A literature review and expert consensus statement on diagnostics in suspected metal implant allergy

BACKGROUND

Although rare, allergic reactions to metal implants represent a diagnostic challenge in view of missing guidelines.

OBJECTIVES

To develop an European expert consensus on characteristics of metal allergy reactions and the utility of various diagnostic tools in suspected metal implant allergy.

METHODS

A nominal group technique (NGT) was applied to develop consensus statements. Initially an online literature database was created on a secure server to enable a comprehensive information. Twenty-three statements were formulated on potential aspects of metal implant allergy with a focus on diagnostics and grouped into five domains. For the consensus development, the panel of 12 experts initially did refine and reformulate those statements that were ambiguous or had unclear wording. By face-to-face (9/12) or virtual participation (3/12), an anonymous online voting was performed.

RESULTS

Consensus (≥80% of agreement) was reached in 20/23 statements. The panel agreed that implant allergy despite being rare should be considered in case of persistent unexplained symptoms. It was, however, recommended to allow adequate time for resolution of symptoms associated with healing and integration of an implant. Obtaining questionnaire-aided standardized medical history and standardized scoring of patient outcomes was also considered an important step by all experts There was broad consensus regarding the utility/performance of patch testing with additional late reading. It was recognized that the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) has to many limitations to be generally recommended. Prior to orthopaedic implant, allergy screening of patients without a history of potential allergy to implant components was not recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an expert consensus process, statements concerning allergy diagnostics in suspected metal implant allergy were created. Areas of nonconsensus were identified, stressing uncertainty among the experts around topics such as preoperative testing in assumed allergy, histological correlate of periimplant allergy and in vitro testing, which underscores the need for further research.

Guideline for allergological diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: S2k Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) in cooperation with the German Dermatological Society (DDG), the Association of German Allergologists (ÄDA), the German Society for Pediatric Allergology (GPA), the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG), the German Society for Pneumology (DGP), the German Society of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, the Austrian Society of Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), the Austrian Society of Dermatology and Venereology (ÖGDV), the German Academy of Allergology and Environmental Medicine (DAAU), and the German Documentation Center for Severe Skin Reactions (dZh)

Not available.

A nontuberculous mycobacterium could solve the mystery of the lady from the Franciscan church in Basel, Switzerland

BACKGROUND

In 1975, the mummified body of a female has been found in the Franciscan church in Basel, Switzerland. Molecular and genealogic analyses unveiled her identity as Anna Catharina Bischoff (ACB), a member of the upper class of post-reformed Basel, who died at the age of 68 years, in 1787. The reason behind her death is still a mystery, especially that toxicological analyses revealed high levels of mercury, a common treatment against infections at that time, in different body organs. The computed tomography (CT) and histological analysis showed bone lesions in the femurs, the rib cage, and the skull, which refers to a potential syphilis case.

RESULTS

Although we could not detect any molecular signs of the syphilis-causing pathogen Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum, we realized high prevalence of a nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) species in brain tissue sample. The genome analysis of this NTM displayed richness of virulence genes and toxins, and similarity to other infectious NTM, known to infect immunocompromised patients. In addition, it displayed potential resistance to mercury compounds, which might indicate a selective advantage against the applied treatment. This suggests that ACB might have suffered from an atypical mycobacteriosis during her life, which could explain the mummy's bone lesion and high mercury concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The study of this mummy exemplifies the importance of employing differential diagnostic approaches in paleopathological analysis, by combining classical anthropological, radiological, histological, and toxicological observations with molecular analysis. It represents a proof-of-concept for the discovery of not-yet-described ancient pathogens in well-preserved specimens, using de novo metagenomic assembly.

[Cutaneous Vasculitides - Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Aetiology]

Cutaneous Vasculitides - Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Aetiology Abstract. Vasculitides are a heterogeneous group of diseases that are classified differently, for example according to the size of the affected vessel or according to primary and secondary causes. The skin is most frequently affected; it can be involved both as single organ vasculitis and in the context of systemic forms. The combination of skin lesions, their anatomical location and information on the time course provide clues for a differential diagnosis. Purpura, blisters, necrosis, ulcerations and possibly a livedo are characteristic manifestations. Constitutional symptoms such as weight loss, exhaustion, fever, and arthralgias are indicative of a systemic form. It is important to differentiate vasculitides from vasculopathies, which can manifest similarly. The most common form in adults is cutaneous leukocytoclastic angiitis, in children IgA vasculitis (Schönlein-Henoch purpura). Various triggers are possible: infections, drugs, autoimmune diseases, and malignancies, whereby up to 50% remain etiologically unexplained. Skin biopsies and laboratory parameters, if necessary supplemented with imaging, are important steps in the clarification process. Treatment is primarily directed at the elimination of a possible triggering cause. Idiopathic cutaneous leukocytoclastic angiitis usually resolves spontaneously; treatment is symptomatic. In more severe cases, topical corticosteroids or calcineurin antagonists are primarily used. In case of therapeutic resistance, systemic immunosuppressants are recommended.

