1
|
Gopalakrishnan V, Spencer CN, Nezi L, Reuben A, Andrews MC, Karpinets TV, Prieto PA, Vicente D, Hoffman K, Wei SC, Cogdill AP, Zhao L, Hudgens CW, Hutchinson DS, Manzo T, Petaccia de Macedo M, Cotechini T, Kumar T, Chen WS, Reddy SM, Szczepaniak Sloane R, Galloway-Pena J, Jiang H, Chen PL, Shpall EJ, Rezvani K, Alousi AM, Chemaly RF, Shelburne S, Vence LM, Okhuysen PC, Jensen VB, Swennes AG, McAllister F, Marcelo Riquelme Sanchez E, Zhang Y, Le Chatelier E, Zitvogel L, Pons N, Austin-Breneman JL, Haydu LE, Burton EM, Gardner JM, Sirmans E, Hu J, Lazar AJ, Tsujikawa T, Diab A, Tawbi H, Glitza IC, Hwu WJ, Patel SP, Woodman SE, Amaria RN, Davies MA, Gershenwald JE, Hwu P, Lee JE, Zhang J, Coussens LM, Cooper ZA, Futreal PA, Daniel CR, Ajami NJ, Petrosino JF, Tetzlaff MT, Sharma P, Allison JP, Jenq RR, Wargo JA. Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients. Science 2018; 359:97-103. [PMID: 29097493 PMCID: PMC5827966 DOI: 10.1126/science.aan4236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2689] [Impact Index Per Article: 448.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Preclinical mouse models suggest that the gut microbiome modulates tumor response to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy; however, this has not been well-characterized in human cancer patients. Here we examined the oral and gut microbiome of melanoma patients undergoing anti-programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) immunotherapy (n = 112). Significant differences were observed in the diversity and composition of the patient gut microbiome of responders versus nonresponders. Analysis of patient fecal microbiome samples (n = 43, 30 responders, 13 nonresponders) showed significantly higher alpha diversity (P < 0.01) and relative abundance of bacteria of the Ruminococcaceae family (P < 0.01) in responding patients. Metagenomic studies revealed functional differences in gut bacteria in responders, including enrichment of anabolic pathways. Immune profiling suggested enhanced systemic and antitumor immunity in responding patients with a favorable gut microbiome as well as in germ-free mice receiving fecal transplants from responding patients. Together, these data have important implications for the treatment of melanoma patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - C N Spencer
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - L Nezi
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - A Reuben
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - M C Andrews
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - T V Karpinets
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - P A Prieto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - D Vicente
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - K Hoffman
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - S C Wei
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - A P Cogdill
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - L Zhao
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - C W Hudgens
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - D S Hutchinson
- Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - T Manzo
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - M Petaccia de Macedo
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - T Cotechini
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Cell Biology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - T Kumar
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - W S Chen
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - S M Reddy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - R Szczepaniak Sloane
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - J Galloway-Pena
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - H Jiang
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - P L Chen
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - E J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - K Rezvani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - A M Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - R F Chemaly
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - S Shelburne
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - L M Vence
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - P C Okhuysen
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - V B Jensen
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - A G Swennes
- Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - F McAllister
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - E Marcelo Riquelme Sanchez
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Y Zhang
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - E Le Chatelier
- Centre de Recherche de Jouy-en-Josas, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - L Zitvogel
- Centre d'Investigation Clinique Biothérapie, Institut Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France
| | - N Pons
- Centre de Recherche de Jouy-en-Josas, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - J L Austin-Breneman
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - L E Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - E M Burton
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - J M Gardner
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - E Sirmans
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - J Hu
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - A J Lazar
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - T Tsujikawa
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Cell Biology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - A Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - H Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - I C Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - W J Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - S P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - S E Woodman
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - R N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - M A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - J E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - P Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - J E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - J Zhang
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - L M Coussens
- Department of Cell, Developmental and Cell Biology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Z A Cooper
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - P A Futreal
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - C R Daniel
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - N J Ajami
- Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - J F Petrosino
- Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - M T Tetzlaff
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - P Sharma
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - J P Allison
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - R R Jenq
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - J A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
- Department of Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Poon SL, Pang ST, McPherson JR, Yu W, Huang KK, Guan P, Weng WH, Siew EY, Liu Y, Heng HL, Chong SC, Gan A, Tay ST, Lim WK, Cutcutache I, Huang D, Ler LD, Nairismagi ML, Lee MH, Chang YH, Yu KJ, Chan-on W, Li BK, Yuan YF, Qian CN, Ng KF, Wu CF, Hsu CL, Bunte RM, Stratton MR, Futreal PA, Sung WK, Chuang CK, Ong CK, Rozen SG, Tan P, Teh BT. Genome-Wide Mutational Signatures of Aristolochic Acid and Its Application as a Screening Tool. Sci Transl Med 2013; 5:197ra101. [DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
|
3
|
Papaemmanuil E, Cazzola M, Boultwood J, Malcovati L, Vyas P, Bowen D, Pellagatti A, Wainscoat JS, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Godfrey AL, Rapado I, Cvejic A, Rance R, McGee C, Ellis P, Mudie LJ, Stephens PJ, McLaren S, Massie CE, Tarpey PS, Varela I, Nik-Zainal S, Davies HR, Shlien A, Jones D, Raine K, Hinton J, Butler AP, Teague JW, Baxter EJ, Score J, Galli A, Della Porta MG, Travaglino E, Groves M, Tauro S, Munshi NC, Anderson KC, El-Naggar A, Fischer A, Mustonen V, Warren AJ, Cross NCP, Green AR, Futreal PA, Stratton MR, Campbell PJ. Somatic SF3B1 mutation in myelodysplasia with ring sideroblasts. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:1384-95. [PMID: 21995386 PMCID: PMC3322589 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1103283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 928] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myelodysplastic syndromes are a diverse and common group of chronic hematologic cancers. The identification of new genetic lesions could facilitate new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. METHODS We used massively parallel sequencing technology to identify somatically acquired point mutations across all protein-coding exons in the genome in 9 patients with low-grade myelodysplasia. Targeted resequencing of the gene encoding RNA splicing factor 3B, subunit 1 (SF3B1), was also performed in a cohort of 2087 patients with myeloid or other cancers. RESULTS We identified 64 point mutations in the 9 patients. Recurrent somatically acquired mutations were identified in SF3B1. Follow-up revealed SF3B1 mutations in 72 of 354 patients (20%) with myelodysplastic syndromes, with particularly high frequency among patients whose disease was characterized by ring sideroblasts (53 of 82 [65%]). The gene was also mutated in 1 to 5% of patients with a variety of other tumor types. The observed mutations were less deleterious than was expected on the basis of chance, suggesting that the mutated protein retains structural integrity with altered function. SF3B1 mutations were associated with down-regulation of key gene networks, including core mitochondrial pathways. Clinically, patients with SF3B1 mutations had fewer cytopenias and longer event-free survival than patients without SF3B1 mutations. CONCLUSIONS Mutations in SF3B1 implicate abnormalities of messenger RNA splicing in the pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndromes. (Funded by the Wellcome Trust and others.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Papaemmanuil
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Teh BT, Varela I, Tarpey P, Raine K, Huang D, Ong CK, Furge KA, Campbell PJ, Stratton MR, Futreal PA. Identification of mutations of the SWI/SNF complex gene PBRM1 by exome sequencing in renal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.4571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
5
|
Slade I, Bacchelli C, Davies H, Murray A, Abbaszadeh F, Hanks S, Barfoot R, Burke A, Chisholm J, Hewitt M, Jenkinson H, King D, Morland B, Pizer B, Prescott K, Saggar A, Side L, Traunecker H, Vaidya S, Ward P, Futreal PA, Vujanic G, Nicholson AG, Sebire N, Turnbull C, Priest JR, Pritchard-Jones K, Houlston R, Stiller C, Stratton MR, Douglas J, Rahman N. DICER1 syndrome: clarifying the diagnosis, clinical features and management implications of a pleiotropic tumour predisposition syndrome. J Med Genet 2011; 48:273-8. [DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2010.083790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 268] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
6
|
Forbes SA, Bhamra G, Bamford S, Dawson E, Kok C, Clements J, Menzies A, Teague JW, Futreal PA, Stratton MR. The Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC). Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2008; Chapter 10:Unit 10.11. [PMID: 18428421 PMCID: PMC2705836 DOI: 10.1002/0471142905.hg1011s57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 572] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
