Drug resistance in patients experiencing early virological failure under a triple combination including indinavir

Potential Associations of Mutations within the HIV-1 Env and Gag Genes Conferring Protease Inhibitor (PI) Drug Resistance

An increasing number of patients in Africa are experiencing virological failure on a second-line antiretroviral protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen, even without resistance-associated mutations in the protease region, suggesting a potential role of other genes in PI resistance. Here, we investigated the prevalence of mutations associated with Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/r) failure in the Envelope gene and the possible coevolution with mutations within the Gag-protease (gag-PR) region. Env and Gag-PR sequences generated from 24 HIV-1 subtype C infected patients failing an LPV/r inclusive treatment regimen and 344 subtype C drug-naïve isolates downloaded from the Los Alamos Database were analyzed. Fisher’s exact test was used to determine the differences in mutation frequency. Bayesian network probability was applied to determine the relationship between mutations occurring within the env and gag-PR regions and LPV/r treatment. Thirty-five mutations in the env region had significantly higher frequencies in LPV/r-treated patients. A combination of Env and Gag-PR mutations was associated with a potential pathway to LPV/r resistance. While Env mutations were not directly associated with LPV/r resistance, they may exert pressure through the Gag and minor PR mutation pathways. Further investigations using site-directed mutagenesis are needed to determine the impact of Env mutations alone and in combination with Gag-PR mutations on viral fitness and LPV/r efficacy.

Mechanistic Analysis of the Broad Antiretroviral Resistance Conferred by HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein Mutations

Although combination antiretroviral (ARV) therapy is highly effective in controlling the progression of HIV disease, drug resistance can be a major obstacle. Recent findings suggest that resistance can develop without ARV target gene mutations.

Despite the effectiveness of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy, virological failure can occur in some HIV-1-infected patients in the absence of mutations in drug target genes. We previously reported that, in vitro, the lab-adapted HIV-1 NL4-3 strain can acquire resistance to the integrase inhibitor dolutegravir (DTG) by acquiring mutations in the envelope glycoprotein (Env) that enhance viral cell-cell transmission. In this study, we investigated whether Env-mediated drug resistance extends to ARVs other than DTG and whether it occurs in other HIV-1 isolates. We demonstrate that Env mutations can reduce susceptibility to multiple classes of ARVs and also increase resistance to ARVs when coupled with target-gene mutations. We observe that the NL4-3 Env mutants display a more stable and closed Env conformation and lower rates of gp120 shedding than the WT virus. We also selected for Env mutations in clinically relevant HIV-1 isolates in the presence of ARVs. These Env mutants exhibit reduced susceptibility to DTG, with effects on replication and Env structure that are HIV-1 strain dependent. Finally, to examine a possible in vivo relevance of Env-mediated drug resistance, we performed single-genome sequencing of plasma-derived virus from five patients failing an integrase inhibitor-containing regimen. This analysis revealed the presence of several mutations in the highly conserved gp120-gp41 interface despite low frequency of resistance mutations in integrase. These results suggest that mutations in Env that enhance the ability of HIV-1 to spread via a cell-cell route may increase the opportunity for the virus to acquire high-level drug resistance mutations in ARV target genes.

Mutations in the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein can broadly rescue blocks at multiple steps in the virus replication cycle

The p6 domain of HIV-1 Gag contains highly conserved peptide motifs that recruit host machinery to sites of virus assembly, thereby promoting particle release from the infected cell. We previously reported that mutations in the YPX_nL motif of p6, which binds the host protein Alix, severely impair HIV-1 replication. Propagation of the p6-Alix binding site mutants in the Jurkat T cell line led to the emergence of viral revertants containing compensatory mutations not in Gag but in Vpu and the envelope (Env) glycoprotein subunits gp120 and gp41. The Env compensatory mutants replicate in Jurkat T cells and primary human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, despite exhibiting severe defects in cell-free particle infectivity and Env-mediated fusogenicity. Remarkably, the Env compensatory mutants can also rescue a replication-delayed integrase (IN) mutant, and exhibit reduced sensitivity to the IN inhibitor Dolutegravir (DTG), demonstrating that they confer a global replication advantage. In addition, confirming the ability of Env mutants to confer escape from DTG, we performed de novo selection for DTG resistance and observed resistance mutations in Env. These results identify amino acid substitutions in Env that confer broad escape from defects in virus replication imposed by either mutations in the HIV-1 genome or by an antiretroviral inhibitor. We attribute this phenotype to the ability of the Env mutants to mediate highly efficient cell-to-cell transmission, resulting in an increase in the multiplicity of infection. These findings have broad implications for our understanding of Env function and the evolution of HIV-1 drug resistance.

Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy: The Emerging Role of HIV Pharmacotherapy Specialists

Despite the availability of 25 antiretroviral agents to treat HIV infection and the significant progresses made in the clinical pharmacology of HIV drugs, viral suppression and immune restoration remain problematic in a large number of HIV-infected persons. One of the main factors responsible for this partial therapeutic success is the difficulty patients have adhering consistently to antiretroviral therapy. Barriers to adherence are diverse and complex and evolve over time, complicating the monitoring of medication-taking behaviors. Consequently, multilevel interventions are often needed to address thoroughly adherence issues. Given the rapid and constant evolution of HIV treatments, innovative multidisciplinary programs integrating HIV pharmacotherapy specialists, as the “medication expert,” are being implemented. Because of his or her advanced knowledge of antiretrovirals, the HIV pharmacotherapy specialist is highly qualified to evaluate patients with complex regimens who are facing barriers to successful care and who need tailored interventions and long-term follow-up.

Time to Viremia for Patients Taking their First Antiretroviral Regimen and the Subsequent Resistance Profiles

BACKGROUND

The resistance profiles for patients on first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens after viremia have not been well studied in community clinic settings in the modern treatment era.

OBJECTIVE

To determine time to viremia and the ART resistance profiles of viremic patients.

METHODS

HIV-positive patients aged ≥16 years initiating a three-drug regimen were retrospectively identified from 01/01/06 to 12/31/12. The regimens were a backbone of two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and a third agent: a protease inhibitor (PI), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), or an integrase inhibitor (II). Time to viremia was compared using a proportional hazards model, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Resistance profiles were described in those with baseline and follow-up genotypes.

RESULTS

For 653 patients, distribution of third-agent use and viremia was: 244 (37%) on PIs with 80 viremia, 364 (56%) on NNRTIs with 84 viremia, and 45 (7%) on II with 11 viremia. Only for NNRTIs, time to viremia was longer than PIs (p = 0.04) for patients with a CD4 count ≥200 cells/mm(3). Of the 175 with viremia, 143 (82%) had baseline and 37 (21%) had follow-up genotype. Upon viremia, emerging ART resistance was rare. One new NNRTI (Y181C) mutation was identified and three patients taking PI-based regimens developed NRTI mutations (M184 V, M184I, and T215Y).

CONCLUSIONS

Time to viremia for NNRTIs was longer than PIs. With viremia, ART resistance rarely developed without PI or II mutations, but with a few NRTI mutations in those taking PI-based regimens, and NNRTI mutations in those taking NNRTI-based regimens.

