Aortic area/height ratio, peak wall stresses, and outcomes in veterans with tricuspid versus bicuspid aortic valve-associated ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

In ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm risk stratification, aortic area/height ratio is a reasonable alternative to maximum diameter. Biomechanically, aortic dissection may be initiated by wall stress exceeding wall strength. Our objective was to evaluate the association between aortic area/height and peak aneurysm wall stresses in relation to valve morphology and 3-year all-cause mortality.

METHODS

Finite element analysis was performed on 270 ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (46 associated with bicuspid and 224 with tricuspid aortic valves) in veterans. Three-dimensional aneurysm geometries were reconstructed from computed tomography and models developed accounting for prestress geometries. Fiber-embedded hyperelastic material model was applied to obtain aneurysm wall stresses during systole. Correlations of aortic area/height ratio and peak wall stresses were compared across valve types. Area/height ratio was evaluated across peak wall stress thresholds obtained from proportional hazards models of 3-year all-cause mortality, with aortic repair treated as a competing risk.

RESULTS

Aortic area/height 10 cm2/m or greater coincided with 23/34 (68%) 5.0 to 5.4 cm and 20/24 (83%) 5.5 cm or greater aneurysms. Area/height correlated weakly with peak aneurysm stresses: for tricuspid valves, r = 0.22 circumferentially and r = 0.24 longitudinally; and for bicuspid valves, r = 0.42 circumferentially and r = 0.14 longitudinally. Age and peak longitudinal stress, but not area/height, were independent predictors of all-cause mortality (age: hazard ratio, 2.20 per 9-year increase, P = .013; peak longitudinal stress: hazard ratio, 1.78 per 73-kPa increase, P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

Area/height was more predictive of high circumferential stresses in bicuspid than tricuspid valve aneurysms, but similarly less predictive of high longitudinal stresses in both valve types. Peak longitudinal stress, not area/height, independently predicted all-cause mortality. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Elongation Occurs in Parallel with Dilatation in a Nonsurgical Population

OBJECTIVES

Rapid diameter growth is a criterion for ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm repair; however, there is sparse data on aneurysm elongation rate. The purpose of this study was to assess aortic elongation rates in nonsyndromic, nonsurgical aneurysms to understand length dynamics and correlate with aortic diameter over time.

METHODS

Patients with <5.5 cm aneurysms and computed tomography angiography imaging at baseline and 3-5 years follow-up underwent patient-specific three-dimensional aneurysm reconstruction using MeVisLab. Aortic length was measured along the vessel centerline between the annulus and aortic arch. Maximum aneurysm diameter was determined from imaging in a plane normal to the vessel centerline. Average rates of aneurysm growth were evaluated using longest available follow-up.

RESULTS

Over the follow-up period, mean aortic length for 67 identified patients increased from 118.2(95% confidence interval: 115.4-121.1)mm to 120.2(117.3- 123.0)mm (p = 0.02) and 15 patients(22%) experienced a change in length of ≥ 5% from baseline. Mean annual growth rate for length (0.38[95% confidence interval : 0.11-0.65]mm/year) was correlated with annual growth rate for diameter (0.1[0.03-0.2]mm/year) (rho = 0.30, p = 0.01). Additionally, annual percentage change in length (0.3[0.1-0.5]%/year) was similar to percentage change in diameter (0.2[0.007-0.4]%/year, p = 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic length increases in parallel with aortic diameter at a similar percentage rate. Further work is needed to identify whether elongation rate is associated with dissection risk. Such studies may provide insight into why patients with aortic diameters smaller than surgical guidelines continue to experience dissection events.

A spotlight on avoidance coping to manage fear of recurrence among breast cancer survivors in an eHealth intervention

Background

Fear of recurrence (FoR) is prevalent among breast cancer survivors (BCS) and may be exacerbated by avoidance coping. This study examined BCS with avoidance coping and their engagement in a FoR eHealth intervention (FoRtitude).

Methods

BCS (N = 196) with elevated FoR participated in FoRtitude. Patient-reported measures assessed avoidance coping with FoR and baseline emotional and behavioral health. Intervention engagement was measured quantitatively (e.g., website logins, telecoaching attendance) and qualitatively (i.e., telecoaching notes).

Results

38 BCS (19%) endorsed avoidance coping, which was associated with more severe post-traumatic anxiety-related symptoms and worse global mental health (ps < .05), but not anxiety (p = .19), depression (p = .11), physical health (p = .12), alcohol consumption (p = .85), or physical activity (p = .39). Avoidance coping was not associated with engagement levels (ps > .05) but did characterize engagement-related motivators and barriers.

Conclusions

Avoidance coping was not a barrier to FoRtitude engagement. eHealth delivery is a promising modality for engaging survivors with avoidance coping in FoR interventions.

Association of 3-Year All-Cause Mortality and Peak Wall Stresses of Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms in Veterans

Risk of aortic dissection in ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms is not sufficiently captured by size-based metrics. From a biomechanical perspective, dissection may be initiated when wall stress exceeds wall strength. Our objective was to assess the association between aneurysm peak wall stresses and 3-year all-cause mortality. Finite element analysis was performed in 273 veterans with chest computed tomography for surveillance of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Three-dimensional geometries were reconstructed and models developed accounting for prestress geometries. A fiber-embedded hyperelastic material model was applied to obtain circumferential and longitudinal wall stresses under systolic pressure. Patients were followed up to 3 years following the scan to assess aneurysm repair and all-cause mortality. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards were estimated for all-cause mortality based on age, aortic diameter, and peak wall stresses, treating aneurysm repair as a competing risk. When accounting for age, subdistribution hazard of mortality was not significantly increased by peak circumferential stresses (p = 0.30) but was significantly increased by peak longitudinal stresses (p = 0.008). Aortic diameter did not significantly increase subdistribution hazard of mortality in either model (circumferential model: p = 0.38; longitudinal model: p = 0.30). The effect of peak longitudinal stresses on subdistribution hazard of mortality was maximized at a binary threshold of 355kPa, which captured 34 of 212(16%) patients with diameter <5 cm, 11 of 36(31%) at 5.0-5.4 cm, and 11 of 25(44%) at ≥5.5 cm. Aneurysm peak longitudinal stresses stratified by age and diameter were associated with increased hazard of 3-year all-cause mortality in a veteran cohort. Risk prediction may be enhanced by considering peak longitudinal stresses.

