1
|
Liu Q, Joshi A, Standing JF, van der Graaf PH. Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning: The New Frontier of Clinical Pharmacology and Precision Medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024; 115:637-642. [PMID: 38505955 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Liu
- United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Amita Joshi
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wenker SAM, Alabdulkarim N, Readman JB, Slob EMA, Satta G, Ali S, Gadher N, Shulman R, Standing JF. Defining the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index of piperacillin/tazobactam within a hollow-fibre infection model to determine target attainment in intensive care patients. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2024; 6:dlae036. [PMID: 38476774 PMCID: PMC10928666 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background It is important to optimize dosing schemes of antibiotics to maximize the probability of therapeutic success. The recommended pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index for piperacillin/tazobactam therapy in clinical studies ranges widely (50%-100% fT>1-4×MIC). Dosing schemes failing to achieve PK/PD targets may lead to negative treatment outcomes. Objectives The first aim of this study was to define the optimal PK/PD index of piperacillin/tazobactam with a hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM). The second aim was to predict whether these PK/PD targets are currently achieved in critically ill patients through PK/PD model simulation. Patients and methods A dose-fractionation study comprising 21 HFIM experiments was performed against a range of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens, doses and infusion times. Clinical data and dose histories from a case series of nine patients with a known bacterial infection treated with piperacillin/tazobactam in the ICU were collected. The PK/PD index and predicted plasma concentrations and therefore target attainment of the patients were simulated using R version 4.2.1. Results fT >MIC was found to be the best-fitting PK/PD index for piperacillin/tazobactam. Bactericidal activity with 2 log10 cfu reduction was associated with 77% fT>MIC. Piperacillin/tazobactam therapy was defined as clinically 'ineffective' in ∼78% (7/9) patients. Around seventy-one percent (5/7) of these patients had a probability of >10% that 2 log10 cfu reduction was not attained. Conclusions Our dose-fractionation study indicates an optimal PK/PD target in piperacillin/tazobactam therapies should be 77% fT>MIC for 2 log10 kill. Doses to achieve this target should be considered when treating patients in ICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne A M Wenker
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Najla Alabdulkarim
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - John B Readman
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Elise M A Slob
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Giovanni Satta
- Department of Infection, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shanom Ali
- Environmental Research Laboratory, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nishma Gadher
- Pharmacy Department, CMORE, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Rob Shulman
- Pharmacy Department, CMORE, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Standing JF, Buggiotti L, Guerra-Assuncao JA, Woodall M, Ellis S, Agyeman AA, Miller C, Okechukwu M, Kirkpatrick E, Jacobs AI, Williams CA, Roy S, Martin-Bernal LM, Williams R, Smith CM, Sanderson T, Ashford FB, Emmanuel B, Afzal ZM, Shields A, Richter AG, Dorward J, Gbinigie O, Van Hecke O, Lown M, Francis N, Jani B, Richards DB, Rahman NM, Yu LM, Thomas NPB, Hart ND, Evans P, Andersson M, Hayward G, Hood K, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Little P, Hobbs FDR, Khoo S, Butler C, Lowe DM, Breuer J. Randomized controlled trial of molnupiravir SARS-CoV-2 viral and antibody response in at-risk adult outpatients. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1652. [PMID: 38396069 PMCID: PMC10891158 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45641-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Viral clearance, antibody response and the mutagenic effect of molnupiravir has not been elucidated in at-risk populations. Non-hospitalised participants within 5 days of SARS-CoV-2 symptoms randomised to receive molnupiravir (n = 253) or Usual Care (n = 324) were recruited to study viral and antibody dynamics and the effect of molnupiravir on viral whole genome sequence from 1437 viral genomes. Molnupiravir accelerates viral load decline, but virus is detectable by Day 5 in most cases. At Day 14 (9 days post-treatment), molnupiravir is associated with significantly higher viral persistence and significantly lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titres compared to Usual Care. Serial sequencing reveals increased mutagenesis with molnupiravir treatment. Persistence of detectable viral RNA at Day 14 in the molnupiravir group is associated with higher transition mutations following treatment cessation. Viral viability at Day 14 is similar in both groups with post-molnupiravir treated samples cultured up to 9 days post cessation of treatment. The current 5-day molnupiravir course is too short. Longer courses should be tested to reduce the risk of potentially transmissible molnupiravir-mutated variants being generated. Trial registration: ISRCTN30448031.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | - Laura Buggiotti
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jose Afonso Guerra-Assuncao
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Maximillian Woodall
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Samuel Ellis
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Akosua A Agyeman
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Charles Miller
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Mercy Okechukwu
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emily Kirkpatrick
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Amy I Jacobs
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte A Williams
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sunando Roy
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Luz M Martin-Bernal
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Williams
- Genetics and Genomic Medicine Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Claire M Smith
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Fiona B Ashford
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Beena Emmanuel
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zaheer M Afzal
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Adrian Shields
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alex G Richter
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jienchi Dorward
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Oghenekome Gbinigie
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Oliver Van Hecke
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Lown
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nick Francis
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Bhautesh Jani
- School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Duncan B Richards
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Najib M Rahman
- Respiratory Trials Unit and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ly-Mee Yu
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Nigel D Hart
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences. Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Philip Evans
- APEx (Exeter Collaboration for Academic Primary Care), University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- National Institute of Health and Care Research, Clinical Research Network, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Gail Hayward
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| | | | - Paul Little
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - F D Richard Hobbs
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Saye Khoo
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Liverpool and Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Christopher Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David M Lowe
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, UK
| | - Judith Breuer
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kreins AY, Roux E, Pang J, Cheng I, Charles O, Roy S, Mohammed R, Owens S, Lowe DM, Brugha R, Williams R, Howley E, Best T, Davies EG, Worth A, Solas C, Standing JF, Goldstein RA, Rocha-Pereira J, Breuer J. Favipiravir induces HuNoV viral mutagenesis and infectivity loss with clinical improvement in immunocompromised patients. Clin Immunol 2024; 259:109901. [PMID: 38218209 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2024.109901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
Chronic human norovirus (HuNoV) infections in immunocompromised patients result in severe disease, yet approved antivirals are lacking. RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) inhibitors inducing viral mutagenesis display broad-spectrum in vitro antiviral activity, but clinical efficacy in HuNoV infections is anecdotal and the potential emergence of drug-resistant variants is concerning. Upon favipiravir (and nitazoxanide) treatment of four immunocompromised patients with life-threatening HuNoV infections, viral whole-genome sequencing showed accumulation of favipiravir-induced mutations which coincided with clinical improvement although treatment failed to clear HuNoV. Infection of zebrafish larvae demonstrated drug-associated loss of viral infectivity and favipiravir treatment showed efficacy despite occurrence of RdRp variants potentially causing favipiravir resistance. This indicates that within-host resistance evolution did not reverse loss of viral fitness caused by genome-wide accumulation of sequence changes. This off-label approach supports the use of mutagenic antivirals for treating prolonged RNA viral infections and further informs the debate surrounding their impact on virus evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Y Kreins
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Immunology and Gene Therapy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Roux
- KU Leuven - Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Juanita Pang
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Iek Cheng
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oscar Charles
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sunando Roy
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Reem Mohammed
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Stephen Owens
- Department of Paediatric Allergy, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - David M Lowe
- Immunology Department, Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rossa Brugha
- Department of Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Williams
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Evey Howley
- Department of Immunology and Gene Therapy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy Best
- Department of Microbiology, Virology and Infection Control, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - E Graham Davies
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Immunology and Gene Therapy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Austen Worth
- Department of Immunology and Gene Therapy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Solas
- Unité des Virus Émergents IRD 190, INSERM 1207, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France; APHM, Laboratoire de Pharmacocinétique et Toxicologie, Hôpital La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard A Goldstein
- Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joana Rocha-Pereira
- KU Leuven - Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Rega Institute, Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Judith Breuer
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gastine S, Morse JD, Leung MT, Wong ICK, Howard RF, Harrop E, Liossi C, Standing JF, Jassal SS, Hain RD, Skene S, Oulton K, Law SL, Quek WT, Anderson BJ. Diamorphine pharmacokinetics and conversion factor estimates for intranasal diamorphine in paediatric breakthrough pain:systematic review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2024; 13:e485-e493. [PMID: 35184039 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intranasal diamorphine is a potential treatment for breakthrough pain but few paediatric data are available to assist dose estimation. AIM To determine an intranasal diamorphine dose in children through an understanding of pharmacokinetics. DESIGN A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to seek diamorphine pharmacokinetic parameters in neonates, children and adults. Parenteral and enteral diamorphine bioavailability were reviewed with respect to formation of the major metabolite, morphine. Clinical data quantifying equianalgesic effects of diamorphine and morphine were reviewed. REVIEW SOURCES PubMed (1960-2020); EMBASE (1980-2020); IPA (1973-2020) and original human research studies that reported diacetylmorphine and metabolite after any dose or route of administration. RESULTS The systematic review identified 19 studies: 16 in adults and 1 in children and 2 neonatal reports. Details of study participants were extracted. Age ranged from premature neonates to 67 years and weight 1.4-88 kg. Intranasal diamorphine bioavailability was predicted as 50%. The equianalgesic intravenous conversion ratio of morphine:diamorphine was 2:1. There was heterogeneity between pharmacokinetic parameter estimates attributed to routes of administration, lack of size standardisation, methodology and pharmacokinetic analysis. Estimates of the pharmacokinetic parameters clearance and volume of distribution were reduced in neonates. There were insufficient paediatric data to characterise clearance or volume maturation of either diamorphine or its metabolites. CONCLUSIONS We estimate equianalgesic ratios of intravenous morphine:diamorphine 2:1, intravenous morphine:intranasal diamorphine 1:1 and oral morphine:intranasal diamorphine of 1:3. These ratios are based on adult literature, but are reasonable for deciding on an initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg in children 4-13 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gastine
- Great Ormond St Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - James D Morse
- Department of Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology, The University of Auckland Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Miriam Ty Leung
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ian Chi Kei Wong
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, UK
| | - Richard F Howard
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Christina Liossi
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Department of Immunity and Inflammation, University College London, London, UK
| | - Satbir Singh Jassal
- Palliative Care, Rainbows Hospice for Children and Young Adults, Loughborough, UK
| | - Richard D Hain
- All-Wales Managed Clinical Network in Paediatric Palliative Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Simon Skene
- Faculty of Arts and Human Sciences, Surrey Clinical Trials Unit, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Kate Oulton
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Siew L Law
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, UK
| | - Wan T Quek
- Research Department of Practice and Policy, University College London School of Pharmacy, London, UK
| | - Brian J Anderson
- Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Auckland Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pai AA, Mohanan E, Panetta JC, Kulkarni UP, Illangeswaran RSS, Balakrishnan B, Jayaraman A, Edison ES, Lakshmi KM, Devasia AJ, Fouzia NA, Korula A, Abraham A, George B, Srivastava A, Mathews V, Standing JF, Balasubramanian P. Treosulfan Exposure Predicts Thalassemia-Free Survival in Patients with Beta Thalassemia Major Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024; 115:116-125. [PMID: 37846495 PMCID: PMC7615782 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
A toxicity-reduced conditioning regimen with treosulfan, fludarabine, and thiotepa in patients with high-risk β-thalassemia major has significantly improved hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes. However, complications resulting from regimen-related toxicities (RRTs), mixed chimerism, and graft rejection remain a challenge. We evaluated the dose-exposure-response relationship of treosulfan and its active metabolite S, S-EBDM, in a uniform cohort of patients with β-thalassemia major to identify whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and dose adjustment of treosulfan is feasible. Plasma treosulfan/S, S-EBDM levels were measured in 77 patients using a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using nlmixr2. The influence of treosulfan and S, S-EBDM exposure, and GSTA1/NQO1 polymorphisms on graft rejection, RRTs, chimerism status, and 1-year overall survival (OS), and thalassemia-free survival (TFS) were assessed. We observed that treosulfan exposure was lower in patients with graft rejection than those without (1,655 vs. 2,037 mg•h/L, P = 0.07). Pharmacodynamic modeling analysis to identify therapeutic cutoff revealed that treosulfan exposure ≥1,660 mg•hour/L was significantly associated with better 1-year TFS (97% vs. 81%, P = 0.02) and a trend to better 1-year OS (90% vs. 69%, P = 0.07). Further, multivariate analysis adjusting for known pre-HCT risk factors also revealed treosulfan exposure <1,660 mg•h/L (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12-9.34; P = 0.03) and GSTA1*B variant genotype (HR = 3.75; 95% CI = 1.04-13.47; P = 0.04) to be independent predictors for inferior 1-year TFS. We conclude that lower treosulfan exposure increases the risk of graft rejection and early transplant-related mortality affecting TFS. As no RRTs were observed with increasing treosulfan exposure, TDM-based dose adjustment could be feasible and beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aswin Anand Pai
- Department of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
- Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, India
| | | | - John C. Panetta
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA
| | - Uday P. Kulkarni
- Department of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | | | - Agila Jayaraman
- Department of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Eunice S. Edison
- Department of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | - Anup J. Devasia
- Department of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | - Anu Korula
- Department of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Aby Abraham
- Department of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Biju George
- Department of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Alok Srivastava
- Department of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Vikram Mathews
- Department of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith DM, Minichmayr IK, Standing JF, Giacomini KM, van der Graaf PH, Peck RW. Ensuring Transparency and Quality of Clinical Trial Reporting in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics: Prospective Trial Registration and Compliance with Reporting Guidelines Are Required for all Clinical Trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 114:1153-1157. [PMID: 37971383 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- D Max Smith
- MedStar Health, Columbia, Maryland, USA
- Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Iris K Minichmayr
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Kathleen M Giacomini
- Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Richard W Peck
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
