Evaluation of agonist efficacy and receptor reserve for alpha 2D-adrenergic receptor regulated G protein activation in PC12 cell membranes

Phenoxybenzamine and benextramine, but not 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-[2-chloroethyl]piperidine hydrochloride, display irreversible noncompetitive antagonism at G protein-coupled receptors

Many irreversible antagonists have been shown to inactivate G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and used to study agonists and spare receptors. Presumably, they bind to primary (agonist) binding sites on the GPCR, although noncompetitive mechanisms of antagonism have been demonstrated but not thoroughly investigated. We studied noncompetitive antagonism by phenoxybenzamine and benextramine at alpha(2A)-adrenoceptors in stably transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells, benextramine and 4-diphenylacetoxy-N-[2-chloroethyl]piperidine hydrochloride (4-DAMP mustard) at endogenous muscarinic acetylcholine (mACh) receptors in human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, and benextramine at serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptors in stably transfected SH-SY5Y cells. Primary binding sites were protected by reversible competitive antagonists during pretreatment with irreversible antagonists. We conducted appropriate radioligand binding assays by measuring remaining primary binding sites and agonist affinity, functional assays to evaluate agonist-induced responses, and constitutive guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS)-Galpha(o) binding assays to determine remaining G protein activity. Phenoxybenzamine (100 microM; 20 min) and benextramine (10 or 100 microM; 20 min) at alpha(2A)-adrenoceptors, but not 4-DAMP mustard (100 nM; 120 min) at mACh receptors, displayed irreversible noncompetitive antagonism in addition to their known irreversible competitive antagonism. Although agonist binding affinity is not influenced, signal transduction is modulated in a G protein-dependent manner via allotopic interactions. Benextramine noncompetitively inhibits agonist-induced responses at three different GPCR types (alpha(2A), mACh, and 5-HT(2A) receptors) that signal via three families of G proteins (G(i/o), G(s), and G(q/11)). We conclude that, where irreversible antagonists are utilized to study drug-receptor interaction mechanisms, the presence of significant irreversible noncompetitive antagonism may influence the interpretation of results under the experimental conditions used.

The [35S]GTPgammaS binding assay: approaches and applications in pharmacology

Receptors of the of seven transmembrane spanning, heterotrimeric G protein coupled family (GPCR) play crucial roles in regulating physiological functions and consequently are targets for the action of many classes of drugs. Activation of receptor by agonist leads to the dissociation of GDP from Galpha of the Galphabetagamma heterotrimer, followed by the binding of GTP to Galpha and subsequent modulation of downstream effectors. The G protein heterotrimer is reformed by GTPase activity of the Galpha subunit, forming Galpha-GDP and so allowing Galpha and Gbetagamma to recombine. The [35S]GTPgammaS assay measures the level of G protein activation following agonist occupation of a GPCR, by determining the binding of the non-hydrolyzable analog [35S]GTPgammaS to Galpha subunits. Thus, the assay measures a functional consequence of receptor occupancy at one of the earliest receptor-mediated events. The assay allows for traditional pharmacological parameters of potency, efficacy and antagonist affinity, with the advantage that agonist measures are not subjected to amplification or other modulation that may occur when analyzing parameters further downstream of the receptor. In general the assay is experimentally more feasible for receptors coupled to the abundant G(i/o) proteins. Nevertheless, [35S]GTPgammaS binding assays are used with GPCRs that couple to the G(s) and G(q) families of G proteins, especially in artificial expression systems, or using receptor-Galpha constructs or immunoprecipitation of [35S]GTPgammaS-labeled Galpha. The relative simplicity of the assay has made it very popular and its use is providing insights into contemporary pharmacological topics including the roles of accessory proteins in signaling, constitutive activity of receptors and agonist specific signaling.

Modulation of agonist responses at the A(1) adenosine receptor by an irreversible antagonist, receptor-G protein uncoupling and by the G protein activation state

Potency and intrinsic activity of agonists depend on ligand structure, but are also regulated by receptor-G protein stoichiometry. A potential functional reserve in adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated G protein activation was investigated by stimulation of guanosine-5'-(gamma-[35S]thio)-triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding by the full agonist 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA) and the partial agonist 5'-deoxy-5'-methylthioadenosine (MeSA). Pretreatment of rat brain membranes with the irreversible antagonist 1-propyl-3-[3-[[4-(fluorosulfonyl)benzoyl]oxy]-propyl]-8-cyclopentylxanthine revealed no classical receptor reserve for either agonist. The functional significance of the G protein coupling state of the receptor and occupancy of G proteins by guanine nucleotides was assessed after partial uncoupling of receptor-G protein complexes with N-ethylmaleimide and in the presence of increasing GDP concentrations. Agonist EC(50) values in G protein activation were increased after NEM pretreatment and at higher GDP concentrations, and a decrease in the relative intrinsic activity of MeSA was observed. The shift of agonist concentration-response curves to the right, the decrease in maximal effects and the decrease in relative intrinsic activity of the partial agonist point to a functional reserve which has to be attributed to GDP-free receptor-G protein complexes. The mechanisms of action of FSCPX, NEM and GDP were fully consistent with the two-state model of receptor activation. The apparent reserve revealed by GDP reflects a shift from spontaneously active GDP-free receptor-G protein complexes (RG)(*), which can bind [35S]GTPgammaS, to (RG) occupied by GDP. The abundance of (RG)(*) is favored by agonists and by the absence of GDP.

