1
|
Keyte R, Mantzios M, Hussain M, Tahrani AA, Abbott S, Strachan R, Singhal R, Egan H. 'Surgery is my only hope': A qualitative study exploring perceptions of living with obesity and the prospect of having bariatric surgery. Clin Obes 2024; 14:e12643. [PMID: 38302857 DOI: 10.1111/cob.12643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
The health benefits of bariatric surgery are well documented; however, the occurrence of weight-regain after surgery, along with the development of mental health difficulties poses a question of how contemporary psychology could assist to prepare people living with obesity prior to undergoing bariatric surgery. This research explored individuals' (in the immediate pre-operative and post-operative population) attitudes, beliefs and experiences towards obesity and their journey to bariatric surgery. Seventeen adult participants (males n = 4; age range: 26-64 years) were recruited and participated in a semi-structured interview. Twelve individuals participated prior to undergoing bariatric surgery. Five individuals participated in the early post-operative period (<3 months post-surgery). People living with obesity displayed high optimism for positive outcomes, with participants hoping that bariatric surgery would be different to previous attempts at weight regulation, with there being a clear shift in the locus of control for weight management from self to healthcare professionals. Whilst this is adaptive, there was the presence of seemingly unrealistic optimism, with many pre-surgery participants not relaying the realistic possibility of post-surgery weight-regain. Despite the optimism individuals feel about bariatric surgery, participants felt that the psychological factors influencing eating behaviours are not being addressed by healthcare. These findings suggest that mindfulness, mindful eating, and self-compassion approaches should be incorporated into clinical practice to support weight regulation and adaption to physiological changes after bariatric surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Keyte
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Michail Mantzios
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Misba Hussain
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sally Abbott
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - Rachel Strachan
- Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, West Bromwich, UK
| | | | - Helen Egan
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nielsen RL, Monfeuga T, Kitchen RR, Egerod L, Leal LG, Schreyer ATH, Gade FS, Sun C, Helenius M, Simonsen L, Willert M, Tahrani AA, McVey Z, Gupta R. Data-driven identification of predictive risk biomarkers for subgroups of osteoarthritis using interpretable machine learning. Nat Commun 2024; 15:2817. [PMID: 38561399 PMCID: PMC10985086 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46663-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is increasing in prevalence and has a severe impact on patients' lives. However, our understanding of biomarkers driving OA risk remains limited. We developed a model predicting the five-year risk of OA diagnosis, integrating retrospective clinical, lifestyle and biomarker data from the UK Biobank (19,120 patients with OA, ROC-AUC: 0.72, 95%CI (0.71-0.73)). Higher age, BMI and prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs contributed most to increased OA risk prediction ahead of diagnosis. We identified 14 subgroups of OA risk profiles. These subgroups were validated in an independent set of patients evaluating the 11-year OA risk, with 88% of patients being uniquely assigned to one of the 14 subgroups. Individual OA risk profiles were characterised by personalised biomarkers. Omics integration demonstrated the predictive importance of key OA genes and pathways (e.g., GDF5 and TGF-β signalling) and OA-specific biomarkers (e.g., CRTAC1 and COL9A1). In summary, this work identifies opportunities for personalised OA prevention and insights into its underlying pathogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Line Egerod
- Novo Nordisk Research Centre Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Luis G Leal
- Novo Nordisk Research Centre Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Carol Sun
- Novo Nordisk Research Centre Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Zahra McVey
- Novo Nordisk Research Centre Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Makhdom EA, Maher A, Ottridge R, Nicholls M, Ali A, Cooper BG, Ajjan RA, Bellary S, Hanif W, Hanna F, Hughes D, Jayagopal V, Mahto R, Patel M, Young J, Nayak AU, Chen MZ, Kyaw-Tun J, Gonzalez S, Gouni R, Subramanian A, Adderley N, Patel S, Tahrani AA. The impact of obstructive sleep apnea treatment on microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes: a feasibility randomized controlled trial. J Clin Sleep Med 2024. [PMID: 38318821 DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.11020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with an increased risk of diabetes-related complications. Hence, it is plausible that Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) could have a favorable impact on these complications. To assess the feasibility of conducting a randomized control trial (RCT) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and OSA over 2 years. METHODS An open-label multicenter feasibility RCT of CPAP vs no CPAP in patients with T2D