Population pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir: influence of drug-drug interactions in a real-life setting

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Twice-daily Ritonavir-boosted Atazanavir With Rifampicin

BACKGROUND

Critical drug-drug interactions (DDI) and hepatotoxicity complicate concurrent use of rifampicin and protease inhibitors. We investigated whether dose escalation of atazanavir/ritonavir could safely overcome the DDI with rifampicin.

METHODS

DERIVE (NCT04121195, EDCTP) was a dose-escalation trial in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) on atazanavir/ritonavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Uganda. Four intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) visits were performed: PK1 300/100 mg OD (baseline); PK2 300/100 mg OD with rifampicin 600 mg; PK3 300/100 mg twice a day (BID) with rifampicin 600 mg OD; PK4 300/100 mg BID with rifampicin 1200 mg OD. Dolutegravir 50 mg BID throughout the study period ensured participants remained protected from subtherapeutic atazanavir concentrations. The data were interpreted with noncompartmental analysis. The target minimum concentration was atazanavir's protein-adjusted IC90 (PA-IC90), 0.014 mg/L.

RESULTS

We enrolled 26 participants (23 female) with median (range) age 44 (28-61) years and weight 67 (50-75) kg. Compared with PK1, atazanavir Ctau, and AUC were significantly reduced at PK2 by 96% and 85%, respectively. The escalation to BID dosing (PK3) reduced this difference in Ctau, and AUC24 to 18% lower and 8% higher, respectively. Comparable exposures were maintained with double doses of rifampicin. Lowest Ctau during PK1, PK3, and PK4 were 12.7-, 4.8-, and 8.6-fold higher than PA-IC90, respectively, whereas 65% of PK2 Ctau were below the limit of quantification (0.03 mg/L), hence likely below PA-IC90. No participant developed significant elevation of liver enzymes, reported a serious adverse event (SAE) or experienced rebound viraemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Twice daily atazanavir/ritonavir during rifampicin co-administration was well tolerated and achieved plasma concentrations above the target.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT04121195. Registered on 09 October 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04121195.

Different effects of the companion antiretroviral drugs on dolutegravir trough concentrations

BACKGROUND

Dolutegravir is widely used in different dual and triple antiretroviral regimens. Here, we sought to investigate the effect of the companion antiretroviral drug(s) on dolutegravir plasma trough concentrations in persons with HIV, with a focus on dual regimens.

METHODS

Dolutegravir concentrations collected from October 2015 to March 2023 ( n  = 900) were stratified according to the main antiretroviral classes (NRTIs, NNRTIs, protease inhibitors) and according to single drugs. Dolutegravir concentrations measured in persons with HIV concomitantly treated with lamivudine were considered as the reference group.

RESULTS

Dolutegravir trough concentrations were significantly higher in persons with HIV given protease inhibitors compared with the reference [1886 (1036-2940) versus 1575 (1026-2226) ng/ml; P  = 0.004]. The highest dolutegravir concentrations were measured in persons with HIV concomitantly treated with unboosted atazanavir [2908 (2130-4135) ng/ml]. Conversely, co-administration of darunavir/ritonavir resulted in significantly lower dolutegravir exposure [909 (496-1397) ng/ml; P  = 0.002 versus reference]. Among NNRTIs, the higher dolutegravir concentrations were measured in presence of rilpivirine [2252 (1489-2686); P  < 0.001 versus reference].

CONCLUSION

Dolutegravir trough concentrations are differently affected by individual antiretroviral drugs, with some drug combinations (i.e. dolutegravir/darunavir/cobicistat, or dolutegravir/rilpivirine) providing significantly higher than expected dolutegravir exposure. Such combinations might be advantageous when there are concerns about dolutegravir plasma exposure or resistance.

Advances in Antiretroviral Therapy for Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Tuberculosis

Tuberculosis is one of the most common opportunistic infections and a prominent cause of death in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, in spite of near-universal access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and tuberculosis preventive therapy. For patients with active tuberculosis but not yet receiving ART, starting ART after anti-tuberculosis treatment can complicate clinical management due to drug toxicities, drug-drug interactions and immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) events. The timing of ART initiation has a crucial impact on treatment outcomes, especially for patients with tuberculous meningitis. The principles of ART in patients with HIV-associated tuberculosis are specific and relatively complex in comparison to patients with other opportunistic infections or cancers. In this review, we summarize the current progress in the timing of ART initiation, ART regimens, drug-drug interactions between anti-tuberculosis and antiretroviral agents, and IRIS.