- Pharma Research & Development (pRED), Roche innovation Center, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang S, Agyeman AA, Hadjichrysanthou C, Standing JF. SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamic modeling to inform model selection and timing and efficacy of antiviral therapy. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol 2023; 12:1450-1460. [PMID: 37534815 PMCID: PMC10583246 DOI: 10.1002/psp4.13022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 07/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Mathematical models of viral dynamics have been reported to describe adequately the dynamic changes of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 viral load within an individual host. In this study, eight published viral dynamic models were assessed, and model selection was performed. Viral load data were collected from a community surveillance study, including 2155 measurements from 162 patients (124 household and 38 non-household contacts). An extended version of the target-cell limited model that includes an eclipse phase and an immune response component that enhances viral clearance described best the data. In general, the parameter estimates showed good precision (relative standard error <10), apart from the death rate of infected cells. The parameter estimates were used to simulate the outcomes of a clinical trial of the antiviral tixagevimab-cilgavimab, a monoclonal antibody combination which blocks infection of the target cells by neutralizing the virus. The simulated outcome of the effectiveness of the antiviral therapy in controlling viral replication was in a good agreement with the clinical trial data. Early treatment with high antiviral efficacy is important for desired therapeutic outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengyuan Zhang
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of PharmacyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Akosua A. Agyeman
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Christoforos Hadjichrysanthou
- Department of MathematicsUniversity of SussexBrightonUK
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public HealthImperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bardol M, Pan S, Walker SM, Standing JF, Dawes JM. Pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic modeling of analgesics and sedatives in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2023; 33:781-792. [PMID: 37341161 PMCID: PMC10947261 DOI: 10.1111/pan.14712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic modeling is an important tool which uses statistical methodology to provide a better understanding of the relationship between concentration and effect of drugs such as analgesics and sedatives. Pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic models also describe between-subject variability that allows identification of subgroups and dose adjustment for optimal pain management in individual patients. This approach is particularly useful in the pediatric population, where most drugs have received limited evaluation and dosing is extrapolated from adult practice. In children, the covariates of weight and age are used to describe size- and maturation-related changes in pharmacokinetics. It is important to consider both size and maturation in order to develop an accurate model and determine the optimal dose for different age groups. An adequate assessment of analgesic and sedative effect using pain scales or brain activity measures is essential to build reliable pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic models. This is often challenging in children due to the multidimensional nature of pain and the limited sensitivity and specificity of some measurement tools. This review provides a summary of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic methodology used to describe the dose-concentration-effect relationship of analgesics and sedation in children, with a focus on the different pharmacodynamic endpoints and the challenges of pharmacodynamic modeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maddlie Bardol
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Shan Pan
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Suellen M. Walker
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain MedicineGreat Ormond St Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- Developmental Neurosciences Program, UCL Great Ormond St Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of PharmacyGreat Ormond St Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Joy M. Dawes
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain MedicineGreat Ormond St Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Barker CIS, Kipper K, Lonsdale DO, Wright K, Thompson G, Kim M, Turner MA, Johnston A, Sharland M, Standing JF. The Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacokinetics of Antimicrobials study (NAPPA): investigating amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin and piperacillin pharmacokinetics from birth to adolescence. J Antimicrob Chemother 2023; 78:2148-2161. [PMID: 37531085 PMCID: PMC10477139 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacokinetic (PK) data underlying paediatric penicillin dosing remain limited, especially in critical care. OBJECTIVES The primary objective of the Neonatal and Paediatric Pharmacokinetics of Antimicrobials study (NAPPA) was to characterize PK profiles of commonly used penicillins using data obtained during routine care, to further understanding of PK variability and inform future evidence-based dosing. METHODS NAPPA was a multicentre study of amoxicillin, co-amoxiclav, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin and piperacillin/tazobactam. Patients were recruited with informed consent. Antibiotic dosing followed standard of care. PK samples were obtained opportunistically or at optimal times, frozen and analysed using UPLC with tandem MS. Pharmacometric analysis was undertaken using NONMEM software (v7.3). Model-based simulations (n = 10 000) tested PTA with British National Formulary for Children (BNFC) and WHO dosing. The study had ethical approval. RESULTS For the combined IV PK model, 963 PK samples from 370 participants were analysed simultaneously incorporating amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin, flucloxacillin and piperacillin data. BNFC high-dose regimen simulations gave these PTA results (median fT>MIC at breakpoints of specified pathogens): amoxicillin 100% (Streptococcus pneumoniae); benzylpenicillin 100% (Group B Streptococcus); flucloxacillin 48% (MSSA); and piperacillin 100% (Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Oral population PK models for flucloxacillin and amoxicillin enabled estimation of first-order absorption rate constants (1.16 h-1 and 1.3 h-1) and bioavailability terms (62.7% and 58.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS NAPPA represents, to our knowledge, the largest prospective combined paediatric penicillin PK study undertaken to date, and the first paediatric flucloxacillin oral PK model. The PTA results provide evidence supportive of BNFC high-dose IV regimens for amoxicillin, benzylpenicillin and piperacillin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte I S Barker
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Level 2 Jenner Wing, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London SW17 0RE, London, UK
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Department, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research & Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Medical & Molecular Genetics, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Karin Kipper
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Level 2 Jenner Wing, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London SW17 0RE, London, UK
- Analytical Services International, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
- Analytical Chemistry Department, Epilepsy Society, Chesham Lane, Chalfont St Peter, Buckinghamshire, UK
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Dagan O Lonsdale
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Level 2 Jenner Wing, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London SW17 0RE, London, UK
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Department, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kirstie Wright
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Level 2 Jenner Wing, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London SW17 0RE, London, UK
| | - Georgina Thompson
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Level 2 Jenner Wing, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London SW17 0RE, London, UK
| | - Min Kim
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Level 2 Jenner Wing, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London SW17 0RE, London, UK
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research & Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark A Turner
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Atholl Johnston
- Analytical Services International, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
- Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mike Sharland
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Level 2 Jenner Wing, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London SW17 0RE, London, UK
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Department, St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Level 2 Jenner Wing, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London SW17 0RE, London, UK
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research & Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Pharmacy Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gbinigie O, Ogburn E, Allen J, Dorward J, Dobson M, Madden TA, Yu LM, Lowe DM, Rahman N, Petrou S, Richards D, Hood K, Patel M, Saville BR, Marion J, Holmes J, Png ME, Hayward G, Lown M, Harris V, Jani B, Hart N, Khoo S, Rutter H, Chalk J, Standing JF, Breuer J, Lavallee L, Hadley E, Cureton L, Benysek M, Andersson MI, Francis N, Thomas NPB, Evans P, van Hecke O, Koshkouei M, Coates M, Barrett S, Bateman C, Davies J, Raymundo-Wood I, Ustianowski A, Nguyen-Van-Tam J, Carson-Stevens A, Hobbs R, Little P, Butler CC. Platform adaptive trial of novel antivirals for early treatment of COVID-19 In the community (PANORAMIC): protocol for a randomised, controlled, open-label, adaptive platform trial of community novel antiviral treatment of COVID-19 in people at increased risk of more severe disease. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069176. [PMID: 37550022 PMCID: PMC10407406 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is an urgent need to determine the safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of novel antiviral treatments for COVID-19 in vaccinated patients in the community at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. METHODS AND ANALYSIS PANORAMIC is a UK-wide, open-label, prospective, adaptive, multiarm platform, randomised clinical trial that evaluates antiviral treatments for COVID-19 in the community. A master protocol governs the addition of new antiviral treatments as they become available, and the introduction and cessation of existing interventions via interim analyses. The first two interventions to be evaluated are molnupiravir (Lagevrio) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA community-dwelling within 5 days of onset of symptomatic COVID-19 (confirmed by PCR or lateral flow test), and either (1) aged 50 years and over, or (2) aged 18-49 years with qualifying comorbidities. Registration occurs via the trial website and by telephone. Recruitment occurs remotely through the central trial team, or in person through clinical sites. Participants are randomised to receive either usual care or a trial drug plus usual care. Outcomes are collected via a participant-completed daily electronic symptom diary for 28 days post randomisation. Participants and/or their Trial Partner are contacted by the research team after days 7, 14 and 28 if the diary is not completed, or if the participant is unable to access the diary. The primary efficacy endpoint is all-cause, non-elective hospitalisation and/or death within 28 days of randomisation. Multiple prespecified interim analyses allow interventions to be stopped for futility or superiority based on prespecified decision criteria. A prospective economic evaluation is embedded within the trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval granted by South Central-Berkshire REC number: 21/SC/0393; IRAS project ID: 1004274. Results will be presented to policymakers and at conferences, and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN30448031; EudraCT number: 2021-005748-31.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oghenekome Gbinigie
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Emma Ogburn
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julie Allen
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jienchi Dorward
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for the Aids Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Melissa Dobson
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Ly-Mee Yu
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David M Lowe
- University College London, Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, London, UK
| | - Najib Rahman
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Oxford, UK
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
- Chinese Academy of Medicine Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Duncan Richards
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Mahendra Patel
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Benjamin R Saville
- Berry Consultants, Austin, Texas, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Jane Holmes
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - May Ee Png
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Gail Hayward
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Lown
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Victoria Harris
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Bhautesh Jani
- General Practice and Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, MVLS, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nigel Hart
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences - Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Saye Khoo
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Heather Rutter
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jem Chalk
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection Inflammation and Immunology, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health Population Policy and Practice, London, UK
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Judith Breuer
- Infection Inflammation and Immunology, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health Population Policy and Practice, London, UK
| | - Layla Lavallee
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elizabeth Hadley
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lucy Cureton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Magdalena Benysek
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Monique I Andersson
- Department of Microbiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Nick Francis
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nicholas P B Thomas
- Windrush Medical Practice, Witney, UK
- Thames Valley and South Midlands Clinical Research Network, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Oxford, UK
- Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK
| | - Philip Evans
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network, London, UK
| | - Oliver van Hecke
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mona Koshkouei
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Maria Coates
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Barrett
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Clare Bateman
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jennifer Davies
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ivy Raymundo-Wood
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Ustianowski
- Regional Infectious Diseases Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Jonathan Nguyen-Van-Tam
- Lifespan and Population Health Unit, University of Nottingham School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Richard Hobbs
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Christopher C Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Azamgarhi T, Warren S, Fouch S, Standing JF, Gerrand C. Prophylactic antibiotics for massive endoprostheses in orthopaedic oncology. Bone Joint J 2023; 105-B:850-856. [PMID: 37524359 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.105b8.bjj-2022-1418.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
The recently published Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens In Tumor Surgery (PARITY) trial found no benefit in extending antibiotic prophylaxis from 24 hours to five days after endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower limb bone tumours. PARITY is the first randomized controlled trial in orthopaedic oncology and is a huge step forward in understanding antibiotic prophylaxis. However, significant gaps remain, including questions around antibiotic choice, particularly in the UK, where cephalosporins are avoided due to concerns of Clostridioides difficile infection. We present a review of the evidence for antibiotic choice, dosing, and timing, and a brief description of PARITY, its implication for practice, and the remaining gaps in our understanding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tariq Azamgarhi
- Pharmacy Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Warren
- Bone Infection Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sarah Fouch
- School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Inflammation and Rheumatology, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Craig Gerrand
- Division of Orthopaedic Oncology, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust Sarcoma Unit, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kane Z, Cheng I, McGarrity O, Chiesa R, Klein N, Cortina-Borja M, Standing JF, Gastine S. Model Based Estimation of Posaconazole Tablet and Suspension Bioavailability in Hospitalized Children Using Real-World Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Data in Patients Receiving Intravenous and Oral Dosing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2023; 67:e0007723. [PMID: 37260401 PMCID: PMC10353366 DOI: 10.1128/aac.00077-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Invasive fungal infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality for immunocompromised patients. Posaconazole is approved for treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection in adult patients, with intravenous, oral suspension, and gastroresistant/delayed-released tablet formulations available. In Europe, until very recently, posaconazole was used off-label in children, although a new delayed-release suspension approved for pediatric use is expected to become available soon. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed which uses posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring data following intravenous and oral dosing in hospitalized children, thus enabling estimation of pediatric suspension and tablet oral bioavailability. In total, 297 therapeutic drug monitoring plasma levels from 104 children were included in this analysis. The final model was a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and nonlinear elimination. Allometric scaling on clearance and volume of distribution was included a priori. Tablet bioavailability was estimated to be 66%. Suspension bioavailability was estimated to decrease with increasing doses, ranging from 3.8% to 32.2% in this study population. Additionally, concomitant use of proton pump-inhibitors was detected as a significant covariate, reducing suspension bioavailability by 41.0%. This is the first population pharmacokinetic study to model posaconazole data from hospitalized children following intravenous, tablet, and suspension dosing simultaneously. The incorporation of saturable posaconazole clearance into the model has been key to the credible joint estimation of tablet and suspension bioavailability. To aid rational posaconazole dosing in children, this model was used alongside published pharmacodynamic targets to predict the probability of target attainment using typical pediatric dosing regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Kane
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Iek Cheng
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Orlagh McGarrity
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert Chiesa
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Klein
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mario Cortina-Borja
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Silke Gastine
