1
|
Taylor JA, Burnell M, Ryana A, Karpinskyj C, Kalsi JK, Taylor H, Apostolidou S, Sharma A, Manchanda R, Woolas R, Campbell S, Parmar M, Singh N, Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A. Association of hysterectomy and invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer: a cohort study within UKCTOCS. BJOG 2022; 129:110-118. [PMID: 34555263 PMCID: PMC7615389 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between hysterectomy with conservation of one or both adnexa and ovarian and tubal cancer. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Thirteen NHS Trusts in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. POPULATION A total of 202 506 postmenopausal women recruited between 2001 and 2005 to the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) and followed up until 31 December 2014. METHODS Multiple sources (questionnaires, hospital notes, Hospital Episodes Statistics, national cancer/death registries, ultrasound reports) were used to obtain accurate data on hysterectomy (with conservation of one or both adnexa) and outcomes censored at bilateral oophorectomy, death, ovarian/tubal cancer diagnosis, loss to follow up or 31 December 2014. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer (WHO 2014) on independent outcome review. RESULTS Hysterectomy with conservation of one or both adnexa was reported in 41 912 (20.7%; 41 912/202 506) women. Median follow up was 11.1 years (interquartile range 9.96-12.04), totalling >2.17 million woman-years. Among women who had undergone hysterectomy, 0.55% (231/41 912) were diagnosed with ovarian/tubal cancer, compared with 0.59% (945/160 594) of those with intact uterus. Multivariable analysis showed no evidence of an association between hysterectomy and invasive epithelial ovarian/tubal cancer (hazard ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.85-1.13, P = 0.765). CONCLUSIONS This large cohort study provides further independent validation that hysterectomy is not associated with alteration of invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer risk. These data are important both for clinical counselling and for refining risk prediction models. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Hysterectomy does not alter risk of invasive epithelial ovarian and tubal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JA Taylor
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Burnell
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Ryana
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - C Karpinskyj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - JK Kalsi
- Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
- Department Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL, London, UK
| | - H Taylor
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - S Apostolidou
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Sharma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - R Manchanda
- Barts Health NHS Trust and Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, CRUK Barts Cancer Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - R Woolas
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | - M Parmar
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - N Singh
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - IJ Jacobs
- Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
- University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - U Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Millstein J, Budden T, Goode EL, Anglesio MS, Talhouk A, Intermaggio MP, Leong HS, Chen S, Elatre W, Gilks B, Nazeran T, Volchek M, Bentley RC, Wang C, Chiu DS, Kommoss S, Leung SCY, Senz J, Lum A, Chow V, Sudderuddin H, Mackenzie R, George J, Fereday S, Hendley J, Traficante N, Steed H, Koziak JM, Köbel M, McNeish IA, Goranova T, Ennis D, Macintyre G, Silva De Silva D, Ramón Y Cajal T, García-Donas J, Hernando Polo S, Rodriguez GC, Cushing-Haugen KL, Harris HR, Greene CS, Zelaya RA, Behrens S, Fortner RT, Sinn P, Herpel E, Lester J, Lubiński J, Oszurek O, Tołoczko A, Cybulski C, Menkiszak J, Pearce CL, Pike MC, Tseng C, Alsop J, Rhenius V, Song H, Jimenez-Linan M, Piskorz AM, Gentry-Maharaj A, Karpinskyj C, Widschwendter M, Singh N, Kennedy CJ, Sharma R, Harnett PR, Gao B, Johnatty SE, Sayer R, Boros J, Winham SJ, Keeney GL, Kaufmann SH, Larson MC, Luk H, Hernandez BY, Thompson PJ, Wilkens LR, Carney ME, Trabert B, Lissowska J, Brinton L, Sherman ME, Bodelon C, Hinsley S, Lewsley LA, Glasspool R, Banerjee SN, Stronach EA, Haluska P, Ray-Coquard I, Mahner S, Winterhoff B, Slamon D, Levine DA, Kelemen LE, Benitez J, Chang-Claude J, Gronwald J, Wu AH, Menon U, Goodman MT, Schildkraut JM, Wentzensen N, Brown R, Berchuck A, Chenevix-Trench G, deFazio A, Gayther SA, García MJ, Henderson MJ, Rossing MA, Beeghly-Fadiel A, Fasching PA, Orsulic S, Karlan BY, Konecny GE, Huntsman DG, Bowtell DD, Brenton JD, Doherty JA, Pharoah PDP, Ramus SJ. Prognostic gene expression signature for high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1240-1250. [PMID: 32473302 PMCID: PMC7484370 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2020] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Median overall survival (OS) for women with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is ∼4 years, yet survival varies widely between patients. There are no well-established, gene expression signatures associated with prognosis. The aim of this study was to develop a robust prognostic signature for OS in patients with HGSOC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Expression of 513 genes, selected from a meta-analysis of 1455 tumours and other candidates, was measured using NanoString technology from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue collected from 3769 women with HGSOC from multiple studies. Elastic net regularization for survival analysis was applied to develop a prognostic model for 5-year OS, trained on 2702 tumours from 15 studies and evaluated on an independent set of 1067 tumours from six studies. RESULTS Expression levels of 276 genes were associated with OS (false discovery rate < 0.05) in covariate-adjusted single-gene analyses. The top five genes were TAP1, ZFHX4, CXCL9, FBN1 and PTGER3 (P < 0.001). The best performing prognostic signature included 101 genes enriched in pathways with treatment implications. Each gain of one standard deviation in the gene expression score conferred a greater than twofold increase in risk of death [hazard ratio (HR) 2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.02-2.71; P < 0.001]. Median survival [HR (95% CI)] by gene expression score quintile was 9.5 (8.3 to -), 5.4 (4.6-7.0), 3.8 (3.3-4.6), 3.2 (2.9-3.7) and 2.3 (2.1-2.6) years. CONCLUSION The OTTA-SPOT (Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium - Stratified Prognosis of Ovarian Tumours) gene expression signature may improve risk stratification in clinical trials by identifying patients who are least likely to achieve 5-year survival. The identified novel genes associated with the outcome may also yield opportunities for the development of targeted therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Millstein
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - T Budden
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia; CRUK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - E L Goode
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - M S Anglesio
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - A Talhouk
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - M P Intermaggio
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - H S Leong
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Chen
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Translational Genomics, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - W Elatre
- Department of Pathology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, USA
| | - B Gilks
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - T Nazeran
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - M Volchek
- Anatomical Pathology, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia
| | - R C Bentley
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, USA
| | - C Wang
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - D S Chiu
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - S Kommoss
- Department of Women's Health, Tuebingen University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - S C Y Leung
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - J Senz
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - A Lum
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - V Chow
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - H Sudderuddin
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - R Mackenzie
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - J George
- The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, USA
| | - S Fereday
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - J Hendley
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - N Traficante
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - H Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada
| | - J M Koziak
- Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, Calgary, Canada
| | - M Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, Calgary, Canada
| | - I A McNeish
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - T Goranova
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Ennis
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - G Macintyre
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Silva De Silva
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - T Ramón Y Cajal
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J García-Donas
- HM Hospitales D Centro Integral Oncológico HM Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
| | - S Hernando Polo
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Funcacion Alcorcon, Alcorcón, Spain
| | - G C Rodriguez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, University of Chicago, Evanston, USA
| | - K L Cushing-Haugen
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA
| | - H R Harris
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - C S Greene
- Department of Systems Pharmacology and Translational Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - R A Zelaya
- Department of Genetics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, USA
| | - S Behrens
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R T Fortner
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Sinn
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - E Herpel
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Lester
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA; Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J Lubiński
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - O Oszurek
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - A Tołoczko
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - C Cybulski
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - J Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - C L Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, USA; Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - M C Pike
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - C Tseng
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J Alsop
