1
|
Hong JK, Kim YM, Cho ES, Lee JB, Kim YS, Park HB. Application of deep learning with bivariate models for genomic prediction of sow lifetime productivity-related traits. Anim Biosci 2024; 37:622-630. [PMID: 38228129 PMCID: PMC10915216 DOI: 10.5713/ab.23.0264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pig breeders cannot obtain phenotypic information at the time of selection for sow lifetime productivity (SLP). They would benefit from obtaining genetic information of candidate sows. Genomic data interpreted using deep learning (DL) techniques could contribute to the genetic improvement of SLP to maximize farm profitability because DL models capture nonlinear genetic effects such as dominance and epistasis more efficiently than conventional genomic prediction methods based on linear models. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of DL for the genomic prediction of two SLP-related traits; lifetime number of litters (LNL) and lifetime pig production (LPP). METHODS Two bivariate DL models, convolutional neural network (CNN) and local convolutional neural network (LCNN), were compared with conventional bivariate linear models (i.e., genomic best linear unbiased prediction, Bayesian ridge regression, Bayes A, and Bayes B). Phenotype and pedigree data were collected from 40,011 sows that had husbandry records. Among these, 3,652 pigs were genotyped using the PorcineSNP60K BeadChip. RESULTS The best predictive correlation for LNL was obtained with CNN (0.28), followed by LCNN (0.26) and conventional linear models (approximately 0.21). For LPP, the best predictive correlation was also obtained with CNN (0.29), followed by LCNN (0.27) and conventional linear models (approximately 0.25). A similar trend was observed with the mean squared error of prediction for the SLP traits. CONCLUSION This study provides an example of a CNN that can outperform against the linear model-based genomic prediction approaches when the nonlinear interaction components are important because LNL and LPP exhibited strong epistatic interaction components. Additionally, our results suggest that applying bivariate DL models could also contribute to the prediction accuracy by utilizing the genetic correlation between LNL and LPP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joon-Ki Hong
- Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000,
Korea
| | - Yong-Min Kim
- Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000,
Korea
| | - Eun-Seok Cho
- Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000,
Korea
| | - Jae-Bong Lee
- Korea Zoonosis Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University, Iksan 54531,
Korea
| | - Young-Sin Kim
- Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000,
Korea
| | - Hee-Bok Park
- Department of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University, Yesan 32439,
Korea
- Resource Science Research Institute, Kongju National University, Yesan 32439,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou W, Yan Z, Zhang L. A comparative study of 11 non-linear regression models highlighting autoencoder, DBN, and SVR, enhanced by SHAP importance analysis in soybean branching prediction. Sci Rep 2024; 14:5905. [PMID: 38467662 PMCID: PMC10928191 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55243-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
To explore a robust tool for advancing digital breeding practices through an artificial intelligence-driven phenotype prediction expert system, we undertook a thorough analysis of 11 non-linear regression models. Our investigation specifically emphasized the significance of Support Vector Regression (SVR) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) in predicting soybean branching. By using branching data (phenotype) of 1918 soybean accessions and 42 k SNP (Single Nucleotide Polymorphism) polymorphic data (genotype), this study systematically compared 11 non-linear regression AI models, including four deep learning models (DBN (deep belief network) regression, ANN (artificial neural network) regression, Autoencoders regression, and MLP (multilayer perceptron) regression) and seven machine learning models (e.g., SVR (support vector regression), XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) regression, Random Forest regression, LightGBM regression, GPs (Gaussian processes) regression, Decision Tree regression, and Polynomial regression). After being evaluated by four valuation metrics: R2 (R-squared), MAE (Mean Absolute Error), MSE (Mean Squared Error), and MAPE (Mean Absolute Percentage Error), it was found that the SVR, Polynomial Regression, DBN, and Autoencoder outperformed other models and could obtain a better prediction accuracy when they were used for phenotype prediction. In the assessment of deep learning approaches, we exemplified the SVR model, conducting analyses on feature importance and gene ontology (GO) enrichment to provide comprehensive support. After comprehensively comparing four feature importance algorithms, no notable distinction was observed in the feature importance ranking scores across the four algorithms, namely Variable Ranking, Permutation, SHAP, and Correlation Matrix, but the SHAP value could provide rich information on genes with negative contributions, and SHAP importance was chosen for feature selection. The results of this study offer valuable insights into AI-mediated plant breeding, addressing challenges faced by traditional breeding programs. The method developed has broad applicability in phenotype prediction, minor QTL (quantitative trait loci) mining, and plant smart-breeding systems, contributing significantly to the advancement of AI-based breeding practices and transitioning from experience-based to data-based breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhou
- Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee, FL, 32307, USA.
| | - Zhengxiao Yan
- Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA
| | - Liting Zhang
- Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Montesinos-López A, Crespo-Herrera L, Dreisigacker S, Gerard G, Vitale P, Saint Pierre C, Govindan V, Tarekegn ZT, Flores MC, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Ramos-Pulido S, Lillemo M, Li H, Montesinos-López OA, Crossa J. Deep learning methods improve genomic prediction of wheat breeding. Front Plant Sci 2024; 15:1324090. [PMID: 38504889 PMCID: PMC10949530 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1324090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
In the field of plant breeding, various machine learning models have been developed and studied to evaluate the genomic prediction (GP) accuracy of unseen phenotypes. Deep learning has shown promise. However, most studies on deep learning in plant breeding have been limited to small datasets, and only a few have explored its application in moderate-sized datasets. In this study, we aimed to address this limitation by utilizing a moderately large dataset. We examined the performance of a deep learning (DL) model and compared it with the widely used and powerful best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) model. The goal was to assess the GP accuracy in the context of a five-fold cross-validation strategy and when predicting complete environments using the DL model. The results revealed the DL model outperformed the GBLUP model in terms of GP accuracy for two out of the five included traits in the five-fold cross-validation strategy, with similar results in the other traits. This indicates the superiority of the DL model in predicting these specific traits. Furthermore, when predicting complete environments using the leave-one-environment-out (LOEO) approach, the DL model demonstrated competitive performance. It is worth noting that the DL model employed in this study extends a previously proposed multi-modal DL model, which had been primarily applied to image data but with small datasets. By utilizing a moderately large dataset, we were able to evaluate the performance and potential of the DL model in a context with more information and challenging scenario in plant breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abelardo Montesinos-López
- Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Leonardo Crespo-Herrera
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Estado. de México, Mexico
| | - Susanna Dreisigacker
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Estado. de México, Mexico
| | - Guillermo Gerard
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Estado. de México, Mexico
| | - Paolo Vitale
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Estado. de México, Mexico
| | - Carolina Saint Pierre
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Estado. de México, Mexico
| | - Velu Govindan
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Estado. de México, Mexico
| | | | - Moisés Chavira Flores
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y Sistemas (IIMAS), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad Universitaria, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez
- Estudios del Desarrollo Rural, Economía, Estadística y Cómputo Aplicado, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco, Estado de México, Mexico
| | - Sofía Ramos-Pulido
- Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Morten Lillemo
- Department of Plant Science, Norwegian University of Life Science (NMBU), Ås, Norway
| | - Huihui Li
- 6State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, Institute of Crop Sciences and CIMMYT China Office, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, China
| | | | - Jose Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Estado. de México, Mexico
- Estudios del Desarrollo Rural, Economía, Estadística y Cómputo Aplicado, Colegio de Postgraduados, Texcoco, Estado de México, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lourenço VM, Ogutu JO, Rodrigues RAP, Posekany A, Piepho HP. Genomic prediction using machine learning: a comparison of the performance of regularized regression, ensemble, instance-based and deep learning methods on synthetic and empirical data. BMC Genomics 2024; 25:152. [PMID: 38326768 PMCID: PMC10848392 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09933-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The accurate prediction of genomic breeding values is central to genomic selection in both plant and animal breeding studies. Genomic prediction involves the use of thousands of molecular markers spanning the entire genome and therefore requires methods able to efficiently handle high dimensional data. Not surprisingly, machine learning methods are becoming widely advocated for and used in genomic prediction studies. These methods encompass different groups of supervised and unsupervised learning methods. Although several studies have compared the predictive performances of individual methods, studies comparing the predictive performance of different groups of methods are rare. However, such studies are crucial for identifying (i) groups of methods with superior genomic predictive performance and assessing (ii) the merits and demerits of such groups of methods relative to each other and to the established classical methods. Here, we comparatively evaluate the genomic predictive performance and informally assess the computational cost of several groups of supervised machine learning methods, specifically, regularized regression methods, deep, ensemble and instance-based learning algorithms, using one simulated animal breeding dataset and three empirical maize breeding datasets obtained from a commercial breeding program. RESULTS Our results show that the relative predictive performance and computational expense of the groups of machine learning methods depend upon both the data and target traits and that for classical regularized methods, increasing model complexity can incur huge computational costs but does not necessarily always improve predictive accuracy. Thus, despite their greater complexity and computational burden, neither the adaptive nor the group regularized methods clearly improved upon the results of their simple regularized counterparts. This rules out selection of one procedure among machine learning methods for routine use in genomic prediction. The results also show that, because of their competitive predictive performance, computational efficiency, simplicity and therefore relatively few tuning parameters, the classical linear mixed model and regularized regression methods are likely to remain strong contenders for genomic prediction. CONCLUSIONS The dependence of predictive performance and computational burden on target datasets and traits call for increasing investments in enhancing the computational efficiency of machine learning algorithms and computing resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanda M Lourenço
- Center for Mathematics and Applications (NOVA Math) and Department of Mathematics, NOVA SST, 2829-516, Caparica, Portugal.
| | - Joseph O Ogutu
- Institute of Crop Science, Biostatistics Unit, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstrasse 23, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.
| | - Rui A P Rodrigues
- Center for Mathematics and Applications (NOVA Math) and Department of Mathematics, NOVA SST, 2829-516, Caparica, Portugal
| | - Alexandra Posekany
- Research Unit of Computational Statistics, Vienna University of Technology, Wiedner Hauptstr. 8-10, 1040, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hans-Peter Piepho
- Institute of Crop Science, Biostatistics Unit, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstrasse 23, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ferrão LFV, Dhakal R, Dias R, Tieman D, Whitaker V, Gore MA, Messina C, Resende MFR. Machine learning applications to improve flavor and nutritional content of horticultural crops through breeding and genetics. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2023; 83:102968. [PMID: 37515935 DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2023.102968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
Over the last decades, significant strides were made in understanding the biochemical factors influencing the nutritional content and flavor profile of fruits and vegetables. Product differentiation in the produce aisle is the natural consequence of increasing consumer power in the food industry. Cotton-candy grapes, specialty tomatoes, and pineapple-flavored white strawberries provide a few examples. Given the increased demand for flavorful varieties, and pressing need to reduce micronutrient malnutrition, we expect breeding to increase its prioritization toward these traits. Reaching this goal will, in part, necessitate knowledge of the genetic architecture controlling these traits, as well as the development of breeding methods that maximize their genetic gain. Can artificial intelligence (AI) help predict flavor preferences, and can such insights be leveraged by breeding programs? In this Perspective, we outline both the opportunities and challenges for the development of more flavorful and nutritious crops, and how AI can support these breeding initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luís Felipe V Ferrão
- Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Rakshya Dhakal
- Plant Breeding Graduate Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Raquel Dias
- Microbiology and Cell Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Denise Tieman
- Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Vance Whitaker
- Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States; Plant Breeding Graduate Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael A Gore
- Plant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States
| | - Carlos Messina
- Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States; Plant Breeding Graduate Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Márcio F R Resende
- Horticultural Sciences Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States; Plant Breeding Graduate Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cembrowska-Lech D, Krzemińska A, Miller T, Nowakowska A, Adamski C, Radaczyńska M, Mikiciuk G, Mikiciuk M. An Integrated Multi-Omics and Artificial Intelligence Framework for Advance Plant Phenotyping in Horticulture. Biology (Basel) 2023; 12:1298. [PMID: 37887008 PMCID: PMC10603917 DOI: 10.3390/biology12101298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
This review discusses the transformative potential of integrating multi-omics data and artificial intelligence (AI) in advancing horticultural research, specifically plant phenotyping. The traditional methods of plant phenotyping, while valuable, are limited in their ability to capture the complexity of plant biology. The advent of (meta-)genomics, (meta-)transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics has provided an opportunity for a more comprehensive analysis. AI and machine learning (ML) techniques can effectively handle the complexity and volume of multi-omics data, providing meaningful interpretations and predictions. Reflecting the multidisciplinary nature of this area of research, in this review, readers will find a collection of state-of-the-art solutions that are key to the integration of multi-omics data and AI for phenotyping experiments in horticulture, including experimental design considerations with several technical and non-technical challenges, which are discussed along with potential solutions. The future prospects of this integration include precision horticulture, predictive breeding, improved disease and stress response management, sustainable crop management, and exploration of plant biodiversity. The integration of multi-omics and AI holds immense promise for revolutionizing horticultural research and applications, heralding a new era in plant phenotyping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danuta Cembrowska-Lech
- Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland;
- Polish Society of Bioinformatics and Data Science BIODATA, Popiełuszki 4c, 71-214 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (T.M.)
| | - Adrianna Krzemińska
- Polish Society of Bioinformatics and Data Science BIODATA, Popiełuszki 4c, 71-214 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (T.M.)
- Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Tymoteusz Miller
- Polish Society of Bioinformatics and Data Science BIODATA, Popiełuszki 4c, 71-214 Szczecin, Poland; (A.K.); (T.M.)
- Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland
| | - Anna Nowakowska
- Department of Physiology and Biochemistry, Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Felczaka 3c, 71-412 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Cezary Adamski
- Institute of Biology, University of Szczecin, Wąska 13, 71-415 Szczecin, Poland;
| | | | - Grzegorz Mikiciuk
- Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland;
| | - Małgorzata Mikiciuk
- Department of Bioengineering, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Y, Zhang N, Chai X, Sun T. Machine learning for image-based multi-omics analysis of leaf veins. J Exp Bot 2023; 74:4928-4941. [PMID: 37410807 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erad251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Veins are a critical component of the plant growth and development system, playing an integral role in supporting and protecting leaves, as well as transporting water, nutrients, and photosynthetic products. A comprehensive understanding of the form and function of veins requires a dual approach that combines plant physiology with cutting-edge image recognition technology. The latest advancements in computer vision and machine learning have facilitated the creation of algorithms that can identify vein networks and explore their developmental progression. Here, we review the functional, environmental, and genetic factors associated with vein networks, along with the current status of research on image analysis. In addition, we discuss the methods of venous phenotype extraction and multi-omics association analysis using machine learning technology, which could provide a theoretical basis for improving crop productivity by optimizing the vein network architecture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yubin Zhang
- Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12 Zhongguancun South St, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Ning Zhang
- Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12 Zhongguancun South St, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Xiujuan Chai
- Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12 Zhongguancun South St, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Tan Sun
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Big Data, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing, China
- Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12 Zhongguancun South St, Beijing 100081, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alves AAC, Fernandes AFA, Lopes FB, Breen V, Hawken R, Gianola D, Rosa GJDM. (Quasi) multitask support vector regression with heuristic hyperparameter optimization for whole-genome prediction of complex traits: a case study with carcass traits in broilers. G3 (Bethesda) 2023; 13:jkad109. [PMID: 37216670 PMCID: PMC10411556 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
This study investigates nonlinear kernels for multitrait (MT) genomic prediction using support vector regression (SVR) models. We assessed the predictive ability delivered by single-trait (ST) and MT models for 2 carcass traits (CT1 and CT2) measured in purebred broiler chickens. The MT models also included information on indicator traits measured in vivo [Growth and feed efficiency trait (FE)]. We proposed an approach termed (quasi) multitask SVR (QMTSVR), with hyperparameter optimization performed via genetic algorithm. ST and MT Bayesian shrinkage and variable selection models [genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP), BayesC (BC), and reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) regression] were employed as benchmarks. MT models were trained using 2 validation designs (CV1 and CV2), which differ if the information on secondary traits is available in the testing set. Models' predictive ability was assessed with prediction accuracy (ACC; i.e. the correlation between predicted and observed values, divided by the square root of phenotype accuracy), standardized root-mean-squared error (RMSE*), and inflation factor (b). To account for potential bias in CV2-style predictions, we also computed a parametric estimate of accuracy (ACCpar). Predictive ability metrics varied according to trait, model, and validation design (CV1 or CV2), ranging from 0.71 to 0.84 for ACC, 0.78 to 0.92 for RMSE*, and between 0.82 and 1.34 for b. The highest ACC and smallest RMSE* were achieved with QMTSVR-CV2 in both traits. We observed that for CT1, model/validation design selection was sensitive to the choice of accuracy metric (ACC or ACCpar). Nonetheless, the higher predictive accuracy of QMTSVR over MTGBLUP and MTBC was replicated across accuracy metrics, besides the similar performance between the proposed method and the MTRKHS model. Results showed that the proposed approach is competitive with conventional MT Bayesian regression models using either Gaussian or spike-slab multivariate priors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Vivian Breen
- Cobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR 72761, USA
| | | | - Daniel Gianola
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mora-Poblete F, Maldonado C, Henrique L, Uhdre R, Scapim CA, Mangolim CA. Multi-trait and multi-environment genomic prediction for flowering traits in maize: a deep learning approach. Front Plant Sci 2023; 14:1153040. [PMID: 37593046 PMCID: PMC10428628 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1153040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.), the third most widely cultivated cereal crop in the world, plays a critical role in global food security. To improve the efficiency of selecting superior genotypes in breeding programs, researchers have aimed to identify key genomic regions that impact agronomic traits. In this study, the performance of multi-trait, multi-environment deep learning models was compared to that of Bayesian models (Markov Chain Monte Carlo generalized linear mixed models (MCMCglmm), Bayesian Genomic Genotype-Environment Interaction (BGGE), and Bayesian Multi-Trait and Multi-Environment (BMTME)) in terms of the prediction accuracy of flowering-related traits (Anthesis-Silking Interval: ASI, Female Flowering: FF, and Male Flowering: MF). A tropical maize panel of 258 inbred lines from Brazil was evaluated in three sites (Cambira-2018, Sabaudia-2018, and Iguatemi-2020 and 2021) using approximately 290,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The results demonstrated a 14.4% increase in prediction accuracy when employing multi-trait models compared to the use of a single trait in a single environment approach. The accuracy of predictions also improved by 6.4% when using a single trait in a multi-environment scheme compared to using multi-trait analysis. Additionally, deep learning models consistently outperformed Bayesian models in both single and multiple trait and environment approaches. A complementary genome-wide association study identified associations with 26 candidate genes related to flowering time traits, and 31 marker-trait associations were identified, accounting for 37%, 37%, and 22% of the phenotypic variation of ASI, FF and MF, respectively. In conclusion, our findings suggest that deep learning models have the potential to significantly improve the accuracy of predictions, regardless of the approach used and provide support for the efficacy of this method in genomic selection for flowering-related traits in tropical maize.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carlos Maldonado
- Centro de Genómica y Bioinformática, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile
| | - Luma Henrique
- Department of Agronomy, State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| | - Renan Uhdre
- Department of Agronomy, State University of Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Heilmann PG, Frisch M, Abbadi A, Kox T, Herzog E. Stacked ensembles on basis of parentage information can predict hybrid performance with an accuracy comparable to marker-based GBLUP. Front Plant Sci 2023; 14:1178902. [PMID: 37546247 PMCID: PMC10401275 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1178902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Testcross factorials in newly established hybrid breeding programs are often highly unbalanced, incomplete, and characterized by predominance of special combining ability (SCA) over general combining ability (GCA). This results in a low efficiency of GCA-based selection. Machine learning algorithms might improve prediction of hybrid performance in such testcross factorials, as they have been successfully applied to find complex underlying patterns in sparse data. Our objective was to compare the prediction accuracy of machine learning algorithms to that of GCA-based prediction and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) in six unbalanced incomplete factorials from hybrid breeding programs of rapeseed, wheat, and corn. We investigated a range of machine learning algorithms with three different types of predictor variables: (a) information on parentage of hybrids, (b) in addition hybrid performance of crosses of the parental lines with other crossing partners, and (c) genotypic marker data. In two highly incomplete and unbalanced factorials from rapeseed, in which the SCA variance contributed considerably to the genetic variance, stacked ensembles of gradient boosting machines based on parentage information outperformed GCA prediction. The stacked ensembles increased prediction accuracy from 0.39 to 0.45, and from 0.48 to 0.54 compared to GCA prediction. The prediction accuracy reached by stacked ensembles without marker data reached values comparable to those of GBLUP that requires marker data. We conclude that hybrid prediction with stacked ensembles of gradient boosting machines based on parentage information is a promising approach that is worth further investigations with other data sets in which SCA variance is high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthias Frisch
- Institute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding II, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany
| | | | | | - Eva Herzog
- Institute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding II, Justus Liebig University, Gießen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ortiz R, Reslow F, Montesinos-López A, Huicho J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Montesinos-López OA, Crossa J. Partial least squares enhance multi-trait genomic prediction of potato cultivars in new environments. Sci Rep 2023; 13:9947. [PMID: 37336933 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37169-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
It is of paramount importance in plant breeding to have methods dealing with large numbers of predictor variables and few sample observations, as well as efficient methods for dealing with high correlation in predictors and measured traits. This paper explores in terms of prediction performance the partial least squares (PLS) method under single-trait (ST) and multi-trait (MT) prediction of potato traits. The first prediction was for tested lines in tested environments under a five-fold cross-validation (5FCV) strategy and the second prediction was for tested lines in untested environments (herein denoted as leave one environment out cross validation, LOEO). There was a good performance in terms of predictions (with accuracy mostly > 0.5 for Pearson's correlation) the accuracy of 5FCV was better than LOEO. Hence, we have empirical evidence that the ST and MT PLS framework is a very valuable tool for prediction in the context of potato breeding data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodomiro Ortiz
- Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 190, SE 23436, Lomma, Sweden.
| | - Fredrik Reslow
- Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. Box 190, SE 23436, Lomma, Sweden
| | - Abelardo Montesinos-López
- Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), 44430, Guadalajara, México
| | - José Huicho
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz Km. 45, El Batán, 56237, Texcoco, Edo. de México, México
| | | | | | - José Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz Km. 45, El Batán, 56237, Texcoco, Edo. de México, México.
- Colegio de Postgraduados (COLPOS), 56230, Montecillos, Edo. de México, México.
- Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Montesinos-López A, Rivera C, Pinto F, Piñera F, Gonzalez D, Reynolds M, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Li H, Montesinos-López OA, Crossa J. Multimodal deep learning methods enhance genomic prediction of wheat breeding. G3 (Bethesda) 2023; 13:jkad045. [PMID: 36869747 PMCID: PMC10151399 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkad045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
While several statistical machine learning methods have been developed and studied for assessing the genomic prediction (GP) accuracy of unobserved phenotypes in plant breeding research, few methods have linked genomics and phenomics (imaging). Deep learning (DL) neural networks have been developed to increase the GP accuracy of unobserved phenotypes while simultaneously accounting for the complexity of genotype-environment interaction (GE); however, unlike conventional GP models, DL has not been investigated for when genomics is linked with phenomics. In this study we used 2 wheat data sets (DS1 and DS2) to compare a novel DL method with conventional GP models. Models fitted for DS1 were GBLUP, gradient boosting machine (GBM), support vector regression (SVR) and the DL method. Results indicated that for 1 year, DL provided better GP accuracy than results obtained by the other models. However, GP accuracy obtained for other years indicated that the GBLUP model was slightly superior to the DL. DS2 is comprised only of genomic data from wheat lines tested for 3 years, 2 environments (drought and irrigated) and 2-4 traits. DS2 results showed that when predicting the irrigated environment with the drought environment, DL had higher accuracy than the GBLUP model in all analyzed traits and years. When predicting drought environment with information on the irrigated environment, the DL model and GBLUP model had similar accuracy. The DL method used in this study is novel and presents a strong degree of generalization as several modules can potentially be incorporated and concatenated to produce an output for a multi-input data structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abelardo Montesinos-López
- Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, 44430, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | - Carolina Rivera
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México- Veracruz Km. 45, El Batán, CP 56237, Texcoco, Edo. de México, Mexico
| | - Francisco Pinto
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México- Veracruz Km. 45, El Batán, CP 56237, Texcoco, Edo. de México, Mexico
| | - Francisco Piñera
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México- Veracruz Km. 45, El Batán, CP 56237, Texcoco, Edo. de México, Mexico
| | - David Gonzalez
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México- Veracruz Km. 45, El Batán, CP 56237, Texcoco, Edo. de México, Mexico
| | - Mathew Reynolds
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México- Veracruz Km. 45, El Batán, CP 56237, Texcoco, Edo. de México, Mexico
| | | | - Huihui Li
- Institute of Crop Sciences, The National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement and CIMMYT China office, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | | | - Jose Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México- Veracruz Km. 45, El Batán, CP 56237, Texcoco, Edo. de México, Mexico
- Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillos, Edo. de México, CP 56230, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wang K, Abid MA, Rasheed A, Crossa J, Hearne S, Li H. DNNGP, a deep neural network-based method for genomic prediction using multi-omics data in plants. Mol Plant 2023; 16:279-293. [PMID: 36366781 DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Genomic prediction is an effective way to accelerate the rate of agronomic trait improvement in plants. Traditional methods typically use linear regression models with clear assumptions; such methods are unable to capture the complex relationships between genotypes and phenotypes. Non-linear models (e.g., deep neural networks) have been proposed as a superior alternative to linear models because they can capture complex non-additive effects. Here we introduce a deep learning (DL) method, deep neural network genomic prediction (DNNGP), for integration of multi-omics data in plants. We trained DNNGP on four datasets and compared its performance with methods built with five classic models: genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP); two methods based on a machine learning (ML) framework, light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) and support vector regression (SVR); and two methods based on a DL framework, deep learning genomic selection (DeepGS) and deep learning genome-wide association study (DLGWAS). DNNGP is novel in five ways. First, it can be applied to a variety of omics data to predict phenotypes. Second, the multilayered hierarchical structure of DNNGP dynamically learns features from raw data, avoiding overfitting and improving the convergence rate using a batch normalization layer and early stopping and rectified linear activation (rectified linear unit) functions. Third, when small datasets were used, DNNGP produced results that are competitive with results from the other five methods, showing greater prediction accuracy than the other methods when large-scale breeding data were used. Fourth, the computation time required by DNNGP was comparable with that of commonly used methods, up to 10 times faster than DeepGS. Fifth, hyperparameters can easily be batch tuned on a local machine. Compared with GBLUP, LightGBM, SVR, DeepGS and DLGWAS, DNNGP is superior to these existing widely used genomic selection (GS) methods. Moreover, DNNGP can generate robust assessments from diverse datasets, including omics data, and quickly incorporate complex and large datasets into usable models, making it a promising and practical approach for straightforward integration into existing GS platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelin Wang
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), CIMMYT - China Office, 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100081, China; Nanfan Research Institute, CAAS, Sanya, Hainan 572024, China
| | | | - Awais Rasheed
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), CIMMYT - China Office, 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100081, China; Department of Plant Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan
| | - Jose Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, Texcoco, D.F. 06600, Mexico
| | - Sarah Hearne
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Apdo. Postal 6-641, Texcoco, D.F. 06600, Mexico
| | - Huihui Li
- Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), CIMMYT - China Office, 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing 100081, China; Nanfan Research Institute, CAAS, Sanya, Hainan 572024, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Atanda SA, Steffes J, Lan Y, Al Bari MA, Kim JH, Morales M, Johnson JP, Saludares R, Worral H, Piche L, Ross A, Grusak M, Coyne C, McGee R, Rao J, Bandillo N. Multi-trait genomic prediction improves selection accuracy for enhancing seed mineral concentrations in pea. Plant Genome 2022; 15:e20260. [PMID: 36193571 DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Multi-trait genomic selection (MT-GS) has the potential to improve predictive ability by maximizing the use of information across related genotypes and genetically correlated traits. In this study, we extended the use of sparse phenotyping method into the MT-GS framework by split testing of entries to maximize borrowing of information across genotypes and predict missing phenotypes for targeted traits without additional phenotyping expenditure. Using 300 advanced breeding lines from North Dakota State University (NDSU) pulse breeding program and ∼200 USDA accessions that were evaluated for 10 nutritional traits, our results show that the proposed sparse phenotyping aided MT-GS can further improve predictive ability by >12% across traits compared with univariate (UNI) genomic selection. The proposed strategy departed from the previous reports that weak genetic correlation is a limitation to the advantage of MT-GS over UNI genomic selection, which was evident in the partially balanced phenotyping-enabled MT-GS. Our results point to heritability and genetic correlation between traits as possible metrics to optimize and further improve the estimation of model parameters, and ultimately, prediction performance. Overall, our study offers a new approach to optimize the prediction performance using the MT-GS and further highlight strategy to maximize the efficiency of GS in a plant breeding program. The sparse-testing-aided MT-GS proposed in this study can be further extended to multi-environment, multi-trait GS to improve prediction performance and further reduce the cost of phenotyping and time-consuming data collection process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jenna Steffes
- Dep. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA
| | - Yang Lan
- Dep. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA
| | - Md Abdullah Al Bari
- Dep. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA
| | - Jeong-Hwa Kim
- Dep. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA
| | - Mario Morales
- Dep. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA
| | - Josephine P Johnson
- Dep. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA
| | - Rica Saludares
- Dep. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA
| | - Hannah Worral
- North Central Research Extension Center, NDSU, 5400 Hwy. 83, South Minot, ND, 58701, USA
| | - Lisa Piche
- Dep. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA
| | - Andrew Ross
- Dep. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA
| | - Mike Grusak
- Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, USDA-ARS, 1616 Albrecht Blvd. N, Fargo, ND, 58102-2765, USA
| | - Clarice Coyne
- USDA-ARS Plant Germplasm Introduction and Testing, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA, 99164, USA
| | - Rebecca McGee
- USDA-ARS, Grain Legume Genetics and Physiology Research, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA
- Dep. of Horticulture, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA, 99164, USA
| | - Jiajia Rao
- Dep. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA
| | - Nonoy Bandillo
- Dep. of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Xu Y, Zhang X, Li H, Zheng H, Zhang J, Olsen MS, Varshney RK, Prasanna BM, Qian Q. Smart breeding driven by big data, artificial intelligence, and integrated genomic-enviromic prediction. Mol Plant 2022; 15:1664-1695. [PMID: 36081348 DOI: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
The first paradigm of plant breeding involves direct selection-based phenotypic observation, followed by predictive breeding using statistical models for quantitative traits constructed based on genetic experimental design and, more recently, by incorporation of molecular marker genotypes. However, plant performance or phenotype (P) is determined by the combined effects of genotype (G), envirotype (E), and genotype by environment interaction (GEI). Phenotypes can be predicted more precisely by training a model using data collected from multiple sources, including spatiotemporal omics (genomics, phenomics, and enviromics across time and space). Integration of 3D information profiles (G-P-E), each with multidimensionality, provides predictive breeding with both tremendous opportunities and great challenges. Here, we first review innovative technologies for predictive breeding. We then evaluate multidimensional information profiles that can be integrated with a predictive breeding strategy, particularly envirotypic data, which have largely been neglected in data collection and are nearly untouched in model construction. We propose a smart breeding scheme, integrated genomic-enviromic prediction (iGEP), as an extension of genomic prediction, using integrated multiomics information, big data technology, and artificial intelligence (mainly focused on machine and deep learning). We discuss how to implement iGEP, including spatiotemporal models, environmental indices, factorial and spatiotemporal structure of plant breeding data, and cross-species prediction. A strategy is then proposed for prediction-based crop redesign at both the macro (individual, population, and species) and micro (gene, metabolism, and network) scales. Finally, we provide perspectives on translating smart breeding into genetic gain through integrative breeding platforms and open-source breeding initiatives. We call for coordinated efforts in smart breeding through iGEP, institutional partnerships, and innovative technological support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunbi Xu
- Institute of Crop Sciences, CIMMYT-China, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; CIMMYT-China Tropical Maize Research Center, School of Food Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong 528231, China; Peking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Weifang, Shandong 261325, China.
| | - Xingping Zhang
- Peking University Institute of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, Weifang, Shandong 261325, China
| | - Huihui Li
- Institute of Crop Sciences, CIMMYT-China, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; National Nanfan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya, Hainan 572024, China
| | - Hongjian Zheng
- CIMMYT-China Specialty Maize Research Center, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 201400, China
| | - Jianan Zhang
- MolBreeding Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050035, China
| | - Michael S Olsen
- CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), ICRAF Campus, United Nations Avenue, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Rajeev K Varshney
- State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia
| | - Boddupalli M Prasanna
- CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), ICRAF Campus, United Nations Avenue, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Qian Qian
- Institute of Crop Sciences, CIMMYT-China, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
John M, Haselbeck F, Dass R, Malisi C, Ricca P, Dreischer C, Schultheiss SJ, Grimm DG. A comparison of classical and machine learning-based phenotype prediction methods on simulated data and three plant species. Front Plant Sci 2022; 13:932512. [PMID: 36407627 PMCID: PMC9673477 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.932512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Genomic selection is an integral tool for breeders to accurately select plants directly from genotype data leading to faster and more resource-efficient breeding programs. Several prediction methods have been established in the last few years. These range from classical linear mixed models to complex non-linear machine learning approaches, such as Support Vector Regression, and modern deep learning-based architectures. Many of these methods have been extensively evaluated on different crop species with varying outcomes. In this work, our aim is to systematically compare 12 different phenotype prediction models, including basic genomic selection methods to more advanced deep learning-based techniques. More importantly, we assess the performance of these models on simulated phenotype data as well as on real-world data from Arabidopsis thaliana and two breeding datasets from soy and corn. The synthetic phenotypic data allow us to analyze all prediction models and especially the selected markers under controlled and predefined settings. We show that Bayes B and linear regression models with sparsity constraints perform best under different simulation settings with respect to explained variance. Further, we can confirm results from other studies that there is no superiority of more complex neural network-based architectures for phenotype prediction compared to well-established methods. However, on real-world data, for which several prediction models yield comparable results with slight advantages for Elastic Net, this picture is less clear, suggesting that there is a lot of room for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maura John
- Technical University of Munich, Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Bioinformatics, Straubing, Germany
- Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Bioinformatics, Straubing, Germany
| | - Florian Haselbeck
- Technical University of Munich, Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Bioinformatics, Straubing, Germany
- Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Bioinformatics, Straubing, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Dominik G. Grimm
- Technical University of Munich, Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, Bioinformatics, Straubing, Germany
- Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences, Bioinformatics, Straubing, Germany
- Technical University of Munich, Department of Informatics, Garching, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aono AH, Francisco FR, Souza LM, Gonçalves PS, Scaloppi Junior EJ, Le Guen V, Fritsche-Neto R, Gorjanc G, Quiles MG, de Souza AP. A divide-and-conquer approach for genomic prediction in rubber tree using machine learning. Sci Rep 2022; 12:18023. [PMID: 36289298 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20416-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) is the main feedstock for commercial rubber; however, its long vegetative cycle has hindered the development of more productive varieties via breeding programs. With the availability of H. brasiliensis genomic data, several linkage maps with associated quantitative trait loci have been constructed and suggested as a tool for marker-assisted selection. Nonetheless, novel genomic strategies are still needed, and genomic selection (GS) may facilitate rubber tree breeding programs aimed at reducing the required cycles for performance assessment. Even though such a methodology has already been shown to be a promising tool for rubber tree breeding, increased model predictive capabilities and practical application are still needed. Here, we developed a novel machine learning-based approach for predicting rubber tree stem circumference based on molecular markers. Through a divide-and-conquer strategy, we propose a neural network prediction system with two stages: (1) subpopulation prediction and (2) phenotype estimation. This approach yielded higher accuracies than traditional statistical models in a single-environment scenario. By delivering large accuracy improvements, our methodology represents a powerful tool for use in Hevea GS strategies. Therefore, the incorporation of machine learning techniques into rubber tree GS represents an opportunity to build more robust models and optimize Hevea breeding programs.