Virological failure in patients with HIV-1 subtype C receiving antiretroviral therapy: an analysis of a prospective national cohort in Sweden

BACKGROUND

People with HIV-1 in low-income and middle-income countries increasingly need second-line regimens with boosted protease inhibitors. However, data are scarce for treatment response in patients with HIV-1 subtype C (HIV-1C), which is predominant in these regions. We aimed to examine factors associated with virological failure in patients in a standardised national health-care setting.

METHODS

We analysed data for participants in InfCare HIV, a prospective national cohort that includes more than 99% of people with HIV in Sweden. We extracted data for the cohort from the InfCare HIV database on Jan 14, 2015. Baseline was initiation of antiretroviral therapy. We used logistic regression to assess factors associated with primary virological failure (failure to suppress HIV-1 within 9 months) in patients with HIV-1B and HIV-1C and calculated odds ratios (OR) for failure. We also used Cox regression models to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for time-to-secondary virological failure (detectable viral load after initial virological suppression). We did homology-based molecular modelling to assess docking.

FINDINGS

We included 1077 patients with HIV-1B and 596 with HIV-1C. In multivariate regression analysis, pre-therapy higher viral load (OR 1·82, 95% CI 1·49-2·21; p<0·0001), subtype C infection (1·75, 1·06-2·88; p=0·028), and boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens (1·55, 1·45-2·11; p=0·004) were associated with increased risk of primary virological failure. Individuals with HIV-1C who were given therapy with boosted protease inhibitors had earlier time-to-secondary virological failure than did those with HIV-1B given similar regimens (adjusted HR 1·92, 95% CI 1·30-2·83; p=0·002). Molecular modelling suggested lower affinity for protease inhibitors to HIV-1C protease than to HIV-1B.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest an increased risk of virological failure in patients with HIV-1C, especially in those on boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens. Future studies should further dissect the biochemical and viral mechanisms of resistance to protease inhibitors in patients with non-B subtypes of HIV-1, including clinical studies to assess the efficacy of boosted protease inhibitor-based regimens in low-income and middle income countries.

FUNDING

Karolinska Institutet Research Foundation, Swedish Research Council, Stockholm County Council, Swedish Physicians against AIDS, US National Institutes of Health, University of Missouri.

Adherence as a predictor of the development of class-specific resistance mutations: the Swiss HIV Cohort Study

Background

Non-adherence is one of the strongest predictors of therapeutic failure in HIV-positive patients. Virologic failure with subsequent emergence of resistance reduces future treatment options and long-term clinical success.

Methods

Prospective observational cohort study including patients starting new class of antiretroviral therapy (ART) between 2003 and 2010. Participants were naïve to ART class and completed ≥1 adherence questionnaire prior to resistance testing. Outcomes were development of any IAS-USA, class-specific, or M184V mutations. Associations between adherence and resistance were estimated using logistic regression models stratified by ART class.

Results

Of 314 included individuals, 162 started NNRTI and 152 a PI/r regimen. Adherence was similar between groups with 85% reporting adherence ≥95%. Number of new mutations increased with increasing non-adherence. In NNRTI group, multivariable models indicated a significant linear association in odds of developing IAS-USA (odds ratio (OR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-2.67) or class-specific (OR 1.65, 95% CI: 1.00-2.70) mutations. Levels of drug resistance were considerably lower in PI/r group and adherence was only significantly associated with M184V mutations (OR 8.38, 95% CI: 1.26-55.70). Adherence was significantly associated with HIV RNA in PI/r but not NNRTI regimens.

Conclusion

Therapies containing PI/r appear more forgiving to incomplete adherence compared with NNRTI regimens, which allow higher levels of resistance, even with adherence above 95%. However, in failing PI/r regimens good adherence may prevent accumulation of further resistance mutations and therefore help to preserve future drug options. In contrast, adherence levels have little impact on NNRTI treatments once the first mutations have emerged.

Multi-step inhibition explains HIV-1 protease inhibitor pharmacodynamics and resistance

HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) are among the most effective antiretroviral drugs. They are characterized by highly cooperative dose-response curves that are not explained by current pharmacodynamic theory. An unresolved problem affecting the clinical use of PIs is that patients who fail PI-containing regimens often have virus that lacks protease mutations, in apparent violation of fundamental evolutionary theory. Here, we show that these unresolved issues can be explained through analysis of the effects of PIs on distinct steps in the viral life cycle. We found that PIs do not affect virion release from infected cells but block entry, reverse transcription, and post-reverse transcription steps. The overall dose-response curves could be reconstructed by combining the curves for each step using the Bliss independence principle, showing that independent inhibition of multiple distinct steps in the life cycle generates the highly cooperative dose-response curves that make these drugs uniquely effective. Approximately half of the inhibitory potential of PIs is manifest at the entry step, likely reflecting interactions between the uncleaved Gag and the cytoplasmic tail (CT) of the Env protein. Sequence changes in the CT alone, which are ignored in current clinical tests for PI resistance, conferred PI resistance, providing an explanation for PI failure without resistance.

Provider-focused intervention increases adherence-related dialogue but does not improve antiretroviral therapy adherence in persons with HIV

BACKGROUND

Physicians' limited knowledge of patients' antiretroviral adherence may reduce their ability to perform effective adherence counseling.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, cross-over study of an intervention to improve physicians' knowledge of patients' antiretroviral adherence. The intervention was a report given to the physician before a routine office visit that included data on Medication Event Monitoring System and self-reported data on antiretroviral adherence, patients' beliefs about antiretroviral therapy, reasons for missed doses, alcohol and drug use, and depression. We audio recorded 1 intervention and 1 control visit for each patient to analyze differences in adherence-related dialogue.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-six patients were randomized, and 106 completed all 5 study visits. Paired audio recorded visits were available for 58 patients. Using a linear regression model that adjusted for site and baseline Medication Event Monitoring System adherence, adherence after intervention visits did not differ significantly from control visits (2.0% higher, P = 0.31, 95% confidence interval: -1.95% to 5.9%). There was a trend toward more total adherence-related utterances (median of 76 vs. 49.5, P = 0.07) and a significant increase in utterances about the current regimen (median of 51.5 vs. 32.5, P = 0.0002) in intervention compared with control visits. However, less than 10% of adherence-related utterances were classified as "problem solving" in content, and one third of physicians' problem-solving utterances were directive in nature.

CONCLUSIONS

Receipt of a detailed report before clinic visits containing data about adherence and other factors did not improve patients' antiretroviral adherence. Analyses of patient-provider dialogue suggests that providers who care for persons with HIV may benefit from training in adherence counseling techniques.

