Abstract P4-01-15: Preliminary results from a phase 2 study of praluzatamab ravtansine (CX-2009) in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC)

Background: CD166 is broadly expressed in normal epithelium and overexpressed in many types of malignancies, including breast cancer. Probody® therapeutic candidates are masked antibodies, conditionally activated by tumor-associated proteases, which restricts their activity to the tumor microenvironment and minimizes ‘off-tumor’ toxicity. CX-2009 is a conditionally activated humanized anti-CD166 monoclonal antibody conjugated to DM4 that showed clinical activity in ABC patients in a phase 1 study (Boni et al. Clin Cancer Res. 2022). This phase 2 study (NCT04596150) evaluates CX-2009 as monotherapy in patients with advanced HR+/HER2− BC (Arm A) and TNBC (Arm B), and in combination with pacmilimab (a conditionally activated PD-L1) in TNBC (Arm C). Methods: Key eligibility criteria for all cohorts include: ECOG 0-1, acceptable end-organ function, measurable disease, willingness to receive ocular prophylaxis for DM-4 related toxicity, and available tumor tissue for CD166 evaluation. Eligibility criteria for HR+ BC include: 2-4 prior regimens (excluding single-agent hormonal therapy with up to 2 prior cytotoxic regimens) and a prior CDK 4/6 inhibitor in the metastatic setting; eligibility criteria for TNBC include CD166 by IHC >1% by central assessment, 1-3 prior regimens in the metastatic setting and prior taxane. All patients initially received 7 mg/kg Q3W; the protocol was subsequently amended to enroll patients at 6 mg/kg Q3W. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) using RECIST v1.1 assessed by central review. Other key endpoints include ORR by investigator assessment, clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24; defined as any response, confirmed or unconfirmed, or SD for 24 weeks), duration of response, and progression-free survival by investigator. Archival tumor specimens and blood samples were collected for correlative research including genomic analyses. Results: As of 13 May 2022, 60 patients were enrolled in Arm A (all patients started at 7 mg/kg); 52 were evaluable for efficacy by investigator. Median duration of follow-up was 29.1 weeks (range: 3.6-60.7). Median age was 60.5 years (36, 83); pts received a median of 3.5 (1, 6) prior treatments for ABC. CD166 H-Score > 200 was reported in 53.3% of patients. Arm A met the primary efficacy endpoint with a confirmed ORR by central radiology of 14.9% (n=47); by investigator, ORR was similar at 15.4% (n=52); an additional 9 patients (17.3%) had an unconfirmed response. CBR24 was 40.4%; using only confirmed responses, CBR24 was 23.1%. Median PFS was 11.4 weeks (95% CI 9.0, 13.9). Common treatment-related all-grade adverse events (TRAEs) included blurred vision (42%), nausea (35%), fatigue (35%), diarrhea (25%), peripheral neuropathy (27%), infusion-related reaction (23%) and decreased appetite (20%). Grade ≥3 ocular and neuropathic TRAEs were 15% and 10%, respectively. AEs resulting in treatment discontinuation (AEDC) were 25%. For Arm B and C, 55 and 10 patients were enrolled (the majority received a starting dose of 6 mg/kg). For Arm B, the futility boundary was crossed (ORR < 10%). Grade ≥3 ocular and neuropathic TRAEs and AEDC at 7 mg/kg in Arm B were similar to Arm A (11%, 11% and 21% respectively); whereas at 6 mg/kg, they were reduced at 3%, 0% and 0%, respectively. Biomarker data and correlation with outcomes will be presented. Conclusions: Praluzatamab ravtansine demonstrated single-agent activity in unselected heavily pretreated patients with HR+/HER2- ABC. Time to event analyses, such as PFS, were confounded by higher-than-expected toxicity at a starting dose of 7 mg/kg. The toxicity profile was generally consistent with a DM4 payload. The lower dose of 6 mg/kg appears to be better tolerated. Additional clinical studies in HR+ABC, incorporating a starting dose of 6 mg/kg and potentially including a biomarker strategy, are warranted.

Citation Format: Kathy Miller, Sara Tolaney, Leisha A. Emens, Sung-Bae Kim, Erika Hamilton, Cristina Saura, Lucia Sanz, Valentina Boni, Filipa Lynce, Juan Miguel Cejalvo, Jennifer Crozier, Shirley Wang, Hirdesh Uppal, Alison L. Hannah, Sara Hurvitz. Preliminary results from a phase 2 study of praluzatamab ravtansine (CX-2009) in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-15.

Treatment With Etirinotecan Pegol for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: Final Results From the Phase 3 ATTAIN Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BM) have a poor prognosis and high clinical need for novel treatments; however, historically, studies have often excluded these patients. Although the BEACON study did not meet its primary end point, treatment with etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy of the physician's choice for patients with advanced breast cancer demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) for the prespecified patient subgroup with preexisting, pretreated, and nonprogressive BM.

Objective

To compare clinical outcomes in patients with BM treated with etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy of the physician's choice in a confirmatory trial.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study was a phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial (ATTAIN) in patients with metastatic breast cancer and a history of stable pretreated BM who experienced disease progression while receiving chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The trial took place at 47 sites in 10 countries, and patients were enrolled between March 7, 2017, and November 6, 2019.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive etirinotecan pegol, 145 mg/m2, every 21 days or chemotherapy (eribulin, ixabepilone, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, or nab-paclitaxel).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was OS. Key secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and the clinical benefit rate.

Results

A total of 178 female patients (9 [5.1%] Asian, 8 [4.5%] Black or African American, and 123 [69.1] White individuals) were randomized to receive treatment with etirinotecan pegol (92 [51.7%]; median [range] age, 53 [27-79] years) or chemotherapy (86 [48.3%]; median [range] age, 52 [24-77] years). Median OS was similar in both groups (etirinotecan pegol, 7.8 months; chemotherapy, 7.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.61-1.33; P = .60). Median progression-free survival for non-central nervous system metastases per blinded independent central review for etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy was 2.8 and 1.9 months (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.45-1.16; P = .18) and 3.9 vs 3.3 months, respectively, for central nervous system metastases (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33-1.05; P = .07). Safety profiles between the groups were largely comparable.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of the ATTAIN randomized clinical trial found no statistically significant difference in outcomes between treatment with etirinotecan pegol and chemotherapy in patients with BM. However, this study represents one of the largest published trials dedicated to patients with breast cancer and BM and may help to inform further research.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02915744.

Phase I, First-in-Human Study of the Probody Therapeutic CX-2029 in Adults with Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancies

PURPOSE

PROCLAIM-CX-2029 is a phase I first-in-human study of CX-2029, a Probody-drug conjugate targeting CD71 (transferrin receptor 1) in adults with advanced solid tumors. Although the transferrin receptor is highly expressed across multiple tumor types, it has not been considered a target for antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) due to its broad expression on normal cells. CX-2029 is a masked form of a proprietary anti-CD71 antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E, designed to be unmasked in the tumor microenvironment by tumor-associated proteases, therefore limiting off-tumor toxicity and creating a therapeutic window for this previously undruggable target.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a dose-escalation, multicenter trial to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of CX-2029. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and cycle 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). CX-2029 was administered i.v. every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled in eight dose levels. No DLTs were reported in the dose escalation through 4 mg/kg. At 5 mg/kg, there were two DLTs (febrile neutropenia and pancytopenia). Following expansion of the 4 mg/kg dose to six patients, two additional DLTs were observed (infusion-related reaction and neutropenia/anemia). Both the 4 and 5 mg/kg doses were declared above the maximum tolerated dose. The recommended phase II dose is 3 mg/kg. The most common dose-dependent hematologic toxicities were anemia and neutropenia. Confirmed partial responses were observed in three patients, all with squamous histologies.

CONCLUSIONS

The Probody therapeutic platform enables targeting CD71, a previously undruggable ADC target, at tolerable doses associated with clinical activity.See related commentary by Oberoi and Garralda, p. 4459.

CX-072 (pacmilimab), a Probody PD-L1 inhibitor, in advanced or recurrent solid tumors (PROCLAIM-CX-072): an open-label dose-finding and first-in-human study

BACKGROUND

Probody® therapeutics are antibody prodrugs that are activated in the tumor microenvironment by tumor-associated proteases, thereby restricting the activity to the tumor microenvironment and minimizing 'off-tumor' toxicity. We report dose-escalation and single-agent expansion phase data from the first-in-human study of CX-072 (pacmilimab), a Probody checkpoint inhibitor directed against programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1).