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bentley S, Cheong J, Gudka N, Makhecha S, Hadjisymeou-Andreou S, Standing JF. Therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dosing for pediatric cystic fibrosis patients: recent advances and future outlooks. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2023; 16:715-726. [PMID: 37470695 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2238597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medicine use in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) is complicated by inconsistent pharmacokinetics at variance with the general population, a lack of research into this and its effects on clinical outcomes. In the absence of established dose regimens, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is a clinically relevant tool to optimize drug exposure and maximize therapeutic effect by the bedside. In clinical practice though, use of this is variable and limited by a lack of expert recommendations. AREAS COVERED We aimed to review the use of TDM in children with CF to summarize recent developments, current recommendations, and opportunities for future directions. We searched PubMed for relevant publications using the broad search terms "cystic fibrosis" in combination with the specific terms "therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)" and "children." Further searches were undertaken using the name of identified drugs combined with the term "TDM." EXPERT OPINION Further research into the use of Bayesian forecasting and the relationship between exposure and response is required to personalize dosing, with the opportunity for the development of expert recommendations in children with CF. Use of noninvasive methods of TDM has the potential to improve accessibility to TDM in this cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siân Bentley
- Pharmacy Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jamie Cheong
- Pharmacy Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nikesh Gudka
- Pharmacy Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Joseph F Standing
- Pharmacy Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation,great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Readman JB, Acman M, Hamawandi A, Chiu CH, Sharland M, Lindsay JA, Standing JF. Cefotaxime/sulbactam plus gentamicin as a potential carbapenem- and amikacin-sparing first-line combination for neonatal sepsis in high ESBL prevalence settings. J Antimicrob Chemother 2023:7191459. [PMID: 37283195 PMCID: PMC10393883 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkad177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Infection with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infection is ubiquitous in some neonatal ICUs and increasing levels of antibiotic resistance are a cause for urgent concern. Delineation of bacterial and viral sepsis can be challenging, often leading to patients receiving empirical antibiotics without or whilst waiting for a definitive causal diagnosis. Empirical therapy is often dependent on broad-spectrum 'Watch' antibiotics, contributing to further resistance. METHODS ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates found to have caused neonatal sepsis and meningitis underwent a detailed in vitro screening including susceptibility testing, chequerboard combination analysis and hollow-fibre infection model dynamic analyses using combinations of cefotaxime, ampicillin and gentamicin in combination with β-lactamase inhibitors. RESULTS Additivity or synergy was found for all antibiotic combinations against seven Escherichia coli and three Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates. Cefotaxime or ampicillin plus sulbactam combined with gentamicin was able to consistently inhibit the growth of ESBL-producing isolates at typical neonatal doses, and the combination cleared the hollow-fibre infection model system of organisms resistant to each agent alone. The combination of cefotaxime/sulbactam and gentamicin was consistently bactericidal at clinically achievable concentrations (Cmax of 180, 60 and 20 mg/L for cefotaxime, sulbactam and gentamicin, respectively). CONCLUSIONS The addition of sulbactam to cefotaxime or ampicillin to the typical first-line empirical therapy could obviate the need for carbapenems and amikacin in settings with high ESBL-infection prevalence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J B Readman
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - M Acman
- UCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Hamawandi
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Cheng-Hsun Chiu
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - M Sharland
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - J A Lindsay
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - J F Standing
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shah RV, Kipper K, Baker EH, Barker CIS, Oldfield I, Philips BJ, Johnston A, Lipman J, Rhodes A, Basarab M, Sharland M, Almahdi S, Wake RM, Standing JF, Lonsdale DO. Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Benzylpenicillin in Critically Unwell Adults. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:antibiotics12040643. [PMID: 37107004 PMCID: PMC10135101 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12040643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmacokinetics are highly variable in critical illness, and suboptimal antibiotic exposure is associated with treatment failure. Benzylpenicillin is a commonly used beta-lactam antibiotic, and pharmacokinetic data of its use in critically ill adults are lacking. We performed a pharmacokinetic study of critically unwell patients receiving benzylpenicillin, using data from the ABDose study. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was undertaken using NONMEM version 7.5, and simulations using the final model were undertaken to optimize the pharmacokinetic profile. We included 77 samples from 12 participants. A two-compartment structural model provided the best fit, with allometric weight scaling for all parameters and a creatinine covariate effect on clearance. Simulations (n = 10,000) demonstrated that 25% of simulated patients receiving 2.4 g 4-hourly failed to achieve a conservative target of 50% of the dosing interval with free drug above the clinical breakpoint MIC (2 mg/L). Simulations demonstrated that target attainment was improved with continuous or extended dosing. To our knowledge, this study represents the first full population PK analysis of benzylpenicillin in critically ill adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reya V Shah
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK
| | - Karin Kipper
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, 50411 Tartu, Estonia
- Analytical Services International Ltd., London SW17 0RE, UK
| | - Emma H Baker
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK
| | - Charlotte I S Barker
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Isobel Oldfield
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK
| | | | - Atholl Johnston
- Analytical Services International Ltd., London SW17 0RE, UK
- Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London WC1E 7HU, UK
| | - Jeffrey Lipman
- Jamieson Trauma Institute, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
- Division of Anaesthesiology Critical Care Emergency and Pain Medicine, Nimes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, 30029 Nimes, France
| | - Andrew Rhodes
- Department of Critical Care, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK
| | - Marina Basarab
- Infection Care Group, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK
| | - Mike Sharland
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK
| | - Sarraa Almahdi
- London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, London HA1 3UJ, UK
| | - Rachel M Wake
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK
- Clinical Academic Group in Infection and Immunity, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London WC1N 3JH, UK
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Dagan O Lonsdale
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK
- Department of Critical Care, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Grandits M, Grünwald-Gruber C, Gastine S, Standing JF, Reljic R, Teh AYH, Ma JKC. Improving the efficacy of plant-made anti-HIV monoclonal antibodies for clinical use. Front Plant Sci 2023; 14:1126470. [PMID: 36923134 PMCID: PMC10009187 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1126470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Broadly neutralising antibodies are promising candidates for preventing and treating Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS), as an alternative to or in combination with antiretroviral therapy (ART). These mAbs bind to sites on the virus essential for virus attachment and entry, thereby inhibiting entry into the host cell. However, the cost and availability of monoclonal antibodies, especially combinations of antibodies, hampers implementation of anti-HIV bNAb therapies in low- to middle- income countries (LMICs) where HIV-1 prevalence is highest. Methods We have produced three HIV broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs), 10-1074, VRC01 and 3BNC117 in the Nicotiana benthamiana transient expression system. The impact of specific modifications to enhance potency and efficacy were assessed. To prolong half-life and increase bioavailability, a M252Y/S254T/T256E (YTE) or M428L/N434S (LS) mutation was introduced. To increase antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), we expressed an afucosylated version of each antibody using a glycoengineered plant line. Results The majority of bNAbs and their variants could be expressed at yields of up to 47 mg/kg. Neither the expression system nor the modifications impacted the neutralization potential of the bNAbs. Afucosylated bNAbs exhibit enhanced ability to bind to FcγRIIIa and trigger ADCC, regardless of the presence of Fc amino acid mutations. Lastly, we demonstrated that Fc-modified variants expressed in plants show enhanced binding to FcRn, which results in a favourable in vivo pharmacokinetic profile compared to their unmodified counterparts. Conclusion Tobacco plants are suitable expression hosts for anti-HIV bNAbs with increased efficacy and an improved pharmacokinetic profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Grandits
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clemens Grünwald-Gruber
- Core Facility Mass Spectrometry, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Silke Gastine
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, University College London (UCL) Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, University College London (UCL) Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rajko Reljic
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Audrey Y-H. Teh
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julian K-C. Ma
- Molecular Immunology Unit, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Standing JF, Agyeman AA. Learning and confirming in publicly funded antiviral trials. Lancet Infect Dis 2023; 23:132-133. [PMID: 36272434 PMCID: PMC9581520 DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00665-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK; Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
| | - Akosua Adom Agyeman
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London WC1N 1EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Standing JF. Could Metabolomics Be the Key to Unlocking Precision Dosing in the Clinic? Clin Pharmacol Ther 2023; 113:207-209. [PMID: 36693112 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph F Standing
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Butler CC, Hobbs FDR, Gbinigie OA, Rahman NM, Hayward G, Richards DB, Dorward J, Lowe DM, Standing JF, Breuer J, Khoo S, Petrou S, Hood K, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Patel MG, Saville BR, Marion J, Ogburn E, Allen J, Rutter H, Francis N, Thomas NPB, Evans P, Dobson M, Madden TA, Holmes J, Harris V, Png ME, Lown M, van Hecke O, Detry MA, Saunders CT, Fitzgerald M, Berry NS, Mwandigha L, Galal U, Mort S, Jani BD, Hart ND, Ahmed H, Butler D, McKenna M, Chalk J, Lavallee L, Hadley E, Cureton L, Benysek M, Andersson M, Coates M, Barrett S, Bateman C, Davies JC, Raymundo-Wood I, Ustianowski A, Carson-Stevens A, Yu LM, Little P. Molnupiravir plus usual care versus usual care alone as early treatment for adults with COVID-19 at increased risk of adverse outcomes (PANORAMIC): an open-label, platform-adaptive randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2023; 401:281-293. [PMID: 36566761 PMCID: PMC9779781 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02597-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 141] [Impact Index Per Article: 141.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safety, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of molnupiravir, an oral antiviral medication for SARS-CoV-2, has not been established in vaccinated patients in the community at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from COVID-19. We aimed to establish whether the addition of molnupiravir to usual care reduced hospital admissions and deaths associated with COVID-19 in this population. METHODS PANORAMIC was a UK-based, national, multicentre, open-label, multigroup, prospective, platform adaptive randomised controlled trial. Eligible participants were aged 50 years or older-or aged 18 years or older with relevant comorbidities-and had been unwell with confirmed COVID-19 for 5 days or fewer in the community. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 800 mg molnupiravir twice daily for 5 days plus usual care or usual care only. A secure, web-based system (Spinnaker) was used for randomisation, which was stratified by age (<50 years vs ≥50 years) and vaccination status (yes vs no). COVID-19 outcomes were tracked via a self-completed online daily diary for 28 days after randomisation. The primary outcome was all-cause hospitalisation or death within 28 days of randomisation, which was analysed using Bayesian models in all eligible participants who were randomly assigned. This trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 30448031. FINDINGS Between Dec 8, 2021, and April 27, 2022, 26 411 participants were randomly assigned, 12 821 to molnupiravir plus usual care, 12 962 to usual care alone, and 628 to other treatment groups (which will be reported separately). 12 529 participants from the molnupiravir plus usual care group, and 12 525 from the usual care group were included in the primary analysis population. The mean age of the population was 56·6 years (SD 12·6), and 24 290 (94%) of 25 708 participants had had at least three doses of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Hospitalisations or deaths were recorded in 105 (1%) of 12 529 participants in the molnupiravir plus usual care group versus 98 (1%) of 12 525 in the usual care group (adjusted odds ratio 1·06 [95% Bayesian credible interval 0·81-1·41]; probability of superiority 0·33). There was no evidence of treatment interaction between subgroups. Serious adverse events were recorded for 50 (0·4%) of 12 774 participants in the molnupiravir plus usual care group and for 45 (0·3%) of 12 934 in the usual care group. None of these events were judged to be related to molnupiravir. INTERPRETATION Molnupiravir did not reduce the frequency of COVID-19-associated hospitalisations or death among high-risk vaccinated adults in the community. FUNDING UK National Institute for Health and Care Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher C Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - F D Richard Hobbs
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Oghenekome A Gbinigie
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Najib M Rahman
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Oxford Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Gail Hayward
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Duncan B Richards
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jienchi Dorward
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - David M Lowe
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK; Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Judith Breuer
- Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Saye Khoo
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Mahendra G Patel
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Benjamin R Saville
- Berry Consultants, Austin, TX, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Emma Ogburn
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julie Allen
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Heather Rutter
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nick Francis
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nicholas P B Thomas
- Windrush Medical Practice, Witney, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research Clinical Research Network: Thames Valley and South Midlands, Oxford, UK; Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK
| | - Philip Evans
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research Clinical Research Network, Leeds, UK
| | - Melissa Dobson
- Oxford Respiratory Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Jane Holmes
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Victoria Harris
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - May Ee Png
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Lown
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Oliver van Hecke
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Lazaro Mwandigha
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ushma Galal
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sam Mort
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Bhautesh D Jani
- General Practice and Primary Care, School of Health and Wellbeing, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nigel D Hart
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Haroon Ahmed
- Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Daniel Butler
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Micheal McKenna
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jem Chalk
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Layla Lavallee
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Elizabeth Hadley
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Lucy Cureton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Magdalena Benysek
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Monique Andersson
- Department of Microbiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Maria Coates
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Barrett
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Clare Bateman
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jennifer C Davies
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ivy Raymundo-Wood
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Ustianowski
- and Regional Infectious Diseases Unit, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Ly-Mee Yu
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Eleftheriou D, Moraes YC, Purvis C, Pursell M, Morillas MM, Kahn R, Mossberg M, Kucera F, Tulloh R, Standing JF, Swallow V, McCormack R, Herberg J, Levin M, Wan M, Klein N, Connon R, Walker AS, Brogan P. Multi-centre, randomised, open-label, blinded endpoint assessed, trial of corticosteroids plus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and aspirin, versus IVIG and aspirin for prevention of coronary artery aneurysms (CAA) in Kawasaki disease (KD): the KD CAA prevention (KD-CAAP) trial protocol. Trials 2023; 24:60. [PMID: 36703139 PMCID: PMC9879235 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-07051-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kawasaki disease (KD) is an acute self-limiting inflammatory vasculitis affecting predominantly medium-sized arteries, particularly the coronary arteries. A number of recent studies conducted in different European countries have demonstrated alarmingly high coronary complications despite treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). These high complication rates now emphasize the need for an urgent reappraisal of IVIG as the sole primary therapeutic agent for KD. The Kawasaki disease CAA prevention (KD-CAAP) trial will test the hypothesis that immediate adjunctive corticosteroid treatment to standard of care IVIG and aspirin will reduce coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) rates in unselected KD patients across Europe. METHODS KD-CAAP is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint assessed trial that will be conducted across Europe supported by the conect4children pan-European clinical trials network. Patients with KD who satisfy the eligibility criteria will be randomised (1:1) to receive either oral prednisolone 2 mg/kg/day plus standard of care therapy IVIG (2 g/kg) and aspirin (40 mg/kg/day); or IVIG and aspirin alone. Further management is dictated by temperature and C-reactive protein (CRP) responses. Co-primary outcomes are as follows: (i) any CAA within the 3 months of trial follow-up; (ii) average estimate of maximum coronary Z-score at weeks 1, 2 and 6 adjusting for rescue treatment. Additional outcomes will be assessed including cost effectiveness, quality of life, corticosteroid toxicity and other safety outcomes. DISCUSSION Several recent studies have indicated that coronary complications associated with KD across Europe are much higher than early trials of IVIG had initially suggested. KD-CAAP directly addresses this issue by exploring the therapeutic benefit of adjunctive corticosteroids in unselected KD cases. If we find that corticosteroids prevent CAA and are safe, this is a cheap and widely available intervention that could be implemented immediately for the benefit of children. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN71987471- March 31, 2020; Eudract 2019-004433-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Despina Eleftheriou
