1
|
Ayala-Borges B, Escobedo M, Egri N, Herrera S, Crespo M, Mirabet S, Arias-Cabrales C, Vilella A, Palou E, Mosquera MM, Pascal M, Colmenero J, Farrero M, Bodro M. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Humoral and Cellular Immunity in a Cohort of Vaccinated Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1845. [PMID: 38140248 PMCID: PMC10747916 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11121845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine humoral and T-cell responses after four doses of mRNA-1273 vaccine in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, and to study predictors of immunogenicity, including the role of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in immunity. Secondarily, safety was also assessed. Liver, heart, and kidney transplant recipients eligible for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination from three different institutions in Barcelona, Spain were included. IgM/IgG antibodies and T cell ELISpot against the S protein four weeks after receiving four consecutive booster doses of the vaccine were analyzed. One hundred and forty-three SOT recipients were included (41% liver, 38% heart, and 21% kidney). The median time from transplantation to vaccination was 6.6 years (SD 7.4). In total, 93% of the patients developed SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG antibodies and 94% S-ELISpot positivity. In total, 97% of recipients developed either humoral or cellular response (100% of liver recipients, 95% of heart recipients, and 88% of kidney recipients). Hypogammaglobulinemia was associated with the absence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies and S-ELISpot reactivity after vaccination, whereas past symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with SARS-CoV-2 IgG/IgM antibodies and S-ELISpot reactivity. Local and systemic side effects were generally mild or moderate, and no recipients experienced the development of de novo DSA or graft dysfunction following vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo Ayala-Borges
- Unit for Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínic, L’Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Miguel Escobedo
- Liver Transplantation, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, L’Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (M.E.); (J.C.)
| | - Natalia Egri
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Clínic, L’Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (N.E.); (E.P.); (M.P.)
| | - Sabina Herrera
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic, L’Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Crespo
- Nephrology Department, Renal Transplant Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Hospital del Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (M.C.); (C.A.-C.)
| | - Sonia Mirabet
- Heart Transplantation Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Sant Pau, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Cardiovaculares (CIBERCV), 08041 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Carlos Arias-Cabrales
- Nephrology Department, Renal Transplant Unit, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Hospital del Mar, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; (M.C.); (C.A.-C.)
| | - Anna Vilella
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital Clínic, L’Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Eduard Palou
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Clínic, L’Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (N.E.); (E.P.); (M.P.)
| | - María M. Mosquera
- Microbiology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Mariona Pascal
- Department of Immunology, Hospital Clínic, L’Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (N.E.); (E.P.); (M.P.)
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Colmenero
- Liver Transplantation, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, L’Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (M.E.); (J.C.)
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Farrero
- Unit for Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínic, L’Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Carrer Villarroel, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Bodro
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic, L’Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Carrer Villarroel, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herrera S, Aguado JM, Candel FJ, Cordero E, Domínguez-Gil B, Fernández-Ruiz M, Los Arcos I, Len Ò, Marcos MÁ, Muñez E, Muñoz P, Rodríguez-Goncer I, Sánchez-Céspedes J, Valerio M, Bodro M. Executive summary of the consensus statement of the group for the study of infection in transplantation and other immunocompromised host (GESITRA-IC) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) on the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid organ transplant recipients. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2023; 37:100788. [PMID: 37591117 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2023.100788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabina Herrera
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS (Institut D'Investigacions Biomèdiques Agust Pi I Sunyer), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jose M Aguado
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (Madrid), Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier Candel
- Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Transplant Coordination, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid 28040, Spain; Department of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elisa Cordero
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Mario Fernández-Ruiz
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (Madrid), Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ibai Los Arcos
- Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Òscar Len
- Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Elena Muñez
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Internal Medicine Department, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Patricia Muñoz
- Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 9 Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Rodríguez-Goncer
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (Madrid), Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12), Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Sánchez-Céspedes
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Instituto de Biomedicina Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Maricela Valerio
- Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, 9 Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Bodro
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS (Institut D'Investigacions Biomèdiques Agust Pi I Sunyer), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abu-Khader A, Hu Q, Kamar F, Galaszkiewicz I, Wang W, Khan F, Berka N. Low incidence of de novo HLA antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination: A cohort study of patients awaiting kidney transplantation. Transpl Infect Dis 2023; 25:e14105. [PMID: 37650468 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibodies against human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA Abs) are associated with an increased risk of allograft loss. Herein, we report the prospective follow-up for anti-HLA Abs formation in 103 patients with end-stage kidney disease on the waiting list for transplantation who underwent COVID-19 vaccination. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sera were tested before and after vaccination using Luminex technology. The cohort comprised of 62 males and 41 females with a mean age of 56 ± 14 years. The patients received BNT162b2 (80.4%), mRNA-1273 (18.5%), AZD1222 (0.40%), or ChAdOx1-S (0.80%) vaccine. Patients were tested before and within 119 ± 50, 95 ± 46 and 25 ± 26 days after the first, second, and third dose of the vaccine, respectively. RESULTS No significant change in calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) after vaccination was seen. Although 98.1% of patients had no change in anti-HLA Abs profile or cPRA after vaccination, two patients (1.9%) developed de novo anti-HLA Abs against class I or II HLA antigens. In those two patients, the cPRA changed from 0% and 63% at baseline to 9% and 90% after vaccination, respectively. Both patients received the BNT162b2 mRNA-based vaccine. The earliest detected anti-HLA Abs was 18 days after the first dose. CONCLUSION In rare cases, new anti-HLA antibodies were observed after COVID-19 vaccination, with potential implications for transplantation. The low incidence of this phenomenon is outweighed by the clinical benefits of vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Abu-Khader
- Transplant Immunology and Histocompatibility Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Texas, USA
| | - Qian Hu
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Fareed Kamar
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Iwona Galaszkiewicz
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Alberta, Canada
| | - Wenjie Wang
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Faisal Khan
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Noureddine Berka
- Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu B, Tamargo C, Brennan DC, Kant S. Measures to Increase Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Narrative Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1755. [PMID: 38140160 PMCID: PMC10748337 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11121755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose of review: To review the data on the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines, administered by different strategies, in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Recent findings: COVID-19 booster vaccines were given to SOTRs as a widespread practice in many transplant centers, mostly as the third and/or fourth dose in an extended vaccine series, with a significantly improved humoral response compared with the initial two-dose scheme. However, one-third of SOTRs remained unresponsive, despite these boosters. Next steps: Vaccination with standard dosing remains the most feasible strategy for attaining protection against COVID-19. Additional booster doses and temporarily holding or reducing mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid may provide immunogenicity to vaccines, according to recent studies demonstrating some efficacy with these measures. Preexposure prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies showed benefit in immunocompromised patients but is no longer recommended by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) due to diminished efficacy against Omicron and recent variants. Screening for the presence and titers of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in SOTRs is not recommended in most clinical settings. T cell-based techniques are needed to evaluate vaccine efficacy and risk of infection. As SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve, new vaccines based on conservative protein component/complexes of the COVID virus, in addition to its spike protein, are warranted to offer prolonged protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Yu
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Midtown Campus, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
| | - Christina Tamargo
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA;
| | - Daniel C. Brennan
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA;
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Sam Kant
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA;
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mehta G, Riva A, Ballester MP, Uson E, Pujadas M, Carvalho-Gomes Â, Sahuco I, Bono A, D’Amico F, Viganò R, Diago E, Lanseros BT, Inglese E, Vazquez DM, Sharma R, Tsou HLP, Harris N, Broekhoven A, Kikkert M, Morales SPT, Myeni SK, Riveiro-Barciela M, Palom A, Zeni N, Brocca A, Cussigh A, Cmet S, Escudero-García D, Stocco M, Natola LA, Ieluzzi D, Paon V, Sangiovanni A, Farina E, di Benedetto C, Sánchez-Torrijos Y, Lucena-Varela A, Román E, Sánchez E, Sánchez-Aldehuelo R, López-Cardona J, Canas-Perez I, Eastgate C, Jeyanesan D, Morocho AE, Di Cola S, Lapenna L, Zaccherini G, Bongiovanni D, Zanaga P, Sayaf K, Hossain S, Crespo J, Robles-Díaz M, Madejón A, Degroote H, Fernández J, Korenjak M, Verhelst X, García-Samaniego J, Andrade RJ, Iruzubieta P, Wright G, Caraceni P, Merli M, Patel VC, Gander A, Albillos A, Soriano G, Donato MF, Sacerdoti D, Toniutto P, Buti M, Duvoux C, Grossi PA, Berg T, Polak WG, Puoti M, Bosch-Comas A, Belli L, Burra P, Russo FP, Coenraad M, Calleja JL, Perricone G, Berenguer M, Claria J, Moreau R, Arroyo V, Angeli P, Sánchez C, Ampuero J, Piano S, Chokshi S, Jalan R. Serological response and breakthrough infection after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cirrhosis and post-liver transplant. Hepatol Commun 2023; 7:e0273. [PMID: 37870985 PMCID: PMC10586829 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccine hesitancy and lack of access remain major issues in disseminating COVID-19 vaccination to liver patients globally. Factors predicting poor response to vaccination and risk of breakthrough infection are important data to target booster vaccine programs. The primary aim of the current study was to measure humoral responses to 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine. Secondary aims included the determination of factors predicting breakthrough infection. METHODS COVID-19 vaccination and Biomarkers in cirrhosis And post-Liver Transplantation is a prospective, multicenter, observational case-control study. Participants were recruited at 4-10 weeks following first and second vaccine doses in cirrhosis [n = 325; 94% messenger RNA (mRNA) and 6% viral vaccine], autoimmune liver disease (AILD) (n = 120; 77% mRNA and 23% viral vaccine), post-liver transplant (LT) (n = 146; 96% mRNA and 3% viral vaccine), and healthy controls (n = 51; 72% mRNA, 24% viral and 4% heterologous combination). Serological end points were measured, and data regarding breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection were collected. RESULTS After adjusting by age, sex, and time of sample collection, anti-Spike IgG levels were the lowest in post-LT patients compared to cirrhosis (p < 0.0001), AILD (p < 0.0001), and control (p = 0.002). Factors predicting reduced responses included older age, Child-Turcotte-Pugh B/C, and elevated IL-6 in cirrhosis; non-mRNA vaccine in AILD; and coronary artery disease, use of mycophenolate and dysregulated B-call activating factor, and lymphotoxin-α levels in LT. Incident infection occurred in 6.6%, 10.6%, 7.4%, and 15.6% of cirrhosis, AILD, post-LT, and control, respectively. The only independent factor predicting infection in cirrhosis was low albumin level. CONCLUSIONS LT patients present the lowest response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. In cirrhosis, the reduced response is associated with older age, stage of liver disease and systemic inflammation, and breakthrough infection with low albumin level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gautam Mehta
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Heath, University College London, London, UK
- The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Antonio Riva
- The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Maria Pilar Ballester
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Eva Uson
- European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF CLIF), EASL-CLIF Consortium and Grifols Chair, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montserrat Pujadas
- European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF CLIF), EASL-CLIF Consortium and Grifols Chair, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ângela Carvalho-Gomes
- Hepatology, HBP Surgery and Transplantation, Hepatology & Liver Transplant Unit, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
- Ciberehd, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ivan Sahuco
- Hepatology, HBP Surgery and Transplantation, Hepatology & Liver Transplant Unit, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
- Ciberehd, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ariadna Bono
- Hepatology, HBP Surgery and Transplantation, Hepatology & Liver Transplant Unit, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
- Ciberehd, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Federico D’Amico
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Infectious Diseases Unit, Milan, Italy
- Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaela Viganò
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Hepatology and Gastroenterology Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Diago
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, IDIPHIM, Madrid, Spain
- Central Unit of Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPaz, Madrid, Spain
- CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Tormo Lanseros
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, IDIPHIM, Madrid, Spain
- CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Elvira Inglese
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Hepatology and Gastroenterology Unit, Milan, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Rajni Sharma
- The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK
| | - Hio Lam Phoebe Tsou
- The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK
| | - Nicola Harris
- The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK
| | - Annelotte Broekhoven
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Kikkert
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Shessy P. Torres Morales
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sebenzile K. Myeni
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Adriana Palom
- Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Valle de Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Nicola Zeni
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, Unit of Internal Medicine and Hepatology (UIMH), University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Brocca
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, Unit of Internal Medicine and Hepatology (UIMH), University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Annarosa Cussigh
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Sara Cmet
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Stocco
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Veronica Paon
- Azienda Ospedaiera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona Italy
| | - Angelo Sangiovanni
- Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Farina
- Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Milan, Italy
| | - Clara di Benedetto
- Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Milan, Italy
| | - Yolanda Sánchez-Torrijos
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla. Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Ana Lucena-Varela
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla. Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Eva Román
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
- EUI-Sant Pau School of Nursing, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisabet Sánchez
- CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rubén Sánchez-Aldehuelo
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julia López-Cardona
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Dhaarica Jeyanesan
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Simone Di Cola
