Mismatch repair deficiency in high-grade meningioma: a rare but recurrent event associated with dramatic immune activation and clinical response to PD-1 blockade

Volumetric growth rate of incidentally found meningiomas on immunotherapy

PURPOSE

The expression of PD-L1 in high-grade meningiomas made it a potential target for immunotherapy research in refractory cases. Several prospective studies in this field are still on going. We sought to retrospectively investigate the effects of check-point inhibitors (CI) on meningiomas that had been naïve to either surgical or radiation approaches by following incidental meningiomas found during treatment with CI for various primary metastatic cancers.

METHODS

We used the NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center Data Hub to find patients treated by CI for various cancers, who also had serial computerized-tomography (CT) or magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) reports of intracranial meningiomas. Meningioma volumetric measurements were compared between the beginning and end of the CI treatment period. Patients treated with chemotherapy during this period were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included in our study, of which 14 (56%) were on CI for melanoma, 5 (20%) for non-small-cell lung cancer and others. CI therapies included nivolumab (n = 15, 60%), ipilimumab (n = 11, 44%) and pembrolizumab (n = 9, %36), while 9 (36%) were on ipilimumab/nivolumab combination. We did not find any significant difference between tumor volumes before and after treatment with CI (1.31 ± 0.46 vs. 1.34 ± 0.46, p=0.8, respectively). Among patients beyond 1 year of follow-up (n = 13), annual growth was 0.011 ± 0.011 cm3/year. Five patients showed minor volume reduction of 0.12 ± 0.10 cm3 (21 ± 6% from baseline). We did not find significant predictors of tumor volume reduction.

CONCLUSION

Check-point inhibitors may impact the natural history of meningiomas. Additional research is needed to define potential clinical indications and treatment goals.

Glioblastoma and Other Primary Brain Malignancies in Adults: A Review

Importance

Malignant primary brain tumors cause more than 15 000 deaths per year in the United States. The annual incidence of primary malignant brain tumors is approximately 7 per 100 000 individuals and increases with age. Five-year survival is approximately 36%.

Observations

Approximately 49% of malignant brain tumors are glioblastomas, and 30% are diffusely infiltrating lower-grade gliomas. Other malignant brain tumors include primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (7%) and malignant forms of ependymomas (3%) and meningiomas (2%). Symptoms of malignant brain tumors include headache (50%), seizures (20%-50%), neurocognitive impairment (30%-40%), and focal neurologic deficits (10%-40%). Magnetic resonance imaging before and after a gadolinium-based contrast agent is the preferred imaging modality for evaluating brain tumors. Diagnosis requires tumor biopsy with consideration of histopathological and molecular characteristics. Treatment varies by tumor type and often includes a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. For patients with glioblastoma, the combination of temozolomide with radiotherapy improved survival when compared with radiotherapy alone (2-year survival, 27.2% vs 10.9%; 5-year survival, 9.8% vs 1.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.6 [95% CI, 0.5-0.7]; P < .001). In patients with anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors with 1p/19q codeletion, probable 20-year overall survival following radiotherapy without vs with the combination of procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine was 13.6% vs 37.1% (80 patients; HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.35-1.03]; P = .06) in the EORTC 26951 trial and 14.9% vs 37% in the RTOG 9402 trial (125 patients; HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40-0.94]; P = .02). Treatment of primary CNS lymphoma includes high-dose methotrexate-containing regimens, followed by consolidation therapy with myeloablative chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue, nonmyeloablative chemotherapy regimens, or whole brain radiation.

Conclusions and Relevance

The incidence of primary malignant brain tumors is approximately 7 per 100 000 individuals, and approximately 49% of primary malignant brain tumors are glioblastomas. Most patients die from progressive disease. First-line therapy for glioblastoma is surgery followed by radiation and the alkylating chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide.

The Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Primary CNS Neoplasms: A Review of Current Knowledge and Therapeutic Approaches

Primary CNS neoplasms are responsible for considerable mortality and morbidity, and many therapies directed at primary brain tumors have proven unsuccessful despite their success in preclinical studies. Recently, the tumor immune microenvironment has emerged as a critical aspect of primary CNS neoplasms that may affect their malignancy, prognosis, and response to therapy across patients and tumor grades. This review covers the tumor microenvironment of various primary CNS neoplasms, with a focus on glioblastoma and meningioma. Additionally, current therapeutic strategies based on elements of the tumor microenvironment, including checkpoint inhibitor therapy and immunotherapeutic vaccines, are discussed.

Malignant anaplastic meningioma in neurofibromatosis type 1 patient: a rare case report

BACKGROUND

Meningiomas are usually associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2), while gliomas are usually associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1). NF-1 is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder associated with skin manifestations, bone conditions, and different types of benign and malignant tumors. Grade 3 anaplastic meningiomas are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. Systemic treatments in grade 3 meningiomas are experimental, with some reports suggestive of minimal clinical benefits. They are used occasionally for recurrent cases with no surgical or radiotherapy roles. In our case, we will focus the discussion on grade 3 anaplastic meningioma in a patient with NF-1, using chemotherapy for this aggressive, recurrent tumor. To our knowledge, this is the first case of NF-1 associated with malignant anaplastic meningioma in English literature.

CASE DESCRIPTION

In this case report, we present a 25-year-old left-handed female patient who fits the diagnostic criteria for NF-1. She presented with focal seizure and was diagnosed with grade 3 anaplastic meningioma, a highly aggressive tumor. She experienced a rapid recurrence after her initial surgery and eventually received multiple lines of treatments, including radiation and chemotherapy [temozolomide (TMZ)].

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic therapy in grade 3 meningiomas is still experimental and may have a slight clinical benefit. As a result, further prospective, multicentric studies are needed to ascertain these outcomes. Patients should be included in prospective trials because of the poor prognosis and aggressive nature of grade 3 meningiomas. In addition, discovering specific molecular biomarkers will allow us to suggest an individualized treatment. This case suggests that the differential diagnosis of a mass in a patient with NF-1 should include tumors known to be associated with the syndrome as well as sporadic, unrelated neoplasms.

Advances in Molecular Biological and Translational Studies in World Health Organization Grades 2 and 3 Meningiomas: A Literature Review

The treatment of World Health Organization (WHO) grades 2 and 3 meningiomas remains difficult and controversial. The pathogenesis of high-grade meningiomas was expected to be elucidated to improve treatment strategies. The molecular biology of meningiomas has been clarified in recent years. High-grade meningiomas have been linked to NF2 mutations and 22q deletion. CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion and TERT promoter mutations are independent prognostic factors for WHO grade 3 meningiomas. In addition to 22q loss, 1p, 14p, and 9q loss have been linked to high-grade meningiomas. Meningiomas enriched in copy number alterations may be biologically invasive. Furthermore, several new comprehensive classifications of meningiomas have been proposed based on these molecular biological features, including DNA methylation status. The new classifications may have implications for treatment strategies for refractory aggressive meningiomas because they provide a more accurate prognosis compared to the conventional WHO classification. Although several systemic therapies, including molecular targeted therapies, may be effective in treating refractory aggressive meningiomas, these drugs are being tested. Systemic drug therapy for meningioma is expected to be developed in the future. Thus, this review aims to discuss the distinct genomic alterations observed in WHO grade 2 and 3 meningiomas, as well as their diagnostic and therapeutic implications and systemic drug therapies for high-grade meningiomas.

Synthesizing Molecular and Immune Characteristics to Move Beyond WHO Grade in Meningiomas: A Focused Review

No portion of this manuscript has previously been presented. Meningiomas, the most common primary intracranial tumors, are histologically categorized by the World Health Organization (WHO) grading system. While higher WHO grade is generally associated with poor clinical outcomes, a significant subset of grade I tumors recur or progress, indicating a need for more reliable models of meningioma behavior. Several groups have developed risk scores based on molecular or immunologic characteristics. These classification schemes show promise, with several models preliminarily demonstrating similar or superior accuracy to WHO grading. Improved understanding of immune system recognition and targeting of meningioma subtypes is necessary to advance the predictive power, as well as develop new therapies. Here, we characterize meningioma molecular drivers, predictive of recurrence and progression, and describe specific aspects of the immune response to meningiomas while highlighting critical questions and ongoing research. Relevant manuscripts of interest were identified using a systematic approach and synthesized into this focused review. Finally, we summarize the ongoing and completed clinical trials for immunotherapy in meningiomas and offer perspective on future directions.