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
| | - Yolanda Collaco Moraes
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Cara Purvis
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Molly Pursell
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Marta Merida Morillas
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Robin Kahn
- Department of Paediatrics, Lund University, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maria Mossberg
- Department of Paediatrics, Lund University, Clinical Sciences, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | - Joseph F Standing
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | | | - Rachael McCormack
- Societi Foundation CIO, The UK Foundation for Kawasaki Disease, Newark, UK
| | - Jethro Herberg
- Section of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Michael Levin
- Section of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mandy Wan
- Pharmacy Department, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nigel Klein
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Roisin Connon
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Ann Sarah Walker
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Paul Brogan
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mak WY, Ooi QX, Cruz CV, Looi I, Yuen KH, Standing JF. Assessment of the nlmixr R package for population pharmacokinetic modeling: A metformin case study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 89:330-339. [PMID: 35976674 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM nlmixr offers first-order conditional estimation (FOCE), FOCE with interaction (FOCEi) and stochastic approximation estimation-maximisation (SAEM) to fit nonlinear mixed-effect models (NLMEM). We modelled metformin's pharmacokinetic data using nlmixr and investigated SAEM and FOCEi's performance with respect to bias and precision of parameter estimates, and robustness to initial estimates. METHOD Compartmental models were fitted. The final model was determined based on the objective function value and inspection of goodness-of-fit plots. The bias and precision of parameter estimates were compared between SAEM and FOCEi using stochastic simulations and estimations. For robustness, parameters were re-estimated as the initial estimates were perturbed 100 times and resultant changes evaluated. RESULTS The absorption kinetics of metformin depend significantly on food status. Under the fasted state, the first-order absorption into the central compartment was preceded by zero-order infusion into the depot compartment, whereas for the fed state, the absorption into the depot was instantaneous followed by first-order absorption from depot into the central compartment. The means of relative mean estimation error (rMEE) ( ME E SAEM ME E FOCEi ) and rRMSE ( RMS E SAEM RMS E FOCEi ) were 0.48 and 0.35, respectively. All parameter estimates given by SAEM appeared to be narrowly distributed and were close to the true value used for simulation. In contrast, the distribution of estimates from FOCEi were skewed and more biased. When initial estimates were perturbed, FOCEi estimates were more biased and imprecise. DISCUSSION nlmixr is reliable for NLMEM. SAEM was superior to FOCEi in terms of bias and precision, and more robust against initial estimate perturbations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Yao Mak
- Clinical Research Centre, Penang General Hospital, Penang, Malaysia.,Institute for Clinical Research, National Institute of Health, Selangor, Malaysia
| | | | - Cintia Valeria Cruz
- Mahidol Oxford Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Irene Looi
- Clinical Research Centre, Seberang Jaya Hospital, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Kah Hay Yuen
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.,Pharmacy Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kembou-Ringert JE, Readman J, Smith CM, Breuer J, Standing JF. Applications of the hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) in viral infection studies. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 78:8-20. [PMID: 36411255 PMCID: PMC9780528 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Conventional cell culture systems involve growing cells in stationary cultures in the presence of growth medium containing various types of supplements. At confluency, the cells are divided and further expanded in new culture dishes. This passage from confluent monolayer to sparse cultures does not reflect normal physiological conditions and represents quite a drastic physiological change that may affect the natural cell physiobiology. Hollow-fibre bioreactors were in part developed to overcome these limitations and since their inception, they have widely been used in production of monoclonal antibodies and recombinant proteins. These bioreactors are increasingly used to study antibacterial drug effects via simulation of in vivo pharmacokinetic profiles. The use of the hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) in viral infection studies is less well developed and in this review we have analysed and summarized the current available literature on the use of these bioreactors, with an emphasis on viruses. Our work has demonstrated that this system can be applied for viral expansion, studies of drug resistance mechanisms, and studies of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) of antiviral compounds. These platforms could therefore have great applications in large-scale vaccine development, and in studies of mechanisms driving antiviral resistance, since the HFIM could recapitulate the same resistance mechanisms and mutations observed in vivo in clinic. Furthermore, some dosage and spacing regimens evaluated in the HFIM system, as allowing maximal viral suppression, are in line with clinical practice and highlight this 'in vivo-like' system as a powerful tool for experimental validation of in vitro-predicted antiviral activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Japhette E Kembou-Ringert
- Department of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - John Readman
- Department of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Claire M Smith
- Department of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Judith Breuer
- Department of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Department of Infection, Immunity & Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health (ICH), University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Smits A, Annaert P, Cavallaro G, De Cock PAJG, de Wildt SN, Kindblom JM, Lagler FB, Moreno C, Pokorna P, Schreuder MF, Standing JF, Turner MA, Vitiello B, Zhao W, Weingberg AM, Willmann R, van den Anker J, Allegaert K. Current knowledge, challenges and innovations in developmental pharmacology: A combined conect4children Expert Group and European Society for Developmental, Perinatal and Paediatric Pharmacology White Paper. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 88:4965-4984. [PMID: 34180088 PMCID: PMC9787161 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 05/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Developmental pharmacology describes the impact of maturation on drug disposition (pharmacokinetics, PK) and drug effects (pharmacodynamics, PD) throughout the paediatric age range. This paper, written by a multidisciplinary group of experts, summarizes current knowledge, and provides suggestions to pharmaceutical companies, regulatory agencies and academicians on how to incorporate the latest knowledge regarding developmental pharmacology and innovative techniques into neonatal and paediatric drug development. Biological aspects of drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion throughout development are summarized. Although this area made enormous progress during the last two decades, remaining knowledge gaps were identified. Minimal risk and burden designs allow for optimally informative but minimally invasive PK sampling, while concomitant profiling of drug metabolites may provide additional insight in the unique PK behaviour in children. Furthermore, developmental PD needs to be considered during drug development, which is illustrated by disease- and/or target organ-specific examples. Identifying and testing PD targets and effects in special populations, and application of age- and/or population-specific assessment tools are discussed. Drug development plans also need to incorporate innovative techniques such as preclinical models to study therapeutic strategies, and shift from sequential enrolment of subgroups, to more rational designs. To stimulate appropriate research plans, illustrations of specific PK/PD-related as well as drug safety-related challenges during drug development are provided. The suggestions made in this joint paper of the Innovative Medicines Initiative conect4children Expert group on Developmental Pharmacology and the European Society for Developmental, Perinatal and Paediatric Pharmacology, should facilitate all those involved in drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Smits
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Neonatal intensive Care unit, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pieter Annaert
- Drug Delivery and Disposition, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Giacomo Cavallaro
- Neonatal intensive care unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Grande Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Pieter A J G De Cock
- Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Pharmacy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Saskia N de Wildt
- Intensive Care and Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud Institute Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jenny M Kindblom
- Pediatric Clinical Research Center, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Florian B Lagler
- Institute for Inherited Metabolic Diseases and Department of Pediatrics, Paracelsus Medical University, Clinical Research Center Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Carmen Moreno
- Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, IiSGM, CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paula Pokorna
- Intensive Care and Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Paediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.,Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michiel F Schreuder
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Joseph F Standing
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.,Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Mark A Turner
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Benedetto Vitiello
- Division of Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatry, Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Wei Zhao
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, China.,Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.,Clinical Research Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
| | | | | | - John van den Anker
- Intensive Care and Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Karel Allegaert
- Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bouazza N, Dokoumetzidis A, Knibbe CAJ, de Wildt SN, Ambery C, De Cock PA, Gasthuys E, Foissac F, Urien S, Hamberg AK, Poggesi I, Zhao W, Vermeulen A, Standing JF, Tréluyer JM. General clinical and methodological considerations on the extrapolation of pharmacokinetics and optimization of study protocols for small molecules and monoclonal antibodies in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 88:4985-4996. [PMID: 36256514 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Pharmacometric modelling plays a key role in both the design and analysis of regulatory trials in paediatric drug development. Studies in adults provide a rich source of data to inform the paediatric investigation plans, including knowledge on drug pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and efficacy. In children, drug disposition differs widely from birth to adolescence but extrapolating adult to paediatric PK, safety and efficacy either with pharmacometric or physiologically based approaches can help design or in some cases reduce the need for clinical studies. Aspects to consider when extrapolating PK include the maturation of drug metabolizing enzyme expression, glomerular filtration, drug excretory systems, and the expression and activity of specific transporters in conjunction with other drug properties such as fraction unbound. Knowledge of these can be used to develop extrapolation tools such as allometric scaling plus maturation functions or physiologically based PK. PK/pharmacodynamic approaches and well-designed clinical trials in children are of key importance in paediatric drug development. In this white paper, state-of-the-art of current methods used for paediatric extrapolation will be discussed. This paper is part of a conect4children implementation of innovative methodologies including pharmacometric and physiologically based PK modelling in clinical trial design/paediatric drug development through dissemination of expertise and expert advice. The suggestions arising from this white paper should define a minimum set of standards in paediatric modelling and contribute to the regulatory science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naïm Bouazza
- Pediatric and Perinatal Drug Evaluation and Pharmacology, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Unité de Recherche Clinique Université Paris Cité Necker-Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France.,CIC-1419 Inserm, Cochin-Necker, Paris, France
| | | | - Catherijne A J Knibbe
- Division of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia N de Wildt
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Intensive Care and Paediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Claire Ambery
- Clinical Pharmacology Modelling and Simulation, GlaxoSmithKline plc, London, UK
| | - Pieter A De Cock
- Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Pharmacy, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.,Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elke Gasthuys
- Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Frantz Foissac
- Pediatric and Perinatal Drug Evaluation and Pharmacology, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Unité de Recherche Clinique Université Paris Cité Necker-Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France.,CIC-1419 Inserm, Cochin-Necker, Paris, France
| | - Saïk Urien
- Pediatric and Perinatal Drug Evaluation and Pharmacology, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Unité de Recherche Clinique Université Paris Cité Necker-Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France.,CIC-1419 Inserm, Cochin-Necker, Paris, France
| | - Anna-Karin Hamberg
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Italo Poggesi
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Wei Zhao
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Department of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.,Clinical Research Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China
| | - An Vermeulen
- Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.,Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Jean-Marc Tréluyer
- Pediatric and Perinatal Drug Evaluation and Pharmacology, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Unité de Recherche Clinique Université Paris Cité Necker-Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France.,CIC-1419 Inserm, Cochin-Necker, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Agyeman AA, You T, Chan PLS, Lonsdale DO, Hadjichrysanthou C, Mahungu T, Wey EQ, Lowe DM, Lipman MCI, Breuer J, Kloprogge F, Standing JF. Comparative assessment of viral dynamic models for SARS-CoV-2 for pharmacodynamic assessment in early treatment trials. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 88:5428-5433. [PMID: 36040430 PMCID: PMC9538685 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Pharmacometric analyses of time series viral load data may detect drug effects with greater power than approaches using single time points. Because SARS-CoV-2 viral load rapidly rises and then falls, viral dynamic models have been used. We compared different modelling approaches when analysing Phase II-type viral dynamic data. Using two SARS-CoV-2 datasets of viral load starting within 7 days of symptoms, we fitted the slope-intercept exponential decay (SI), reduced target cell limited (rTCL), target cell limited (TCL) and TCL with eclipse phase (TCLE) models using nlmixr. Model performance was assessed via Bayesian information criterion (BIC), visual predictive checks (VPCs), goodness-of-fit plots, and parameter precision. The most complex (TCLE) model had the highest BIC for both datasets. The estimated viral decline rate was similar for all models except the TCL model for dataset A with a higher rate (median [range] day-1 : dataset A; 0.63 [0.56-1.84]; dataset B: 0.81 [0.74-0.85]). Our findings suggest simple models should be considered during pharmacodynamic model development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akosua A Agyeman
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tao You
- Beyond Consulting Ltd., Cheshire, UK.,Medical Research Council, UK
| | | | - Dagan O Lonsdale
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St George's University of London, London, UK.,Department of Intensive Care, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Christoforos Hadjichrysanthou
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tabitha Mahungu
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Free Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emmanuel Q Wey
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Free Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Centre for Clinical Microbiology, Division of Infection and Immunity University College London, London, UK
| | - David M Lowe
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Campus, London, UK
| | - Marc C I Lipman
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,UCL Respiratory, University College London, Royal Free Campus, London, UK
| | - Judy Breuer
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Microbiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Frank Kloprogge
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lowe DM, Brown LAK, Chowdhury K, Davey S, Yee P, Ikeji F, Ndoutoumou A, Shah D, Lennon A, Rai A, Agyeman AA, Checkley A, Longley N, Dehbi HM, Freemantle N, Breuer J, Standing JF. Favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir, or combination therapy (FLARE): A randomised, double-blind, 2 × 2 factorial placebo-controlled trial of early antiviral therapy in COVID-19. PLoS Med 2022; 19:e1004120. [PMID: 36260627 PMCID: PMC9629589 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early antiviral treatment is effective for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) but currently available agents are expensive. Favipiravir is routinely used in many countries, but efficacy is unproven. Antiviral combinations have not been systematically studied. We aimed to evaluate the effect of favipiravir, lopinavir-ritonavir or the combination of both agents on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral load trajectory when administered early. METHODS AND FINDINGS We conducted a Phase 2, proof of principle, randomised, placebo-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial, double-blind trial of ambulatory outpatients with early COVID-19 (within 7 days of symptom onset) at 2 sites in the United Kingdom. Participants were randomised using a centralised online process to receive: favipiravir (1,800 mg twice daily on Day 1 followed by 400 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7) plus lopinavir-ritonavir (400 mg/100 mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200 mg/50 mg 4 times daily on Days 2 to 7), favipiravir plus lopinavir-ritonavir placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir plus favipiravir placebo, or both placebos. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 viral load at Day 5, accounting for baseline viral load. Between 6 October 2020 and 4 November 2021, we recruited 240 participants. For the favipiravir+lopinavir-ritonavir, favipiravir+placebo, lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo, and placebo-only arms, we recruited 61, 59, 60, and 60 participants and analysed 55, 56, 55, and 58 participants, respectively, who provided viral load measures at Day 1 and Day 5. In the primary analysis, the mean viral load in the favipiravir+placebo arm had changed by -0.57 log10 (95% CI -1.21 to 0.07, p = 0.08) and in the lopinavir-ritonavir+placebo arm by -0.18 log10 (95% CI -0.82 to 0.46, p = 0.58) compared to the placebo arm at Day 5. There was no significant interaction between favipiravir and lopinavir-ritonavir (interaction coefficient term: 0.59 log10, 95% CI -0.32 to 1.50, p = 0.20). More participants had undetectable virus at Day 5 in the favipiravir+placebo arm compared to placebo only (46.3% versus 26.9%, odds ratio (OR): 2.47, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.65; p = 0.03). Adverse events were observed more frequently with lopinavir-ritonavir, mainly gastrointestinal disturbance. Favipiravir drug levels were lower in the combination arm than the favipiravir monotherapy arm, possibly due to poor absorption. The major limitation was that the study population was relatively young and healthy compared to those most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS At the current doses, no treatment significantly reduced viral load in the primary analysis. Favipiravir requires further evaluation with consideration of dose escalation. Lopinavir-ritonavir administration was associated with lower plasma favipiravir concentrations. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04499677 EudraCT: 2020-002106-68.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M. Lowe
