1
|
Geinitz H, Silberberger E, Spiegl K, Feichtinger J, Wagner H, Hermann P, Bräutigam E, Track C, Weis EM, Venhoda C, Huppert R, Spindelbalker-Renner B, Zauner-Babor G, Nyiri DV, Karasek N, Erdei M, Gheju R, Gruber G, Egger M, Dieplinger B. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination willingness and humoral vaccination response in radiation oncology patients. Vaccine 2024; 42:945-959. [PMID: 38246842 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND SARS-CoV-2 infection has been and, in some parts, still is a threat to oncologic patients, making it crucial to understand perception of vaccination and immunologic responses in this vulnerable patient segment. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in relation to malignant disease characteristics and therapies have so far not been studied consecutively in larger oncologic patient populations. This study captures SARS-CoV-2 vaccination willingness and humoral immune response in a large consecutive oncologic patient collective at the beginning of 2021. METHODS 1142 patients were consecutively recruited over 5.5 months at a tertiary department for radiation oncology and were assessed for vaccination willingness via a standardized interview. In already vaccinated patients total SARS-CoV-2 S antibody titres against the spike protein (Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S) and were evaluated 35 days or later after the first dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. RESULTS Vaccination willingness was high with a rate of 90 %. The most frequent reasons for rejection were: undecided/potential vaccination after therapy, distrust in the vaccine and fear of interaction with comorbidities. Factors associated with lower vaccination willingness were: worse general condition, lower age and female sex. 80 % of the participants had been previously vaccinated, 8 % reported previous infection and 16 % received vaccination during antineoplastic therapy. In 97.5 % of the vaccinated patients Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S was detected. In a univariable analysis parameters associated with non-conversion were: lower performance status, spread to the local lymphatics (N + ), hematologic disease and diffuse metastases. All patients with oligometastatic disease achieved positive Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titres. For patients with two vaccinations several risk factors were identified, that were associated with low antibody concentrations. CONCLUSIONS SARS-CoV-2 vaccination willingness among oncologic patients was high in the first months after its availability, and most patients had already received one or two doses. Over 97 % of vaccinated patients had measurable anti-SARS-CoV-2 S titres. Our data supports early identification of low humoral responders after vaccination and could facilitate the design of future oncologic vaccine trials (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04918888).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Geinitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria; Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Medizinische Fakultät, Krankenhausstraße 5, A-4020 Linz, Austria.
| | - Elisabeth Silberberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Kurt Spiegl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Johann Feichtinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Helga Wagner
- Kompetenzzentrum für Klinische Studien (KKS Linz) am Zentrum für Klinische Forschung (ZKF), Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Medizinische Fakultät, Med Campus I, Gebäude ADM, 8.OG, Krankenhausstraße 5, A-4020 Linz, Austria
| | - Philipp Hermann
- Kompetenzzentrum für Klinische Studien (KKS Linz) am Zentrum für Klinische Forschung (ZKF), Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Medizinische Fakultät, Med Campus I, Gebäude ADM, 8.OG, Krankenhausstraße 5, A-4020 Linz, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Bräutigam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Christine Track
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Eva Maria Weis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Clemens Venhoda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Roswitha Huppert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Barbara Spindelbalker-Renner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Georgine Zauner-Babor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Dalma Viktoria Nyiri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Nicola Karasek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Mercedesz Erdei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Ruben Gheju
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Georg Gruber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz GmbH, Barmherzige Schwestern, Seilerstätte 4, 4010 Linz, Austria
| | - Margot Egger
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brueder Linz and Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Benjamin Dieplinger
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brueder Linz and Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
New J, Cham J, Smith L, Puglisi L, Huynh T, Kurian S, Bagsic S, Fielding R, Hong L, Reddy P, Eum KS, Martin A, Barrick B, Marsh C, Quigley M, Nicholson LJ, Pandey AC. Effects of antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents on postvaccination SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections, antibody response, and serological cytokine profile. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e008233. [PMID: 38296596 PMCID: PMC10831464 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite immunization, patients on antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents have a heightened risk of COVID-19 infection. However, accurately attributing this risk to specific medications remains challenging. METHODS An observational cohort study from December 11, 2020 to September 22, 2022, within a large healthcare system in San Diego, California, USA was designed to identify medications associated with greatest risk of postimmunization SARS-CoV-2 infection. Adults prescribed WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classified antineoplastic and immunomodulating medications were matched (by age, sex, race, and number of immunizations) with control patients not prescribed these medications yielding a population of 26 724 patients for analysis. From this population, 218 blood samples were collected from an enrolled subset to assess serological response and cytokine profile in relation to immunization. RESULTS Prescription of WHO ATC classified antineoplastic and immunomodulatory agents was associated with elevated postimmunization SARS-CoV-2 infection risk (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.38 to 1.63). While multiple immunization doses demonstrated a decreased association with postimmunization SARS-CoV-2 infection risk, antineoplastic and immunomodulatory treated patients with four doses remained at heightened risk (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.43). Risk variation was identified among medication subclasses, with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibiting monoclonal antibodies, calcineurin inhibitors, and CD20 monoclonal antibody inhibitors identified to associate with increased risk of postimmunization SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antineoplastic and immunomodulatory treated patients also displayed a reduced IgG antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 epitopes alongside a unique serum cytokine profile. CONCLUSIONS Antineoplastic and immunomodulating medications associate with an elevated risk of postimmunization SARS-CoV-2 infection in a drug-specific manner. This comprehensive, unbiased analysis of all WHO ATC classified antineoplastic and immunomodulating medications identifies medications associated with greatest risk. These findings are crucial in guiding and refining vaccination strategies for patients prescribed these treatments, ensuring optimized protection for this susceptible population in future COVID-19 variant surges and potentially for other RNA immunization targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob New
- Medicine, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jason Cham
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Lana Smith
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Leah Puglisi
- Medicine, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Tridu Huynh
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Sunil Kurian
- Scripps Organ Transplantation Research & Biorepository, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | | | - Russel Fielding
- Strategy & Planning, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Lee Hong
- Medicine, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Priya Reddy
- Medicine, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Ki Suk Eum
- Medicine, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
- Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Pacific Islands Healthcare System, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
| | - Allison Martin
- Scripps Organ Transplantation Research & Biorepository, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Bethany Barrick
- Scripps Organ Transplantation Research & Biorepository, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Christopher Marsh
- Scripps Organ Transplantation Research & Biorepository, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
| | | | - Laura J Nicholson
- Medicine, Scripps Health, La Jolla, California, USA
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Amitabh C Pandey
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, California, USA
- Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