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, Roma, Italy
| | - Lucia Lapenna
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, Roma, Italy
| | - Giacomo Zaccherini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Deborah Bongiovanni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paola Zanaga
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Gastroenterology and Multivisceral Transplant Units, Azienda Ospedale Università’ di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Katia Sayaf
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Gastroenterology and Multivisceral Transplant Units, Azienda Ospedale Università’ di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Sabir Hossain
- Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, UK
| | - Javier Crespo
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
- Clinical and Traslational Digestive Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Mercedes Robles-Díaz
- CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Antonio Madejón
- Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, CIBERehd, IdiPAZ, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Helena Degroote
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
- Liver Research Center Ghent, Ghent University, Belgium
- European Reference Network (ERN)RARE-LIVER
| | - Javier Fernández
- European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF CLIF), EASL-CLIF Consortium and Grifols Chair, Barcelona, Spain
- Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi-Sunyer (IDIBAPS) and Centro de Investigación Biomèdica en Red (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Xavier Verhelst
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium
- Liver Research Center Ghent, Ghent University, Belgium
- European Reference Network (ERN)RARE-LIVER
| | - Javier García-Samaniego
- Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, CIBERehd, IdiPAZ, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raúl J. Andrade
- CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
- Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| | - Paula Iruzubieta
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
- Clinical and Traslational Digestive Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain
| | - Gavin Wright
- Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, UK
| | - Paolo Caraceni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Unit of Semeiotics, Liver and Alcohol-related Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Manuela Merli
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza, Roma, Italy
| | - Vishal C Patel
- The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
- Institute of Liver Studies, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Amir Gander
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Agustín Albillos
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Instituto Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Germán Soriano
- CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
- Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Francesca Donato
- Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Milan, Italy
| | - David Sacerdoti
- Azienda Ospedaiera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona Italy
| | - Pierluigi Toniutto
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Maria Buti
- Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Valle de Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christophe Duvoux
- Department of Hepatogy-Liver Transplant Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital-APHP, Paris Est University, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Antonio Grossi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, ASST Sette Laghim, Varese, Italy
| | - Thomas Berg
- European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL)
| | - Wojciech G. Polak
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB and Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Massimo Puoti
- University of Milano Bicocca, Infectious Diseases Niguarda Great Metropolitan Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Bosch-Comas
- European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF CLIF), EASL-CLIF Consortium and Grifols Chair, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luca Belli
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Hepatology and Gastroenterology Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizia Burra
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Gastroenterology and Multivisceral Transplant Units, Azienda Ospedale Università’ di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Francesco Paolo Russo
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
- Gastroenterology and Multivisceral Transplant Units, Azienda Ospedale Università’ di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Minneke Coenraad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - José Luis Calleja
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, IDIPHIM, Madrid, Spain
- CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain
| | - Giovanni Perricone
- ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Hepatology and Gastroenterology Unit, Milan, Italy
| | - Marina Berenguer
- Hepatology, HBP Surgery and Transplantation, Hepatology & Liver Transplant Unit, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
- Ciberehd, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Joan Claria
- European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF CLIF), EASL-CLIF Consortium and Grifols Chair, Barcelona, Spain
- Hospital Clínic, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi-Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBERehd) and Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Richard Moreau
- European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF CLIF), EASL-CLIF Consortium and Grifols Chair, Barcelona, Spain
- INSERM and Université Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche sur l’inflammation (CRI), Paris, France
- APHP, Service d’hépatologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Vicente Arroyo
- European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF CLIF), EASL-CLIF Consortium and Grifols Chair, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo Angeli
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, Unit of Internal Medicine and Hepatology (UIMH), University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Cristina Sánchez
- European Foundation for the Study of Chronic Liver Failure (EF CLIF), EASL-CLIF Consortium and Grifols Chair, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Ampuero
- Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla. Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Salvatore Piano
- Department of Medicine - DIMED, Unit of Internal Medicine and Hepatology (UIMH), University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Shilpa Chokshi
- The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Rajiv Jalan
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Heath, University College London, London, UK
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seija M, García-Luna J, Rammauro F, Brugnini A, Trías N, Astesiano R, Santiago J, Orihuela N, Zulberti C, Machado D, Recalde C, Yandián F, Guerisoli A, Noboa J, Orihuela S, Curi L, Bugstaller E, Noboa O, Nin M, Bianchi S, Tiscornia A, Lens D. Low switched memory B cells are associated with no humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccine boosters in kidney transplant recipients. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1202630. [PMID: 37942335 PMCID: PMC10628322 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1202630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and boosters in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is heterogeneous and depends on immunosuppression status. There is no validated immune measurement associated with serological response in clinical practice. Multicolor flow cytometric immunophenotyping could be useful for measuring immune response. This study aimed to study B- and T-cell compartments through Standardized EuroFlow PID Orientation after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and their association with IgG SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity status after two doses or boosters. Methods We conducted a multicenter prospective study to evaluate humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in KTRs. Heterologous regimen: two doses of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 and two boosters of BNT162b2 mRNA (n=75). Homologous vaccination: two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA and one BNT162b2 mRNA booster (n=13). Booster doses were administrated to KTRs without taking into account their IgG SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity status. Peripheral blood samples were collected 30 days after the second dose and after the last heterologous or homologous booster. A standardized EuroFlow PID Orientation Tube (PIDOT) and a supervised automated analysis were used for immune monitoring cellular subsets after boosters. Results A total of 88 KTRs were included and divided into three groups according to the time of the first detected IgG SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity: non-responders (NRs, n=23), booster responders (BRs, n=41), and two-dose responders (2DRs, n=24). The NR group was more frequent on mycophenolate than the responder groups (NRs, 96%; BRs, 80%; 2DRs, 42%; p=0.000). Switched memory B cells in the 2DR group were higher than those in the BR and NR groups (medians of 30, 17, and 10 cells/ul, respectively; p=0.017). Additionally, the absolute count of central memory/terminal memory CD8 T cells was higher in the 2DR group than in the BR and NR groups. (166, 98, and 93 cells/ul, respectively; p=0.041). The rest of the T-cell populations studied did not show a statistical difference. Conclusion switched memory B cells and memory CD8 T-cell populations in peripheral blood were associated with the magnitude of the humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Boosters increased IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 levels, CM/TM CD8 T cells, and switched MBCs in patients with seropositivity after two doses. Interestingly, no seropositivity after boosters was associated with the use of mycophenolate and a lower number of switched MBCs and CM/TM CD8 T cells in peripheral blood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Seija
- Centro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
- Departamento de Fisiopatología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Joaquin García-Luna
- Laboratorio de Citometría de Flujo, Departamento Básico de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Florencia Rammauro
- Departamento de Inmunobiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
- Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Andreína Brugnini
- Laboratorio de Citometría de Flujo, Departamento Básico de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Natalia Trías
- Laboratorio de Citometría de Flujo, Departamento Básico de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Rossana Astesiano
- Centro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - José Santiago
- Centro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Natalia Orihuela
- Centro de Trasplante INU, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | | | - Danilo Machado
- Centro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Cecilia Recalde
- Centro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Federico Yandián
- Centro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Ana Guerisoli
- Centro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Javier Noboa
- Centro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
- Departamento de Inmunobiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Sergio Orihuela
- Centro de Trasplante INU, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Lilian Curi
- Centro de Trasplante INU, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Emma Bugstaller
- Centro de Trasplante, Hospital Evangélico, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Oscar Noboa
- Centro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Marcelo Nin
- Centro de Nefrología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
- Centro de Trasplante INU, Hospital Italiano, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Sergio Bianchi
- Departamento de Fisiopatología, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
- Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Adriana Tiscornia
- Instituto Nacional de Donación y Trasplante, Hospital de Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República y Ministerio de Salud Pública, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Daniela Lens
- Laboratorio de Citometría de Flujo, Departamento Básico de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schoepf IC, Riebensahm C, Becchetti C, Blaser V, Unternährer CV, Banz V, Hirzel C, Suter-Riniker FM, Berzigotti A. Evolution of humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in liver transplant recipients - a longitudinal study. Swiss Med Wkly 2023; 153:40118. [PMID: 37955624 DOI: 10.57187/smw.2023.40118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Liver transplant recipients show suboptimal vaccine-elicited immune responses to severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. This study aimed to assess real-world data on SARS-CoV-2 antibodies after the second and third SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in liver transplant recipients in Switzerland. METHODS We enrolled liver transplant recipients who attended regular follow-up visits between 01/07/2021 and 30/04/2022 at the outpatient clinic of the Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine at Bern University Hospital, Switzerland. Following the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health recommendations, we measured SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG antibodies in 117 liver transplant recipients ≥4 weeks after the second SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination from 07/2021-04/2022. In case of antibody levels of <100 AU/ml, patients received a third vaccination and antibodies were re-measured. Patients with antibody levels of >100 AU/ml were defined as "responders", those with 12-100 AU/ml as "partial responders" and those with <12 AU/ml as "non-responders". RESULTS After two vaccinations, 36/117 (31%) were responders, 42/117 (36%) were partial responders and 39/117 (33%) were non-responders. The humoral immune response improved significantly after the third vaccination, resulting in 31/55 (56%) responders among the previous partial or non-responders. A total of 26 patients developed COVID-19, of whom two had a moderate or severe course (both non-responders after three doses). DISCUSSION One third of liver transplant recipients showed an optimal response following two vaccinations; a third dose achieved a complete antibody response in more than half of partial and non-responders. We observed only one severe course of COVID-19 and no deaths from COVID-19 in the vaccinated liver transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella C Schoepf
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- University Department of Medicine and Infectious Diseases Service, Kantonsspital Baselland, University of Basel, Bruderholz, Switzerland
| | - Carlotta Riebensahm
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Becchetti
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Hepatology and Gastroenterology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentine Blaser
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Céline V Unternährer
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Vanessa Banz
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Hirzel
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Annalisa Berzigotti
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tan EX, Lim WH, Thong E, Chavatte JM, Zhang J, Lim J, Jin JY, Lim DR, Kang JY, Tang ASP, Chan KE, Tan C, Tan SN, Nah B, Huang DQ, Wang LF, Tambyah PA, Somani J, Young B, Muthiah MD. Clinical Course, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Liver Transplant Recipients. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1537. [PMID: 37745946 PMCID: PMC10513132 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Immunocompromised individuals have been excluded from landmark studies of messenger RNA vaccinations for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In such patients, the response to vaccination may be blunted and may wane more quickly compared with immunocompetent patients. We studied the factors associated with decreased antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and risk factors for subsequent breakthrough infections in liver transplant (LT) patients undergoing coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination with at least 2 doses of messenger RNA vaccine from April 28, 2021, to April 28, 2022. Methods All LT recipients received at least 2 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer BioNTech) vaccine 21 d apart. We measured the antibody response against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein using the Roche Elecsys immunoassay to the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, and the presence of neutralizing antibodies was measured by the surrogate virus neutralization test (cPass) before first and second doses of vaccination and also between 2 and 3 mo after the second dose of vaccination. Results Ninety-three LT recipients who received 2 doses of BNT162b2 were included in the analysis. The mean time from LT was 110 ± 154 mo. After 2-dose vaccination, 38.7% of LT recipients (36/93) were vaccine nonresponders on the cPass assay compared with 20.4% (19/93) on the Roche S assay. On multivariable analysis, increased age and increased tacrolimus trough were found to be associated with poor neutralizing antibody response (P = 0.038 and 0.022, respectively). The use of antimetabolite therapy in conjunction with tacrolimus approached statistical significance (odds ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.180-3.72; P = 0.062). Breakthrough infection occurred in 18 of 88 LT recipients (20.4%). Female gender was independently associated with breakthrough infections (P < 0.001). Conclusions Among LT recipients, older age and higher tacrolimus trough levels were associated with poorer immune response to 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Further studies are needed to assess variables associated with breakthrough infections and, hence, who should be prioritized for booster vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunice X. Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Wen Hui Lim
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Elizabeth Thong
- Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Jinyan Zhang
- Programme in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Jonathan Lim
- National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore
| | | | | | | | - Ansel Shao Pin Tang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kai En Chan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Caitlyn Tan
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shi Ni Tan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Benjamin Nah
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Daniel Q. Huang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Lin-Fa Wang
