1
|
Bai X, Shaheen A, Grieco C, d’Arienzo PD, Mina F, Czapla JA, Lawless AR, Bongiovanni E, Santaniello U, Zappi H, Dulak D, Williamson A, Lee R, Gupta A, Li C, Si L, Ubaldi M, Yamazaki N, Ogata D, Johnson R, Park BC, Jung S, Madonna G, Hochherz J, Umeda Y, Nakamura Y, Gebhardt C, Festino L, Capone M, Ascierto PA, Johnson DB, Lo SN, Long GV, Menzies AM, Namikawa K, Mandala M, Guo J, Lorigan P, Najjar YG, Haydon A, Quaglino P, Boland GM, Sullivan RJ, Furness AJ, Plummer R, Flaherty KT. Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy as adjuvant therapy in BRAF V600-mutant stage III melanoma after definitive surgery: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 71:102564. [PMID: 38572079 PMCID: PMC10990704 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Bai
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, China
- Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | | | | | | | - Florentia Mina
- Skin Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Eleonora Bongiovanni
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Italy
| | - Umberto Santaniello
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Italy
| | | | - Dominika Dulak
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Rebecca Lee
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Caili Li
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, China
| | - Lu Si
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, China
| | | | - Naoya Yamazaki
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dai Ogata
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rebecca Johnson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Benjamin C. Park
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Seungyeon Jung
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gabriele Madonna
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Juliane Hochherz
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), University Skin Cancer Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yoshiyasu Umeda
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Christoffer Gebhardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), University Skin Cancer Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lucia Festino
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Mariaelena Capone
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Douglas B. Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Serigne N. Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M. Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kenjiro Namikawa
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Jun Guo
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, China
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Pietro Quaglino
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stassen RC, Maas CCHM, van der Veldt AAM, Lo SN, Saw RPM, Varey AHR, Scolyer RA, Long GV, Thompson JF, Rutkowski P, Keilholz U, van Akkooi ACJ, Verhoef C, van Klaveren D, Grünhagen DJ. Development and validation of a novel model to predict recurrence-free survival and melanoma-specific survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with melanoma: an international, retrospective, multicentre analysis. Lancet Oncol 2024; 25:509-517. [PMID: 38547894 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00076-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of adjuvant systemic treatment for patients with high-risk melanomas necessitates accurate staging of disease. However, inconsistencies in outcomes exist between disease stages as defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (8th edition). We aimed to develop a tool to predict patient-specific outcomes in people with melanoma rather than grouping patients according to disease stage. METHODS Patients older than 13 years with confirmed primary melanoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) between Oct 29, 1997, and Nov 11, 2013, at four European melanoma centres (based in Berlin, Germany; Amsterdam and Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and Warsaw, Poland) were included in the development cohort. Potential predictors of recurrence-free and melanoma-specific survival assessed were sex, age, presence of ulceration, primary tumour location, histological subtype, Breslow thickness, sentinel node status, number of sentinel nodes removed, maximum diameter of the largest sentinel node metastasis, and Dewar classification. A prognostic model and nomogram were developed to predict 5-year recurrence-free survival on a continuous scale in patients with stage pT1b or higher melanomas. This model was also calibrated to predict melanoma-specific survival. Model performance was assessed by discrimination (area under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC]) and calibration. External validation was done in a cohort of patients with primary melanomas who underwent SLNB between Jan 30, 1997, and Dec 12, 2013, at the Melanoma Institute Australia (Sydney, NSW, Australia). FINDINGS The development cohort consisted of 4071 patients, of whom 2075 (51%) were female and 1996 (49%) were male. 889 (22%) had sentinel node-positive disease and 3182 (78%) had sentinel node-negative disease. The validation cohort comprised 4822 patients, of whom 1965 (41%) were female and 2857 (59%) were male. 891 (18%) had sentinel node-positive disease and 3931 (82%) had sentinel node-negative disease. Median follow-up was 4·8 years (IQR 2·3-7·8) in the development cohort and 5·0 years (2·2-8·9) in the validation cohort. In the development cohort, 5-year recurrence-free survival was 73·5% (95% CI 72·0-75·1) and 5-year melanoma-specific survival was 86·5% (85·3-87·8). In the validation cohort, the corresponding estimates were 66·1% (64·6-67·7) and 83·3% (82·0-84·6), respectively. The final model contained six prognostic factors: sentinel node status, Breslow thickness, presence of ulceration, age at SLNB, primary tumour location, and maximum diameter of the largest sentinel node metastasis. In the development cohort, for the model's prediction of recurrence-free survival, the AUC was 0·80 (95% CI 0·78-0·81); for prediction of melanoma-specific survival, the AUC was 0·81 (0·79-0·84). External validation showed good calibration for both outcomes, with AUCs of 0·73 (0·71-0·75) and 0·76 (0·74-0·78), respectively. INTERPRETATION Our prediction model and nomogram accurately predicted patient-specific risk probabilities for 5-year recurrence-free and melanoma-specific survival. These tools could have important implications for clinical decision making when considering adjuvant treatments in patients with high-risk melanomas. FUNDING Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert C Stassen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Carolien C H M Maas
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander H R Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Plastic Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital and Mater Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ulrich Keilholz
- Department of Haemato-oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - David van Klaveren
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Centre Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gjorup CA, Woodford R, Li I, Carlino MS, Ch'ng S, Chung D, Hsiao E, Lo SN, London K, Long GV, Menzies AM, Nieweg OE, Pennington TE, Rtshiladze MA, Saw RPM, Scolyer RA, Shannon KF, Spillane AJ, Stretch JR, Thompson JF, Varey AHR, van Akkooi ACJ. ASO Visual Abstract: Role of Concurrent Ultrasound Surveillance of Sentinel Node-Positive Node Fields in Melanoma Patients Having Routine Cross-Sectional Imaging. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1882-1883. [PMID: 38117390 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14665-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A Gjorup
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel Woodford
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Isabel Li
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, Australia
| | - Sydney Ch'ng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Head and Neck Service, Camperdown, Australia
| | - David Chung
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Alfred Nuclear Medicine and Ultrasound, Newtown, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
| | - Edward Hsiao
- Mater Imaging, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kevin London
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Alfred Nuclear Medicine and Ultrasound, Newtown, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
- Charles Perkin Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Thomas E Pennington
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Michael A Rtshiladze
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Charles Perkin Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kerwin F Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Head and Neck Service, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Andrew J Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
- Breast and Melanoma Surgery Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander H R Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jacques SK, McKeown J, Grover P, Johnson DB, Zaremba A, Dimitriou F, Weiser R, Farid M, Namikawa K, Sullivan RJ, Rutkowski P, Lebbe C, Hamid O, Zager JS, Michielin O, Neyns B, Nakamura Y, Robert C, Mehnert J, Ascierto PA, Bhave P, Park B, Zimmer L, Mangana J, Mooradian M, Placzke J, Allayous C, Glitza Oliva IC, Mehmi I, Depalo D, Wicky A, Schwarze JK, Roy S, Boatwright C, Vanella V, Long GV, Menzies AM, Lo SN, Carlino MS. Outcomes of patients with resected stage III/IV acral or mucosal melanoma, treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 based therapy. Eur J Cancer 2024; 199:113563. [PMID: 38278007 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Acral (AM) and mucosal melanomas (MM) are rare subtypes with a poor prognosis. In those with advanced disease, anti-PD-1 (PD1) therapy has reduced activity compared to that seen in non-acral cutaneous melanoma. OBJECTIVE To determine the efficacy of adjuvant PD1 in resected AM or MM. DESIGN An international, retrospective cohort study SETTING: Data up to November 2021 collected from 20 centres across 10 countries. PARTICIPANTS One hundred and ninety four patients with resected stage III or IV1 AM or MM who received adjuvant PD1 were included and compared to matched patients from the Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) database using a propensity score matching analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were investigated. RESULTS Forty five of 139 (32%) AM and 9 of 55 (16%) MM patients completed adjuvant therapy. The main reason for early treatment cessation in both groups was disease recurrence: 51 (37%) and 30 (55%) in the AM and MM groups, respectively. In the AM group adjuvant PD1 was associated with a longer RFS [HR-0.69 (0.52-0.92, p = 0.0127)], DMFS [HR0.58 (0.38-0.89, p = 0.0134)] and OS [HR of 0.59 (0.38-0.92, p-value 0.0196)] when compared to the historical cohort. In the MM group there was no statistical difference in RFS [HR1.36 (0.69-2.68,p-value 0.3799], DMFS or OS. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE After adjuvant PD1, both AM and MM have a high risk of recurrence. Our data suggests a benefit to using adjuvant PD1 therapy in resected AM but not in resected MM. Additional studies to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant PD1 for MM are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah K Jacques
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Janet McKeown
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Piyush Grover
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Anne Zaremba
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Florentia Dimitriou
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich and Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roi Weiser
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Kenjiro Namikawa
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryan J Sullivan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Celeste Lebbe
- Université Paris Cite,AP-HP Dermato-oncology, Cancer institute APHP.nord Paris cité, INSERM U976, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic, A Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan S Zager
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Olivier Michielin
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bart Neyns
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Yasuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Caroline Robert
- Institute Gustave Roussy and Paris Saclay University, Villejuif Cedex, France
| | | | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Prachi Bhave
- Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin Park
- Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Joanna Mangana
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich and Faculty of Medicine, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Megan Mooradian
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joanna Placzke
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Clare Allayous
- Université Paris Cite,AP-HP Dermato-oncology, Cancer institute APHP.nord Paris cité, INSERM U976, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Inderjit Mehmi
- The Angeles Clinic, A Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Danielle Depalo
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Alexandre Wicky
- Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Severine Roy
- Institute Gustave Roussy and Paris Saclay University, Villejuif Cedex, France
| | | | - Vito Vanella
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Mater Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bagge RO, Mikiver R, Marchetti MA, Lo SN, van Akkooi ACJ, Coit DG, Ingvar C, Isaksson K, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF, Varey AHR, Wong SL, Lyth J, Bartlett EK. Population-Based Validation of the MIA and MSKCC Tools for Predicting Sentinel Lymph Node Status. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:260-268. [PMID: 38198163 PMCID: PMC10782377 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
Importance Patients with melanoma are selected for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) based on their risk of a positive SLN. To improve selection, the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) developed predictive models, but the utility of these models remains to be tested. Objective To determine the clinical utility of the MIA and MSKCC models. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a population-based comparative effectiveness research study including 10 089 consecutive patients with cutaneous melanoma undergoing SLNB from the Swedish Melanoma Registry from January 2007 to December 2021. Data were analyzed from May to August 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures, The predicted probability of SLN positivity was calculated using the MSKCC model and a limited MIA model (using mitotic rate as absent/present instead of count/mm2 and excluding the optional variable lymphovascular invasion) for each patient. The operating characteristics of the models were assessed and compared. The clinical utility of each model was assessed using decision curve analysis and compared with a strategy of performing SLNB on all patients. Results Among 10 089 included patients, the median (IQR) age was 64.0 (52.0-73.0) years, and 5340 (52.9%) were male. The median Breslow thickness was 1.8 mm, and 1802 patients (17.9%) had a positive SLN. Both models were well calibrated across the full range of predicted probabilities and had similar external area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC; MSKCC: 70.8%; 95% CI, 69.5-72.1 and limited MIA: 69.7%; 95% CI, 68.4-71.1). At a risk threshold of 5%, decision curve analysis indicated no added net benefit for either model compared to performing SLNB for all patients. At risk thresholds of 10% or higher, both models added net benefit compared to SLNB for all patients. The greatest benefit was observed in patients with T2 melanomas using a threshold of 10%; in that setting, the use of the nomograms led to a net reduction of 8 avoidable SLNBs per 100 patients for the MSKCC nomogram and 7 per 100 patients for the limited MIA nomogram compared to a strategy of SLNB for all. Conclusions and Relevance This study confirmed the statistical performance of both the MSKCC and limited MIA models in a large, nationally representative data set. However, decision curve analysis demonstrated that using the models only improved selection for SLNB compared to biopsy in all patients when a risk threshold of at least 7% was used, with the greatest benefit seen for T2 melanomas at a threshold of 10%. Care should be taken when using these nomograms to guide selection for SLNB at the lowest thresholds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rasmus Mikiver
- Regional Cancer Center Southeast Sweden and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | | | - Serigne N. Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander C. J. van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel G. Coit
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christian Ingvar
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Karolin Isaksson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Kristianstad Hospital, Kristianstad, Sweden
| | - Richard A. Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John F. Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander H. R. Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sandra L. Wong
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Johan Lyth
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Edmund K. Bartlett
- Gastric and Mixed Tumor Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gjorup CA, Woodford R, Li I, Carlino MS, Ch'ng S, Chung D, Hsiao E, Lo SN, London K, Long GV, Menzies AM, Nieweg OE, Pennington TE, Rtshiladze MA, Saw RPM, Scolyer RA, Shannon KF, Spillane AJ, Stretch JR, Thompson JF, Varey AHR, van Akkooi ACJ. Role of Concurrent Ultrasound Surveillance of Sentinel Node-Positive Node Fields in Melanoma Patients Having Routine Cross-Sectional Imaging. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1857-1864. [PMID: 37966706 PMCID: PMC10838221 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14526-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In sentinel node-positive (SN+ve) melanoma patients, active surveillance with regular ultrasound examination of the node field has become standard, rather than completion lymph node dissection (CLND). A proportion of these patients now receive adjuvant systemic therapy and have routine cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography [CT] or positron emission tomography [PET]/CT). The role of concurrent ultrasound (US) surveillance in these patients is unclear. The purpose of our study was to describe the modality of detection of nodal recurrence in SN+ve node fields. METHODS SN+ve melanoma patients who did not undergo CLND treated at a single institution from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020 were included. RESULTS A total of 225 SN+ve patients with a median follow-up of 23 months were included. Of these, 119 (53%) received adjuvant systemic therapy. Eighty (36%) developed a recurrence at any site; 24 (11%) recurred first in the SN+ve field, of which 12 (5%) were confirmed node field recurrence only at 2 months follow-up. The nodal recurrences were first detected by ultrasound in seven (3%), CT in seven (3%), and PET/CT in seven (3%) patients. All nodal recurrences evident on US were also evident on PET/CT and vice versa. CONCLUSIONS The high rate of recurrences outside the node field and the identification of all US-detected nodal recurrences on concurrent cross-sectional imaging modalities suggest that routine concurrent ultrasound surveillance of the node-positive field may be unnecessary for SN+ve melanoma patients having routine cross-sectional imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A Gjorup