Wespe statt Biene – Akzidentelle Neusensibilisierung auf Wespengift unter Immuntherapie mit Bienengift

Während einer laufenden Immuntherapie mit Bienengift bei einer auf Bienengift monosensibilisierten Patientin wurde im 3. Jahr irrtümlicherweise eine Erhaltungsdosis Wespengift verabreicht. Es traten keine unmittelbaren Nebenwirkungen auf, hingegen konnte nach einigen Wochen ein Anstieg der initial negativen wespengiftspezifischen IgE- und IgG-Antikörper dokumentiert werden. Es muss somit von einer aktiven Sensibilisierung durch die hohe Einmaldosis Wespengift ausgegangen werden. Die Immuntherapie mit Bienengift konnte nach der empfohlenen Dauer von 5 Jahren vollendet werden. Eine akzidentelle nachweislich aktive Sensibilisierung auf ein Allergen ist sehr selten, dürfte aber einen Verstoß gegen die Pflichten aus dem Behandlungsvertrag darstellen und möglicherweise sogar den Tatbestand der Körperverletzung erfüllen. Die permanente Schädigung kann rechtlich schwerer wiegen als ein einmaliger Dosierungsfehler. Die strikte Anwendung von Leitlinienempfehlungen ist zur Vermeidung von systematischen und menschlichen Fehlern unabdingbar.

NaOH ist nicht NaCl – ulzeröse Reaktion auf Natronlauge bei der Epikutantestung der Inhaltsstoffe einer Sonnenschutzcreme

Bei der Epikutantestung mit patienteneigenem Material oder Einzelsubstanzen von komplexen Zubereitungen sind die Auswahl der Testsubstanzen und die Bedingungen, zu denen diese Substanzen getestet werden, von besonderer Wichtigkeit. Wir berichten über eine Patientin, bei der eine allergische Kontaktdermatitis nach Applikation einer Sonnencreme entstanden war. Im Rahmen der diagnostischen Epikutanteste wurden auch die einzelnen Inhaltstoffe der Sonnencreme, die vom Hersteller zur Verfügung gestellt worden waren, getestet. Dabei kam es zu einem folgenschweren Fehler, indem diese Inhaltsstoffe ohne ausreichende Überprüfung getestet wurden und u. a. Natronlauge appliziert wurde. Die entstandene Kolliquationsnekrose am Testort heilte erst innerhalb von ca. 2,5 Monaten spontan ab und gab Anlass für einen Haftpflichtfall. Die Aufarbeitung dieser Fehlleistung und die Konsequenzen, die in unserer Abteilung getroffen wurden, um dergleichen Probleme in Zukunft sicher vermeiden zu können, werden besprochen.

Akute Schwellung im Halsbereich nach iodhaltigem Kontrastmittel – der oft unerkannte Iodmumps anhand von drei Fallbeispielen

Es werden drei Patientinnen vorgestellt, die zur Abklärung einer akuten Halsschwellung nach einer Untersuchung mit iodierten Kontrastmitteln zugewiesen wurden. Bei allen drei war ein akutes Angioödem vermutet worden, das allerdings nicht ausreichend auf Antihistaminika und Kortikosteroide ansprach. Es wurde schließlich ein sog. „Iodmumps“ oder Iod-assoziierte Sialoadenopathie diagnostiziert. Sonografisch und histologisch finden sich lediglich ein Ödem der Speicheldrüsen, hingegen keine Hinweise für eine ausgeprägte entzündliche Reaktion. Diese Komplikation ist nicht so selten und wird von Iod selbst ausgelöst, wie mit einer Provokation mit Iod-Kaliumiodid (Lugolʼscher Lösung) nachgewiesen werden konnte. Die pathophysiologisch ungeklärte Iod-assoziierte Sialoadenopathie wird somit als idiosynkratische Reaktion klassifiziert.

Tätowierung durch intradermale Hauttests mit farbstoffhaltigen Medikamenten

Bei zwei Individuen, einem 72-jährigen Patienten und einer 20-jährigen Kontrollprobandin, wurde bei der Durchführung von Hauttests mit farbigen Medikamenten eine iatrogene Tätowierung verursacht. Der Patient hatte eine anaphylaktische Reaktion auf ein Eisenpräparat erlitten, und es bestand die zwingende Indikation für eine erneute intravenöse Eisensubstitution. Deshalb wurden weiterführende Abklärungen inklusive Hauttests durchgeführt. Die zweite Tätowierung erfolgte im Rahmen einer Studie zur Evaluation des irritativen Potenzials von Intradermaltests mit Isosulfanblau, einem diagnostischen Farbstoff. In beiden Fällen war vorab eine Einverständniserklärung bzw. ein Ethikvotum eingeholt worden, sodass es zu keinen weiteren rechtlichen Konsequenzen kam.