Development and validation of an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method to quantify antiretroviral drug concentrations in human plasma for therapeutic monitoring

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) is highly effective for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. ART previously consisted of concomitant administration of many drugs, multiple times per day. Currently, ART generally consists of two- or three-drug regimens once daily as fixed-dose combinations. Drug monitoring may be necessary to ensure adequate concentrations are achieved in the plasma over the dosing interval and prevent further HIV resistance formation. Additionally, nonadherence remains an issue, highlighting the need to ensure sufficient ART exposure. Towards this effort, we developed and validated a highly selective ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous quantification of a panel of nine antiretrovirals: abacavir, bictegravir, cabotegravir, dolutegravir, doravirine, emtricitabine, lamivudine, raltegravir, and tenofovir in human plasma. Using only 50 µL of plasma, a simple protein precipitation with acetonitrile with internal standards followed by reconstitution in 50 uL (high) or 400 uL (low) was performed. Analyte separation was achieved using a multistep UPLC gradient mixture of (A: 0.1% formic acid in water and B: acetonitrile) and a Waters CORTECS T3 (2.1 ×100 mm) column. The method was comprehensively validated according to the United States Food and Drug Administration Bioanalytical Guidelines over two clinically relevant ranges (1-250 ng/mL and 100-5000 ng/mL) with excellent linearity (R2 > 0.99 for all). The assay run time was 7.5 min. This method achieves acceptable performance of trueness (89.7-104.1%), repeatability, and precision (CV <15%), and allows for simultaneous quantification of guideline-recommended ART regimens. This method can be utilized for the therapeutic monitoring of antiretrovirals in human plasma.

Dolutegravir pharmacokinetics in Ugandan patients with TB and HIV receiving standard- versus high-dose rifampicin

Higher rifampicin doses may improve tuberculosis treatment outcomes. This could however exacerbate the existing drug interaction with dolutegravir. Moreover, the metabolism of dolutegravir may also be affected by polymorphism of UGT1A1, a gene that codes for uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase. We used population pharmacokinetic modeling to compare the pharmacokinetics of dolutegravir when coadministered with standard- versus high-dose rifampicin in adults with tuberculosis and HIV, and investigated the effect of genetic polymorphisms. Data from the SAEFRIF trial, where participants were randomized to receive first-line tuberculosis treatment with either standard- 10 mg/kg or high-dose 35 mg/kg rifampicin alongside antiretroviral therapy, were used. The dolutegravir model was developed with 211 plasma concentrations from 44 participants. The median (interquartile range) rifampicin area under the curve (AUC) in the standard- and high-dose arms were 32.3 (28.7-36.7) and 153 (138-175) mg·h/L, respectively. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination and absorption through transit compartments best described dolutegravir pharmacokinetics. For a typical 56 kg participant, we estimated a clearance, absorption rate constant, and volume of distribution of 1.87 L/h, 1.42 h-1, and 12.4 L, respectively. Each 10 mg·h/L increase in the AUC of coadministered rifampicin from 32.3 mg·h/L led to a 2.3 (3.1-1.4) % decrease in dolutegravir bioavailability. Genetic polymorphism of UGT1A1 did not significantly affect dolutegravir pharmacokinetics. Simulations of trough dolutegravir concentrations show that the 50 mg twice-daily regimen attains both the primary and secondary therapeutic targets of 0.064 and 0.3 mg/L, respectively, regardless of the dose of coadministered rifampicin, unlike the once-daily regimen.

Modeling tumor size dynamics based on real-world electronic health records and image data in advanced melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer therapy but only a fraction of patients benefits from this therapy. Model-informed drug development can be used to assess prognostic and predictive clinical factors or biomarkers associated with treatment response. Most pharmacometric models have thus far been developed using data from randomized clinical trials, and further studies are needed to translate their findings into the real-world setting. We developed a tumor growth inhibition model based on real-world clinical and imaging data in a population of 91 advanced melanoma patients receiving ICIs (i.e., ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab). Drug effect was modeled as an ON/OFF treatment effect, with a tumor killing rate constant identical for the three drugs. Significant and clinically relevant covariate effects of albumin, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status were identified on the baseline tumor volume parameter, as well as NRAS mutation on tumor growth rate constant using standard pharmacometric approaches. In a population subgroup (n = 38), we had the opportunity to conduct an exploratory analysis of image-based covariates (i.e., radiomics features), by combining machine learning and conventional pharmacometric covariate selection approaches. Overall, we demonstrated an innovative pipeline for longitudinal analyses of clinical and imaging RWD with a high-dimensional covariate selection method that enabled the identification of factors associated with tumor dynamics. This study also provides a proof of concept for using radiomics features as model covariates.

