1
|
Rosenberg JE, Mamtani R, Sonpavde GP, Loriot Y, Duran I, Lee JL, Matsubara N, Vulsteke C, Castellano D, Sridhar SS, Pappot H, Gurney H, Bedke J, van der Heijden MS, Galli L, Keam B, Masumori N, Meran J, O'Donnell PH, Park SH, Grande E, Sengeløv L, Uemura H, Skaltsa K, Campbell M, Matsangou M, Wu C, Hepp Z, McKay C, Powles T, Petrylak DP. Health-related Quality of Life in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma from EV-301: A Phase 3 Trial of Enfortumab Vedotin Versus Chemotherapy. Eur Urol 2024; 85:574-585. [PMID: 38418343 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE In comparison to chemotherapy, enfortumab vedotin (EV) prolonged overall survival in patients with previously treated advanced urothelial carcinoma in EV-301. The objective of the present study was to assess patient experiences of EV versus chemotherapy using patient-reported outcome (PRO) analysis of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS For patients in the phase 3 EV-301 trial randomized to EV or chemotherapy we assessed responses to the validated European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) at baseline, weekly for the first 12 wk, and then every 12 wk until discontinuation. We analyzed the QLQ-C30 change from baseline to week 12, the confirmed improvement rate, and the time to improvement or deterioration. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Baseline PRO compliance rates were 91% for the EV arm (n = 301) and 89% for the chemotherapy arm (n = 307); the corresponding average rates from baseline to week 12 were 70% and 67%. Patients receiving EV versus chemotherapy had reduced pain (difference in change from baseline to week 12: -5.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.8 to -0.7; p = 0.027) and worsening appetite loss (7.3, 95% CI 0.90-13.69; p = 0.026). Larger proportions of patients in the EV arm reported HRQoL improvement from baseline than in the chemotherapy arm; the odds of a confirmed improvement across ten QLQ-C30 function/symptom scales were 1.67 to 2.76 times higher for EV than for chemotherapy. Patients in the EV arm had a shorter time to first confirmed improvement in global health status (GHS)/QoL, fatigue, pain, and physical, role, emotional, and social functioning (all p < 0.05). EV delayed the time to first confirmed deterioration in GHS/QoL (p = 0.027), but worsening appetite loss occurred earlier (p = 0.009) in comparison to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS HRQoL with EV was maintained, and deterioration in HRQoL was delayed with EV in comparison to chemotherapy. Better results with EV were reported for some scales, with the greatest difference observed for pain. These findings reinforce the EV safety and efficacy outcomes and benefits observed in EV-301. PATIENT SUMMARY Patients with previously treated advanced cancer of the urinary tract receiving the drug enfortumab vedotin maintained their HRQoL in comparison to patients treated with chemotherapy. The EV-301 trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03474107 and on EudraCT as 2017-003344-21.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ronac Mamtani
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Guru P Sonpavde
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Ignacio Duran
- Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Jae-Lyun Lee
- Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Christof Vulsteke
- Center for Oncological Research, University of Antwerp, Integrated Cancer Center Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | - Jens Bedke
- Faculty of Medicine, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Luca Galli
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana Spedali Riuniti S. Chiara, Pisa, Italy
| | - Bhumsuk Keam
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Johannes Meran
- Internal Medicine 2, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Wien, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Se Hoon Park
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Milowsky MI, O'Donnell PH, Hoimes CJ, Petrylak DP, Flaig TW, Moon HH, Friedlander TW, Mar N, McKay RR, Srinivas S, Gravis G, Ramamurthy C, Bupathi M, Bracarda S, Wright P, Hepp Z, Carret AS, Yu Y, Dillon R, Kataria R, Beaumont JL, Purnajo I, Rosenberg JE. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Cancer Who Are Ineligible for Cisplatin and Treated With First-Line Enfortumab Vedotin Alone or With Pembrolizumab. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1403-1414. [PMID: 38215355 PMCID: PMC11095879 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Locally advanced/metastatic urothelial cancer (la/mUC) affects patients' quality of life (QOL) and functioning. We describe the impact of first-line (1L) enfortumab vedotin (EV) alone or with pembrolizumab (P) on QOL/functioning/symptoms in patients with la/mUC who were cisplatin-ineligible from EV-103 Cohort K. METHODS In this phase Ib/II trial, patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to EV + P or EV monotherapy (mono). Exploratory patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) at baseline, once per week for cycles 1-3, and then in every cycle through the end of treatment. Changes in scores from baseline to week 24, reported as least squares mean (standard error), were assessed by mixed models for repeated measures. There were no formal statistical comparisons between treatment arms. RESULTS Of 149 patients treated, 65 (EV + P) and 63 (EV mono) comprised the PRO analysis set. For EV + P, EORTC QLQ-C30 QOL was maintained through week 24 with improvements in emotional functioning, pain, and insomnia. Clinically meaningful improvements were seen in EORTC QLQ-C30 pain after EV + P at weeks 12 (-14.41 [3.14]) and 24 (-14.99 [3.56]) and BPI-SF worst pain at week 24 (-2.07 [0.37]). For EV mono, EORTC QLQ-C30 QOL remained stable with clinically meaningful improvements in EORTC QLQ-C30 pain (-12.55 [4.27]), insomnia (-14.46 [4.69]), and constipation (-10.09 [4.35]) at week 24. There were small-to-moderate improvements in BPI-SF worst pain at week 24. CONCLUSION EV + P in patients with la/mUC who were cisplatin-ineligible was associated with preservation or improvement of QOL/functioning/symptoms. Improvement in pain was seen in both PRO instruments and treatment arms. These data complement clinical outcomes of 1L EV + P.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew I. Milowsky
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | | | - Thomas W. Flaig
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | - Helen H. Moon
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Riverside, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Jonathan E. Rosenberg
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mori K, Hatakeyama S, Enokida H, Miyake H, Kikuchi E, Nishiyama H, Ichikawa T, Kamai T, Kaji Y, Kume H, Kondo T, Matsuyama H, Masumori N, Kawauchi A, Takenaka A, Uemura H, Eto M, Nonomura N, Fujii Y, Hinotsu S, Ohyama C. Summary of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma 2023 by the Japanese Urological Association. Int J Urol 2024; 31:194-207. [PMID: 38113344 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
This article is an English translation of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (2nd edition) published in June 2023. The Japanese Urological Association's (JUA) Guidelines Committee on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) created a 2023 update guideline to support clinicians' current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate its recommendations into clinical practice. The new guideline adhered as closely as possible to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020 ver. 3.0. Findings related to epidemiological, pathological, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up were reviewed. In addition, seven clinical questions (CQs) were set to determine the grade of recommendation and level of evidence. Preconceptions and biases were removed from the preparation process, the overall evidence was evaluated appropriately, and recommendations were made after fully considering the balance between benefits and harms. Although the evidence is still insufficient to be taken up as a CQ, the latest important information is described in seven columns, and clinical issues that should be resolved in the future related to the CQ are described as recommendations for tomorrow. We hope that these guidelines will help medical professionals, patients, and their families involved in the treatment of UTUC in their decision-making, and hope that a critical review of these guidelines will lead to further refinements in the next edition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuyuki Mori
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
| | - Hideki Enokida
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Hideaki Miyake
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Department of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Ichikawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takao Kamai
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Yasushi Kaji
- Department of Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Adachi Medical Center, Adachi, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyasu Matsuyama
- Department of Urology, JA Yamaguchi Kouseiren Nagato General Hospital, Nagato, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Naoya Masumori
- Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | - Atsushi Takenaka
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Fujii
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiro Hinotsu
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Management, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cavillon A, Pouessel D, Houédé N, Mathevet F, Dauxois JY, Chevreau C, Culine S, Delord JP, Porcher R, Filleron T. Assessing Long-term Treatment Benefits Using Complementary Statistical Approaches: An In Silico Analysis of the Phase III Keynote-045 and Checkmate-214 Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Trials. Eur Urol 2024; 85:293-300. [PMID: 36849297 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Keynote-045 trial illustrates that the long-term benefit (LTB) of treatment does not always translate to improved progression-free survival (PFS). Milestone survival and flexible parametric survival model with cure (FPCM) have been proposed as complementary statistical approaches to more comprehensively evaluate LTBs of treatments. OBJECTIVE The current study compares milestone survival and FPCM analyses to evaluate treatment effects of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) phase III trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Individual patient data, from initial and follow-up analyses of Keynote-045 (urothelial cancer) and Checkmate-214 (advanced renal cell carcinoma), were reconstructed for PFS. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Each trial was reanalyzed using the Cox proportional hazard regression and two complementary methods (milestone survival and FPCM) to estimate treatment impact on the LTB. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS For each trial, there was evidence of nonproportional hazards. For the long-term analysis of the Keynote-045 trial, FPCM identified a time-dependent effect on PFS, but the Cox model found no statistical difference in PFS (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.08). Milestone survival and FPCM identified improvements in the LTB fractions. This was consistent with the results from the reanalysis of Keynote-045, based on the shorter follow-up, although the LTB fraction was not retained. The increase in PFS in Checkmate-214 was identified by both Cox model and FPCM. Experimental treatment-dependent improvement in the LTB fraction was demonstrated using milestone survival and FPCM. The LTB fraction estimated with FPCM was consistent with the results from the reanalysis of the shorter follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS Although ICIs show substantial shifts toward LTBs in terms of PFS, based on a conventional Kaplan-Meier or Cox model analysis, our approach provides an alternative assessment of benefit-risk ratios for new therapeutics and facilitates communicating risk to patients. Kidney patients treated with ICIs can be counseled that they are potentially cured, but future work will need to definitively validate this conclusion. PATIENT SUMMARY Although immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments show substantial shifts toward long-term benefits in terms of progression-free survival, a more rigorous attempt to quantify this shift, rather than simply using a Kaplan-Meier estimate or comparing progression-free survival curves using the classic Cox model, is warranted. Our results suggest that advanced renal cell carcinoma patients who had not received a previous treatment are functionally cured by nivolumab and ipilimumab, which is not the case for second-line urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Cavillon
- Biostatistics & Health Data Science Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Nadine Houédé
- Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes Cedex, France
| | - Fanny Mathevet
- Biostatistics & Health Data Science Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Jean Yves Dauxois
- Institut de Mathématiques de Toulouse, UMR 5219, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INSA, Toulouse, France
| | - Christine Chevreau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Stéphane Culine
- Department of Medical Oncology, UCOG, AP-HP, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France; Paris Curie University, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Delord
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Raphael Porcher
- Université Paris Cité, Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistiques (CRESS-UMR1153), INSERM, INRAE, Paris, France; Centre d'Épidémiologie Clinique, AP-HP, Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Filleron
- Biostatistics & Health Data Science Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nadal R, Valderrama BP, Bellmunt J. Progress in systemic therapy for advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:8-27. [PMID: 37945764 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00826-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
Despite recent advances, advanced-stage urothelial carcinoma (aUC) remains incurable, with 5-year survival rates of approximately 10%. Platinum-based chemotherapy has a major role as first-line therapy for most patients with aUC. The approval of the anti-PD-L1 antibody avelumab as maintenance therapy for patients without initial disease progression on platinum-based chemotherapy is an important development that has improved the survival outcomes of patients with this disease. Otherwise, the use of first-line immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 has been restricted to patients who are ineligible for platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. Other important developments include the FDA-accelerated approval of first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab for patients ineligible to receive cisplatin and the availability of FGFR inhibitors, enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan for subsequent lines of therapy. Several research questions remain unaddressed including the lack of adequate biomarkers, how to assign priority to the different treatment options for individual patients and which agents can be effective as monotherapies. The future is promising with the emergence of modalities such as antibody-drug conjugate-like drugs, next-generation ICIs, bispecific antibodies and cellular therapies. In this Review, we summarize the evolution of systemic therapy for patients with aUC and provide insights into the unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Nadal