Kleine Ursache – große Wirkung: Spättyp-Hauttests mit Medikamenten als Auslöser von disseminierten Rezidivexanthemen

Es werden zwei Patienten vorgestellt, die wegen eines streuenden allergischen Kontakt- bzw. Arzneimittelexanthems auf Budesonid bzw. Antibiotika abgeklärt wurden. Bei beiden trat innerhalb einiger Stunden nach Anlegen eines Epikutantests mit Budesonid bzw. Intradermaltesten mit Amoxicillin eine stark positive Hauttestreaktion sowie ein Exanthem auf. Beim ersten Patienten lag eine Sensibilisierung auf die kreuzreagierenden Moleküle Budesonid und Amcinonid, bei der zweiten Patientin eine ausgeprägte Überempfindlichkeit auf Aminopenizilline vor. Aufflammphänomene (Flare-ups) sind v. a. aus der Kontaktallergologie bekannt, können aber auch bei der Abklärung von allergischen Arzneimittelexanthemen auftreten. Systemische Reaktionen vom verzögerten Typ auf Spättyp-Hauttests mit Medikamenten sind relativ selten, können aber eine erhebliche Morbidität bewirken. Verschiedene Formen von Aufflammphänomenen in der Allergologie werden diskutiert.

Isolierte Zungenschwellung nach Penizillin und negative Allergieabklärung – alles in Butter?

Penizilline können alle Arten spezifischer Immunreaktionen nach der erweiterten Coombs- und Gell-Klassifikation auslösen und zählen zu den häufigsten Ursachen unerwünschter Arzneimittelreaktionen. Das diagnostische Armamentarium umfasst neben den verschiedenen Hauttesten den Nachweis spezifischer IgE gegen allergene Determinanten am Betalaktam-Molekül und ggf. zelluläre Aktivierungsteste. Im Fall negativer Ergebnisse bei den genannten Testen kann ggf. noch die Toleranz im Rahmen eines Provokationstestes nachgewiesen werden. Die Sensitivität der diagnostischen Teste ist – mit Ausnahme des Provokationstests – aber limitiert, und falsch negative Teste sind möglich. Wir präsentieren zwei Fälle mit einer isolierten Zungenschwellung nach Gabe von Amoxicillin bei vollständig negativem, wiederholtem allergologischen Work-up. Bei beiden Patienten konnte die Überempfindlichkeit nur mit einer Reexposition nachgewiesen werden.

Aus den Augen, aus dem Sinn – Knacknuss-Anamnese bei disseminierten Arzneimittelexanthemen auf „vergessene“ Selbstmedikation

Es werden zwei Patienten vorgestellt, die zur Abklärung unklarer Exantheme zugewiesen wurden, bei beiden wurde die Diagnose initial nicht gestellt. Der erste Patient hatte ein ausgeprägtes Arzneimittelexanthem, die Patientin ein generalisiertes fixes Arzneimittelexanthem. Die wegen Verdacht auf Arzneimittelallergie durchgeführte aufwändige allergologische Diagnostik fiel zunächst unergiebig aus. Bei beiden wurde initial der Auslöser anamnestisch nicht erfasst, da die Patienten die Selbsttherapie mit frei verkäuflichen Medikamenten vergessen hatten oder als nicht relevant betrachteten. Erst auf intensive Befragung konnten die Auslöser Pseudoephedrin bzw. Paracetamol eruiert und bestätigt werden. Die zentrale Rolle einer umfassenden Anamneseerhebung und Dokumentation aller eingenommenen Therapeutika wird dargestellt.

Pricktest als Provokation – schwere anaphylaktische Reaktion auf Hauttests mit Ceftriaxon bei beruflicher Exposition

Es werden zwei Patienten vorgestellt, die wegen eines Asthma bronchiale bei beruflichem Kontakt mit Ceftriaxon abgeklärt wurden. Bei beiden trat innerhalb von Minuten nach Anlegen eines Pricktests mit Ceftriaxon eine adrenalinpflichtige, anaphylaktische Reaktion auf. Systemische Reaktionen auf Hauttests mit Betalaktamantibiotika sind relativ selten, sie können auch bei Patienten mit vorausgegangenen milden Symptomen wie Urtikaria oder beruflichen Kontaktallergien auf Betalaktame auftreten. Als Risikofaktoren werden schwere Anaphylaxien in der Anamnese und ein kurzes Reaktionsintervall genannt. Eine korrekte Durchführung der Hauttests mit Titration und eine adäquate Überwachung sind zu beachten.

Use of intravenous iron and risk of anaphylaxis: A multinational observational post-authorisation safety study in Europe

PURPOSE

This post-authorisation safety study estimated the risk of anaphylaxis in patients receiving intravenous (IV) iron in Europe, with interest in iron dextran and iron non-dextrans. Studies conducted in the United States have reported risk of anaphylaxis to IV iron ranging from 2.0 to 6.8 per 10 000 first treatments.