METHODS

In the dose-escalation phase of this multicenter, open-label study (NCT03013491), adults with advanced solid tumors (naive to programmed-death-1/PD-L1 or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 inhibitors) were enrolled into one of seven dose-escalation cohorts, with pacmilimab administered intravenously every 14 days. The primary endpoints were safety and determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In the expansion phase, patients with one of six prespecified malignancies (triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]; anal squamous cell carcinoma [aSCC]; cutaneous SCC [cSCC]; undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma [UPS]; small bowel adenocarcinoma [SBA]; and thymic epithelial tumor [TET]); or high tumor mutational burden (hTMB) tumors were enrolled. The primary endpoint was objective response (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v.1.1).

RESULTS

An MTD was not reached with doses up to 30 mg/kg. A recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of 10 mg/kg was chosen based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic findings in the expansion phase. Ninety-eight patients enrolled in the expansion phase: TNBC (n=14), aSCC (n=14), cSCC (n=14), UPS (n=20), SBA (n=14), TET (n=8), and hTMB tumors (n=14). Of 114 patients receiving pacmilimab at the RP2D, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 10 patients (9%), serious TRAEs in six patients (5%), and treatment discontinuation due to TRAEs in two patients (2%). Grade ≥3 immune-related AEs occurred in two patients (rash, myocarditis). High PD-L1 expression (ie, >50% Tumor Proportion Score) was observed in 22/144 (19%) patients. Confirmed objective responses were observed in patients with cSCC (n=5, including one complete response), hTMB (n=4, including one complete response), aSCC (n=2), TNBC (n=1), UPS (n=1), and anaplastic thyroid cancer (n=1).

CONCLUSIONS

Pacmilimab can be administered safely at the RP2D of 10 mg/kg every 14 days. At this dose, pacmilimab had a low rate of immune-mediated toxicity and showed signs of antitumor activity in patients not selected for high PD-L1 expression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03013491.

Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) plus Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Safety, Efficacy, and Immune Activation (PIVOT-02)

This single-arm, phase I dose-escalation trial (NCT02983045) evaluated bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214/BEMPEG), a CD122-preferential IL2 pathway agonist, plus nivolumab in 38 patients with selected immunotherapy-naïve advanced solid tumors (melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and non-small cell lung cancer). Three dose-limiting toxicities were reported in 2 of 17 patients during dose escalation [hypotension (n = 1), hyperglycemia (n = 1), metabolic acidosis (n = 1)]. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were flu-like symptoms (86.8%), rash (78.9%), fatigue (73.7%), and pruritus (52.6%). Eight patients (21.1%) experienced grade 3/4 TRAEs; there were no treatment-related deaths. Total objective response rate across tumor types and dose cohorts was 59.5% (22/37), with 7 complete responses (18.9%). Cellular and gene expression analysis of longitudinal tumor biopsies revealed increased infiltration, activation, and cytotoxicity of CD8⁺ T cells, without regulatory T-cell enhancement. At the recommended phase II dose, BEMPEG 0.006 mg/kg plus nivolumab 360 mg every 3 weeks, the combination was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging clinical activity irrespective of baseline PD-L1 status. SIGNIFICANCE: These data show that BEMPEG can be successfully combined with a checkpoint inhibitor as dual immunotherapy for a range of advanced solid tumors. Efficacy was observed regardless of baseline PD-L1 status and baseline levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, suggesting therapeutic potential for patients with poor prognostic risk factors for response to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade.See related commentary by Rouanne et al., p. 1097.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1079.

Preliminary population pharmacokinetics supports phase II dose selection for masked anti-PD-L1 antibody CX-072

3602

Background: PROBODY therapeutics (Pb-Tx) are antibody prodrugs designed to reduce off-tumor, on-target toxicities. The mask inhibits Pb-Tx binding in the periphery yet can be removed by tumor-associated proteases, restricting target engagement to the tumor. This is the first report of preliminary clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis supporting selection of the phase II dose for CX-072, an anti–PD-L1 Pb-Tx, from the ongoing phase I/II PROCLAIM-CX-072 study (NCT03013491). Methods: A quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model1 was used to project the CX-072 plasma trough level (Cmin) corresponding to 95% intratumoral receptor occupancy (RO). Human PK and anti-drug antibody (ADA) data were obtained at selected times postdose following IV administration of 0.03–30 mpk CX-072 in PROCLAIM-CX-072. Population PK (POPPK) modeling was performed with NONMEM v7.3.0. Exploratory analysis and simulations were done with R v3.3.1 or later. Covariates were selected for POPPK using forward addition ( P<0.05) followed by backward deletion ( P<0.01). Results: The preliminary POPPK analyses were informed using available PK data as of August, 2019 from 135 subjects receiving CX-072 Q2W as monotherapy in the dose-escalation and expansion cohorts of PROCLAIM-CX-072. A mixture model was used to capture time- and dose-dependent apparent ADA effect on clearance (CL). The preliminary POPPK model estimates for CX-072 CL and volume of distribution (Vd) were 0.306 L/day and 4.84 L, respectively. Statistically significant covariate effects included body weight on the central Vd and CL, and albumin on CL. The QSP model predicted a CX-072 Cmin of 13–99 nM would be required for 95% intratumoral RO. POPPK simulations suggested that >95% of patients receiving CX-072 10 mg/kg Q2W would meet or exceed this targeted Cmin regardless of ADA. Additional observed data indicated that the majority of patients receiving 10 mpk CX-072 Q3W × 4 with 3 mpk ipilimumab (IPI) Q3W × 4 in the CX-072-IPI combination part of PROCLAIM-CX-072 maintained the targeted Cmin. Simulations did not suggest there would be a clinically meaningful change in exposure following a fixed dose of CX-072 800 mg relative to the 10 mpk weight-based dose. Conclusions: Preliminary PK analysis supports selection of 800 mg CX-072 Q2W as the recommended monotherapy dose and 800 mg Q3W when combined with IPI. The combination of 800 mg CX-072 + 3 mpk IPI Q3W × 4 doses, followed by monotherapy administration of 800 mg CX-072 Q2W is being further explored in phase II. Reference: 1) Stroh M et al. CPT. 2019(9):676-84. Clinical trial information: NCT03013491 .

PIVOT-09: A phase III randomized open-label study of bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) plus nivolumab versus sunitinib or cabozantinib (investigator's choice) in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

TPS763

Background: Bempegaldesleukin (BEMPEG; NKTR-214) is a first-in-class interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor pathway agonist that activates and expands effector T cells and natural killer cells in the tumor microenvironment and increases tumor PD-L1 expression, making BEMPEG a promising agent for combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors. In a phase 1/2 study, BEMPEG plus nivolumab (NIVO) demonstrated an encouraging objective response rate (ORR) in first-line advanced RCC (46%) and a manageable safety profile. BEMPEG plus NIVO offers a potential novel immunooncology treatment option for patients with advanced RCC. Methods: A global, multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of BEMPEG plus NIVO vs investigator’s choice of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; sunitinib [SUNI] or cabozantinib [CABO]) in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic RCC with a clear-cell component. Patients must not have had prior systemic therapy (including neoadjuvant, adjuvant or vaccine therapy) for RCC. Key exclusion criteria include active brain metastasis and autoimmune disease requiring systemic immunosuppressive agents. Approximately 600 patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive 0.006 mg/kg BEMPEG plus 360 mg NIVO intravenously every 3 weeks or TKI (50 mg SUNI [4 weeks on, 2 weeks off schedule] or 60 mg CABO; orally each day). Patients will be stratified by International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic score (0 [favorable risk] vs 1-2 [intermediate risk] vs 3-6 [poor risk]) and TKI choice (SUNI vs CABO). Primary objectives are ORR by blinded independent central review (BICR) and overall survival in the IMDC intermediate/poor risk population and the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary objectives are progression-free survival by BICR in the IMDC intermediate/poor risk population and the ITT population, safety, PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker, and quality of life. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03729245.

