Combination of Itacitinib or Parsaclisib with Pembrolizumab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Phase I Study

PURPOSE

This phase Ib open-label, multicenter, platform study (NCT02646748) explored safety, tolerability, and preliminary activity of itacitinib (Janus kinase 1 inhibitor) or parsaclisib (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ inhibitor) in combination with pembrolizumab [programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor].

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors with disease progression following all available therapies were enrolled and received itacitinib (Part 1 initially 300 mg once daily) or parsaclisib (Part 1 initially 10 mg once daily; Part 2 all patients 0.3 mg once daily) plus pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks).

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients were enrolled in the study and treated with itacitinib (Part 1, n = 49) or parsaclisib (Part 1, n = 83; Part 2, n = 27) plus pembrolizumab. The maximum tolerated/pharmacologically active doses were itacitinib 300 mg once daily and parsaclisib 30 mg once daily. Most common itacitinib treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were fatigue, nausea, and anemia. Most common parsaclisib TRAEs were fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, and pyrexia in Part 1, and fatigue, maculopapular rash, diarrhea, nausea, and pruritus in Part 2. In patients receiving itacitinib plus pembrolizumab, four (8.2%) achieved a partial response (PR) in Part 1. Among patients receiving parsaclisib plus pembrolizumab, 5 (6.0%) achieved a complete response and 9 (10.8%) a PR in Part 1; 5 of 27 (18.5%) patients in Part 2 achieved a PR.

CONCLUSIONS

Although combination of itacitinib or parsaclisib with pembrolizumab showed modest clinical activity in this study, the overall response rates observed did not support continued development in patients with solid tumors.

SIGNIFICANCE

PD-1 blockade combined with targeted therapies have demonstrated encouraging preclinical activity. In this phase I study, patients with advanced solid tumors treated with pembrolizumab (PD-1 inhibitor) and either itacitinib (JAK1 inhibitor) or parsaclisib (PI3Kδ inhibitor) experienced limited clinical activity beyond that expected with checkpoint inhibition alone and showed little effect on T-cell infiltration in the tumor. These results do not support continued development of these combinations.

Berzosertib Plus Topotecan vs Topotecan Alone in Patients With Relapsed Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC), a high replication stress tumor, have poor prognoses and few therapeutic options. A phase 2 study showed antitumor activity with the addition of the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase inhibitor berzosertib to topotecan.

Objective

To investigate whether the addition of berzosertib to topotecan improves clinical outcomes for patients with relapsed SCLC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Between December 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022, this open-label phase 2 randomized clinical trial recruited 60 patients with SCLC and relapse after 1 or more prior therapies from 16 US cancer centers. Patients previously treated with topotecan were not eligible.

Interventions

Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive topotecan alone (group 1), 1.25 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 through 5, or with berzosertib (group 2), 210 mg/m2 intravenously on days 2 and 5, in 21-day cycles. Randomization was stratified by tumor sensitivity to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) in the overall population and among patients with platinum-sensitive or platinum-resistant tumors. The PFS and OS for each treatment group were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare PFS and OS between the 2 groups, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the treatment hazard ratios (HRs) and the corresponding 2-sided 95% CI.

Results

Of 60 patients (median [range] age, 59 [34-79] years; 33 [55%] male) included in this study, 20 were randomly assigned to receive topotecan alone and 40 to receive a combination of topotecan with berzosertib. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 21.3 (18.1-28.3) months, there was no difference in PFS between the 2 groups (median, 3.0 [95% CI, 1.2-5.1] months for group 1 vs 3.9 [95% CI, 2.8-4.6] months for group 2; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.46-1.41]; P = .44). Overall survival was significantly longer with the combination therapy (5.4 [95% CI, 3.2-6.8] months vs 8.9 [95% CI, 4.8-11.4] months; HR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.29-0.96], P = .03). Adverse event profiles were similar between the 2 groups (eg, grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, 11 of 20 [55%] vs 20 of 40 [50%], and any grade nausea, 9 of 20 [45%] vs 14 of 40 [35%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, treatment with berzosertib plus topotecan did not improve PFS compared with topotecan therapy alone among patients with relapsed SCLC. However, the combination treatment significantly improved OS.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03896503.

A phase II clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of durvalumab as first line therapy in advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2

Background

Approximately 30-40% of patients with advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with an impaired performance status (PS). There are limited prospective data on the safety and efficacy of durvalumab in these patients.

Methods

In this single-arm phase II clinical trial (NCT02879617), patients with previously untreated Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2 received durvalumab 1500 mg every 28 days until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety determined by grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

Findings

Between April 2017 and March 2021, 50 patients were enrolled, of whom 47 received durvalumab. With a median follow-up of 28 months, median OS was 6 months (95% CI 4-10). TRAEs grade 3 occurred in nine of 47 patients (19%, 95% CI 9%-33%). OS in patients with a PD-L1 TPS of 0, 1-49%, and ≥50% was six months (95% CI 3-15), 11 months (95% CI 4-16), and 11 months (95% CI 0-not reached (NR)), respectively. Health related quality of life (HQRL) assessed at baseline and during therapy demonstrated no statistically significant change over the course of treatment.

Interpretation

This study demonstrates that single agent durvalumab is safe and well tolerated in the 1st line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC and ECOG PS of 2, with an encouraging OS benefit in patients with PD-L1 positive tumors. This trial is amongst the largest prospective studies evaluating durvalumab in the 1st line treatment of advanced stage NSCLC and a PS of 2.

Funding

AstraZeneca, NCI P30CA047904.

Phase I Study of Entinostat, Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide in Previously Untreated Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer, ETCTN 10399

BACKGROUND

CREBBP and EP300 mutations occur at a frequency of 15% and 13%, respectively, in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and preclinical models demonstrated susceptibility to targeting with HDAC inhibitors.

METHODS

Patients with treatment-naïve extensive-stage SCLC, ECOG ≤2 were enrolled and treated with entinostat orally weekly (4 dose levels, DL) in combination with standard dose carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab. Cohort allocation was determined by Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design targeting an MTD with a DLT rate of 20%.

RESULTS

Three patients were enrolled and treated at DL1 with entinostat 2 mg. Patients were aged 69-83; 2 male, 1 female; 2 were ECOG 1, and 1 was ECOG 0. The most common adverse events (AEs) were anemia (3), neutropenia (3), thrombocytopenia (2), leukopenia (2), and hypocalcemia (2). Two experienced DLTs during cycle 1: (1) grade (Gr) 4 febrile neutropenia, and (1) Gr 5 sepsis. BOIN design required stopping accrual to DL1, and the trial was closed to further accrual. Entinostat and atezolizumab pharmacokinetics were both comparable to historical controls.

CONCLUSION

Addition of entinostat to atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide is unsafe and resulted in early onset and severe neutropenia, thrombocytopenia. Further exploration of entinostat with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab should not be explored. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04631029).

Tumor cell p38 inhibition to overcome immunotherapy resistance

Patients with tumors that do not respond to immune-checkpoint inhibition often harbor a non-T cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment, characterized by the absence of IFN-γ-associated CD8+ T cell and dendritic cell activation. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying immune exclusion in non-responding patients may enable the development of novel combination therapies. p38 MAPK is a known regulator of dendritic and myeloid cells however a tumor-intrinsic immunomodulatory role has not been previously described. Here we identify tumor cell p38 signaling as a therapeutic target to potentiate anti-tumor immunity and overcome resistance to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Molecular analysis of tumor tissues from patients with human papillomavirus-negative head and neck squamous carcinoma reveals a p38-centered network enriched in non-T cell-inflamed tumors. Pan-cancer single-cell RNA analysis suggests that p38 activation may be an immune-exclusion mechanism across multiple tumor types. P38 knockdown in cancer cell lines increases T cell migration, and p38 inhibition plus ICI in preclinical models shows greater efficacy compared to monotherapies. In a clinical trial of patients refractory to PD1/L1 therapy, pexmetinib, a p38 inhibitor, plus nivolumab demonstrated deep and durable clinical responses. Targeting of p38 with anti-PD1 has the potential to induce the T cell-inflamed phenotype and overcome immunotherapy resistance.

A single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial of osimertinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor exon 18 G719X, exon 20 S768I, or exon 21 L861Q mutations

BACKGROUND

For patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutations, osimertinib is the standard of care. Investigating the activity and safety of osimertinib in patients with EGFR exon 18 G719X, exon 20 S768I, or exon 21 L861Q mutations is of clinical interest.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer with confirmed EGFR exon 18 G719X, exon 20 S768I, or exon 21 L861Q mutations were eligible. Patients were required to have measurable disease, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Patients were required to be EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naive. The primary objective was objective response rate, and secondary objectives were progression-free survival, safety, and overall survival. The study used a two-stage design with a plan to enroll 17 patients in the first stage, and the study was terminated after the first stage due to slow accrual.

RESULTS

Between May 2018 and March 2020, 17 patients were enrolled and received study therapy. The median age of patients was 70 years (interquartile range 62-76), the majority were female (n = 11), had a performance status of 1 (n = 10), and five patients had brain metastases at baseline. The objective response rate was 47% [95% confidence interval (CI) 23% to 72%], and the radiographic responses observed were partial response (n = 8), stable disease (n = 8), and progressive disease (n = 1). The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (95% CI 5.0-15.2 months), and the median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI 7.3-29.2 months). The median duration on treatment was 6.1 months (range 3.6-11.9 months), and the most common adverse events (regardless of attribution) were diarrhea, fatigue, anorexia, weight loss, and dyspnea.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial suggests osimertinib has activity in patients with these uncommon EGFR mutations.

Emerging therapeutic strategies for enhancing sensitivity and countering resistance to programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

The availability of agents targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint has transformed treatment of advanced and/or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a substantial proportion of patients treated with these agents do not respond or experience only a brief period of clinical benefit. Even among those whose disease responds, many subsequently experience disease progression. Consequently, novel approaches are needed that enhance antitumor immunity and counter resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibitors, thereby improving and/or prolonging responses and patient outcomes, in both PD-(L)1 inhibitor-sensitive and inhibitor-resistant NSCLC. Mechanisms contributing to sensitivity and/or resistance to PD-(L)1 inhibitors in NSCLC include upregulation of other immune checkpoints and/or the presence of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, which represent potential targets for new therapies. This review explores novel therapeutic regimens under investigation for enhancing responses to PD-(L)1 inhibitors and countering resistance, and summarizes the latest clinical evidence in NSCLC.