Clinical Significance of Molecular Alterations and Systemic Therapy for Meningiomas: Where Do We Stand?

Simple Summary

Meningiomas are the most frequent intracranial tumors and comprise a heterogeneous spectrum of diseases, ranging from small, asymptomatic tumors that do not need treatment to large, symptomatic ones causing seizures or neurological deficits that require surgery and/or radiotherapy. Systemic therapy is reserved for progressive or recurrent meningiomas when surgery and/or radiotherapy options have been exhausted, with only modest activity in terms of disease control and survival. Novel molecular alterations are correlated with grading, location, and prognosis of meningiomas. Moreover, some of these driver alterations regulate meningioma growth and progression and may be targeted by specific drugs that are under investigation in clinical trials. Lastly, the microenvironment surrounding meningiomas may also contribute to regulating tumor growth: in particular, PD-L1 and/or M2 macrophage expression may represent a target for immunotherapy.

Abstract

Meningiomas are common intracranial tumors that can be treated successfully in most cases with surgical resection and/or adjuvant radiotherapy. However, approximately 20% of patients show an aggressive clinical course with tumor recurrence or progressive disease, resulting in significant morbidity and increased mortality. Despite several studies that have investigated different cytotoxic agents in aggressive meningiomas in the past several years, limited evidence of efficacy and clinical benefit has been reported thus far. Novel molecular alterations have been linked to a particular clinicopathological phenotype and have been correlated with grading, location, and prognosis of meningiomas. In this regard, SMO, AKT, and PIK3CA mutations are typical of anterior skull base meningiomas, whereas KLF4 mutations are specific for secretory histology, and BAP1 alterations are common in progressive rhabdoid meningiomas. Alterations in TERT, DMD, and BAP1 correlate with poor outcomes. Moreover, some actionable mutations, including SMO, AKT1, and PIK3CA, regulate meningioma growth and are under investigation in clinical trials. PD-L1 and/or M2 macrophage expression in the microenvironment provides evidence for the investigation of immunotherapy in progressive meningiomas.

Phase 2 study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent and residual high-grade meningiomas

High-grade meningiomas are associated with neuro-cognitive morbidity and have limited treatments. High-grade meningiomas harbor an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression may contribute to their aggressive phenotype. Here, we present the results of a single-arm, open-label phase 2 trial (NCT03279692) evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in a cohort of 25 evaluable patients with recurrent and progressive grade 2 and 3 meningiomas. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients alive and progression-free at 6 months (PFS-6). Secondary endpoints include progression-free and overall survival, best intracranial response, and toxicity. Our study has met its primary endpoint and achieved a PFS-6 rate of 0.48 (90% exact CI: 0.31-0.66) and a median PFS of 7.6 months (90% CI: 3.4-12.9 months). Twenty percent of patients have experienced one (or more) grade-3 or higher treatment-related adverse events. These results suggest that pembrolizumab exerts promising efficacy on a subset of these tumors. Further studies are needed to identify the biological facets within the meningioma TME that may drive response to immune-based therapies.

Immunotherapy for Neuro-oncology

Immunotherapy has changed the landscape of treatment of many solid and hematological malignancies and is at the forefront of cancer breakthroughs. Several circumstances unique to the central nervous system (CNS) such as limited space for an inflammatory response, difficulties with repeated sampling, corticosteroid use for management of cerebral edema, and immunosuppressive mechanisms within the tumor and brain parenchyma have posed challenges in clinical development of immunotherapy for intracranial tumors. Nonetheless, the success of immunotherapy in brain metastases (BMs) from solid cancers such as melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) proves that the CNS is not an immune-privileged organ and is capable of initiating and regulating immune responses that lead to tumor control. However, the development of immunotherapeutics for the most malignant primary brain tumor, glioblastoma (GBM), has been challenging due to systemic and profound tumor-mediated immunosuppression unique to GBM, intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity, and lack of stably expressed clonal antigens. Here, we review recent advances in the field of immunotherapy for neuro-oncology with a focus on BM, GBM, and rare CNS cancers.

