1
|
Ledogar JA, Senck S, Villmoare BA, Smith AL, Weber GW, Richmond BG, Dechow PC, Ross CF, Grosse IR, Wright BW, Wang Q, Byron C, Benazzi S, Carlson KJ, Carlson KB, Pryor McIntosh LC, van Casteren A, Strait DS. Mechanical compensation in the evolution of the early hominin feeding apparatus. Proc Biol Sci 2022; 289:20220711. [PMID: 35703052 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Australopiths, a group of hominins from the Plio-Pleistocene of Africa, are characterized by derived traits in their crania hypothesized to strengthen the facial skeleton against feeding loads and increase the efficiency of bite force production. The crania of robust australopiths are further thought to be stronger and more efficient than those of gracile australopiths. Results of prior mechanical analyses have been broadly consistent with this hypothesis, but here we show that the predictions of the hypothesis with respect to mechanical strength are not met: some gracile australopith crania are as strong as that of a robust australopith, and the strength of gracile australopith crania overlaps substantially with that of chimpanzee crania. We hypothesize that the evolution of cranial traits that increased the efficiency of bite force production in australopiths may have simultaneously weakened the face, leading to the compensatory evolution of additional traits that reinforced the facial skeleton. The evolution of facial form in early hominins can therefore be thought of as an interplay between the need to increase the efficiency of bite force production and the need to maintain the structural integrity of the face.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin A Ledogar
- Department of Health Sciences, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37614, USA
| | - Sascha Senck
- Research Group Computed Tomography, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, 4600 Wels, Austria
| | - Brian A Villmoare
- Department of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA
| | - Amanda L Smith
- Department of Anatomy, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, WA 98901, USA
| | - Gerhard W Weber
- Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.,Human Evolution and Archaeological Sciences (HEAS), University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Paul C Dechow
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Dallas, TX 75246, USA
| | - Callum F Ross
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Ian R Grosse
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
| | - Barth W Wright
- Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66106, USA
| | - Qian Wang
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Dallas, TX 75246, USA
| | - Craig Byron
- Department of Biology, Mercer University, Macon, GA 31207, USA
| | - Stefano Benazzi
- Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Ravenna 48121, Italy
| | - Kristian J Carlson
- Department of Integrative Anatomical Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.,Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa
| | - Keely B Carlson
- Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
| | - Leslie C Pryor McIntosh
- Department of Bio-Medical Sciences, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine South Georgia, Moultrie, GA 31768, USA
| | - Adam van Casteren
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
| | - David S Strait
- Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA.,Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith AL, Nicholas C, Bakhsh N, Patankar S, Ledogar JA, Moreno‐Uribe L. Biomechanical consequences of alveolar cleft defect. FASEB J 2022. [DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.s1.r6240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L. Smith
- AnatomyPacific Northwest University of Health SciencesYakimaWA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cook RW, Vazzana A, Sorrentino R, Benazzi S, Smith AL, Strait DS, Ledogar JA. The cranial biomechanics and feeding performance of Homo floresiensis. Interface Focus 2021; 11:20200083. [PMID: 34938433 PMCID: PMC8361579 DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2020.0083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Homo floresiensis is a small-bodied hominin from Flores, Indonesia, that exhibits plesiomorphic dentognathic features, including large premolars and a robust mandible, aspects of which have been considered australopith-like. However, relative to australopith species, H. floresiensis exhibits reduced molar size and a cranium with diminutive midfacial dimensions similar to those of later Homo, suggesting a reduction in the frequency of forceful biting behaviours. Our study uses finite-element analysis to examine the feeding biomechanics of the H. floresiensis cranium. We simulate premolar (P3) and molar (M2) biting in a finite-element model (FEM) of the H. floresiensis holotype cranium (LB1) and compare the mechanical results with FEMs of chimpanzees, modern humans and a sample of australopiths (MH1, Sts 5, OH5). With few exceptions, strain magnitudes in LB1 resemble elevated levels observed in modern Homo. Our analysis of LB1 suggests that H. floresiensis could produce bite forces with high mechanical efficiency, but was subject to tensile jaw joint reaction forces during molar biting, which perhaps constrained maximum postcanine bite force production. The inferred feeding biomechanics of H. floresiensis closely resemble modern humans, suggesting that this pattern may have been present in the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens and H. floresiensis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca W Cook
- Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Antonino Vazzana
- Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rita Sorrentino
- Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Biological, Geological, and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Benazzi
- Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Amanda L Smith
- Department of Anatomy, Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, Yakima, WA, USA
| | - David S Strait
- Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Justin A Ledogar
- Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martin JM, Leece AB, Neubauer S, Baker SE, Mongle CS, Boschian G, Schwartz GT, Smith AL, Ledogar JA, Strait DS, Herries AIR. Drimolen cranium DNH 155 documents microevolution in an early hominin species. Nat Ecol Evol 2020; 5:38-45. [PMID: 33168991 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-01319-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Paranthropus robustus is a small-brained extinct hominin from South Africa characterized by derived, robust craniodental morphology. The most complete known skull of this species is DNH 7 from Drimolen Main Quarry, which differs from P. robustus specimens recovered elsewhere in ways attributed to sexual dimorphism. Here, we describe a new fossil specimen from Drimolen Main Quarry, dated from approximately 2.04-1.95 million years ago, that challenges this view. DNH 155 is a well-preserved adult male cranium that shares with DNH 7 a suite of primitive and derived features unlike those seen in adult P. robustus specimens from other chronologically younger deposits. This refutes existing hypotheses linking sexual dimorphism, ontogeny and social behaviour within this taxon, and clarifies hypotheses concerning hominin phylogeny. We document small-scale morphological changes in P. robustus associated with ecological change within a short time frame and restricted geography. This represents the most highly resolved evidence yet of microevolutionary change within an early hominin species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse M Martin