COSMIC is currently the most comprehensive global resource for information on somatic mutations in human cancer, combining curation of the scientific literature with tumor resequencing data from the Cancer Genome Project at the Sanger Institute, U.K. Almost 4800 genes and 250000 tumors have been examined, resulting in over 50000 mutations available for investigation. This information can be accessed in a number of ways, the most convenient being the Web-based system which allows detailed data mining, presenting the results in easily interpretable formats. This unit describes the graphical system in detail, elaborating an example walkthrough and the many ways that the resulting information can be thoroughly investigated by combining data, respecializing the query, or viewing the results in different ways. Alternate protocols overview the available precompiled data files available for download.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Forbes
- Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pollock PM, Gartside MG, Dejeza LC, Powell MA, Mallon MA, Davies H, Mohammadi M, Futreal PA, Stratton MR, Trent JM, Goodfellow PJ. Frequent activating FGFR2 mutations in endometrial carcinomas parallel germline mutations associated with craniosynostosis and skeletal dysplasia syndromes. Oncogene 2007; 26:7158-62. [PMID: 17525745 PMCID: PMC2871595 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 229] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecological malignancy in the United States. Although most women present with early disease confined to the uterus, the majority of persistent or recurrent tumors are refractory to current chemotherapies. We have identified a total of 11 different FGFR2 mutations in 3/10 (30%) of endometrial cell lines and 19/187 (10%) of primary uterine tumors. Mutations were seen primarily in tumors of the endometrioid histologic subtype (18/115 cases investigated, 16%). The majority of the somatic mutations identified were identical to germline activating mutations in FGFR2 and FGFR3 that cause Apert Syndrome, Beare-Stevenson Syndrome, hypochondroplasia, achondroplasia and SADDAN syndrome. The two most common somatic mutations identified were S252W (in eight tumors) and N550K (in five samples). Four novel mutations were identified, three of which are also likely to result in receptor gain-of-function. Extensive functional analyses have already been performed on many of these mutations, demonstrating they result in receptor activation through a variety of mechanisms. The discovery of activating FGFR2 mutations in endometrial carcinoma raises the possibility of employing anti-FGFR molecularly targeted therapies in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P M Pollock
- Cancer and Cell Biology Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dicks E, Teague JW, Stephens P, Raine K, Yates A, Mattocks C, Tarpey P, Butler A, Menzies A, Richardson D, Jenkinson A, Davies H, Edkins S, Forbes S, Gray K, Greenman C, Shepherd R, Stratton MR, Futreal PA, Wooster R. AutoCSA, an algorithm for high throughput DNA sequence variant detection in cancer genomes. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 23:1689-91. [PMID: 17485433 PMCID: PMC5947781 DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
The undertaking of large-scale DNA sequencing screens for somatic variants in human cancers requires accurate and rapid processing of traces for variants. Due to their often aneuploid nature and admixed normal tissue, heterozygous variants found in primary cancers are often subtle and difficult to detect. To address these issues, we have developed a mutation detection algorithm, AutoCSA, specifically optimized for the high throughput screening of cancer samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Dicks
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - J. W. Teague
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - P. Stephens
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - K. Raine
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - A. Yates
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - C. Mattocks
- NGRL (Wessex), Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, SP2 8BJ, UK
| | - P. Tarpey
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - A. Butler
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - A. Menzies
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - D. Richardson
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - A. Jenkinson
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - H. Davies
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - S. Edkins
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - S. Forbes
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - K. Gray
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - C. Greenman
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - R. Shepherd
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - M. R. Stratton
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. Contact:
| | - P. A. Futreal
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - R. Wooster
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Field M, Tarpey P, Boyle J, Edkins S, Goodship J, Luo Y, Moon J, Teague J, Stratton MR, Futreal PA, Wooster R, Raymond FL, Turner G. Mutations in the RSK2(RPS6KA3) gene cause Coffin-Lowry syndrome and nonsyndromic X-linked mental retardation. Clin Genet 2007; 70:509-15. [PMID: 17100996 PMCID: PMC2714973 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00723.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
We describe three families with X-linked mental retardation, two with a deletion of a single amino acid and one with a missense mutation in the proximal domain of the RSK2(RPS6KA3) (ribosomal protein S6 kinase, 90 kDa, polypeptide 3) protein similar to mutations found in Coffin-Lowry syndrome (CLS). In two families, the clinical diagnosis had been nonsyndromic X-linked mental retardation. In the third family, although CLS had been suspected, the clinical features were atypical and the degree of intellectual disability much less than expected. These families show that strict reliance on classical clinical criteria for mutation testing may result in a missed diagnosis. A less targeted screening approach to mutation testing is advocated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Field
- The NSW GOLD Service, Hunter Genetics, Newcastle, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tarpey P, Thomas S, Sarvananthan N, Mallya U, Lisgo S, Talbot CJ, Roberts EO, Awan M, Surendran M, McLean RJ, Reinecke RD, Langmann A, Lindner S, Koch M, Woodruff G, Gale R, Degg C, Droutsas K, Asproudis I, Zubcov AA, Pieh C, Veal CD, Machado RD, Backhouse OC, Baumber L, Jain S, Constantinescu CS, Brodsky MC, Hunter DG, Hertle RW, Read RJ, Edkins S, O’Meara S, Parker A, Stevens C, Teague J, Wooster R, Futreal PA, Trembath RC, Stratton MR, Raymond FL, Gottlob I. Mutations in FRMD7, a newly identified member of the FERM family, cause X-linked idiopathic congenital nystagmus. Nat Genet 2006; 38:1242-4. [PMID: 17013395 PMCID: PMC2592600 DOI: 10.1038/ng1893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2006] [Accepted: 09/01/2006] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Idiopathic congenital nystagmus is characterized by involuntary, periodic, predominantly horizontal oscillations of both eyes. We identified 22 mutations in FRMD7 in 26 families with X-linked idiopathic congenital nystagmus. Screening of 42 singleton cases of idiopathic congenital nystagmus (28 male, 14 females) yielded three mutations (7%). We found restricted expression of FRMD7 in human embryonic brain and developing neural retina, suggesting a specific role in the control of eye movement and gaze stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Tarpey
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton Cambridge CB10 1SA UK
| | - S Thomas
- Ophthalmology Group, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, RKCSB, PO Box 65, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - N Sarvananthan
- Ophthalmology Group, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, RKCSB, PO Box 65, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - U Mallya
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Addenbrookes Hospital Cambridge CB2 2XY UK
| | - S Lisgo
- Institute of Human Genetics, International Centre for Life, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
| | - CJ Talbot
- Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
| | - EO Roberts
- Ophthalmology Group, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, RKCSB, PO Box 65, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - M Awan
- Ophthalmology Group, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, RKCSB, PO Box 65, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - M Surendran
- Ophthalmology Group, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, RKCSB, PO Box 65, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - RJ McLean
- Ophthalmology Group, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, RKCSB, PO Box 65, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| | - RD Reinecke
- Foerderer Eye Movement Centre for Children, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107 USA
| | - A Langmann
- Medical University Graz, Department of Ophthalmology, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - S Lindner
- Medical University Graz, Department of Ophthalmology, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - M Koch
- Medical University Graz, Department of Ophthalmology, Auenbruggerplatz 4, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - G Woodruff
- Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane North, Fulwood, Preston, Lancashire PR2 9HT
| | - R Gale
- Ophthalmology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK
| | - C Degg
- Department of Medical Physics, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK
| | - K Droutsas
- Department of Ophthalmology, Justus-Liebig-University, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - I Asproudis
- Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - AA Zubcov
- University Eye Hospital, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - C Pieh
- University Eye Hospital, Killianstr. 5, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - CD Veal
- Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
| | - RD Machado
- Division of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, King’s College London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - OC Backhouse
- Ophthalmology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK
| | - L Baumber
- Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
- Division of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, King’s College London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - S Jain
- Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane North, Fulwood, Preston, Lancashire PR2 9HT
| | - CS Constantinescu
- Division of Clinical Neurology, School of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK
| | - MC Brodsky
- Arkansas Children’s Hospital, 800 Marshall, Little Rock, Arkansas 72202, UK
| | - DG Hunter
- Department of Ophthalmology, Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass 02115, USA
| | - RW Hertle
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre, Division of Paediatric Ophthalmology, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, 3705 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - RJ Read
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Addenbrookes Hospital Cambridge CB2 2XY UK
| | - S Edkins
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton Cambridge CB10 1SA UK
| | - S O’Meara
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton Cambridge CB10 1SA UK