- National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- Hospital Virgen del Rocio, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Hospital del Mar Research Inst Lab (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Bladder cancer is a global health issue with sex differences in incidence and prognosis. Bladder cancer has distinct molecular subtypes with multiple pathogenic pathways depending on whether the disease is non-muscle invasive or muscle invasive. The mutational burden is higher in muscle-invasive than in non-muscle-invasive disease. Commonly mutated genes include TERT, FGFR3, TP53, PIK3CA, STAG2 and genes involved in chromatin modification. Subtyping of both forms of bladder cancer is likely to change considerably with the advent of single-cell analysis methods. Early detection signifies a better disease prognosis; thus, minimally invasive diagnostic options are needed to improve patient outcomes. Urine-based tests are available for disease diagnosis and surveillance, and analysis of blood-based cell-free DNA is a promising tool for the detection of minimal residual disease and metastatic relapse. Transurethral resection is the cornerstone treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and intravesical therapy can further improve oncological outcomes. For muscle-invasive bladder cancer, radical cystectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care with evidence supporting trimodality therapy. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated benefit in non-muscle-invasive, muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Effective management requires a multidisciplinary approach that considers patient characteristics and molecular disease characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Dyrskjøt
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Donna E Hansel
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason A Efstathiou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Margaret A Knowles
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeremy Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Dan Theodorescu
- Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Annakib S, Fiteni F, Houédé N. Quality of Life with Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:467-476. [PMID: 37244802 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapies have improved the prognosis for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancers (la/mUC) but little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with this mode of treatment. OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review of changes in HRQoL global health and domain scores in patients with la/mUC receiving mAb therapies. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION MEDLINE and the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology meeting databases were searched from January 2015 to June 18, 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Data were updated on February 3, 2023. Eligible studies were prospective trials assessing HRQoL in patients with la/mUC treated with mAbs. Patients treated for local disease or with radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone were excluded. Meta-analyses, reviews, and case reports were excluded. The validity of randomized trials was assessed using the Risk-of-Bias-2 (RoB2) tool and the strength of outcome evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The data were analyzed via qualitative synthesis of the evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Of the 1066 studies identified, nine were included (2364 patients); eight were interventional trials and one was an observational study. The mean change in global health score ranged from -2.8 to 1.9. Constipation, fatigue and pain symptoms, and emotional, physical, role and social functioning improved with treatment in at least two studies. No study demonstrated a significant improvement in global health score. Eight studies reported stability. In the RANGE trial, the global health score decreased. Only two studies had high internal validity according to RoB2 assessment. The HRQoL domain certainty was low, with moderate certainty only for the pain symptom domain. Disease- and treatment-related symptoms, tumor shrinkage, and disease recurrence were correlated to HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS Patient HRQoL with mAb therapies for la/mUC did not worsen over time. HRQoL is influenced by several factors related to treatment, tumor characteristics, and the patient's health condition. Evidence was moderate at best and further studies are needed. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the evidence on health-related quality-of-life for patients with advanced bladder cancer treated with antibody therapies. We found that quality of life does not worsen on treatment, and sometimes improves. We conclude that these treatments do not negatively affect quality of life, but further studies are needed to draw solid conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soufyan Annakib
- CHU Nîmes, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Nîmes, France; CHU Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
| | - Frédéric Fiteni
- CHU Nîmes, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Nîmes, France; Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier, INSERM U896, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Nadine Houédé
- CHU Nîmes, Institut de Cancérologie du Gard, Nîmes, France; Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier, INSERM U896, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morgans AK, Galsky MD, Wright P, Hepp Z, Chang N, Willmon CL, Sesterhenn S, Liu Y, Sonpavde GP. Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes with first-line therapy in patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma by cisplatin-eligibility. Urol Oncol 2023:S1078-1439(23)00098-4. [PMID: 37208230 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) have a poor prognosis. With recent therapeutic advances, data on real-world treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in patients with la/mUC treated with first-line therapy are limited, particularly when comparing patients who are cisplatin-ineligible versus cisplatin-eligible. METHODS This was a retrospective observational study of real-world first-line treatment patterns and OS in patients with la/mUC stratified by cisplatin-eligibility and treatment. Data were from a nationwide electronic health record-derived de-identified database. Eligible patients were adults diagnosed with la/mUC from May 2016 to April 2021 and followed until death or end of data availability in January 2022. OS stratified by first-line treatment and cisplatin eligibility was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared via multivariable Cox proportional-hazard models adjusted for clinical covariates. RESULTS Of 4,757 patients with la/mUC, 3,632 (76.4%) received first-line treatment, with 2,029 (55.9%) cisplatin-ineligible and 1,603 (44.1%) cisplatin-eligible. Patients who were cisplatin-ineligible were older (mean age, 74.9 vs. 68.8 years) and had lower CrCl (median, 46.4 vs. 87.0 ml/min). Only 43.8% of patients receiving first-line treatment (37.6% cisplatin-ineligible vs. 51.6% cisplatin-eligible) received second-line therapy. Median OS in all patients receiving first-line treatment was 10.8 (95% CI, 10.2-11.3) months and was shorter in patients who were cisplatin-ineligible than cisplatin-eligible (8.5 [95% CI, 7.8-9.0] vs. 14.4 [13.3-16.1]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.9 [0.7-1.1]). Cisplatin-based therapy was associated with longer OS (17.6 [15.1-20.4] months) than other first-line treatments (the shortest OS was with PD-1/L1 inhibitor monotherapy; 7.7 [6.8-8.8] months), including among patients who were classified as cisplatin-ineligible. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed la/mUC are poor, particularly for patients who are cisplatin-ineligible and/or do not receive cisplatin-based therapy. Many patients with la/mUC did not receive first-line treatment and among those who did, fewer than half received second-line therapy. These data highlight the need for more effective first-line therapies for all patients with la/mUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthew D Galsky
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Guru P Sonpavde
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; AdventHealth Cancer Institute and University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bergerot CD, Gupta S. Time to Rethink Quality of Life Assessment in Patients with Urothelial Cancer in the Current Therapeutic Era? Eur Urol 2023; 83:329-330. [PMID: 35779991 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Grivas P, Kopyltsov E, Su PJ, Parnis FX, Park SH, Yamamoto Y, Fong PC, Tournigand C, Climent Duran MA, Bamias A, Caserta C, Chang J, Cislo P, di Pietro A, Wang J, Powles T. Patient-reported Outcomes from JAVELIN Bladder 100: Avelumab First-line Maintenance Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care Alone for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol 2023; 83:320-328. [PMID: 35654659 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In JAVELIN Bladder 100, avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged overall survival (OS; primary endpoint) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) without disease progression with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with avelumab plus BSC versus BSC alone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized phase 3 trial (NCT02603432) was conducted in 700 patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma that had not progressed with first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin. PROs were a secondary endpoint. INTERVENTION Avelumab plus BSC (n = 350) or BSC alone (n = 350). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder Symptom Index-18 (FBlSI-18) and EuroQol five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) assessments were analyzed using descriptive statistics and mixed-effect models. Time to deterioration (TTD; prespecified definition: a ≥3-point decrease from baseline in the FBlSI-18 disease-related symptoms-physical subscale for two consecutive assessments) was evaluated via Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Completion rates for scheduled on-treatment PRO assessments were >90% (overall and average per assessment). Results from descriptive analyses and mixed-effect or repeated-measures models of FBlSI-18 and EQ-5D-5L were similar between arms. TTD was also similar, both in the prespecified analysis (hazard ratio 1.26 [95% confidence interval: 0.90, 1.77]) and in the post hoc analyses including off-treatment assessments and different event definitions. Limitations included the open-label design and limited numbers of evaluable patients at later time points. CONCLUSIONS Addition of avelumab first-line maintenance to BSC in patients with aUC that had not progressed with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy prolonged OS, with a relatively minimal effect on quality of life. PATIENT SUMMARY In this trial of people with advanced urothelial carcinoma who had benefited from first-line chemotherapy (ie, had stable disease or reduced tumor size), treatment with avelumab maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone improved survival significantly, without compromising quality of life, as reported by the patients themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Evgeny Kopyltsov
- State Institution of Healthcare Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Omsk, Russia
| | - Po-Jung Su
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, LinKuo, Taiwan
| | - Francis X Parnis
- Adelaide Cancer Centre, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Se Hoon Park
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Peter C Fong
- The University of Auckland and Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris-Est Créteil University, Créteil, France
| | | | - Aristotelis Bamias
- Alexandra General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Claudia Caserta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria, Terni, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yu EM, Mudireddy M, Biswas R, Aragon-Ching JB. The role of switch maintenance therapy in urothelial cancers. Ther Adv Urol 2023; 15:17562872221147760. [PMID: 36891217 PMCID: PMC9986508 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221147760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Maintenance therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the treatment paradigm of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial established avelumab, one of several ICIs in use today, as a life-prolonging maintenance therapy for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Platinum-based chemotherapy is most often used in the first-line treatment of mUC, and while response rates approach about 50%, disease control is usually short-lived upon completion of the standard three to six cycles of chemotherapy. Much progress has been made in recent years in the second-line space and beyond with the use of ICIs, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in eligible patients at the time of disease progression post-platinum-based chemotherapy. However, many patients with progressive mUC after first-line chemotherapy suffer from rapid progression of disease, treatment toxicity with subsequent lines of therapy, and a limited life expectancy. Until the results of the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial were presented in 2020, there were no maintenance strategies proven to be beneficial over best supportive care after disease control is achieved with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. To date, standard of care frontline treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer remains to be four to six cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy followed by maintenance avelumab. This review summarizes the current evidence available on maintenance therapies in mUC, as well as several highly anticipated clinical trials that we hope will result in further progress in the management of this aggressive cancer and improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun-mi Yu
- GU Medical Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer
Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Mythri Mudireddy
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Inova
Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Rakesh Biswas
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Inova
Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Jeanny B. Aragon-Ching
- GU Medical Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer
Institute, 8081 Innovation Park Drive, Fairfax, VA 22031, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Morgans AK, Grewal S, Hepp Z, Fuldeore R, Odak S, Macahilig C, Shillington AC, Sonpavde G. Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Following Discontinuation of PD-1/L1 Inhibitor Therapy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:543-552. [PMID: 36088235 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The patterns of care and attrition of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) patients eligible for systemic therapy following PD-1/L1 inhibitors are unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment patterns among patients with la/mUC following discontinuation of first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) PD-1/L1 inhibitor therapy. METHODS An ambispective, multisite, chart review study was conducted in the United States, including patients with la/mUC. Eligible patients had initiated and subsequently discontinued PD-1/L1 therapy in the 1L or 2L setting for la/mUC between May 2016 and July 2018; with follow-up through October 2019. Patient characteristics, treatments, and overall survival (OS) were described. Patients had the option to complete a 1-time patient reported outcomes (PRO) survey. RESULTS Among 300 patients included in the chart review, 198 (66%) received 1L PD-1/L1 inhibitor and 102 (34%) received 2L PD-1/L1 inhibitor. Following discontinuation of PD-1/L1 inhibitor therapy, 34% (n = 68) received subsequent therapy in 2L and 29% (n = 30) in third-line (3L). The median OS post-1L PD-1/L1 inhibitor was 9.4 (95% CI 8.6-NA) and 2.5 months (95% CI 2.24-3.50) for those who received and did not receive subsequent therapy, respectively. Following 2L PD-1/L1 inhibitor discontinuation, the median OS was 5.7 (95% CI 5.1-7.8) and 3.98 (95% CI 3.29-4.87) months for those who received and did not receive subsequent therapy, respectively. Among those with PRO data, 64% reported experiencing cancer-related pain and 29.6% received an opioid. Only 12.7% reported having a caregiver, requiring approximately 13 h/d of service. CONCLUSION The symptom and caregiver burden are high among real-world patients with la/mUC who discontinued 1L or 2L PD-1/L1 inhibitors and outcomes are dismal, with a minority receiving subsequent therapy. Patterns of care in the setting of 1L maintenance avelumab and novel agents require further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Shardul Odak