Collapse
|
18
|
Zandberg JD, Fernandez CT, Danilevicz MF, Thomas WJW, Edwards D, Batley J. The Global Assessment of Oilseed Brassica Crop Species Yield, Yield Stability and the Underlying Genetics. Plants (Basel) 2022; 11:2740. [PMID: 36297764 PMCID: PMC9610009 DOI: 10.3390/plants11202740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The global demand for oilseeds is increasing along with the human population. The family of Brassicaceae crops are no exception, typically harvested as a valuable source of oil, rich in beneficial molecules important for human health. The global capacity for improving Brassica yield has steadily risen over the last 50 years, with the major crop Brassica napus (rapeseed, canola) production increasing to ~72 Gt in 2020. In contrast, the production of Brassica mustard crops has fluctuated, rarely improving in farming efficiency. The drastic increase in global yield of B. napus is largely due to the demand for a stable source of cooking oil. Furthermore, with the adoption of highly efficient farming techniques, yield enhancement programs, breeding programs, the integration of high-throughput phenotyping technology and establishing the underlying genetics, B. napus yields have increased by >450 fold since 1978. Yield stability has been improved with new management strategies targeting diseases and pests, as well as by understanding the complex interaction of environment, phenotype and genotype. This review assesses the global yield and yield stability of agriculturally important oilseed Brassica species and discusses how contemporary farming and genetic techniques have driven improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaco D. Zandberg
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
| | | | - Monica F. Danilevicz
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
| | - William J. W. Thomas
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
| | - David Edwards
- Center for Applied Bioinformatics, School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Batley
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Khan MHU, Wang S, Wang J, Ahmar S, Saeed S, Khan SU, Xu X, Chen H, Bhat JA, Feng X. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Climate-Resilient Smart-Crop Breeding. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:11156. [PMID: 36232455 PMCID: PMC9570104 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Revised: 09/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Recently, Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a revolutionary field, providing a great opportunity in shaping modern crop breeding, and is extensively used indoors for plant science. Advances in crop phenomics, enviromics, together with the other “omics” approaches are paving ways for elucidating the detailed complex biological mechanisms that motivate crop functions in response to environmental trepidations. These “omics” approaches have provided plant researchers with precise tools to evaluate the important agronomic traits for larger-sized germplasm at a reduced time interval in the early growth stages. However, the big data and the complex relationships within impede the understanding of the complex mechanisms behind genes driving the agronomic-trait formations. AI brings huge computational power and many new tools and strategies for future breeding. The present review will encompass how applications of AI technology, utilized for current breeding practice, assist to solve the problem in high-throughput phenotyping and gene functional analysis, and how advances in AI technologies bring new opportunities for future breeding, to make envirotyping data widely utilized in breeding. Furthermore, in the current breeding methods, linking genotype to phenotype remains a massive challenge and impedes the optimal application of high-throughput field phenotyping, genomics, and enviromics. In this review, we elaborate on how AI will be the preferred tool to increase the accuracy in high-throughput crop phenotyping, genotyping, and envirotyping data; moreover, we explore the developing approaches and challenges for multiomics big computing data integration. Therefore, the integration of AI with “omics” tools can allow rapid gene identification and eventually accelerate crop-improvement programs.
Collapse
|
20
|
Montesinos-López OA, Montesinos-López A, Bernal Sandoval DA, Mosqueda-Gonzalez BA, Valenzo-Jiménez MA, Crossa J. Multi-trait genome prediction of new environments with partial least squares. Front Genet 2022; 13:966775. [PMID: 36134027 PMCID: PMC9483856 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.966775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The genomic selection (GS) methodology proposed over 20 years ago by Meuwissen et al. (Genetics, 2001) has revolutionized plant breeding. A predictive methodology that trains statistical machine learning algorithms with phenotypic and genotypic data of a reference population and makes predictions for genotyped candidate lines, GS saves significant resources in the selection of candidate individuals. However, its practical implementation is still challenging when the plant breeder is interested in the prediction of future seasons or new locations and/or environments, which is called the “leave one environment out” issue. Furthermore, because the distributions of the training and testing set do not match, most statistical machine learning methods struggle to produce moderate or reasonable prediction accuracies. For this reason, the main objective of this study was to explore the use of the multi-trait partial least square (MT-PLS) regression methodology for this specific task, benchmarking its performance with the Bayesian Multi-trait Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (MT-GBLUP) method. The benchmarking process was performed with five actual data sets. We found that in all data sets the MT-PLS method outperformed the popular MT-GBLUP method by 349.8% (under predictor E + G), 484.4% (under predictor E + G + GE; where E denotes environments, G genotypes and GE the genotype by environment interaction) and 15.9% (under predictor G + GE) across traits. Our results provide empirical evidence of the power of the MT-PLS methodology for the prediction of future seasons or new environments. Furthermore, the comparison between single univariate-trait (UT) versus MT for GBLUP and PLS gave an increase in prediction accuracy of MT-GBLUP versus UT-GBLUP, but not for MT-PLS versus UT-PLS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Abelardo Montesinos-López
- Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
- *Correspondence: Abelardo Montesinos-López, , José Crossa,
| | | | | | - Marco Alberto Valenzo-Jiménez
- Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo (UMSNH), Avenida Francisco J. Mujica S/N Ciudad Universitaria, Morelia, MC, Mexico
| | - José Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, Texcoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico
- Colegio de Porstgraduados, Montecillos, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico
- *Correspondence: Abelardo Montesinos-López, , José Crossa,
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Montesinos-López OA, Montesinos-López A, Cano-Paez B, Hernández-Suárez CM, Santana-Mancilla PC, Crossa J. A Comparison of Three Machine Learning Methods for Multivariate Genomic Prediction Using the Sparse Kernels Method (SKM) Library. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13081494. [PMID: 36011405 PMCID: PMC9407886 DOI: 10.3390/genes13081494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 08/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) changed the way plant breeders select genotypes. GS takes advantage of phenotypic and genotypic information to training a statistical machine learning model, which is used to predict phenotypic (or breeding) values of new lines for which only genotypic information is available. Therefore, many statistical machine learning methods have been proposed for this task. Multi-trait (MT) genomic prediction models take advantage of correlated traits to improve prediction accuracy. Therefore, some multivariate statistical machine learning methods are popular for GS. In this paper, we compare the prediction performance of three MT methods: the MT genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP), the MT partial least squares (PLS) and the multi-trait random forest (RF) methods. Benchmarking was performed with six real datasets. We found that the three investigated methods produce similar results, but under predictors with genotype (G) and environment (E), that is, E + G, the MT GBLUP achieved superior performance, whereas under predictors E + G + genotype × environment (GE) and G + GE, random forest achieved the best results. We also found that the best predictions were achieved under the predictors E + G and E + G + GE. Here, we also provide the R code for the implementation of these three statistical machine learning methods in the sparse kernel method (SKM) library, which offers not only options for single-trait prediction with various statistical machine learning methods but also some options for MT predictions that can help to capture improved complex patterns in datasets that are common in genomic selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Abelardo Montesinos-López
- Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44100, Mexico
- Correspondence: (A.M.-L.); (J.C.)
| | - Bernabe Cano-Paez
- Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México City 04510, Mexico
| | - Carlos Moisés Hernández-Suárez
- Instituto de Ciencias Tecnología e Innovación, Universidad Francisco Gavidia, El Progreso St., No. 2748, Colonia Flor Blanca, San Salvador CP 1101, El Salvador
| | | | - José Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco 56237, Mexico
- Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo 56230, Mexico
- Correspondence: (A.M.-L.); (J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Buenrostro-mariscal R, Santana-mancilla PC, Montesinos-lópez OA, Nieto Hipólito JI, Anido-rifón LE. A Review of Deep Learning Applications for the Next Generation of Cognitive Networks. Applied Sciences 2022; 12:6262. [DOI: 10.3390/app12126262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Intelligence capabilities will be the cornerstone in the development of next-generation cognitive networks. These capabilities allow them to observe network conditions, learn from them, and then, using prior knowledge gained, respond to its operating environment to optimize network performance. This study aims to offer an overview of the current state of the art related to the use of deep learning in applications for intelligent cognitive networks that can serve as a reference for future initiatives in this field. For this, a systematic literature review was carried out in three databases, and eligible articles were selected that focused on using deep learning to solve challenges presented by current cognitive networks. As a result, 14 articles were analyzed. The results showed that applying algorithms based on deep learning to optimize cognitive data networks has been approached from different perspectives in recent years and in an experimental way to test its technological feasibility. In addition, its implications for solving fundamental challenges in current wireless networks are discussed.
Collapse
|
23
|
Danilevicz MF, Gill M, Anderson R, Batley J, Bennamoun M, Bayer PE, Edwards D. Plant Genotype to Phenotype Prediction Using Machine Learning. Front Genet 2022; 13:822173. [PMID: 35664329 PMCID: PMC9159391 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.822173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic prediction tools support crop breeding based on statistical methods, such as the genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP). However, these tools are not designed to capture non-linear relationships within multi-dimensional datasets, or deal with high dimension datasets such as imagery collected by unmanned aerial vehicles. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have the potential to surpass the prediction accuracy of current tools used for genotype to phenotype prediction, due to their capacity to autonomously extract data features and represent their relationships at multiple levels of abstraction. This review addresses the challenges of applying statistical and machine learning methods for predicting phenotypic traits based on genetic markers, environment data, and imagery for crop breeding. We present the advantages and disadvantages of explainable model structures, discuss the potential of machine learning models for genotype to phenotype prediction in crop breeding, and the challenges, including the scarcity of high-quality datasets, inconsistent metadata annotation and the requirements of ML models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica F. Danilevicz
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Mitchell Gill
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Robyn Anderson
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Batley
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Mohammed Bennamoun
- School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Philipp E. Bayer
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - David Edwards
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- *Correspondence: David Edwards,
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mathew B, Hauptmann A, Léon J, Sillanpää MJ. NeuralLasso: Neural Networks Meet Lasso in Genomic Prediction. Front Plant Sci 2022; 13:800161. [PMID: 35574107 PMCID: PMC9100816 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.800161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Prediction of complex traits based on genome-wide marker information is of central importance for both animal and plant breeding. Numerous models have been proposed for the prediction of complex traits and still considerable effort has been given to improve the prediction accuracy of these models, because various genetics factors like additive, dominance and epistasis effects can influence of the prediction accuracy of such models. Recently machine learning (ML) methods have been widely applied for prediction in both animal and plant breeding programs. In this study, we propose a new algorithm for genomic prediction which is based on neural networks, but incorporates classical elements of LASSO. Our new method is able to account for the local epistasis (higher order interaction between the neighboring markers) in the prediction. We compare the prediction accuracy of our new method with the most commonly used prediction methods, such as BayesA, BayesB, Bayesian Lasso (BL), genomic BLUP and Elastic Net (EN) using the heterogenous stock mouse and rice field data sets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boby Mathew
- Bayer CropScience, Monheim am Rhein, Germany
- Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Andreas Hauptmann
- Research Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jens Léon
- Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Mikko J. Sillanpää
- Research Unit of Mathematical Sciences, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Reinoso-Peláez EL, Gianola D, González-Recio O. Genome-Enabled Prediction Methods Based on Machine Learning. Methods Mol Biol 2022; 2467:189-218. [PMID: 35451777 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Growth of artificial intelligence and machine learning (ML) methodology has been explosive in recent years. In this class of procedures, computers get knowledge from sets of experiences and provide forecasts or classification. In genome-wide based prediction (GWP), many ML studies have been carried out. This chapter provides a description of main semiparametric and nonparametric algorithms used in GWP in animals and plants. Thirty-four ML comparative studies conducted in the last decade were used to develop a meta-analysis through a Thurstonian model, to evaluate algorithms with the best predictive qualities. It was found that some kernel, Bayesian, and ensemble methods displayed greater robustness and predictive ability. However, the type of study and data distribution must be considered in order to choose the most appropriate model for a given problem.
Collapse
|
26
|
Galli G, Sabadin F, Yassue RM, Galves C, Carvalho HF, Crossa J, Montesinos-López OA, Fritsche-Neto R. Automated Machine Learning: A Case Study of Genomic "Image-Based" Prediction in Maize Hybrids. Front Plant Sci 2022; 13:845524. [PMID: 35321444 PMCID: PMC8936805 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.845524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Machine learning methods such as multilayer perceptrons (MLP) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have emerged as promising methods for genomic prediction (GP). In this context, we assess the performance of MLP and CNN on regression and classification tasks in a case study with maize hybrids. The genomic information was provided to the MLP as a relationship matrix and to the CNN as "genomic images." In the regression task, the machine learning models were compared along with GBLUP. Under the classification task, MLP and CNN were compared. In this case, the traits (plant height and grain yield) were discretized in such a way to create balanced (moderate selection intensity) and unbalanced (extreme selection intensity) datasets for further evaluations. An automatic hyperparameter search for MLP and CNN was performed, and the best models were reported. For both task types, several metrics were calculated under a validation scheme to assess the effect of the prediction method and other variables. Overall, MLP and CNN presented competitive results to GBLUP. Also, we bring new insights on automated machine learning for genomic prediction and its implications to plant breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Galli
- Department of Genetics, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - Felipe Sabadin
- School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
| | - Rafael Massahiro Yassue
- Department of Genetics, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - Cassia Galves
- Department of Food Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | | - Jose Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | | | - Roberto Fritsche-Neto
- Department of Genetics, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
- International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Los Baños, Philippines
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Montesinos-López OA, Montesinos-López JC, Montesinos-López A, Ramírez-Alcaraz JM, Poland J, Singh R, Dreisigacker S, Crespo L, Mondal S, Govidan V, Juliana P, Espino JH, Shrestha S, Varshney RK, Crossa J. Bayesian multitrait kernel methods improve multienvironment genome-based prediction. G3 (Bethesda) 2022; 12:6446035. [PMID: 34849802 PMCID: PMC9210316 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
When multitrait data are available, the preferred models are those that are able to account for correlations between phenotypic traits because when the degree of correlation is moderate or large, this increases the genomic prediction accuracy. For this reason, in this article, we explore Bayesian multitrait kernel methods for genomic prediction and we illustrate the power of these models with three-real datasets. The kernels under study were the linear, Gaussian, polynomial, and sigmoid kernels; they were compared with the conventional Ridge regression and GBLUP multitrait models. The results show that, in general, the Gaussian kernel method outperformed conventional Bayesian Ridge and GBLUP multitrait linear models by 2.2–17.45% (datasets 1–3) in terms of prediction performance based on the mean square error of prediction. This improvement in terms of prediction performance of the Bayesian multitrait kernel method can be attributed to the fact that the proposed model is able to capture nonlinear patterns more efficiently than linear multitrait models. However, not all kernels perform well in the datasets used for evaluation, which is why more than one kernel should be evaluated to be able to choose the best kernel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Abelardo Montesinos-López
- Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Guadalajara 44430, Mexico
- Corresponding author: Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco 44430, Mexico. (A.M.-L.); International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). Km 45 Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texcoco, Edo de Mexico, Mexico. (J.C.)