Decreased Dolutegravir and Efavirenz Concentrations With Preserved Virological Suppression in Patients With Tuberculosis and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Receiving High-Dose Rifampicin

BACKGROUND

Higher doses of rifampicin may improve treatment outcomes and reduce the duration of tuberculosis (TB) therapy. However, drug-drug interactions with antiretroviral therapy (ART) and safety in people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have not been evaluated.

METHODS

This was a randomized, open-label trial where newly diagnosed TB patients were randomized to higher (35 mg/kg) or standard (10 mg/kg) daily-dose rifampicin. ART treatment-naive patients were randomized to dolutegravir- or efavirenz-based ART. At week 6, trough dolutegravir or mid-dose efavirenz plasma concentrations were assayed. HIV viral load was measured at week 24.

RESULTS

Among 128 patients randomized, the median CD4 count was 191 cells/mm3. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) for trough dolutegravir concentrations on higher- vs standard-dose rifampicin was 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], .34-.97; P = .039) and the GMR for mid-dose efavirenz was 0.63 (95% CI, .38-1.07; P = .083). There was no significant difference in attainment of targets for dolutegravir trough or efavirenz mid-dose concentrations between rifampicin doses. The incidence of HIV treatment failure at week 24 was similar between rifampicin doses (14.9% vs 14.0%, P = .901), as was the incidence of drug-related grade 3-4 adverse events (9.8% vs 6%). At week 8, fewer patients remained sputum culture positive on higher-dose rifampicin (18.6% vs 37.0%, P = .063).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standard-dose rifampicin, high-dose rifampicin reduced dolutegravir and efavirenz exposures, but HIV suppression was similar across treatment arms. Higher-dose rifampicin was well tolerated among people with HIV and associated with a trend toward faster sputum culture conversion.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT03982277.

Tuberkulose im Erwachsenenalter

Die Tuberkulose ist in Deutschland eine seltene, überwiegend gut behandelbare Erkrankung. Weltweit ist sie eine der häufigsten Infektionserkrankungen mit ca. 10 Millionen Neuerkrankungen/Jahr. Auch bei einer niedrigen Inzidenz in Deutschland bleibt Tuberkulose insbesondere aufgrund der internationalen Entwicklungen und Migrationsbewegungen eine wichtige Differenzialdiagnose. In Deutschland besteht, aufgrund der niedrigen Prävalenz der Erkrankung und der damit verbundenen abnehmenden klinischen Erfahrung, ein Informationsbedarf zu allen Aspekten der Tuberkulose und ihrer Kontrolle. Diese Leitlinie umfasst die mikrobiologische Diagnostik, die Grundprinzipien der Standardtherapie, die Behandlung verschiedener Organmanifestationen, den Umgang mit typischen unerwünschten Arzneimittelwirkungen, die Besonderheiten in der Diagnostik und Therapie resistenter Tuberkulose sowie die Behandlung bei TB-HIV-Koinfektion. Sie geht darüber hinaus auf Versorgungsaspekte und gesetzliche Regelungen wie auch auf die Diagnosestellung und präventive Therapie einer latenten tuberkulösen Infektion ein. Es wird ausgeführt, wann es der Behandlung durch spezialisierte Zentren bedarf.

Die Aktualisierung der S2k-Leitlinie „Tuberkulose im Erwachsenenalter“ soll allen in der Tuberkuloseversorgung Tätigen als Richtschnur für die Prävention, die Diagnose und die Therapie der Tuberkulose dienen und helfen, den heutigen Herausforderungen im Umgang mit Tuberkulose in Deutschland gewachsen zu sein.