METHODS

Cohort study of IV iron new users, captured mostly through pharmacy ambulatory dispensing, from populations covered by health and administrative data sources in five European countries from 1999 to 2017. Anaphylaxis events were identified through an algorithm that used parenteral penicillin as a positive control.

RESULTS

A total of 304 210 patients with a first IV iron treatment (6367 iron dextran), among whom 13-16 anaphylaxis cases were identified and reported as a range to comply with data protection regulations. The pooled unadjusted incidence proportion (IP) ranged from 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-0.9) to 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3-1.0) per 10 000 first treatments. No events were identified at first dextran treatments. There were 231 294 first penicillin treatments with 30 potential cases of anaphylaxis (IP = 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-1.7 per 10 000 treatments).

CONCLUSION

We found an IP of anaphylaxis from 0.4 to 0.5 per 10 000 first IV iron treatments. The study captured only a fraction of IV iron treatments administered in hospitals, where most first treatments are likely to happen. Due to this limitation, the study could not exclude a differential risk of anaphylaxis between iron dextran and iron non-dextrans. The IP of anaphylaxis in users of penicillin was consistent with incidences reported in the literature.

European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA): Characteristics of patients patch tested and diagnosed with irritant contact dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is caused by the acute locally toxic effect of a strong irritant, or the cumulative exposure to various weaker physical and/or chemical irritants.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics of patients with ICD in the population patch tested in the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA; www.essca-dc.org) database.

METHODS

Data collected by the ESSCA in consecutively patch-tested patients from January 2009 to December 2018 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 68 072 patients, 8702 were diagnosed with ICD (without concomitant allergic contact dermatitis [ACD]). Hand and face were the most reported anatomical sites, and 45.7% of the ICD was occupational ICD (OICD). The highest proportions of OICD were found in metal turners, bakers, pastry cooks, and confectionery makers. Among patients diagnosed with ICD, 45% were found sensitized with no relevance for the current disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The hands were mainly involved in OICD also in the subgroup of patients with contact dermatitis, in whom relevant contact sensitization had been ruled out, emphasizing the need for limiting irritant exposures. However, in difficult-to-treat contact dermatitis, unrecognized contact allergy, or unrecognized clinical relevance of identified allergies owing to incomplete or wrong product ingredient information must always be considered.

Patch test results with the European baseline series and additions thereof in the ESSCA network, 2015-2018

BACKGROUND

Clinical surveillance of the prevalence of contact allergy in consecutively patch tested patients is a proven instrument to continually assess the importance of contact allergens (haptens) assembled in a baseline series.

OBJECTIVES

To present current results from the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies, including 13 countries represented by 1 to 11 departments.

METHODS

Anonymized or pseudonymized patch test and clinical data from various data capture systems used locally or nationally as transferred to the Erlangen data centre were pooled and descriptively analysed after quality control.

RESULTS

In the 4 years (2015-2018), data from 51 914 patients patch tested with the European baseline series (EBS) of contact allergens were analysed. Contact allergy to nickel was most frequent (17.6% positive), followed by contact allergy to fragrance mix I (6.9%), methylisothiazolinone (MI; 6.2%), and Myroxylon pereirae resin (balsam of Peru; 5.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

While the prevalence of MI contact allergy decreased substantially following regulatory intervention, the persistently high levels of allergy to metals, fragrances, other preservatives, and rubber chemicals point to problems needing further research and, potentially, preventive efforts. Results with national additions to the baseline series provide important information on substances possibly to be considered for inclusion in the EBS.

Towards a more precise diagnosis of hypersensitivity to beta-lactams - an EAACI position paper

A recent survey of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Drug Allergy Interest Group (DAIG) on how European allergy specialists deal with beta-lactam (BL) hypersensitivity demonstrated a significant heterogeneity in current practice, suggesting the need to review and update existing EAACI guidelines in order to make the diagnostic procedures as safe and accurate, but also as cost-effective, as possible. For this purpose, a bibliographic search on large studies regarding BL hypersensitivity diagnosis was performed by an EAACI task force, which reviewed and evaluated the literature data using the GRADE system for quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. The updated guidelines provide a risk stratification in BL hypersensitivity according to index reaction(s), as well as an algorithmic approach, based on cross-reactivity studies, in patients with a suspicion of BL hypersensitivity and an immediate need for antibiotic therapy, when referral to an allergist is not feasible. Furthermore, the update addresses availability and concentrations of skin test (ST) reagents, ST and drug provocation test (DPT) protocols, and diagnostic algorithms and administration of alternative BL in allergic subjects. Specifically, distinct diagnostic algorithms are suggested depending on risk stratification of the patient into high and low risk based on the morphology and chronology of the reaction, immediate (ie, occurring within 1-6 hours after the last administered dose) or nonimmediate (ie, occurring more than 1 hour after the initial drug administration), and the reaction severity. Regarding the allergy workup, the main novelty of this document is the fact that in some low-risk nonimmediate reactions ST are not mandatory, especially in children. For DPT, further studies are necessary to provide data supporting the standardization of protocols, especially of those regarding nonimmediate reactions, for which there is currently no consensus.