| | | | - Jesse Poland
- Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Science Center, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
| | - Ravi Singh
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico
| | - Susanne Dreisigacker
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico
| | - Leonardo Crespo
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico
| | - Sushismita Mondal
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico
| | - Velu Govidan
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico
| | - Philomin Juliana
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico
| | - Julio Huerta Espino
- Campo Experimental Valle de Mexico, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, Texcoco 56235, Mexico
| | - Sandesh Shrestha
- Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Science Center, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
| | - Rajeev K Varshney
- International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502324, India
- State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Australia
| | - José Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico
- Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillos, Edo. de México 56230, Mexico
- Corresponding author: Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco 44430, Mexico. (A.M.-L.); International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). Km 45 Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texcoco, Edo de Mexico, Mexico. (J.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sandhu KS, Patil SS, Aoun M, Carter AH. Multi-Trait Multi-Environment Genomic Prediction for End-Use Quality Traits in Winter Wheat. Front Genet 2022; 13:831020. [PMID: 35173770 PMCID: PMC8841657 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.831020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Soft white wheat is a wheat class used in foreign and domestic markets to make various end products requiring specific quality attributes. Due to associated cost, time, and amount of seed needed, phenotyping for the end-use quality trait is delayed until later generations. Previously, we explored the potential of using genomic selection (GS) for selecting superior genotypes earlier in the breeding program. Breeders typically measure multiple traits across various locations, and it opens up the avenue for exploring multi-trait-based GS models. This study's main objective was to explore the potential of using multi-trait GS models for predicting seven different end-use quality traits using cross-validation, independent prediction, and across-location predictions in a wheat breeding program. The population used consisted of 666 soft white wheat genotypes planted for 5 years at two locations in Washington, United States. We optimized and compared the performances of four uni-trait- and multi-trait-based GS models, namely, Bayes B, genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), multilayer perceptron (MLP), and random forests. The prediction accuracies for multi-trait GS models were 5.5 and 7.9% superior to uni-trait models for the within-environment and across-location predictions. Multi-trait machine and deep learning models performed superior to GBLUP and Bayes B for across-location predictions, but their advantages diminished when the genotype by environment component was included in the model. The highest improvement in prediction accuracy, that is, 35% was obtained for flour protein content with the multi-trait MLP model. This study showed the potential of using multi-trait-based GS models to enhance prediction accuracy by using information from previously phenotyped traits. It would assist in speeding up the breeding cycle time in a cost-friendly manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karansher S. Sandhu
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| | - Shruti Sunil Patil
- School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States1
| | - Meriem Aoun
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| | - Arron H. Carter
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
The last decade witnessed an unprecedented increase in the adoption of genomic selection (GS) and phenomics tools in plant breeding programs, especially in major cereal crops. GS has demonstrated the potential for selecting superior genotypes with high precision and accelerating the breeding cycle. Phenomics is a rapidly advancing domain to alleviate phenotyping bottlenecks and explores new large-scale phenotyping and data acquisition methods. In this review, we discuss the lesson learned from GS and phenomics in six self-pollinated crops, primarily focusing on rice, wheat, soybean, common bean, chickpea, and groundnut, and their implementation schemes are discussed after assessing their impact in the breeding programs. Here, the status of the adoption of genomics and phenomics is provided for those crops, with a complete GS overview. GS’s progress until 2020 is discussed in detail, and relevant information and links to the source codes are provided for implementing this technology into plant breeding programs, with most of the examples from wheat breeding programs. Detailed information about various phenotyping tools is provided to strengthen the field of phenomics for a plant breeder in the coming years. Finally, we highlight the benefits of merging genomic selection, phenomics, and machine and deep learning that have resulted in extraordinary results during recent years in wheat, rice, and soybean. Hence, there is a potential for adopting these technologies into crops like the common bean, chickpea, and groundnut. The adoption of phenomics and GS into different breeding programs will accelerate genetic gain that would create an impact on food security, realizing the need to feed an ever-growing population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karansher S. Sandhu
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
- *Correspondence: Karansher S. Sandhu,
| | - Lance F. Merrick
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| | - Sindhuja Sankaran
- Department of Biological System Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| | - Zhiwu Zhang
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| | - Arron H. Carter
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Crossa J, Montesinos-López OA, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Costa-Neto G, Fritsche-Neto R, Ortiz R, Martini JWR, Lillemo M, Montesinos-López A, Jarquin D, Breseghello F, Cuevas J, Rincent R. Genome and Environment Based Prediction Models and Methods of Complex Traits Incorporating Genotype × Environment Interaction. Methods Mol Biol 2022; 2467:245-283. [PMID: 35451779 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2205-6_9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Genomic-enabled prediction models are of paramount importance for the successful implementation of genomic selection (GS) based on breeding values. As opposed to animal breeding, plant breeding includes extensive multienvironment and multiyear field trial data. Hence, genomic-enabled prediction models should include genotype × environment (G × E) interaction, which most of the time increases the prediction performance when the response of lines are different from environment to environment. In this chapter, we describe a historical timeline since 2012 related to advances of the GS models that take into account G × E interaction. We describe theoretical and practical aspects of those GS models, including the gains in prediction performance when including G × E structures for both complex continuous and categorical scale traits. Then, we detailed and explained the main G × E genomic prediction models for complex traits measured in continuous and noncontinuous (categorical) scale. Related to G × E interaction models this review also examine the analyses of the information generated with high-throughput phenotype data (phenomic) and the joint analyses of multitrait and multienvironment field trial data that is also employed in the general assessment of multitrait G × E interaction. The inclusion of nongenomic data in increasing the accuracy and biological reliability of the G × E approach is also outlined. We show the recent advances in large-scale envirotyping (enviromics), and how the use of mechanistic computational modeling can derive the crop growth and development aspects useful for predicting phenotypes and explaining G × E.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz, Mexico
- Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillos, Mexico
| | | | | | - Germano Costa-Neto
- Departamento de Genética, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz" (ESALQ/USP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Roberto Fritsche-Neto
- Departamento de Genética, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz" (ESALQ/USP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rodomiro Ortiz
- Department of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Alnarp, Sweden
| | - Johannes W R Martini
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz, Mexico
| | - Morten Lillemo
- Department of Plant Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, IHA/CIGENE, Ås, Norway
| | - Abelardo Montesinos-López
- Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
| | | | | | - Jaime Cuevas
- Universidad de Quintana Roo, Chetumal, Quintana Roo, Mexico.
| | - Renaud Rincent
- Université Paris-Saclay, INRAE, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Génétique Quantitative et Evolution - Le Moulon, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Montesinos-López OA, Montesinos-López A, Mosqueda-González BA, Bentley AR, Lillemo M, Varshney RK, Crossa J. A New Deep Learning Calibration Method Enhances Genome-Based Prediction of Continuous Crop Traits. Front Genet 2021; 12:798840. [PMID: 34976026 PMCID: PMC8718701 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.798840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) has the potential to revolutionize predictive plant breeding. A reference population is phenotyped and genotyped to train a statistical model that is used to perform genome-enabled predictions of new individuals that were only genotyped. In this vein, deep neural networks, are a type of machine learning model and have been widely adopted for use in GS studies, as they are not parametric methods, making them more adept at capturing nonlinear patterns. However, the training process for deep neural networks is very challenging due to the numerous hyper-parameters that need to be tuned, especially when imperfect tuning can result in biased predictions. In this paper we propose a simple method for calibrating (adjusting) the prediction of continuous response variables resulting from deep learning applications. We evaluated the proposed deep learning calibration method (DL_M2) using four crop breeding data sets and its performance was compared with the standard deep learning method (DL_M1), as well as the standard genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (GBLUP). While the GBLUP was the most accurate model overall, the proposed deep learning calibration method (DL_M2) helped increase the genome-enabled prediction performance in all data sets when compared with the traditional DL method (DL_M1). Taken together, we provide evidence for extending the use of the proposed calibration method to evaluate its potential and consistency for predicting performance in the context of GS applied to plant breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Abelardo Montesinos-López
- Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
- *Correspondence: Abelardo Montesinos-López, ; Rajeev K. Varshney, ; José Crossa,
| | - Brandon A. Mosqueda-González
- Centro de Investigación en Computación (CIC), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Esq. Miguel Othón de Mendizábal, Mexico city, Mexico
| | - Alison R. Bentley
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Morten Lillemo
- Department of Plant Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, IHA/CIGENE, As, Norway
| | - Rajeev K. Varshney
- Centre of Excellence in Genomics and Systems Biology, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India
- State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Centre for Crop and Food Innovation, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia
- *Correspondence: Abelardo Montesinos-López, ; Rajeev K. Varshney, ; José Crossa,
| | - José Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
- Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Mexico
- *Correspondence: Abelardo Montesinos-López, ; Rajeev K. Varshney, ; José Crossa,
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Xu Y, Liu X, Cao X, Huang C, Liu E, Qian S, Liu X, Wu Y, Dong F, Qiu CW, Qiu J, Hua K, Su W, Wu J, Xu H, Han Y, Fu C, Yin Z, Liu M, Roepman R, Dietmann S, Virta M, Kengara F, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Zhao T, Dai J, Yang J, Lan L, Luo M, Liu Z, An T, Zhang B, He X, Cong S, Liu X, Zhang W, Lewis JP, Tiedje JM, Wang Q, An Z, Wang F, Zhang L, Huang T, Lu C, Cai Z, Wang F, Zhang J. Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. Innovation (N Y) 2021; 2:100179. [PMID: 34877560 PMCID: PMC8633405 DOI: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) coupled with promising machine learning (ML) techniques well known from computer science is broadly affecting many aspects of various fields including science and technology, industry, and even our day-to-day life. The ML techniques have been developed to analyze high-throughput data with a view to obtaining useful insights, categorizing, predicting, and making evidence-based decisions in novel ways, which will promote the growth of novel applications and fuel the sustainable booming of AI. This paper undertakes a comprehensive survey on the development and application of AI in different aspects of fundamental sciences, including information science, mathematics, medical science, materials science, geoscience, life science, physics, and chemistry. The challenges that each discipline of science meets, and the potentials of AI techniques to handle these challenges, are discussed in detail. Moreover, we shed light on new research trends entailing the integration of AI into each scientific discipline. The aim of this paper is to provide a broad research guideline on fundamental sciences with potential infusion of AI, to help motivate researchers to deeply understand the state-of-the-art applications of AI-based fundamental sciences, and thereby to help promote the continuous development of these fundamental sciences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongjun Xu
- Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Xin Liu
- Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Xin Cao
- Zhongshan Hospital Institute of Clinical Science, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Changping Huang
- Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Enke Liu
- Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan, Guangdong 523808, China
| | - Sen Qian
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Xingchen Liu
- Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, China
| | - Yanjun Wu
- Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Fengliang Dong
- National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Cheng-Wei Qiu
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117583, Singapore
| | - Junjun Qiu
- Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine-Related Diseases, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Keqin Hua
- Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine-Related Diseases, Shanghai 200011, China
| | - Wentao Su
- School of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China
| | - Jian Wu
- Second Affiliated Hospital School of Medicine, and School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Huiyu Xu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
| | - Yong Han
- Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China
| | - Chenguang Fu
- School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
| | - Zhigang Yin
- Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Fuzhou 350002, China
| | - Miao Liu
- Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- Songshan Lake Materials Laboratory, Dongguan, Guangdong 523808, China
| | - Ronald Roepman
- Medical Center, Radboud University, 6500 Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Sabine Dietmann
- Institute for Informatics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Marko Virta
- Department of Microbiology, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
| | - Fredrick Kengara
- School of Pure and Applied Sciences, Bomet University College, Bomet 20400, Kenya
| | - Ze Zhang
- Agriculture College of Shihezi University, Xinjiang 832000, China
| | - Lifu Zhang
- Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China
- Agriculture College of Shihezi University, Xinjiang 832000, China
| | - Taolan Zhao
- Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Ji Dai
- The Brain Cognition and Brain Disease Institute, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen 518055, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
- Shenzhen-Hong Kong Institute of Brain Science-Shenzhen Fundamental Research Institutions, Shenzhen 518055, China
| | | | - Liang Lan
- Department of Communication Studies, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ming Luo
- South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
- Center of Economic Botany, Core Botanical Gardens, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China