- Programme in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Paul A. Tambyah
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jyoti Somani
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore
| | - Barnaby Young
- National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Mark D. Muthiah
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- National University Centre for Organ Transplantation, National University Health System, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Luo X, Lessomo FYN, Yu Z, Xie Y. Factors influencing immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in liver transplantation recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1145081. [PMID: 37731498 PMCID: PMC10508849 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1145081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This review summarizes the factors influencing the efficacy and safety of the COVID-19 vaccine in LTR through meta-analysis, hoping to provide strategies for vaccine use. Methods Electronic databases were screened for studies on mRNA vaccines in LTR. The primary outcome was the pooled seroconversion rate, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of adverse events+breakthrough infections. Subgroup analyses were made based on BMI, associated comorbidities, presence of baseline leukopenia, time since transplant, and drugs used. Result In total, 31 articles got included. The pooled seroconversion rate after at least two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was 72% (95% CI [0.52-0.91). With significant heterogeneity among studies I2 = 99.9%, the seroconversion rate was about 72% (95%CI [0.66-0.75]), from the studies reporting two doses of vaccine slightly higher around 75%(95%CI [0.29-1.22]) from studies reporting three doses. The pooled seroconversion rate within the lower to normal BMI group was 74% (95% CI [0.22-1.27], Pi=0.005) against 67% (95% CI [0.52-0.81], Pi=0.000) in the high BMI group. The pooled seroconversion rate in the ''positive leukopenia'' group was the lowest, 59%. Leukopenia could influence the vaccine seroconversion rate in LTR. From the time since transplant analysis after setting seven years as cut off point, the pooled seroconversion rate after at least two doses of COVID-19 vaccination was 53% (95% CI [0.18-0.83], P=0.003, I2 = 99.6%) in <7years group and 83% (95% CI [0.76-0.90], P=0.000 I2 = 95.7%) in > 7years group. The only time since transplantation had reached statistical significance to be considered a risk factor predictor of poor serological response (OR=1.27 95%CI [1.03-1.55], P=0.024). The breakthrough infection rate after vaccination was very low2% (95% CI 0.01-0.03, I2 = 63.0%), and the overall incidence of adverse events, which included mainly pain at the injection site and fatigue, was 18% (95%CI [0.11-0.25], I2 = 98.6%, Pi=0.000). Conclusion The seroconversion rate in LTR vaccinated with at least two doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine could be significantly affected by the vaccine type, immunosuppressant used, BMI, leukopenia, associated comorbidities, and time since transplantation. Nevertheless, booster doses are still recommended for LTR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyi Luo
- Queen Mary School, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | | | - Zhimin Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yong Xie
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Feldman AG, Beaty B, Everitt M, Goebel J, Kempe A, Pratscher L, Danziger-Isakov LA. Survey of pediatric transplant center practices regarding COVID-19 vaccine mandates for transplant candidates and living donors and use of COVID-19-positive deceased organs. Pediatr Transplant 2023; 27:e14513. [PMID: 36939212 PMCID: PMC10509306 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 vaccine is recommended for individuals ages ≥6 months; however, whether vaccination should be mandated for transplant candidates and living donors remains controversial. This study assessed COVID-19 policies at US pediatric solid organ transplant centers. METHODS A 79-item survey was emailed between March and April 2022 to 200 UNOS Medical Directors detailing center COVID-19 vaccine policies for transplant candidates and living donors and use of grafts from COVID-19-positive deceased donors. RESULTS The response rate was 77% (154/200). For children aged 5-15 years, 23% (35/154 centers) have a COVID-19 vaccine mandate, 27% (42/154) anticipate implementing a future mandate, and 47% (72/154) have not considered or do not anticipate implementing a mandate. For children ≥16 years, 32% (50/154 centers) have a COVID-19 vaccine mandate, 25% (39/154) anticipate implementing a future mandate, and 40% (62/154) have not considered or do not anticipate implementing a mandate. The top two reasons for not implementing a COVID-19 vaccine mandate were concerns about penalizing a child for their parent's decision and worsening inequities in transplant. Of 85 kidney and liver living donor centers, 32% (27/85) require vaccination of donors. Twenty percent (31/154) of centers accept organs from COVID-19-positive deceased donors. CONCLUSIONS There is great variation among pediatric SOT centers in both the implementation and details of COVID-19 vaccine mandates for candidates and living donors. To guide more uniform policies, further data are needed on COVID-19 disease, vaccine efficacy, and use of grafts from donors positive for COVID-19 in the pediatric transplant population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy G. Feldman
- Section of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Pediatric Liver Transplant Center, Digestive Health Institute, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Brenda Beaty
- Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Melanie Everitt
- Pediatric Heart Transplant Program, Section of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jens Goebel
- Pediatrics and Human Development, Section of Pediatric Nephrology, Helen DeVos Children’s Hospital, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | - Allison Kempe
- Department of Pediatrics, Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS), University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children’s Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | - Lara A. Danziger-Isakov
- Immunocompromised Host Infectious Disease, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Subramanian V. Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccination Among Recipients of Solid Organ Transplants. J Infect Dis 2023; 228:S34-S45. [PMID: 37539762 PMCID: PMC10401623 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiad152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at high risk for infections including SARS-CoV-2, primarily due to use of immunosuppressive therapies that prevent organ rejection. Furthermore, these immunosuppressants are typically associated with suboptimal responses to vaccination. While COVID-19 vaccines have reduced the risk of COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality in SOTRs, breakthrough infection rates and death remain higher in this population compared with immunocompetent individuals. Approaches to enhancing response in SOTRs, such as through administration of additional doses and heterologous vaccination, have resulted in increased seroresponse and antibody levels. In this article, safety and immunogenicity of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in SOTRs are explored by dose. Key considerations for clinical practice and the current vaccine recommendations for SOTRs are discussed within the context of the dynamic COVID-19 vaccination guideline landscape. A thorough understanding of these topics is essential for determining public health and vaccination strategies to help protect immunocompromised populations, including SOTRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Subramanian
- Correspondence: Vijay Subramanian, MD, Tampa General Hospital, 409 Bayshore Blvd, Tampa, FL 33606 ()
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Perreault G, Ching C, Nobel YR. COVID-19 in patients with liver disease and liver transplant: clinical implications, prevention, and management. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231188586. [PMID: 37521085 PMCID: PMC10372508 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231188586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had enormous implications for the care of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), cirrhosis, and liver transplant (LT). Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 vary in patients with CLD and cirrhosis compared to healthy controls, and in patients with LT compared to patients without LT. Several special considerations apply to the approach to vaccination and treatment in patients with CLD and LT. The practice of liver transplantation has also been heavily impacted by the pandemic, including persistent reductions in living donor LT and increases in LT for an indication of alcohol-related liver disease. Recent medical society guidelines strive to standardize severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 testing in donors and recipients and the approach to transplantation after recovered from COVID-19 infection, but certain controversies remain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Perreault
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charlotte Ching
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cheung CKM, Law KWT, Law AWH, Law MF, Ho R, Wong SH. Efficacy of Vaccine Protection Against COVID-19 Virus Infection in Patients with Chronic Liver Diseases. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2023; 11:718-735. [PMID: 36969905 PMCID: PMC10037513 DOI: 10.14218/jcth.2022.00339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 is a useful weapon to combat the virus. Patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs), including compensated or decompensated liver cirrhosis and noncirrhotic diseases, have a decreased immunologic response to coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines. At the same time, they have increased mortality if infected. Current data show a reduction in mortality when patients with chronic liver diseases are vaccinated. A suboptimal vaccine response has been observed in liver transplant recipients, especially those receiving immunosuppressive therapy, so an early booster dose is recommended to achieve a better protective effect. Currently, there are no clinical data comparing the protective efficacy of different vaccines in patients with chronic liver diseases. Patient preference, availability of the vaccine in the country or area, and adverse effect profiles are factors to consider when choosing a vaccine. There have been reports of immune-mediated hepatitis after coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination, and clinicians should be aware of that potential side effect. Most patients who developed hepatitis after vaccination responded well to treatment with prednisolone, but an alternative type of vaccine should be considered for subsequent booster doses. Further prospective studies are required to investigate the duration of immunity and protection against different viral variants in patients with chronic liver diseases or liver transplant recipients, as well as the effect of heterologous vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Ka Man Cheung
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | | | | | - Man Fai Law
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Rita Ho
- Department of Medicine, North District Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Sunny Hei Wong
- Institute of Digestive Disease and Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alotaibi AS, Shalabi HA, Alhifany AA, Alotaibi NE, Alnuhait MA, Altheaby AR, Alhazmi AY. Humoral and Cellular Immunity following Five Doses of COVID-19 Vaccines in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1166. [PMID: 37514982 PMCID: PMC10384009 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11071166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at increased risk of COVID-19 infection because of their suppressed immunity. The available data show that COVID-19 vaccines are less effective in SOT recipients. We aimed to assess the cellular and humoral immunogenicity with an increasing the number of doses of COVID-19 vaccines in SOT recipients and to identify factors affecting vaccine response in this population. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to identify ongoing and completed studies of humoral and cellular immunity following COVID-19 vaccines in SOT recipients. The search retrieved 278 results with 45 duplicates, and 43 records did not match the inclusion criteria. After title and abstract screening, we retained 189 records, and 135 records were excluded. The reasons for exclusion involved studies with immunocompromised patients (non-transplant recipients), dialysis patients, and individuals who had already recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection. After full-text reading, 55 observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included. The proportion of responders appeared higher after the third, fourth, and fifth doses. The risk factors for non-response included older age and the use of mycophenolate mofetil, corticosteroids, and other immunosuppressants. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates the immunogenicity following different doses of COVID-19 vaccines among SOT patients. Due to the low immunogenicity of vaccines, additional strategies to improve vaccine response may be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulmalik S Alotaibi
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
| | - Heba A Shalabi
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah A Alhifany
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nouf E Alotaibi
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed A Alnuhait
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulrahman R Altheaby
- Organ Transplant Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdulfattah Y Alhazmi
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ballester MP, Jalan R, Mehta G. Vaccination in liver diseases and liver Transplantation: Recommendations, implications and opportunities in the post-covid era. JHEP Rep 2023:100776. [PMID: 37360567 PMCID: PMC10241163 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The interest in vaccination efficacy and toxicity has surged following the Covid-19 pandemic. Immune responses to several vaccines have been shown to be suboptimal in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) or post-liver transplant (LT), as a consequence of cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction (CAID) or post-LT immunosuppression respectively. Accordingly, vaccine-preventable infections may be more common or severe than in the general population. The Covid-19 pandemic has greatly accelerated research and development into vaccination technology and platforms, which will have spillover benefits for liver patients. The aims of this review are: (i) to discuss the impact of vaccine-preventable infections on CLD and post-LT patients, (ii) to appraise current evidence supporting vaccination strategies, and (iii) to provide some insight into recent developments relevant for liver patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pilar Ballester
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital of Valencia, Spain
- Incliva Biomedical Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - Rajiv Jalan
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gautam Mehta
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, UK
- Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Oh YJ, Kim J, Kang ES, Rhu J, Choi GS, Joh JW. Analysis of Antibody Responses After COVID-19 Vaccination in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Study. J Korean Med Sci 2023; 38:e121. [PMID: 37096307 PMCID: PMC10125795 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplant (LT) recipients were considered a vulnerable population during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The clinical efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine is unknown in immunocompromised patients. The purpose of this study was to provide evidence of antibody responses after COVID-19 vaccination in LT recipients. METHODS This study enrolled 46 patients who underwent LT at Samsung Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) before implementation of the one-dose vaccine in Korea. Those who completed the two-dose COVID-19 vaccine between August 2021 and September 2021 were included and followed through December 2021. Semiquantitative anti-spike serologic testing was performed using the Roche Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 S enzyme immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkereuz, Switzerland) with a positive cutoff of at least 0.8 U/mL. RESULTS Among all 46 participants, 40 (87%) demonstrated an antibody response after the second dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, while six (13%) had no antibody response after the second dose. Upon univariate analysis, patients with higher antibody titer had longer years since LT (2.3 ± 2.8 vs. 9.4 ± 5.0, P < 0.001). A lower median tacrolimus (TAC) level before vaccination and after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine indicated a significantly higher antibody response (2.3 [1.6-3.2] vs. 7.0 [3.7-7.8], P = 0.006, 2.5 [1.6-3.3] vs. 5.7 [4.2-7.2], P = 0.003). Period between 2nd vaccination and serologic testing was significantly higher in the antibody-response group compared to the no-antibody-response group (30.2 ± 24.0 vs. 65.9 ± 35.0, P = 0.012). A multivariate analysis of antibody responses revealed TAC level before vaccination as a statistically significant factor. CONCLUSION A higher TAC level before vaccination resulted in less effective vaccination in LT patients. Booster vaccinations are required, especially for patients in the early stage after LT who have compromised immune function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Ju Oh
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jongman Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Eun-Suk Kang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Jinsoo Rhu
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gyu-Seong Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Won Joh
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Maria Tsikala Vafea, Ghady Haidar. COVID-19 Prevention in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Current State of the Evidence. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2023. [PMID: 37217369 PMCID: PMC10030334 DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
Although COVID-19 vaccines are safe, most organ transplant recipients fail to mount an antibody response after two mRNA vaccines. Thus, three mRNA vaccines constitute a primary vaccine series after solid organ transplant. However, neutralizing antibodies after three or greater mRNA vaccines are lower against Omicron versus older variants. Predictors of attenuated responses include age, vaccination within 1 year from transplant, mycophenolate, and BNT162b2. Some seronegative transplant recipients exhibit durable T-cell responses. Vaccine effectiveness in transplants is lower than in the general population. Immunosuppression reduction around revaccination warrants further study. Monoclonal antibody pre-exposure prophylaxis may be protective against susceptible variants.
