1
|
Fang S, Lu J, Zhou X, Wang Y, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE, Cormier JN, Wargo J, Sui D, Amos CI, Lee JE. Functional annotation of melanoma risk loci identifies novel susceptibility genes. Carcinogenesis 2020; 41:452-457. [PMID: 31630191 DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgz173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome-wide association study (GWAS)-identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are tag SNPs located in both transcribed and non-coding regulatory DNA regions, rather than representing causal or functional variants for disease. To identify functional variants or genes for melanoma susceptibility, we used functional mapping and annotation (FUMA) to perform functional annotation of the summary statistics of 2541 significant melanoma risk SNPs (P < 5 × 10-8) identified by GWAS. The original GWAS melanoma study included 15 990 cases and 26 409 controls, representing the largest international meta-analysis of melanoma susceptibility. We prioritized 330 unique genes, including those in immune cytokine signaling pathways, from 19 loci through positional, expression quantitative trait locus, and chromatin interaction mapping. In comparison, only 38 melanoma-related genes were identified in the original meta-analysis. In addition to the well-known melanoma susceptibility genes confirmed in the meta-analysis (MC1R, CDKN2A, TERT, OCA2 and ARNT/SETDB1), we also identified additional novel genes using FUMA to map SNPs to genes. Through chromatin interaction mapping, we prioritized IFNA7, IFNA10, IFNA16, IFNA17, IFNA14, IFNA6, IFNA21, IFNA4, IFNE and IFNA5; these 10 most significant genes are all involved in immune system and cytokine signaling pathways. In the gene analysis, we identified 72 genes with a P < 2.5 × 10-6. The genes associated with melanoma risk were DEF8 (P = 1.09 × 10-57), DBNDD1 (P = 2.19 × 10-42), SPATA33 (P = 3.54 × 10-38) and MC1R (P = 1.04 × 10-36). In summary, this study identifies novel putative melanoma susceptibility genes and provides a guide for further experimental validation of functional variants and disease-related genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shenying Fang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jiachun Lu
- The Institute for Chemical Carcinogenesis, Collaborative Innovation Center for Environmental Toxicity, School of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xinke Zhou
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuling Wang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dawen Sui
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haydu LE, Lo SN, McQuade JL, Amaria RN, Wargo J, Ross MI, Cormier JN, Lucci A, Lee JE, Ferguson SD, Saw RP, Spillane AJ, Shannon KF, Stretch JR, Hwu P, Patel SP, Diab A, Wong MK, Glitza Oliva IC, Tawbi H, Carlino MS, Menzies AM, Long GV, Lazar AJ, Tetzlaff MT, Scolyer RA, Gershenwald JE, Thompson JF, Davies MA. Cumulative Incidence and Predictors of CNS Metastasis for Patients With American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Stage III Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:1429-1441. [PMID: 31990608 PMCID: PMC7193747 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Improved understanding of the incidence, risk factors, and timing of CNS metastasis is needed to inform surveillance strategies for patients with melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical data were extracted from the databases of 2 major melanoma centers in the United States and Australia for 1,918 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition stage III melanoma, diagnosed from 1998-2014, who had (negative) baseline CNS imaging within 4 months of diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of CNS metastasis was calculated in the presence of the competing risk of death, from stage III presentation and at benchmark time points 1, 2, and 5 years postdiagnosis. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 70.2 months, distant recurrence occurred in 711 patients (37.1%). The first site of distant metastasis was CNS only for 3.9% of patients, CNS and extracranial (EC) for 1.8%, and EC only for 31.4%. Overall, 16.7% of patients were diagnosed with CNS metastasis during follow-up. The cumulative incidence of CNS metastasis was 3.6% (95% CI, 2.9% to 4.6%) at 1 year, 9.6% (95% CI, 8.3% to 11.0%) at 2 years, and 15.8% (95% CI, 14.1% to 17.6%) at 5 years. The risk of CNS metastasis was significantly influenced by patient sex, age, AJCC stage, primary tumor site, and primary tumor mitotic rate in multivariable and conditional analyses. High primary tumor mitotic rate was significantly associated with increased risk of CNS metastasis at diagnosis and all subsequent time points examined. CONCLUSION Similar rates of CNS metastasis were observed in 2 large, geographically distinct cohorts of patients with stage III melanoma. The results highlight the importance of primary tumor mitotic rate. Furthermore, they provide a framework for developing evidence-based surveillance strategies and evaluating the impact of contemporary adjuvant therapies on the risk of CNS metastasis development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E. Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Serigne N. Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer L. McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rodabe N. Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jennifer Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Merrick I. Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Janice N. Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey E. Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sherise D. Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Robyn P.M. Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew J. Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kerwin F. Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan R. Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sapna P. Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael K.K. Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Isabella C. Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Matteo S. Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander M. Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Translational and Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael T. Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Translational and Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Richard A. Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - John F. Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael A. Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keung EZ, Asare EA, Chiang YJ, Prakash LR, Rajkot N, Torres KE, Hunt KK, Feig BW, Cormier JN, Roland CL, Katz MHG, Lee JE, Tzeng CWD. Postoperative pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy for non-pancreas retroperitoneal tumor resection. Am J Surg 2019; 220:140-146. [PMID: 31843190 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Short-term outcomes after distal pancreatectomy (DP) for retroperitoneal (RP) tumors are unknown. We sought to identify rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and morbidity after en bloc DP with RP tumor resection. METHODS A retrospective review of 43 patients who underwent DP with RP tumor resection (1/2011-12/2017) was performed. RESULTS Seventeen patients had RP sarcoma, 12 renal cell carcinoma, 11 gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and 3 adrenocortical carcinoma. Grade III-IV complications occurred in 7 patients. Grade B POPF occurred in 14 patients, grade C POPF in none, and biochemical leak in 6. Of 22 patients who developed radiographically evident peri-pancreatic fluid collections, 7 required percutaneous drainage. The 90-day readmission rate was 33%. CONCLUSIONS DP with RP tumor resection is associated with high rates of clinically relevant POPF compared to historical results for DP for primary pancreatic tumors. Multi-center studies to identify targetable predictors and risk mitigation strategies for POPF in this rare high-risk population are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elliot A Asare
- Department of Surgery, University of Utah and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nikita Rajkot
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fang S, Xu T, Xiong M, Zhou X, Wang Y, Haydu LE, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE, Prieto VG, Cormier JN, Wargo J, Sui D, Wei Q, Amos CI, Lee JE. Role of Immune Response, Inflammation, and Tumor Immune Response-Related Cytokines/Chemokines in Melanoma Progression. J Invest Dermatol 2019; 139:2352-2358.e3. [PMID: 31176707 PMCID: PMC6814532 DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.03.1158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
To investigate the role of tumor cytokines/chemokines in melanoma immune response, we estimated the proportions of immune cell subsets in melanoma tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas, followed by evaluation of the association between cytokine/chemokine expression and these subsets. We then investigated the association of immune cell subsets, chemokines, and cytokines with patient survival. Finally, we evaluated the immune cell tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) score for correlation with melanoma patient outcome in a separate cohort. There was good agreement between RNA sequencing estimation of T-cell subset and pathologist-determined TIL score. Expression levels of cytokines IL-12A, IFNG, and IL-10, and chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 were positively correlated with PDCD1, CTLA-4, and CD8+ T-cell subset, but negatively correlated with tumor purity (Bonferroni-corrected P < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, higher expression levels of cytokines IFN-γ and TGFB1, but not chemokines, were associated with improved overall survival. A higher expression level of CD8+ T-cell subset was also associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-0.35, P = 0.002). Finally, multivariable analysis showed that patients with a brisk TIL score had improved melanoma-specific survival than those with a nonbrisk score (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.27-0.98, P = 0.0423). These results suggest that the expression of specific tumor cytokines represents important biomarkers of melanoma immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shenying Fang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| | - Tao Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Momiao Xiong
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Xinke Zhou
- The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuling Wang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren E Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dawen Sui
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Qingyi Wei
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amaria RN, Haymaker CL, Forget MA, Bassett R, Cormier JN, Davies MA, Diab A, Gershenwald JE, Glitza IC, Lee JE, Lucci A, McQuade JL, Patel SP, Royal RE, Ross MI, Tawbi HAH, Wargo JA, Wong MK, Bernatchez C, Hwu P. Lymphodepletion (LD), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and high (HD-IL2) versus low-dose (LD-IL2) IL-2 followed by pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM). J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.9543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9543 Background: TIL adoptive cell transfer (ACT) therapy can produce durable responses for MM pts although efficacy appears lower in the era of checkpoint inhibitors. Toxicities from HD-IL2, including sepsis physiology, limits widespread use of this regimen. Suppression of transferred TIL by either tumor cells or the tumor microenvironment could limit TIL responses. Pembro is known to promote T cell activation, thus, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of TIL with pembro with HD-IL2 versus LD-IL2. Methods: Pts with MM who had tumor harvested and cryopreserved TIL at MD Anderson with PS 0-1 and normal organ function were eligible. All pts received a standard LD regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, followed by infusion of pooled ex-vivo expanded TIL and either HD-IL2 (Arm 1: 720,000 IU/kg IV q 8 hrs up to 15 doses) or LD-IL2 (Arm 2: 2 million IU SC for 14 d). Pts received pembro 200mg IV starting 21 d post T cell infusion every 3 wks for up to 2 yrs. Pts were randomized 1:1 based on stage and LDH. Paired blood and tumor biopsies were obtained prior to LD, prior to first and second dose of pembro and at time of progression. Results: A total of 36 pts were planned to enroll (18 in each arm); however, the protocol met pre-specified futility boundaries in Arm 1 which prompted early closure after treatment of 14 pts (7 in each Arm). Median age was 50 yrs, 6 were female, 8 had cutaneous melanoma, 2 mucosal, 2 uveal and 2 unknown primary. 86% were stage M1c, 14% M1D, 50% had LDH elevation. Median lines of prior therapy were 3 (range 1-6), including prior anti PD-1 in 13 pts. Best overall response was 1 PR (for 10 mos), 2 SD, 3 PD, 1 NE in Arm 1; 1 PR (ongoing over 36 mos), 1 SD, 5 PD in Arm 2. With median follow up of 9.2 mos, PFS was 3.9 mos for Arm 1 and 2.1 mos for Arm 2 (p = 0.99). Median OS was 9.7 mos for Arm 1 and 8.8 mos for Arm 2 (p = 0.71). Toxicity was similar in both Arms but with lower rates of grade 3 febrile neutropenia (57% vs. 71%) and shorter hospital stay (median 16 vs. 18 d) in Arm 2 vs. Arm 1. Conclusions: In a heavily treated pt population, TIL with pembro achieved low response rates. Use of LD-IL2 did not diminish efficacy and may be better tolerated than HD-IL2 for TIL ACT. Correlative studies are ongoing to determine mechanisms of treatment response and failure. Clinical trial information: NCT02500576.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Roland Bassett
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Adi Diab
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Anthony Lucci
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Merrick I. Ross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fonseca AL, Roland CL, Cormier JN, Torres KE, Hunt KH, Bishop AJ, Guadagnolo A, Feig BW. Radiation and Its Impact on Local Recurrence in Extremity and Trunk Well-Differentiated Liposarcomas. Am Surg 2019; 85:52-58. [PMID: 30760345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Patients with well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) of the extremity and trunk are treated primarily with surgical resection, with radiation used for a number of anecdotal reasons, including large size and positive margins. In this study, we evaluate the appropriate role for radiation in these tumors. A retrospective chart review of patients with extremity and trunk soft tissue liposarcomas referred to a free-standing cancer center from January 1995 to December 2011 was performed. One hundred eighty-three patients with extremity and trunk soft tissue WDLPS were identified: 61 per cent were female, median age was 60 years (range, 19-84 years) and 2 per cent had a focal area of dedifferentiation, margin status was positive in 57 per cent. Fourteen per cent of patients received radiation. Fifty patients developed recurrent disease; 28 per cent of these received radiation. Median time to recurrence was 18 years (range, 0.7-22 years). Of the 50 patients who recurred, 14 (28%) received radiation. Radiation was associated with decreased second recurrence when administered for recurrent disease (P = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, tumor size ≤ 10 cm (P = 0.014) and anatomically difficult area of resection (P = 0.008) were predictive of increased risk of recurrence. Older age (P = 0.02), dedifferentiated liposarcomas (P < 0.001), and difficult area of resection (P = 0.02) were associated with the administration of radiotherapy. Administration of radiation therapy was not associated with decreased time to recurrence in WDLPS overall; however, it should be considered in patients with recurrent disease.
