1
|
Gupta A, Chouhdry H, Ellis SD, Young K, Mahnken J, Comfort B, Shanks D, McGreevy S, Rudy C, Zufer T, Mabry S, Woodward J, Wilson A, Anderson H, Loucks J, Chandaka S, Abu-El-Rub N, Mazzotti DR, Song X, Schmitz N, Conroy M, Supiano MA, Waitman LR, Burns JM. Design of a pragmatic randomized implementation effectiveness trial testing a health system wide hypertension program for older adults. Contemp Clin Trials 2024; 138:107466. [PMID: 38331381 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
Hypertension control remains poor. Multiple barriers at the level of patients, providers, and health systems interfere with implementation of hypertension guidelines and effective lowering of BP. Some strategies such as self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) and remote management by pharmacists are safe and effectively lower BP but have not been effectively implemented. In this study, we combine such evidence-based strategies to build a remote hypertension program and test its effectiveness and implementation in large health systems. This randomized, controlled, pragmatic type I hybrid implementation effectiveness trial will examine the virtual collaborative care clinic (vCCC), a hypertension program that integrates automated patient identification, SMBP, remote BP monitoring by trained health system pharmacists, and frequent patient-provider communication. We will randomize 1000 patients with uncontrolled hypertension from two large health systems in a 1:1 ratio to either vCCC or control (usual care with education) groups for a 2-year intervention. Outcome measures including BP measurements, cognitive function, and a symptom checklist will be completed during study visits. Other outcome measures of cardiovascular events, mortality, and health care utilization will be assessed using Medicare data. For the primary outcome of proportion achieving BP control (defined as systolic BP < 130 mmHg) in the two groups, we will use a generalized linear mixed model analysis. Implementation outcomes include acceptability and feasibility of the program. This study will guide implementation of a hypertension program within large health systems to effectively lower BP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Gupta
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States; Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
| | - Hira Chouhdry
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Shellie D Ellis
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Kate Young
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Jonathan Mahnken
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Branden Comfort
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Denton Shanks
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Sheila McGreevy
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Courtney Rudy
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Tahira Zufer
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Sharissa Mabry
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Jennifer Woodward
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Amber Wilson
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Heidi Anderson
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Jennifer Loucks
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Sravani Chandaka
- Division of Medical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Noor Abu-El-Rub
- Division of Medical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Diego R Mazzotti
- Division of Medical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Xing Song
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Biostatistics, and Medical Epidemiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Nolan Schmitz
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Molly Conroy
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Mark A Supiano
- Geriatrics Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine and Center on Aging, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Lemuel R Waitman
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Biostatistics, and Medical Epidemiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Jeffrey M Burns
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aasbø G, Staff AC, Blix E, Pay ASD, Waldum Å, Rivedal S, Solbrække KN. Expectations related to home-based telemonitoring of high-risk pregnancies: A qualitative study addressing healthcare providers' and users' views in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:276-285. [PMID: 37983832 PMCID: PMC10823400 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A pregnancy can be evaluated as high-risk for the woman and/or the fetus based on medical history and on previous or ongoing pregnancy characteristics. Monitoring high-risk pregnancies is crucial for early detection of alarming features, enabling timely intervention to ensure optimal maternal and fetal health outcomes. Home-based telemonitoring (HBTM) is a marginally exploited opportunity in antenatal care. The aim of this study was to illuminate healthcare providers' and users' expectations and views about HBTM of maternal and fetal health in high-risk pregnancies before implementation. MATERIAL AND METHODS To address diverse perspectives regarding HBTM of high-risk pregnancies, four different groups of experienced healthcare providers or users were interviewed (n = 21). Focus group interviews were conducted separately with midwives, obstetricians, and women who had previously experienced stillbirth. Six individual interviews were conducted with hospitalized women with ongoing high-risk pregnancies, representing potential candidates for HBTM. None of the participants had any previous experience with HBTM of pregnancies. The study is embedded in a social constructivist research paradigm. Interviews were analyzed using a thematic approach. RESULTS The participants acknowledged the benefits and potentials of more active roles for both care recipients and providers in HBTM. Concerns were clearly addressed and articulated in the following themes: eligibility and ability of women, availability of midwives and obstetricians, empowerment and patient safety, and shared responsibility. All groups problematized issues crucial to maintaining a sense of safety for care recipients, and healthcare providers also addressed issues related to maintaining a sense of safety also for the care providers. Conditions for HBTM were understood in terms of optimal personalized training, individual assessment of eligibility, and empowerment of an active patient role. These conditions were linked to the importance of competent and experienced midwives and obstetricians operating the monitoring, as well as the availability and continuity of care provision. Maintenance of safety in HBTM in high-risk pregnancies was crucial, particularly so in situations involving emerging acute health issues. CONCLUSIONS HBTM requires new, proactive roles among midwives, obstetricians, and monitored women, introducing a fine-tuned balance between personalized and standardized care to provide safe, optimal monitoring of high-risk pregnancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunvor Aasbø
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health ResearchUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Anne Cathrine Staff
- Division of Obstetrics and GynecologyOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Ellen Blix
- Department of Nursing and Health PromotionOslo Metropolitan UniversityOsloNorway
| | - Aase S. D. Pay
- Department of Nursing and Health PromotionOslo Metropolitan UniversityOsloNorway
- Department of Gynecology and ObstetricsBærum Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital TrustGjettumNorway
| | - Åsa Waldum
- Division of Obstetrics and GynecologyOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | - Sunniva Rivedal
- Center for Diaconia and Professional PracticeVID Specialized UniversityOsloNorway
| | - Kari N. Solbrække
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health ResearchUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saxena M, Roll A, Walson JL, Pearman E, Legge H, Nindi P, Chirambo CM, Titus A, Johnson J, Bélou EA, Togbevi CI, Chabi F, Avokpaho E, Kalua K, Ajjampur SSR, Ibikounlé M, Aruldas K, Means AR. "Our desire is to make this village intestinal worm free": Identifying determinants of high coverage of community-wide mass drug administration for soil transmitted helminths in Benin, India, and Malawi. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2024; 18:e0011819. [PMID: 38319937 PMCID: PMC10846705 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Soil-transmitted helminth infections (STH) are associated with substantial morbidity in low-and-middle-income countries, accounting for 2.7 million disability-adjusted life years annually. Current World Health Organization guidelines recommend controlling STH-associated morbidity through periodic deworming of at-risk populations, including children and women of reproductive age (15-49 years). However, there is increasing interest in community-wide mass drug administration (cMDA) which includes deworming adults who serve as infection reservoirs as a method to improve coverage and possibly to interrupt STH transmission. We investigated determinants of cMDA coverage by comparing high-coverage clusters (HCCs) and low-coverage clusters (LCCs) receiving STH cMDA in three countries. METHODS A convergent mixed-methods design was used to analyze data from HCCs and LCCs in DeWorm3 trial sites in Benin, India, and Malawi following three rounds of cMDA. Qualitative data were collected via 48 community-level focus group discussions. Quantitative data were collected via routine activities nested within the DeWorm3 trial, including annual censuses and coverage surveys. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided coding, theme development and a rating process to determine the influence of each CFIR construct on cMDA coverage. RESULTS Of 23 CFIR constructs evaluated, we identified 11 constructs that differentiated between HCCs and LCCs, indicating they are potential drivers of coverage. Determinants differentiating HCC and LCC include participant experiences with previous community-wide programs, communities' perceptions of directly observed therapy (DOT), perceptions about the treatment uptake behaviors of neighbors, and women's agency to make household-level treatment decisions. CONCLUSION The convergent mixed-methods study identified barriers and facilitators that may be useful to NTD programs to improve cMDA implementation for STH, increase treatment coverage, and contribute to the successful control or elimination of STH. TRIAL REGISTRATION The parent trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03014167).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malvika Saxena
- The Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Amy Roll
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Judd L. Walson
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Global Health, Medicine, Pediatrics and Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- The DeWorm3 Project, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Emily Pearman
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- The DeWorm3 Project, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Hugo Legge
- The DeWorm3 Project, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Providence Nindi
- Blantyre Institute for Community Outreach (BICO), Lions Sight First Eye Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi
| | | | - Angelin Titus
- The Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Jabaselvi Johnson
- The Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | | | - Félicien Chabi
- Institut de Recherche Clinique du Benin, Abomey-Calavi, Benin
| | | | - Khumbo Kalua
- Blantyre Institute for Community Outreach (BICO), Lions Sight First Eye Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi
- College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Sitara Swarna Rao Ajjampur
- The Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Moudachirou Ibikounlé
- Institut de Recherche Clinique du Benin, Abomey-Calavi, Benin
- Centre de Recherche pour la lutte contre les Maladies Infectieuses Tropicales (CReMIT/TIDRC), Université d’Abomey-Calavi, Abomey-Calavi, Benin
| | - Kumudha Aruldas
- The Wellcome Trust Research Laboratory, Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Arianna Rubin Means
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- The DeWorm3 Project, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baim-Lance A, Addison D, Archer N, Gordon P, Duke S, Shubert V, Nash D, Robertson M. Integrating a Resilience Framework to Assess Implementation of a Novel HIV Care Re-Engagement Model in NYC. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2023; 94:308-316. [PMID: 37851952 PMCID: PMC10609692 DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000003285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Bottom Up Project, a collaboration of clinical, community, and academic partners, consists of 7 major steps that leverage a health information exchange, a system for sharing patient health information, with real-time alerts to mobilize peer outreach workers to find and re-engage persons with HIV disconnected from care. Bottom Up faced implementation challenges in its start-up phase and produced effective responses leading to Project maturation, which we explore using a novel implementation science framework incorporating resilience. METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with implementation staff (N = 6) and meeting minutes and protocols document reviews (N = 35). The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and a novel resilience framework guided thematic and process analyses. The resilience framework consisted of the following 3 resilience types: absorptive to cope with adversity, adaptive to adjust as short-term solutions, and transformative to structurally change. RESULTS The Project experienced 20 major challenges, 2-5 challenges per step. Challenges were multilevel and of chronic and crisis intensities. Implementers overcame challenges by leveraging multilevel factors that were absorptive, adaptive (most common), and transformative. DISCUSSION Bottom Up matured by practicing consistency and flexibility. The Project maintained core operations while under crisis-level stress by strategically simplifying or "downshifting" activities. Transformational responses suggest that specific initiatives can catalyze organizational change. CONCLUSIONS Bottom Up implementation demonstrates using diverse tactics to respond to challenges, thereby shaping Project development and in turn organizations. Applying resilience to Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research helps build awareness of active and dynamic processes promoting or impeding the growth and success of intervention-oriented Projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Baim-Lance
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
- Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, New York, NY
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx VA
| | - Diane Addison
- Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY
| | | | - Peter Gordon
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY; and
| | | | | | - Denis Nash
- Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, New York, NY
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY
| | - McKaylee Robertson
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
- Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health, City University of New York, New York, NY
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, James J Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx VA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY
- Housing Works, New York, NY
- Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Internal Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY; and
- Alliance for Positive Change, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Matsuoka A, Mizutani T, Kaji Y, Yaguchi-Saito A, Odawara M, Saito J, Fujimori M, Uchitomi Y, Shimazu T. Barriers and facilitators to implementing geriatric assessment in daily oncology practice in Japan: A qualitative study using an implementation framework. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101625. [PMID: 37708801 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Various guidelines recommend geriatric assessment (GA) for older adults with cancer, but it is not widely implemented in daily practice. This study uses an implementation framework to comprehensively and systematically identify multi-level barriers and facilitators to implementing GA in daily oncology practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted 16 semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers in 10 designated cancer hospitals in Japan, using purposive and convenience sampling. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide collection and analysis of interview data following a deductive content analysis approach with consensual qualitative research methods. After coding the interview data, ratings were assigned to each CFIR construct for each case, reflecting the valence and strength of each construct relative to implementation success. Then, those constructs that appeared to distinguish between high-implementation hospitals (HI) where GA is routinely performed in daily practice and low-implementation hospitals (LI) where GA is performed only for research purposes or not at all were explored. RESULTS Of the 24 CFIR constructs assessed in the interviews, 15 strongly distinguished between HI and LI. In HI, GA was self-administered (Adaptability), or administered via a mobile app with interpretation (Design Quality and Packaging). In HI, healthcare providers were strongly aware of the urgent need to change practice for older adults (Tension for Change) and recognized that GA was compatible with existing workflow as part of their jobs (Compatibility), whereas in LI, they did not realize the need to change practice, and dismissed GA as an extra burden on their heavy workload. In HI, usefulness of GA was widely recognized by healthcare providers (Knowledge & Beliefs about the Intervention), GA had a high priority (Relative Priority) and had strong support from hospital directors, managers, and nursing chiefs (Leadership Engagement), and multiple stakeholders were successfully engaged, including nurses (Key Stakeholders), peer doctors (Opinion Leaders), and those who drive implementation of GA (Champions). DISCUSSION These findings suggest that successful implementation of GA should focus on not only individual beliefs about the usefulness of GA and the complexity of GA itself, but also organizational factors related to hospitals and the engagement of multiple stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayumu Matsuoka
- Division of Survivorship Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomonori Mizutani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Kaji
- Division of Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akiko Yaguchi-Saito
- Division of Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan; Faculty of Human Sciences, Tokiwa University, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Miyuki Odawara
- Division of Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junko Saito
- Division of Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Maiko Fujimori
- Division of Survivorship Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yosuke Uchitomi
- Division of Survivorship Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taichi Shimazu
- Division of Behavioral Sciences, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Grootjans SJM, Stijnen MMN, Hesdahl-DE Jong I, Kroese MEAL, Ruwaard D, Jansen MWJ. Implementation of an integrated community approach in deprived neighbourhoods: a theory-based process evaluation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Scand J Public Health 2023:14034948231199804. [PMID: 37726916 DOI: 10.1177/14034948231199804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the implementation process of an Integrated Community Approach (ICA) applied in four low socio-economic status neighbourhoods in Maastricht, the Netherlands. The ICA is a Population Health Management initiative and aims to improve population health, quality of care, professional's satisfaction and decrease costs of care. This study addresses the facilitators and barriers for implementing the ICA from a stakeholder perspective, including steering group members, professionals and citizens. METHODS We conducted a mixed-methods study using a triangulation of methods to investigate the implementation from 1 December 2016 to 31 December 2020. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided data collection and data-analysis for evaluating the implementation process. In total, 77 interviews, 97 observations, seven focus groups, 65 collected documents and two surveys with open-ended questions were conducted. RESULTS Facilitators for implementation were the use of citizen science to bring residents' needs into sharp focus, the integration of the ideology of Positive Health into the working routines of the professionals and leadership at the steering group level to overcome barriers in the ICA. The existing accounting and financial infrastructure obstructed combining budgets at neighbourhood level. CONCLUSIONS Engaging citizens and professionals at an early stage is an important facilitator for implementation. The use of a shared vision on health also worked as a facilitator since it created a shared language among professionals, which is important in Population Health Management initiatives where multiple professionals are expected to collaborate. TRIAL REGISTRATION NTR 6543; registration date, 25 July 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanneke J M Grootjans