- RTI- Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Furubayashi N, Minato A, Negishi T, Sakamoto N, Song Y, Hori Y, Tomoda T, Harada M, Tamura S, Kobayashi H, Wada Y, Kuroiwa K, Seki N, Fujimoto N, Nakamura M. The Eosinophil Changes, Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Patients with an Older Age and a Poor Performance Status. Onco Targets Ther 2022; 15:1321-1330. [PMID: 36388155 PMCID: PMC9645692 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s389138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the eosinophil changes, efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab treatment in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients of older age and those with a poor performance status (PS). Materials and Methods Consecutive patients with advanced UC who received pembrolizumab after the failure of platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2018 and June 2021 were retrospectively examined. Results 105 patients (median age, 72 years), 71.4% of whom were men, were enrolled. Patients of ≥75 years of age were considered to be older patients (n=40), and patients with PS ≥2 were considered to have a poor PS (n=10). The objective response and disease control rates were 42.5% and 52.5%, respectively, in older patients and 0% and 10.0%, respectively, in patients with a poor PS. Overall survival (OS) in the older and younger groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent. However, a poor PS was significantly associated with poor survival. Safety analyses demonstrated no significant difference in the occurrence of any immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including grade ≥3, between the older and younger groups. However, a poor PS was significantly associated with the low occurrence of any irAEs. The change of the eosinophil count, the increase of the relative eosinophil count (REC) and the decrease of the neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) did not differ to a statistically significant extent between the older and younger groups, but showed significant differences between the poor and good PS (PS 0–1) groups. Conclusion Pembrolizumab for advanced UC demonstrated similar changes in the eosinophil count, efficacy and toxicity in both older and younger patients. In patients with a poor PS, although toxicity was significantly lower, survival was significantly worse, and neither an increase in REC nor a decrease in NER were observed, but these values showed significant changes in patients with a good PS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuki Furubayashi
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
- Correspondence: Nobuki Furubayashi, Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Notame 3-1-1, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan, Tel +81-92-541-3231, Fax +81-92-551-4585, Email
| | - Akinori Minato
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Takahito Negishi
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Naotaka Sakamoto
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoohyun Song
- Department of Urology, Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Hori
- Department of Urology, Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | | | - Mirii Harada
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Shingo Tamura
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroki Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yamato Wada
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kentaro Kuroiwa
- Department of Urology, Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Narihito Seki
- Department of Urology, Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Naohiro Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Motonobu Nakamura
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pala L, Sala I, Oriecuia C, De Pas T, Queirolo P, Specchia C, Cocorocchio E, Ferrucci P, Patanè D, Saponara M, Pennacchioli E, Coppola S, Viale G, Giaccone G, Gelber RD, Bagnardi V, Conforti F. Association of Anticancer Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors With Patient-Reported Outcomes Assessed in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2226252. [PMID: 35972744 PMCID: PMC9382448 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.26252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The association of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with patient quality of life has been poorly explored. OBJECTIVE To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessed in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of immunotherapy-based treatments. DATA SOURCES This systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis used RCTs identified in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from database inception to June 1, 2021. STUDY SELECTION A total of 2259 RCTs were identified that assessed ICIs as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy or combined with another ICI and/or targeted therapy vs control groups not containing immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Studies were reviewed independently by 2 authors. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS This meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines and recommendations of the Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data Consortium. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The coprimary aims of the meta-analysis were (1) pooled differences between treatment groups in the mean change of PRO score from baseline to 12 and 24 weeks of follow-up and (2) pooled differences between treatment groups in the time to deterioration of PRO score. For each end point, RCTs have been analyzed according to the type of treatment administered in the experimental group: ICIs given as monotherapy, ICIs combined with chemotherapy, or ICIs in association with another ICI and/or with targeted therapies. RESULTS Of the 2259 identified RCTs, 34 (18 709 patients) met the selection criteria and were analyzed. In the group of 19 RCTs testing ICIs as monotherapy, the pooled between-groups difference of mean change from baseline to 12 weeks of follow-up was 4.6 (95% CI, 2.8-6.4), and the mean change from baseline to 24 weeks of follow-up was 6.1 (95% CI, 4.2-8.1), significantly favoring ICIs. The pooled difference was 1.4 (95% CI, -0.4 to 3.2) at week 12 and 2.5 (95% CI, -0.8 to 5.9) at week 24 in the group of 8 RCTs testing ICIs combined with chemotherapy and 2.1 (95% CI, -0.8 to 5.0) at week 12 and 2.1 (95% CI, -0.4 to 4.5) at week 24 in the group of 8 RCTs testing other ICI-containing combinations. The time to deterioration was significantly longer in the immunotherapy-containing groups compared with control groups in all 3 groups of RCTs evaluated (hazard ratios of 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70-0.91] for ICIs as monotherapy, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.78-1.00] for ICIs plus chemotherapy, and 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63-0.96] for other ICI-containing combinations). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy appear to have a favorable association with patient-reported quality of life and can be combined with other classes of anticancer drugs without worsening this quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Pala
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas, and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Oncology Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Isabella Sala
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Oriecuia
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Tommaso De Pas
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas, and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Oncology Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Paola Queirolo
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas, and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Specchia
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Emilia Cocorocchio
- Division of Medical Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Ferrucci
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy
| | - Damiano Patanè
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas, and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Maristella Saponara
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas, and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Pennacchioli
- Melanoma, Sarcoma, and Rare Tumors Surgery Division, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Coppola
- Melanoma, Sarcoma, and Rare Tumors Surgery Division, European Institute of Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Viale
- Department of Pathology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Richard D. Gelber
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Frontier Science & Technology Research Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Conforti
- Division of Melanoma, Sarcomas, and Rare Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Oncology Unit, Humanitas Gavazzeni, Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hu X, Li G, Wu S. Advances in Diagnosis and Therapy for Bladder Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133181. [PMID: 35804953 PMCID: PMC9265007 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The clinical management of bladder cancer has been developing in the past decade, including diagnostic tools and treatment options. Both monotherapy and combination therapy have been undoubtedly upgraded. Multiple diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies have been developed to meet the urgent clinical needs, resulting in the emergence of various explorations for cancer diagnosis and therapy. In this review, we mainly focus on the advances in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer. Abstract Bladder cancer (BCa) is one of the most common and expensive urinary system malignancies for its high recurrence and progression rate. In recent years, immense amounts of studies have been carried out to bring a more comprehensive cognition and numerous promising clinic approaches for BCa therapy. The development of innovative enhanced cystoscopy techniques (optical techniques, imaging systems) and tumor biomarkers-based non-invasive urine screening (DNA methylation-based urine test) would dramatically improve the accuracy of tumor detection, reducing the risk of recurrence and progression of BCa. Moreover, intravesical instillation and systemic therapeutic strategies (cocktail therapy, immunotherapy, vaccine therapy, targeted therapy) also provide plentiful measures to break the predicament of BCa. Several exploratory clinical studies, including novel surgical approaches, pharmaceutical compositions, and bladder preservation techniques, emerged continually, which are supposed to be promising candidates for BCa clinical treatment. Here, recent advances and prospects of diagnosis, intravesical or systemic treatment, and novel drug delivery systems for BCa therapy are reviewed in this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinzi Hu
- Institute of Urology, The Affiliated Luohu Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518000, China; (X.H.); (G.L.)
- Department of Urology, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518116, China
| | - Guangzhi Li
- Institute of Urology, The Affiliated Luohu Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518000, China; (X.H.); (G.L.)
- Department of Urology, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518116, China
| | - Song Wu
- Institute of Urology, The Affiliated Luohu Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518000, China; (X.H.); (G.L.)
- Department of Urology, South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518116, China
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gebski V, Obermair A, Janda M. Toward Incorporating Health-Related Quality of Life as Coprimary End Points in Clinical Trials: Time to Achieve Clinical Important Differences and QoL Profiles. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2378-2388. [PMID: 35576502 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Besides morbidity and mortality, quality of life (QoL) is a key outcome of cancer treatments. Trials on the basis of clinical outcomes have expectations that QoL outcomes can be either tolerated or improved. Simultaneously considering QoL and clinical outcomes is challenging with lack of suitable metrics allowing incorporation of QoL as coprimary end points in clinical trial design and utilization of hierarchical hypothesis testing. METHOD We propose combining time to achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and probabilities of a MCID occurring in each QoL domain to provide QoL metrics analogous to those used for clinical end points. For QoL domains of interest, these yield QoL profiles, time to MCID, and number needed to treat. Incorporation of QoL as coprimary end points in clinical trial designs through hierarchical hypothesis testing can easily be achieved. The noninferiority designed Laparoscopic Approach to Carcinoma of the Endometrium trial, evaluating laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery for endometrial cancer with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General QoL domains, is used to illustrate the usefulness of these metrics. RESULTS This analysis revealed that laparoscopic surgery had a significant shorter time to MCID for physical and functional well-being QoL domains (physical mean: 1.5 months, 95% CI, 0.5 to 2.6; P = .002; and functional mean: 1.4 months; 95% CI, 0.4 to 2.4; P = .003) than abdominal surgery, but little difference between the two approaches for psychologic social and emotion well-being. Probability profile plots show a consistent > 2-fold higher chance of attaining a MCID for physical and functional well-being over time for laparoscopic compared with abdominal surgery. CONCLUSION This analysis reinforces the potential value of novel MCID metrics and their usefulness in raising the profile of QoL outcomes to complement clinical end points. The methods will allow health professionals to counsel patients about QoL outcomes and clinical outcomes simultaneously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Val Gebski
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andreas Obermair
- Queensland Centre for Gynaecological Cancer Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Monika Janda
- Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lu K, Chiu KY, Cheng CL. Immunotherapy in Genitourinary Malignancy: Evolution in Revolution or Revolution in Evolution. Cancer Treat Res 2022; 183:201-23. [PMID: 35551661 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-96376-7_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy, the 5th pillar of cancer care after surgery, radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and precision therapy (molecular targeted therapy), is revolutionizing the standard of care in certain patients with genitourinary malignancies. As modest clinical benefits of IL-2 for metastatic renal cell carcinoma and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin therapy for early-stage bladder cancers in the past years, immune checkpoint inhibitors therapies demonstrate meaningful survival benefit and durable clinical response in renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and some prostate cancer. Despite best efforts, the benefits are limited to a minority of unselected patients due to the complexities of biomarker development. Now come the next hurdles: figuring out which patients best respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors and which patients won't respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors? How best to approach immune checkpoint inhibitors therapies to extend/maximize the treatment response as long as possible? How to overcome therapeutic resistance by specific concurrent immunomodulators or targeted therapy or chemotherapy? The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination or sequencing with chemotherapy or other targeted therapies or other immunomodulating therapeutics in the early disease, neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and metastatic setting is actively under exploration. Ideal strategy for cancer care is to provide not just more time, but more quality time: there remain unmet needs for novel therapies that exploit molecular or genetic pathways to extend survival without compromising health-related quality of life for patients with advanced genitourinary malignancies. Further research is needed to discover new therapeutic strategies, and validate efficacy and effectiveness in real-world settings.