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - V Rhenius
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - H Song
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - M Jimenez-Linan
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - A M Piskorz
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - C Karpinskyj
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - N Singh
- Department of Pathology, Barts Health National Health Service Trust, London, UK
| | - C J Kennedy
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - R Sharma
- Pathology West ICPMR Westmead, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; University of Western Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - P R Harnett
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney-West Cancer Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - B Gao
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; The Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Sydney-West Cancer Network, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - S E Johnatty
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - R Sayer
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - J Boros
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - S J Winham
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - G L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - S H Kaufmann
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA; Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - M C Larson
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - H Luk
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, USA
| | - B Y Hernandez
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, USA
| | - P J Thompson
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - L R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, USA
| | - M E Carney
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, USA
| | - B Trabert
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - J Lissowska
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, M Sklodowska Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - L Brinton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - M E Sherman
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Jacksonville, USA
| | - C Bodelon
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S Hinsley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - L A Lewsley
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - R Glasspool
- Department of Medical Oncology, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - S N Banerjee
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E A Stronach
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - P Haluska
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - I Ray-Coquard
- Centre Leon Berard and University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - S Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - B Winterhoff
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - D Slamon
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - D A Levine
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Gynecologic Oncology, Laura and Isaac Pearlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - L E Kelemen
- Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA
| | - J Benitez
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain; Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain
| | - J Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Cancer Epidemiology Group, University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - J Gronwald
- Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - A H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - U Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials & Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| | - M T Goodman
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cancer Prevention and Genetics Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - J M Schildkraut
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - N Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - R Brown
- Division of Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Action Research Centre, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - A Berchuck
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Duke University Hospital, Durham, USA
| | - G Chenevix-Trench
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - A deFazio
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - S A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics and the Cedars Sinai Genomics Core, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - M J García
- Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid, Spain; Biomedical Network on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Madrid, Spain
| | - M J Henderson
- Children's Cancer Institute, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - M A Rossing
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA; Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| | - A Beeghly-Fadiel
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, USA
| | - P A Fasching
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - S Orsulic
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA; Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - B Y Karlan
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA; Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - G E Konecny
- David Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA
| | - D G Huntsman
- British Columbia's Ovarian Cancer Research (OVCARE) Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver General Hospital, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada
| | - D D Bowtell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - J D Brenton
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - J A Doherty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - P D P Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - S J Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Adult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre, University of NSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Trembling PM, Apostolidou S, Gentry-Maharaj A, Parkes J, Ryan A, Tanwar S, Burnell M, Menon U, Rosenberg WM. Association between skirt size and chronic liver disease in post-menopausal women: a prospective cohort study within the United Kingdom Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). BMC Public Health 2018; 18:409. [PMID: 29587697 PMCID: PMC5870222 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5308-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We investigated the association between self-reported skirt size (SS) and change in SS, and incidence of chronic liver disease (CLD) in a prospective cohort study of women recruited to the UKCTOCS trial. Methods Women recruited to UKCTOCS in England without documented CLD self-reported their current UK SS during trial participation and were asked to recall their SS when aged in 20s (via completion of a questionnaire 3–5 years after recruitment). Participants were followed up via electronic health record linkage and hazard ratios (HR) calculated for incident liver-related events (LRE). Results Three hundred twenty-two (0.3%) of 94,124 women experienced a first LRE. Compared to SS ≤ 16, rates of LRE were higher in the SS ≥ 18 groups (both when aged in 20s and at questionnaire completion). Event rates were higher if there was no change in SS or an increase in SS, compared to a decrease in SS. In the models adjusted for potential confounders, HRs for LRE were higher in the groups of women reporting SS ≥ 18 both when aged in 20s (HR = 1.39 (95% CI; 0.87–2.23)) and at questionnaire completion (HR = 1.37 (95% CI; 1.07–1.75)). Compared to a decrease in SS, HRs were higher in the no change (HR = 1.78 (95% CI; 0.95–3.34)) and increase (HR = 1.80 (95% CI; 1.01–3.21)) groups. Conclusion CLD is associated with high SS and an increase in SS over time. These data suggest SS can be used in simple public health messages about communicating the risk of liver disease. Trial Registration UKCTOCS is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN22488978. Registered 06/04/2000. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5308-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P M Trembling
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, NW3 2PF, London, UK.
| | - S Apostolidou
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - J Parkes
- Public Health Sciences and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - A Ryan
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - S Tanwar
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, NW3 2PF, London, UK
| | - M Burnell
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - U Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - W M Rosenberg
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, Rowland Hill Street, NW3 2PF, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a low-prevalence postmenopausal cancer with a high mortality rate and is the fifth most lethal cancer in women. The most common serous subtype with TP53 mutations spreads rapidly throughout the peritoneal cavity (stage III/IV) when 5-year survival is 10%. If diagnosed while confined to the ovary (stage I), the survival rate exceeds 90%. This is the rationale for screening. Annual transvaginal ultrasound (TVU) scans used as a primary screening modality or as a second-line test following primary screening with serum CA125 (multimodal) have been investigated in several trials. Only two large randomized controlled trials have provided mortality data. The US Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial studied over 78 000 women (randomized to screening with either TVU or CA125, or control) over 6 years with 14 years follow-up and found no mortality benefit from screening and increased morbidity in the screened arm. The UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening studied over 202 000 women randomized to TVU, multimodal or control in a 1 : 1 : 2 ratio over 7-11 years with 11 years follow-up. CA125 was interpreted by the Risk of Ovarian Cancer algorithm which identifies a rise in the level rather than a fixed cut-off. There was a late reduction in mortality after 7 years in the screened arm (23% in the multimodal arm and 21% in the TVU arm), but the overall reduction was not significant. Further follow-up may reveal whether TVU has a primary or secondary role in ovarian cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- b Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health , University College London , London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gentry-Maharaj A, Karpinskyj C, Glazer C, Burnell M, Bailey K, Apostolidou S, Ryan A, Lanceley A, Fraser L, Jacobs I, Hunter MS, Menon U. Prevalence and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine/non-pharmacological interventions use for menopausal symptoms within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening. Climacteric 2017; 20:240-247. [PMID: 28326899 PMCID: PMC5448394 DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1301919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2016] [Revised: 01/26/2017] [Accepted: 02/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The negative publicity about menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has led to increased use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) and non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) for menopausal symptom relief. We report on the prevalence and predictors of CAM/NPI among UK postmenopausal women. METHOD Postmenopausal women aged 50-74 years were invited to participate in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). A total of 202 638 women were recruited and completed a baseline questionnaire. Of these, 136 020 were sent a postal follow-up-questionnaire between September 2006 and May 2009 which included ever-use of CAM/NPI for menopausal symptom relief. Both questionnaires included MHT use. RESULTS A total of 88 430 (65.0%) women returned a completed follow-up-questionnaire; 22 206 (25.1%) reported ever-use of one or more CAM/NPI. Highest use was reported for herbal therapies (43.8%; 9725/22 206), vitamins (42.6%; 9458/22 206), lifestyle approaches (32.1%; 7137/22 206) and phytoestrogens (21.6%; 4802/22 206). Older women reported less ever-use of herbal therapies, vitamins and phytoestrogens. Lifestyle approaches, aromatherapy/reflexology/acupuncture and homeopathy were similar across age groups. Higher education, Black ethnicity, MHT or previous oral contraceptive pill use were associated with higher CAM/NPI use. Women assessed as being less hopeful about their future were less likely to use CAM/NPI. CONCLUSION One in four postmenopausal women reported ever-use of CAM therapies/NPI for menopausal symptom relief, with lower use reported by older women. Higher levels of education and previous MHT use were positive predictors of CAM/NPI use. UKCTOCS Trial registration: ISRCTN22488978.