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M M N Stijnen
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Academic Collaborative Centre for Public Health Limburg, Public Health Service South Limburg (GGD Zuid Limburg), Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - I Hesdahl-DE Jong
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M E A L Kroese
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - D Ruwaard
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M W J Jansen
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Academic Collaborative Centre for Public Health Limburg, Public Health Service South Limburg (GGD Zuid Limburg), Heerlen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wennerberg C, Hellström A, Schildmeijer K, Ekstedt M. Effects of Web-Based and Mobile Self-Care Support in Addition to Standard Care in Patients After Radical Prostatectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Cancer 2023; 9:e44320. [PMID: 37672332 PMCID: PMC10512115 DOI: 10.2196/44320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is a common form of cancer that is often treated with radical prostatectomy, which can leave patients with urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction. Self-care (pelvic floor muscle exercises and physical activity) is recommended to reduce the side effects. As more and more men are living in the aftermath of treatment, effective rehabilitation support is warranted. Digital self-care support has the potential to improve patient outcomes, but it has rarely been evaluated longitudinally in randomized controlled trials. Therefore, we developed and evaluated the effects of digital self-care support (electronic Patient Activation in Treatment at Home [ePATH]) on prostate-specific symptoms. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the effects of web-based and mobile self-care support on urinary continence, sexual function, and self-care, compared with standard care, at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after radical prostatectomy. METHODS A multicenter randomized controlled trial with 2 study arms was conducted, with the longitudinal effects of additional digital self-care support (ePATH) compared with those of standard care alone. ePATH was designed based on the self-determination theory to strengthen patients' activation in self-care through nurse-assisted individualized modules. Men planned for radical prostatectomy at 3 county hospitals in southern Sweden were included offline and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. The effects of ePATH were evaluated for 1 year after surgery using self-assessed questionnaires. Linear mixed models and ordinal regression analyses were performed. RESULTS This study included 170 men (85 in each group) from January 2018 to December 2019. The participants in the intervention and control groups did not differ in their demographic characteristics. In the intervention group, 64% (53/83) of the participants used ePATH, but the use declined over time. The linear mixed model showed no substantial differences between the groups in urinary continence (β=-5.60; P=.09; 95% CI -12.15 to -0.96) or sexual function (β=-.12; P=.97; 95% CI -7.05 to -6.81). Participants in the intervention and control groups did not differ in physical activity (odds ratio 1.16, 95% CI 0.71-1.89; P=.57) or pelvic floor muscle exercises (odds ratio 1.51, 95% CI 0.86-2.66; P=.15). CONCLUSIONS ePATH did not affect postoperative side effects or self-care but reflected how this support may work in typical clinical conditions. To complement standard rehabilitation, digital self-care support must be adapted to the context and individual preferences for use and effect. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN18055968; https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18055968. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/11625.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Wennerberg
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Region Kalmar County, Kalmar, Sweden
| | - Amanda Hellström
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
| | | | - Mirjam Ekstedt
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
- Department of Learning, Management, Informatics and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
O'Donovan B, Kirke C, Pate M, McHugh S, Bennett K, Cahir C. Mapping the Theoretical Domain Framework to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: do multiple frameworks add value? Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:100. [PMID: 37620981 PMCID: PMC10464139 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00466-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation researchers often combine the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in their studies. However there is some debate on the merits of using multiple frameworks-whether they contribute to results or provide superfluous analysis. Our recent research combined the TDF and CFIR to identify determinants to widespread incorporation of patient held medication lists (PHML) in healthcare practice. The aim of this report is to provide guidance on the use of the TDF and CFIR; by assessing the degree of overlap between the two frameworks in their application to interviews about PHML. METHODS Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals (HCPs) and non HCPs (people taking multiple medicines and caregivers).Interview data were transcribed and analysed using the TDF and CFIR. Within paired domains substantial intersection/overlap across constructs and domains within the two frameworks was classified as > 75% of coding references, consistent intersection/overlap was defined as > 50% and ≤ 75%, average intersection/overlap was defined as ≤ 50% and > 25% and non-substantial intersection/overlap was classified as ≤ 25% of coding references. RESULTS Interview data were collected from 39 participants - 21 HCPs and 18 non HCPs. Mapping of TDF domains to CFIR domains/constructs identified key determinants in six TDF domains: Environmental context & resources, Beliefs about capabilities, Beliefs about consequences, Social influences, Behavioural regulation and Social/professional role & identity; and five CFIR domains: Intervention Characteristics, Outer Setting, Inner Setting, Characteristics of Individual and Process. A pattern of substantial intersection/overlap in coding emerged with broad TDF domains such as Environmental context & resources often linked to well-defined CFIR domains and constructs (e.g. design quality & packaging within Intervention Characteristics). Broad CFIR constructs such as knowledge & beliefs about intervention within Characteristics of Individuals also linked to more descriptive TDF domains like Beliefs about capabilities. In addition there was some unexpected non-substantial intersection/overlap in coding with the TDF domain Social influences less frequently linked to the CFIR Inner Setting domain and constructs such as networks and communications. CONCLUSIONS Identifying intersections/overlaps in coding between CFIR and TDF can assist interpretation of findings in implementation research. The strengths of each framework were exploited in a reciprocal process which provided more information to broad/poorly defined domains and enabled identification of implementation determinants and innovation determinants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B O'Donovan
- Data Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - C Kirke
- Quality Improvement Division, Health Service Executive (HSE), Medication Safety, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Pate
- Quality Improvement Division, Health Service Executive (HSE), Medication Safety, Dublin, Ireland
| | - S McHugh
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - K Bennett
- Data Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Cahir
- Data Science Centre, School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kelly M, Fullen B, Martin D, Bradley C, O'Mahony B, McVeigh JG. Design and development of an eHealth intervention to support self-management in people with musculoskeletal disorders - 'eHealth: It's TIME': a study protocol. HRB Open Res 2023; 5:73. [PMID: 37675192 PMCID: PMC10477747 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13611.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a leading cause of global morbidity, with the burden expected to increase in the near future. Self-management, with the support of healthcare professionals, is recommended for many MSDs. However, frequent clinical contact is not feasible. Previous research has highlighted the need for a co-designed eHealth-mediated self-management follow-up support intervention which integrates remote monitoring and behavioural change. Thus, the current study aims to develop and design a user-centred, eHealth-mediated self-management support prototype for people with MSDs. Methods: A three-step, iterative system development cycle will be utilised to develop and design the "eHealth: It's TIME prototype". The three-step process will include creating website features and content using two sequential focus groups with people with MSDs (n = 6 - 8); heuristic testing using the 10 heuristic principles of Nielsen (n = 5); and usability testing through in-person 60-minute interviews with people with MSDs (n = 3 - 5) and musculoskeletal physiotherapists (n = 3 - 5). Conclusion: The eHealth: It's TIME prototype will be a systematically developed, follow-up self-management support intervention guided by behavioural change theory and the preferences of end users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Kelly
- Discipline of Physiotherapy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Department of Physiotherapy, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Brona Fullen
- School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Denis Martin
- School of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Colin Bradley
- Department of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Billy O'Mahony
- School of Computer Science and Information Technology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Moult A, Baker D, Twohig H, Missen M, Iqbal Z, Duffy H, Paskins Z. Applying the consolidated framework for implementation research to evaluate the community rapid intervention service. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:844. [PMID: 37559064 PMCID: PMC10413526 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09864-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Developed in 2019, the Community Rapid Intervention Service (CRIS) is a community intervention service aiming to prevent hospital admissions. CRIS provides a response within two hours to patients with sub-acute medical needs in their usual place of residence. This evaluation aimed to identify challenges and facilitators to implementation of the service, with a view to informing future service development, optimising patient care and disseminating learning to other areas looking to implement similar services. METHODS This study used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as an evaluation framework. We conducted semi-structured interviews with local healthcare system leaders, clinicians that worked within the CRIS, and clinicians who interfaced with the CRIS. The CFIR was used to guide data collection and analysis. Two Community of Practice (CoP) meetings were held to gather stakeholders' perspectives of the evaluation. RESULTS Three key themes were identified from the analysis of 13 interviews: contextual factors influencing implementation, service identity and navigating complexity. Contextual factors such the influence of the Covid 19 pandemic upon health services and the expansion of the CRIS were discussed by participants. The adaptability of the service was deemed both a facilitator and challenge of implementation. Ways to build-on and improve the existing CRIS model were suggested. CONCLUSION This evaluation has shown that the CRIS may need to be redefined with clarity provided as to how the service interfaces with other urgent and planned care offered in acute, primary, community and social services. Structuring the evaluation around the CFIR was helpful in identifying facilitators and challenges that influenced the implementation of the CRIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Moult
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, ST5 5BG, UK.
| | - Dereth Baker
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - Helen Twohig
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, ST5 5BG, UK
| | - Matthew Missen
- Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Trust Headquarters, Corporation St, Stafford, UK
| | - Zafar Iqbal
- Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Trust Headquarters, Corporation St, Stafford, UK
| | - Helen Duffy
- Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Trust Headquarters, Corporation St, Stafford, UK
| | - Zoe Paskins
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Newcastle-Under-Lyme, ST5 5BG, UK
- Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Midland Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust , ST5 5BG, Stafford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lin YJ, Ranusch A, Seagull FJ, Sussman JB, Barnes GD. Dynamic interplay between available resources and implementation climate across phases of implementation: a qualitative study of a VA national population health tool. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:74. [PMID: 37386501 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00460-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Available resources within an organization can determine the implementation success of an intervention. However, few studies have investigated how the required resources change over the phases of implementation. Using stakeholder interviews, we examined the changes in and interactions between available resources and implementation climate in the implementation and sustainment phases of a national implementation effort for a population health tool. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of the interviews with 20 anticoagulation professionals at 17 clinical sites in the Veterans Health Administration health system about their experiences with a population health dashboard for anticoagulant management. Interview transcripts were coded using constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and according to the phase of implementation (pre-implementation, implementation, and sustainment) as defined by the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) Roadmap. We analyzed the factors that may determine successful implementation by examining the co-occurrence patterns between available resources and implementation climate across different implementation phases. To illustrate the variations in these determinants across phases, we aggregated and scored coded statements using a previously published CFIR scoring system (- 2 to + 2). Key relationships between available resources and implementation climate were identified and summarized using thematic analysis. RESULTS The resources necessary to support the successful implementation of an intervention are not static; both the quantity and types of resources shift based on the phases of the intervention. Furthermore, increased resource availability does not guarantee the sustainment of intervention success. Users need different types of support beyond the technical aspects of an intervention, and this support varies over time. Specifically, available resources in the form of technological support and social/emotional support help users establish trust in a new technological-based intervention during the implementation phase. Resources that foster and maintain collaboration between users and other stakeholders help them stay motivated during sustainment. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight the dynamic nature of available resources and their impacts on the implementation climate across different phases of implementation. A better understanding of the dynamics of available resources over time from the users' perspectives will allow the adaptation of resources to better meet the needs of the intervention stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Jen Lin
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Allison Ranusch
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - F Jacob Seagull
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeremy B Sussman
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Geoffrey D Barnes
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Frankel Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd, B14 G214, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kouijzer MMTE, Kip H, Bouman YHA, Kelders SM. Implementation of virtual reality in healthcare: a scoping review on the implementation process of virtual reality in various healthcare settings. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:67. [PMID: 37328858 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00442-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Virtual reality (VR) is increasingly used in healthcare settings as recent technological advancements create possibilities for diagnosis and treatment. VR is a technology that uses a headset to simulate a reality in which the user is immersed in a virtual environment, creating the impression that the user is physically present in this virtual space. Despite the potential added value of virtual reality technology in healthcare, its uptake in clinical practice is still in its infancy and challenges arise in the implementation of VR. Effective implementation could improve the adoption, uptake, and impact of VR. However, these implementation procedures still seem to be understudied in practice. This scoping review aimed to examine the current state of affairs in the implementation of VR technology in healthcare settings and to provide an overview of factors related to the implementation of VR. METHODS To give an overview of relevant literature, a scoping review was undertaken of articles published up until February 2022, guided by the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley (2005). The databases Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were systematically searched to identify records that highlighted the current state of affairs regarding the implementation of VR in healthcare settings. Information about each study was extracted using a structured data extraction form. RESULTS Of the 5523 records identified, 29 were included in this study. Most studies focused on barriers and facilitators to implementation, highlighting similar factors related to the behavior of adopters of VR and the practical resources the organization should arrange for. However, few studies focus on systematic implementation and on using a theoretical framework to guide implementation. Despite the recommendation of using a structured, multi-level implementation intervention to support the needs of all involved stakeholders, there was no link between the identified barriers and facilitators, and specific implementation objectives or suitable strategies to overcome these barriers in the included articles. CONCLUSION To take the implementation of VR in healthcare to the next level, it is important to ensure that implementation is not studied in separate studies focusing on one element, e.g., healthcare provider-related barriers, as is common in current literature. Based on the results of this study, we recommend that the implementation of VR entails the entire process, from identifying barriers to developing and employing a coherent, multi-level implementation intervention with suitable strategies. This implementation process could be supported by implementation frameworks and ideally focus on behavior change of stakeholders such as healthcare providers, patients, and managers. This in turn might result in increased uptake and use of VR technologies that are of added value for healthcare practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marileen M T E Kouijzer