Guidance for clinicians and patients with non-small cell lung cancer in the time of precision medicine

Major advances in the diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have resulted in a sharp decline in associated mortality rates, thereby propelling NSCLC to the forefront of precision medicine. Current guidelines recommend upfront comprehensive molecular testing for all known and actionable driver alterations/biomarkers (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, KRAS, NTRK, MET, RET, HER2 [ERBB2], and PD-L1), especially in advanced disease stages, as they significantly influence response to therapy. In particular, hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing (HC-NGS) with an RNA fusion panel to detect gene fusions is a veritable requirement at both diagnosis and progression (resistance) of any-stage non-squamous adenocarcinoma NSCLCs. This testing modality ensures selection of the most timely, appropriate, and personalized treatment, maximization of therapeutic efficacy, and prevention of use of suboptimal/contraindicated therapy. As a complement to clinical testing and treatment, patient, family, and caregiver education is also key to early screening and diagnosis, access to care, coping strategies, positive outcomes, and survival. The advent of social media and increased internet access has amplified the volume of educational and support resources, consequently changing the dynamics of patient care. This review provides guidance on integration of comprehensive genomic testing with an RNA fusion panel as a global diagnostic standard for all adenocarcinoma NSCLC disease stages and provides key information on patient and caregiver education and resources.

Phase II Randomized Study of Ramucirumab and Pembrolizumab Versus Standard of Care in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Previously Treated With Immunotherapy-Lung-MAP S1800A

PURPOSE

Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a major unmet need. Combining ICI with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/VEGF receptor inhibition has yielded promising results in multiple tumor types.

METHODS

In this randomized phase II Lung-MAP nonmatch substudy (S1800A), patients ineligible for a biomarker-matched substudy with NSCLC previously treated with ICI and platinum-based chemotherapy and progressive disease at least 84 days after initiation of ICI were randomly assigned to receive ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab (RP) or investigator's choice standard of care (SOC: docetaxel/ramucirumab, docetaxel, gemcitabine, and pemetrexed). With a goal of 130 eligible patients, the primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) using a one-sided 10% level using the better of a standard log-rank (SLR) and weighted log-rank (WLR; G[rho = 0, gamma = 1]) test. Secondary end points included objective response, duration of response, investigator-assessed progression-free survival, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Of 166 patients enrolled, 136 were eligible (69 RP; 67 SOC). OS was significantly improved with RP (hazard ratio [80% CI]: 0.69 [0.51 to 0.92]; SLR one-sided P = .05; WLR one-sided P = .15). The median (80% CI) OS was 14.5 (13.9 to 16.1) months for RP and 11.6 (9.9 to 13.0) months for SOC. OS benefit for RP was seen in most subgroups. Investigator-assessed progression-free survival (hazard ratio [80% CI]: 0.86 [0.66 to 1.14]; one-sided SLR, P = .25 and .14 for WLR) and response rates (22% RP v 28% SOC, one-sided P = .19) were similar between arms. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 42% of patients in the RP group and 60% on SOC.

CONCLUSION

This randomized phase II trial demonstrated significantly improved OS with RP compared with SOC in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with ICI and chemotherapy. The safety was consistent with known toxicities of both drugs. These data warrant further evaluation.

Overall survival from a phase II randomized study of ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab versus standard of care for advanced non–small cell lung cancer previously treated with immunotherapy: Lung-MAP nonmatched substudy S1800A

9004

Background: Resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy develops in most patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Tumors that develop resistance to ICI constitute a major unmet need. Combined ICI and VEGF/VEGF receptor inhibition have shown benefit in multiple tumor types through immune modulation. We evaluated pembrolizumab and ramucirumab (P+R) in advanced, ICI-exposed NSCLC, under the aegis of Lung-MAP, a master protocol for pts with stage IV, previously treated NSCLC. Pt characteristics and treatment toxicities were presented at ASCO 2021. Methods: S1800A was a randomized phase II trial for pts ineligible for a biomarker-matched substudy with acquired resistance to ICI defined as previous ICI therapy for at least 84 days with progressive disease (PD) on or after therapy. Eligibility stipulated PD on prior platinum-based doublet therapy (sequential or in combination with ICI) and ECOG PS of 0-1. Pts were stratified by PD-L1 expression, histology, and intent to receive ramucirumab in the standard of care (SOC) arm and were randomized to P+R or SOC (investigator’s choice of docetaxel+R; docetaxel, pemetrexed, gemcitabine). With a goal of 144 total/130 eligible pts, the primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) between the arms using a 1-sided 10% level log-rank test upon 90 deaths. Secondary endpoints included response, duration of response, investigator assessed-progression free survival and toxicity. Results: From May 17, 2019 to November 16, 2020, 166 pts were enrolled with 137 eligible (69 P+R; 68 SOC [45 +R, 23 w/o R]). Main causes for ineligibility were lack of PD on ICI or chemotherapy (6 SOC, 6 P+R), > 1 line of ICI (2 P+R), ICI discontinued due to toxicity (2 SOC), or lack of measurable disease (2 SOC, 1 P+R). OS was significantly improved with P+R (HR: 0.61 [0.38-0.97], 1-sided p-value = 0.019; median [95% CI] OS of 15.0 (13.2-17) months (mo) for P+R and 11.6 (8.5-13.8) mo in SOC arm). Progression-free survival (PFS) was not different between the arms (HR: 0.86 [0.57-1.31], 1-sided p-value=0.25; median PFS (95% CI) of 4.5 (4.0-6.9) mo for P+R and 5.2 (4.0-6.6) mo in SOC arm). ORR was not different between the arms (p=0.28). OS benefit for P+R was seen in most subgroups. Analysis of survival based on genomic alterations, tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 will be presented. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab + ramucirumab in pts with advanced NSCLC previously treated with chemotherapy and immunotherapy led to improved OS compared to SOC. Discordance of ORR and PFS from OS has been reported in prior ICI trials (Rittmeyer et al. Lancet 2017). This is the first trial in the 2nd line setting without a chemotherapy backbone to demonstrate a potential survival benefit compared to SOC regimens including docetaxel and ramucirumab using the Lung-MAP platform. Clinical trial information: NCT03971474.

A phase 1/2 study of REGN5093-M114, a METxMET antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET)-overexpressing NSCLC

TPS8593

Background: MET, also called hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR), is a high-affinity transmembrane protein receptor for HGF. MET is overexpressed in various malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MET overexpression can accompany MET exon 14 alteration or de novo/acquired MET amplification. REGN5093-M114 is an antibody drug conjugate composed of a novel linker-payload (M114, carrying the maytansine derivative M24, a potent inhibitor of microtubule assembly) covalently bound to lysine residues on a MET-targeting human IgG4p bispecific antibody, REGN5093. In preclinical models of MET overexpressing cancers, REGN5093-M114 demonstrated significant dose-dependent antitumor activity. Methods: This is an open label, phase 1/2, first-in-human, multicenter dose-escalation study with cohort expansion evaluating REGN5093-M114 in patients with MET-overexpressing NSCLC (NCT04982224). Patients must have advanced stage NSCLC for which there are no approved therapies available expected to confer clinical benefit, with tumor overexpressing MET (≥75% tumor cell staining at 2+) as centrally confirmed by immunohistochemistry. For the expansion phase, patients must have at least one lesion that is measurable by RECIST 1.1. REGN5093-M114 will be administered intravenously once every 3 weeks over 30 minutes until disease progression, intolerable adverse events, withdrawal of consent, or study withdrawal. The primary objectives in dose escalation are to evaluate safety, tolerability, PK, and maximum tolerated dose and/or recommended phase 2 dosing regimen of REGN5093-M114. PKs will include the assessment of REGN5093-M114, total antibody, and payload M24 concentrations. The primary objective in dose expansion is to assess preliminary anti-tumor activity of REGN5093-M114 in MET-overexpressing NSCLC as measured by the objective response rate. The secondary objectives of both phases of the study include an evaluation of treatment durability, and the immunogenicity of REGN5093-M114. This study is currently open to enrollment. Clinical trial information: NCT04982224.

Phase I study of entinostat (Ent), atezolizumab (A), carboplatin (C), and etoposide (E) in previously untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), ETCTN 10399

e20606

Background: A-CE has demonstrated improved overall survival in ES-SCLC, but there are currently no approved therapies targeting genomic alterations in SCLC. Mutations in acetyltransferases CREBBP and EP300 occur at a frequency of 15% and 13%, respectively, in SCLC, and PDX models with CREBBP mutations were demonstrated to be susceptible to targeting with HDAC inhibitors. Ent, a class I selective HDAC inhibitor, has also demonstrated clinical activity in a combination with pembrolizumab in patients with NSCLC and uveal melanoma with minimal hematologic toxicity at RP2D of 5 mg PO weekly. We conducted a phase I trial to evaluate the combination of Ent with A-CE for ES-SCLC, NCI ETCTN 10399. Methods: Patients (pts) with treatment-naïve ES-SCLC, stable or treated brain metastases, ECOG ≤2 were enrolled and treated on up to 4 dose levels of Ent. Allocation to cohorts was determined using Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design targeting a MTD with a DLT rate of 20%. Dose levels (DL) included Ent 2 mg, 3 mg, or 5 mg PO weekly on day (d) 1 in addition to 4 cycles of A-CE (A 1200 mg, C AUC 5, E 100 mg/m2 d 1-3) followed E+A for 1 year. Pre-treatment tissue and plasma collected for WES. Results: 3 pts were enrolled and treated at DL1 with Ent 2 mg. Pts were age 69-83, 2 male, 1 female, 2 were ECOG 1, 1 was ECOG 0, and 1 with prior SRS radiation for brain metastases. 2 of 3 experienced DLTs during cycle 1: (1) Grade (Gr) 4 febrile neutropenia after 2 doses of Ent and (1) Gr 5 sepsis after 1 dose of Ent. BOIN design required stopping accrual to dose level 1 and the trial was closed to further accrual. The pt without DLT experienced grade 3 thrombocytopenia after 2 doses of Ent, but recovered after holding cycle 1, day 15 Ent. This patient experienced Gr 3 neutropenia during cycle 2. The most common adverse events were anemia (3), neutropenia (3), thrombocytopenia (2), leukopenia (2), hypocalcemia (2). Of these, most were Gr 3-4: anemia (1), neutropenia (3), thrombocytopenia (2), leukopenia (1), hypocalcemia (1). Conclusions: The combination of low dose Ent 2 mg PO weekly + AC-E is unsafe and resulted in early onset and severe neutropenia, thrombocytopenia in the first 1-2 weeks and ≥Gr 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia prior to completing 2 cycles of treatment for all pts. There is no role for further exploration of entinostat with carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT04631029.