Phase 1/2a study of once daily oral BAL101553, a novel tumor checkpoint controller (TCC), in adult patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) or high-grade glioma

2025

Background: BAL101553 (prodrug of BAL27862) is a novel TCC that promotes tumor cell death by modulating the spindle assembly checkpoint. BAL27862 is a lipophilic, small molecule shown in rodents to penetrate the brain (brain/plasma ratio around unity), with promising antitumor activity in orthotopic preclinical GBM models as monotherapy or in combination with radiotherapy (RT) with or without temozolomide. In this ongoing study (NCT02490800, CDI-CS-002), daily oral BAL101553 was initially examined in solid-tumor patients, with an MTD of 16 mg/d and DLTs of G4 hyponatremia and G2 hallucinations (Lopez 2018, JCO 36, 2018, suppl. A2530). Subsequently the study was expanded by including a separate cohort of patients with progressive or recurrent GBM or high-grade glioma (Ingles Garces 2017, JCO 35, 2018, suppl. TPS2601). Methods: Patients with histologically-confirmed GBM or high-grade glioma, with progressive or recurrent disease after prior RT with/without chemotherapy, received once-daily oral BAL101553 (28-day cycles) in a 3+3 dose-escalation design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Adverse events were assessed by CTCAE v4.03 grade (G), and tumor response by RANO every two cycles. Pharmacokinetics (PK) were evaluated on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2. Results: In the ongoing study, 23 pts (13M/10F; median age 50 y), median (min–max) number of prior regimens = 2 (1–5), received doses of 8, 15, 20, 25 or 30 mg oral BAL101553 once daily. One DLT of reversible G2 depression and fatigue occurred at 20 mg. Both mean Cmax and AUC increased with dose between 8 and 30 mg. The PK exposure in GBM patients was lower than for solid tumor patients, in particular at 20 and 25 mg. At 25 mg/d (n = 3), one patient with IDH-mutated GBM had a partial response (63% area reduction per RANO) and continues on study > 8 months, and another patient had stable disease for 5 months. At 15–20 mg/d, stable disease was observed in 3/10 patients. Conclusions: The current data in patients with GBM or high-grade glioma suggest that BAL101553 is well tolerated at dose levels above the MTD established in patients with advanced solid tumors, and shows indications of clinical activity. Clinical trial information: 02490800.

A phase III randomized open label study comparing bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) plus nivolumab to sunitinib or cabozantinib (investigator's choice) in patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma

TPS4595

Background: Bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) is a CD122-preferential IL-2 pathway agonist that stimulates proliferation and activation of tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells within the tumor microenvironment and increases PD-1/PD-L1 expression. These properties make bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) a potentially promising agent for combination therapy with checkpoint inhibitors that target and inhibit the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. In phase 1 studies, NKTR-214 plus nivolumab demonstrated encouraging objective response rates (ORR) in first-line renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and an acceptable safety profile. Immunotherapy with NKTR-214 plus nivolumab may lead to greater clinical benefit than tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), standard-of-care agents, in this patient population. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label phase 3 study (NCT03729245) will evaluate the efficacy and safety of bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) plus nivolumab compared with investigator’s choice of TKI (sunitinib or cabozantinib) in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic RCC with clear cell component. Exclusion criteria include active brain metastasis and autoimmune disease. Approximately 600 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by PD-L1 status (≥1% vs < 1% or indeterminate), International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic score (1-2 [intermediate risk] vs 3-6 [poor risk]); and TKI (sunitinib or cabozantinib; cabozantinib percentage to be capped at 50%). Combination therapy will consist of bempegaldesleukin (NKTR-214) 0.006 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks (Q3W) plus nivolumab 360 mg IV Q3W until progression or death or maximum of 2 years. TKI therapy will consist of sunitinib 50 mg orally once daily (QD) for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks off or cabozantinib 60 mg orally QD. Primary objectives are ORR by blinded independent central radiology (BICR) assessment and overall survival. Secondary objectives are progression-free survival by BICR, safety, predictive value of PD-L1 expression, and quality of life. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03729245.

ATTAIN: Phase III study of etirinotecan pegol versus treatment of physician's choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases

The increasing incidence of breast cancer brain metastases is a major clinical problem with its associated poor prognosis and limited treatment options. The long-acting topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, etirinotecan pegol, was designed to preferentially accumulate in tumor tissue including brain metastases, providing sustained cytotoxic SN38 levels. Motivated by improved survival findings from subgroup analyses from the Phase III BEACON trial, this ongoing randomized, Phase III trial compares etirinotecan pegol to drugs commonly used for advanced breast cancer in patients with stable, treated breast cancer brain metastases who have been previously treated with an anthracycline, taxane and capecitabine. The primary end point is overall survival. Secondary end points include objective response rate, progression-free survival and time to CNS disease progression or recurrence in patients with/without CNS lesions present at study entry. Trial registration number: NCT02915744.

NKTR-214 + nivolumab in first-line advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Updated results from PIVOT-02

388

Background: Single-agent checkpoint inhibitors have changed the mUC treatment landscape; however, unmet need remains in first-line (1L) cisplatin ineligible mUC, particularly for PD-L1 negative (–) patients (pts). NKTR-214 is a CD122-biased agonist designed to provide sustained signaling through the IL-2 βγ receptor. PIVOT-02 is an ongoing study of NKTR-214 + nivolumab (nivo) in pts with advanced cancers, including mUC. Methods: Pts with mUC who were 1L cisplatin ineligible or refused standard of care (SOC) received NKTR-214 IV 0.006 mg/kg + nivo IV 360 mg q3w. Responses were assessed every 8 wks. Matched blood and tumor biopsies were evaluated for biomarkers including PD-L1 expression (assessed by Dako 28-8 PharmaDx IHC; PD-L1+ defined as ≥ 1% tumor cell staining). Results: As of 11 Oct. 2018, 34 pts received ≥ 1 dose of treatment (cisplatin ineligible [n=22]; refused SOC [n=12]). Median age was 70. Of 34 pts, 23 were efficacy evaluable (defined per protocol as having ≥ 1 post-treatment scan), 7 were pending a first scan, 1 pt was excluded for non-eligibility (no target lesion), and 3 discontinued prior to first scan. Thresholds for efficacy were exceeded in all 1L mUC cohorts under a pre-specified Fleming ORR analysis. In the efficacy evaluable population, overall ORR was 48% (11/23; 95% CI 27–69%) with a 17% CR rate (4/23) and 70% (16/23) DCR. The ORR was 50% in PD-L1– pts (5/10; 95% CI 19–81%) and 56% in PD-L1+ pts (5/9; 95% CI 21–86%). PD-L1 status was unknown in 4 efficacy-evaluable pts. The most common treatment-related AEs (TRAE, >30%) were fatigue (59%), pyrexia (38%), chills (32%), and flu-like symptoms (32%). Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 18% of pts and 8.8% discontinued due to TRAEs. No G4/G5 TRAEs occurred. 22 pts had available baseline PD-L1 results (PD-L1+ [n=11]; PD-L1– [n=11]). 10 of the 11 PD-L1– baseline samples had matched wk 3 biopsies. Of these, 6/10 (60%) converted to PD-L1+ at wk 3. Updated results will be presented. Conclusions: NKTR-214 + nivo showed encouraging clinical activity, including CRs, and an acceptable preliminary safety profile in pts with mUC. Efficacy appears independent of PD-L1 status with a similar ORR in PD-L1– and + tumors. These data support further evaluation of the combination. Clinical trial information: NCT02983045.

Talazoparib in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer and a Germline BRCA Mutation

BACKGROUND

The poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) inhibitor talazoparib has shown antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer and germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2).

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial in which patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation were assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive talazoparib (1 mg once daily) or standard single-agent therapy of the physician's choice (capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine in continuous 21-day cycles). The primary end point was progression-free survival, which was assessed by blinded independent central review.

RESULTS

Of the 431 patients who underwent randomization, 287 were assigned to receive talazoparib and 144 were assigned to receive standard therapy. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the talazoparib group than in the standard-therapy group (8.6 months vs. 5.6 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.71; P<0.001). The interim median hazard ratio for death was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.55 to 1.06; P=0.11 [57% of projected events]). The objective response rate was higher in the talazoparib group than in the standard-therapy group (62.6% vs. 27.2%; odds ratio, 5.0; 95% CI, 2.9 to 8.8; P<0.001). Hematologic grade 3-4 adverse events (primarily anemia) occurred in 55% of the patients who received talazoparib and in 38% of the patients who received standard therapy; nonhematologic grade 3 adverse events occurred in 32% and 38% of the patients, respectively. Patient-reported outcomes favored talazoparib; significant overall improvements and significant delays in the time to clinically meaningful deterioration according to both the global health status-quality-of-life and breast symptoms scales were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation, single-agent talazoparib provided a significant benefit over standard chemotherapy with respect to progression-free survival. Patient-reported outcomes were superior with talazoparib. (Funded by Medivation [Pfizer]; EMBRACA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01945775 .).

Abstract P5-19-05: Health-related quality of life during a phase 2 study of talazoparib in patients with advanced breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations (ABRAZO)

Background: Talazoparib (TALA; 1 mg/d) was well tolerated and exhibited promising antitumor activity in ABRAZO, a 2-cohort, 2-stage, open-label phase 2 study (NCT02034916) in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and gBRCA1/2 mutations following platinum-based therapy (cohort 1 [C1]) or ≥3 platinum-free cytotoxic-based regimens (cohort 2 [C2]). This analysis evaluates health-related quality of life (QoL) for both cohorts.