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research; Department of Technology, Human & Institutional Behaviour, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
| | - Hanneke Kip
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research; Department of Technology, Human & Institutional Behaviour, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
- Department of Research, Transfore, Deventer, Netherlands
| | | | - Saskia M Kelders
- Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research; Department of Technology, Human & Institutional Behaviour, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Strong H, Hood AM, Johnson Y, Hackworth R, Reed-Shackelford M, Ramaswamy R, Varughese T, Quinn CT, Crosby LE. Using the consolidated framework for implementation research to identify recruitment barriers and targeted strategies for a shared decision-making randomized clinical trial in pediatric sickle cell disease. Clin Trials 2023; 20:211-222. [PMID: 36794731 PMCID: PMC10330034 DOI: 10.1177/17407745231154199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Recruitment is often a barrier in clinical trials that include minoritized populations, such as individuals with sickle cell disease. In the United States, the majority of people with sickle cell disease identify as Black or African American. In sickle cell disease, 57% of the United States trials that ended early did so due to low enrollment. Thus, there is a need for interventions that improve trial enrollment in this population. After lower-than-expected recruitment during the first 6 months of the Engaging Parents of Children with Sickle Cell Anemia and their Providers in Shared-Decision-Making for Hydroxyurea trial, a multi-site study for young children with sickle cell disease, we collected data to understand barriers and used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to categorize them and guide the development of targeted strategies. METHODS Study staff used screening logs and coordinator and principal investigator calls to identify recruitment barriers that were then mapped onto Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs. Targeted strategies were implemented during Months 7-13. Recruitment and enrollment data were summarized before (Months 1-6) and during the implementation period (Months 7-13). RESULTS During the first 13 months, 60 caregivers (M = 30.65 years; SD = 6.35) enrolled in the trial. Most caregivers primarily self-identified as female (n = 54, 95%) and African American or Black (n = 51, 90%). Recruitment barriers mapped onto three Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs: (1) Process barriers (i.e. no identified "site champion" and poor recruitment planning at several sites); (2) Inner setting barriers (i.e. limited communication, low relative study priority at several sites); and (3) Outer setting barriers (i.e. poor patient attendance at clinic appointments). Targeted strategies to improve recruitment included (1) principal investigator site visits and retraining on recruitment procedures to address process barriers; (2) increased frequency of communication through all coordinator, site principal investigator, and individual site calls to address inner setting barriers; and (3) development and implementation of no-show procedures for clinic appointments to address outer setting barriers. After implementation of the recruitment strategies, the number of caregivers identified for pre-screening increased from 54 to 164, and enrollment more than tripled from 14 to 46 caregiver participants. CONCLUSION Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research constructs guided the development of targeted strategies that increased enrollment. This reflective process reframes recruitment challenges as the responsibility of the research team rather than characterizing minoritized populations as "difficult" or "hard to reach." Future trials including patients with sickle cell disease and minoritized populations may benefit from this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Strong
- Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Anna M Hood
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Yolanda Johnson
- Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Rogelle Hackworth
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Partner, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Marque Reed-Shackelford
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Partner, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Rohit Ramaswamy
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Taniya Varughese
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Charles T Quinn
- Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Division of Hematology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Lori E Crosby
- Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Cancer and Blood Diseases Institute, Division of Hematology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gupta A, Ellis SD, Burkhardt C, Young K, Mazzotti DR, Mahnken J, Abu-el-rub N, Chandaka S, Comfort B, Shanks D, Woodward J, Unrein A, Anderson H, Loucks J, Song X, Waitman LR, Burns JM. Implementing a home-based virtual hypertension programme-a pilot feasibility study. Fam Pract 2023; 40:414-422. [PMID: 35994031 PMCID: PMC10047620 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmac084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Implementing a health system-based hypertension programme may lower blood pressure (BP). METHODS We performed a randomized, controlled pilot study to assess feasibility, acceptability, and safety of a home-based virtual hypertension programme integrating evidence-based strategies to overcome current barriers to BP control. Trained clinical pharmacists staffed the virtual collaborative care clinic (vCCC) to remotely manage hypertension using a BP dashboard and phone "visits" to monitor BP, adherence, side effects of medications, and prescribe anti-hypertensives. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension were identified via electronic health records. Enrolled patients were randomized to either vCCC or usual care for 3 months. We assessed patients' home BP monitoring behaviour, and patients', physicians', and pharmacists' perspectives on feasibility and acceptability of individual programme components. RESULTS Thirty-one patients (vCCC = 17, usual care = 14) from six physician clinics completed the pilot study. After 3 months, average BP decreased in the vCCC arm (P = 0.01), but not in the control arm (P = 0.45). The vCCC participants measured BP more (9.9 vs. 1.2 per week, P < 0.001). There were no intervention-related adverse events. Participating physicians (n = 6), pharmacists (n = 5), and patients (n = 31) rated all programme components with average scores of >4.0, a pre-specified benchmark. Nine adaptations in vCCC design and delivery were made based on potential barriers to implementing the programme and suggestions. CONCLUSION A home-based virtual hypertension programme using team-based care, technology, and a logical integration of evidence-based strategies is safe, acceptable, and feasible to intended users. These pilot data support studies to assess the effectiveness of this programme at a larger scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Gupta
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
- KU Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Shellie D Ellis
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Crystal Burkhardt
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States
| | - Kate Young
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Diego R Mazzotti
- Division of Medical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Jonathan Mahnken
- KU Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Noor Abu-el-rub
- Division of Medical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Sravani Chandaka
- Division of Medical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Branden Comfort
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Denton Shanks
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Jennifer Woodward
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Amber Unrein
- KU Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Heidi Anderson
- KU Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Jennifer Loucks
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Xing Song
- Health Management and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Lemuel R Waitman
- Health Management and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Jeffrey M Burns
- KU Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wilson HK, Wieler C, Bell DL, Bhattarai AP, Castillo-Hernandez IM, Williams ER, Evans EM, Berg AC. Implementation of the Diabetes Prevention Program in Georgia Cooperative Extension According to RE-AIM and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Prev Sci 2023:10.1007/s11121-023-01518-0. [PMID: 36930404 PMCID: PMC10021035 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-023-01518-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Increased dissemination of the CDC's Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) is imperative to reduce type 2 diabetes. Due to its nationwide reach and mission to improve health, Cooperative Extension (Extension) is poised to be a sustainable DPP delivery system. However, research evaluating DPP implementation in Extension remains scant. Extension professionals delivered the DPP in a single-arm hybrid type II effectiveness-implementation study. Semi-structured interviews with Extension professionals were conducted at three time points. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided interview coding and analysis. Constructs were rated for magnitude and valence and evaluated as facilitators or barriers of RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) outcomes. The program reached 119 participants, was adopted by 92% (n = 12/13) of trained Extension professionals and was implemented according to CDC standards: all programs exceeded the minimum 22-session requirement (26 ± 2 sessions). The program was effective in achieving weight loss (5.0 ± 5.2%) and physical activity (179 ± 122 min/week) goals. At post-intervention, eight professionals (67%) had begun or planned to maintain the intervention within the next 6 months. Several facilitators were identified, including Extension leadership structure, organizational compatibility, and technical assistance calls. Limited time to recruit participants was the primary barrier. Positive RE-AIM outcomes, facilitated by contextual factors, indicate Extension is an effective and sustainable DPP delivery system. Extension and other DPP implementers should plan strategies that promote communication, the program's evidence-base, recruitment time, and resource access. Researchers should explore DPP implementation in real-world settings to determine overall and setting-specific best practices, promote intervention uptake, and reduce diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah K Wilson
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Exercise Science, Concordia College, Moorhead, MN, 56562, USA
| | - Caroline Wieler
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Darci L Bell
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Ajit P Bhattarai
- Department of Organizational Learning and Performance, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID, 83209, USA
| | - Isaura M Castillo-Hernandez
- Human Movement Sciences Research Center, School of Physical Education and Sports, University of Costa Rica, San José, 11502, Costa Rica
| | - Ewan R Williams
- Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Ellen M Evans
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Alison C Berg
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Barwick M, Brown J, Petricca K, Stevens B, Powell BJ, Jaouich A, Shakespeare J, Seto E. The Implementation Playbook: study protocol for the development and feasibility evaluation of a digital tool for effective implementation of evidence-based innovations. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:21. [PMID: 36882826 PMCID: PMC9990055 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00402-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence-based innovations can improve health outcomes, but only if successfully implemented. Implementation can be complex, highly susceptible to failure, costly and resource intensive. Internationally, there is an urgent need to improve the implementation of effective innovations. Successful implementation is best guided by implementation science, but organizations lack implementation know-how and have difficulty applying it. Implementation support is typically shared in static, non-interactive, overly academic guides and is rarely evaluated. In-person implementation facilitation is often soft-funded, costly, and scarce. This study seeks to improve effective implementation by (1) developing a first-in-kind digital tool to guide pragmatic, empirically based and self-directed implementation planning in real-time; and (2) exploring the tool's feasibility in six health organizations implementing different innovations. METHODS Ideation emerged from a paper-based resource, The Implementation Game©, and a revision called The Implementation Roadmap©; both integrate core implementation components from evidence, models and frameworks to guide structured, explicit, and pragmatic planning. Prior funding also generated user personas and high-level product requirements. This study will design, develop, and evaluate the feasibility of a digital tool called The Implementation Playbook©. In Phase 1, user-centred design and usability testing will inform tool content, visual interface, and functions to produce a minimum viable product. Phase 2 will explore the Playbook's feasibility in six purposefully selected health organizations sampled for maximum variation. Organizations will use the Playbook for up to 24 months to implement an innovation of their choosing. Mixed methods will gather: (i) field notes from implementation team check-in meetings; (ii) interviews with implementation teams about their experience using the tool; (iii) user free-form content entered into the tool as teams work through implementation planning; (iv) Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change questionnaire; (v) System Usability Scale; and (vi) tool metrics on how users progressed through activities and the time required to do so. DISCUSSION Effective implementation of evidence-based innovations is essential for optimal health. We seek to develop a prototype digital tool and demonstrate its feasibility and usefulness across organizations implementing different innovations. This technology could fill a significant need globally, be highly scalable, and potentially valid for diverse organizations implementing various innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Barwick
- Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. .,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. .,Social and Behavioural Health Sciences, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | | | - Kadia Petricca
- Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Bonnie Stevens
- Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Byron J Powell
- Center for Mental Health Services Research, Brown School, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Division of Infectious Diseases, John T. Milliken Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Center for Dissemination & Implementation, Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alexia Jaouich
- Stepped Care Solutions, Mount Pearl, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Jill Shakespeare
- Provincial System Support Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
| | - Emily Seto
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Centre for Digital Therapeutics, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Smit DJM, Proper KI, Engels JA, Campmans JMD, van Oostrom SH. Barriers and facilitators for participation in workplace health promotion programs: results from peer-to-peer interviews among employees. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2023; 96:389-400. [PMID: 36305914 PMCID: PMC9614189 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-022-01930-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Workplace health promotion programs (WHPPs) have shown to be effective in improving lifestyle behaviors of employees. Despite potential benefits for employees, participation rates are generally low. The aim of this study was to gain deeper insight into barriers and facilitators for participation in WHPPs prior to implementation according to employees. METHODS Peer-to-peer interviewing, a method derived from citizen science, was used to actively involve employees in the data collection. Employees working in the cleaning-, ICT- and facility-sector were trained to interview their co-workers. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was performed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), complemented with the constructs 'interpersonal factors' and 'intrapersonal factors' from the social ecological model. Data were coded deductively and inductively, and rated by two researchers independently. RESULTS Fourteen peer-interviewers conducted 62 peer-to-peer interviews. Main barriers for participation in WHPPs were an unsupportive organizational culture where lifestyle is not a common topic and programs that are not tailored to their needs. Support from peers and supervisors were facilitators. The availability of organizational resources, such as facilities and financial compensation, support participation. CONCLUSIONS To enhance participation of employees in WHPPs it is recommended to take into account the barriers and facilitators identified in this study. For instance, employees should be involved in the development and implementation of WHPPS by the employer and their needs and available resources should be taken into account. This may lead to more successful implementation and higher participation rates in future WHPPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise J. M. Smit
- Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands ,Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin I. Proper
- Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands ,Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Josephine A. Engels
- HAN University of Applied Sciences, Occupation and Health Research Group, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jennifer M. D. Campmans
- Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra H. van Oostrom
- Center for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tarp K, Nielsen SL, Holmberg TT, Dalsgaard CH, Borkner S, Skaarnes H, Jensen EK, Piera-Jiménez J, Vis C, Mathiasen K. Therapist perceptions of the implementation of a new screening procedure using the ItFits-toolkit in an iCBT routine care clinic: A mixed-methods study using the consolidated framework for implementation research. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1104301. [PMID: 37091699 PMCID: PMC10117952 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1104301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study investigates the implementation of a new, more automated screening procedure using the ItFits-toolkit in the online clinic, Internet Psychiatry (iPsych) (www.internetpsykiatrien.dk), delivering guided iCBT for mild to moderate anxiety and depressive disorders. The study focuses on how the therapists experienced the process. Methods Qualitative data were collected from semi-structured individual interviews with seven therapists from iPsych. The interviews were conducted using an interview guide with questions based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Quantitative data on the perceived level of normalization were collected from iPsych therapists, administrative staff, and off-site professionals in contact with the target demographic at 10-time points throughout the implementation. Results The therapists experienced an improvement in the intake procedure. They reported having more relevant information about the patients to be used during the assessment and the treatment; they liked the new design better; there was a better alignment of expectations between patients and therapists; the patient group was generally a better fit for treatment after implementation; and more of the assessed patients were included in the program. The quantitative data support the interview data and describe a process of normalization that increases over time. Discussion The ItFits-toolkit appears to have been an effective mediator of the implementation process. The therapists were aided in the process of change, resulting in an enhanced ability to target the patients who can benefit from the treatment program, less expenditure of time on the wrong population, and more satisfied therapists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine Tarp