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel Woodford
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Isabel Li
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, Australia
| | - Sydney Ch'ng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Head and Neck Service, Camperdown, Australia
| | - David Chung
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Alfred Nuclear Medicine and Ultrasound, Newtown, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
| | - Edward Hsiao
- Mater Imaging, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kevin London
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Alfred Nuclear Medicine and Ultrasound, Newtown, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
- Charles Perkin Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Thomas E Pennington
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Michael A Rtshiladze
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Charles Perkin Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kerwin F Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Head and Neck Service, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Andrew J Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
- Breast and Melanoma Surgery Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander H R Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lo SN. Insights into the statistical quality of randomized clinical trial reports submitted to the British Journal of Dermatology. Br J Dermatol 2024; 190:295-296. [PMID: 38123133 DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljad518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Anderson ADG, Lo SN, Guitera P. Commentary: Real-world post-deployment performance of a novel machine learning-based digital health technology for skin lesion assessment and suggestions for post-market surveillance. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1345659. [PMID: 38379561 PMCID: PMC10877043 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1345659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander D. G. Anderson
- Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust, Truro, United Kingdom
- University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Serigne N. Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Darlington, NSW, Australia
| | - Pascale Guitera
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Darlington, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre (SMDC), Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Varey AHR, Li I, El Sharouni MA, Simon J, Dedeilia A, Ch'ng S, Saw RPM, Spillane AJ, Shannon KF, Pennington TE, Rtshiladze M, Stretch JR, Nieweg OE, van Akkooi A, Sullivan RJ, Boland GM, Gershenwald JE, van Diest PJ, Scolyer RA, Long GV, Thompson JF, Lo SN. Predicting Recurrence-Free and Overall Survival for Patients With Stage II Melanoma: The MIA Calculator. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301020. [PMID: 38315961 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 09/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS) were demonstrated in two recent randomized trials for patients with sentinel node (SN)-negative stage IIB or IIC melanoma receiving adjuvant systemic therapy (pembrolizumab/nivolumab). However, adverse events also occurred. Accurate individualized prognostic estimates of RFS and overall survival (OS) would allow patients to more accurately weigh the risks and benefits of adjuvant therapy. Since the current American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition (AJCC-8) melanoma staging system focuses on melanoma-specific survival, we developed a multivariable risk prediction calculator that provides estimates of 5- and 10-year RFS and OS for these patients. METHODS Data were extracted from the Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) database for patients diagnosed with stage II (clinical or pathological) melanoma (n = 3,220). Survival prediction models were developed using multivariable Cox regression analyses (MIA models) and externally validated twice using data sets from the United States and the Netherlands. Each model's performance was assessed using C-statistics and calibration plots and compared with Cox models on the basis of AJCC-8 staging (stage models). RESULTS The 5-year and 10-year RFS C-statistics were 0.70 and 0.73 (MIA-model) versus 0.61 and 0.60 (stage-model), respectively. For OS, the 5-year and 10-year C-statistics were 0.71 and 0.75 (MIA-model) compared with 0.62 and 0.61 (stage-model), respectively. The MIA models were well calibrated and externally validated. CONCLUSION The MIA models offer accurate and personalized estimates of both RFS and OS in patients with stage II melanoma even in the absence of pathological staging with SN biopsy. These models were robust on external validations and may be used in everyday practice both with (ideally) and without performing SN biopsy to identify high-risk patients for further management strategies. An online tool will be available at the MIA website (Risk Prediction Tools).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander H R Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Isabel Li
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Julie Simon
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Sydney Ch'ng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew J Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kerwin F Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas E Pennington
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Rtshiladze
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rogiers A, Dimitriou F, Lobon I, Harvey C, Vergara IA, Pires da Silva I, Lo SN, Scolyer RA, Carlino MS, Menzies AM, Long GV. Seasonal patterns of toxicity in melanoma patients treated with combination anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2024; 198:113506. [PMID: 38184928 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors are frequently associated with the development of immunotherapy-related adverse events (irAEs). The exact etiology, including the role of environmental factors, remains incompletely understood. METHODS We analyzed the records of 394 melanoma patients from three centers (northern and southern hemisphere). Patients had received at least one cycle of anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. We study the distribution and time to irAEs onset throughout the calendar year. RESULTS 764 irAEs were recorded; the most frequent were skin rash (35%), hepatitis (32%) and colitis (30%). The irAEs incidence was the highest in autumn and winter, and the ratio for the 'number of irAEs' per 'therapies commenced' was the highest in winter and lowest in summer (2.4 and 1.7, respectively). Season-specific patterns in the time of irAEs onset were observed for pneumonitis (shorter time to onset in autumn, p = 0.025), hepatitis (shorter time to onset in spring, p = 0.016) and sarcoid-like immune reaction (shorter time to onset in autumn, p = 0.041). Season-specific patterns for early-onset irAEs were observed for hepatitis (spring, p = 0.023) and nephritis (summer, p = 0.017). Early-onset pneumonitis was more frequent in autumn-winter (p = 0.008) and early-onset nephritis in spring-summer (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Environmental factors that are associated with particular seasons may contribute to the development of certain irAEs and suggest the potential effect of environmental triggers. The identification of these factors may enhance preventive and therapeutic strategies to reduce the morbidity of irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aljosja Rogiers
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Florentia Dimitriou
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Irene Lobon
- Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Catriona Harvey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Charles Perkin Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ismael A Vergara
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Charles Perkin Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ines Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lo SN, Varey AHR, El Sharouni MA, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF. Online tools for predicting melanoma survival: Including sentinel node status as a variable improves prediction accuracy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024; 38:e182-e184. [PMID: 37728525 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.19524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander H R Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Harvey C, Nahar KJ, McKeown J, Lo SN, Farag S, Yousaf N, Young K, Tas L, Meerveld-Eggink A, Blank C, Thomas A, McQuade J, Schilling B, Johnson DB, Huertas RM, Arance A, Lee J, Zimmer L, Long GV, Carlino MS, Wang Y, Menzies AM. Management of infliximab refractory immune checkpoint inhibitor gastrointestinal toxicity: a multicenter case series. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e008232. [PMID: 38296594 PMCID: PMC10831444 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) gastrointestinal toxicity (gastritis, enteritis, colitis) is a major cause of morbidity and treatment-related death. Guidelines agree steroid-refractory cases warrant infliximab, however best management of infliximab-refractory ICI gastrointestinal toxicity (IRIGItox) is unknown. METHODS We conducted an international multicenter retrospective case series. IRIGItox was defined as failure of symptom resolution ≤grade 1 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.5.0) following ≥2 infliximab doses or failure of symptom resolution ≤grade 2 after one dose. Data were extracted regarding demographics, steroid use, response to treatment, and survival outcomes. Toxicity was graded at symptom onset and time of infliximab failure. Efficacy of infliximab refractory therapy was assessed by symptom resolution, time to resolution and steroid wean duration. Survival outcomes were examined based on immunosuppressive therapy received. RESULTS 78 patients were identified: median age 60 years; 56% men; majority melanoma (N=70, 90%); 60 (77%) received anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 alone or in combination with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 and most had colitis (N=74, 95%). 106 post-infliximab treatments were given: 31 calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs); 27 antimetabolites (mycophenolate, azathioprine); 16 non-systemic immunomodulatory agents (eg, mesalazine or budesonide); 15 vedolizumab; 5 other biologics (anti-interleukin-12/23, 16, Janus kinase inhibitors) and 7 interventional procedures (including colectomy); 5 did not receive post-infliximab therapy. Symptom resolution was achieved in most (N=23/31, 74%) patients treated with CNIs; 12/27 (44%) with antimetabolites; 7/16 (44%) with non-systemic immunomodulation, 8/15 (53%) with vedolizumab and 5/7 (71%) with interventional procedures. No non-vedolizumab biologics resulted in toxicity resolution. CNIs had the shortest time to symptom resolution (12 days) and steroid wean (43 days); however, were associated with poorer event-free survival (6.3 months) and overall survival (26.8 months) than other agents. Conversely, vedolizumab had the longest time to toxicity resolution and steroid wean, 66 and 124 days, but most favorable survival data: EFS 24.5 months; median OS not reached. Six death occurred (three due to IRIGItox or management of toxicity; three with persisting IRIGItox and progressive disease). CONCLUSIONS IRIGItox causes major morbidity and mortality. Management is heterogeneous. CNIs appear most likely to result in toxicity resolution in the shortest time period, however, are associated with poorer oncological outcomes in contrast to vedolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catriona Harvey
- Westmead Hospital WNH, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kazi J Nahar
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Janet McKeown
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Research and Biostatistics Group, Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - Kate Young
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Liselotte Tas
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Austin Thomas
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer McQuade
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | | | - Ana Arance
- Hospital Clinic and Institut D'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joanna Lee
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Yinghong Wang
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexander Maxwell Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith J, Cust AE, Lo SN. Risk factors for subsequent primary melanoma in patients with previous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol 2024; 190:174-183. [PMID: 37562043 DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljad275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compared with the general population, people with a previous melanoma are at increased risk of developing another primary melanoma. Understanding the risk factors associated with multiple primary melanomas can inform patient education and tailored surveillance. OBJECTIVES To examine the risk factors for subsequent primary melanoma in people with a previous melanoma, by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available data. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase and MEDLINE. Studies that reported a risk estimate or raw frequencies and conducted between 1982 and August 2022 were included. Adjusted risk estimates were prioritized over univariable risk estimates. PRISMA reporting guidelines were followed. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted to derive pooled estimates. Quality assessment was conducted by two researchers using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. GRADE was used to rate the certainty and quality of the evidence. RESULTS Data from 27 studies involving 413 181 participants were pooled and analysed. Risk factors assessed included age and sex, environmental, lifestyle, phenotypic, genetic and histopathological factors, and there was wide variation in how they were categorized and analysed. Independent risk factors identified from pooled analyses included male sex [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.40-1.53], increasing age per 10 years (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.14-1.24), light skin colour (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.23-1.70), family history [odds ratio (OR) 1.79, 95% CI 1.25-2.56], CDKN2A mutation (OR 5.29, 95% CI 2.70-10.37), a high or moderate naevus count [OR 2.63 (95% CI 1.61-4.30) and OR 1.64 (95% CI 1.07-2.51), respectively], one or more atypical naevi (OR 3.01, 95% CI 1.52-5.97), first lesions occurring on the head or neck, lentigo maligna subtype (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.15-1.17), other subtype (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.27) and inadequate sun protection (HR 1.85, 95% CI 0.98-3.50). Based on the GRADE criteria, there was high to very low confidence in the pooled effect estimates. CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis identified several consistent, independent risk factors for the development of subsequent primary melanoma. These findings will help stratify the risk of subsequent melanoma, tailor skin-check schedules and inform patient education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet Smith
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health
| | - Anne E Cust
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ni Y, Watts CG, Scolyer RA, Madronio C, Armstrong BK, Morton RL, Menzies SW, Mann GJ, Thompson JF, Cust AE, Lo SN. Prognosis for people with multiple primary melanomas compared with a single primary melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2024; 90:170-174. [PMID: 37714220 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.08.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 07/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Ni
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Caroline G Watts
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The Kirby Institute UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christine Madronio
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bruce K Armstrong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; School of Population and Global Health, The University of WA, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Scott W Menzies
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Graham J Mann
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hepner A, Versluis JM, Wallace R, Allayous C, Brown LJ, Trojaniello C, Gerard CL, Jansen YJ, Bhave P, Neyns B, Haydon A, Michielin O, Mangana J, Klein O, Shoushtari AN, Warner AB, Ascierto PA, McQuade JL, Carlino MS, Zimmer L, Lebbe C, Johnson DB, Sandhu S, Atkinson V, Blank CU, Lo SN, Long GV, Menzies AM. The features and management of acquired resistance to PD1-based therapy in metastatic melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2024; 196:113441. [PMID: 37988842 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anti-PD-1 therapy (PD1) either alone or with anti-CTLA-4 (CTLA4), has high initial response rates, however 20% of patients (pts) with complete response (CR) and 30% with partial response (PR) within 12 months of treatment experience subsequent disease progression by 6 years. The nature and optimal management of this acquired resistance (AR) remains unknown. METHODS Pts from 16 centres who responded to PD1-based therapy and who later progressed were examined. Demographics, disease characteristics and subsequent treatments were evaluated. RESULTS 299 melanoma pts were identified, median age 64y, 44% BRAFV600m. 172 (58%) received PD1 alone, 114 (38%) PD1/CTLA4 and 13 (4%) PD1 and an investigational drug. 90 (30%) pts had CR, 209 (70%) PR. Median time to AR was 12.6 mo (95% CI, 11.3, 14.2). Most (N = 193, 65%) progressed in a single organ site, and in a solitary lesion (N = 151, 51%). The most frequent sites were lymph nodes (38%) and brain (25%). Management at AR included systemic therapy (ST, 45%), local therapy (LT) +ST (31%), LT alone (21%), or observation (3%). There was no statistical difference in PFS2 or OS based on management, however, PFS2 was numerically superior for pts treated with ST alone who progressed off PD1 therapy than those who progressed on PD1 (2-year PFS2 42% versus 25%, p = 0.249). mOS from AR was 38.0 months (95% CI, 29.5-NR); longer in single-site versus multi-site progression (2-year OS 70% vs 54%, p < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS Acquired resistance to PD1 therapy in melanoma is largely oligometastatic, and pts may have a favorable survival outcome following salvage treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Hepner
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Roslyn Wallace
- Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Clara Allayous
- Université Paris Cite, Dermato-Oncology AP-HP Hôpital Saint Louis, INSERM U976, F-75010 Paris, France
| | - Lauren Julia Brown
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Camille Lea Gerard
- Precision Oncology Center Oncology department, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Yanina Jl Jansen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Prachi Bhave
- Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Andrew Haydon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Olivier Michielin
- Precision Oncology Center Oncology department, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Oliver Klein
- Olivia Newton-John Cancer Centre and Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alexander N Shoushtari
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Celeste Lebbe