| | - A Parker
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton Cambridge CB10 1SA UK
| | - C Stevens
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton Cambridge CB10 1SA UK
| | - J Teague
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton Cambridge CB10 1SA UK
| | - R Wooster
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton Cambridge CB10 1SA UK
| | - PA Futreal
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton Cambridge CB10 1SA UK
| | - RC Trembath
- Division of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, King’s College London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - MR Stratton
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton Cambridge CB10 1SA UK
| | - FL Raymond
- Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Addenbrookes Hospital Cambridge CB2 2XY UK
- Joint senior authors and corresponding authors and
| | - I Gottlob
- Ophthalmology Group, School of Medicine, University of Leicester, RKCSB, PO Box 65, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
- Joint senior authors and corresponding authors and
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Futreal PA, Wooster R, Stratton MR. Somatic mutations in human cancer: insights from resequencing the protein kinase gene family. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2006; 70:43-9. [PMID: 16869737 DOI: 10.1101/sqb.2005.70.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
All cancers arise due to the accumulation of mutations in critical target genes that, when altered, give rise to selective advantage in the cell and its progeny that harbor them. Knowledge of these mutations is key in understanding the biology of cancer initiation and progression, as well as the development of more targeted therapeutic strategies. We have undertaken a systematic screen of all annotated protein kinases in the human genome for mutations in a series of cancers including breast, non-small-cell lung, and testicular cancer. Our results show a wide diversity in mutation prevalence within and between tumor types. We have identified a mutator phenotype in human breast previously undescribed. The results presented from sequencing the same 1.3 million base pairs through several tumor types suggest that most of the observed mutations are likely to be passenger events rather than causally implicated in oncogenesis. However, this work does provide evidence for the likely existence of multiple, infrequently mutated kinases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Futreal
- Cancer Genome Project, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Forbes S, Clements J, Dawson E, Bamford S, Webb T, Dogan A, Flanagan A, Teague J, Wooster R, Futreal PA, Stratton MR. COSMIC 2005. Br J Cancer 2006; 94:318-22. [PMID: 16421597 PMCID: PMC2361125 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 288] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer (COSMIC) database and web site was developed to preserve somatic mutation data and share it with the community. Over the past 25 years, approximately 350 cancer genes have been identified, of which 311 are somatically mutated. COSMIC has been expanded and now holds data previously reported in the scientific literature for 28 known cancer genes. In addition, there is data from the systematic sequencing of 518 protein kinase genes. The total gene count in COSMIC stands at 538; 25 have a mutation frequency above 5% in one or more tumour type, no mutations were found in 333 genes and 180 are rarely mutated with frequencies <5% in any tumour set. The COSMIC web site has been expanded to give more views and summaries of the data and provide faster query routes and downloads. In addition, there is a new section describing mutations found through a screen of known cancer genes in 728 cancer cell lines including the NCI-60 set of cancer cell lines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Forbes
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - J Clements
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - E Dawson
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - S Bamford
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - T Webb
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - A Dogan
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - A Flanagan
- The Institute of Orthopaedics, UCL, Stanmore, Middlesex, HA7 4LP, UK
| | - J Teague
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - R Wooster
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK. E-mail:
| | - P A Futreal
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK
| | - M R Stratton
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, CB10 1SA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bamford S, Dawson E, Forbes S, Clements J, Pettett R, Dogan A, Flanagan A, Teague J, Futreal PA, Stratton MR, Wooster R. The COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database and website. Br J Cancer 2004; 91:355-8. [PMID: 15188009 PMCID: PMC2409828 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 931] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The discovery of mutations in cancer genes has advanced our understanding of cancer. These results are dispersed across the scientific literature and with the availability of the human genome sequence will continue to accrue. The COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database and website have been developed to store somatic mutation data in a single location and display the data and other information related to human cancer. To populate this resource, data has currently been extracted from reports in the scientific literature for somatic mutations in four genes, BRAF, HRAS, KRAS2 and NRAS. At present, the database holds information on 66 634 samples and reports a total of 10 647 mutations. Through the web pages, these data can be queried, displayed as figures or tables and exported in a number of formats. COSMIC is an ongoing project that will continue to curate somatic mutation data and release it through the website.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bamford
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| | - E Dawson
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| | - S Forbes
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| | - J Clements
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| | - R Pettett
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| | - A Dogan
- Department of Histopathology, Royal Free and University Medical School, University Street, London WC1E 6JJ, UK
| | - A Flanagan
- The Institute of Orthopaedics, UCL, Stanmore, Middlesex HA7 4LP, UK
| | - J Teague
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| | - P A Futreal
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK. E-mail:
| | - M R Stratton
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| | - R Wooster
- Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hateboer N, Gumbs C, Teare MD, Coles GA, Griffiths D, Ravine D, Futreal PA, Rahman N. Confirmation of a gene locus for medullary cystic kidney disease (MCKD2) on chromosome 16p12. Kidney Int 2001; 60:1233-9. [PMID: 11576337 DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00932.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autosomal-dominant medullary cystic kidney disease (MCKD) is an interstitial nephropathy characterized by structural renal tubular defects that result in salt wasting and a reduction in urinary concentration. The condition has clinical and morphological similarities to autosomal-recessive juvenile nephronophthisis. Two genes predisposing to MCKD have been localized. MCKD1 on chromosome 1q21 was localized in two Cypriot families, and MCKD2 on chromosome 16p12 was localized in a single Italian family. We have evaluated a large Welsh MCKD family for linkage at these two loci. METHODS Clinical data and DNA samples were collected from affected family members. Polymorphic microsatellite markers spanning the critical regions on chromosome 1 and chromosome 16 that encompass MCKD1 and MCKD2 were analyzed. Two-point and multipoint LOD scores were calculated. RESULTS The family fulfilled previously published criteria for the diagnosis of MCKD, but hyperuricemia and gout were not prominent features. Twenty-one affected individuals were identified. Mean age at death or end-stage renal disease was 47 years (37 to 60). Linkage and haplotype analysis generated strongly negative results at MCKD1 on chromosome 1q21 (two-point LOD score = -5.32). Strong evidence of linkage to MCKD2 was generated with a maximum multi-point LOD score of 3.75. CONCLUSION These results provide the first independent confirmation of a gene predisposing to MCKD on chromosome 16p12 and indicate that mutation of this gene is not restricted to a single family or population. The absence of hyperuricemia and gout in our family indicates that these are not obligatory features of MCKD2 mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Hateboer
- Institute of Nephrology, Department of Histopathology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alvarez AA, Lambers AR, Lancaster JM, Maxwell GL, Ali S, Gumbs C, Berchuck A, Futreal PA. Allele loss on chromosome 1p36 in epithelial ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 82:94-8. [PMID: 11426968 DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Prior studies have shown that allelic loss on chromosome 1p36 occurs frequently in ovarian as well as several other types of cancer. This suggests that inactivation of gene(s) in this region may play a role in the pathogenesis of these cancers. The aim of this study was to further delineate the region of loss on chromosome 1p36 in ovarian cancers and to identify associated patient or tumor characteristics. METHODS Paired normal/cancer DNA samples from 75 ovarian cancers (21 early stage I/II and 54 advanced stage III/IV) were analyzed using microsatellite markers. RESULTS Forty-nine of 75 (65%) ovarian cancers had loss of at least one marker. The marker demonstrating the most frequent loss was D1S1597, which was lost in 29/57 (51%) informative cases. Allele loss on 1p36 was significantly more common in poorly differentiated ovarian cancers (73%) relative to well or moderately differentiated cases (48%) (P = 0.03). Evidence was obtained for two common regions of deletion: one flanked by D1S1646/D1S244 and another more proximally by D1S244/D1S228. CONCLUSION These findings further delineate regions on chromosome 1p36 proposed to contain tumor suppressor gene(s) that may play a role in the development and/or progression of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Allele loss on 1p36 is associated with poor histologic grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Alvarez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology/Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Identification of the genes that cause oncogenesis is a central aim of cancer research. We searched the proteins predicted from the draft human genome sequence for paralogues of known tumour suppressor genes, but no novel genes were identified. We then assessed whether it was possible to search directly for oncogenic sequence changes in cancer cells by comparing cancer genome sequences against the draft genome. Apparently chimaeric transcripts (from oncogenic fusion genes generated by chromosomal translocations, the ends of which mapped to different genomic locations) were detected to the same degree in both normal and neoplastic tissues, indicating a significant level of false positives. Our experiment underscores the limited amount and variable quality of DNA sequence from cancer cells that is currently available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Futreal