- Research Unit for Digital Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- *Correspondence: Kristine Tarp
| | - Søren Lange Nielsen
- Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Trine Theresa Holmberg
- Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Caroline Høier Dalsgaard
- Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Simone Borkner
- Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Helene Skaarnes
- Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Esben Kjems Jensen
- Research Unit for Digital Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jordi Piera-Jiménez
- Catalan Health Service, Barcelona, Spain
- Digitalization for the Sustainability of the Healthcare System DS3-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Informatics, Multimedia and Telecommunications, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christiaan Vis
- Clinical, Neuro- & Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Section for Research-Based Innovation, Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Kim Mathiasen
- Research Unit for Digital Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Centre for Digital Psychiatry, Mental Health Services in the Region of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pham L, Moles RJ, O’Reilly CL, Carter S, Raynes-Greenow C, Chen TF, Raduescu C, Randall S, Bloomfield J, Strowel C, Murphy A, Gardner D, El-Den S. Perinatal Women's Views of Pharmacist-Delivered Perinatal Depression Screening: A Qualitative Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:16295. [PMID: 36498368 PMCID: PMC9738857 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Internationally, 20% of women experience perinatal depression (PND). Healthcare providers including general practitioners and midwives are critical in providing PND screening and support; however, the current workforce is unable to meet growing demands for PND care. As accessible and trusted primary healthcare professionals, pharmacists could provide PND care to complement existing services, thereby contributing to early detection and intervention. This study aimed to explore perinatal women's views of community pharmacist-delivered PND screening and care, with a focus on their attitudes towards and acceptability of PND screening implementation in community pharmacy. Semi-structured interviews with women (n = 41) were undertaken, whereby interview data were transcribed verbatim and then inductively and thematically analysed. Five overarching themes emerged; "patient experience with existing PND support and screening services"; "familiarity with pharmacists' roles"; "pharmacist visibility in PND screening care"; "patient-pharmacist relationships" and "factors influencing service accessibility". Themes and subthemes were mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Findings highlight participants' generally positive attitudes towards community pharmacist-delivered PND screening and care, and the potential acceptability of such services provided pharmacists are trained and referral pathways are established. Addressing perceived barriers and facilitators would allow community pharmacist-delivered PND screening and care to support existing PND care models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily Pham
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Rebekah J. Moles
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Claire L. O’Reilly
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Stephen Carter
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Camille Raynes-Greenow
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Timothy F. Chen
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Corina Raduescu
- The University of Sydney Business School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Sue Randall
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Bloomfield
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Clara Strowel
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Andrea Murphy
- College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - David Gardner
- College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Sarira El-Den
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rangachari P, Mushiana SS, Herbert K. A scoping review of applications of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to telehealth service implementation initiatives. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1450. [PMID: 36447279 PMCID: PMC9708146 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08871-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), introduced in 2009, has the potential to provide a comprehensive understanding of the determinants of implementation-effectiveness of health service innovations. Although the CFIR has been increasingly used in recent years to examine factors influencing telehealth implementation, no comprehensive reviews currently exist on the scope of knowledge gained exclusively from applications of the CFIR to telehealth implementation initiatives. This review sought to address this gap. METHODS PRISMA-ScR criteria were used to inform a scoping review of the literature. Five academic databases (PUBMED, PROQUEST, SCIDIRECT, CINAHL, and WoS) were searched for eligible sources of evidence from 01.01.2010 through 12.31.2021. The initial search yielded a total of 18,388 records, of which, 64 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria for the review. Included articles were reviewed in full to extract data, and data collected were synthesized to address the review questions. RESULTS Most included articles were published during or after 2020 (64%), and a majority (77%) were qualitative or mixed-method studies seeking to understand barriers or facilitators to telehealth implementation using the CFIR. There were few comparative- or implementation-effectiveness studies containing outcome measures (5%). The database search however, revealed a growing number of protocols for implementation-effectiveness studies published since 2020. Most articles (91%) reported the CFIR Inner Setting domain (e.g., leadership engagement) to have a predominant influence over telehealth implementation success. By comparison, few articles (14%) reported the CFIR Outer Setting domain (e.g., telehealth policies) to have notable influence. While more (63%) telehealth initiatives were focused on specialty (vs primary) care, a vast majority (78%) were focused on clinical practice over medical education, healthcare administration, or population health. CONCLUSIONS Organized provider groups have historically paid considerable attention to advocating for telehealth policy (Outer Setting) reform. However, results suggest that for effective telehealth implementation, provider groups need to refocus their efforts on educating individual providers on the complex inter-relationships between Inner Setting constructs and telehealth implementation-effectiveness. On a separate note, the growth in implementation-effectiveness study protocols since 2020, suggests that additional outcome measures may soon be available, to provide a more nuanced understanding of the determinants of effective telehealth implementation based on the CFIR domains and constructs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavani Rangachari
- grid.266831.80000 0001 2168 8754Department of Population Health and Leadership, School of Health Sciences, University of New Haven, 300 Boston Post Road, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
| | - Swapandeep S. Mushiana
- grid.410372.30000 0004 0419 2775Veterans Affairs (VA) Quality Scholars Program - San Francisco VA Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA 94121 USA
| | - Krista Herbert
- Portland Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System, Portland, OR 97239 USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kelly M, Fullen B, Martin D, Bradley C, O'Mahony B, McVeigh JG. Design and development of an eHealth intervention to support self-Management in people with musculoskeletal Disorders - ‘eHealth: It’s TIME’: a study protocol. HRB Open Res 2022. [DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13611.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a leading cause of global morbidity, with the burden expected to increase in the near future. Self-management, with the support of healthcare professionals, is recommended for many MSDs. However, frequent clinical contact is not feasible. Previous research has highlighted the need for a co-designed eHealth-mediated self-management follow-up support intervention which integrates remote monitoring and behavioural change. Thus, the current study aims to develop and design a user-centred, eHealth-mediated self-management support prototype for people with MSDs. Methods: A three-step, iterative system development cycle will be utilised to develop and design the “eHealth: It’s TIME prototype”. The three-step process will include creating website features and content using two sequential focus groups with people with MSDs (n = 6 – 8); heuristic testing using the 10 heuristic principles of Nielsen (n = 5); and usability testing through in-person 60-minute interviews with people with MSDs (n = 3 – 5) and musculoskeletal physiotherapists (n = 3 – 5). Conclusion: The eHealth: It’s TIME prototype will be a systematically developed, follow-up self-management support intervention guided by behavioural change theory and the preferences of end users.
Collapse
|
22
|
Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implement Sci 2022; 17:75. [DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Many implementation efforts fail, even with highly developed plans for execution, because contextual factors can be powerful forces working against implementation in the real world. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is one of the most commonly used determinant frameworks to assess these contextual factors; however, it has been over 10 years since publication and there is a need for updates. The purpose of this project was to elicit feedback from experienced CFIR users to inform updates to the framework.
Methods
User feedback was obtained from two sources: (1) a literature review with a systematic search; and (2) a survey of authors who used the CFIR in a published study. Data were combined across both sources and reviewed to identify themes; a consensus approach was used to finalize all CFIR updates. The VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System IRB declared this study exempt from the requirements of 38 CFR 16 based on category 2.
Results
The systematic search yielded 376 articles that contained the CFIR in the title and/or abstract and 334 unique authors with contact information; 59 articles included feedback on the CFIR. Forty percent (n = 134/334) of authors completed the survey. The CFIR received positive ratings on most framework sensibility items (e.g., applicability, usability), but respondents also provided recommendations for changes. Overall, updates to the CFIR include revisions to existing domains and constructs as well as the addition, removal, or relocation of constructs. These changes address important critiques of the CFIR, including better centering innovation recipients and adding determinants to equity in implementation.
Conclusion
The updates in the CFIR reflect feedback from a growing community of CFIR users. Although there are many updates, constructs can be mapped back to the original CFIR to ensure longitudinal consistency. We encourage users to continue critiquing the CFIR, facilitating the evolution of the framework as implementation science advances.
Collapse
|
23
|
Lin JL, Huber B, Amir O, Gehrmann S, Ramirez KS, Ochoa KM, Asch SM, Gajos KZ, Grosz BJ, Sanders LM. Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Family-Centered Technology in Complex Care: Feasibility Study. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e30902. [PMID: 35998021 PMCID: PMC9449827 DOI: 10.2196/30902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Care coordination is challenging but crucial for children with medical complexity (CMC). Technology-based solutions are increasingly prevalent but little is known about how to successfully deploy them in the care of CMC. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of GoalKeeper (GK), an internet-based system for eliciting and monitoring family-centered goals for CMC, and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation. Methods We used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to explore the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of GK as part of a clinical trial of GK in ambulatory clinics at a children’s hospital (NCT03620071). The study was conducted in 3 phases: preimplementation, implementation (trial), and postimplementation. For the trial, we recruited providers at participating clinics and English-speaking parents of CMC<12 years of age with home internet access. All participants used GK during an initial clinic visit and for 3 months after. We conducted preimplementation focus groups and postimplementation semistructured exit interviews using the CFIR interview guide. Participant exit surveys assessed GK feasibility and acceptability on a 5-point Likert scale. For each interview, 3 independent coders used content analysis and serial coding reviews based on the CFIR qualitative analytic plan and assigned quantitative ratings to each CFIR construct (–2 strong barrier to +2 strong facilitator). Results Preimplementation focus groups included 2 parents (1 male participant and 1 female participant) and 3 providers (1 in complex care, 1 in clinical informatics, and 1 in neurology). From focus groups, we developed 3 implementation strategies: education (parents: 5-minute demo; providers: 30-minute tutorial and 5-minute video on use in a clinic visit; both: instructional manual), tech support (in-person, virtual), and automated email reminders for parents. For implementation (April 1, 2019, to December 21, 2020), we enrolled 11 providers (7 female participants, 5 in complex care) and 35 parents (mean age 38.3, SD 7.8 years; n=28, 80% female; n=17, 49% Caucasian; n=16, 46% Hispanic; and n=30, 86% at least some college). One parent-provider pair did not use GK in the clinic visit, and few used GK after the visit. In 18 parent and 9 provider exit interviews, the key facilitators were shared goal setting, GK’s internet accessibility and email reminders (parents), and GK’s ability to set long-term goals and use at the end of visits (providers). A key barrier was GK’s lack of integration into the electronic health record or patient portal. Most parents (13/19) and providers (6/9) would recommend GK to their peers. Conclusions Family-centered technologies like GK are feasible and acceptable for the care of CMC, but sustained use depends on integration into electronic health records. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03620071; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03620071
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jody L Lin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Bernd Huber
- John A Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Allston, MA, United States
| | - Ofra Amir
- Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Sebastian Gehrmann
- John A Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Allston, MA, United States
| | - Kimberly S Ramirez
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Kimberly M Ochoa
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Steven M Asch
- Center for Innovation to Implementation, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, United States.,Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Krzysztof Z Gajos
- John A Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Allston, MA, United States
| | - Barbara J Grosz
- John A Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Allston, MA, United States
| | - Lee M Sanders
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chen W, Flanagan A, Nippak PM, Nicin M, Sinha SK. Understanding the Experience of Geriatric Care Professionals in Using Telemedicine to Care for Older Patients in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed-Methods Study. JMIR Aging 2022; 5:e34952. [PMID: 35830331 PMCID: PMC9369613 DOI: 10.2196/34952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Geriatric care professionals were forced to rapidly adopt the use of telemedicine technologies to ensure the continuity of care for their older patients in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there is little current literature that describes how telemedicine technologies can best be used to meet the needs of geriatric care professionals in providing care to frail older patients, their caregivers, and their families. Objective This study aims to identify the benefits and challenges geriatric care professionals face when using telemedicine technologies with frail older patients, their caregivers, and their families and how to maximize the benefits of this method of providing care. Methods This was a mixed methods study that recruited geriatric care professionals to complete an online survey regarding their personal demographics and experiences with using telemedicine technologies and participate in a semistructured interview. Interview responses were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Results Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained from 30 practicing geriatric care professionals (22, 73%, geriatricians, 5, 17%, geriatric psychiatrists, and 3, 10%, geriatric nurse practitioners) recruited from across the Greater Toronto Area. Analysis of interview data identified 5 CFIR contextual barriers (complexity, design quality and packaging, patient needs and resources, readiness for implementation, and culture) and 13 CFIR contextual facilitators (relative advantage, adaptability, tension for change, available resources, access to knowledge, networks and communications, compatibility, knowledge and beliefs, self-efficacy, champions, external agents, executing, and reflecting and evaluating). The CFIR concept of external policy and incentives was found to be a neutral construct. Conclusions This is the first known study to use the CFIR to develop a comprehensive narrative to characterize the experiences of Ontario geriatric care professionals using telemedicine technologies in providing care. Overall, telemedicine can significantly enable most of the geriatric care that is traditionally provided in person but is less useful in providing specific aspects of geriatric care to frail older patients, their caregivers, and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenwen Chen
- School of Health Services Management, Ted Rogers School of Management, Toronto Metropolitan University, TRS 2-068350 Victoria Street, Toronto, CA
| | - Ashley Flanagan
- National Institute on Ageing, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, CA
| | - Pria Md Nippak
- School of Health Services Management, Ted Rogers School of Management, Toronto Metropolitan University, TRS 2-068350 Victoria Street, Toronto, CA
| | - Michael Nicin
- National Institute on Ageing, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, CA
| | - Samir K Sinha
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, CA.,National Institute on Ageing, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, CA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Herrera S, Salazar A, Nazar G. Barriers and Supports in eHealth Implementation among People with Chronic Cardiovascular Ailments: Integrative Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19. [PMID: 35886149 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
eHealth interventions use information technology to provide attention to patients with chronic cardiovascular conditions, thereby supporting their self-management abilities. OBJECTIVE Identify barriers and aids to the implementation of eHealth interventions in people with chronic cardiovascular conditions from the perspectives of users, health professionals and institutions. METHOD An integrative database review of WoS, Scopus, PubMed and Scielo of publications between 2016 and 2020 reporting eHealth interventions in people with chronic cardiovascular diseases. Keywords used were eHealth and chronic disease. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria application, 14 articles were identified. RESULTS Barriers and aids were identified from the viewpoints of users, health professionals and health institutions. Some notable barriers include users' age and low technological literacy, perceived depersonalization in attention, limitations in technology access and usability, and associated costs. Aids included digital education and support from significant others. CONCLUSIONS eHealth interventions are an alternative with wide potentiality for chronic disease management; however, their implementation must be actively managed.