Real-world use and outcomes of dolutegravir-containing antiretroviral therapy in HIV and tuberculosis co-infection: a site survey and cohort study in sub-Saharan Africa

INTRODUCTION

Dolutegravir is being scaled up globally as part of antiretroviral therapy (ART), but for people with HIV and tuberculosis co-infection, its use is complicated by a drug-drug interaction with rifampicin requiring an additional daily dose of dolutegravir. This represents a disadvantage over efavirenz, which does not have a major drug-drug interaction with rifampicin. We sought to describe HIV clinic practices for prescribing concomitant dolutegravir and rifampicin, and characterize virologic outcomes among patients with tuberculosis co-infection receiving dolutegravir or efavirenz.

METHODS

Within the four sub-Saharan Africa regions of the International epidemiology Databases to Evaluate AIDS consortium, we conducted a site survey (2021) and a cohort study (2015-2021). The cohort study used routine clinical data and included patients newly initiating or already receiving dolutegravir or efavirenz at the time of tuberculosis diagnosis. Patients were followed from tuberculosis diagnosis until viral suppression (<1000 copies/ml), a competing event (switching ART regimen; loss to program/death) or administrative censoring at 12 months.

RESULTS

In the survey, 86 of 90 (96%) HIV clinics in 18 countries reported prescribing dolutegravir to patients who were receiving rifampicin as part of tuberculosis treatment, with 77 (90%) reporting that they use twice-daily dosing of dolutegravir, of which 74 (96%) reported having 50 mg tablets available to accommodate twice-daily dosing. The cohort study included 3563 patients in 11 countries, with 67% newly or recently initiating ART. Among patients receiving dolutegravir (n = 465), the cumulative incidence of viral suppression was 58.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 54.3-63.3%), switching ART regimen was 4.1% (95% CI: 2.6-6.2%) and loss to program/death was 23.4% (95% CI: 19.7-27.4%). Patients receiving dolutegravir had improved viral suppression compared with patients receiving efavirenz who had a tuberculosis diagnosis before site dolutegravir availability (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR]: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.28-1.68) and after site dolutegravir availability (aSHR 1.28, 95% CI: 1.08-1.51).

CONCLUSIONS

At a programmatic level, dolutegravir was being widely prescribed in sub-Saharan Africa for people with HIV and tuberculosis co-infection with a dose adjustment for the drug-drug interaction with rifampicin. Despite this more complex regimen, our cohort study revealed that dolutegravir did not negatively impact viral suppression.

Population Pharmacokinetic Model and Alternative Dosing Regimens for Dolutegravir Coadministered with Rifampicin

Dolutegravir-based regimens are recommended as first-line therapy for HIV in low- and middle-income countries where tuberculosis is the most common opportunistic infection. Concurrent HIV/tuberculosis treatment is challenging because of drug-drug interactions. Our analysis aimed to characterize dolutegravir's population pharmacokinetics when coadministered with rifampicin and assess alternative dolutegravir dosing regimens. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model of dolutegravir in NONMEM with data from two healthy-volunteer studies (RADIO and ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01231542) and validated it with data from the INSPIRING study, which consisted of participants living with HIV. The model was developed with 817 dolutegravir plasma concentrations from 41 participants. A 2-compartment model with first-order elimination and lagged absorption best described dolutegravir's pharmacokinetics. For a typical 70-kg individual, we estimated a clearance, absorption rate constant, central volume, and peripheral volume of 1.03 L/h, 1.61 h^-1, 12.7 L, and 3.85 L, respectively. Rifampicin coadministration increased dolutegravir clearance by 144% (95% confidence interval [CI], 126 to 161%). Simulations showed that when 50 or 100 mg once-daily dolutegravir is coadministered with rifampicin in 70-kg individuals, 71.7% and 91.5% attain trough concentrations above 0.064 mg/L, the protein-adjusted 90% inhibitory concentration (PA-IC₉₀), respectively. The model developed from healthy-volunteer data describes patient data reasonably well but underpredicts trough concentrations. Although 50 mg of dolutegravir given twice daily achieves target concentrations in more than 99% of individuals cotreated with rifampicin, 100 mg of dolutegravir, once daily, in the same population is predicted to achieve satisfactory pharmacokinetic target attainment. The efficacy of this regimen should be investigated since it presents an opportunity for treatment simplification.