- Université Paris Cite, Dermato-Oncology AP-HP Hôpital Saint Louis, INSERM U976, F-75010 Paris, France
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville TN, USA
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Victoria Atkinson
- University of Queensland and Princess Alexandra and Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Christian U Blank
- Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI), Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lo SN, Varey AHR, El Sharouni MA, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF. Knowledge of sentinel lymph node status improves accuracy when predicting melanoma mortality and selecting patients for adjuvant immunotherapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2023. [PMID: 38147411 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.19709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander H R Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Plastic of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Paver EC, Ahmed T, Burke H, Saw RPM, Stretch JR, Spillane AJ, Shannon KF, Vergara IA, Elder DE, Lo SN, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA. Prognostic Significance of Incipient Ulceration in Primary Cutaneous Melanoma. JAMA Dermatol 2023; 159:1359-1367. [PMID: 37910123 PMCID: PMC10620673 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.4193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
Importance Ulceration represents a key feature in cutaneous melanoma, contributing to staging according to the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) system. However, cases with incipient ulceration do not quite fulfill the AJCC definition of ulceration and are consequently classified as nonulcerated, presenting interpretive difficulty for pathologists. The prognostic implication of incipient ulceration is uncertain. Objective To evaluate the prognostic significance of incipient ulceration in cutaneous melanoma. Design, Setting, and Participants This case-control study consisted of resected primary cutaneous melanomas diagnosed between 2005 and 2015, identified from the Melanoma Institute Australia research database and with slides available for review at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital. Slides were reviewed by pathologists experienced in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions to identify cases (incipient ulceration) and controls (ulcerated or nonulcerated). Incipient ulceration cases were matched at a 1:2 ratio with nonulcerated and ulcerated controls, respectively. Study analysis was conducted from March to June 2023. Main Outcomes Clinicopathological factors and clinical outcomes: overall survival (OS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared between cases and controls. Results Of 2284 patients with melanoma identified, 340 patients (median [IQR] age, 69 [24-94] years; 136 [68%] men; median follow-up, 7.2 years) met the criteria. The matched cohort consisted of 40 cases of incipiently ulcerated melanoma matched 1:2 with 80 nonulcerated controls, and 80 ulcerated controls. The median (IQR) Breslow thickness differed significantly between cases and controls; 2.8 (1.7-4.1) mm for incipient cases compared with 1.0 (0.6-2.1) mm and 5.3 (3.5-8.0) mm for nonulcerated and ulcerated melanomas, respectively. Median (IQR) tumor mitotic rate was 5.0 (3.0-9.0) per mm2 in incipiently ulcerated cases compared with 1 (0-3.0) per mm2 in nonulcerated controls and 9 (5.0-14.0) per mm2 in ulcerated controls. Based on the matched cohorts, patients with nonulcerated tumors had significantly better OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.27-0.88; P = .02) and RFS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.22-0.64; P < .001) than patients with incipient ulceration. The RFS was significantly worse in ulcerated tumors compared with incipiently ulcerated cases (HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.07-2.60; P = .03). After adjusting for pathological factors, no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes were observed between cases and either control group. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this case-control study indicate that incipient ulceration in a primary melanoma represents an adverse prognostic feature that should be noted by pathologists in their reports and considered in future guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C. Paver
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and New South Wales Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Tasnia Ahmed
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hazel Burke
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn P. M. Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan R. Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew J. Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kerwin F. Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ismael A. Vergara
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David E. Elder
- Department of Dermatology and Department of Pathology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Serigne N. Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John F. Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard A. Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and New South Wales Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Regio Pereira A, Hirata S, Pietkiewicz P, Menzies SW, Brancaccio G, Collgros H, Argenziano G, Lo SN, Ahmed T, Pampena R, Longo C, Guitera P. Dermoscopy of Lentiginous Melanomas and Equivocal Benign Pigmented Macules of the Scalp: A Case-Control Multicentric Study. Dermatology 2023; 240:132-141. [PMID: 38035549 PMCID: PMC10866176 DOI: 10.1159/000535030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although the dermoscopic features of facial lentiginous melanomas (LM), including lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma, have been extensively studied, the literature about those located on the scalp is scarce. This study aims to describe the dermoscopic features of scalp LM and assess the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy to discriminate them from equivocal benign pigmented macules. METHODS Consecutive cases of scalp LM and histopathology-proven benign but clinically equivocal pigmented macules (actinic keratoses, solar lentigos, seborrhoeic keratoses, and lichen planus-like keratoses) from four referral centres were included. Dermoscopic features were analysed by two blinded experts. The diagnostic performance of a predictive model was assessed. RESULTS 56 LM and 44 controls were included. Multiple features previously described for facial and extrafacial LM were frequently identified in both groups. Expert's sensitivity to diagnose scalp LM was 76.8% (63.6-87.0) and 78.6% (65.6-88.4), with specificity of 54.5% (38.9-69.6) and 56.8% (41.0-71.7), and fair agreement (kappa coefficient 0.248). The strongest independent predictors of malignancy were (OR, 95% CI) chaos of colour (15.43, 1.48-160.3), pigmented reticular lines (14.96, 1.68-132.9), increased density of vascular network (3.45, 1.09-10.92), and perifollicular grey circles (2.89, 0.96-8.67). The predictive model achieved 85.7% (73.8-93.6) sensitivity, 61.4% (45.5-75.6) specificity, and 81.5 (73.0-90.0) area under curve to discriminate benign and malignant lesions. A diagnostic flowchart was proposed, which should improve the diagnostic performance of dermoscopy. CONCLUSION Both facial and extrafacial dermoscopic patterns can be identified in scalp LM, with considerable overlap with benign pigmented macules, leading to low specificity and interobserver agreement on dermoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Regio Pereira
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Pawel Pietkiewicz
- Poznańskie Centrum Diagnostyki Znamion Barwnikowych, Poznan, Poland
- Polish Dermatoscopy Group, Poznan, Poland
| | - Scott W. Menzies
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Helena Collgros
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Serigne N. Lo
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tasnia Ahmed
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Riccardo Pampena
- Skin Cancer Center, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Caterina Longo
- Skin Cancer Center, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Department of Dermatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Pascale Guitera
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bai X, Shaheen A, Grieco C, d’Arienzo PD, Mina F, Czapla JA, Lawless AR, Bongiovanni E, Santaniello U, Zappi H, Dulak D, Williamson A, Lee R, Gupta A, Li C, Si L, Ubaldi M, Yamazaki N, Ogata D, Johnson R, Park BC, Jung S, Madonna G, Hochherz J, Umeda Y, Nakamura Y, Gebhardt C, Festino L, Capone M, Ascierto PA, Johnson DB, Lo SN, Long GV, Menzies AM, Namikawa K, Mandala M, Guo J, Lorigan P, Najjar YG, Haydon A, Quaglino P, Boland GM, Sullivan RJ, Furness AJ, Plummer R, Flaherty KT. Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy as adjuvant therapy in BRAF V600-mutant stage III melanoma after definitive surgery: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 65:102290. [PMID: 37965433 PMCID: PMC10641479 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Both dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) and anti-PD-1 monotherapy (PD-1) are approved adjuvant therapies for patients with stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. However, there is still a lack of head-to-head comparative data. We aimed to describe efficacy and toxicity outcomes for these two standard therapies across melanoma centers. Methods This multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted in 15 melanoma centers in Australia, China, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK, and US. We included adult patients with resected stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma who received either adjuvant D/T or PD-1 between Jul 2015 and Oct 2022. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), recurrence pattern and toxicity. Findings We included 598 patients with stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma who received either adjuvant D/T (n = 393 [66%]) or PD-1 (n = 205 [34%]) post definitive surgery between Jul 2015 and Oct 2022. At a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 21-43), the median RFS was 51.0 months (95% CI 41.0-not reached [NR]) in the D/T group, significantly longer than PD-1 (44.8 months [95% CI 28.5-NR]) (univariate: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.87, P = 0.003; multivariate: HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.86, P = 0.007), with comparable OS with PD-1 (multivariate, HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.48-1.70, P = 0.75). Similar findings were observed using a restricted-mean-survival-time model. Among those who experienced recurrence, the proportion of distant metastases was higher in the D/T cohort. D/T had a higher incidence of treatment modification due to adverse events (AEs) than PD-1, but fewer persistent AEs. Interpretation In patients with stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma post definitive surgery, D/T yielded better RFS than PD-1, with higher transient but lower persistent toxicity, and comparable OS. D/T seems to provide a better outcome compared with PD-1, but a longer follow-up and ideally a large prospective trial are needed. Funding Dr. Xue Bai was supported by the Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Programme (QMS20211101) for her efforts devoted to this study. Dr. Keith T. Flaherty was funded by Adelson Medical Research Foundation for the efforts devoted to this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Bai
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
- Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | | | | | | | - Florentia Mina
- Skin Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Eleonora Bongiovanni
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Italy
| | - Umberto Santaniello
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Italy
| | | | - Dominika Dulak
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Rebecca Lee
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Caili Li
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Si
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | | | - Naoya Yamazaki
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dai Ogata
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rebecca Johnson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Benjamin C. Park
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Seungyeon Jung
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gabriele Madonna
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Juliane Hochherz
- Department of Dermatology, University Skin Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yoshiyasu Umeda
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Christoffer Gebhardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Skin Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lucia Festino
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Mariaelena Capone
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Douglas B. Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Serigne N. Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M. Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kenjiro Namikawa
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Jun Guo
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Pietro Quaglino
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Conway JW, Braden J, Lo SN, Scolyer RA, Carlino MS, Menzies AM, Long GV, da Silva IP. VEGF Inhibitors Improve Survival Outcomes in Patients with Liver Metastases across Cancer Types-A Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5012. [PMID: 37894379 PMCID: PMC10605052 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver metastases are associated with poor prognosis across cancers. Novel treatment strategies to treat patients with liver metastases are needed. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors in patients with liver metastases across cancers. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Embase was performed between January 2000 and April 2023. Randomized controlled trials of patients with liver metastases comparing standard of care (systemic therapy or best supportive care) with or without vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors were included in the study. Outcomes reported included progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS A total of 4445 patients with liver metastases from 25 randomized controlled trials were included in this analysis. The addition of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors to standard systemic therapy or best supportive care was associated with superior progression-free survival (HR = 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40-0.61) and overall survival (HR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93) in patients with liver metastases. In a subgroup analysis of patients with versus patients without liver metastases, the benefit with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors was more pronounced in the group with liver metastases (HR = 0.44) versus without (HR = 0.57) for progression-free survival, but not for overall survival. CONCLUSION The addition of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors to standard management improved survival outcomes in patients with liver metastasis across cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan W. Conway
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Jorja Braden
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Serigne N. Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Richard A. Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW 2099, Australia
| | - Matteo S. Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, NSW 2148, Australia
| | - Alexander M. Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Mater Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Mater Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
| | - Ines Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, 40 Rocklands Rd, North Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, NSW 2148, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Maher NG, Prosser N, Aivazian K, Colebatch AJ, Ferguson PM, Karim RZ, McKenzie CA, Rawson RV, Lo SN, Scolyer RA. Inter-rater concordance of basal cell carcinoma subtypes: influences on reporting format and opportunities for further classification modifications. Pathology 2023; 55:800-805. [PMID: 37393148 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
Diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) higher risk subtypes influences management strategies because of their propensity to recur locally. Subtyping is prone to inter-observer variability, and subtyping definitions are inconsistently applied. This study sought to compare the interobserver reproducibility of individual BCC subtypes using the 4th edition World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Skin Tumours (CoST) definitions, with classification into lower and higher risk histological subtype groups. Ninety-one BCC cases were rated by seven pathologists, noting the presence of BCC subtype(s), and providing a higher or lower risk subtype grouping per case. Raters were provided with definitions as per the 4th edition WHO CoST for 10 listed BCC subtypes. Surgical specimen type was noted. Subgroup analysis was performed to exclude cases when the tumour deep front was not well visualised, or there was tangential sectioning (n = 6). Light's kappa was used to assess inter-rater reliability. From the total group (n = 91), five BCC subtypes showed a sufficient number of ratings for computing a κ statistic. From these five subtypes, superficial subtype showed substantial inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.64), and the other four subtypes showed moderate inter-rater agreement [nodular (κ = 0.45), sclerosing/morphoeic (κ = 0.45), infiltrating (κ = 0.49) and micronodular (κ = 0.57)]. Two-tiered rating into either higher or lower risk subtype showed substantial inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.72). Our results suggest a need to more precisely define BCC subtypes. We suggest reporting BCC subtype using a two-tiered risk grouping, followed by specific subtypes present. Further studies examining the inter-rater reliability of less common BCC subtypes are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nigel G Maher
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natasha Prosser
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karina Aivazian
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew J Colebatch
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Peter M Ferguson
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rooshdiya Z Karim
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Catriona A McKenzie
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robert V Rawson