and OSA. Patients with resting oxygen saturation <90%, central apnea index >15/hour or Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) ≥11 were excluded. OSA was diagnosed using a multichannel portable device (ApneaLink Air, ResMed). The primary outcome measures were related to feasibility, and the secondary outcomes were changes in various clinical and biochemical parameters related to diabetes outcomes. RESULTS Eighty-three (40 CPAP vs 43 no CPAP) patients were randomized, with a median (IQR) follow-up of 645 [545, 861] days. CPAP compliance was inadequate, with a median usage of approximately 3.5 hours/night. Early CPAP use predicted longer-term compliance. The adjusted analysis showed a possible favorable association between being randomized to CPAP and several diabetes-related endpoints (chronic kidney disease (CKD), neuropathy, and quality of life (QoL)). CONCLUSIONS It was feasible to recruit, randomize, and achieve a high follow-up rate over 2 years in patients with OSA and T2D. CPAP compliance might improve by a run-in period before randomization. A full RCT is necessary to assess the observed favorable association between CPAP and CKD, neuropathy, and QoL in patients with T2D. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Registry: ISRCTN; URL: https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12361838; Title: The impact of sleep disorders in patients with type 2 diabetes; Identifier: ISRCTN12361838.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esraa A Makhdom
- Institute of Metabolism and System Research, University of Birmingham, UK
- Department of Respiratory Care, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, SA
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham health partners, UK
| | - Alisha Maher
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ryan Ottridge
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mathew Nicholls
- Institute of Metabolism and System Research, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Asad Ali
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Brendan G Cooper
- University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ramzi A Ajjan
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Srikanth Bellary
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham health partners, UK
- University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Wasim Hanif
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham health partners, UK
| | - Fahmy Hanna
- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke on Trent, UK
| | - David Hughes
- University Hospitals of Derby & Burton NHS Trust, Derby, UK
| | | | - Rajni Mahto
- South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, South Warwickshire, UK
| | - Mayank Patel
- University Hospital Southampton NHS FT, Southampton, UK
| | - James Young
- Royal Wolverhampton hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Ananth U Nayak
- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke on Trent, UK
| | - Mimi Z Chen
- St George's University Hospitals NHS FT, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Nicola Adderley
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Smitaa Patel
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and System Research, University of Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham health partners, UK
- University Hospitals of Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sadeghimakki R, Tahrani AA. Cardiopulmonary outcomes in people with impaired lung function: the role of metabolic syndrome. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2023; 35:100796. [PMID: 38023336 PMCID: PMC10679758 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Roham Sadeghimakki
- Public Health Nutrition Research Group, London Metropolitan University, London, UK
| | - Abd A. Tahrani
- Institue of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tahrani AA. Comment on: Perceptions of bariatric surgery in patients with type 2 diabetes-data from a self-administered questionnaire. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2023; 19:1355-1356. [PMID: 37802661 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), University of Birmingham, and Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hussain M, Egan H, Keyte R, Strachan R, Tahrani AA, Mantzios M. Exploring the association between self-compassion, mindfulness and mindful eating with eating behaviours amongst patients with obesity. Nutr Health 2023; 29:683-693. [PMID: 35538911 DOI: 10.1177/02601060221094671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: People who have obesity often experience problematic eating behaviours, contributing towards their excessive weight gain. Aims: Understanding problematic eating behaviours and their association to self-compassion, mindfulness and mindful eating is important for the development of future interventions that improve weight-loss and weight-regulation. Methods: One hundred and one participants attending their first session of a 6-session dietetic programme within a Tier 3 medical weight management service in the West Midlands, UK were recruited to complete questionnaires on self-compassion, mindfulness, mindful eating and eating behaviours, such as, emotional, restrained, external, fat and sugar consumption and grazing. Results: The findings suggested all three constructs, self-compassion, mindfulness and mindful eating were significantly and negatively