Pharmacologic profiling reveals lapatinib as a novel antiviral against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 virus has resulted in a worldwide pandemic, but effective antiviral therapies are not widely available. To improve treatment options, we conducted a high-throughput screen to uncover compounds that block SARS-CoV-2 infection. A minimally pathogenic human betacoronavirus (OC43) was used to infect physiologically-relevant human pulmonary fibroblasts (MRC5) to facilitate rapid antiviral discovery in a preclinical model. Comprehensive profiling was conducted on more than 600 compounds, with each compound arrayed across 10 dose points. Our screening revealed several FDA-approved agents that can attenuate both OC43 and SARS-CoV-2 viral replication, including lapatinib, doramapimod, and 17-AAG. Importantly, lapatinib inhibited SARS-CoV-2 RNA replication by over 50,000-fold. Further, both lapatinib and doramapimod could be combined with remdesivir to improve antiviral activity in cells. These findings reveal novel therapeutic avenues that could limit SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm growth is minimal at sizes that do not meet criteria for surgical repair

BACKGROUND

Historic studies of nonsyndromic ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (aTAAs) reported that the typical aTAA growth rate was approximately 0.6 mm/year, but data were limited due to relatively few studies using computed tomography (CT) imaging. Our purpose was to reevaluate the annual growth rate of nonsyndromic aTAAs that do not meet criteria for surgical repair in veterans in the contemporary era, using modern CT imaging suitable for highly accurate and reproducible aneurysm measurement.

METHODS

Nonsurgical patients (diameter <5.5 cm) undergoing aneurysm surveillance at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center with repeat CT imaging performed 3 to 5 years apart were identified. Maximum diameter was determined by a single radiologist using multiplanar reformat-based measurements. Average rate of aneurysm growth was evaluated based on longest available follow-up.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were included. Average follow-up time was 4.06±0.83 years. Patients were exclusively male, with average age of 68.1±6.0 years, and the majority had a history of smoking (n=52, 78%), hypertension (n=52, 78%), and dyslipidemia (n=48, 72%). Average baseline aneurysm diameter was 44.0±3.2 mm and average growth rate was 0.11±0.31 mm/year, with no difference in growth rate between patients with initial diameter ≤45 vs. >45 mm. Only 3 patients experienced clinically significant changes in diameter with magnitude greater than 5% of baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

In this veteran population, most patients did not experience significant annual aneurysm growth over up to 5 years of follow-up, regardless of initial diameter. Thus, in the modern era, aTAAs may not grow as quickly as previously described, which will be important in determining appropriate intervals for aneurysm surveillance based upon risk-benefit ratio.

A Phase Ib Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Inhaled DV281, a TLR9 Agonist, in Combination with Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Although PD-(L)1 inhibitors have shown efficacy in advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), many patients do not respond to this treatment and more effective combinations with acceptable toxicities are needed. To assess the potential benefit of combining localized innate immune stimulation with checkpoint blockade, the TLR9 agonist DV281 was combined with nivolumab in a phase Ib study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients after one or two prior lines of systemic therapy were enrolled in a dose-escalation study with a 3+3 design. DV281 was administered via inhalation in five dose cohorts at 1 to 25 mg; nivolumab 240 mg was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. Safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and response to treatment were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients with advanced NSCLC enrolled. Baseline programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression was present in 16 patients (61.5%); 21 (80.7%) had received previous anti-PD-1/PD-L1. Thirteen patients (50%) had stable disease, nine (34.6%) had progressive disease, and four (15.4%) were not evaluable. Median duration of disease control was 124 days. Adverse events were seen in 16 patients (61.5%), mostly grade 1/2 chills, fatigue, flu-like symptoms, diarrhea, and rash; there was only one grade 3 adverse event (dyspnea). Pharmacodynamic assessment, measured by IFN- inducible gene expression, showed target engagement in all dose cohorts. Systemic pharmacodynamic responses plateaued in the 2 highest dose cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

DV281 with nivolumab was well tolerated with target engagement observed at every dose. Pharmacodynamic advantages at doses above 10 mg were unclear. The long duration of disease control in 50% of patients suggests clinically relevant activity in this population of heavily pretreated patients.

Targeted eHealth Intervention to Reduce Breast Cancer Survivors' Fear of Recurrence: Results from the FoRtitude Randomized Trial

Background

Fear of recurrence (FoR) is a prevalent concern among breast cancer survivors (BCS), yet few accessible interventions exist. This study evaluated a targeted eHealth intervention, “FoRtitude,” to reduce FoR using cognitive behavioral skills training and telecoaching.

Methods

BCS (N  = 196) were recruited from an academic medical center and 3 National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program community sites, had stage 0-III breast cancer, were 1-10 years postprimary treatment, with moderate to high FoR and familiarity with the internet. Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy, participants were independently randomly assigned to 3 cognitive behavioral skills (relaxation, cognitive restructuring, worry practice) vs an attention control condition (health management content [HMC]) and to telecoaching (motivational interviewing) vs no telecoaching. Website content was released across 4 weeks and included didactic lessons, interactive tools, and a text-messaging feature. BCS completed the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory at baseline and at 4 and 8 weeks. Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory scores over time were compared using mixed-effects models. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

Results

FCRI scores [SD] decreased statistically significantly from baseline to postintervention (T0 = 53.1 [17.4], T2 = 41.9 [16.2], P < .001). The magnitude of reduction in FCRI scores was comparable across cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) and attention control HMC conditions and was predicted by increased self-efficacy. Telecoaching was associated with lower attrition and greater website use (mean adherence score [SD] = 26.6 [7.2] vs 21.0 [10.5], P < .001).