Collapse
|
18
|
Koguchi D, Matsumoto K, Ikeda M, Taoka Y, Hirayama T, Murakami Y, Utsunomiya T, Matsuda D, Okuno N, Irie A, Iwamura M. Impact of salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy on prognosis in patients with recurrence after radical cystectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study. BMC Urol 2022; 22:75. [PMID: 35549909 PMCID: PMC9103293 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01026-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients experiencing disease recurrence after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer, data about the impact of clinicopathologic factors, including salvage treatment using cytotoxic chemotherapy, on the survival are scarce. We investigated the prognostic value of clinicopathologic factors and the treatment effect of salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy (SC) in such patients. Methods In this retrospective study, we evaluated the clinical data for 86 patients who experienced recurrence after RC. Administration of SC or of best supportive care (BSC) was determined in consultation with the urologist in charge and in accordance with each patient’s performance status, wishes for treatment, and renal function. Statistical analyses explored for prognostic factors and evaluated the treatment effect of SC compared with BSC in terms of cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results Multivariate analyses showed that liver metastasis after RC (hazard ratio [HR] 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17 to 3.85; P = 0.01) and locally advanced disease at RC (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.06 to 3.46; P = 0.03) are independent risk factors for worse CSS in patients experiencing recurrence after RC. In a risk stratification model, patients were assigned to one of two groups based on liver metastasis and locally advanced stage. In the high-risk group, which included 68 patients with 1–2 risk factors, CSS was significantly better for patients receiving SC than for those receiving BSC (median survival duration: 9.4 months vs. 2.4 months, P = 0.005). The therapeutic effect of SC was not related to a history of adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions The present study indicated the potential value of 1st-line SC in patients experiencing recurrence after RC even with advanced features, such as liver metastasis after RC and locally advanced disease at RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dai Koguchi
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Kazumasa Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.
| | - Masaomi Ikeda
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Taoka
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahiro Hirayama
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasukiyo Murakami
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takuji Utsunomiya
- Department of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Norihiko Okuno
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Akira Irie
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Iwamura
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Furubayashi N, Minato A, Negishi T, Sakamoto N, Song Y, Hori Y, Tomoda T, Harada M, Tamura S, Miura A, Komori H, Kuroiwa K, Seki N, Fujimoto N, Nakamura M. Association Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and Efficacy and Changes in the Relative Eosinophil Count Among Patients with Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treated by Pembrolizumab. Cancer Manag Res 2022; 14:1641-1651. [PMID: 35535266 PMCID: PMC9078345 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s360473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and the clinical outcomes and also between irAEs and the post-treatment changes in the relative eosinophil count (REC) in advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) patients treated with pembrolizumab. Materials and Methods This retrospective study analyzed 105 advanced UC patients treated with pembrolizumab after disease progression on platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2018 and June 2021. The association between the occurrence of irAEs and the efficacy of pembrolizumab was investigated. The change in the REC from before the initiation of pembrolizumab therapy, to three weeks after treatment and the incidence of irAEs were determined. Results Overall irAEs were associated with a significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) (58.8% vs 25.4%, P<0.001), a longer progression-free survival (PFS) (25.1 months vs 3.1 months, P< 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (31.2 months vs 11.5 months, P< 0.001) compared to patients without irAEs; however, grade ≥3 irAEs were not associated with the ORR (36.4% vs 36.2%, P=0.989), PFS (9.5 vs 5.5 months, P=0.249), or OS (not reached vs 13.7 months, P=0.335). Compared to a decreased REC at 3 weeks after pembrolizumab, an increased relative REC at 3 weeks was not associated with the incidence of any-grade irAEs (32.3% vs 32.5%, P=0.984) or of grade ≥3 irAEs (10.8% vs 10.0%, P=0.900). Multivariate analyses revealed a female sex (P=0.005), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≥1 (P=0.024), albumin <3.7 g/dl (P<0.001), decreased REC (3 weeks later) (P<0.001), and the absence of irAEs of any grade (P=0.002) to be independently associated with a worse OS. Conclusion Patients with irAEs showed a significantly better survival compared to patients without irAEs in advanced UC treated with pembrolizumab. An increased posttreatment REC may be a marker predicting improved clinical outcomes and it had no significant relationship with the incidence of irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuki Furubayashi
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
- Correspondence: Nobuki Furubayashi, Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Notame 3-1-1, Minami-ku, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan, Tel +81-92-541-3231, Fax +81-92-551-4585, Email
| | - Akinori Minato
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Takahito Negishi
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Naotaka Sakamoto
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoohyun Song
- Department of Urology, Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Hori
- Department of Urology, Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | | | - Mirii Harada
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Shingo Tamura
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Akihiro Miura
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroki Komori
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kentaro Kuroiwa
- Department of Urology, Miyazaki Prefectural Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Narihito Seki
- Department of Urology, Kyushu Central Hospital of the Mutual Aid Association of Public School Teachers, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Naohiro Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Motonobu Nakamura
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Eto M, Lee JL, Chang YH, Gao S, Singh M, Gurney H. Clinical evidence and insights supporting the use of avelumab first-line maintenance treatment in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in the Asia-Pacific region. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2022; 18:e191-e203. [PMID: 35238147 PMCID: PMC9542411 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Until recently, international and Asia-specific guidelines for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) recommended first-line (1L) platinum-based chemotherapy, followed by second-line (2L) anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy where possible, or 1L ICI therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients with PD-L1+ tumors. However, long-term outcomes remain poor and only a minority of patients receive 2L therapy. The JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial-which assessed avelumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) as 1L maintenance therapy plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in patients with advanced UC that had not progressed with 1L platinum-based chemotherapy-is the only phase 3 trial of ICI-based treatment in the 1L setting to show significantly improved overall survival, and this treatment approach is now recommended in updated treatment guidelines. Available data from the trial suggest that efficacy and safety in patients enrolled in the Asia-Pacific region were similar to findings in the overall population. In this review, we discuss the treatment of advanced UC, with a specific focus on studies in the Asia-Pacific region, and summarize key findings supporting the use of avelumab 1L maintenance as a standard of care in this setting both in cisplatin-eligible and cisplatin-ineligible patients and irrespective of PD-L1 status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Jae-Lyun Lee
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Seasea Gao
- Merck Pte. Ltd., Singapore, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
| | | | - Howard Gurney
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mcgregor B, O'donnell PH, Balar A, Petrylak D, Rosenberg J, Yu EY, Quinn DI, Heath EI, Campbell M, Hepp Z, Mckay C, Steinberg J, Regnault A, Mazerolle F, Galsky MD. Health-related Quality of Life of Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin after Platinum and PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Therapy: Results from Cohort 1 of the Phase 2 EV-201 Clinical Trial. Eur Urol 2022. [PMID: 35168844 PMCID: PMC9385268 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EV-201 trial (NCT03219333) demonstrated a clinically meaningful and durable response rate and a tolerable safety profile with enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (LA/mUC) treated with prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy (cohort 1). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were included in EV-201 as exploratory endpoints. OBJECTIVE To evaluate PRO data for cohort 1 of EV-201 to better understand the relationship between EV therapy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Enrolled patients with LA/mUC who received EV were invited to electronically complete two HRQoL instruments (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EQ-5D-3L) at baseline and day 1 of each cycle until treatment discontinuation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Patient demographics, completion and compliance rates, and PRO scores were analysed using descriptive statistics. Selected EORTC QLQ-C30 scores were analysed post hoc using a repeated-measures mixed model. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Among treated patients (n = 125), 95% completed both baseline questionnaires. Compliance rates were ≥86% throughout the study. Descriptive analyses showed that global health status, physical functioning, and symptom scores remained stable over time, with average scores similar at each cycle. Lower pain and fatigue scores were observed in responders at cycles following an objective response. Pain was lower at cycle 3 than at baseline in patients with bone metastases. Mean EQ-5D-3L utility score (0.80 at baseline; range from 0.77 at cycle 2 to 0.91 at cycle 10) and visual analogue scale scores (66.9 at baseline; range from 65.5 at cycle 2 to 78.4 at cycle 10) remained similar over time. Variability and the small sample size limited definitive conclusions. CONCLUSIONS PRO scores remained stable throughout EV treatment, further supporting the overall value of EV in the treatment of patients with LA/mUC. The potential benefit of EV therapy on overall HRQoL and symptoms such as pain and fatigue is currently being explored. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study of adult patients with advanced cancer of the urinary tract that progressed after previous medications, quality of life, ability to function, and symptoms did not worsen on treatment with enfortumab vedotin, which is an antibody + drug combination. Some improvements in pain and fatigue were reported by patients, but further research needs to be conducted. These data complement the efficacy and safety data from the EV-201 trial.
Collapse
|
22
|
Kamusheva M, Georgieva V, Marinov L, Boncheva E, Milushewa P, Grigorova P, Marinov K, Petrova G. Volume and trends of adalimumab and pembrolizumab reimbursed market: the Bulgarian perspective. BIOTECHNOL BIOTEC EQ 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2021.2019116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Kamusheva
- Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Viktoria Georgieva
- Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Lyubomir Marinov
- Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacotherapy and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Elka Boncheva
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Petya Milushewa
- Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Plamena Grigorova
- Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Kalin Marinov
- Department of International Economic Relations and Business, Faculty of International Economics and Politics, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Guenka Petrova
- Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Zhong W, Yang M, Cheng S, Hou W, Wang B, Chen J, Yu H, Ouyang Y, Wang X, Ou Z, Xu P, Li X, Zhou L, Huang J, Wang C, Lin T. Identification of an IDO1-based immune classifier for survival prediction of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Sci 2021; 113:852-863. [PMID: 34962030 PMCID: PMC8898711 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The limited response rate of immunotherapy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) might be attributed to additional immunosuppressive mechanisms in vivo. As a promising immune checkpoint target, the expression and prognostic role of indoleamine 2,3‐dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) in UTUC remains unknown. In this study, the expression and prognostic value of IDO1 was analyzed in 251 patients from 3 independent cohorts. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model was used to construct an IDO1‐based immune classifier and external validation was performed to further validate the classifier. RNA sequencing and immunofluorescence were used to explore the immune contexture of different risk groups stratified by classifier. We found that high IDO1 expression on tumor cells (TC) indicated a poorer overall survival and disease‐free survival in all cohorts. Patients with high expression of IDO1 TC possessed increased infiltration of CD4+, CD8+ and Foxp3+ T cells. An immune classifier based on intratumoral CD8+ lymphocytes, IDO1 TC, and stromal PD‐L1 expression status was developed, with its area under the curves (AUCs) values for overall survival at 5 y being 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65‐0.93) in the discovery cohort, 0.75 (95% CI 0.58‐0.92) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.65‐0.92) in the internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. The high‐risk group stratified by the immune classifier was associated with immunosuppressive contexture, accompanied by enhanced CD8+ T cells exhaustion patterns. Our IDO1‐based immune classifier can provide a superior accuracy for survival prediction and lead to individual stratification of UTUC immune subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenlong Zhong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases
| | - Meng Yang
- Department of Urology, Yan'an Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, PR China
| | - Sida Cheng
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, PR China
| | - Weibin Hou
- Department of Urology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, PR China
| | - Bo Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases
| | - Junyu Chen
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases
| | - Hao Yu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases
| | - Yi Ouyang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases
| | - Xiaofei Wang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases
| | - Ziwei Ou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases
| | - Peiqi Xu
- Department of Urology, Yan'an Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, PR China
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, PR China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, PR China
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases
| | - Chunhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Yan'an Hospital, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, PR China
| | - Tianxin Lin