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Menzies SW, Sinz C, Menzies M, Lo SN, Yolland W, Lingohr J, Razmara M, Tschandl P, Guitera P, Scolyer RA, Boltz F, Borik-Heil L, Herbert Chan H, Chromy D, Coker DJ, Collgros H, Eghtedari M, Corral Forteza M, Forward E, Gallo B, Geisler S, Gibson M, Hampel A, Ho G, Junez L, Kienzl P, Martin A, Moloney FJ, Regio Pereira A, Ressler JM, Richter S, Silic K, Silly T, Skoll M, Tittes J, Weber P, Weninger W, Weiss D, Woo-Sampson P, Zilberg C, Kittler H. Comparison of humans versus mobile phone-powered artificial intelligence for the diagnosis and management of pigmented skin cancer in secondary care: a multicentre, prospective, diagnostic, clinical trial. Lancet Digit Health 2023; 5:e679-e691. [PMID: 37775188 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00130-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnosis of skin cancer requires medical expertise, which is scarce. Mobile phone-powered artificial intelligence (AI) could aid diagnosis, but it is unclear how this technology performs in a clinical scenario. Our primary aim was to test in the clinic whether there was equivalence between AI algorithms and clinicians for the diagnosis and management of pigmented skin lesions. METHODS In this multicentre, prospective, diagnostic, clinical trial, we included specialist and novice clinicians and patients from two tertiary referral centres in Australia and Austria. Specialists had a specialist medical qualification related to diagnosing and managing pigmented skin lesions, whereas novices were dermatology junior doctors or registrars in trainee positions who had experience in examining and managing these lesions. Eligible patients were aged 18-99 years and had a modified Fitzpatrick I-III skin type; those in the diagnostic trial were undergoing routine excision or biopsy of one or more suspicious pigmented skin lesions bigger than 3 mm in the longest diameter, and those in the management trial had baseline total-body photographs taken within 1-4 years. We used two mobile phone-powered AI instruments incorporating a simple optical attachment: a new 7-class AI algorithm and the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) AI algorithm, which was previously tested in a large online reader study. The reference standard for excised lesions in the diagnostic trial was histopathological examination; in the management trial, the reference standard was a descending hierarchy based on histopathological examination, comparison of baseline total-body photographs, digital monitoring, and telediagnosis. The main outcome of this study was to compare the accuracy of expert and novice diagnostic and management decisions with the two AI instruments. Possible decisions in the management trial were dismissal, biopsy, or 3-month monitoring. Decisions to monitor were considered equivalent to dismissal (scenario A) or biopsy of malignant lesions (scenario B). The trial was registered at the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12620000695909 (Universal trial number U1111-1251-8995). FINDINGS The diagnostic study included 172 suspicious pigmented lesions (84 malignant) from 124 patients and the management study included 5696 pigmented lesions (18 malignant) from the whole body of 66 high-risk patients. The diagnoses of the 7-class AI algorithm were equivalent to the specialists' diagnoses (absolute accuracy difference 1·2% [95% CI -6·9 to 9·2]) and significantly superior to the novices' ones (21·5% [13·1 to 30·0]). The diagnoses of the ISIC AI algorithm were significantly inferior to the specialists' diagnoses (-11·6% [-20·3 to -3·0]) but significantly superior to the novices' ones (8·7% [-0·5 to 18·0]). The best 7-class management AI was significantly inferior to specialists' management (absolute accuracy difference in correct management decision -0·5% [95% CI -0·7 to -0·2] in scenario A and -0·4% [-0·8 to -0·05] in scenario B). Compared with the novices' management, the 7-class management AI was significantly inferior (-0·4% [-0·6 to -0·2]) in scenario A but significantly superior (0·4% [0·0 to 0·9]) in scenario B. INTERPRETATION The mobile phone-powered AI technology is simple, practical, and accurate for the diagnosis of suspicious pigmented skin cancer in patients presenting to a specialist setting, although its usage for management decisions requires more careful execution. An AI algorithm that was superior in experimental studies was significantly inferior to specialists in a real-world scenario, suggesting that caution is needed when extrapolating results of experimental studies to clinical practice. FUNDING MetaOptima Technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott W Menzies
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Christoph Sinz
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michelle Menzies
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Skintography, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Philipp Tschandl
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Pascale Guitera
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Florentina Boltz
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Liliane Borik-Heil
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hsien Herbert Chan
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - David Chromy
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - David J Coker
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Helena Collgros
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Maryam Eghtedari
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Marina Corral Forteza
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Emily Forward
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Bruna Gallo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephanie Geisler
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthew Gibson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Dermatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Amelie Hampel
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Genevieve Ho
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Dermatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Laura Junez
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philipp Kienzl
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Arthur Martin
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Fergal J Moloney
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Amanda Regio Pereira
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Susanne Richter
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Katharina Silic
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Silly
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Skoll
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Julia Tittes
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philipp Weber
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Weninger
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Doris Weiss
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ping Woo-Sampson
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Catherine Zilberg
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Harald Kittler
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Adegoke NA, Gide TN, Mao Y, Quek C, Patrick E, Carlino MS, Lo SN, Menzies AM, Pires da Silva I, Vergara IA, Long G, Scolyer RA, Wilmott JS. Classification of the tumor immune microenvironment and associations with outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapies. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e007144. [PMID: 37865395 PMCID: PMC10603328 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-007144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor microenvironment (TME) characteristics are potential biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma. This study developed a method to perform unsupervised classification of TME of metastatic melanoma. METHODS We used multiplex immunohistochemical and quantitative pathology-derived assessment of immune cell compositions of intratumoral and peritumoral regions of metastatic melanoma baseline biopsies to classify TME in relation to response to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monotherapy or in combination with anti-cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 (ipilimumab (IPI)+PD-1). RESULTS Spatial profiling of CD8+T cells, macrophages, and melanoma cells, as well as phenotypic PD-1 receptor ligand (PD-L1) and CD16 proportions, were used to identify and classify patients into one of three mutually exclusive TME classes: immune-scarce, immune-intermediate, and immune-rich tumors. Patients with immune-rich tumors were characterized by a lower proportion of melanoma cells and higher proportions of immune cells, including higher PD-L1 expression. These patients had higher response rates and longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those with immune-intermediate and immune-scarce tumors. At a median follow-up of 18 months (95% CI: 6.7 to 49 months), the 1-year PFS was 76% (95% CI: 64% to 90%) for patients with an immune-rich tumor, 56% (95% CI: 44% to 72%) for those with an immune-intermediate tumor, and 33% (95% CI: 23% to 47%) for patients with an immune-scarce tumor. A higher response rate was observed in patients with an immune-scarce or immune-intermediate tumor when treated with IPI+PD-1 compared with those treated with PD-1 alone. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides an automatic TME classification method that may predict the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nurudeen A Adegoke
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tuba N Gide
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yizhe Mao
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Camelia Quek
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ellis Patrick
- Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander Maxwell Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ines Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ismael A Vergara
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georgina Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James S Wilmott
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Blake SC, Guitera P, Cust AE, Galea C, Lo SN, Scolyer RA, Armstrong BK, Thompson JF, Menzies SW, Madronio C, Morton RL, Mann GJ, Watts CG. The association of dermatologist demographic density with melanoma survival in New South Wales, Australia. Australas J Dermatol 2023; 64:425-429. [PMID: 37353974 PMCID: PMC10953459 DOI: 10.1111/ajd.14113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie C. Blake
- School of MedicineUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Pascale Guitera
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic CentreRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Anne E. Cust
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Claire Galea
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Serigne N. Lo
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical SchoolThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Richard A. Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical SchoolThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic OncologyRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health PathologySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Charles Perkins CentreThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Bruce K. Armstrong
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- School of Population and Global Health, Population and Public HealthThe University of Western AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - John F. Thompson
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical SchoolThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical OncologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Scott W. Menzies
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical SchoolThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Christine Madronio
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical SchoolThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Rachael L. Morton
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials CentreThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Graham J. Mann
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- The John Curtin School of Medical ResearchAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralian Capital TerritoryAustralia
| | - Caroline G. Watts
- The Daffodil CentreThe University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Surveillance and Evaluation Research Program, Kirby InstituteUniversity of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Li AT, Law J, Ch'ng S, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF, Lo SN, Varey AHR. External validation in an Australian population of the EORTC-DeCOG nomogram predicting recurrence, distant metastasis and overall mortality in melanoma patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes. Eur J Cancer 2023; 189:112901. [PMID: 37263897 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Calculating an accurate prognosis for melanoma patients who have a positive sentinel node (SN) biopsy is important both for them and for their treating doctors to guide decision-making, particularly when adjuvant systemic therapy is being considered. The recently published EORTC-DeCOG nomograms aim to provide this via an online portal that predicts 5-year rates for recurrence, distant metastasis and overall mortality. The present study provides external validation of these nomograms. METHODS/MATERIALS De-identified data from patients with a positive SN biopsy between 2003 and 2015 were extracted from the prospectively maintained Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) research database. ROC-curves with C-statistics, regression co-efficients and Decision Curve Net Benefit analyses were performed using the integrated private validation portal on the nomograms' hosting platform (Evidencio). RESULTS Complete data were available for 352 patients. The respective C-statistics for recurrence, distant metastasis and overall mortality nomogram validations were 0.68, 0.69 and 0.66. CONCLUSION The performance of the nomograms in predicting recurrence and distant metastasis was similar in the MIA and the development populations, suggesting that they are robust. However, the overall mortality nomogram performance was significantly poorer in the MIA population (C-statistic 0.66) than in the original EORTC-DeCOG derivation cohort (C-statistic 0.70) and may therefore be less reliable for clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew T Li
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jenaleen Law
- Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sydney Ch'ng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal Prince Alfred Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander H R Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Holtkamp LHJ, Lo SN, Thompson JF, Spillane AJ, Stretch JR, Saw RPM, Shannon KF, Nieweg OE, Hong AM. Adjuvant radiotherapy after salvage surgery for melanoma recurrence in a node field following a previous lymph node dissection. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:97-104. [PMID: 36971691 PMCID: PMC10952220 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) can be given to melanoma patients following salvage surgery for node field recurrence after a previous regional node dissection, but the value of this treatment strategy is poorly documented. This study evaluated long-term node field control and survival of patients treated in this way in an era before effective adjuvant systemic therapy became available. METHODS Data for 76 patients treated between 1990 and 2011 were extracted from an institutional database. Baseline patient characteristics, treatment details and oncological outcomes were analysed. RESULTS Adjuvant RT with conventional fractionation (median dose 48 Gy in 20 fractions) was given to 43 patients (57%) and hypofractionated RT (median dose 33 Gy in 6 fractions) to 33 patients (43%). The 5-year node field control rate was 70%, 5-year recurrence-free survival 17%, 5-year melanoma-specific survival 26% and 5-year overall survival 25%. CONCLUSIONS Salvage surgery with adjuvant RT achieved node field control in 70% of melanoma patients with node field recurrence following a prior node dissection. However, disease progression at distant sites was common and survival outcomes were poor. Prospective data will be required to assess outcomes for contemporary combinations of surgery, adjuvant RT and systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lodewijka H. J. Holtkamp
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneyNorth SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Surgical OncologyUniversity Medical Centre GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Serigne N. Lo
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneyNorth SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - John F. Thompson
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneyNorth SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical OncologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Andrew J. Spillane
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneyNorth SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of SurgeryRoyal North Shore HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Jonathan R. Stretch
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneyNorth SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical OncologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Robyn P. M. Saw
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneyNorth SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical OncologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kerwin F. Shannon
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneyNorth SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical OncologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Omgo E. Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneyNorth SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical OncologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Angela M. Hong
- Melanoma Institute AustraliaThe University of SydneyNorth SydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Department of Radiation OncologyChris O'Brien LifehouseSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- GenesisCare Radiation OncologyMater HospitalSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gouveia BM, Carlos G, Wadell A, Sinz C, Ahmed T, Lo SN, Rawson RV, Ferguson PM, Scolyer RA, Guitera P. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy can detect the invasive component of lentigo maligna melanoma: Prospective analysis and case-control study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2023; 37:1293-1301. [PMID: 36855833 PMCID: PMC10946995 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lentigo maligna (LM), a form of melanoma in situ, has no risk of causing metastasis unless dermal invasive melanoma (LMM) supervenes. Furthermore, the detection of invasion impacts prognosis and management. OBJECTIVE To assess the accuracy of RCM for the detection of invasion component on LM/LMM lesions. METHODS In the initial case-control study, the performance of one expert in detecting LMM at the time of initial RCM assessment of LM/LMM lesions was recorded prospectively (n = 229). The cases were assessed on RCM-histopathology correlation sessions and a panel with nine RCM features was proposed to identify LMM, which was subsequently tested in a subset of initial cohort (n = 93) in the matched case-control study by two blinded observers. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to evaluate RCM features predictive of LMM. Reproducibility of assessment of the nine RCM features was also evaluated. RESULTS A total of 229 LM/LMM cases evaluated by histopathology were assessed blindly and prospectively by an expert confocalist. On histopathology, 210 were LM and 19 were LMM cases. Correct identification of an invasive component was achieved for 17 of 19 LMM cases (89%) and the absence of a dermal component was correctly diagnosed in 190 of 210 LM cases (90%). In the matched case-control (LMM n = 35, LM n = 58), epidermal and junctional disarray, large size of melanocytes and nests of melanocytes were independent predictors of LMM on multivariate analysis. The interobserver analysis demonstrated that these three features had a fair reproducibility between the two investigators (K = 0.4). The multivariable model including those three features showed a high predictive performance AUC = 74% (CI 95% 64-85%), with sensitivity of 63% (95% CI 52-78%) and specificity of 79% (CI 95% 74-88%), and likelihood ratio of 18 (p-value 0.0026). CONCLUSION Three RCM features were predictive for identifying invasive melanoma in the background of LM.