Conclusions

BCS experienced statistically significant reductions in FoR postintervention, but improvements were comparable between CBT and attention controls. Telecoaching improved adherence and retention. Future research is needed on optimal integration of CBT and HMC, dose, and features of eHealth delivery that contributed to reducing FoR. In the COVID-19 era, remote delivery has become even more essential for reaching survivors struggling with FoR.

Growth of common iliac artery aneurysms coexisting with abdominal aortic aneurysms: associated factors and potential role of intraluminal thrombus

BACKGROUND

The factors influencing common iliac artery aneurysm (CIA) growth are not fully known. Intraluminal thrombus (ILT) has been studied as a marker of growth in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), but its role in CIAs is unknown. This study aims to examine the factors associated with growth of CIAs coexistent with AAA using serial cross-sectional imaging (CT and MRI) with multiplanar reconstruction (MPR).

METHODS

Patients with synchronous AAA and CIA observed at contrast-enhanced CT or MRI were included. The maximal diameters of both CIA and AAA were measured using MPR. Correlation of the baseline aneurysm diameter and growth rate between CIA and AAA was evaluated. Multivariate regression analysis was used to investigate the factors associated with CIA growth.

RESULTS

Seventy-five AAA patients (age 74±9 years; all male) with 100 CIAs were followed for an average of 2.2±1.2 years. CIA and AAA growth were positively correlated (r=0.39, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that CIA baseline diameter, AAA baseline diameter, and smoking were positively related to CIA growth. In 2-3 cm CIAs (n=59), ILT tends to be an independent predictor of AAA growth (P=0.076), and CIAs with ILT grow at more than twice the rate of CIAs without ILT (1.7 vs. 0.8 mm/year, P=0.036), despite similar baseline diameters.

CONCLUSIONS

CIA baseline diameter, coexisting AAA baseline diameter, and smoking are associated with CIA growth. In CIAs measuring 2-3 cm, the presence of ILT is associated with faster growth, and should be taken into account when determining surveillance intervals and timing of intervention for patients being considered for AAA repair.

Concomitant back pain as a predictor of outcome after single level lumbar micro-decompressive surgery - A study of 995 patients

Objective

To determine if preoperative leg pain and low back pain severity affected postoperative outcome.

Method

Prospectively collected Spine-Tango data was analysed for 995 consecutive patients who underwent a primary, single level, lumbar micro-decompression/microdiscectomy at a single tertiary spinal centre.

Result

At 3 months, 72% of patients were satisfied with the outcome of surgery. Pre-operative low back pain was a significant predictor of poor outcome (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Our study has shown that patients with a low back pain VAS of 6 or more have a significantly greater chance of a poor outcome following primary lumbar microdecompressive/microdiscectomy surgery.

Abstract CT224: Phase Ib/II, open label, multicenter study of inhaled DV281, a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist, in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Background and Objectives: DV281 is a synthetic CpG-ODN agonist of TLR9 that stimulates dendritic cells to release IFN-alpha and mature into antigen presenting cells to activate T cell anti-tumor responses. Nivolumab is a PD-1 inhibitor that has demonstrated activity in advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Study DV9- NSC-01 (NCT03326752) is a phase 1b/2 study to assess safety and pharmacodynamic activity of DV281 in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC and to determine the recommended dose for expansion.

Methods: Anti-PD-1/L1 experienced or naïve patients were enrolled in 2L or 3L NSCLC in the escalation phase, 3+3 design: 5 dose cohorts, with intra-patient dose escalation between the first 2 monotherapy doses: cohort 1: 1 mg; cohort 2: 1 to 3 mg; cohort 3: 3 to 10 mg; cohort 4: 10 to 15 mg; cohort 5: 15 to 25 mg. Nivolumab was administered at 240 mg Q2w. Safety was primary objective and pharmacodynamic effects including IFN-inducible gene expression were key secondary objective. DV281 is administered via inhalation, first alone, weekly for 2 doses, then 6 doses weekly with nivolumab, followed by a 5 week off period of DV281, while continuing nivolumab, then DV281 with intravenous nivolumab Q2w for an additional 24 weeks.

Preliminary Results from the Escalation phase: 22 patients have been enrolled to date: Cohort (C) 1: 4 patients; C 2: 3 pts; C3: 7 pts; C 4: 7 pts; C 5: 1pt, ongoing. Median age 67 y/o; male 50%; all ECOG PS0-1 (27.3/72.7%); non squamous 15 (68%), squamous 7 (32%); locally advanced 4 (18%), metastatic 18 (82%); PD-L1 expression: positive 12 pts (52%), negative 10 pts (48%); prior lines of therapy - 1 line: 10 pts (45.5%), 2 lines:12 (54.5%). Previous treatment with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: 18 pts (9 as single agent, 9 in combination). Median treatment duration 11.5 weeks (1 to 38). Eighteen patients discontinued DV281: adverse event 2, PD 14, other 2. Safety profile of DV281 alone and combined with nivolumab with a median number of 5 doses (1.0 to 18.0): grade 1/ 2 chills (18%), fatigue (13.6%), flu-like symptoms (4.5%), diarrhea (13.6%) and rash (13.6%); no grade ≥3 DV281/nivolumab treatment related AE; no immune-related AEs. Pharmacodynamic (PD) assessment (IFN-induced genes) shows target engagement in all dose cohorts, with every patient showing evidence of target engagement in cohorts 3 and 4. A dose dependent increase in PD activity appears to begin to plateau at the 15 mg dose.