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.,Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Urological Diseases.,Kashgar Prefecture First People's Hospital of Kashi, Xinjiang, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Boutros A, Bruzzone M, Tanda ET, Croce E, Arecco L, Cecchi F, Pronzato P, Ceppi M, Lambertini M, Spagnolo F. Health-related quality of life in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in randomised controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2021; 159:154-166. [PMID: 34753012 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionised clinical practice in oncology in the last years, leading to a survival benefit in several tumour types. To investigate whether these benefits are associated with improved quality of life, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between ICIs and standard chemotherapy (CT) in patients with advanced solid tumours. METHODS Clinical trials comparing the efficacy of ICIs (either programmed death receptor-1 and programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibitors, as single agent or in combination) versus CT were included. Trials evaluating treatment with ICIs plus CT versus CT alone were also included, whereas studies in which the control arm included other anticancer agents (such as targeted therapy and other ICIs) or placebo alone were excluded. The aim of our meta-analysis was to compare PROs in subjects treated with ICIs or ICIs plus CT (intervention) with those reported by patients receiving CT (control). The co-primary endpoints were time from baseline to first deterioration in PROs, defined as the time from baseline to the first clinically significant deterioration in PROs, and the changes in PROs from baseline to follow-up between ICI and CT treatment groups (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021247440). RESULTS A total of 8341 patients from 17 randomised trials of ICI versus CT were included in the analysis. Treatment with ICI delayed clinical deterioration over standard CT in Global Health Status/QoL EORTC QLQ-C30 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.89), and in both EQ-5D utility index (HR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.82) and EQ-5D visual analogue scale (VAS; HR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.61-0.80). The difference in mean change between the ICI-treated group and the CT-treated group was 5.82 (95% CI, 4.11-7.53) in favour of ICI. Similarly, in the EQ-5D, the mean change differences favoured treatment with ICIs in both Utility Index and VAS, with differences of 0.05 (95% CI, 0.03-0.07) and 5.41 (95% CI, 3.39-7.43), respectively. CONCLUSIONS ICIs are associated with higher levels of quality of life and longer time to clinical deterioration on several PROs scales compared with CT in different types of solid tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Boutros
- Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Marco Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Enrica T Tanda
- Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Elena Croce
- Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Federica Cecchi
- Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Paolo Pronzato
- Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesco Spagnolo
- Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abdihamid O, Omar A, Rugambwa T. Defining the correlation between immune-checkpoint inhibitors-related adverse events and clinical outcomes: a narrative review. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 15:1314. [PMID: 35047065 PMCID: PMC8723746 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have increased modern anticancer armamentarium portfolios, with 15%-60% of cancer patients deriving clinical benefit while others progress, including some occurrences of accelerated progressions. ICIs have also introduced a new pattern of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Recently, a mechanistic link was proposed in which patients who develop ICIs-related irAEs derive a survival benefit compared to those who do not, suggesting an overlap between toxicities and the treatment efficacy. Identifying predictive biomarkers to optimally identify patients who will benefit from ICIs is a contemporary research area in Oncology. However, the data remains sparse, with only several smaller studies showing a plausible direct proportionality of a therapeutic effect across tumours. In contrast, the overall survival and progression-free survival rate depend on the tumour type, degree of toxicities, duration of exposure, affected system/organs and inherent patient characteristics. Furthermore, the occurrence of irAEs appears to be more associated with a clinical benefit from programmed death 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors than anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4. Several questions remain unanswered, including the association between survival benefit and specific type of organ system toxicities, toxicity grade, if the benefit is entirely due to immortal-time biases (ITBs), presence of patients confounding comorbidities like autoimmune diseases, and finally, immune heterogeneities. Considering ITB represents a key element in interpreting these studies since patients with precipitated death or with an earlier disease progresses rarely develop irAEs; in fact, such patients have not stayed in the study long enough to experience such irAEs. Conversely, patients that stayed in the study for a longer period have a higher risk of developing irAEs. Landmark analysis is key in these studies if a real association is to be found. Overall response and disease control rates are mainly higher in those who develop irAEs due to immune activation. So, this review aims to summarise the evidence from key studies that addressed this important clinical question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Abdihamid
- Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410008, People’s Republic of China
| | - Abeid Omar
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Champlion Street, Alazarita, Alexandria 21131, Egypt
| | - Tibera Rugambwa
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mbeya Zonal Referral Hospital, Mbeya 419, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Arai T, Takeuchi N, Sazuka T, Sato H, Imamura Y, Sakamoto S, Komiya A, Ichikawa T. Successful treatment of metastatic bladder cancer by gemcitabine-cisplatin re-challenge after pembrolizumab. IJU Case Rep 2021; 4:360-362. [PMID: 34755056 PMCID: PMC8560445 DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 06/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The advent of pembrolizumab has contributed to improved treatment outcomes for metastatic urothelial carcinoma, but the outcomes of treatments after second-line treatment have not been established. CASE PRESENTATION A 72-year-old man was referred to our hospital with gross hematuria and diagnosed with suspicion of bladder cancer cT1N0M0. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor was performed, but local recurrence and multiple lung metastases appeared 5 months after surgery. Although gemcitabine-cisplatin was performed as first-line chemotherapy, the local lesion increased, and pembrolizumab was used as a second-line treatment. Pembrolizumab was also ineffective; however, re-challenge with gemcitabine-cisplatin as third-line treatment produced a good therapeutic effect. CONCLUSION We report a successful case in which gemcitabine-cisplatin re-challenge after pembrolizumab therapy was effective in metastatic bladder cancer. Re-administration of chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitors may be a broadly effective treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Arai
- Department of UrologyChiba University Graduate School of MedicineChibaJapan
| | - Nobuyoshi Takeuchi
- Department of UrologyChiba University Graduate School of MedicineChibaJapan
| | - Tomokazu Sazuka
- Department of UrologyChiba University Graduate School of MedicineChibaJapan
| | - Hiroaki Sato
- Department of UrologyChiba University Graduate School of MedicineChibaJapan
| | - Yusuke Imamura
- Department of UrologyChiba University Graduate School of MedicineChibaJapan
| | - Shinichi Sakamoto
- Department of UrologyChiba University Graduate School of MedicineChibaJapan
| | - Akira Komiya
- Department of UrologyChiba University Graduate School of MedicineChibaJapan
| | - Tomohiko Ichikawa
- Department of UrologyChiba University Graduate School of MedicineChibaJapan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zinzani PL, Ramchandren R, Santoro A, Paszkiewicz-Kozik E, Gasiorowski R, Johnson NA, Oliveira JSR, Buccheri V, Perini GF, Dickinson M, McDonald AB, Özcan M, Sekiguchi N, Zhu Y, Raut M, Saretsky TL, Nahar A, Kuruvilla JG. Quality-of-life analysis of pembrolizumab vs brentuximab vedotin for relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood Adv 2021:bloodadvances. [PMID: 34644372 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Pembrolizumab improved health-related quality of life over brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed/refractory cHL Pembrolizumab should be considered the preferred treatment option for relapsed/refractory cHL post-ASCT or in patients ineligible for ASCT
KEYNOTE-204 (NCT02684292) demonstrated a progression-free survival advantage for pembrolizumab over brentuximab vedotin (BV) in patients who had relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL) following, or who were ineligible for, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured by patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KEYNOTE-204, are reported from patients who received ≥1 dose of study treatment and completed ≥1 PRO assessment. The EORTC QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and EuroQoL EQ-5D were administered at baseline, every 6 weeks until week 24, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Prespecified end points included least squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline to week 24 and time to true deterioration (TTD; ≥10-point decline from baseline). Comparisons were evaluated using 2-sided P values uncontrolled for multiplicity. High compliance at baseline (>90%) and through week 24 (>80%) was demonstrated across treatment groups (PRO analysis set: pembrolizumab, n = 146; BV, n = 150). The EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL) score improved from baseline to week 24 on pembrolizumab and worsened on BV and demonstrated significant LSM differences at 24 weeks (GHS/QoL: 8.60 [95% confidence interval, 3.89-13.31]; P = .0004). Significant improvements were observed in each QLQ-C30 domain except emotional and cognitive functioning. Compared with BV, pembrolizumab prolonged TTD for GHS/QoL (hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.22-0.74]; P = .003) and each QLQ-C30 domain except cognitive functioning. In conclusion, pembrolizumab demonstrated overall improvements in PROs of HRQoL measures over BV in the KEYNOTE-204 study. These data and previously reported efficacy results support pembrolizumab as the preferred treatment option for patients with R/R cHL who are ineligible for or experience relapse after ASCT.
Collapse
|
28
|
Rhea LP, Aragon-Ching JB. Advances and Controversies With Checkpoint Inhibitors in Bladder Cancer. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2021; 15:11795549211044963. [PMID: 34602833 PMCID: PMC8481722 DOI: 10.1177/11795549211044963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of bladder urothelial cancers and have wide application in almost all disease states. Although several drugs have initially been shown to be beneficial in the second-line metastatic setting, there are still ongoing controversies and debate, including voluntary withdrawals of durvalumab and atezolizumab, along with the approval of agents in the first-line setting in the cisplatin-ineligible state based on inconsistent confirmatory phase III trials. As novel immunotherapy drugs are discovered and studied in various phases of clinical trials, these agents will continue to change the treatment landscape for bladder cancer patients. This review will discuss current available evidence and information and key pivotal trials using checkpoint inhibitors in bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan P Rhea
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kato M, Kobayashi T, Matsui Y, Ito K, Hikami K, Yamada T, Ogawa K, Nakamura K, Sassa N, Yokomizo A, Abe T, Tsuchihashi K, Tatarano S, Inokuchi J, Tomida R, Fujiwara M, Takahashi A, Matsumoto K, Shimizu K, Araki H, Kurahashi R, Ozaki Y, Tashiro Y, Uegaki M, Kojima T, Uchida J, Ogawa O, Nishiyama H, Kitamura H. Impact of the objective response to and number of cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma on overall survival of patients treated with pembrolizumab. Int J Urol 2021; 28:1261-1267. [PMID: 34545627 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the impact of the number of cycles and objective response to chemotherapy on overall survival in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab. METHODS This multicenter, retrospective study included 755 patients from 59 institutions with advanced, chemoresistant urothelial carcinoma who received pembrolizumab. The associations of the overall survival with the number of cycles and best objective response were investigated using Cox multiple regression analysis. RESULTS Overall, 391 patients received standard first-line chemotherapy and pembrolizumab as a second-line treatment, and were included in the final analysis. Of the 391 patients, 185 received less than four cycles, 134 received four to six cycles and 72 received more than six cycles of first-line chemotherapy. An objective response (complete or partial response) to chemotherapy was observed in 145 patients (37.1%). Univariate analysis showed that the overall survival of patients who received more than six cycles or responded to chemotherapy (complete or partial response) was significantly longer than that of patients who received less than four cycles or did not respond to chemotherapy (stable or progressive disease). At multivariate levels, no correlations were observed between overall survival and the number of cycles of or the response to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Therapeutic benefit of pembrolizumab can be expected irrespective of the objective response to and number of cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minoru Kato
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Matsui
- Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kensuke Hikami
- Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kosuke Ogawa
- Department of Urology, Kobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kenji Nakamura
- Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Naoto Sassa
- Department of Urology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Nagakute, Japan
| | - Akira Yokomizo
- Department of Urology, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takashige Abe
- Department of Urology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Ryotaro Tomida
- Department of Urology, Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | | | - Atsushi Takahashi
- Department of Urology, Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital, Hakodate, Japan
| | | | - Kosuke Shimizu
- Department of Urology, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiromasa Araki
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Yu Ozaki
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Himeji Medical Center, Himeji, Japan
| | - Yu Tashiro
- Department of Urology, Tazuke Kofukai Medical Research Institute Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Takahiro Kojima
- Department of Urology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Junji Uchida
- Department of Urology, Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Osamu Ogawa
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gonzalez BD, Eisel SL, Bowles KE, Hoogland AI, James BW, Small BJ, Sharpe S, Hyland KA, Bulls HW, Christy SM, Mansfield J, Nelson AM, Alla R, Maharaj K, Kennedy B, Lafranchise E, Williams NL, Jennewein S, Oswald LB, Postow MA, Dicker AP, Jim HSL. Meta-Analysis of Quality of Life in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 114:808-818. [PMID: 34508604 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have published patient-reported quality of life (QOL), but the size and heterogeneity of this literature can make patient education difficult. This meta-analysis aimed to describe change in QOL and symptomatology in patients receiving ICIs for cancer. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, databases were searched through November 2019 for articles or abstracts of prospective, original studies reporting longitudinal QOL in adult cancer patients treated with ICIs. The prespecified primary outcomes were change in global QOL among patients treated with ICIs and difference in change since baseline in global QOL between patients treated with ICI vs. non-ICI active treatment. Secondary outcomes included physical functioning and symptomatology. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Twenty-six of 20,323 publications met inclusion criteria. Global QOL did not change over time in patients treated with ICIs (k = 26, n = 6,974, P = .19). Larger improvements in global QOL was observed in patients receiving ICI vs. non-ICI regimens (k = 16, ICI n = 3,588, non-ICI n = 2,948, P < .001). Physical functioning did not change in patients treated with ICIs (k = 14, n = 3,169, P=.47); there were no differences in mean change between ICI vs. non-ICI regimens (k = 11, n = 4,630, P=.94. Regarding symptoms, appetite loss, insomnia, and pain severity decreased but dyspnea severity increased in patients treated with ICIs (k = 14, n = 3,243-3,499) (Ps < 0.001). Insomnia severity was higher in patients treated with ICIs than non-ICI regimens (k = 11, n = 4,791) (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS This study is among the first to quantitatively summarize QOL in patients treated with ICIs. Findings suggest ICI recipients report no change in global QOL and higher QOL than patients treated with non-ICI regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian D Gonzalez