Chemotherapy and targeted therapies for meningiomas: what is the evidence?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although most meningiomas are slow growing tumors mainly controlled by surgery with or without radiotherapy, aggressive meningiomas that fail these conventional treatments constitute a rare situation, a therapeutic challenge and an unmet need in neuro-oncology.

RECENT FINDING

Mutational landscape in recurrent high-grade meningiomas includes mainly NF2 mutation or 22q chromosomal deletion, whereas telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter, BAP-1 and CDK2NA mutations were also found in aggressive meningiomas. Pi3K-Akt-mTOR pathway is currently the most relevant intracellular signaling pathway target in meningiomas with preliminary clinical activity observed. Assessment of drug activity with progression free survival rate at 6 months is challenging in regard to meningioma growth rate heterogeneity, so that 3-dimensional growth rate before and during treatment could be considered in the future to selected new active drugs.

SUMMARY

Despite a low evidence level, some systemic therapies may be considered for patients with recurrent meningioma not amenable to further surgery or radiotherapy. In recurrent high-grade meningioma, everolimus-octreotide combination, bevacizumab, sunitinib and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy exhibit a signal of activity that may justify their clinical use. Despite a lack of clear signal of activity to date, immunotherapy may offer new perspectives in the treatment of these refractory tumors.

T lymphocyte-targeted immune checkpoint modulation in glioma

Immunomodulatory therapies targeting inhibitory checkpoint molecules have revolutionized the treatment of solid tumor malignancies. Concerns about whether systemic administration of an immune checkpoint inhibitor could impact primary brain tumors were answered with the observation of definitive responses in pediatric patients harboring hypermutated gliomas. Although initial clinical results in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) were disappointing, recently published results have demonstrated a potential survival benefit in patients with recurrent GBM treated with neoadjuvant programmed cell death protein 1 blockade. While these findings necessitate verification in subsequent studies, they support the possibility of achieving clinical meaningful immune responses in malignant primary brain tumors including GBM, a disease in dire need of additional therapeutic options. There are several challenges involved in treating glioma with immune checkpoint modulators including the immunosuppressive nature of GBM itself with high inhibitory checkpoint expression, the immunoselective blood brain barrier impairing the ability for peripheral lymphocytes to traffic to the tumor microenvironment and the high prevalence of corticosteroid use which suppress lymphocyte activation. However, by simultaneously targeting multiple costimulatory and inhibitory pathways, it may be possible to achieve an effective antitumoral immune response. To this end, there are now several novel agents targeting more recently uncovered “second generation” checkpoint molecules. Given the multiplicity of drugs being considered for combination regimens, an increased understanding of the mechanisms of action and resistance combined with more robust preclinical and early clinical testing will be needed to be able to adequately test these agents. This review summarizes our current understanding of T lymphocyte-modulating checkpoint molecules as it pertains to glioma with the hope for a renewed focus on the most promising therapeutic strategies.

Molecular Profiling of 22 Primary Atypical Meningiomas Shows the Prognostic Significance of 18q Heterozygous Loss and CDKN2A/B Homozygous Deletion on Recurrence-Free Survival

The use of adjuvant therapy is controversial in atypical meningiomas with gross total resection. Predictors of recurrence risk could be useful in selecting patients for additional treatments. The aim of this study was to investigate whether molecular features are associated with recurrence risk of atypical meningiomas. According to WHO classification, the diagnosis of atypical meningioma was based on the presence of one major criteria (mitotic activity, brain invasion) or three or more minor criteria. The molecular profile of 22 cases (eight mitotically active, eight brain-invasive, and six with minor criteria) was assessed exploring the mutational status and copy number variation of 409 genes using next generation sequencing. Of the 22 patients with a median follow up of 53.5 months, 13 had recurrence of disease within 68 months. NF2 mutation was the only recurrent alteration (11/22) and was unrelated to clinical-pathological features. Recurring meningiomas featured a significantly higher proportion of copy number losses than non-recurring ones (p = 0.027). Chromosome 18q heterozygous loss or CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion was significantly associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (p = 0.008; hazard ratio: 5.3). Atypical meningiomas could be tested routinely for these genetic alterations to identify cases for adjuvant treatment.