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Li-An K. Brown
- Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kashfia Chowdhury
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephanie Davey
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philip Yee
- Department of Rheumatology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Felicia Ikeji
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amalia Ndoutoumou
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Divya Shah
- Department of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander Lennon
- Department of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Abhulya Rai
- Department of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Akosua A. Agyeman
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Checkley
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola Longley
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hakim-Moulay Dehbi
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nick Freemantle
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Breuer
- Department of Virology, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Standing JF. Comment on: Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimization of mezlocillin in neonates and young infants. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:3524. [PMID: 36101504 PMCID: PMC9704430 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
|
29
|
Obiero CW, Williams P, Murunga S, Thitiri J, Omollo R, Walker AS, Egondi T, Nyaoke B, Correia E, Kane Z, Gastine S, Kipper K, Standing JF, Ellis S, Sharland M, Berkley JA. Randomised controlled trial of fosfomycin in neonatal sepsis: pharmacokinetics and safety in relation to sodium overload. Arch Dis Child 2022; 107:802-810. [PMID: 35078765 PMCID: PMC9411916 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-322483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess pharmacokinetics and changes to sodium levels in addition to adverse events (AEs) associated with fosfomycin among neonates with clinical sepsis. DESIGN A single-centre open-label randomised controlled trial. SETTING Kilifi County Hospital, Kenya. PATIENTS 120 neonates aged ≤28 days admitted being treated with standard-of-care (SOC) antibiotics for sepsis: ampicillin and gentamicin between March 2018 and February 2019. INTERVENTION We randomly assigned half the participants to receive additional intravenous then oral fosfomycin at 100 mg/kg two times per day for up to 7 days (SOC-F) and followed up for 28 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Serum sodium, AEs and fosfomycin pharmacokinetics. RESULTS 61 and 59 infants aged 0-23 days were assigned to SOC-F and SOC, respectively. There was no evidence of impact of fosfomycin on serum sodium or gastrointestinal side effects. We observed 35 AEs among 25 SOC-F participants and 50 AEs among 34 SOC participants during 1560 and 1565 infant-days observation, respectively (2.2 vs 3.2 events/100 infant-days; incidence rate difference -0.95 events/100 infant-days (95% CI -2.1 to 0.20)). Four SOC-F and 3 SOC participants died. From 238 pharmacokinetic samples, modelling suggests an intravenous dose of 150 mg/kg two times per day is required for pharmacodynamic target attainment in most children, reduced to 100 mg/kg two times per day in neonates aged <7 days or weighing <1500 g. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Fosfomycin offers potential as an affordable regimen with a simple dosing schedule for neonatal sepsis. Further research on its safety is needed in larger cohorts of hospitalised neonates, including very preterm neonates or those critically ill. Resistance suppression would only be achieved for the most sensitive of organisms so fosfomycin is recommended to be used in combination with another antimicrobial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03453177.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina W Obiero
- Clinical Research Deptartment, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.,Department of Global Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Phoebe Williams
- Clinical Research Deptartment, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.,Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sheila Murunga
- Clinical Research Deptartment, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Johnstone Thitiri
- Clinical Research Deptartment, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Raymond Omollo
- Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Thaddaeus Egondi
- Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Borna Nyaoke
- Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Erika Correia
- Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Zoe Kane
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Silke Gastine
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Karin Kipper
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.,Analytical Services International (ASI) Ltd, St George's - University of London, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sally Ellis
- Global Antibiotic Research and Development Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Mike Sharland
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of London, London, UK
| | - James Alexander Berkley
- Clinical Research Deptartment, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya .,Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Vaitkute G, Panic G, Alber DG, Faizura-Yeop I, Cloutman-Green E, Swann J, Veys P, Standing JF, Klein N, Bajaj-Elliott M. Linking gastrointestinal microbiota and metabolome dynamics to clinical outcomes in paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Microbiome 2022; 10:89. [PMID: 35689247 PMCID: PMC9185888 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-022-01270-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a curative procedure for a variety of conditions. Despite major advances, a plethora of adverse clinical outcomes can develop post-transplantation including graft-versus-host disease and infections, which remain the major causes of morbidity and mortality. There is increasing evidence that the gastrointestinal microbiota is associated with clinical outcomes post-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Herein, we investigated the longitudinal dynamics of the gut microbiota and metabolome and potential associations to clinical outcomes in paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation at a single centre. RESULTS On admission (baseline), the majority of patients presented with a different gut microbial composition in comparison with healthy control children with a significantly lower alpha diversity. A further, marked decrease in alpha diversity was observed immediately post-transplantation and in most microbial diversity, and composition did not return to baseline status whilst hospitalised. Longitudinal trajectories identified continuous fluctuations in microbial composition, with the dominance of a single taxon in a significant proportion of patients. Using pam clustering, three clusters were observed in the dataset. Cluster 1 was common pre-transplantation, characterised by a higher abundance of Clostridium XIVa, Bacteroides and Lachnospiraceae; cluster 2 and cluster 3 were more common post-transplantation with a higher abundance of Streptococcus and Staphylococcus in the former whilst Enterococcus, Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia predominated in the latter. Cluster 3 was also associated with a higher risk of viraemia. Likewise, further multivariate analysis reveals Enterobacteriaceae, viraemia, use of total parenteral nutrition and various antimicrobials contributing towards cluster 3, Streptococcaceae, Staphylococcaceae, Neisseriaceae, vancomycin and metronidazole contributing towards cluster 2. Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, Bifidobacteriaceae and not being on total parenteral nutrition contributed to cluster 1. Untargeted metabolomic analyses revealed changes that paralleled fluctuations in microbiota composition; importantly, low faecal butyrate was associated with a higher risk of viraemia. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight the frequent shifts and dominations in the gut microbiota of paediatric patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The study reveals associations between the faecal microbiota, metabolome and viraemia. To identify and explore the potential of microbial biomarkers that may predict the risk of complications post-HSCT, larger multi-centre studies investigating the longitudinal microbial profiling in paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation are warranted. Video abstract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gintare Vaitkute
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH UK
- Department of Surgical Biotechnology, UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, UCL, London, NW3 2PF UK
| | - Gordana Panic
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK
- School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK
| | - Dagmar G. Alber
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH UK
| | | | | | - Jonathan Swann
- Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ UK
- School of Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK
| | - Paul Veys
- Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, WC1N 3JH UK
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH UK
- Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, WC1N 3JH UK
| | - Nigel Klein
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH UK
- Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, WC1N 3JH UK
| | - Mona Bajaj-Elliott
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, WC1N 1EH UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Morse JD, Anderson BJ, Gastine S, Wong ICK, Standing JF. Pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation to understand diamorphine dose-response in neonates, children, and adolescents. Paediatr Anaesth 2022; 32:716-726. [PMID: 35212432 DOI: 10.1111/pan.14425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and simulation can facilitate understanding and prediction of exposure-response relationships in children with acute or chronic pain. The pharmacokinetics of diamorphine (diacetylmorphine, heroin), a strong opioid, remain poorly quantified in children and dose is often guided by clinical acumen. This tutorial demonstrates how a model to describe intranasal and intravenous diamorphine pharmacokinetics can be fashioned from a model for diamorphine disposition in adults and a model describing morphine disposition in children. Allometric scaling and maturation models were applied to clearances and volumes to account for differences in size and age between children and adults. The utility of modeling and simulation to gain insight into the analgesic exposure-response relationship is demonstrated. The model explains reported observations, can be used for interrogation, interpolated to determine equianalgesia and inform future clinical studies. Simulation was used to illustrate how diamorphine is rapidly metabolized to morphine via its active metabolite 6-monoacetylmorphine, which mediates an early dopaminergic response accountable for early euphoria. Morphine formation is then responsible for the slower, prolonged analgesic response. Time-concentration profiles of diamorphine and its metabolites reflected disposition changes with age and were used to describe intravenous and intranasal dosing regimens. These indicated that morphine exposure in children after intranasal diamorphine 0.1 mg.kg-1 was similar to that after intranasal diamorphine 5 mg in adults. A target concentration of morphine 30 μg.L-1 can be achieved by a diamorphine intravenous infusion in neonates 14 μg.kg-1 .h-1 , in a 5-year-old child 42 μg.kg-1 .h-1 and in an 15 year-old-adolescent 33 μg.kg-1 .h-1 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D Morse
- Department of Pharmacology & Clinical Pharmacology, Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Brian J Anderson
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Silke Gastine
- Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ian C K Wong
- Centre for Safe Medication Practice and Research, Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vestesson E, Booth J, Hatcher J, McGarrity O, Sebire NJ, Steventon A, Suarez Alonso C, Tomlin S, Standing JF. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antimicrobial prescribing at a specialist paediatric hospital: an observational study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:1185-1188. [PMID: 35134183 PMCID: PMC9383401 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkac009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted healthcare delivery and there are growing concerns that the pandemic will accelerate antimicrobial resistance. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antibiotic prescribing in a tertiary paediatric hospital in London, UK. METHODS Data on patient characteristics and antimicrobial administration for inpatients treated between 29 April 2019 and Sunday 28 March 2021 were extracted from the electronic health record (EHR). Interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) and the proportion of prescribed antibiotics from the WHO 'Access' class. RESULTS A total of 23 292 inpatient admissions were included. Prior to the pandemic there were an average 262 admissions per week compared with 212 during the pandemic period. Patient demographics were similar in the two periods but there was a shift in the specialities that patients had been admitted to. During the pandemic, there was a crude increase in antibiotic DOTs, from 801 weekly DOT before the pandemic to 846. The proportion of Access antibiotics decreased from 44% to 42%. However, after controlling for changes in patient characteristics, there was no evidence for the pandemic having an impact on antibiotic prescribing. CONCLUSIONS The patient population in a specialist children's hospital was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, but after adjusting for these changes there was no evidence that antibiotic prescribing was significantly affected by the pandemic. This highlights both the value of routine, high-quality EHR data and importance of appropriate statistical methods that can adjust for underlying changes to populations when evaluating impacts of the pandemic on healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Vestesson
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- The Health Foundation, London, UK
| | - John Booth
- Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | - Neil J. Sebire
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- NIHR GOSH BRC, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gastine S, Obiero C, Kane Z, Williams P, Readman J, Murunga S, Thitiri J, Ellis S, Correia E, Nyaoke B, Kipper K, van den Anker J, Sharland M, Berkley JA, Standing JF. Simultaneous pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) assessment of ampicillin and gentamicin in the treatment of neonatal sepsis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:448-456. [PMID: 35107141 PMCID: PMC8809196 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to simultaneously investigate the pharmacokinetics of ampicillin and gentamicin, currently the WHO standard of care for treating neonatal sepsis. Methods Pharmacokinetic data were collected in 59 neonates receiving ampicillin and gentamicin for suspected or proven sepsis in the NeoFosfo trial (NCT03453177). A panel of 23 clinical Escherichia coli isolates from neonates with sepsis, resistant to either ampicillin, gentamicin or both, were tested for susceptibility using chequerboards. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modelling and simulations were used to compare single-agent (EUCAST MIC) and combination (chequerboard MIC) target attainment with standard dosing regimens. Results A model was established that simultaneously estimated parameters of a one-compartment ampicillin model and a two-compartment gentamicin model. A common clearance for both drugs was used (6.89 L/h/70 kg) relating to glomerular filtration (CLGFR), with an additional clearance term added for ampicillin (5.3 L/h/70 kg). Covariate modelling included a priori allometric weight and post-menstrual age scaling of clearance. Further covariate relationships on renal clearance were postnatal age and serum creatinine. Simulation-based PKPD assessments suggest good Gram-positive (MIC ≤ 0.25 mg/L) cover. However, less than one-quarter of neonates were predicted to receive efficacious coverage against Enterobacterales (MIC ≤ 2 mg/L). The benefit of the ampicillin/gentamicin combination was limited, with only 2/23 E. coli clinical strains showing FIC index < 0.5 (synergy) and most in the range 0.5–1 (suggesting additivity). Simulations showed that feasible dosing strategies would be insufficient to cover resistant strains. Conclusions PKPD simulations showed ampicillin and gentamicin combination therapy was insufficient to cover Enterobacterales, suggesting the need for alternative empirical treatment options for neonatal sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gastine
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Zoe Kane
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.,Quotient Sciences, Mere Way, Ruddington, Nottingham, UK
| | - Phoebe Williams
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - John Readman
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Sally Ellis
- Global Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership (GARDP), Genève, Switzerland
| | - Erika Correia
- Global Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership (GARDP), Genève, Switzerland
| | - Borna Nyaoke
- Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Karin Kipper
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - John van den Anker
- Department of Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Switzerland.,Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mike Sharland
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St. George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - James A Berkley