Collapse
Grants
- Melanoma Institute Australia
- N/A MetaOptima Technology Incl., Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Evaxion, Provectus Biopharmaceuticals Australia, Qbiotics, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, NeraCare, AMGEN Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Myriad Genetics, GlaxoSmithKline.
- APP1141295 NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruna Melhoranse Gouveia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Giuliana Carlos
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andreanne Wadell
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- CHUS - Hôtel-Dieu, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | - Christoph Sinz
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tasnia Ahmed
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert V Rawson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter M Ferguson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pascale Guitera
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Shteinman ER, Vergara IA, Rawson RV, Lo SN, Maeda N, Koyama K, da Silva IP, Long GV, Scolyer RA, Wilmott JS, Menzies AM. Molecular and clinical correlates of HER3 expression highlights its potential role as a therapeutic target in melanoma. Pathology 2023:S0031-3025(23)00121-6. [PMID: 37286471 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2023.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor family member HER3 (erbB3) has been implicated in several types of cancer and recently drugs targeting HER3 have shown promising clinical activity. In melanoma, HER3 overexpression has been linked to both metastasis formation and resistance to drug therapy in cell culture models. Here, we sought to characterise the expression of HER3 in 187 melanoma biopsies (149 cutaneous, 38 mucosal) using immunohistochemistry, as well as to analyse the association between HER3 expression and molecular, clinical and pathological variables. A subset of the cutaneous melanoma specimens was taken prior to treatment with immune checkpoint blockade therapy (pre-ICB) (n=79). HER3 expression (≥1+) was observed in 136 of 187 samples (∼73%). HER3 expression was found to be markedly lower in the mucosal melanomas, with 17 of the 38 tumours (∼45%) demonstrating no HER3 expression. In cutaneous melanomas, there was a negative association between HER3 expression and mutational load, a positive association with NRAS mutational status, and a trend of negative association with PD-L1 expression. In the pre-ICB cohort, an association was found between high HER3 expression (≥2+) and overall survival after anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy. Overall, our results indicate that HER3 is a promising therapeutic avenue in cutaneous melanoma worthy of further clinical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva R Shteinman
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ismael A Vergara
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robert V Rawson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Inês Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James S Wilmott
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Thompson JR, Lai-Kwon J, Morton RL, Guminski AD, Gonzalez M, Atkinson V, Sandhu S, Brown MP, Menzies AM, McArthur GA, Lo SN, Long GV, Bartula I. Health-related quality of life in patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2023; 15:593-610. [PMID: 37132182 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2022-0262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims: To describe the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) patients throughout the first 18 weeks of ipilimumab-nivolumab or nivolumab treatment. Materials & methods: HRQoL data (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, additional Brain Neoplasm Module, and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire) were collected as a secondary outcome of the Anti-PD1 Brain Collaboration phase II trial. Mixed linear modeling assessed changes over time, whereas the Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine median time to first deterioration. Results: Asymptomatic MBM patients treated with ipilimumab-nivolumab (n = 33) or nivolumab (n = 24) maintained baseline HRQoL. MBM patients with symptoms or leptomeningeal/progressive disease treated with nivolumab (n = 14) reported a statistically significant trend toward improvement. Conclusion: MBM patients treated with either ipilimumab-nivolumab or nivolumab did not report a significant deterioration in HRQoL within 18 weeks of treatment initiation. Clinical trial registration: NCT02374242 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake R Thompson
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
| | - Julia Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
- National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Center, Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia
| | - Alexander D Guminski
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
- Royal North Shore & Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
| | - Maria Gonzalez
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
| | - Victoria Atkinson
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, 4072, Australia
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
| | - Michael P Brown
- Translational Oncology Laboratory, Center for Cancer Biology, SA Pathology & University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia
- Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
- Royal North Shore & Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
| | - Grant A McArthur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
- Royal North Shore & Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
- Charles Perkins Center, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia
| | - Iris Bartula
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Wollstonecraft, New South Wales, 2065, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mao Y, Gide TN, Adegoke NA, Quek C, Maher N, Potter A, Patrick E, Saw RPM, Thompson JF, Spillane AJ, Shannon KF, Carlino MS, Lo SN, Menzies AM, da Silva IP, Long GV, Scolyer RA, Wilmott JS. Cross-platform comparison of immune signatures in immunotherapy-treated patients with advanced melanoma using a rank-based scoring approach. J Transl Med 2023; 21:257. [PMID: 37055772 PMCID: PMC10103529 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04092-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gene expression profiling is increasingly being utilised as a diagnostic, prognostic and predictive tool for managing cancer patients. Single-sample scoring approach has been developed to alleviate instability of signature scores due to variations from sample composition. However, it is a challenge to achieve comparable signature scores across different expressional platforms. METHODS The pre-treatment biopsies from a total of 158 patients, who have received single-agent anti-PD-1 (n = 84) or anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 therapy (n = 74), were performed using NanoString PanCancer IO360 Panel. Multiple immune-related signature scores were measured from a single-sample rank-based scoring approach, singscore. We assessed the reproducibility and the performance in reporting immune profile of singscore based on NanoString assay in advance melanoma. To conduct cross-platform analyses, singscores between the immune profiles of NanoString assay and the previous orthogonal whole transcriptome sequencing (WTS) data were compared through linear regression and cross-platform prediction. RESULTS singscore-derived signature scores reported significantly high scores in responders in multiple PD-1, MHC-1-, CD8 T-cell-, antigen presentation-, cytokine- and chemokine-related signatures. We found that singscore provided stable and reproducible signature scores among the repeats in different batches and cross-sample normalisations. The cross-platform comparisons confirmed that singscores derived via NanoString and WTS were comparable. When singscore of WTS generated by the overlapping genes to the NanoString gene set, the signatures generated highly correlated cross-platform scores (Spearman correlation interquartile range (IQR) [0.88, 0.92] and r2 IQR [0.77, 0.81]) and better prediction on cross-platform response (AUC = 86.3%). The model suggested that Tumour Inflammation Signature (TIS) and Personalised Immunotherapy Platform (PIP) PD-1 are informative signatures for predicting immunotherapy-response outcomes in advanced melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1-based therapies. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the outcome of this study confirms that singscore based on NanoString data is a feasible approach to produce reliable signature scores for determining patients' immune profiles and the potential clinical utility in biomarker implementation, as well as to conduct cross-platform comparisons, such as WTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yizhe Mao
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tuba N Gide
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nurudeen A Adegoke
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Camelia Quek
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nigel Maher
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison Potter
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ellis Patrick
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew J Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kerwin F Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Inês Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James S Wilmott
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vergara IA, Lo SN, Li I, Menzies AM, Carlino MS, Scolyer RA, Long GV, da Silva IP. Abstract 6747: Sites of metastases prior to systemic treatment influence progression patterns and survival in stage IV melanoma patients. Cancer Res 2023. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-6747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Different metastatic sites have distinct response rates to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), suggesting that anatomical locations play a role in treatment response and survival. This project investigated the impact that sites of metastases present at baseline - ie. before starting treatment - have on the anatomical patterns of progression and their association with survival in patients (pts) exposed to ICI and BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) as first line treatment.
Methods: We curated the progression history of distant metastases of 568 stage IV pts; 352 pts had first line treatment with antiPD1 +/- antiCTLA4, and 216 pts had first line BRAF/MEKi. We sought to investigate the association between sites of metastases at baseline and (a) sites of progression in pts who failed first line anti-PD1 vs first line BRAF/MEKi, (b) sites of progression in pts who failed first line anti-PD1 with innate vs acquired resistance, and (c) survival of all pts, from time of first line treatment to last follow-up.
Results: Using a sophisticated mathematical graph representation of anatomical disease progression, we unveiled sites of metastases at baseline that impacted where new sites of metastases developed on treatment failure. In pts with brain metastasis at baseline, pts who failed anti-PD1 had higher progression in the brain compared to BRAF/MEKi progressors (68.1% in anti-PD1 progressors vs 62.5% in BRAF/MEKi progressors). In contrast, the opposite trend was observed in the progression to the brain in pts with no brain metastasis at baseline, which was lower in anti-PD1 progressors compared to BRAF/MEKi progressors (20.6% in anti-PD1 progressors vs 32.6% in BRAF/MEKi progressors).Within pts who failed anti-PD1, pts with innate resistance (n=95) had a higher rate of progression in the brain (42.1%) compared to pts with acquired (n=36) resistance (25%). Among pts with innate resistance who had brain metastasis at baseline (n=36), 80.6% progressed in the brain. In contrast, among pts with innate resistance without brain metastasis at baseline (n=59), only 18.6% progressed to the brain.Sites of metastases at baseline also had an impact on the survival of pts. In BRAF/MEKi pts, brain metastasis at baseline was not associated with survival (log-rank p-value=0.6). In contrast, anti-PD1 pts with brain metastasis at baseline had worst survival (2-yr survival 56%) compared to pts without brain metastasis at baseline (2-yr survival 73%, log-rank p-value=0.005).
Utilisation of this graph representation for the development of a time-dependent predictor of brain metastases will be presented.
Further associations of metastatic sites of disease at baseline with progression and survival will be discussed.
Conclusions: Different sites of metastases at baseline have a distinct effect on the progression patterns and survival of pts who received BRAF/MEKi or anti-PD1 as first line treatment.