Clinical management of treatment-experienced, HIV/AIDS patients in the combination antiretroviral therapy era

Despite the success of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) in improving clinical outcomes, treatment failure remains a significant challenge, particularly for highly treatment-experienced patients. This review evaluates current issues in the management of HIV-infected, treatment-experienced patients. It may provide guidance in selecting active, tolerable drug combinations that promote a reasonable quality of life, full adherence and a durable treatment response. Current treatment guidelines and clinical trial data were reviewed to identify reasons for treatment failure and to summarize therapy options for treatment-experienced and highly treatment-experienced patients. Current treatment options include nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and inhibitors of viral fusion, entry and integration. The use of NRTIs may be limited by resistance and short- and long-term toxicities. Resistance has restricted the NNRTI class with cross-resistance preventing their sequential use. Etravirine, a next-generation NNRTI, however, demonstrates effective virological suppression in patients with baseline NNRTI resistance. Boosted PIs are key components of ART for treatment-experienced patients. The newer boosted PIs tipranavir and darunavir have demonstrated impressive activity in patients with resistance to NRTIs, NNRTIs and PIs, as well as in less treatment-experienced patients for darunavir. The fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide has demonstrated efficacy in heavily treatment-experienced patients, although injection-site reactions can be problematical. The recently approved integrase inhibitor raltegravir has also shown impressive potency and tolerability in highly treatment-experienced patients. Finally, the entry inhibitor maraviroc has also been approved recently, although its use is somewhat limited by the need for HIV tropism testing. The availability of potent next-generation PIs, NNRTIs, integrase and entry-inhibitors may offer improved therapy for treatment-experienced patients, including those with multiresistant virus. These new drugs may reduce HIV immunological and clinical progression and in doing so may also reduce treatment costs.

Antiretroviral medication adherence and the development of class-specific antiretroviral resistance

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between antiretroviral adherence and the development of class-specific antiretroviral medication resistance.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Literature and conference abstract review of studies assessing the association between adherence to antiretroviral therapy and the development of antiretroviral medication resistance.

RESULTS

Factors that determine class-specific adherence-resistance relationships include antiretroviral regimen potency, viral fitness or, more specifically, the interplay between the fold-change in resistance and fold-change in fitness caused by drug resistance mutations, and the genetic barrier to antiretroviral resistance. During multidrug therapy, differential drug exposure increases the likelihood of developing resistance. In addition, antiretroviral medications with higher potency and higher genetic barriers to resistance decrease the incidence of resistance for companion antiretroviral medications at all adherence levels.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge of class-specific adherence-resistance relationships may help clinicians and patients tailor therapy to match individual patterns of adherence in order to minimize the development of resistance at failure. In addition, this information may guide the selection of optimal drug combinations and regimen sequences to improve the durability of antiretroviral therapy.

Longitudinal community plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations and incidence of HIV-1 among injecting drug users: prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relation between plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations in the community and HIV incidence among injecting drug users.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Inner city community in Vancouver, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Injecting drug users, with and without HIV, followed up every six months between 1 May 1996 and 30 June 2007.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Estimated community plasma HIV-1 RNA in the six months before each HIV negative participant's follow-up visit. Associated HIV incidence.

RESULTS

Among 622 injecting drug users with HIV, 12 435 measurements of plasma HIV-1 RNA were obtained. Among 1429 injecting drug users without HIV, there were 155 HIV seroconversions, resulting in an incidence density of 2.49 (95% confidence interval 2.09 to 2.88) per 100 person years. In a Cox model that adjusted for unsafe sexual behaviours and sharing used syringes, the estimated community plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration remained independently associated with the time to HIV seroconversion (hazard ratio 3.32 (1.82 to 6.08, P<0.001), per log(10) increase). When the follow-up period was limited to observations after 1 January 1988 (when the median plasma HIV RNA concentration was <20 000 copies/ml), the median viral load was no longer statistically associated with HIV incidence (1.70 (0.79 to 3.67, P=0.175), per log(10) increase).

CONCLUSIONS

A longitudinal measure of community plasma HIV-1 RNA concentration was correlated with the community HIV incidence rate and predicted HIV incidence independent of unsafe sexual behaviours and sharing used syringes. If these findings are confirmed, they could help to inform both HIV prevention and treatment interventions.

Analyses of HIV-1 drug-resistance profiles among infected adolescents experiencing delayed antiretroviral treatment switch after initial nonsuppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy

Treatment failure and drug resistance create obstacles to long-term management of HIV-1 infection. Nearly 60% of infected persons fail their first highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimen, partially because of nonadherence, requiring a switch to a second regimen to prevent drug resistance. Among HIV-infected youth, a group with rising infection rates, treatment switch is often delayed; virologic and immunologic consequences of this delay are unknown. We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study of drug resistance outcomes of initial HAART in U.S. youth enrolled between 1999-2001 in a multicenter, observational study and experiencing delayed switch in their first nonsuppressive treatment regimen for up to 3 years. HIV-1 genotyping was performed on plasma samples collected longitudinally, and changes in drug resistance mutations, CD4+ T cell numbers and viral replication capacity were assessed. Forty-four percent (n = 18) of youth in the parent study experiencing virologic nonsuppression were maintained on their initial HAART regimen for a median of 144 weeks. Drug resistance was detected in 61% (11/18) of subjects during the study. Subjects on non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) regimens developed more (8/10) drug resistance mutations than those on protease-inhibitor (PI) regimens (2/7) (p = 0.058). Subjects developing NNRTI-resistance (NNRTI-R), showed a trend toward lower CD4+ T cell gains (median: -6 cells/mm(3) per year) than those without detectable NNRTI-R (median: +149 cells/mm(3) per year) (p = 0.16). HIV-1-infected youth maintained on initial nonsuppressive NNRTI-based HAART regimens are more likely to develop drug-resistant viremia than with PI-based HAART. This finding may have implications for initial treatment regimens and transmission risk in HIV-infected youth, a group with rising infection rates.

Approach to the Treatment-Experienced Patient

The management of treatment-experienced patients is complex and challenging. Fortunately, new agents continue to be developed that offer hope to those who have developed resistance to currently available agents. Knowing when, how, and in whom to use new agents is never easy and highlights the importance of expert care for HIV-infected patients. The management of treatment-experienced patients requires considerable expertise, especially now that patients with highly resistant virus can hope to achieve full virologic suppression.

The pharmacology of HIV drug resistance

Drug resistance to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a major factor in the failure of antiretroviral therapy.1 In order for practitioners to provide effective pharmaceutical care to their HIV patients, it is essential that they understand the mechanisms of HIV drug resistance as well as the various factors that can contribute to its emergence. This article is based on didactic content from the infectious disease section of the Integrated Sequence II Course in the PharmD program at South University. In the course, students are first given an overview that includes key structural components of HIV and a discussion of the HIV life cycle. A detailed presentation on the pharmacology of the various classes of antiretroviral agents follows. The clinical impact and prevalence of HIV drug resistance is then discussed along with factors that might contribute to it. Mechanisms of drug resistance for each class of antiretroviral agents are presented in detail followed by a discussion of the basis and clinical utility of HIV drug resistance testing. Finally, new targets for HIV pharmacotherapy are presented along with an overview of new antiretroviral agents that are being developed. Content taught in lecture is reinforced by relevant case studies that students work on in small groups during the recitation period.

Current therapy for human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

Antiretroviral treatments with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) have shown remarkable progress in the past decade and resulted in impressive improvements in life expectancy and quality of life for patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1). Despite the clinical benefits, the management of HIV infection faces many problems. Although HAART is able to suppress the viral load in the plasma, it is unable to eradicate it, and once HAART is initiated, treatment needs to be continued over a lifetime. The side effects of long-term HAART, such as lipodystrophy, lactic acidosis, insulin resistance, and hyperlipidemia, are negative impacts for patients who receive HAART. In addition, patients need to demonstrate high adherence to the therapy to achieve viral suppression and prevent the development of a drug-resistant virus. This review discusses currently recommended antiretroviral treatment strategies, the difficulties with antiretroviral treatments, and current issues regarding HIV management.