Clinical significance of checkpoint regulator "Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1)" expression in meningioma: review of the current status

Introduction

Meningioma is the most common primary brain tumor. Most meningiomas are benign; however, a subset of these tumors can be aggressive, presenting with early or multiple tumor recurrences that are refractory to neurosurgical resection and radiotherapy. There is no standard systemic therapy for these patients, and post-surgical management of these patients is usually complicated due to lack of accurate prediction for tumor progression.

Methods

In this review, we summarise the crucial immunosuppressive role of checkpoint regulators, including PD-1 and PD-L1 interacting in the tumor microenvironment, which has led to efforts aimed at targeting this axis.

Results

Since their discovery, checkpoint inhibitors have significantly improved the outcome in many types of cancers. Currently, targeted therapy for PD-1 and PD-L1 proteins are being tested in several ongoing clinical trials for brain tumors such as glioblastoma. More recently, there have been some reports implicating increased PD-L1 expression in high-grade (WHO grades II and III) meningiomas. Several clinical trials are underway to assess the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors in the therapeutic management of patients with aggressive meningiomas. Here, we review the immune suppressive microenvironment in meningiomas, and then focus on clinical and pathological characterization and tumor heterogeneity with respect to PD-L1 expression as well as challenges associated with the assessment of PD-L1 expression in meningioma.

Conclusion

We conclude with a brief review of ongoing clinical trials using checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of high-grade and refractory meningiomas.

Meningioma: A Review of Clinicopathological and Molecular Aspects

Meningiomas are the most the common primary brain tumors in adults, representing approximately a third of all intracranial neoplasms. They classically are found to be more common in females, with the exception of higher grades that have a predilection for males, and patients of older age. Meningiomas can also be seen as a spectrum of inherited syndromes such as neurofibromatosis 2 as well as ionizing radiation. In general, the 5-year survival for a WHO grade I meningioma exceeds 80%; however, survival is greatly reduced in anaplastic meningiomas. The standard of care for meningiomas in a surgically-accessible location is gross total resection. Radiation therapy is generally saved for atypical, anaplastic, recurrent, and surgically inaccessible benign meningiomas with a total dose of ~60 Gy. However, the method of radiation, regimen and timing is still evolving and is an area of active research with ongoing clinical trials. While there are currently no good adjuvant chemotherapeutic agents available, recent advances in the genomic and epigenomic landscape of meningiomas are being explored for potential targeted therapy.

Basis for Immunotherapy for Treatment of Meningiomas

Meningiomas are common tumors that account for approximately one third of CNS tumors diagnosed every year. They are classified by the World Health Organization in grades I-III. Higher grades have an increased rate of growth, invasiveness, rate of recurrence, and worse outcomes than lower grades. Most meningiomas are grade I, while ~18% of meningiomas are grade II and III in hospital-based series. Meningiomas are typically "benign" tumors that are treated with surgery and radiation. However, when they recur or are unresectable, treatment options are very limited, especially since they are chemotherapy-resistant. Recent advances in the treatment of cancers with immunotherapy have focused on checkpoint blockade as well as other types of immunotherapy. There is emerging evidence supporting the use of immunotherapy as a potentially effective treatment strategy for meningioma patients. The immune microenvironment of meningiomas is a complex interplay of genetic alterations, immunomodulatory protein expression, and tumor-immune cell interactions. Meningiomas are known to be infiltrated by immune cells including microglia, macrophages, B-cells, and T-cells. Several mechanisms contribute to decreased an ti-tumor immune response, allowing tumor growth and evasion of the immune system. We discuss the most current knowledge on the immune micro-environment of meningiomas, preclinical findings of immunotherapy in meningiomas, meningioma immunotherapy clinical trials, and also offer insight into future prospects for immunotherapies in meningiomas.

Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in meningioma; prognostic significance and its association with hypoxia and NFKB2 expression

Management of clinically aggressive meningiomas is a considerable challenge. PD-L1 induced immune suppression has increasingly gained attention in clinical management of cancer; however, to date, the clinical significance and regulatory mechanisms of PD-L1 in meningioma is not yet fully characterized. We sought to characterize PD-L1 expression in meningioma and elucidate its regulatory mechanisms. Immunohistochemical staining of PD-L1 expression in meningiomas showed 43% positivity in both tumor and immune cells and we observed intra and inter tumoral heterogeneity. Univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed that PD-L1 protein expression is an independent prognostic marker for worse recurrence free survival in meningioma. Furthermore, our transcriptomic analysis revealed a strong association between PD-L1 expression and that of NFKB2 and carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9). We also demonstrated that both of these markers, when co-expressed with PD-L1, predict tumor progression. Our studies on several meningioma cell lines cultured in hypoxic conditions validated the association of CA9 and PD-L1 expression. Here we show the clinical significance of PD-L1 in meningioma as a marker that can predict tumor recurrence. We also show an association PD-L1 expression with NFKB2 expression and its induction under hypoxic conditions. These findings may open new avenues of molecular investigation in pathogenesis of meningioma.

The medical necessity of advanced molecular testing in the diagnosis and treatment of brain tumor patients

Accurate pathologic diagnoses and molecularly informed treatment decisions for a wide variety of cancers depend on robust clinical molecular testing that uses genomic, epigenomic, and transcriptomic-based tools. Nowhere is this more essential than in the workup of brain tumors, as emphasized by the incorporation of molecular criteria into the 2016 World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors and the updated official guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Despite the medical necessity of molecular testing in brain tumors, access to and utilization of molecular diagnostics is still highly variable across institutions, and a lack of reimbursement for such testing remains a significant obstacle. The objectives of this review are (i) to identify barriers to adoption of molecular testing in brain tumors, (ii) to describe the current molecular tools recommended for the clinical evaluation of brain tumors, and (iii) to summarize how molecular data are interpreted to guide clinical care, so as to improve understanding and justification for their coverage in the routine workup of adult and pediatric brain tumor cases.

NF2 mutation status and tumor mutational burden correlate with immune cell infiltration in meningiomas

BACKGROUND

The tumor microenvironment is an emerging biomarker of underlying genomic heterogeneity and response to immunotherapy-based treatment regimens in solid malignancies. How tumor mutational burden influences the density, distribution, and presence of a localized immune response in meningiomas is unknown.

METHODS

Representative hematoxylin and eosin slides were reviewed at 40X to assess for the density of inflammatory cells. Lymphocytes and macrophages were quantified in the following ordinal manner: 0 = not present, 1 = 1-25 cells present, and 2 = greater than 26 cells present. Immune cell infiltrate grade was scored for both scattered and aggregated distributions. Next generation targeted sequencing was performed on all meningiomas included in this study.

RESULTS

One hundred and forty-five meningiomas were evaluated in this study. Lymphocytes were observed in both scattered (95.9%) and aggregated (21.4%) distributions. A total of 115 (79.3%) meningiomas had 1-25 scattered lymphocytes, and 24 (16.6%) had > 25 scattered lymphocytes, and 6 (4.1%) had no scattered lymphocytes. Twenty (13.8%) meningiomas had 1-25 aggregated lymphocytes. Eleven (7.6%) had > 25 aggregated lymphocytes and 114 (78.6%) had no aggregated lymphocytes. Six (4.1%) meningiomas had 1-25 aggregated macrophages, 5 (3.4%) had > 25 aggregated macrophages, and 134 (92.4%) had no aggregated macrophages. Density of aggregated lymphocytes and aggregated macrophages were associated with higher tumor grade, P = 0.0071 and P = 0.0068, respectively. Scattered lymphocyte density was not associated with meningioma grade. The presence of scattered lymphocytes was associated with increased tumor mutational burden. Meningiomas that did not have scattered lymphocytes had a mean number of single mutations of 2.3 ± 2.9, compared with meningiomas that had scattered lymphocytes, 6.9 ± 20.3, P = 0.03. NF2 mutations were identified in 59 (40.7%) meningiomas and were associated with increased density of scattered lymphocytes. NF2 mutations were seen in 0 (0%) meningiomas that did not have scattered lymphocytes, 46 (40.0%) meningiomas that had 1-25 scattered lymphocytes, and 13 (54.2%) meningiomas that had > 25 scattered lymphocytes, P = 0.046.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that distribution of immune cell infiltration in meningiomas is associated with tumor mutational burden. NF2 mutational status was associated with an increasing density of scattered lymphocytes. As the role of immunotherapy in meningiomas continues to be elucidated with clinical trials that are currently underway, these results may serve as a novel biomarker of tumor mutational burden in meningiomas.