| | - Zhaofeng Liu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Tao An
- Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200030, China
| | - Bin Zhang
- Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, China
| | - Xiao He
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Shan Cong
- Suzhou Institute of Nano-Tech and Nano-Bionics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou 215123, China
| | - Xiaohong Liu
- Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing 400714, China
| | - James P. Lewis
- Institute of Coal Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Taiyuan 030001, China
| | - James M. Tiedje
- Center for Microbial Ecology, Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Qi Wang
- Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
- Zhejiang Lab, Hangzhou 311121, China
| | - Zhulin An
- Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Fei Wang
- Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Libo Zhang
- Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Tao Huang
- Shanghai Institute of Nutrition and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
| | - Chuan Lu
- Department of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3FL, UK
| | - Zhipeng Cai
- Department of Computer Science, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
| | - Fang Wang
- Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Jiabao Zhang
- Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sandhu K, Patil SS, Pumphrey M, Carter A. Multitrait machine- and deep-learning models for genomic selection using spectral information in a wheat breeding program. Plant Genome 2021; 14:e20119. [PMID: 34482627 DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Prediction of breeding values is central to plant breeding and has been revolutionized by the adoption of genomic selection (GS). Use of machine- and deep-learning algorithms applied to complex traits in plants can improve prediction accuracies. Because of the tremendous increase in collected data in breeding programs and the slow rate of genetic gain increase, it is required to explore the potential of artificial intelligence in analyzing the data. The main objectives of this study include optimization of multitrait (MT) machine- and deep-learning models for predicting grain yield and grain protein content in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using spectral information. This study compares the performance of four machine- and deep-learning-based unitrait (UT) and MT models with traditional genomic best linear unbiased predictor (GBLUP) and Bayesian models. The dataset consisted of 650 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from a spring wheat breeding program grown for three years (2014-2016), and spectral data were collected at heading and grain filling stages. The MT-GS models performed 0-28.5 and -0.04 to 15% superior to the UT-GS models. Random forest and multilayer perceptron were the best performing machine- and deep-learning models to predict both traits. Four explored Bayesian models gave similar accuracies, which were less than machine- and deep-learning-based models and required increased computational time. Green normalized difference vegetation index (GNDVI) best predicted grain protein content in seven out of the nine MT-GS models. Overall, this study concluded that machine- and deep-learning-based MT-GS models increased prediction accuracy and should be employed in large-scale breeding programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karansher Sandhu
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, WA State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA
| | - Shruti Sunil Patil
- School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, WA State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA
| | - Michael Pumphrey
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, WA State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA
| | - Arron Carter
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, WA State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Montesinos-Lopez OA, Montesinos-Lopez JC, Salazar E, Barron JA, Montesinos-Lopez A, Buenrostro-Mariscal R, Crossa J. Application of a Poisson deep neural network model for the prediction of count data in genome-based prediction. Plant Genome 2021; 14:e20118. [PMID: 34323393 DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is revolutionizing conventional ways of developing new plants and animals. However, because it is a predictive methodology, GS strongly depends on statistical and machine learning to perform these predictions. For continuous outcomes, more models are available for GS. Unfortunately, for count data outcomes, there are few efficient statistical machine learning models for large datasets or for datasets with fewer observations than independent variables. For this reason, in this paper, we applied the univariate version of the Poisson deep neural network (PDNN) proposed earlier for genomic predictions of count data. The model was implemented with (a) the negative log-likelihood of Poisson distribution as the loss function, (b) the rectified linear activation unit as the activation function in hidden layers, and (c) the exponential activation function in the output layer. The advantage of the PDNN model is that it captures complex patterns in the data by implementing many nonlinear transformations in the hidden layers. Moreover, since it was implemented in Tensorflow as the back-end, and in Keras as the front-end, the model can be applied to moderate and large datasets, which is a significant advantage over previous GS models for count data. The PDNN model was compared with deep learning models with continuous outcomes, conventional generalized Poisson regression models, and conventional Bayesian regression methods. We found that the PDNN model outperformed the Bayesian regression and generalized Poisson regression methods in terms of prediction accuracy, although it was not better than the conventional deep neural network with continuous outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jose C Montesinos-Lopez
- Dep. de Estadística, Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, Guanajuato, Guanajuato, 36023, México
| | - Eduardo Salazar
- Facultad de Telemática, Univ. de Colima, Colima, Colima, 28040, México
| | - Jose Alberto Barron
- Dep. of Animal Production (DPA), Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Av. La Molina, s/n La Molina 15024, Lima, Perú
| | - Abelardo Montesinos-Lopez
- Dep. de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías, Univ. de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44430, México
| | | | - Jose Crossa
- Biometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera km 45, Mexico-Veracruz, Texcoco, Edo. de México, CP 52640, México
- Colegio de Post-Graduados, CP 56230, Montecillos, Edo. de México, Texcoco, México
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Vu NT, Phuc TH, Oanh KTP, Sang NV, Trang TT, Nguyen NH. Accuracies of genomic predictions for disease resistance of striped catfish to Edwardsiella ictaluri using artificial intelligence algorithms. G3 (Bethesda) 2021; 12:6408442. [PMID: 34788431 PMCID: PMC8727988 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Assessments of genomic prediction accuracies using artificial intelligent (AI) algorithms (i.e., machine and deep learning methods) are currently not available or very limited in aquaculture species. The principal aim of this study was to examine the predictive performance of these new methods for disease resistance to Edwardsiella ictaluri in a population of striped catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus and to make comparisons with four common methods, i.e., pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP), genomic-based best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) and a nonlinear Bayesian approach (notably BayesR). Our analyses using machine learning (i.e., ML-KAML) and deep learning (i.e., DL-MLP and DL-CNN) together with the four common methods (PBLUP, GBLUP, ssGBLUP, and BayesR) were conducted for two main disease resistance traits (i.e., survival status coded as 0 and 1 and survival time, i.e., days that the animals were still alive after the challenge test) in a pedigree consisting of 560 individual animals (490 offspring and 70 parents) genotyped for 14,154 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs). The results using 6,470 SNPs after quality control showed that machine learning methods outperformed PBLUP, GBLUP, and ssGBLUP, with the increases in the prediction accuracies for both traits by 9.1–15.4%. However, the prediction accuracies obtained from machine learning methods were comparable to those estimated using BayesR. Imputation of missing genotypes using AlphaFamImpute increased the prediction accuracies by 5.3–19.2% in all the methods and data used. On the other hand, there were insignificant decreases (0.3–5.6%) in the prediction accuracies for both survival status and survival time when multivariate models were used in comparison to univariate analyses. Interestingly, the genomic prediction accuracies based on only highly significant SNPs (P < 0.00001, 318–400 SNPs for survival status and 1,362–1,589 SNPs for survival time) were somewhat lower (0.3–15.6%) than those obtained from the whole set of 6,470 SNPs. In most of our analyses, the accuracies of genomic prediction were somewhat higher for survival time than survival status (0/1 data). It is concluded that although there are prospects for the application of genomic selection to increase disease resistance to E. ictaluri in striped catfish breeding programs, further evaluation of these methods should be made in independent families/populations when more data are accumulated in future generations to avoid possible biases in the genetic parameters estimates and prediction accuracies for the disease-resistant traits studied in this population of striped catfish P. hypophthalmus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nguyen Thanh Vu
- School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.,Genecology Research Center, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.,Research Institute for Aquaculture No.2, Ho Chi Minh 710000, Vietnam
| | - Tran Huu Phuc
- Research Institute for Aquaculture No.2, Ho Chi Minh 710000, Vietnam
| | - Kim Thi Phuong Oanh
- Institute of Genome Research, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Van Sang
- Research Institute for Aquaculture No.2, Ho Chi Minh 710000, Vietnam
| | - Trinh Thi Trang
- School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.,Genecology Research Center, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.,Vietnam National University of Agriculture, Gia Lam 131000, Vietnam
| | - Nguyen Hong Nguyen
- School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia.,Genecology Research Center, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Danilevicz MF, Bayer PE, Nestor BJ, Bennamoun M, Edwards D. Resources for image-based high-throughput phenotyping in crops and data sharing challenges. Plant Physiol 2021; 187:699-715. [PMID: 34608963 PMCID: PMC8561249 DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiab301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
High-throughput phenotyping (HTP) platforms are capable of monitoring the phenotypic variation of plants through multiple types of sensors, such as red green and blue (RGB) cameras, hyperspectral sensors, and computed tomography, which can be associated with environmental and genotypic data. Because of the wide range of information provided, HTP datasets represent a valuable asset to characterize crop phenotypes. As HTP becomes widely employed with more tools and data being released, it is important that researchers are aware of these resources and how they can be applied to accelerate crop improvement. Researchers may exploit these datasets either for phenotype comparison or employ them as a benchmark to assess tool performance and to support the development of tools that are better at generalizing between different crops and environments. In this review, we describe the use of image-based HTP for yield prediction, root phenotyping, development of climate-resilient crops, detecting pathogen and pest infestation, and quantitative trait measurement. We emphasize the need for researchers to share phenotypic data, and offer a comprehensive list of available datasets to assist crop breeders and tool developers to leverage these resources in order to accelerate crop breeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica F. Danilevicz
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - Philipp E. Bayer
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - Benjamin J. Nestor
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - Mohammed Bennamoun
- Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
| | - David Edwards
- School of Biological Sciences and Institute of Agriculture, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia 6009, Australia
- Author for communication:
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Amas J, Anderson R, Edwards D, Cowling W, Batley J. Status and advances in mining for blackleg (Leptosphaeria maculans) quantitative resistance (QR) in oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Theor Appl Genet 2021; 134:3123-3145. [PMID: 34104999 PMCID: PMC8440254 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-021-03877-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
KEY MESSAGE Quantitative resistance (QR) loci discovered through genetic and genomic analyses are abundant in the Brassica napus genome, providing an opportunity for their utilization in enhancing blackleg resistance. Quantitative resistance (QR) has long been utilized to manage blackleg in Brassica napus (canola, oilseed rape), even before major resistance genes (R-genes) were extensively explored in breeding programmes. In contrast to R-gene-mediated qualitative resistance, QR reduces blackleg symptoms rather than completely eliminating the disease. As a polygenic trait, QR is controlled by numerous genes with modest effects, which exerts less pressure on the pathogen to evolve; hence, its effectiveness is more durable compared to R-gene-mediated resistance. Furthermore, combining QR with major R-genes has been shown to enhance resistance against diseases in important crops, including oilseed rape. For these reasons, there has been a renewed interest among breeders in utilizing QR in crop improvement. However, the mechanisms governing QR are largely unknown, limiting its deployment. Advances in genomics are facilitating the dissection of the genetic and molecular underpinnings of QR, resulting in the discovery of several loci and genes that can be potentially deployed to enhance blackleg resistance. Here, we summarize the efforts undertaken to identify blackleg QR loci in oilseed rape using linkage and association analysis. We update the knowledge on the possible mechanisms governing QR and the advances in searching for the underlying genes. Lastly, we lay out strategies to accelerate the genetic improvement of blackleg QR in oilseed rape using improved phenotyping approaches and genomic prediction tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junrey Amas
- School of Biological Sciences and The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6001 Australia
| | - Robyn Anderson
- School of Biological Sciences and The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6001 Australia
| | - David Edwards
- School of Biological Sciences and The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6001 Australia
| | - Wallace Cowling
- School of Agriculture and Environment and The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009 Australia
| | - Jacqueline Batley
- School of Biological Sciences and The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6001 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jighly A, Hayden M, Daetwyler H. Integrating genomic selection with a genotype plus genotype x environment (GGE) model improves prediction accuracy and computational efficiency. Plant Cell Environ 2021; 44:3459-3470. [PMID: 34231236 DOI: 10.1111/pce.14145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) is one of the major factors affecting the prediction accuracy of genomic selection (GS) models. Standard models have low power to model complex GEI, and they fail to predict phenotypes in unobserved environments. Here, we developed a novel prediction model that account for GEI, named 3GS, that combines genotype plus genotype × environment (GGE) analysis with GS. The model calculates the principal components (PCs) of the environmental phenotypes using GGE analysis and predict the performance of these PCs using standard GS models before converting the GEBVs of these PCs (pcGEBVs) back to the original phenotypes. We demonstrated three advantages of the new model. First, 3GS showed significantly higher prediction accuracy primarily for deviated environments that have low to negative correlations to other environments. Second, 3GS can predict new genotypes in unobserved environments with high accuracy. Third, the computational complexity of 3GS increases linearly with increasing the number of environments and the population size, unlike the standard models that exhibit exponential increase, making it hundreds of times faster than the standard models for large data sets. 3GS can improve prediction accuracy with minimal resources in modern breeding programmes in which massive populations get multi-environment phenotypes with high-throughput techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulqader Jighly