- Medicine, Southeast Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cavic G, Almonte AA, Hicks SM, Neeman T, Wang JW, Brew S, Choi PY, Cockburn I, Gardiner EE, Yip D, Fahrer AM, Kanjanapan Y. Response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients on cancer therapy: Analysis in a SARS-CoV-2-naïve population. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38221764 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients have increased morbidity and mortality from COVID-19, but may respond poorly to vaccination. The Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccination Efficacy and Rare Events in Solid Tumors (EVEREST) study, comparing seropositivity between cancer patients and healthy controls in a low SARS-CoV-2 community-transmission setting, allows determination of vaccine response with minimal interference from infection. METHODS Solid tumor patients from The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia, and healthy controls who received COVID-19 vaccination between March 2021 and January 2022 were included. Blood samples were collected at baseline, pre-second vaccine dose and at 1, 3 (primary endpoint), and 6 months post-second dose. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike-RBD (S-RBD) and anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies were measured. RESULTS Ninety-six solid tumor patients and 20 healthy controls were enrolled, with median age 62 years, and 60% were female. Participants received either AZD1222 (65%) or BNT162b2 (35%) COVID-19 vaccines. Seropositivity 3 months post vaccination was 87% (76/87) in patients and 100% (20/20) in controls (p = .12). Seropositivity was observed in 84% of patients on chemotherapy, 80% on immunotherapy, and 96% on targeted therapy (differences not satistically significant). Seropositivity in cancer patients increased from 40% (6/15) after first dose, to 95% (35/37) 1 month after second dose, then dropped to 87% (76/87) 3 months after second dose. CONCLUSION Most patients and all controls became seropositive after two vaccine doses. Antibody concentrations and seropositivity showed a decrease between 1 and 3 months post vaccination, highlighting need for booster vaccinations. SARS-CoV-2 infection amplifies S-RBD antibody responses; however, cannot be adequately identified using nucleocapsid serology. This underlines the value of our COVID-naïve population in studying vaccine immunogenicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Cavic
- Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Andrew A Almonte
- Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Sarah M Hicks
- John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Teresa Neeman
- Biological Data Science Institute, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Jo-Wai Wang
- Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Sue Brew
- Medical Oncology Clinical Trials Unit, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
| | - Philip Y Choi
- John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
| | - Ian Cockburn
- John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Elizabeth E Gardiner
- John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Desmond Yip
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
- ANU Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
- Department of Haematology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
| | - Aude M Fahrer
- Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
- Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| | - Yada Kanjanapan
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia
- ANU Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Figueiredo JC, Levy J, Choi SY, Xu AM, Merin NM, Hamid O, Lemos T, Nguyen N, Nadri M, Gonzalez A, Mahov S, Darrah JM, Gong J, Paquette RL, Mita AC, Vescio RA, Salvy SJ, Mehmi I, Hendifar AE, Natale R, Tourtellotte WG, Krishnan Ramanujan V, Huynh CA, Sobhani K, Reckamp KL, Merchant AA. Low booster uptake in cancer patients despite health benefits. medRxiv 2023:2023.10.25.23297483. [PMID: 37961284 PMCID: PMC10635201 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.25.23297483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Patients with cancer are at increased risk of death from COVID-19 and have reduced immune responses to SARS-CoV2 vaccines, necessitating regular boosters. We performed comprehensive chart reviews, surveys of patients attitudes, serology for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and T-cell receptor (TCR) β sequencing for cellular responses on a cohort of 982 cancer patients receiving active cancer therapy accrued between November-3-2020 and Mar-31-2023. We found that 92·3% of patients received the primer vaccine, 70·8% received one monovalent booster, but only 30·1% received a bivalent booster. Booster uptake was lower under age 50, and among African American or Hispanic patients. Nearly all patients seroconverted after 2+ booster vaccinations (>99%) and improved cellular responses, demonstrating that repeated boosters could overcome poor response to vaccination. Receipt of booster vaccinations was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR=0·61, P=0·024). Booster uptake in high-risk cancer patients remains low and strategies to encourage booster uptake are needed. Highlights COVID-19 booster vaccinations increase antibody levels and maintain T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 in patients receiving various anti-cancer therapiesBooster vaccinations reduced all-cause mortality in patientsA significant proportion of patients remain unboosted and strategies are needed to encourage patients to be up-to-date with vaccinations.
Collapse
|
5
|
Meza L, Zengin Z, Salgia S, Malhotra J, Karczewska E, Dorff T, Tripathi A, Ely J, Kelley E, Mead H, Hsu J, Dizman N, Salgia N, Chawla N, Chehrazi-Raffle A, Muddasani R, Govindarajan A, Rock A, Liu S, Salgia R, Trent J, Altin J, Pal SK. Twelve-Month Follow-up of the Immune Response After COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Genitourinary Cancers: A Prospective Cohort Analysis. Oncologist 2023; 28:e748-e755. [PMID: 36971500 PMCID: PMC10485287 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccinations against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have had a transformative impact on morbidity and mortality. However, the long-term impact of vaccination on patients with genitourinary cancers is currently unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study aimed to assess seroconversion rates in patients with genitourinary cancers receiving COVID-19 vaccination. Patients with prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, or urothelial cancer who had not been vaccinated for COVID-19 were included. Blood samples were obtained at baseline and after 2, 6, and 12 months of one dose of an FDA-approved COVID-19 vaccine. Antibody titer analysis was performed using the SCoV-2 Detect IgG ELISA assay, and the results were reported as immune status ratio (ISR). A paired t-test was used for comparison of ISR values between timepoints. In addition, T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing was performed to assess for differences in TCR repertoire 2 months after vaccination. RESULTS Out of 133 patients enrolled, 98 baseline blood samples were collected. At 2-, 6-, and 12-month time points 98, 70, and 50 samples were collected, respectively. Median age was 67 (IQR, 62-75), with the majority of patients diagnosed with prostate (55.1%) or renal cell carcinoma (41.8%). Compared to baseline (0.24 [95% CI, 0.19-0.31]) a significant increase in the geometric mean ISR values was observed at the 2-month timepoint (5.59 [4.76-6.55]) (P < .001). However, at the 6-month timepoint, a significant decrease in the ISR values was observed (4.66 [95% CI, 4.04-5.38]; P < .0001). Notably, at the 12-month timepoint, the addition of a booster dose resulted in an absolute increase in the ISR values compared to those who did not receive a booster dose (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS Only a minority of patients with genitourinary cancers did not ultimately achieve satisfactory seroconversion after receiving commercial COVID-19 vaccination. Cancer type or treatment rendered did not appear to affect the immune response mounted after vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Meza
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Zeynep Zengin
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Sabrina Salgia
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jasnoor Malhotra
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ewa Karczewska
- Department of Immuno-Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Tanya Dorff
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Abhishek Tripathi
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Ely
- Pathogen and Microbiome Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute North, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
| | - Erin Kelley
- Pathogen and Microbiome Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute North, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
| | - Heather Mead
- Pathogen and Microbiome Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute North, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
| | - JoAnn Hsu
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Nazli Dizman
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Nicholas Salgia
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Neal Chawla
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Alex Chehrazi-Raffle
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ramya Muddasani
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ameish Govindarajan
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Adam Rock
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Sandy Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Ravi Salgia
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Trent
- Integrated Cancer Genomics Division, Translational Genomics Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - John Altin
- Pathogen and Microbiome Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute North, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
| | - Sumanta K Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology and Experimental Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rodilla AM, Tavolacci S, Cagan J, Shah T, Mittan S, Mack PC, Hirsch FR. Serological Response to SARS-CoV-2 after COVID-19 Vaccination in Lung Cancer Patients: Short Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11050969. [PMID: 37243073 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11050969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