Advances in Molecular Classification and Therapeutic Opportunities in Meningiomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Our understanding of the genetic and epigenetic alterations in meningioma and the underlying tumor biology of meningioma has significantly changed over the past decade and resulted in revision of prognostically relevant meningioma subclasses within and beyond the WHO classification of CNS tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors recognizes WHO grade I, II, and III based on histopathological features. Recent work has identified genetic alterations with prognostic implications, including mutations of the TERT promoter, loss of function of the DMD gene, and inactivation of the tumor suppressor BAP-1. Studies of DNA methylation patterns in meningiomas have resulted in a novel and prognostically relevant meningioma subclassification schema. There have been major advances in our understanding of prognostically relevant genetic and epigenetic changes in meningioma which will hopefully allow for improvement in clinical trial design and the development of more effective therapies for meningioma.

Error-prone DNA repair pathways as determinants of immunotherapy activity: an emerging scenario for cancer treatment

Defects in DNA repair machinery play a critical role in the pathogenesis and progression of human cancer. When they occur, the tumor cells activate error-prone mechanisms which lead to genomic instability and high mutation rate. These defects represent, therefore, a cancer Achilles'heel which could be therapeutically exploited by the use of DNA damage response inhibitors. Moreover, experimental and clinical evidence indicates that DNA repair deregulation has a pivotal role also in promoting immune recognition and immune destruction of cancer cells. Indeed, immune checkpoint inhibitors have received regulatory approval in tumors characterized by high genomic instability, such as melanomas and lung cancer. Here, we discuss how deregulation of DNA repair, through activation of error-prone mechanisms, increases immune activation against cancer. Finally, we address the potential strategies to use DNA repair components as biomarkers and/or therapeutic targets to empower immune-oncology treatment of human cancer.

STK11 mutation status is associated with decreased survival in meningiomas

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that STK11 mutations may influence clinical outcome and response to immunotherapy in cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Next-generation targeted sequencing of STK11 mutation status in a large cohort of 188 meningiomas.

RESULTS

STK11 loss-of-function mutations were identified in 3.7% of meningiomas. STK11 mutations were found in both low- and high-grade lesions and samples from primary and recurrent disease. There was a 2.8-fold increased risk of death for patients whose meningioma harbored an STK11 mutation, after controlling for lesion grade and occurrence status. The median overall survival for patients with STK11-mutated meningiomas was 4.4 years compared with 16.8 years.

CONCLUSION

These data identify recurrent STK11 mutations in a subset of meningiomas. Genotyping of STK11 is encouraged for meningioma patients undergoing immunotherapy-based therapy.

Recent Advances in Meningioma Immunogenetics

Meningiomas are relatively common, and typically benign intracranial tumors, which in many cases can be cured by surgical resection. However, less prevalent, high grade meningiomas, grow quickly, and recur frequently despite treatment, leading to poor patient outcomes. Across tumor grades, subjective guidelines for histological analysis can preclude accurate diagnosis, and an insufficient understanding of recurrence risk can cloud the choice of optimal treatment. Improved diagnostic and prognostic markers capable of discerning between the 15 heterogeneous WHO recognized meningioma subtypes are necessary to improve disease management and identify new targeted drug treatments. In this review, we show the advances in molecular profiling and immunophenotyping of meningiomas, which may lead to the development of new personalized therapeutic strategies.