- Cancer Genome Project, Sanger Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Alvarez AA, Moore WF, Robboy SJ, Bentley RC, Gumbs C, Futreal PA, Berchuck A. K-ras mutations in Müllerian inclusion cysts associated with serous borderline tumors of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80:201-6. [PMID: 11161860 DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2000.6066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Müllerian inclusion cysts (MIC) are small benign appearing glands that are occasionally noted in lymph nodes and peritoneal biopsies. They occur most frequently in women with serous ovarian tumors, with borderline tumors (SBOT) having a higher incidence than invasive cancers. The aim of this study was to examine whether MIC and SBOT have identical K-ras mutations, which would suggest that they are related. Methods. Six patients in whom adequate tissue was available from SBOT, MIC, and normal tissue were identified from a consecutive series of patients with SBOT who underwent lymph node sampling from 1992 to 1997 at Duke University Medical Center. DNA extraction was performed using laser capture microdissection. Exon 1 of the K-ras gene was amplified using PCR and subjected to single-strand conformation analysis to screen for mutations. Shifted bands were sequenced to confirm the presence of mutations. RESULTS Mutations in codon 12 of K-ras were found in three of six (50%) SBOT. In two of these three cases, the identical mutation was found in the SBOT and the MIC (gly to val in both cases), but not in the corresponding normal DNA. In one case, a mutation was seen in the ovarian tumor (gly to asp), but not in the corresponding MIC. CONCLUSIONS Mutations in codon 12 of the K-ras gene are a hallmark of serous borderline tumors. The presence of identical K-ras mutations in some SBOT and their associated MIC suggests that they are related processes. Both may arise due to a field effect, or alternatively some MIC may represent metastases from the primary ovarian tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A Alvarez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology/Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ferguson AT, Evron E, Umbricht CB, Pandita TK, Chan TA, Hermeking H, Marks JR, Lambers AR, Futreal PA, Stampfer MR, Sukumar S. High frequency of hypermethylation at the 14-3-3 sigma locus leads to gene silencing in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97:6049-54. [PMID: 10811911 PMCID: PMC18556 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.100566997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 360] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Expression of 14-3-3 final sigma (final sigma) is induced in response to DNA damage, and causes cells to arrest in G(2). By SAGE (serial analysis of gene expression) analysis, we identified final sigma as a gene whose expression is 7-fold lower in breast carcinoma cells than in normal breast epithelium. We verified this finding by Northern blot analysis. Remarkably, final sigma mRNA was undetectable in 45 of 48 primary breast carcinomas. Genetic alterations at final sigma such as loss of heterozygosity were rare (1/20 informative cases), and no mutations were detected (0/34). On the other hand, hypermethylation of CpG islands in the final sigma gene was detected in 91% (75/82) of breast tumors and was associated with lack of gene expression. Hypermethylation of final sigma is functionally important, because treatment of final sigma-non-expressing breast cancer cell lines with the drug 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine resulted in demethylation of the gene and synthesis of final sigma mRNA. Breast cancer cells lacking final sigma expression showed increased number of chromosomal breaks and gaps when exposed to gamma-irradiation. Therefore, it is possible that loss of final sigma expression contributes to malignant transformation by impairing the G(2) cell cycle checkpoint function, thus allowing an accumulation of genetic defects. Hypermethylation and loss of final sigma expression are the most consistent molecular alterations in breast cancer identified so far.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A T Ferguson
- Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, 410 BBCRB, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231-1000, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Miron A, Schildkraut JM, Rimer BK, Winer EP, Sugg Skinner C, Futreal PA, Culler D, Calingaert B, Clark S, Kelly Marcom P, Iglehart JD. Testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in the southeastern United States. Ann Surg 2000; 231:624-34. [PMID: 10767783 PMCID: PMC1421049 DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200005000-00002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To detail characterization of mutations and uncharacterized variants in the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, as observed in a population of breast cancer patients from the southeastern United States, and to examine baseline characteristics of women referred for counseling and testing and provide a preliminary look at how counseling and testing affected intentions toward prophylactic surgery. BACKGROUND Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes give rise to a dramatically increased risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer or both. There are many reports about special populations in which deleterious mutations are present at a high frequency. It is useful to study these genes in more heterogeneous populations, reflecting different geographic regions. Interest in preventive surgery for gene carriers is high in women and their surgeons. METHODS Women were recruited through a prospective clinical trial of counseling and free genetic testing. BRCA1 and BRCA2 were screened for mutations using standard techniques, and results were given to participants. Baseline questionnaires determined interest in preventive surgery at the beginning of the study. Follow-up questionnaires for those who completed testing surveyed interest in prophylactic surgery after counseling and receiving test results. RESULTS Of 213 women who completed counseling and testing, 44 (20.6%) had 29 separate mutations; there were 11 Jewish women carrying three founder mutations. Twenty-eight women (13.1%) had uncharacterized variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2; nine were not previously reported. Women overestimated their chances of possessing a deleterious gene mutation compared to a statistical estimate of carrier risk. A number of women changed their intentions toward preventive surgery after genetic counseling and testing. CONCLUSIONS Hereditary breast cancer due to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 was a heterogeneous syndrome in the southeastern United States. Most mutations were seen just once, and uncharacterized variants were common and of uncertain clinical significance. In general, positive test results tended to reinforce intentions toward prophylactic surgery. In contrast, women not interested in surgery at the time of entry tended to remain reluctant after testing and counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Miron
- Departments of Surgery, Medicine, and Family and Community Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lakhani SR, Gusterson BA, Jacquemier J, Sloane JP, Anderson TJ, van de Vijver MJ, Venter D, Freeman A, Antoniou A, McGuffog L, Smyth E, Steel CM, Haites N, Scott RJ, Goldgar D, Neuhausen S, Daly PA, Ormiston W, McManus R, Scherneck S, Ponder BA, Futreal PA, Peto J, Stoppa-Lyonnet D, Bignon YJ, Stratton MR. The pathology of familial breast cancer: histological features of cancers in families not attributable to mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Clin Cancer Res 2000; 6:782-9. [PMID: 10741697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancers arising in carriers of mutations in the breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, differ histologically from each other and from breast cancers unselected for a family history. However, a substantial proportion of families with multiple cases of breast cancer is not attributable to these two genes (non-BRCA1/2 families). We have now characterized the pathology of 82 breast cancers from non-BRCA1/2 families. Breast cancers in non-BRCA1/2 families were of lower grade (P = 0.0018), showed fewer mitoses (P < 0.0001), less nuclear pleomorphism (P = 0.0014), less lymphocytic infiltrate (P < 0.0001), a lesser extent of the tumor with a continuous pushing margin (P = 0.004), a lesser extent of the tumor composed of solid sheets of cells (P = 0.0047), less necrosis (P = 0.002), and wereparison with BRCA2 tumors, non-BRCA1/2 tumors were lower grade (P = 0.017) and exhibited less pleomorphism (P = 0.01) and more tubule formation (P = 0.05). In comparison with control breast cancers unselected for a family history of the disease, non-BRCA1/2 tumors were of significantly lower grade (P = 0.001), showed less pleomorphism (P = 0.0002), and had a lower mitotic count (P = 0.003). The results indicate that non-BRCA1/2 breast cancers differ histologically from both BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancers and are overall of lower grade. They also suggest that non-BRCA1/2 breast cancers differ from nonfamilial breast cancers, but these differences may be attributable to various types of bias.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- BRCA2 Protein
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/genetics
- Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
- Carcinoma, Medullary/genetics
- Carcinoma, Medullary/pathology
- Family Health
- Female
- Genes, BRCA1/genetics
- Humans
- Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating
- Mitotic Index
- Mutation
- Neoplasm Proteins/genetics
- Transcription Factors/genetics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S R Lakhani
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Medical School, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer deaths in American women. About 10% of cases are thought to have a hereditary basis, and family history is the strongest known risk factor. In the past, prophylactic oophorectomy has been advocated for women with two or more affected first-degree relatives. More recently, with the identification of the genes responsible for most hereditary ovarian cancers (BRCA1, BRCA2), oophorectomy can now be offered specifically to women who are mutation carriers. Conversely, noncarriers in these families can be reassured that their risk of ovarian cancer is not increased. The value of oophorectomy in mutation carriers has not yet been proven, however, and concern exists that the benefit may be less than intuitively expected. First, although the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer initially was reported to be as high as 60%, more recent studies have suggested risks in the range of 15 to 30%. A better understanding of the factors that underlie variable penetrance in mutation carriers is needed to augment our ability to counsel individual women. In addition, peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma indistinguishable from ovarian cancer occurs in some women after oophorectomy. Studies that better define the frequency with which this occurs are needed to establish the magnitude of the protective effect conferred by prophylactic oophorectomy. In view of the uncertainty regarding the efficacy of prophylactic oophorectomy, chemopreventive and early detection approaches also deserve consideration as strategies for decreasing ovarian cancer mortality in women who carry mutations in ovarian cancer susceptibility genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