Phase 2 randomized trial of neoadjuvant or palliative chemotherapy with or without immunotherapy for peritoneal mesothelioma (Alliance A092001)

TPS8598

Background: Peritoneal mesothelioma is a rare and poorly studied disease with few treatment options. For patients who are not surgical candidates, treatment recommendations for systemic therapy have been extrapolated from clinical trials for pleural mesothelioma that commonly exclude patients with peritoneal mesothelioma. Recently, the combination of the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab and the CTLA-4 inhibitor ipilimumab received FDA-approval for the frontline treatment of non-resectable pleural mesothelioma. Additionally, a prospective, non-randomized phase 2 trial demonstrated activity with combined PD-L1 (atezolizumab) and VEGF (bevacizumab) blockade in peritoneal mesothelioma. In parallel, encouraging activity with combined chemo-immunotherapy has been reported in pleural mesothelioma. Given the benefits observed with immunotherapy, and the potential to improve upon those with chemotherapy and VEGF inhibition, we seek to determine whether the addition of the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab improves outcomes with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in patients with newly diagnosed peritoneal mesothelioma. Methods: A092001 is a prospective, randomized phase 2 clinical trial. All patients with newly diagnosed peritoneal mesothelioma will be randomized 1:1 using a dynamic allocation Pocock-Simon procedure to receive carboplatin, pemetrexed, and bevacizumab, with or without atezolizumab, every 21 days for four cycles. Patients who are eligible to proceed with surgery after four cycles of therapy will then do so. Patients who are not eligible to proceed with surgery may receive maintenance bevacizumab and atezolizumab, or second-line atezolizumab with bevacizumab until progression of disease or toxicity. The primary objective is to determine whether frontline treatment with carboplatin, pemetrexed, bevacizumab and atezolizumab results in a superior best response rate (RR) to carboplatin, pemetrexed and bevacizumab as determined by RECIST. With 31 eligible patients per arm (62 eligible total), this randomized design has 80% power to detect an improvement in the RR from 20% to 45%, with a 1-sided significance level of 0.10 where an interim futility analysis will be conducted after 32 patients are enrolled. As stratification factors we have included eligibility for cytoreductive surgery at diagnosis, and histologic subtype. Secondary endpoints include assessment of progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse events. As integrated biomarkers, we will determine if soluble mesothelin-related peptides and megakaryocyte potentiating factor correlate with responses. This trial was recently approved by the National Cancer Institute Central IRB and is activating at sites across the country. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882. Clinical trial information: NCT05001880.

NCI 9938: Phase I clinical trial of ATR inhibitor berzosertib (M6620, VX-970) in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors

3012

Background: Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) is activated in response to replication stress from topoisomerase 1 inhibitors. Selective ATR inhibition with berzosertib potentiates the efficacy of irinotecan in colorectal mouse xenograft models. We hypothesized that berzosertib in combination with irinotecan is well tolerated, modulates the DNA damage repair response to irinotecan, and the combination is associated with clinical activity. Methods: This phase I study utilized a modified Storer’s up and down dose escalation design. Dose Levels (DLs) combined berzosertib 60 to 270 mg/m2 with irinotecan 180 mg/m2, every 2 weeks in a 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Activity, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) were secondary endpoints. The identification of molecular subpopulations sensitized to the combination was exploratory. Results: Between July 2016 and July 2021, 51 patients (pts) enrolled, of whom 50 received treatment. Pts most commonly had colorectal cancer (CRC, 39%), pancreatic cancer (24%), small cell lung cancer (SCLC, 6%) and non-small cell lung cancer (6%). The median number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range, 2 to 11). In Stage I, 1 of 3 evaluable pts experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 lung infection at DL3 (berzosertib 180 mg/m2 - irinotecan 180 mg/m2), and Stage II was initiated enrolling cohorts of 5 pts. In Stage II, 4 of the first 11 pts treated at DL4 (berzosertib 270 mg/m2 - irinotecan 180 mg/m2) were unable to complete the DLT evaluation period due to clinically significant toxicity not meeting DLT criteria: grade 2 diarrhea (1 pt), grade 3 diarrhea (1 pt), and grade 3 neutrophil decrease (2 pts). The protocol was amended to limit dose escalation beyond DL4. At DL4, 1 of 21 evaluable pts experienced DLT (grade 4 febrile neutropenia). Most common treatment-related grade ≥ 3 toxicities were neutrophil decrease (34%), lymphocyte decrease (30%), WBC decrease (28%), anemia (20%), diarrhea (16%), fatigue (8%) and hypokalemia (8%). 2 partial responses were observed, occurring in pts with pancreatic cancer and ATM alterations: 32% decrease in an ATM E11828/ATM K1109* tumor lasting 15.3 months and 68% decrease in an ATM R3008H/germline ATM R1882* tumor ongoing at 11 months. An additional pt with ATM S214fs*40 mutant colorectal cancer (CRC) experienced a 26% decrease lasting 7.5 months. Conclusions: Berzosertib 270 mg/m2 - irinotecan 180 mg/m2 was declared the RP2D. The combination is associated with manageable side effects and promising disease activity in ATM mutant solid tumors. PK and PD studies are in process. Tumor biopsy studies are planned in a 15 pt dose expansion cohort at DL4, enrolling pts with CRC, pancreatic cancer, SCLC and DNA damage repair deficient tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT02595931.

A phase II study of talazoparib plus avelumab in patients with stage IV or recurrent nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer bearing pathogenic STK11 genomic alterations (SWOG S1900C, LUNG-MAP sub-study, NCT04173507)

9060

Background: Inactivating STK11 genomic alterations are prevalent in non-squamous (nsq) NSCLC and define a patient (pt) subgroup with poor prognosis and inferior response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). PARP inhibitors (PARPi) can potentiate response to CPIs in preclinical models. We conducted a single arm Phase II study within Lung-MAP to evaluate the efficacy and safety of talazoparib in combination with avelumab in patients (pts) with previously treated nsq NSCLC harboring pathogenic STK11 genomic alterations. Methods: Eligibility: STK11 pathogenic somatic mutation or bi-allelic loss on tumor identified via LUNGMAP screening; stage IV or recurrent nsq NSCLC, receipt of one prior line of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy and platinum-based chemotherapy for stage IV or recurrent disease (sequentially or in combination) and disease progression > 42 days following treatment initiation, a ECOG PS of 0-1, adequate organ function and no previous PARPi exposure. Pts received talazoparib (1000 mg PO daily) plus avelumab (800 mg IV Q2W). Co-primary objectives were to evaluate the best objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate at 12 weeks (DCR12) after study registration, assessed by RECISTv1.1. Rejection of an ORR of 10% required ≥ 8 responses or rejection of a DCR12 of 30% required ≥18 w/ disease control at 12 weeks and ≥4 responses. Results: 47 pts enrolled from January 16 - November 16, 2020; 42 pts met eligibility (50% male, 50% female). 54% of pts had PD-L1 TPS < 1%. The median TMB was 8.83 Mut/Mb and 45% of pts had KRAS mutations. 52% of the pts had received ≥2 prior lines of treatment for stage IV disease. As of the November 24, 2021 data cutoff, 3 pts remain on treatment, the ORR was 2% (n = 1) and the DCR12 was 40% (n = 17). 26 pts (62%) had SD as best objective response. One responding pt remained on treatment for > 14 mo. The median progression-free survival (39 events) was 2.7 mo (95% CI, 1.6-3.9 mo) and the median overall survival (30 events) was 7.6 mo (95% CI, 6.3-12.2 mo). There were no reported grade 5 treatment toxicities and most grade 3-4 toxicities were hematologic. Additional biomarker analysis to assess effects of key co-mutations on clinical outcomes will be presented. Conclusions: Treatment with talazoparib and avelumab did not meet the pre-specified threshold for efficacy in previously treated STK11-mutant NSCLC in this biomarker-driven Phase II study, though durable disease stabilization was observed. Further studies are required to determine optimal therapeutic approaches for this challenging subset of NSCLC pts. Funding: NIH/NCI grants U10CA180888, U10CA180819. Talazoparib was provided by Pfizer. Avelumab was provided by Pfizer, as part of an alliance between Pfizer and the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100004755). Clinical trial information: NCT04173507.

Overcoming KRAS-Mutant Lung Cancer

More than 50 years after the discovery of RAS family proteins, which harbor the most common activating mutations in cancer, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the first direct allele-specific inhibitor of mutant KRAS in lung cancer. We highlight the history of discovering RAS and decades of studies targeting KRAS-driven lung cancer. A landmark article by Shokat and colleagues in 2013 elucidated allosteric inhibition of this undruggable target and paved the way for the first-in-class direct KRAS^G12C inhibitor. Although these drugs have impressive 36%-45% objective response rates with a median duration of response of 10 months, many tumors do not respond, and diverse mechanisms of resistance have already been observed; this includes new KRAS alterations, activation of alternate RTK pathway proteins, bypass pathways, and transcriptional remodeling. These resistance mechanisms can be profiled using tissue-based and plasma-based testing and help to inform clinical trial options for patients. We conclude with a discussion of research informing ongoing clinical trials to rationally test promising treatments to thwart or overcome resistance to KRAS^G12C inhibitors and target other KRAS-altered lung cancers.