Citation Format: Ismael A. Vergara, Serigne N. Lo, Isabel Li, Alexander M. Menzies, Matteo S. Carlino, Richard A. Scolyer, Georgina V. Long, Ines Pires da Silva. Sites of metastases prior to systemic treatment influence progression patterns and survival in stage IV melanoma patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6747.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismael A. Vergara
- 1Melanoma Institute Australia, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Serigne N. Lo
- 2Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Isabel Li
- 2Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M. Menzies
- 3Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matteo S. Carlino
- 4Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Blacktown Hospital, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Richard A. Scolyer
- 5Melanoma Institute Australia, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, , Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Georgina V. Long
- 6Melanoma Institute Australia, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ines Pires da Silva
- 7Melanoma Institute Australia, Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Miller JR, Lo SN, Nosrati M, Stretch JR, Spillane AJ, Saw RPM, Shannon KF, Nieweg OE, Ch'ng S, Kim KB, Leong SP, Thompson JF, Scolyer RA, Kashani-Sabet M. Improving Selection for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Among Patients With Melanoma. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e236356. [PMID: 37074717 PMCID: PMC10116363 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.6356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Refining eligibility guidelines may identify more appropriate patients to undergo useful medical procedures. Objective To improve cost-effectiveness in selecting patients with melanoma for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). Design, Setting, and Participants This hybrid prognostic study/decision analytical model was conducted among patients with melanoma who were eligible for SLNB at 2 melanoma centers from Australia and the US from 2000 to 2014. Participants consisted of 2 cohorts of patients with melanoma undergoing SLNB and a cohort of eligible patients without SLNB. Individualized probabilities of SLNB positivity generated by a patient-centered methodology (PCM) were compared with those generated by conventional multiple logistic regression analysis investigating 12 prognostic factors. Prognostic accuracy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for each methodology and by matched-pair analyses. Interventions Triaging appropriate patients to undergo SLNB. Main Outcomes and Measures Total number of SLNBs performed (giving total cost) vs number of SLNB-positive outcomes (a measure of effectiveness) was evaluated. Improved cost-effectiveness through judicious patient selection was interpreted as increased numbers of SLNB-positive outcomes achieved, decreased numbers of SLNBs performed, or both outcomes simultaneously. Results Among 7331 patients with melanoma, SLNB outcomes were assessed in 3640 Australian patients (2212 males [60.8%]; 2447 aged >50 years [67.2%]) and 1342 US patients (774 males [57.7%]; 885 aged >50 years [66.0%]); 2349 patients eligible for SLNB who did not undergo the procedure were included in the simulation. PCM-generated probabilities achieved an AUROC of 0.803 in predicting SLNB positivity in the Australian cohort and 0.826 in the US cohort, higher than corresponding AUROCs generated by conventional logistic regression analysis. In simulation, adopting many SLNB-positive probabilities as minimally acceptable patient-selection criteria resulted in fewer procedures performed or increased the expected numbers of positive SLNBs. A minimally acceptable PCM-generated probability of 8.7% elicited the same number of SLNBs as historically performed (3640 SLNBs), with 1066 positive SLNBs (29.3%), constituting an improvement of 287 additional positive SLNBs compared with 779 actual positive SLNBs (36.8% improvement). In contrast, adopting a 23.7% PCM-generated minimum cutoff probability resulted in performing 1825 SLNBs, or 1815 fewer SLNBs than the actual experience (49.9%). It resulted in the same expected number of positive results (779 SLNBs), for a 42.7% positivity rate. Conclusions and Relevance This prognostic study/decision analytical model found that the PCM approach outperformed conventional multiple logistic regression analysis in predicting which patients would have positive results on SLNB. These findings suggest that systematically producing and exploiting more accurate SLNB-positivity probabilities could improve the selection of patients with melanoma for SLNB compared with using established guidelines, thus improving the cost-effectiveness of the selection process. Eligibility guidelines to undergo SLNB should include a context-tailored minimum cutoff probability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Miller
- Center for Melanoma Research and Treatment, California Pacific Medical Center and Research Institute, San Francisco
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mehdi Nosrati
- Center for Melanoma Research and Treatment, California Pacific Medical Center and Research Institute, San Francisco
| | - Jonathan R Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew J Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Breast and Melanoma Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kerwin F Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sydney Ch'ng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kevin B Kim
- Center for Melanoma Research and Treatment, California Pacific Medical Center and Research Institute, San Francisco
| | - Stanley P Leong
- Center for Melanoma Research and Treatment, California Pacific Medical Center and Research Institute, San Francisco
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mohammed Kashani-Sabet
- Center for Melanoma Research and Treatment, California Pacific Medical Center and Research Institute, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Weppler AM, Da Meda L, Pires da Silva I, Xu W, Grignani G, Menzies AM, Carlino MS, Long GV, Lo SN, Nordman I, Steer CB, Lyle M, Trojaniello C, Ascierto PA, Lebbe C, Sandhu S. Durability of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma after treatment cessation. Eur J Cancer 2023; 183:109-118. [PMID: 36842413 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) is highly responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); however, durability of response after treatment cessation and response to retreatment in the setting of progression is unknown. METHODS Patients (pts) having mMCC from 10 centres who discontinued ICI treatment for a reason other than progression were studied. RESULTS Forty patients were included. Median time on treatment was 13.5 months (range 1-35). Thirty-one patients (77.5%) stopped treatment electively while 9 patients (22.5%) stopped due to treatment-related toxicity. After median of 12.3 months from discontinuation, 14 pts (35%) have progressed (PD). Disease progression rate following ICI discontinuation was 26% (8 of 31) in patients who discontinued in complete response (CR), 57% (4 of 7) in patients in partial response and 100% (2 of 2) in those with stable disease. Median progression-free survival (PFS) after treatment cessation was 21 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18- not reached [NR]), with a third of patients progressing during their first year off treatment. PFS was longer for patients who discontinued ICI electively (median PFS 29 months; 95% CI, 21-NR) compared to those who stopped due to toxicity (median PFS 11 months; 95% CI, 10-NR). ICI was restarted in 8 of 14 pts (57%) with PD, with response rate of 75% (4 CR, 2 partial response, 1 stable disease, 1 PD). CONCLUSION ICI responses in mMCC do not appear durable off treatment, including in patients who achieve a CR, though response to retreatment is promising. Extended duration of treatment needs to be investigated to optimise long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laetitia Da Meda
- Institut du cancer AP-HP. Nord - Université Paris Cité Dermato-Oncology, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Ines Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia; Westmead & Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Wen Xu
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia; Westmead & Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Ina Nordman
- Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, Australia; University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Christopher B Steer
- Border Medical Oncology, Albury Wodonga Regional Cancer Centre, Albury, Australia Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Australia; University of NSW, Rural Clinical Campus, Albury, Australia
| | - Megan Lyle
- Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Australia; James Cook University, Cairns, Australia
| | | | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Celeste Lebbe
- Institut du cancer AP-HP. Nord - Université Paris Cité Dermato-Oncology, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ni Y, Watts CG, Scolyer RA, Madronio C, Armstrong BK, Morton RL, Menzies SW, Mann GJ, Thompson JF, Lo SN, Cust AE. Risk of developing a second primary melanoma after a first primary melanoma in a population-based Australian cohort. Br J Dermatol 2023; 188:814-816. [PMID: 36946230 DOI: 10.1093/bjd/ljad076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
The cross-sectional survey identified risk factors for developing a second primary melanoma. Melanoma patients with characteristics such as male sex, older age, high nevus count, or melanoma on the trunk or upper limbs have a substantially higher risk of subsequent melanoma and therefore should be monitored with priority accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Ni
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Caroline G Watts
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Kirby Institute UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christine Madronio
- Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bruce K Armstrong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Population and Global Health, The University of WA, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Scott W Menzies
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Graham J Mann
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
El Sharouni MA, Lo SN, Scolyer RA, van Gils CH, Thompson JF. REPLY to MS#JAAD-D-23-00002R1. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023:S0190-9622(23)00440-1. [PMID: 36935017 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rawson RV, Vergara IA, Stretch JR, Saw RPM, Thompson JF, Lo SN, Scolyer RA, Busam KJ. Representativeness of initial skin biopsies showing pure desmoplastic melanoma: implications for management. Pathology 2023; 55:214-222. [PMID: 36646575 PMCID: PMC10439514 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2022.12.346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Desmoplastic melanoma (DM) is an uncommon subtype of melanoma with distinct clinicopathological features. It is classified into pure desmoplastic melanoma (PDM) when the proportion of desmoplastic melanoma is ≥90% of the dermally-invasive component, and mixed desmoplastic melanoma (MDM) when the proportion of desmoplastic melanoma is <90%. Studies have reported a lower sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)-positivity rate in PDM compared to MDM and non-DM. As a result, some have recommended not performing SLNB in PDM patients. When PDM is identified in a partial biopsy of a melanoma, there is a risk that sampling bias may under-recognise MDM, but to the best of our knowledge this has not been previously assessed or quantified. The aim of this study was to assess the concordance of the proportion of desmoplastic melanoma in an initial partial biopsy of PDM with the proportion in the entire tumour following complete excision, in patients with cutaneous melanoma. A secondary aim was to determine how frequently this potentially resulted in a patient not receiving a SLNB. Seventy-eight cases of cutaneous melanoma were identified from the Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) database and 23 cases from the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC), where an initial biopsy contained PDM and a subsequent wide excision had residual invasive melanoma. Clinicopathological features were analysed in all patients, including whether a SLNB was performed, the results of SLNB, and any subsequent recurrence. Ninety percent (91/101) of cases were still classified as PDM in the complete wide excision specimen while 10% (10/101) of cases were reclassified as MDM, which was a significant change in classification of final desmoplastic melanoma subtype (p<0.001). The proportion of desmoplastic melanoma was also significantly different between the initial and excisional biopsies (p=0.004). Forty-eight (48/101) patients had a SLNB, of which two (4.5%) were positive for metastatic melanoma; both cases were PDM in the excision specimen. Of the 10 cases demonstrating MDM in the excision specimen, the initial biopsy was a punch biopsy in six cases, shave biopsy in two cases and subcutaneous tissue was sampled in two patients (one punch biopsy, one incisional biopsy). Four of these 10 patients underwent SLNB which was negative in all cases. Twenty-two patients developed recurrence in the follow-up period (median 30 months, range 1-192 months), three with MDM in their excision specimen. One patient did not have a SLNB and developed regional lymph node recurrence. In this study there was a 10% risk that the percentage of desmoplastic melanoma in an initial biopsy of PDM was not representative of the entire lesion, resulting in reclassification as MDM in the excision specimen. If a SLNB is not performed in such cases, a positive SLNB may be missed (one patient in our study) which could impact treatment options for the patient. We recommend caution in not offering a SLNB in the setting of an initial biopsy of PDM if the biopsy is small compared with the overall lesion. If a SLNB is not procured at the time of wide excision in such cases, the SLNs should still be mapped by lymphoscintigraphy to facilitate careful follow up and to enable earlier detection and treatment of nodal disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R V Rawson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - I A Vergara
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J R Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - R P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - S N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - R A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - K J Busam
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Varey AHR, Thompson JF, Howle JR, Lo SN, Ch’ng S, Carlino MS. Has the advent of modern adjuvant systemic therapy for melanoma rendered sentinel node biopsy unnecessary? Eur J Cancer 2023; 186:166-171. [PMID: 37080117 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
The prognostic value of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is well established and SNB was therefore adopted as a requirement for pathological staging of melanomas>1 mm thick in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition. Consequently, a negative SNB status became an eligibility criterion for clinical trials of adjuvant systemic therapy in resected stage IIB/C melanoma. However, since the Keynote 716 trial demonstrated an improvement in relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with Stage IIB/C melanoma, all of whom had SNB staging, some have argued that SNB is no longer required for patients with T3 and T4 primary melanomas. The rationale for omitting SNB is that these patients will be able to access adjuvant immunotherapy regardless of SNB status, avoiding the costs and potential complications of SNB. However, this argument overlooks the prognostic value of knowing a patient's nodal status and the therapeutic benefit of SNB in regional disease control. Based on extrapolation of data from multiple sources, we demonstrate that the risk of regional node-field relapse with SNB and immunotherapy for T3b and T4 melanomas is around 7-9% but is 20-27% without SNB. Similarly, the node-field recurrence rate with SNB alone is around 14% compared to around 40% with no SNB or immunotherapy. Consequently, in the absence of prospective data, we propose that the optimal management of the regional node-field for high-risk T3b and T4 primary melanomas is likely to be achieved by combining SNB and adjuvant immunotherapy for those patients who are suitable, rather than either treatment alone.