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - C. Karpinskyj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - C. Glazer
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Bispebjerg - Frederiksberg Hospital, Institute of Public Health, University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
| | - M. Burnell
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - K. Bailey
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - S. Apostolidou
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - A. Ryan
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - A. Lanceley
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - L. Fraser
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| | - I. Jacobs
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
- UNSW AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- Centre for Women's Health, Institute of Human Development, University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - M. S. Hunter
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Guy’s Campus, King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - U. Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women’s Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Burnell M, Iyer R, Gentry-Maharaj A, Nordin A, Liston R, Manchanda R, Das N, Gornall R, Beardmore-Gray A, Hillaby K, Leeson S, Linder A, Lopes A, Meechan D, Mould T, Nevin J, Olaitan A, Rufford B, Shanbhag S, Thackeray A, Wood N, Reynolds K, Ryan A, Menon U. Benchmarking of surgical complications in gynaecological oncology: prospective multicentre study. BJOG 2016; 123:2171-2180. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Burnell
- Department of Women's Cancer; Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre; Institute for Women's Health; University College London; London UK
| | - R Iyer
- Department of Women's Cancer; Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre; Institute for Women's Health; University College London; London UK
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Department of Women's Cancer; Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre; Institute for Women's Health; University College London; London UK
| | - A Nordin
- East Kent Gynaecological Oncology Centre; Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital; Margate UK
| | - R Liston
- Department of Women's Cancer; Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre; Institute for Women's Health; University College London; London UK
| | - R Manchanda
- Department of Women's Cancer; Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre; Institute for Women's Health; University College London; London UK
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer; Barts Cancer Centre; Barts and the London NHS Trust; London UK
| | - N Das
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer; Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust; Truro UK
| | - R Gornall
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology; Cheltenham General Hospital; Cheltenham UK
| | - A Beardmore-Gray
- Department of Women's Cancer; Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre; Institute for Women's Health; University College London; London UK
| | - K Hillaby
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology; Cheltenham General Hospital; Cheltenham UK
| | - S Leeson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; BetsiCadwaladr University Health Board; Bangor UK
| | - A Linder
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology; The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust; Ipswich Suffolk UK
| | - A Lopes
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer; Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust; Truro UK
| | | | - T Mould
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology; University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - J Nevin
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre; Birmingham City Hospital; Birmingham UK
| | - A Olaitan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology; University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; London UK
| | - B Rufford
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology; The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust; Ipswich Suffolk UK
| | - S Shanbhag
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology; Glasgow Royal Infirmary; Glasgow UK
| | | | - N Wood
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology; Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation trust; Royal Preston Hospital; Preston UK
| | - K Reynolds
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer; Barts Cancer Centre; Barts and the London NHS Trust; London UK
| | - A Ryan
- Department of Women's Cancer; Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre; Institute for Women's Health; University College London; London UK
| | - U Menon
- Department of Women's Cancer; Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre; Institute for Women's Health; University College London; London UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thomas DS, Fourkala EO, Apostolidou S, Gunu R, Ryan A, Jacobs I, Menon U, Alderton W, Gentry-Maharaj A, Timms JF. Evaluation of serum CEA, CYFRA21-1 and CA125 for the early detection of colorectal cancer using longitudinal preclinical samples. Br J Cancer 2015; 113:268-74. [PMID: 26035703 PMCID: PMC4506388 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 03/23/2015] [Accepted: 05/06/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Blood-borne biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) could markedly increase screening uptake. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CYFRA21-1 and CA125 for the early detection of CRC in an asymptomatic cohort. Methods: This nested case–control study within UKCTOCS used 381 serial serum samples from 40 women subsequently diagnosed with CRC, 20 women subsequently diagnosed with benign disease and 40 matched non-cancer controls with three to four samples per subject taken annually up to 4 years before diagnosis. CEA, CYFRA21-1 and CA125 were measured using validated assays and performance of markers evaluated for different pre-diagnosis time groups. Results: CEA levels increased towards diagnosis in a third of all cases (half of late-stage cases), whereas longitudinal profiles were static in both benign and non-cancer controls. At a threshold of >5 ng ml−1 the sensitivities for detecting CRC up to 1 and 4 years before clinical presentation were 25% and 13%, respectively, at 95% specificity. At a threshold of >2.5 ng ml−1, sensitivities were 57.5% and 38.4%, respectively, with specificities of 81% and 83.5%. CYFRA21-1 and CA125 had no utility as screening markers and did not enhance CEA performance when used in combination. CEA gave average lead times of 17–24 months for test-positive cases. Conclusions: CEA is elevated in a significant proportion of individuals with preclinical CRC, but would not be useful alone as a screening tool. This work sets a baseline from which to develop panels of biomarkers which combine CEA for improved early detection of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D S Thomas
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - E-O Fourkala
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - S Apostolidou
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - R Gunu
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - A Ryan
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - I Jacobs
- 1] Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK [2] Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, 1.018 Core Technology Facility, University of Manchester, Grafton Street Manchester M13 9NT, UK
| | - U Menon
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - W Alderton
- Abcodia Ltd, The Network Building, 97 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4TP, UK
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - J F Timms
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Iyer R, Gentry-Maharaj A, Nordin A, Burnell M, Liston R, Manchanda R, Das N, Desai R, Gornall R, Beardmore-Gray A, Nevin J, Hillaby K, Leeson S, Linder A, Lopes A, Meechan D, Mould T, Varkey S, Olaitan A, Rufford B, Ryan A, Shanbhag S, Thackeray A, Wood N, Reynolds K, Menon U. Predictors of complications in gynaecological oncological surgery: a prospective multicentre study (UKGOSOC-UK gynaecological oncology surgical outcomes and complications). Br J Cancer 2015; 112:475-84. [PMID: 25535730 PMCID: PMC4453652 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2014] [Revised: 11/16/2014] [Accepted: 11/30/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data on surgical outcomes in gynaecological oncology. We report on predictors of complications in a multicentre prospective study. METHODS Data on surgical procedures and resulting complications were contemporaneously recorded on consented patients in 10 participating UK gynaecological cancer centres. Patients were sent follow-up letters to capture any further complications. Post-operative (Post-op) complications were graded (I-V) in increasing severity using the Clavien-Dindo system. Grade I complications were excluded from the analysis. Univariable and multivariable regression was used to identify predictors of complications using all surgery for intra-operative (Intra-op) and only those with both hospital and patient-reported data for Post-op complications. RESULTS Prospective data were available on 2948 major operations undertaken between April 2010 and February 2012. Median age was 62 years, with 35% obese and 20.4% ASA grade ⩾3. Consultant gynaecological oncologists performed 74.3% of operations. Intra-op complications were reported in 139 of 2948 and Grade II-V Post-op complications in 379 of 1462 surgeries. The predictors of risk were different for Intra-op and Post-op complications. For Intra-op complications, previous abdominal surgery, metabolic/endocrine disorders (excluding diabetes), surgical complexity and final diagnosis were significant in univariable and multivariable regression (P<0.05), with diabetes only in multivariable regression (P=0.006). For Post-op complications, age, comorbidity status, diabetes, surgical approach, duration of surgery, and final diagnosis were significant in both univariable and multivariable regression (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS This multicentre prospective audit benchmarks the considerable morbidity associated with gynaecological oncology surgery. There are significant patient and surgical factors that influence this risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Iyer