Development of a macrophage-based nanoparticle platform for antiretroviral drug delivery

Complex dosing regimens, costs, side effects, biodistribution limitations, and variable drug pharmacokinetic patterns have affected the long-term efficacy of antiretroviral medicines. To address these problems, a nanoparticle indinavir (NP-IDV) formulation packaged into carrier bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) was developed. Drug distribution and disease outcomes were assessed in immune-competent and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected humanized immune-deficient mice, respectively. In the former, NP-IDV formulation contained within BMMs was adoptively transferred. After a single administration, single-photon emission computed tomography, histology, and reverse-phase-high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) demonstrated robust lung, liver, and spleen BMMs and drug distribution. Tissue and sera IDV levels were greater than or equal to 50 microM for 2 weeks. NP-IDV-BMMs administered to HIV-1-challenged humanized mice revealed reduced numbers of virus-infected cells in plasma, lymph nodes, spleen, liver, and lung, as well as, CD4(+) T-cell protection. We conclude that a single dose of NP-IDV, using BMMs as a carrier, is effective and warrants consideration for human testing.

Virologic and immunologic response to highly active antiretroviral therapy

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) delays clinical progression by suppressing viral replication, measured by a substantial reduction in HIV RNA, allowing the immune system to reconstitute, measured in most studies by an increase in CD4 cells. These virologic and immunologic consequences do not occur uniformly among HAART users. Markers of HIV disease stage at the time of HAART initiation are critical determinants of the progression while receiving HAART. In this report, we review studies describing the heterogeneous virologic and immunologic progression after the initiation of HAART, discuss methodologic concerns in the study of the response of biomarkers, and update findings obtained in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, which show that CD4 cell count, history of antiretroviral therapy, and age at the time of initiation are independent determinants of response.

Application and impact of population pharmacokinetics in the assessment of antiretroviral pharmacotherapy

Population pharmacokinetics has been an important technique used to explore and define relevant sources of variation in drug exposure and response in patient populations. This has been especially true in the area of antiretroviral therapy where the assurance of adequate and sustained drug exposure of multiple agents is highly correlated with therapeutic success. Population pharmacokinetic analyses across the four drug classes and 20 US FDA-approved products used to treat HIV have been published to date. The published reports were predominantly based on actual clinical trials conducted in HIV-infected patients with one or more agents administered. Modelling and simulation approaches have been used in the evaluation of antiretroviral agent outcomes incorporating problematic design and analysis factors such as sparse plasma sampling, data imbalance and censored data. Additional benefits of population modelling approaches applied to the investigation of antiretroviral agents include the ability to assess dosing compliance, understanding and quantifying drug-drug interactions in order to select dosing regimens and the screening of new drug candidates. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models have been used to characterise the relationship between drug exposure and virological and immunological response, and to predict clinical outcome. These models offer the best opportunity for individualising and optimising patient therapy, particularly when adjusted for adherence/compliance. The impact of population pharmacokinetics in the area of antiretroviral therapy can be directly assessed by its role in the validation of surrogate markers such as viral RNA load, therapeutic drug monitoring and the management of individual patient outcomes via exposure-toxicity relationships. Each of these population pharmacokinetic outcomes has contributed to the current regulatory environment, specifically in the area of accelerated approval of new antiretroviral agents.

Approach to the Treatment-experienced patient

Failure of antiretroviral therapy can occur for a variety of reasons, but is often caused by or accompanied by drug resistance, which increases with continued time on nonsuppressive, failing regimens. Response to early virologic failure on an initial regimen may be associated with minimal or no resistance and can sometimes be managed simply by reinforcing adherence or by intensifying therapy. Resistance testing is an important tool for managing patients who are failing therapy; it should be used in most cases to guide selection of the next regimen. For patients with extensive treatment experience and drug resistance, there are a variety of approaches that have been suggested when fully suppressive options are not available. Clinicians caring for such patients must balance the benefit of slower progression associated with continued therapy against the risk of increasing drug resistance and loss of future treatment options.

Genotypic resistance analyses in nucleoside-pretreated patients failing an indinavir containing regimen: results from a randomized comparative trial: (Novavir ANRS 073)

BACKGROUND

Different studies have shown that most patients failing a first-line treatment containing a protease-inhibitor (PI) had low PI plasma levels and no PI-related resistance mutations. NOVAVIR was a randomized trial comparing stavudine/lamivudine/indinavir (d4T/3TC/IDV) and zidovudine/lamivudine/indinavir (AZT/3TC/IDV) in patients pretreated with AZT, didanosine (ddI) and/or zalcitabine (ddC) but naive for PIs.

OBJECTIVE

To study the mechanisms of virological failure in NOVAVIR trial through analyses of genotypic resistance profiles of reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PR), and plasma IDV concentrations at time to failure.

METHODS

Plasma HIV-RNA PR and RT sequences were determined in 27 failing patients (d4T/3TC/IDV n=11; AZT/3TC/IDV n=16) at baseline and at time to failure. IDV plasma measurements were performed in both samples.

RESULTS

At baseline, 20 out of the 27 patients had at least two thymidine analogs associated mutations. At time to failure, mutation M184V in the RT gene was present in 22 out of the 27 failing patients. Thirteen out of the 27 (48%) patients had acquisition of PI mutations compared to baseline sequence. Of the 26 patients with adherence data, 13 (50%) subjects were classified as having difficulty in adherence. The proportion of patients with low adherence was higher in the subgroup of patients failing without acquisition of new PI mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients experienced with NRTIs, failure to PI-containing regimen may occur in spite of appropriate adherence to therapy and is associated with emergence of PI mutations in half of the cases. These results suggest that, although PIs have a high genetic barrier, sub-optimal activity of associated drugs may favor the selection of PI resistance mutations.

Couple-focused support to improve HIV medication adherence: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of a couple-based intervention to improve medication-taking behavior in a clinic population with demonstrated adherence problems.

DESIGN

A randomized controlled trial (SMART Couples Study) conducted between August 2000 and January 2004.

SETTING

Two HIV/AIDS outpatient clinics in New York City.

PARTICIPANTS

Heterosexual and homosexual HIV-serodiscordant couples (n = 215) in which the HIV-seropositive partner had < 80% adherence at baseline. The sample was predominantly lower-income racial/ethnic minorities.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomly assigned to a four-session couple-focused adherence intervention or usual care. The intervention consisted of education about treatment and adherence, identifying adherence barriers, developing communication and problem-solving strategies, optimizing partner support, and building confidence for optimal adherence.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Medication adherence at week 8 (2 weeks after the intervention) compared with baseline, assessed with a Medication Event Monitoring System cap.

RESULTS

Intervention participants showed higher mean medication adherence at post-intervention when compared with controls whether adherence was defined as proportion of prescribed doses taken (76% versus 60%) or doses taken within specified time parameters (58% versus 35%). Also, participants in the intervention arm were significantly more likely to achieve high levels of adherence (> 80%, > 90%, or > 95%) when compared with controls. However, in most cases, effects diminished with time, as seen at follow-up at 3 and 6 months.

