Expression of peroxisomal enoyl-CoA hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase enzyme and its mRNA in peroxisome proliferator-induced liver tumors

Protein profiling of mouse livers with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activation

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) is important in the induction of cell-specific pleiotropic responses, including the development of liver tumors, when it is chronically activated by structurally diverse synthetic ligands such as Wy-14,643 or by unmetabolized endogenous ligands resulting from the disruption of the gene encoding acyl coenzyme A (CoA) oxidase (AOX). Alterations in gene expression patterns in livers with PPARalpha activation were delineated by using a proteomic approach to analyze liver proteins of Wy-14,643-treated and AOX(-/-) mice. We identified 46 differentially expressed proteins in mouse livers with PPARalpha activation. Up-regulated proteins, including acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase, farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase, and carnitine O-octanoyltransferase, are involved in fatty acid metabolism, whereas down-regulated proteins, including ketohexokinase, formiminotransferase-cyclodeaminase, fructose-bisphosphatase aldolase B, sarcosine dehydrogenase, and cysteine sulfinic acid decarboxylase, are involved in carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism. Among stress response and xenobiotic metabolism proteins, selenium-binding protein 2 and catalase showed a dramatic approximately 18-fold decrease in expression and a modest approximately 6-fold increase in expression, respectively. In addition, glycine N-methyltransferase, pyrophosphate phosphohydrolase, and protein phosphatase 1D were down-regulated with PPARalpha activation. These observations establish proteomic profiles reflecting a common and predictable pattern of differential protein expression in livers with PPARalpha activation. We conclude that livers with PPARalpha activation are transcriptionally geared towards fatty acid combustion.

Comparison of oxidative stress and changes of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes induced by phthalates in rats

Phthalates are widely used as a plasticizer and cause a peroxisome proliferation. Peroxisome proliferators (PPs), such as di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) and clofibrate (CF) are known to have a hepatocarcinogenic potential in rodents. It has been proposed that these PPs may cause hepatocellular cancer by an oxidative damage-mediated mechanism(s). The primary purpose of this study is to find whether there is a difference between the oxidative damage by hepatocarcinogenic PPs (DEHP and CF) and the oxidative damage by weak PPs [di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) and n-butylbenzyl phthalate (BBP)]. The second purpose is to investigate if phthalates can affect the phase I/phase II enzymes, and if the effect of PPs on metabolizing enzymes correlates with peroxisome proliferation or not. After rats were treated with PPs (DEHP, DBP and BBP; 50, 200, 1000 mg/kg, CF; 100 mg/kg, p.o., for 14 days), the activities of metabolizing enzymes and peroxisomal enzymes were investigated, and the oxidative damage was measured using 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in the DNA and malonedialdehyde (MDA) in the livers. These four PPs significantly increased the relative liver weights, palmitoyl-CoA oxidation and activity of carnitine acetyltransferase. DEHP was found to be the most potent PP among three phthalates. A dramatic and dose-dependent increase in hepatic MDA levels was observed in CF (100 mg/kg), DEHP (>or=50 mg/kg), DBP and BBP (>or=200 mg/kg) groups. However, the 8-OHdG in hepatic DNA was increased only in DEHP (1000 mg/kg) and CF groups. Activities of cytochrome p4501A1, 1A2, 3A4, UDP-glucuronosyl transferase and glutathione S-transferase were decreased overall by PPs, but there is no correlation between the inhibitory effect on metabolizing enzymes and the peroxisome proliferation. These results indicate that 8-OHdG positively correlates with carcinogenic potential of PPs, but other factors as well as peroxisomal H(2)O(2) could be involved in the generation of 8-OHdG and the carcinogenesis of PPs. The present findings also demonstrate that the effect of PPs on xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes may be independent of the peroxisome proliferation and the oxidative stress. Thus it is possible that the PPs affect the hepatic toxification/detoxification capacity even in humans.