Collapse
|
7
|
Fonseca AL, Roland CL, Cormier JN, Torres KE, Hunt KH, Bishop AJ, Guadagnolo A, Feig BW. Radiation and Its Impact on Local Recurrence in Extremity and Trunk Well-Differentiated Liposarcomas. Am Surg 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481908500126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Patients with well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) of the extremity and trunk are treated primarily with surgical resection, with radiation used for a number of anecdotal reasons, including large size and positive margins. In this study, we evaluate the appropriate role for radiation in these tumors. A retrospective chart review of patients with extremity and trunk soft tissue liposarcomas referred to a free-standing cancer center from January 1995 to December 2011 was performed. One hundred eighty-three patients with extremity and trunk soft tissue WDLPS were identified: 61 per cent were female, median age was 60 years (range, 19–84 years) and 2 per cent had a focal area of dedifferentiation, margin status was positive in 57 per cent. Fourteen per cent of patients received radiation. Fifty patients developed recurrent disease; 28 per cent of these received radiation. Median time to recurrence was 18 years (range, 0.7–22 years). Of the 50 patients who recurred, 14 (28%) received radiation. Radiation was associated with decreased second recurrence when administered for recurrent disease (P = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, tumor size ≤ 10 cm (P = 0.014) and anatomically difficult area of resection (P = 0.008) were predictive of increased risk of recurrence. Older age (P = 0.02), dedifferentiated liposarcomas (P < 0.001), and difficult area of resection (P = 0.02) were associated with the administration of radiotherapy. Administration of radiation therapy was not associated with decreased time to recurrence in WDLPS overall; however, it should be considered in patients with recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabelle L. Fonseca
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christina L. Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N. Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Keila E. Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly H. Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew J. Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Barry W. Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Keung EZ, Chiang YJ, Cormier JN, Torres KE, Hunt KK, Feig BW, Roland CL. Treatment at low-volume hospitals is associated with reduced short-term and long-term outcomes for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Cancer 2018; 124:4495-4503. [PMID: 30317543 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2018] [Revised: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare tumors for which complete surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment. The objective of the current study was to determine the impact of hospital case volume on outcomes in patients with RPS. METHODS A total of 6950 patients with primary RPS who underwent surgical resection were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (1998-2011). Treating hospitals were classified by annual case volume; low-volume hospitals (LVHs) and high-volume hospitals (HVHs) were defined as those with ≤10 cases per year and >10 cases per year, respectively. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazard models were created to compare risks. RESULTS Of the 1131 reporting hospitals, the majority (1127 hospitals; 99.6%) were LVHs treating the majority of patients (6270 patients; 90.2%). Patients treated at LVHs were more likely to have lower grade and smaller tumors, receive radiotherapy, and undergo incomplete macroscopic (R2) resection. Patients treated at HVHs had lower 30-day readmission rates (1.8% vs 3.4%; P<.001), 30-day (1.9% vs 3.1%; P=.004) and 90-day (3.2% vs 5.7%; P=.007) mortality, longer median OS (76.2 months vs 64.2 months; P<.001), and higher 5-year OS rates (58% vs 52%; P<.001). After controlling for age, sex, insurance status, tumor size, tumor grade, surgical resection margin status, and radiotherapy administration, treatment at an HVH was found to be independently associated with a reduced risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.91 [P=.003]). CONCLUSIONS Primary RPS are rare tumors, and to our knowledge few surgeons and institutions have significant experience and expertise in their multidisciplinary management and surgical resection. Although additional studies are needed, patient outcomes may be impacted by the case volume and expertise of the treating facility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Amaria RN, Reddy SM, Tawbi HA, Davies MA, Ross MI, Glitza IC, Cormier JN, Lewis C, Hwu WJ, Hanna E, Diab A, Wong MK, Royal R, Gross N, Weber R, Lai SY, Ehlers R, Blando J, Milton DR, Woodman S, Kageyama R, Wells DK, Hwu P, Patel SP, Lucci A, Hessel A, Lee JE, Gershenwald J, Simpson L, Burton EM, Posada L, Haydu L, Wang L, Zhang S, Lazar AJ, Hudgens CW, Gopalakrishnan V, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Spencer CN, Prieto V, Sharma P, Allison J, Tetzlaff MT, Wargo JA. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. Nat Med 2018; 24:1649-1654. [PMID: 30297909 PMCID: PMC6481682 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0197-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 520] [Impact Index Per Article: 86.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 08/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Preclinical studies suggest that treatment with neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade is associated with enhanced survival and antigen-specific T cell responses compared with adjuvant treatment1; however, optimal regimens have not been defined. Here we report results from a randomized phase 2 study of neoadjuvant nivolumab versus combined ipilimumab with nivolumab in 23 patients with high-risk resectable melanoma ( NCT02519322 ). RECIST overall response rates (ORR), pathologic complete response rates (pCR), treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) and immune correlates of response were assessed. Treatment with combined ipilimumab and nivolumab yielded high response rates (RECIST ORR 73%, pCR 45%) but substantial toxicity (73% grade 3 trAEs), whereas treatment with nivolumab monotherapy yielded modest responses (ORR 25%, pCR 25%) and low toxicity (8% grade 3 trAEs). Immune correlates of response were identified, demonstrating higher lymphoid infiltrates in responders to both therapies and a more clonal and diverse T cell infiltrate in responders to nivolumab monotherapy. These results describe the feasibility of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in melanoma and emphasize the need for additional studies to optimize treatment regimens and to validate putative biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sangeetha M Reddy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carol Lewis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ehab Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neil Gross
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Randal Weber
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen Y Lai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Ehlers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jorge Blando
- Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Scott Woodman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robin Kageyama
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel K Wells
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy Hessel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren Simpson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Liberty Posada
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lauren Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Linghua Wang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shaojun Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Alexandre Reuben
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Miles C Andrews
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Victor Prieto
- Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Genitourinary Cancers, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James Allison
- Department of Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Translational and Molecular Pathology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of Genomic Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Keung EZ, Lazar AJ, Torres KE, Wang WL, Cormier JN, Ashleigh Guadagnolo B, Bishop AJ, Lin H, Hunt KK, Bird J, Lewis VO, Patel SR, Wargo JA, Somaiah N, Roland CL. Phase II study of neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade in patients with surgically resectable undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:913. [PMID: 30249211 PMCID: PMC6154892 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-4829-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous and rare group of solid tumors of mesenchymal origin that can arise anywhere in the body. Although surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for patients with localized disease, disease recurrence is common and 5-year overall survival is poor (~ 65%). Both radiation therapy and conventional chemotherapy are used to reduce local and distant recurrence. However, the utility of radiation therapy is often limited by disease location (in the case of retroperitoneal sarcomas, for instance) while systemic therapy with conventional lines of chemotherapy offer limited efficacy and are often poorly tolerated and associated with significant toxicity. Within the past decade, major advances have been made in the treatment of other malignancies including melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and non-small cell lung carcinoma with the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors such as ipilimumab (anti-CTLA4), pembrolizumab (anti-PD1), and nivolumab (anti-PD1). The recently published SARC028 (NCT02301039), an open label, phase II, multicenter trial of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced bone and soft tissue sarcomas reported promising activity in select histologic subtypes of advanced STS, including undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma. METHODS There is a clear need for novel and effective adjuncts in the treatment of STS. We hypothesize that immune checkpoint blockade will be effective in patients with surgically resectable primary or locally recurrent dedifferentiated liposarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma when administered in the neoadjuvant setting. The primary aim of this phase II, single-center, open label, randomized non-comparative trial is to determine the pathologic response to neoadjuvant nivolumab monotherapy and combination nivolumab/ipilimumab in patients with resectable dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the trunk or extremity treated with concurrent standard of care neoadjuvant radiation therapy. DISCUSSION This study will help define the role of single agent anti-PD1 and combination anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 therapy in patients with surgically resectable dedifferentiated liposarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03307616 , registered October 12, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Z Keung
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., FCT17.6054, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Departments of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., FCT17.6054, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Departments of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., FCT17.6054, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heather Lin
- Departments of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., FCT17.6054, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Justin Bird
- Departments of Orthopaedic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Valerae O Lewis
- Departments of Orthopaedic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Shreyaskumar R Patel
- Departments of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., FCT17.6054, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
- Departments of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Departments of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., FCT17.6054, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ikoma N, Roland CL, Torres KE, Chiang YJ, Wang WL, Somaiah N, Mann GN, Hunt KK, Cormier JN, Feig BW. Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Retroperitoneal Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma: Early Reoperation may not Provide Benefit. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2193-2200. [PMID: 29520652 PMCID: PMC6030482 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6417-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Current evidence regarding salvage resection for recurrent retroperitoneal (RP) sarcomas generally lacks detailed histology-specific analyses, but the aggressiveness of these tumors varies widely by histology. We investigated associations between timing and extent of salvage surgery and survival outcomes in patients with recurrent RP well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS). METHODS The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Surgical Oncology sarcoma database was reviewed to identify patients with RP WDLPS who underwent surgical resection for first recurrent disease (salvage surgery) in 1995-2015. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to identify factors associated with overall survival and disease-free survival. RESULTS We identified 52 patients who underwent salvage surgery for RP WDLPS for first local recurrence; 28 (54%) underwent salvage surgery within 6 months after recurrence. Concomitant organ resections were performed in 32 (62%) patients, 4 (13%) of whom had pathologic invasion of resected organs. After R0/R1 resections (n = 45), 38 (84%) experienced a second local recurrence. Multivariable analyses revealed that organ invasion at the primary surgery [hazard ratio (HR) 13.08; p = 0.005] and disease-free interval < 1 year (HR 3.64; p = 0.044) were associated with shorter overall survival. Recurrence-to-salvage interval < 6 months was associated with shorter disease-free survival (HR 2.18; p = 0.025). Concomitant organ resection was associated with a longer hospital stay: ≥ 14 days (odds ratio 21.58; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Early salvage surgery may not always be the best approach for recurrent RP WDLPS patients. Because organ invasion is rare among recurrent RP WDLPS patients and concomitant organ resection is associated with a longer hospital stay, preservation of uninvolved organs should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gary N Mann
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Scutti JAB, Vence LM, Royal RE, Wray TC, Cormier JN, Lee JE, Lucci A, Gershenwald JE, Ross MI, Wargo J, Millerchip KA, Amaria RN, Davis MA, Diab A, Glitza IC, Hwu W, Patel S, Woodman SE, Overwijk WW, Hwu P. Abstract 614: Resiquimod, a Toll-like receptor agonist promotes melanoma regression by enhancing plasmacytoid dendritic cells and T cytotoxic activity as a vaccination adjuvant and by direct tumor application. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Cancer immunotherapy is a modern strategy aiming at restoring the capacity of the immune system to target tumors in cancer patients. Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists may enhance vaccination or direct immune activation at the tumor microenvironment. This clinical trial evaluated the biologic effects of Resiquimod, a TLR agonist that can activate both myeloid (TLR 8) and plasmacytoid (TLR 7) dendritic cells, on advanced stage melanoma. Methods: Subjects with in-transit melanoma metastases or high risk for recurrence and appropriate HLA were treated with peptide vaccination (class 1 restricted peptide GP100(g209-2m) and, if HLA-DP4+, class 2 restricted peptide MAGE-3243-258). Half of the patients were randomized to receive Resiquimod as an adjuvant applied to the GP100 vaccination site. Subjects with in-transit disease were then treated with resiquimod topically on half of the target lesions. To evaluate the T cell function, fresh PBMC and single cell tumor suspension were analyzed by flow cytometry using gp100-specific dextramer staining. RNA from the vaccination site was also analyzed using real-time PCR. Results: All patients (n=47) underwent GP100(g209-2m) vaccination, a majority (39) also received the MAGE-3243-258 peptide. Type 1 interferon pathway protein profiles of vaccination sites showed activation of plasmacytoid dendritic cells in patients with Resiquimod, but not in its absence. Nineteen subjects had in-transit disease at entry into the trial. In response to peptide vaccination alone, tumor regression was more likely in patients who received Resiquimod (group A) compared to those who did not (group B). (4/9 vs 0/10). In group A, 5 patients continued treatment with Resiquimod topically on the tumors, and all had tumor response (4PR, 1CR). In group B, 5 continued to tumoral resiquimod and 3 had regression (3 PR). Type I interferon (as measured by MxA and IRF7) IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha increased at the vaccination site 24 hrs after vaccination only at the sites where Resiquimod was applied. In blood, Resiquimod increased gp100-specific CD8 T cells frequency at week 8 (p=0.03) only in patients who received Resiquimod at the vaccination site. Conclusions: Resiquimod activates plasmacytoid dendritic cells at a peptide vaccination site and augments peptide vaccination sufficiently to mediate regression of in-transit melanoma metastasis. Resiquimod on in-transit melanoma, in vaccinated hosts, drives regression of metastases, regardless of previous exposure at vaccination site. An increased amount of cytokines such type I interferon, IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, and T specific cytotoxic frequency were increased at the vaccination site after patients received Resiquimod.