- Quotient Sciences, Mere Way, Ruddington, Nottingham, UK.,Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.,Pharmacy Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kania SP, Silva JMF, Charles OJ, Booth J, Cheung SYA, Yates JWT, Worth A, Breuer J, Klein N, Amrolia PJ, Veys P, Standing JF. Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation After Paediatric Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Risk Factors and Sensitivity Analysis of Mathematical Model. Front Immunol 2022; 13:903063. [PMID: 35903096 PMCID: PMC9314642 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.903063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) establishes a lifelong latent infection in healthy humans, kept under immune control by cytotoxic T cells (CTLs). Following paediatric haematopoetic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), a loss of immune surveillance leads to opportunistic outgrowth of EBV-infected cells, resulting in EBV reactivation, which can ultimately progress to post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). The aims of this study were to identify risk factors for EBV reactivation in children in the first 100 days post-HSCT and to assess the suitability of a previously reported mathematical model to mechanistically model EBV reactivation kinetics in this cohort. Retrospective electronic data were collected from 56 children who underwent HSCT at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH) between 2005 and 2016. Using EBV viral load (VL) measurements from weekly quantitative PCR (qPCR) monitoring post-HSCT, a multivariable Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) model was developed to assess time to first EBV reactivation event in the first 100 days post-HSCT. Sensitivity analysis of a previously reported mathematical model was performed to identify key parameters affecting EBV VL. Cox-PH modelling revealed EBV seropositivity of the HSCT recipient and administration of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) pre-HSCT to be significantly associated with an increased risk of EBV reactivation in the first 100 days post-HSCT (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 2.32, P = 0.02; AHR = 2.55, P = 0.04). Five parameters were found to affect EBV VL in sensitivity analysis of the previously reported mathematical model. In conclusion, we have assessed the effect of multiple covariates on EBV reactivation in the first 100 days post-HSCT in children and have identified key parameters in a previously reported mechanistic mathematical model that affect EBV VL. Future work will aim to fit this model to patient EBV VLs, develop the model to account for interindividual variability and model the effect of clinically relevant covariates such as rituximab therapy and ATG on EBV VL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soumya P Kania
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research & Teaching Department, University College London (UCL) Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Juliana M F Silva
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oscar J Charles
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research & Teaching Department, University College London (UCL) Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Booth
- Digital Research, Informatics and Virtual Environment Unit, National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - S Y Amy Cheung
- Integrated Drug Development, Certara, Princeton, NJ, United States
| | - James W T Yates
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics (DMPK) Modelling, In-Vitro In-Vivo Translation, GlaxoSmithKline, Stevenage, United Kingdom
| | - Austen Worth
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - Judith Breuer
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research & Teaching Department, University College London (UCL) Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel Klein
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research & Teaching Department, University College London (UCL) Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Persis J Amrolia
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research & Teaching Department, University College London (UCL) Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Veys
- Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research & Teaching Department, University College London (UCL) Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tagalakis AD, Jayarajan V, Maeshima R, Ho KH, Syed F, Wu L, Aldossary AM, Munye MM, Mistry T, Ogunbiyi OK, Sala A, Standing JF, Moghimi SM, Stoker AW, Hart SL. Integrin-Targeted, Short Interfering RNA Nanocomplexes for Neuroblastoma Tumor-Specific Delivery Achieve MYCN Silencing with Improved Survival. Adv Funct Mater 2021; 31:2104843. [PMID: 35712226 PMCID: PMC9178728 DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202104843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The authors aim to develop siRNA therapeutics for cancer that can be administered systemically to target tumors and retard their growth. The efficacy of systemic delivery of siRNA to tumors with nanoparticles based on lipids or polymers is often compromised by their rapid clearance from the circulation by the liver. Here, multifunctional cationic and anionic siRNA nanoparticle formulations are described, termed receptor-targeted nanocomplexes (RTNs), that comprise peptides for siRNA packaging into nanoparticles and receptor-mediated cell uptake, together with lipids that confer nanoparticles with stealth properties to enhance stability in the circulation, and fusogenic properties to enhance endosomal release within the cell. Intravenous administration of RTNs in mice leads to predominant accumulation in xenograft tumors, with very little detected in the liver, lung, or spleen. Although non-targeted RTNs also enter the tumor, cell uptake appears to be RGD peptide-dependent indicating integrin-mediated uptake. RTNs with siRNA against MYCN (a member of the Myc family of transcription factors) in mice with MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma tumors show significant retardation of xenograft tumor growth and enhanced survival. This study shows that RTN formulations can achieve specific tumor-targeting, with minimal clearance by the liver and so enable delivery of tumor-targeted siRNA therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristides D. Tagalakis
- Department of Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College London30 Guilford StreetLondonWC1N 1EHUK
- Present address:
Department of BiologyEdge Hill UniversityOrmskirkL39 4QPUK
| | - Vignesh Jayarajan
- Department of Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College London30 Guilford StreetLondonWC1N 1EHUK
| | - Ruhina Maeshima
- Department of Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College London30 Guilford StreetLondonWC1N 1EHUK
| | - Kin H. Ho
- Department of InflammationInfection and ImmunityUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College London30 Guilford StreetLondonWC1N 1EHUK
| | - Farhatullah Syed
- Department of InflammationInfection and ImmunityUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College London30 Guilford StreetLondonWC1N 1EHUK
| | - Lin‐Ping Wu
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology and NanotoxicologyFaculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenUniversitetsparken 2Copenhagen2100Denmark
- Present address:
Guangzhou institute of Biomedicine and HealthChinese Academy of SciencesGuangzhou510530People's Republic of China
| | - Ahmad M. Aldossary
- Department of Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College London30 Guilford StreetLondonWC1N 1EHUK
- Present address:
National Center for BiotechnologyKing Abdulaziz City for Science and TechnologyRiyadh11442Saudi Arabia
| | - Mustafa M. Munye
- Department of Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College London30 Guilford StreetLondonWC1N 1EHUK
- Present address:
Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult12th Floor Tower Wing, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze PondLondonSE1 9RTUK
| | - Talisa Mistry
- Department of HistopathologyGreat Ormond Street Hospital for ChildrenNHS Foundation TrustLondonWC1N 3JHUK
| | - Olumide Kayode Ogunbiyi
- Department of HistopathologyGreat Ormond Street Hospital for ChildrenNHS Foundation TrustLondonWC1N 3JHUK
| | - Arturo Sala
- Department of Life SciencesBrunel University LondonKingston LaneMiddlesexUB8 3PHUK
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Department of InflammationInfection and ImmunityUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College London30 Guilford StreetLondonWC1N 1EHUK
| | - Seyed M. Moghimi
- Centre for Pharmaceutical Nanotechnology and NanotoxicologyFaculty of Health and Medical SciencesUniversity of CopenhagenUniversitetsparken 2Copenhagen2100Denmark
- Present address:
School of Pharmacy, and Translational and Clinical Research Institute, the Faculty of Medical SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneNE1 7RUUK
- Present address:
Colorado Center for Nanomedicine and Nanosafety, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical SciencesUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusAuroraCO80045USA
| | - Andrew W. Stoker
- Department of Developmental Biology and CancerUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College London30 Guilford StreetLondonWC1N 1EHUK
| | - Stephen L. Hart
- Department of Genetics and Genomic MedicineUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College London30 Guilford StreetLondonWC1N 1EHUK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zylbersztejn A, Almossawi O, Gudka N, Tompsett D, De Stavola B, Standing JF, Smyth R, Hardelid P. Access to palivizumab among children at high risk of respiratory syncytial virus complications in English hospitals. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 88:1246-1257. [PMID: 34478568 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Palivizumab is a monoclonal antibody which can prevent infection with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Due to its high cost, it is recommended for high-risk infants only. We aimed to determine the proportion of infants eligible for palivizumab treatment in England who receive at least one dose. METHODS We used the Hospital Treatment Insights database, which contains hospital admission records linked to hospital pharmacy dispensing data for 43 out of 153 hospitals in England. Infants born between 2010 and 2016 were considered eligible for palivizumab if their medical records indicated chronic lung disease (CLD), congenital heart disease (CHD) or severe immunodeficiency (SCID), and they met additional criteria based on gestational age at birth and age at start of the RSV season (beginning of October). We calculated the proportion of infants who received at least one dose of palivizumab in their first RSV season, and modelled the odds of treatment according to multiple child characteristics using logistic regression models. RESULTS We identified 3712 eligible children, of whom 2479 (67%) had complete information on all risk factors. Palivizumab was prescribed to 832 of eligible children (34%). Being born at <30 weeks' gestation, aged <6 months at the start of RSV season, and having two or more of CLD, CHD or SCID were associated with higher odds of treatment. CONCLUSION In England, palivizumab is not prescribed to the majority of children who are eligible to receive it. Doctors managing these infants may be unfamiliar with the eligibility criteria or constrained by other considerations, such as cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ania Zylbersztejn
- Population, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Ofran Almossawi
- Population, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | | | - Daniel Tompsett
- Population, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Bianca De Stavola
- Population, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Rosalind Smyth
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Pia Hardelid
- Population, Policy & Practice Research and Teaching Department, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bentley S, Davies JC, Gastine S, Donovan J, Standing JF. Clinical pharmacokinetics and dose recommendations for posaconazole gastroresistant tablets in children with cystic fibrosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76:3247-3254. [PMID: 34458906 PMCID: PMC8598294 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the population pharmacokinetics of posaconazole gastroresistant tablets in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) and perform simulations to recommend optimal doses. Patients and methods Children from a paediatric CF centre who had received posaconazole tablets and underwent therapeutic drug monitoring were identified from pharmacy records. Relevant clinical data were collated from case notes and electronic patient records and used to develop an allometrically scaled population pharmacokinetic model. A stepwise covariate model-building exercise evaluated the influence of interacting medicines and liver function. Results One hundred posaconazole serum concentrations were collected from 37 children with a median age of 14 years (range 7–17). Posaconazole pharmacokinetics were adequately described by a one-compartment model with inter-individual variability on clearance. Dose simulations demonstrated a 77%–83% probability of attaining a trough target of 1 mg/L with a dose of 300 mg every 12 h for two doses then 300 mg once daily (OD) in children aged 6–11 years; and 86%–88% with a dose of 400 mg every 12 h for two doses then 400 mg OD in adolescents aged 12–17 years. This dose scheme also yielded a 90% probability of achieving an AUC of 30 mg·h/L. AUC and trough concentration were highly correlated (r2 = 0.98). Simulations showed that trough concentrations of >0.75 mg/L would exceed an AUC of 30 mg·h/L in 90% of patients. Conclusions A starting dose of 300 mg OD in those aged 6–11 years and 400 mg OD in those aged 12–17 years (following loading doses) yields a 90% probability of attaining an AUC of 30 mg·h/L.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siân Bentley
- Pharmacy Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.,National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Jane C Davies
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,Paediatric Respiratory Medicine Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Silke Gastine
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jackie Donovan
- Clinical Biochemistry Department, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.,Pharmacy Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sadouki Z, McHugh TD, Aarnoutse R, Ortiz Canseco J, Darlow C, Hope W, van Ingen J, Longshaw C, Manissero D, Mead A, Pelligand L, Phee L, Readman J, Ruth MM, Standing JF, Stone N, Wey EQ, Kloprogge F. Application of the hollow fibre infection model (HFIM) in antimicrobial development: a systematic review and recommendations of reporting. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76:2252-2259. [PMID: 34179966 PMCID: PMC8361333 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic review focuses on the use of the in vitro hollow fibre infection model (HFIM) for microbial culture. We summarize the direction of the field to date and propose best-practice principles for reporting of the applications. METHODS Searches in six databases (MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, PubMed®, BIOSIS®, SCOPUS® and Cochrane®) up to January 2020 identified 129 studies meeting our inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently assessed and extracted data from each publication. The quality of reporting of microbiological and technical parameters was analysed. RESULTS Forty-seven out of 129 (36.4%) studies did not report the minimum pharmacokinetic parameters required in order to replicate the pharmacokinetic profile of HFIM experiments. Fifty-three out of 129 (41.1%) publications did not report the medium used in the HFIM. The overwhelming majority of publications did not perform any technical repeats [107/129 (82.9%)] or biological repeats [97/129 (75.2%)]. CONCLUSIONS This review demonstrates that most publications provide insufficient data to allow for results to be evaluated, thus impairing the reproducibility of HFIM experiments. Therefore, there is a clear need for the development of laboratory standardization and improved reporting of HFIM experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Sadouki
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.,Centre of Clinical Microbiology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Timothy D McHugh
- Centre of Clinical Microbiology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rob Aarnoutse
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud Center of Infectious Diseases (RCI), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christopher Darlow
- Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - William Hope
- Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jakko van Ingen
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Davide Manissero
- Medical Affairs for Infection and Immune Diagnostics, QIAGEN, London, UK
| | - Andrew Mead
- Department of Comparative Biological Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - Ludovic Pelligand
- Department of Comparative Biological Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - Lynette Phee
- Antimicrobial Research Group, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - John Readman
- Infection, Immunity, Inflammation Section, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Mike M Ruth
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud Center of Infectious Diseases (RCI), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity, Inflammation Section, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Neil Stone
- Department of Microbiology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | | | - Frank Kloprogge
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gastine S, Pang J, Boshier FA, Carter SJ, Lonsdale DO, Cortina‐Borja M, Hung IF, Breuer J, Kloprogge F, Standing JF. Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Viral Dynamics to Model Response to Antiviral Therapies. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2021; 110:321-333. [PMID: 33641159 PMCID: PMC8014833 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral loads change rapidly following symptom onset, so to assess antivirals it is important to understand the natural history and patient factors influencing this. We undertook an individual patient-level meta-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamics in humans to describe viral dynamics and estimate the effects of antivirals used to date. This systematic review identified case reports, case series, and clinical trial data from publications between January 1, 2020, and May 31, 2020, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) regression model of time to viral clearance was fitted to respiratory and stool samples. A simplified four parameter nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) model was fitted to viral load trajectories in all sampling sites and covariate modeling of respiratory viral dynamics was performed to quantify time-dependent drug effects. Patient-level data from 645 individuals (age 1 month to 100 years) with 6,316 viral loads were extracted. Model-based simulations of viral load trajectories in samples from the upper and lower respiratory tract, stool, blood, urine, ocular secretions, and breast milk were generated. Cox-PH modeling showed longer time to viral clearance in older patients, men, and those with more severe disease. Remdesivir was associated with faster viral clearance (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 9.19, P < 0.001), as well as interferon, particularly when combined with ribavirin (AHR = 2.2, P = 0.015; AHR = 6.04, P = 0.006). Combination therapy should be further investigated. A viral dynamic dataset and NLME model for designing and analyzing antiviral trials has been established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gastine
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching DepartmentGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Juanita Pang
- Division of Infection and ImmunityUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Simon J. Carter
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching DepartmentGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Dagan O. Lonsdale
- Department of Clinical PharmacologySt George’s University of LondonLondonUK
- Department of Intensive CareSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Mario Cortina‐Borja
- Population, Policy and Practice Research and Teaching DepartmentGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Ivan F.N. Hung
- Division of Infectious DiseasesDepartment of MedicineThe University of Hong KongHong KongChina
| | - Judy Breuer
- Division of Infection and ImmunityUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Frank Kloprogge
