Predictors of in-hospital mortality in HIV-infected patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Underlying immunodeficiency is associated with severe COVID-19, but the prognosis of persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PWH) with COVID-19 is under debate. Aim: assessment of the mortality rate and major determinants of death in HIV-infected patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in Spain before vaccine availability. Design: Retrospective nationwide public database analysis.

METHODS

Nationwide, retrospective, observational analysis of all hospitalizations with COVID-19 during year 2020 in Spain. Stratification was made according to HIV status. The National Registry of Hospital Discharges was used with the ICD-10 coding list.

RESULTS

A total of 117 694 adults were hospitalized with COVID-19 during 2020. Only 234 (0.2%) were HIV-positives. More than 95% were on antiretroviral therapy. Compared to HIV-negatives, PWH were younger (mean age 53.2 vs. 66.5 years old; P<0.001) and more frequently male (74.8% vs. 56.6%; P<0.001). Most co-morbidities predisposing to severe COVID-19 (diabetes, hypertension, dementia and cardiovascular disease) were more frequent in HIV-negatives. In contrast, the rate of baseline liver disease was over 6-fold higher in PWH (27.4% vs. 4.4%; P<0.001). In-hospital mortality was lower in PWH (9.4% vs. 16%; P=0.004). In multivariate analysis, older age, dementia and especially advanced liver disease (relative risk (RR): 7.6) were the major determinants of death in PWH hospitalized with COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

HIV-infected patients hospitalized in Spain with COVID-19 during 2020 had better survival than HIV-negatives, most likely explained by younger age and lower rate of co-morbidities. However, advanced liver disease was a major predictor of death in PWH hospitalized with COVID-19.

Clinical experience with integrase inhibitors in HIV-2-infected individuals in Spain

BACKGROUND

HIV-2 is a neglected virus despite estimates of 1-2 million people being infected worldwide. The virus is naturally resistant to some antiretrovirals used to treat HIV-1 and therapeutic options are limited for patients with HIV-2.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we analysed all HIV-2-infected individuals treated with integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) recorded in the Spanish HIV-2 cohort. Demographics, treatment modalities, laboratory values, quantitative HIV-2 RNA and CD4 counts as well as drug resistance were analysed.

RESULTS

From a total of 354 HIV-2-infected patients recruited by the Spanish HIV-2 cohort as of December 2017, INSTIs had been given to 44, in 18 as first-line therapy and in 26 after failing other antiretroviral regimens. After a median follow-up of 13 months of INSTI-based therapy, undetectable viraemia for HIV-2 was achieved in 89% of treatment-naive and in 65.4% of treatment-experienced patients. In parallel, CD4 gains were 82 and 126 cells/mm3, respectively. Treatment failure occurred in 15 patients, 2 being treatment-naive and 13 treatment-experienced. INSTI resistance changes were recognized in 12 patients: N155H (5), Q148H/R (3), Y143C/G (3) and R263K (1).

CONCLUSIONS

Combinations based on INSTIs are effective and safe treatment options for HIV-2-infected individuals. However, resistance mutations to INSTIs are selected frequently in failing patients, reducing the already limited treatment options.

Drug-Induced Lung Injury in a Liver Transplant Patient Treated With Sofosbuvir

New direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have dramatically improved sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in patients treated for chronic hepatitis C. Although the safety of these agents has been very good in registration trials, unexpected side effects have been reported after much broader use of DAAs on marketing. We retrospectively examined all liver transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C that received sofosbuvir-based regimens at our clinic. A total of 24 liver transplant recipients with recurrent chronic hepatitis C had received sofosbuvir up to April 2015. Regimens were as follows: sofosbuvir+simeprevir (8), SOF+ledipasvir (6), sofosbuvir+daclatasvir (5) and sofosbuvir+ribavirin (5). Overall, treatment was very well tolerated with only mild adverse events in 42% of patients. However, a 52-year-old woman developed severe respiratory failure within 10 days after beginning sofosbuvir+daclatasvir. High-resolution computerized tomography showed areas of diffused ground-glass opacities in both lungs, suggesting drug-induced lung injury. The bronchoalveolar lavage showed marked signs of acute inflammation without recovering any infectious agent. The patient was treated with high-dose corticosteroids and steadily recovered. DAA therapy was not discontinued, but sofosbuvir was replaced by simeprevir. She reached sustained virologic response after completing 24 weeks of DAA therapy. Given the close temporal association, radiologic and bronchoalveolar lavage findings, and negative work-up for infectious agents, we postulated that sofosbuvir was the most likely explanation for drug-induced lung injury in our patient.