Citation Format: Jorge A. Borin Scutti, Luis M. Vence, Richard E. Royal, Tara C. Wray, Janice N. Cormier, Jeffrey E. Lee, Anthony Lucci, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Merrick I. Ross, Jennifer Wargo, Karen A. Millerchip, Rodabe N. Amaria, Michael A. Davis, Adi Diab, Isabella C. Glitza, Wen Hwu, Sapna Patel, Scott E. Woodman, Willem W. Overwijk, Patrick Hwu. Resiquimod, a Toll-like receptor agonist promotes melanoma regression by enhancing plasmacytoid dendritic cells and T cytotoxic activity as a vaccination adjuvant and by direct tumor application [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 614.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Adi Diab
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Wen Hwu
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Forget MA, Haymaker C, Hess KR, Meng YJ, Creasy C, Karpinets T, Fulbright OJ, Roszik J, Woodman SE, Kim YU, Sakellariou-Thompson D, Bhatta A, Wahl A, Flores E, Thorsen ST, Tavera RJ, Ramachandran R, Gonzalez AM, Toth CL, Wardell S, Mansaray R, Patel V, Carpio DJ, Vaughn C, Farinas CM, Velasquez PG, Hwu WJ, Patel SP, Davies MA, Diab A, Glitza IC, Tawbi H, Wong MK, Cain S, Ross MI, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, Lucci A, Royal R, Cormier JN, Wargo JA, Radvanyi LG, Torres-Cabala CA, Beroukhim R, Hwu P, Amaria RN, Bernatchez C. Prospective Analysis of Adoptive TIL Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma: Response, Impact of Anti-CTLA4, and Biomarkers to Predict Clinical Outcome. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24:4416-4428. [PMID: 29848573 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-3649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has consistently demonstrated clinical efficacy in metastatic melanoma. Recent widespread use of checkpoint blockade has shifted the treatment landscape, raising questions regarding impact of these therapies on response to TIL and appropriate immunotherapy sequence.Patients and Methods: Seventy-four metastatic melanoma patients were treated with autologous TIL and evaluated for clinical response according to irRC, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Immunologic factors associated with response were also evaluated.Results: Best overall response for the entire cohort was 42%; 47% in 43 checkpoint-naïve patients, 38% when patients were exposed to anti-CTLA4 alone (21 patients) and 33% if also exposed to anti-PD1 (9 patients) prior to TIL ACT. Median overall survival was 17.3 months; 24.6 months in CTLA4-naïve patients and 8.6 months in patients with prior CTLA4 blockade. The latter patients were infused with fewer TIL and experienced a shorter duration of response. Infusion of higher numbers of TIL with CD8 predominance and expression of BTLA correlated with improved response in anti-CTLA4 naïve patients, but not in anti-CTLA4 refractory patients. Baseline serum levels of IL9 predicted response to TIL ACT, while TIL persistence, tumor recognition, and mutation burden did not correlate with outcome.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the deleterious effects of prior exposure to anti-CTLA4 on TIL ACT response and shows that baseline IL9 levels can potentially serve as a predictive tool to select the appropriate sequence of immunotherapies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4416-28. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Andrée Forget
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Cara Haymaker
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Kenneth R Hess
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Yuzhong Jeff Meng
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Caitlin Creasy
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Tatiana Karpinets
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Orenthial J Fulbright
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Jason Roszik
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas.,Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Scott E Woodman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Young Uk Kim
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | | | - Ankit Bhatta
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Arely Wahl
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Esteban Flores
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Shawne T Thorsen
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - René J Tavera
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Renjith Ramachandran
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Audrey M Gonzalez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher L Toth
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Seth Wardell
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Rahmatu Mansaray
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Vruti Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Destiny Joy Carpio
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Carol Vaughn
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Chantell M Farinas
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Portia G Velasquez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Isabella C Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Hussein Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Suzanne Cain
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas.,Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MDACC, Houston, Texas
| | - Laszlo G Radvanyi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | | | - Rameen Beroukhim
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas
| | - Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas.
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Amaria RN, Reddy SM, Tawbi HAH, Davies MA, Ross MI, Glitza IC, Cormier JN, Lewis CM, Hwu WJ, Hanna EY, Diab A, Wong MK, Royal RE, Gross ND, Weber RS, Lai SY, Ehlers RA, Burton EM, Tetzlaff MT, Wargo JA. Neoadjuvant (neo) immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in patients (Pts) with high-risk resectable metastatic melanoma (MM). J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.9510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Merrick I. Ross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Carol M. Lewis
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ehab Y. Hanna
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Neil D. Gross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, TX
| | - Randal S. Weber
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Richard A. Ehlers
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Nassau Bay, TX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ikoma N, Roland CL, Cormier JN, Chiang YJ, Torres KE, Hunt KK, You YN, Feig BW. Nongastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Spindle Cell Sarcomas of the Colon or Rectum. Am Surg 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481808400433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Because of the low incidence of nongastrointestinal stromal tumor (non-GIST) spindle cell sarcomas of the colon or rectum, the clinical behavior and ideal surgical treatment of these tumors and patient outcomes are poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to characterize these tumors and to determine the best surgical approach. We identified 1056 patients with non-GIST spindle cell sarcomas of the colon or rectum (1998–2010) in the National Cancer Database and collected data for each patient that included patient and tumor characteristics, tumor site (colon vs rectum), surgery type, and outcomes. The median overall survival was significantly longer in patients with rectal tumors than in those with colon tumors ( P < 0.01). Patients with colon tumors who underwent anatomic surgical resection showed a trend toward longer median survival than those with no surgical treatment [hazard ratio (HR), 1.94; P = 0.09] or who underwent local excision (HR, 1.74; P = 0.09). Patients with rectal tumors did not benefit from anatomic surgical resection, but there was a trend favoring local excision (HR, 0.55; P = 0.06). Local sphincter-sparing procedures should be considered for rectal non-GIST tumors whenever technically feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christina L. Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N. Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Keila E. Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K. Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Y. Nancy You
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Barry W. Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ikoma N, Roland CL, Cormier JN, Chiang YJ, Torres KE, Hunt KK, You YN, Feig BW. Nongastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Spindle Cell Sarcomas of the Colon or Rectum. Am Surg 2018; 84:570-575. [PMID: 29712608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Because of the low incidence of nongastrointestinal stromal tumor (non-GIST) spindle cell sarcomas of the colon or rectum, the clinical behavior and ideal surgical treatment of these tumors and patient outcomes are poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to characterize these tumors and to determine the best surgical approach. We identified 1056 patients with non-GIST spindle cell sarcomas of the colon or rectum (1998-2010) in the National Cancer Database and collected data for each patient that included patient and tumor characteristics, tumor site (colon vs rectum), surgery type, and outcomes. The median overall survival was significantly longer in patients with rectal tumors than in those with colon tumors (P < 0.01). Patients with colon tumors who underwent anatomic surgical resection showed a trend toward longer median survival than those with no surgical treatment [hazard ratio (HR), 1.94; P = 0.09] or who underwent local excision (HR, 1.74; P = 0.09). Patients with rectal tumors did not benefit from anatomic surgical resection, but there was a trend favoring local excision (HR, 0.55; P = 0.06). Local sphincter-sparing procedures should be considered for rectal non-GIST tumors whenever technically feasible.