Collapse
|
18
|
Egri N, Calderón H, Martinez R, Vazquez M, Gómez-Caverzaschi V, Pascal M, Araújo O, Juan M, González-Navarro EA, Hernández-Rodríguez J. Cellular and humoral responses after second and third SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in patients with autoimmune diseases treated with rituximab: specific T cell immunity remains longer and plays a protective role against SARS-CoV-2 reinfections. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1146841. [PMID: 37180097 PMCID: PMC10174323 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1146841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Humoral and cellular immune responses are known to be crucial for patients to recover from COVID-19 and to protect them against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection once infected or vaccinated. Objectives This study aimed to investigate humoral and T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with autoimmune diseases after the second and third vaccine doses while on rituximab and their potential protective role against reinfection. Methods Ten COVID-19-naïve patients were included. Three time points were used for monitoring cellular and humoral responses: pre-vaccine to exclude virus exposure (time point 1) and post-second and post-third vaccine (time points 2 and 3). Specific IgG antibodies were monitored by Luminex and T cells against SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein by ELISpot and CoVITEST. All episodes of symptomatic COVID-19 were recorded. Results Nine patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis and one with an undifferentiated autoimmune disease were included. Nine patients received mRNA vaccines. The last rituximab infusion was administered for a mean (SD) of 15 (10) weeks before the first vaccine and six patients were CD19-B cell-depleted. After a mean (SD) of 19 (10) and 16 (2) days from the second and third vaccine dose, IgG anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in six (60%) and eight (80%) patients, respectively. All patients developed specific T cell responses by ELISpot and CoVITEST in time points 2 and 3. Previous B cell depletion correlated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels. Nine (90%) patients developed mild COVID-19 after a median of 7 months of the third dose. Conclusion Rituximab in patients with autoimmune diseases reduces humoral responses but does not avoid the development of T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, which remain present after a booster dose. A steady cellular immunity appears to be protective against subsequent reinfections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Egri
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Center of the European Reference Network (ERN) for Rare Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (RITA) and ERN on Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ReCONNET); Spanish Center of the Centros, Servicios y Unidades de Referencia (CSUR) and Catalan Center of the Xarxa d’Unitats d’Expertesa Clínica (XUEC) for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases and Primary Immunodeficiencies, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hugo Calderón
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Center of the European Reference Network (ERN) for Rare Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (RITA) and ERN on Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ReCONNET); Spanish Center of the Centros, Servicios y Unidades de Referencia (CSUR) and Catalan Center of the Xarxa d’Unitats d’Expertesa Clínica (XUEC) for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases and Primary Immunodeficiencies, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Robert Martinez
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Center of the European Reference Network (ERN) for Rare Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (RITA) and ERN on Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ReCONNET); Spanish Center of the Centros, Servicios y Unidades de Referencia (CSUR) and Catalan Center of the Xarxa d’Unitats d’Expertesa Clínica (XUEC) for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases and Primary Immunodeficiencies, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mario Vazquez
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Center of the European Reference Network (ERN) for Rare Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (RITA) and ERN on Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ReCONNET); Spanish Center of the Centros, Servicios y Unidades de Referencia (CSUR) and Catalan Center of the Xarxa d’Unitats d’Expertesa Clínica (XUEC) for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases and Primary Immunodeficiencies, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Verónica Gómez-Caverzaschi
- Clinical Unit of Autoinflammatory Diseases and Vasculitis Research Unit, Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Center of the European Reference Network (ERN) for Rare Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (RITA) and ERN on Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ReCONNET), Spanish Center of the Centros, Servicios y Unidades de Referencia (CSUR) and Catalan Center of the Xarxa d’Unitats d’Expertesa Clínica (XUEC) for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases and Primary Immunodeficiencies, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mariona Pascal
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Center of the European Reference Network (ERN) for Rare Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (RITA) and ERN on Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ReCONNET); Spanish Center of the Centros, Servicios y Unidades de Referencia (CSUR) and Catalan Center of the Xarxa d’Unitats d’Expertesa Clínica (XUEC) for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases and Primary Immunodeficiencies, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olga Araújo
- Clinical Unit of Autoinflammatory Diseases and Vasculitis Research Unit, Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Center of the European Reference Network (ERN) for Rare Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (RITA) and ERN on Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ReCONNET), Spanish Center of the Centros, Servicios y Unidades de Referencia (CSUR) and Catalan Center of the Xarxa d’Unitats d’Expertesa Clínica (XUEC) for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases and Primary Immunodeficiencies, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manel Juan
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Center of the European Reference Network (ERN) for Rare Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (RITA) and ERN on Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ReCONNET); Spanish Center of the Centros, Servicios y Unidades de Referencia (CSUR) and Catalan Center of the Xarxa d’Unitats d’Expertesa Clínica (XUEC) for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases and Primary Immunodeficiencies, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Europa Azucena González-Navarro
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Center of the European Reference Network (ERN) for Rare Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (RITA) and ERN on Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ReCONNET); Spanish Center of the Centros, Servicios y Unidades de Referencia (CSUR) and Catalan Center of the Xarxa d’Unitats d’Expertesa Clínica (XUEC) for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases and Primary Immunodeficiencies, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Hernández-Rodríguez
- Clinical Unit of Autoinflammatory Diseases and Vasculitis Research Unit, Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Center of the European Reference Network (ERN) for Rare Immunodeficiency, Autoinflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases (RITA) and ERN on Connective Tissue and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ReCONNET), Spanish Center of the Centros, Servicios y Unidades de Referencia (CSUR) and Catalan Center of the Xarxa d’Unitats d’Expertesa Clínica (XUEC) for Autoinflammatory Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases and Primary Immunodeficiencies, Barcelona, Spain
- *Correspondence: José Hernández-Rodríguez,
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fatima I, Duong N. The impact of COVID-19 on liver transplantation: challenges and perspectives. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231171452. [PMID: 37180361 PMCID: PMC10172841 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231171452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented unique challenges to patients with decompensated cirrhosis awaiting transplant, with respect to accessing medical facilities for routine clinic visits, imaging, laboratory workup, or endoscopies. There was a delay in organ procurement that led to a decrease in the number of liver transplants (LTs) and an increase in the morality of waitlisted patients at the beginning of the pandemic. LT numbers later equalized to pre-pandemic numbers due to combined efforts and adaptability of transplant centers as well as dynamic guidelines. Due to being immunosuppressed, the demographics of LT patients were at an increased risk of infection. Although there is a higher rate of mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic liver disease, LT itself is not a risk factor for mortality in COVID-19. There was no difference in overall mortality in LT patients compared to non-LT patients, and mortality risk factors were the same: age, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and chronic kidney disease. The most common causes of death were respiratory complications. Liver-related deaths were reported in 1.6% of patients. The optimal timing of liver transplantation post-infection depends on various factors, such as the severity of liver injury, the presence of comorbidities, and the progression of the underlying liver disease. There is not enough data available on COVID-19 cholangiopathy and the number of cases that will be seen in the future that will require LT. There are some concerns of lower immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in LT patients but available evidence suggests that the vaccines are safe and well-tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nikki Duong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and
Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Memenga F, Kueppers ST, Borof K, Kirchhof P, Duengelhoef PM, Barten MJ, Lütgehetmann M, Berisha F, Fluschnik N, Becher PM, Kondziella C, Bernhardt AM, Reichenspurner H, Blankenberg S, Magnussen C, Rybczynski M. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination-Induced Immunogenicity in Heart Transplant Recipients. Transpl Int 2023; 36:10883. [PMID: 36814697 PMCID: PMC9939437 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.10883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Among heart transplant (HT) recipients, a reduced immunological response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has been reported. We aimed to assess the humoral and T-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in HT recipients to understand determinants of immunogenicity. HT recipients were prospectively enrolled from January 2021 until March 2022. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG levels were quantified after two and three doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BNT162b2, mRNA1273, or AZD1222). Spike-specific T-cell responses were assessed using flow cytometry. Ninety-one patients were included in the study (69% male, median age 55 years, median time from HT to first vaccination 6.1 years). Seroconversion rates were 34% after two and 63% after three doses. Older patient age (p = 0.003) and shorter time since HT (p = 0.001) were associated with lower antibody concentrations after three vaccinations. There were no associations between vaccine types or immunosuppressive regimens and humoral response, except for prednisolone, which was predictive of a reduced response after two (p = 0.001), but not after three doses (p = 0.434). A T-cell response was observed in 50% after two and in 74% after three doses. Despite three vaccine doses, a large proportion of HT recipients exhibits a reduced immune response. Additional strategies are desirable to improve vaccine immunogenicity in this vulnerable group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Memenga
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simon Thomas Kueppers
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Katrin Borof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Paulus Kirchhof
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Markus Johannes Barten
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Marc Lütgehetmann
- Institute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hamburg/Lübeck/Borstel/Riems, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Filip Berisha
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nina Fluschnik
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Moritz Becher
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Kondziella
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alexander M Bernhardt
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hermann Reichenspurner
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christina Magnussen
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Meike Rybczynski
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Various vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 have been developed in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic, several of which are highly effective in preventing COVID-19 in the general population. Patients with chronic liver diseases (CLDs), particularly those with liver cirrhosis, are considered to be at a high risk for severe COVID-19 and death. Given the increased rates of disease severity and mortality in patients with liver disease, there is an urgent need to understand the efficacy of vaccination in this population. However, the data regarding efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with CLDs is limited. Indeed, several organ-specific or systemic immune-mediated side effects following COVID-19 vaccination, including liver injury similar to autoimmune hepatitis, have been recently reported. Although the number of cases of vaccine-related liver injury is increasing, its frequency, clinical course, and mechanism remain unclear. Here, we review the current findings on COVID-19 vaccination and liver disease, focusing on: (1) The impact of COVID-19 in patients with CLD; (2) The efficacy, safety, and risk-benefit profiles of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with CLD; and (3) Liver injury following COVID-19 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sotaro Ozaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu 879-5593, Oita, Japan
- Department of Infectious Disease Control, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu 879-5593, Oita, Japan
| | - Takashi Kobayashi
- Department of Infectious Disease Control, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu 879-5593, Oita, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Mizukami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu 879-5593, Oita, Japan
| | - Kazunari Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu 879-5593, Oita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sandoval M, Nguyen DT, Huang HJ, Yi SG, Ghobrial RM, Gaber AO, Graviss EA. COVID-19 mortality may be reduced among fully vaccinated solid organ transplant recipients. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0279222. [PMID: 36542654 PMCID: PMC9770372 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at increased risk for morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 due to their immunosuppressed state and reduced immunogenicity from COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. This investigation examined the association between COVID-19 mRNA vaccination status and mortality among SOT recipients diagnosed with COVID-19. METHODS & FINDINGS A retrospective, registry-based chart review was conducted investigating COVID-19 mortality among immunosuppressed solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients in a large metropolitan healthcare system in Houston, Texas, USA. Electronic health record data was collected from consecutive SOT recipients who received a diagnostic SARS-CoV-2 test between March 1, 2020, and October 1, 2021. The primary exposure was COVID-19 vaccination status at time of COVID-19 diagnosis. Patients were considered 'fully vaccinated' at fourteen days after completing their vaccine course. COVID-19 mortality within 60 days and intensive care unit admission within 30 days were primary and secondary endpoints, respectively. Among 646 SOT recipients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 at Houston Methodist Hospital between March 2020, and October 2021, 70 (10.8%) expired from COVID-19 within 60 days. Transplanted organs included 63 (9.8%) heart, 355 (55.0%) kidney, 108 (16.7%) liver, 70 (10.8%) lung, and 50 (7.7%) multi-organ. Increasing age was a risk factor for COVID-19 mortality, while vaccination within 180 days of COVID-19 diagnosis was protective in Cox proportional hazard models with hazard ratio 1.04 (95% CI: 1.01-1.06) and 0.31 (0.11-0.90), respectively). These findings were confirmed in the propensity score matched cohort between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. CONCLUSIONS This investigation found COVID-19 mortality may be significantly reduced among immunosuppressed SOT recipients within 6 months following vaccination. These findings can inform vaccination policies targeting immunosuppressed populations worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micaela Sandoval
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Duc T. Nguyen
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Howard J. Huang
- J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Stephanie G. Yi
- J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - R. Mark Ghobrial
- J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - A. Osama Gaber
- J.C. Walter Jr Transplant Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Edward A. Graviss
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics & Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chen X, Luo D, Mei B, Du J, Liu X, Xie H, Liu L, Su S, Mai G. Immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022; 29:441-456. [PMID: 36509376 PMCID: PMC9733302 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at increased risks of morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in SOT recipients. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases were searched for eligible reports published from 1 December 2019 to 31 May 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included reports evaluating the humoral immune response (HIR) or cellular immune response rate in SOT recipients after the administration of COVID-19 vaccines. PARTICIPANTS SOT recipients who received COVID-19 vaccines. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS We used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess bias in case-control and cohort studies. For randomised-controlled trials, the Jadad Scale was used. METHODS We used a random-effects model to calculate the pooled rates of immune response with 95% CI. We used a risk ratio (RR) with 95% CI for a comparison of immune responses between SOT and healthy controls. RESULTS A total of 91 reports involving 11 886 transplant recipients (lung: 655; heart: 539; liver: 1946; and kidney: 8746) and 2125 healthy controls revealed pooled HIR rates after the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd COVID-19 vaccine doses in SOT recipients were 9.5% (95% CI, 7-11.9%), 43.6% (95% CI, 39.3-47.8%) and 55.1% (95% CI, 44.7-65.6%), respectively. For specific organs, the HIR rates were still low after 1st vaccine dose (lung: 4.4%; kidney: 9.4%; heart: 13.2%; liver: 29.5%) and 2nd vaccine dose (lung: 28.4%; kidney: 37.6%; heart: 50.3%; liver: 64.5%). CONCLUSIONS A booster vaccination enhances the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in SOT; however, a significant share of the recipients still has not built a detectable HIR after receiving the 3rd dose. This finding calls for alternative approaches, including the use of monoclonal antibodies. In addition, lung transplant recipients need urgent booster vaccination to improve the immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinpei Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, China; Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
| | - De Luo
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China; Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Bingjie Mei
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| | - Juan Du
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
| | - Xiangdong Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The 4th People's Hospital of Zigong City, Zigong, China.
| | - Hui Xie
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, China.
| | - Lin Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, China.