Hepatitis C virus coinfection independently increases the risk of cardiovascular disease in HIV-positive patients

Patients infected with HIV are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease despite successful antiretroviral therapy. Likewise, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with extrahepatic complications, including cardiovascular disease. However the risk of cardiovascular disease has not been formally examined in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. A retrospective study was carried out to assess the influence of HCV coinfection on the risk of cardiovascular events in a large cohort of HIV-infected patients recruited since year 2004. A composite event of cardiovascular disease was used as an endpoint, including myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke or death due to any of them. A total of 1136 patients (567 HIV-monoinfected, 70 HCV-monoinfected and 499 HIV/HCV-coinfected) were analysed. Mean age was 42.7 years, 79% were males, and 46% were former injection drug users. Over a mean follow-up of 79.4 ± 21 months, 3 patients died due to cardiovascular disease, whereas 29 suffered a first episode of coronary ischaemia or stroke. HIV/HCV-coinfected patients had a greater incidence of cardiovascular disease events and/or death than HIV-monoinfected individuals (4% vs 1.2%, P = 0.004) and HCV-monoinfected persons (4% vs 1.4%, P = 0.5). After adjusting for demographics, virological parameters and classical cardiovascular disease risk factors (smoking, hypertension, diabetes, high LDL cholesterol), both HIV/HCV coinfection (HR 2.91; CI 95%: 1.19-7.12; P = 0.02) and hypertension (HR 3.65; CI 95%: 1.34-9.94; P = 0.01) were independently associated with cardiovascular disease events and/or death in HIV-infected patients. Chronic hepatitis C and hypertension are independently associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk in HIV-infected patients. Therefore, treatment of chronic hepatitis C should be prioritized in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients regardless of any liver fibrosis staging.

Transmission of HIV Drug Resistance and the Predicted Effect on Current First-line Regimens in Europe

Transmitted human immunodeficiency virus drug resistance in Europe is stable at around 8%. The impact of baseline mutation patterns on susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs should be addressed using clinical guidelines. The impact on baseline susceptibility is largest for nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Background. Numerous studies have shown that baseline drug resistance patterns may influence the outcome of antiretroviral therapy. Therefore, guidelines recommend drug resistance testing to guide the choice of initial regimen. In addition to optimizing individual patient management, these baseline resistance data enable transmitted drug resistance (TDR) to be surveyed for public health purposes. The SPREAD program systematically collects data to gain insight into TDR occurring in Europe since 2001.

Methods. Demographic, clinical, and virological data from 4140 antiretroviral-naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–infected individuals from 26 countries who were newly diagnosed between 2008 and 2010 were analyzed. Evidence of TDR was defined using the WHO list for surveillance of drug resistance mutations. Prevalence of TDR was assessed over time by comparing the results to SPREAD data from 2002 to 2007. Baseline susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs was predicted using the Stanford HIVdb program version 7.0.

Results. The overall prevalence of TDR did not change significantly over time and was 8.3% (95% confidence interval, 7.2%–9.5%) in 2008–2010. The most frequent indicators of TDR were nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations (4.5%), followed by nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) mutations (2.9%) and protease inhibitor mutations (2.0%). Baseline mutations were most predictive of reduced susceptibility to initial NNRTI-based regimens: 4.5% and 6.5% of patient isolates were predicted to have resistance to regimens containing efavirenz or rilpivirine, respectively, independent of current NRTI backbones.