Conclusions: In this population of heavily pretreated patients, DV281 in monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab was well tolerated. Target engagement was observed at all dose levels. The expansion phase will use a modified dosing schedule, evaluating several groups of patients: non squamous resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 or to EGFR inhibitors; squamous experienced or naïve to anti PD-1/PD-L1.

Citation Format: Edward Garon, Alexander I. Spira, Melissa Johnson, Lyudmila Bazhenova, Joseph Leach, Albert Candia, Robert Coffman, Mary Janatpour, Erick Gamelin, Robert Janssen, Laura Q. Chow. Phase Ib/II, open label, multicenter study of inhaled DV281, a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist, in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT224.

On the relative impact of intraluminal thrombus heterogeneity on abdominal aortic aneurysm mechanics

Intraluminal thrombus (ILT) is present in the majority of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) of a size warranting consideration for surgical or endovascular intervention. The rupture risk of AAAs is thought to be related to the balance of vessel wall strength and the mechanical stress caused by systemic blood pressure. Previous finite element analyses of AAAs have shown that ILT can reduce and homogenize aneurysm wall stress. These works have largely considered ILT to be homogeneous in mechanical character or have idealized a stiffness distribution through the thrombus thickness. In this work, we use MRI to delineate the heterogeneous composition of ILT in 7 AAAs and perform patient-specific finite element analysis under multiple conditions of ILT layer stiffness disparity. We find that explicit incorporation of ILT heterogeneity in the finite element analysis is unlikely to substantially alter major stress analysis predictions regarding aneurysm rupture risk in comparison to models assuming a homogenous thrombus, provided that the maximal ILT stiffness is the same between models. Our results also show that under a homogeneous ILT assumption, the choice of ILT stiffness from values common in the literature can result in significantly larger variations in stress predictions compared to the effects of thrombus heterogeneity.

MR Venous Flow in Sigmoid Sinus Diverticulum

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Case reports demonstrate that coiling of a sigmoid sinus diverticulum can treat pulsatile tinnitus. We hypothesized that MR imaging 4D flow and computational fluid dynamics would reveal distinct blood flow patterns in the venous outflow tract in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with pulsatile tinnitus of suspected venous etiology underwent MR imaging at 3T, using venous phase contrast-enhanced MR angiography, 4D flow, and 2D phase contrast. The contrast-enhanced MRA contours were evaluated to determine the presence and extent of a sigmoid sinus diverticulum. Computational fluid dynamics analysis was performed using the 4D flow inlet flow and the luminal contours from contrast-enhanced MRA as boundary conditions. In addition, computational fluid dynamics was performed for the expected post treatment conditions by smoothing the venous geometry to exclude the sigmoid sinus diverticulum from the anatomic boundary conditions. Streamlines were generated from the 4D flow and computational fluid dynamics velocity maps, and flow patterns were examined for the presence of rotational components.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with pulsatile tinnitus of suspected venous etiology and 10 control subjects were enrolled. Five (20%) of the symptomatic subjects had sigmoid sinus diverticula, all associated with an upstream stenosis. In each of these patients, but none of the controls, a stenosis-related flow jet was directed toward the opening of the sigmoid sinus diverticulum with rotational flow patterns in the sigmoid sinus diverticulum and parent sigmoid sinus on both 4D flow and computational fluid dynamics.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent patterns of blood flow can be visualized in a sigmoid sinus diverticulum and the parent sinus using 4D flow and computational fluid dynamics. Strong components of rotational blood flow were seen in subjects with sigmoid sinus diverticula that were absent in controls.

Chronic Sinusitis as a Manifestation of Primary Immunodeficiency in Adults

Twenty-three adult patients evaluated at a university medical center for severe refractory sinusitis were found to have a primary immunodeficiency on the basis of total immunoglobulin, IgG subclass, and vaccine response determinations. The most common finding was IgG3 deficiency with antibody hyporesponsiveness to pneumococcal vaccine. Treatment options included prophylactic antibiotics and aggressive management of associated allergies with intravenous immunoglobulin reserved for severely affected patients who failed more conservative therapy.

Quantitative Synthetic MRI in Children: Normative Intracranial Tissue Segmentation Values during Development

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Synthetic MR imaging is a new technique to create absolute R1 relaxivity (1/T1), R2 relaxivity (1/T2), and proton-density maps using a single multiple-spin-echo saturation recovery sequence. These relaxivity maps allow rapid automated intracranial segmentation of tissue types. To assess its utility in children, we created a normative data base of intracranial volume and brain parenchymal, GM, WM, CSF, and myelin volumes in a pediatric population with normal brain MRI findings using synthetic MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All multiple-spin-echo saturation recovery sequences containing brain MR imaging examinations performed during 34 months were retrospectively reviewed. Abnormal examination findings were excluded following a detailed radiographic and clinical chart review. The remaining normal examination findings were then quantitatively analyzed with synthetic MR imaging. Intracranial, brain parenchymal, GM, WM, CSF, and myelin volumes were plotted versus age. Qualitative assessment of segmentation accuracy was performed. Selected abnormal examination findings were compared with these normative curves.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two MRI examinations with normal findings were included of individuals ranging from 0.1 to 21.5 years of age (median, 11.8 years). Resulting normative data plots compared favorably with previously published data obtained using more onerous techniques. Differentiation from pathologic states was possible using quantitative values in select cases.

CONCLUSIONS

A pediatric data base of normal intracranial tissue volumes using a single sequence and rapid software analysis has been compiled and correlates with previously published data. This provides a framework for clinical interpretation of quantitative synthetic MR images during development. Improved age-based segmentation algorithms in young children are needed.

A phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo- controlled study of chemo-immunotherapy combination using motolimod with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group partners study

BACKGROUND

A phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in women with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma to evaluate the efficacy and safety of motolimod-a Toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8) agonist that stimulates robust innate immune responses-combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), a chemotherapeutic that induces immunogenic cell death.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma were randomized 1 : 1 to receive PLD in combination with blinded motolimod or placebo. Randomization was stratified by platinum-free interval (≤6 versus >6-12 months) and Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) performance status (0 versus 1). Treatment cycles were repeated every 28 days until disease progression.

RESULTS

The addition of motolimod to PLD did not significantly improve overall survival (OS; log rank one-sided P = 0.923, HR = 1.22) or progression-free survival (PFS; log rank one-sided P = 0.943, HR = 1.21). The combination was well tolerated, with no synergistic or unexpected serious toxicity. Most patients experienced adverse events of fatigue, anemia, nausea, decreased white blood cells, and constipation. In pre-specified subgroup analyses, motolimod-treated patients who experienced injection site reactions (ISR) had a lower risk of death compared with those who did not experience ISR. Additionally, pre-treatment in vitro responses of immune biomarkers to TLR8 stimulation predicted OS outcomes in patients receiving motolimod on study. Immune score (tumor infiltrating lymphocytes; TIL), TLR8 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, mutational status in BRCA and other DNA repair genes, and autoantibody biomarkers did not correlate with OS or PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of motolimod to PLD did not improve clinical outcomes compared with placebo. However, subset analyses identified statistically significant differences in the OS of motolimod-treated patients on the basis of ISR and in vitro immune responses. Collectively, these data may provide important clues for identifying patients for treatment with immunomodulatory agents in novel combinations and/or delivery approaches.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT 01666444.

Avelumab for patients with previously treated metastatic or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (JAVELIN Solid Tumor): dose-expansion cohort of a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial

BACKGROUND

Avelumab, a human Ig-G1 monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1 and approved in the USA for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma, has shown antitumour activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumours in a dose-escalation phase 1a trial. In this dose-expansion cohort of that trial, we assess avelumab treatment in a cohort of patients with advanced, platinum-treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

In this dose-expansion cohort of a multicentre, open-label, phase 1 study, patients with progressive or platinum-resistant metastatic or recurrent NSCLC were enrolled at 58 cancer treatment centres and academic hospitals in the USA. Eligible patients had confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with squamous or non-squamous histology, measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), tumour biopsy or archival sample for biomarker assessment, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, among other criteria. Patient selection was not based on PD-L1 expression or expression of other biomarkers, including EGFR or KRAS mutation or ALK translocation status. Patients received infusional avelumab monotherapy 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression or toxicity. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01772004; enrolment in this cohort is closed and the trial is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 10, 2013, and June 24, 2014, 184 patients were enrolled and initiated treatment with avelumab. Median follow-up duration was 8·8 months (IQR 7·2-11·9). The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were fatigue (46 [25%] of 184 patients), infusion-related reaction (38 [21%]), and nausea (23 [13%]). Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events occurred in 23 (13%) of 184 patients; the most common (occurring in more than two patients) were infusion-related reaction (four [2%] patients) and increased lipase level (three [2%]). 16 (9%) of 184 patients had a serious adverse event related to treatment with avelumab, with infusion-related reaction (in four [2%] patients) and dyspnoea (in two [1%]) occurring in more than one patient. Serious adverse events irrespective of cause occurred in 80 (44%) of 184 patients. Those occurring in more than five patients (≥3%) were dyspnoea (ten patients [5%]), pneumonia (nine [5%]), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (six [3%]). Immune-related treatment-related events occurred in 22 patients (12%). Of 184 patients, 22 (12% [95% CI 8-18]) achieved a confirmed objective response, including one complete response and 21 partial responses. 70 (38%) had stable disease. Overall, 92 (50%) of 184 patients achieved disease control (they had a confirmed response or stable disease as their best overall response). One patient was initially thought to have died from grade 5 radiation pneumonitis during the study; however, this adverse event was subsequently regraded to grade 3 and the death was attributed to disease progression.

INTERPRETATION

Avelumab showed an acceptable safety profile and antitumour activity in patients with progressive or treatment-resistant NSCLC, providing a rationale for further studies of avelumab in this disease setting.

FUNDING

Merck KGaA and Pfizer.

A phase Ib/II study of cabozantinib (XL184) with or without erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Cabozantinib is a multi-kinase inhibitor that targets MET, AXL, and VEGFR2, and may synergize with EGFR inhibition in NSCLC. Cabozantinib was assessed alone or in combination with erlotinib in patients with progressive NSCLC and EGFR mutations who had previously received erlotinib.

METHODS

This was a phase Ib/II study (NCT00596648). The primary objectives of phase I were to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics and to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cabozantinib plus erlotinib in patients who failed prior erlotinib treatment. In phase II, patients with prior response or stable disease with erlotinib who progressed were randomized to single-agent cabozantinib 100 mg qd vs cabozantinib 100 mg qd and erlotinib 50 mg qd (phase I MTD), with a primary objective of estimating objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were treated in phase I. Doses of 100 mg cabozantinib plus 50 mg erlotinib, or 40 mg cabozantinib plus 150 mg erlotinib were determined to be MTDs. Diarrhea was the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity and the most frequent AE (87.5% of patients). The ORR for phase I was 8.2% (90% CI 3.3-16.5). In phase II, one patient in the cabozantinib arm (N = 15) experienced a partial response, for an ORR of 6.7% (90% CI 0.3-27.9), with no responses for cabozantinib plus erlotinib (N = 13). There was no evidence that co-administration of cabozantinib markedly altered erlotinib pharmacokinetics or vice versa.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite responses with cabozantinib/erlotinib in phase I, there were no responses in the combination arm of phase II in patients with acquired resistance to erlotinib. Cabozantinib did not appear to re-sensitize these patients to erlotinib.