The recently described Bcl10 gene has been suggested to be a major target gene for inactivation in a variety of human cancers. In order to further evaluate the role of this gene in human adult malignancies, we have analysed a series of carcinomas for mutations in the Bcl10 gene. We have screened a panel of 174 carcinoma samples in total, comprised of 47 breast, 36 epithelial ovarian, 36 endometrial, 12 cervical, 23 colorectal and 20 head/neck carcinomas, all unselected for grade or stage. This panel reflects, in part, tumours reported to have involvement of the 1p22 region of chromosome 1, the region harbouring the Bcl10 gene. No deleterious mutations were detected in any of the samples analysed, strongly suggesting that Bcl10 is not a common target for inactivation in adult malignancies and that BCL10 is not the gene targeted for frequent inactivation at 1p22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Lambers
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
About 10% of ovarian cancer cases are thought to have a hereditary basis and family history is the strongest risk factor for the development of this disease. In the past, prophylactic oophorectomy has been advocated for women with two or more affected first-degree relatives. More recently, with the identification of the genes responsible for most hereditary ovarian cancers (BRCA1, BRCA2), oophorectomy can now be offered specifically to women who are mutation carriers. Conversely, non-carriers in these families can be reassured that their risk of ovarian cancer is not increased. The value of oophorectomy in mutation carriers has not yet been proven, however, and there are concerns that the benefit may be less than intuitively expected. First, although the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer initially was reported to be as high as 60%, more recent studies have reported risks in the range of 15-30%. A better understanding of the genetic and/or environmental basis of variable penetrance is needed to augment our ability to counsel women regarding their risk. In addition, peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma indistinguishable from ovarian cancer occurs in some women following oophorectomy. Studies that better define how often this occurs also are needed to establish more firmly the value of prophylactic oophorectomy. In view of the uncertainty regarding the efficacy of prophylactic oophorectomy, chemopreventive and early detection approaches also deserve consideration as strategies for decreasing ovarian cancer mortality in women who carry mutations in ovarian cancer susceptibility genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lancaster JM, Carney ME, Gray J, Myring J, Gumbs C, Sampson J, Wheeler D, France E, Wiseman R, Harper P, Futreal PA. BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast cancer families from Wales: moderate mutation frequency and two recurrent mutations in BRCA1. Br J Cancer 1998; 78:1417-20. [PMID: 9836472 PMCID: PMC2063207 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutations in the BRCA1/BRCA2 genes account for varying proportions of breast cancer families studied, and demonstrate considerable variation in mutational spectra coincident with ethnic and geographical diversity. We have screened for mutations in 17 families from Wales with two or more cases of breast cancer under age 50 and/or ovarian cancer. Eight out of 17 (47%) families had demonstrable mutations. Six out of 17 (35%) carried BRCA1 mutations and 2 out of 17 (12%) carried BRCA2 mutations. Two recurrent mutations in BRCA1 were identified, which appear to represent founder mutations in this population. These data support the existence of additional breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Lancaster
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tonin PN, Mes-Masson AM, Futreal PA, Morgan K, Mahon M, Foulkes WD, Cole DE, Provencher D, Ghadirian P, Narod SA. Founder BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in French Canadian breast and ovarian cancer families. Am J Hum Genet 1998; 63:1341-51. [PMID: 9792861 PMCID: PMC1377544 DOI: 10.1086/302099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
We have identified four mutations in each of the breast cancer-susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, in French Canadian breast cancer and breast/ovarian cancer families from Quebec. To identify founder effects, we examined independently ascertained French Canadian cancer families for the distribution of these eight mutations. Mutations were found in 41 of 97 families. Six of eight mutations were observed at least twice. The BRCA1 C4446T mutation was the most common mutation found, followed by the BRCA2 8765delAG mutation. Together, these mutations were found in 28 of 41 families identified to have a mutation. The odds of detection of any of the four BRCA1 mutations was 18.7x greater if one or more cases of ovarian cancer were also present in the family. The odds of detection of any of the four BRCA2 mutations was 5.3x greater if there were at least five cases of breast cancer in the family. Interestingly, the presence of a breast cancer case <36 years of age was strongly predictive of the presence of any of the eight mutations screened. Carriers of the same mutation, from different families, shared similar haplotypes, indicating that the mutant alleles were likely to be identical by descent for a mutation in the founder population. The identification of common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations will facilitate carrier detection in French Canadian breast cancer and breast/ovarian cancer families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P N Tonin
- Departments of Human Genetics and Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Berchuck A, Heron KA, Carney ME, Lancaster JM, Fraser EG, Vinson VL, Deffenbaugh AM, Miron A, Marks JR, Futreal PA, Frank TS. Frequency of germline and somatic BRCA1 mutations in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4:2433-7. [PMID: 9796975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Germline mutations in the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene are thought to be the most common cause of hereditary ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to explore further the role of BRCA1 alterations in the development of ovarian cancers. We sought to determine whether somatic BRCA1 mutations are ever present in ovarian cancers and whether mutation is always accompanied by loss of the wild-type allele. The entire coding region and intronic splice sites of BRCA1 were sequenced using genomic DNA samples from 103 unselected ovarian cancers. Thirteen clearly deleterious BRCA1 mutations and two variants of uncertain significance were found. Blood DNA was available in all but two cases and demonstrated that 4 of 13 mutations and both variants of uncertain significance were germline alterations, whereas in seven cases the mutation was a somatic change present only in the cancer. Using four microsatellite markers, loss of heterozygosity at the BRCA1 locus was found in all 15 ovarian cancers with BRCA1 sequence alterations, compared with only 58% of ovarian cancers that did not have BRCA1 mutations. BRCA1-associated ovarian cancers were characterized by serous histology and moderate histological grade. These data confirm prior reports suggesting that germline mutations in BRCA1 are present in about 5% of women with ovarian cancer. In addition, somatic mutations in BRCA1 occur in the development of some sporadic cases. The finding that both germline and somatic BRCA1 mutations are accompanied by loss of heterozygosity, suggests that loss of this tumor suppressor gene is a critical event in the development of these cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Carney ME, Maxwell GL, Lancaster JM, Gumbs C, Marks J, Berchuck A, Futreal PA. Aberrant splicing of the TSG101 tumor suppressor gene in human breast and ovarian cancers. J Soc Gynecol Investig 1998; 5:281-5. [PMID: 9773405 DOI: 10.1016/s1071-5576(98)00018-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether large deletions or other alterations in the putative tumor suppressor gene TSG101 play a role in the molecular pathogenesis of breast and ovarian cancers. METHODS Expression of TSG101 transcripts was examined in breast and ovarian cancers using the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and selected transcripts were sequenced. Southern blot analysis was performed to determine whether there were genomic deletions in the TSG101 gene, and Northern blot analysis was used to examine the relative abundance of various transcripts. RESULTS All the cancerous and normal breast tissue examined expressed full length 1145 base pair (bp) TSG101 transcripts. Additional truncated transcripts were seen using the RT-PCR in 57 (64%) of 89 primary breast cancers, 1 (20%) of 5 breast cancer cell lines, 3 (50%) of 6 normal breast tissues, 16 (64%) of 25 primary ovarian cancers and 1 (33%) of 3 ovarian cancer cell lines. Only the primary breast (21%) and ovarian (24%) cancers had three or more truncated transcripts. None of the normal tissues or cell lines examined had more than two aberrant transcripts. DNA sequencing revealed that the most commonly expressed truncated transcript arises because of loss of 902 bp between codons 153 and 1055. Only full length TSG101 transcripts were seen on Northern blot analysis of breast cancer cell lines, however. There was no evidence of genomic deletions in the TSG101 gene on Southern blot analysis. CONCLUSION Truncated TSG101 transcripts that probably represent splice variants are present in some breast and ovarian cancers, but there is no evidence to suggest that loss of this putative tumor suppressor gene plays a role in the molecular pathogenesis of these cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Carney
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Maxwell GL, Risinger JI, Tong B, Shaw H, Barrett JC, Berchuck A, Futreal PA. Mutation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene is not a feature of ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol 1998; 70:13-6. [PMID: 9698466 DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The PTEN tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 10q23 undergoes inactivating mutations in several types of malignancies including glioblastomas and prostate and endometrial carcinomas. The aim of this study was to determine if mutation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene is a feature of sporadic or BRCA1-associated ovarian carcinomas. METHODS Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid was extracted from 11 ovarian cancer cell lines and 50 frozen ovarian cancers, including 4 cases that developed in women with germline mutations in the BRCA1 breast/ovarian cancer susceptibility gene. The polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify each of the nine exons and intronic splice sites of the PTEN gene. These products were then screened for mutations using single strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Variant bands were further evaluated using automated DNA sequencing. RESULTS A previously unreported silent polymorphism at codon 240 (TAT to TAC) in exon 7 was noted in one of the primary ovarian carcinomas. Mutations in the PTEN gene were not found in any of the 50 primary ovarian cancers or 11 immortalized ovarian cancer cell lines. CONCLUSION Alteration of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene does not appear to be a feature of sporadic or BRCA1-associated ovarian cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G L Maxwell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Maxwell GL, Risinger JI, Gumbs C, Shaw