Collapse
|
17
|
Roland CL, Bednarski BK, Watson K, Torres KE, Cormier JN, Wang WL, Lazar A, Somaiah N, Hunt KK, Feig BW. Identification of preoperative factors associated with outcomes following surgical management of intra-abdominal recurrent or metastatic GIST following neoadjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117:879-885. [PMID: 29448300 PMCID: PMC5992050 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of surgical resection in the treatment of patients with metastatic/recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is unclear. The aim of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with oncologic outcomes for recurrent/metastatic GIST after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. METHODS We identified 107 patients with metastatic or recurrent GIST treated with TKIs and surgical resection (2002-2012). Patients that underwent palliative or incomplete resection were excluded. Complete resection was achieved in 87 patients which comprise the analytic cohort. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for GIST-specific survival (DSS) and time-to-recurrence (TTR). RESULTS At a median follow-up of 51 months (91 months for survivors), median DSS was 74 months and TTR was 21 months. By univariate analysis, unifocal disease, duration of TKI < 365 days, and no evidence of radiographic progression were associated with improved TTR and DSS. Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that evidence of radiographic progression was associated with shorter DSS (HR 2.53, 95%CI = 1.27-5.06, P = 0.008) and increased risk of recurrence (HR 3.33, 95%CI = 1.91-5.82, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Patients with unifocal disease and radiographic evidence of response to TKI therapy may achieve improved oncologic outcomes when complete surgical resection is achieved following treatment with TKI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina L. Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian K. Bednarski
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelsey Watson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Keila E. Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N. Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Alexander Lazar
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K. Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Barry W. Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fisher SB, Chiang YJ, Feig BW, Cormier JN, Hunt KK, Torres KE, Roland CL. Comparative Performance of the 7th and 8th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Trunk and Extremities. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:1126-1132. [PMID: 29468609 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6378-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging for soft tissue sarcomas of the trunk/extremities divides T stage into four categories and upstages nodal disease to stage IV. We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate the prognostic power of the new system. METHODS A total of 26,144 patients were identified from the NCDB from 2004 to 2013. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS Including T3 (10 cm > × >15 cm) and T4 (> 15 cm) categories resulted in an increased number of patients classified as stage III (5120 as IIIA [19.6%] and 4280 as IIIB [16.4%], vs. 7882 [30.1%] previously), and there was a small increase in the number of patients classified as stage IV (2776 [10.6%], vs. 2565 [9.8%] previously). In the 7th edition, the hazard ratio (HR) for death increases with stage, with large incremental increases between stages II-III and III-IV. In the 8th edition, the HR for death demonstrates smaller incremental increases between each stage. Five-year OS for 7th edition T1 and T2 patients was 78.8 and 58.8% (p < 0.01), respectively, versus 62.6, 53.5, and 56.1% for T2, T3, and T4 patients, respectively, in the 8th edition (p < 0.01). Patients with isolated nodal disease (n = 211) had a better 5-year OS than those with distant metastases (33.1% vs. 12.4%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The AJCC 8th edition uses T stage to more accurately stratify OS in patients with large, high-grade tumors (T3/4) compared with those patients with T2 tumors, which facilitates risk assessment. The distinction between T3 and T4 may not be clinically significant. Patients with metastatic nodal disease have a survival outcome intermediate to those with stages III and IV disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ikoma N, Cormier JN, Feig B, Du XL, Yamal JM, Hofstetter W, Das P, Ajani JA, Roland CL, Fournier K, Royal R, Mansfield P, Badgwell BD. Racial disparities in preoperative chemotherapy use in gastric cancer patients in the United States: Analysis of the National Cancer Data Base, 2006-2014. Cancer 2018; 124:998-1007. [PMID: 29393964 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Revised: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No studies have investigated whether race/ethnicity is associated with the recommended use of preoperative chemotherapy or subsequent outcomes in gastric cancer. To determine whether there is such an association, analyses of patients with gastric cancer in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) were performed. METHODS Patients with clinical T2-4bN0-1M0 gastric adenocarcinoma, as defined by the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual, who underwent gastrectomy from 2006 to 2014 were identified from the NCDB. Multiple logistic regression was conducted to examine factors associated with preoperative chemotherapy use. RESULTS This study identified 16,945 patients who met the criteria, and 8286 of these patients (49%) underwent preoperative chemotherapy. The use of preoperative chemotherapy remarkably increased over the study period, from 34% in 2006 to 65% in 2014. Preoperative chemotherapy was more commonly used for cardia tumors than noncardia tumors (83% vs 44% in 2014). In a multivariable analysis, races and ethnicities other than non-Hispanic (NH) white race were associated with less frequent use of preoperative chemotherapy in comparison with NH whites after adjustments for social, tumor, and hospital factors. The insurance status and the education level mediated an enhanced effect of racial/ethnic disparities in preoperative chemotherapy use. The use of preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy was associated with reduced racial/ethnic disparities in overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Racial/ethnic disparities in the use of preoperative chemotherapy and in outcomes exist among patients with gastric cancer in the United States. Efforts to improve the access to high-quality cancer care in minority groups may reduce racial disparities in gastric cancer in the United States. Cancer 2018;124:998-1007. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Barry Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Xianglin L Du
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Jose-Miguel Yamal
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Wayne Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Keith Fournier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul Mansfield
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian D Badgwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Keung EZ, Tsai JW, Ali AM, Cormier JN, Bishop AJ, Guadagnolo BA, Hunt KK, Torres KE, Somaiah N, Wargo JA, Lazar A, Wang WL, Roland CL. Abstract B27: Analysis of the immune infiltrate in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the extremity and trunk in response to radiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3265.sarcomas17-b27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the extremity and trunk (ET UPS) presents a unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Recently, immunotherapy has been employed in the treatment of patients with advanced UPS with preliminary evidence of benefit in 40% of a small initial cohort (SARC028). However, there is currently a paucity of data characterizing the immune infiltrate population in ET UPS. Radiotherapy (RT) is associated with improved locoregional control in combination with surgery. Localized RT has been shown in other tumor types to promote tumor antigen release and enhance tumor-specific targeting by the adaptive immune system. The aim of this study was two-fold: 1) to characterize the immune infiltrate in ET UPS and 2) to evaluate the effect of preoperative RT on immune cell infiltrates in ET UPS.
Methods: We identified 17 matched ET UPS tumor samples before and after RT. Immunohistochemistry for CD8, CD4, PD-L1, PD1, CD3, CD163, and FOXP3 was performed on the matched pairs. Changes in immune infiltrate over time between the pairs were compared with a paired t-test.
Results: CD8, CD4, PD-L1, PD1, CD3, CD163, and FoxP3 positive cells were identified in all samples. The effects were variable, but there was an overall trend towards an increase in the density of tumor-infiltrating immune cells of all assayed types in ET UPS following completion of RT, with increases in the median number of CD8 (55 vs. 111 cells/mm2, p=0.17), CD4 (3 vs. 13 cells/mm2, p=0.01), CD3 (158 vs. 219 cells/mm2, p=0.06), CD163 (1363 vs. 2001 cells/mm2, p=0.76), and FOXP3 (14 vs. 25 cells/mm2, p=0.23) positive cells in RT-treated tumor sections. Interestingly, although PD-L1 was not expressed in any pre-RT ET UPS tumors, positive PD-L1 expression was observed in 21% (3/14) of tumors after RT treatment (p=0.07).
Conclusion: An immune infiltrate is present in ET UPS at the time of diagnosis, with a trend towards increased density of immune infiltrate and PD-L1 expression after completion of RT. These data support evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors with standard of care RT in the treatment of ET UPS.
Citation Format: Emily Z. Keung, Jen-Wei Tsai, Ali M. Ali, Janice N. Cormier, Andrew J. Bishop, B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, Kelly K. Hunt, Keila E. Torres, Neeta Somaiah, Jennifer A. Wargo, Alexander Lazar, Wei-Lien Wang, Cristina L. Roland. Analysis of the immune infiltrate in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the extremity and trunk in response to radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Conference on Advances in Sarcomas: From Basic Science to Clinical Translation; May 16-19, 2017; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2018;24(2_Suppl):Abstract nr B27.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Z. Keung
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jen-Wei Tsai
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ali M. Ali
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Kelly K. Hunt
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Keila E. Torres
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Alexander Lazar
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stucky CCH, Cromwell KD, Voss RK, Chiang YJ, Woodman K, Lee JE, Cormier JN. Surgeon symptoms, strain, and selections: Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical ergonomics. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2018; 27:1-8. [PMID: 29511535 PMCID: PMC5832650 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2017] [Revised: 11/26/2017] [Accepted: 12/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Many surgeons experience work-related pain and musculoskeletal symptoms; however, comprehensive reporting of surgeon ailments is lacking in the literature. We sought to evaluate surgeons' work-related symptoms, possible causes of these symptoms, and to report outcomes associated with those symptoms. Materials and methods Five major medical indices were queried for articles published between 1980 and 2014. Included articles evaluated musculoskeletal symptoms and ergonomic outcomes in surgeons. A meta-analysis using a fixed-effect model was used to report pooled results. Results Forty articles with 5152 surveyed surgeons were included. Sixty-eight percent of surgeons surveyed reported generalized pain. Site-specific pain included pain in the back (50%), neck (48%), and arm or shoulder (43%). Fatigue was reported by 71% of surgeons, numbness by 37%, and stiffness by 45%. Compared with surgeons performing open surgery, surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) were significantly more likely to experience pain in the neck (OR 2.77 [95% CI 1.30–5.93]), arm or shoulder (OR 4.59 [2.19–9.61]), hands (OR 2.99 [1.33–6.71], and legs (OR 12.34 [5.43–28.06]) and experience higher odds of fatigue (8.09 [5.60–11.70]) and numbness (6.82 [1.75–26.65]). Operating exacerbated pain in 61% of surgeons, but only 29% sought treatment for their symptoms. We found no direct association between muscles strained and symptoms. Conclusions Most surgeons report work-related symptoms but are unlikely to seek medical attention. MIS surgeons are significantly more likely to experience musculoskeletal symptoms than surgeons performing open surgery. Symptoms experienced do not necessarily correlate with strain. 68% of surveyed surgeons reported experiencing generalized pain from operating. Minimally-invasive surgeons were more likely to report pain, fatigue, and numbness. Only 29% of surgeons reported seeking treatment for symptoms. No association between objective strain on muscles and reported symptoms was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chee-Chee H Stucky
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Kate D Cromwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Rachel K Voss
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Karin Woodman
- Department of Neuro-oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 431, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1484, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ikoma N, Roland CL, Torres KE, Chiang YJ, Wang WL, Somaiah N, Mann GN, Hunt KK, Cormier JN, Feig BW. Concomitant organ resection does not improve outcomes in primary retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcoma: A retrospective cohort study at a major sarcoma center. J Surg Oncol 2017; 117:1188-1194. [PMID: 29228466 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated whether concomitant organ removal as part of the primary resection of RP WDLPS confers an outcome advantage in patients treated at a major sarcoma center. METHODS The departmental sarcoma database was reviewed to identify patients with RP WDLPS who underwent initial surgical resection for primary disease at MD Anderson Cancer Center during the study period 1995-2011. We retrospectively reviewed medical records and examined associations between clinicopathologic variables and overall survival (OS) as well as disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS Among 83 patients included in this study, 76 patients (92%) underwent complete resection (R0/R1). Concomitant organ resections were performed in 38 patients (46%). Invasion of the resected organ/s was seen in six patients (7%). Estimated OS was 11.3 years (5-year OS, 86%), and DFS was 5.4 years (5-year DFS, 51%). By multivariate analysis, concomitant organ resection was not associated with improved OS (P = 0.428) or DFS (P = 0.946), and lack of organ resection was associated with a lower risk of postoperative complications (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Concomitant organ resection was not associated with a survival benefit in RP WDLPS in this study. In patients with primary RP WDLPS, we recommend selective resection of contiguous organs only if there is clinical suspicion of invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gary N Mann