Short communication: The activity of brigatinib in patients with disease progression after next generation anaplastic lymphoma tyrosine kinase inhibitors and an exploratory analysis of circulating tumor DNA

BACKGROUND

Brigatinib, a second generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is central nervous system (CNS) penetrant and active against anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) resistance mutations. We prospectively studied the activity of brigatinib in patients with disease progression after second generation ALK TKIs.

METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB/IV ALK + non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and progressive disease after second ALK TKIs were eligible. Cohort A enrolled patients with disease progression on any second ALK TKI, cohort B enrolled patients with disease progression after first-line therapy with alectinib, and cohort C enrolled patients who experienced disease progression on standard dose brigatinib. Brigatinib treatment was 90 mg daily for seven days and then escalated to 180 mg daily in cohorts A and B, and 240 mg daily in cohort C. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and a 2-stage design was used. The intended enrollment was 20 patients in stage 1, and 20 patients in stage 2.

RESULTS

The study was closed due to slow accrual. Between March 2017 and June 2020, 32 patients received study therapy; three patients in cohort A moved to cohort C after initial progression for a total of 35 study subjects. Of the 32 patients, 16 (50%) were male, the median age was 55 years (range 32-76), and patients received a median number of 2 prior ALK TKI's (range 1-3). Cohort A enrolled 27 patients, cohort B enrolled four patients, and cohort C enrolled four patients. The ORR in cohorts A, B, and C was 33% (95% confidence interval (CI: 16% to 54%), 25% (95% CI: 0.63% to 81%), and 0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Brigatinib has activity in ALK positive NSCLC patients with disease progression after second generation ALK TKIs.

Durvalumab plus tremelimumab alone or in combination with low-dose or hypofractionated radiotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer refractory to previous PD(L)-1 therapy: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is resistant to PD-1 and PD-L1 (PD[L]-1)-targeted therapy have poor outcomes. Studies suggest that radiotherapy could enhance antitumour immunity. Therefore, we investigated the potential benefit of PD-L1 (durvalumab) and CTLA-4 (tremelimumab) inhibition alone or combined with radiotherapy.

METHODS

This open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial was done by the National Cancer Institute Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network at 18 US sites. Patients aged 18 years or older with metastatic NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and progression during previous PD(L)-1 therapy were eligible. They were randomly assigned (1:1:1) in a web-based system by the study statistician using a permuted block scheme (block sizes of three or six) without stratification to receive either durvalumab (1500 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for a maximum of 13 cycles) plus tremelimumab (75 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for a maximum of four cycles) alone or with low-dose (0·5 Gy delivered twice per day, repeated for 2 days during each of the first four cycles of therapy) or hypofractionated radiotherapy (24 Gy total delivered over three 8-Gy fractions during the first cycle only), 1 week after initial durvalumab-tremelimumab administration. Study treatment was continued until 1 year or until progression. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (best locally assessed confirmed response of a partial or complete response) and, along with safety, was analysed in patients who received at least one dose of study therapy. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02888743, and is now complete.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 24, 2017, and March 29, 2019, 90 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, of whom 78 (26 per group) were treated. This trial was stopped due to futility assessed in an interim analysis. At a median follow-up of 12·4 months (IQR 7·8-15·1), there were no differences in overall response rates between the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group (three [11·5%, 90% CI 1·2-21·8] of 26 patients) and the low-dose radiotherapy group (two [7·7%, 0·0-16·3] of 26 patients; p=0·64) or the hypofractionated radiotherapy group (three [11·5%, 1·2-21·8] of 26 patients; p=0·99). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were dyspnoea (two [8%] in the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group; three [12%] in the low-dose radiotherapy group; and three [12%] in the hypofractionated radiotherapy group) and hyponatraemia (one [4%] in the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group vs two [8%] in the low-dose radiotherapy group vs three [12%] in the hypofractionated radiotherapy group). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in one (4%) patient in the durvalumab-tremelimumab alone group (maculopapular rash), five (19%) patients in the low-dose radiotherapy group (abdominal pain, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, hypokalemia, and respiratory failure), and four (15%) patients in the hypofractionated group (adrenal insufficiency, colitis, diarrhoea, and hyponatremia). In the low-dose radiotherapy group, there was one death from respiratory failure potentially related to study therapy.

INTERPRETATION

Radiotherapy did not increase responses to combined PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 inhibition in patients with NSCLC resistant to PD(L)-1 therapy. However, PD-L1 plus CTLA-4 therapy could be a treatment option for some patients. Future studies should refine predictive biomarkers in this setting.

FUNDING

The US National Institutes of Health and the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

IMpower150 Final Exploratory Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in Key NSCLC Patient Subgroups With EGFR Mutations or Metastases in the Liver or Brain

INTRODUCTION

Final overall survival (OS) analyses are presented for EGFR mutations and liver or brain metastases subgroups in the phase III IMpower150 study (NCT02366143) evaluating atezolizumab+bevacizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (ABCP) or atezolizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (ACP) vs bevacizumab+carboplatin/paclitaxel (BCP).

METHODS

Overall, 1202 patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) with chemotherapy-naive, metastatic, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to ABCP, ACP or BCP. Patients with treated, stable brain metastases were permitted. OS was assessed in EGFR mutations and baseline liver metastases subgroups; rate and time to development (TTD) of new brain metastases was assessed in ITT patients.

RESULTS

At data cutoff (September 13, 2019; median follow-up, 39.3 months), OS improvements were sustained with ABCP versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: hazard ratio [HR] 0.60; 95% CI: 0.31-1.14; prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]: HR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.38-1.46) and baseline liver metastases (HR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.45-1.02) subgroups. ACP did not show survival benefit versus BCP in sensitizing EGFR mutations (all: HR 1.0; 95% CI: 0.57-1.74; prior TKI: HR 1.22; 95% CI: 0.68-2.22) or liver metastases (HR 1.01; 95% CI: 0.68-1.51) subgroups. Overall, 100 patients (8.3%) developed new brain metastases. While not formally evaluated, an improvement toward delayed TTD was seen with ABCP vs BCP (HR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.39-1.19).

CONCLUSIONS

This final exploratory analysis showed OS benefits for ABCP versus BCP in patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations, including those with prior TKI failures, and with liver metastases, although these results should be interpreted with caution. The impact of ABCP on delaying the development of new brain lesions requires further investigation.

Macro-vasculature and positron emission tomography (PET) standardized uptake value in lung cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between macro-vasculature features and the standardized uptake value (SUV) of positron emission tomography (PET), which is a surrogate for the metabolic activity of a lung tumor.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 90 lung cancer patients who had both chest CT and PET-CT examinations before receiving cancer treatment. The SUVs in the medical reports were used. We quantified three macro-vasculature features depicted on CT images (i.e., vessel number, vessel volume, and vessel tortuosity) and several tumor features (i.e., volume, maximum diameter, mean diameter, surface area, and density). Tumor size (e.g., volume) was used as a covariate to adjust for possible confounding factors. Backward stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed to develop a model for predicting PET SUV from the relevant image features. The Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

PET SUV was positively correlated with vessel volume (R = 0.44, p<0.001) and vessel number (R = 0.44, p<0.001) but not with vessel tortuosity (R = 0.124, p >0.05). After adjusting for tumor size, PET SUV was significantly correlated with vessel tortuosity (R = 0.299, p = 0.004) and vessel number (R = 0.224, p = 0.035), but only marginally correlated with vessel volume (R = 0.187, p = 0.079). The multiple regression model showed a performance with an R-Squared of 0.391 and an adjusted R-Squared of 0.355 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our investigations demonstrate the potential relationship between macro-vasculature and PET SUV and suggest the possibility of inferring the metabolic activity of a lung tumor from chest CT images. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Phase II randomized study of ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab versus standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with a checkpoint inhibitor: Toxicity update (Lung-MAP non-matched sub-study S1800A)

9075

Background: The therapeutic landscape in metastatic NSCLC has dramatically changed with approvals of immunotherapy agents in both treatment-naïve and previously treated cancer patients (pts) and irrespective of histology. Pts with tumors that develop resistance is a significant area of unmet need. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been shown to modulate the tumor immune microenvironment and combination immune checkpoint and VEGF/VEGF receptor inhibition have shown benefit in multiple tumor types. Lung-MAP is a master protocol for pts with stage IV, previously treated NSCLC. Pts who were not eligible for a biomarker-matched substudy enrolled in S1800A. The adverse event profile will be presented. Methods: S1800A is a phase II randomized trial for pts who previously received PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor therapy for at least 84 days and platinum-based doublet therapy with ECOG 0-1 stratified by PD-L1 expression, histology and intent to receive ramucirumab in the standard of care (SOC) arm. Pts were randomized 1:1 to pembrolizumab and ramucirumab P+R or SOC (docetaxel +R [SOC w R]; docetaxel, pemetrexed or gemcitabine [SOC wo R]). The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included response, duration of response, investigator assessed-progression free survival and evaluation of toxicity. Results: From May 17, 2019 to November 16, 2020, 166 pts enrolled and 140 determined eligible [69 (49%) P+R; 46 (33%) SOC w R; 25 (18%) SOC wo R]. Treatments for those who received SOC wo R included 3 on docetaxel (19%); 12 on gemcitabine (75%); and on 1 on pemetrexed (6%). 131 were eligible for adverse event (AE) assessment. The most common AE were fatigue (38%), proteinuria (28%), hypertension (23%), diarrhea (22%) and hypothyroidism (22%) on P+R; fatigue (61%), anemia (48%), diarrhea (41%) and neutropenia (39%) on SOC w R and anemia (56%), leukopenia (56%), fatigue (44%) and neutropenia (44%) on SOC wo R. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 32% of pts on P+R, 54% of pts on SOC w R and 56% of pts on SOC wo R. Cardiac and thromboembolic events occurred in 12% of pts on P+R, 11% of pts on SOC w R and 0% of pts on SOC wo R. Grade 5 AE occurred in 2 pts on P+R (respiratory failure and cardiac arrest), 3 pts on SOC w R (2 respiratory failure and sepsis) and 1 pt on SOC wo R (sepsis). Four patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 (1 on P+R and 3 on SOC) and 3 died (1 on P+R and 2 on SOC). Conclusions: Grade 3 toxicities were lower in P+R compared to SOC arms with or without R. Cardiac and thromboembolic events were similar in arms that included R. P+R was generally well-tolerated. Efficacy outcomes will be presented when data matures. Clinical trial information: NCT03971474.