In comparison to the general population, lung cancer patients are more likely to suffer from severe Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and associated mortality. Considering this increased risk, and in order to prevent symptoms and severe disease, patients with lung cancer have been prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination primary and booster doses. Despite this, the pivotal clinical trials did not include these patients, which leaves open questions regarding vaccine efficacy and humoral immune response. This review outlines the findings of recent investigations into the humoral responses of lung cancer patients to COVID-19 vaccination, particularly the primary doses and first boost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ananda M Rodilla
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Sooyun Tavolacci
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Jazz Cagan
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Tanay Shah
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Sandeep Mittan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY 10461, USA
| | - Philip C Mack
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Fred R Hirsch
- Center for Thoracic Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pedrazzoli P, Lasagna A, Cassaniti I, Piralla A, Squeri A, Bruno R, Sacchi P, Baldanti F, Di Maio M, Beretta GD, Cinieri S, Silvestris N. Vaccination for seasonal flu, pneumococcal infection, and SARS-CoV-2 in patients with solid tumors: recommendations of the Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM). ESMO Open 2023; 8:101215. [PMID: 37104930 PMCID: PMC10067463 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with cancer have a well-known and higher risk of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). VPDs may cause severe complications in this setting due to the immune system impairment, malnutrition and oncological treatments. Despite this evidence, vaccination rates are inadequate. The Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) has been involved in vaccination awareness since 2014. Based on a careful review of the available data about the immunogenicity, effectiveness and safety of flu, pneumococcal and anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, we report the recommendations of the Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica about these vaccinations in adult patients with solid tumors. AIOM recommends comprehensive education on the issue of VPDs. We believe that a multidisciplinary care model may improve the vaccination coverage in immunocompromised patients. Continued surveillance, implementation of preventive practices and future well-designed immunological prospective studies are essential for a better management of our patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Pedrazzoli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Therapy, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - A Lasagna
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
| | - I Cassaniti
- Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - A Piralla
- Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - A Squeri
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology "G. Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy; School of Specialization in Medical Oncology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - R Bruno
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Division of Infectious Diseases I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - P Sacchi
- Division of Infectious Diseases I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - F Baldanti
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Microbiology and Virology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - M Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Division of Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - G D Beretta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Santo Spirito Hospital, Pescara, Italy
| | - S Cinieri
- Medical Oncology Division and Breast Unit, Senatore Antonio Perrino Hospital, ASL Brindisi, Brindisi, Italy
| | - N Silvestris
- Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology "G. Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Azar JH, Evans JP, Sikorski MH, Chakravarthy KB, McKenney S, Carmody I, Zeng C, Teodorescu R, Song NJ, Hamon JL, Bucci D, Velegraki M, Bolyard C, Weller KP, Reisinger SA, Bhat SA, Maddocks KJ, Denlinger N, Epperla N, Gumina RJ, Vlasova AN, Oltz EM, Saif LJ, Chung D, Woyach JA, Shields PG, Liu SL, Li Z, Rubinstein MP. Selective suppression of de novo SARS-CoV-2 vaccine antibody responses in patients with cancer on B cell-targeted therapy. JCI Insight 2023; 8:e163434. [PMID: 36749632 PMCID: PMC10070099 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.163434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
We assessed vaccine-induced antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral virus and Omicron variant before and after booster immunization in 57 patients with B cell malignancies. Over one-third of vaccinated patients at the pre-booster time point were seronegative, and these patients were predominantly on active cancer therapies such as anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. While booster immunization was able to induce detectable antibodies in a small fraction of seronegative patients, the overall booster benefit was disproportionately evident in patients already seropositive and not receiving active therapy. While ancestral virus- and Omicron variant-reactive antibody levels among individual patients were largely concordant, neutralizing antibodies against Omicron tended to be reduced. Interestingly, in all patients, including those unable to generate detectable antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 spike, we observed comparable levels of EBV- and influenza-reactive antibodies, demonstrating that B cell-targeting therapies primarily impair de novo but not preexisting antibody levels. These findings support rationale for vaccination before cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph H. Azar
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - John P. Evans
- Center for Retrovirus Research
- Department of Veterinary Biosciences
- Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology Program
| | - Madison H. Sikorski
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Karthik B. Chakravarthy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Selah McKenney
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Ian Carmody
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Cong Zeng
- Center for Retrovirus Research
- Department of Veterinary Biosciences
| | - Rachael Teodorescu
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - No-Joon Song
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Jamie L. Hamon
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Donna Bucci
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Maria Velegraki
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Chelsea Bolyard
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Kevin P. Weller
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Sarah A. Reisinger
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James, The James Cancer Hospital
| | - Seema A. Bhat
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Kami J. Maddocks
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Nathan Denlinger
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Narendranath Epperla
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Richard J. Gumina
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine; and
| | - Anastasia N. Vlasova
- Center for Food Animal Health, Animal Sciences Department, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, College of Food, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Veterinary Preventive Medicine Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
- Viruses and Emerging Pathogens Program, Infectious Diseases Institute
| | - Eugene M. Oltz
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
- Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity; and
| | - Linda J. Saif
- Center for Food Animal Health, Animal Sciences Department, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, College of Food, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Veterinary Preventive Medicine Department, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio, USA
- Viruses and Emerging Pathogens Program, Infectious Diseases Institute
| | - Dongjun Chung
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Woyach
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Peter G. Shields
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Shan-Lu Liu
- Center for Retrovirus Research
- Department of Veterinary Biosciences
- Viruses and Emerging Pathogens Program, Infectious Diseases Institute
- Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity; and
| | - Zihai Li
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| | - Mark P. Rubinstein
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine
- The Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – James
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Qi E, Courcoubetis G, Liljegren E, Herrera E, Nguyen N, Nadri M, Ghandehari S, Kazemian E, Reckamp KL, Merin NM, Merchant A, Mason J, Figueiredo JC, Shishido SN, Kuhn P. Investigation of liquid biopsy analytes in peripheral blood of individuals after SARS-CoV-2 infection. EBioMedicine 2023; 90:104519. [PMID: 36921564 PMCID: PMC10008671 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) is linked to severe organ damage. The identification and stratification of at-risk SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals is vital to providing appropriate care. This exploratory study looks for a potential liquid biopsy signal for PACS using both manual and machine learning approaches. METHODS Using a high definition single cell assay (HDSCA) workflow for liquid biopsy, we analysed 100 Post-COVID patients and 19 pre-pandemic normal donor (ND) controls. Within our patient cohort, 73 had received at least 1 dose of vaccination prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection. We stratified the COVID patients into 25 asymptomatic, 22 symptomatic COVID-19 but not suspected for PACS and 53 PACS suspected. All COVID-19 patients investigated in this study were diagnosed between April 2020 and January 2022 with a median 243 days (range 16-669) from diagnosis to their blood draw. We did a histopathological examination of rare events in the peripheral blood and used a machine learning model to evaluate predictors of PACS. FINDINGS The manual classification found rare cellular and acellular events consistent with features of endothelial cells and platelet structures in the PACS-suspected cohort. The three categories encompassing the hypothesised events were observed at a significantly higher incidence in the PACS-suspected cohort compared to the ND (p-value < 0.05). The machine learning classifier performed well when separating the NDs from Post-COVID with an accuracy of 90.1%, but poorly when separating the patients suspected and not suspected of PACS with an accuracy of 58.7%. INTERPRETATION Both the manual and the machine learning model found differences in the Post-COVID cohort and the NDs, suggesting the existence of a liquid biopsy signal after active SARS-CoV-2 infection. More research is needed to stratify PACS and its subsyndromes. FUNDING This work was funded in whole or in part by Fulgent Genetics, Kathy and Richard Leventhal and Vassiliadis Research Fund. This work was also supported by the National Cancer InstituteU54CA260591.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Qi