H, Bentley RC, Barrett JC, Berchuck A, Futreal PA. Mutation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in endometrial hyperplasias. Cancer Res 1998; 58:2500-3. [PMID: 9635567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Mutation and deletion of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene occurs in about 40% of endometrial carcinomas. The purpose of this study was to determine whether PTEN mutations also are present in endometrial hyperplasias, which are premalignant precursors of invasive endometrial adenocarcinomas. Genomic DNA from 51 endometrial hyperplasias was extracted from paraffin blocks, and PCR was used to amplify the nine exons of the PTEN gene. These products were screened using single-strand conformation analysis, and variant bands were sequenced. Somatic mutations in the PTEN gene were seen in 10 of 51 cases (20%), and two mutations were found in one case. An identical 4-bp deletion in exon 8 was seen in three cases, and 8 of 11 PTEN mutations predicted truncated protein products. There was no higher frequency of PTEN mutations in endometrial hyperplasias with atypia (6 of 32; 19%) relative to those without atypia (4 of 19; 21%). These data suggest that inactivation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene is an early event in the development of some endometrial cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G L Maxwell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology/Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Brunet JS, Ghadirian P, Rebbeck TR, Lerman C, Garber JE, Tonin PN, Abrahamson J, Foulkes WD, Daly M, Wagner-Costalas J, Godwin A, Olopade OI, Moslehi R, Liede A, Futreal PA, Weber BL, Lenoir GM, Lynch HT, Narod SA. Effect of smoking on breast cancer in carriers of mutant BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998; 90:761-6. [PMID: 9605646 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/90.10.761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking has carcinogenic effects, and possibly antiestrogenic effects as well, but it has not been found to be a risk factor for breast cancer in women in the general population. However, hereditary breast cancer is primarily a disease of premenopausal women, and interactions between genes and hormonal and environmental risk factors may be particularly important in this subgroup. METHODS We conducted a matched case-control study of breast cancer among women who have been identified to be carriers of a deleterious mutation in either the BRCA1 or the BRCA2 gene. These women were assessed for genetic risk at one of several genetic counseling programs for cancer in North America. Information about lifetime smoking history was derived from a questionnaire routinely administered to women who were found to carry a mutation in either gene. Smoking histories of case subjects with breast cancer and age-matched healthy control subjects were compared. Odds ratios for developing breast cancer were determined for smokers versus nonsmokers by use of conditional logistic regression for matched sets after adjustment for other known risk factors. RESULTS Subjects with BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations and breast cancer were significantly more likely to have been nonsmokers than were subjects with mutations and without breast cancer (two-sided P = .007). In a multivariate analysis, subjects with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations who had smoked cigarettes for more than 4 pack-years (i.e., number of packs per day multiplied by the number of years of smoking) were found to have a lower breast cancer risk (odds ratio = 0.46, 95% confidence interval = 0.27-0.80; two-sided P = .006) than subjects with mutations who never smoked. CONCLUSIONS This study raises the possibility that smoking reduces the risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J S Brunet
- Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Crider-Miller SJ, Reid LH, Higgins MJ, Nowak NJ, Shows TB, Futreal PA, Weissman BE. Novel transcribed sequences within the BWS/WT2 region in 11p15.5: tissue-specific expression correlates with cancer type. Genomics 1997; 46:355-63. [PMID: 9441738 DOI: 10.1006/geno.1997.5061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Chromosome band 11p15.5 has proven to be an intriguing area of the human genome. Various studies have linked alterations in this region to growth-related disorders such as Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and a variety of human cancers. Furthermore, functional assays in G401 Wilms tumor cells and RD rhabdomyosarcoma cells support the existence of a tumor suppressor gene on 11p15.5, sometimes called WT2. In addition, several genes mapping to this region show imprinted expression, suggesting that 11p15.5 contains an imprinted domain. We have employed solution hybrid capture in combination with sequence analysis to identify 16 genes within the approximately 700-kb critical region of 11p15.5 between D11S601 and D11S1318. Two of these genes, NAP1L4 and KCNA9, had been previously reported. Ten novel transcripts were identified with partial cDNA sequences selected by solution hybrid capture. Sequence homology to known ESTs was used to identify the remaining gene transcripts. Interestingly, the tissue-specific mRNA expression of these genes correlates with the tumor types linked to this region. This work can be compiled into a transcript map, important in the elucidation of tumor suppressor activity on chromosome 11p15.5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Crider-Miller
- Department of Pathology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
McAllister KA, Haugen-Strano A, Hagevik S, Brownlee HA, Collins NK, Futreal PA, Bennett LM, Wiseman RW. Characterization of the rat and mouse homologues of the BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility gene. Cancer Res 1997; 57:3121-5. [PMID: 9242436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Inherited BRCA2 mutations confer profound susceptibility to human breast and ovarian cancer. The rat and mouse Brca2 homologues share 58% and 59% identity (72% similarity), respectively, with the human BRCA2 protein. The Brca2 proteins also share a potential nuclear localization signal (human codons 3263-3269) and a highly conserved large carboxyl region (77% identity, 86% similarity between human and rodents) that may represent important functional domains. At least six of eight previously described BRC repeats have been highly conserved in rats and mice. Expression studies demonstrate an 11-12 Kb transcript with rodent tissue-specific patterns of expression consistent with human BRCA2. These results will facilitate studies of Brca2 function during normal and neoplastic development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K A McAllister
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Lancaster JM, Berchuck A, Futreal PA, Wiseman RW. Dideoxy fingerprinting assay for BRCA1 mutation analysis. Mol Carcinog 1997; 19:176-9. [PMID: 9254884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Since the isolation of BRCA1, the familial breast/ovarian cancer predisposition gene, much effort has been invested in characterizing the mutation spectrum. The large size of the gene and the wide distribution of its more than 100 mutations has increased the challenge of this endeavor such that traditional mutation detection techniques are inadequate. We examined the sensitivity of dideoxy fingerprinting (DDF), which combine a Sanger sequencing reaction with multiple-fragment single-strand conformation analysis (SSCA), as a mutation detection technique to screen BRCA1. Here we describe the technique and compare its sensitivity with that of SSCA in detecting 21 previously described BRCA1 sequence variants. All the variants were detected by DDF, but only 17 of 21 (81%) were observed by SSCA under standard conditions. Three of four alterations missed by SSCA were base substitutions. As a BRCA1 mutation detection technique, DDF was more sensitive than SSCA and may prove to be a useful research tool in defining the mutation spectrum within this and other genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Lancaster
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Marks JR, Huper G, Vaughn JP, Davis PL, Norris J, McDonnell DP, Wiseman RW, Futreal PA, Iglehart JD. BRCA1 expression is not directly responsive to estrogen. Oncogene 1997; 14:115-21. [PMID: 9010238 DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1200808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Expression of the breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA1, is induced by 17-beta estradiol (E2) in estrogen receptor containing breast cancer cell lines. Our previous studies have shown that BRCA1 transcription is also regulated with the cell cycle, reaching maximal levels just before the onset of DNA synthesis. In this study, we have examined whether the estrogen induction of BRCA1 is direct or is a result of the mitogenic activity of the hormone. Four lines of evidence lead us to conclude that E2 induces BRCA1 primarily through an increase in DNA synthesis: (1) The kinetics and magnitude of induction are different from the directly E2 inducible gene, pS2; (2) Induction of BRCA1, but not pS2, is blocked by cycloheximide indicating that de novo protein synthesis is required; (3) Other hormonal and growth factor treatments that induce DNA synthesis have a similar effect, including IGF-1, EGF and DNA synthetic flares induced by tamoxifen and retinoic acid; (4) BRCA1 genomic fragments near the 5' end of the gene containing putative estrogen response elements fail to respond to E2 when transfected into breast cancer cell lines. The most consistent explanation for these findings and other published studies is that BRCA1 transcription is induced as a result of the mitogenic activity of E2 in estrogen receptor positive cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Marks
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lancaster JM, Brownlee HA, Bell DA, Futreal PA, Marks JR, Berchuck A, Wiseman RW, Taylor JA. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase polymorphism as a risk factor for ovarian cancer. Mol Carcinog 1996. [PMID: 8944076 DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2744(199611)17:3<160::aid-mc8>3.0.co;2-j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX) is one of many enzymes involved in the metabolism of endogenous and exogenous toxicants. Polymorphic forms of the human EPHX gene have been described that vary in enzymatic activity, and one, Tyr113His, has been associated with hepatocellular carcinoma susceptibility. We demonstrated that EPHX was highly expressed in the human ovary, and investigated whether specific EPHX genotypes are associated with ovarian cancer susceptibility. Seventy-three Caucasian patients with ovarian cancer and 75 Caucasian-female controls without cancer were genotyped for the Tyr113His polymorphism by a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay. The frequency of the homozygous high-activity genotype was 41% in the control population and 64% in the ovarian cancer patients. The odds ratio for ovarian cancer with this genotype was 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.3, 5.0; P < 0.01). The increased ovarian cancer risk associated with the high-activity genotype could reflect differences in metabolic activation of endogenous or exogenous carcinogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Lancaster