CONCLUSION

The SMART Couples program significantly improved medication adherence over usual care, although the level of improved adherence, for many participants, was still suboptimal and the effect was attenuated over time.

Lethal mutagenesis of HIV

HIV-1 and other retroviruses exhibit mutation rates that are 1,000,000-fold greater than their host organisms. Error-prone viral replication may place retroviruses and other RNA viruses near the threshold of "error catastrophe" or extinction due to an intolerable load of deleterious mutations. Strategies designed to drive viruses to error catastrophe have been applied to HIV-1 and a number of RNA viruses. Here, we review the concept of extinguishing HIV infection by "lethal mutagenesis" and consider the utility of this new approach in combination with conventional antiretroviral strategies.

Resistance profiles and adherence at primary virological failure in three different highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens: analysis of failure rates in a randomized study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the interplay between resistance and adherence in the virological failure of three fundamentally different highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 56 verified primary virological failures (viral load >400 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) among 293 patients randomized to two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)+ritonavir+saquinavir (RS-arm) (n=115), two NRTIs+nevirapine+nelfinavir (NN-arm) (n=118), or abacavir+stavudine+didanosine (ASD-arm) (n=60) followed up for a median of 90 weeks. Data on adherence were collected from patient files, and genotyping was performed on plasma samples collected at time of failure.

RESULTS

Treatment interruption or poor adherence was mainly caused by side effects and accounted for 74% of failures, and was associated with absence of resistance mutations. In the 30 failing patients not switched from randomized treatment, we found resistance in two of 12 patients in the RS-arm (M184 V only), four of six patients in the NN-arm [all four had non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations], and seven of 12 patients in the ASD-arm (NRTI mutations only). Two adherent patients on randomized treatment failed in the RS-arm, none in the NN-arm, and six in the ASD-arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary virological failure was caused mainly by treatment interruption. No primary protease inhibitor (PI) mutations were found in patients failing on boosted saquinavir, whereas resistance to NNRTIs and NRTIs was prevalent in several patients failing on regimens based on these medications.

Update on the Virologic and Immunologic Response to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) delays clinical progression by suppressing viral replication, measured by a substantial reduction in HIV RNA, allowing the immune system to reconstitute, measured in most studies by an increase in CD4 cells. These virologic and immunologic consequences do not occur uniformly among HAART users. Markers of HIV disease stage at the time of HAART initiation are critical determinants of the progression while receiving HAART. In this report, we review studies describing the heterogeneous virologic and immunologic progression after the initiation of HAART, discuss methodologic concerns in the study of the response of biomarkers, and update findings obtained in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, which show that CD4 cell count, history of antiretroviral therapy, and age at the time of initiation are independent determinants of response.

Modeling the Impact of Modified Directly Observed Antiretroviral Therapy on HIV Suppression and Resistance, Disease Progression, and Death

A simulation model that used Markov assumptions with Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis was evaluated 1500 times at 10,000 iterations. Modified directly observed therapy (MDOT) for human immunodeficiency virus was assumed to improve adherence to therapy to 90% of prescribed doses. The impact of MDOT interventions on modeled biological and clinical outcomes was compared for populations with mean rates of adherence (i.e., the mean percentage of prescribed doses taken by each member of the population who had not discontinued therapy) of 40%, 50%, 60%, and 70%. MDOT reduced the risk of virological failure, development of opportunistic infections, and death, yet increased the risk of drug resistance, for each adherence distribution among persons with detectable plasma virus loads. Over 1500 trials, for a population with 50% adherence to therapy and a 12-month period, MDOT increased the median rate of virological suppression from 13.2% to 37.0% of patients, decreased the rate of opportunistic infection from 5.7% to 4.3% of patients, and decreased the death rate from 2.9% to 2.2% of patients. In the same population, however, MDOT increased the rate of new drug resistance mutations from 1.00 to 1.41 per person during the 12-month period. The impact of MDOT was smaller in populations with higher levels of adherence. MDOT interventions will likely improve clinical outcomes in populations with low levels of adherence but may not be effective at preventing drug resistance in treatment-experienced populations. MDOT may be more effective in preventing drug resistance with potent regimens in treatment-naive patients.

The impact of adherence on CD4 cell count responses among HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

There have been concerns that irreversible immune damage may result if highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is initiated after the CD4 cell count declines to below 350 cells/microL; however, the role of antiretroviral adherence on CD4 cell count responses has not been well evaluated.

METHODS

We evaluated CD4 cell count responses of 1522 antiretroviral-naive patients initiating HAART who were stratified by baseline CD4 cell count (<50, 50-199, and >or=200 cells/microL) and adherence.

RESULTS

Among patients starting HAART with <50 cells/microL, during the fifth 15-week period after the initiation of HAART, absolute CD4 cell counts were 200 cells/microL (interquartile range [IQR]: 130-290) for adherent patients versus 60 cells/microL (IQR: 10-130) for nonadherent patients. Similarly, among patients starting HAART with 50 to 199 cells/microL, during the fifth 15-week period after the initiation of HAART, absolute CD4 cell counts were 300 cells/microL (IQR: 180-390) versus 125 cells/microL (IQR: 40-210) for nonadherent patients. In Cox regression analyses, adherence was the strongest independent predictor of the time to a gain of >or=50 cells/microL from baseline (relative hazard [RH] = 2.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.46-3.37). Among patients with baseline CD4 cell counts <200 cells/microL, adherence was the strongest independent predictor of the time to a CD4 cell count >200 cells/microL (RH = 4.85, 95% CI: 3.15-7.47).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that substantial CD4 gains are possible among highly advanced adherent patients and should contribute to the ongoing debate over the optimal time to initiate HAART.

Comparison of four-drug regimens and pairs of sequential three-drug regimens as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether therapy for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) should be initiated with a four-drug or two sequential three-drug regimens.

METHODS

In this multicenter trial we compared initial therapy involving four-drug regimens containing efavirenz and nelfinavir in combination with either didanosine and stavudine or zidovudine and lamivudine with therapy involving two consecutive three-drug regimens the first of which contained either efavirenz or nelfinavir.

RESULTS

A total of 980 subjects were followed for a median of 2.3 years. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of regimen failures between the group that received the four-drug regimen containing didanosine, stavudine, nelfinavir, and efavirenz and the groups that received the three-drug regimens beginning with didanosine, stavudine, and nelfinavir (hazard ratio for regimen failure, 1.24) or didanosine, stavudine, and efavirenz (hazard ratio, 1.01). There was no significant difference between the group that received the four-drug regimen containing zidovudine, lamivudine, nelfinavir, and efavirenz and the groups that received the three-drug regimens beginning with zidovudine, lamivudine, and nelfinavir (hazard ratio, 1.06) or zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz (hazard ratio, 1.45). A four-drug regimen was associated with a longer time to the first regimen failure than the three-drug regimens containing didanosine, stavudine, and nelfinavir (hazard ratio for a first regimen failure, 0.55); didanosine, stavudine, and efavirenz (hazard ratio, 0.63); or zidovudine, lamivudine, and nelfinavir (hazard ratio, 0.49), but not the three-drug regimen containing zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz (hazard ratio, 1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in the duration of successful HIV-1 treatment between a single four-drug regimen and two consecutive three-drug regimens. Among these treatment strategies, initiating therapy with the three-drug regimen of zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz is the optimal choice.

Comparison of sequential three-drug regimens as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection

BACKGROUND

The optimal sequencing of antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is unknown. We compared several different antiretroviral treatment strategies.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized, partially double-blind trial used a factorial design to compare pairs of sequential three-drug regimens, starting with a regimen including zidovudine and lamivudine or a regimen including didanosine and stavudine in combination with either nelfinavir or efavirenz. The primary end point was the length of time to the failure of the second three-drug regimen.

RESULTS

A total of 620 subjects who had not previously received antiretroviral therapy were followed for a median of 2.3 years. Starting with a three-drug regimen containing efavirenz combined with zidovudine and lamivudine (but not efavirenz combined with didanosine and stavudine) appeared to delay the failure of the second regimen, as compared with starting with a regimen containing nelfinavir (hazard ratio for failure of the second regimen, 0.71; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.48 to 1.06), as well as to delay the second virologic failure (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.29 to 1.09), and significantly delayed the failure of the first regimen (hazard ratio, 0.39) and the first virologic failure (hazard ratio, 0.34). Starting with zidovudine and lamivudine combined with efavirenz (but not zidovudine and lamivudine combined with nelfinavir) appeared to delay the failure of the second regimen, as compared with starting with didanosine and stavudine (hazard ratio, 0.68), and significantly delayed both the first and the second virologic failures (hazard ratio for the first virologic failure, 0.39; hazard ratio for the second virologic failure, 0.47), as well as the failure of the first regimen (hazard ratio, 0.35). The initial use of zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz resulted in a shorter time to viral suppression.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of antiretroviral drugs depends on how they are combined. The combination of zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz is superior to the other antiretroviral regimens used as initial therapy in this study.

Clinical and Immunologic Outcome in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection, According to Virologic Efficacy in the Year after Virus Undetectability, during Antiretroviral Therapy

To evaluate factors associated with durable viral suppression (DVS), low viral rebound (virus load of 500-5000 copies/mL), and high viral rebound (virus load above 5000 copies/mL), we studied 3736 patients who achieved an undetectable virus load (i.e., <500 copies/mL) while receiving an initial highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen containing a protease inhibitor (PI). A total of 2636 patients (71%) had DVS, 387 (10%) had low viral rebound, and 713 (19%) had high viral rebound. Factors associated with DVS were antiretroviral-naive status, choice of PI (indinavir or boosted PI), lower virus load and higher CD4+ cell count, shorter duration of therapy (<6 months), and larger CD4+ cell increment until an undetectable virus load was attained. These factors (except for receipt of indinavir) were also associated with low versus high viral rebound. Compared with patients with DVS, patients with high viral rebound were more likely to experience clinical failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-3.02) and immunologic failure (aHR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.34-1.83), and patients with low viral rebound were as likely to experience these types of failure (aHR for clinical failure, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.48-2.92]; aHR for immunologic failure, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.87-1.32]), suggesting that a low viral rebound while receiving HAART that contains a PI has no significant consequence on midterm clinical outcome.

Association between Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Drug Resistance

Nonadherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is a major cause of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug resistance; however the level of nonadherence associated with the greatest risk of resistance is unknown. Beginning in February 2000, 195 patients at the Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center (Baltimore, MD) who were receiving HAART and who had HIV loads of <500 copies/mL were recruited into a cohort study and observed for 1 year. At each visit, adherence to HAART was assessed and plasma samples were obtained and stored for resistance testing, if indicated. The overall incidence of viral rebound with clinically significant resistance was 14.5 cases per 100 person-years. By multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression, a cumulative adherence of 70%-89%, a CD4 cell nadir of <200 cells/microL, and the missing of a scheduled clinic visit in the past month were independently associated with an increased hazard of viral rebound with clinically significant resistance. Clinicians and patients must set high adherence goals to avoid the development of resistance.

Efficiency of a programmed -1 ribosomal frameshift in the different subtypes of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group M

The synthesis of the Gag-Pol polyprotein, the precursor of the enzymes of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), requires a programmed -1 ribosomal frameshift. This frameshift has been investigated so far only for subtype B of HIV-1 group M. In this subtype, the frameshift stimulatory signal was found to be a two-stem helix, in which a three-purine bulge interrupts the two stems. In this study, using a luciferase reporter system, we compare, for the first time, the frameshift efficiency of all the subtypes of group M. Mutants of subtype B, including a natural variant were also investigated. Our results with mutants of subtype B confirm that the bulge and the lower stem of the frameshift stimulatory signal contribute to the frameshift in addition to the upper stem-loop considered previously as the sole participant. Our results also show that the frameshift stimulatory signal of all of the other subtypes of group M can be folded into the same structure as in subtype B, despite sequence variations. Moreover, the frameshift efficiency of these subtypes, when assessed in cultured cells, falls within a narrow window (the maximal deviation from the mean value calculated from the experimental values of all the subtypes being approximately 35%), although the predicted thermodynamic stability of the frameshift stimulatory signal differs between the subtypes (from -17.2 kcal/mole to -26.2 kcal/mole). The fact that the frameshift efficiencies fall within a narrow range for all of the subtypes of HIV-1 group M stresses the potential of the frameshift event as an antiviral target.

High levels of adherence do not prevent accumulation of HIV drug resistance mutations

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relationship between development of antiretroviral drug resistance and adherence by measured treatment duration, virologic suppression, and the rate of accumulating new drug resistance mutations at different levels of adherence.

METHODS

Adherence was measured with unannounced pill counts performed at the participant's usual place of residence in a prospective cohort of HIV-positive urban poor individuals. Two genotypic resistance tests separated by 6 months (G1 and G2) were obtained in individuals on a stable regimen and with detectable viremia (> 50 copies/ml). The primary resistance outcome was the number of new HIV antiretroviral drug resistance mutations occurring over the 6 months between G1 and G2.

RESULTS

High levels of adherence were closely associated with greater time on treatment (P < 0.0001) and viral suppression (P < 0.0001) in 148 individuals. In a subset of 57 patients with a plasma viral load > 50 copies/ml on stable therapy, the accumulation of new drug resistance mutations was positively associated with the duration of prior treatment (P = 0.03) and pill count adherence (P = 0.002). Assuming fully suppressed individuals (< 50 copies/ml) do not develop resistance, it was estimated that 23% of all drug resistance occurs in the top quintile of adherence (92-100%), and over 50% of all drug resistance mutations occur in the top two quintiles of adherence (79-100%).

CONCLUSION

Increasing rates of viral suppression at high levels of adherence is balanced by increasing rates of drug resistance among viremic patients. Exceptionally high levels of adherence will not prevent population levels of drug resistance.

Doubts about DOT: antiretroviral therapy for resource-poor countries

INTRODUCTION

Directly observed therapy programs developed for tuberculosis (TB) have been suggested as a model for the provision of HIV medications in resource-poor countries in order to ensure adherence and prevent drug resistance.

METHODS

Opinions were formed based on a review of scientific literature regarding the effectiveness of witnessed dosing in directly observed TB therapy programs, adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy in resource-rich and resource-poor settings, relationship between adherence and HIV antiretroviral drug resistance, HIV viral load and risk of HIV transmission, and stigmatization concerns related to HIV and TB in resource-poor settings.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that the enthusiasm for HIV directly observed therapy programs is premature based on: equivocal evidence that witnessed dosing is superior to self administered therapy; mistaken assumptions that resource-poor countries are a 'special case' with respect to adherence; possible paradoxical impact of good adherence on HIV drug resistance; unproven efficacy of antiretroviral therapy in preventing HIV transmission; and potential stigmatization of daily antiretroviral dosing.

Indinavir plasma concentrations and resistance mutations in patients experiencing early virological failure

Virological failure under protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral regimens is often not explained by the selection of resistance mutations. The role of low indinavir (IDV) plasma levels in treatment failure was assessed in 46 subjects experiencing early virological failure to a first-line IDV-containing triple combination. Overall, 69% of patients showed subtherapeutic IDV plasma levels (it was not detected at all in 75% of them). Subjects with detectable but suboptimal IDV levels developed more IDV resistance mutations. Thus, drug monitoring may be useful to assess treatment adherence and risk of drug resistance in early virological failures. This information may be crucial for choosing the most appropriate rescue intervention.

Is there a baseline CD4 cell count that precludes a survival response to modern antiretroviral therapy?

OBJECTIVE

Therapeutic guidelines advise that 200-350 x 106 cells/l may approximate an irreversible threshold beyond which response to therapy is compromised. We evaluated whether non-immune-based factors such as physician experience and adherence could affect survival among HIV-infected adults starting HAART.

METHODS

Analysis of 1416 antiretroviral naive patients who initiated triple therapy between 1 August 1996 and 31 July 2000, and were followed until 31 July 2001. Patients whose physicians had previously enrolled six or more patients were defined as having an experienced physician. Patients who received medications for at least 75% of the time during the first year of HAART were defined as adherent. Cumulative mortality rates and adjusted relative hazards were determined for various CD4 cell count strata.

RESULTS

Among patients with < 50 x 106 cells/l the adjusted relative hazard of mortality was 5.07 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.50-10.26] for patients of experienced physicians and was 11.99 (95% CI, 6.33-22.74) among patients with inexperienced physicians, in comparison to patients with > or = 200 x 106 cells/l treated by experienced physicians. Similarly, among patients with < 50 x 106 cells/l, the adjusted relative hazard of mortality was 6.19 (95% CI, 3.03-12.65) for adherent patients and was 35.71 (95% CI, 16.17-78.85) for non-adherent patients, in comparison to adherent patients with > or = 200 x 106 cells/l.

CONCLUSION

Survival rates following the initiation of HAART are dramatically improved among patients starting with CD4 counts < 200 x 106 cells/l once adjusted for conservative estimates of physician experience and adherence. Our results indicate that the current emphasis of therapeutic guidelines on initiating therapy at CD4 cell counts above 200 x 106 cells/l should be re-examined.

Comparison of the efficacy, safety and predictive value of HIV genotyping using distinct ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors

The pharmacokinetic profile of protease inhibitors (PI) is improved significantly by adding low doses of ritonavir (rit). The use of rit-boosted PI allows the reduction of pill burden, improves dosing schedules and enhances drug exposure, all factors that have been associated with a greater benefit of antiretroviral therapy. All patients receiving rit 100 mg bid together with saquinavir (SQV) soft gel 1000 mg bid, indinavir (IDV) 800 mg bid or lopinavir (LPV) 400 mg bid, as part of a salvage regimen, were retrospectively analyzed in a reference institution. Only subjects who had failed all three antiretroviral drug families in the past were included. A total of 299 patients were included in the study (121 on SQV, 62 on IDV and 116 on LPV). Mean plasma HIV-RNA and CD4 lymphocyte counts at baseline were less favourable in the LPV group (4.4 logs, 275 cells/microl) with respect to SQV (4.3 logs, 355 cells/microl) and IDV (3.7 logs, 409 cells/microl) groups (P < 0.05). The proportion of subjects experiencing virological success (attainment of either < 500 HIV-RNA copies/ml or > 1 log reduction) in an intent-to-treat analysis at 24 weeks was 61% with LPV, 49% with SQV and 48% with IDV. The CD4 count increased 48% with SQV, 45% with IDV and 37% with LPV. The proportion of subjects discontinuing therapy due to adverse events was higher using IDV (27%) than using either SQV (11%) or LPV (6%) (P < 0.05). The presence of < 5 or > 5 PI resistance mutations at baseline discriminated significantly better who would respond to therapy in all instances: 90 vs. 48% with LPV, 95 vs. 21% with SQV and 90 vs. 23% with IDV. The efficacy of rit-boosted PI combinations is greatly influenced by the extent of baseline PI resistance. Differences, not only in potency, but mainly in tolerance may favour the selection of one dual PI combination over others.

Nevirapine or lamivudine plus stavudine and indinavir: examples of 2-class versus 3-class regimens for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

We compared use of a 3-class regimen (nevirapine [Nvp], stavudine [d4T], and indinavir [Idv; 1000 mg 3 times daily]) with use of a 2-class regimen (lamivudine [3TC], d4T, and Idv [800 mg 3 times daily]) for 145 patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). At week 72, the plasma HIV-1 RNA level was undetectable in 52% of Nvp recipients versus 79% of 3TC recipients (P<.001). Idv trough levels were 81 ng/mL in the Nvp group and 99 ng/mL in the 3TC group (P=.012). In the Nvp group, 42.5% of patients discontinued the study regimen; in the 3TC group, 22.5% of patients discontinued therapy (P=.013). The rate of resistance to nonnucleoside analogue reverse-transcriptase inhibitors among patients in the Nvp group with virological failure was not different from the rate of resistance to 3TC among patients in the 3TC group with virological failure. These results do not support the use of a 3-class regimen that includes Nvp for patients with no or limited exposure to nucleoside analogues.

[Genotypic resistance of human immunodeficiency virus in patients with virologic failure]

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study is to asses the prevalence of resistances in a group of patients with virological failure establishing the relationship between the appearance of mutations and the given antiretroviral therapy along with other variables used in these patients follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Samples belonging to 88 patients were selected either with viral load levels above 30.000 copies/ml after reaching undetectable viral load levels, or with persistently detectable levels above 1.000 copies/ml. Resistances were tested by means of Line Probe Assay (LiPA). The history of patients' antiretroviral treatments was reviewed.

RESULTS

Mutations were observed in 52,6% of cases for reverse transcriptase (RT) an in 81,8% for the protease genes, being T215Y and V82A the most frequently detected ones. Mutations coferring resistance to the given antiretrovirals appeared in 33 cases. No statistical significance was observed between the presence of mutations and the administered therapy. In the multivariate analysis we found for LiPA RT a greater risk of appearance of mutations according to patient motility (OR = 4,0).

CONCLUSIONS

the prevalence of resistance mutations in patients with virologic failure is placed around 50% in both genes. A consensus in the definition of virologic failure in HIV infected patients is urged.

Virologic rebound on HAART in the context of low treatment adherence is associated with a low prevalence of antiretroviral drug resistance

The contributions of viral drug resistance, drug pharmacokinetics, and treatment adherence to failure of protease inhibitor (PI)-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) have been explored in isolation. We examined the interactions between these factors. Patients on their first PI-based HAART combination for >6 months with plasma HIV viral load (VL) >1000 copies/mL ("viremic" group) were compared with patients with a stable VL <50 copies/mL ("nonviremic" group). Data were collected on adherence (measured electronically), PI plasma levels (sampled randomly, at trough and twice after an observed dose), viral genotype, and phenotype. Mean adherence was significantly lower in the viremic group (84.3% versus 100.1%; p =.005). In the viremic group, substitutions in HIV protease were detected most frequently in the following positions in subjects on indinavir (IDV): L10I/V (35.7%), M46I/L (35.7%), A71T/V (35.7%), V82A (42.9%); and for subjects on nelfinavir (NFV): D30N (50.0%), V77I (56.3%), N88D (37.5%). Phenotypic resistance was detected in 20% of isolates from patients on IDV and 42% on NFV. Lower adherence was associated with detection of fewer resistance substitutions (r = 0.52; p =.005) and less phenotypic resistance (rho = 0.56, p =.005). There were no differences between the groups in pharmacokinetics. However, in viremic subjects, lower postdose NFV levels were associated with higher resistance (rho = -0.61, p =.02).

Prevalence of HIV protease mutations on failure of nelfinavir-containing HAART: a retrospective analysis of four clinical studies and two observational cohorts

BACKGROUND

Both D30N and L90M in HIV-1 protease are primary resistance mutations that emerge under nelfinavir drug pressure. Although D30N confers little or no cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors (PIs) and has been shown to allow effective substitution of a second PI, L90M with secondary mutations is involved in broad cross-resistance to the class. Although L90M has been observed rarely to date under nelfinavir selection, data on the relative incidence of these two mutations on failure of first-line nelfinavir HAART are sparse.

METHOD

We performed a systematic review of HIV-1 protease genotypes from four clinical trials and two observational cohorts in which PI-naive patients failed to achieve or sustain full virological suppression on a nelfinavir-based first HAART regime.

RESULTS

Wild-type protease was observed in 61.9% of 189 isolates and secondary PI mutations were observed in only <3%. D30N and L90M (+/- secondary mutations) occurred in 30.7% and 4.8%, respectively. Only one sample displayed both mutations (0.5%).

CONCLUSION

Almost 95% of failures on first-line nelfinavir-based triple-drug HAART occur without PI mutations or with D30N as the primary protease change. L90M occurs in only 5% of cases. These results are of significance for determining the feasibility of initiating a second PI after first-line nelfinavir failure.

Evolution of Antiretroviral Phenotypic and Genotypic Drug Resistance in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-1-Infected Children Treated with Abacavir/Lamivudine, Zidovudine/Lamivudine or Abacavir/Zidovudine, with or without Nelfinavir (The Penta 5 Trial)

Purpose and methods

To describe the evolution of resistance to zidovudine (ZDV), lamivudine (3TC), abacavir (ABC) and nelfinavir (NFV), 113 previously untreated children in the PENTA 5 trial had resistance assayed at baseline, rebound and/or 24, 48, 72 weeks (VIRCO: phenotyping and genotyping with ‘Virtual Phenotype’ interpretation).

Results

At baseline, few reverse transcriptase mutations and no primary protease inhibitor mutations were observed. Time to detectable HIV-1 RNA with reduced phenotypic susceptibility to any drug was shortest in the ZDV+3TC arm (overall logrank P=0.02). Through a median follow-up of 55 weeks, at their last assessment 11 (28%), 16 (40%) and 13 (32%) children with detectable HIV-1 RNA and a resistance test available had mutations conferring resistance to none, one, or two or more trial drugs, respectively, according to the virtual phenotype. Reduced phenotypic susceptibility to ABC only occurred in the 3TC+ABC arm and required K65R and/or L74V in addition to M184V. NFV-resistant virus was selected slowly through D30N or L90M pathways, and selection of ZDV-resistant virus was rare.

Conclusions

Selection of 3TC-resistant virus was most frequent, followed by NFV and/or ABC; selection of ZDV-resistant virus was rare. Importantly, although in vitro, ABC selects for M184V as the first mutation, ABC did not select for M184V when combined with ZDV without 3TC. The most sustained HIV-1 RNA response was in the 3TC+ABC arm, but mutations conferring reduced susceptibility to 3TC and/or ABC evolved more frequently if virological failure occurred with 3TC+ABC than with ZDV+ABC.

Genotypic testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance

There are 16 approved human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drugs belonging to three mechanistic classes: protease inhibitors, nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors, and nonnucleoside RT inhibitors. HIV-1 resistance to these drugs is caused by mutations in the protease and RT enzymes, the molecular targets of these drugs. Drug resistance mutations arise most often in treated individuals, resulting from selective drug pressure in the presence of incompletely suppressed virus replication. HIV-1 isolates with drug resistance mutations, however, may also be transmitted to newly infected individuals. Three expert panels have recommended that HIV-1 protease and RT susceptibility testing should be used to help select HIV drug therapy. Although genotypic testing is more complex than typical antimicrobial susceptibility tests, there is a rich literature supporting the prognostic value of HIV-1 protease and RT mutations. This review describes the genetic mechanisms of HIV-1 drug resistance and summarizes published data linking individual RT and protease mutations to in vitro and in vivo resistance to the currently available HIV drugs.

Final analysis of the Trilège induction-maintenance trial: results at 18 months

BACKGROUND

First results of Trilège demonstrated that the strategy of less intensive antiviral therapy is less effective than continuation of triple-drug therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the final number of failures at month 18 and to study viral dynamics in patients experiencing a virological failure.

DESIGN

Longitudinal follow-up from a randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Forty-three AIDS clinical-trial units.

PATIENTS

A total of 279 HIV-1 infected adults randomized in Trilège.

MEASUREMENTS

Analysis of recurrent values of HIV RNA > 500 copies/ml beyond time to virologic failure.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients experienced virological failure by month 18; 10 in the zidovudine (ZDV) + lamivudine (3TC) + indinavir (IDV) arm, 46 in the ZDV + 3TC arm, and 27 in the ZDV + IDV arm, confirming previous results. Whatever the treatment ultimately received, 87% of patients had an HIV RNA < 500 copies/ml at month 18 with no statistical difference between randomized arms. Patients experiencing a failure in the triple-drug regimen had a greater tendency to maintain HIV RNA > 500 copies/ml beyond the time of virological failure than patients in both less intensive treatment groups who experienced failure. Lower levels of HIV RNA at failure and reinitiating of either the original triple-drug regimen or a new combination of nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors were associated with lower hazard ratios for developing recurrent HIV RNA > 500 copies/ml.

CONCLUSION

Results confirmed the failure of a less intensive regimen to maintain patients with a viral suppression (HIV RNA < 500 copies/ml). Although there is a lower incidence of failure in the triple-drug regimen, randomization to a less intensive regimen of ZDV + 3TC or ZDV + IDV was not detrimental, as treatment modification, either to the original triple regimen, or a different regimen was successful.