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew Hayden
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hans Daetwyler
- Agriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
- School of Applied Systems Biology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Montesinos-López A, Runcie DE, Ibba MI, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Montesinos-López OA, Crespo LA, Bentley AR, Crossa J. Multi-trait genomic-enabled prediction enhances accuracy in multi-year wheat breeding trials. G3 (Bethesda) 2021; 11:6332007. [PMID: 34568924 PMCID: PMC8496321 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Implementing genomic-based prediction models in genomic selection requires an understanding of the measures for evaluating prediction accuracy from different models and methods using multi-trait data. In this study, we compared prediction accuracy using six large multi-trait wheat data sets (quality and grain yield). The data were used to predict 1 year (testing) from the previous year (training) to assess prediction accuracy using four different prediction models. The results indicated that the conventional Pearson’s correlation between observed and predicted values underestimated the true correlation value, whereas the corrected Pearson’s correlation calculated by fitting a bivariate model was higher than the division of the Pearson’s correlation by the squared root of the heritability across traits, by 2.53–11.46%. Across the datasets, the corrected Pearson’s correlation was higher than the uncorrected by 5.80–14.01%. Overall, we found that for grain yield the prediction performance was highest using a multi-trait compared to a single-trait model. The higher the absolute genetic correlation between traits the greater the benefits of multi-trait models for increasing the genomic-enabled prediction accuracy of traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abelardo Montesinos-López
- Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara 44430, Mexico
| | - Daniel E Runcie
- Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis CA 95616, USA
| | - Maria Itria Ibba
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz, México
| | | | | | - Leonardo A Crespo
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz, México
| | - Alison R Bentley
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz, México
| | - José Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz, México.,Colegio de Postgraduados (COLPOS), Montecillos, Edo. de México, México
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Razzaq A, Kaur P, Akhter N, Wani SH, Saleem F. Next-Generation Breeding Strategies for Climate-Ready Crops. Front Plant Sci 2021; 12:620420. [PMID: 34367194 PMCID: PMC8336580 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.620420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Climate change is a threat to global food security due to the reduction of crop productivity around the globe. Food security is a matter of concern for stakeholders and policymakers as the global population is predicted to bypass 10 billion in the coming years. Crop improvement via modern breeding techniques along with efficient agronomic practices innovations in microbiome applications, and exploiting the natural variations in underutilized crops is an excellent way forward to fulfill future food requirements. In this review, we describe the next-generation breeding tools that can be used to increase crop production by developing climate-resilient superior genotypes to cope with the future challenges of global food security. Recent innovations in genomic-assisted breeding (GAB) strategies allow the construction of highly annotated crop pan-genomes to give a snapshot of the full landscape of genetic diversity (GD) and recapture the lost gene repertoire of a species. Pan-genomes provide new platforms to exploit these unique genes or genetic variation for optimizing breeding programs. The advent of next-generation clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/CRISPR-associated (CRISPR/Cas) systems, such as prime editing, base editing, and de nova domestication, has institutionalized the idea that genome editing is revamped for crop improvement. Also, the availability of versatile Cas orthologs, including Cas9, Cas12, Cas13, and Cas14, improved the editing efficiency. Now, the CRISPR/Cas systems have numerous applications in crop research and successfully edit the major crop to develop resistance against abiotic and biotic stress. By adopting high-throughput phenotyping approaches and big data analytics tools like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), agriculture is heading toward automation or digitalization. The integration of speed breeding with genomic and phenomic tools can allow rapid gene identifications and ultimately accelerate crop improvement programs. In addition, the integration of next-generation multidisciplinary breeding platforms can open exciting avenues to develop climate-ready crops toward global food security.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Razzaq
- Centre of Agricultural Biochemistry and Biotechnology (CABB), University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Parwinder Kaur
- UWA School of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Naheed Akhter
- College of Allied Health Professional, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Shabir Hussain Wani
- Mountain Research Center for Field Crops, Khudwani, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Srinagar, India
| | - Fozia Saleem
- Centre of Agricultural Biochemistry and Biotechnology (CABB), University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sandhu KS, Aoun M, Morris CF, Carter AH. Genomic Selection for End-Use Quality and Processing Traits in Soft White Winter Wheat Breeding Program with Machine and Deep Learning Models. Biology (Basel) 2021; 10:689. [PMID: 34356544 PMCID: PMC8301459 DOI: 10.3390/biology10070689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Breeding for grain yield, biotic and abiotic stress resistance, and end-use quality are important goals of wheat breeding programs. Screening for end-use quality traits is usually secondary to grain yield due to high labor needs, cost of testing, and large seed requirements for phenotyping. Genomic selection provides an alternative to predict performance using genome-wide markers under forward and across location predictions, where a previous year's dataset can be used to build the models. Due to large datasets in breeding programs, we explored the potential of the machine and deep learning models to predict fourteen end-use quality traits in a winter wheat breeding program. The population used consisted of 666 wheat genotypes screened for five years (2015-19) at two locations (Pullman and Lind, WA, USA). Nine different models, including two machine learning (random forest and support vector machine) and two deep learning models (convolutional neural network and multilayer perceptron) were explored for cross-validation, forward, and across locations predictions. The prediction accuracies for different traits varied from 0.45-0.81, 0.29-0.55, and 0.27-0.50 under cross-validation, forward, and across location predictions. In general, forward prediction accuracies kept increasing over time due to increments in training data size and was more evident for machine and deep learning models. Deep learning models were superior over the traditional ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (RRBLUP) and Bayesian models under all prediction scenarios. The high accuracy observed for end-use quality traits in this study support predicting them in early generations, leading to the advancement of superior genotypes to more extensive grain yield trails. Furthermore, the superior performance of machine and deep learning models strengthens the idea to include them in large scale breeding programs for predicting complex traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karansher Singh Sandhu
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA; (K.S.S.); (M.A.)
| | - Meriem Aoun
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA; (K.S.S.); (M.A.)
| | - Craig F. Morris
- USDA-ARS Western Wheat Quality Laboratory, E-202 Food Quality Building, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA;
| | - Arron H. Carter
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA; (K.S.S.); (M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Reynolds MP, Lewis JM, Ammar K, Basnet BR, Crespo-Herrera L, Crossa J, Dhugga KS, Dreisigacker S, Juliana P, Karwat H, Kishii M, Krause MR, Langridge P, Lashkari A, Mondal S, Payne T, Pequeno D, Pinto F, Sansaloni C, Schulthess U, Singh RP, Sonder K, Sukumaran S, Xiong W, Braun HJ. Harnessing translational research in wheat for climate resilience. J Exp Bot 2021; 72:5134-5157. [PMID: 34139769 PMCID: PMC8272565 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erab256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Despite being the world's most widely grown crop, research investments in wheat (Triticum aestivum and Triticum durum) fall behind those in other staple crops. Current yield gains will not meet 2050 needs, and climate stresses compound this challenge. However, there is good evidence that heat and drought resilience can be boosted through translating promising ideas into novel breeding technologies using powerful new tools in genetics and remote sensing, for example. Such technologies can also be applied to identify climate resilience traits from among the vast and largely untapped reserve of wheat genetic resources in collections worldwide. This review describes multi-pronged research opportunities at the focus of the Heat and Drought Wheat Improvement Consortium (coordinated by CIMMYT), which together create a pipeline to boost heat and drought resilience, specifically: improving crop design targets using big data approaches; developing phenomic tools for field-based screening and research; applying genomic technologies to elucidate the bases of climate resilience traits; and applying these outputs in developing next-generation breeding methods. The global impact of these outputs will be validated through the International Wheat Improvement Network, a global germplasm development and testing system that contributes key productivity traits to approximately half of the global wheat-growing area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew P Reynolds
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Janet M Lewis
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Karim Ammar
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Bhoja R Basnet
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | | | - José Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Kanwarpal S Dhugga
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | | | - Philomin Juliana
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Hannes Karwat
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Masahiro Kishii
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Margaret R Krause
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Peter Langridge
- School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1, Glen Osmond SA 5064, Australia
- Wheat Initiative, Julius Kühn-Institute, Königin-Luise-Str. 19, 14195 Berlin, Germany
| | - Azam Lashkari
- CIMMYT-Henan Collaborative Innovation Center, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, PR China
| | - Suchismita Mondal
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Thomas Payne
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Diego Pequeno
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Francisco Pinto
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Carolina Sansaloni
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Urs Schulthess
- CIMMYT-Henan Collaborative Innovation Center, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, PR China
| | - Ravi P Singh
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | - Kai Sonder
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| | | | - Wei Xiong
- CIMMYT-Henan Collaborative Innovation Center, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, PR China
| | - Hans J Braun
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Liang M, Chang T, An B, Duan X, Du L, Wang X, Miao J, Xu L, Gao X, Zhang L, Li J, Gao H. A Stacking Ensemble Learning Framework for Genomic Prediction. Front Genet 2021; 12:600040. [PMID: 33747037 PMCID: PMC7969712 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.600040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is perhaps the most useful tool for the interpretation of large genomic datasets. However, the performance of a single machine learning method in genomic selection (GS) is currently unsatisfactory. To improve the genomic predictions, we constructed a stacking ensemble learning framework (SELF), integrating three machine learning methods, to predict genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs). The present study evaluated the prediction ability of SELF by analyzing three real datasets, with different genetic architecture; comparing the prediction accuracy of SELF, base learners, genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) and BayesB. For each trait, SELF performed better than base learners, which included support vector regression (SVR), kernel ridge regression (KRR) and elastic net (ENET). The prediction accuracy of SELF was, on average, 7.70% higher than GBLUP in three datasets. Except for the milk fat percentage (MFP) traits, of the German Holstein dairy cattle dataset, SELF was more robust than BayesB in all remaining traits. Therefore, we believed that SEFL has the potential to be promoted to estimate GEBVs in other animals and plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mang Liang
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Tianpeng Chang
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Bingxing An
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xinghai Duan
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lili Du
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoqiao Wang
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Miao
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lingyang Xu
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xue Gao
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lupei Zhang
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Junya Li
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Huijiang Gao
- Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Montesinos-López OA, Montesinos-López A, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Barrón-López JA, Martini JWR, Fajardo-Flores SB, Gaytan-Lugo LS, Santana-Mancilla PC, Crossa J. A review of deep learning applications for genomic selection. BMC Genomics 2021; 22:19. [PMID: 33407114 PMCID: PMC7789712 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-07319-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several conventional genomic Bayesian (or no Bayesian) prediction methods have been proposed including the standard additive genetic effect model for which the variance components are estimated with mixed model equations. In recent years, deep learning (DL) methods have been considered in the context of genomic prediction. The DL methods are nonparametric models providing flexibility to adapt to complicated associations between data and output with the ability to adapt to very complex patterns. MAIN BODY We review the applications of deep learning (DL) methods in genomic selection (GS) to obtain a meta-picture of GS performance and highlight how these tools can help solve challenging plant breeding problems. We also provide general guidance for the effective use of DL methods including the fundamentals of DL and the requirements for its appropriate use. We discuss the pros and cons of this technique compared to traditional genomic prediction approaches as well as the current trends in DL applications. CONCLUSIONS The main requirement for using DL is the quality and sufficiently large training data. Although, based on current literature GS in plant and animal breeding we did not find clear superiority of DL in terms of prediction power compared to conventional genome based prediction models. Nevertheless, there are clear evidences that DL algorithms capture nonlinear patterns more efficiently than conventional genome based. Deep learning algorithms are able to integrate data from different sources as is usually needed in GS assisted breeding and it shows the ability for improving prediction accuracy for large plant breeding data. It is important to apply DL to large training-testing data sets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Abelardo Montesinos-López
- Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, 44430, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
| | | | - José Alberto Barrón-López
- Department of Animal Production (DPA), Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Av. La Molina s/n La Molina, 15024, Lima, Peru
| | - Johannes W R Martini
- Biometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, CP 52640, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, Mexico
| | | | - Laura S Gaytan-Lugo
- School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Universidad de Colima, 28040, Colima, Colima, Mexico
| | | | - José Crossa
- Colegio de Postgraduados, CP 56230, Montecillos, Edo. de México, Mexico.