- Palaeoscience, Department of Archaeology and History, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - A B Leece
- Palaeoscience, Department of Archaeology and History, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simon Neubauer
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Human Evolution, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Baker
- Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Carrie S Mongle
- Division of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA.,Turkana Basin Institute, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Giovanni Boschian
- Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa.,Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Gary T Schwartz
- Institute of Human Origins, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Amanda L Smith
- Department of Organismal Biology & Anatomy, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Justin A Ledogar
- Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David S Strait
- Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa. .,Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Andy I R Herries
- Palaeoscience, Department of Archaeology and History, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.,Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sansalone G, Allen K, Ledogar JA, Ledogar S, Mitchell DR, Profico A, Castiglione S, Melchionna M, Serio C, Mondanaro A, Raia P, Wroe S. Variation in the strength of allometry drives rates of evolution in primate brain shape. Proc Biol Sci 2020; 287:20200807. [PMID: 32635870 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Large brains are a defining feature of primates, as is a clear allometric trend between body mass and brain size. However, important questions on the macroevolution of brain shape in primates remain unanswered. Here we address two: (i), does the relationship between the brain size and its shape follow allometric trends and (ii), is this relationship consistent over evolutionary time? We employ three-dimensional geometric morphometrics and phylogenetic comparative methods to answer these questions, based on a large sample representing 151 species and most primate families. We found two distinct trends regarding the relationship between brain shape and brain size. Hominoidea and Cercopithecinae showed significant evolutionary allometry, whereas no allometric trends were discernible for Strepsirrhini, Colobinae or Platyrrhini. Furthermore, we found that in the taxa characterized by significant allometry, brain shape evolution accelerated, whereas for taxa in which such allometry was absent, the evolution of brain shape decelerated. We conclude that although primates in general are typically described as large-brained, strong allometric effects on brain shape are largely confined to the order's representatives that display more complex behavioural repertoires.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Sansalone
- Function, Evolution and Anatomy Research Lab, Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, NSW 2351, Armidale, Australia
| | - K Allen
- Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St Louis, Washington, MO, USA
| | - J A Ledogar
- Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - S Ledogar
- Function, Evolution and Anatomy Research Lab, Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, NSW 2351, Armidale, Australia.,Department of Archaeology and Palaeoanthropology, School of Humanities, University of New England, NSW 2351, Armidale, Australia
| | - D R Mitchell
- Function, Evolution and Anatomy Research Lab, Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, NSW 2351, Armidale, Australia.,Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, Old Main 330, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA
| | - A Profico
- Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - S Castiglione
- Department of Earth Sciences, Environment and Resources, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, L.go San Marcellino 10, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - M Melchionna
- Department of Earth Sciences, Environment and Resources, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, L.go San Marcellino 10, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - C Serio
- Department of Earth Sciences, Environment and Resources, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, L.go San Marcellino 10, 80138, Naples, Italy.,Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Mondanaro
- Department of Earth Sciences, Environment and Resources, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, L.go San Marcellino 10, 80138, Naples, Italy.,Department of Earth Sciences, University of Florence, Italy
| | - P Raia
- Department of Earth Sciences, Environment and Resources, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, L.go San Marcellino 10, 80138, Naples, Italy
| | - S Wroe
- Function, Evolution and Anatomy Research Lab, Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, NSW 2351, Armidale, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Neaux D, Wroe S, Ledogar JA, Heins Ledogar S, Sansalone G. Morphological integration affects the evolution of midline cranial base, lateral basicranium, and face across primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 2019; 170:37-47. [PMID: 31290149 DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.23899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The basicranium and face are two integrated bony structures displaying great morphological diversity across primates. Previous studies in hominids determined that the basicranium is composed of two independent modules: the midline basicranium, mostly influenced by brain size, and the lateral basicranium, predominantly associated with facial shape. To better assess how morphological integration impacts the evolution of primate cranial shape diversity, we test to determine whether the relationships found in hominids are retained across the order. MATERIALS AND METHODS Three-dimensional landmarks (29) were placed on 143 computed tomography scans of six major clades of extant primate crania. We assessed the covariation between midline basicranium, lateral basicranium, face, and endocranial volume using phylogenetically informed partial least squares analyses and phylogenetic generalized least squares models. RESULTS We found significant integration between lateral basicranium and face and between midline basicranium and face. We also described a significant correlation between midline basicranium and endocranial volume but not between lateral basicranium and endocranial volume. DISCUSSION Our findings demonstrate a significant and pervasive integration in the craniofacial structures across primates, differing from previous results in hominids. The uniqueness of module organization in hominids may explain this distinction. We found that endocranial volume is significantly integrated to the midline basicranium but not to the lateral basicranium. This finding underlines the significant effect of brain size on the shape of the midline structures of the cranial base in primates. With the covariations linking the studied features defined here, we suggest that future studies should focus on determining the causal links between them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitri Neaux
- Archéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements (AASPE), UMR 7209, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle-CNRS, Paris, France.,Function, Evolution & Anatomy Research Lab, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.,Laboratoire Paléontologie Evolution Paléoécosystèmes Paléoprimatologie (PALEVOPRIM), UMR 7262, Université de Poitiers-CNRS, Poitiers, France
| | - Stephen Wroe
- Function, Evolution & Anatomy Research Lab, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Justin A Ledogar
- Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Sarah Heins Ledogar
- Department of Archaeology & Palaeoanthropology, School of Humanities, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gabriele Sansalone
- Function, Evolution & Anatomy Research Lab, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Sciences, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy.,Center for Evolutionary Ecology, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mitchell DR, Sherratt E, Ledogar JA, Wroe S. The biomechanics of foraging determines face length among kangaroos and their relatives. Proc Biol Sci 2019; 285:rspb.2018.0845. [PMID: 29925620 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Increasing body size is accompanied by facial elongation across a number of mammalian taxa. This trend forms the basis of a proposed evolutionary rule, cranial evolutionary allometry (CREA). However, facial length has also been widely associated with the varying mechanical resistance of foods. Here, we combine geometric morphometrics and computational biomechanical analyses to determine whether evolutionary allometry or feeding ecology have been dominant influences on facial elongation across 16 species of kangaroos and relatives (Macropodiformes). We found no support for an allometric trend. Nor was craniofacial morphology strictly defined by dietary categories, but rather associated with a combination of the mechanical properties of vegetation types and cropping behaviours used to access them. Among species examined here, shorter muzzles coincided with known diets of tough, resistant plant tissues, accessed via active slicing by the anterior dentition. This morphology consistently resulted in increased mechanical efficiency and decreased bone deformation during incisor biting. Longer muzzles, by contrast, aligned with softer foods or feeding behaviours invoking cervical musculature that circumvent the need for hard biting. These findings point to a potential for craniofacial morphology to predict feeding ecology in macropodiforms, which may be useful for species management planning and for inferring palaeoecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Rex Mitchell
- Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
| | - Emma Sherratt
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
| | - Justin A Ledogar
- Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
| | - Stephen Wroe
- Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mitchell DR, Sherratt E, Sansalone G, Ledogar JA, Flavel RJ, Wroe S. Feeding Biomechanics Influences Craniofacial Morphology at the Subspecies Scale among Australian Pademelons (Macropodidae: Thylogale). J MAMM EVOL 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s10914-018-9455-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
9
|
Bicknell RDC, Ledogar JA, Wroe S, Gutzler BC, Watson WH, Paterson JR. Computational biomechanical analyses demonstrate similar shell-crushing abilities in modern and ancient arthropods. Proc Biol Sci 2018; 285:rspb.2018.1935. [PMID: 30355715 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The biology of the American horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus, is well documented-including its dietary habits, particularly the ability to crush shell with gnathobasic walking appendages-but virtually nothing is known about the feeding biomechanics of this iconic arthropod. Limulus polyphemus is also considered the archetypal functional analogue of various extinct groups with serial gnathobasic appendages, including eurypterids, trilobites and other early arthropods, especially Sidneyia inexpectans from the mid-Cambrian (508 Myr) Burgess Shale of Canada. Exceptionally preserved specimens of S. inexpectans show evidence suggestive of durophagous (shell-crushing) tendencies-including thick gnathobasic spine cuticle and shelly gut contents-but the masticatory capabilities of this fossil species have yet to be compared with modern durophagous arthropods. Here, we use advanced computational techniques, specifically a unique application of 3D finite-element analysis (FEA), to model the feeding mechanics of L. polyphemus and S. inexpectans: the first such analyses of a modern horseshoe crab and a fossil arthropod. Results show that mechanical performance of the feeding appendages in both arthropods is remarkably similar, suggesting that S. inexpectans had similar shell-crushing capabilities to L. polyphemus This biomechanical solution to processing shelly food therefore has a history extending over 500 Myr, arising soon after the first shell-bearing animals. Arrival of durophagous predators during the early phase of animal evolution undoubtedly fuelled the Cambrian 'arms race' that involved a rapid increase in diversity, disparity and abundance of biomineralized prey species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell D C Bicknell
- Palaeoscience Research Centre, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia .,Function, Evolution and Anatomy Research Lab, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
| | - Justin A Ledogar
- Palaeoscience Research Centre, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia.,Function, Evolution and Anatomy Research Lab, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia.,Department of Evolutionary Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Stephen Wroe
- Palaeoscience Research Centre, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia.,Function, Evolution and Anatomy Research Lab, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
| | - Benjamin C Gutzler
- Department of Biological Sciences and School of Marine Science and Ocean Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
| | - Winsor H Watson
- Department of Biological Sciences and School of Marine Science and Ocean Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA
| | - John R Paterson
- Palaeoscience Research Centre, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Neaux D, Sansalone G, Ledogar JA, Heins Ledogar S, Luk TH, Wroe S. Basicranium and face: Assessing the impact of morphological integration on primate evolution. J Hum Evol 2018; 118:43-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
11
|