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Sarah L Eisel
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Kristina E Bowles
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Aasha I Hoogland
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Brian W James
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Brent J Small
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Susan Sharpe
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Kelly A Hyland
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Hailey W Bulls
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Shannon M Christy
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Jori Mansfield
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Raviteja Alla
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Kelly Maharaj
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Brittany Kennedy
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | - Sarah Jennewein
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Laura B Oswald
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Michael A Postow
- Southeast Radiation Oncology Group, Levine Cancer Institute at Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | | | - Heather S L Jim
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Nelson BE, Hong A, Jana B. Elucidation of Novel Molecular Targets for Therapeutic Strategies in Urothelial Carcinoma: A Literature Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:705294. [PMID: 34422659 PMCID: PMC8374860 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.705294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma therapy is a rapidly evolving and expanding field. Traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens have not produced optimal long-term outcomes, and many urothelial cancer patients have comorbidities that disqualify them as chemotherapy candidates. In recent years, a plethora of novel therapeutic agents that target diverse molecular pathways has emerged as alternative treatment modalities for not only metastatic urothelial carcinoma, but also for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in adjuvant and definitive settings. This review paper aims to discuss the various categories of therapeutic agents for these different types of urothelial cancer, discussing immunotherapy, antibody-drug conjugates, kinase inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, peptide vaccination, and other drugs targeting pathways such as angiogenesis, DNA synthesis, mTOR/PI3K/AKT, and EGFR/HER-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blessie Elizabeth Nelson
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States
| | - Angelina Hong
- School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States
| | - Bagi Jana
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kobayashi T, Takeuchi A, Nishiyama H, Eto M. Current status and future perspectives of immunotherapy against urothelial and kidney cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:1481-1492. [PMID: 34389866 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Much attention has been paid to immune checkpoint inhibitors to various cancer treatments. In urothelial cancer, pembrolizumab was initially approved for patients who either recurred or progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. For the platinum-fit population, although the standard first-line treatment is still platinum-based systemic chemotherapy, avelumab has been recently approved as a maintenance therapy for patients who have not had disease progression with four to six cycles of first-line chemotherapy. In addition, adjuvant nivolumab has just prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) by ~10 months, compared with placebo in patients with muscle-invasive bladder urothelial cancer or upper tract urothelial cancer at high-risk of recurrence after radical surgical resection. On the other hand, in kidney cancer, nivolumab was initially approved for advanced renal cell carcinoma patients after one or two prior anti-angiogenic therapies. Next, combinations of two immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab + ipilimumab) and immune checkpoint inhibitor + tyrosine kinase inhibitors (pembrolizumab + axitinib and avelumab + axitinib) were approved for the first-line treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Recently, new generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as cabozantinib and lenvatinib have been combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Both nivolumab + cabozantinib and pembrolizumab + lenvatinib have demonstrated superior progression-free survival and objective response rate, compared with sunitinib. So far, no prospective trials have demonstrated the duration of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments. We are now doing the Japan Clinical Oncology Group 1905 trial, where patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who have received an immune checkpoint inhibitor for 24 weeks are divided into two groups: those who continue immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment and those who discontinue immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ario Takeuchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Anota A, Pozet A, Lemasson H, Cotté FE, Falcoz A, Eberst G, Mouillet G, Guerzider S, Charton É, Westeel V. Impact of open-label versus blinded study design on patient-reported outcomes data in randomized clinical trials of immunotherapy in advanced or metastatic cancer patients: a systematic review. Qual Life Res 2021. [PMID: 34283382 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02945-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM A systematic literature review of immuno-oncology trials was conducted to assess the potential impact of open-label vs double-blind trial design on patient-reported outcome (PRO) data. METHODS A systematic search of indexed literature published from January 2009 to May 2019 was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE database. All randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of immuno-oncology therapies on advanced cancer patients reporting PRO data were identified. Descriptive analyses were performed to quantify differences at baseline and over time, by the type of study, regarding questionnaire completion rate and PRO scores. RESULTS In total, 23 studies were retained (15 open-label, 8 blinded). At baseline, no difference in completion rate was observed between arms irrespective of trial design (absolute mean difference of 2.8% and 2.2% for open label and blinded studies, respectively). No clinically significant difference in baseline PRO scores was observed between arms. Over time, impact on PRO scores could not be identified due to the limited number of studies, heterogeneity of questionnaires and tumor types. CONCLUSIONS Trial design had no impact on PRO completion rate or baseline scores. Future research should involve analyses by specific cancer types and ideally compare individual data from two similar RCTs (blinded vs. open-label).
Collapse
|
34
|
Galsky MD, Balar AV, Black PC, Campbell MT, Dykstra GS, Grivas P, Gupta S, Hoimes CJ, Lopez LP, Meeks JJ, Plimack ER, Rosenberg JE, Shore N, Steinberg GD, Kamat AM. Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of urothelial cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:e002552. [PMID: 34266883 PMCID: PMC8286774 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A number of immunotherapies have been developed and adopted for the treatment of urothelial cancer (encompassing cancers arising from the bladder, urethra, or renal pelvis). For these immunotherapies to positively impact patient outcomes, optimal selection of agents and treatment scheduling, especially in conjunction with existing treatment paradigms, is paramount. Immunotherapies also warrant specific and unique considerations regarding patient management, emphasizing both the prompt identification and treatment of potential toxicities. In order to address these issues, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a panel of experts in the field of immunotherapy for urothelial cancer. The expert panel developed this clinical practice guideline (CPG) to inform healthcare professionals on important aspects of immunotherapeutic treatment for urothelial cancer, including diagnostic testing, treatment planning, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and patient quality of life (QOL) considerations. The evidence- and consensus-based recommendations in this CPG are intended to give guidance to cancer care providers treating patients with urothelial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Galsky
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Arjun V Balar
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matthew T Campbell
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gail S Dykstra
- Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network (BCAN), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Dykstra Research, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Petros Grivas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Shilpa Gupta
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Christoper J Hoimes
- Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lidia P Lopez
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Joshua J Meeks
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- The Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Plimack
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jonathan E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Deparment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Neal Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
| | - Gary D Steinberg
- Department of Urology and Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology under Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Janev A, Ramuta TŽ, Tratnjek L, Sardoč Ž, Obradović H, Mojsilović S, Taskovska M, Smrkolj T, Kreft ME. Detrimental Effect of Various Preparations of the Human Amniotic Membrane Homogenate on the 2D and 3D Bladder Cancer In vitro Models. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021; 9:690358. [PMID: 34249888 PMCID: PMC8267883 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.690358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite being among the ten most common cancers with high recurrence rates worldwide, there have been no major breakthroughs in the standard treatment options for bladder cancer in recent years. The use of a human amniotic membrane (hAM) to treat cancer is one of the promising ideas that have emerged in recent years. This study aimed to investigate the anticancer activity of hAM homogenate on 2D and 3D cancer models. We evaluated the effects of hAM homogenates on the human muscle invasive bladder cancer urothelial (T24) cells, papillary cancer urothelial (RT4) cells and normal porcine urothelial (NPU) cells as well as on human mammary gland non-tumorigenic (MCF10a) cells and low-metastatic breast cancer (MCF7) cells. After 24 h, we observed a gradual detachment of cancerous cells from the culture surface, while the hAM homogenate did not affect the normal cells. The most pronounced effect hAM homogenate had on bladder cancer cells; however, the potency of their detachment was dependent on the treatment protocol and the preparation of hAM homogenate. We demonstrated that hAM homogenate significantly decreased the adhesion, growth, and proliferation of human bladder invasive and papillary cancer urothelial cells and did not affect normal urothelial cells even in 7-day treatment. By using light and electron microscopy we showed that hAM homogenate disrupted the architecture of 2D and 3D bladder cancer models. The information provided by our study highlights the detrimental effect of hAM homogenate on bladder cancer cells and strengthens the idea of the potential clinical application of hAM for bladder cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandar Janev
- Institute of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Taja Železnik Ramuta
- Institute of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Larisa Tratnjek
- Institute of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Žiga Sardoč
- Institute of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Hristina Obradović
- Laboratory for Experimental Hematology and Stem Cells, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Slavko Mojsilović
- Laboratory for Experimental Hematology and Stem Cells, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Milena Taskovska
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Chair of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Tomaž Smrkolj
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Chair of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Mateja Erdani Kreft
- Institute of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Takemura A, Matsushita Y, Tamura K, Sugiyama T, Nagata M, Otsuka A, Miyake H. Pembrolizumab Versus Combined Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine and Paclitaxel: A Comparative Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Platinum-refractory Advanced Urothelial Cancer. In Vivo 2021; 35:1889-1894. [PMID: 33910878 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM There are limited data on comprehensive assessments of several treatments as second-line therapy against advanced urothelial cancer (UC). The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between advanced UC patients receiving either pembrolizumab (Pem) or combined chemotherapy with gemcitabine and paclitaxel (GP) as second-line therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 89 patients with platinum-refractory advanced UC, consisting of 46 and 43 who received Pem and GP therapy, respectively, as second-line treatment. RESULTS There were no significant differences in major clinicopathological parameters between Pem and GP groups. No significant difference in the objective response rate was noted between the two groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) in the Pem group was significantly longer than that in the GP group; however, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between them. Multivariate analyses identified performance status ≤2 and liver metastasis as independent factors associated with poor outcomes in both PFS and OS. The incidence of adverse events in the GP group was significantly higher than that in the Pem group. CONCLUSION Pem could be regarded as standard agent for platinum-refractory advanced UC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayana Takemura
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.,Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Medical Center, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Yuto Matsushita
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Keita Tamura
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Takayuki Sugiyama
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Masao Nagata
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Medical Center, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Atsushi Otsuka
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Hideaki Miyake
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan;
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Qin S, Yi L, Li S, Tan C, Zeng X, Wang L, Peng Y, Wan X. Cost-Effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Urothelial Cancer. Adv Ther 2021; 38:3399-408. [PMID: 34019245 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01785-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The IMvigor130 trial found that atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (atezolizumab group) as first-line therapy prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC), compared with placebo plus platinum-based chemotherapy (placebo group). The current study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for mUC from the US payer perspective. METHODS A Markov model was adopted to compare the cost and effectiveness of atezolizumab and placebo group in the first-line setting of patients with mUC. Life years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. Subgroup, one-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the model robustness. RESULTS Atezolizumab group provided an additional 0.39 QALYs (0.52 LYs) and an incremental cost of $170,759 per QALY compared with the placebo group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $434,317 per QALY. Subgroup analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression of at least 5% on immune cells had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $325,236 per QALY. The results of one-way sensitivity analyses suggested that our model was sensitive to the cycle cost of atezolizumab and the hazard ratio of PFS. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that there was 0% probability of the atezolizumab group being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 per QALY. The extrapolations need to be validated by real-world data. CONCLUSIONS From the US payer perspective, atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy is not cost-effective in the first-line therapy for patients with mUC on the basis of a WTP threshold of $150,000 per QALY. On the basis of the value standpoint, price reduction of atezolizumab is expected to improve the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab in patients with mUC.