- Biometrics and Statistics Unit, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, CP 52640, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, Mexico.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Crossa J, Fritsche-Neto R, Montesinos-Lopez OA, Costa-Neto G, Dreisigacker S, Montesinos-Lopez A, Bentley AR. The Modern Plant Breeding Triangle: Optimizing the Use of Genomics, Phenomics, and Enviromics Data. Front Plant Sci 2021; 12:651480. [PMID: 33936136 PMCID: PMC8085545 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.651480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jose Crossa
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz, de Mexico, Mexico
- Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico
| | - Roberto Fritsche-Neto
- Department of Genetics, “Luiz de Queiroz” Agriculture College, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Germano Costa-Neto
- Department of Genetics, “Luiz de Queiroz” Agriculture College, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Susanne Dreisigacker
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz, de Mexico, Mexico
| | - Abelardo Montesinos-Lopez
- Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
| | - Alison R. Bentley
- International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Carretera México-Veracruz, de Mexico, Mexico
- *Correspondence: Alison R. Bentley
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Passafaro TL, Lopes FB, Dórea JRR, Craven M, Breen V, Hawken RJ, Rosa GJM. Would large dataset sample size unveil the potential of deep neural networks for improved genome-enabled prediction of complex traits? The case for body weight in broilers. BMC Genomics 2020; 21:771. [PMID: 33167865 PMCID: PMC7654004 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-07181-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep neural networks (DNN) are a particular case of artificial neural networks (ANN) composed by multiple hidden layers, and have recently gained attention in genome-enabled prediction of complex traits. Yet, few studies in genome-enabled prediction have assessed the performance of DNN compared to traditional regression models. Strikingly, no clear superiority of DNN has been reported so far, and results seem highly dependent on the species and traits of application. Nevertheless, the relatively small datasets used in previous studies, most with fewer than 5000 observations may have precluded the full potential of DNN. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the impact of the dataset sample size on the performance of DNN compared to Bayesian regression models for genome-enable prediction of body weight in broilers by sub-sampling 63,526 observations of the training set. RESULTS Predictive performance of DNN improved as sample size increased, reaching a plateau at about 0.32 of prediction correlation when 60% of the entire training set size was used (i.e., 39,510 observations). Interestingly, DNN showed superior prediction correlation using up to 3% of training set, but poorer prediction correlation after that compared to Bayesian Ridge Regression (BRR) and Bayes Cπ. Regardless of the amount of data used to train the predictive machines, DNN displayed the lowest mean square error of prediction compared to all other approaches. The predictive bias was lower for DNN compared to Bayesian models, across all dataset sizes, with estimates close to one with larger sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS DNN had worse prediction correlation compared to BRR and Bayes Cπ, but improved mean square error of prediction and bias relative to both Bayesian models for genome-enabled prediction of body weight in broilers. Such findings, highlights advantages and disadvantages between predictive approaches depending on the criterion used for comparison. Furthermore, the inclusion of more data per se is not a guarantee for the DNN to outperform the Bayesian regression methods commonly used for genome-enabled prediction. Nonetheless, further analysis is necessary to detect scenarios where DNN can clearly outperform Bayesian benchmark models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago L Passafaro
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
| | | | - João R R Dórea
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
| | - Mark Craven
- Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
- Department of Computer Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA
| | - Vivian Breen
- Cobb-Vantress Inc., Siloam Springs, AR, 72761, USA
| | | | - Guilherme J M Rosa
- Department of Animal and Dairy Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
- Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Montesinos-López OA, Montesinos-López JC, Singh P, Lozano-Ramirez N, Barrón-López A, Montesinos-López A, Crossa J. A Multivariate Poisson Deep Learning Model for Genomic Prediction of Count Data. G3 (Bethesda) 2020; 10:4177-4190. [PMID: 32934019 PMCID: PMC7642922 DOI: 10.1534/g3.120.401631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The paradigm called genomic selection (GS) is a revolutionary way of developing new plants and animals. This is a predictive methodology, since it uses learning methods to perform its task. Unfortunately, there is no universal model that can be used for all types of predictions; for this reason, specific methodologies are required for each type of output (response variables). Since there is a lack of efficient methodologies for multivariate count data outcomes, in this paper, a multivariate Poisson deep neural network (MPDN) model is proposed for the genomic prediction of various count outcomes simultaneously. The MPDN model uses the minus log-likelihood of a Poisson distribution as a loss function, in hidden layers for capturing nonlinear patterns using the rectified linear unit (RELU) activation function and, in the output layer, the exponential activation function was used for producing outputs on the same scale of counts. The proposed MPDN model was compared to conventional generalized Poisson regression models and univariate Poisson deep learning models in two experimental data sets of count data. We found that the proposed MPDL outperformed univariate Poisson deep neural network models, but did not outperform, in terms of prediction, the univariate generalized Poisson regression models. All deep learning models were implemented in Tensorflow as back-end and Keras as front-end, which allows implementing these models on moderate and large data sets, which is a significant advantage over previous GS models for multivariate count data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Pawan Singh
- Biometrics and Statistics Unit, Genetic Resources Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Mexico
| | - Nerida Lozano-Ramirez
- Biometrics and Statistics Unit, Genetic Resources Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Mexico
| | - Alberto Barrón-López
- Department of Animal Production (DPA), Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina, Av. La Molina s/n La Molina, 15024, Lima, Perú
| | - Abelardo Montesinos-López
- Departamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Universidad de Guadalajara, 44430, Jalisco, México
| | - José Crossa
- Biometrics and Statistics Unit, Genetic Resources Program, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45 Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Mexico
- Colegio de Post-Graduados, Montecillos Texcoco. Edo. de Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Pégard M, Segura V, Muñoz F, Bastien C, Jorge V, Sanchez L. Favorable Conditions for Genomic Evaluation to Outperform Classical Pedigree Evaluation Highlighted by a Proof-of-Concept Study in Poplar. Front Plant Sci 2020; 11:581954. [PMID: 33193528 PMCID: PMC7655903 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.581954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Forest trees like poplar are particular in many ways compared to other domesticated species. They have long juvenile phases, ongoing crop-wild gene flow, extensive outcrossing, and slow growth. All these particularities tend to make the conduction of breeding programs and evaluation stages costly both in time and resources. Perennials like trees are therefore good candidates for the implementation of genomic selection (GS) which is a good way to accelerate the breeding process, by unchaining selection from phenotypic evaluation without affecting precision. In this study, we tried to compare GS to pedigree-based traditional evaluation, and evaluated under which conditions genomic evaluation outperforms classical pedigree evaluation. Several conditions were evaluated as the constitution of the training population by cross-validation, the implementation of multi-trait, single trait, additive and non-additive models with different estimation methods (G-BLUP or weighted G-BLUP). Finally, the impact of the marker densification was tested through four marker density sets. The population under study corresponds to a pedigree of 24 parents and 1,011 offspring, structured into 35 full-sib families. Four evaluation batches were planted in the same location and seven traits were evaluated on 1 and 2 years old trees. The quality of prediction was reported by the accuracy, the Spearman rank correlation and prediction bias and tested with a cross-validation and an independent individual test set. Our results show that genomic evaluation performance could be comparable to the already well-optimized pedigree-based evaluation under certain conditions. Genomic evaluation appeared to be advantageous when using an independent test set and a set of less precise phenotypes. Genome-based methods showed advantages over pedigree counterparts when ranking candidates at the within-family levels, for most of the families. Our study also showed that looking at ranking criteria as Spearman rank correlation can reveal benefits to genomic selection hidden by biased predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vincent Segura
- BioForA, INRA, ONF, Orléans, France
- AGAP, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Kim KD, Kang Y, Kim C. Application of Genomic Big Data in Plant Breeding:Past, Present, and Future. Plants (Basel) 2020; 9:E1454. [PMID: 33126607 PMCID: PMC7694055 DOI: 10.3390/plants9111454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Plant breeding has a long history of developing new varieties that have ensured the food security of the human population. During this long journey together with humanity, plant breeders have successfully integrated the latest innovations in science and technologies to accelerate the increase in crop production and quality. For the past two decades, since the completion of human genome sequencing, genomic tools and sequencing technologies have advanced remarkably, and adopting these innovations has enabled us to cost down and/or speed up the plant breeding process. Currently, with the growing mass of genomic data and digitalized biological data, interdisciplinary approaches using new technologies could lead to a new paradigm of plant breeding. In this review, we summarize the overall history and advances of plant breeding, which have been aided by plant genomic research. We highlight the key advances in the field of plant genomics that have impacted plant breeding over the past decades and introduce the current status of innovative approaches such as genomic selection, which could overcome limitations of conventional breeding and enhance the rate of genetic gain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Do Kim
- Department of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Myongji University, Yongin 17058, Korea;
| | - Yuna Kang
- Department of Crop Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea;
| | - Changsoo Kim
- Department of Crop Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea;
- Department of Smart Agriculture Systems, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Guo J, Khan J, Pradhan S, Shahi D, Khan N, Avci M, Mcbreen J, Harrison S, Brown-Guedira G, Murphy JP, Johnson J, Mergoum M, Esten Mason R, Ibrahim AMH, Sutton R, Griffey C, Babar MA. Multi-Trait Genomic Prediction of Yield-Related Traits in US Soft Wheat under Variable Water Regimes. Genes (Basel) 2020; 11:genes11111270. [PMID: 33126620 PMCID: PMC7716228 DOI: 10.3390/genes11111270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The performance of genomic prediction (GP) on genetically correlated traits can be improved through an interdependence multi-trait model under a multi-environment context. In this study, a panel of 237 soft facultative wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines was evaluated to compare single- and multi-trait models for predicting grain yield (GY), harvest index (HI), spike fertility (SF), and thousand grain weight (TGW). The panel was phenotyped in two locations and two years in Florida under drought and moderately drought stress conditions, while the genotyping was performed using 27,957 genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) makers. Five predictive models including Multi-environment Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (MGBLUP), Bayesian Multi-trait Multi-environment (BMTME), Bayesian Multi-output Regressor Stacking (BMORS), Single-trait Multi-environment Deep Learning (SMDL), and Multi-trait Multi-environment Deep Learning (MMDL) were compared. Across environments, the multi-trait statistical model (BMTME) was superior to the multi-trait DL model for prediction accuracy in most scenarios, but the DL models were comparable to the statistical models for response to selection. The multi-trait model also showed 5 to 22% more genetic gain compared to the single-trait model across environment reflected by the response to selection. Overall, these results suggest that multi-trait genomic prediction can be an efficient strategy for economically important yield component related traits in soft wheat.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Guo
- Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (J.G.); (J.K.); (S.P.); (D.S.); (N.K.); (M.A.); (J.M.)
| | - Jahangir Khan
- Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (J.G.); (J.K.); (S.P.); (D.S.); (N.K.); (M.A.); (J.M.)
| | - Sumit Pradhan
- Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (J.G.); (J.K.); (S.P.); (D.S.); (N.K.); (M.A.); (J.M.)
| | - Dipendra Shahi
- Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (J.G.); (J.K.); (S.P.); (D.S.); (N.K.); (M.A.); (J.M.)
| | - Naeem Khan
- Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (J.G.); (J.K.); (S.P.); (D.S.); (N.K.); (M.A.); (J.M.)
| | - Muhsin Avci
- Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (J.G.); (J.K.); (S.P.); (D.S.); (N.K.); (M.A.); (J.M.)
| | - Jordan Mcbreen
- Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (J.G.); (J.K.); (S.P.); (D.S.); (N.K.); (M.A.); (J.M.)
| | - Stephen Harrison
- School of Plant Environment and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA;
| | | | - Joseph Paul Murphy
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA;
| | - Jerry Johnson
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 32223, USA; (J.J.); (M.M.)
| | - Mohamed Mergoum
- Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 32223, USA; (J.J.); (M.M.)
| | - Richanrd Esten Mason
- Department of Crop Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA;
| | - Amir M. H. Ibrahim
- Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA; (A.M.H.I.); (R.S.)
| | - Russel Sutton
- Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA; (A.M.H.I.); (R.S.)
| | - Carl Griffey
- School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA;
| | - Md Ali Babar
- Department of Agronomy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; (J.G.); (J.K.); (S.P.); (D.S.); (N.K.); (M.A.); (J.M.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|