A phase II study of rucaparib in patients with high genomic LOH and/or BRCA 1/2 mutated stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (Lung-MAP Sub-Study, S1900A)

9024

Background: While prior studies have shown robust efficacy leading to FDA approval of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in BRCA-associated cancers, data in NSCLC are much less clear. S1900A, a LUNG-MAP substudy, evaluated the PARPi rucaparib in advanced stage NSCLC harboring BRCA1/2 mutations or genomic loss of heterozygosity (LOH) as a phenotypic marker of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Methods: Eligible patients (pts) were required to have a deleterious mutation in BRCA1/BRCA2 and/or high (≥21%) genomic LOH. Key eligibility criteria: advanced NSCLC patients (pts) with progression on or after platinum based chemotherapy and/or PD-(L)1 antibody and progressed on most recent line of systemic therapy, a Zubrod performance status of 0-1, adequate organ function, no ≥ grade 3 hypercholesterolemia, no previous PARPi exposure and no systemic therapy within 21 days of registration. Pts stratified by histology into two cohorts (squamous [sq] and non-squamous/mixed histology [nsq]). With 40 eligible pts per cohort, the design had 91% power to rule out an ORR of 15% if the true ORR was at least 35% at the 1-sided 5% level. A planned interim analysis on the first 20 pts evaluable for response per cohort required ≥ 3 responses to proceed to full enrollment. Results: 64 pts enrolled (27 sq cohort; 37 nsq cohort) of whom 59 are eligible. Median age 65.7 yrs; M/F 33/26 (56/44%); 98% of the pts received at least 1 prior line of treatment for stage IV disease. Biomarker selection included 36 pts (61%) LOH only, 4 pts (7%) BRCA1 only, 11 pts (19%) BRCA2 only, 4 pts (7%) BRCA1 + LOH high and 4 pts (7%) BRCA2 + LOH high. Both cohorts were closed for futility with insufficient responses in the interim analysis populations. In the full study, 4 responses (3 nsq/1 sq) were reported. ORR was 7% (95% CI: 0-13) (9% nsq/4% sq) and DCR was 62% (95% CI: 50-75) (62% nsq/64% sq); 3 of the 4 responders harbored BRCA1/2 mutations and 1 of 4 high LOH; ORR in BRCA1/2+ pts 3/23 (13%). Median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI: 1.6-4.6) in nsq cohort and 2.9 months (95% CI 1.6-6.2) in sq cohort. Median OS was 7.8 months in nsq cohort and 7.9 months in sq cohort. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were anemia (22%), lymphopenia (8%), fatigue (8%) and transaminitis (5%). Conclusions: S1900A failed to show the requisite level of efficacy for rucaparib in advanced NSCLC pts with high genomic LOH and/or a BRCA1/2 mutation. There were no new safety signals and hematologic toxicities were the most frequent adverse events. Genomic LOH as a phenotypic marker of HRD does not predict sufficient activity of rucaparib in NSCLC. These results stand in contrast to the high level of efficacy of PARPi in patients with BRCA-associated or high LOH cancers of other tumor types. Underlying biologic differences in the genomic characteristics of these cancers vs. NSCLC may be responsible. Studies examining this premise are ongoing. (NCT03845296). Clinical trial information: NCT03845296.

Phase IB Study of Osimertinib in Combination with Navitoclax in EGFR-mutant NSCLC Following Resistance to Initial EGFR Therapy (ETCTN 9903)

PURPOSE

Osimertinib is an effective therapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but resistance invariably develops. Navitoclax is an oral inhibitor of BCL-2/BCL-xL that has exhibited synergy with osimertinib in preclinical models of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. In hematologic malignancies, BCL-2 family inhibitors in combination therapy effectively increase cellular apoptosis and decrease drug resistance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-arm phase Ib study evaluated safety, tolerability, and feasibility of osimertinib and navitoclax, including dose expansion in T790M-positive patients at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Eligible patients had advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC with prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor exposure. Five dose levels were planned with osimertinib from 40 to 80 mg orally daily and navitoclax from 150 to 325 mg orally daily.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients were enrolled (18 in the dose-escalation cohort and nine in the dose-expansion cohort): median age 65, 67% female, 48% exon 19 del, and 37% L858R, median one prior line of therapy. The most common adverse events were lymphopenia (37%), fatigue (22%), nausea (22%), and thrombocytopenia (37%). No dose-limiting toxicities were seen in dose-escalation cohort; osimertinib 80 mg, navitoclax 150 mg was chosen as the RP2D. Most patients (78%) received >95% of planned doses through three cycles. In expansion cohort, objective response rate was 100% and median progression-free survival was 16.8 months. A proapoptotic effect from navitoclax was demonstrated by early-onset thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral combination therapy with navitoclax and osimertinib was safe and feasible at RP2D with clinical efficacy. Early thrombocytopenia was common, supporting an target engagement by navitoclax. Further study of BCL-2/BCL-xL inhibition to enhance osimertinib activity is warranted.

Crizotinib in Patients With MET-Amplified NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

MET amplification is a rare, potentially actionable, primary oncogenic driver in patients with NSCLC.

METHODS

The influence of MET amplification on the clinical activity of the ALK, ROS1, and MET inhibitor, crizotinib (250 mg twice daily), was examined in patients with NSCLC (NCT00585195) who were enrolled into high (≥4 MET-to-CEP7 ratio), medium (>2.2 to <4 MET-to-CEP7 ratio), or low (≥1.8 to ≤2.2 MET-to-CEP7 ratio) amplification categories. Retrospective next-generation sequencing profiling was performed on archival tumor tissue. End points included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients with a MET-to-CEP7 ratio greater than or equal to 1.8 by local fluorescence in situ hybridization testing received crizotinib. All patients were response-assessable, among whom 21, 14, and 3 had high, medium, and low MET amplification, respectively. ORRs of 8 of 21 (38.1%), 2 of 14 (14.3%), and 1 of 3 (33.3%), median duration of response of 5.2, 3.8, and 12.2 months, and median progression-free survival values of 6.7, 1.9, and 1.8 months were observed for those with high, medium, and low MET amplification, respectively. MET amplification gene copy number greater than or equal to 6 was detected by next-generation sequencing in 15 of 19 (78.9%) analyzable patients. Of these 15 patients, objective responses were observed in six (40%), two of whom had concurrent MET exon 14 alterations. No responses were observed among five patients with concurrent KRAS, BRAF, or EGFR mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with high-level, MET-amplified NSCLC responded to crizotinib with the highest ORR. Use of combined diagnostics for MET and other oncogenes may potentially identify patients most likely to respond to crizotinib.

Immune Checkpoint Blockade in Oncogene-Driven Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Patients with oncogene-driven lung cancer have limited therapeutic options after progressing on their targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Given the growing role of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in the treatment of lung cancer, oncogene-driven cancer has warranted further evaluation regarding ICI therapy. However, initial ICI studies have suggested that ICI monotherapy is not only lacking in efficacy, but that it may be less tolerable in oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We performed a detailed review of the literature using Pubmed, and present the current and impactful findings here. Studies evaluating the use of concurrent ICI therapy and TKI therapy have also suggested increased toxicity and lack of increased activity in these patients. Larger studies have suggested that the sequence of ICI therapy and TKI, such as utilizing ICI therapy after TKI as opposed to before TKI, may play a role in reducing toxicity (hepatotoxicity, pneumonitis); however, these studies are limited in number. Novel methods of patient selection, including low tumor mutational burden, inflamed phenotyping, and  high CD8 + tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, may aid in determining ideal patients to give ICI therapy. Novel therapeutic combinations including the addition of anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) therapy or radiotherapy show promising findings for these patients. Given the growing unmet need for therapeutic options in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC who have failed TKI therapy, further research is warranted.

Updated overall survival (OS) and genomic analysis from a single-arm phase II study of dabrafenib (D) + trametinib (T) in patients (pts) with BRAF V600E mutant (Mut) metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

9593

Background: The phase II multicenter, open label study, which evaluated efficacy and safety of D+T in pretreated (cohort B) and treatment (tx)-naive (cohort C) pts with BRAF V600E mut metastatic NSCLC. The results of the primary analysis have been reported. Here, we present an updated survival and genomic analysis data for cohorts B and C. Methods: Tx-naïve (n=36) and pretreated (n=57) pts received D 150 mg twice daily + T 2 mg daily. Primary objective: ORR, secondary objectives: PFS, DOR, OS, safety, tolerability and PK of D+T. Tumor samples were centrally tested using a NGS cancer targeted panel (Oncomine Dx Target test, ThermoFisher Scientific). KM curves and Cox regression models were used to evaluate potential associations between baseline genomic landscape and pt efficacy endpoints. Results: As of June 22, 2019, median (m) follow-up was 16.3 mo in tx-naïve pts and 16.6 mo in pretreated pts. mOS was 17.3 mo (95% CI: 12.3, 40.2; 3 yr OS: 40%) and 18.2 mo (95% CI: 14.3, 28.6; 3 yr OS: 33%) with 14/36 and 11/57 pts alive in tx naïve and pretreated pts respectively. Detailed efficacy results are presented in table. 57/62 tumor samples retrieved from 93 pts were centrally confirmed to have BRAF V600E mut; 5 non-confirmed BRAF tumors (3 pts had PR) were positive for c-MET T1010I, KRAS G12V, ALK fusion and 2 JAK3 S493C with mPFS of 13.8 mo while OS was NE due to limited data points. Eleven pts (18%) had concomitant somatic mutations and/or genetic alterations in addition to BRAF V600E mut: 4 had alterations within PI3K pathway4 had concomitant mutations at IDH1 R132X, and 3 pts had additional mutations at BRAF G466V, KRAS G13C and a cMET exon 14 skipping, respectively. Pts whose tumors had concomitant genetic alterations, particularly in PI3K pathway, showed a trend towards decreased PFS and OS. Safety profile was similar to previous reported results. Conclusions: This update of BRF113928 study reported improved and durable OS rates with combination D+T in BRAF V600E mut NSCLC pts. Co-occurring genetic alterations might influence clinical outcomes of such pts. Further validation is ongoing to corroborate current genomic findings. Clinical trial information: NCT01336634 . [Table: see text]

