The generation of PD-L1 and PD-L2 in cancer cells: From nuclear chromatin reorganization to extracellular presentation

The immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) targeting on PD-1/PD-L1 has shown remarkable promise in treating cancers. However, the low response rate and frequently observed severe side effects limit its broad benefits. It is partially due to less understanding of the biological regulation of PD-L1. Here, we systematically and comprehensively summarized the regulation of PD-L1 from nuclear chromatin reorganization to extracellular presentation. In PD-L1 and PD-L2 highly expressed cancer cells, a new TAD (topologically associating domain) (chr9: 5,400,000-5,600,000) around CD274 and CD273 was discovered, which includes a reported super-enhancer to drive synchronous transcription of PD-L1 and PD-L2. The re-shaped TAD allows transcription factors such as STAT3 and IRF1 recruit to PD-L1 locus in order to guide the expression of PD-L1. After transcription, the PD-L1 is tightly regulated by miRNAs and RNA-binding proteins via the long 3'UTR. At translational level, PD-L1 protein and its membrane presentation are tightly regulated by post-translational modification such as glycosylation and ubiquitination. In addition, PD-L1 can be secreted via exosome to systematically inhibit immune response. Therefore, fully dissecting the regulation of PD-L1/PD-L2 and thoroughly detecting PD-L1/PD-L2 as well as their regulatory networks will bring more insights in ICB and ICB-based combinational therapy.

Expression of programmed death ligand 1 in drug-resistant osteosarcoma: An exploratory study

Background

Inhibition of the programmed death ligand 1, programmed death 1 pathway has been successfully used for treatment of multiple advanced adult cancers. However, its use in pediatric osteosarcoma is still in its infancy. In this study, we investigated programmed death ligand 1 and other checkpoint molecules' expression to determine the potential usefulness as targets for drug therapy.

Methods

We incubated human wild-type osteosarcoma cells with incremental concentrations of doxorubicin to create a doxorubicin-resistant cell line. Matrigel in vitro invasion assays were used to compare invasiveness. Comparative programmed death ligand 1 expression was evaluated by Western blot assays. An immuno-oncology checkpoint protein panel was used to compare concentrations of 16 other checkpoint molecules. Chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to determine significant differences.

Results

A doxorubicin-resistant cell line was successfully created and was significantly more invasive than wild-type cells (0.47 vs 0.07, P < .001). On Western blot assay, doxorubicin-resistant but not wild-type cells expressed programmed death ligand 1. Doxorubicin-resistant cells had significantly higher levels of T-cell immunoglobulin-3 and cluster of differentiation 86 and higher cluster of differentiation 27, cluster of differentiation 40, lymphocyte-activation gene-3, cluster of differentiation 80, programmed death ligand 1, programmed death ligand 2, and inducible T-cell costimulatory expression than wild-type cells. Both lines expressed B- and T-lymphocyte attenuator, cluster of differentiation 28, herpesvirus entry mediator, and programmed death 1. Herpesvirus entry mediator, cluster of differentiation 40, and programmed death ligand 2 were also present in the culture media of both cell lines.

Conclusion

Doxorubicin-resistant osteosarcoma seems to express higher programmed death ligand 1 than nonresistant wild-type cells. Benchmarking checkpoint molecules may provide the basis for future studies that elucidate pathways of drug resistance and tumor metastasis, biomarkers for cancer prognosis or recurrence, and future targets for directed drug therapy.

B Cells in Atherosclerosis: Mechanisms and Potential Clinical Applications

•

B cells regulate atherosclerotic plaque formation through production of antibodies and cytokines, and effects are subset specific (B1 and B2).

•

Putative human atheroprotective B1 cells function similarly to murine B1 in their spontaneous IgM antibody production. However, marker strategies in identifying human and murine B1 are different.

•

IgM antibody to oxidation specific epitopes produced by B1 cells associate with human coronary artery disease.

•

Neoantigen immunization may be a promising strategy for atherosclerosis vaccine development, but further study to determine relevant antigens still need to be done.

•

B-cell–targeted therapies, used in treating autoimmune diseases as well as lymphoid cancers, might have potential applications in treating cardiovascular diseases. Short- and long-term cardiovascular effects of these agents need to be assessed.

Because atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death worldwide, understanding inflammatory processes underpinning its pathology is critical. B cells have been implicated as a key immune cell type in regulating atherosclerosis. B-cell effects, mediated by antibodies and cytokines, are subset specific. In this review, we focus on elaborating mechanisms underlying subtype-specific roles of B cells in atherosclerosis and discuss available human data implicating B cells in atherosclerosis. We further discuss potential B cell–linked therapeutic approaches, including immunization and B cell–targeted biologics. Given recent evidence strongly supporting a role for B cells in human atherosclerosis and the expansion of immunomodulatory agents that affect B-cell biology in clinical use and clinical trials for other disorders, it is important that the cardiovascular field be cognizant of potential beneficial or untoward effects of modulating B-cell activity on atherosclerosis.