Towards a more precise diagnosis of hypersensitivity to beta-lactams - an EAACI position paper

A recent survey of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Drug Allergy Interest Group (DAIG) on how European allergy specialists deal with beta-lactam (BL) hypersensitivity demonstrated a significant heterogeneity in current practice, suggesting the need to review and update existing EAACI guidelines in order to make the diagnostic procedures as safe and accurate, but also as cost-effective, as possible. For this purpose, a bibliographic search on large studies regarding BL hypersensitivity diagnosis was performed by an EAACI task force, which reviewed and evaluated the literature data using the GRADE system for quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. The updated guidelines provide a risk stratification in BL hypersensitivity according to index reaction(s), as well as an algorithmic approach, based on cross-reactivity studies, in patients with a suspicion of BL hypersensitivity and an immediate need for antibiotic therapy, when referral to an allergist is not feasible. Furthermore, the update addresses availability and concentrations of skin test (ST) reagents, ST and drug provocation test (DPT) protocols, and diagnostic algorithms and administration of alternative BL in allergic subjects. Specifically, distinct diagnostic algorithms are suggested depending on risk stratification of the patient into high and low risk based on the morphology and chronology of the reaction, immediate (ie, occurring within 1-6 hours after the last administered dose) or nonimmediate (ie, occurring more than 1 hour after the initial drug administration), and the reaction severity. Regarding the allergy workup, the main novelty of this document is the fact that in some low-risk nonimmediate reactions ST are not mandatory, especially in children. For DPT, further studies are necessary to provide data supporting the standardization of protocols, especially of those regarding nonimmediate reactions, for which there is currently no consensus.

Atopy patch testing with aeroallergens in a large clinical population of dermatitis patients in Germany and Switzerland, 2000-2015: a retrospective multicentre study

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic significance of the atopy patch test for the management of dermatitis possibly triggered by aeroallergens is still controversial. However, sufficiently large studies with routinely tested standardized aeroallergen patch test preparations in dermatitis patients are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reaction frequency and the reaction profiles of 10 until mid-2015 commercially available, standardized aeroallergen patch test preparations of the 'Stallerpatch' test series (Stallergenes, Antony Cedex, France) in a large multicentre patient cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective data analysis of patients with suspected aeroallergen-dependent eczematous skin lesions was performed, who were patch tested in 15 Information Network of Departments of Dermatology-associated clinics between 2000 and 2015. Patients were stratified according to their atopic dermatitis (AD) status.

RESULTS

The study group included 3676 patients (median age 41 years, 34.8% males, 54.5% AD). The most common aeroallergens causing positive patch test reactions were Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (19.6%), Dermatophagoides farinae (16.9%), birch (6.2%), timothy grass (6.0%), cat dander (5.4%), mugwort (4.9%) and dog dander (4.6%). Reactions to other pollen allergen preparations, that is 5 grasses (3.2%), cocksfoot (2.1%) and plantain (1.6%), were less common. Positive patch test reactions to aeroallergens were consistently more frequent in patients with AD. These patients showed proportionally less dubious, follicular, irritant and weak positive reactions. Independent of AD status, a patient history of past or present allergic rhinitis was associated with an increased chance of a positive aeroallergen patch test reaction to pollen allergens.

CONCLUSION

The aeroallergen patch test is a useful add-on tool in clinical routine, especially in patients with AD and/or respiratory allergy. A patch test series comprising Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Dermatophagoides farinae, birch, timothy grass, cat dander and mugwort seems to be suitable. Controlled studies with specific provocation and elimination procedures are required to further evaluate the diagnostic significance of the proposed screening series.

The epidemic of methylisothiazolinone contact allergy in Europe: follow-up on changing exposures

BACKGROUND

Methylisothiazolinone (MI) has caused an unprecedented epidemic of contact allergy in Europe and elsewhere. Subsequently, regulatory action has been taken, at least in Europe, aiming at reducing risk of MI sensitization.

OBJECTIVE

To follow-up on the prevalence of contact allergy to MI in consecutively patch tested patients and assess the spectrum of products containing MI or methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI)/MI in patients positive to MI which elicited current allergic contact dermatitis.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was performed in 2016 and 2017, including all adult patients patch tested with the baseline series (including MI 0.2% aq.) between 1 May and 31 October at 14 centres in 11 European countries. Patients with positive reactions (+ to +++) to MI were further examined regarding history, clinical characteristics and eliciting products, which were categorized into 34 types and 4 classes (leave-on, rinse-off, household, occupational). The results were compared with the reference year 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 317 patients, n = 202 of 4278 tested in 2016 (4.72%) and n = 115 of 3879 tested in 2017 (2.96%), had positive reactions to MI; the previous result from 2015 was 5.97% (P < 0.0001). The share of currently relevant contact allergy among all positive reactions declined significantly as well (P = 0.0032). Concerning product classes, a relative decline of leave-on and a relative increase of rinse-off and household products was noted.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of MI contact allergy decreased by 50% from 2015 to 2017. As a consequence of regulation, the share of cosmetics products (leave-on in particular) eliciting allergic contact dermatitis is decreasing. The chosen method of analysing causative products in sensitized patients has proven useful to monitor effects of intervention.