Avelumab for patients with previously treated metastatic or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (JAVELIN Solid Tumor): dose-expansion cohort of a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial

BACKGROUND

Avelumab, a human Ig-G1 monoclonal antibody targeting PD-L1 and approved in the USA for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma, has shown antitumour activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced solid tumours in a dose-escalation phase 1a trial. In this dose-expansion cohort of that trial, we assess avelumab treatment in a cohort of patients with advanced, platinum-treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

In this dose-expansion cohort of a multicentre, open-label, phase 1 study, patients with progressive or platinum-resistant metastatic or recurrent NSCLC were enrolled at 58 cancer treatment centres and academic hospitals in the USA. Eligible patients had confirmed stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with squamous or non-squamous histology, measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), tumour biopsy or archival sample for biomarker assessment, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, among other criteria. Patient selection was not based on PD-L1 expression or expression of other biomarkers, including EGFR or KRAS mutation or ALK translocation status. Patients received infusional avelumab monotherapy 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until disease progression or toxicity. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01772004; enrolment in this cohort is closed and the trial is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 10, 2013, and June 24, 2014, 184 patients were enrolled and initiated treatment with avelumab. Median follow-up duration was 8·8 months (IQR 7·2-11·9). The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were fatigue (46 [25%] of 184 patients), infusion-related reaction (38 [21%]), and nausea (23 [13%]). Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events occurred in 23 (13%) of 184 patients; the most common (occurring in more than two patients) were infusion-related reaction (four [2%] patients) and increased lipase level (three [2%]). 16 (9%) of 184 patients had a serious adverse event related to treatment with avelumab, with infusion-related reaction (in four [2%] patients) and dyspnoea (in two [1%]) occurring in more than one patient. Serious adverse events irrespective of cause occurred in 80 (44%) of 184 patients. Those occurring in more than five patients (≥3%) were dyspnoea (ten patients [5%]), pneumonia (nine [5%]), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (six [3%]). Immune-related treatment-related events occurred in 22 patients (12%). Of 184 patients, 22 (12% [95% CI 8-18]) achieved a confirmed objective response, including one complete response and 21 partial responses. 70 (38%) had stable disease. Overall, 92 (50%) of 184 patients achieved disease control (they had a confirmed response or stable disease as their best overall response). One patient was initially thought to have died from grade 5 radiation pneumonitis during the study; however, this adverse event was subsequently regraded to grade 3 and the death was attributed to disease progression.

INTERPRETATION

Avelumab showed an acceptable safety profile and antitumour activity in patients with progressive or treatment-resistant NSCLC, providing a rationale for further studies of avelumab in this disease setting.

FUNDING

Merck KGaA and Pfizer.

Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Atezolizumab is a humanised antiprogrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-L1 and programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1 and B7-1 interactions, reinvigorating anticancer immunity. We assessed its efficacy and safety versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (OAK) in 194 academic or community oncology centres in 31 countries. We enrolled patients who had squamous or non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, were 18 years or older, had measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients had received one to two previous cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens (one or more platinum based combination therapies) for stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients with a history of autoimmune disease and those who had received previous treatments with docetaxel, CD137 agonists, anti-CTLA4, or therapies targeting the PD-L1 and PD-1 pathway were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenously receive either atezolizumab 1200 mg or docetaxel 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks by permuted block randomisation (block size of eight) via an interactive voice or web response system. Coprimary endpoints were overall survival in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and PD-L1-expression population TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 (≥1% PD-L1 on tumour cells or tumour-infiltrating immune cells). The primary efficacy analysis was done in the first 850 of 1225 enrolled patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02008227.

FINDINGS

Between March 11, 2014, and April 29, 2015, 1225 patients were recruited. In the primary population, 425 patients were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab and 425 patients were assigned to receive docetaxel. Overall survival was significantly longer with atezolizumab in the ITT and PD-L1-expression populations. In the ITT population, overall survival was improved with atezolizumab compared with docetaxel (median overall survival was 13·8 months [95% CI 11·8-15·7] vs 9·6 months [8·6-11·2]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·73 [95% CI 0·62-0·87], p=0·0003). Overall survival in the TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population was improved with atezolizumab (n=241) compared with docetaxel (n=222; median overall survival was 15·7 months [95% CI 12·6-18·0] with atezolizumab vs 10·3 months [8·8-12·0] with docetaxel; HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·58-0·93]; p=0·0102). Patients in the PD-L1 low or undetectable subgroup (TC0 and IC0) also had improved survival with atezolizumab (median overall survival 12·6 months vs 8·9 months; HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·59-0·96]). Overall survival improvement was similar in patients with squamous (HR 0·73 [95% CI 0·54-0·98]; n=112 in the atezolizumab group and n=110 in the docetaxel group) or non-squamous (0·73 [0·60-0·89]; n=313 and n=315) histology. Fewer patients had treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events with atezolizumab (90 [15%] of 609 patients) versus docetaxel (247 [43%] of 578 patients). One treatment-related death from a respiratory tract infection was reported in the docetaxel group.

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, OAK is the first randomised phase 3 study to report results of a PD-L1-targeted therapy, with atezolizumab treatment resulting in a clinically relevant improvement of overall survival versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer, regardless of PD-L1 expression or histology, with a favourable safety profile.

FUNDING

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech, Inc.

Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Atezolizumab is a humanised antiprogrammed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-L1 and programmed death-1 (PD-1) and PD-L1 and B7-1 interactions, reinvigorating anticancer immunity. We assessed its efficacy and safety versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial (OAK) in 194 academic or community oncology centres in 31 countries. We enrolled patients who had squamous or non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, were 18 years or older, had measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients had received one to two previous cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens (one or more platinum based combination therapies) for stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients with a history of autoimmune disease and those who had received previous treatments with docetaxel, CD137 agonists, anti-CTLA4, or therapies targeting the PD-L1 and PD-1 pathway were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to intravenously receive either atezolizumab 1200 mg or docetaxel 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks by permuted block randomisation (block size of eight) via an interactive voice or web response system. Coprimary endpoints were overall survival in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and PD-L1-expression population TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 (≥1% PD-L1 on tumour cells or tumour-infiltrating immune cells). The primary efficacy analysis was done in the first 850 of 1225 enrolled patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02008227.