Wroe S, Parr WCH, Ledogar JA, Bourke J, Evans SP, Fiorenza L, Benazzi S, Hublin JJ, Stringer C, Kullmer O, Curry M, Rae TC, Yokley TR. Computer simulations show that Neanderthal facial morphology represents adaptation to cold and high energy demands, but not heavy biting. Proc Biol Sci 2018; 285:20180085. [PMID: 29618551 PMCID: PMC5904316 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Three adaptive hypotheses have been forwarded to explain the distinctive Neanderthal face: (i) an improved ability to accommodate high anterior bite forces, (ii) more effective conditioning of cold and/or dry air and, (iii) adaptation to facilitate greater ventilatory demands. We test these hypotheses using three-dimensional models of Neanderthals, modern humans, and a close outgroup (Homo heidelbergensis), applying finite-element analysis (FEA) and computational fluid dynamics (CFD). This is the most comprehensive application of either approach applied to date and the first to include both. FEA reveals few differences between H. heidelbergensis, modern humans, and Neanderthals in their capacities to sustain high anterior tooth loadings. CFD shows that the nasal cavities of Neanderthals and especially modern humans condition air more efficiently than does that of H. heidelbergensis, suggesting that both evolved to better withstand cold and/or dry climates than less derived Homo We further find that Neanderthals could move considerably more air through the nasal pathway than could H. heidelbergensis or modern humans, consistent with the propositions that, relative to our outgroup Homo, Neanderthal facial morphology evolved to reflect improved capacities to better condition cold, dry air, and, to move greater air volumes in response to higher energetic requirements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Wroe
- Function, Evolution and Anatomy Research Lab, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
| | - William C H Parr
- Surgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratory (SORL), Level 1, Clinical Sciences Bld, Gate 6, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Avoca St, Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales 2031, Australia
| | - Justin A Ledogar
- Function, Evolution and Anatomy Research Lab, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
| | - Jason Bourke
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York Institute of Technology, Jonesboro, AR 72401, USA
| | - Samuel P Evans
- School of Engineering, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales 2308, Australia
| | - Luca Fiorenza
- Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
| | - Stefano Benazzi
- Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Via degli Ariani 1, Ravenna 48121, Italy
- Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jean-Jacques Hublin
- Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Chris Stringer
- Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK
| | - Ottmar Kullmer
- Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut Frankfurt am Main, Abteilung Paläoanthropologie und Messelforschung, Sektion Tertiäre Säugetiere, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Michael Curry
- Function, Evolution and Anatomy Research Lab, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia
| | - Todd C Rae
- Centre for Research in Evolutionary and Environmental Anthropology, University of Roehampton, London, UK
| | - Todd R Yokley
- Metropolitan State University of Denver, PO Box 173362, Campus Box 28, Denver, CO 80217-3362, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ledogar JA, Luk THY, Perry JMG, Neaux D, Wroe S. Biting mechanics and niche separation in a specialized clade of primate seed predators. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0190689. [PMID: 29324822 PMCID: PMC5764286 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2017] [Accepted: 12/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
We analyzed feeding biomechanics in pitheciine monkeys (Pithecia, Chiropotes, Cacajao), a clade that specializes on hard-husked unripe fruit (sclerocarpy) and resistant seeds (seed predation). We tested the hypothesis that pitheciine crania are well-suited to generate and withstand forceful canine and molar biting, with the prediction that they generate bite forces more efficiently and better resist masticatory strains than the closely-related Callicebus, which does not specialize on unripe fruits and/or seeds. We also tested the hypothesis that Callicebus-Pithecia-Chiropotes-Cacajao represent a morphocline of increasing sclerocarpic specialization with respect to biting leverage and craniofacial strength, consistent with anterior dental morphology. We found that pitheciines have higher biting leverage than Callicebus and are generally more resistant to masticatory strain. However, Cacajao was found to experience high strain magnitudes in some facial regions. We therefore found limited support for the morphocline hypothesis, at least with respect to the mechanical performance metrics examined here. Biting leverage in Cacajao was nearly identical (or slightly less than) in Chiropotes and strain magnitudes during canine biting were more likely to follow a Cacajao-Chiropotes-Pithecia trend of increasing strength, in contrast to the proposed morphocline. These results could indicate that bite force efficiency and derived anterior teeth were selected for in pitheciines at the expense of increased strain magnitudes. However, our results for Cacajao potentially reflect reduced feeding competition offered by allopatry with other pitheciines, which allows Cacajao species to choose from a wider variety of fruits at various stages of ripeness, leading to reduction in the selection for robust facial features. We also found that feeding biomechanics in sympatric Pithecia and Chiropotes are consistent with data on food structural properties and observations of dietary niche separation, with the former being well-suited for the regular molar crushing of hard seeds and the latter better adapted for breaching hard fruits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin A. Ledogar
- Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Theodora H. Y. Luk
- Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan M. G. Perry
- Center for Functional Anatomy and Evolution, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Dimitri Neaux
- Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen Wroe
- Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Neaux D, Bienvenu T, Guy F, Daver G, Sansalone G, Ledogar JA, Rae TC, Wroe S, Brunet M. Relationship between foramen magnum position and locomotion in extant and extinct hominoids. J Hum Evol 2017; 113:1-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Revised: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
14
|
Ledogar JA, Benazzi S, Smith AL, Weber GW, Carlson KB, Dechow PC, Grosse IR, Ross CF, Richmond BG, Wright BW, Wang Q, Byron C, Carlson KJ, De Ruiter DJ, Pryor Mcintosh LC, Strait DS. The Biomechanics of Bony Facial "Buttresses" in South African Australopiths: An Experimental Study Using Finite Element Analysis. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2017; 300:171-195. [PMID: 28000396 DOI: 10.1002/ar.23492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2016] [Revised: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Australopiths exhibit a number of derived facial features that are thought to strengthen the face against high and/or repetitive loads associated with a diet that included mechanically challenging foods. Here, we use finite element analysis (FEA) to test hypotheses related to the purported strengthening role of the zygomatic root and "anterior pillar" in australopiths. We modified our previously constructed models of Sts 5 (Australopithecus africanus) and MH1 (A. sediba) to differ in the morphology of the zygomatic root, including changes to both the shape and positioning of the zygomatic root complex, in addition to creating variants of Sts 5 lacking anterior pillars. We found that both an expanded zygomatic root and the presence of "anterior pillars" reinforce the face against feeding loads. We also found that strain orientations are most compatible with the hypothesis that the pillar evolved to resist loads associated with premolar loading, and that this morphology has an ancillary effect of strengthening the face during all loading regimes. These results provide support for the functional hypotheses. However, we found that an anteriorly positioned zygomatic root increases strain magnitudes even in models with an inflated/reinforced root complex. These results suggest that an anteriorly placed zygomatic root complex evolved to enhance the efficiency of bite force production while facial reinforcement features, such as the anterior pillar and the expanded zygomatic root, may have been selected for in part to compensate for the weakening effect of this facial configuration. Anat Rec, 300:171-195, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin A Ledogar
- Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.,Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, Albany, New York
| | - Stefano Benazzi
- Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Ravenna, 48121, Italy.,Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 04103, Germany
| | - Amanda L Smith
- Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, Albany, New York.,Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Gerhard W Weber
- Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, A-1090, Austria
| | - Keely B Carlson
- Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Paul C Dechow
- School of Science and Mathematics, Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College, Tifton, Georgia 30605
| | - Ian R Grosse
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts
| | - Callum F Ross
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brian G Richmond
- Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.,Division of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York
| | - Barth W Wright
- Department of Anatomy, Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Qian Wang
- School of Science and Mathematics, Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College, Tifton, Georgia 30605
| | - Craig Byron
- Department of Biology, Mercer University, Macon, Georgia
| | - Kristian J Carlson
- Department of Cell and Neurobiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.,Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Wits, 2050, South Africa
| | - Darryl J De Ruiter
- Department of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas.,Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Wits, 2050, South Africa
| | - Leslie C Pryor Mcintosh
- School of Science and Mathematics, Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College, Tifton, Georgia 30605
| | - David S Strait
- Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, Albany, New York.,Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prado FB, Freire AR, Cláudia Rossi A, Ledogar JA, Smith AL, Dechow PC, Strait DS, Voigt T, Ross CF. Review of In Vivo Bone Strain Studies and Finite Element Models of the Zygomatic Complex in Humans and Nonhuman Primates: Implications for Clinical Research and Practice. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2017; 299:1753-1778. [PMID: 27870351 DOI: 10.1002/ar.23486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2016] [Revised: 07/16/2016] [Accepted: 07/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The craniofacial skeleton is often described in the clinical literature as being comprised of vertical bony pillars, which transmit forces from the toothrow to the neurocranium as axial compressive stresses, reinforced transversely by buttresses. Here, we review the literature on bony microarchitecture, in vivo bone strain, and finite-element modeling of the facial skeleton of humans and nonhuman primates to address questions regarding the structural and functional existence of facial pillars and buttresses. Available bone material properties data do not support the existence of pillars and buttresses in humans or Sapajus apella. Deformation regimes in the zygomatic complex emphasize bending and shear, therefore conceptualizing the zygomatic complex of humans or nonhuman primates as a pillar obscures its patterns of stress, strain, and deformation. Human fossil relatives and chimpanzees exhibit strain regimes corroborating the existence of a canine-frontal pillar, but the notion of a zygomatic pillar has no support. The emerging consensus on patterns of strain and deformation in finite element models (FEMs) of the human facial skeleton corroborates hypotheses in the clinical literature regarding zygomatic complex function, and provide new insights into patterns of failure of titanium and resorbable plates in experimental studies. It is suggested that the "pillar and buttress" model of human craniofacial skeleton function be replaced with FEMs that more accurately and precisely represent in vivo function, and which can serve as the basis for future research into implants used in restoration of occlusal function and fracture repair. Anat Rec, 299:1753-1778, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felippe Bevilacqua Prado
- Department of Morphology, Anatomy Area, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alexandre Rodrigues Freire
- Department of Morphology, Anatomy Area, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ana Cláudia Rossi
- Department of Morphology, Anatomy Area, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas-UNICAMP, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Justin A Ledogar
- Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia
| | - Amanda L Smith
- Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Paul C Dechow
- Department of Biomedical Sciences Texas A&M University, College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas
| | - David S Strait
- Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia
| | - Tilman Voigt
- Department of Organismal Biology & Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Callum F Ross
- Department of Organismal Biology & Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ledogar JA, Dechow PC, Wang Q, Gharpure PH, Gordon AD, Baab KL, Smith AL, Weber GW, Grosse IR, Ross CF, Richmond BG, Wright BW, Byron C, Wroe S, Strait DS. Human feeding biomechanics: performance, variation, and functional constraints. PeerJ 2016; 4:e2242. [PMID: 27547550 PMCID: PMC4975005 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2016] [Accepted: 06/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The evolution of the modern human (Homo sapiens) cranium is characterized by a reduction in the size of the feeding system, including reductions in the size of the facial skeleton, postcanine teeth, and the muscles involved in biting and chewing. The conventional view hypothesizes that gracilization of the human feeding system is related to a shift toward eating foods that were less mechanically challenging to consume and/or foods that were processed using tools before being ingested. This hypothesis predicts that human feeding systems should not be well-configured to produce forceful bites and that the cranium should be structurally weak. An alternate hypothesis, based on the observation that humans have mechanically efficient jaw adductors, states that the modern human face is adapted to generate and withstand high biting forces. We used finite element analysis (FEA) to test two opposing mechanical hypotheses: that compared to our closest living relative, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), the modern human craniofacial skeleton is (1) less well configured, or (2) better configured to