% and 13.2%, respectively. Treatment delays are associated with a higher rate of hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Studies report similar rates of hepatotoxicity for oral and IV acetylcysteine, but direct comparisons are lacking. While it is difficult to disentangle the effects of dose and duration from route, our findings suggest that the rates of hepatotoxicity are similar for oral and IV administration.

A review of acetaminophen poisoning

Acetaminophen poisoning remains one of the more common drugs taken in overdose with potentially fatal consequences. Early recognition and prompt treatment with N-acetylcysteine can prevent hepatic injury. With acute overdose, the Rumack-Matthew nomogram is a useful tool to assess risk and guide management. Equally common to acute overdose is the repeated use of excessive amounts of acetaminophen. Simultaneous ingestion of several different acetaminophen-containing products may result in excessive dosage. These patients also benefit from N-acetylcysteine. Standard courses of N-acetylcysteine may need to be extended in patients with persistently elevated plasma concentrations of acetaminophen or with signs of hepatic injury.

Effects of delay in infusion of N-acetylcysteine on appearance of adverse drug reactions after acetaminophen overdose: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between different types of adverse drug reaction (ADR) and late time to N-acetylcysteine (NAC) infusion in patients presenting to the hospital with acetaminophen overdose.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of patients admitted to the hospital for acute acetaminophen overdose over a period of 5 years (1 January 2004 to 31 December 2008). The primary outcome of interest was the relationship between ADR, if any, and late time to NAC infusion. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used to test differences between groups depending on the normality of the data. SPSS 15 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Of 305 patients with acetaminophen overdose, 146 (47.9%) were treated with intravenous NAC and 139 (45.6%) were included in this study. Different types of ADR were observed in 94 (67.6%) patients. Late time to NAC infusion was significantly associated with cutaneous anaphylactoid reactions when compared to patients without this type of ADR (p  <  0.001). However, there were no significant differences in time to NAC infusion between patients with and without the following ADR: gastrointestinal reactions (p = 0.11), respiratory reactions (p = 0.77), central nervous reactions (p = 0.64), and cardiovascular reactions (p = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

Late time to NAC infusion is a risk factor for developing cutaneous anaphylactoid reactions, suggesting, rather than proving, that early NAC infusion (≤ 8 hours) may be protective against this type of ADR.

Association between gastrointestinal manifestations following acetaminophen poisoning and outcome in 291 acetaminophen poisoning patients

BACKGROUND

Acetaminophen poisoning is a common clinical problem, and early identification of patients with more severe poisoning is key to improving outcomes.

PURPOSES

This study intends to document prevalence, clinical characteristics, and predictors of gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations and to assess the impact of these manifestations on outcome in patients with acetaminophen poisoning.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of hospital admissions for acute acetaminophen poisoning conducted over a period of 5 years from 1 January 2004 to 31 December 2008. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used to test differences between groups depending on the normality of the data. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 15 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety-one patients were studied; their mean age was 23.01 +/- 7.4 years and 76.6% had GI manifestations. Multiple logistic regression showed that significant risk factors for GI manifestations were present among patients who reported acetaminophen dose ingested >or=10 g (p < 0.001), and latency time more than 8 hours (p = 0.030). GI manifestations at first admission predicted poorer outcomes in terms of estimated acetaminophen levels to be a possible toxic (p < 0.001), elevated bilirubin levels (p = 0.002), prolonged prothrombin time (PT; p = 0.002), elevated creatinine level (p = 0.028), declination of potassium level (p < 0.001), and prolonged hospital stay (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

GI manifestations were common among patients with acetaminophen poisoning. This study suggests that the presence of GI manifestations at first presentation appears to be an important risk marker of subsequent hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity.

Clinical policy: critical issues in the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acetaminophen overdose

This clinical policy focuses on critical issues concerning the management of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acetaminophen overdose. The subcommittee reviewed the medical literature relevant to the questions posed. The critical questions are: 1. What are the indications for N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in the acetaminophen overdose patient with a known time of acute ingestion who can be risk stratified by th Rumack-Matthew nomogram? 2. What are the indications for NAC in the acetaminophen overdose patient who cannot be risk stratified by the Rumack-Matthew nomogram? Recommendations are provided on the basis of the strength of evidence of the literature. Level A recommendations represent patient management principles that reflect a high degree of clinical certainty; Level B recommendations represent patient management principles that reflect moderate clinical certainty; and Level C recommendations represent other patient management strategies that are based on preliminary, inconclusive, or conflicting evidence, or based on committee consensus. This guideline is intended for physicians working in EDs.