Collapse
|
38
|
Taarnhøj GA, Lindberg H, Johansen C, Pappot H. Patient-Reported Outcomes, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Clinical Outcomes for Urothelial Cancer Patients Receiving Chemo- or Immunotherapy: A Real-Life Experience. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10091852. [PMID: 33923176 PMCID: PMC8123186 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC) often have comorbidities, which cause trouble for the completion of oncological treatment, and little is known about their quality of life (QoL). The aim of the present study was to obtain and describe patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and QoL data from UCC patients in the treatment for locally advanced muscle-invasive or metastatic UCC. A total of 79 patients with UCC completed four questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-BLM30, HADS, and select PRO-CTCAE™ questions) once weekly during their treatment. From those, 26 patients (33%) underwent neoadjuvant treatment for local disease while 53 patients (67%) were treated for metastatic disease. Of all patients, 54% did not complete the planned treatment due to progression, nephrotoxicity, death, or intolerable symptoms during treatment. The five most prevalent PRO-CTCAE grade ≥ 2 symptoms were frequent urination (37%), fatigue (35%), pain (31%), dry mouth (23%), and swelling of the arms or legs (23%). The baseline mean overall QoL was 61 (±SD 24) for all patients (neoadjuvant (73, ±SD 19) and metastatic (54, ±SD 24)) and remained stable over the course of treatment for both groups. A stable overall QoL was observed for the patients in this study. More than half of the patients did not, however, complete the planned treatment. Further supportive care is warranted for bladder cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gry Assam Taarnhøj
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (C.J.); (H.P.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +45-3545-0737
| | - Henriette Lindberg
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Herlev Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark;
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (C.J.); (H.P.)
| | - Helle Pappot
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; (C.J.); (H.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Andre T, Amonkar M, Norquist JM, Shiu KK, Kim TW, Jensen BV, Jensen LH, Punt CJA, Smith D, Garcia-Carbonero R, Sevilla I, De La Fouchardiere C, Rivera F, Elez E, Diaz LA, Yoshino T, Van Cutsem E, Yang P, Farooqui M, Le DT. Health-related quality of life in patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficient metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy (KEYNOTE-177): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22:665-677. [PMID: 33812497 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(21)00064-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the KEYNOTE-177 study, pembrolizumab monotherapy provided statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer. To further support the efficacy and safety findings of the KEYNOTE-177 study, results of the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) analyses are reported here. METHODS KEYNOTE-177 is an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial being done at 192 cancer centres in 23 countries, in patients aged 18 years and older with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and who had not received previous systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally by use of interactive voice response or integrated web response technology to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or investigator's choice chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6 [leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin] or FOLFIRI [leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan] intravenously every 2 weeks with or without intravenous bevacizumab or cetuximab). Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (previously reported) and overall survival (data to be reported at the time of the final analysis). HRQOL outcomes were evaluated as prespecified exploratory endpoints. The analysis population comprised all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and completed at least one HRQOL assessment. HRQOL outcomes were mean change from baseline to prespecified week 18 in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire-Colorectal 29 (EORTC QLQ-CR29) scale and item scores, and in the EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) visual analogue scale and health utility scores; the proportion of patients with improved, stable, or deteriorated scores from baseline to prespecified week 18 in EORTC QLQ-C30 scales and items; and time to deterioration in EORTC QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QOL), physical functioning, social functioning, and fatigue scores and EORTC QLQ-CR29 urinary incontinence scores. The threshold for a small and clinically meaningful mean difference in EORTC QLQ-C30 score was 5-8 points. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02563002 and is ongoing; recruitment is closed. FINDINGS Between Feb 11, 2016, and Feb 19, 2018, 307 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive pembrolizumab (n=153) or chemotherapy (n=154). The HRQOL analysis population comprised 294 patients (152 receiving pembrolizumab and 142 receiving chemotherapy). As of Feb 19, 2020, median time from randomisation to data cutoff was 32·4 months (IQR 27·7-37·8). Least squares mean (LSM) change from baseline to prespecified week 18 showed a clinically meaningful improvement in EORTC QLQ-C30 GHS/QOL scores with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy (between-group LSM difference 8·96 [95% CI 4·24-13·69]; two-sided nominal p=0·0002). Median time to deterioration was longer with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for GHS/QOL (hazard ratio 0·61 [95% CI 0·38-0·98]; one-sided nominal p=0·019), physical functioning (0·50 [95% CI 0·32-0·81]; one-sided nominal p=0·0016), social functioning (0·53 [95% CI 0·32-0·87]; one-sided nominal p=0·0050), and fatigue scores (0·48 [95% CI 0·33-0·69]; one-sided nominal p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION Pembrolizumab monotherapy led to clinically meaningful improvements in HRQOL compared with chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic colorectal cancer. These data, along with the previously reported clinical benefits, support pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment option for this population. FUNDING Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Andre
- Sorbonne Université and Hõpital Saint-Antoine, Paris, France.
| | | | | | - Kai-Keen Shiu
- University College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Tae Won Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | - Cornelis J A Punt
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Isabel Sevilla
- Investigación Clínica y Traslacional en Cáncer, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas de Málaga, Hospitales Universitarios Regional y Virgen de la Victoria de Málaga, Malaga, Spain
| | | | - Fernando Rivera
- Hospital Universitario M de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Elena Elez
- Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis A Diaz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Eric Van Cutsem
- University Hospitals Gasthuisberg/Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | - Dung T Le
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Li Z, Li X, Lam W, Cao Y, Han H, Zhang X, Fang J, Xiao K, Zhou F. Safety and Activity of Programmed Cell Death 1 Versus Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors for Platinum-Resistant Urothelial Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Published Clinical Trials. Front Oncol 2021; 11:629646. [PMID: 33869015 PMCID: PMC8047637 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.629646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Programmed death 1/ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) inhibitors have acceptable antitumor activity in patients with platinum-resistant urothelial cancer (UC). However, the reliability and comparability of the antitumor activity, safety profiles and survival outcomes of different immune checkpoint inhibitors are unknown. Our objective was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapies in platinum-resistant UC patients. Methods We reviewed the published trials from the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases up to August 2020. A well-designed mirror principle strategy to screen and pair trial characteristics was used to justify indirect comparisons. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). The safety profile and survival outcomes were also evaluated. The restricted mean survival time (RMST) up to 12 months was calculated. Results Eight studies including 1,666 advanced or metastatic UC patients (1,021 patients with anti–PD-L1 treatment and 645 patients with anti–PD-1 treatment) met the study criteria. The ORRs of anti–PD-1 and PD-L1 therapy were 22% (95% CI, 18%–25%) and 15% (95% CI, 13%–17%) with all studies combined. The proportions of the treated population with a confirmed objective response (I2 = 0; P = 0.966; HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.23–2.07; P < 0.001) and disease control (I2 = 30.6%; P = 0.229; HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.10–1.66; P = 0.004) were higher with anti–PD-1 therapy than with anti–PD-L1 therapy. The treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (I2 = 78.3%; P = 0.003; OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.65–1.84; P = 0.741) and grade 3–5 treatment-related AEs (I2 = 68.5%; P = 0.023; OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.95–3.01; P = 0.074) of anti–PD-1 therapy were comparable to those of anti–PD-L1 therapy. The RMST values at the 12-month follow-up were 9.4 months (95% CI,: 8.8–10.0) for anti–PD-1 therapy and 9.3 months (95% CI, 8.8–9.7) for anti–PD-L1 therapy (z = 0.26, P = 0.794). There was no significant difference between patients in the anti–PD-1 and anti–PD-L1 groups (12-month overall survival (OS): 43% versus 42%, P = 0.765. I2 = 0; P = 0.999; HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83–1.09; P = 0.474). Conclusions The results of our systematic comparison suggest that anti–PD-1 therapy exhibits better antitumor activity than anti–PD-L1 therapy, with comparable safety profiles and survival outcomes. These findings may contribute to enhanced treatment awareness in patients with platinum-resistant UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaishang Li
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinic Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Urology of Shenzhen Research and Development Center of Medical Engineering and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xueying Li
- Department of Oncology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wayne Lam
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Yabing Cao
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Kiang Wu, Macau, Macau
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Urology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xueqi Zhang
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinic Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Urology of Shenzhen Research and Development Center of Medical Engineering and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jiequn Fang
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinic Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Urology of Shenzhen Research and Development Center of Medical Engineering and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Kefeng Xiao
- Department of Urology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, The Second Clinic Medical College of Jinan University, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Urology of Shenzhen Research and Development Center of Medical Engineering and Technology, Shenzhen, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Urology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Urology, Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Grivas P, Agarwal N, Pal S, Kalebasty AR, Sridhar SS, Smith J, Devgan G, Sternberg CN, Bellmunt J. Avelumab first-line maintenance in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: Applying clinical trial findings to clinical practice. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 97:102187. [PMID: 33839438 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Revised: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Although urothelial carcinoma (UC) is considered a chemotherapy-sensitive tumor, progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) are typically short following standard first-line (1L) platinum-containing chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have antitumor activity in UC and favorable safety profiles compared with chemotherapy; however, trials of 1L ICI monotherapy or chemotherapy + ICI combinations have not yet shown improved OS vs chemotherapy alone. In addition to direct cytotoxicity, chemotherapy has potential immunogenic effects, providing a rationale for assessing ICIs as switch-maintenance therapy. In the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial, avelumab administered as 1L maintenance with best supportive care (BSC) significantly prolonged OS vs BSC alone in patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC that had not progressed with 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy (median OS, 21.4 vs 14.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.56-0.86]; P = 0.001). Efficacy benefits were seen across various subgroups, including recipients of 1L cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy, patients with PD-L1+ or PD-L1- tumors, and patients with diverse characteristics. Results from JAVELIN Bladder 100 led to the approval of avelumab as 1L maintenance therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC that has not progressed with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Avelumab 1L maintenance is also included as a standard of care in treatment guidelines for advanced UC with level 1 evidence. This review summarizes the data that supported these developments and discusses practical considerations for administering avelumab maintenance in clinical practice, including patient selection and treatment management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petros Grivas
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Neeraj Agarwal
- University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Sumanta Pal
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Jodi Smith
- EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA, USA; an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | - Cora N Sternberg
- Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and IMIM-PSMAR Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Following platinum-based regimens becoming the reference standard of care, it has taken almost four decades to find a systemic treatment that improved overall survival in metastatic urothelial tumors. Single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors have not only improved overall survival but also the quality of life of patients with metastatic urothelial tumors after failure of platinum-based regimens and as a maintenance therapy after four to six cycles of standard first-line chemotherapy. In addition, very promising data are emerging when single-agent immunotherapy is offered as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment for patients with muscle-invasive disease and also in the non-muscle-invasive setting. There is an extensive debate about the role of PD-L1 expression as a reliable biomarker to predict the activity of immune-based regimens. Furthermore, the lack of consensus concerning its utility means that there is a need for more and better tools to identify patients who are likely to benefit from these novel approaches. The field of urothelial tumors now additionally exploits novel antibody-drug conjugates and fibroblast growth factor-receptor inhibitors that are being tested in combination with immunotherapy. This added complexity contributes to an enormous increase in the challenges that will be faced shortly.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
With around 30,000 new cases annually bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most frequent cancers in Germany and the incidence is associated with advanced age and nicotine use. Urothelial carcinoma is the most frequent histological variant of BC in Central Europe. Nonmuscle-invasive BC can be resected endourologically and treated with intravesical instillation therapy. In the case of progression to nonmetastatic muscle-invasive disease radical cystectomy with accompanying neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy can be curative. Systemic treatment is the standard of care in metastatic disease. Although immunotherapy has made great progress in recent years, palliative chemotherapy remains the gold standard in first-line treatment. The armamentarium is continuously evolving: systemic immunotherapy is currently being investigated in nonmuscle-invasive BC as well as in perioperative and maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy and several studies are testing new targeted agents in palliative systemic therapy. This article gives an overview of current innovations and the expected paradigm shift in systemic treatment of BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Tamalunas
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - Gerald B Schulz
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - Severin Rodler
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - Maria Apfelbeck
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - Christian G Stief
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland
| | - Jozefina Casuscelli
- Urologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Harrington KJ, Soulières D, Le Tourneau C, Dinis J, Licitra LF, Ahn MJ, Soria A, Machiels JPH, Mach N, Mehra R, Burtness B, Ellison MC, Cheng JD, Chirovsky DR, Swaby RF, Cohen EEW. Quality of Life With Pembrolizumab for Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: KEYNOTE-040. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:171-181. [PMID: 32407532 PMCID: PMC7850527 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) affects health-related quality of life (HRQoL); few treatments have demonstrated clinically meaningful HRQoL benefit. KEYNOTE-040 evaluated pembrolizumab vs standard of care (SOC) in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC whose disease recurred or progressed after platinum-containing regimen. METHODS Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg or SOC (methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab). Exploratory HRQoL analyses used European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30 quality-of-life, EORTC 35-question quality-of-life head and neck cancer-specific module, and EuroQoL 5-dimensions questionnaires. RESULTS The HRQoL population comprised 469 patients (pembrolizumab = 241, SOC = 228). HRQoL compliance for patients in the study at week 15 was 75.3% (116 of 154) for pembrolizumab and 74.6% (85 of 114) for SOC. The median time to deterioration in global health status (GHS) and QoL scores were 4.8 months with pembrolizumab and 2.8 months with SOC (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59 to 1.05). At week 15, GHS / QoL scores were stable for pembrolizumab (least squares mean [LSM] = 0.39, 95% CI = -3.00 to 3.78) but worsened for SOC (LSM = -5.86, 95% CI = -9.68 to -2.04); the LSM between-group difference was 6.25 points (95% CI = 1.32 to 11.18; nominal 2-sided P = .01). A greater difference in the LSM for GHS / QoL score occurred with pembrolizumab vs docetaxel (10.23, 95% CI = 3.15 to 17.30) compared with pembrolizumab vs methotrexate (6.21, 95% CI = -4.57 to 16.99) or pembrolizumab vs cetuximab (-1.44, 95% CI = -11.43 to 8.56). Pembrolizumab-treated patients had stable functioning and symptoms at week 15, with no notable differences from SOC. CONCLUSIONS GHS / QoL scores were stable with pembrolizumab but declined with SOC in patients at week 15, supporting the clinically meaningful benefit of pembrolizumab in recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin J Harrington
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | | | - Christophe Le Tourneau
- Department of Drug Development and Innovation (D3i), Institut Curie, Paris and Saint-Cloud, France
- INSERM U900 Research Unit, Saint-Cloud, France
- Paris-Saclay University, Paris, France
| | - Jose Dinis
- Instituto Português Oncologia, Porto, Portugal
| | - Lisa F Licitra
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Myung-Ju Ahn
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ainara Soria
- Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Nicolas Mach
- HUG - Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ranee Mehra
- Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ezra E W Cohen
- Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rhea LP, Mendez-Marti S, Kim D, Aragon-Ching JB. Role of immunotherapy in bladder cancer. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 26:100296. [PMID: 33421822 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2020.100296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Revised: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
The role of immunotherapy in bladder urothelial cancers is rapidly expanding. Since the initial second-line therapy approval for patients who fail prior platinum-based chemotherapy, the use of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has been rapidly evolving. There are approved indications for first-line metastatic disease in the platinum-ineligible patients or the cisplatin-ineligible PD-L1 positive patients, and there is a label for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer who are BCG-refractory. In addition, a trial on maintenance immunotherapy with avelumab showed positive findings with improvement in overall survival that has also changed standard of care for these patients. There are ongoing clinical trials evaluating its use in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant perioperative muscle-invasive bladder cancer setting. The pivotal trials that led to these FDA approvals and promising and ongoing trials are discussed herein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Logan P Rhea
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Car
| | | | - Davis Kim
- Virginia Commonwealth University Medical School
| | - Jeanny B Aragon-Ching
- Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Xin W, Ding H, Fang Q, Zheng X, Tong Y, Xu G, Yang G. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in China: an economic analysis based on a randomised, open-label, phase III trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038867. [PMID: 33371020 PMCID: PMC7751211 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab was recently demonstrated to have survival benefit in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (r/mHNSCC). However, the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in China remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE This analysis aimed to describe the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care (SOC) therapy in r/mHNSCC in China. DESIGN A Markov model consisting of three health states (stable, progressive and dead) was developed to compare the cost and effectiveness of pembrolizumab with SOC in platinum-resistant r/mHNSCC. Model inputs for transition probabilities and toxicity were collected from the KEYNOTE-040 trial, while health utilities were estimated from a literature review. Cost data were acquired for the payer's perspective in China. Costs and outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3.0%. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to test the uncertainties surrounding model parameters. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), which were calculated as the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). RESULTS The total mean cost of pembrolizumab and SOC was US$45 861 and US$41 950, respectively. As for effectiveness, pembrolizumab yielded 0.31 QALYs compared with 0.25 QALYs for SOC therapy. The ICER for pembrolizumab versus SOC was US$65 186/QALY, which was higher than the willingness-to-pay threshold (WTP) of US$28 130/QALY in China. The univariate sensitivity analysis indicated that utility values for progressive state, probability from stable to progressive in the SOC group, as well as cost of pembrolizumab were the three most influential variables on ICER. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that standard therapy was more likely to be cost-effective compared with pembrolizumab at a WTP value of US$28 130/QALY. Results were robust across both univariate analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab is not likely to be a cost-effective strategy compared with SOC therapy in patients with platinum-resistant r/mHNSCC in China. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02252042; Post-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenxiu Xin
- Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer(IBMC),Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Haiying Ding
- Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer(IBMC),Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qilu Fang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer(IBMC),Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiaowei Zheng
- Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer(IBMC),Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yinghui Tong
- Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer(IBMC),Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Gaoqi Xu
- Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer(IBMC),Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Guonong Yang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer(IBMC),Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ryoo BY, Merle P, Kulkarni AS, Cheng AL, Bouattour M, Lim HY, Breder V, Edeline J, Chao Y, Ogasawara S, Yau T, Garrido M, Chan SL, Daniele B, Norquist JM, Chen E, Siegel AB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Kudo M. Health-related quality-of-life impact of pembrolizumab versus best supportive care in previously systemically treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: KEYNOTE-240. Cancer 2020; 127:865-874. [PMID: 33231873 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important outcome measure and prognostic indicator in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). KEYNOTE-240 (NCT02702401) assessed the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus best supportive care (BSC) versus placebo plus BSC in patients with HCC who previously received sorafenib. This study presents the results of a prespecified exploratory analysis of patient-reported outcomes. METHODS Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its HCC supplement (EORTC QLQ-HCC18) electronically at baseline; at weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18; and then every 9 weeks until 1 year or end of treatment, and at the 30-day safety follow-up visit. RESULTS The HRQoL population included 271 and 127 patients randomly assigned to pembrolizumab and placebo, respectively. From baseline to week 12, changes in both scores were similar between pembrolizumab and placebo; global health status/QoL scores were stable. The proportions of patients who improved, remained stable, or deteriorated across all functional domain and symptom scores were generally similar between pembrolizumab and placebo. Time to deterioration was similar between the 2 arms based on the prespecified analysis of EORTC QLQ-HCC18 domains of abdominal swelling, fatigue, and pain. CONCLUSION Pembrolizumab preserved HRQoL during treatment for advanced HCC. Combined with efficacy and safety results from KEYNOTE-240, these findings support a positive benefit/risk profile for pembrolizumab in a second-line treatment setting for patients with HCC who previously received sorafenib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baek-Yeol Ryoo
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Philippe Merle
- Croix-Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | | | - Ann-Lii Cheng
- National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Mohamed Bouattour
- Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Ho Yeong Lim
- Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Valeriy Breder
- N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Yee Chao
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Sadahisa Ogasawara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Thomas Yau
- The University at Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China
| | | | - Stephen L Chan
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong
| | | | | | - Erluo Chen
- Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey
| | | | - Andrew X Zhu
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Jiahui International Cancer Center, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Richard S Finn
- David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Necchi A, Nishiyama H, Matsubara N, Lee JL, Petrylak DP, de Wit R, Drakaki A, Liepa AM, Mao H, Bell-McGuinn K, Powles T. Health-related quality of life in the randomized phase 3 study of ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo plus docetaxel in platinum-refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma (RANGE). BMC Urol 2020; 20:181. [PMID: 33160359 PMCID: PMC7648381 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-020-00752-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate patient-reported outcomes with ramucirumab plus docetaxel, a regimen which improved progression-free survival in platinum-refractory advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC). METHODS RANGE-a randomized, double-blinded, phase 3 trial in patients with platinum-refractory aUC. Ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2) or placebo plus docetaxel were administered every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients received maximum 10 cycles of docetaxel. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EuroQoL five-dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) were administered at baseline, start of each cycle, and 30-day follow-up visit. A ≥ 10-point change in QLQ-C30 scores was considered meaningful. Rates of improved/stable scores were compared between treatment arms using Fisher's exact test. Time to deterioration (TtD) was estimated and compared using Kaplan-Meier estimation and log-rank test. RESULTS Of the 530 patients, ~ 97% patients in each arm provided baseline QLQ-C30 data. On-treatment compliance was ≥ 88% for first 8 cycles. Mean baseline QLQ-C30 scores were similar between arms, with global quality of life (QoL), fatigue, pain, and insomnia having greatest impairment. Postbaseline rates of improved/stable QLQ-C30 scores were similar between treatment arms except for greater improvement in pain score with ramucirumab. TtD of QLQ-C30 scales favored ramucirumab arm. Baseline EQ-5D-5L index and visual analogue scale scores were similar between arms, followed by relatively stable on-treatment scores. EQ-5D-5L scores worsened at post-discontinuation follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS Ramucirumab plus docetaxel did not negatively impact QoL compared with docetaxel alone in platinum-refractory aUC. Improved TtD and tumor associated rates of pain favored ramucirumab treatment. CLINICAL TRAIL REGISTRATION NCT02426125. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02426125 . Date of registration: April 24th 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, 20133, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | - Jae-Lyun Lee
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | - Huzhang Mao
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Couchoud C, Fagnoni P, Aubin F, Westeel V, Maurina T, Thiery-Vuillemin A, Gerard C, Kroemer M, Borg C, Limat S, Nerich V. Economic evaluations of cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review and quality evaluation. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2020; 69:1947-1958. [PMID: 32676716 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02646-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Scientific advances in the last decade have highlighted the use of immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, to be an effective strategy in cancer therapy. However, these immunotherapeutic agents are expensive, and their use must take into account economic criteria. Thus, the objective of the present study was to systematically identify and review published EE related to the use of ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab in melanoma, lung cancer, head and neck cancer or renal cell carcinoma, and to assess their quality. METHODS The systematic literature research was conducted on Medline via PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify economic evaluations published before July 2018. The quality of each selected economic evaluation was assessed by two independent reviewers using the Drummond checklist. RESULTS Our systematic review was based on 32 economic evaluations using different methodological approaches, different perspectives and different time horizons. Three-quarters of the economic evaluations are full (n = 24) with a Drummond score ≥ 7, synonymous of "high quality". Among them, 66% reported a strategy that was cost-effective. The most assessed immunotherapeutic agent was nivolumab. In patients with renal cell carcinoma or head and neck cancer, it was less likely to be cost-effective than in patients with melanoma or lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS Whether or not these findings will be confirmed remains to be seen when market approval to cover more indications is extended and new effective immunotherapeutic agents become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Couchoud
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon Cedex, France
| | - Philippe Fagnoni
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Dijon, France
- INSERM UMR 866, University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
- EPICAD LNC UMR 1231, University of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - François Aubin
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Besançon, France
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
| | - Virginie Westeel
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
- Pulmonary Medicine Department, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France
| | - Tristan Maurina
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Claire Gerard
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon Cedex, France
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
| | - Marie Kroemer
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon Cedex, France
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
| | - Christophe Borg
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Samuel Limat
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon Cedex, France
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France
| | - Virginie Nerich
- Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 3 Boulevard Alexandre Fleming, 25030, Besancon Cedex, France.
- INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, RIGHT Interactions Greffon-Hôte-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire Et Génique, Besançon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Liang F, Zhang S, Wang Q, Li W. Clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors approved by US Food and Drug Administration. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:823. [PMID: 32867707 PMCID: PMC7457752 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07313-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We describe the clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors using the European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) and ASCO VF. Methods We identify all approved indications of immune checkpoint inhibitors based on RCTs between January 1, 2011 and September 30, 2018 by FDA. Information including medians and HR of OS (PFS or DFS) and 95% CI, grade 3 or 4 toxicities in each arm, QOL data, survival probability at fixed time were extracted. Results Immune checkpoint inhibitors were approved for 18 indications based on RCTs. All the indications meet the ESMO-MCBS 1.1 threshold for meaningful benefit. By the updated ASCO-VF, the median Net Health Benefit (NHB) of these agents was 55.3 (range 17.4–77.1). Two third of the indication gained the bonus points for durable survival benefits by updated ASCO VF. When updated results were incorporated in the assessment, clinical benefit of most approved immune checkpoint inhibitors increased with a median improvement of NHB of 10 (range 2–20). Conclusions Approved immune checkpoint inhibitors provided clinical meaningful benefit by ESMO-MCBS 1.1, and most of these agents reach the threshold for bonus points for durable survival in the updated ASCO VF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fei Liang
- Medical Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.,Department of Biostatistics, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Sheng Zhang
- Medical Oncology, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, 270 Dongan Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Qin Wang
- Shanghai University of Engineering Science, Shanghai, China.
| | - Wenfeng Li
- Department of Medical oncology, the affiliated hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
| |
Collapse
|