- Convergent Science Institute in Cancer, Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - George Courcoubetis
- Convergent Science Institute in Cancer, Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Emmett Liljegren
- Convergent Science Institute in Cancer, Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Ergueen Herrera
- Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd Suite AC1072, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Nathalie Nguyen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Maimoona Nadri
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Sara Ghandehari
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Pulmonary Rehabilitation in the Women's Guild Lung Institute, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Elham Kazemian
- Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd Suite AC1072, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Karen L Reckamp
- Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd Suite AC1072, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Noah M Merin
- Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Akil Merchant
- Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Jeremy Mason
- Convergent Science Institute in Cancer, Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Jane C Figueiredo
- Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd Suite AC1072, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Stephanie N Shishido
- Convergent Science Institute in Cancer, Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Peter Kuhn
- Convergent Science Institute in Cancer, Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; Department of Biological Sciences, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wankhede D, Grover S, Hofman P. Determinants of humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in solid cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine 2023; 41:1791-1798. [PMID: 36792435 PMCID: PMC9922575 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Solid cancer patients following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination are likely to have a lower seroconversion rate than healthy adults. Seroconversion between those with and without cancer is likely to vary moderately or to be restricted to specific subgroups. Therefore, we sought to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk factors for diminished humoral immune responses in solid cancer patients. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were used to search literature through May 1, 2022. Prospective or retrospective studies comparing responders with non-responders against SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) following COVID-19 vaccination were included. Pooled Odds Ratios (pORs) with 95% CIs for binary variables and differences in means (with SDs) for continuous variables were calculated to determine the pooled effect estimates of risk factors for poor antibody response. RESULTS Fifteen studies enrolling 3593 patients were included in the analysis. Seroconversion was seen in 84% of the pooled study population. Male gender, age >65 years, and recent chemotherapy were all factors in a poor immune response. Patients under follow-up, those who received immunotherapy or targeted therapy, were more likely to be seropositive. Cancer subtypes, vaccine types, and timing of antibody testing from the 2nd dose of vaccine did not correlate with seroconversion. CONCLUSION Cytotoxic therapy for solid cancer may portend poor immune response following 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines suggesting a need for booster doses in these patients. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are likely to be associated with seropositive status, and thus can be considered as an alternative to cytotoxic agents in cases where both therapies are equally efficacious.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Durgesh Wankhede
- Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
| | - Sandeep Grover
- Center for Human Genetics, Universitatsklinikum Giessen und Marburg - Standort Marburg, 35055 Marburg, Germany
| | - Paul Hofman
- Laboratory of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Pasteur Hospital, University Côte d’Azur, 30 avenue de la voie romaine, 06002 Nice, France,Institute for Research on Cancer and Ageing, Nice (IRCAN), INSERM U1081 and UMR CNRS 7284, Team 4, Nice, France,Hospital-Integrated Biobank BB-0033-00025, Pasteur Hospital, Nice, France,University Hospital Federation OncoAge, CHU de Nice, University Côte d’Azur, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fernandes MDCR, Vasconcelos GS, de Melo ACL, Matsui TC, Caetano LF, de Carvalho Araújo FM, Fonseca MHG. Influence of age, gender, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and pre-existing diseases in antibody response after COVID-19 vaccination: A review. Mol Immunol 2023; 156:148-155. [PMID: 36921489 PMCID: PMC9998295 DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2023.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
Vaccines induce specific long-term immunological memory against pathogens, preventing the worsening of diseases. The COVID-19 health emergency has caused more than 6 million deaths and started a race for vaccine development. Antibody response to COVID-19 vaccines has been investigated primarily in healthcare workers. The heterogeneity of immune responses and the behavior of this response in particular groups were still very little explored. In this review, we discuss whether antibody responses after vaccination are influenced by age, gender, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, or pre-existing diseases.
Collapse
|
12
|
Retnakumar SV, Chauvin C, Bayry J. The implication of anti-PD-1 therapy in cancer patients for the vaccination against viral and other infectious diseases. Pharmacol Ther 2023; 245:108399. [PMID: 37001736 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2023.108399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
The phenomenon of 'T cell exhaustion', a state of T cell dysfunction observed during chronic infections and cancers, has been a major obstacle in mounting appropriate immune responses against infectious agents or tumor antigens. The exhausted T cells are characterized by poor effector functions mainly due to the overexpression of inhibitory receptors such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), T cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing 3 (TIM3), lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3), and T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) domain (TIGIT), commonly referred to as immune checkpoint (ICP) molecules. ICP blockade, especially of PD-1 that can potentially reverse T cell exhaustion and thereby re-stimulate the impaired immune system, is widely used in clinics as a promising therapeutic strategy for various cancers and is more recently being investigated in infectious diseases as well. In fact, cancer patients represent a population of immunocompromised individuals who are more susceptible to infections and associated complications, and thus the need for protective vaccinations against these diseases is of prime importance in this category. When it comes to vaccinating anti-PD-1-treated cancer patients against infectious diseases including COVID-19 and influenza, a special focus should be brought on the revived immune cells, which could be dynamically affected by the antigenic stimulation. However, since cancer patients are not generally included in clinical trials for designing vaccines against infectious diseases, the possible interaction between vaccine immune responses and ICP therapy is largely unexplored. Mechanistically, the reversal of T cell exhaustion by ICP in an otherwise immunocompromised population could be beneficial for the vaccine's efficacy, helping the immune system to mount a robust immune response. Nevertheless, patients with cancer undergoing anti-PD-1 blockade are known to experience immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). The risk of increasing the irAEs due to the overstimulation of the immune system during vaccination is a major concern. Therefore, while routine vaccination is indispensable for the protection of cancer patients, the impact of PD-1 blockade on vaccine responses against infectious agents requires careful consideration to avoid undesirable adverse effects that could impair the efficacy of anti-cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhao L, Fu L, He Y, Li H, Song Y, Liu S. Effectiveness and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Malignant Disease. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11. [PMID: 36851363 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11020486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
A novel virus named SARS-CoV-2 has caused a worldwide pandemic, resulting in a disastrous impact to the public health since 2019. The disease is much more lethal among patients with malignant disease. Vaccination plays an important role in the prevention of infection and subsequent severe COVID-19. However, the efficacy and safety of vaccines for cancer patients needs further investigation. Encouragingly, there have been important findings deduced from research so far. In this review, an overview of the immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safeness of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer to date is to be shown. We also highlight important questions to consider and directions that could be followed in future research.