Conclusions. Although TDR was highest for NRTIs, the impact of baseline drug resistance patterns on susceptibility was largest for NNRTIs. The prevalence of TDR assessed by epidemiological surveys does not clearly indicate to what degree susceptibility to different drug classes is affected.

Changes in liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients following different outcomes with peginterferon plus ribavirin therapy

There is scarce information about the impact of antiviral treatment on subsequent progression of liver fibrosis in HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C who experience different outcomes following peginterferon-ribavirin therapy. We conducted a retrospective study of a cohort of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with longitudinal assessment of liver fibrosis using elastometry. Patients were split out into four groups according to the prior peginterferon-ribavirin response: sustained virological response (SVR), relapse (R), partial response (PR) and null response (NR). A group of untreated, coinfected patients was taken as control. Significant liver fibrosis progression (sLFP) was defined as a shift from baseline Metavir estimates ≤ F2 to F3-F4, or by >30% increase in liver stiffness in patients with baseline F3-F4. Conversely, significant liver fibrosis regression (sLFR) was defined as a shift from baseline Metavir estimates F3-F4 to ≤ F2, or by >30% reduction in liver stiffness in patients that kept on F3-F4. A total of 498 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were examined. They were classified as follows: 138 (27.7%) SVR, 40 (8%) R, 61 (12.2%) PR, 71 (14.3%) NR and 188 (37.8%) naive. After a mean follow-up of 53.3 months, sLFP occurred less frequently in patients with SVR (7.2%) compared with R (25%; P = 0.002), PR (23%; P = 0.002), NR (29.6%; P < 0.001) and naïve (19.7%; P = 0.002). Conversely, sLFR was 26.1% in SVR compared with 10% in R (P = 0.03), 14.8% in PR (P = 0.06), 16.9% in NR (P = 0.07) and 10.6% in naïve (P < 0.001). Sustained clearance of serum HCV-RNA following a course of antiviral treatment is the major determinant of liver fibrosis regression in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

Multicenter evaluation of the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 assay for the quantitative detection of HIV-1 RNA in plasma

The Nuclisens EasyQ HIV-1 v1.1 assay (Biomerieux) is a real-time detection method combined with NASBA technology designed to measure plasma HIV-RNA. Its performance was assessed in 1008 clinical specimens collected from individuals infected with clade B (774) and non-B (234) HIV-1 variants at four European laboratories. The results were compared with those obtained using three other commercial viral load assays: Cobas Amplicor Monitor HIV-1 v1.5 (Roche), Versant HIV-1 RNA assay (Bayer) and Nuclisens HIV-1 QT (Biomerieux). Overall, the linearity, specificity and reproducibility of the EasyQ assay was comparable with that from the other tests. The correlation coefficient (R) between methodologies was 0.85 for Amplicor; 0.87 for Versant; and 0.91 for Nuclisens. The specificity of the assay was 99.4%. Of note, Versant missed 17% of specimens with non-B subtypes which could be detected by EasyQ, while Amplicor provided similar results than EasyQ. HIV-1 group O specimens were only detected by the EasyQ assay. In conclusion, the performance of the EasyQ assay seems to be similar to that of other HIV-1 viral load tests currently on the market, but it is more sensitive than Versant for HIV-1 non-B subtypes and shows a wider dynamic range than Amplicor. Moreover, as it incorporates the advantage of real-time detection procedures, it facilitates high throughput and short turnaround time.

Drug resistance in patients experiencing early virological failure under a triple combination including indinavir

OBJECTIVE

To assess the pattern of drug resistance mutations selected in HIV-1-infected patients failing a first line triple combination therapy including indinavir.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Plasma samples from 87 patients collected at the time of the first virological rebound (> 50 HIV-RNA copies/ml) were examined for the presence of drug-resistant genotypes.