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 1st Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 1st Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - A Nordin
- National Cancer Intelligence Network Gynaecology Clinical Reference Group, 5th Floor, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London SE1 8UG, UK
| | - M Burnell
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 1st Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - R Liston
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 1st Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - R Manchanda
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 1st Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - N Das
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3LJ, UK
| | - R Desai
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 1st Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - R Gornall
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Cheltenham General Hospital, Sandford Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire GL53 7AN, UK
| | - A Beardmore-Gray
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 1st Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - J Nevin
- Pan Birmingham Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Birmingham City Hospital, Dudley Road, Birmingham, West Midlands B18 7QH, UK
| | - K Hillaby
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Cheltenham General Hospital, Sandford Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire GL53 7AN, UK
| | - S Leeson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Penrhosgarnedd, Bangor, Gwynedd, North Wales LL57 2PW, UK
| | - A Linder
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Heath Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP4 5PD, UK
| | - A Lopes
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, Cornwall TR1 3LJ, UK
| | - D Meechan
- Trent Cancer Registry, 5 Old Fulwood Road, Sheffield S10 3TG, UK
| | - T Mould
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 2nd Floor North, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, UK
| | - S Varkey
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 1st Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - A Olaitan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 2nd Floor North, 250 Euston Road, London NW1 2PG, UK
| | - B Rufford
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Heath Road, Ipswich, Suffolk IP4 5PD, UK
| | - A Ryan
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 1st Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - S Shanbhag
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow G31 2ER, UK
| | - A Thackeray
- Trent Cancer Registry, 5 Old Fulwood Road, Sheffield S10 3TG, UK
| | - N Wood
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane, North Fulwood, Preston Lancashire PR2 9HT, UK
| | - K Reynolds
- Department of Gynaecological Cancer, Barts Cancer Centre, Barts and the London NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital (Barts), West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - U Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 1st Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jenkinson C, Elliott V, Menon U, Apostolidou S, Fourkala OE, Gentry-Maharaj A, Pereira SP, Jacobs I, Cox TF, Greenhalf W, Timms JF, Sutton R, Neoptolemos JP, Costello E. Evaluation in pre-diagnosis samples discounts ICAM-1 and TIMP-1 as biomarkers for earlier diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. J Proteomics 2015; 113:400-2. [PMID: 25316052 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2014] [Accepted: 10/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Circulating intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) have been widely proposed as potential diagnostic biomarkers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We report on serum protein levels prior to clinical presentation of pancreatic cancer. Serum ICAM-1 and TIMP-1 were measured by ELISA in two case–control sets: 1) samples from patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (n = 40), chronic pancreatitis (n = 20), benign jaundice due to gall stones (n = 20) and healthy subjects (n = 20); 2) a preclinical set from the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening biobank of samples collected from 27 post-menopausal women 0–12 months prior to diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and controls matched for date of donation and centre. Levels of ICAM-1 and TIMP-1 were significantly elevated in set 1 in PDAC patients with jaundice compared to PDAC patients without jaundice and both proteins were elevated in patients with jaundice due to gall stones. Neither protein was elevated in samples taken 0–12 months prior to PDAC diagnosis compared to non-cancer control samples. In conclusion, evaluation in pre-diagnosis samples discounts ICAM-1 and TIMP-1 as biomarkers for earlier diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Failure to account for obstructive jaundice may have contributed to the previous promise of these candidate biomarkers. BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE Pancreatic cancer is usually diagnosed when at an advanced stage which greatly limits therapeutic options. Biomarkers that could facilitate earlier diagnosis are urgently sought.
Collapse
|
10
|
Köbel M, Madore J, Ramus SJ, Clarke BA, Pharoah PDP, Deen S, Bowtell DD, Odunsi K, Menon U, Morrison C, Lele S, Bshara W, Sucheston L, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Thiel FC, Hartmann A, Wachter DL, Anglesio MS, Høgdall E, Jensen A, Høgdall C, Kalli KR, Fridley BL, Keeney GL, Fogarty ZC, Vierkant RA, Liu S, Cho S, Nelson G, Ghatage P, Gentry-Maharaj A, Gayther SA, Benjamin E, Widschwendter M, Intermaggio MP, Rosen B, Bernardini MQ, Mackay H, Oza A, Shaw P, Jimenez-Linan M, Driver KE, Alsop J, Mack M, Koziak JM, Steed H, Ewanowich C, DeFazio A, Chenevix-Trench G, Fereday S, Gao B, Johnatty SE, George J, Galletta L, Goode EL, Kjær SK, Huntsman DG, Fasching PA, Moysich KB, Brenton JD, Kelemen LE. Evidence for a time-dependent association between FOLR1 expression and survival from ovarian carcinoma: implications for clinical testing. An Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis consortium study. Br J Cancer 2014; 111:2297-307. [PMID: 25349970 PMCID: PMC4264456 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 09/03/2014] [Accepted: 10/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) is expressed in the majority of ovarian carcinomas (OvCa), making it an attractive target for therapy. However, clinical trials testing anti-FOLR1 therapies in OvCa show mixed results and require better understanding of the prognostic relevance of FOLR1 expression. We conducted a large study evaluating FOLR1 expression with survival in different histological types of OvCa. METHODS Tissue microarrays composed of tumour samples from 2801 patients in the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium were assessed for FOLR1 expression by centralised immunohistochemistry. We estimated associations for overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival using adjusted Cox regression models. High-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were evaluated independently for association between FOLR1 mRNA upregulation and survival. RESULTS FOLR1 expression ranged from 76% in HGSC to 11% in mucinous carcinomas in OTTA. For HGSC, the association between FOLR1 expression and OS changed significantly during the years following diagnosis in OTTA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=1422) and TCGA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=485). In OTTA, particularly for FIGO stage I/II tumours, patients with FOLR1-positive HGSC showed increased OS during the first 2 years only (hazard ratio=0.44, 95% confidence interval=0.20-0.96) and patients with FOLR1-positive clear cell carcinomas (CCC) showed decreased PFS independent of follow-up time (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.10-3.25, N=259). In TCGA, FOLR1 mRNA upregulation in HGSC was also associated with increased OS during the first 2 years following diagnosis irrespective of tumour stage (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS FOLR1-positive HGSC tumours were associated with an increased OS in the first 2 years following diagnosis. Patients with FOLR1-negative, poor prognosis HGSC would be unlikely to benefit from anti-FOLR1 therapies. In contrast, a decreased PFS interval was observed for FOLR1-positive CCC. The clinical efficacy of FOLR1-targeted interventions should therefore be evaluated according to histology, stage and time following diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - J Madore
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Gloucester House–level 3, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - S J Ramus
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B A Clarke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 Univeristy Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P D P Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - S Deen
- Department of Histopathology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - D D Bowtell
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - K Odunsi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - U Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - C Morrison
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - S Lele
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - W Bshara
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - L Sucheston
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - M W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - F C Thiel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - D L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - M S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
| | - E Høgdall
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2370 Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - C Høgdall
- The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - K R Kalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - B L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - G L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Stabile 13, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Z C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - R A Vierkant
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S Liu