Pro-oxidant effect of dehydroepiandrosterone in rats is mediated by PPAR activation

DHEA-treatment exerts a dual effect, prooxidant or antioxidant, depending on the dosage and, therefore, on the tissue concentration reached. In agreement with previous studies showing a prooxidant effect of DHEA, here we show that pharmacological doses of DHEA produce increased H(2)O(2) levels and a marked reduction of GSH content in rat liver. DHEA, also increases both catalase (by 30%) and cytochrome-C-reductase (by 30%) activities in the liver cytosol. The effectiveness of the state of increased oxidative stress is also documented by changes in fatty acid pattern of the microsomal membranes. Moreover, DHEA, at high doses, enhances beta-oxidation, as demonstrated by an increase of acyl-CoA-oxidase activity and of cytochrome P450 4A content, confirming that it acts as a PPARs inducer. Both PPARs induction and proxidant effects completely disappear when DHEA is administered at lower doses. Seven days treatment (4 or 10 mg) is unable to affect either levels of proxidant species and of antioxidant molecules, or cytochrome P450 4A content and beta-oxidation. Prolonged DHEA treatment (4 mg/day) for three weeks not only is unable to affect PPARs activation and beta-oxidation, but it also exerts a protective effect against ADP/Fe(2+) induced lipid peroxidation. This latter result confirms the antioxidant effects of DHEA at low doses, as already previously documented.

Central role of PPARalpha in the mechanism of action of hepatocarcinogenic peroxisome proliferators

Peroxisome proliferators (PP) are a large class of structurally dissimilar chemicals. These chemicals have diverse effects in rodents and humans, including regulation of lipid metabolism, growth promotion, and induction of hepatocarcinogenesis. Most, if not all, effects of PP are mediated by three members of the nuclear receptor superfamily called PP-activated receptors (PPAR). In this review, we discuss the evidence that PPARalpha, the predominant PPAR in the, liver is involved in the growth promoting and hepatocarcinogenic effects of PP.

Current cytochemical techniques for the investigation of peroxisomes. A review

The past decade has witnessed unprecedented progress in elucidation of the complex problems of the biogenesis of peroxisomes and related human disorders, with further deepening of our understanding of the metabolic role of this ubiquitous cell organelle. There have been many recent reviews on biochemical and molecular biological aspects of peroxisomes, with the morphology and cytochemistry receiving little attention. This review focuses on the state-of-the-art cytochemical techniques available for investigation of peroxisomes. After a brief introduction into the use of the 3,3'-diaminobenzidine method for localization of catalase, which is still most commonly used for identification of peroxisomes, the cerium technique for detection of peroxisomal oxidases is discussed. The influence of the buffer used in the incubation medium on the ultrastructural pattern obtained in rat liver peroxisomes in conjunction with the localization of urate oxidase in their crystalline cores is discussed, particularly since Tris-maleate buffer inhibits the enzyme activity. In immunocytochemistry, quantitation of immunogold labeling by automatic image analysis enables quantitative assessment of alterations of proteins in the matrix of peroxisomes. This provides a highly sensitive approach for analysis of peroxisomal responses to metabolic alterations or to xenobiotics. The recent evidence suggesting the involvement of ER in the biogenesis of "preperoxisomes" is mentioned and the potential role of preembedding immunocytochemistry for identification of ER-derived early peroxisomes is emphasized. The use of GFP expressed with a peroxisomal targeting signal for the investigation of peroxisomes in living cells is briefly discussed. Finally, the application of in situ hybridization for detection of peroxisomal mRNAs is reviewed, with emphasis on a recent protocol using perfusion-fixation, paraffin embedding, and digoxigenin-labeled cRNA probes, which provides a highly sensitive method for detection of both high- and low-abundance mRNAs encoding peroxisomal proteins. (J Histochem Cytochem 47:1219-1232, 1999)

Evidence against peroxisome proliferation-induced hepatic oxidative damage

It has been proposed that nongenotoxic peroxisome proliferators may cause hepatocellular cancer by an oxidative damage-mediated mechanism(s). The argument for this hypothesis is based mainly on the noted ability of peroxisome proliferators to induce significantly H2O2-producing peroxisomal beta-oxidation while causing a minimal induction of H2O2-degrading catalase. The recent discovery, accurate determination, and use of isoprostanes as a sensitive indicator of oxidative damage prompted us to investigate whether induction of hepatic peroxisomal beta-oxidation in male B6C3F1 mice is accompanied by elevated levels of isoprostanes in those livers. The data show that while 7 days of feeding mice a diet containing 100 ppm [4-chloro-6-(2,3-xylidino)-2-pyrimidinylthio]acetic acid (WY-14,643) increased peroxisomal beta-oxidation by 16-fold and catalase activity by only 2-fold, hepatic levels of esterified F2-isoprostanes were not altered. These levels were 2.8 +/- 0.5 ng/g liver in control mice and 2.4 +/- 0.1 ng/g liver in mice fed the experimental diet for 7 days. Consequently, it is concluded that oxidative stress does not appear to occur in response to peroxisome proliferation, as evidenced by the lack of increase in hepatic levels of F2-isoprostanes in livers of mice treated with the potent peroxisome proliferator WY-14,643.