| | - Song Su
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
| | - Gang Mai
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Deyang City, Deyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dib M, Le Corre N, Ortiz C, García D, Ferrés M, Martinez-Valdebenito C, Ruiz-Tagle C, Ojeda MJ, Espinoza MA, Jara A, Arab JP, Rabagliati R, Vizcaya C, Ceballos ME, Sarmiento M, Mondaca S, Viñuela M, Pastore A, Szwarcfiter V, Galdames E, Barrera A, Castro P, Gálvez NMS, Soto JA, Bueno SM, Kalergis AM, Nervi B, Balcells ME. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster in solid organ transplant recipients previously immunised with inactivated versus mRNA vaccines: A prospective cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health - Americas 2022; 16:100371. [PMID: 36185969 PMCID: PMC9503242 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background Methods Findings Interpretation Funding
Collapse
|
25
|
Meshram HS, Kute V, Rane H, Dave R, Banerjee S, Mishra V, Chauhan S. Humoral and cellular response of COVID-19 vaccine among solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Transpl Infect Dis 2022; 24:e13926. [PMID: 35924679 PMCID: PMC9538045 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to analyze the humoral and cellular response to standard and booster (additional doses) COVID-19 vaccination in solid organ transplantation (SOT) and the risk factors involved for an impaired response. METHODS We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published up until January 11, 2022, that reported immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccine among SOT. The study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42022300547. RESULTS Of the 1527 studies, 112 studies, which involved 15391 SOT and 2844 healthy controls, were included. SOT showed a low humoral response (effect size [ES]: 0.44 [0.40-0.48]) in overall and in control studies (log-Odds-ratio [OR]: -4.46 [-8.10 to -2.35]). The humoral response was highest in liver (ES: 0.67 [0.61-0.74]) followed by heart (ES: 0.45 [0.32-0.59]), kidney (ES: 0.40 [0.36-0.45]), kidney-pancreas (ES: 0.33 [0.13-0.53]), and lung (0.27 [0.17-0.37]). The meta-analysis for standard and booster dose (ES: 0.43 [0.39-0.47] vs. 0.51 [0.43-0.54]) showed a marginal increase of 18% efficacy. SOT with prior infection had higher response (ES: 0.94 [0.92-0.96] vs. ES: 0.40 [0.39-0.41]; p-value < .01). The seroresponse with mRNA-12723 mRNA was highest 0.52 (0.40-0.64). Mycophenolic acid (OR: 1.42 [1.21-1.63]) and Belatacept (OR: 1.89 [1.3-2.49]) had highest risk for nonresponse. SOT had a parallelly decreased cellular response (ES: 0.42 [0.32-0.52]) in overall and control studies (OR: -3.12 [-0.4.12 to -2.13]). INTERPRETATION Overall, SOT develops a suboptimal response compared to the general population. Immunosuppression including mycophenolic acid, belatacept, and tacrolimus is associated with decreased response. Booster doses increase the immune response, but further upgradation in vaccination strategy for SOT is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vivek Kute
- Department of NephrologyIKDRC‐ITSAhmedabadIndia
| | - Hemant Rane
- Department of AnaesthesiaIKDRC‐ITSAhmedabadIndia
| | - Ruchir Dave
- Department of NephrologyIKDRC‐ITSAhmedabadIndia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Knowledge on SARS-CoV-2 infection and its resultant COVID-19 in liver diseases has rapidly increased during the pandemic. Hereby, we review COVID-19 liver manifestations and pathophysiological aspects related to SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients without liver disease as well as the impact of COVID-19 in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), particularly cirrhosis and liver transplantation (LT). SARS-CoV-2 infection has been associated with overt proinflammatory cytokine profile, which probably contributes substantially to the observed early and late liver abnormalities. CLD, particularly decompensated cirrhosis, should be regarded as a risk factor for severe COVID-19 and death. LT was impacted during the pandemic, mainly due to concerns regarding donation and infection in recipients. However, LT did not represent a risk factor per se of worse outcome. Even though scarce, data regarding COVID-19 specific therapy in special populations such as LT recipients seem promising. COVID-19 vaccine-induced immunity seems impaired in CLD and LT recipients, advocating for a revised schedule of vaccine administration in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-François Dufour
- Hepatology, Department of Biomedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Marjot
- Oxford Liver Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Chiara Becchetti
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Bern, Italy
- Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Herbert Tilg
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cheng CH, Hung HC, Lee JC, Huang PW, Gu PW, Lai Y, Wang YC, Wu TH, Lee CF, Wu TJ, Chou HS, Chan KM, Huang CG, Lee WC. Determinants of Antibody Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Liver Transplant Recipients: The Role of Immunosuppression Reduction. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10. [PMID: 36366336 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10111827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Liver transplant recipients on chronic immunosuppression show an attenuated antibody response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Adjusting immunosuppressants during vaccination remains debated. We enrolled 380 liver transplant recipients receiving 2 doses of a protein subunit, mRNA, or a vector vaccine. The patients were informed to temporarily suspend immunosuppression for 2 weeks for both vaccination doses. We measured anti-live-SARS-CoV-2 spike neutralizing antibody levels at 1−2 months after the second vaccination; 83.9% of patients had humoral responses (SARS-CoV-2 NT50 ≥ 9.62 IU/mL) to 2 doses of vaccines. The mRNA (86.7%) and protein subunit vaccines (85%) yielded higher response rates than the vector vaccines (40.9%). Immunosuppression suspension during the two vaccinations yielded a higher response rate (91.5% vs. 57.7%). Only eight patients (2.1%) experienced transaminase level elevation of thrice the normal value (>110 IU/L) after the second vaccination. Most recovered spontaneously after resuming immunosuppression. Multivariate analysis revealed ABO incompatibility, white blood cell count <4000, lymphocyte count <20%, tacrolimus trough level >6.5 ng/mL, and no immunosuppression adjustment as independent risk factors to nonresponse. The mRNA and protein subunit vaccines yielded a higher response rate. Immunosuppression suspension for 2 weeks enhanced the antibody response. ABO incompatibility, leukopenia, lymphopenia, a high tacrolimus trough level, and no immunosuppression adjustment are associated with nonresponse.
Collapse
|
28
|
Casenaz A, Grosjean S, Aho-Glélé LS, Bour JB, Auvray C, Manoha C. Humoral and cellular immune response after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 messenger ribonucleic acid vaccination in heart transplant recipients: An observational study in France. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1027708. [PMID: 36388890 PMCID: PMC9643719 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1027708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Heart transplant (HT) recipients have a high risk of developing severe COVID-19. Immunoglobulin G antibodies are considered to provide protective immunity and T-cell activity is thought to confer protection from severe disease. However, data on T-cell response to mRNA vaccination in a context of HT remains limited. METHODS In 96 HT patients, a IFN-γ release assay and an anti-Spike antibody test were used to evaluate the ability of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines to generate cellular and humoral immune response. Blood samples were collected few weeks to 7 months after vaccination. Multiple fractional polynomial and LASSO regression models were used to define predictors of T-cell response. RESULTS Three to five months after vaccination, three doses of vaccine induced a positive SARS-CoV-2 T-cell response in 47% of recipients and a positive humoral response in 83% of recipients, 11.1% of patients remained negative for both T and B cell responses. Three doses were necessary to reach high IgG response levels (>590 BAU/mL), which were obtained in a third of patients. Immunity was greatly amplified in the group who had three vaccine doses plus COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSION Our study revealed that T and B immunity decreases over time, leading us to suggest the interest of a booster vaccination at 5 months after the third dose. Moreover, a close follow-up of immune response following vaccination is needed to ensure ongoing immune protection. We also found that significant predictors of higher cellular response were infection and active smoking, regardless of immunosuppressive treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Casenaz
- Virology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Sandrine Grosjean
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Ludwig-Serge Aho-Glélé
- Epidemiology and Infection Control Unit, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Bour
- Virology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Christelle Auvray
- Virology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Catherine Manoha
- Virology Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Dijon Bourgogne University Hospital, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tobudic S, Uyanik-Ünal K, Koblischke M, Schneider L, Blüml S, Winkler F, Haslacher H, Perkmann T, Burgmann H, Aberle JH, Winkler S. Immune response after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in heart transplant recipients: long-term follow-up and evaluation of a third vaccination. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2022; 30:zwac231. [PMID: 36200302 PMCID: PMC9619585 DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwac231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Selma Tobudic
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Keziban Uyanik-Ünal
- Clinical Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Lisa Schneider
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Blüml
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Florian Winkler
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Austria
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helmuth Haslacher
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Perkmann
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Heinz Burgmann
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| | - Judith H Aberle
- Center for Virology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Winkler
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vinson AJ, Anzalone AJ, Sun J, Dai R, Agarwal G, Lee SB, French E, Olex A, Ison MG, Mannon RB. The risk and consequences of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid organ transplant recipients relative to non-immunosuppressed controls. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:2418-2432. [PMID: 35674237 PMCID: PMC9348256 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.17117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Clinical outcomes in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with breakthrough COVID (BTCo) after two doses of mRNA vaccination compared to the non-immunocompromised/immunosuppressed (ISC) general population, are not well described. In a cohort of adult patients testing positive for COVID-19 between December 10, 2020 and April 4, 2022, we compared the cumulative incidence of BTCo in a non-ISC population to SOT recipients (overall and by organ type) using the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) including data from 36 sites across the United States. We assessed the risk of complications post-BTCo in vaccinated SOT recipients versus SOT with unconfirmed vaccination status (UVS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression. BTCo occurred in 4776 vaccinated SOT recipients over a median of 149 days (IQR 99-233), with the highest cumulative incidence in heart recipients. The relative risk of BTCo was greatest in SOT recipients (relative to non-ISC) during the pre-Delta period (HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.80-3.08). The greatest relative benefit with vaccination for both non-ISC and SOT cohorts was in BTCo mortality (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.36-0.39 for non-ISC; HR 0.67, 95% 0.57-0.78 for SOT relative to UVS). While the relative benefit of vaccine was less in SOT than non-ISC, SOT patients still exhibited significant benefit with vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda J. Vinson
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
| | - Alfred J. Anzalone
- Department of Neurological Sciences University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska USA
| | - Jing Sun
- Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, Maryland USA
| | - Ran Dai
- Department of Biostatistics University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska USA
| | - Gaurav Agarwal
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama USA
| | - Stephen B. Lee
- Division of Infectious Diseases (Regina) University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
| | - Evan French
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia USA
| | - Amy Olex
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia USA
| | - Michael G. Ison
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, Illinois USA
| | - Roslyn B. Mannon
- Division of Nephology, Department of Medicine University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska USA
| | - N3C consortium
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia Canada
- Department of Neurological Sciences University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska USA
- Department of Epidemiology Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, Maryland USA
- Department of Biostatistics University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska USA
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases (Regina) University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
- Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Organ Transplantation Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Chicago, Illinois USA
- Division of Nephology, Department of Medicine University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Marjot T, Eberhardt CS, Boettler T, Belli LS, Berenguer M, Buti M, Jalan R, Mondelli MU, Moreau R, Shouval D, Berg T, Cornberg M. Impact of COVID-19 on the liver and on the care of patients with chronic liver disease, hepatobiliary cancer, and liver transplantation: An updated EASL position paper. J Hepatol 2022; 77:1161-97. [PMID: 35868584 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a serious challenge to the hepatology community, particularly healthcare professionals and patients. While the rapid development of safe and effective vaccines and treatments has improved the clinical landscape, the emergence of the omicron variant has presented new challenges. Thus, it is timely that the European Association for the Study of the Liver provides a summary of the latest data on the impact of COVID-19 on the liver and issues guidance on the care of patients with chronic liver disease, hepatobiliary cancer, and previous liver transplantation, as the world continues to deal with the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
|
32
|
Cheung KS, Mok CH, Mao X, Zhang R, Hung IFN, Seto WK, Yuen MF. COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity among chronic liver disease patients and liver transplant recipients: A meta-analysis. Clin Mol Hepatol 2022; 28:890-911. [PMID: 36263669 PMCID: PMC9597217 DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Data of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine immunogenicity among chronic liver disease (CLD) and liver transplant (LT) patients are conflicting. We performed meta-analysis to examine vaccine immunogenicity regarding etiology, cirrhosis status, vaccine platform and type of antibody. METHODS We collected data via three databases from inception to February 16, 2022, and reported pooled seroconversion rate, T cell response and safety data after two vaccine doses. RESULTS Twenty-eight (CLD only: 5; LT only: 18; both: 2; LT with third dose: 3) observational studies of 3,945 patients were included. For CLD patients, seroconversion rate ranged between 84% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76-90%) and 91% (95% CI, 83-95%), based predominantly on neutralizing antibody and anti-spike antibody, respectively. Seroconversion rate was 81% (95% CI, 76-86%) in chronic hepatitis B, 96% (95% CI, 93-97%) in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, 85% (95% CI, 75-91%) in cirrhosis and 85% (95% CI, 78-90%) in non-cirrhosis, 86% (95% CI, 78-92%) for inactivated vaccine and 89% (95% CI, 71-96%) for mRNA vaccine. The pooled seroconversion rate of anti-spike antibody was 66% (95% CI, 55-75%) after two doses of mRNA vaccines and 88% (95% CI, 58-98%) after third dose among LT recipients. T cell response rate was 65% (95% CI, 30-89%). Prevalence of adverse events was 27% (95% CI, 18-38%) and 63% (95% CI, 39-82%) among CLD and LT groups, respectively. CONCLUSION CLD patients had good humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine, while LT recipients had lower response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka Shing Cheung
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Chiu Hang Mok
- School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Xianhua Mao
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ruiqi Zhang
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ivan FN Hung
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Wai Kay Seto
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
- State Key Laboratory of Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Man Fung Yuen
- Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- State Key Laboratory of Liver Research, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Girnita AL, Wang L, Colovai AI, Ahearn P, Azzi Y, Menon MC, Fernandez-Vina M, Gebel HM, Steve Woodle E, Cravedi P, Maltzman JS, Akalin E. Analysis of Cross-sectional and Longitudinal HLA and Anti-viral Responses After COVID Infection in Renal Allograft Recipients: Differences and Correlates. Transplantation 2022; 106:2085-2091. [PMID: 36070571 PMCID: PMC9521392 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Characterization of anti-HLA versus anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (anti-SARS-CoV-2) immune globulin isotypes in organ transplant recipients after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has not been reported. We aimed to determine changes in anti-HLA antibodies in renal transplant patients with COVID-19 and compare the immunoglobulin and epitope-binding pattern versus anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study of 46 kidney transplant recipients including 21 with longitudinal sampling. Using a semi-quantitative multiplex assay, we determined immunoglobulin (Ig) M, IgA, IgG, and IgG1-2-3-4 antibodies against Class I and Class II HLA, and 5 SARS-CoV-2 epitopes including the nucleocapsid protein and multiple regions of the spike protein. RESULTS Fourteen of 46 (30%) patients had donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (donor-specific antibody [DSA]), 12 (26%) had non-DSA anti-HLA antibodies and 45 (98%) had anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Most DSAs targeted HLA-DQ (71%), with a dominant IgG isotype and IgG1 subtype prevalence (93%), and/or IgG3 (64%), followed by IgG2 (36%). Comparatively, there was a higher prevalence of IgA (85% versus 14%, P = 0.0001) and IgM (87%, versus 36%, P = 0.001) in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody profile, when compared to DSAs, respectively. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody profile was characterized by increased prevalence of IgM and IgA, when compared to DSAs. The median calculated panel reactive antibody before COVID-19 diagnosis (24%) tended to decrease after COVID-19 diagnosis (10%) but it was not statistically significant ( P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS Anti-HLA antibody strength and calculated panel reactive antibody in kidney transplant recipients after COVID-19 do not significantly increase after infection. Although the IgG isotype was the dominant form in both HLA and SARS-CoV-2 antigens, the alloimmune response had a low IgA pattern, whereas anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were high IgA/IgM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alin L. Girnita
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Lin Wang
- Department of Pathology, Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Laboratory, Stanford Blood Center, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Adriana I. Colovai
- Department of Transplantation, Kidney Transplant Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Patrick Ahearn
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Yorg Azzi
- Department of Transplantation, Kidney Transplant Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Madhav C. Menon
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | - E. Steve Woodle
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Department of Medicine, Translational Transplant Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan S. Maltzman
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Enver Akalin