FINDINGS

Between March 11, 2014, and April 29, 2015, 1225 patients were recruited. In the primary population, 425 patients were randomly assigned to receive atezolizumab and 425 patients were assigned to receive docetaxel. Overall survival was significantly longer with atezolizumab in the ITT and PD-L1-expression populations. In the ITT population, overall survival was improved with atezolizumab compared with docetaxel (median overall survival was 13·8 months [95% CI 11·8-15·7] vs 9·6 months [8·6-11·2]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·73 [95% CI 0·62-0·87], p=0·0003). Overall survival in the TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 population was improved with atezolizumab (n=241) compared with docetaxel (n=222; median overall survival was 15·7 months [95% CI 12·6-18·0] with atezolizumab vs 10·3 months [8·8-12·0] with docetaxel; HR 0·74 [95% CI 0·58-0·93]; p=0·0102). Patients in the PD-L1 low or undetectable subgroup (TC0 and IC0) also had improved survival with atezolizumab (median overall survival 12·6 months vs 8·9 months; HR 0·75 [95% CI 0·59-0·96]). Overall survival improvement was similar in patients with squamous (HR 0·73 [95% CI 0·54-0·98]; n=112 in the atezolizumab group and n=110 in the docetaxel group) or non-squamous (0·73 [0·60-0·89]; n=313 and n=315) histology. Fewer patients had treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events with atezolizumab (90 [15%] of 609 patients) versus docetaxel (247 [43%] of 578 patients). One treatment-related death from a respiratory tract infection was reported in the docetaxel group.

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, OAK is the first randomised phase 3 study to report results of a PD-L1-targeted therapy, with atezolizumab treatment resulting in a clinically relevant improvement of overall survival versus docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer, regardless of PD-L1 expression or histology, with a favourable safety profile.

FUNDING

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech, Inc.

Abstract CT132: Safety of avelumab (MSB0010718C), an anti-PD-L1 antibody: updated analysis from the phase Ib JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial

Background: The programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) are key therapeutic targets in the reactivation of the immune response against multiple cancers. Avelumab* (MSB0010718C) is a fully human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 antibody currently being investigated in clinical trials. The primary objective of this phase Ib, open-label expansion study (NCT01772004) was to assess the safety and tolerability of avelumab in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic (LA/M) solid tumors.

Methods: Pts from 16 different expansion cohorts (including NSCLC, gastric, ovarian, urothelial, and breast; ECOG performance status [PS] of 0-1 at trial entry) and unselected for PD-L1 expression were treated with avelumab at 10 mg/kg IV, Q2W until confirmed progression, unacceptable toxicity, or any criteria for withdrawal occurred. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4.0.

Results: As of Aug 4, 2015, 900 pts were treated with avelumab and followed for ?4 wks. Median age was 62 years (range, 23-91), ECOG PS was 0 (39.1%), 1 (60.6%), or 2-3 (0.2%), and median number of prior lines of anticancer therapy was 2 (range, 1-13). Median duration of treatment with avelumab and number of administrations were 10.0 wks (range, 2-92) and 5 infusions (range, 1-43), respectively. Treatment-related (TR) AEs of any grade occurred in 585 pts (65.0%). Grade ?3 TRAEs occurred in 91 pts (10.1%). The most frequent (?0.5%) grade ?3 TRAEs were IRRs (n = 8, 0.9%), GGT elevation (n = 7, 0.8%), lipase elevation (n = 7, 0.8%), anemia (n = 7, 0.8%), and fatigue (n = 6, 0.7%). Seventy-five pts (8.3%) experienced potential immune-related (ir) TRAEs, with hypothyroidism (n = 34, 3.8%) and pneumonitis (n = 8, 0.9%) occurring most frequently (?0.5%). Grade ?3 potential irTRAEs were reported for 17 pts (1.9%); the most frequent (?0.3%) were autoimmune hepatitis (n = 4; 0.4%), colitis (n = 3; 0.3%), and pneumonitis (n = 3; 0.3%). TRAEs resulted in permanent treatment discontinuation for 64 pts (7.1%); 2.6% (n = 23) discontinued due to an IRR and 1.3% (n = 12) discontinued due to a potential irTRAE. TRAEs were considered the primary cause of death by the investigator for 4 pts (0.4%): radiation pneumonitis (1), autoimmune hepatitis (1), acute liver failure (1), and respiratory distress (1).

Conclusion: Single-agent avelumab shows an acceptable safety profile in a heavily pretreated population of pts with LA/M malignancies. To date, &gt;1,500 pts have been enrolled in the JAVELIN Solid Tumor clinical trial. Additional safety and efficacy analyses from this study are ongoing, and recruitment to several phase III trials is underway. *Proposed INN.

Citation Format: Karen Kelly, Manish Patel, Jeffrey R. Infante, Nicholas Iannotti, Petros Nikolinakos, Joseph Leach, Ding Wang, Jason Chandler, Guy Jerusalem, Jayne Gurtler, Henrik-Tobias Arkenau, Marcis Bajars, Anja von Heydebreck, Isabell Speit, Christopher R. Heery, James L. Gulley. Safety of avelumab (MSB0010718C), an anti-PD-L1 antibody: updated analysis from the phase Ib JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr CT132.