generate and withstand high magnitude bite forces. We considered intraspecific variation in our examination of human feeding biomechanics by examining a sample of geographically diverse crania that differed notably in shape. We found that our biomechanical models of human crania had broadly similar mechanical behavior despite their shape variation and were, on average, less structurally stiff than the crania of chimpanzees during unilateral biting when loaded with physiologically-scaled muscle loads. Our results also show that modern humans are efficient producers of bite force, consistent with previous analyses. However, highly tensile reaction forces were generated at the working (biting) side jaw joint during unilateral molar bites in which the chewing muscles were recruited with bilateral symmetry. In life, such a configuration would have increased the risk of joint dislocation and constrained the maximum recruitment levels of the masticatory muscles on the balancing (non-biting) side of the head. Our results do not necessarily conflict with the hypothesis that anterior tooth (incisors, canines, premolars) biting could have been selectively important in humans, although the reduced size of the premolars in humans has been shown to increase the risk of tooth crown fracture. We interpret our results to suggest that human craniofacial evolution was probably not driven by selection for high magnitude unilateral biting, and that increased masticatory muscle efficiency in humans is likely to be a secondary byproduct of selection for some function unrelated to forceful biting behaviors. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that a shift to softer foods and/or the innovation of pre-oral food processing techniques relaxed selective pressures maintaining craniofacial features that favor forceful biting and chewing behaviors, leading to the characteristically small and gracile faces of modern humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin A. Ledogar
- Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York, United States
| | - Paul C. Dechow
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Qian Wang
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Poorva H. Gharpure
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, United States
| | - Adam D. Gordon
- Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York, United States
| | - Karen L. Baab
- Department of Anatomy, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona, United States
| | - Amanda L. Smith
- Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York, United States
- Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| | - Gerhard W. Weber
- Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ian R. Grosse
- Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Callum F. Ross
- Department of Organismal Biology & Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Brian G. Richmond
- Division of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, United States
- Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Barth W. Wright
- Department of Anatomy, Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
| | - Craig Byron
- Department of Biology, Mercer University, Macon, Georgia, United States
| | - Stephen Wroe
- Zoology Division, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David S. Strait
- Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, New York, United States
- Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Smith AL, Benazzi S, Ledogar JA, Tamvada K, Pryor Smith LC, Weber GW, Spencer MA, Lucas PW, Michael S, Shekeban A, Al-Fadhalah K, Almusallam AS, Dechow PC, Grosse IR, Ross CF, Madden RH, Richmond BG, Wright BW, Wang Q, Byron C, Slice DE, Wood S, Dzialo C, Berthaume MA, Casteren AV, Strait DS. The feeding biomechanics and dietary ecology of Paranthropus boisei. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2015; 298:145-67. [PMID: 25529240 PMCID: PMC4420635 DOI: 10.1002/ar.23073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 10/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The African Plio-Pleistocene hominins known as australopiths evolved derived craniodental features frequently interpreted as adaptations for feeding on either hard, or compliant/tough foods. Among australopiths, Paranthropus boisei is the most robust form, exhibiting traits traditionally hypothesized to produce high bite forces efficiently and strengthen the face against feeding stresses. However, recent mechanical analyses imply that P. boisei may not have been an efficient producer of bite force and that robust morphology in primates is not necessarily strong. Here we use an engineering method, finite element analysis, to show that the facial skeleton of P. boisei is structurally strong, exhibits a strain pattern different from that in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and Australopithecus africanus, and efficiently produces high bite force. It has been suggested that P. boisei consumed a diet of compliant/tough foods like grass blades and sedge pith. However, the blunt occlusal topography of this and other species suggests that australopiths are adapted to consume hard foods, perhaps including grass and sedge seeds. A consideration of evolutionary trends in morphology relating to feeding mechanics suggests that food processing behaviors in gracile australopiths evidently were disrupted by environmental change, perhaps contributing to the eventual evolution of Homo and Paranthropus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L. Smith
- Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, Albany, New York
| | - Stefano Benazzi
- Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Via degli Ariani 1, Ravenna 48121, Italy
- Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Kelli Tamvada
- Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, Albany, New York
| | - Leslie C. Pryor Smith
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas
| | - Gerhard W. Weber
- Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Mark A. Spencer
- School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona
- Department of Biology, South Mountain Community College, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Peter W. Lucas
- Department of Bioclinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat 13110, Kuwait
| | - Shaji Michael
- Nanotechnology Research Facility, College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait University, Safat 13060, Kuwait
| | - Ali Shekeban
- Nanotechnology Research Facility, College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait University, Safat 13060, Kuwait
| | - Khaled Al-Fadhalah
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait University, Safat 13060, Kuwait
| | - Abdulwahab S. Almusallam
- Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering and Petroleum, Kuwait University, Safat 13060, Kuwait
| | - Paul C. Dechow
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ian R. Grosse
- Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts
| | - Callum F. Ross
- Department of Organismal Biology & Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Richard H. Madden
- Department of Organismal Biology & Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brian G. Richmond
- Center for the Advanced Study of Hominid Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, NW, Washington, District of Columbia
- Human Origins Program, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, District of Columbia