- Department of Transplantation, Kidney Transplant Program, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Peled Y, Afek A, Kreiss Y, Rahav G, Nemet I, Kliker L, Indenbaum V, Ram E, Lavee J, Segev A, Matezki S, Sternik L, Raanani E, Lustig Y, Patel JK, Mandelboim M. Kinetics of cellular and humoral responses to third BNT162B2 COVID-19 vaccine over six months in heart transplant recipients - implications for the omicron variant. J Heart Lung Transplant 2022; 41:1417-1425. [PMID: 35710484 PMCID: PMC9128305 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2022.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The durability of the immune response following the 3-dose BNT162b2 vaccination is unknown. The complexity of the situation is enhanced by the threat that highly transmissible variants may further accelerate the decline in the protection afforded by mRNA vaccines. METHODS One hundred and three 3-dose-vaccinated heart transplant recipients were longitudinally assessed for the kinetics of variant-specific neutralization (Cohort 1, n = 60) and SARS-CoV-2-specific-T-cell response (Cohort 2, n = 54) over 6 months. Neutralization and T-cell responses were compared between paired samples at 2 time points, using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test for continuous variables and McNemar's test for dichotomous variables. The Bonferroni method of p values adjustment for multiple comparison was applied. RESULTS The third dose induced high neutralization of the wild-type virus and delta variant (geometric mean titer [GMT], 137.2 [95% CI, 84.8-221.9] and 80.6, [95% CI, 49.3-132.0], respectively), and to a lesser degree of the omicron variant (GMT, 10.3 [95% CI, 5.9-17.9]). At 6 months, serum neutralizing activity declined but was still high for the wild-type virus and for the delta variant (GMTs 38.1 [95% CI, 21.2-69.4], p = 0.011; and 28.9 [95% CI, 16.6-52.3], p = 0.022, respectively), but not for the omicron variant (GMT 5.9 [95% CI, 3.4-9.8], p = 0.463). The percentages of neutralizing sera against the wild-type virus, delta and omicron variants increased from 70%, 65%, and 38%, before the third dose, to 93% (p < 0.001), 88% (p < 0.001), and 48% (p = 0.021) at 3 weeks after, respectively; and remained high through the 6 months for the wild-type (80%, p = 0.06) and delta (77%, p = 0.102). The third dose induced the development of a sustained SARS-CoV-2-specific-T-cell population, which persisted through 6 months. CONCLUSIONS The third BNT162b2 dose elicited a durable SARS-CoV-2-specific T-cell response and induced effective and durable neutralization of the wild-type virus and the delta variant, and to a lesser degree of the omicron variant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yael Peled
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Israel,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel,Reprint requests: Yael Peled, MD, Sheba Medical Center, Israel 52621. Telephone: 972-3-5302710. Fax: 972-3-5302410
| | - Arnon Afek
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel,General Management, Sheba Medical Center, Israel
| | - Yitshak Kreiss
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel,General Management, Sheba Medical Center, Israel
| | - Galia Rahav
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel,Infectious Disease Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Israel
| | - Ital Nemet
- Central Virology Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Limor Kliker
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel,Central Virology Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | | | - Eilon Ram
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Israel,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Jacob Lavee
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Israel,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Amit Segev
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Israel,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Shlomi Matezki
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Israel,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Leonid Sternik
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Israel,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Ehud Raanani
- Leviev Cardiothoracic and Vascular Center, Sheba Medical Center, Israel,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel
| | - Yaniv Lustig
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel,Central Virology Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - Jignesh K. Patel
- Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute and David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michal Mandelboim
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel,Central Virology Laboratory, Ministry of Health, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yoo JJ, Yon DK, Lee SW, Shin JI, Kim BK. Humoral Immunogenicity to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Biol Sci 2022; 18:5849-5857. [PMID: 36263175 PMCID: PMC9576515 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.77030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Solid organ transplant recipients generally show reduced immunogenicity to various vaccines. We aimed to assess the immunogenicity of the immune response among orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients after the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. A systematic search was performed to evaluate immunogenicity or adverse events reported after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The pooled analysis of 20 studies showed a humoral immune response rate of 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.77) after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination among OLT recipients. The immunogenicity among OLT recipients was significantly lower compared to the overall population and healthy controls, with odds ratios (ORs) of 0.80 and 0.69. However, it was significantly higher than that of patients receiving other organ transplants, especially kidneys, with an OR of 1.50. Male sex, old age, chronic kidney disease, obesity, and multiple or high immunosuppressant doses significantly increased the risk of unresponsiveness in patients with OLT. The overall incidence of any adverse event after vaccination was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.55-0.81), similar to that of control. OLT recipients had an overall humoral immune response rate of 70% after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, which is lower than that of healthy controls but favourable compared to those of other solid organ transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong-Ju Yoo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyaung University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Keon Yon
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Won Lee
- Department of Data Science, Sejong University College of Software Convergence, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Il Shin
- Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,✉ Corresponding authors: contributed equally to this work. Jae Il Shin, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea. E-mail: ; Beom Kyung Kim, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine. 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea. Tel.: +82-(0)2-2228-1930, Fax: +82-(0) 2-393-6884, E-mail:
| | - Beom Kyung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Yonsei Liver Center, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,✉ Corresponding authors: contributed equally to this work. Jae Il Shin, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea. E-mail: ; Beom Kyung Kim, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine. 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea. Tel.: +82-(0)2-2228-1930, Fax: +82-(0) 2-393-6884, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Luo D, Chen X, Du J, Mei B, Wang A, Kuang F, Fang C, Gan Y, Peng F, Yang X, Dahmen U, Li B, Song S. Immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in chronic liver disease patients and liver transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Liver Int 2022; 43:34-48. [PMID: 35986903 PMCID: PMC9537964 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Chronic liver disease (CLD) patients and liver transplant (LT) recipients have an increased risk of morbidity and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in CLD patients and LT recipients is poorly understood. The present study aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in CLD patients and LT recipients. METHODS We searched electronic databases for eligible studies. Two reviewers independently conducted the literature search, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. The rates of detectable immune response were pooled from single-arm studies. For comparative studies, we compared the rates of detectable immune response between patients and healthy controls. The meta-analysis was conducted using the Stata software with a random-effects model. RESULTS In total, 19 observational studies involving 4191 participants met the inclusion criteria. The pooled rates of detectable humoral immune response after two doses of COVID-19 vaccination in CLD patients and LT recipients were 95% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 88%-99%) and 66% (95% CI = 57%-74%) respectively. After two doses of vaccination, the humoral immune response rate was similar in CLD patients and healthy controls (risk ratio [RR] = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.90-1.02; p = .14). In contrast, LT recipients had a lower humoral immune response rate after two doses of vaccination than healthy controls (RR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.59-0.77; p < .01). CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis demonstrated that COVID-19 vaccination induced strong humoral immune responses in CLD patients but poor humoral immune responses in LT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- De Luo
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryThe Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical UniversityLuzhouChina,Department of NephrologyUniversity Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg‐EssenEssenGermany
| | - Xinpei Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryPeople's Hospital of Deyang CityDeyangChina,Department of General, Visceral and Vascular SurgeryJena University HospitalJenaGermany
| | - Juan Du
- Department of Clinical MedicineSouthwest Medical UniversityLuzhouChina
| | - Bingjie Mei
- Sichuan Cancer HospitalSchool of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina
| | - Ankang Wang
- Department of General SurgeryNanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College of North Sichuan Medical CollegeNanchongChina
| | - Fei Kuang
- Institute of Immunology, Medical FacultyUniversity of Duisburg‐EssenEssenGermany
| | - Cheng Fang
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryThe Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical UniversityLuzhouChina
| | - Yu Gan
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryThe Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical UniversityLuzhouChina
| | - Fangyi Peng
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryThe Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical UniversityLuzhouChina
| | - Xiaoli Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryThe Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical UniversityLuzhouChina
| | - Uta Dahmen
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular SurgeryJena University HospitalJenaGermany
| | - Bo Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryThe Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical UniversityLuzhouChina
| | - Su Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary SurgeryThe Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical UniversityLuzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kwon JH, Tenforde MW, Gaglani M, Talbot HK, Ginde AA, McNeal T, Ghamande S, Douin DJ, Casey JD, Mohr NM, Zepeski A, Shapiro NI, Gibbs KW, Files DC, Hager DN, Shehu A, Prekker ME, Caspers SD, Exline MC, Botros M, Gong MN, Li A, Mohamed A, Johnson NJ, Srinivasan V, Steingrub JS, Peltan ID, Brown SM, Martin ET, Khan A, Hough CL, Busse LW, Duggal A, Wilson JG, Perez C, Chang SY, Mallow C, Rovinski R, Babcock HM, Lauring AS, Felley L, Halasa N, Chappell JD, Grijalva CG, Rice TW, Womack KN, Lindsell CJ, Hart KW, Baughman A, Olson SM, Schrag S, Kobayashi M, Verani JR, Patel MM, Self WH. mRNA Vaccine Effectiveness Against Coronavirus Disease 2019 Hospitalization Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. J Infect Dis 2022; 226:797-807. [PMID: 35385875 PMCID: PMC9047160 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiac118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study objective was to evaluate 2- and 3-dose coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccine effectiveness (VE) in preventing COVID-19 hospitalization among adult solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. METHODS We conducted a 21-site case-control analysis of 10 425 adults hospitalized in March to December 2021. Cases were hospitalized with COVID-19; controls were hospitalized for an alternative diagnosis (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-negative). Participants were classified as follows: SOT recipient (n = 440), other immunocompromising condition (n = 1684), or immunocompetent (n = 8301). The VE against COVID-19-associated hospitalization was calculated as 1-adjusted odds ratio of prior vaccination among cases compared with controls. RESULTS Among SOT recipients, VE was 29% (95% confidence interval [CI], -19% to 58%) for 2 doses and 77% (95% CI, 48% to 90%) for 3 doses. Among patients with other immunocompromising conditions, VE was 72% (95% CI, 64% to 79%) for 2 doses and 92% (95% CI, 85% to 95%) for 3 doses. Among immunocompetent patients, VE was 88% (95% CI, 87% to 90%) for 2 doses and 96% (95% CI, 83% to 99%) for 3 doses. CONCLUSIONS Effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines was lower for SOT recipients than immunocompetent adults and those with other immunocompromising conditions. Among SOT recipients, vaccination with 3 doses of an mRNA vaccine led to substantially greater protection than 2 doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie H Kwon
- Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Manjusha Gaglani
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - H Keipp Talbot
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Adit A Ginde
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Tresa McNeal
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Shekhar Ghamande
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - David J Douin
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jonathan D Casey
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Nicholas M Mohr
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Anne Zepeski
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Nathan I Shapiro
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kevin W Gibbs
- Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - D Clark Files
- Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - David N Hager
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Arber Shehu
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew E Prekker
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sean D Caspers
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Matthew C Exline
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mena Botros
- Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Michelle N Gong
- Department of Medicine, Montefiore Health System, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Alex Li
- Department of Medicine, Montefiore Health System, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Amira Mohamed
- Department of Medicine, Montefiore Health System, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nicholas J Johnson
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Vasisht Srinivasan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jay S Steingrub
- Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ithan D Peltan
- Department of Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Samuel M Brown
- Department of Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Emily T Martin
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Akram Khan
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Catherine L Hough
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Abhijit Duggal
- Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jennifer G Wilson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Cynthia Perez
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Steven Y Chang
- Department of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Christopher Mallow
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami and Jackson Memorial Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Randal Rovinski
- Department of Medicine, University of Miami and Jackson Memorial Health System, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Hilary M Babcock
- Department of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Adam S Lauring
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Laura Felley
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Natasha Halasa
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - James D Chappell
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Carlos G Grijalva
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Todd W Rice
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kelsey N Womack
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Christopher J Lindsell
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Kimberly W Hart
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Adrienne Baughman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Wesley H Self
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Villavicencio A, Ebisu Y, Raja M, Sanchez‐Covarrubias AP, Reynolds JM, Natori Y. Adverse events after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review. Transpl Infect Dis 2022; 24:e13936. [PMID: 36067062 PMCID: PMC9538206 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aasith Villavicencio
- Division of Internal MedicineDepartment of MedicineUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiFloridaUSA
| | - Yosuke Ebisu
- Division of Infectious DiseaseDepartment of MedicineUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiFloridaUSA,Kameda Medical CenterChibaJapan
| | - Mohammed Raja
- Division of Infectious DiseaseDepartment of MedicineUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiFloridaUSA
| | - Alex P. Sanchez‐Covarrubias
- Division of Gynecologic OncologyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of MiamiMiller School of MedicineMiamiFloridaUSA
| | - John M. Reynolds
- Department of Health Informatics, Calder Memorial LibraryUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiFloridaUSA
| | - Yoichiro Natori
- Division of Infectious DiseaseDepartment of MedicineUniversity of Miami Miller School of MedicineMiamiFloridaUSA,Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Health SystemMiamiFloridaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Delrue L, Muylaert A, Beernaert A, De Pelsmaeker I, Boel E, Moya A, Verstreken S, Dierckx R, Heggermont W, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M. T Cell and Antibody Response Following Double Dose of BNT162b2 mRNA Vaccine in SARS-CoV-2 Naïve Heart Transplant Recipients. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12092148. [PMID: 36140549 PMCID: PMC9497465 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Preliminary studies have suggested a low post-vaccination antibody response against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in heart transplant(HTx)recipients. Although many studies have focused on the role of antibodies in vaccine-induced protection against SARS-CoV-2, the role of T cell immunity is less well characterized. To date, data regarding seroconversion and T cell response after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients undergoing HTx are scarce. Therefore, the present study aimed to assess the specific memory humoral and cellular responses after two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine in HTx recipients. Methods: Blood was drawn from heart transplant (HTx) recipients at two pre-specified time points after the first and second vaccine doses to measure both the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response against the spike protein and the SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cell response. Results: Our study included 34 SARS-CoV-2 naïve HTx recipients (mean age, 61 ± 11 years). The mean time from transplantation to the first vaccine dose is 10 ± 10 years. Subgroup analysis (n = 21) demonstrated that after the first vaccine dose, only 14% had antibodies and 19% had a SARS-CoV-2-reactive T-cell response, which increased to 41% and 53%, respectively, after the second dose. Interestingly, 20% of patients with no antibodies after the second dose still had a positive SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cell response. The percentage of patients with positive S-IgG antibody titers was significantly higher 5 years after transplantation (18% 0–5 years post-TX vs. 65% 5 years post-TX, p = 0.013). Similarly, 5 years after heart transplantation, the percentage of patients with a T cell response was significantly higher (35% 0–5 years post-TX vs. 71% 5 years post-TX, p = 0.030). Conclusions: In SARS-CoV-2 naïve HTx recipients, post-vaccination antibody titers but also SARS-CoV-2 specific T cell response are low. Therefore, the protection from SARS-CoV-2 that is generally attributed to vaccination should be regarded with caution in HTx recipients.