Pharmacokinetic features of dolutegravir with rifampicin and rifabutin among patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and tuberculosis/mycobacterium avium complex

BACKGROUND

Rifamycins are the cornerstone of anti-tuberculosis therapy while they are potent inducers of drug metabolizing enzymes. For the first time, we evaluated the effect of rifampicin (RIF) and rifabutin (RBT) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dolutegravir (DTG) in patients with HIV and tuberculosis (TB)/ mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) co-infection.

METHODS

Both HIV/TB (or MAC) co-infected patients and HIV infected patients without TB/MAC were enrolled. Patients in the RIF group received DTG 50 mg twice daily together with 600mg of RIF, while patients in the RBT group received DTG 50 mg once daily together with 300 mg of RBT. The DTG pharmacokinetic profiles in different groups were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 13 subjects in the RIF group, 12 subjects in the RBT group, and 10 subjects in non-TB/MAC group were enrolled. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) of the trough concentration (Ctr) of DTG in the RIF group to non-TB/MAC group was 1.33 [90% confidence interval (CI):0.97 to 1.81], while the GMR of the maximum concentration (Cmax) of DTG was 1.29 (90% CI: 1.23 to 1.36). The GMR of the Ctr of DTG in the RBT group to non-TB/MAC group was 0.41 (90% CI: 0.30 to 0.57), while the GMR of the Cmax of DTG was 0.55 (90% CI: 0.52 to 0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the relatively low trough concentrations of DTG with RBT, DTG 50mg once daily together with RBT could only serve as an alternative option for HIV/TB (or MAC) co-infected patients.

High-content analysis and Kinetic Image Cytometry identify toxicity and epigenetic effects of HIV antiretrovirals on human iPSC-neurons and primary neural precursor cells

INTRODUCTION

Despite viral suppression due to combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) continue to affect half of people with HIV, suggesting that certain antiretrovirals (ARVs) may contribute to HAND.

METHODS

We examined the effects of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) and the integrase inhibitors dolutegravir (DTG) and elvitegravir (EVG) on viability, structure, and function of glutamatergic neurons (a subtype of CNS neuron involved in cognition) derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC-neurons), and primary human neural precursor cells (hNPCs), which are responsible for neurogenesis.

RESULTS

Using automated digital microscopy and image analysis (high content analysis, HCA), we found that DTG, EVG, and TDF decreased hiPSC-neuron viability, neurites, and synapses after 7 days of treatment. Analysis of hiPSC-neuron calcium activity using Kinetic Image Cytometry (KIC) demonstrated that DTG and EVG also decreased the frequency and magnitude of intracellular calcium transients. Longer ARV exposures and simultaneous exposure to multiple ARVs increased the magnitude of these neurotoxic effects. Using the Microscopic Imaging of Epigenetic Landscapes (MIEL) assay, we found that TDF decreased hNPC viability and changed the distribution of histone modifications that regulate chromatin packing, suggesting that TDF may reduce neuroprogenitor pools important for CNS development and maintenance of cognition in adults.

CONCLUSION

This study establishes human preclinical assays that can screen potential ARVs for CNS toxicity to develop safer cART regimens and HAND therapeutics.

Optimizing Dolutegravir Initiation in Neonates Using Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation

BACKGROUND

A knowledge gap exists for dolutegravir (DTG) pharmacokinetics and safety during the first 4 weeks of life, preventing safe and effective DTG use in neonates.

SETTING

Population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation were used to assess newborn DTG dosing requirements during the first few days of life as a function of maternal DTG dosing history before delivery.

METHODS

DTG PK data were obtained from pregnant women and infants enrolled in the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network P1026S study. Maternal and neonate population pharmacokinetic models were separately developed. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to simulate neonatal concentrations after 2 doses of DTG after birth for infants born to mothers either receiving or not receiving DTG before delivery.

RESULTS

In DTG-naïve infants, a 5-mg DTG dose at birth with a second dose after 48 hours maintained median concentrations above the lower bound of the target range (0.77 μg/mL) and below the upper bound of the target range (7.34 μg/mL representing 2-fold above the adult Cmax value). In DTG-exposed infants, a 5-mg DTG dose at 24 hours after birth with a second dose after 48 hours maintained median concentrations within or nearly within the target range, even if the last maternal DTG dose was taken as soon as 6 hours or as long as 24 hours before delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Newborn DTG dosing requirements during the first few days of life depend on maternal DTG dosing history before delivery. These results may help the design of future clinical studies of DTG in the neonatal population.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of integrase strand transfer inhibitors

The integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing regimens are currently considered as the first-line treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Although possessing a common mechanism of action to inhibit HIV integrase irreversibly to stop HIV replication cycle, the INSTIs, including raltegravir, elvitegravir, dolutegravir, and bictegravir, differ in pharmacokinetic characteristics. While raltegravir undergoes biotransformation by the UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), elvitegravir is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and co-formulated with cobicistat to increase its plasma exposure. The metabolism pathways of dolutegravir and bictegravir are similar, both including CYP3A and UGT1A1, and both agents are substrates to different drug transporters. Because of their differences in metabolism, INSTIs interact with other medications differently through CYP enzymes and transporters as inducers or inhibitors. These drug interactions may become an important consideration in the long-term clinical use because the life expectancy of people with HIV (PWH) approaches to that of the general population. Also, common geriatric challenges such as multimorbidity and polypharmacy have been increasingly recognized in PWH. This review provides a summary of pharmacokinetic interactions with INSTIs and future perspectives in implications of INSTI drug interactions.

Durability of Dolutegravir-Based Regimens: A 5-Year Prospective Observational Study

This study evaluates the frequency and causes of dolutegravir (DTG) discontinuation along 5 years of follow-up, in both antiretroviral treatment (ART)-naive and experienced people living with HIV (PLWH). This is a prospective multi-center cohort study enrolling PLWH on DTG from July 2014 until November 2020. DTG-durability was investigated using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used for estimating the hazard ratio (HR) of DTG discontinuation for any cause, and for adverse events (AEs). Nine hundred sixty-three PLWH were included, 25.3% were women and 28.0% were ART-naive. Discontinuations for any causes were 10.1 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 8.9-11.5] per 100 person-years, similar in most regimens, with the apparent exception of tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine+DTG (p < 0.0001). In the multivariable Cox regression model, non-Caucasian ethnicity, age ≥50 years, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were associated with a higher probability of DTG interruption. The incidence rate of virological failure was 0.4 (95% CI 0.2-0.7) per 100 person-years, while the estimated discontinuation rate for AEs was 4.0 (3.2-4.9) per 100 person-years. Thirty-four DTG interruptions were due to grade ≥3 events (10 central nervous system, 6 hypersensitivity, 3 renal, 3 myalgia/asthenia, 3 abdominal pain, 2 gastrointestinal, and 7 other events). People with lower body mass index, age ≥50 years, and lower eGFR were at higher risk of AEs, while dual combinations were protective (HR 0.41 compared with abacavir/lamivudine/DTG, 95% CI 0.22-0.77). In this prospective observational study, we found high DTG durability and a low rate of virological failures. Dual therapies seemed protective toward AEs and might be considered, when feasible, a suitable option to minimize drug interactions and improve tolerability.

The impact of age on antiretroviral drug pharmacokinetics in the treatment of adults living with HIV

INTRODUCTION

People living with HIV (PLWH) are aging and will receive life-long treatment: despite substantial improvement in drug efficacy and tolerability, side effects still occur and they can blunt antiretroviral treatment effectiveness. Since age may affect drug exposure and may be associated with side-effects we aimed at reviewing available data on the effect of age on antiretrovirals' pharmacokinetics in adult patients.

AREAS COVERED

We searched public databases and major conference proceedings for data on age and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in PLWH. We limited our review to currently used drugs and focused on population pharmacokinetics and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Available evidence of a potential detrimental effect in elderly PLWH is limited by study design and small sample sizes. Careful consideration of undoubtful benefits and potential harms is advised when prescribing ARVs to geriatric patients and the knowledge of pharmacokinetics changes need to be included in the process. With the 'greying' of the pandemic we need studies with a specific focus on geriatric patients living with HIV that will consider specific phenotypes and associated changes (including sarcopenia).

Pharmacokinetic parameters and weight change in HIV patients newly switched to dolutegravir-based regimens in SIMPL'HIV clinical trial

This study aims to evaluate the association between dolutegravir (DTG) pharmacokinetic parameters and weight changes in treatment-experienced people with HIV (PWHIV) from the Simpl'HIV study newly switched to a dual DTG-based regimen. We used multivariable linear regressions to evaluate the association between DTG pharmacokinetic parameters at week 48 (derived using an established model) and weight change between week 0 and week 48. We adjusted our model for potential confounders including CD4 nadir, female sex, African origin, age, weight at week 0 and presence of a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimen before switch to DTG. The analysis included data from 39 PWHIV. An average significant weight gain of 2.4 kg was observed between baseline and week 48. DTG plasma exposure was not significantly associated with weight gain, even after adjusting for potential confounders (P = .9). We found no significant association between DTG pharmacokinetic parameters and weight gain amongst PWHIV newly switched to a DTG-based dual regimen.