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lancaster JM, Brownlee HA, Bell DA, Futreal PA, Marks JR, Berchuck A, Wiseman RW, Taylor JA. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase polymorphism as a risk factor for ovarian cancer. Mol Carcinog 1996. [PMID: 8944076 DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2744(199611)17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX) is one of many enzymes involved in the metabolism of endogenous and exogenous toxicants. Polymorphic forms of the human EPHX gene have been described that vary in enzymatic activity, and one, Tyr113His, has been associated with hepatocellular carcinoma susceptibility. We demonstrated that EPHX was highly expressed in the human ovary, and investigated whether specific EPHX genotypes are associated with ovarian cancer susceptibility. Seventy-three Caucasian patients with ovarian cancer and 75 Caucasian-female controls without cancer were genotyped for the Tyr113His polymorphism by a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay. The frequency of the homozygous high-activity genotype was 41% in the control population and 64% in the ovarian cancer patients. The odds ratio for ovarian cancer with this genotype was 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.3, 5.0; P < 0.01). The increased ovarian cancer risk associated with the high-activity genotype could reflect differences in metabolic activation of endogenous or exogenous carcinogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Lancaster
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EPHX) is one of many enzymes involved in the metabolism of endogenous and exogenous toxicants. Polymorphic forms of the human EPHX gene have been described that vary in enzymatic activity, and one, Tyr113His, has been associated with hepatocellular carcinoma susceptibility. We demonstrated that EPHX was highly expressed in the human ovary, and investigated whether specific EPHX genotypes are associated with ovarian cancer susceptibility. Seventy-three Caucasian patients with ovarian cancer and 75 Caucasian-female controls without cancer were genotyped for the Tyr113His polymorphism by a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay. The frequency of the homozygous high-activity genotype was 41% in the control population and 64% in the ovarian cancer patients. The odds ratio for ovarian cancer with this genotype was 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.3, 5.0; P < 0.01). The increased ovarian cancer risk associated with the high-activity genotype could reflect differences in metabolic activation of endogenous or exogenous carcinogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Lancaster
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Vaughn JP, Cirisano FD, Huper G, Berchuck A, Futreal PA, Marks JR, Iglehart JD. Cell cycle control of BRCA2. Cancer Res 1996; 56:4590-4. [PMID: 8840967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Identifying the conditions and kinetics of the induction of BRCA2 gene expression may implicate roles for the function of the tumor suppressor gene. In this study, expression of BRCA2 mRNA is shown to be regulated by the cell cycle and associated with proliferation in normal and tumor-derived breast epithelial cells. Cells arrested in G(0) or early G1 contained low levels of BRCA2 mRNA. After release into a proliferating state, cells produced maximum levels of BRCA2 mRNA in late G1 and the S-phase. Similar cell cycle control of BRCA2 was observed in fractions of exponentially growing cells isolated by centrifugal elutriation. Expression of BRCA2 was shown to be independent of bulk DNA synthesis. In addition, the kinetics of BRCA2 mRNA up-regulation appeared to be similar to those of BRCA1, suggesting that the two genes could be commonly controlled. These results imply that these two tumor suppressor genes are utilized during growth and may have a protective role in cellular proliferation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Vaughn
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Lancaster JM, Wooster R, Mangion J, Phelan CM, Cochran C, Gumbs C, Seal S, Barfoot R, Collins N, Bignell G, Patel S, Hamoudi R, Larsson C, Wiseman RW, Berchuck A, Iglehart JD, Marks JR, Ashworth A, Stratton MR, Futreal PA. BRCA2 mutations in primary breast and ovarian cancers. Nat Genet 1996; 13:238-40. [PMID: 8640235 DOI: 10.1038/ng0696-238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 244] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The second hereditary breast cancer gene, BRCA2, was recently isolated. Germline mutations of this gene predispose carriers to breast cancer, and, to a lesser extent, ovarian cancer. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the BRCA2 locus has been observed in 30-40% of sporadic breast and ovarian tumours, implying that BRCA2 may act as a tumour suppressor gene in a proportion of sporadic cases. To define the role of BRCA2 in sporadic breast and ovarian cancer, we screened the entire gene for mutations using a combination of techniques in 70 primary breast carcinomas and in 55 primary epithelial ovarian carcinomas. Our analysis revealed alterations in 2/70 breast tumours and none of the ovarian carcinomas. One alteration found in the breast cancers was a 2-basepair (bp) deletion (4710delAG) which was subsequently shown to be a germline mutation, the other was a somatic missense mutation (Asp3095Glu) of unknown significance. Our results suggest that BRCA2 is a very infrequent target for somatic inactivation in breast and ovarian carcinomas, similar to the results obtained for BRCA1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Lancaster
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Vaughn JP, Davis PL, Jarboe MD, Huper G, Evans AC, Wiseman RW, Berchuck A, Iglehart JD, Futreal PA, Marks JR. BRCA1 expression is induced before DNA synthesis in both normal and tumor-derived breast cells. Cell Growth Differ 1996; 7:711-5. [PMID: 8780884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Insight into the function of the BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene may be gained by studying its regulation. In this study, the expression of BRCA1 was examined as a function of the cell cycle in normal and tumor-derived breast epithelial cells. Cells arrested in G(zero) or early in G1 contained low levels of BRCA1 mRNA. After release, populations of cells reached maximal levels of BRCA1 in late G1 and S phase. Induction of BRCA1 was shown to occur before the onset of DNA synthesis by synchronizing cells at the G1-S boundary. Levels of the BRCA1 protein were regulated in a similar manner. No difference was observed between primary cultures of normal mammary epithelial cells and immortalized tumor-derived cell lines. These results suggest that BRCA1 may function at the G1-S checkpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P Vaughn
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Phelan CM, Larsson C, Baird S, Futreal PA, Ruttledge MH, Morgan K, Tonin P, Hung H, Korneluk RG, Pollak MN, Narod SA. The human mammary-derived growth inhibitor (MDGI) gene: genomic structure and mutation analysis in human breast tumors. Genomics 1996; 34:63-8. [PMID: 8661024 DOI: 10.1006/geno.1996.0241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The mammary-derived growth inhibitor (MDGI) gene is a candidate tumor suppressor gene for human breast cancer. It has been shown to reduce the tumorigenicity of breast cancer cell lines in nude mice, and loss of expression of this gene has been shown in primary breast tumors. Furthermore, the human MDGI gene has been mapped to human chromosome 1p32-p35, a common region of deletion in sporadic breast tumors. We have determined the genomic structure of the human MDGI gene from a cosmid clone mapping to chromosome 1p32-p35 and have more finely mapped the MDGI gene relative to chromosome 1p microsatellite markers. The gene covers approximately 8 kb of genomic DNA and is divided into four exons. In an attempt to identify possible inactivating mutations in the MDGI gene in human breast cancer, we have sequenced all four exons and their surrounding splice junctions in 30 sporadic breast tumors. Ten of these tumors showed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the 1p32-p35 region, with 5 tumors showing LOH in the subregion containing the MDGI gene. No mutations were found in this analysis. A polymorphism was identified in exon 2 in the constitutional DNA of 1/30 cases in this study, which resulted in the conversion of a lysine to an arginine residue at codon 53. This variant was present in the constitutional DNA of a further 3/26 women with sporadic breast cancer and 2/90 control individuals (P = 0.20). Despite experimental evidence that MDGI has tumor suppressor activity, our data suggest that mutations in the coding region are uncommon in human breast tumorigenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Phelan
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Phelan CM, Lancaster JM, Tonin P, Gumbs C, Cochran C, Carter R, Ghadirian P, Perret C, Moslehi R, Dion F, Faucher MC, Dole K, Karimi S, Foulkes W, Lounis H, Warner E, Goss P, Anderson D, Larsson C, Narod SA, Futreal PA. Mutation analysis of the BRCA2 gene in 49 site-specific breast cancer families. Nat Genet 1996; 13:120-2. [PMID: 8673090 DOI: 10.1038/ng0596-120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 170] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
The hereditary breast cancer gene BRCA2 was recently cloned and is believed to account for almost half of site-specific breast cancer families and the majority of male breast cancer families. We screened 49 site-specific breast cancer families for mutations in the BRCA2 gene using single strand conformation analysis (SSCA) followed by direct sequencing. We found mutations in eight families, including all four families with male breast cancer. The eight mutations were small deletions with the exception of a single nonsense mutation, an all were predicted to interrupt the BRCA2 coding sequence and to lead to a truncated protein product. Other factors which predicted the presence of a BRCA2 mutation included a case of breast cancer diagnosed at age 35 or below (P = 0.01) and a family history of pancreatic cancer (P = 0.03). Two mutations were seen twice, including a 8535delAG, which was detected in two French Canadian families. Our results suggest the possibility that the proportion of site-specific breast cancer families attributable to BRCA2 may be overestimated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Phelan
- Department of Human Genetic and Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Microcell-mediated introduction of a neo-tagged human chromosome 1 (HC-1-neo) into several immortal cell lines has previously been shown to induce growth arrest and phenotypic changes indicative of replicative senescence. Somatic cell hybridization studies have localized senescence activity for immortal hamster 10W-2 cells to a cytogenetically defined region between 1q23 and the q terminus. Previous microcell-mediated chromosome transfer experiments showed that a chromosome 1 with an interstitial q-arm deletion (del-1q) lacks senescence inducing activity for several immortal human cell lines that are sensitive to an intact HC-1-neo. In contrast, our studies reveal that the del-1q chromosome retains activity for 10W-2 cells, indicating that there are at least two senescence genes on human chromosome 1. Sequence-tagged site (STS) content analysis revealed that the q arm of the del-1q chromosome has an interstitial deletion of approximately 63 centimorgans (cM), between the proximal STS marker DIS534 and distal marker DIS412, approximately 1q12 to 1q31. This deletion analysis provides a candidate region for one of the senescence genes on 1q. In addition, because this deletion region extends distally beyond 1q23, it localizes the region containing a second senescence gene to approximately 1q31-qter, between DIS422 and the q terminus. STS content analysis of a panel of 11 10W-2 microcell hybrid clones that escaped senescence identified 2 common regions of loss of 1q material below the distal breakpoint of del-1q. One region is flanked by markers DIS459 and ACTN2, and the second lies between markers WI-4683 and DIS1609, indicating that the distal 1q senescence gene(s) localizes within 1q42-43.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P J Vojta