Methods: QoL was assessed on day 1 (baseline) and every 6 weeks for the initial 24 weeks and every 12 weeks thereafter, or sooner if progression was clinically suspected, using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and its breast cancer module, QLQ-BR23. For all scales, results were summarized using descriptive statistics for each cohort and at each time point, based on Characters (max 3400 including title, body and table [including spaces]): 3363 No abbreviations in title; title sentence case; define acronyms; no figures Category: Psychosocial, QOL, and Educational Aspects – Other 2 observed values and changes from baseline (clinically meaningful defined as ≥10-point change from baseline). Time to deterioration (TTD; defined as ≥10-point decrease in global health status [GHS]/functional scales or increase in symptom scales) analyses using survival analysis methods were carried out on the GHS/functional scales of QLQ-C30 and symptom scales of QLQ-BR23.

Results:GHS was maintained from baseline across all time points for both C1 and C2 except at week 24 in C2, when a statistically significant but not clinically meaningful improvement in GHS was observed. In C1, statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement was observed at specific time points in 4 functional scales (body image, week 6; sexual functioning, week 24; sexual enjoyment, week 36; and future perspective, weeks 6, 18, and 24) and in 3 symptom scales (dyspnea, week 24; insomnia, week 24; and breast symptoms, weeks 6 and 36). Statistically significant and clinically meaningful deterioration in C1 was observed in 2 functional scales (emotional functioning, week 12 and end of treatment, and role functioning, end of treatment) and in 1 symptom scale (fatigue, week 6). In C2, statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement was observed at specific time points in 4 functional scales (role functioning, week 24; social functioning, week 24; sexual enjoyment, week 18; and future perspective, weeks 6, 12, and 18) and in 5 symptom scales (nausea/vomiting, week 18; pain, weeks 12, 18, and 24; insomnia, week 24; breast symptoms, weeks 12 and 18; and arm symptoms, week 48). For C2, no statistically significant and clinically meaningful deterioration was observed for any functional or symptoms scales across all time points, except in the dyspnea symptom scale at week 18. For C1 and C2, the median (95% confidence interval) TTD of GHS was 2.8 (2.1-3.0) and 5.5 (4.2-5.7) months, respectively. The median TTD for all QLQ-C30 functional scales for C1 and C2 ranged 2.1-3.1 and 4.2-5.6 months, respectively; the median TTD for all QLQ-BR23 symptoms scales ranged 2.6-4.0 and 4.2-5.6 months, respectively.

Conclusions: The QoL of TALA-treated patients during ABRAZO was maintained. QoL is being evaluated among atients with germline BRCA1/2 mutated advanced BC treated with TALA vs physician's choice chemotherapy in the phase 3 EMBRACA trial (NCT01945775).

Citation Format: Hurvitz SA, Turner NC, Telli ML, Rugo HS, Mailliez A, Ettl J, Grischke E-M, Mina LA, Balmaña J, Fasching PA, Tudor C, Quek RGW, Hannah AL, Robson ME, Wardley AM. Health-related quality of life during a phase 2 study of talazoparib in patients with advanced breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations (ABRAZO) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-19-05.

Abstract P1-14-03: ABRAZO: Exposure-efficacy and -safety analyses of breast cancer patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations receiving talazoparib in a phase 2 open-label trial

Background: Talazoparib (TALA) is a dual-mechanism poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that traps PARP on DNA. Efficacy results of this phase 2 trial were previously presented (Turner et al, ASCO 2017, abstract 1007). This study included sparse pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling for patients through cycle 4 of therapy. Exploratory analyses included assessment of exposure versus parameters of efficacy and safety.

Methods: ABRAZO (NCT02034916) was a parallel-cohort, open-label phase 2 study of TALA (1 mg/d) following (i) platinum-based therapy (cohort 1) or (ii) ≥3 platinum-free cytotoxic-based regimens (cohort 2) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutation. Sparse PK sampling was performed on day 1 of cycles 1-4, consisting of a predose sample collected ≤60 minutes prior to dosing and 2 postdose samples collected ≥30 minutes after dosing (time of food ingestion prior to the dose was collected). The collection times of the 2 postdose samples were separated by ≥2 hours. Efficacy parameters included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) by central review and objective response rate (ORR). Safety parameters included incidence of overall adverse events (AEs) and grade ≥3 AEs. Individual AUCs (area under concentration-time curves) for exposure-response analyses were predicted by population PK analyses.

Results: Patients were divided into AUC tertiles: low (median, 109.0 ng*hr/mL; n=27), intermediate (median, 170.8 ng*hr/mL; n=27), and high (median, 219.2 ng*hr/mL; n=27). Median rPFS was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1, 8.3) in the lowest AUC tertile, 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.7, 8.4) in the intermediate AUC tertile, and 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.9, 5.6) in the highest AUC tertile. The ORR was 22.2% (95% CI, 8.6, 42.3) in the lowest AUC tertile, 25.9% (95% CI, 11.1, 46.3) in the intermediate AUC tertile, and 37.0% (95% CI, 19.4, 57.6) in the highest AUC tertile. AEs of any grade were reported in 11 patients (40.7%) in the lowest AUC tertile, 21 patients (77.8%) in the intermediate AUC tertile, and 22 patients (81.5%) in the highest AUC tertile. Grade ≥3 AEs were reported in 8 patients (29.6%) in the lowest AUC tertile and in 18 patients (66.7%) in the intermediate and highest AUC tertiles. The most common AEs in all 3 exposure tertiles were anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia.

Conclusions: Median rPFS did not change with increasing systemic exposure. There may be a trend to higher ORR in patients with highest systemic exposure. A larger percentage of patients experienced AEs with elevated systemic exposure. Increased response rates with greater exposure does not translate to improved rPFS. These results should be interpreted with caution due to the low patient numbers in each cohort.

Citation Format: Telli ML, Turner NC, Mailliez A, Ettl J, Grischke E-M, Mina LA, Balmaña J, Hurvitz SA, Wardley AM, Fasching PA, Tudor C, Nguyen L, Hannah AL, Robson ME, Rugo HS. ABRAZO: Exposure-efficacy and -safety analyses of breast cancer patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations receiving talazoparib in a phase 2 open-label trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-03.

Randomized study of etirinotecan pegol versus irinotecan as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Etirinotecan pegol (EP) is a long-acting topoisomerase-I inhibitor designed to provide sustained exposure to SN-38 (active metabolite of irinotecan). This phase II study compared EP versus irinotecan as second-line treatment for KRAS-mutant, irinotecan-naïve, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

Patients were randomized to EP 145 mg/m² or irinotecan 350 mg/m² Q21d until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) with response determined by central radiologic review (RECIST version 1.1).

RESULTS

The study was terminated before completing accrual due to evolving standards of care. Eighty-three patients were randomized. Median PFS was longer with EP versus irinotecan (4.0 versus 2.8 months, respectively; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.40-1.04; P = 0.07). Six-month PFS rates were 32.8 and 15.4%, respectively. Median OS was 9.6 and 8.4 months in EP and irinotecan arms, respectively (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.56-1.49). ORRs were 10 and 5%, respectively (P = 0.676); median DOR was significantly longer in EP arm (7.9 versus 1.4 months; P = 0.018). The most common grade-3/4 adverse events for EP and irinotecan were diarrhea (21 vs 20%), neutropenia (10 vs 22%), abdominal pain (14 vs 5%), nausea (14 vs 2%), and vomiting (12 vs 7%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

EP is active and safe for second-line treatment of KRAS-mutant, irinotecan-naïve mCRC.

A multicenter, open-label, expanded phase 2 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etirinotecan pegol, a polymer conjugate of irinotecan, in women with recurrent platinum-resistant or refractory ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Etirinotecan pegol (EP) is a novel polyethylene glycol conjugated form of irinotecan with documented activity in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC). We report the results of the expanded portion of a phase II study of EP in patients with PROC who received prior pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) or who were unable to receive it.

METHODS

This multicenter, open-label, phase II study evaluated EP q21d for PROC. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Patient populations evaluated included a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) group consisting of all patients who received at least one dose and with measurable disease and a primary efficacy (pEFF) group (subset of the mITT population who received prior PLD).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine patients were enrolled. Of the 132 patients in the mITT group, 20 achieved an ORR (15.2%; 95% CI 9.5-22.4); median PFS and OS were 4.4 months and 10.2 months, respectively. In the pEFF group (n=104), 15 patients (14.4%; 95% CI 8.3-22.7) achieved an ORR; median PFS and OS were 4.4 months and 10.9 months, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were diarrhea (20%), abdominal pain (17%), vomiting (14%), dehydration (13%), and nausea (13%). Severe diarrhea was reduced to 15% with strict adherence to screening and management guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the activity and safety of single-agent EP in patients with PROC, including patients who received prior PLD. Further evaluation earlier in the disease course and in combination is warranted.