Collapse
|
26
|
Turner T, Haggerty T, Dekeseredy P, Hare J, Sedney CL. Using an Implementation Research Framework to Identify Facilitators and Barriers to Physical Activity and Weight Loss in Appalachia. South Med J 2022; 115:214-219. [PMID: 35237841 PMCID: PMC8908912 DOI: 10.14423/smj.0000000000001370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES West Virginia (WV) is the only state entirely located in Appalachia, a large, mostly rural area in the eastern United States. WV has the highest adult obesity rate in the United States, as well as one of the highest physical inactivity rates. Obesity has been found to be significantly higher in rural counties than in urban counties, and many rural communities do not have the resources to address this growing health concern. It is well documented that healthy eating and becoming more physically active can be successful in reducing weight and managing obesity-related illness. Despite this overwhelming evidence, obesity rates in WV continue to climb. The purpose of this study was to understand the factors associated with obesity in WV and identify what influences the behavior of people in regard to weight loss and exercise. METHODS Four focus groups were conducted across the state of WV, transcribed, and thematically analyzed to examine the facilitators and barriers associated with healthy behaviors. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used as an approach to classify characteristics and plan implementation strategies integrating five domains. The CFIR has been used to identify potential barriers and facilitators to interventions and can be used before or during an intervention. In addition, the CFIR has been used as a framework to guide analysis and provide a means to organize intervention stakeholders' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to successful interventions. RESULTS Participants identified barriers and facilitators across all 5 major domains of the CFIR-intervention characteristics, outer setting (eg, cultural norms, infrastructure), inner setting (eg, access to knowledge), characteristics of individuals, and the implementation process-and 16 subdomains. Participants discussed how socioeconomic, cultural, and environmental factors influenced diet and exercise. Cost, family culture, and limited access to resources (eg, healthy foods, community-based fitness programs, health care) were common themes expressed by participants. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study identify how individuals living in rural Appalachian view lifestyle changes and what influences their ability to pursue physical activity and healthy eating. Future programs to encourage healthy lifestyles in Appalachia need to consider the characteristics of the given community to achieve the goal of a tailored lifestyle intervention program that is feasible and effective. In addition, the findings suggest that the CFIR can be used to implement and refine intervention strategies that can be used in the real world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyra Turner
- From Health Sciences, Departments of Family Medicine and Neurosurgery, and the Department of Neurosurgery at the Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, and Pocahontas Memorial Hospital, Buckeye, West Virginia
| | - Treah Haggerty
- From Health Sciences, Departments of Family Medicine and Neurosurgery, and the Department of Neurosurgery at the Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, and Pocahontas Memorial Hospital, Buckeye, West Virginia
| | - Patricia Dekeseredy
- From Health Sciences, Departments of Family Medicine and Neurosurgery, and the Department of Neurosurgery at the Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, and Pocahontas Memorial Hospital, Buckeye, West Virginia
| | - Julie Hare
- From Health Sciences, Departments of Family Medicine and Neurosurgery, and the Department of Neurosurgery at the Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, and Pocahontas Memorial Hospital, Buckeye, West Virginia
| | - Cara L Sedney
- From Health Sciences, Departments of Family Medicine and Neurosurgery, and the Department of Neurosurgery at the Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, West Virginia University, Morgantown, and Pocahontas Memorial Hospital, Buckeye, West Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nalugwa T, Handley M, Shete P, Ojok C, Nantale M, Reza T, Katamba A, Cattamanchi A, Ackerman S. Readiness to implement on-site molecular testing for tuberculosis in community health centers in Uganda. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:9. [PMID: 35109936 PMCID: PMC8812219 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00260-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Newer molecular testing platforms are now available for deployment at lower-level community health centers. There are limited data on facility- and health worker-level factors that would promote successful adoption of such platforms for rapid tuberculosis (TB) testing and treatment initiation. Our study aimed to assess readiness to implement onsite molecular testing at community health centers in Uganda, a high TB burden country in sub-Saharan Africa. Methods To understand implementation readiness, we conducted a qualitative assessment guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) at 6 community health centers in central and eastern Uganda between February and April 2018. We conducted 23 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with health workers involved in TB care at each health center to assess TB-related work practices and readiness to adopt onsite molecular testing using the GeneXpert Edge platform. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded for thematic analysis. Results Participants (N=23) included 6 nurses/nursing assistants, 6 clinicians, 6 laboratory directors/technicians, 1 medical officer, 2 health center directors, and 2 other health workers involved in TB care. Health workers described general enthusiasm that on-site molecular testing could lead to greater efficiencies in TB diagnosis and treatment, including faster turn- around time for TB test results, lack of need for trained laboratory technicians to interpret results, and reduced need to transport sputum specimens to higher level facilities. However, health workers also expressed concerns about implementation feasibility. These included uncertainty about TB infection risk, safety risks from disposal of hazardous waste, a lack of local capacity to provide timely troubleshooting and maintenance services, and concerns about the security of GeneXpert devices and accessories. Health workers also expressed the need for backup batteries to support testing or charging when wall power is unstable. Conclusion Our study generated a nuanced understanding of modifiable contextual barriers and led to direct revisions of implementation strategies for onsite molecular testing. The findings highlight that novel diagnostics should be implemented along with health system co-interventions that address contextual barriers to their effective uptake. Pre-implementation assessment of stakeholder perspectives, collaborative work processes, and institutional contexts is essential when introducing innovative technology in complex health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talemwa Nalugwa
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda. .,Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Kampala, Uganda.
| | - Margaret Handley
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Priya Shete
- Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christopher Ojok
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.,Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Mariam Nantale
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.,Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Tania Reza
- Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Achilles Katamba
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.,Uganda Tuberculosis Implementation Research Consortium, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Adithya Cattamanchi
- Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Center for Tuberculosis, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sara Ackerman
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kip EC, Udedi M, Kulisewa K, Go VF, Gaynes BN. Barriers and facilitators to implementing the HEADSS psychosocial screening tool for adolescents living with HIV/AIDS in teen club program in Malawi: health care providers perspectives. Int J Ment Health Syst 2022; 16:8. [PMID: 35101066 PMCID: PMC8805413 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-022-00520-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescents living with HIV (ALHIV) are at high risk of experiencing mental health problems. Depression is a major contributor to the burden of HIV-related disease amongst ALHIV and is significantly linked to non-adherence to anti-retroviral therapy (ART), yet it is under-recognized. In 2015, the Baylor College of Medicine International Pediatric AIDS Initiative (BIPAI) recommended that the psychosocial screening tool Home, Education, Activities, Drugs, Sexuality, Suicide/Depression (HEADSS) be used to screen ALHIV in Malawi who were part of an adolescent antiretroviral therapy program termed "Teen Club". However, the HEADSS tool has been substantially under-utilized. This study assessed barriers and facilitators to implementing HEADSS for ALHIV attending Teen Club Program in four selected health facilities in Malawi. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews at four program sites (one district hospital and one health center each in two districts) between April and May 2019. Twenty key informants were purposively selected to join this study based on their role and experiences. We used the five domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to guide the development of the interview guides, analysis and interpretation of results. RESULTS Barriers included inadequate planning for integration of the HEADSS approach; concerns that the HEADSS tool was too long, time consuming, lacked appropriate cultural context, and increased workload; and reports by participants that they did not have knowledge and skills to screen ALHIV using this tool. Facilitators to implementing the screening were that health care providers viewed screening as a guide to better systematic counselling, believed that screening could build better client provider relationship, and thought that it could fit into the existing work practice since it is not complex. CONCLUSIONS A culturally adapted screening tool, especially one that can be used by non-clinicians such as lay health workers, would improve the ability to address mental health needs of ALHIV in many primary care and social service settings where resources for professional mental health staff are limited. These findings are a springboard for efforts to culturally adapt the HEADSS screening tool for detection of mental and risky behaviors among ALHIV attending ART program in Malawi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther C Kip
- Malawi College of Medicine, Private Bag 360, Blantyre, Malawi.
| | - Michael Udedi
- Malawi College of Medicine, Private Bag 360, Blantyre, Malawi
- Malawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | | | - Vivian F Go
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
McVay MA, Cooper KB, Donahue ML, Carrera Seoane M, Shah NR, Webb F, Perri M, Jake‐Schoffman DE. Engaging primary care patients with existing online tools for weight loss: A pilot trial. Obes Sci Pract 2022; 8:569-584. [PMID: 36238223 PMCID: PMC9535672 DOI: 10.1002/osp4.592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Free online tools show potential for promoting weight loss at a low cost, but there is limited evidence about how to effectively engage patients with them. To address this, a low‐dose, flexible intervention was developed that aims to enhance weight‐related discussions with primary care providers (PCPs) and engage patients with an organic (i.e., not researcher‐created) weight loss‐focused social media community and online self‐monitoring tool. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention was evaluated in a single‐arm, 12‐week pilot. Methods PCPs were recruited at two clinics, then PCP's patients with upcoming appointments were identified and recruited. Patients received an interactive online kickoff before their scheduled primary care appointment, then 8 follow‐up messages over 12 weeks via email or their electronic health record patient portal. Patients completed assessments at baseline, post‐appointment, and week 12. Primary care providers and patients completed semi‐structured interviews. Results All PCPs approached enrolled (n = 6); patient recruitment was on track to meet the study goal prior to COVID‐19 restrictions, and n = 27 patients enrolled. Patient satisfaction with the pre‐appointment kickoff was high. Twenty‐four patients reported discussing weight‐related topics at their primary care appointment and all were satisfied with the discussion. Twenty‐two patients completed 12‐week assessments. Of these, 15 reported engaging with the self‐monitoring tool and 9 with the social media community. Patient interviews revealed reasons for low social media community engagement, including perceived lack of fit. On average, patients with available data (n = 21) lost 2.4 ± 4.1% of baseline weight, and 28.6% of these patients lost ≥3% of baseline weight. Primary care providers reported high intervention satisfaction. Conclusions The intervention and trial design show potential, although additional strategies are needed to promote tool engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A. McVay
- Department of Health Education & Behavior University of Florida Gainesville FL
| | - Kellie B Cooper
- Department of Health Education & Behavior University of Florida Gainesville FL
| | | | | | - Nipa R. Shah
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine Jacksonville FL
| | - Fern Webb
- Department of Surgery University of Florida Jacksonville FL
| | - Michael Perri
- College of Public Health and Health Professions University of Florida Gainesville
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Highfield L, Ferguson GM, Holcomb J. Barriers and facilitators to implementation of the Accountable Health Communities (AHC) Model: Findings from a between-site qualitative assessment of implementation strategies. Front Health Serv 2022; 2:926657. [PMID: 36925813 PMCID: PMC10012815 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.926657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Introduction A multitude of HRSN interventions are undergoing testing in the U.S., with the CMS Accountable Health Communities (AHC) Model as the largest. HRSN interventions typically include screening for social needs, referral to community resources, and patient navigation to ensure needs are met. There is currently a paucity of evidence on implementation of HRSN interventions. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) is a determinant framework widely used to plan and assess implementation. To the authors knowledge, there are no published studies assessing CFIR constructs for HRSN intervention implementation in the U.S. In the Assessment step of the Strengthening Peer AHC Navigation (SPAN) model, a between-site qualitative assessment methodology was used to examine implementation within and between AHC bridge organizations (BOs) within six ERIC implementation strategies identified by the authors based on AHC Model requirements. Objective Our aim was to identify and present between-site barriers and facilitators to AHC Model implementation strategies. Design A multi-site qualitative analysis methodology was used. CFIR determinants were linked to six Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) strategies: staff training, identify and prepare champions, facilitation, community resource engagement (alignment through advisory boards and working groups), data systems, and quality monitoring and assurance. Interviews were analyzed using thematic content analysis in NVivo 12 (QSR International). Setting Five health-related bridge organizations participating in the AHC Model. Results Fifty-eight interviews were completed with 34 staff and 24 patients or patient proxies. Facilitators were identified across five of the six ERIC strategies. Barriers were identified across all six. While organizations found the AHC Model compatible and facilitators to implementation included previous experience, meeting patient needs and resources, and leadership engagement and support, a number of barriers presented challenges to implementation. Issues with adequate staff training, staff skills to resolve HRSN, including patient communication and boundary spanning, setting staff goals, beneficiary caseloads and measurement of progress, data infrastructure (including EHR), available resources to implement and differences in perceptions between clinical delivery site (CDS), and CSP of how to measure and resolve HRSN. Conclusions and relevance The conduct of a pre-implementation readiness assessment benefited from identifying CFIR determinants linked to various ERIC implementation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Highfield
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) John P. and Katherine G. McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gayla M Ferguson
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jennifer Holcomb
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) School of Public Health, Houston, TX, United States.,Sinai Urban Health Institute, Sinai Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fletcher J, Brophy L, Pirkis J, Hamilton B. Contextual Barriers and Enablers to Safewards Implementation in Victoria, Australia: Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:733272. [PMID: 34803758 PMCID: PMC8599364 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.733272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Safewards is a complex psychosocial intervention designed to reduce conflict and containment on inpatient mental health units. There is mounting international evidence of the effectiveness and acceptability of Safewards. However, a significant challenge exists in promising interventions, such as Safewards, being translated into routine practice. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) provides a framework through which to understand implementation in complex health service environments. The aim was to inform more effective implementation of Safewards using the CFIR domains and constructs, capitalizing on developing an understanding of variations across wards. Method: Seven Safewards Leads completed the Training and Implementation Diary for 18 wards that opted in to a trial of Safewards. Fidelity Checklist scores were used to categorize low, medium and high implementers of Safewards at the end of the 12-week implementation period. Results: Qualitative data from the diaries were analyzed thematically and coded according to the five CFIR domains which included 39 constructs. Twenty-six constructs across the five domains were highlighted within the data to have acted as a barrier or enabler. Further analysis revealed that six constructs distinguished between low, medium, and high implementing wards. Discussion: Our findings suggest that for implementation of Safewards to succeed, particular attention needs to be paid to engagement of key staff including managers, making training a priority for all ward staff, adequate planning of the process of implementation and creating an environment on each inpatient unit that prioritize and enables Safewards interventions to be undertaken by staff regularly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Fletcher
- Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Lisa Brophy
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jane Pirkis
- Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Bridget Hamilton
- Centre for Psychiatric Nursing, School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Tumma A, Berzou S, Jaques K, Shah D, Smith AC, Thomas EE. Considerations for the Implementation of a Telestroke Network: A Systematic Review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 31:106171. [PMID: 34735902 DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The application of telestroke has matured considerably since its inception in 1999. The use of telestroke is now recommended in several published guidelines. Consequently, jurisdictions without a telestroke service are seeking practical information on the best approach to implement telestroke. French et al. (2013) reviewed the challenges of implementing a telestroke network including studies between 2000 and 2010. At the time, telestroke networks were largely limited to the UK, USA, Canada and Europe and only one process evaluation had been conducted. Given the prolific expansion of telestroke services since 2010, we conducted a systematic review to determine factors associated with successful establishment, management, and sustainability of a contemporary telestroke services. A comprehensive search of telestroke studies was conducted in July 2021. Empirical studies published between 2010 and 2021 were included if they contained descriptive, evaluation or operational data on the implementation of a telestroke network. Studies were subsequently evaluated using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The initial literature search revealed a total of 7415 potential studies; 38 of which met the inclusion criteria. The past decade of process evaluation studies has enabled a more nuanced investigations into how to implement and sustain a telestroke network. Pre-implementation planning is crucial to ensure clear telestroke processes, governance structures and stakeholder engagement. Sustainability of networks relies on securing long-term investment, providing adequate resources, and maintaining staff motivation and willingness. Recommendations are provided to overcome commonly identified barriers related to technology, staffing, planning and standardisation of processes, evaluation, and sustainability and scale-up. Further research needs to explore how new advancements in stroke care such as endovascular clot retrieval (EVT) and advanced brain imaging can be considered and planned for during the implementation of a new telestroke service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abishek Tumma
- Department of Medicine, Queensland Health, Logan Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Souad Berzou
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Katherine Jaques
- Queensland Health, Clinical Excellence Queensland, Brisbane Australia
| | - Darshan Shah
- Department of Neurology, Queensland Health, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Anthony C Smith
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Innovative Technology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Emma E Thomas
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this scoping review was to identify studies combining the concepts of eHealth and work participation for sick-listed employees across diagnostic groups in health care and workplace contexts. INTRODUCTION There is an increased demand for better health care services and technologies, and eHealth is proposed as a useful tool to improve efficiency and reduce costs. eHealth functions at the intersection of medical informatics, public health, and business, and may be a promising solution for managing the process of return to work among employees on sick leave. Assessment of work outcomes is essential in evaluating the effectiveness of health services, and there is a need to map the research literature on existing eHealth interventions to facilitate work participation. INCLUSION CRITERIA This scoping review considered studies combining two core concepts: eHealth and work participation. It considered studies on eHealth interventions for employees (18 to 65 years of age) on sick leave due to any type of diagnosis or disability, conducted by any stakeholder in workplace or health care contexts and in any country. Empirical data from both quantitative and qualitative studies were included. METHODS Published and unpublished studies from January 1, 2008, to August 21, 2020, written in English were included in this review. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, PsycINFO, WHO clinical registry, and ClinicalTrials.gov. A three-step search strategy was followed. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers and undertaken using an extraction tool developed specifically for the scoping review objectives. RESULTS This review identified 15 studies eligible for inclusion. Four studies delivered the eHealth intervention by telephone, while 10 interventions were web-based. Of the web-based interventions, five had a blended approach, such as website and email support, or website and social media platforms. One study used an app-based intervention. Only eight studies targeted employees sick-listed due to common sick leave diagnoses, such as common mental disorders and musculoskeletal disorders. The workplace context was the target of the eHealth intervention in seven studies, although the intervention was still delivered by health personnel such as therapists or occupational physicians. Collaboration on individual cases between the health professional, employer, and employee to facilitate work participation seemed to be rare. Four studies reported both a theoretical and an empirical base for the intervention used. CONCLUSIONS This review demonstrated that the use of eHealth interventions to facilitate work participation is limited, and there is a need for future studies on the use of eHealth technology for this purpose. Developing eHealth interventions specifically for populations at risk of long-term sick leave, and encouraging collaboration between all relevant stakeholders, may help improve work participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tone Langjordet Johnsen
- NORCE, Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway
- Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Thomas Johansen
- National Advisory Unit on Occupational Rehabilitation, Rauland, Norway
| | - Anne-Mette Hedeager Momsen
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark
- DEFACTUM - Social and Health Services and Labour Market, Corporate Quality, Central Denmark Region, Denmark
| | - Torill Helene Tveito
- Department of Health, Social and Welfare Studies, University of South-Eastern Norway, Horten, Norway
| | - Claus Vinther Nielsen
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark
- DEFACTUM - Social and Health Services and Labour Market, Corporate Quality, Central Denmark Region, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Region Hospital West Jutland, Denmark
| | - Cecilie Varsi
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Irene Øyeflaten
- NORCE, Norwegian Research Centre, Bergen, Norway
- National Advisory Unit on Occupational Rehabilitation, Rauland, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Piat M, Wainwright M, Cherkas D, Leblanc S, Sofouli E, Rivest MP, Albert H, Casey R, O'Rourke JJ, Labonté L. Identifying and understanding the contextual factors that shaped mid-implementation outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in organizations implementing mental health recovery innovations into services. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:101. [PMID: 34526136 PMCID: PMC8441235 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00206-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Seven housing and health services organizations were guided through a process of translating Chapter Six of the Canadian Guidelines for Recovery-Oriented Practice into a recovery-oriented innovation and plan for its implementation. At the time of the COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown measures, six of the seven organizations had begun implementing their chosen innovation (peer workers, wellness recovery action planning facilitator training, staff training and a family support group). This mid-implementation study used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify contextual factors that influenced organizations to continue or postpone implementation of recovery-oriented innovations in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS Twenty-seven semi-structured 45-min interviews were conducted between May and June 2020 (21 implementation team members and six providers of the innovation (trainers, facilitators, peer workers). Interview guides and analysis were based on the CFIR. Content analysis combined deductive and inductive approaches. Summaries of coded data were given ratings based on strength and valence of the construct's impact on implementation. Ratings were visualized by mid-implementation outcome and recovery innovation to identify constructs which appear to distinguish between sites with a more or less favorable mid-implementation outcomes. RESULTS Four mid-implementation outcomes were observed at this snapshot in time (from most to least positive): continued implementation with adaptation (one site), postponement with adaptation and estimated relaunch date (four sites), indefinite postponement with no decision on relaunch date (one site), and no implementation of innovation yet (one site). Two constructs had either a negative influence (external policies and incentives-renamed COVID-19-related external policy for this study) or a positive influence (leadership engagement), regardless of implementation outcome. Four factors appeared to distinguish between more or less positive mid-implementation outcome: adaptability, implementation climate and relative priority, available resources, and formally appointed internal implementation leaders (renamed "engaging implementation teams during the COVID-19 pandemic" for this study). CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented outer setting factor. Studies that use the CFIR at the mid-implementation stage are rare, as are studies focusing on the outer setting. Through robust qualitative analysis, we identify the key factors that shaped the course of implementation of recovery innovations over this turbulent time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myra Piat
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University and Douglas Mental Health University Institute, 6875, boul. LaSalle, Montréal, Québec, H4H 1R3, Canada.
| | - Megan Wainwright
- Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Danielle Cherkas
- Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, 246 Bloor St W, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1V4, Canada
| | - Sébastien Leblanc
- École de travail social, Université de Moncton, 18, avenue Antonine-Maillet, Moncton, Nouveau-Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada
| | - Eleni Sofouli
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Ludmer Research & Training Building, 1033 Avenue des Pins, Montréal, QC, H3A 1A1, Canada
| | - Marie-Pier Rivest
- École de travail social, Université de Moncton, 18, avenue Antonine-Maillet, Moncton, Nouveau-Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada
| | - Hélène Albert
- École de travail social, Université de Moncton, 18, avenue Antonine-Maillet, Moncton, Nouveau-Brunswick, E1A 3E9, Canada
| | - Regina Casey
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, T-325, 2211 Westbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2B5I, Canada
| | - Joseph J O'Rourke
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, T-325, 2211 Westbrook Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2B5I, Canada
| | - Lise Labonté
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute, 6875, boul. LaSalle, Montréal, Québec, H4H 1R3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kerins C, Kelly C, Reardon CM, Houghton C, Toomey E, Hayes CB, Geaney F, Perry IJ, McSharry J, McHugh S. Factors Influencing Fidelity to a Calorie Posting Policy in Public Hospitals: A Mixed Methods Study. Front Public Health 2021; 9:707668. [PMID: 34485232 PMCID: PMC8414889 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.707668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Labelling menus with nutrition information has increasingly become an important obesity policy option. While much research to-date has focused on determining its effectiveness, few studies report the extent to which menu labelling is implemented as designed. The aim of this study was to explore factors influencing fidelity to a calorie posting policy in Irish acute public hospitals. Methods: A mixed methods sequential explanatory study design was employed, with a nested case study for the qualitative component. Quantitative data on implementation fidelity at hospitals were analysed first and informed case sampling in the follow-on qualitative phase. Maximum variation sampling was used to select four hospitals with high and low levels of implementation and variation in terms of geographic location, hospital size, complexity of care provided and hospital type. Data were collected using structured observations, unstructured non-participant observations and in-depth semi-structured interviews. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided qualitative data collection and analysis. Using framework analysis, factors influencing implementation were identified. A triangulation protocol was used to integrate fidelity findings from multiple sources. Data on influencing factors and fidelity were then combined using joint displays for within and cross-case analysis. Results: Quantitative fidelity data showed seven hospitals were categorised as low implementers and 28 hospitals were high implementers of the policy. Across the four hospitals selected as cases, qualitative analysis revealed factors influencing implementation and fidelity were multiple, and operated independently and in combination. Factors were related to the internal hospital environment (e.g., leadership support, access to knowledge and information, perceived importance of calorie posting implementation), external hospital environment (e.g., national policy, monitoring), features of the calorie posting policy (e.g., availability of supporting materials), and the implementation process (e.g., engaging relevant stakeholders). Integrated analysis of fidelity indicated a pattern of partial adherence to the calorie posting policy across the four hospitals. Across all hospitals, there was a consistent pattern of low adherence to calorie posting across all menu items on sale, low adherence to calorie information displayed per standard portion or per meal, low adherence to standardised recipes/portions, and inaccurate calorie information. Conclusion: Efforts to maximise fidelity require multi-level, multi-component strategies in order to reduce or mitigate barriers and to leverage facilitators. Future research should examine the relative importance of calorie posting determinants and the association between implementation strategies and shifts in fidelity to intervention core components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Kerins
- Discipline of Health Promotion, School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Colette Kelly
- Discipline of Health Promotion, School of Health Sciences, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Caitlin M Reardon
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Catherine Houghton
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Elaine Toomey
- Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.,Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Catherine B Hayes
- Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Fiona Geaney
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Ivan J Perry
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Jenny McSharry
- Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Sheena McHugh
- School of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wilhelm AK, Schwedhelm M, Bigelow M, Bates N, Hang M, Ortega L, Pergament S, Allen ML. Evaluation of a school-based participatory intervention to improve school environments using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1615. [PMID: 34479533 PMCID: PMC8414723 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11644-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Participatory research offers a promising approach to addressing health inequities and improving the social determinants of health for diverse populations of adolescents. However, little research has systematically explored factors influencing the implementation of participatory health interventions targeting health disparities. Objective This study examined the utility of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in identifying and comparing barriers and facilitators influencing implementation of participatory research trials by employing an adaptation of the CFIR to assess the implementation of a multi-component, urban public school-based participatory health intervention. Methods We collected qualitative data over a one-year period through weekly team meeting observational field notes and regular semi-structured interviews with five community-based participatory researchers, one school-based partner, and four school principals involved in implementing a participatory intervention in five schools. Adapted CFIR constructs guided our largely deductive approach to thematic data analysis. We ranked each of the three intervention components as high or low implementation to create an overall implementation effectiveness score for all five schools. Cross-case comparison of constructs across high and low implementation schools identified constructs that most strongly influenced implementation. Results Ten of 30 assessed constructs consistently distinguished between high and low implementation schools in this participatory intervention, with five strongly distinguishing. Three additional constructs played influential, though non-distinguishing, roles within this participatory intervention implementation. Influential constructs spanned all five domains and fit within three broad themes: 1) leadership engagement, 2) alignment between the intervention and institutional goals, priorities, demographics, and existing systems, and 3) tensions between adaptability and complexity within participatory interventions. However, the dynamic and collaborative nature of participatory intervention implementation underscores the artificial distinction between inner and outer settings in participatory research and the individual behavior change focus does not consider how relationships between stakeholders at multiple levels of participatory interventions shape the implementation process. Conclusions The CFIR is a useful framework for the assessment of participatory research trial implementation. Our findings underscore how the framework can be readily adapted to further strengthen its fit as a tool to examine project implementation in this context. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-11644-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- April K Wilhelm
- Program in Health Disparities Research, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware St. SE, Suite 166, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA.