Older Age is Associated with Higher Dolutegravir Exposure in Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid of People Living with HIV

BACKGROUND

People living with human immunodeficiency virus are ageing under combination antiretroviral treatments but data on drug exposure in serum and cerebrospinal fluid are limited. Dolutegravir is a widely used second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor: conflicting data suggest that neuropsychiatric side effects may present at a higher frequency in patients with higher dolutegravir serum concentrations.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of our therapeutic drug monitoring registry identifying patients receiving once-daily dolutegravir without concomitant interacting drugs and significant clinical conditions. Data were analysed stratifying time after drug dose intake (maximum concentration 0.5-4 and trough concentration 21-27 h). Cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients enrolled in neurological studies and receiving dolutegravir were analysed for dolutegravir cerebrospinal fluid concentrations and cerebrospinal fluid-to-plasma ratios. Serum and cerebrospinal fluid concentrations were measured through validated chromatographic methods.

RESULTS

We included 207 (providing 457 serum samples) and 41 patients (providing 41 cerebrospinal fluid samples). Participants were mostly male (68.2-72.8%) of median age of 50 years (50-53 years). Non-significant changes in dolutegravir maximum concentration and trough concentration were observed with age at Spearman's test (p values > 0.05); linear logistic regression showed a significant effect of age on dolutegravir trough concentration (p = 0.0013) (Fig. 1). Dolutegravir maximum concentration [3830 ng/mL (2311-5057) vs 4230 ng/mL (2919-5272), p = 0.311] and trough concentration [838 ng/mL (362-1587) vs 966 ng/mL (460-2085), p = 0.056] were non-significantly or borderline higher in patients aged > 50 years. Cerebrospinal dolutegravir concentrations were associated with plasma concentrations (ρ = 0.374, p = 0.016) and age (ρ = 0.537, p = 0.003); cerebrospinal fluid dolutegravir concentrations (13.8 vs 7.3 ng/mL, p = 0.015) and cerebrospinal fluid-to-plasma ratios (0.57 vs 0.32%, p = 0.017] were higher in participants aged > 50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed an increase in dolutegravir exposure in serum and in cerebrospinal fluid in older patients living with human immunodeficiency virus.

Pharmacokinetic profiles of boosted darunavir, dolutegravir and lamivudine in aging people living with HIV

OBJECTIVES

The pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs may differ in elderly people living with HIV (PLWH) because of age-related physiological changes. We aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics of several antiretroviral drugs in aging PLWH enrolled in the Swiss HIV Cohort (SHCS).

DESIGN

Full pharmacokinetic profiling nested in a multicenter, observational, prospective cohort study. Additional collection of single point pharmacokinetic data during SHCS follow-up visits (unselected PLWH).

METHODS

PLWH were eligible for the full pharmacokinetics investigation if they were over the age of 55 years, on a stable boosted darunavir-containing or dolutegravir-containing regimen. Single point measurements were prospectively collected during SHCS follow-up visits to compare antiretroviral drug exposure in aging (≥65 years) and younger (<65 years) PLWH.

RESULTS

Nineteen PLWH with a median age of 64 years participated in the full pharmacokinetic investigations. Single point pharmacokinetic data were collected for 804 PLWH with a median age of 52 years. Boosted darunavir clearance was 40% lower in aging (≥65 years) compared with younger (<65 years) PLWH, consistent with other drugs predominantly metabolized by CYP3A. Dolutegravir exposure was similar between age groups whereas lamivudine exposure increased by 11% in aging PLWH. Median boosted darunavir, dolutegravir and lamivudine t1/2 were 148%, 45% and 32% higher in aging compared with younger PLWH.

CONCLUSION

Advanced age did not affect boosted darunavir exposure to a clinically significant extent despite the observed high variability in exposure. Age minimally affected dolutegravir and lamivudine exposure. Thus, dose adjustment based on age is a priori not warranted.