Collapse
|
14
|
Ruiz JI, Lopez-Olivo MA, Geng Y, Suarez-Almazor ME. COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e006246. [PMID: 36746512 PMCID: PMC9905786 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-006246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can cause off-target inflammatory and immune-related adverse events (irAE). Conceivably, COVID-19 vaccination could trigger an inflammatory and immune response that could induce or aggravate irAE. METHODS The objective of this systematic review is to appraise the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer treated with ICI. The literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase in English from December 2019 to February 2022. The review included clinical trials, observational cohort studies, case series, and case reports reporting on the clinical efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines on patients with cancer treated with ICI. Outcomes of interest included seroconversion, SARS-CoV-2 infection rate, severe COVID-19, COVID-19 mortality rate. Incidence of ICI irAEs was also ascertained as well as vaccine adverse events. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled effect sizes of the outcomes when possible, using random effects models. RESULTS Overall, 19 studies were included for the analysis (n=10 865 with 2477 receiving ICI). We analyzed 15 cohort studies, 1 cross-sectional study, and 3 case reports. There were no statistically significant differences in seroconversion rates after the second dose of the vaccine when comparing patients with cancer receiving ICI with patients without cancer (risk ratio, RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.03) or with patients with cancer without active treatment (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.04). There was a higher probability of seroconversion in patients with cancer treated with ICI compared with patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.18). In a single study in patients receiving ICI, no differences were observed in risk of irAE between those receiving inactivated vaccine and those unvaccinated (pneumonitis RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.3; rash RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.62; arthralgia RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.75). There were no studies for other types of vaccines comparing vaccinated vs not vaccinated in patients treated with ICI. The most common vaccine-related adverse events were local pain or fatigue. Overall, the quality of evidence was rated as very low. CONCLUSION COVID-19 vaccination appears to be effective and safe in patients with cancer receiving ICI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Ignacio Ruiz
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Maria Angeles Lopez-Olivo
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yimin Geng
- Research Medical Library, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Maria E Suarez-Almazor
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Spiliopoulou P, Janse van Rensburg HJ, Avery L, Kulasingam V, Razak A, Bedard P, Hansen A, Chruscinski A, Wang B, Kulikova M, Chen R, Speers V, Nguyen A, Lee J, Coburn B, Spreafico A, Siu LL. Longitudinal efficacy and toxicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy. Cell Death Dis 2023; 14:49. [PMID: 36670100 PMCID: PMC9853486 DOI: 10.1038/s41419-022-05548-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Despite more than 2 years having elapsed since the onset of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, a level of hesitation around increased SARS-CoV-2 vaccine toxicity in cancer patients receiving immunotherapy (IO) remains. This hesitation stems from the idea that IO agents could elicit an overwhelming immune stimulation post vaccination and therefore increase the risk of vaccine-related toxicity. The aim of our study was to explore serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients treated with IO and describe the level of immune stimulation using parameters such as blood cytokines, autoantibody levels and immune related adverse events (irAEs) post vaccination. Fifty-one evaluable patients were enrolled in this longitudinal study. Absolute levels and neutralization potential of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were not significantly different in the IO group compared to non-IO. Chemotherapy adversely affected seroconversion when compared to IO and/or targeted treatment. Following vaccination, the prevalence of grade ≥2 irAEs in patients treated with IO was not higher than the usual reported IO toxicity. We report, for the first time, that anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, elicited the generation of five autoantibodies. The significantly increased autoantibodies were IgM autoantibodies against beta-2 glycoprotein (p = 0.02), myeloperoxidase (p = 0.03), nucleosome (p = 0.041), SPLUNC2 (p < 0.001) and IgG autoantibody against Myosin Heavy Chain 6 (MYH6) (p < 0.001). Overall, comprehensive analysis of a small cohort showed that co-administration of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and IO is not associated with increased irAEs. Nevertheless, the detection of autoantibodies post anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination warrants further investigation (NCT03702309).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lisa Avery
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vathany Kulasingam
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Albiruni Razak
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Philippe Bedard
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrzej Chruscinski
- Mutli-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ben Wang
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Kulikova
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel Chen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vanessa Speers
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alisa Nguyen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jasmine Lee
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Bryan Coburn
- Laboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Anna Spreafico
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Uaprasert N, Pitakkitnukun P, Tangcheewinsirikul N, Chiasakul T, Rojnuckarin P. Immunogenicity and risks associated with impaired immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and booster in hematologic malignancy patients: an updated meta-analysis. Blood Cancer J 2022; 12:173. [PMID: 36550105 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00776-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with hematologic malignancies (HM) have demonstrated impaired immune responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Factors associated with poor immunogenicity remain largely undetermined. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and medRxiv databases to identify studies that reported humoral or cellular immune responses (CIR) following complete SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. The primary aim was to estimate the seroconversion rate (SR) following complete SARS-CoV-2 vaccination across various subtypes of HM diseases and treatments. The secondary aims were to determine the rates of development of neutralizing antibodies (NAb) and CIR following complete vaccination and SR following booster doses. A total of 170 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis of primary and secondary outcomes. A meta-analysis of 150 studies including 20,922 HM patients revealed a pooled SR following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination of 67.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.8-70.4%; I2 = 94%). Meta-regression analysis showed that patients with lymphoid malignancies, but not myeloid malignancies, had lower seroconversion rates than those with solid cancers (R2 = 0.52, P < 0.0001). Patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART), B-cell targeted therapies or JAK inhibitors were associated with poor seroconversion (R2 = 0.39, P < 0.0001). The pooled NAb and CIR rates were 52.8% (95% CI; 45.8-59.7%, I2 = 87%) and 66.6% (95% CI, 57.1-74.9%; I2 = 86%), respectively. Approximately 20.9% (95% CI, 11.4-35.1%, I2 = 90%) of HM patients failed to elicit humoral and cellular immunity. Among non-seroconverted patients after primary vaccination, only 40.5% (95% CI, 33.0-48.4%; I2 = 87%) mounted seroconversion after the booster. In conclusion, HM patients, especially those with lymphoid malignancies and/or receiving CART, B-cell targeted therapies, or JAK inhibitors, showed poor SR after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. A minority of patients attained seroconversion after booster vaccination. Strategies to improve immune response in these severely immunosuppressed patients are needed.