RESULTS

The mean level of plasma viraemia at rebound was 7824 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml in 73 subjects with good compliance, whereas it was 359,460 HIV-1 RNA copies/ml in 14 patients who admitted to poor adherence. Genetic sequence analysis yielded results for 51 (70%) of the patients having good adherence. More than half of them (26/51, 51%) carried primary mutations associated with resistance to nucleoside analogues. In contrast, primary protease inhibitor resistance mutations were recognized less frequently (14/51, 27%; P < 0.05). Moreover, in 23 (45%) patients there was no evidence of drug-resistant viruses at all. The most frequent drug-resistant genotypes in the reverse transcriptase gene were at codons 184 (n = 19), 215 (n = 14) and 41 (n = 8), whereas for the protease they were at codons 46 (n = 10), 82 (n = 9) and 90 (n = 7). No resistance genotypes were found among non-compliant patients.

CONCLUSION

The overall rate of drug-resistant HIV genotypes was 38% (28/73) in patients with good adherence and who were experiencing a first virological failure under a triple combination regimen including indinavir; resistance to nucleoside analogues was more frequent than resistance to indinavir. Therefore, treatment intensification in those patients without resistance, or a selective substitution of nucleosides in those with resistance limited to these compounds, might be justified.

Monitoring the response to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 group O infected patients using two new RT-PCR assays

Failure to recognise infection caused by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) group O variants has been described using both serological and genetic procedures. Moreover, monitoring the response to antiretroviral therapy is a difficult task in patients infected with HIV-1 group O since commercial tests are not available so far for the quantitation of this virus. In this study, the virological response to antiretroviral therapy were assessed in five HIV-1 group O-infected patients living in Spain by using two new and different RT-PCR methods (MUPROVAMA and LCx). Twenty-four plasma samples belonging to these five patients were selected. As reference, p24 antigenaemia levels and CD4+ cell counts were used. All samples yielded positive viral load values using MUPROVAMA (range: 138 to 595,500 HIV-RNA copies/ml) and 23 of 24 using LCx (range: < 178 to 98,356 HIV-RNA copies/ml). Overall, the results obtained using both assays showed a good correlation among themselves, and in respect to p24 antigenaemia and CD4+ cell counts. However, the values provided by LCx were significantly lower (0.33 logs on average) than those provided by MUPROVAMA. In conclusion, both the highly sensitive MUPROVAMA and LCx Quantitative assays might represent an useful tool for guiding the decision on when start treatment and for monitoring the response to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 group O-infected patients.

Efficacy and safety of didanosine and lamivudine both once daily plus indinavir in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

BACKGROUND

The combination of didanosine (DDI) and lamivudine (3TC) has been not recommended in guidelines for the first-line treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection because two major considerations might reduce its efficacy. First, both drugs are non-thymidine nucleosides and might exert less antiviral activity on activated T cells. Second, the codon 184 mutation emerging under 3TC failure could confer cross-resistance to DDI. However, because the intracellular half-life of their active metabolites allows administration once daily, the resulting improvement in patient compliance should favor this combination over others.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the virologic and immunologic outcome at 6 months in 46 naive HIV-infected patients (41% were intravenous drug users) who began a treatment of a triple combination of DDI, 3TC, and indinavir (IDV) with the schedule optimized to improve adherence. Both DDI and 3TC were administered once daily (450 mg and 300 mg, respectively) and IDV was taken twice daily (1,200 mg). Patients chose schedules at their convenience, according to their job timings and preferences. All had a plasma viral load (PVL) of more than 500 HIV-RNA copies/mL at the time they entered the study, and overall the mean PVL value was 54,201 copies/mL.

RESULTS

Overall, nine patients did not complete the study period: two died of non-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related causes, three described severe gastrointestinal symptoms, one discontinued therapy voluntarily, and three were lost to follow-up. Among the remaining 37 patients, a PVL value of less than 500 copies/mL was reached by 31 (83.7%) patients, and values below 40 copies/mL were recorded in 71% (22/31) of them. Overall, a clinically significant increase in the CD4 cell count (more than 60 cells/microL) was seen in 70.2% (26/37) of patients. Treatment adherence, assessed using both self-reporting and the pill count method, was considered good (more than 90% of pills prescribed were taken) in all but four patients; three of them were among those six who did not reach undetectable PVL values at the sixth month. Mutations at codons 184, 74, 65, and 151, which confer resistance to 3TC and DDI, could be examined in 12 of the 15 patients having PVL values above 40 copies/mL at the sixth month. The codon 184 mutation emerged in 25%, meanwhile the codon 74 mutation only appeared in one patient; none carried the codon 151 mutant genotype. Nine months after beginning treatment, 29 (93.5%) of the 31 patients who reached less than 500 copies/mL at the sixth month still sustained PVL values below this threshold, and 25 (80.6%) had less than 40 copies/mL.