Collapse
|
38
|
Bhave P, Hong A, Lo SN, Johnson R, Mangana J, Johnson DB, Dulgar O, Eroglu Z, Yeoh HL, Haydon A, Lodde GC, Livingstone E, Khattak A, Kähler K, Hausschild A, McArthur GA, Menzies AM, Long G, Wang W, Carlino MS. Efficacy and toxicity of adjuvant radiotherapy in recurrent melanoma after adjuvant immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:jitc-2022-006629. [PMID: 36889810 PMCID: PMC10008434 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-006629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with stage III melanoma, despite surgical resection and adjuvant systemic therapy, locoregional recurrences still occur. The randomized, phase III Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG) 02.01 trial demonstrated that adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after complete lymphadenectomy (CLND) halves the incidence of melanoma recurrence within local nodal basins without improving overall survival or quality of life. However, the study was conducted prior to the current era of adjuvant systemic therapies and when CLND was the standard approach for microscopic nodal disease. As such, there is currently no data on the role of adjuvant RT in patients with melanoma who recur during or after adjuvant immunotherapy, including those that may or may not have undergone prior CLND. In this study, we aimed to answer this question. METHODS Patients with resected stage III melanoma who received adjuvant anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) (±ipilimumab) immunotherapy with a subsequent locoregional (lymph node and/or in-transit metastases) recurrence were retrospectively identified. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were conducted. Primary outcome was rate of subsequent locoregional recurrence; secondary outcomes were locoregional recurrence-free survival (lr-RFS2) and overall RFS (RFS2) to second recurrence. RESULTS In total, 71 patients were identified: 42 (59%) men, 30 (42%) BRAF V600E mutant, 43 (61%) stage IIIC at diagnosis. Median time to first recurrence was 7 months (1-44), 24 (34%) received adjuvant RT and 47 (66%) did not. Thirty-three patients (46%) developed a second recurrence at a median of 5 months (1-22). The rate of locoregional relapse at second recurrence was lower in those who received adjuvant RT (8%, 2/24) compared with those who did not (36%, 17/47, p=0.01). Adjuvant RT at first recurrence was associated with an improved lr-RFS2 (HR 0.16, p=0.015), with a trend towards an improved RFS2 (HR 0.54, p=0.072) and no effect on risk of distant recurrence or overall survival. CONCLUSION This is the first study to investigate the role of adjuvant RT in patients with melanoma with locoregional disease recurrence during or after adjuvant anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy. Adjuvant RT was associated with improved lr-RFS2, but not risk of distant recurrence, demonstrating a likely benefit in locoregional disease control in the modern era. Further prospective studies are required to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prachi Bhave
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Angela Hong
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca Johnson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Johanna Mangana
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Ozgecan Dulgar
- Department of Cutaneous Malignancy, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Zeynep Eroglu
- Department of Cutaneous Malignancy, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Hui-Ling Yeoh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Haydon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Georg C Lodde
- Department of Dermatology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Adnan Khattak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Katharina Kähler
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Axel Hausschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Grant A McArthur
- Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alexander Maxwell Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georgina Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wei Wang
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia .,Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lai-Kwon J, Jacques S, Carlino M, Benannoune N, Robert C, Allayous C, Baroudjian B, Lebbe C, Zimmer L, Eroglu Z, Topcu TO, Dimitriou F, Haydon A, Lo SN, Menzies AM, Long GV. Efficacy of ipilimumab 3mg/kg following progression on low dose ipilimumab in metastatic melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2023; 186:12-21. [PMID: 37018924 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differing doses of ipilimumab (IPI) are used in combination with an anti-PD1 antibody in advanced melanoma. There is no data on the outcomes of patients who progress following low-dose IPI (< 3 mg/kg) and are subsequently treated with IPI 3 mg/kg (IPI3). We conducted a multicentre retrospective survey to assess the efficacy of this strategy. METHODS Patients with resected stage III, unresectable stage III or IV melanoma who received low dose IPI (< 3 mg/kg) with an anti-PD1 antibody with recurrence (neo/adjuvant) or progressive disease (metastatic), who then received IPI3± anti-PD1 antibody were eligible. Best investigator-determined Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analysed. RESULTS Total 36 patients received low-dose IPI with an anti-PD1 antibody, 18 (50%) in the neo/adjuvant and 18 (50%) in the metastatic setting. Of which, 20 (56%) had primary resistance and 16 (44%) had acquired resistance. All patients received IPI3 for unresectable stage III or IV melanoma; median age 60 (29-78), 18 (50%) M1d disease, 32 (89%) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Around 35 (97%) received IPI3 with nivolumab and 1 received IPI3 alone. The response rate to IPI3 was 9/36 (25%). In patients with primary resistance, the response rate was 6/20 (30%). After a median follow-up of 22 months (95% CI: 15-27 months), the median PFS and OS were not reached in patients who responded; 1-year PFS and OS were 73% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS IPI3 following recurrence/progression on low dose IPI has clinical activity, including in primary resistance. IPI dosing is therefore critical in a subset of patients.
Collapse
|
40
|
El Sharouni MA, Rawson RV, Potter AJ, Paver EC, Wilmott JS, Witkamp AJ, Sigurdsson V, van Diest PJ, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF, Lo SN, van Gils CH. Melanomas in children and adolescents: Clinicopathologic features and survival outcomes. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88:609-616. [PMID: 36509217 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.08.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanomas in the first 2 decades of life are uncommon and poorly understood. OBJECTIVE To assess clinicopathologic features and survival of children (≤11 years) and adolescents (12-19 years) diagnosed with melanoma. METHODS A pooled cohort of 514 patients was analyzed (397 Dutch, 117 Australian; 62 children, 452 adolescents). Pathology reports were reevaluated to determine melanoma subtypes. Multivariable Cox models were generated for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Melanoma subtypes were conventional melanoma (superficial spreading, nodular, desmoplastic, and acral lentiginous), spitzoid melanoma, and melanoma associated with a congenital nevus in 428, 78, and 8 patients, respectively. Ten-year RFS was 91.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82.4%-100%) in children and 86.4% (95% CI, 82.7%-90.3%) in adolescents (P = .32). Ten-year OS was 100% in children and 92.7% (95% CI, 89.8%-95.8%) in adolescents (P = .09). On multivariable analysis possible only for the adolescent cohort due to the small number of children, ulceration status, and anatomic site were associated with RFS and OS, whereas age, sex, mitotic index, sentinel node status and melanoma subtype were not. Breslow thickness >4 mm was associated with worse RFS. LIMITATIONS Retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS Survival rates for children and adolescents with melanomas were high. Ulceration, head or neck location and Breslow thickness >4 mm predicted worse survival in adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Robert V Rawson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alison J Potter
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth C Paver
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - James S Wilmott
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vigfús Sigurdsson
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Tissue Oncology and Diagnostic Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Iravani A, Wallace R, Lo SN, Galligan A, Weppler AM, Hicks RJ, Sandhu S. FDG PET/CT Prognostic Markers in Patients with Advanced Melanoma Treated with Ipilimumab and Nivolumab. Radiology 2023; 307:e221180. [PMID: 36853183 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
Background Despite improved response to combined ipilimumab and nivolumab (hereafter, IpiNivo) treatment for advanced melanoma, many patients exhibit primary or acquired resistance. This, combined with high risk of immune-related adverse events, makes identifying markers predictive of outcomes desirable. Purpose To investigate the prognostic value of fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT parameters at baseline and as part of response monitoring in patients with advanced melanoma undergoing IpiNivo treatment. Materials and Methods This was a single-center retrospective study of adult patients with melanoma who received IpiNivo. Baseline FDG PET/CT parameters that included metabolic tumor volume (MTV), tumor stage, mutation status, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, lactate dehydrogenase level, and treatment line were correlated with overall survival in univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Treatment response as determined with FDG PET/CT was correlated with overall survival. Results In total, 122 patients (median age, 61 years [IQR, 51-69 years]; 89 men) were included; 78% (95 of 122) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0, 52% (45 of 86) had an elevated lactate dehydrogenase level, 39% (48 of 122) had a metastatic stage of M1c and 45% (55 of 122) M1d, 45% (55 of 122) had BRAF V600E/K mutation, and the median MTV was 42 mL. Patients with a higher than median MTV at baseline FDG PET/CT had a lower 12-month survival rate compared with those with a lower than median MTV (43% [95% CI: 32, 58] vs 66% [95% CI: 55, 79], P < .001). In multivariable analysis, higher versus lower than median MTV, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance scores of 1-2 versus 0, and subsequent versus first-line IpiNivo treatment were independently associated with overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.68 [95% CI: 1.02, 2.78], P = .04; 3.1 [95% CI: 1.8, 5.4], P < .001; and 11.2 [95% CI: 3.4, 37.1], P = .002, respectively). The 12-month overall survival rate was lower in patients with progressive disease than in those without progression (35% [95% CI: 24, 51] vs 90% [95% CI: 83, 99]; HR, 7.3 [95% CI: 3.9, 13.3]; P < .001). Conclusion Baseline fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT metabolic tumor volume was an independent prognostic marker in patients with advanced melanoma who received ipilimumab and nivolumab treatment. © RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Iravani
- From the Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine (A.I.) and Department of Oncology (R.W., S.S.), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (A.I., S.S.) and St Vincent's Hospital Department of Medicine (A.G., R.J.H.), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (A.I.); Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia (S.N.L.); Immunology and Diabetes Unit, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); and Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (A.M.W.)
| | - Roslyn Wallace
- From the Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine (A.I.) and Department of Oncology (R.W., S.S.), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (A.I., S.S.) and St Vincent's Hospital Department of Medicine (A.G., R.J.H.), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (A.I.); Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia (S.N.L.); Immunology and Diabetes Unit, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); and Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (A.M.W.)
| | - Serigne N Lo
- From the Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine (A.I.) and Department of Oncology (R.W., S.S.), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (A.I., S.S.) and St Vincent's Hospital Department of Medicine (A.G., R.J.H.), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (A.I.); Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia (S.N.L.); Immunology and Diabetes Unit, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); and Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (A.M.W.)
| | - Anna Galligan
- From the Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine (A.I.) and Department of Oncology (R.W., S.S.), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (A.I., S.S.) and St Vincent's Hospital Department of Medicine (A.G., R.J.H.), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (A.I.); Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia (S.N.L.); Immunology and Diabetes Unit, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); and Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (A.M.W.)
| | - Alison M Weppler
- From the Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine (A.I.) and Department of Oncology (R.W., S.S.), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (A.I., S.S.) and St Vincent's Hospital Department of Medicine (A.G., R.J.H.), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (A.I.); Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia (S.N.L.); Immunology and Diabetes Unit, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); and Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (A.M.W.)
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- From the Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine (A.I.) and Department of Oncology (R.W., S.S.), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (A.I., S.S.) and St Vincent's Hospital Department of Medicine (A.G., R.J.H.), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (A.I.); Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia (S.N.L.); Immunology and Diabetes Unit, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); and Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (A.M.W.)
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- From the Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine (A.I.) and Department of Oncology (R.W., S.S.), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology (A.I., S.S.) and St Vincent's Hospital Department of Medicine (A.G., R.J.H.), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash (A.I.); Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, North Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia (S.N.L.); Institute for Research and Medical Consultations (IRMC), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia (S.N.L.); Immunology and Diabetes Unit, St Vincent's Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (A.G.); and Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (A.M.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sharouni MAE, Lo SN, Varey AH, Elias SG, Witkamp AJ, Sigurdsson V, Suijkerbuijk KP, van Diest PJ, van Gils CH, Blokx WA, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF. Plain Language Summary - Development and validation of risk calculators for people with "thin" melanomas on their skin to predict the likelihood that their cancer will return. Future Oncol 2023; 19:97-102. [PMID: 36762595 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2022-0525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT? This is a summary of an article describing the development of risk calculators for use in people who develop a type of melanoma on their skin called "thin" melanoma to predict the likelihood that their cancer will return. The article was originally published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2021. HOW WERE THE CALCULATORS DEVELOPED? Calculations were performed to predict the chance of people with thin melanomas surviving without their melanoma recurring. Three graphical prediction calculators (called nomograms) were developed, along with easy-to-use online calculators using the same underlying calculation methods. The model was developed using data for 25,930 Dutch people diagnosed with thin melanomas (called the "development set"). To test its ability to predict melanoma recurrence, it was then compared with data for 2,968 Australian people with melanoma (the "validation set"). The calculators developed in the Dutch patients were found to accurately predict the risk of melanoma recurring for people with melanoma in the Australian "validation" group. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN? The calculators provide estimates of the risk of the melanoma returning for people with thin melanomas. The easy-to-use online calculators are freely available on a smartphone, tablet or computer, and will assist in providing accurate estimates of recurrence risks for individuals with thin melanomas, allowing more intensive follow-up of those whose predicted risk of their melanoma returning is high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Ann El Sharouni
- Department of Dermatology, University Medic al Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander Hr Varey
- Department of Dermatology, University Medic al Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Julius Center for Health Sciences & Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Vigfús Sigurdsson
- Department of Dermatology, University Medic al Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karijn Pm Suijkerbuijk
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul J van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla H van Gils
- Julius Center for Health Sciences & Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Willeke Am Blokx
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Melanoma & Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zhang R, Smit AK, Espinoza D, Allen M, Reyes-Marcelino G, Kimlin MG, Lo SN, Sharman AR, Law MH, Kanetsky PA, Mann GJ, Cust AE. Validation of self-reported sun exposure against electronic ultraviolet radiation dosimeters. Int J Epidemiol 2023; 52:324-328. [PMID: 36153755 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyac179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Zhang
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Amelia K Smit
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Espinoza
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Martin Allen
- MacDiarmid Institute for Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Gillian Reyes-Marcelino
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael G Kimlin
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ashleigh R Sharman
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matthew H Law
- Statistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.,Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Graham J Mann
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,The John Curtin School of Medical Research, ANU College of Health and Medicine, ANU, Canberra, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bartula I, Tran AD, Nowak AK, Ahmed T, Morton RL, Burmeister BH, Dolven-Jacobsen K, Nobes J, Thompson JF, Fogarty GB, Lo SN, Hong AM. Longitudinal Trajectory of Quality of Life for Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastases: A Secondary Analysis from a Whole Brain Radiotherapy Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