Prolonged survival in patients with breast cancer and a history of brain metastases: results of a preplanned subgroup analysis from the randomized phase III BEACON trial

Purpose

Conventional chemotherapy has limited activity in patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BCBM). Etirinotecan pegol (EP), a novel long-acting topoisomerase-1 inhibitor, was designed using advanced polymer technology to preferentially accumulate in tumor tissue including brain metastases, providing sustained cytotoxic SN38 levels.

Methods

The phase 3 BEACON trial enrolled 852 women with heavily pretreated locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer between 2011 and 2013. BEACON compared EP with treatment of physician’s choice (TPC; eribulin, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel, ixabepilone, or docetaxel) in patients previously treated with anthracycline, taxane, and capecitabine, including those with treated, stable brain metastases. The primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was assessed in a pre-defined subgroup of BCBM patients; an exploratory post hoc analysis adjusting for the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (GPA) index was also conducted.

Results

In the trial, 67 BCBM patients were randomized (EP, n = 36; TPC, n = 31). Treatment subgroups were balanced for baseline characteristics and GPA indices. EP was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death (HR 0.51; P < 0.01) versus TPC; median OS was 10.0 and 4.8 months, respectively. Improvement in OS was observed in both poorer and better GPA prognostic groups. Survival rates at 12 months were 44.4% for EP versus 19.4% for TPC. Consistent with the overall BEACON population, fewer patients on EP experienced grade ≥3 toxicity (50 vs. 70%).

Conclusions

The significant improvement in survival in BCBM patients provides encouraging data for EP in this difficult-to-treat subgroup of patients. A phase three trial of EP in BCBM patients is underway (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02915744).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4304-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Final results of a phase 2 study of talazoparib (TALA) following platinum or multiple cytotoxic regimens in advanced breast cancer patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 mutations (ABRAZO)

1007

Background: TALA is a dual-mechanism PARP inhibitor that traps PARP on DNA. This study was designed to assess the activity of TALA in pts with g BRCA1/2mutation previously exposed to platinum or multiple prior cytotoxic regimens. Methods: ABRAZO (NCT02034916) is a 2-cohort, 2-stage phase 2 study of TALA (1 mg/d) following platinum-based therapy (Cohort 1 [C1]) or ≥ 3 platinum-free cytotoxic-based regimens (Cohort 2 [C2]) in pts with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and g BRCA1/2mutation. Pts had ECOG PS ≤ 1 and measurable disease by RECIST v1.1. Five responses per cohort were required in ≤ 35 pts to progress to stage 2. The primary endpoint was confirmed ORR by independent radiology facility (IRF). Secondary endpoints: clinical benefit rate ≥ 24 weeks (CBR24), DOR, PFS, and OS. Results: From May 2014 to Feb 2016, 84 pts were enrolled (C1, n = 49; C2, n = 35). At data cutoff (1 Sep 2016), 9 pts continued on treatment. Both cohorts proceeded to stage 2 before enrollment closed. Median age was 50 (range, 31–75) years; 58% of pts had an ECOG PS of 0. TNBC/HR+ incidence in C1 and C2 was 59%/41% and 17%/83%, respectively. Median number of prior cytotoxic regimens administered for advanced disease was 2 in C1 and 4 in C2. ORR by IRF for BRCA1/BRCA2 was 24%/34%, and ORR by IRF for TNBC/HR+ was 26%/29%. Common all grade AEs: anemia (52%), fatigue (45%), nausea (42%), diarrhea (33%), thrombocytopenia (33%), and neutropenia (27%). Grade ≥ 3 AEs: anemia (35%), thrombocytopenia (19%), and neutropenia (15%). Nonhematological AEs grade ≥ 3 did not occur. AEs related to TALA led to drug discontinuation in 3 pts (4%); 4 AEs resulted in death, none related to TALA. Conclusions: TALA was well tolerated in MBC pts with a g BRCA1/2 mutation, exhibiting promising antitumor activity in C1 and C2. TALA vs physician’s choice of treatment in g BRCA1/2-mutated MBC is being evaluated in the phase 3 EMBRACA trial (NCT01945775). Clinical trial information: NCT02034916. [Table: see text]

Phase 1/2a trial of daily oral BAL101553, a novel tumor checkpoint controller (TCC), in advanced solid tumors

2532

Background: BAL101553 (prodrug of BAL27862) is a small molecule TCC that binds microtubules and promotes tumor cell death by activation of the spindle assembly checkpoint. In a previous study (NCT01397929, Lopez et al. JCO 34, 2016; abstr 2525), 2-h IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15 (q28d) of BAL101553 up to 80 mg/m2 (maximum administered dose, MAD) showed vascular toxicities, including transient hypertension, which appeared to be Cmax related. The recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) was 30 mg/m2 weekly IV. Based on nonclinical models, antiproliferative effects of BAL27862 are driven by AUC. This trial explores whether once daily oral administration of BAL101553 reduces Cmax-related toxicity and improves the therapeutic window (NCT02490800). Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors who failed standard therapy, received QD oral BAL101553 (28-d cycles) in a 3+3 dose-escalation design to determine the MTD. Adverse events were assessed by CTCAEv4 grade (G); tumor response by RECIST 1.1; serial PK on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2. Results: In the ongoing study, 19 pts (9M/10F; median age 67 y) received doses of 2, 4, 8, 16 or 30 mg oral BAL101553 QD. The MAD was 30 mg with DLTs of reversible G2 hallucination and asymptomatic, reversible G3 electrolyte imbalances. No DLTs were observed at ≤ 16 mg. Dosing is ongoing between 16 and 30 mg QD to determine the MTD. BAL27862 exposures after oral QD dosing of BAL101553 compared to weekly 2-h infusions suggested high relative oral bioavailability. The BAL27862 weekly AUC at the oral MAD (30 mg QD) compared to the RP2D of 30 mg/m2 for 2-h IV was more than 5-fold higher (19,656 vs 3,584 ng*h/mL) and Cmax was 1.5-fold lower (171 vs 266 ng/mL). Both Cmaxand AUC were dose-proportional, with low/moderate variability. Oral BAL101553 had no effects on blood pressure and showed no vascular toxicity. 5 pts had stable disease (2 pts [cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine pancreatic cancer] > 4 cycles). Conclusions: Daily oral BAL101553 enables higher weekly exposures of BAL27862 with lower Cmax levels compared with a 2-h weekly infusion, due to the absence of Cmax related vascular toxicity. Doses up to 16 mg QD are well tolerated. The MAD has been identified as 30 mg QD; definition of the MTD is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02490800.

A phase I study to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and antitumor activities of daily oral BAL101553, a novel tumor checkpoint controller (TCC) in adult patients with progressive or recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) or high-grade glioma

TPS2601

Background: BAL101553 (prodrug of BAL27862) is a novel TCC that promotes tumor cell death by modulating the spindle assembly checkpoint. BAL27862 is a lipophilic, small molecule (MW 387) shown in rats to penetrate the brain (1:1 plasma ratio) and has shown promising antitumor activity in orthotopic preclinical models of GBM as monotherapy or in combination with radiotherapy (RT) with/without chemotherapy. In a completed Phase 1 study with 2-h IV infusions (Days 1, 8, 15, q28d, NCT01397929 , CDI-CS-001, Lopez et al. J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 suppl; 2525), dose-limiting vascular effects were observed and appeared Cmax related. Preclinical data suggest that antiproliferative effects of BAL101553/27862 are driven by exposure (AUC); thus vascular toxicity and antitumor activity are mediated by different PK drivers. In this ongoing study (NCT02490800, CDI-CS-002), daily oral BAL101553 was initially examined in solid-tumor patients; no vascular toxicities were observed at doses up to the MAD of 30 mg QD. Given this absence, the study was amended to enroll separate cohorts of patients with progressive or recurrent GBM or high-grade glioma. Methods: This is an ongoing multicenter, open-label, Phase 1 dose-escalation study using a 3+3 design to determine the MTD, characterize dose-limiting toxicities and assess the PK, PD and antitumor activities of daily oral administration of BAL101553 in consecutive 28-day cycles at a starting dose of 8 mg QD. Patients with histologically-confirmed GBM or high-grade glioma, with progressive or recurrent disease after prior RT with/without chemotherapy, are eligible for enrollment. This includes patients with histologically-confirmed low-grade glioma with unequivocal evidence by imaging of transformation to high-grade glioma. Adverse events are assessed using CTCAEv4; tumor response by RANO (every 2 cycles). The dose escalation allows for doubling of dose levels depending on observed toxicities. PD assessments include circulating tumor cells. PK profiles are assessed throughout the first two treatment cycles. Clinical trial information: NCT02490800.