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lancaster JM, Cochran CJ, Brownlee HA, Evans AC, Berchuck A, Futreal PA, Wiseman RW. Detection of BRCA1 mutations in women with early-onset ovarian cancer by use of the protein truncation test. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88:552-4. [PMID: 8606385 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/88.8.552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- J M Lancaster
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Norris J, Fan D, Aleman C, Marks JR, Futreal PA, Wiseman RW, Iglehart JD, Deininger PL, McDonnell DP. Identification of a new subclass of Alu DNA repeats which can function as estrogen receptor-dependent transcriptional enhancers. J Biol Chem 1995; 270:22777-82. [PMID: 7559405 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.270.39.22777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 181] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
We have utilized a genetic selection system in yeast to identify novel estrogen-responsive genes within the human genome and to define the sequences in the BRCA-1 gene responsible for its estrogen responsiveness. This approach led to the identification of a new subclass within the Alu family of DNA repeats which have diverged from known Alu sequences and have acquired the ability to function as estrogen receptor-dependent enhancers. Importantly, these new elements confer receptor-dependent estrogen responsiveness to a heterologous promoter when assayed in mammalian cells. This transcriptional activity can be attenuated by the addition of either of three different classes of estrogen receptor antagonists, indicating that these elements function as classical estrogen receptor-dependent enhancers. Furthermore, this enhancer activity is restricted to a specific subset of DNA repeats because consensus Alu elements of four major subfamilies do not respond to the estrogen receptor. Previously, most Alu sequences have been considered to be functionally inert. However, this work provides strong evidence that a significant subset can confer estrogen responsiveness upon a promoter within which they are located. Clearly, Alu sequences must now be considered as important contributors to the regulation of gene transcription in estrogen receptor-containing cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Norris
- Department of Pharmacology, Duke University Medical School, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Futreal PA, Liu Q, Shattuck-Eidens D, Cochran C, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, Bennett LM, Haugen-Strano A, Swensen J, Miki Y. BRCA1 mutations in primary breast and ovarian carcinomas. Science 1994; 266:120-2. [PMID: 7939630 DOI: 10.1126/science.7939630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 831] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Loss of heterozygosity data from familial tumors suggest that BRCA1, a gene that confers susceptibility to ovarian and early-onset breast cancer, encodes a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 region is also subject to allelic loss in sporadic breast and ovarian cancers, an indication that BRCA1 mutations may occur somatically in these tumors. The BRCA1 coding region was examined for mutations in primary breast and ovarian tumors that show allele loss at the BRCA1 locus. Mutations were detected in 3 of 32 breast and 1 of 12 ovarian carcinomas; all four mutations were germline alterations and occurred in early-onset cancers. These results suggest that mutation of BRCA1 may not be critical in the development of the majority of breast and ovarian cancers that arise in the absence of a mutant germline allele.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Futreal
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal PA, Harshman K, Tavtigian S, Liu Q, Cochran C, Bennett LM, Ding W. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science 1994; 266:66-71. [PMID: 7545954 DOI: 10.1126/science.7545954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4046] [Impact Index Per Article: 134.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
A strong candidate for the 17q-linked BRCA1 gene, which influences susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer, has been identified by positional cloning methods. Probable predisposing mutations have been detected in five of eight kindreds presumed to segregate BRCA1 susceptibility alleles. The mutations include an 11-base pair deletion, a 1-base pair insertion, a stop codon, a missense substitution, and an inferred regulatory mutation. The BRCA1 gene is expressed in numerous tissues, including breast and ovary, and encodes a predicted protein of 1863 amino acids. This protein contains a zinc finger domain in its amino-terminal region, but is otherwise unrelated to previously described proteins. Identification of BRCA1 should facilitate early diagnosis of breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility in some individuals as well as a better understanding of breast cancer biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Miki
- Department of Medical Informatics, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City 84132
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kamb A, Futreal PA, Rosenthal J, Cochran C, Harshman KD, Liu Q, Phelps RS, Tavtigian SV, Tran T, Hussey C. Localization of the VHR phosphatase gene and its analysis as a candidate for BRCA1. Genomics 1994; 23:163-7. [PMID: 7829067 DOI: 10.1006/geno.1994.1473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
The VH1-related human protein (VHR) gene was localized to human chromosome 17q21 in a region thought to contain the BRCA1 locus, a locus that confers susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer. VHR encodes a phosphatase with dual specificity for tyrosine and serine residues. Thus it is a plausible candidate for a tumor suppressor gene such as BRCA1. To test this possibility, the VHR coding sequence was screened in individuals with familial breast cancer and in sporadic breast tumor and breast cancer cell lines. No mutations were detected, suggesting that the VHR gene is not BRCA1.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- BRCA1 Protein
- Base Sequence
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17
- DNA Mutational Analysis
- DNA, Complementary/genetics
- DNA, Neoplasm/genetics
- Dual Specificity Phosphatase 3
- Female
- Genes
- Genes, Tumor Suppressor
- Genetic Predisposition to Disease
- Humans
- Molecular Sequence Data
- Neoplasm Proteins/genetics
- Neoplasm Proteins/physiology
- Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Polymorphism, Genetic
- Polymorphism, Single-Stranded Conformational
- Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases/genetics
- RNA, Messenger/genetics
- RNA, Neoplasm/genetics
- Transcription Factors
- Tumor Cells, Cultured
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Kamb
- Myriad Genetics, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah 84108
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Futreal PA, Cochran C, Rosenthal J, Miki Y, Swenson J, Hobbs M, Bennett LM, Haugen-Strano A, Marks J, Barrett JC. Isolation of a diverged homeobox gene, MOX1, from the BRCA1 region on 17q21 by solution hybrid capture. Hum Mol Genet 1994; 3:1359-64. [PMID: 7987315 DOI: 10.1093/hmg/3.8.1359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Using the technique of solution hybridization coupled with magnetic bead capture, we have isolated a novel homeobox-containing gene from the BRCA1 region of 17q21. This gene is the human homologue of the mouse Mox1 gene previously localized to a syntenic region of mouse chromosome 11. Multiple overlapping cDNAs of human MOX1 were identified using both a cosmid and a P1 genomic clone containing the microsatellite markers D17S750 and D17S858 which map within the BRCA1 region defined by D17S776 and D17S78. MOX1 expression was observed in a variety of normal tissues examined, including breast and ovary. Given that the gene contains a homeobox domain and has the potential to regulate growth and differentiation, MOX1 represents an attractive candidate for the BRCA1 gene. This possibility was investigated in a series of BRCA1 kindreds and primary sporadic breast tumors. No evidence for mutation was found in the coding sequence, making it unlikely that MOX1 is the BRCA1 gene. However, the widespread expression of MOX1 in non-embryonal tissues suggests a role in normal cell biology which warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Futreal
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Futreal PA, Cochran C, Marks JR, Iglehart JD, Zimmerman W, Barrett JC, Wiseman RW. Mutation analysis of the THRA1 gene in breast cancer: deletion/fusion of the gene to a novel sequence on 17q in the BT474 cell line. Cancer Res 1994; 54:1791-4. [PMID: 7511052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
We have previously described a common region of deletion and allele loss on chromosome 17q in sporadic breast cancers that is likely to contain a tumor suppressor gene. The region, mapped to 17q12-q21, was bordered by D17S250 and D17S579 on the centromeric and telomeric sides, respectively. This deletion region overlaps the BRCA1 locus, which predisposes to familial breast and ovarian cancer. The most frequent loss of heterozygosity was observed at the thyroid hormone receptor alpha (THRA1) locus. Southern analysis revealed a rearrangement of THRA1 in the BT474 breast cancer cell line. This rearrangement represented a deletion of exons 8-10 of one THRA1 allele that was also coamplified with ERBB2. Northern blots showed two mutant transcripts in BT474 cells. Analysis of the mutant transcripts revealed fusion of the THRA1 exon 7 by splicing to a novel sequence designated BTR for "BT474 transcribed rearrangement." BTR was found to be highly conserved and mapped to 17q. The deletion in BT474 cells spans the entire BRCA1 region. To search for additional mutations in the THRA1 gene, all nine protein-encoding exons of THRA1 were examined for point mutations via single strand conformation analysis in a series of primary breast tumors, breast cancer cell lines, and lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from the youngest affected members of several German breast cancer families. No point mutations were detected, including the unrearranged THRA1 allele in BT474. We have thus excluded THRA1 as a commonly mutated sporadic breast cancer tumor suppressor gene and as the BRCA1 gene.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Amino Acid Sequence
- Base Sequence
- Blotting, Northern
- Breast Neoplasms/genetics
- Cell Line
- Chromosome Mapping
- Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17
- Cloning, Molecular
- Conserved Sequence
- DNA Mutational Analysis
- DNA Primers
- DNA, Neoplasm/genetics
- DNA, Neoplasm/isolation & purification
- Exons
- Female
- Gene Deletion
- Gene Rearrangement
- Genetic Markers
- Humans
- Molecular Sequence Data
- Point Mutation
- Poly A/analysis
- Polymerase Chain Reaction
- RNA/analysis
- RNA, Messenger
- Receptors, Thyroid Hormone/genetics
- Transcription, Genetic
- Tumor Cells, Cultured
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Futreal
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|