Antiemetic use in acetaminophen poisoning: how does the route of N-acetylcysteine administration affect utilization?

INTRODUCTION

We sought to compare antiemetic use after acetaminophen poisoning in patients treated with oral or intravenous (IV) N-acetylcysteine (NAC).

METHODS

Our retrospective chart review identified 20 orally treated patients and 17 IV-treated patients. For both groups, we calculated the total number of antiemetic doses given, their associated cost, and also determined parameters that correlated with antiemetic use.

RESULTS

IV-treated patients received fewer total antiemetic doses than those receiving oral NAC (1.1 0.2 vs. 2.8 0.7; P 0.04). Antiemetic cost correlated with doses received for both groups; however, because the regression lines differed (P 0.02), antiemetic therapy cost was less in IV-treated patients. In addition, serum acetaminophen concentration correlated with total antiemetic doses in oral NAC patients (P 0.002) but not with IV treatment patients (P 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous NAC reduced antiemetic utilization, and it costs less than oral therapy. Furthermore, antiemetic use appeared to be determined by a combination of acetaminophen concentration and NAC administration route.

Clinical policy: critical issues in the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with acetaminophen overdose

This clinical policy focuses on critical issues concerning the management of patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acetaminophen overdose. The subcommittee reviewed the medical literature relevant to the questions posed. The critical questions are: 1. What are the indications for N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in the acetaminophen overdose patient with a known time of acute ingestion who can be risk stratified by the Rumack-Matthew nomogram? 2. What are the indications for NAC in the acetaminophen overdose patient who cannot be risk stratified by the Rumack-Matthew nomogram? Recommendations are provided on the basis of the strength of evidence of the literature. Level A recommendations represent patient management principles that reflect a high degree of clinical certainty; Level B recommendations represent patient management principles that reflect moderate clinical certainty; and Level C recommendations represent other patient management strategies that are based on preliminary, inconclusive, or conflicting evidence, or based on committee consensus. This guideline is intended for physicians working in EDs.

Adverse gastrointestinal effects of arginine and related amino acids

Oral supplements of arginine and citrulline increase local nitric oxide (NO) production in the small intestine and this may be harmful under certain circumstances. Gastrointestinal toxicity was therefore reviewed with respect to the intestinal physiology of arginine, citrulline, ornithine, and cystine (which shares the same transporter) and the many clinical trials of supplements of the dibasic amino acids or N-acetylcysteine (NAC). The human intestinal dibasic amino acid transport system has high affinity and low capacity. L-arginine (but not lysine, ornithine, or D-arginine) induces water and electrolyte secretion that is mediated by NO, which acts as an absorbagogue at low levels and as a secretagogue at high levels. The action of many laxatives is NO mediated and there are reports of diarrhea following oral administration of arginine or ornithine. The clinical data cover a wide span of arginine intakes from 3 g/d to>100 g/d, but the standard of reporting adverse effects (e.g. nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea) was variable. Single doses of 3-6 g rarely provoked side effects and healthy athletes appeared to be more susceptible than diabetic patients to gastrointestinal symptoms at individual doses>9 g. This may relate to an effect of disease on gastrointestinal motility and pharmacokinetics. Most side effects of arginine and NAC occurred at single doses of >9 g in adults (>140 mg/kg) often when part of a daily regime of approximately>30 g/d (>174 mmol/d). In the case of arginine, this compares with the laxative threshold of the nonabsorbed disaccharide alcohol, lactitol (74 g or 194 mmol). Adverse effects seemed dependent on the dosage regime and disappeared if divided doses were ingested (unlike lactitol). Large single doses of poorly absorbed amino acids seem to provoke diarrhea. More research is needed to refine dosage strategies that reduce this phenomenon. It is suggested that dipeptide forms of arginine may meet this criterion.