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Keung EZ, Chiang YJ, Voss RK, Cormier JN, Torres KE, Hunt KK, Feig BW, Roland CL. Defining the incidence and clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in soft tissue sarcoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 44:170-177. [PMID: 29208319 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Revised: 10/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/16/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence and clinical significance of lymph node metastasis (LNM, N1) in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is unclear. Recent studies have focused on extremity/trunk STS (ETSTS). We sought to define the subgroup of patients with LNM at sarcoma diagnosis across all disease sites and histologies. METHODS We identified and categorized 89,870 STS patients from the National Cancer Data Base (1998-2012) by nodal stage. Pathologically confirmed LNM (pN1) were identified in 1404 patients; 1750 had clinically suspicious but not pathologically confirmed LNM (cN1). Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Of 3154 patients (3.5%) with pN1 or cN1 LNM at presentation, 1310 had synchronous distant metastasis (M1). LNM affected a small proportion of patients (5.8% head/neck, 5.3% intrathoracic, 5.1% intra-abdominal, 2.0% ETSTS). Angiosarcoma (6%), epithelioid (13%), clear cell (16%), and small cell sarcoma (19%) had the highest incidence of LNM, although liposarcoma, fibrous histiocytoma, and leiomyosarcoma accounted for the greatest number of LNM patients. For pN1M0 disease, median overall survival (OS) was 28.2 months, varying by histology. Among patients with pN1M0 STS, angiosarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and fibrous histiocytoma were associated with worse median OS (19.4, 23.8, 27.1, and 29.3 months) compared to epithelioid sarcoma and liposarcoma (49.6 and 56.0 months, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Despite clinical suspicion, pathologic LN evaluation in STS is inconsistently performed. LNM occurs across anatomic disease sites and is unevenly distributed across histologies. Although M1 disease portends poor prognosis regardless of LN status, LNM predicts worse OS in a histology-dependent manner in M0 disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rachel K Voss
- Department of Surgery, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Keung EZ, Tsai JW, Ali AM, Cormier JN, Bishop AJ, Guadagnolo BA, Torres KE, Somaiah N, Hunt KK, Wargo JA, Lazar AJ, Wang WL, Roland CL. Analysis of the immune infiltrate in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the extremity and trunk in response to radiotherapy: Rationale for combination neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition and radiotherapy. Oncoimmunology 2017; 7:e1385689. [PMID: 29308306 PMCID: PMC5749668 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2017.1385689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2017] [Revised: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/24/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the extremity and trunk (ET-UPS) presents a unique therapeutic challenge. Although immunotherapy has recently been employed in advanced soft tissue sarcoma, there is limited data characterizing the immune infiltrate in ET-UPS. Radiotherapy (RT) has been shown in other tumor types to promote tumor antigen release and enhance tumor-specific targeting by the adaptive immune system. The aim of this study was to 1) characterize the baseline immune infiltrate and 2) evaluate the effect of preoperative RT on the histologic appearance of and the immune infiltrate in ET-UPS. Methods: We identified 17 matched ET-UPS samples before and after RT. Immunohistochemistry was performed with CD8, CD4, PD-L1, PD1, CD3, CD163 and FoxP3 positive cells identified in all samples. Changes in the immune infiltrate following RT were examined. Results: There was a trend towards increased density of tumor infiltrating immune cells in ET-UPS following RT, with increases in median number of CD3 (158 vs 219 cells/mm2, p = 0.06), CD4 (3 vs 13 cells/mm2, p = 0.01), CD8 (55 vs 111 cells/mm2, p = 0.17), and FOXP3 (14 vs 25 cells/mm2, p = 0.23) positive cells. Interestingly, although PD-L1 was not expressed in any ET-UPS tumor at baseline, positive PD-L1 expression was observed in 21% (3/14) of tumors after RT (p = 0.07). Conclusion: An immune infiltrate is present in ET-UPS at the time of diagnosis, with a trend towards increased density of immune infiltrate and PD-L1 expression after RT. These data support prospectively evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors with standard of care RT in the treatment of ET-UPS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Z. Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jen-Wei Tsai
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ali M. Ali
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Janice N. Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew J. Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Keila E. Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly K. Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexander J. Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christina L. Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Voss RK, Chiang YJ, Torres KE, Guadagnolo BA, Mann GN, Feig BW, Cormier JN, Roland CL. Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines is Associated with Improved Survival for Patients with Stage 2A and Stages 2B and 3 Extremity and Superficial Trunk Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24:3271-3278. [PMID: 28741122 PMCID: PMC5693748 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6015-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has instituted treatment guidelines for stage 2A and stages 2B and 3 extremity and superficial trunk soft tissue sarcomas (ETSTS). This study examined adherence to the NCCN guidelines and factors associated with nonadherent treatment and survival outcomes. METHODS Patients with stage 2A and stages 2B and 3 ETSTS (n = 15,957) were categorized as undergoing adherent or nonadherent treatment based on the 2014 NCCN guidelines. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with nonadherent treatment. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were calculated, and Cox models were used to generate adjusted survival curves and hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS The findings showed that 87.2% of the patients with stage 2A disease and 58.3% of the patients with stage 2B or 3 disease received adherent treatment. Community treatment facilities and uninsured or unknown insurance status were associated with nonadherent treatment for both stage groups. Adherent treatment was associated with higher 5-year adjusted OS and DSS for stage 2A and stage 2B or 3 patients. In Cox models, nonadherent treatment was associated with worse survival for both stage 2A disease (HR, 2.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.02-2.63) and stages 2B and 3 disease (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.53-1.73). Increasing age and non-private insurance were associated with poorer outcomes. For stages 2B and 3 disease, treatment at a community center and African American race were associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to NCCN guidelines is excellent for stage 2A and poor for stages 2B and 3 ETSTS. Adherent treatment was associated with improved survival outcomes, highlighting the importance of adherence to NCCN guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel K Voss
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gary N Mann
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fang S, Wang Y, Dang Y, Gagel A, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE, Cormier JN, Wargo J, Haydu LE, Davies MA, McQuade JL, Sui D, Bassett RL, Reveille JD, Wei Q, Amos CI, Lee JE. Association between Body Mass Index, C-Reactive Protein Levels, and Melanoma Patient Outcomes. J Invest Dermatol 2017; 137:1792-1795. [PMID: 28442307 DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2016] [Revised: 04/10/2017] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Shenying Fang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| | - Yuling Wang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yifang Dang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrew Gagel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lauren E Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer L McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dawen Sui
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roland L Bassett
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John D Reveille
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunogenetics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Qingyi Wei
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher I Amos
- Community and Family Medicine, Geisel College of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pujara D, Chiang YJ, Cormier JN, Bruera E, Badgwell B. Selective Approach for Patients with Advanced Malignancy and Gastrointestinal Obstruction. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 225:53-59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2017] [Revised: 03/20/2017] [Accepted: 04/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
28
|
Ikoma N, Torres KE, Lin HY, Ravi V, Roland CL, Mann GN, Hunt KK, Cormier JN, Feig BW. Recurrence patterns of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma and impact of salvage surgery. J Surg Oncol 2017; 116:313-319. [PMID: 28557016 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 04/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal treatment strategies for retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma (RPLMS), particularly recurrent disease, are unknown. METHODS We searched the tumor registry at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) to identify patients with RPLMS treated between 1994 and 2013. RESULTS We identified 172 patients with a diagnosis of a RPLMS. Among the 85 patients who underwent complete resection included in the survival analysis, the median overall survival (OS) was 8.3 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-12.3), 5-year local recurrence rate was 21%, and 5-year distant metastasis rate was 47%. Among 114 patients who experienced recurrence, patients who underwent salvage surgery for recurrent disease had longer OS after recurrence than patients who did not undergo salvage surgery (median survival after recurrence 5.6 vs 3.3 years, 3-year OS rates after recurrence 72.6% vs 58.1%, HR 0.402 [95%CI, 0.243-0.666]; P = 0.0004). Whether salvage surgery was performed for local or distant recurrence was not associated with OS. Patients who had a longer disease-free interval (≥12 months) had better progression-free survival after salvage surgery than those who had a shorter interval (HR, 0.437 [95%CI, 0.244-0.783]; P = 0.0055). CONCLUSIONS We recommend that salvage surgery be considered for selected patients with local or distant recurrence of RP LMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Heather Y Lin
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Vinod Ravi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gary N Mann
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wargo JA, Amaria RN, Prieto PA, Andrews MC, Tetzlaff MT, Futreal PA, Hwu P, Hwu WJ, Glitza IC, Tawbi HAH, Cormier JN, Lee JE, Patel SP, Simpson L, Burton EM, Bassett RL, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE, Davies MA, Woodman SE. Relapse-free survial and target identification to enhance response with neoadjuvant and adjuvant dabrafenib + trametinib (D+T) treatment compared to standard-of-care (SOC) surgery in patients (pts) with high-risk resectable BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.9587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9587 Background: Targeted and immune therapies have dramatically improved outcomes in stage IV metastatic melanoma pts. These agents are now being tested in earlier-stage disease. SOC surgery for high-risk resectable melanoma (AJCC stage IIIB/IIIC), with or without adjuvant therapy, is associated with a high risk of relapse (~70%). We hypothesized that neoadjuvant (neo) + adjuvant treatment with D+T improves RFS in these pts. Longitudinally collected biospecimens from pts receiving this treatment were analyzed to identify candidate strategies to further improve outcomes. Methods: A prospective single-institution randomized clinical trial (NCT02231775) was conducted in BRAF-mutant pts with resectable Stage IIIB/C or oligometastatic stage IV melanoma. Pts were randomized 1:2 to SOC (Arm A) versus neo + adjuvant D+T (Arm B; 8 wks neo + 44 wks adjuvant). The primary endpoint was RFS. Tumor biopsies were collected at baseline, week 3, and at surgery for molecular and immune profiling (whole exome sequencing, gene expression profiling, IHC, flow cytometry). Results: 21 of a planned 84 patients were enrolled (Arm A = 7, Arm B = 14). Arms were well balanced for standard prognostic factors, and toxicity was manageable. RECIST response rate with neo D+T was 77%, and the pathologic complete response rate (pCR) was 58%. First interim analysis revealed significantly improved RFS in the D+T arm over SOC (HR 62.5, p < 0.0001), leading to early closure to enrollment. Pts with a pCR at surgery had significantly improved RFS versus pts without pCR (p = 0.04) on neo D+T. Tumor profiling revealed incomplete MAPK pathway blockade and higher levels of CD8+ T cells expressing immunomodulators Tim-3 and Lag-3 in pts who did not achieve a pCR. Conclusions: Neo + adjuvant D+T is associated with a high pCR rate and markedly improved RFS over SOC in pts with high-risk resectable BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma. pCR at surgery is associated with improved RFS. Tumor analyses reveal candidate targets for testing in future trials to enhance responses to neo D+T. Clinical trial information: NCT02231775.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Peter A. Prieto
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Patrick Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lauren Simpson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Merrick I. Ross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Royal RE, Vence LM, Wray T, Cormier JN, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, Ross MI, Wargo JA, Amaria RN, Davies MA, Diab A, Glitza IC, Hwu WJ, Patel SP, Woodman SE, Overwijk WW, Hwu P. A toll-like receptor agonist to drive melanoma regression as a vaccination adjuvant or by direct tumor application. J Clin Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.9582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9582 Background: Toll like receptor (TLR) agonists may enhance vaccination or direct immune activation at the tumor microenvironment. This trial evaluates the biologic and clinical effects of Resiquimod, a TLR 7/8 agonist that can activate both myeloid (mDC, TLR 8) and plasmacytoid (pDC, TLR 7) dendritic cells, in patients with advanced stage melanoma. Methods: Class I HLA-A0201+ subjects with in-transit melanoma metastases or high risk for recurrence were vaccinated weekly with peptide vaccination (class I restricted peptide GP100209-2m and, if HLA-DP4+, also with class II restricted peptide MAGE-3243-258). Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive Resiquimod as an adjuvant applied to the GP100 vaccination site. Subjects with in-transit disease were thereafter treated with resiquimod topically on half of the target lesions. Results: All patients (n = 47) underwent GP100209-2m vaccination, a majority (39) also received the MAGE-3243-258 peptide. The type I interferon-inducible genes (Mx A and IRF7), IFNg, and IP-10 RNA expression were up-regulated only in vaccination sites treated with Resiquimod (each p < 0.01) , demonstrating pDC activation (Type I interferon) and possibly T and NK cell activation (IFNg and IP-10). Nineteen subjects had in-transit disease at entry into the trial. In response to peptide vaccination alone, tumor regression was more likely in patients who received Resiquimod at the vaccination site (group A) compared to those who did not (group B). (4/9 vs 0/10, p = 0.033). In group A, 5 patients continued treatment with Resiquimod topically on the tumors, and all had tumor response (4PR, 1CR). In group B, 5 continued to tumoral resiquimod and 3 had regression (3 PR). Conclusions: Resiquimod increases Type I interferon and IFNg at the peptide vaccination site by activation of pDC/mDC and increases the antitumor response sufficiently to mediate regression of in-transit melanoma metastasis. Resiquimod on in-transit melanoma, in vaccinated hosts, drives regression of metastases, regardless of previous exposure at vaccination. Clinical trial information: NCT00960752.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luis M Vence