associated with grazing and emotional eating, but mindful eating was the only construct that also displayed a significant and negative association with other eating behaviours that are often barriers to successful weight regulation, such as external eating and fat consumption. Further investigation suggested mindful eating had an indirect effect on fat consumption and grazing via external eating. Conclusion: Whilst, self-compassion, mindfulness and mindful eating displayed a negative relationship with grazing and emotional eating, mindful eating also displayed a negative relationship with fat consumption and external eating. Possible explanations and directions for future work are discussed with an emphasis on the need for more empirical work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misba Hussain
- Department of Psychology, Birmingham City University, UK
| | - Helen Egan
- Department of Psychology, Birmingham City University, UK
| | - Rebecca Keyte
- Department of Psychology, Birmingham City University, UK
| | | | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abbott S, Chan F, Tahrani AA, Wong SH, Campbell FEJ, Parmar C, Pournaras DJ, Denton A, Sinclair AJ, Mollan SP. Weight Management Interventions for Adults With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Practice Recommendations. Neurology 2023; 101:e2138-e2150. [PMID: 37813577 PMCID: PMC10663033 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is associated with obesity; however, there is a lack of clinical consensus on how to manage weight in IIH. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate weight loss interventions in people with IIH to determine which intervention is superior in terms of weight loss, reduction in intracranial pressure (ICP), benefit to visual and headache outcomes, quality of life, and mental health. METHODS A systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023339569). MEDLINE and CINAHL were searched for relevant literature published from inception until December 15, 2022. Screening and quality appraisal was conducted by 2 independent reviewers. Recommendations were graded using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network methodology. RESULTS A total of 17 studies were included. Bariatric surgery resulted in 27.2-27.8 kg weight loss at 24 months (Level 1- to 1++). Lifestyle weight management interventions resulted in between 1.4 and 15.7 kg weight loss (Level 2+ to 1++). Bariatric surgery resulted in the greatest mean reduction in ICP (-11.9 cm H2O) at 24 months (Level 1++), followed by multicomponent lifestyle intervention + acetazolamide (-11.2 cm H2O) at 6 months (Level 1+) and then a very low-energy diet intervention (-8.0 cm H2O) at 3 months (Level 2++). The least ICP reduction was shown at 24 months after completing a 12-month multicomponent lifestyle intervention (-3.5 cm H2O) (Level 1++). Reduction in body weight was shown to be highly correlated with reduction in ICP (Level 2++ to 1++). DISCUSSION Bariatric surgery should be considered for women with IIH and a body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 since this had the most robust evidence for sustained weight management (grade A). A multicomponent lifestyle intervention (diet + physical activity + behavior) had the most robust evidence for modest weight loss with a BMI <35 kg/m2 (grade B). Longer-term outcomes for weight management interventions in people with IIH are required to determine whether there is a superior weight loss intervention for IIH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Abbott
- From the Research Centre for Healthcare and Communities (S.A.), Coventry University; Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (F.C.), University Hospitals Birmingham; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (A.A.T.), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Novo Nordisk (A.A.T.), Bagsvaerd, Denmark; Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.H.W.), Moorfields Eye Hospital; Medical Eye Unit (S.H.W.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHSFT, London; School of Life Course & Population Sciences (S.H.W.), Kings College London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (S.H.W.), University College London; Adult Weight Management (Bariatric Surgery) (F.E.J.C.), NHS Grampian; Department of Surgery (C.P.), University College London Hospitals; Department of Surgery (C.P.), Barts Health NHS Trust, London; Upper Gastrointestinal (D.J.P.), Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust; IIH UK (A.D.), London; Translational Brain Science (A.J.S., S.P.M.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; and Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona Chan