Antiemetics in the ED: a randomized controlled trial comparing 3 common agents

We sought to compare the efficacy of 3 intravenous antiemetic medications in ED patients complaining of moderate to severe nausea. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial compares 1.25 mg droperidol, 10 mg metoclopramide, 10 mg prochlorperazine, and saline placebo. Adult ED patients complaining of nausea were eligible. Nausea was measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale at 0 and 30 minutes after treatment. A convenience sample of 100 patients was enrolled; 97 had complete data available for analysis. Of these, 22 patients received droperidol, 25 received metoclopramide, 24 received prochlorperazine, and 26 received placebo. Droperidol (-54.5 mm) was significantly better than metoclopramide (-40.2 mm) or prochlorperazine (-40.5 mm) at reducing nausea at 30 minutes (P = .04). There were no significant differences in rescue medication or patient satisfaction; however, droperidol had significantly higher akathisia (71.4% vs 23.5%) at 24-hour follow-up. When administered intravenously to adult patients with moderate to severe nausea, droperidol was more effective than metoclopramide or prochlorperazine but caused more extrapyramidal symptoms. Metoclopramide and prochlorperazine were not more effective than saline placebo. All patients improved over time and possibly with intravenous hydration.

Risk factors for emesis after therapeutic use of activated charcoal in acutely poisoned children

OBJECTIVES

Vomiting frequently complicates the administration of activated charcoal. The incidence of such vomiting is not defined precisely in the pediatric population. Little is known about the patient-, poison-, or procedure-specific factors that contribute to emesis of charcoal. This study aimed to estimate the incidence of vomiting subsequent to therapeutic administration of charcoal to poisoned children < or =18 years of age and to examine the relative contributions of several risk factors to the occurrence of vomiting.

METHODS

Data were collected on a prospective cohort of 275 consecutive children who were treated with activated charcoal for acute poisoning exposure. The study was set in the emergency department of an urban, tertiary-care children's hospital. Sorbitol content of the charcoal was alternately assigned. Potential risk factors for vomiting were recorded prospectively, and the occurrence of vomiting within 2 hours of charcoal administration was measured.

RESULTS

A total of 56 (20.4%) of 275 patients vomited. Median time to vomiting was 10 minutes. Previous vomiting (relative risk: 3.41; 95% CI: 1.48-7.85) and nasogastric tube administration (relative risk: 2.40; 95% CI: 1.13-5.09) were found to be the most significant independent risk factors for vomiting. The increased risk among children >12 years of age, compared with younger children, approached significance. Sorbitol content, large charcoal volumes, or fast administration rates did not increase vomiting risk significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

One of every 5 children who are given activated charcoal within our pediatric emergency department vomited. Children with previous vomiting or nasogastric tube administration were at highest risk, and these factors should be accounted for in future investigation of antiemetic strategies. Sorbitol content of charcoal was not a significant risk factor for emesis.

Utility of acetylcysteine in treating poisonings and adverse drug reactions

As recognition of the role of free radicals and reactive toxins in the pathogenesis of disease, poisoning, and adverse drug reactions has evolved, interest in the use of acetylcysteine as a modulator of these effects has steadily increased in recent years. Acetylcysteine is commonly thought to serve as a glutathione precursor and consequently can increase or sustain intracellular glutathione which scavenges reactive oxygen species caused by toxins or subsequent tissue injury. At least 10 additional mechanisms of action for acetylcysteine have been demonstrated in various laboratory models, but a unifying framework of its actions is still to be proposed. This paper reviews the current experimental and therapeutic status of acetylcysteine for the treatment of poisonings and adverse drug reactions. Of the 45 potential uses of acetylcysteine that were identified for the treatment of poisonings or adverse drug reactions, 14 of the toxic effects have little support for its use while promising results have been demonstrated for 27 toxicities. Currently, treatment of acute paracetamol (acetaminophen) poisoning is the only widely accepted clinical indication for acetylcysteine as a treatment for poisoning or adverse drug reactions. In many clinical situations acetylcysteine is used empirically utilising modifications of dosage regimens employed for paracetamol poisoning. Often it is difficult to determine the benefit of therapy with acetylcysteine owing to the nature of the toxicity being treated, the use of other therapies, the presence of comorbid conditions, and the small number of patients studied. The diverse and positive nature of the investigations suggest that there is considerable promise in acetylcysteine as a research tool and pharmacological agent.