CONCLUSION

The combination of DDI and 3TC both once daily plus IDV twice daily is well tolerated, seems to favor a good adherence, and shows significant antiviral activity.

Different outcomes in patients achieving complete or partial viral load suppression on antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Potent combination antiretroviral therapy can reduce HIV plasma viral load (VL) to levels below the detection limit for as long as 2 years or more. A VL <500 HIV RNA copies/mL was until recently considered a reasonable therapeutic goal. However, lower levels seem necessary if VL rebounds and development of drug resistance are to be avoided.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The clinical and virologic outcome at 1 year were prospectively examined in a group of 100 patients who began a triple combination antiretroviral therapy regimen consisting of stavudine (d4T), lamivudine (3TC), and indinavir (IDV). A modified ultrasensitive VL test with a detection limit of 40 copies/mL and a point mutation nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for detecting the codon 184 mutation conferring 3TC resistance were used for testing samples collected longitudinally from these individuals.

RESULTS

Overall, VL values <40 copies/mL were reached in 45% and 32% of patients at nadir and at 12 months, respectively. More than half (24 of 45 persons) who achieved a level <40 copies/mL at nadir remained with undetectable VL at 1 year, whereas this occurred in only one fourth (7 of 28 persons) of those having levels of 40 to 500 copies/mL (P < .05). However, rebounds in VL to >500 copies/mL at 1 year were seen at similar rates (26.6% and 25%, respectively) in persons achieving either complete (<40 copies/mL) or partial (40-500 copies/mL) VL suppression at nadir. In contrast, the codon 184 mutation emerged more frequently at 1 year in patients whose VL remained between 40 and 500 copies/mL at nadir than in those who reached a level <40 copies/mL (30.7% versus 0%; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Plasma VL at nadir after beginning highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) predicts the 1-year outcome. The achievement of levels of viremia <40 copies/mL are desirable during antiretroviral therapy if prolonged benefit is to be obtained. Because more than two thirds of persons with residual viremia do not show drug resistance, intensification strategies should be investigated for those patients with a good virologic response but without complete suppression during the first 6 months on HAART.

Comparison of three different commercial methods for measuring plasma viraemia in patients infected with non-B HIV-1 subtypes

In order to determine whether commercial assays presently in use for the quantification of plasma human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA levels detect different genetic viral subtypes with the same reliability, a panel of 38 samples corresponding to 22 HIV-1-infected patients, representing non-B subtypes A-F, was examined. One to three plasma samples belonging to each individual were tested by the second-generation HIV-1 branched DNA (bDNA) assay (Chiron, Spain), the Nuclisens assay (Organon-Teknika, Spain), the Amplicor Monitor reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay (Roche, Spain), and the Ultradirect Monitor (Roche) using primers specifically designed to amplify non-B HIV-1 subtypes. Each of the different methods for measuring viral load showed a distinct sensitivity for non-B HIV-1 subtypes. Values higher than the assay detection limit were obtained in 22 (57.9%), 33 (86.8%), and 37 (93.3%) samples using the bDNA, Nuclisens, and Monitor assays, respectively. Significantly different values (>0.5 logs) were found in 55.3%, 81.6%, and 71.1% of specimens comparing results provided by bDNA and Nuclisens, bDNA and Monitor, and Nuclisens and Monitor, respectively. Quantitative values provided by the Ultradirect Monitor test using non-B primers were particularly discordant with the other tests. Overall, 44.7% of samples yielded higher viral load values with this assay than with the regular Monitor assay, reflecting its enhanced sensitivity for non-B subtypes; however, the reproducibility of this test was low. These results support the recommendation of always using the same assay when monitoring plasma viraemia.