Phase I study of TRC102 in combination with cisplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced solid tumors/Phase II study of TRC102 with pemetrexed in patients with mesothelioma refractory to pemetrexed and cisplatin or carboplatin

9055

Background: Treatment options remain limited in malignant pleural mesothelioma refractory to pemetrexed +/- platinum. TRC102 (methoxyamine hydrochloride) is a novel biochemical inhibitor of the BER pathway. Available data support the hypothesis that TRC102 bound DNA is a substrate for topoisomerase II, which cleaves TRC102-bound DNA sites to produce strand breaks in cancer cells that cause cellular apoptosis and enhance the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy. Methods: This was a parallel cohort trial of a Phase I of TRC102 in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) and pemetrexed in patients with advanced solid tumors (Arm A) and a Phase II of TRC102 with pemetrexed in patients with mesothelioma refractory to platinum and pemetrexed (Arm B). Results: In Arm A dose escalation, 16 pts (11M/5F) were treated; 9 evaluable through 3 TRC102 dose levels (50, 75, and 100 mg/day, PO), with CDDP 60 mg/m2 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (levels 1- 3); and 5 evaluable at TRC102 100 mg/day PO, CDDP 75 mg/m2, pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 (level 4). Cycles were every 21 days. There were no DLT’s, establishing level 4 as the RP2D. The only grade 4 treatment-related AE was thrombocytopenia on cycle 22 (level 2). Cycle 1 grade 3 AEs were 1 hypophosphatemia (level 1) and 1 leukopenia (level 2). There were 3 PRs (all parotid salivary gland tumors). Median PFS (95%CI) = 7.1% (1.4 – 15.5) mos. Arm B was designed as the first stage of a two stage Gehan design trial of patients with mesothelioma who had progressed on or recurred within 6 months of pemetrexed + platinum frontline treatment. 14 pts were treated with TRC102 50 mg/day D1-4 and pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 21 days. There were 2 PRs (both in epithelioid cancer of which 1 was confirmed), meeting the pre-specified criteria for continued interest ( > 0/14). mPFS (95% CI) was 4.3 (1.4 - 6.8) mos. 8 pts had stable disease for at least 1 cycle (4 stable at cycles 6, 9, 10 and 12). There were 1 grade 4 neutropenia and 5 grade 3 AE’s (1 each – anemia, neutropenia, leukopenia, fatigue, hyponatremia). Conclusions: TRC102 in combination with CDDP and pemetrexed exhibited antitumor activity, particularly in salivary gland tumors, and a tolerable safety profile at the doses tested. The combination of TRC102 and pemetrexed demonstrated activity in malignant mesothelioma that progressed on prior pemetrexed. Additional studies are warranted to confirm preliminary signals of activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02535312.

IMpower150: Exploratory analysis of brain metastases development

9587

Background: In the global phase III IMpower150 study (NCT02366143), atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) + chemo (carboplatin + paclitaxel [CP] (ABCP) showed significant improvements in PFS and OS vs BCP in patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic NSCLC (Socinski et al. N Engl J Med 2018). Because bev has been shown to delay or prevent brain metastases progression in NSCLC (Fu et al. J Chemother 2016; Ilhan-Mutlu et al. Mol Can Ther 2016), exploratory analyses were conducted to assess the development of brain metastases in patients treated with ABCP, BCP and atezo + CP (ACP) in IMpower150. Methods: A total of 1202 patients (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive ABCP, ACP or BCP. Doses were given every 3 weeks: atezo 1200 mg, bev 15 mg/kg, carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL/min and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2. Co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS and OS in ITT–wild-type (no EGFR or ALK alterations) patients. Exploratory analyses included the rate and time to development (TTD) of new brain metastases in the ITT population, regardless of the presence of baseline brain metastases, as well as safety. Brain scans were performed as clinically indicated, and analyses were based on investigator assessments. Results: With a minimum follow-up of 32.4 months in the ITT population (data cutoff: September 13, 2019), 100 patients had developed brain metastases, with the highest rate of new brain lesions seen in the ACP (11.9%) vs the ABCP (7.0%) and BCP (6.0%) arms (table). Median TTD was not reached in any arm; a trend toward delayed TTD was seen in the ABCP vs BCP arm (HR, 0.68 [95% CI: 0.39, 1.19]). Among patients with and without brain metastases, 17 (35.4%) and 155 (44.0%) in the ACP arm, 18 (64.3%) and 207 (56.7%) in the ABCP arm and 10 (41.7%) and 183 (49.5%) in the BCP arm had Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events, respectively. Conclusions: The ACP arm had the highest rate of new brain lesions, whereas the ABCP and BCP arms had similar, lower rates. Taken together with the trend toward delayed development of new brain lesions with ABCP, the data suggest that adding atezo to BCP may not reduce the rate of new brain lesion development but may delay the time to new lesion development. No new safety signals were observed in this exploratory analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT02366143 . [Table: see text]

Nab-paclitaxel in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have developed disease progression after platinum-based doublet chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The selection of later-line treatment for older patients with AJCC (version 7) stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel is approved with carboplatin for the first-line treatment of patients with NSCLC and subgroup analysis of phase 3 data has suggested superior survival in older patients.

METHODS

The authors conducted a phase 2 study of nab-paclitaxel in 42 patients aged ≥70 years who had been treated previously with a platinum doublet regimen; patients also could have received a PD-1 inhibitor. The primary endpoint of the current study was grade 3 to 5 toxicity (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). In addition to response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), geriatric assessments also were performed before and during treatment, associations between baseline sarcopenia and outcomes were explored, and changes in T lymphocyte p16 before and during treatment were measured. The authors also performed a retrospective subgroup analysis of 19 older patients who were treated with nab-paclitaxel as part of a larger, randomized, phase 2 study; data were not combined.

RESULTS

The rate of grade 3 to 5 toxicities was 33.7%. The most common grade 3 to 5 toxicities were decreased white blood cell count (11.9%), neutropenia (9.5%), and fatigue (11.9%). The response rate was 34.2% (2.6% complete response rate and 31.6% partial response rate). The median PFS was 5.2 months and the median OS was 9.3 months. Adverse prognostic factors were common: 42% of patients were frail and 39% of patients were prefrail, whereas 21% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 and 27% were sarcopenic. Only frailty was found to be predictive of inferior survival. A subgroup analysis of 19 older patients treated with nab-paclitaxel alone in a prior trial demonstrated a response rate of 15.8%, a PFS of 4.2 months, and an OS of 13.6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Fit and prefrail older patients with stage IV NSCLC should be considered for treatment with nab-paclitaxel after disease progression with doublet chemotherapy.

Antitumor activity of crizotinib in lung cancers harboring a MET exon 14 alteration

MET exon 14 alterations are oncogenic drivers of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs)1. These alterations are associated with increased MET activity and preclinical sensitivity to MET inhibition2. Crizotinib is a multikinase inhibitor with potent activity against MET3. The antitumor activity and safety of crizotinib were assessed in 69 patients with advanced NSCLCs harboring MET exon 14 alterations. Objective response rate was 32% (95% confidence interval (CI), 21-45) among 65 response-evaluable patients. Objective responses were observed independent of the molecular heterogeneity that characterizes these cancers and did not vary by splice-site region and mutation type of the MET exon 14 alteration, concurrent increased MET copy number or the detection of a MET exon 14 alteration in circulating tumor DNA. The median duration of response was 9.1 months (95% CI, 6.4-12.7). The median progression-free survival was 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.4-9.1). MET exon 14 alteration defines a molecular subgroup of NSCLCs for which MET inhibition with crizotinib is active. These results address an unmet need for targeted therapy in people with lung cancers with MET exon 14 alterations and adds to an expanding list of genomically driven therapies for oncogenic subsets of NSCLC.

A phase II study of nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy plus necitumumab in the first-line treatment of patients with stage IV squamous non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Necitumumab is a second-generation, recombinant, human IgG1-type monoclonal antibody directed against EGFR approved for adult patients with metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) and carboplatin in combination with necitumumab as first-line therapy in patients with stage IV squamous NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The treatment regimen comprised triplet induction with necitumumab (800 mg) with nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m²) and carboplatin (AUC 6 mg*min/mL) for 4 cycles, followed by doublet maintenance with necitumumab and nab-paclitaxel with a 3-weekly schedule until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint of the study was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were enrolled. Median age was 65 years (range, 47-80 years). The majority of the patients were male (n = 42 [77.8%]) with an ECOG PS of 1 (n = 42 [77.8%]). The ORR was 51% (n = 26/54), and the disease control rate was 78.4% (n = 40/54). Median overall survival (OS) was 15.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.18-not calculable), and the OS rate at 12 months was 50.4% (95% CI: 29.0-68.4). Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.24-7.69)]. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia (57.4%), fatigue (55.6%), neutrophil count decreased (55.6%), hypomagnesemia (44.4%), and rash (38.9%).

CONCLUSION

Necitumumab/nab-paclitaxel/carboplatin first-line therapy produced favorable efficacy outcomes with manageable toxicity in patients with stage IV squamous NSCLC. The safety profile was fairly comparable with previous necitumumab combination studies in lung cancer.