- Division of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York
| | - Barth W. Wright
- Department of Anatomy, Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, Missouri
| | - Qian Wang
- Division of Basic Medical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia
| | - Craig Byron
- Department of Biology, Mercer University, Macon, Georgia
| | - Dennis E. Slice
- Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
- School of Computational Science & Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Dirac Science Library, Tallahassee, Florida
| | - Sarah Wood
- Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts
| | - Christine Dzialo
- Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts
| | - Michael A. Berthaume
- Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts
- Medical and Biological Engineering Research Group, Department of Engineering, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Kingston-Upon-Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Van Casteren
- Department of Bioclinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Safat 13110, Kuwait
- Max Planck Weizman Center for Integrative Archaeology and Anthropology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - David S. Strait
- Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, Albany, New York
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Smith AL, Benazzi S, Ledogar JA, Tamvada K, Smith LCP, Weber GW, Spencer MA, Dechow PC, Grosse IR, Ross CF, Richmond BG, Wright BW, Wang Q, Byron C, Slice DE, Strait DS. Biomechanical implications of intraspecific shape variation in chimpanzee crania: moving toward an integration of geometric morphometrics and finite element analysis. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2015; 298:122-44. [PMID: 25529239 PMCID: PMC4274755 DOI: 10.1002/ar.23074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
In a broad range of evolutionary studies, an understanding of intraspecific variation is needed in order to contextualize and interpret the meaning of variation between species. However, mechanical analyses of primate crania using experimental or modeling methods typically encounter logistical constraints that force them to rely on data gathered from only one or a few individuals. This results in a lack of knowledge concerning the mechanical significance of intraspecific shape variation that limits our ability to infer the significance of interspecific differences. This study uses geometric morphometric methods (GM) and finite element analysis (FEA) to examine the biomechanical implications of shape variation in chimpanzee crania, thereby providing a comparative context in which to interpret shape-related mechanical variation between hominin species. Six finite element models (FEMs) of chimpanzee crania were constructed from CT scans following shape-space Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of a matrix of 709 Procrustes coordinates (digitized onto 21 specimens) to identify the individuals at the extremes of the first three principal components. The FEMs were assigned the material properties of bone and were loaded and constrained to simulate maximal bites on the P(3) and M(2) . Resulting strains indicate that intraspecific cranial variation in morphology is associated with quantitatively high levels of variation in strain magnitudes, but qualitatively little variation in the distribution of strain concentrations. Thus, interspecific comparisons should include considerations of the spatial patterning of strains rather than focus only on their magnitudes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda L. Smith
- Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY, 12222, USA
| | - Stefano Benazzi
- Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz, 6 04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Via degli Ariani 1, Ravenna 48121, Italy
| | - Justin A. Ledogar
- Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY, 12222, USA
| | - Kelli Tamvada
- Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY, 12222, USA
| | - Leslie C. Pryor Smith
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A & M University Baylor College of Dentistry, 3302 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA
| | - Gerhard W. Weber
- Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Mark A. Spencer
- School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Box 874101, Tempe, AZ, 85287-4104
- Biology, South Mountain Community College, 7050 S. 24 Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85042
| | - Paul C. Dechow
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Texas A & M University Baylor College of Dentistry, 3302 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA
| | - Ian R. Grosse
- Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, 160 Governor's Drive, Amherst, MA, 01003-2210
| | - Callum F. Ross
- Department of Organismal Biology & Anatomy, University of Chicago, 1027 East 57th 30 Street, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Brian G. Richmond
- Center for the Advanced Study of Hominid Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, 2110 G St. NW, Washington, D. C., 20052, USA
- Human Origins Program, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C., 20560, USA
- Division of Anthropology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79 Street, New York, NY 10024-5192
| | - Barth W. Wright
- Department of Anatomy, Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, 1750 Independence Avenue, Kansas City, MO, 64106-1453, USA
| | - Qian Wang
- Division of Basic Medical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, 1550 College Street, Macon, GA, 31207, USA
| | - Craig Byron
- Department of Biology, Mercer University, 1400 Coleman Avenue, Macon, GA, 31207, USA
| | - Dennis E. Slice
- Department of Anthropology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
- School of Computational Science & Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Dirac Science Library, Tallahassee, FL, 32306-4120
| | - David S. Strait
- Department of Anthropology, University at Albany, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY, 12222, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Winchester JM, Boyer DM, St Clair EM, Gosselin-Ildari AD, Cooke SB, Ledogar JA. Dental topography of platyrrhines and prosimians: convergence and contrasts. Am J Phys Anthropol 2013; 153:29-44. [PMID: 24318939 DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2013] [Accepted: 09/27/2013] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Dental topographic analysis is the quantitative assessment of shape of three-dimensional models of tooth crowns and component features. Molar topographic curvature, relief, and complexity correlate with aspects of feeding behavior in certain living primates, and have been employed to investigate dietary ecology in extant and extinct primate species. This study investigates whether dental topography correlates with diet among a diverse sample of living platyrrhines, and compares platyrrhine topography with that of prosimians. We sampled 111 lower second molars of 11 platyrrhine genera and 121 of 20 prosimian genera. For each tooth we calculated Dirichlet normal energy (DNE), relief index (RFI), and orientation patch count (OPCR), quantifying surface curvature, relief, and complexity respectively. Shearing ratios and quotients were also measured. Statistical analyses partitioned effects of diet and taxon on topography in platyrrhines alone and relative to prosimians. Discriminant function analyses assessed predictive diet models. Results indicate that platyrrhine dental topography correlates to dietary preference, and platyrrhine-only predictive models yield high rates of accuracy. The same is true for prosimians. Topographic variance is broadly similar among platyrrhines and prosimians. One exception is that platyrrhines display higher average relief and lower relief variance, possibly related to lower relative molar size and functional links between relief and tooth longevity distinct from curvature or complexity. Explicitly incorporating phylogenetic distance matrices into statistical analyses of the combined platyrrhine-prosimian sample results in loss of significance of dietary effects for OPCR and SQ, while greatly increasing dietary significance of RFI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia M Winchester