Earlier defibrotide initiation post-diagnosis of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome improves Day +100 survival following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) is a progressive, potentially fatal complication of conditioning for haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The VOD/SOS pathophysiological cascade involves endothelial-cell activation and damage, and a prothrombotic-hypofibrinolytic state. Severe VOD/SOS (typically characterized by multi-organ dysfunction) may be associated with >80% mortality. Defibrotide is approved for treating severe hepatic VOD/SOS post-HSCT in the European Union, and for hepatic VOD/SOS with renal or pulmonary dysfunction post-HSCT in the United States. Previously, defibrotide (25 mg/kg/day in 4 divided doses for a recommended ≥21 days) was available through an expanded-access treatment protocol for patients with VOD/SOS. Data from this study were examined post-hoc to determine if the timing of defibrotide initiation post-VOD/SOS diagnosis affected Day +100 survival post-HSCT. Among 573 patients, defibrotide was started on the day of VOD/SOS diagnosis in approximately 30%, and within 7 days in >90%. The relationship between Day +100 survival and treatment initiation before/after specific days post-diagnosis showed superior survival when treatment was initiated closer to VOD/SOS diagnosis with a statistically significant trend over time for better outcomes with earlier treatment initiation (P < 0·001). These results suggest that initiation of defibrotide should not be delayed after diagnosis of VOD/SOS.

Defibrotide for Patients with Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome: Interim Results from a Treatment IND Study

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease, or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS), is a serious and potentially fatal complication of conditioning for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or of chemotherapy regimens alone. Defibrotide is a complex mixture of single-stranded polydeoxyribonucleotides that is approved in the United States for treating hepatic VOD/SOS with renal or pulmonary dysfunction post-HSCT and in the European Union, Israel, and South Korea for treating severe hepatic VOD/SOS post-HSCT. Defibrotide was previously available in the United States as an investigational drug through a treatment protocol (treatment IND) study. Interim results of that large, treatment IND study of patients with VOD/SOS and with or without multiorgan dysfunction (MOD; also known as multiorgan failure) are presented here. Defibrotide was administered i.v. at 6.25 mg/kg every 6 hours (25 mg/kg/day), with a recommended treatment duration of at least 21 days. Enrolled patients (n = 681) were diagnosed with VOD/SOS based on Baltimore or modified Seattle criteria or liver biopsy analysis. Among the 573 HSCT recipients, 288 (50.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 46.2% to 54.4%) were alive at day +100 post-HSCT. Day +100 survival for the pediatric (≤16 years) and adult (>16 years) subgroups was 54.5% (95% CI, 49.1% to 60.0%; n = 174 of 319) and 44.9% (95% CI, 38.8% to 51.0%; n = 114 of 254), respectively. In the MOD subgroup, 159 of 351 patients (45.3%; 95% CI, 40.1% to 50.5%) of patients were alive at day +100 post-HSCT. Treatment with defibrotide was generally well tolerated, and drug-related toxicities were consistent with previous studies. Adverse events were reported in 69.6% of safety-evaluable patients (399 of 573). Other than VOD/SOS and associated MOD symptoms, the most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse event was hypotension (13.8%). Day +100 survival results observed in this trial were consistent with results seen in previous trials of defibrotide for VOD/SOS in adult and pediatric patients. These data support the potential benefit of defibrotide in treating a VOD/SOS patient population that includes those with and without MOD.

Phase 3 trial of defibrotide for the treatment of severe veno-occlusive disease and multi-organ failure

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), also called sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), is a potentially life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Untreated hepatic VOD/SOS with multi-organ failure (MOF) is associated with >80% mortality. Defibrotide has shown promising efficacy treating hepatic VOD/SOS with MOF in phase 2 studies. This phase 3 study investigated safety and efficacy of defibrotide in patients with established hepatic VOD/SOS and advanced MOF. Patients (n = 102) given defibrotide 25 mg/kg per day were compared with 32 historical controls identified out of 6867 medical charts of HSCT patients by blinded independent reviewers. Baseline characteristics between groups were well balanced. The primary endpoint was survival at day +100 post-HSCT; observed rates equaled 38.2% in the defibrotide group and 25% in the controls (23% estimated difference; 95.1% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-40.8;P= .0109, using a propensity-adjusted analysis). Observed day +100 complete response (CR) rates equaled 25.5% for defibrotide and 12.5% for controls (19% difference using similar methodology; 95.1% CI, 3.5-34.6;P= .0160). Defibrotide was generally well tolerated with manageable toxicity. Related adverse events (AEs) included hemorrhage or hypotension; incidence of common hemorrhagic AEs (including pulmonary alveolar [11.8% and 15.6%] and gastrointestinal bleeding [7.8% and 9.4%]) was similar between the defibrotide and control groups, respectively. Defibrotide was associated with significant improvement in day +100 survival and CR rate. The historical-control methodology offers a novel, meaningful approach for phase 3 evaluation of orphan diseases associated with high mortality. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #.

Abstract P1-13-02: Early change in topoisomerase 1 (Top1) positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is associated with overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced breast cancer after treatment with etirinotecan pegol

Background: Etirinotecan pegol (EP) is a long-acting Top1 inhibitor providing sustained levels of active metabolite throughout the entire chemotherapy cycle. The phase 3 BEACON trial compared EP to treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients with advanced breast cancer, demonstrating a non-statistically significant 2.1 month difference in survival favoring EP in the intent to treat population. A novel aspect of the BEACON trial is to explore the utility of biomarkers measured in CTCs for predicting efficacy with EP. Pre- and post-treatment CTCs were isolated from blood of 77% of the 852 BEACON patients. Target-specific pharmacodynamic biomarkers for EP measured in CTCs were analyzed to identify patients most responsive to treatment with EP.

Methods: Donation of blood samples for CTC analysis was voluntary. Participating BEACON patients had serial (baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1 [C2D1], Cycle 4 Day 1 [C4D1], End of Treatment) 7.5-mL whole blood samples drawn in EDTA tubes and shipped within 96 hours ambient to ApoCell (Houston, TX) for processing. PBMCs were separated by Ficoll® gradient, and CTCs were isolated using ApoStream® technology. Isolated cells were deposited on three slides and stained for DAPI, CD45, cytokeratin markers, as well as Top1, Top2, Ki67, γH2AX, Rad51, ABCG2, and TUNEL. Biomarkers were quantified by iCys® laser scanning cytometer equipped with image analysis software, and correlated with OS using Cox multiple regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

Results: The CTC substudy yielded 611 pre-treatment, 519 C2D1, 268 C4D1, and 431 End of Treatment samples. Among the successfully processed blood samples, 98% had detectable CTCs, with a median of 63, 46, 51, and 57 CTCs/mL at baseline, C2D1, C4D1, and End of Treatment, respectively. Cox regression analyses of CTC number and percentage of Top1, Top2, Ki67, or TUNEL positive CTCs identified a correlation for post-treatment number of Top1-positive CTCs with OS in patients receiving EP. To assess the impact of Top1-positive CTCs, patients were classified as Top1-High (&gt; median) or Top1-Low (≤ median) based on the percent of Top1-positive CTCs at baseline. Among the Top1-High patients at baseline, significantly improved OS (HR 0.54, p=0.007) was observed for those who converted to Top1-Low after their first treatment with EP (C2D1), but not TPC (HR 1.12, p=0.613). These results suggest that decreased number of Top1-positive CTCs may reflect EP target engagement with Top1, as these patients derived the most benefit from treatment.

Conclusions: CTC collection and analysis was successfully incorporated into the phase 3 BEACON study, with 77% patient participation. CTC detection rate using ApoStream® was high, permitting evaluation of biomarkers at baseline and post-treatment. Significantly improved OS was observed in patients who had a decreased number of Top1-positive CTCs following cycle 1 of EP.

Citation Format: Rugo HS, Cortes J, Awada A, O'Shaughnessy J, Twelves C, Im S-A, Hannah AL, Lu L, Sy S, Caygill K, Zajchowski D, Davis DW, Hoch U, Perez EA. Early change in topoisomerase 1 (Top1) positive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) is associated with overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced breast cancer after treatment with etirinotecan pegol. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-02.