Highly multiplexed immunofluorescence images and single-cell data of immune markers in tonsil and lung cancer

In this data descriptor, we document a dataset of multiplexed immunofluorescence images and derived single-cell measurements of immune lineage and other markers in formaldehyde-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human tonsil and lung cancer tissue. We used tissue cyclic immunofluorescence (t-CyCIF) to generate fluorescence images which we artifact corrected using the BaSiC tool, stitched and registered using the ASHLAR algorithm, and segmented using ilastik software and MATLAB. We extracted single-cell features from these images using HistoCAT software. The resulting dataset can be visualized using image browsers and analyzed using high-dimensional, single-cell methods. This dataset is a valuable resource for biological discovery of the immune system in normal and diseased states as well as for the development of multiplexed image analysis and viewing tools.

Qualifying antibodies for image-based immune profiling and multiplexed tissue imaging

Multiplexed tissue imaging enables precise, spatially resolved enumeration and characterization of cell types and states in human resection specimens. A growing number of methods applicable to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections have been described, the majority of which rely on antibodies for antigen detection and mapping. This protocol provides step-by-step procedures for confirming the selectivity and specificity of antibodies used in fluorescence-based tissue imaging and for the construction and validation of antibody panels. Although the protocol is implemented using tissue-based cyclic immunofluorescence (t-CyCIF) as an imaging platform, these antibody-testing methods are broadly applicable. We demonstrate assembly of a 16-antibody panel for enumerating and localizing T cells and B cells, macrophages, and cells expressing immune checkpoint regulators. The protocol is accessible to individuals with experience in microscopy and immunofluorescence; some experience in computation is required for data analysis. A typical 30-antibody dataset for 20 FFPE slides can be generated within 2 weeks.

Going to extremes: determinants of extraordinary response and survival in patients with cancer

Research into factors affecting treatment response or survival in patients with cancer frequently involves cohorts that span the most common range of clinical outcomes, as such patients are most readily available for study. However, attention has turned to highly unusual patients who have exceptionally favourable or atypically poor responses to treatment and/or overall survival, with the expectation that patients at the extremes may provide insights that could ultimately improve the outcome of individuals with more typical disease trajectories. While clinicians can often recount surprising patients whose clinical journey was very unusual, given known clinical characteristics and prognostic indicators, there is a lack of consensus among researchers on how best to define exceptional patients, and little has been proposed for the optimal design of studies to identify factors that dictate unusual outcome. In this Opinion article, we review different approaches to identifying exceptional patients with cancer and possible study designs to investigate extraordinary clinical outcomes. We discuss pitfalls with finding these rare patients, including challenges associated with accrual of patients across different treatment centres and time periods. We describe recent molecular and immunological factors that have been identified as contributing to unusual patient outcome and make recommendations for future studies on these intriguing patients.

Comparative genomic analysis of driver mutations in matched primary and recurrent meningiomas

A significant proportion of low-grade WHO grade I and higher-grade WHO grade II or III meningiomas are at risk to develop post-resection recurrence. Though recent studies investigated genomic alterations within histological subtypes of meningiomas, few have compared genomic profiles of primary meningiomas matched to their recurrences. The present study aimed to identify oncogenic driver mutations that may indicate risk of meningioma recurrence and aggressive clinical course. Seventeen patients treated for low-grade (n = 8) or high-grade (n = 9) meningioma and underwent both primary and recurrent resection between 2007-2017 were reviewed. Tumor specimens (n = 38) underwent genomic sequencing of known oncogenic driver mutations. Primary and recurrent tumors were compared using matched-pair analyses for mutational associations with clinical outcomes including functional status, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Most common driver mutations included POLE and NF2. There was no enrichment for any driver mutation from primary to recurrent tumor specimen. NF2 mutant meningiomas were associated with larger tumor size (8-fold increase), presence of vasogenic edema, and higher mitotic proliferation on univariate and independently on multivariate regression (p's < 0.05) after controlling for preoperative and tumor features. Tumors with POLE driver mutations were associated with decreased functional status at last postoperative follow-up (p = 0.022) relative to presentation. Mutation status was not associated with PFS or OS on multivariate Cox regression, but rather with grade of resection (p = 0.046) for PFS. While primary and recurrent tumors exhibited similar driver mutations within patients, the identification of driver mutations associated with clinical outcomes is crucial for guiding potential targeted treatments in recurrent meningiomas.