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Tara Wray
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Merrick I. Ross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | - Adi Diab
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Patrick Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Shaitelman SF, Chiang YJ, Griffin KD, DeSnyder SM, Smith BD, Schaverien MV, Woodward WA, Cormier JN. Radiation therapy targets and the risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 162:201-215. [PMID: 28012086 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4089-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Accepted: 12/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE New indications have been found for regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in breast cancer treatment, yet the relationship of RNI and lymphedema risk is uncertain. We sought to determine the association of RNI and lymphedema. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus for articles in English on humans published from 1995 to 2015, using search terms breast neoplasm, treatment, and morbidity. Two investigators independently selected articles and extracted information, including manuscripts reporting incidence of lymphedema by radiation targets. Meta-analyses, review papers, case-control studies, matched-pair studies, repetitive datasets, and retrospective studies were excluded. A total of 2399 abstracts were identified and 323 corresponding articles reviewed. Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Data were pooled using a random effects mixed model. Network meta-analyses were performed to determine the association of radiation targets alone and radiation targets plus extent of axillary surgery on incidence of lymphedema. RESULTS The addition of RNI to breast/CW irradiation was associated with an increased incidence of lymphedema (OR 2.85; 95% CI 1.24-6.55). In patients treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary sampling, there was no association of lymphedema with the addition of RNI to breast/CW irradiation (OR 1.58; 95% CI 0.54-4.66; pooled incidence 5.7 and 4.1%, respectively). Among patients treated with axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), treatment with RNI in addition to breast/CW radiation was associated with a significantly higher risk of lymphedema (OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.38-5.44; pooled incidence 18.2 and 9.4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS RNI is associated with a significantly higher risk of lymphedema than irradiation of the breast/CW, particularly after ALND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1202, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Kate D Griffin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sarah M DeSnyder
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1434, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1202, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Mark V Schaverien
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1488, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Wendy A Woodward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1202, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Roland CL, Boland GM, Demicco EG, Lusby K, Ingram D, May CD, Kivlin CM, Watson K, Al Sannaa GA, Wang WL, Ravi V, Pollock RE, Lev D, Cormier JN, Hunt KK, Feig BW, Lazar AJ, Torres KE. Clinical Observations and Molecular Variables of Primary Vascular Leiomyosarcoma. JAMA Surg 2016; 151:347-54. [PMID: 26629783 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.4205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Vascular leiomyosarcomas are a rare subtype of leiomyosarcomas that most commonly affect the inferior vena cava and account for 5% of all leiomyosarcomas. These tumors are aggressive malignant tumors for which adjuvant modalities have not shown increased efficacy compared with surgery. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the outcomes of patients with vascular leiomyosarcoma and the association between vascular leiomyosarcomas and immunohistochemical molecular markers, to determine their potential prognostic and therapeutic utility. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective medical record review of a cohort of 77 patients who presented to the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston during the period from January 1993 to April 2012. Data were analyzed during the period from November 2012 to May 2015. All of the patients received a confirmed diagnosis of vascular leiomyosarcoma. Immunohistochemical studies for biomarkers were performed on a tissue microarray that included 26 primary specimens of vascular leiomyosarcoma. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Demographic and clinical factors were evaluated to assess clinical course, patterns of recurrence, and survival outcomes for patients with primary vascular leiomyosarcoma. A univariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to correlate disease-specific survival and time to recurrence with potential prognostic indicators. RESULTS Sixty-three patients with localized disease who underwent surgical resection formed the study population, and their data were used for subsequent outcomes analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 58 years (range, 22-78 years). The majority of patients were female (41 patients [65%]) and white (51 patients [81%]). The 5-year disease-specific survival rate after tumor resection was 65%. The median time to local recurrence was 43 months, the median time to distant recurrence was 25 months, and the median time to concurrent local and distant recurrences was 15 months (P = .04). Strong expressions of cytoplasmic β-catenin (hazard ratio, 5.33 [95% CI, 0.97-29.30]; P = .06) and insulinlike growth factor 1 receptor (hazard ratio, 2.74 [95% CI, 1.14-6.56]; P = .02) were associated with inferior disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Vascular leiomyosarcomas are aggressive malignant tumors, with high recurrence rates. Expressions of β-catenin and insulinlike growth factor 1 receptor were associated with poor disease-specific survival. Prospective studies should evaluate the clinical and therapeutic utility of these molecular markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Genevieve M Boland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston2Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Elizabeth G Demicco
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston4Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Kristelle Lusby
- Sarcoma Research Center, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Davis Ingram
- Sarcoma Research Center, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Caitlin D May
- Sarcoma Research Center, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston6Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
| | - Christine M Kivlin
- Sarcoma Research Center, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston6Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
| | - Kelsey Watson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ghadah A Al Sannaa
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Vinod Ravi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Dina Lev
- Sarcoma Research Center, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston9Department of Cancer Biology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Wen S, Huang X, Frankowski RF, Cormier JN, Pisters P. A Bayesian multivariate joint frailty model for disease recurrences and survival. Stat Med 2016; 35:4794-4812. [PMID: 27383540 DOI: 10.1002/sim.7030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2015] [Revised: 02/28/2016] [Accepted: 06/05/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Motivated by a study for soft tissue sarcoma, this article considers the analysis of diseases recurrence and survival. A multivariate frailty hazard model is established for joint modeling of three correlated time-to-event outcomes: local disease recurrence, distant disease recurrence (metastasis), and death. The goals are to find out (i) the effects of treatments on local and distant disease recurrences, and death, (ii) the effects of local and distant disease recurrences on death, and (iii) the correlation between local and distant recurrences. By our approach, all these three important questions, which are commonly asked in similar medical research studies, can be answered by a single model. We put the proposed joint frailty model in a Bayesian framework and use a hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for the computation of posterior distributions. This hybrid algorithm relies on the evaluation of the gradient of target log density and a guided walk progress, and it combines these two strategies to suppress random walk behavior. A further distinction is that the hybrid algorithm can update all the components of a multivariate state vector simultaneously. Simulation studies are conducted to assess the proposed joint frailty model and the computation algorithm. The motivating soft tissue sarcoma data set is analyzed for illustration purpose. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sijin Wen
- Department of Biostatistics, West Virginia University School of Public Health, Morgantown, 26506, WV, U.S.A..
| | - Xuelin Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77230, TX, U.S.A
| | - Ralph F Frankowski
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, The University of Texas at Houston Health Science Center, Houston, 77230, TX, U.S.A
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, School of Public Health, The University of Texas at Houston Health Science Center, Houston, 77230, TX, U.S.A
| | - Peter Pisters
- Department of Surgical Oncology, School of Public Health, The University of Texas at Houston Health Science Center, Houston, 77230, TX, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Amaria RN, Haymaker CL, Bernatchez C, Forget MA, Patel V, Hwu WJ, Davies MA, Patel SP, Diab A, Glitza IC, Tawbi HAH, Woodman SE, Wargo JA, Ross MI, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, Cormier JN, Royal RE, Lucci A, Hwu P. A phase I/II study of lymphodepletion plus adoptive cell transfer (ACT) with T cells transduced with CXCR2 and NGFR followed by high dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.tps9594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Vruti Patel
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Adi Diab
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Merrick I. Ross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | | | | - Anthony Lucci
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Patrick Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Watson KL, Al Sannaa GA, Kivlin CM, Ingram DR, Landers SM, Roland CL, Cormier JN, Hunt KK, Feig BW, Ashleigh Guadagnolo B, Bishop AJ, Wang WL, Slopis JM, McCutcheon IE, Lazar AJ, Torres KE. Patterns of recurrence and survival in sporadic, neurofibromatosis Type 1-associated, and radiation-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. J Neurosurg 2016; 126:319-329. [PMID: 27035165 DOI: 10.3171/2015.12.jns152443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs) are an aggressive group of soft tissue sarcomas that can arise sporadically, in the context of neurofibromatosis Type 1 (NF1) or at a site of prior irradiation. Large series profiling the features and outcomes of sporadic, NF1-associated, and radiation-associated MPNSTs are limited. The goal of this study was to elucidate differences between MPNST etiologies in a large single-institution retrospective study. METHODS Patients (n = 317) were identified through the tumor registry of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Clinicopathological features were retrospectively collected. Features were compared among MPNST subtypes for patients who had sufficient clinical history (n = 289), and clinicopathological features were used to identify adverse predictors of recurrence and survival outcomes. RESULTS Five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) estimates were 56.6%, 49.6%, and 53.6%, respectively, for the high-grade MPNST cohort. Five-year DSS was lower in NF1-associated and radiation-associated MPNST than in sporadic MPNST (52%, 47%, and 67%, respectively, p = 0.140). Patients with radiation-associated MPNST had worse 5-year LRFS than those with the sporadic and NF1-associated subtypes (RT-associated vs sporadic, p = 0.010; RT-associated vs NF1-associated, p = 0.232). Truncally located tumors, positive surgical margins, local recurrence, and metastasis were predictors of adverse DSS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Radiation-associated MPNSTs are associated with poorer local recurrence-free and disease-specific survival than sporadic and NF1-associated tumors. NF1-associated MPNSTs may have worse survival outcomes owing to large tumor size, compromising truncal location, and lower rate of negative resection margins compared with sporadic tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christine M Kivlin
- Departments of 1 Surgical Oncology.,The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ian E McCutcheon
- Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; and
| | - Alexandar J Lazar
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fang S, Sui D, Wang Y, Liu H, Chiang YJ, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE, Cormier JN, Royal RE, Lucci A, Wargo J, Hu MI, Gardner JM, Reveille JD, Bassett RL, Wei Q, Amos CI, Lee JE. Association of Vitamin D Levels With Outcome in Patients With Melanoma After Adjustment For C-Reactive Protein. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34:1741-7. [PMID: 27001565 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.64.1357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate for an association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (vitamin D) and outcome measures in patients with melanoma after evaluation is controlled for systemic inflammatory response (SIR) on the basis of simultaneous C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS Plasma samples from 1,042 prospectively observed patients with melanoma were assayed for vitamin D and CRP. The associations of demographics and CRP with vitamin D were determined, followed by a determination of the association between vitamin D and stage and outcome measures from the date of blood draw. The vitamin D level was considered sufficient if it was 30 to 100 ng/mL. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed. RESULTS The median vitamin D level was 25.0 ng/mL. The median follow-up time was 7.1 years. A lower vitamin D was associated with the blood draw during fall/winter months (P < .001), older age (P = .001), increased CRP (P < .001), increased tumor thickness (P < .001), ulcerated tumor (P = .0105), and advanced melanoma stage (P = .0024). On univariate analysis, lower vitamin D was associated with poorer overall (OS; P < .001), melanoma-specific survival (MSS; P = .0025), and disease-free survival (DFS; P = .0466). The effect of vitamin D on these outcome measures persisted after adjustment for CRP and other covariates. Multivariable hazards ratios per unit decrease of vitamin D were 1.02 for OS (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.04; P = .0051), 1.02 for MSS (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.04; P = .048), and 1.02 for DFS (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.04; P = .0427). CONCLUSION Lower vitamin D levels in patients with melanoma were associated with poorer outcomes. Although lower vitamin D was strongly associated with higher CRP, the associations of lower vitamin D with poorer OS, MSS, and DFS were independent of this association. Investigation of mechanisms responsible for these associations may be of value to patients with melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shenying Fang