| | - Maria Schwedhelm
- Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota, Peik Hall, 159 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Martha Bigelow
- Department of Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education and Human Development, University of Minnesota, Peik Hall, 159 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA
| | - Nicole Bates
- ESTEM, Office of Equity, Saint Paul Public Schools, 600 Weir Drive, Woodbury, MN, 55125, USA
| | - Mikow Hang
- Program in Health Disparities Research, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware St. SE, Suite 166, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA.,SoLaHmo Partnership for Health and Wellness, Inc, Community University Health Care Center, 2001 Bloomington Avenue, Minneapolis, MN, 55404, USA
| | - Luis Ortega
- SoLaHmo Partnership for Health and Wellness, Inc, Community University Health Care Center, 2001 Bloomington Avenue, Minneapolis, MN, 55404, USA
| | - Shannon Pergament
- SoLaHmo Partnership for Health and Wellness, Inc, Community University Health Care Center, 2001 Bloomington Avenue, Minneapolis, MN, 55404, USA
| | - Michele L Allen
- Program in Health Disparities Research, Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, 717 Delaware St. SE, Suite 166, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rogers HL, Pablo Hernando S, Núñez-Fernández S, Sanchez A, Martos C, Moreno M, Grandes G. Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of an evidence-based health promotion intervention in a primary care setting: a qualitative study. J Health Organ Manag 2021; ahead-of-print. [PMID: 34464035 PMCID: PMC9136863 DOI: 10.1108/jhom-12-2020-0512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to elucidate the health care organization, management and policy barriers and facilitators associated with implementation of an evidence-based health promotion intervention in primary care centers in the Basque Country, Spain. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH Seven focus groups were conducted with 49 health professionals from six primary care centers participating in the Prescribing Healthy Life program. Text was analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) focusing on those constructs related to health care organization, management and policy. FINDINGS The health promotion intervention was found to be compatible with the values of primary care professionals. However, professionals at all centers reported barriers to implementation related to: (1) external policy and incentives, (2) compatibility with existing workflow and (3) available resources to carry out the program. Specific barriers in these areas related to lack of financial and political support, consultation time constraints and difficulty managing competing day-to-day demands. Other barriers and facilitators were related to the constructs networks and communication, culture, relative priority and leadership engagement. A set of six specific barrier-facilitator pairs emerged. ORIGINALITY/VALUE Implementation science and, specifically, the CFIR constructs were used as a guide. Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a health promotion program in primary care were identified. Healthcare managers and policy makers can modify these factors to foster a more propitious implementation environment. These factors should be appropriately monitored, both in pre-implementation phases and during the implementation process, in order to ensure effective integration of health promotion into the primary care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather L Rogers
- Psychology and Health Research Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.,Ikerbasque Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Susana Pablo Hernando
- Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Healthcare Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Silvia Núñez-Fernández
- Psychology and Health Research Group, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Alvaro Sanchez
- Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Healthcare Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Carlos Martos
- Arrigorriaga Health Center, Integrated Health Organization Barrualde-Galdakao, Osakidetza, Arrigorriaga, Spain
| | - Maribel Moreno
- Integrated Health Organization Barrualde-Galdakao, Osakidetza, Galdakao, Spain
| | - Gonzalo Grandes
- Primary Care Research Unit of Bizkaia, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Basque Healthcare Service-Osakidetza, Barakaldo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Rodriguez VJ, Chahine A, de la Rosa A, Lee TK, Cristofari NV, Jones DL, Zulu R, Chitalu N, Weiss SM. Identifying factors associated with successful implementation and uptake of an evidence-based voluntary medical male circumcision program in Zambia: the Spear and Shield 2 Program. Transl Behav Med 2021; 10:970-977. [PMID: 31093661 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Voluntary medical male circumcision has been shown to provide a 50%-70% reduction in the risk of HIV infection without contributing to behavioral disinhibition of safer sexual practices. This study examined the interim implementation and dissemination data of Spear and Shield 2, an HIV risk-reduction program in Zambia. The purpose of this interim review was to identify contextual challenges to implementation and implement midcourse corrections associated with sustainability of program delivery. Using a mixed-methods design, quantitative evaluations of organizational functioning, barriers to implementation, burnout, and organizational readiness, as well as qualitative data utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), were examined to evaluate program implementation. Participants were 184 health care providers from 46 clinics in Zambia. Successful implementation was associated with better community and leader support, and employee readiness and motivation. Quantitative assessments were not related to implementation and provided a limited picture of implementation outcomes. Results suggest that the qualitative data underlying the CFIR constructs provided a nuanced, contextual assessment of implementation, and dissemination outcomes. The CFIR may be valuable in informing the implementation of evidence-based interventions in other parts of Zambia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violeta J Rodriguez
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.,Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Antonio Chahine
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Aileen de la Rosa
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Tae Kyoung Lee
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nicholas V Cristofari
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Deborah L Jones
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Robert Zulu
- Department of Surgery, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.,Department of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Ndashi Chitalu
- Department of Surgery, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia.,Department of Surgery, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia
| | - Stephen M Weiss
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Pussig B, Pas L, Li A, Vermandere M, Aertgeerts B, Matheï C. Primary care implementation study to scale up early identification and brief intervention and reduce alcohol-related negative outcomes at the community level (PINO): study protocol for a quasi-experimental 3-arm study. BMC Fam Pract 2021; 22:144. [PMID: 34210261 PMCID: PMC8248288 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01479-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary healthcare-based Early Identification and Brief Intervention (EIBI) for hazardous and harmful alcohol use is both a clinically relevant and cost-effective strategy to reduce heavy drinking. Unfortunately, it remains poorly implemented in daily practice. Multiple studies have shown that training and support (T&S) programs can increase the use of EIBI. Nonetheless, gains have only been modest and short-term at best. Suggestions have been made to rely more on multicomponent programs that simultaneously address several barriers to the implementation of EIBI. The PINO-project aims to evaluate the added value of such a multicomponent program to improve EIBI delivery in daily practice. METHODS/DESIGN A quasi-experimental three-arm implementation study in Flanders (Belgium) will assess the effects of tailored T&S to General Practitioners (GPs) with or without community mobilisation on EIBI delivery in general practice. The study lasts 18 months and will take place in three comparable municipalities. In municipality 1 and 2, GPs receive a tailored T&S program. The T&S is theoretically founded and tailored to the GPs' views, needs and practice characteristics. Furthermore, community actions will be embedded within municipality 1 providing additional, contextual, support. In municipality 3, GPs are offered a minimal intervention to facilitate data collection. The primary outcome is the proportion of adult patients screened for hazardous and harmful alcohol use at the end of an 18-month implementation period. The secondary outcome is the scaling up activity at municipal level in screening rates, as assessed every 3 months, and the proportion of patients who received an additional brief intervention when necessary. Furthermore, the correlation between the opinions and needs of the GP's, their practice organisation and their EIBI performance will be explored. DISCUSSION The PINO-project addresses the gap between what is theoretically possible and the current practice. This is an innovative study combining T&S at GP level with community actions. At the same time, it implements and evaluates practice T&S based on the theoretical domains framework. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research of UZ/KU Leuven (reference number s63342 and G-2020-2177-R2(MAR)) and is registered on clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT04398576 ) in May 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bram Pussig
- Academic Centre for General Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok H - bus 7001, 3001 Leuven, KU Belgium
| | - Lodewijk Pas
- Academic Centre for General Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok H - bus 7001, 3001 Leuven, KU Belgium
| | - Ann Li
- Academic Centre for General Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok H - bus 7001, 3001 Leuven, KU Belgium
| | - Mieke Vermandere
- Academic Centre for General Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok H - bus 7001, 3001 Leuven, KU Belgium
| | - Bert Aertgeerts
- Academic Centre for General Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok H - bus 7001, 3001 Leuven, KU Belgium
| | - Catharina Matheï
- Academic Centre for General Practice, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok H - bus 7001, 3001 Leuven, KU Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lu KD, Cooper D, Dubrowski R, Barwick M, Radom-Aizik S. Exploration of Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Best Practice in Exercise Medicine in Primary Pediatric Care-Pediatrician Perspectives. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2021; 33:162-9. [PMID: 34167088 DOI: 10.1123/pes.2020-0214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the known health benefits of physical activity (PA), few primary care pediatricians discuss, evaluate, or prescribe PA for children. The goal of this study was to examine pediatricians' thoughts and practices related to child PA and the perceived facilitators and barriers to implementing PA evaluation and prescription in pediatric primary care clinics. METHODS The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to explore implementation barriers and facilitators. A mixed-method design combined questionnaires and focus groups with 27 pediatricians. RESULTS Despite the pediatricians' beliefs that PA is important for patients, there was wide practice variability in their approaches to discussing PA. Several perceived barriers to implementing PA evaluation and prescription were identified, including lack of knowledge and training, managing time for PA with multiple demands, the need for a team approach and simple PA tools and resources, support for patient tailoring of PA messaging, and a need for PA best practice champions. CONCLUSION The identified barriers to implementing evidence in PA suggest several directions for improvement, including a care-team approach; quick, inexpensive, and simple PA tools; community PA partnerships; PA training in medical education; evidence-based strategies; and PA directories for families. These efforts could facilitate the implementation of PA best practices in pediatrics.
Collapse
|
41
|
Heinsch M, Wyllie J, Carlson J, Wells H, Tickner C, Kay-Lambkin F. Theories Informing eHealth Implementation: Systematic Review and Typology Classification. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e18500. [PMID: 34057427 PMCID: PMC8204232 DOI: 10.2196/18500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Theory-guided approaches to implementation science have informed translation efforts and the acceptance of eHealth (digital health) interventions in clinical care. However, there is scarce evidence on which theories are best suited to addressing the inherent complexity of eHealth implementation. Objective The objectives of this systematic review are to identify theories that inform and explain eHealth implementation and to classify these theories using the typology by Sovacool and Hess for theories of sociotechnical change. Methods An electronic search was conducted in the PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Sociological Source Ultimate, Web of Science, ABI/INFORM, EBSCO, and ProQuest databases in June 2019. Studies were included if they were published between 2009 and June 2019; were written in English; reported on empirical research, regardless of study or publication type; reported on one or more theories in the context of eHealth implementation; and were published in a peer-reviewed journal. A total of 2 reviewers independently assessed the titles, abstracts, and full texts. Theories identified were classified using a typology for theories of sociotechnical change, which was considered a useful tool for ordering and analyzing the diverse theoretical approaches as a basis for future theory building. Results Of the 13,101 potentially relevant titles, 119 studies were included. The review identified 36 theories used to explain implementation approaches in eHealth. The most commonly used approaches were the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (n=33) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) (n=32). These theories were primarily concerned with individual and interpersonal elements of eHealth acceptance. Less common were theories that reflect the various disorderly social processes and structural dimensions of implementation, such as the normalization process theory (n=17) and the structuration theory (n=6). Conclusions Theories currently informing the implementation of eHealth interventions predominantly focus on predicting or explaining end-user acceptance. Theoretical perspectives that capture the dense and intricate relationships and structures required to enact sustainable change are less well represented in the eHealth literature. Given the growing acknowledgment of the inherent complexity of eHealth implementation, future research should develop and test models that recognize and reflect the multidimensional, dynamic, and relational nature of this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Heinsch
- Centre for Brain and Mental Health Priority Research Centre, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.,School of Humanities and Social Science, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Jessica Wyllie
- Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Jamie Carlson
- Newcastle Business School, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Hannah Wells
- Centre for Brain and Mental Health Priority Research Centre, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Campbell Tickner
- Centre for Brain and Mental Health Priority Research Centre, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Frances Kay-Lambkin
- Centre for Brain and Mental Health Priority Research Centre, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Bastos de Carvalho A, Lee Ware S, Belcher T, Mehmeti F, Higgins EB, Sprang R, Williams C, Studts JL, Studts CR. Evaluation of multi-level barriers and facilitators in a large diabetic retinopathy screening program in federally qualified health centers: a qualitative study. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:54. [PMID: 34022946 PMCID: PMC8141191 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00157-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recommended annual diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening for people with diabetes has low rates in the USA, especially in underserved populations. Telemedicine DR screening (TDRS) in primary care clinics could expand access and increase adherence. Despite this potential, studies have observed high variability in TDRS rates among clinics and over time, highlighting the need for implementation supports. Previous studies of determinants of TDRS focus on patients' perspectives, with few studies targeting upstream multi-level barriers and facilitators. Addressing this gap, this qualitative study aimed to identify and evaluate multi-level perceived determinants of TDRS in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), to inform the development of targeted implementation strategies. METHODS We developed a theory-based semi-structured interview tool based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We conducted 22 key informant interviews with professionals involved in TDRS (administrators, clinicians, staff). The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Reported barriers and facilitators were organized into emergent themes and classified according to CFIR constructs. Constructs influencing TDRS implementation were rated for each study site and compared across sites by the investigators. RESULTS Professionals identified 21 main barriers and facilitators under twelve constructs of the five CFIR domains. Several identified themes were novel, whereas others corroborated previous findings in the literature (e.g., lack of time and human resources, presence of a champion). Of the 21 identified themes, 13 were classified under the CFIR's Inner Setting domain, specifically under the constructs Compatibility and Available Resources. Themes under the Outer Setting domain (constructs External Incentives and Cost) were primarily perceived by administrators, whereas themes in other domains were perceived across all professional categories. Two Inner Setting (Leadership Engagement, Goals and Feedback) and two Process (Champion, Engaging) constructs were found to strongly distinguish sites with high versus low TDRS performance. CONCLUSIONS This study classified barriers and facilitators to TDRS as perceived by administrators, clinicians, and staff in FQHCs, then identified CFIR constructs that distinguished high- and low-performance clinics. Implementation strategies such as academic detailing and collection and communication of program data and successes to leadership; engaging of stakeholders through involvement in implementation planning; and appointment of intervention champions may therefore improve TDRS implementation and sustainment in resource-constrained settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Bastos de Carvalho
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky, 110 Conn Terrace Ste 550, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA.