- Anatomic Pathology Research Laboratory, Calgary Laboratory Services, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - S Cho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - G Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - P Ghatage
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - S A Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - E Benjamin
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London WC1E 6JJ, UK
| | - M Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - M P Intermaggio
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B Rosen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - H Mackay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - A Oza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P Shaw
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Jimenez-Linan
- Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - K E Driver
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J Alsop
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - M Mack
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J M Koziak
- Department of Population Health Research, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, 2210 2nd Street SW, Calgary, AB, T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - H Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - C Ewanowich
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - A DeFazio
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - G Chenevix-Trench
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - S Fereday
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - B Gao
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - S E Johnatty
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - J George
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - L Galletta
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - AOCS Study Group
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - E L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S K Kjær
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
- The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - D G Huntsman
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
- Centre For Translational and Applied Genomics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - P A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - K B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - J D Brenton
- National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
- Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - L E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina and Hollings Cancer Center, 135 Cannon Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Köbel M, Madore J, Ramus SJ, Clarke BA, Pharoah PDP, Deen S, Bowtell DD, Odunsi K, Menon U, Morrison C, Lele S, Bshara W, Sucheston L, Beckmann MW, Hein A, Thiel FC, Hartmann A, Wachter DL, Anglesio MS, Høgdall E, Jensen A, Høgdall C, Kalli KR, Fridley BL, Keeney GL, Fogarty ZC, Vierkant RA, Liu S, Cho S, Nelson G, Ghatage P, Gentry-Maharaj A, Gayther SA, Benjamin E, Widschwendter M, Intermaggio MP, Rosen B, Bernardini MQ, Mackay H, Oza A, Shaw P, Jimenez-Linan M, Driver KE, Alsop J, Mack M, Koziak JM, Steed H, Ewanowich C, DeFazio A, Chenevix-Trench G, Fereday S, Gao B, Johnatty SE, George J, Galletta L, Goode EL, Kjær SK, Huntsman DG, Fasching PA, Moysich KB, Brenton JD, Kelemen LE. Evidence for a time-dependent association between FOLR1 expression and survival from ovarian carcinoma: implications for clinical testing. An Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis consortium study. Br J Cancer 2014. [PMID: 25349970 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.567] [] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) is expressed in the majority of ovarian carcinomas (OvCa), making it an attractive target for therapy. However, clinical trials testing anti-FOLR1 therapies in OvCa show mixed results and require better understanding of the prognostic relevance of FOLR1 expression. We conducted a large study evaluating FOLR1 expression with survival in different histological types of OvCa. METHODS Tissue microarrays composed of tumour samples from 2801 patients in the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium were assessed for FOLR1 expression by centralised immunohistochemistry. We estimated associations for overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival using adjusted Cox regression models. High-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were evaluated independently for association between FOLR1 mRNA upregulation and survival. RESULTS FOLR1 expression ranged from 76% in HGSC to 11% in mucinous carcinomas in OTTA. For HGSC, the association between FOLR1 expression and OS changed significantly during the years following diagnosis in OTTA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=1422) and TCGA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=485). In OTTA, particularly for FIGO stage I/II tumours, patients with FOLR1-positive HGSC showed increased OS during the first 2 years only (hazard ratio=0.44, 95% confidence interval=0.20-0.96) and patients with FOLR1-positive clear cell carcinomas (CCC) showed decreased PFS independent of follow-up time (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.10-3.25, N=259). In TCGA, FOLR1 mRNA upregulation in HGSC was also associated with increased OS during the first 2 years following diagnosis irrespective of tumour stage (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS FOLR1-positive HGSC tumours were associated with an increased OS in the first 2 years following diagnosis. Patients with FOLR1-negative, poor prognosis HGSC would be unlikely to benefit from anti-FOLR1 therapies. In contrast, a decreased PFS interval was observed for FOLR1-positive CCC. The clinical efficacy of FOLR1-targeted interventions should therefore be evaluated according to histology, stage and time following diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Köbel
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - J Madore
- 1] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada [2] Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Gloucester House-level 3, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - S J Ramus
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B A Clarke
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, 610 Univeristy Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P D P Pharoah
- 1] Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK [2] Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - S Deen
- Department of Histopathology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK
| | - D D Bowtell
- 1] Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia [2] Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia [3] Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 30 Flemington Road, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - K Odunsi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - U Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - C Morrison
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - S Lele
- 1] Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA [2] Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - W Bshara
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - L Sucheston
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - M W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hein
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - F C Thiel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - D L Wachter
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Krankenhausstrasse 8-10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - M S Anglesio
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada
| | - E Høgdall
- 1] Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark [2] Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2370 Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - C Høgdall
- The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - K R Kalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - B L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA
| | - G L Keeney
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Anatomic Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Stabile 13, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Z C Fogarty
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - R A Vierkant
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S Liu
- Anatomic Pathology Research Laboratory, Calgary Laboratory Services, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - S Cho
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - G Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - P Ghatage
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Center, 1403 29 ST NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Department of Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - S A Gayther
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - E Benjamin
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London WC1E 6JJ, UK
| | - M Widschwendter
- Department of Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - M P Intermaggio
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Harlyne Norris Research Tower, 1450 Biggy Street, Office 2517G, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - B Rosen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Q Bernardini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - H Mackay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
| | - A Oza
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - P Shaw
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, M-700, Toronto, ON M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - M Jimenez-Linan
- 1] Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK [2] National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK
| | - K E Driver
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J Alsop
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - M Mack
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
| | - J M Koziak
- Department of Population Health Research, Alberta Health Services-Cancer Care, 2210 2nd Street SW, Calgary, AB, T2S 3C3, Canada
| | - H Steed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - C Ewanowich
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Royal Alexandra Hospital, 10240 Kingsway Ave, Edmonton, AB T5H 3V9, Canada
| | - A DeFazio
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - G Chenevix-Trench
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - S Fereday
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - B Gao
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology and Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, University of Sydney at Westmead Millennium Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
| | - S E Johnatty
- Genetics and Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Herston, QLD,4006, Australia
| | - J George
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | - L Galletta
- Department of Cancer Genomics and Genetics, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Locked Bag I, A'Beckett Street, East Melbourne, VIC 8006, Australia
| | | | - E L Goode
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW Charlton 6, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - S K Kjær