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Dawen Sui
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Yuling Wang
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Huey Liu
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Richard E Royal
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Jennifer Wargo
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Mimi I Hu
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Julie M Gardner
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - John D Reveille
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Roland L Bassett
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Qingyi Wei
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Christopher I Amos
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Shenying Fang, Dawen Sui, Yuling Wang, Huey Liu, Yi-Ju Chiang, Merrick I. Ross, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Janice N. Cormier, Richard E. Royal, Anthony Lucci, Jennifer Wargo, Mimi I. Hu, Julie M. Gardner, Roland L. Bassett, and Jeffrey E. Lee, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; John D. Reveille, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX; Qingyi Wei, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC; and Christopher I. Amos, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Roland CL, May CD, Watson KL, Al Sannaa GA, Dineen SP, Feig R, Landers S, Ingram DR, Wang WL, Guadagnolo BA, Feig B, Hunt KK, Cormier JN, Lazar AJ, Torres KE. Analysis of Clinical and Molecular Factors Impacting Oncologic Outcomes in Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:2220-8. [PMID: 26847678 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5115-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS) present a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Identification of prognostic molecular markers is required for the discovery of novel treatment approaches. The purpose of this study was to correlate clinicopathologic variables, expression of tyrosine kinase receptors, and markers of cell cycle progression and survival with oncologic outcomes. METHODS A tissue microarray containing 208 primary UPS samples was analyzed by immunohistochemistry for protein markers and in situ hybridization for microRNA. Staining results were correlated with clinicopathologic features and oncologic outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess associations between expression of protein markers, mi-RNA, and outcome. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 3.9 years (9 years for survivors), 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) was 63 %. Clinical variables associated with improved DSS included age <61 years, tumor size <10 cm, margin-negative resection, and sporadic-tumor status. At the protein level, loss of cyclin D1 (p = 0.06), pEGFR (p = 0.023), pIGF-1R (p = 0.022), and PTEN (p < 0.001) and overexpression of AXL (p = 0.015) were associated with reduced DSS on univariate analysis. Ki67, PCNA, and pEGFR were more highly expressed in sporadic UPS than radiation-associated (RA-UPS), whereas RA-UPS samples expressed higher levels of both phosphorylated and total IGF-1R. DISCUSSION Loss of cyclin D1, overexpression of AXL, and loss of PTEN are associated with poor cancer-specific outcomes and warrant further investigation in UPS. The differences in protein expression in sporadic versus RA-UPS may indicate that the activated molecular signaling nodes may be different for each specific histology and also could explain the aggressive phenotype seen in RA-UPS compared with the sporadic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina L Roland
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Caitlin D May
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston - Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelsey L Watson
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ghadah A Al Sannaa
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sean P Dineen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rachel Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sharon Landers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Davis R Ingram
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Barry Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lairson DR, Parikh RC, Cormier JN, Chan W, Du XL. Cost-Effectiveness of Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer and Age Effect in Older Women. Value Health 2015; 18:1070-1078. [PMID: 26686793 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2014] [Revised: 07/08/2015] [Accepted: 08/03/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous economic evaluations compared specific chemotherapy agents using input parameters from clinical trials and resource utilization costs. Cost-effectiveness of treatment groups (drug classes) using community-level effectiveness and cost data, however, has not been assessed for elderly patients with breast cancer. OBJECTIVE To assess the cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy regimens by age and disease stage under "real-world" conditions for patients with breast cancer. METHODS The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data were used to identify patients with breast cancer with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I/II/IIIa, hormone receptor-negative (estrogen receptor-negative and progesterone receptor-negative) patients from 1992 to 2009. Patients were categorized into three adjuvant treatment groups: 1) no chemotherapy, 2) anthracycline, and 3) non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Median life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were measured using Kaplan-Meier analysis and were evaluated against average total health care costs (2013 US dollars). RESULTS A total of 4575 patients (propensity score-matched) were included for the primary analysis. The anthracycline group experienced 12.05 QALYs and mean total health care costs of $119,055, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $7,688 per QALY gained as compared with the no chemotherapy group (QALYs 7.81; average health care cost $86,383). The non-anthracycline-based group was dominated by the anthracycline group with lower QALYs (9.56) and higher health care costs ($122,791). Base-case results were found to be consistent with the best-case and worst-case scenarios for utility assignments. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios varied by age group (range $3,790-$90,405 per QALY gained). CONCLUSIONS Anthracycline-based chemotherapy was found cost-effective for elderly patients with early stage (stage I, II, IIIa) breast cancer considering the US threshold of $100,000 per QALY. Further research may be needed to characterize differential effects across age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David R Lairson
- Division of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Rohan C Parikh
- Division of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wenyaw Chan
- Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xianglin L Du
- Division of Management, Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA; Division of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Voss RK, Woods TN, Cromwell KD, Nelson KC, Cormier JN. Improving outcomes in patients with melanoma: strategies to ensure an early diagnosis. Patient Relat Outcome Meas 2015; 6:229-42. [PMID: 26609248 PMCID: PMC4644158 DOI: 10.2147/prom.s69351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Patients with thin, low-risk melanomas have an excellent long-term prognosis and higher quality of life than those who are diagnosed at later stages. From an economic standpoint, treatment of early stage melanoma consumes a fraction of the health care resources needed to treat advanced disease. Consequently, early diagnosis of melanoma is in the best interest of patients, payers, and health care systems. This review describes strategies to ensure that patients receive an early diagnosis through interventions ranging from better utilization of primary care clinics, to in vivo diagnostic technologies, to new "apps" available in the market. Strategies for screening those at high risk due to age, male sex, skin type, nevi, genetic mutations, or family history are discussed. Despite progress in identifying those at high risk for melanoma, there remains a lack of general consensus worldwide for best screening practices. Strategies to ensure early diagnosis of recurrent disease in those with a prior melanoma diagnosis are also reviewed. Variations in recurrence surveillance practices by type of provider and country are featured, with evidence demonstrating that various imaging studies, including ultrasound, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, provide only minimal gains in life expectancy, even for those with more advanced (stage III) disease. Because the majority of melanomas are attributable to ultraviolet radiation in the form of sunlight, primary prevention strategies, including sunscreen use and behavioral interventions, are reviewed. Recent international government regulation of tanning beds is described, as well as issues surrounding the continued use artificial ultraviolet sources among youth. Health care stakeholder strategies to minimize UV exposure are summarized. The recommendations encompass both specific behaviors and broad intervention targets (eg, individuals, social spheres, organizations, celebrities, governments).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel K Voss
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tessa N Woods
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kate D Cromwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelly C Nelson
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Voss RK, Cromwell KD, Chiang YJ, Armer JM, Ross MI, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, Stewart BR, Shaitelman SF, Cormier JN. The long-term risk of upper-extremity lymphedema is two-fold higher in breast cancer patients than in melanoma patients. J Surg Oncol 2015; 112:834-40. [PMID: 26477877 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2015] [Accepted: 10/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We assessed the cumulative incidence, symptoms, and risk factors for upper-extremity lymphedema in breast cancer and melanoma patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection. METHODS Patients were recruited preoperatively (time 0) and assessed at 6, 12, and 18 months postoperatively. Limb volume change (LVC) was measured by perometry. Lymphedema was categorized as none, mild (LVC 5-9.9%), or moderate/severe (LVC≥10%). Symptoms were assessed with a validated lymphedema instrument. Longitudinal logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors associated with moderate/severe lymphedema. RESULTS Among 205 breast cancer and 144 melanoma patients, the cumulative incidence of moderate/severe lymphedema at 18 months was 36.5% and 35.0%, respectively. However, in adjusted analyses, factors associated with moderate/severe lymphedema were breast cancer (OR 2.0, P = 0.03), body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m(2) (OR 1.6, P = 0.04), greater number of lymph nodes removed (OR 1.05, P < 0.01), and longer interval since surgery (OR 2.33 at 18 months, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Lymphedema incidence increased over time in both cohorts. However, the adjusted risk of moderate/severe lymphedema was two-fold higher in breast cancer patients. These results may be attributed to surgical treatment of the primary tumor in the breast and more frequent use of radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel K Voss
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kate D Cromwell
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yi-Ju Chiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jane M Armer
- Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bob R Stewart
- Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Simona F Shaitelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Liu L, Huang X, Yaroshinsky A, Cormier JN. Joint frailty models for zero-inflated recurrent events in the presence of a terminal event. Biometrics 2015; 72:204-14. [DOI: 10.1111/biom.12376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2014] [Revised: 05/01/2015] [Accepted: 06/01/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Liu
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center; Northwestern University; Chicago, Illinois 60611 U.S.A
| | - Xuelin Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; University of Texas; Houston, Texas 77030 U.S.A
| | | | - Janice N. Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center; University of Texas; Houston, Texas 77030 U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kneuertz PJ, Chang GJ, Hu CY, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Eng C, Vilar E, Skibber JM, Feig BW, Cormier JN, You YN. Overtreatment of young adults with colon cancer: more intense treatments with unmatched survival gains. JAMA Surg 2015; 150:402-9. [PMID: 25806815 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Colon cancer is increasing among adults younger than 50 years. However, the prognosis of young-onset colon cancer remains poorly defined given significant age-related demographic, disease, and treatment differences. OBJECTIVE To define stage-specific treatments and prognosis of colon cancer diagnosed in young adults (ages 18-49 years) vs older adults (ages 65-75 years) outside of the clinical trial setting while accounting for real-world age-related variations in patient, tumor, and treatment factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A nationwide cohort study was conducted among US hospitals accredited by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Participants were 13 102 patients diagnosed as having young-onset colon adenocarcinoma aged 18 to 49 years and 37 007 patients diagnosed as having later-onset colon adenocarcinoma aged 65 to 75 years treated between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2005, and reported to the National Cancer Data Base. EXPOSURES Patients who underwent surgical resection and postoperative systemic chemotherapy of curative intent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was stage-specific relative survival, an objective measure of survival among patients with cancer, adjusting for baseline mortality rates and independent of the data on cause of death. The secondary end point was stage-specific likelihood of receiving postoperative systemic chemotherapy. RESULTS Most young-onset colon cancer was initially seen at advanced stages (61.8% had stage III or IV). After adjusting for patient-related and tumor-related factors, young patients were more likely to receive systemic chemotherapy, particularly multiagent regimens, at all stages relative to those with later-onset disease. These odds ratios were 2.88 (95% CI, 2.21-3.77) for stage I, 3.93 (95% CI, 3.58-4.31) for stage II, 2.42 (95% CI, 2.18-2.68) for stage III, and 2.74 (95% CI, 2.44-3.07) for stage IV. The significantly more intense treatments received by younger patients were unmatched by any survival gain, which was nil for stage II (relative risk, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69-1.17) and marginal for stage III (relative risk, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.97) and stage IV (relative risk, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.90). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Young adults with colon cancer received significantly more postoperative systemic chemotherapy at all stages, but they experienced only minimal gain in adjusted survival compared with their older counterparts who received less treatment. This mismatch suggests that attention should be given to long-term cancer survivorship in young adults with colon cancer because they likely face survivorship needs that are distinct from those of their older counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Kneuertz