Controversies in drug allergy: Testing for delayed reactions

Controversies exist with regard to in vivo approaches to delayed immunologically mediated adverse drug reactions, such as exanthem (maculopapular eruption), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, and fixed drug eruptions. In particular, widespread differences exist between regions and practice on the availability and use of intradermal and patch testing, the standard drug concentrations used, the use of additional drugs in intradermal and patch testing to help determine cross-reactivity, the timing of testing in relation to the occurrence of the adverse drug reaction, the use of testing in specific phenotypes, and the use of oral challenge in conjunction with delayed intradermal and patch testing to ascertain drug tolerance. It was noted that there have been advances in the science of delayed T cell-mediated reactions that have shed light on immunopathogenesis and provided a mechanism of preprescription screening in the case of HLA-B*57:01 and abacavir hypersensitivity and HLA-B*15:02 and carbamazepine Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis in Southeast Asian subjects. Future directions should include the collaboration of large international networks to develop and standardize in vivo diagnostic approaches, such as skin testing and patch testing, combined with ex vivo and in vitro laboratory approaches.

Metal hypersensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implant complications-A retrospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity to metals as a cause of implant-related complications has been a subject of controversy. Projections indicate an increase in the frequency of joint replacements of between 300% and 600% by the year 2030; therefore, this issue is of considerable interest.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate sensitization to implant materials in patients with implant-related complications, to identify allergens, and to clarify whether hypersensitivity is a relevant cause.

METHODS

Patients with implant-related complications or a positive history of contact allergy and planned total joint replacements referred for allergological investigation between 2004 and 2017 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 311 patients were included. A positive patch test reaction to a metal was seen in 64.4% of preoperative patients and in 54.6% of patients with implant-related complications. Common alloy metals such as cobalt, chromium and titanium gave positive reactions in up to 2.9% of patients with implant-related complications. None of the patients with skin changes had a positive patch test reaction to an implant metal.

CONCLUSION

Other factors, such as the type of replaced joint and mechanical stress, seem to be more relevant for implant-related complications. Sensitization to metals or other materials seems to rarely play a role, and is overestimated.

Delayed-type hypersensitivity to oral and parenteral drugs

Adverse drug reactions of the delayed type rank among the most common dermatoses and are predominantly characterized by exanthematous macular or maculopapular eruptions. However, approximately 2 % of affected individuals develop severe or even life-threatening systemic immune reactions associated with organ involvement, requiring immediate diagnosis and treatment. Numerous drugs are capable of eliciting delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions, with antibiotics, anticonvulsant drugs, and the xanthine oxidase inhibitor allopurinol being the most common. Apart from genetic susceptibility, predisposing factors for the development of drug hypersensitivity reactions include high drug doses, polypharmacy, long treatment duration, female gender, as well as acute or chronic infections.

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by a new temporary blue-black tattoo dye - sensitization to genipin from jagua (Genipa americana L.) fruit extract

BACKGROUND

Temporary tattoos made with an extract of the jagua fruit (Genipa americana L.) are becoming increasingly popular. It is claimed that it is 'dermatologically tested' and does not contain p-phenylenediamine. Extracts of jagua and gardenia fruits have been used by indigenous people in South America, as well as in traditional Chinese medicine, for centuries. Genipin is currently used for its cross-linking effect in the manufacture of polysaccharides, and is being investigated for its anti-inflammatory and other properties.

OBJECTIVES

To report the presence of the allergenic substance genipin in a self-administered temporary tattoo dye made from the fruit juice of jagua (Genipa americana L.).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 39-year-old female who repeatedly applied 'completely natural and 100% safe' Earth Jagua® tattoo, obtained via the internet, to her left hand developed allergic contact dermatitis within 6 weeks. Analysis of the dye showed the presence of geniposide and genipin.

RESULTS

Patch tests with the dye and with its main components, including genipin, gave strong positive reactions to the latter. There was no sensitization to other ingredients or p-amino compounds.

CONCLUSIONS

We report an extensively evaluated case of allergic contact dermatitis caused by a temporary Earth Jagua® tattoo. The allergen identified is genipin, a substance that is increasingly used for tattoos and as a therapeutic agent in medicine. This could result in an increase in the number of allergic reactions in the future.

Thaumatin and gum arabic allergy in chewing gum factory workers

Thaumatin is a sweetener and flavor modifier commonly used in the food industry. Likewise, gum arabic is widely used as a food stabilizer and thickening agent. We report here that a powder mixture composed of 10% thaumatin and 90% gum arabic led to allergic symptoms in the upper airways in occupationally exposed individuals: four of eight workers of a chewing gum factory exposed to this powder mixture had pronounced rhinitis. A positive skin prick test result for pure thaumatin was obtained in all four individuals with rhinitis of whom two also had a positive skin prick test result for pure gum arabic and gum arabic-specific IgE. Subsitution of a powdered thaumatin with a liquid form reduced symptoms among the rhinitic workers. Although gum arabic is a well-known potential allergen, we were unable to find prior documentation of allergic symptoms to thaumatin when it is used in the food industry.