- 1] Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark [2] The Juliane Marie Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Ø, Denmark
| | - D G Huntsman
- 1] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, BC Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5E 4E6, Canada [2] Centre For Translational and Applied Genomics, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
| | - P A Fasching
- 1] Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitaetsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany [2] Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - K B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA
| | - J D Brenton
- 1] National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, UK [2] Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Hutchison/MRC Research Centre, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XZ, UK [3] Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK [4] Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK
| | - L E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina and Hollings Cancer Center, 135 Cannon Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bailey K, Pikhart H, Ryan A, Apostolidou S, Fourkala E, Burnell M, Gentry-Maharaj A, Kalsi J, Parmar M, Jacobs I, Menon U. Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in national sample of English women: the UKCTOCS Study. Eur J Public Health 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cku151.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
13
|
Sharma A, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Ryan A, Amso NN, Campbell S, Jacobs I, Menon U. Reply: To PMID 23456790. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43:600-601. [PMID: 24789307 DOI: 10.1002/uog.13354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A Sharma
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7DN, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sharma A, Burnell M, Gentry-Maharaj A, Campbell S, Amso NN, Seif MW, Fletcher G, Brunel C, Turner G, Rangar R, Ryan A, Jacobs I, Menon U. Factors affecting visualization of postmenopausal ovaries: descriptive study from the multicenter United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42:472-477. [PMID: 23456790 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2012] [Revised: 01/28/2013] [Accepted: 02/12/2013] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Transvaginal sonography (TVS) is core to any ovarian cancer screening strategy. General-population screening involves older postmenopausal women in whom ovarian visualization is difficult because of decreasing ovarian size and lack of follicular activity. We report on factors affecting the visualization of postmenopausal ovaries in the multicenter United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). METHODS The UKCTOCS is a randomized controlled trial of 202 638 postmenopausal women with 50 639 women in the ultrasound scan arm. TVS is the primary screening modality in the ultrasound scan arm. Age, education, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), previous pelvic surgery, lifestyle and reproductive factors, and a personal/family history of cancer were assessed for their effects on ovarian visualization at the initial TVS. RESULTS Between 11 June 2001 and 18 August 2007, 43 867 women underwent TVS. The median age and BMI of the women were 60.6 (interquartile range (IQR), 9.9) years and 25.7 (IQR, 5.8), respectively. The right ovary was visualized in 29 297 (66.8%) and the left ovary was visualized in 28 726 (65.5%). Visualization of ovaries decreased with previous hysterectomy (odds ratio (OR) = 0.534; 95% CI, 0.504-0.567), previous tubal ligation (OR = 0.895; 95% CI, 0.852-0.940), increasing age (OR = 0.953; 95% CI, 0.950-0.956), unilateral oophorectomy (OR = 0.224; 95% CI, 0.186-0.269) and being overweight (OR = 0.918; 95% CI, 0.876-0.962) or obese (OR = 0.715; 95% CI, 0.677-0.755). Increased visualization was observed with a history of infertility (OR = 1.134; 95% CI, 1.005-1.279) and increasing age (in years) at menopause (OR = 1.005; 95% CI, 1.001-1.009). CONCLUSIONS Several factors affect the visualization of postmenopausal ovaries. Their impact needs to be taken into consideration when developing quality assurance for ovarian ultrasound scanning or comparing study results as their prevalence may differ between populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sharma
- Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Iyer R, Gentry-Maharaj A, Nordin A, Liston R, Burnell M, Das N, Desai R, Gornall R, Beardmore-Gray A, Hillaby K, Leeson S, Linder A, Lopes A, Meechan D, Mould T, Nevin J, Olaitan A, Rufford B, Ryan A, Shanbhag S, Thackeray A, Wood N, Reynolds K, Menon U. Patient-reporting improves estimates of postoperative complication rates: a prospective cohort study in gynaecological oncology. Br J Cancer 2013; 109:623-32. [PMID: 23846170 PMCID: PMC3738134 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Revised: 06/16/2013] [Accepted: 06/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Most studies use hospital data to calculate postoperative complication rates (PCRs). We report on improving PCR estimates through use of patient-reporting. Methods: A prospective cohort study of major surgery performed at 10 UK gynaecological cancer centres was undertaken. Hospitals entered the data contemporaneously into an online database. Patients were sent follow-up letters to capture postoperative complications. Grade II–V (Clavien–Dindo classification) patient-reported postoperative complications were verified from hospital records. Postoperative complication rate was defined as the proportion of surgeries with a Grade II–V postoperative complication. Results: Patient replies were received for 1462 (68%) of 2152 surgeries undertaken between April 2010 and February 2012. Overall, 452 Grade II–V (402 II, 50 III–V) complications were reported in 379 of the 1462 surgeries. This included 172 surgeries with 200 hospital-reported complications and 231 with 280 patient-reported complications. All (100% concordance) 36 Grade III–V and 158 of 280 (56.4% concordance) Grade II patient-reported complications were verified on hospital case-note review. The PCR using hospital-reported data was 11.8% (172 out of 1462; 95% CI 11–14), patient-reported was 15.8% (231 out of 1462; 95% CI 14–17.8), hospital and verified patient-reported was 19.4% (283 out of 1462; 95% CI 17.4–21.4) and all data were 25.9% (379 out of 1462; 95% CI 24–28). After excluding Grade II complications, the hospital and patient verified Grade III–V PCR was 3.3% (48 out of 1462; 95% CI 2.5–4.3). Conclusion: This is the first prospective study of postoperative complications we are aware of in gynaecological oncology to include the patient-reported data. Patient-reporting is invaluable for obtaining complete information on postoperative complications. Primary care case-note review is likely to improve verification rates of patient-reported Grade II complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Iyer
- University College, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gentry-Maharaj A, Sharma A, Burnell M, Ryan A, Amso NN, Seif MW, Turner G, Brunell C, Fletcher G, Rangar R, Fallowfield L, Campbell S, Jacobs I, Menon U. Acceptance of transvaginal sonography by postmenopausal women participating in the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41:73-79. [PMID: 22791597 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess pain and overall experience of transvaginal sonography (TVS) in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. METHODS In the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS), 50 639 postmenopausal women were randomized to undergo annual TVS at 13 trial centers in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Together with the appointment letter for their annual scan, a random sample of 150 women per center was sent a detailed 48-item postal questionnaire regarding the screening experience. It included a specific question about pain using a score of 0-5, where 5 was severe pain and 3 was discomfort. To assess factors that might affect a woman's reported pain experience, the pain score was regressed on age, hormone replacement therapy use, body mass index, a history of hysterectomy, prolonged scanning time, ovarian visualization, scan result, sonographer's visualization rates and opinion of the women regarding the sonographer who performed the scan. RESULTS Between 7 July and 9 September 2009, 1950 randomly chosen women (150 per regional center) were sent the questionnaire. Of the 800 (41.0%) who returned the questionnaire, 651 could be linked to their TVS appointment. One-hundred and fifty-two (23.3%) women reported pain/discomfort (score 3-5) during TVS and 473 (72.7%) reported no discomfort (score 0-2). Only 23 (3.5%) women reported experiencing moderate/severe pain. Increasing discomfort/pain was independently associated with a history of hysterectomy and participant's reporting of prolonged scan time. Women who experienced pain on TVS were less compliant (odds ratio = 0.87) with the following year's scan compared with those who did not experience pain. CONCLUSIONS The majority of postmenopausal women found TVS acceptable. Pain influenced compliance and correlated with women's perception of increased scanning time and previous hysterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, Women's Cancer, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pedersen JW, Gentry-Maharaj A, Fourkala EO, Dawnay A, Burnell M, Zaikin A, Pedersen AE, Jacobs I, Menon U, Wandall HH. Early detection of cancer in the general population: a blinded case-control study of p53 autoantibodies in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 2012; 108:107-14. [PMID: 23169294 PMCID: PMC3553520 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Recent reports from cancer screening trials in high-risk populations suggest that autoantibodies can be detected before clinical diagnosis. However, there is minimal data on the role of autoantibody signatures in cancer screening in the general population. Methods: Informative p53 peptides were identified in sera from patients with colorectal cancer using an autoantibody microarray with 15-mer overlapping peptides covering the complete p53 sequence. The selected peptides were evaluated in a blinded case–control study using stored serum from the multimodal arm of the United Kingdom Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening where women gave annual blood samples. Cases were postmenopausal women who developed colorectal cancer following recruitment, with 2 or more serum samples preceding diagnosis. Controls were age-matched women with no history of cancer. Results: The 50 640 women randomised to the multimodal group were followed up for a median of 6.8 (inter-quartile range 5.9–8.4) years. Colorectal cancer notification was received in 101 women with serial samples of whom 97 (297 samples) had given consent for secondary studies. They were matched 1 : 1 with 97 controls (296 serial samples). The four most informative peptides identified 25.8% of colorectal cancer patients with a specificity of 95%. The median lead time was 1.4 (range 0.12–3.8) years before clinical diagnosis. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that in the general population, autoantibody signatures are detectable during preclinical disease and may be of value in cancer screening. In colorectal cancer screening in particular, where the current need is to improve compliance, it suggests that p53 autoantibodies may contribute towards risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W Pedersen