The influence of ovariectomy and estrogen replacement on voiding patterns and detrusor muscarinic receptor affinity in the rat

A rat model of ovariectomy-induced voiding dysfunction was established and the effects of ovariectomy and subsequent estrogen replacement on the affinity of muscarinic receptors in the rat bladder were determined. Voiding frequency and spatial distribution patterns were documented in sham-operated (control), and ovariectomized (placebo- or estrogen-treated) rats. The ovariectomized rats had a significantly different urinating pattern, i.e. higher voiding frequency and less peripheral voiding than the sham-operated group, suggestive of urge incontinence. Using this model of voiding dysfunction, negative logs of dissociation constants of carbachol of the rat detrusor muscarinic receptors were then determined indirectly using the Furchgott's double-reciprocal method. Receptor affinities were not significantly different in all groups compared to control females. In conclusion, a model of ovariectomy-induced voiding dysfunction in ovariectomized rats was established, where bladder dysfunction occurred with no significant changes in the affinity of muscarinic receptors.

Species-related pharmacological heterogeneity of histamine H(3) receptors

We compared radioligand binding and functional data for histamine H(3) receptor ligands across different tissues or species to evaluate the basis for pharmacological evidence of receptor heterogeneity previously reported. Agonist binding affinities showed correlation coefficients near unity in comparing human, dog, rat, and guinea pig cerebral cortical histamine H(3) receptors. Antagonist binding affinities revealed lower correlations for human compared to dog, rat, or guinea pig, suggesting species-based pharmacological differences. The functional potencies of histamine H(3) receptor antagonists in field-stimulated guinea pig ileum were highly correlated to binding affinities for guinea pig, dog, and, to a lesser extent, rat cerebral cortex. However, antagonist binding affinity at human cerebral cortex did not correlate well with guinea pig ileum functional potency. These results suggest significant interspecies histamine H(3) receptor heterogeneity, consistent with recent receptor gene sequence data. Therefore, genetic heterogeneity, rather than peripheral and central histamine H(3) receptor diversity, is responsible for the pharmacological differences observed.

Validation of Furchgott's method to determine agonist-dependent A1-adenosine receptor reserve in guinea-pig atrium

1. The ubiquitous distribution of A1-adenosine receptors (A1AdoR) represents an impediment to achieve organ and/or response selectivity of A1AdoR agonists. Differential receptor reserve may be exploited to overcome this problem. We hypothesize that A1AdoR reserve is agonist-dependent and can be accurately estimated with Furchgott's method. 2. Concentration-response curves were constructed from measurement of the atrial monophasic action potential duration in guinea-pig, isolated hearts treated with R(-) N6-(2-phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA) or 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyl-adenosine (CCPA) before and after treatment with the selective, irreversible A1AdoR antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-3-[3-[[4-(fluorosulphonyl)benzoyl]oxy]propyl]-1-prop ylxanthine (FSCPX). Using Furchgott's method, we determined the equilibrium dissociation constant (KA) of R-PIA and CCPA, and the fraction of non-inactivated A1AdoRs remaining after FSCPX treatment (q(functional)). Values of q(functional) were correlated to the fraction of specific binding sites after FSCPX treatment labelled by [3H]-8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine ([3H]-CPX) derived from saturation binding normalized to control (q(binding)). 3. Both R-PIA and CCPA are full A1AdoR agonists, but have significantly different potencies (pD2 [EC50]=6.84+/-0.04 [145 nM] vs 7.36+/-0.04 [44 nM], respectively), receptor affinities (pKA [KA]= 6.54+/-0.10 [288 nM] vs 6.13+/-0.03 [734 nM]), and pharmacological shift ratios defined as KA/EC50 (2.2+/-0.6 vs 15.9+/-1.5). Values for q(functional) and q(binding) were highly correlated (r2=0.96). The ratio between the intrinsic efficacies of CCPA and R-PIA derived from Furchgott's analysis was 5.9, a value similar to the ratio of 6.2-6.6 calculated from previously obtained binding data. 4. Radioligand binding studies validated the use of Furchgott's method to estimate A1AdoR reserve. A1AdoR reserve was agonist-dependent. CCPA was shown to be a high intrinsic efficacy, low affinity agonist, whereas R-PIA was found to be a low intrinsic efficacy, high affinity agonist.