- From the Research Centre for Healthcare and Communities (S.A.), Coventry University; Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (F.C.), University Hospitals Birmingham; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (A.A.T.), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Novo Nordisk (A.A.T.), Bagsvaerd, Denmark; Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.H.W.), Moorfields Eye Hospital; Medical Eye Unit (S.H.W.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHSFT, London; School of Life Course & Population Sciences (S.H.W.), Kings College London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (S.H.W.), University College London; Adult Weight Management (Bariatric Surgery) (F.E.J.C.), NHS Grampian; Department of Surgery (C.P.), University College London Hospitals; Department of Surgery (C.P.), Barts Health NHS Trust, London; Upper Gastrointestinal (D.J.P.), Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust; IIH UK (A.D.), London; Translational Brain Science (A.J.S., S.P.M.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; and Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- From the Research Centre for Healthcare and Communities (S.A.), Coventry University; Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (F.C.), University Hospitals Birmingham; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (A.A.T.), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Novo Nordisk (A.A.T.), Bagsvaerd, Denmark; Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.H.W.), Moorfields Eye Hospital; Medical Eye Unit (S.H.W.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHSFT, London; School of Life Course & Population Sciences (S.H.W.), Kings College London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (S.H.W.), University College London; Adult Weight Management (Bariatric Surgery) (F.E.J.C.), NHS Grampian; Department of Surgery (C.P.), University College London Hospitals; Department of Surgery (C.P.), Barts Health NHS Trust, London; Upper Gastrointestinal (D.J.P.), Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust; IIH UK (A.D.), London; Translational Brain Science (A.J.S., S.P.M.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; and Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Sui Hsien Wong
- From the Research Centre for Healthcare and Communities (S.A.), Coventry University; Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (F.C.), University Hospitals Birmingham; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (A.A.T.), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Novo Nordisk (A.A.T.), Bagsvaerd, Denmark; Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.H.W.), Moorfields Eye Hospital; Medical Eye Unit (S.H.W.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHSFT, London; School of Life Course & Population Sciences (S.H.W.), Kings College London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (S.H.W.), University College London; Adult Weight Management (Bariatric Surgery) (F.E.J.C.), NHS Grampian; Department of Surgery (C.P.), University College London Hospitals; Department of Surgery (C.P.), Barts Health NHS Trust, London; Upper Gastrointestinal (D.J.P.), Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust; IIH UK (A.D.), London; Translational Brain Science (A.J.S., S.P.M.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; and Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona E J Campbell
- From the Research Centre for Healthcare and Communities (S.A.), Coventry University; Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (F.C.), University Hospitals Birmingham; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (A.A.T.), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Novo Nordisk (A.A.T.), Bagsvaerd, Denmark; Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.H.W.), Moorfields Eye Hospital; Medical Eye Unit (S.H.W.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHSFT, London; School of Life Course & Population Sciences (S.H.W.), Kings College London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (S.H.W.), University College London; Adult Weight Management (Bariatric Surgery) (F.E.J.C.), NHS Grampian; Department of Surgery (C.P.), University College London Hospitals; Department of Surgery (C.P.), Barts Health NHS Trust, London; Upper Gastrointestinal (D.J.P.), Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust; IIH UK (A.D.), London; Translational Brain Science (A.J.S., S.P.M.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; and Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Chetan Parmar
- From the Research Centre for Healthcare and Communities (S.A.), Coventry University; Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (F.C.), University Hospitals Birmingham; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (A.A.T.), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Novo Nordisk (A.A.T.), Bagsvaerd, Denmark; Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.H.W.), Moorfields Eye Hospital; Medical Eye Unit (S.H.W.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHSFT, London; School of Life Course & Population Sciences (S.H.W.), Kings College London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (S.H.W.), University College London; Adult Weight Management (Bariatric Surgery) (F.E.J.C.), NHS Grampian; Department of Surgery (C.P.), University College London Hospitals; Department of Surgery (C.P.), Barts Health NHS Trust, London; Upper Gastrointestinal (D.J.P.), Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust; IIH UK (A.D.), London; Translational Brain Science (A.J.S., S.P.M.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; and Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Dimitri J Pournaras