Rhinitis in Swiss adults is associated with asthma and early life factors, but not second hand tobacco smoke or obesity

BACKGROUND

Second hand tobacco smoke (SHS) and overweight/obesity are risk factors for asthma and lower airway respiratory symptoms. We investigated whether SHS or overweight/obesity were also associated with allergic or non-allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data were obtained during the second SAPALDIA Study. Interviewer administered questionnaires were completed by 8047 participants from 8 communities in Switzerland. Blood was collected from 5841 participants and tested for allergen specific IgE. Allergic rhinitis was defined as nasal symptoms with detectable IgE. Data were analysed by multinomial logistic regression with four outcome categories defined according to the presence or absence of rhinitis and/or atopy.

RESULTS

The prevalence of allergic rhinitis was 885 (15.2%) and non-allergic rhinitis 323 (5.5%). The risk of allergic rhinitis was increased in subjects with physician diagnosed asthma (Relative Risk Ratio 6.81; 95%CI 5.39, 8.6), maternal atopy (1.56; 1.27, 1.92) and paternal atopy (1.41; 1.11, 1.79). Older subjects were at lower risk (0.96; 0.95,0.97 per year), as were those raised on a farm (0.64; 0.49,0.84), with older siblings (0.92; 0.86,0.97 per sib) or from rural areas. The risk of non-allergic rhinitis was also increased in subjects with physician diagnosed asthma (4.02; 2.86, 5.67), reduced in males (0.59; 0.46, 0.77), but not associated with upbringing on a farm or older siblings. There were no significant associations of SHS or overweight/obesity with either form of rhinitis.

CONCLUSIONS

Allergic and non-allergic rhinitis have different risk factors apart from asthma. There are significant regional variations within Switzerland, which are not explained by the factors examined.

Arzneimittelallergien: klinische Präsentation und Warnzeichen

Zusammenfassung. Prinzipiell können alle Medikamente allergische Reaktionen auslösen, allerdings gibt es erhebliche Unterschiede in der Häufigkeit und klinischen Präsentation. Antibiotika, Antiepileptika und NSAIDs gehören zu den häufigsten Auslösern. Das Risiko für Sensibilisierungen und für schwere Verläufe hängt vom Aussmass der Immunaktivierung des Einzelnen ab, von Dosis, Dauer der Behandlung, Verabreichungsart, Geschlecht und bei einigen Substanzen auch von HLA-Merkmalen. Im vorliegenden Artikel werden die häufigsten immunmediierten Hypersensitivitätsreaktionen gegen Arzneimittel vorgestellt und auf klinische Warnzeichen für schwere Verläufe hingewiesen.

Guideline for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: S2K-Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) and the German Dermatological Society (DDG) in collaboration with the Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the German Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (ÖGAI), the German Academy of Allergology and Environmental Medicine (DAAU), the German Center for Documentation of Severe Skin Reactions and the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Products (BfArM)

Drug hypersensitivity reactions are unpredictable adverse drug reactions. They manifest either within 1–6 h following drug intake (immediate reactions) with mild to life-threatening symptoms of anaphylaxis, or several hours to days later (delayed reactions), primarily as exanthematous eruptions. It is not always possible to detect involvement of the immune system (allergy). Waiving diagnostic tests can result in severe reactions on renewed exposure on the one hand, and to unjustified treatment restrictions on the other. With this guideline, experts from various specialist societies and institutions have formulated recommendations and an algorithm for the diagnosis of allergies. The key principles of diagnosing allergic/hypersensitivity drug reactions are presented. Where possible, the objective is to perform allergy diagnostics within 4 weeks–6 months following the reaction. A clinical classification of symptoms based on the morphology and time course of the reaction is required in order to plan a diagnostic work-up. In the case of typical symptoms of a drug hypersensitivity reaction and unequivocal findings from validated skin and/or laboratory tests, a reaction can be attributed to a trigger with sufficient confidence. However, skin and laboratory tests are often negative or insufficiently reliable. In such cases, controlled provocation testing is required to clarify drug reactions. This method is reliable and safe when attention is paid to indications and contraindications and performed under appropriate medical supervision. The results of the overall assessment are discussed with the patient and documented in an „allergy passport“ in order to ensure targeted avoidance in the future and allow the use of alternative drugs where possible.