Collapse
|
17
|
Dimou A. Areas of Uncertainty in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination for Cancer Patients. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10122117. [PMID: 36560527 PMCID: PMC9784623 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10122117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, it was recognized that infection with SARS-CoV-2 is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer; therefore, preventive vaccination in cancer survivors is expected to be particularly impactful. Heterogeneity in how a neoplastic disease diagnosis and treatment interferes with humoral and cellular immunity, however, poses a number of challenges in vaccination strategies. Herein, the available literature on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines among patients with cancer is critically appraised under the lens of anti-neoplastic treatment optimization. The objective of this review is to highlight areas of uncertainty, where more research could inform future SARS-CoV-2 immunization programs and maximize benefits in the high-risk cancer survivor population, and also minimize cancer treatment deviations from standard practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasios Dimou
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kakkassery H, Carpenter E, Patten PEM, Irshad S. Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with cancer. Trends Mol Med 2022; 28:1082-1099. [PMID: 35999131 PMCID: PMC9345889 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2022.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its corresponding disease (COVID-19) has been shown to impose a higher burden on cancer patients than on the general population. Approved vaccines for use include new technology mRNA vaccines such as BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna), and nonreplicating viral vector vaccines such as Ad26.COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson) and AZD1222 (AstraZeneca). Impaired or delayed humoral and diminished T-cell responses are evident in patients with cancer, especially in patients with haematological cancers or those under active chemotherapy. Herein we review the current data on vaccine immunogenicity in cancer patients, including recommendations for current practice and future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Kakkassery
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Esme Carpenter
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Piers E M Patten
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Haematological Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sheeba Irshad
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK; Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, King's College London, London, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Almasri M, Bshesh K, Khan W, Mushannen M, Salameh MA, Shafiq A, Vattoth AL, Elkassas N, Zakaria D. Cancer Patients and the COVID-19 Vaccines: Considerations and Challenges. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14. [PMID: 36428722 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Few guidelines exist for COVID-19 vaccination amongst cancer patients, fostering uncertainty regarding the immunogenicity, safety, and effects of cancer therapies on vaccination, which this review aims to address. A literature review was conducted to include the latest articles covering the immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with solid and hematologic cancers receiving various treatments. Lower seropositivity following vaccination was associated with malignancy (compared to the general population), and hematologic malignancy (compared to solid cancers). Patients receiving active cancer therapy (unspecified), chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunosuppressants generally demonstrated lower seropositivity compared to healthy controls; though checkpoint inhibition, endocrine therapy, and cyclin dependent kinase inhibition did not appear to affect seropositivity. Vaccination appeared safe and well-tolerated in patients with current or past cancer and those undergoing treatment. Adverse events were comparable to the general population, but inflammatory lymphadenopathy following vaccination was commonly reported and may be mistaken for malignant etiology. Additionally, radiation recall phenomenon was sporadically reported in patients who had received radiotherapy. Overall, while seropositivity rates were decreased, cancer patients showed capacity to generate safe and effective immune responses to COVID-19 vaccination, thus vaccination should be encouraged and hesitancy should be addressed in this population.
Collapse
|
20
|
La Verde N, Riva A, Cona MS, Gabrieli A, Cattaneo M, Fasola C, Lipari G, De Stradis C, Favorito V, Lombardi Stocchetti B, Chizzoniti D, Covizzi A, Rulli E, Galli F, Ruggieri L, Gambaro A, Ferrario S, Dalu D, Tarkowski MS. Immunogenicity of two doses of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines for solid cancer patients on treatment with or without a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. Int J Cancer 2022; 152:661-671. [PMID: 36056571 PMCID: PMC9538813 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Previous studies on the immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines showed a reduced seroconversion in cancer patients. The aim of our study is to evaluate the immunogenicity of two doses of mRNA vaccines in solid cancer patients with or without a previous exposure to the virus. This is a single-institution, prospective, nonrandomized study. Patients in active treatment and a control cohort of healthy people received two doses of BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, BioNTech/Pfizer, The United States) or mRNA-1273 (Spikevax, Moderna). Vaccine was administered before starting anticancer therapy or on the first day of the treatment cycle. SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels against S1, RBD (to evaluate vaccine response) and N proteins (to evaluate previous infection) were measured in plasma before the first dose and 30 days after the second one. From January to June 2021, 195 consecutive cancer patients and 20 healthy controls were enrolled. Thirty-one cancer patients had a previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Cancer patients previously exposed to the virus had significantly higher median levels of anti-S1 and anti-RBD IgG, compared to healthy controls (P = .0349) and to cancer patients without a previous infection (P < .001). Vaccine type (anti-S1: P < .0001; anti-RBD: P = .0045), comorbidities (anti-S1: P = .0274; anti-RBD: P = .0048) and the use of G-CSF (anti-S1: P = .0151) negatively affected the antibody response. Conversely, previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 significantly enhanced the response to vaccination (anti-S1: P < .0001; anti-RBD: P = .0026). Vaccine immunogenicity in cancer patients with a previous exposure to SARS-CoV-2 seems comparable to that of healthy subjects. On the other hand, clinical variables of immune frailty negatively affect humoral immune response to vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicla La Verde
- Department of OncologySacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoMilanItaly
| | - Agostino Riva
- Department of Infectious DiseasesSacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoMilanItaly,Luigi Sacco Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences DIBICUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Maria Silvia Cona
- Department of OncologySacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoMilanItaly
| | - Arianna Gabrieli
- Luigi Sacco Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences DIBICUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Monica Cattaneo
- Department of OncologySacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoMilanItaly
| | - Cinzia Fasola
- Department of OncologySacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoMilanItaly
| | - Giuseppe Lipari
- Luigi Sacco Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences DIBICUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Claudia De Stradis
- Luigi Sacco Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences DIBICUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| | - Valentina Favorito
- Department of OncologySacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoMilanItaly
| | | | - Davide Chizzoniti
- Department of OncologySacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoMilanItaly
| | - Alice Covizzi
- Department of Infectious DiseasesSacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoMilanItaly
| | - Eliana Rulli
- Laboratory of Methodology for Clinical ResearchIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - Francesca Galli
- Laboratory of Methodology for Clinical ResearchIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCSMilanItaly
| | - Lorenzo Ruggieri
- Department of OncologySacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoMilanItaly
| | - Anna Gambaro
- Department of OncologySacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoMilanItaly
| | - Sabrina Ferrario
- Department of OncologySacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoMilanItaly
| | - Davide Dalu
- Department of OncologySacco Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli SaccoMilanItaly
| | - Maciej S. Tarkowski
- Luigi Sacco Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences DIBICUniversity of MilanMilanItaly