| | - S Lee Ware
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky, 110 Conn Terrace Ste 550, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Tamara Belcher
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky, 110 Conn Terrace Ste 550, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Franceska Mehmeti
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky, 110 Conn Terrace Ste 550, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Eric B Higgins
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky, 110 Conn Terrace Ste 550, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Rob Sprang
- Kentucky Telecare, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Cody Williams
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Kentucky, 110 Conn Terrace Ste 550, Lexington, KY, 40508, USA
| | - Jamie L Studts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.,Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Christina R Studts
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pedregosa S, Fabrellas N, Risco E, Pereira M, Stefaniak M, Şenuzun F, Martin S, Zabalegui A. Implementing dedicated education units in 6 European undergraduate nursing and midwifery students clinical placements. BMC Nurs 2021; 20:61. [PMID: 33849533 PMCID: PMC8042977 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-021-00576-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Undergraduate students’ clinical experience, working directly with patients and the healthcare team is essential to ensure students acquire the necessary competence for practice. There are differences in the quality of clinical environments and in students’ clinical placement experiences and not all clinical sites are optimal learning environments. The Dedicated Education Unit clinical education model allows students to develop the practical knowledge, skills and professionalism they will need as nurses/midwives. Methods We employed the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify and compare barriers and facilitators in the implementation of the Dedicated Education Unit in 6 European undergraduate nursing/midwifery student clinical placement settings and to describe the experience of nurses/midwives involved in the Dedicated Education Unit model implementation and evaluation. A pre-post implementation interpretive assessment was based on participants’ responses to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research construct questions. Results Although Dedicated Education Unit model implementation in our project was heterogeneous, no main implementation barriers were perceived. Qualitative data showed that educational-service collaboration, including a focus on mutual goals, organizational communication and networking, satisfaction of educational and healthcare professionals, and the establishment of a safe space for professional discussion and feedback, were considered facilitators. Conclusions This study describes the key elements guiding educational and healthcare stakeholders in Dedicated Education Unit implementation, engaging participants in the entire process, and offering other organizations the opportunity to consider the benefits of this clinical education model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Núria Fabrellas
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ester Risco
- Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Fisun Şenuzun
- Ege University Faculty of Nursing Internal Medicine Nursing, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Sandra Martin
- Center of Expertise Health Innovation at UC Leuven-Limburg, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tyack Z, Simons M, McPhail SM, Harvey G, Zappala T, Ware RS, Kimble RM. Improving the patient-centred care of children with life-altering skin conditions using feedback from electronic patient-reported outcome measures: protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study (PEDS-ePROM). BMJ Open 2021; 11:e041861. [PMID: 33837095 PMCID: PMC8043009 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with children have been described as 'giving a voice to the child'. Few studies have examined the routine use of these measures as potentially therapeutic interventions. This study aims to investigate: (1) the effectiveness of feedback using graphical displays of information from electronic PROMs (ePROMs) that target health-related quality of life, to improve health outcomes, referrals and treatment satisfaction and (2) the implementation of ePROMs and graphical displays by assessing acceptability, sustainability, cost, fidelity and context of the intervention and study processes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A hybrid II effectiveness-implementation study will be conducted from February 2020 with children with life-altering skin conditions attending two outpatient clinics at a specialist paediatric children's hospital. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial and mixed methods process evaluation will be completed. Randomisation will occur at the child participant level. Children or parent proxies completing baseline ePROMs will be randomised to: (1) completion of ePROMs plus graphical displays of ePROM results to treating clinicians in consultations, versus (2) completion of ePROMs without graphical display of ePROM results. The primary outcome of the effectiveness trial will be overall health-related quality of life of children. Secondary outcomes will include other health-related quality of life outcomes (eg, child psychosocial and physical health, parent psychosocial health), referrals and treatment satisfaction. Trial data will be primarily analysed using linear mixed-effects models; and implementation data using inductive thematic analysis of interviews, meeting minutes, observational field notes and study communication mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval was obtained from Children's Health Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2019/QCHQ/56290), The University of Queensland (2019002233) and Queensland University of Technology (1900000847). Dissemination will occur through stakeholder groups, scientific meetings and peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12620000174987).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zephanie Tyack
- Centre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Pegg Leditschke Children's Burns Centre, Children's Health Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Megan Simons
- Centre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Steven M McPhail
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Clinical Informatics Directorate, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Gillian Harvey
- Adelaide Nursing School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tania Zappala
- General Paediatrics and Dermatology Department, Queensland Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Robert S Ware
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University - GC Campus, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| | - Roy M Kimble
- Centre for Children's Burns and Trauma Research, Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Pegg Leditschke Children's Burns Centre, Children's Health Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Seljelid B, Varsi C, Solberg Nes L, Øystese KA, Børøsund E. A Digital Patient-Provider Communication Intervention (InvolveMe): Qualitative Study on the Implementation Preparation Based on Identified Facilitators and Barriers. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e22399. [PMID: 33830063 PMCID: PMC8294341 DOI: 10.2196/22399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Chronic health conditions are affecting an increasing number of individuals, who experience various symptoms that decrease their quality of life. Digital communication interventions that enable patients to report their symptoms have been shown to positively impact chronic disease management by improving access to care, patient-provider communication, clinical outcomes, and health-related quality of life. These interventions have the potential to prepare patients and health care providers (HCPs) before visits and improve patient-provider communication. Despite the recent rapid development and increasing number of digital communication interventions that have shown positive research results, barriers to realizing the benefits offered through these types of interventions still exist. Objective The aim of this study is to prepare for the implementation of a digital patient-provider communication intervention in the daily workflow at 2 outpatient clinics by identifying potential determinants of implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to tailor the use of digital communication intervention to the intended context and identify key aspects for an implementation plan. Methods A combination of focus groups, workshops, and project steering committee meetings was conducted with HCPs (n=14) and patients (n=2) from 2 outpatient clinics at a university hospital. The CFIR was used to guide data collection and analysis. Transcripts, written minutes, and notes were analyzed and coded into 5 CFIR domains using thematic analysis. Results Data were examined and analyzed into 18 CFIR constructs relevant to the study purpose. On the basis of the identified determinants, important intervention tailoring includes adjustments to the digital features and adjustments to fit the clinical workflow and a decision to conduct a future pilot study. Furthermore, it was decided to provide the intervention to patients as early as possible in their disease trajectory, with tailored information about its use. Key aspects for the implementation plan encompassed maintaining the identified engagement and positive attitude, involving key stakeholders in the implementation process, and providing the needed support and training. Conclusions This study offers insight into the involvement of stakeholders in the tailoring and implementation planning of a digital communication intervention in clinical practice. Stakeholder involvement in the identification of implementation facilitators and barriers can contribute to the tailoring of digital communication interventions and how they are used and can also inform systematic and targeted implementation planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berit Seljelid
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Cooperation, Patient Education and Equivalent Health Services, CEO's Staff, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cecilie Varsi
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Lise Solberg Nes
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, College of Medicine & Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Kristin Astrid Øystese
- Section of Specialized Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology, Morbid Obesity and Preventive Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medical Biochemistry, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Elin Børøsund
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lundquist CB, Pallesen H, Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T, Brunner IC. Exploring physiotherapists' and occupational therapists' perceptions of the upper limb prediction algorithm PREP2 after stroke in a rehabilitation setting: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e038880. [PMID: 33827826 PMCID: PMC8031067 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore how physiotherapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) perceive upper limb (UL) prediction algorithms in a stroke rehabilitation setting and identify potential barriers to and facilitators of their implementation. DESIGN This was a qualitative study. SETTING The study took place at a neurorehabilitation centre. PARTICIPANTS Three to six PTs and OTs. METHODS We conducted four focus group interviews in order to explore therapists' perceptions of UL prediction algorithms, in particular the Predict Recovery Potential algorithm (PREP2). The Consolidated Framework for advancing Implementation Research was used to develop the interview guide. Data were analysed using a thematic content analysis. Meaning units were identified and subthemes formed. Information gained from all interviews was synthesised, and four main themes emerged. RESULTS The four main themes were current practice, perceived benefits, barriers and preconditions for implementation. The participants knew of UL prediction algorithms. However, only a few had a profound knowledge and few were using the Shoulder Abduction Finger Extension test, a core component of the PREP2 algorithm, in their current practice. PREP2 was considered a potentially helpful tool when planning treatment and setting goals. A main barrier was concern about the accuracy of the algorithm. Furthermore, participants dreaded potential dilemmas arising from having to confront the patients with their prognosis. Preconditions for implementation included tailoring the implementation to a specific unit, sufficient time for acquiring new skills and an organisation supporting implementation. CONCLUSION In the present study, experienced neurological therapists were sceptical towards prediction algorithms due to the lack of precision of the algorithms and concerns about ethical dilemmas. However, the PREP2 algorithm was regarded as potentially useful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hanne Pallesen
- Research Department, Regional Hospital Hammel Neurocenter, Hammel, Denmark
- Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Iris Charlotte Brunner
- Research Department, Regional Hospital Hammel Neurocenter, Hammel, Denmark
- Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Varsi C, Ledel Solem IK, Eide H, Børøsund E, Kristjansdottir OB, Heldal K, Waxenberg LB, Weiss KE, Schreurs KMG, Morrison EJ, Stubhaug A, Solberg Nes L. Health care providers' experiences of pain management and attitudes towards digitally supported self-management interventions for chronic pain: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:275. [PMID: 33766028 PMCID: PMC7992849 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06278-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic pain constitutes a significant burden for the individuals affected, and is a frequent reason why patients seek health care services. While in-person psychosocial interventions can be of support to people living with chronic pain, such interventions are not always accessible. eHealth interventions may provide greater accessibility, but the evidence and use of digital self-management solutions for chronic pain are still limited and the lack of health care provider input in the development process of such solutions a concern. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate health care providers' experiences of treating patients with chronic pain, their attitudes towards, and use of, digital solutions in pain management, and their suggestions for content and design elements for a potential digital pain self-management intervention. METHODS Twelve health care providers representing a variety of health care disciplines participated in semi-structured interviews. The interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS The material was analyzed into three main themes: [1] Patients with chronic pain and their current use of the health care services, [2] Health care providers' own motivation and impression of patient prerequisites for use of digital self-management interventions, and [3] Suggestions for content and design elements in a digital self-management intervention for people living with chronic pain. The challenges faced by patients living with chronic pain were described as numerous. Despite interest and positive attitudes, few of the health care providers had used or recommended eHealth solutions to their patients. A range of potential content and functionality elements were identified, including aspects of motivation and engagement and providers also emphasized the importance of easy access and positive, personal content to support existing treatment. CONCLUSIONS This study offers insights into health care providers' considerations for the potential of digital self-management interventions supporting patients living with chronic pain. Findings indicate the need for change and a more comprehensive treatment approach to pain management. eHealth solutions may contribute to such change, and providers pointed to a need for health care provider involvement, timely support and follow-up as important factors for integrating digital pain self-management interventions into clinical care. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03705104.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilie Varsi
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway. .,Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
| | - Ingrid Konstanse Ledel Solem
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hilde Eide
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway.,Science Centre Health and Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| | - Elin Børøsund
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olöf B Kristjansdottir
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Lori B Waxenberg
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Karen E Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Karlein M G Schreurs
- Department of Psychology, Health & Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Audun Stubhaug
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pain Management and Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lise Solberg Nes
- Department of Digital Health Research, Division of Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Pb 4950 Nydalen, N-0424, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Psychiatry & Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Husain A, Cohen E, Dubrowski R, Jamieson T, Kurahashi AM, Lokuge B, Rapoport A, Saunders S, Stasiulis E, Stinson J, Subramaniam S, Wegier P, Barwick M. A Clinical Communication Tool (Loop) for Team-Based Care in Pediatric and Adult Care Settings: Hybrid Mixed Methods Implementation Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e25505. [PMID: 33656445 PMCID: PMC8294640 DOI: 10.2196/25505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 12/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication within the circle of care is central to coordinated, safe, and effective care; yet patients, caregivers, and health care providers often experience poor communication and fragmented care. Through a sequential program of research, the Loop Research Collaborative developed a web-based, asynchronous clinical communication system for team-based care. Loop assembles the circle of care centered on a patient, in private networking spaces called Patient Loops. The patient, their caregiver, or both are part of the Patient Loop. The communication is threaded, it can be filtered and sorted in multiple ways, it is securely stored, and can be exported for upload to a medical record. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to implement and evaluate Loop. The study reporting adheres to the Standards for Reporting Implementation Research. METHODS The study was a hybrid type II mixed methods design to simultaneously evaluate Loop's clinical and implementation effectiveness, and implementation barriers and facilitators in 6 health care sites. Data included monthly user check-in interviews and bimonthly surveys to capture patient or caregiver experience of continuity of care, in-depth interviews to explore barriers and facilitators based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and Loop usage extracted directly from the Loop system. RESULTS We recruited 25 initiating health care providers across 6 sites who then identified patients or caregivers for recruitment. Of 147 patient or caregiver participants who were assessed and met screening criteria, 57 consented and 52 were enrolled on Loop, creating 52 Patient Loops. Across all Patient Loops, 96 additional health care providers consented to join the Loop teams. Loop usage was followed for up to 8 months. The median number of messages exchanged per team was 1 (range 0-28). The monthly check-in and CFIR interviews showed that although participants acknowledged that Loop could potentially fill a gap, existing modes of communication, workflows, incentives, and the lack of integration with the hospital electronic medical records and patient portals were barriers to its adoption. While participants acknowledged Loop's potential value for engaging the patient and caregiver, and for improving communication within the patient's circle of care, Loop's relative advantage was not realized during the study and there was insufficient tension for change. Missing data limited the analysis of continuity of care. CONCLUSIONS Fundamental structural and implementation challenges persist toward realizing Loop's potential as a shared system of asynchronous communication. Barriers include health information system integration; system, organizational, and individual tension for change; and a fee structure for health care provider compensation for asynchronous communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amna Husain
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Eyal Cohen
- Pediatric Medicine and Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raluca Dubrowski
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Trevor Jamieson
- Department of Medicine, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Bhadra Lokuge
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Adam Rapoport
- Pediatric Advanced Care Team, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Emily's House Children's Hospice, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephanie Saunders
- Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Elaine Stasiulis
- Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer Stinson
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Melanie Barwick
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Christie HL, Boots LMM, Tange HJ, Verhey FRJ, de Vugt ME. Implementations of Evidence-Based eHealth Interventions for Caregivers of People With Dementia in Municipality Contexts (Myinlife and Partner in Balance): Evaluation Study. JMIR Aging 2021; 4:e21629. [PMID: 33544085 PMCID: PMC8081156 DOI: 10.2196/21629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Very few evidence-based eHealth interventions for caregivers of people with dementia are implemented into practice. Municipalities are one promising context in which to implement these interventions due to their available policy and innovation incentives regarding (dementia) caregiving and prevention. In this study, two evidence-based eHealth interventions for caregivers of people with dementia (Partner in Balance and Myinlife) were implemented in 8 municipalities in the Euregion Meuse-Rhine. Partner in Balance is a blended care, 8-week, self-management intervention intervention designed to aid caregivers of people with dementia in adapting to their new roles that is delivered through coaches in participating health care organizations who are trained to use it to offer online support to their clients. Myinlife is an eHealth/mHealth intervention integrated into the Dutch Alzheimer’s Association website and available from the App Store or Google Play, designed to help caregivers of people with dementia use their social network to better organize care and share positive (caregiving) experiences. Objective This study’s objectives were to evaluate the success of the implementation of Myinlife and Partner in Balance and investigate determinants of their successful implementation in the municipality context. Methods This study collected eHealth use data, Partner in Balance coach evaluation questionnaires, and information on implementation determinants. This was done by conducting interviews with the municipality officials based on the measurement instrument for determinants of implementation (MIDI). These data from multiple sources and perspectives were integrated and analyzed to form a total picture of the determinants (barriers and facilitators to implementation in the municipality context). Results The municipality implementation of Partner in Balance and Myinlife showed varying levels of success. In the end, 3 municipalities planned to continue the implementation of Partner in Balance, while none planned to continue the implementation of Myinlife. The 2 Partner in Balance municipalities that did not consider the implementation to be successful viewed the implementation as an external project. For Myinlife, it was clear that more face-to-face contact was needed to engage the implementing municipality and target groups. Successful implementations were linked to implementer self-efficacy and sense of ownership, which seemed to be absent in unsuccessful implementations. Conclusions The experiences of implementing these interventions suggested that this implementation context was feasible regarding the required budget and infrastructure. The need to foster sense of ownership and self-efficacy in implementers will be integrated into future implementation protocols as part of standard implementation materials for municipalities and organizations implementing Myinlife and Partner in Balance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Liane Christie
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Lizzy Mitzy Maria Boots
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Huibert Johannes Tange
- Department of Family Practice, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Frans Rochus Josef Verhey
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Elizabeth de Vugt
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Holcomb JL, Walton GH, Sokale IO, Ferguson GM, Schick VR, Highfield L. Developing and Evaluating a Quality Improvement Intervention to Facilitate Patient Navigation in the Accountable Health Communities Model. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:596873. [PMID: 33575264 PMCID: PMC7870472 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.596873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The Accountable Health Communities (AHC) Model was designed to address the health-related social needs of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services beneficiaries. Bridge organizations across the AHC Model have identified lack of technical assistance and peer planning as potential barriers to Model success, particularly around patient navigation. The technical assistance and peer planning literature lacks an organizing, conceptual framework, but implementation science frameworks could serve as useful guides. The Strengthening Peer AHC Navigation (SPAN) research protocol seeks to fill this gap and will apply three implementation science frameworks, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, Intervention Mapping, and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change compilation, to develop a multi-level quality improvement intervention and evaluate the impact of peer planning on Model outcomes. The aims of the SPAN study are to implement and evaluate a novel multi-level quality improvement intervention to improve AHC implementation and navigation milestones through structured peer planning and to provide successful technical assistance for the AHC Model. Methods and Analysis: The quality improvement intervention is outlined in four Tasks: (1) Assessment – to conduct an assessment of each bridge organization's current implementation, needs, and readiness in AHC Model navigation activities; (2) Planning – to engage in a peer planning approach to build capacity for AHC Model navigation activities; (3) Implementation with technical assistance – Co-creation of a quality improvement protocol for AHC Model navigation activities; and (4) Evaluation – measure the impact of the peer planning and technical assistance approach. Alongside the development and implementation of the quality improvement intervention, this protocol describes a mixed method, convergent parallel study design which will be used to evaluate whether the quality improvement intervention will lead to better outcomes. Tasks will be replicated with five bridge organizations participating in the AHC Model. Discussion: This research protocol provides a framework that can be used to conduct structured peer planning with technical assistance for social needs programs. This study will provide data on both implementation and outcomes which eventually may impact healthcare cost and utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Holcomb
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gretchen H Walton
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Itunu O Sokale
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gayla M Ferguson
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Vanessa R Schick
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Linda Highfield
- Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|