- Institute for Global HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching DepartmentGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kane Z, Gastine S, Obiero C, Williams P, Murunga S, Thitiri J, Ellis S, Correia E, Nyaoke B, Kipper K, van den Anker J, Sharland M, Berkley JA, Standing JF. IV and oral fosfomycin pharmacokinetics in neonates with suspected clinical sepsis. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76:1855-1864. [PMID: 33855449 PMCID: PMC8212774 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fosfomycin has the potential to be re-purposed as part of a combination therapy to treat neonatal sepsis where resistance to current standard of care (SOC) is common. Limited data exist on neonatal fosfomycin pharmacokinetics and estimates of bioavailability and CSF/plasma ratio in this vulnerable population are lacking. OBJECTIVES To generate data informing the appropriate dosing of IV and oral fosfomycin in neonates using a population pharmacokinetic analysis of plasma and CSF data. METHODS The NeoFosfo study (NCT03453177) was a randomized trial that examined the safety and pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin comparing SOC versus SOC plus fosfomycin. Sixty-one neonates received fosfomycin (100 mg/kg IV q12h for 48 h) and then they converted to oral therapy at the same dose. Two plasma pharmacokinetic samples were taken following the first IV and oral doses, sample times were randomized to cover the whole pharmacokinetic profile and opportunistic CSF pharmacokinetic samples were collected. A population pharmacokinetic model was developed in NONMEM and simulations were performed. RESULTS In total, 238 plasma and 15 CSF concentrations were collected. A two-compartment disposition model, with an additional CSF compartment and first-order absorption, best described the data. Bioavailability was estimated as 0.48 (95% CI = 0.347-0.775) and the CSF/plasma ratio as 0.32 (95% CI = 0.272-0.409). Allometric weight and postmenstrual age (PMA) scaling was applied; additional covariates included postnatal age (PNA) on clearance and CSF protein on CSF/plasma ratio. CONCLUSIONS Through this analysis a population pharmacokinetic model has been developed that can be used alongside currently available pharmacodynamic targets to select a neonatal fosfomycin dose based on an infant's PMA, PNA and weight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Kane
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.,Quotient Sciences, Mere Way, Ruddington, Nottingham, UK
| | - Silke Gastine
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Phoebe Williams
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Sally Ellis
- GARDP-Global Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Erika Correia
- GARDP-Global Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership, Genève, Switzerland
| | - Borna Nyaoke
- DNDi-Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Karin Kipper
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - John van den Anker
- Department of Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mike Sharland
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - James A Berkley
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.,Centre for Tropical Medicine & Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,The Childhood Acute Illness & Nutrition (CHAIN) Network, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.,Pharmacy Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Channon-Wells S, Kwok M, Booth J, Bamford A, Konstanty P, Hatcher J, Dixon G, Diggle PJ, Standing JF, Irwin AD. The use of continuous electronic prescribing data to infer trends in antimicrobial consumption and estimate the impact of stewardship interventions in hospitalized children. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76:2464-2471. [PMID: 34109397 PMCID: PMC8361331 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Understanding antimicrobial consumption is essential to mitigate the development of antimicrobial resistance, yet robust data in children are sparse and methodologically limited. Electronic prescribing systems provide an important opportunity to analyse and report antimicrobial consumption in detail. Objectives We investigated the value of electronic prescribing data from a tertiary children’s hospital to report temporal trends in antimicrobial consumption in hospitalized children and compare commonly used metrics of antimicrobial consumption. Methods Daily measures of antimicrobial consumption [days of therapy (DOT) and DDDs] were derived from the electronic prescribing system between 2010 and 2018. Autoregressive moving-average models were used to infer trends and the estimates were compared with simulated point prevalence surveys (PPSs). Results More than 1.3 million antimicrobial administrations were analysed. There was significant daily and seasonal variation in overall consumption, which reduced annually by 1.77% (95% CI 0.50% to 3.02%). Relative consumption of meropenem decreased by 6.6% annually (95% CI −3.5% to 15.8%) following the expansion of the hospital antimicrobial stewardship programme. DOT and DDDs exhibited similar trends for most antimicrobials, though inconsistencies were observed where changes to dosage guidelines altered consumption calculation by DDDs, but not DOT. PPS simulations resulted in estimates of change over time, which converged on the model estimates, but with much less precision. Conclusions Electronic prescribing systems offer significant opportunities to better understand and report antimicrobial consumption in children. This approach to modelling administration data overcomes the limitations of using interval data and dispensary data. It provides substantially more detailed inferences on prescribing patterns and the potential impact of stewardship interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Channon-Wells
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - M Kwok
- UCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Booth
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Bamford
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - P Konstanty
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Hatcher
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - G Dixon
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - P J Diggle
- CHICAS, Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK
| | - J F Standing
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - A D Irwin
- Infection Management and Prevention Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,UQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kane Z, Picetti R, Wilby A, Standing JF, Grassin-Delyle S, Roberts I, Shakur-Still H. Physiologically based modelling of tranexamic acid pharmacokinetics following intravenous, intramuscular, sub-cutaneous and oral administration in healthy volunteers. Eur J Pharm Sci 2021; 164:105893. [PMID: 34087356 PMCID: PMC8299544 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Tranexamic acid (TXA) as a treatment for post-partum haemorrhage (PPH) depends on early intervention and rapid systemic exposure. This study uses PBPK modelling to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of TXA given by different routes of administration; intravenous, intramuscular, sub-cutaneous and oral. Intramuscular administration of 1000 mg TXA is predicted to achieve >15 mg/L in plasma in <15 min and exceed this level for approximately 3 h post dose.
Background : Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic drug that reduces surgical blood loss and death due to bleeding after trauma and post-partum haemorrhage. Treatment success is dependant on early intervention and rapid systemic exposure to TXA. The requirement for intravenous (IV) administration can in some situations limit accessibility to TXA therapy. Here we employ physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling (PBPK) to evaluate if adequate TXA exposure maybe achieved when given via different routes of administration. Methods : A commercially available PBPK software (GastroPlus®) was used to model published TXA pharmacokinetics. IV, oral and intramuscular (IM) models were developed using healthy volunteer PK data from twelve different single dose regimens (n = 48 participants). The model was verified using separate IV and oral validation datasets (n = 26 participants). Oral, IM and sub-cutaneous (SQ) dose finding simulations were performed. Results : Across the different TXA regimens evaluated TXA plasma concentrations varied from 0.1 to 94.0 µg/mL. Estimates of the total plasma clearance of TXA ranged from 0.091 to 0.104 L/h/kg, oral bioavailability from 36 to 67% and Tmax from 2.6 to 3.2 and 0.4 to 1.0 h following oral and intramuscular administration respectively. Variability in the observed TXA PK could be captured through predictable demographic effects on clearance, combined with intestinal permeability and stomach transit time following oral administration and muscle blood flow and muscle/plasma partition coefficients following intra-muscular dosing. Conclusions : This study indicates that intramuscular administration is the non-intravenous route of administration with the most potential for achieving targeted TXA exposures. Plasma levels following an IM dose of 1000 mg TXA are predicted to exceed 15 mg/mL in < 15 min and be maintained above this level for approximately 3 h, achieving systemic exposure (AUC0–6) of 99 to 105 µg*hr/mL after a single dose. Well-designed clinical trials to verify these predictions and confirm the utility of intramuscular TXA are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Kane
- Quotient Sciences, Mere Way, Ruddington, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Roberto Picetti
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Wilby
- Quotient Sciences, Mere Way, Ruddington, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stanislas Grassin-Delyle
- 3 Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, and Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, Infection et inflammation, Montigny le Bretonneux, France
| | - Ian Roberts
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Haleema Shakur-Still
- Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gastine S, Hsia Y, Clements M, Barker CI, Bielicki J, Hartmann C, Sharland M, Standing JF. Variation in Target Attainment of Beta-Lactam Antibiotic Dosing Between International Pediatric Formularies. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2021; 109:958-970. [PMID: 33521971 PMCID: PMC8358626 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
As antimicrobial susceptibility of common bacterial pathogens decreases, ensuring optimal dosing may preserve the use of older antibiotics in order to limit the spread of resistance to newer agents. Beta-lactams represent the most widely prescribed antibiotic class, yet most were licensed prior to legislation changes mandating their study in children. As a result, significant heterogeneity persists in the pediatric doses used globally, along with quality of evidence used to inform dosing. This review summarizes dosing recommendations from the major pediatric reference sources and tries to answer the questions: Does beta-lactam dose heterogeneity matter? Does it impact pharmacodynamic target attainment? For three important severe clinical infections-pneumonia, sepsis, and meningitis-pharmacokinetic models were identified for common for beta-lactam antibiotics. Real-world demographics were derived from three multicenter point prevalence surveys. Simulation results were compared with minimum inhibitory concentration distributions to inform appropriateness of recommended doses in targeted and empiric treatment. While cephalosporin dosing regimens are largely adequate for target attainment, they also pose the most risk of neurotoxicity. Our review highlights aminopenicillin, piperacillin, and meropenem doses as potentially requiring review/optimization in order to preserve the use of these agents in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silke Gastine
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching DepartmentUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Yingfen Hsia
- School of PharmacyQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUK
| | | | - Charlotte I.S. Barker
- Department of Medical & Molecular GeneticsKing’s College LondonLondonUK
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research GroupInstitute for Infection and ImmunitySt George’s University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Julia Bielicki
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research GroupInstitute for Infection and ImmunitySt George’s University of LondonLondonUK
- Paediatric Pharmacology GroupUniversity of Basel Children’s HospitalBaselSwitzerland
| | | | - Mike Sharland
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research GroupInstitute for Infection and ImmunitySt George’s University of LondonLondonUK
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Research and Teaching DepartmentUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
- Department of PharmacyGreat Ormond Street Hospital for ChildrenLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Brown LAK, Freemantle N, Breuer J, Dehbi HM, Chowdhury K, Jones G, Ikeji F, Ndoutoumou A, Santhirakumar K, Longley N, Checkley AM, Standing JF, Lowe DM. Early antiviral treatment in outpatients with COVID-19 (FLARE): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:193. [PMID: 33685502 PMCID: PMC7938371 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05139-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective of this trial is to assess whether early antiviral therapy in outpatients with COVID-19 with either favipiravir plus lopinavir/ritonavir, lopinavir/ritonavir alone, or favipiravir alone, is associated with a decrease in viral load of SARS-CoV-2 compared with placebo. TRIAL DESIGN FLARE is a phase IIA randomised, double-blind, 2x2 factorial placebo-controlled, interventional trial. PARTICIPANTS This trial is being conducted in the United Kingdom, with Royal Free Hospital, London as the lead site. Participants are non-hospitalised adults with highly suspected COVID-19 within the first 5 days of symptom onset, or who have tested positive with SARS-CoV-2 causing COVID-19 within the first 7 days of symptom onset, or who are asymptomatic but tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 for the first time within the last 48 hours. Inclusion criteria are as follows: 1. Any adult with the following: Symptoms compatible with COVID-19 disease (Fever >37.8°C on at least one occasion AND either cough and/ or anosmia) within the first 5 days of symptom onset (date/time of enrolment must be within the first 5 days of symptom onset) OR ANY symptoms compatible with COVID-19 disease (may include, but are not limited to fever, cough, shortness of breath, malaise, myalgia, headache, coryza) and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 within the first 7 days of symptom onset) (date/time of enrolment must be within the first 7 days of symptom onset) OR no symptoms but tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 within the last 48 hours (date/time of test must be within 48 hours of enrolment) 2. Male or female aged 18 years to 70 years old inclusive at screening 3. Willing and able to take daily saliva samples 4. Able to provide full informed consent and willing to comply with trial-related procedures Exclusion criteria are as follows: 1. Known hypersensitivity to any of the active ingredients or excipients in favipiravir and matched placebo, and in lopinavir/ritonavir and matched placebo (See Appendix 2) 2. Chronic liver disease at screening (known cirrhosis of any aetiology, chronic hepatitis (e.g. autoimmune, viral, steatohepatitis), cholangitis or any known elevation of liver aminotransferases with AST or ALT > 3 X ULN)* 3. Chronic kidney disease (stage 3 or beyond) at screening: eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 * 4. HIV infection, if untreated, detectable viral load or on protease inhibitor therapy 5. Any clinical condition which the investigator considers would make the participant unsuitable for the trial 6. Concomitant medications known to interact with favipiravir and matched placebo, and with lopinavir/ritonavir and matched placebo, and carry risk of toxicity for the participant 7. Current severe illness requiring hospitalisation 8. Pregnancy and/ or breastfeeding 9. Eligible female participants of childbearing potential and male participants with a partner of childbearing potential not willing to use highly effective contraceptive measures during the trial and within the time point specified following last trial treatment dose. 10. Participants enrolled in any other interventional drug or vaccine trial (co-enrolment in observational studies is acceptable) 11. Participants who have received the COVID-19 vaccine *Considering the importance of early treatment of COVID-19 to impact viral load, the absence of known chronic liver/ kidney disease will be confirmed verbally by the participant during pre-screening and Screening/Baseline visit. Safety blood samples will be collected at Screening/Baseline visit (Day 1) and test results will be examined as soon as they become available and within 24 hours. INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR Participants will be randomised 1:1:1:1 using a concealed online minimisation process into one of the following four arms: Arm 1: Favipiravir + Lopinavir/ritonavir Oral favipiravir at 1800mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 400mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7 PLUS lopinavir/ritonavir at 400mg/100mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200mg/50mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7. Arm 2: Favipiravir + Lopinavir/ritonavir placebo Oral favipiravir at 1800mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 400mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7 PLUS lopinavir/ritonavir matched placebo at 400mg/100mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200mg/50mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7. Arm 3: Favipiravir placebo + Lopinavir/ritonavir Oral favipiravir matched placebo at 1800mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 400mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7 PLUS lopinavir/ritonavir at 400mg/100mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200mg/50mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7. Arm 4: Favipiravir placebo + Lopinavir/ritonavir placebo Oral favipiravir matched placebo at 1800mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 400mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7 PLUS lopinavir/ritonavir matched placebo at 400mg/100mg twice daily on Day 1, followed by 200mg/50mg four (4) times daily from Day 2 to Day 7. MAIN OUTCOMES The primary outcome is upper respiratory tract viral load at Day 5. SECONDARY OUTCOMES Percentage of participants with undetectable upper respiratory tract viral load after 5 days of therapy Proportion of participants with undetectable stool viral load after 7 days of therapy Rate of decrease in upper respiratory tract viral load during 7 days of therapy Duration of fever following commencement of trial medications Proportion of participants with hepatotoxicity after 7 days of therapy Proportion of participants with other medication-related toxicity after 7 days of therapy and 14 days post-randomisation Proportion of participants admitted to hospital with COVID-19 related illness Proportion of participants admitted to ICU with COVID-19 related illness Proportion of participants who have died with COVID-19 related illness Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of favipiravir Exploratory: Proportion of participants with deleterious or resistance-conferring mutations in SARS-CoV-2 RANDOMISATION: Participants will be randomised 1:1:1:1 using a concealed online minimisation process, with the following factors: trial site, age (≤ 55 vs > 55 years old), gender, obesity (BMI <30 vs ≥30), symptomatic or asymptomatic, current smoking status (Yes = current smoker, No = ex-smoker, never smoker), ethnicity (Caucasian, other) and presence or absence of comorbidity (defined as diabetes, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease (including previous myocardial infarction), other heart disease (arrhythmia and valvular heart disease), asthma, COPD, other chronic respiratory disease). BLINDING (MASKING) Participants and investigators will both be blinded to treatment allocation (double-blind). NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE) 240 participants, 60 in each arm. TRIAL STATUS Protocol version 4.0 dated 7th January 2021. Date of first enrolment: October 2020. Recruitment is ongoing, with anticipated finish date of 31st March 2021. TRIAL REGISTRATION The FLARE trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, trial identifying number NCT04499677 , date of registration 4th August 2020. FULL PROTOCOL The full protocol is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest in expediting dissemination of this material, the familiar formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-An K Brown
- UCL Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK
| | - Nick Freemantle
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, 90 High Holborn, 2nd Floor, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK.