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Huang Y, Shin JE, Xu AM, Yao C, Joung S, Wu M, Zhang R, Shin B, Foley J, Mahov SB, Modes ME, Ebinger JE, Driver M, Braun JG, Jefferies CA, Parimon T, Hayes C, Sobhani K, Merchant A, Gharib SA, Jordan SC, Cheng S, Goodridge HS, Chen P. Evidence of premature lymphocyte aging in people with low anti-spike antibody levels after BNT162b2 vaccination. iScience 2022; 25:105209. [PMID: 36188190 PMCID: PMC9510055 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have unquestionably blunted the overall impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, but host factors such as age, sex, obesity, and other co-morbidities can affect vaccine efficacy. We identified individuals in a relatively healthy population of healthcare workers (CORALE study cohort) who had unexpectedly low peak anti-spike receptor binding domain (S-RBD) antibody levels after receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine. Compared to matched controls, "low responders" had fewer spike-specific antibody-producing B cells after the second and third/booster doses. Moreover, their spike-specific T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire had less depth and their CD4+ and CD8+T cell responses to spike peptide stimulation were less robust. Single cell transcriptomic evaluation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells revealed activation of aging pathways in low responder B and CD4+T cells that could underlie their attenuated anti-S-RBD antibody production. Premature lymphocyte aging may therefore contribute to a less effective humoral response and could reduce vaccination efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yapei Huang
- Women’s Guild Lung Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Juliana E. Shin
- Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,Research Division of Immunology in the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Alexander M. Xu
- Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Changfu Yao
- Women’s Guild Lung Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Sandy Joung
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Min Wu
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Ruan Zhang
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Bongha Shin
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Joslyn Foley
- Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Simeon B. Mahov
- Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Matthew E. Modes
- Women’s Guild Lung Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Joseph E. Ebinger
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Matthew Driver
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Jonathan G. Braun
- Research Division of Immunology in the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,F. Widjaja Foundation Inflammatory Bowel and Immunobiology Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Caroline A. Jefferies
- Research Division of Immunology in the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Tanyalak Parimon
- Women’s Guild Lung Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Chelsea Hayes
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Kimia Sobhani
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Akil Merchant
- Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,Division of Hematology and Cellular Therapy, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Sina A. Gharib
- Computational Medicine Core at Center for Lung Biology, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
| | - Stanley C. Jordan
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Susan Cheng
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,Corresponding author
| | - Helen S. Goodridge
- Board of Governors Regenerative Medicine Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,Research Division of Immunology in the Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,Corresponding author
| | - Peter Chen
- Women’s Guild Lung Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA,Corresponding author
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Noori M, Azizi S, Abbasi Varaki F, Nejadghaderi SA, Bashash D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of immune response against first and second doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in adult patients with hematological malignancies. Int Immunopharmacol 2022; 110:109046. [PMID: 35843148 PMCID: PMC9273573 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients particularly those with hematological malignancies are at higher risk of affecting by severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to the immunocompromised nature of the disease and the immunosuppressive treatments, they are more likely to develop less antibody protection; therefore, we aimed to evaluate the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with hematological malignancies. METHODS A comprehensive systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, as well as Google scholar search engine as of December 10, 2021. Our primary outcomes of interest comprised of estimating the antibody seropositive rate following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with hematological malignancies and to compare it with those who were affected by solid tumors or healthy subjects. The secondary outcomes were to assess the vaccine's immunogenicity based on different treatments, status of the disease, and type of vaccine. After the two-step screening, the data were extracted and the summary measures were calculated using a random-effect model. RESULTS A total of 82 articles recording 13,804 patients with a diagnosis of malignancy were included in the present review. The seropositive rates in patients with hematological malignancies after first and second vaccine doses were 30.0% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 11.9-52.0) and 62.3% (95%CI 56.0-68.5), respectively. These patients were less likely to develop antibody response as compared to cases with solid tumors (RR 0.73, 95%CI 0.67-0.79) and healthy subjects (RR 0.62, 95%CI 0.54-0.71) following complete immunization. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients had the lowest response rate among all subtypes of hematological malignancies (first dose: 22.0%, 95%CI 13.5-31.8 and second dose: 47.8%, 95%CI 41.2-54.4). Besides, anti-CD20 therapies (5.7%, 95%CI 2.0-10.6) and bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (26.8%, 95%CI 16.9-37.8) represented the lowest seropositiveness post first and second doses, respectively. Notably, patients who were in active status of disease showed lower antibody detection rate compared to those on remission status (RR 0.87, 95%CI 0.76-0.99). Furthermore, lower rate of seropositivity was found in patients received BNT162.b2 compared to ones who received mRNA-1273 (RR 0.89, 95%CI 0.79-0.99). CONCLUSION Our findings highlight the substantially low rate of seroprotection in patients with hematological malignancies with a wide range of rates among disease subgroups and different treatments; further highlighting the fact that booster doses might be acquired for these patients to improve immunity against SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Noori
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Urology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shadi Azizi
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farhan Abbasi Varaki
- Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Aria Nejadghaderi
- School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Expert Group (SRMEG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
| | - Davood Bashash
- Department of Hematology and Blood Banking, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fendler A, de Vries EGE, GeurtsvanKessel CH, Haanen JB, Wörmann B, Turajlic S, von Lilienfeld-Toal M. COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer: immunogenicity, efficacy and safety. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2022; 19:385-401. [PMID: 35277694 PMCID: PMC8916486 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00610-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Patients with cancer have a higher risk of severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and associated mortality than the general population. Owing to this increased risk, patients with cancer have been prioritized for COVID-19 vaccination globally, for both primary and booster vaccinations. However, given that these patients were not included in the pivotal clinical trials, considerable uncertainty remains regarding vaccine efficacy, and the extent of humoral and cellular immune responses in these patients, as well as the risks of vaccine-related adverse events. In this Review, we summarize the current knowledge generated in studies conducted since COVID-19 vaccines first became available. We also highlight critical points that might affect vaccine efficacy in patients with cancer in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Fendler
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - John B Haanen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bernhard Wörmann
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Department of Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Samra Turajlic
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal
- Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany.