- Interdepartmental Doctoral Program in Anthropological Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-4364; Institute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00014, Finland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Strait DS, Constantino P, Lucas PW, Richmond BG, Spencer MA, Dechow PC, Ross CF, Grosse IR, Wright BW, Wood BA, Weber GW, Wang Q, Byron C, Slice DE, Chalk J, Smith AL, Smith LC, Wood S, Berthaume M, Benazzi S, Dzialo C, Tamvada K, Ledogar JA. Viewpoints: Diet and dietary adaptations in early hominins: The hard food perspective. Am J Phys Anthropol 2013; 151:339-55. [DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2012] [Accepted: 04/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- David S. Strait
- Department of Anthropology; University at Albany; Albany; NY; 12222
| | - Paul Constantino
- Department of Biological Sciences; Marshall University; Huntington; WV; 25755
| | - Peter W. Lucas
- Department of Bioclinical Sciences; Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University; Kuwait
| | | | - Mark A. Spencer
- School of Human Evolution and Social Change; Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University; Tempe; AZ; 85287-4104
| | - Paul C. Dechow
- Department of Biomedical Sciences; Texas A&M Health Science Center, Baylor College of Dentistry; Dallas; TX; 75246
| | - Callum F. Ross
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy; University of Chicago; Chicago; IL; 60637
| | - Ian R. Grosse
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering; University of Massachusetts; Amherst; MA; 01003-2210
| | - Barth W. Wright
- Department of Anatomy; Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences; Kansas City; MO; 64106-1453
| | | | - Gerhard W. Weber
- Department of Anthropology; University of Vienna; A-1090; Vienna; Austria
| | - Qian Wang
- Division of Basic Medical Sciences; Mercer University School of Medicine; Macon; GA; 31207
| | - Craig Byron
- Department of Biology; Mercer University; Macon; GA; 31207
| | - Dennis E. Slice
- School of Computational Science and Department of Biological Science; Florida State University; Tallahassee; FL; 32306-4120
| | - Janine Chalk
- Department of Evolutionary Anthropology; Duke University; Durham; NC; 27708-0383
| | - Amanda L. Smith
- Department of Anthropology; University at Albany; Albany; NY; 12222
| | - Leslie C. Smith
- Department of Biomedical Sciences; Texas A&M Health Science Center, Baylor College of Dentistry; Dallas; TX; 75246
| | - Sarah Wood
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering; University of Massachusetts; Amherst; MA; 01003-2210
| | - Michael Berthaume
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering; University of Massachusetts; Amherst; MA; 01003-2210
| | - Stefano Benazzi
- Department of Human Evolution; Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology; 04103; Leipzig; Germany
| | - Christine Dzialo
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering; University of Massachusetts; Amherst; MA; 01003-2210
| | - Kelli Tamvada
- Department of Anthropology; University at Albany; Albany; NY; 12222
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Smith AL, Benazzi S, Ledogar JA, Smith L, Weber GW, Dechow PC, Grosse IR, Spencer MA, Wang Q, Strait DS. Considering the constrained lever model: Feeding biomechanics of OH 5 assessed using finite element analysis. FASEB J 2013. [DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.27.1_supplement.520.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Leslie Smith
- Biomedical SciencesBaylor College of DentistryTexas A&M Health Sciences CenterDallasTX
| | | | - Paul C Dechow
- Biomedical SciencesBaylor College of DentistryTexas A&M Health Sciences CenterDallasTX
| | - Ian R Grosse
- Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of Massachusetts at AmherstAmherstMA
| | - Mark A Spencer
- Institute of Human OriginsArizona State UniversityTempeAZ
| | - Qian Wang
- AnatomyMercer University School of MedicineMaconGA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ledogar JA, Winchester JM, St. Clair EM, Boyer DM. Diet and dental topography in pitheciine seed predators. Am J Phys Anthropol 2012; 150:107-21. [DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2012] [Accepted: 09/28/2012] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
23
|
Kamilar JM, Ledogar JA. Species co-occurrence patterns and dietary resource competition in primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 2010; 144:131-9. [PMID: 20740497 DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.21380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2010] [Accepted: 06/18/2010] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Diamond (Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM, editors. Ecology and evolution of communities. Cambridge: Belknap. p 342-444 (1975)) argued that interspecific competition between species occupying similar niches results in a nonrandom pattern of species distributions. In particular, some species pairs may never be found in the same community due to competitive exclusion. Rigorous analytical methods have been developed to investigate the possible role that interspecific competition has on the evolution of communities. Many studies that have implemented these methods have shown support for Diamond's assembly rules, yet there are numerous exceptions. We build on this previous research by examining the co-occurrence patterns of primate species in 109 communities from across the world. We used EcoSim to calculate a checkerboard (C) score for each region. The C score provides a measure of the proportion of species pairs that do not co-occur in a set of communities. High C scores indicate that species are nonrandomly distributed throughout a region, and interspecific competition may be driving patterns of competitive exclusion. We conducted two sets of analyses. One included all primate species per region, and the second analysis assigned each species to one of four dietary guilds: frugivores, folivores, insectivores, and frugivore-insectivores. Using all species per region, we found significantly high C scores in 9 of 10 regions examined. For frugivores, we found significantly high-C scores in more than 50% of regions. In contrast, only 23% of regions exhibited significantly high-C scores for folivores. Our results suggest that communities are nonrandomly structured and may be the result of greater levels of interspecific competition between frugivores compared to folivores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Kamilar
- Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8277, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|