Abstract CT225: A Phase Ib/IIa randomized pilot study to investigate the safety and tolerability of autologous T-cells with enhanced T-cell receptors specific to NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a (GSK3377794) alone, or in combination with pembrolizumab, in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction: There is a high unmet medical need for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have failed platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors. Only 10% of such patients receive any benefit from current therapies, and novel therapies are needed to improve outcomes. Preclinical data support the efficacy, specificity and possible safety of NYESO1/LAGE1a T-cell receptor-engineered patient Tcells (GSK3377794) in NSCLC. Pembrolizumab (PEM) is a monoclonal antibody, which specifically blocks PD1/PDL1 interaction, thereby increasing the antitumor function of Tcells. Thus, the combination of GSK3377794 and PEM may work synergistically due to the inhibition of PD1/PD-L1 signaling on GSK3377794 and other T-cells, potentially further improving the therapeutic effect.

Methods: This is a Phase Ib/IIa randomized, multiarm, openlabel pilot study (NCT03709706) in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)A*02:01, HLAA*02:05 and/or HLAA*02:06 adult patients (aged &gt;18 years) whose tumors express NYESO1 and/or LAGE1a. This study aims to enroll up to 44 patients with unresectable Stage IIIb or Stage IV NSCLC who were either ineligible for definitive chemoradiotherapy, have recurrent disease which has progressed during or after platinumbased chemotherapy with or without anti-PD-1 agents, have terminated prior treatment due to intolerable side effects, or have refused standard approved treatment. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to two treatment arms. Arm A will receive GSK3377794 as monotherapy, administered as a single intravenous (IV) infusion; Arm B will receive GSK3377794 as a single IV infusion on Day 1 followed by PEM 200 mg initiated on Day 22 and continued for up to 35 cycles or until disease progression. Patients in Arm A who progress after receiving GSK3377794 monotherapy will be offered antiPD1 therapy at the same dose and duration as Arm B. The study will use a Bayesian adaptive design, wherein enrollment can be halted in either arm for futility. The patient journey will consist of 3 parts: patients will undergo eligibility screening (Part 1), followed by leukapheresis (Part 2), after which patients will enter the Interventional Phase (Part 3) during which patients will receive preparative lymphodepleting chemotherapy followed by infusion of GSK3377794. The first patient was screened on December 31, 2018.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03709706

Study is funded by GlaxoSmithKline and is in collaboration with Merck & Co., Inc.

Citation Format: Karen L. Reckamp, Wallace Akerley, Martin J. Edelman, Balazs Halmos, Kai He, Melissa Johnson, Raja Mudad, Joel W. Neal, Taofeek K. Owonikoko, Jyoti D. Patel, Sandip P. Patel, Jonathan W. Riess, Adrian G. Sacher, Simon Turcotte, Liza C. Villaruz, Marjorie G. Zauderer, Benedetto Farsaci, Aisha Hasan, Roma Patel, Yuehui Wu, Michael Chisamore, Vincent Lam. A Phase Ib/IIa randomized pilot study to investigate the safety and tolerability of autologous T-cells with enhanced T-cell receptors specific to NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a (GSK3377794) alone, or in combination with pembrolizumab, in advanced non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT225.

PD-L1 Testing in Guiding Patient Selection for PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor Therapy in Lung Cancer

Immunotherapy with programmed death 1 (PD-1)- and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-targeted monoclonal antibodies has dramatically changed the therapeutic and prognostic landscape for several types of malignancy. PD-1 and PD-L1 are immune checkpoint proteins whose binding ultimately result in T cell exhaustion and self-tolerance. Blocking this pathway 'releases the brakes' on the immune system and allows for attack of tumor cells that express PD-L1. The clinical trials that led to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of these agents used different immunohistochemical (IHC) platforms with various PD-L1 antibodies to assess for PD-L1 expression on either tumor cells or tumor-infiltrating immune cells. There are four PD-L1 IHC assays registered with the FDA, using four different PD-L1 antibodies (22C3, 28-8, SP263, SP142), on two different IHC platforms (Dako and Ventana), each with their own scoring systems. Attempts at harmonization of PD-L1 IHC antibodies and staining platforms are underway. While PD-L1 IHC can be used to predict the likelihood of response to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy, a proportion of patients that are negative can have a response and identification of alternative biomarkers is critical to further refine selection of patients most likely to respond to these therapies.

Comparison of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays and response to PD-1/L1 inhibitors in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in clinical practice

AIMS

Several studies have demonstrated analytical comparability between different PD-L1 assays, but their clinical validity in non-small-cell lung cancer in terms of response to treatment outside clinical trials has not been established. The aim of our study is to assess the analytical performance of laboratory-developed tests for Ventana SP263 and Agilent/Dako 22C3, and to investigate the association between PD-L1 assays and response to PD-1/L1 inhibitors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PD-L1 SP263 and 22C3 assays were performed on 302 consecutive non-small-cell lung carcinoma samples Both assays were optimised for use on the automated Ventana BenchMark Ultra platform. Scoring algorithms for staining of the tumour cells using the established cut-offs were applied to all samples. Best overall response (BOR) for 44 patients treated with either nivolumab, pembrolizumab or atezolizumab were assessed using recist version 1.1 and correlated with PD-L1 assay results. Assays showed good agreement, with a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.82-0.90)]. Comparing the assays using cut-offs of 1%, 5%, 10%, 1-49% and ≥50% showed an association between the two assays (P < 0.0001). The SP263 10% cut-off (P = 0.032) was associated with BOR, whereas the 1% (P = 0.087) and 5% (P = 0.051) cut-offs were not. In contrast 22C3, cut-offs of 1% (P = 0.019), 5% (P = 0.025) and 10% (P = 0.014) were all associated with BOR.

CONCLUSIONS

The SP263 and 22C3 LDTs demonstrated good analytical concordance, and correlation with response to PD-1/L1 inhibitors.

Pembrolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Phase 1 cohorts from the KEYNOTE-021 study

OBJECTIVES

Platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has modest benefit overall, but has the potential to amplify immune responses. In cohorts A-C of the multicohort phase 1/2 study KEYNOTE-021 (Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02039674), we evaluated combinations of platinum-doublet chemotherapy with the anti-programmed death 1 monocloncal antibody pembrolizumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated, advanced NSCLC without EGFR/ALK aberrations were randomized to pembrolizumab 2 or 10 mg/kg Q3W plus carboplatin area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) 6 mg/mL/min plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m² (cohort A, any histology), carboplatin AUC 6 mg/mL/min plus paclitaxel 200 mg/m² plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (cohort B, non-squamous), or carboplatin AUC 5 mg/mL/min plus pemetrexed 500 mg/m² (cohort C, non-squamous) for 4 cycles followed by maintenance pembrolizumab (cohort A), pembrolizumab plus bevacizumab (cohort B), or pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed (cohort C). Response was assessed by blinded independent central review.

RESULTS

Overall, 74 patients were randomized; median follow-up was 21.4, 16.4, and 17.4 months in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred in any cohort at either pembrolizumab dose. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were alopecia, fatigue, and nausea. Treatment-related grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 40%, 42%, and 46% of patients in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively; AEs with possible immune etiology occurred in 24%, 50%, and 38% of patients, respectively. Objective response rates were 48%, 56%, and 75% in cohorts A, B, and C, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab in combination with carboplatin-paclitaxel and with pemetrexed-carboplatin yielded encouraging antitumor activity and toxicity consistent with known toxicities of platinum-based chemotherapy or pembrolizumab monotherapy.

Phase Ib Study of Bavituximab With Carboplatin and Pemetrexed in Chemotherapy-Naive Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Bavituximab is an immunomodulatory chimeric monoclonal antibody that inhibits phosphatidylserine signaling, which promotes innate and adaptive immune responses. In this phase Ib trial we evaluated the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of pemetrexed, carboplatin, bavituximab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC and performance status 0 or 1 were treated with pemetrexed 500 mg/m² and carboplatin area under the curve 6 once every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles, with concurrent bavituximab (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg) intravenously weekly, using a standard 3+3 design. At the maximum identified dose, additional patients were enrolled to further characterize the safety profile. The primary objective was to characterize the safety, determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and establish the recommended phase II dose of bavituximab in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin in incurable stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC.

RESULTS

Between March 29, 2011 and December 30, 2013, 26 patients were enrolled. Three patients each were enrolled into dose escalation cohorts of bavituximab (0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg). Therapy was well tolerated with no DLTs, and toxicities were consistent with those expected from pemetrexed/carboplatin. Overall response was 28%, with a median progression-free and overall survival of 4.8 months and 12.2 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of pemetrexed, carboplatin, bavituximab is well tolerated. However, with toxicities and preliminary efficacy signal similar to pemetrexed/carboplatin alone, further studies of bavituximab should focus on ways to enhance its immunomodulatory role.

ATM protein is deficient in over 40% of lung adenocarcinomas

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the USA and worldwide, and of the estimated 1.2 million new cases of lung cancer diagnosed every year, over 30% are lung adenocarcinomas. The backbone of 1^st-line systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, in the absence of an actionable oncogenic driver, is platinum-based chemotherapy. ATM and ATR are DNA damage signaling kinases activated at DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and stalled and collapsed replication forks, respectively. ATM protein is lost in a number of cancer cell lines and ATR kinase inhibitors synergize with cisplatin to resolve xenograft models of ATM-deficient lung cancer. We therefore sought to determine the frequency of ATM loss in a tissue microarray (TMA) of lung adenocarcinoma. Here we report the validation of a commercial antibody (ab32420) for the identification of ATM by immunohistochemistry and estimate that 61 of 147 (41%, 95% CI 34%-50%) cases of lung adenocarcinoma are negative for ATM protein expression. As a positive control for ATM staining, nuclear ATM protein was identified in stroma and immune infiltrate in all evaluable cases. ATM loss in lung adenocarcinoma was not associated with overall survival. However, our preclinical findings in ATM-deficient cell lines suggest that ATM could be a predictive biomarker for synergy of an ATR kinase inhibitor with standard-of-care cisplatin. This could improve clinical outcome in 100,000's of patients with ATM-deficient lung adenocarcinoma every year.