|
45
|
Lee J, Ahmed T, Maurichi A, Di Guardo L, Stagno AM, Warburton L, Taylor AM, Livingstone E, Rehman S, Khattak A, Kahler KC, Vanella V, Atkinson V, Millward M, Schadendorf D, Johnson DB, Ascierto PA, Hauschild A, Lo SN, Long GV, Menzies AM, Carlino MS. BRAF inhibitor cessation prior to disease progression in metastatic melanoma: Long-term outcomes. Eur J Cancer 2023; 179:87-97. [PMID: 36509002 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND BRAF mutant melanoma treated with BRAF ± MEK inhibitor (targeted therapy) has a high response rate; however, most patients progress (PD). Some patients have durable response, but it is unknown whether treatment can be discontinued in these patients. We describe the recurrence risk, progression patterns, response to subsequent treatment, and survival of patients with advanced melanoma who ceased targeted therapy prior to PD. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ninety-four patients who ceased targeted therapy without progression were identified retrospectively from 11 centres: 45 were male; 81 V600E; 88 stage IV. Fifty-nine were treated with BRAF + MEK inhibitor, and 35 were treated with BRAF inhibitor alone. Median treatment duration was 29.6 months (range 0.36-77.9). At cessation, 67 were in complete response, 21 in partial response, and 2 stable disease. RESULTS After median follow-up from cessation of 42.9 months (range 0.0-88.7), 36 (38%) progressed; median time to progression was 4.7 months (range 0.7-56.9); 30 (83%) were asymptomatic and 7 (19%) had new brain metastases. Progression rates did not differ by best response: 34% for complete response and 43% for partial response (P = 0.65). Treatment duration was strongly associated with risk of progression: Median treatment duration was 18.3 (range 0.85-65.7) months for those who progressed and 34.6 (range 0.36-77.9) months for those who did not (P = 0.0004). Twenty-two received further targeted therapy with 15 (68%) responses. CONCLUSION Risk of progression after cessation of targeted therapy is strongly associated with treatment duration. Response to retreatment with targeted therapy is high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tasnia Ahmed
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrea Maurichi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Di Guardo
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna M Stagno
- SC Medical Oncology/ASST-Monza San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Amelia M Taylor
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Saba Rehman
- Vanderbilt University Medical Centre, Nashville, USA
| | - Adnan Khattak
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia; Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Vito Vanella
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Victoria Atkinson
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Greenslopes Private Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Michael Millward
- School of Medicine/University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen & German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, Germany
| | | | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Axel Hauschild
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health/The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore & Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre/The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health/The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Royal North Shore & Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health/The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Blacktown and Westmead Hospitals, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Newell F, Johansson PA, Wilmott JS, Nones K, Lakis V, Pritchard AL, Lo SN, Rawson RV, Kazakoff SH, Colebatch AJ, Koufariotis LT, Ferguson PM, Wood S, Leonard C, Law MH, Brooks KM, Broit N, Palmer JM, Couts KL, Vergara IA, Long GV, Barbour AP, Nieweg OE, Shivalingam B, Robinson WA, Stretch JR, Spillane AJ, Saw RP, Shannon KF, Thompson JF, Mann GJ, Pearson JV, Scolyer RA, Waddell N, Hayward NK. Comparative Genomics Provides Etiologic and Biological Insight into Melanoma Subtypes. Cancer Discov 2022; 12:2856-2879. [PMID: 36098958 PMCID: PMC9716259 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-22-0603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Melanoma is a cancer of melanocytes, with multiple subtypes based on body site location. Cutaneous melanoma is associated with skin exposed to ultraviolet radiation; uveal melanoma occurs in the eyes; mucosal melanoma occurs in internal mucous membranes; and acral melanoma occurs on the palms, soles, and nail beds. Here, we present the largest whole-genome sequencing study of melanoma to date, with 570 tumors profiled, as well as methylation and RNA sequencing for subsets of tumors. Uveal melanoma is genomically distinct from other melanoma subtypes, harboring the lowest tumor mutation burden and with significantly mutated genes in the G-protein signaling pathway. Most cutaneous, acral, and mucosal melanomas share alterations in components of the MAPK, PI3K, p53, p16, and telomere pathways. However, the mechanism by which these pathways are activated or inactivated varies between melanoma subtypes. Additionally, we identify potential novel germline predisposition genes for some of the less common melanoma subtypes. SIGNIFICANCE This is the largest whole-genome analysis of melanoma to date, comprehensively comparing the genomics of the four major melanoma subtypes. This study highlights both similarities and differences between the subtypes, providing insights into the etiology and biology of melanoma. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2711.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felicity Newell
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Corresponding Authors: Felicity Newell, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia. Phone: 61-7-3845-3965; E-mail: ; Richard A. Scolyer, Melanoma Institute Australia, 40 Rockland Road, Wollstonecraft, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia. Phone: 61-2-9515-7011; E-mail: ; and Nicola Waddell, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia. Phone: 61-7-3845-3538;
| | - Peter A. Johansson
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - James S. Wilmott
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katia Nones
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Vanessa Lakis
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Antonia L. Pritchard
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Department of Genetics and Immunology, Division of Biomedical Science, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, Scotland, United Kingdom
| | - Serigne N. Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robert V. Rawson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Andrew J. Colebatch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Peter M. Ferguson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Scott Wood
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Conrad Leonard
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Matthew H. Law
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kelly M. Brooks
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Natasa Broit
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Q-Gen Cell Therapeutics, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Jane M. Palmer
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kasey L. Couts
- Center for Rare Melanomas, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Ismael A. Vergara
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew P. Barbour
- Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Omgo E. Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brindha Shivalingam
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Neurosurgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - William A. Robinson
- Center for Rare Melanomas, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jonathan R. Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew J. Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn P.M. Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kerwin F. Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John F. Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Graham J. Mann
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.,John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - John V. Pearson
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Richard A. Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Corresponding Authors: Felicity Newell, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia. Phone: 61-7-3845-3965; E-mail: ; Richard A. Scolyer, Melanoma Institute Australia, 40 Rockland Road, Wollstonecraft, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia. Phone: 61-2-9515-7011; E-mail: ; and Nicola Waddell, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia. Phone: 61-7-3845-3538;
| | - Nicola Waddell
- QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,Corresponding Authors: Felicity Newell, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia. Phone: 61-7-3845-3965; E-mail: ; Richard A. Scolyer, Melanoma Institute Australia, 40 Rockland Road, Wollstonecraft, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia. Phone: 61-2-9515-7011; E-mail: ; and Nicola Waddell, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia. Phone: 61-7-3845-3538;
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Moncrieff MD, Lo SN, Scolyer RA, Heaton MJ, Nobes JP, Snelling AP, Carr MJ, Nessim C, Wade R, Peach AH, Kisyova R, Mason J, Wilson ED, Nolan G, Pritchard Jones R, Johansson I, Olofsson Bagge R, Wright LJ, Patel NG, Sondak VK, Thompson JF, Zager JS. Clinical Outcomes and Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Melanoma Micrometastases From an International Multicenter Study: Implications for the Management of American Joint Committee on Cancer IIIA Disease. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:3940-3951. [PMID: 35849790 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Indications for offering adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with early-stage melanomas with low disease burden sentinel node (SN) micrometastases, namely, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC; eighth edition) stage IIIA disease, are presently controversial. The current study sought to identify high-risk SN-positive AJCC stage IIIA patients who are more likely to derive benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy. METHODS Patients were recruited from an intercontinental (Australia/Europe/North America) consortium of nine high-volume cancer centers. All were adult patients with pathologic stage pT1b/pT2a primary cutaneous melanomas who underwent SN biopsy between 2005 and 2020. Patient data, primary tumor and SN characteristics, and survival outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Three thousand six hundred seven patients were included. The median follow-up was 34 months. Pairwise disease comparison demonstrated no significant survival difference between N1a and N2a subgroups. Survival analysis identified a SN tumor deposit maximum dimension of 0.3 mm as the optimal cut point for stratifying survival. Five-year disease-specific survival rates were 80.3% and 94.1% for patients with SN metastatic tumor deposits ≥ 0.3 mm and < 0.3 mm, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.26 [1.11 to 1.44]; P < .0001). Similar findings were seen for overall disease-free and distant metastasis-free survival. There were no survival differences between the AJCC IB patients and low-risk (< 0.3 mm) AJCC IIIA patients. The newly identified high-risk (≥ 0.3 mm) subgroup comprised 271 (66.4%) of the AJCC IIIA cohort, whereas only 142 (34.8%) patients had SN tumor deposits > 1 mm in maximum dimension. CONCLUSION Patients with AJCC IIIA melanoma with SN tumor deposits ≥ 0.3 mm in maximum dimension are at higher risk of disease progression and may benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy or enrollment into a clinical trial. Patients with SN deposits < 0.3 mm in maximum dimension can be managed similar to their SN-negative, AJCC IB counterparts, thereby avoiding regular radiological surveillance and more intensive follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc D Moncrieff
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin J Heaton
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Jenny P Nobes
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew P Snelling
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | | | - Carolyn Nessim
- The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ryckie Wade
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - A Howard Peach
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Rumi Kisyova
- North Bristol Hospital NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Mason
- North Bristol Hospital NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Ewan D Wilson
- North Bristol Hospital NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Grant Nolan
- St Helens and Knowsley NHS Teaching Hospitals Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | | | - Iva Johansson
- Sahlgrenska Centre for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Centre for Cancer Research, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lucie J Wright
- United Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Nakul G Patel
- United Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | | | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute of Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hanna S, Marinos E, Bryan D, Ahmed T, Lo SN, Carlino MS, Smith A, Cairns G, Shannon K, Long GV, Scolyer RA, Saw RPM. Effect of the SunSafe Student Ambassador Program on the attitudes, knowledge and behaviour of Australian high-school students towards sun safety: a prospective study. Clin Exp Dermatol 2022; 47:1956-1967. [PMID: 35434843 DOI: 10.1111/ced.15220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The SunSafe Student Ambassador Program (SSSAP) in Australia uses the peer-to-peer learning environment to educate high-school students about sun-safety. AIMS To assess whether the SSSAP would improve knowledge, attitudes and behaviours towards sun safety in high-school students and whether this would be sustained at 3 months. METHODS An assessment survey was delivered before, immediately after and 3 months after participation in the SSSAP in 2019. RESULTS In total, 503 participants completed the pre-presentation survey, 274 completed the post-presentation survey, and 218 completed both. Immediately following presentation, the total composite score for all 18 knowledge questions increased from a mean ± SD of 11.8 ± 3.5 to 13.8 ± 4.7 (P < 0.001). There was strong evidence for an improvement in one attitude-based question 'Is it healthy to have a tan?' (P < 0.01) and one behaviour question about wearing sunscreen daily (P = 0.02). After 3 months, 235 students were matched to their pre-presentation survey. The composite score of all knowledge questions had improved from 11.2 ± 3.5 to 12.1 ± 4.5 (out of a total of 18) (P < 0.01). There was also an improvement in two attitude questions 'Do you feel better when you have a tan?' (P = 0.03) and 'Is it healthy to have a tan?' (very strong evidence: P < 0.001), and evidence for a reduction in time spent outdoors on a weekday (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION The SSSAP was associated with improvements in knowledge, attitude and behaviour towards sun safety immediately and at 3 months post-presentation. Further research is required to determine whether these positive effects are sustained and whether they ultimately reduce skin cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Hanna
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Derek Bryan
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tasnia Ahmed
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Annika Smith
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgia Cairns
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kerwin Shannon
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Mater Hospital, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Varey AHR, Williams GJ, Lo SN, Taing CY, Maurichi A, Santinami M, Scolyer RA, Thompson JF. Clinical Management of Melanocytic Tumours of Uncertain Malignant Potential (MelTUMPs), including Melanocytomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 37:859-870. [PMID: 36251355 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Little guidance is currently available for managing patients with melanocytic tumours of uncertain malignant potential (MelTUMPs, including melanocytomas), in particular the optimal excision margins and whether to offer sentinel node biopsy (SNB). The objective of this review is to evaluate excision margins and the prognostic utility of SNB by systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched to October 2021 for studies of patients with MelTUMPs reporting excision margins and/or SNB-positivity. Meta-analysis was performed on the SNB-positivity rate using a random effects model, followed by sensitivity analyses on subgroups. 111 primary studies reported excision margins and/or SNB data for 1962 patients. Follow-up was available for 1649 patients: 1561 (94.7%) were alive without disease at last review, 53 (3.2%) had developed further disease, 29 (1.8%) had died of metastatic disease (melanoma) and six (0.4%) died of unrelated causes. SNB was performed in 837 patients. The pooled positivity rate on meta-analysis was 32% (95% CI: 23-44%). Clinical outcome could be correlated with excision margin in only 171 patients (60% of those with known follow up) and was therefore not analysed further. Evidence indicating the ideal excision margins for MelTUMPs was lacking. SNB had a high positivity rate despite very low rates of recurrence or melanoma-related death. Consequently, SNB should not be offered routinely for MelTUMPs (including melanocytomas), due to its lack of prognostic utility for this tumour type (high certainty of evidence).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A H R Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| | - G J Williams
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - S N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - C Y Taing
- Cancer Council Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - A Maurichi
- Melanoma and Sarcoma Surgical Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - M Santinami
- Melanoma and Sarcoma Surgical Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - R A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - J F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Lawless AK, Coker DJ, Lo SN, Ahmed T, Scolyer RA, Ch'ng S, Nieweg OE, Shannon K, Spillane A, Stretch JR, Thompson JF, Saw RPM. ASO Visual Abstract: Clinicopathological Characteristics Predicting Further Recurrence and Survival Following Resection of In-transit Melanoma Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:7031-7032. [PMID: 35994160 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12266-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna K Lawless
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - David J Coker
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tasnia Ahmed
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sydney Ch'ng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kerwin Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Breast and Melanoma Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|