- Copenhagen Center for Glycomics, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, DK-2200, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sharma A, Apostolidou S, Burnell M, Campbell S, Habib M, Gentry-Maharaj A, Amso N, Seif MW, Fletcher G, Singh N, Benjamin E, Brunell C, Turner G, Rangar R, Godfrey K, Oram D, Herod J, Williamson K, Jenkins H, Mould T, Woolas R, Murdoch J, Dobbs S, Leeson S, Cruickshank D, Fourkala EO, Ryan A, Parmar M, Jacobs I, Menon U. Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women with ultrasound-detected ovarian masses: a prospective cohort study within the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40:338-344. [PMID: 22911637 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the risk of primary epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and slow growing borderline or Type I and aggressive Type II EOC in postmenopausal women with adnexal abnormalities on ultrasound. METHODS This was a prospective cohort study in the ultrasound group of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening of postmenopausal women with ultrasound-detected abnormal adnexal (unilocular, multilocular, unilocular solid and multilocular solid, solid) morphology on their first scan. Women were followed up through the national cancer registries and by postal questionnaires. Absolute risks of EOC and borderline, Type I and Type II EOC within 3 years of initial scan were calculated. RESULTS Of 48 053 women who underwent ultrasound examination and had complete scan data, 4367 (9.1% (95% CI, 8.8-9.3%)) had abnormal adnexal morphology. Median follow-up was 7.09 (25(th) -75(th) centiles, 6.03-7.92) years. Forty-seven (32 borderline or Type I, 15 Type II) were diagnosed with EOC. The overall absolute risk of EOC associated with abnormal adnexal morphology was 1.08% (95% CI, 0.79-1.43%); for borderline and Type I it was 0.73% (95% CI, 0.5-1.03%); and for Type II it was 0.34% (95% CI, 0.33-0.79%). In the subgroup (n = 741) with solid elements (unilocular solid, multilocular solid and solid) overall absolute risk was 4.45% (95% CI, 3.08-6.20%), for borderline and Type I it was 3.1% (95% CI, 1.9-4.6%) and for Type II it was 1.3% (95% CI, 0.6-2.4%). 11 982 women had both ovaries visualized and normal annual scans throughout the 3-year follow-up period. In this group, no borderline or Type I and eight Type II cancers were diagnosed. CONCLUSION Asymptomatic postmenopausal women with ultrasound-detected adnexal abnormalities with solid elements have a 1 in 22 risk for EOC. Despite the higher prevalence of Type II EOC, the risk of borderline or Type I cancer in women with ultrasound abnormalities seems to be higher than does the risk of Type II cancer. This has important immediate implications for patients with incidental adnexal findings as well as for any future ultrasound-based screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sharma
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fourkala EO, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Ryan A, Manchanda R, Dawnay A, Jacobs I, Widschwendter M, Menon U. Histological confirmation of breast cancer registration and self-reporting in England and Wales: a cohort study within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening. Br J Cancer 2012; 106:1910-6. [PMID: 22596242 PMCID: PMC3388556 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2012] [Revised: 03/20/2012] [Accepted: 03/22/2012] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In research studies, accurate information of cancer diagnosis is crucial. In women with breast cancer (BC), we compare cancer registration (CR) in England/Wales and self-reporting with independent confirmation. METHODS In the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening, notification of BC diagnosed between randomisation and 31 December 2009 was obtained through (1) CR (17 October 2011) and (2) self-reporting using postal-questionnaire. Breast cancer was confirmed using a detailed questionnaire (BC questionnaire BCQ) completed by the treating clinician (gold standard). Apparent sensitivity and positive-predictive value of CR/self-reporting vs BCQ were calculated. RESULTS Of 1065 women with possible BC notification, diagnosis was confirmed in 932 (87.5%). A total of 3.1% (28 out of 918) of BC CR and 12.4% (128 out of 1032) of women with self-reported BC only had in-situ carcinoma on BCQ. Another 4.6% (43 out of 932) of BCQ-confirmed cancer did not have a BC registration, and 3.6% (34 out of 932) did not self-report BC. Apparent sensitivity of CR and self-reporting vs BCQ were 95.4 and 96.4%, respectively. Positive-predictive value of self-reporting (87.1%) was significantly lower than that of CR (96.8%). Women aged<65 were more likely to over report in-situ carcinoma as BC. Overall, 73 (6.8%) women would have been misclassified/missed if CR, and 167 (15.6%) if self-reporting data alone was used. CONCLUSION This study confirms the reliability of BC registration in England/Wales and highlights the fact that 1 in 10 women self-reporting BC might only have in-situ breast carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E O Fourkala
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, 149 Tottenham Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, 149 Tottenham Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - M Burnell
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, 149 Tottenham Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - A Ryan
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, 149 Tottenham Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - R Manchanda
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, 149 Tottenham Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - A Dawnay
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, 149 Tottenham Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - I Jacobs
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, 149 Tottenham Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - M Widschwendter
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, 149 Tottenham Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| | - U Menon
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, UCL EGA Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, 149 Tottenham Road, London W1T 7DN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hunter MS, Gentry-Maharaj A, Ryan A, Burnell M, Lanceley A, Fraser L, Jacobs I, Menon U. Prevalence, frequency and problem rating of hot flushes persist in older postmenopausal women: impact of age, body mass index, hysterectomy, hormone therapy use, lifestyle and mood in a cross-sectional cohort study of 10,418 British women aged 54-65. BJOG 2011; 119:40-50. [PMID: 22008610 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03166.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Hot flushes and night sweats (HFs/NSs) are the main menopausal symptoms, but few studies have been adequately powered to examine the dimensions or predictors of experiencing HFs/NSs. We report on these variables in a large UK cohort of postmenopausal women. DESIGN Cross-sectional cohort study. SETTING UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS) cohort. POPULATION A cohort of 202,638 postmenopausal women, aged 50-74 years, without oophorectomy, recruited to UKCTOCS between 2001 and 2005. METHODS Women completed a follow-up questionnaire, and those aged 54-65 years were mailed a survey in July 2008. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Hot flush prevalence and hot flush rating scale. RESULTS Of the 15,000 women mailed, 10,418 returned completed questionnaires; 90% had previously had HFs/NSs. Despite being on average 10 years postmenopausal, 54% experienced HFs/NSs (frequency of 33 per week with mean problem rating 4/10) that persisted across the age range. Past hysterectomy (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.19-1.86), ever having smoked (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.11-1.46) and alcohol consumption (current units) (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09) predicted ever having had HFs/NSs. Anxiety (OR 3.09, 95% CI 2.57-3.72), hysterectomy (OR 2.74, 95% CI 2.32-3.25), depressed mood (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.24-1.99), years since last menstrual period (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.94-0.96) and education (above and below 18 years) (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99) predicted the current prevalence of HFs/NSs. Few predictors of frequency were identified, but problem rating was associated with depressed mood, hysterectomy, skirt size increase and frequency of HFs/NSs. Past hormone therapy users who had discontinued treatment were more likely to have HFs/NSs that were more frequent and problematic. CONCLUSIONS To date, this is the largest UK study of the experience of HFs/NSs amongst older postmenopausal women. HFs/NSs are more prevalent in this age band than has previously been assumed. These findings and the associations of smoking, hysterectomy, anxiety, depressed mood and hormone therapy use with the experience of HFs/NSs have implications for prevention and symptom management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Hunter
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sharma A, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Fourkala EO, Campbell S, Amso N, Seif MW, Ryan A, Parmar M, Jacobs I, Menon U. Assessing the malignant potential of ovarian inclusion cysts in postmenopausal women within the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2011; 119:207-19. [PMID: 21762355 DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03038.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the malignant potential of ultrasound-detected ovarian inclusion cysts in the development of ovarian cancer (OC) in postmenopausal women. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS). POPULATION Postmenopausal women. METHODS In UKCTOCS, women in the ultrasound group have annual scans. Women with inclusion cysts (single/multiple anechoic ≤10-mm ovarian cysts) and normal ovaries (both uniform hypoechogenicity) on their first scan were identified and followed up through cancer registry/questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Relative risk (RR) of developing OC, invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (iEOC), breast cancer (BC) and endometrial cancer (EC) in women with inclusion cysts relative to those with normal ovaries. The incidence was compared with UK age-adjusted expected rates (Office for National Statistics, 2005). RESULTS Postmenopausal women (n = 48,230) attended the year 1 (11 June 2001-6 December 2006) screen; 1234 (2.5%) had inclusion cysts alone and 22,914 had normal scans. By 1 November 2009 (median follow-up, 6.13 years; interquartile range, 4.96-6.98 years), four, three (one Type II), seven and 22 women with inclusion cysts and 32, 29 (20 Type II), 90 and 397 women with normal ovaries were diagnosed with OC, iEOC, EC and BC, respectively. The RR values for the respective cancers (OC [RR, 2.32; confidence interval [CI], 0.86-6.28], iEOC [RR, 1.92; CI, 0.62-5.92], EC [RR, 1.44; CI, 0.68-3.05], BC [RR, 1.12; CI, 0.73-1.73]) were not increased. There was no difference between the observed versus expected incidence rates for these cancers in women with inclusion cysts. CONCLUSIONS Postmenopausal women with ultrasound-detected inclusion cysts do not seem to be at increased risk of ovarian or breast/endometrial (hormone-dependent) cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sharma
- Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre, University College London, EGA Institute for Women's Health, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pearce CL, Near AM, Van Den Berg DJ, Ramus SJ, Gentry-Maharaj A, Menon U, Gayther SA, Anderson AR, Edlund CK, Wu AH, Chen X, Beesley J, Webb PM, Holt SK, Chen C, Doherty JA, Rossing MA, Whittemore AS, McGuire V, DiCioccio RA, Goodman MT, Lurie G, Carney ME, Wilkens LR, Ness RB, Moysich KB, Edwards R, Jennison E, Kjaer SK, Hogdall E, Hogdall CK, Goode EL, Sellers TA, Vierkant RA, Cunningham JM, Schildkraut JM, Berchuck A, Moorman PG, Iversen ES, Cramer DW, Terry KL, Vitonis AF, Titus-Ernstoff L, Song H, Pharoah PDP, Spurdle AB, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Brewster W, Galitovskiy V, Chenevix-Trench G. Erratum: Validating genetic risk associations for ovarian cancer through the International Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Br J Cancer 2009. [PMCID: PMC2778538 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
23
|
Cunningham JM, Vierkant RA, Sellers TA, Phelan C, Rider DN, Liebow M, Schildkraut J, Berchuck A, Couch FJ, Wang X, Fridley BL, Gentry-Maharaj A, Menon U, Hogdall E, Kjaer S, Whittemore A, DiCioccio R, Song H, Gayther SA, Ramus SJ, Pharaoh PDP, Goode EL. Cell cycle genes and ovarian cancer susceptibility: a tagSNP analysis. Br J Cancer 2009; 101:1461-8. [PMID: 19738611 PMCID: PMC2768434 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Dysregulation of the cell cycle is a hallmark of many cancers including ovarian cancer, a leading cause of gynaecologic cancer mortality worldwide. Methods: We examined single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (n=288) from 39 cell cycle regulation genes, including cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and CDK inhibitors, in a two-stage study. White, non-Hispanic cases (n=829) and ovarian cancer-free controls (n=941) were genotyped using an Illumina assay. Results: Eleven variants in nine genes (ABL1, CCNB2, CDKN1A, CCND3, E2F2, CDK2, E2F3, CDC2, and CDK7) were associated with risk of ovarian cancer in at least one genetic model. Seven SNPs were then assessed in four additional studies with 1689 cases and 3398 controls. Association between risk of ovarian cancer and ABL1 rs2855192 found in the original population [odds ratio, ORBB vs AA 2.81 (1.29–6.09), P=0.01] was also observed in a replication population, and the association remained suggestive in the combined analysis [ORBB vs AA 1.59 (1.08–2.34), P=0.02]. No other SNP associations remained suggestive in the replication populations. Conclusion: ABL1 has been implicated in multiple processes including cell division, cell adhesion and cellular stress response. These results suggest that characterization of the function of genetic variation in this gene in other ovarian cancer populations is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Cunningham
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Quaye L, Dafou D, Ramus SJ, Song H, Gentry-Maharaj A, Notaridou M, Hogdall E, Kjaer SK, Christensen L, Hogdall C, Easton DF, Jacobs I, Menon U, Pharoah PD, Gayther SA. Functional complementation studies identify candidate genes and common genetic variants associated with ovarian cancer survival. Hum Mol Genet 2009. [DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddp234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
25
|
Quaye L, Song H, Ramus SJ, Gentry-Maharaj A, Høgdall E, DiCioccio RA, McGuire V, Wu AH, Van Den Berg DJ, Pike MC, Wozniak E, Doherty JA, Rossing MA, Ness RB, Moysich KB, Høgdall C, Blaakaer J, Easton DF, Ponder BAJ, Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Whittemore AS, Krüger-Kjaer S, Pearce CL, Pharoah PDP, Gayther SA. Tagging single-nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate oncogenes and susceptibility to ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer 2009; 100:993-1001. [PMID: 19240718 PMCID: PMC2661781 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2008] [Revised: 01/19/2009] [Accepted: 01/26/2009] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Low-moderate risk alleles that are relatively common in the population may explain a significant proportion of the excess familial risk of ovarian cancer (OC) not attributed to highly penetrant genes. In this study, we evaluated the risks of OC associated with common germline variants in five oncogenes (BRAF, ERBB2, KRAS, NMI and PIK3CA) known to be involved in OC development. Thirty-four tagging SNPs in these genes were genotyped in approximately 1800 invasive OC cases and 3000 controls from population-based studies in Denmark, the United Kingdom and the United States. We found no evidence of disease association for SNPs in BRAF, KRAS, ERBB2 and PIK3CA when OC was considered as a single disease phenotype; but after stratification by histological subtype, we found borderline evidence of association for SNPs in KRAS and BRAF with mucinous OC and in ERBB2 and PIK3CA with endometrioid OC. For NMI, we identified a SNP (rs11683487) that was associated with a decreased risk of OC (unadjusted P(dominant)=0.004). We then genotyped rs11683487 in another 1097 cases and 1792 controls from an additional three case-control studies from the United States. The combined odds ratio was 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.99) and remained statistically significant (P(dominant)=0.032). We also identified two haplotypes in ERBB2 associated with an increased OC risk (P(global)=0.034) and a haplotype in BRAF that had a protective effect (P(global)=0.005). In conclusion, these data provide borderline evidence of association for common allelic variation in the NMI with risk of epithelial OC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Quaye
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - H Song
- Strangeways Research Laboratory, CR-UK Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - S J Ramus
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Gentry-Maharaj
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - E Høgdall
- Department of Virus, Hormones and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R A DiCioccio
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - V McGuire
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - A H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - D J Van Den Berg
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - M C Pike
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - E Wozniak
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - J A Doherty
- JD Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - M A Rossing
- JD Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - R B Ness
- Department of Epidemiology and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - K B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - C Høgdall
- Gynaecology Clinic, The Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, CR-UK
| | - J Blaakaer
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
- Strangeways Research Laboratory, CR-UK Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Virus, Hormones and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA
- Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- JD Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Gynaecology Clinic, The Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, CR-UK
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Genetic Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - D F Easton
- Department of Oncology, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Genetic Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - B A J Ponder
- Strangeways Research Laboratory, CR-UK Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - I J Jacobs
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - U Menon
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - A S Whittemore
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - S Krüger-Kjaer
- Department of Virus, Hormones and Cancer, Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Gynaecology Clinic, The Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, CR-UK
| | - C L Pearce
- Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - P D P Pharoah
- Strangeways Research Laboratory, CR-UK Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - S A Gayther
- Gynaecological Oncology Department, UCL EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pearce CL, Near AM, Van Den Berg DJ, Ramus SJ, Gentry-Maharaj A, Menon U, Gayther SA, Anderson AR, Edlund CK, Wu AH, Chen X, Beesley J, Webb PM, Holt SK, Chen C, Doherty JA, Rossing MA, Whittemore AS, McGuire V, DiCioccio RA, Goodman MT, Lurie G, Carney ME, Wilkens LR, Ness RB, Moysich KB, Edwards R, Jennison E, Kjaer SK, Hogdall E, Hogdall CK, Goode EL, Sellers TA, Vierkant RA, Cunningham JM, Cunningham JC, Schildkraut JM, Berchuck A, Moorman PG, Iversen ES, Cramer DW, Terry KL, Vitonis AF, Titus-Ernstoff L, Song H, Pharoah PDP, Spurdle AB, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Brewster W, Galitovskiy V, Chenevix-Trench G. Validating genetic risk associations for ovarian cancer through the international Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Br J Cancer 2009; 100:412-20. [PMID: 19127255 PMCID: PMC2634713 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2008] [Revised: 11/11/2008] [Accepted: 11/18/2008] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The search for genetic variants associated with ovarian cancer risk has focused on pathways including sex steroid hormones, DNA repair, and cell cycle control. The Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) identified 10 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes in these pathways, which had been genotyped by Consortium members and a pooled analysis of these data was conducted. Three of the 10 SNPs showed evidence of an association with ovarian cancer at P< or =0.10 in a log-additive model: rs2740574 in CYP3A4 (P=0.011), rs1805386 in LIG4 (P=0.007), and rs3218536 in XRCC2 (P=0.095). Additional genotyping in other OCAC studies was undertaken and only the variant in CYP3A4, rs2740574, continued to show an association in the replication data among homozygous carriers: OR(homozygous(hom))=2.50 (95% CI 0.54-11.57, P=0.24) with 1406 cases and 2827 controls. Overall, in the combined data the odds ratio was 2.81 among carriers of two copies of the minor allele (95% CI 1.20-6.56, P=0.017, p(het) across studies=0.42) with 1969 cases and 3491 controls. There was no association among heterozygous carriers. CYP3A4 encodes a key enzyme in oestrogen metabolism and our finding between rs2740574 and risk of ovarian cancer suggests that this pathway may be involved in ovarian carcinogenesis. Additional follow-up is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C L Pearce
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|