Abstract P4-11-08: Impact of treatment on quality of life (QOL) in the BEACON study, a randomized phase III trial of etirinotecan pegol (EP) versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (aBC) whose disease has progressed following anthracycline (A), taxane (T) and capecitabine (C)

Background: The need remains for novel agents that prolong survival and/or improve QOL in women with aBC. EP is a long-acting topoisomerase 1 inhibitor engineered to produce sustained exposure to irinotecan and its active metabolite SN38. Given previous efficacy seen in an earlier phase II trial in MBC, EP 145 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was compared to TPC (one of 7 single-agent regimens) in the randomized phase 3 BEACON study (NCT01492101). As reported at ASCO 2015 (abstract 1001), EP prolonged median overall survival by 2.1 months, although this did not reach statistical significance (12.4 vs 10.3 months; HR 0.87, p=0.08). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events were significantly less common with EP (48% vs 63% with TPC, p&lt;0.001). We now present results of the QOL analyses.

Methods: Patients completed validated health-related QoL (HRQoL) questionnaires, EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and breast cancer-specific QLQ-BR23, pretreatment and every 8 weeks until progression, death or withdrawal of consent. Questionnaires were scored according to the EORTC manual. For each scale, raw scores were standardized via a linear transformation to a range from 0 to 100. Absolute scores and changes from baseline were analyzed longitudinally and categorically using a 5-point difference calculated by treatment group. Comparisons between treatment groups were conducted to evaluate the differences in global health status, functional scores and symptoms over time.

Results: The majority of patients who were randomized (total: 733/852 [86%], EP: 378/429 [88%], TPC: 355/423 [84%]) completed at least one post-baseline HRQoL questionnaire. In the EORTC QLQ-C30, grade ≥ 3 AEs significantly impacted HRQoL measured by global health status and 5 additional functional domains. Of the six domains, compared to TPC in a longitudinal analysis, EP was statistically superior in the mean treatment effect through Week 32 in global health status p=0.02 and physical functioning scale p=0.01. EP was also numerically superior in all other scales. In EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR-23, a total of 13 symptoms were measured and categorically analyzed. There were no treatment differences in 7 of 13 symptom scales. EP was associated with worsening of 3 symptom scales: appetite loss, nausea/vomiting, and diarrhea. TPC was associated with worsening of 2 symptom scales: dyspnea and systemic side effects.

Conclusions: In the phase 3 BEACON trial comparing EP to TPC, the more favorable toxicity profile of EP resulted in an improvement in global health status and physical function (results of the symptom scales confirmed the different toxicities of the two arms). EP remains a promising investigational therapy for aBC.

Citation Format: Cortes J, Awada A, Perez EA, Rugo HS, Twelves C, Im S-A, Zhao C, Hoch U, Ney J, Hannah AL, O'Shaughnessy J. Impact of treatment on quality of life (QOL) in the BEACON study, a randomized phase III trial of etirinotecan pegol (EP) versus treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (aBC) whose disease has progressed following anthracycline (A), taxane (T) and capecitabine (C). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-11-08.

Etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) versus treatment of physician's choice in women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine (BEACON): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

New options are needed for patients with heavily pretreated breast cancer. Etirinotecan pegol is a long-acting topoisomerase-I inhibitor that prolongs exposure to, but reduces the toxicity of, SN38 (the active metabolite of irinotecan). We assessed whether etirinotecan pegol is superior to currently available treatments for patients with previously treated, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

In this open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3 study (BEACON; BrEAst Cancer Outcomes with NKTR-102), conducted at 135 sites in 11 countries, patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine (and two to five previous regimens for advanced disease) were randomly assigned (1:1) centrally via an interactive response system to etirinotecan pegol (145 mg/m(2) as a 90-min intravenous infusion every 3 weeks) or single-drug treatment of physician's choice. Patients with stable brain metastases and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 were eligible. Randomisation was stratified with a permuted block scheme by region, previous eribulin, and receptor status. After randomisation, patients and investigators were aware of treatment assignments. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01492101.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 19, 2011, and Aug 20, 2013, 852 patients were randomly assigned; 429 to etirinotecan pegol and 423 to treatment of physician's choice. There was no significant difference in overall survival between groups (median 12·4 months [95% CI 11·0-13·6] for the etirinotecan pegol group vs 10·3 months [9·0-11·3] for the treatment of physician's choice group; hazard ratio 0·87 [95% CI 0·75-1·02]; p=0·084). The safety population includes the 831 patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment (425 assigned to etirinotecan pegol and 406 to treatment of physician's choice). Serious adverse events were recorded for 128 (30%) patients treated with etirinotecan pegol and 129 (32%) treated with treatment of physician's choice. Fewer patients in the etirinotecan pegol group had grade 3 or worse toxicity than those in the treatment of physician's choice group (204 [48%] vs 256 [63%]; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were diarrhoea (41 [10%] in the experimental group vs five [1%] in the control group), neutropenia (41 [10%] vs 125 [31%]), and peripheral neuropathy (two [<1%] vs 15 [4%]). Three patients in the etirinotecan pegol group died of treatment-related adverse events (pneumonia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and acute renal failure) and two in the treatment of physician's choice group (neutropenic sepsis and septic shock).

INTERPRETATION

This trial did not demonstrate an improvement in overall survival for etirinotecan pegol compared to treatment of physician's choice in patients with heavily pre-treated advanced breast cancer. The toxicity profile noted in the etirinotecan pegol group differed from that in the control group. In view of the frequency of cross-resistance and overlapping toxicities noted with many available drugs and the need for effective drugs in highly refractory disease, etirinotecan pegol may warrant further research in some subgroups of patients.

FUNDING

Nektar Therapeutics.

Etirinotecan pegol (EP) target-specific pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers measured in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from patients in the phase III BEACON study in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC)

1087

Background: EP is a unique topoisomerase 1 inhibitor that provides continuous exposure to SN38. EP demonstrated a 29% overall response rate in patients with mBC, leading to a phase III global BEACON study in patients with mBC. CTCs in patient blood samples provide a minimally invasive approach to detect PD markers of drug activity. We developed quantitative multiplex immunofluorescent assays to measure target-specific PD biomarkers for EP in CTCs isolated pre- and post-treatment. Methods: Assays for Top1, Top2, g-H2Ax, Rad51, ABCG2, and Ki-67 were developed using control (0.1% DMSO) and drug-treated (SN38, 10 uM) tumor cell lines (HCT116, MCF7, A549, SKBr3) and PBMCs from healthy donors. The optimal antibody for each biomarker was then multiplexed in a panel with antibodies against cytokeratin, CD45 and DAPI for phenotypic identification of CTCs. For analysis of BEACON pts, serial 7.5 mL whole blood samples were drawn and shipped ambient to Apocell (Houston, TX) for further processing. PBMCs were separated and CTCs were isolated using ApoStream technology. CTCs were stained for PD markers and analyzed using an iCys laser scanning cytometer equipped with image analysis software. Results: Antibodies bound to tumor cells showed staining confined to the nucleus (Top1, Top2, g-H2AX, Ki-67) or membrane (ABCG2), exhibited defined peak separation from their isotype controls, and signal strength correlated with cellular expression of high and low levels of markers. To date, ~ 80% of BEACON pts consent to participate in the CTC sub-study. As of 30 Oct 2012, data from 167 pre-dose blood samples from BEACON pts were available. 99% of blood samples were successfully processed. 93% had detectable CTCs, yielding a median of 216 CTCs (range: 7.5-14816). Staining was positive for Top1, Top2, g-H2Ax, Rad51, ABCG2, and Ki-67 in 82%, 89%, 16%, 53%, 31%, 52% of samples, respectively. Conclusions: EP target-specific pharmacodynamic biomarkers can be reliably measured in CTCs isolated from patients participating in BEACON. Sample collection and analysis of pre- and post-treatment samples is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT01492101.

A first-in-human (FIH) dose-escalation study of the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of intravenous BAL101553, a novel microtubule inhibitor, in adult patients with advanced solid tumors

2566

Background: BAL101553, a pro-drug of the small molecule BAL27862, is a novel microtubule targeting agent (MTA) with cytotoxic and vascular disrupting properties. Pre-clinical data showed anti-proliferative activity in several in vitro and xenograft tumour models, including tumours refractory to conventional MTAs through diverse resistance mechanisms. Primary objectives of this FIH study were determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary objectives included the evaluation of PK, PD and anti-tumour activity. Methods: An accelerated titration dose-escalation design was used. Eligible patients (pts) with advanced solid tumours, who had failed standard therapy, received BAL101553 as a 2-h intravenous infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to CTCAEv4. Disease response was assessed by RECIST 1.1 every 2 cycles. Results: 16 pts (7 male; median age 52 years; range 29-80) with solid tumours were treated at 4 dose levels (15, 30, 45 and 60 mg/m2). DLTs were observed at 60 mg/m2 and included rapidly reversible grade (G) 3 hypertension (HTN) and G3 reduced mobility/ dizziness. DLT criteria for HTN were subsequently modified. Frequent drug-related AEs were injection site reactions, nausea, vomiting (all G1-2), and G2-3 HTN (transient during the infusion; responding to nifedipine). One pt experienced G2 peripheral neuropathy at 60 mg/m2. PK analyses indicated conversion of BAL101553 to the active BAL27862, dose proportional exposure for both compounds and a half-life of BAL27862 in a range of 11 to 27 h. Preliminary tumour PD data comparing pre/post biopsies showed loss of CD34+ capillaries and focally decreased proliferation. A confirmed partial response was demonstrated in 1 pt with ampullary (pancreaticobiliary) cancer maintained on treatment for >16 cycles with intra-pt dose escalation. 2 pts (laryngeal and rectal cancer) demonstrated stable disease >16 weeks. Conclusions: BAL101553 is well tolerated up to 60 mg/m2 with evidence of anti-tumour activity. Dose escalation continues to determine the MTD. Clinical trial information: NCT01397929.