| | - Judy Breuer
- Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London, UK
| | - Hakim-Moulay Dehbi
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, 90 High Holborn, 2nd Floor, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Kashfia Chowdhury
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, 90 High Holborn, 2nd Floor, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Gemma Jones
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, 90 High Holborn, 2nd Floor, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Felicia Ikeji
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, 90 High Holborn, 2nd Floor, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Amalia Ndoutoumou
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, 90 High Holborn, 2nd Floor, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Krishneya Santhirakumar
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, 90 High Holborn, 2nd Floor, London, WC1V 6LJ, UK
| | - Nicky Longley
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Anna M Checkley
- Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Inflammation, Immunity Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK
| | - David M Lowe
- UCL Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Clements MN, Russell N, Bielicki JA, Ellis S, Gastine S, Hsia Y, Standing JF, Walker AS, Sharland M. Global antibiotic dosing strategies in hospitalised children: Characterising variation and implications for harmonisation of international guidelines. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252223. [PMID: 34043696 PMCID: PMC8159011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paediatric global antibiotic guidelines are inconsistent, most likely due to the limited pharmacokinetic and efficacy data in this population. We investigated factors underlying variation in antibiotic dosing using data from five global point prevalence surveys. METHODS & FINDINGS Data from 3,367 doses of the 16 most frequent intravenous antibiotics administered to children 1 month-12 years across 23 countries were analysed. For each antibiotic, we identified standard doses given as either weight-based doses (in mg/kg/day) or fixed daily doses (in mg/day), and investigated the pattern of dosing using each strategy. Factors underlying observed variation in weight-based doses were investigated using linear mixed effects models. Weight-based dosing (in mg/kg/day) clustered around a small number of peaks, and all antibiotics had 1-3 standard weight-based doses used in 5%-48% of doses. Dosing strategy was more often weight-based than fixed daily dosing for all antibiotics apart from teicoplanin, which had approximately equal proportions of dosing attributable to each strategy. No strong consistent patterns emerged to explain the historical variation in actual weight-based doses used apart from higher dosing seen in central nervous system infections, and lower in skin and soft tissue infections compared to lower respiratory tract infections. Higher dosing was noted in the Americas compared to the European region. CONCLUSIONS Antibiotic dosing in children clusters around a small number of doses, although variation remains. There is a clear opportunity for the clinical, scientific and public health communities to consolidate behind a consistent set of global antibiotic dosing guidelines to harmonise current practice and prioritise future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Neal Russell
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julia A. Bielicki
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sally Ellis
- Global Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Silke Gastine
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yingfen Hsia
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s University, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph F. Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mike Sharland
- Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s University, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gonzalez Hernandez F, Carter SJ, Iso-Sipilä J, Goldsmith P, Almousa AA, Gastine S, Lilaonitkul W, Kloprogge F, Standing JF. An automated approach to identify scientific publications reporting pharmacokinetic parameters. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 6:88. [PMID: 34381873 PMCID: PMC8343403 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16718.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic (PK) predictions of new chemical entities are aided by prior knowledge from other compounds. The development of robust algorithms that improve preclinical and clinical phases of drug development remains constrained by the need to search, curate and standardise PK information across the constantly-growing scientific literature. The lack of centralised, up-to-date and comprehensive repositories of PK data represents a significant limitation in the drug development pipeline.In this work, we propose a machine learning approach to automatically identify and characterise scientific publications reporting PK parameters from in vivo data, providing a centralised repository of PK literature. A dataset of 4,792 PubMed publications was labelled by field experts depending on whether in vivo PK parameters were estimated in the study. Different classification pipelines were compared using a bootstrap approach and the best-performing architecture was used to develop a comprehensive and automatically-updated repository of PK publications. The best-performing architecture encoded documents using unigram features and mean pooling of BioBERT embeddings obtaining an F1 score of 83.8% on the test set. The pipeline retrieved over 121K PubMed publications in which in vivo PK parameters were estimated and it was scheduled to perform weekly updates on newly published articles. All the relevant documents were released through a publicly available web interface (https://app.pkpdai.com) and characterised by the drugs, species and conditions mentioned in the abstract, to facilitate the subsequent search of relevant PK data. This automated, open-access repository can be used to accelerate the search and comparison of PK results, curate ADME datasets, and facilitate subsequent text mining tasks in the PK domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Simon J Carter
- Institute of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.,Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Silke Gastine
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Watjana Lilaonitkul
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.,Health Data Research, London, UK
| | - Frank Kloprogge
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Zeitlinger M, Koch BCP, Bruggemann R, De Cock P, Felton T, Hites M, Le J, Luque S, MacGowan AP, Marriott DJE, Muller AE, Nadrah K, Paterson DL, Standing JF, Telles JP, Wölfl-Duchek M, Thy M, Roberts JA. Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Antiviral Agents Used to Treat SARS-CoV-2 and Their Potential Interaction with Drugs and Other Supportive Measures: A Comprehensive Review by the PK/PD of Anti-Infectives Study Group of the European Society of Antimicrobial Agents. Clin Pharmacokinet 2020; 59:1195-1216. [PMID: 32725382 PMCID: PMC7385074 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-020-00924-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
There is an urgent need to identify optimal antiviral therapies for COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2. We have conducted a rapid and comprehensive review of relevant pharmacological evidence, focusing on (1) the pharmacokinetics (PK) of potential antiviral therapies; (2) coronavirus-specific pharmacodynamics (PD); (3) PK and PD interactions between proposed combination therapies; (4) pharmacology of major supportive therapies; and (5) anticipated drug-drug interactions (DDIs). We found promising in vitro evidence for remdesivir, (hydroxy)chloroquine and favipiravir against SARS-CoV-2; potential clinical benefit in SARS-CoV-2 with remdesivir, the combination of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) plus ribavirin; and strong evidence for LPV/r plus ribavirin against Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) for post-exposure prophylaxis in healthcare workers. Despite these emerging data, robust controlled clinical trials assessing patient-centred outcomes remain imperative and clinical data have already reduced expectations with regard to some drugs. Any therapy should be used with caution in the light of potential drug interactions and the uncertainty of optimal doses for treating mild versus serious infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Zeitlinger
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | | | | | - Pieter De Cock
- Department of Pharmacy 2, Heymans Institute of Pharmacology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Timothy Felton
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Intensive Care Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Maya Hites
- Clinic of Infectious Diseases, CUB-Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jennifer Le
- Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sonia Luque
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital del Mar, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
- Infectious Pathology and Antimicrobials Research Group (IPAR), Institut Hospital del Mar D'Investigacions Mèdiques (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alasdair P MacGowan
- Bristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research and Evaluation, Infection Sciences, Severn Pathology Partnership, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Westbury-On-Trym, Bristol, UK
| | - Deborah J E Marriott
- St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anouk E Muller
- HaaglandenMC, The Hague and ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kristina Nadrah
- Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - David L Paterson
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - João P Telles
- Department of Infectious Diseases, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Michael Wölfl-Duchek
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael Thy
- Infectious Diseases Department and Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Bichat, Paris, France
- EA7323, Evaluation of Perinatal and Paediatric Therapeutics and Pharmacology, University Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Jason A Roberts
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Centre for Translational Anti-Infective Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- Department of Pharmacy, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- Division of Anaesthesiology Critical Care Emergency and Pain Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France.
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, QLD, 4029, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lonsdale DO, Kipper K, Baker EH, Barker CIS, Oldfield I, Philips BJ, Johnston A, Rhodes A, Sharland M, Standing JF. β-Lactam antimicrobial pharmacokinetics and target attainment in critically ill patients aged 1 day to 90 years: the ABDose study. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75:3625-3634. [DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The pharmacokinetics of β-lactam antibiotics in critical illness remain poorly characterized, particularly in neonates, children and the elderly. We undertook a pharmacokinetic study of commonly used β-lactam antibiotics in critically ill patients of all ages. The aims were to produce a whole-life β-lactam pharmacokinetic model and describe the extent to which standard doses achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets associated with clinical cure.
Patients and methods
A total of 212 critically ill participants with an age range from 1 day (gestational age 24 weeks) to 90 years were recruited from a UK hospital, providing 1339 pharmacokinetic samples. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was undertaken using non-linear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM) for each drug. Pooled data were used to estimate maturation and decline of β-lactam pharmacokinetics throughout life.
Results
Pharmacokinetic models for eight drugs were described, including what is thought to be the first benzylpenicillin model in critically ill adults. We estimate that 50% of adult β-lactam clearance is achieved by 43 weeks post-menstrual age (chronological plus gestational age). Fifty percent of decline from peak adult clearance occurs by 71 years. Paediatric participants were significantly less likely than adults to achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets with standard antibiotic doses (P < 0.01).
Conclusions
We believe this to be the first prospective whole-life antibiotic pharmacokinetic study in the critically ill. The study provides further evidence that standard antibiotic doses fail to achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets associated with clinical success in adults, children and neonates. Maturation and decline parameters estimated from this study could be adopted as a standard for future prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dagan O Lonsdale
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Karin Kipper
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Analytical Services International Ltd, London, UK
| | - Emma H Baker
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Charlotte I S Barker
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Isobel Oldfield
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Atholl Johnston
- Analytical Services International Ltd, London, UK
- Clinical Pharmacology, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Rhodes
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mike Sharland
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
- St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George’s, University of London, London, UK
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Wareham DW, Abdul Momin MHF, Phee LM, Hornsey M, Standing JF. Cefepime/sulbactam as an enhanced antimicrobial combination therapy for the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections—authors’ response. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75:2713. [DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkaa270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- David W Wareham
- Antimicrobial Research Group, Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - M H F Abdul Momin
- Antimicrobial Research Group, Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - Lynette M Phee
- Antimicrobial Research Group, Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - Michael Hornsey
- Antimicrobial Research Group, Centre for Immunobiology, Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Germovsek E, Osborne L, Gunaratnam F, Lounis SA, Busquets FB, Standing JF, Sinha AK. Development and external evaluation of a population pharmacokinetic model for continuous and intermittent administration of vancomycin in neonates and infants using prospectively collected data. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 74:1003-1011. [PMID: 30668696 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Revised: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vancomycin is commonly used for nosocomial bacterial pathogens causing late-onset septicaemia in preterm infants. We prospectively collected pharmacokinetic data aiming to describe pharmacokinetics and determine covariates contributing to the variability in neonatal vancomycin pharmacokinetics. Further, we aimed to use the model to compare the ratio of AUC24 at steady-state to the MIC (AUC24,ss/MIC) of several intermittent and continuous dosing regimens. METHODS Newborns receiving vancomycin for suspected or confirmed late-onset sepsis were included. Peak and trough concentrations for intermittent vancomycin dosing and steady-state concentrations for continuous vancomycin dosing were measured. NONMEM 7.3 was used for population pharmacokinetic analysis. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to compare dosing schemes. RESULTS Data from 54 infants were used for model development and from 34 infants for the model evaluation {corrected gestational age [median (range)] = 29 (23.7-41.9) weeks and 28 (23.4-41.7) weeks, respectively}. The final model was a one-compartment model. Weight and postmenstrual age were included a priori, and then no additional covariate significantly improved the model fit. Final model parameter estimates [mean (SEM)]: CL = 5.7 (0.3) L/h/70 kg and V = 39.3 (3.7) L/70 kg. Visual predictive check of the evaluation dataset confirmed the model can predict external data. Simulations using MIC of 1 mg/L showed that for neonates with gestational age ≤25 weeks and postnatal age ≤2 weeks AUC24,ss/MIC was lower with the intermittent regimen (median 482 versus 663). CONCLUSIONS A population pharmacokinetic model for continuous and intermittent vancomycin administration in infants was developed. Continuous administration might be favourable for treating infections caused by resistant microorganisms in very young and immature infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Germovsek
- Inflammation, Infection and Rheumatology Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, UK.,Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Leanne Osborne
- Neonatal Unit, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, UK
| | - Flora Gunaratnam
- Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, UK
| | - Shehrazed A Lounis
- Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, UK
| | - Ferran Bossacoma Busquets
- Inflammation, Infection and Rheumatology Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, UK.,Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Passeig Hospital Sant Joan de Deu 2, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Inflammation, Infection and Rheumatology Section, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London, UK
| | - Ajay K Sinha
- Neonatal Unit, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel Road, Whitechapel, London, UK.,Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, 4 Newark Street, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|