- Department of General Surgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Chung-Yuan Hu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Cathy Eng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Eduardo Vilar
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston4Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - John M Skibber
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Y Nancy You
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Brudvik KW, Patel SH, Roland CL, Conrad C, Torres KE, Hunt KK, Cormier JN, Feig BW, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN. Survival After Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor and Sarcoma Liver Metastases in 146 Patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2015; 19:1476-83. [PMID: 26001368 PMCID: PMC4506212 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-2845-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/28/2015] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated outcomes by primary tumor type in patients who underwent resection of liver metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), leiomyosarcomas, and other sarcomas. METHOD Our institutional liver database was used to identify patients who underwent resection from 1998 through 2013. Histopathological, clinical, and survival data were analyzed. RESULTS One hundred forty-six patients underwent resection of liver metastases from GIST (n = 49), leiomyosarcomas (n = 47), or other sarcomas (n = 50). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates in patients with GIST, leiomyosarcomas, and other sarcomas were 55.3, 48.4, and 44.9%, respectively, and the 10-year OS rates were 52.5, 9.2, and 23.0%, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was better for GIST (35.7%; p = 0.003) than for leiomyosarcomas (3.4%) and other sarcomas (21.4%). Lung recurrence was more common for leiomyosarcomas (36% of patients; p < 0.0001) than for other sarcomas (12%) and GIST (2%). For GIST, the findings support a benefit of imatinib regarding the 5-year RFS rate compared to resection alone (47.1 vs. 9.5%; p = 0.013). For leiomyosarcoma, primary tumor location did not affect the 5-year RFS rate (intraabdominal 14.5%; other location 0%; p = 0.182). CONCLUSION Liver metastases from GIST, leiomyosarcomas, and other sarcomas should be assessed separately as their survival and recurrence patterns are different. This is especially important for GIST, for which imatinib is now available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristoffer W Brudvik
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1484, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Affiliation(s)
- Sangbum Choi
- Division of Clinical and Translational Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine; The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston; Houston, TX U.S.A
| | - Xuelin Huang
- Department of Biostatistics; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston, TX U.S.A
| | - Janice N. Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Houston, TX U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tseng WW, Zhou S, To CA, Thall PF, Lazar AJ, Pollock RE, Lin PP, Cormier JN, Lewis VO, Feig BW, Hunt KK, Ballo MT, Patel S, Pisters PWT. Phase 1 adaptive dose-finding study of neoadjuvant gemcitabine combined with radiation therapy for patients with high-risk extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer 2015; 121:3659-67. [PMID: 26177983 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 05/23/2015] [Accepted: 05/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine given concurrently with preoperative, fixed-dose external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for patients with resectable, high-risk extremity and trunk soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS Gemcitabine was administered on days 1, 8, 22, 29, 43, and 50 with EBRT (50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks). The gemcitabine MTD was determined with a toxicity severity weight method (TSWM) incorporating 6 toxicity types. The TSWM is a Bayesian procedure that choses each cohort's dose to have a posterior mean total toxicity burden closest to a predetermined clinician-defined target. Clinicopathologic and outcome data were also collected. RESULTS Thirty-six patients completed the study. According to the TSWM, the gemcitabine MTD was 700 mg/m(2). At this dose level, 4 patients (24%) experienced grade 4 toxicity; no toxicity-related deaths occurred. All tumors were resected with microscopically negative margins. Pathologic responses of >90% tumor necrosis were achieved in 17 patients (47%); 14 (39%) had complete responses. With a median follow-up of 6.2 years, the 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were 85%, 80%, and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The TSWM combines data from qualitatively different toxicities and can be used to determine the MTD for a drug given as part of a multimodality treatment. Neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus radiation therapy is feasible and safe in patients with high-risk extremity and trunk STS. Major pathologic responses can be achieved, and after complete resection, long-term clinical outcomes are encouraging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William W Tseng
- Section of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.,Sarcoma Program, Hoag Family Cancer Institute and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, California
| | - Shouhao Zhou
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christina A To
- Department of Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Peter F Thall
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Raphael E Pollock
- Division of Surgical Oncology, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Patrick P Lin
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Valerae O Lewis
- Department of Orthopedic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew T Ballo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Shreyaskumar Patel
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bedrosian I, Xing Y, Abdel Rahman S, Allen L, Le-Petross H, Whitman GJ, Meric-Bernstam F, Hunt KK, Babiera GV, Cormier JN. A Cost Analysis of Preoperative Breast MRI Use for Patients with Invasive Lobular Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 23:23-9. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4710-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2014] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
47
|
Amaria RN, Wargo JA, Cooper ZA, Tetzlaff MT, Reuben A, Davies MA, Gershenwald JE, Jiang H, Austin-Breneman J, Lee JE, Hwu P, Hwu WJ, Cormier JN, Royal RE, Lucci A, Patel SP, Diab A, Glitza IC, Burton EM, Ross MI. Treatment with neoadjuvant BRAF Inhibition Yields Responses in Patients (pts) with High Risk Borderline Resectable Stage III Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.e20097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hong Jiang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Patrick Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Anthony Lucci
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Adi Diab
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Merrick I. Ross
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bishop AJ, Zagars GK, Torres KE, Hunt KK, Cormier JN, Feig BW, Guadagnolo BA. Combined Modality Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Single-Institution Series of 121 Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 93:158-65. [PMID: 26130233 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.04.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2014] [Revised: 02/18/2015] [Accepted: 04/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate local control, survival outcomes, and complication rates of patients treated with aggressive surgery and radiation therapy (RT) for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). METHODS AND MATERIALS We reviewed the medical records of 121 consecutive patients treated for RPS with surgery and RT between 1965 and 2012. The most common histology was liposarcoma (n = 42; 35%). The median follow-up was 100 months (range: 20-467 months). Eighty-six patients (71%) were treated for initial presentation of RPS, and 35 patients (29%) presented with and were treated for RPS recurrence. RT was preoperative in 88 patients (73%; median dose: 50.4 Gy) and postoperative in 33 patients (27%; median dose: 55 Gy). RESULTS Five-year local control and overall survival rates were 56% and 57%, respectively. Two factors were associated with higher risk of any intra-abdominal recurrence at 5 years: positive or uncertain margins (58% vs 30% for negative margins, P < .001; hazard ratio [HR]: 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-4.8) and disease recurrence after previous resection (76% vs 31% for de novo RPS, P < .001; HR: 4.4; 95% CI: 2.5-7.5). The 10-year complication rate was 5%, and RT-related complications were associated with postoperative RT (P < .001) and RT dose of ≥ 60 Gy (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Intra-abdominal RPS recurrence continues to be a significant challenge despite the use of aggressive surgery and radiation therapy. Given the complications associated with postoperative radiation therapy, we recommend that preoperative radiation therapy is the preferred strategy when combined modality therapy is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gunar K Zagars
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Keila E Torres
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Barry W Feig
- Department of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Health Services Research, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Fang S, Wang Y, Chun YS, Liu H, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE, Cormier JN, Royal RE, Lucci A, Schacherer CW, Reveille JD, Sui D, Bassett RL, Wang LE, Wei Q, Amos CI, Lee JE. The relationship between blood IL-12p40 level and melanoma progression. Int J Cancer 2015; 136:1874-80. [PMID: 25196740 PMCID: PMC4323934 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2014] [Revised: 07/22/2014] [Accepted: 08/14/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Cytokines such as Interleukin (IL)-12p70 ("IL-12") and IL-23 can influence tumor progression. We tested the hypothesis that blood levels of IL-12p40, the common subunit of both cytokines, are associated with melanoma progression. Blood from 2,048 white melanoma patients were collected at a single institution between March 1998 and March 2011. Plasma levels of IL-12p40 were determined for 573 patients (discovery), 249 patients (Validation 1) and 244 patients (Validation 2). Per 10-unit change of IL-12p40 level was used to investigate associations with melanoma patient outcome among all patients or among patients with early or advanced stage. Among stage I/II melanoma patients in the pooled data set, after adjustment for sex, age, stage and blood draw time from diagnosis, elevated IL-12p40 was associated with melanoma recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.04 per 10-unit increase in IL-12p40, 95% CI 1.02-1.06, p = 8.48 × 10(-5) ]; Elevated IL-12p40 was also associated with a poorer melanoma specific survival (HR = 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09, p = 3.35 × 10(-5) ) and overall survival (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.08, p = 8.78×10(-7) ) in multivariate analysis. Among stage III/IV melanoma patients in the pooled data set, no significant association was detected between elevated IL-12p40 and overall survival, or with melanoma specific survival, with or without adjustment for the above covariates. Early stage melanoma patients with elevated IL-12p40 levels are more likely to develop disease recurrence and have a poorer survival. Further investigation with a larger sample size will be needed to determine the role of IL-12p40 in advanced stage melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shenying Fang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Fang S, Wang Y, Chun YS, Liu H, Ross MI, Gershenwald JE, Cormier JN, Royal RE, Lucci A, Schacherer CW, Reveille JD, Chen W, Sui D, Bassett RL, Wang LE, Wei Q, Amos CI, Lee JE. Association of Common Genetic Polymorphisms with Melanoma Patient IL-12p40 Blood Levels, Risk, and Outcomes. J Invest Dermatol 2015; 135:2266-2272. [PMID: 25848976 PMCID: PMC4580731 DOI: 10.1038/jid.2015.138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2014] [Revised: 03/19/2015] [Accepted: 03/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Recent investigation has identified association of IL-12p40 blood levels with melanoma recurrence and patient survival. No studies have investigated associations of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with melanoma patient IL-12p40 blood levels or their potential contributions to melanoma susceptibility or patient outcome. In the current study, 818,237 SNPs were available for 1,804 melanoma cases and 1,026 controls. IL-12p40 blood levels were assessed among 573 cases (discovery), 249 cases (case validation), and 299 controls (control validation). SNPs were evaluated for association with log[IL-12p40] levels in the discovery data set and replicated in two validation data sets, and significant SNPs were assessed for association with melanoma susceptibility and patient outcomes. The most significant SNP associated with log[IL-12p40] was in the IL-12B gene region (rs6897260, combined P=9.26 × 10(-38)); this single variant explained 13.1% of variability in log[IL-12p40]. The most significant SNP in EBF1 was rs6895454 (combined P=2.24 × 10(-9)). A marker in IL12B was associated with melanoma susceptibility (rs3213119, multivariate P=0.0499; OR=1.50, 95% CI 1.00-2.24), whereas a marker in EBF1 was associated with melanoma-specific survival in advanced-stage patients (rs10515789, multivariate P=0.02; HR=1.93, 95% CI 1.11-3.35). Both EBF1 and IL12B strongly regulate IL-12p40 blood levels, and IL-12p40 polymorphisms may contribute to melanoma susceptibility and influence patient outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shenying Fang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; These authors contributed equally to this work.
| | - Yuling Wang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yun S Chun
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Huey Liu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| | - Janice N Cormier
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard E Royal
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christopher W Schacherer
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John D Reveille
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunogenetics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Dawen Sui
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roland L Bassett
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Li-E Wang
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Qingyi Wei
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher I Amos
- Geisel College of Medicine, Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA; These authors contributed equally to this work
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; These authors contributed equally to this work
| |
Collapse
|