- Research Group Infections in Haematology/Oncology, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology, Hans Knöll Institute, Jena, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Piechotta V, Mellinghoff SC, Hirsch C, Brinkmann A, Iannizzi C, Kreuzberger N, Adams A, Monsef I, Stemler J, Cornely OA, Bröckelmann PJ, Skoetz N. Effectiveness, immunogenicity, and safety of COVID-19 vaccines for individuals with hematological malignancies: a systematic review. Blood Cancer J 2022; 12:86. [PMID: 35641489 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-022-00684-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) appears limited due to disease and treatment-associated immune impairment. We conducted a systematic review of prospective studies published from 10/12/2021 onwards in medical databases to assess clinical efficacy parameters, humoral and cellular immunogenicity and adverse events (AE) following two doses of COVID-19 approved vaccines. In 57 eligible studies reporting 7393 patients, clinical outcomes were rarely reported and rates of SARS-CoV-2 infection (range 0–11.9%), symptomatic disease (0–2.7%), hospital admission (0–2.8%), or death (0–0.5%) were low. Seroconversion rates ranged from 38.1–99.1% across studies with the highest response rate in myeloproliferative diseases and the lowest in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Patients with B-cell depleting treatment had lower seroconversion rates as compared to other targeted treatments or chemotherapy. The vaccine-induced T-cell response was rarely and heterogeneously reported (26.5–85.9%). Similarly, AEs were rarely reported (0–50.9% ≥1 AE, 0–7.5% ≥1 serious AE). In conclusion, HM patients present impaired humoral and cellular immune response to COVID-19 vaccination with disease and treatment specific response patterns. In light of the ongoing pandemic with the easing of mitigation strategies, new approaches to avert severe infection are urgently needed for this vulnerable patient population that responds poorly to current COVID-19 vaccine regimens.
Collapse
|
25
|
Tomalka JA, Suthar MS, Deeks SG, Sekaly RP. Fighting the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic requires a global approach to understanding the heterogeneity of vaccine responses. Nat Immunol 2022; 23:360-370. [PMID: 35210622 DOI: 10.1038/s41590-022-01130-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Host genetic and environmental factors including age, biological sex, diet, geographical location, microbiome composition and metabolites converge to influence innate and adaptive immune responses to vaccines. Failure to understand and account for these factors when investigating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine efficacy may impair the development of the next generation of vaccines. Most studies aimed at identifying mechanisms of vaccine-mediated immune protection have focused on adaptive immune responses. It is well established, however, that mobilization of the innate immune response is essential to the development of effective cellular and humoral immunity. A comprehensive understanding of the innate immune response and environmental factors that contribute to the development of broad and durable cellular and humoral immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 and other vaccines requires a holistic and unbiased approach. Along with optimization of the immunogen and vectors, the development of adjuvants based on our evolving understanding of how the innate immune system shapes vaccine responses will be essential. Defining the innate immune mechanisms underlying the establishment of long-lived plasma cells and memory T cells could lead to a universal vaccine for coronaviruses, a key biomedical priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A Tomalka
- Pathology Advanced Translational Research Unit, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mehul S Suthar
- Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Steven G Deeks
- Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rafick Pierre Sekaly
- Pathology Advanced Translational Research Unit, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. .,Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fucà G, Lecchi M, Ciniselli CM, Ottini A, Spagnoletti A, Mazzeo L, Morelli D, Frati P, Stroscia M, Ebrahem E, Sottotetti E, Galli G, D’Elia MG, Lobefaro R, Ducceschi M, Di Guardo L, Bhoori S, Provenzano S, Platania M, Niger M, Colombo E, Nichetti F, Duca M, Rivoltini L, Mortarini R, Baili P, Apolone G, de Braud F, Verderio P, Damian S. Efficacy of mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and dynamics of humoral immune response in patients with solid tumors: results from the institutional registry of an Italian tertiary cancer center. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221108687. [PMID: 35923922 PMCID: PMC9340426 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221108687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Systemic immunosuppression characterizing cancer patients represents a concern regarding the efficacy of anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination, and real-world evidence is needed to define the efficacy and the dynamics of humoral immune response to mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Methods: We conducted an observational study that included patients with solid tumors who were candidates for mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. The primary objective was to monitor the immunologic response to the mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in terms of anti-spike antibody levels. All the patients received two doses of the mRNA-1273 vaccine or the BNT162b2 vaccine. Healthcare workers served as a control group of healthy subjects. Results: Among the 243 patients included in the present analysis, 208 (85.60%) and 238 (97.94%) resulted seroconverted after the first and the second dose of vaccine, respectively. Only five patients (2.06%) had a negative titer after the second dose. No significant differences in the rate of seroconversion after two vaccine doses were observed in patients as compared with the control group of healthy subjects. Age and anticancer treatment class had an independent impact on the antibody titer after the second dose of vaccination. In a subgroup of 171 patients with available data about the third timepoint, patients receiving immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors seem to have a higher peak of antibodies soon after the second dose (3 weeks after), but a more pronounced decrease at a late timepoint (3 months after). Conclusions: The systemic immunosuppression characterizing cancer patients did not seem to dramatically affect the humoral response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in our population of patients with solid tumors. Further investigation is needed to dissect the interplay between immunotherapy and longitudinal dynamics of humoral response to mRNA vaccines, as well as to analyze the cellular response to mRNA vaccines in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Fucà
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Mara Lecchi
- Unit of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Maura Ciniselli
- Unit of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Arianna Ottini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Spagnoletti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Mazzeo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Morelli
- Unit of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Frati
- Unit of Immunotherapy of Human Tumors, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Stroscia
- Unit of Immunotherapy of Human Tumors, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabella Ebrahem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Sottotetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Galli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia D’Elia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Lobefaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Monika Ducceschi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenza Di Guardo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Sherrie Bhoori
- Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Provenzano
- Medical Oncology Unit 2, Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Platania
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Niger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Colombo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Federico Nichetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Computational Oncology, Molecular Diagnostics Program, National Center for Tumor Diseases and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matteo Duca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Licia Rivoltini
- Unit of Immunotherapy of Human Tumors, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Mortarini
- Human Tumors Immunobiology Unit, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Baili
- Unit of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, Department of Applied Research and Technological Development, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Scientific Directorate, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Apolone
- Scientific Directorate, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy Oncology and Hemato-Oncology Department, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Damian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian, 1, Milan 20133, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Elkrief A, Wu JT, Jani C, Enriquez KT, Glover M, Shah MR, Shaikh HG, Beeghly-Fadiel A, French B, Jhawar SR, Johnson DB, McKay RR, Rivera DR, Reuben DY, Shah S, Tinianov SL, Vinh DC, Mishra S, Warner JL. Learning through a Pandemic: The Current State of Knowledge on COVID-19 and Cancer. Cancer Discov 2021; 12:303-330. [PMID: 34893494 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-1368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has left patients with current or past history of cancer facing disparate consequences at every stage of the cancer trajectory. This comprehensive review offers a landscape analysis of the current state of the literature on COVID-19 and cancer including the immune response to COVID-19, risk factors for severe disease, and impact of anticancer therapies. We also review the latest data on treatment of COVID-19 and vaccination safety and efficacy in patients with cancer, as well as impact of the pandemic on cancer care, including the urgent need for rapid evidence generation and real-world study designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle Elkrief
- Hemato-Oncology, University of Montreal Research Center (CRCHUM)
| | | | | | - Kyle T Enriquez
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine
| | | | - Mansi R Shah
- Division of Blood Disorders, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
| | | | | | | | - Sachin R Jhawar
- Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | - Daniel Y Reuben
- Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina
| | | | | | | | - Sanjay Mishra
- Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Jeremy L Warner
- Medicine and Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|