ALK FISH patterns and the detection of ALK fusions by next generation sequencing in lung adenocarcinoma

Break-apart ALK FISH probe is the FDA approved approach for detection of ALK rearrangements in lung carcinoma patients who may benefit from ALK kinase inhibitors. The FISH assay can be technically challenging and difficult to interpret. ALK immunohistochemistry and next generation sequencing have been proposed as alternative approaches. In this study, we compared various ALK –FISH patterns to next –generation sequencing (NGS) for gene fusion detection, ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) and tumor responses to crizotinib. 72 (4%) of 2116 lung adenocarcinoma were positive by ALK- FISH. Of 28 ALK-FISH positive cases selected for the study, FISH patterns included 15 (54%) cases with split signal, 10 (36%) with single orange signal and 3 (10%) with “mixed pattern”. 12 (80%) cases with split signal and 4 (40%) cases with single orange signal were positive by NGS and IHC, while mixed cases were all negative. Mutation analysis of discordant cases revealed multiple mutations including oncogenic mutations in EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and ATM genes. All discordant cases in groups with split and mixed signal showed a lower number of cells with rearrangement (mean 28.5%; range 20.5-36.9%). No statistically significant association between response to crizotinib and FISH patterns was observed (p=0.73). In contrast, NGS fusion positive cases were associated with more responses to crizotinib than NGS negative cases (p= 0.016). Our study suggests that ALK FISH alone may not be the most reliable assay for detection of ALK gene rearrangements, and probably should be used in parallel with ALK IHC and NGS for detection of gene fusions and mutations.

The Impact of Smoking and TP53 Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients with Targetable Mutations-The Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium (LCMC2)

Purpose: Multiplex genomic profiling is standard of care for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas. The Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium (LCMC) is a multi-institutional effort to identify and treat oncogenic driver events in patients with lung adenocarcinomas.Experimental Design: Sixteen U.S. institutions enrolled 1,367 patients with lung cancer in LCMC2; 904 were deemed eligible and had at least one of 14 cancer-related genes profiled using validated methods including genotyping, massively parallel sequencing, and IHC.Results: The use of targeted therapies in patients with EGFR, ERBB2, or BRAF p.V600E mutations, ALK, ROS1, or RET rearrangements, or MET amplification was associated with a survival increment of 1.5 years compared with those with such mutations not receiving targeted therapy, and 1.0 year compared with those lacking a targetable driver. Importantly, 60 patients with a history of smoking derived similar survival benefit from targeted therapy for alterations in EGFR/ALK/ROS1, when compared with 75 never smokers with the same alterations. In addition, coexisting TP53 mutations were associated with shorter survival among patients with EGFR, ALK, or ROS1 alterations.Conclusion: Patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung and an oncogenic driver mutation treated with effective targeted therapy have a longer survival, regardless of prior smoking history. Molecular testing should be performed on all individuals with lung adenocarcinomas irrespective of clinical characteristics. Routine use of massively parallel sequencing enables detection of both targetable driver alterations and tumor suppressor gene and other alterations that have potential significance for therapy selection and as predictive markers for the efficacy of treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 24(5); 1038-47. ©2017 AACR.

First-Line Nivolumab in Stage IV or Recurrent Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab has been associated with longer overall survival than docetaxel among patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In an open-label phase 3 trial, we compared first-line nivolumab with chemotherapy in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive NSCLC.

METHODS

We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC and a PD-L1 tumor-expression level of 1% or more to receive nivolumab (administered intravenously at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight once every 2 weeks) or platinum-based chemotherapy (administered once every 3 weeks for up to six cycles). Patients receiving chemotherapy could cross over to receive nivolumab at the time of disease progression. The primary end point was progression-free survival, as assessed by means of blinded independent central review, among patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 5% or more.

RESULTS

Among the 423 patients with a PD-L1 expression level of 5% or more, the median progression-free survival was 4.2 months with nivolumab versus 5.9 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.45; P=0.25), and the median overall survival was 14.4 months versus 13.2 months (hazard ratio for death, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.30). A total of 128 of 212 patients (60%) in the chemotherapy group received nivolumab as subsequent therapy. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 71% of the patients who received nivolumab and in 92% of those who received chemotherapy. Treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 18% of the patients who received nivolumab and in 51% of those who received chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab was not associated with significantly longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy among patients with previously untreated stage IV or recurrent NSCLC with a PD-L1 expression level of 5% or more. Overall survival was similar between groups. Nivolumab had a favorable safety profile, as compared with chemotherapy, with no new or unexpected safety signals. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and others; CheckMate 026 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02041533 .).

Phase 1/2 study of rilotumumab (AMG 102), a hepatocyte growth factor inhibitor, and erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Activation of the mesenchymal-epidermal transition factor (MET) tyrosine kinase and its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), is implicated in resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. In this phase 1/2 trial, rilotumumab (an anti-HGF antibody) combined with erlotinib was evaluated in patients with metastatic, previously treated non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

In phase 1, a dose de-escalation design was adopted with rilotumumab starting at 15 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks and oral erlotinib 150 mg daily. In phase 2, the disease control rate (DCR) (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) of the combination was evaluated using a Simon 2-stage design. The biomarkers examined included 10 plasma-circulating molecules associated with the EGFR and MET pathways.

RESULTS

Without indications for de-escalation, the recommended phase 2 dose was dose level 0. Overall, 45 response-evaluable patients were enrolled (13 with squamous carcinoma, 32 with adenocarcinoma; 2 had confirmed EGFR mutations, 33 had confirmed wild-type [WT] EGFR, and 7 had KRAS mutations). The DCR for all patients was 60% (90% confidence interval [CI], 47.1%-71.3%). Median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (90% CI, 1.4-2.7 months), and median overall survival was 6.6 months (90% CI, 5.6-8.9 months). Among patients with WT EGFR, the DCR was 60.6% (90% CI, 46.3%-73.3%), median progression-free survival was 2.6 months (90% CI, 1.4-2.7 months), and median overall survival was 7.0 months (90% CI, 5.6-13.4 months). Elevated baseline levels of neuregulin 1 were associated with longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19-0.87), whereas elevated amphiregulin levels were associated with more rapid progression (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.48-3.08).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined rilotumumab and erlotinib had an acceptable safety profile, and the DCR met the prespecified criteria for success. In the EGFR WT group, the DCR exceeded published reports for erlotinib alone. High circulating levels of neuregulin 1 may indicate sensitivity to this combination. Cancer 2017;123:2936-44. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Understanding Mechanisms of Resistance in the Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and the Role of Biopsy at Progression

Molecular profiling and the discovery of drugs that target specific activating mutations have allowed the personalization of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently over-expressed and/or aberrantly activated in different cancers, including NSCLC. The most common activating mutations of EGFR in NSCLC fall within the tyrosine kinase-binding domain. Three oral EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for first-line use in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC (exon 19 deletions or exon 21 [L858R] substitution mutations), as detected by an FDA-approved test. However, disease progression is common and is often the result of secondary mutations, of which the EGFR T790M mutation is the most prevalent. Few options were available upon progression until the introduction of osimertinib, a kinase inhibitor that targets the T790M mutation, which was recently approved for use in patients with metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC, as detected by an FDA-approved test, who progressed on or after EGFR TKI therapy. With the introduction of osimertinib, outcomes can now be improved in select patients. Therefore, performing a biopsy at progression to determine the underlying molecular cause of the acquired resistance is important for the enabling of individualized options that may provide the greatest opportunity for improved outcomes. This review discusses the latest updates in molecular testing at progression and outlines treatment options for this difficult-to-treat population.

THE ONCOLOGIST

2017;22:3-11 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Although the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)-gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib-have changed the treatment paradigm for non-small cell lung cancer among those with EGFR mutation positive disease, most patients experience progression after approximately 12 months of treatment. Until recently, options were limited for patients who progressed, but improvements in molecular profiling and the approval of osimertinib, which targets the resistance mutation T790M, afford the opportunity for improved outcomes in many patients with this mutation. This article explains the options available after progression on initial EGFR TKI therapy and the importance of molecular testing at progression in making treatment decisions.

Immune checkpoint blockade in lung cancer

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of advanced lung cancer. The adaptive immune system has developed a sophisticated method of tumor growth control, but T-cell activation is regulated by various checkpoints. Blockade of the immune checkpoints with therapies targeting the PD-1 pathway, such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab, has been validated as a therapeutic approach in non-small cell lung cancer. Newer therapies and novel combinations are also being evaluated, and the use of biomarkers in conjunction with these drugs is an area of active investigation. This review summarizes the current evidence for the efficacy and safety of the above approaches in the treatment of lung cancer.

The clinical utility of PD-L1 testing in selecting non-small cell lung cancer patients for PD1/PD-L1-directed therapy

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States and worldwide. Long thought to be nonimmunogenic, immunotherapy in lung cancer has historically been met with disappointing results. Programmed death-1 (PD-1), and the PD-1 ligand, PD-L1, are immune checkpoint proteins that fine-tune the antigen-specific T-cell response after stimulation of the T-cell receptor and are crucial for self-tolerance. This pathway in particular is co-opted by tumors through expression of PD-L1 on the tumor cell surface and within the tumor microenvironment, allowing for direct suppression of antitumor cytolytic T-cell activity by the tumor. Indeed, induction of the PD1/PD-L1 pathway represents an adaptive immune resistance mechanism exerted by tumor cells in response to endogenous antitumor activity. In 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved two immuno-oncology agents, the PD-1 inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab, for the treatment of previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Coincident with the clinical trials that led to these regulatory approvals has been the development of several immunohistochemistry (IHC) tests of PD-L1 expression, which may serve to select patients who will derive the most benefit from PD1- or PD-L1-directed therapy. The PD-L1 IHC assays are distinct in their methods and interpretation, which poses a challenge to clinicians selecting patients for these therapies.

Is there a role of nab-paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer? The data suggest yes

Nab-paclitaxel is a novel therapeutic agent, which was approved in combination with carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regardless of histologic subtype in the United States of America by the Food and Drug Administration in 2012 and by the European Commission in 2015. This approval was based on the results of a phase III clinical trial showing superior response rates compared with solvent-based paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin. This review will focus on the early development and clinical data to date supporting the use of nab-paclitaxel in advanced NSCLC. The clinical question central to this review is whether nab-paclitaxel has a place in the current therapeutic landscape of advanced NSCLC.