Management of cerebral cavernous malformations in the pediatric population: a literature review and case illustrations

Cavernous malformations (CM) are vascular malformations of the central nervous system that may occur in the brain and spinal cord. They are one of the four major types of vascular malformations that also includes developmental venous anomalies (DVA)s, arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), and capillary telangiectasias. CMs are a common vascular malformation, and 25% of them occur in the pediatric age group. They can present with acute or chronic symptoms including headache, neurologic deficits secondary to hemorrhage, mass effect, or epilepsy. This review will focus on the neurosurgical management of intracranial cavernous malformations in children. Pediatric CMs have special considerations different from CM that occur in the adult population which are highlighted throughout this review. Characteristics specific to pediatric CM epidemiology, genetics, presentation, pathology, location, size, epilepsy, and management will be discussed. Specific considerations must be entertained with the diagnosis of pediatric CM in that management needs to include consideration of the lifetime risk of hemorrhage, as well as the possibility of development of epilepsy. If in an accessible location, most cavernomas should be surgically removed in a timely fashion to provide lifelong cure for pediatric patients. The review closes with the discussion of two interesting cavernous malformation cases occurring in a 12-year old male and a 12-year old female that exhibit many of the important aspects specific to the management of a pediatric patient with CM, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to treatment.

Diagnostic Exercise: Circling and Behavioral Changes in a Cat

A 4-year old spayed male domestic shorthair cat was presented with a history of circling and behavioral changes. Neurologic examination showed mild proprioceptive deficits. The lesion was localized in the forebrain, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed the presence of a large midline intracranial mass extending from the frontal lobe to the tentorial region of the brain. Euthanasia was elected due to poor prognosis. Histopathologic evaluation confirmed the presence of a mass composed by sheets and aggregates of large round/polygonal cells and multinucleate cells associated with deposits of cholesterol clefts, scattered hemorrhages and hemosiderin-laden macrophages. Immunohistochemistry showed that the round/polygonal cells and multinucleate cells were strongly positive for major histocompatibility complex class II antigen, variably positive for CD18, and occasionally positive for S100. Subsets of spindle cells showing variable expression of vimentin, S100, and neuron-specific enolase were also present. The final diagnosis was cholesterol granuloma. Differential diagnosis with meningioma is discussed.

Comparison of microtia reconstruction outcomes using rib cartilage vs porous polyethylene implant

IMPORTANCE

Auricular reconstruction is a unique blend of cosmesis and functionality. The choice of the optimal framework material to use is an important decision for the patient with microtia.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the outcomes of reconstruction of microtia using porous polyethylene implants and rib cartilage grafts.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective medical record review from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2012, at a tertiary academic institution. Thirty-five patients (36 ears) undergoing microtia repair were divided into groups using high-density porous polyethylene (17 ears), rib cartilage (17 ears), and both materials (2 ears). Only patients with completed repair were included in the analysis.

EXPOSURES

Reconstructive surgery for microtia.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

We compared groups in terms of mean number of operations, age at treatment initiation, and complications (infection, extrusion, cartilage exposure, and pneumothorax). Photographs were graded by blinded observers to give each patient a score on protrusion, definition, shape, size, location, and color match.

RESULTS

The cartilage group was older than the polyethylene group (mean age, 8.0 vs 6.9 years; P = .23). The mean number of operations was 4.88 for the cartilage group vs 3.35 for the polyethylene group (P = .004). Two patients in the polyethylene group had postoperative infections and implant extrusion and underwent subsequent reconstruction with cartilage grafts. Patients in the cartilage group had no infection or extrusion; 1 had a minor cartilage exposure. No patient had pneumothorax. Patients in the polyethylene group had significantly better grades for ear definition and size match, whereas those in the cartilage group had a significantly better color match. Patients in the cartilage group had better protrusion and location outcomes, although the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Comparison of reconstruction with porous polyethylene implants and rib cartilage grafts showed neither material to be clearly superior. Polyethylene implants may achieve a better cosmetic outcome in the categories of ear definition, shape, and size with a higher risk for infection and extrusion. Patients in the cartilage group were older and underwent significantly more surgical procedures, which should factor into the decision on which technique to choose.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Decreased infarct volume and intracranial hemorrhage associated with intra-arterial nonionic iso-osmolar contrast material in an MCA occlusion/reperfusion model

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Infarct volume and intracranial hemorrhage after reperfusion with nonionic low-osmolar and iso-osmolar iodinated IRCM has not been previously compared. We postulated that iso-osmolar and low-osmolar iodinated contrast media exert varied effects on cerebral infarct after intra-arterial injection. We compared infarct volume and hemorrhagic changes following intra-arterial infusion of iodixanol, iopamidol, or normal saline in a rat MCA occlusion/reperfusion model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Infarct was induced in 30 rats by a previously validated method of MCA suture occlusion. Reperfusion was performed after 5 hours with either iodixanol (n = 9), iopamidol (n = 12), or saline (n = 9). MR images were obtained at both 6 and 24 hours after ischemia, followed by sacrifice. Infarct volume was measured with T2WI and DWI by semiautomatic segmentation. Incidence and area of hemorrhage were measured on brain sections postmortem.

RESULTS

T2WI mean infarct volumes were 242 ± 89, 324 ± 70, and 345 ± 92 mm(3) at 6 hours, and 341 ± 147,470 ± 91, and 462 ± 71 mm(3) at 24 hours in the iodixanol, iopamidol, and saline groups, respectively. Differences in infarct volume among groups were significant at 6 hours (P < .03) and 24 hours (P < .05). In the iodixanol, iopamidol, and saline groups, mean areas for cortical intracranial hemorrhage were 0.8, 18.2, and 25.7 mm(2); and 28, 31, and 56.7 mm(2), respectively, for deep intracranial hemorrhage. The differences in intracranial hemorrhage area among groups were statistically significant for cortical intracranial hemorrhage (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-arterial infusion of nonionic iso-osmolar iodixanol showed reduced infarct volume and reduced cortical intracranial hemorrhage areas in comparison with nonionic low-osmolar iopamidol and saline. Our results may be relevant in the setting of intra-arterial therapy for acute stroke in humans, warranting further investigation.