Phase I clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of KOS-862 (Epothilone D) in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphoma

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose and safety of the epothilone, KOS-862, in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were treated weekly for 3 out of 4 weeks (Schedule A) or 2 out of 3 weeks (Schedule B) with KOS-862 (16-120 mg/m(2)). Pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was performed during cycles 1 and 2; pharmacodynamic (PD) assessment for microtubule bundle formation (MTBF) was performed after the 1st dose, only at or above 100 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled, and twenty-nine completed ≥1 cycle of therapy. Dose limiting toxicity [DLT] was observed at 120 mg/m(2). PK data were linear from 16 to 100 mg/m(2), with proportional increases in mean C(max) and AUC(tot) as a function of dose. Full PK analysis (mean ± SD) at 100 mg/m(2) revealed the following: half-life (t (½)) = 9.1 ± 2.2 h; volume of distribution (V(z)) = 119 ± 41 L/m(2); clearance (CL) = 9.3 ± 3.2 L/h/m(2). MTBF (n = 9) was seen in 40% of PBMCs within 1 h and in 15% of PBMC at 24-hours post infusion at 100 mg/m(2). Tumor shrinkage (n = 2, lymphoma), stable disease >3 months (n = 5, renal, prostate, oropharynx, cholangiocarcinoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma), and tumor marker reductions (n = 1, colorectal cancer/CEA) were observed.

CONCLUSION

KOS-862 was well tolerated with manageable toxicity, favorable PK profile, and the suggestion of clinical activity. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 100 mg/m(2) weekly 3-on/1-off. MTBF can be demonstrated in PBMCs of patients exposed to KOS-862.

A randomized, open-label, phase II study of MDV3100 alone or in combination with leuprolide and dutasteride as neoadjuvant therapy to prostatectomy in intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer

TPS4695

Background: MDV3100 is a potent androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitor (ARSI) that inhibits AR signaling via three mechanisms: inhibition of androgen binding to AR, inhibition of AR nuclear translocation, and inhibition of nuclear AR-DNA binding. In vivo, MDV3100 induces significant prostate cancer apoptosis, an effect not seen with anti-androgens. To date, the use of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy has not led to an improvement in time to PSA progression (Soloway 2002; Aus 2002). While serum androgens may be suppressed using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists, intratumoral levels of androgens remain, driving continued AR signaling and prostate cancer survival. More effective inhibition of AR signaling may improve local and systemic disease control. Methods: MDV3100-07 will assess the effect of 6 mos of neoadjuvant AR blockade with AR inhibition alone (MDV3100) or in combination with maximal suppression of androgens (MDV3100 +leuprolide [L] + dutasteride [D]). Eligible patients will have treatment-naive localized prostate cancer and be candidates for radical prostatectomy. Patients must have either PSA > 10 ng/mL or Gleason score ≥ 7 (4 + 3) with ≥3 cores containing tumor. Patients with evidence of metastatic/nodal disease are excluded. All patients receive MDV3100 (160 mg/d PO); those randomized to MDV3100+L+D therapy also receive L (22.5mg IM q3m) and D (0.5 mg/day PO). Serum/tumor androgen levels will be serially assessed. Tissue from the diagnostic and prostatectomy specimens will be evaluated for androgen levels, AR signaling profiles, and selected markers of apoptosis and mitotic indices. The primary efficacy endpoint is pathological complete response (pCR) rate at time of radical prostatectomy. For each arm, the percent of patients who achieve a pCR will be compared to the percent pCR in patients treated with neoadjuvant leuprolide, estimated to be 5% in a mixed low-to-intermediate risk population. Target Accrual: 40 pts will be randomized 1:1 to MDV3100 or MDV3100+L+D therapy. Keywords:MDV3100, prostate cancer, androgen receptor, anti-androgen, Phase 2, neoadjuvant.

OT3-01-07: The BEACON Study (BrEAst Cancer Outcomes with NKTR-102): A Phase 3 Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of NKTR-102 Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC) in Patients (pts) with Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Previously Treated with an Anthracycline, a Taxane, and Capecitabine (ATC)

Background

NKTR-102 is a next-generation topoisomerase I inhibitor-polymer conjugate with a markedly reduced Cmax and a continuous exposure profile compared to irinotecan. A phase 2 trial of single-agent NKTR-102 compared a dose of 145 mg/m2 every 2w or every 3w in 3rd-line MBC (Awada et al, ASCO 2011). Overall the ORR was 29% (including 3% CR) with the prior ATC subset demonstrating an ORR of 31%. Dosing every 3w was better tolerated; in this arm, median PFS equaled 5.3m and median OS equaled 13.1m.

Trial Design: NKTR-102 will be compared to TPC in an open-label, randomized, parallel, two arm multicenter Phase 3 pivotal study in pts with previously treated locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Key Entry Criteria: Adult females, with ECOG 0 or 1 with adequate liver, kidney and marrow function. All patients must have received prior therapy with an anthracycline (in neo/adjuvant or metastatic setting or both), a taxane (in neo/adjuvant or metastatic setting or both) and capecitabine (in neo/adjuvant or locally advanced/metastatic setting or both) unless not medically appropriate or explicitly contraindicated for the patient. All chemotherapy- and radiation-related toxicities must have resolved to ≤ Grade 1, except for stable sensory neuropathy ≤ Grade 2 and alopecia. Pts with brain metastases may be eligible, if stable for prior 4 weeks without steroids. Pts with Grade ≥ 2 pre-existing diarrhea or receiving chronic anti-diarrheal supportive care are not eligible.

Statistical Methods: The primary efficacy endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include ORR by RECIST v1.1 and PFS. Pts will be randomized 1:1 to NKTR-102 given IV at 145 mg/m2 over 90-min every 21 days or TPC. Patients randomized to TPC will receive single agent chemotherapy, limited to choice of one of the following 5 agents: eribulin, ixabepilone, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, or a taxane. The investigator must decide which agent will be given to the patient prior to randomization. Pts will be stratified by geographical region and disease characteristics.

Target Accrual: Approximately 840 patients (420 pts per treatment arm) will be randomized in order to obtain 615 deaths (alpha = 0.05; power 90% with one interim analysis scheduled when 50% of the deaths have occurred). PK sampling will be performed in a subset of pts and blood and/or tumor samples are planned for potential predictive markers of response and toxicity. Enrollment is expected to remain open until the end of 2013.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-07.

Phase I dose escalation study of KOS-1584, a novel epothilone, in patients with advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

First-in-man study of KOS-1584, a second generation epothilone.

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid malignancies received KOS-1584 every 3 weeks until disease progression. Using a modified Fibonacci dose escalation scheme, one patient was enrolled at each dose level until the first instance of grade 2 toxicity. Thereafter, a standard 3 + 3 design was utilized.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients in 14 cohorts were dosed from 0.8 to 48 mg/m(2). Diarrhea, arthralgias, and encephalopathy were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at doses ≥36 mg/m(2). At the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), the most common adverse effects were peripheral neuropathy (low grade), fatigue, arthralgias/myalgias, and diarrhea (31, 6%). The incidence of neutropenia was low. The overall clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life of KOS-1584 were 11 ± 6.17 L/h/m(2), 327 ± 161 L/m(2), and 21.9 ± 8.75 h, respectively. The half-life for the seco-metabolite (KOS-1891) was 29.6 ± 13.8 h. KOS-1584 exhibited linear pharmacokinetics. A dose-dependent increase in microtubulin bundle formation was observed at doses ≥27 mg/m(2). Two patients achieved partial responses and 24 patients had stable disease (SD).

CONCLUSIONS

The RP2D of KOS-1584 is 36 mg/m(2). The lack of severe neurologic toxicity, diarrhea, neutropenia, or hypersensitivity reactions; favorable pharmacokinetic profile; and early evidence of activity support further evaluation.