- From the Research Centre for Healthcare and Communities (S.A.), Coventry University; Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (F.C.), University Hospitals Birmingham; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (A.A.T.), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Novo Nordisk (A.A.T.), Bagsvaerd, Denmark; Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.H.W.), Moorfields Eye Hospital; Medical Eye Unit (S.H.W.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHSFT, London; School of Life Course & Population Sciences (S.H.W.), Kings College London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (S.H.W.), University College London; Adult Weight Management (Bariatric Surgery) (F.E.J.C.), NHS Grampian; Department of Surgery (C.P.), University College London Hospitals; Department of Surgery (C.P.), Barts Health NHS Trust, London; Upper Gastrointestinal (D.J.P.), Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust; IIH UK (A.D.), London; Translational Brain Science (A.J.S., S.P.M.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; and Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Amanda Denton
- From the Research Centre for Healthcare and Communities (S.A.), Coventry University; Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (F.C.), University Hospitals Birmingham; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (A.A.T.), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Novo Nordisk (A.A.T.), Bagsvaerd, Denmark; Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.H.W.), Moorfields Eye Hospital; Medical Eye Unit (S.H.W.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHSFT, London; School of Life Course & Population Sciences (S.H.W.), Kings College London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (S.H.W.), University College London; Adult Weight Management (Bariatric Surgery) (F.E.J.C.), NHS Grampian; Department of Surgery (C.P.), University College London Hospitals; Department of Surgery (C.P.), Barts Health NHS Trust, London; Upper Gastrointestinal (D.J.P.), Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust; IIH UK (A.D.), London; Translational Brain Science (A.J.S., S.P.M.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; and Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra Jean Sinclair
- From the Research Centre for Healthcare and Communities (S.A.), Coventry University; Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (F.C.), University Hospitals Birmingham; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (A.A.T.), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Novo Nordisk (A.A.T.), Bagsvaerd, Denmark; Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.H.W.), Moorfields Eye Hospital; Medical Eye Unit (S.H.W.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHSFT, London; School of Life Course & Population Sciences (S.H.W.), Kings College London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (S.H.W.), University College London; Adult Weight Management (Bariatric Surgery) (F.E.J.C.), NHS Grampian; Department of Surgery (C.P.), University College London Hospitals; Department of Surgery (C.P.), Barts Health NHS Trust, London; Upper Gastrointestinal (D.J.P.), Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust; IIH UK (A.D.), London; Translational Brain Science (A.J.S., S.P.M.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; and Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Susan P Mollan
- From the Research Centre for Healthcare and Communities (S.A.), Coventry University; Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (F.C.), University Hospitals Birmingham; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (A.A.T.), University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Novo Nordisk (A.A.T.), Bagsvaerd, Denmark; Department of Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.H.W.), Moorfields Eye Hospital; Medical Eye Unit (S.H.W.), Guy's and St Thomas' NHSFT, London; School of Life Course & Population Sciences (S.H.W.), Kings College London; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences (S.H.W.), University College London; Adult Weight Management (Bariatric Surgery) (F.E.J.C.), NHS Grampian; Department of Surgery (C.P.), University College London Hospitals; Department of Surgery (C.P.), Barts Health NHS Trust, London; Upper Gastrointestinal (D.J.P.), Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, North Bristol NHS Trust; IIH UK (A.D.), London; Translational Brain Science (A.J.S., S.P.M.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; and Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alimajstorovic Z, Mitchell JL, Yiangou A, Hancox T, Southam AD, Grech O, Ottridge R, Winder CL, Tahrani AA, Tan TM, Mollan SP, Dunn WB, Sinclair AJ. Determining the role of novel metabolic pathways in driving intracranial pressure reduction after weight loss. Brain Commun 2023; 5:fcad272. [PMID: 37901040 PMCID: PMC10608960 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension, a disease classically occurring in women with obesity, is characterized by raised intracranial pressure. Weight loss leads to the reduction in intracranial pressure. Additionally, pharmacological glucagon-like peptide-1 agonism reduces cerebrospinal fluid secretion and intracranial pressure. The potential mechanisms by which weight loss reduces intracranial pressure are unknown and were the focus of this study. Meal stimulation tests (fasted plasma sample, then samples at 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min following a standardized meal) were conducted pre- and post-bariatric surgery [early (2 weeks) and late (12 months)] in patients with active idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Dynamic changes in gut neuropeptides (glucagon-like peptide-1, gastric inhibitory polypeptide and ghrelin) and metabolites (untargeted ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) were evaluated. We determined the relationship between gut neuropeptides, metabolites and intracranial pressure. Eighteen idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients were included [Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) n = 7, gastric banding n = 6 or sleeve gastrectomy n = 5]. At 2 weeks post-bariatric surgery, despite similar weight loss, RYGB had a 2-fold (50%) greater reduction in intracranial pressure compared to sleeve. Increased meal-stimulated glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion was observed after RYGB (+600%) compared to sleeve (+319%). There was no change in gastric inhibitory polypeptide and ghrelin. Dynamic changes in meal-stimulated metabolites after bariatric surgery consistently identified changes in lipid metabolites, predominantly ceramides, glycerophospholipids and lysoglycerophospholipids, which correlated with intracranial pressure. A greater number of differential lipid metabolites were observed in the RYGB cohort at 2 weeks, and these also correlated with intracranial pressure. In idiopathic intracranial hypertension, we identified novel changes in lipid metabolites and meal-stimulated glucagon-like peptide-1 levels following bariatric surgery which were associated with changes in intracranial pressure. RYGB was most effective at reducing intracranial pressure despite analogous weight loss to gastric sleeve at 2 weeks post-surgery and was associated with more pronounced changes in these metabolite pathways. We suggest that these novel perturbations in lipid metabolism and glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion are mechanistically important in driving a reduction in intracranial pressure following weight loss in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Therapeutic targeting of these pathways, for example with glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist infusion, could represent a therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zerin Alimajstorovic
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - James L Mitchell
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - Andreas Yiangou
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - Thomas Hancox
- School of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Andrew D Southam
- School of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Olivia Grech
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Ryan Ottridge
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Catherine L Winder
- School of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Department of Biochemistry and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular, and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 5TR, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Tricia M Tan
- Section of Endocrinology and Investigative Medicine, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2BX, UK
| | - Susan P Mollan
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| | - Warwick B Dunn
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- School of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Department of Biochemistry and Systems Biology, Institute of Systems, Molecular, and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 5TR, UK
| | - Alexandra J Sinclair
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tahrani AA, Panova-Noeva M, Schloot NC, Hennige AM, Soderberg J, Nadglowski J, Tarasenko L, Ahmad NN, Sleypen BS, Bravo R, Al-Najim W, le Roux CW. Stratification of obesity phenotypes to optimize future therapy (SOPHIA). Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 17:1031-1039. [PMID: 37791820 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2264783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Obesity is considered a poor lifestyle choice. 'Obesity' is not a sufficient definition for patients, any more than 'cancer' or 'arthritis' would be. A major obstacle is the lack of understanding of pathogenesis. The disease of obesity is considered homogenous, while response to treatment is thought of as heterogeneous. This can change if pathogenesis, risk profiles for complications, and treatment responses are viewed within the context of obesity consisting of several subsets of disease. AREAS COVERED The European Union-funded Innovative Medicine Initiative project Stratification of Obesity Phenotypes to Optimize Future Obesity Therapy is part of a momentum shift. Operational variables are being used to develop tests and therapies which may allow the prediction of risk of obesities and the prediction of response to obesity treatments. However, changing stakeholder perspectives on obesity may require more than high-quality data and analysis. EXPERT OPINION For patients to benefit, clinicians need to integrate evidence-based treatments and payers need to reimburse the management of the disease of obesity. This will generate commercial opportunities for industry. We need to involve stakeholders (patients, clinicians, regulators, payer, patient organisations) to create a shared value for mutual gain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Werd Al-Najim
- Diabetes Complications Research Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Carel W le Roux
- Diabetes Complications Research Centre, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ard J, Andersen CO, Sommer Matthiessen K, Morgen CS, Rathor N, