Development of a polynucleotide vaccine from melanoma antigen recognized by T cells-1 and recombinant protein from melanoma antigen recognized by T cells-1 for melanoma vaccine clinical trials

Cloning variable region genes of clonal lymphoma immunoglobulin for generating patient-specific idiotype DNA vaccine

Available therapies for lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) provide no survival advantage if started before signs or symptoms of end-organ damage develop; hence, current recommendations are to follow a program of observation while patients are in the asymptomatic phase of disease. We hypothesize that using idiotypic determinants of a B-cell lymphoma's surface immunoglobulin as a tumor-specific marker, we can develop patient-specific chemokine-idiotype fusion DNA vaccines that induce an immune response against LPL. By activating the host immune system against the tumor antigen, we postulate that disease control of asymptomatic phase lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma can be maintained. These chemokine-idiotype fusion DNA vaccines provide protection in a lymphoma mouse model and have recently entered clinical trials. Herein, we describe procedures for the generation of therapeutic vaccines, particularly "second-generation" recombinant vaccines. Specifically, in the Methods section we describe how to identify lymphoma-associated immunoglobulin V (IgV) genes from patient biopsy and how to assemble these genes as single-chain variable gene fragment (scFv) in-frame with MIP-3α to generate novel DNA fusion vaccines.

Whole protein and defined CD8(+) and CD4(+) peptides linked to penetratin targets both MHC class I and II antigen presentation pathways

Cytoplasmic delivery and cross-presentation of proteins and peptides is necessary for processing and presentation of antigens for the generation of cytotoxic T cells. We previously described the use of the 16 amino acid peptide penetratin from the Drosophila Antennapedia homeodomain (penetratin, Antp) to transport cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes derived from ovalbumin (OVA) or the Mucin-1 tumor-associated antigen into cells. We have now shown that penetratin covalently conjugated to OVA protein and linked in tandem to CD4(+) and/or CD8(+) T-cell epitopes from OVA-stimulated T cells in vitro (B3Z T-cell hybridoma and OT-I and OT-II T cells). The induction of these responses was directly mediated by the penetratin peptide as linking a nonspecific 16-mer peptide to OVA or mixing did not induce CD8(+) or CD4(+) T-cell responses in vitro. Furthermore, interferon (IFN)-γ-secreting CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells were induced which suppressed B16.OVA tumor growth in C57BL/6 mice. Tumor protection was mediated by a CD8(+) T-cell-dependent mechanism and did not require CD4(+) help to protect mice 7 days after a boost immunization. Alternatively, 40 days after a boost immunization, the presence of CD4(+) help enhanced antigen-specific IFN-γ-secreting CD8(+) T cells and tumor protection in mice challenged with B16.OVA. Long-term CD8 responses were equally enhanced by antigen-specific and universal CD4 help. In addition, immunization with AntpOVA significantly delayed growth of B16.OVA tumors in mice in a tumor therapy model.

Phase I Study of a Plasmid DNA Vaccine Encoding MART-1 in Patients with Resected Melanoma at Risk for Relapse

Immunization with plasmid DNA represents an attractive method for increasing cellular immune responses against cancer antigens. The safety and immunologic response of a plasmid encoding the MART-1 melanocyte differentiation antigen was evaluated in 12 patients with resected melanoma at risk for relapse. As a control, patients were also administered a plasmid encoding hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). After establishing immunologic activity of the vaccines in mice, groups of three to six HLA-A2-positive patients were enrolled into one of three cohorts in which they received intramuscular injections of the MART-1 plasmid into the right deltoid and the HBsAg plasmid into the left deltoid at doses of 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 mg on days 1, 43, 85, and 127. Injections were well tolerated. Toxicity was limited to grade 1 pain and injection site tenderness. Systemic toxicity was not observed. Although baseline MART-1-specific lymphoproliferative and ELISPOT responses were evident, no patient manifested increases after injection of the MART-1 plasmid. Furthermore, changes in MART-1-specific precursors were not evident after immunization as assessed by an in vitro stimulation assay. No patients manifested a lymphoproliferative response to HBsAg antigen, and significant antibody responses to HBsAg were also not observed. Although injections were safe, the authors could not show significant immunologic responses to plasmid encoding MART-1 or HBsAg using the dose, schedule, and route of administration applied. This study underscores species differences in the ability to respond to plasmid immunogens.

Immunotherapy of malignant melanoma

Several areas of immunotherapeutic research may ultimately improve the effectiveness of active specific immunotherapy for melanoma and other malignancies. Identification of the most relevant tumor antigens will continue to be a vital component of vaccine design. Optimizing delivery of these antigens by use of adjuvants, dendritic cells, or heat shock proteins will enhance the immunogenicity of vaccines. The use of DNA vaccines to deliver nucleotides that encode relevant antigens and immunologic molecules, such as costimulatory molecules, and the use of targeted therapy with immunocytokines have yielded promising results in animal studies. Finally, cutting-edge techniques such as quantitative polymerase chain reaction and gene/protein microarrays will be used to monitor the response to a vaccine and thereby guide management decisions. Although IFN-alpha 2b is the only FDA-approved adjuvant treatment for AJCC stage IIB/III melanoma, recent data failed to show a benefit in overall survival. For patients with AJCC stage IV melanoma, chemotherapy with dacarbazine is currently the standard of care, with modest response rates of 15% to 20%. The encouraging response rates and low toxicities that were reported in phase I/III trials suggest that active immunotherapy may prove to be the most effective adjuvant therapy. At present, there are no FDA-approved cancer vaccines for malignant melanoma, and the results of ongoing randomized phase III clinical trials are greatly anticipated.

Cancer vaccines

Attempts to generate an anticancer immune response in vivo in patients with cancer have taken several forms. Although to date there have been relatively few published studies describing the effects of the approach in hematologic malignancy, that circumstance is expected to change rapidly during the next few years. In solid tumors, it is not known which, if any, of the approaches being explored will be able to produce responses of sufficient effectiveness and duration to be of general clinical value. Despite the documented increase in survival of patients developing an immune response to tumor immunization, no randomized clinical trial has been entirely convincing. As knowledge of the molecular basis of the immune response and of the immune defenses used by cancer cells improves, it is reasonable to expect to see increasing benefits from tumor vaccines, which are likely to complement, long before they replace, conventional therapies.