Hypersensitivity from intravenous iron products

In the last several years, intravenous therapy with iron products has been more widely used. Although it has been a standard procedure in dialysis-associated anemia since the early 1990s, its use is expanding to a host of conditions associated with iron deficiency, especially young women with heavy uterine bleeding and pregnancy. Free iron is associated with unacceptable high toxicity inducing severe, hemodynamically significant symptoms. Subsequently, formulations that contain the iron as an iron carbohydrate nanoparticle have been designed. With newer formulations, including low-molecular-weight iron dextran, iron sucrose, ferric gluconate, ferumoxytol, iron isomaltoside, and ferric carboxymaltose, serious adverse events are rare.

Systemic Allergic Reaction to the GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Exenatide

Objective: To report a case of systemic hypersensitivity to the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist exenatide used in diabetes care to provide significant information within the context of postmarketing safety surveillance of this new drug class. Case Summary: We report on a 52-year-old male with insufficiently controlled diabetes. GLP-1 agonist treatment was indicated and the patient was started on 5 to 10 µg exenatide (Byetta) twice daily, which had to be stopped after 1 month due to intolerable nausea. One year later, an attempt with 0.6 to 1.8 mg liraglutide (Victoza) once daily was well tolerated but lacked efficacy after a few months. Finally, the patient was started on 2 mg exenatide (Bydureon) once weekly. Concomitant treatment included metformine 1000 mg twice daily and candesartan/hydrochlorothiazide (Blopress Plus) 16/12.5 mg once daily. A few hours after the second injection, local urticaria and disseminated pruritus evolved and after the third injection pruritus, urticaria, and shortness of breath developed, which resolved to antihistamines and corticosteroids. Intradermal tests were positive for Byetta (1:1000) and Bydureon (1:100) (both exenatide), while Victoza (liraglutide) was negative (1:10). Specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to the drugs was not available for testing. Discussion: An objective causality assessment revealed that the adverse effect to exenatide (Bydureon) was probable (Naranjo probability scale: score of 8). Consistency was established through positive skin tests and the biological explanation that the administration of GLP-1 receptor agonists has been associated with antibody formation. Conclusion: Considering emerging use of GLP-1 receptor agonists, systemic hypersensitivity should be recognized as a risk in clinical practice.

[The significance of an allergological examination in asthma and COPD]

Of the two most common obstructive lung diseases - bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) - asthma is clearly associated with a possible allergic background, therefore an allergological examination should be included in the work-up of this disease. COPD on the other hand is usually not expected to be linked with an atopic diathesis. Medical history, clinical manifestations, the presence of other atopic diseases, prick tests and measurement of specific IgE antibodies in the serum provide an indication of an allergic genesis of the obstructive pulmonary disease. Bronchial asthma can be roughly divided into an allergic phenotype (TH2-weighted) and a non-allergic phenotype (non-TH2-weighted). The TH2- weighted form leads to an infiltration of eosinophils into the bronchial wall allowing the possibility of a higher concentration of nitrogen oxide in the exhaled air (FeNO measurement) to be detected. In addition to the differentiation between allergic and non-allergic bronchial obstruction, an evaluation of symptoms associated with the workplace (work related asthma) must take place. Furthermore, questions about an intolerance to aspirin (aspirin - exacerbated respiratory disease) or exercise induced symptoms (exercise-induced asthma) should be asked. After a careful interpretation of clinical symptoms and findings in allergy tests, an allergologist can analyze the usefulness of a specific immunotherapy (SIT). For children who suffer from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, an early SIT can prevent the shift to inflammation of the lower respiratory tract (asthma). Due to the overlapping pathophysiology and symptomatology between bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease an allergological examination should be considered also in COPD patients.

[Allergies to betalactam-antibiotics: when and how to evaluate?]

When there is the suspicion of an allergic reaction to betalactam-antibiotics, the allergological evaluation is an important tool to confirm the allergy and to test alternative medicaments. As all the testing methods for the allergologic evaluation (cutaneous tests and in-vitro tests) don't have a high sensitivity, a broad case report and the former documentation of the symptoms and diagnostic findings are essential, to enable a high significance of the examination and to assess the indication for the provocation test which is the gold standard in many cases. The documentation of the time flow is basic, to differentiate between immediate reactions (hours after intake) and nonimmediate reactions (several days after intake). The diagnostic evaluation not later than after six months increases the prospects for a successful allergic evaluation.

Irritant contact dermatitis from a black henna tattoo without sensitization to para-phenylendiamine

Allergic contact dermatitis from nonpermanent black henna tattoos has been frequently reported, particularly in children. Contamination or adulteration of the dyes with para-phenylendiamine has been identified as major cause of active sensitization and elicitation of severe allergic contact dermatitis. Sequelae include permanent sensitization, hyper- or hypopigmentation, scarring, keloids, and hypertrichosis. We report a rare case of irritant dermatitis to an unknown ingredient in a black henna tattoo with consecutive hypopigmentation. Sensitization to para-phenylendiamine and other para-compounds was excluded by patch test evaluation. This is relevant for future exposure to consumer products such as hair dyes or in occupational settings. Generally, black henna tattoos, particularly if done with dyes of unknown composition, should be strongly discouraged.