Collapse
|
40
|
Peghin M, Graziano E, Grossi PA. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:1430. [PMID: 36146506 PMCID: PMC9503203 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10091430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed significant global challenges for solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Mortality rates of COVID-19 in this patient population remain high, despite new available therapeutic options and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. Priority access to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for waitlisted candidates and for SOT patients and their family members is recommended since the advantage from vaccination reduces the risk of COVID-19-related complications. However, immunogenicity and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines are lower in waitlisted candidates and SOT recipients than in the general population. Routine systematic assessment of humoral and cellular immune responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is controversial, although highly recommended for investigation and improvement of knowledge. SOT recipients should continue to adhere to preventive protective measures despite vaccination and may undergo passive antibody prophylaxis. This article seeks to provide an update on SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and preventive measures in SOT recipients based on existing literature and international guidelines.
Collapse
|
41
|
Toapanta-Yanchapaxi L, Chiquete E, Ávila-Rojo E, López-Yánez S, Luna Del Villar Velasco S, Rivera Monroy S, López Gómez T, Andrés Aguilar JB, Balcázar Antonio DF, Alcaraz-Fuerte C, García Baysa M, López Jiménez JL, Márquez-Guillén E, Vilatobá M, Cruz-Martínez R, Carpinteyro-Espin P, Chávez-Villa M, Romero Morelos RD, Torres-Del Real D, Uscanga-Domínguez LF, García-Alanis M, Tapia Sosa R, Servín-Rojas M, Valdez-Echeverria RD, García-Juárez I. Humoral response to different SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in orthotopic liver transplant recipients. Vaccine 2022; 40:5621-5630. [PMID: 36028456 PMCID: PMC9393170 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background The safety and efficacy data of the different types of available vaccines is still needed. The goal of the present analysis was to evaluate the humoral response to the COVID-19 vaccines in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Methods Participants were included from February to September 2021. No prioritized vaccination roll call applied for OLT patients. Controls were otherwise healthy people. Blood samples were drawn after 15 days of the complete vaccine doses. The samples were analyzed according to the manufacturer's instructions using the Liaison XL platform from DiaSorin (DiaSorin S.p.A., Italy), and SARS-COV-2 IgG II Quant (Abbott Diagnostics, IL, USA). Results A total of 187 participants (133 OLT, 54 controls, median age: 60 years, 58.8% women) were included for the analysis; 74.3% had at least one comorbidity. The serologic response in OLT patients was lower than in controls (median 549 AU/mL vs. 3450 AU/mL, respectively; p = 0.001). A positive humoral response was found in 133 OLT individuals: 89.2% with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), 60% ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca), 76.9% with CoronaVac (Sinovac, Life Sciences, China), 55.6% Ad5-nCov (Cansino, Biologics), 68.2% Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) and 100% with mRNA-1273. In controls the serological response was 100%, except for Cansino (75%). In a multivariable model, personal history of COVID-19 and BNT162b2 inoculation were associated with the serologic response, while the use of prednisone (vs. other immunosuppressants) reduced this response. Conclusion The serologic response to COVID-19 vaccines in OLT patients is lower than in healthy controls. The BNT162b2 vaccine was associated with a higher serologic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liz Toapanta-Yanchapaxi
- Neurology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Erwin Chiquete
- Neurology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Esmeralda Ávila-Rojo
- Liver Transplant Unit and Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Silvia López-Yánez
- Liver Transplant Unit and Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | | | - Sergio Rivera Monroy
- Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Tomás López Gómez
- Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Juan Bruno Andrés Aguilar
- Clinical Pathology Laboratory, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | | | - Carlos Alcaraz-Fuerte
- Neurology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Magdalena García Baysa
- Transplant Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - José Luis López Jiménez
- Nursing Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Ernesto Márquez-Guillén
- Liver Transplant Unit and Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Mario Vilatobá
- Transplant Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Rodrigo Cruz-Martínez
- Transplant Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | | | - Mariana Chávez-Villa
- Transplant Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | | | - Daniel Torres-Del Real
- Transplant Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Luis F Uscanga-Domínguez
- Liver Transplant Unit and Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Mario García-Alanis
- Neurology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Ramiro Tapia Sosa
- Liver Transplant Unit and Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | - Maximiliano Servín-Rojas
- Liver Transplant Unit and Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico
| | | | - Ignacio García-Juárez
- Liver Transplant Unit and Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mehrabi Nejad MM, Shobeiri P, Dehghanbanadaki H, Tabary M, Aryannejad A, Haji Ghadery A, Shabani M, Moosaie F, SeyedAlinaghi S, Rezaei N. Seroconversion following the first, second, and third dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in immunocompromised population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Virol J 2022; 19:132. [PMID: 35941646 PMCID: PMC9358061 DOI: 10.1186/s12985-022-01858-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunocompromised (IC) patients are at higher risk of more severe COVID-19 infections than the general population. Special considerations should be dedicated to such patients. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines based on the vaccine type and etiology as well as the necessity of booster dose in this high-risk population. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for observational studies published between June 1st, 2020, and September 1st, 2021, which investigated the seroconversion after COVID-19 vaccine administration in adult patients with IC conditions. For investigation of sources of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. RESULTS According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we included 81 articles in the meta-analysis. The overall crude prevalence of seroconversion after the first (n: 7460), second (n: 13,181), and third (n: 909, all population were transplant patients with mRNA vaccine administration) dose administration was 26.17% (95% CI 19.01%, 33.99%, I2 = 97.1%), 57.11% (95% CI: 49.22%, 64.83%, I2 = 98.4%), and 48.65% (95% CI: 34.63%, 62.79%, I2 = 94.4%). Despite the relatively same immunogenicity of mRNA and vector-based vaccines after the first dose, the mRNA vaccines induced higher immunity after the second dose. Regarding the etiologic factor, transplant patients were less likely to develop immunity after both first and second dose rather than patients with malignancy (17.0% vs 37.0% after first dose, P = 0.02; 38.3% vs 72.1% after second dose, P < 0.001) or autoimmune disease (17.0% vs 36.4%, P = 0.04; 38.3% vs 80.2%, P < 0.001). To evaluate the efficacy of the third dose, we observed an increasing trend in transplant patients after the first (17.0%), second (38.3%), and third (48.6%) dose. CONCLUSION The rising pattern of seroconversion after boosting tends to be promising. In this case, more attention should be devoted to transplant patients who possess the lowest response rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad-Mehdi Mehrabi Nejad
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran.,School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parnian Shobeiri
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.,Department of Immunology, Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Pediatrics Center of Excellence, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qarib St, Keshavarz Blvd, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran.,Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Hojat Dehghanbanadaki
- Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammadreza Tabary
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Armin Aryannejad
- Experimental Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abdolkarim Haji Ghadery
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahya Shabani
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Moosaie
- School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - SeyedAhmad SeyedAlinaghi
- Iranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High-Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Keshavarz Blvd., Tehran, 1419733141, Iran.
| | - Nima Rezaei
- Department of Immunology, Research Center for Immunodeficiencies, Pediatrics Center of Excellence, Children's Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Qarib St, Keshavarz Blvd, Tehran, 1419733141, Iran. .,Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Egri N, Olivé V, Hernández-Rodríguez J, Castro P, De Guzman C, Heredia L, Segura AC, Fernandez M, de Moner N, Torradeflot M, Ballús J, Martinez R, Vazquez M, Costa MV, Dobaño C, Mazza M, Mazzotti L, Pascal M, Juan M, González-Navarro EA, Calderón H. CoVITEST: A Fast and Reliable Method to Monitor Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Specific T Cells From Whole Blood. Front Immunol 2022; 13:848586. [PMID: 35865538 PMCID: PMC9295597 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.848586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Cellular and humoral immune responses are essential for COVID-19 recovery and protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. To date, the evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 immune protection has mainly focused on antibody detection, generally disregarding the cellular response, or placing it in a secondary position. This phenomenon may be explained by the complex nature of the assays needed to analyze cellular immunity compared with the technically simple and automated detection of antibodies. Nevertheless, a large body of evidence supports the relevance of the T cell's role in protection against SARS-CoV-2, especially in vulnerable individuals with a weakened immune system (such as the population over 65 and patients with immunodeficiencies). Here we propose to use CoVITEST (Covid19 anti-Viral Immunity based on T cells for Evaluation in a Simple Test), a fast, affordable and accessible in-house assay that, together with a diagnostic matrix, allows us to determine those patients who might be protected with SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cells. The method was established using healthy SARS-CoV-2-naïve donors pre- and post-vaccination (n=30), and further validated with convalescent COVID-19 donors (n=51) in a side-by-side comparison with the gold standard IFN-γ ELISpot. We demonstrated that our CoVITEST presented reliable and comparable results to those obtained with the ELISpot technique in a considerably shorter time (less than 8 hours). In conclusion, we present a simple but reliable assay to determine cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2 that can be used routinely during this pandemic to monitor the immune status in vulnerable patients and thereby adjust their therapeutic approaches. This method might indeed help to optimize and improve decision-making protocols for re-vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, at least for some population subsets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Egri
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victoria Olivé
- Occupational Health Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Hernández-Rodríguez
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Vasculitis Research Unit and Autoinflammatory Diseases Clinical Unit, Department of Autoimmune Diseases, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Castro
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Medical Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Catherine De Guzman
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Libertad Heredia
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Castellet Segura
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M. Dolores Fernandez
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Noemi de Moner
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Torradeflot
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Judit Ballús
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Robert Martinez
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mario Vazquez
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Vidal Costa
- ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlota Dobaño
- ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER Infectious Diseases (CIBERINFEC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Massimiliano Mazza
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, FC, Italy
| | - Lucia Mazzotti
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, FC, Italy
| | - Mariona Pascal
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Allergy Network ARADyAL, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manel Juan
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Europa Azucena González-Navarro
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hugo Calderón
- Department of Immunology, Centre de Diagnòstic Biomèdic, Hospital Clínic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nimmo A, Gardiner D, Ushiro-Lumb I, Ravanan R, Forsythe JLR. The Global Impact of COVID-19 on Solid Organ Transplantation: Two Years Into a Pandemic. Transplantation 2022; 106:1312-1329. [PMID: 35404911 PMCID: PMC9213067 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a major global impact on solid organ transplantation (SOT). An estimated 16% global reduction in transplant activity occurred over the course of 2020, most markedly impacting kidney transplant and living donor programs, resulting in substantial knock-on effects for waitlisted patients. The increased severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection risk and excess deaths in transplant candidates has resulted in substantial effort to prioritize the safe restart and continuation of transplant programs over the second year of the pandemic, with transplant rates returning towards prepandemic levels. Over the past 2 y, COVID-19 mortality in SOT recipients has fallen from 20%-25% to 8%-10%, attributed to the increased and early availability of SARS-CoV-2 testing, adherence to nonpharmaceutical interventions, development of novel treatments, and vaccination. Despite these positive steps, transplant programs and SOT recipients continue to face challenges. Vaccine efficacy in SOT recipients is substantially lower than the general population and SOT recipients remain at an increased risk of adverse outcomes if they develop COVID-19. SOT recipients and transplant teams need to remain vigilant and ongoing adherence to nonpharmaceutical interventions appears essential. In this review, we summarize the global impact of COVID-19 on transplant activity, donor evaluation, and patient outcomes over the past 2 y, discuss the current strategies aimed at preventing and treating SARS-CoV-2 infection in SOT recipients, and based on lessons learnt from this pandemic, propose steps the transplant community could consider as preparation for future pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ailish Nimmo
- Renal Department, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cuadrado A, Del Barrio M, Fortea JI, Amigo L, San Segundo D, Rodriguez-Cundin MP, Rebollo MH, Fernandez-Santiago R, Castillo F, Achalandabaso M, Echeverri J, Anderson EJ, Rodríguez-Sanjuan JC, López-Hoyos M, Crespo J, Fábrega E. Antibody response to the messenger RNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna) in liver transplant recipients. Hepatol Commun 2022; 6:1673-1679. [PMID: 35344281 PMCID: PMC9110949 DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Different reports have shown the clinical and serologic response to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the general population, but few studies have examined these responses in transplant recipients. We assessed the vaccine immunogenicity of two doses (100 μg) of the mRNA-1273 vaccine (Moderna) administered with a 28-day interval in liver transplant recipients (LTRs) at follow-up at the Marques de Valdecilla University Hospital. LTRs without a history of COVID-19 infection were tested for SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies directed against the spike protein (S) a median of 43 days after receiving the second Moderna vaccine dose. Clinical data, including immunosuppressive regimen and routine laboratory data, were obtained from the medical record of each patient up to 3 months before the date of the first vaccination. Factors associated with serologic response were evaluated through logistic regression. In total, 129 LTRs who had anti-S results were included. Most patients were men (n = 99; 76.7%) with a median age of 63 years (interquartile range, 56-68). Alcohol (43.4%) and chronic hepatitis C (18.6%) were the most frequent causes of liver transplantation. A positive anti-S IgG response was observed in 113 LTRs (87.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 80.8-92.2). A strong inverse relationship between mycophenolate mofetil use and serologic response was found (odds ratio, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.02-0.26; p = 0.001). Conclusion: Most LTRs develop an immunological response to the Moderna SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccine. An immunosuppressive regimen that includes mycophenolate predicts a weak serologic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Cuadrado
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain.,Clinical and Translational Digestive Research GroupUniversity of CantabriaInstituto de investigación sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL)SantanderSpain
| | - María Del Barrio
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain.,Clinical and Translational Digestive Research GroupUniversity of CantabriaInstituto de investigación sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL)SantanderSpain
| | - José Ignacio Fortea
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain.,Clinical and Translational Digestive Research GroupUniversity of CantabriaInstituto de investigación sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL)SantanderSpain
| | - Lidia Amigo
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain.,Clinical and Translational Digestive Research GroupUniversity of CantabriaInstituto de investigación sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL)SantanderSpain
| | - David San Segundo
- Department of ImmunologyMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalIDIVALSantanderSpain
| | | | - María Henar Rebollo
- Department of Preventive MedicineMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalCantabriaSpain
| | - Roberto Fernandez-Santiago
- Department of General SurgeryMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain.,IDIVALSchool of MedicineUniversity of CantabriaSantanderSpain
| | - Federico Castillo
- Department of General SurgeryMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain.,IDIVALSchool of MedicineUniversity of CantabriaSantanderSpain
| | - Maria Achalandabaso
- Department of General SurgeryMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain.,IDIVALSchool of MedicineUniversity of CantabriaSantanderSpain
| | - Juan Echeverri
- Department of General SurgeryMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain.,IDIVALSchool of MedicineUniversity of CantabriaSantanderSpain
| | - Edward J Anderson
- Department of General SurgeryMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain.,IDIVALSchool of MedicineUniversity of CantabriaSantanderSpain
| | - Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Sanjuan
- Department of General SurgeryMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain.,IDIVALSchool of MedicineUniversity of CantabriaSantanderSpain
| | - Marcos López-Hoyos
- Department of ImmunologyMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalIDIVALSantanderSpain
| | - Javier Crespo
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain.,Clinical and Translational Digestive Research GroupUniversity of CantabriaInstituto de investigación sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL)SantanderSpain
| | - Emilio Fábrega
- Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMarqués de Valdecilla University HospitalSantanderSpain.,Clinical and Translational Digestive Research GroupUniversity of CantabriaInstituto de investigación sanitaria Valdecilla (IDIVAL)SantanderSpain
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Opsomer R, Kuypers D. COVID-19 and solid organ transplantation: Finding the right balance. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2022; 36:100710. [PMID: 35809422 PMCID: PMC9251959 DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2022.100710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Opsomer
- Catholic University of Leuven, Faculty of Medicine, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Dirk Kuypers
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation; Catholic University Leuven, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Toniutto P, Falleti E, Cmet S, Cussigh A, Veneto L, Bitetto D, Fornasiere E, Fumolo E, Fabris C, Sartor A, Peressutti R, Curcio F, Regattin L, Grillone L. Past COVID-19 and immunosuppressive regimens affect the long-term response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in liver transplant recipients. J Hepatol 2022; 77:152-162. [PMID: 35283215 PMCID: PMC8908852 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS The long-term immunogenicity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in liver transplant (LT) recipients is unknown. We aimed to assess the long-term antibody response of the Pfizer-BioNTech® BNT162b2 vaccine in LT recipients compared to controls. METHODS LT recipients underwent anti-SARS-CoV-2 anti-receptor-binding domain protein IgG (anti-RBD) and anti-nucleocapsid protein IgG antibody (anti-N) measurements at the first and 1, 4 and 6 months after the second vaccination dose. RESULTS One hundred forty-three LT recipients and 58 controls were enrolled. At baseline, 131/143 (91.6%) LT recipients tested anti-N negative (COVID-19 naïve), and 12/143 (8.4%) tested positive (COVID-19 recovered) compared to negative controls. Among COVID-19 naïve, 22.1% were anti-RBD positives 1 month after the first vaccine dose, while 66.4%, 77%, and 78.8% were 1, 4 and 6 months following the second vaccine dose. In contrast, 100% of controls were positive at 4 months (p <0.001). The median anti-RBD titer 4 months after the second vaccine dose was significantly lower (32 U/ml) in COVID-19 naïve than in controls (852 U/ml, p <0.0001). A higher daily dose of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (p <0.001), higher frequency of ascites (p = 0.012), and lower serum leukocyte count (p = 0.016) were independent predictors of anti-RBD negativity at 6 months. All COVID-19 recovered patients tested positive for anti-RBD at each time point. The median antibody titer was similar in those taking MMF (9,400 U/ml, 11,925 U/ml, 13,305 U/ml, and 10,095 U/ml) or not taking MMF (13,950 U/ml, 9,575 U/ml, 3,500 U/ml, 2,835 U/ml, p = NS) 3 weeks after the first and 1, 4 and 6 months after the second vaccine dose, respectively. CONCLUSIONS In COVID-19-naïve LT recipients, the immunogenicity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was significantly lower than that in controls. MMF was the main determinant of vaccination failure in SARS-CoV-2-naïve patients. LAY SUMMARY The immunogenicity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in liver transplant recipients is currently unknown. Herein, we show that liver transplant recipients who have not previously had COVID-19 are less likely to mount effective antibody responses to vaccination than a control population. The main determinant of vaccination failure was the use of the immunosuppressive drug mycophenolate mofetil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierluigi Toniutto
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Specialized Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy.
| | | | - Sara Cmet
- Clinical Pathology, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Laura Veneto
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Specialized Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Davide Bitetto
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Specialized Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Ezio Fornasiere
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Specialized Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Elisa Fumolo
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Specialized Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabris
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, Department of Specialized Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Assunta Sartor
- Microbiology Unit, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Roberto Peressutti
- Regional Center of Liver Transplantation, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | | | - Laura Regattin
- Hospital Health Management, Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Grillone
- Department of Medical Area (DAME), Udine University Hospital, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Guarino M, Esposito I, Portella G, Cossiga V, Loperto I, Tortora R, Cennamo M, Capasso M, Terracciano D, Galeota Lanza A, Di Somma S, Picciotto FP, Morisco F. Humoral Response to 2-dose BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Liver Transplant Recipients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:1534-1541.e4. [PMID: 35066136 PMCID: PMC8770248 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS In the context of the Italian severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination program, liver transplant (LT) recipients were prioritized for vaccine administration, although the lower response to vaccines is a well-known problem in this population. We aimed to evaluate immunogenicity of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in LT recipients and healthy controls and to identify factors associated with negative response to vaccine. METHODS In a cohort of adult patients with LT, we prospectively evaluated the humoral response (with anti-Spike protein IgG-LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2-IgG chemiluminescent assay) at 1 and 3 months after 2-dose vaccination. A group of 307 vaccinated health care workers, matched by age and sex, served as controls. RESULTS Overall, 492 LT patients were enrolled (75.41% male; median age, 64.85 years). Detectable antibodies were observed in the 75% of patients, with a median value of 73.9 AU/mL after 3 months from 2-dose vaccination. At multivariable analysis, older age (>40 years; P = .016), shorter time from liver transplantation (<5 years; P = .004), and immunosuppression with antimetabolites (P = .029) were significantly associated with non-response to vaccination. Moreover, the LT recipients showed antibody titers statistically lower than the control group (103 vs 261 AU/mL; P < .0001). Finally, in both controls and LT patients, we found a trend of inverse correlation between age and antibody titers (correlation coefficients: -0.2023 and -0.2345, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Three months after vaccination, LT recipients showed humoral response in 75% of cases. Older age, shorter time from transplantation, and use of antimetabolites were factors associated with non-response to vaccination, and LT recipients at risk of non-response to vaccination needed to be kept under close monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Guarino
- The Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II," Naples, Italy.
| | | | - Giuseppe Portella
- the Department of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Valentina Cossiga
- The Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II," Naples, Italy
| | - Ilaria Loperto
- the UOC Epidemiologia e Prevenzione e Registro Tumori, ASL Napoli 1 Centro, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Michele Cennamo
- the Department of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Mario Capasso
- The Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II," Naples, Italy
| | - Daniela Terracciano
- the Department of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Sarah Di Somma
- the Department of Translational Medical Science, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Filomena Morisco
- The Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II," Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sripongpun P, Pinpathomrat N, Bruminhent J, Kaewdech A. Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccinations in Patients With Chronic Liver Disease and Liver Transplant Recipients: An Update. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:924454. [PMID: 35814781 PMCID: PMC9257133 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.924454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a current global pandemic associated with an increased mortality, particularly in patients with comorbidities. Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) and liver transplant (LT) recipients are at higher risk of morbidity and mortality after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Many liver societies have recommended that these patients should receive COVID-19 vaccinations, although there are limited studies assessing risks and benefits in this population. In addition, two doses of mRNA vaccines may not provide sufficient immune response, and booster dose(s) may be necessary, especially in LT recipients. Notably, variants of concern have recently emerged, and it remains unclear whether currently available vaccines provide adequate and durable protective immunity against these novel variants. This review focuses on the role of COVID-19 vaccinations in CLD and LT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pimsiri Sripongpun
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Nawamin Pinpathomrat
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
| | - Jackrapong Bruminhent
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Ramathibodi Excellence Center for Organ Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Apichat Kaewdech
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Division of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand
- *Correspondence: Apichat Kaewdech,
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Zong K, Peng D, Yang H, Huang Z, Luo Y, Wang Y, Xiang S, Li T, Mou T, Wu Z. Risk Factors for Weak Antibody Response of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adult Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Immunol 2022; 13:888385. [PMID: 35774786 PMCID: PMC9237843 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.888385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThis is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the factors that contribute to poor antibody response in organ transplant recipients after receiving the 2-dose severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine.MethodData was obtained from Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM). Studies reporting factors associated with antibody responses to the 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients were included in our study based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two researchers completed the literature search, screening, and data extraction. Randomized models were used to obtain results. Egger’s test was performed to determine publication bias. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the stability of the result. The heterogeneity was determined using the Galbraith plot and subgroup analysis.ResultsA total of 29 studies were included in the present study. The factors included living donor, BNT162b2, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, antimetabolite, mycophenolic acid (MPA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine, corticosteroids, high-dose corticosteroids, belatacept, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, tritherapy, age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), hemoglobin, and tacrolimus level were significantly different. Multivariate analysis showed significant differences in age, diabetes mellitus, MPA or MMF, high-dose corticosteroids, tritherapy, and eGFR.ConclusionThe possible independent risk factors for negative antibody response in patients with organ transplants who received the 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine include age, diabetes mellitus, low eGFR, MPA or MMF, high-dose corticosteroids, and triple immunosuppression therapy. mTOR inhibitor can be a protective factor against weak antibody response.Systematic Review RegistrationPROSPERO, identifier CRD42021257965.
Collapse
|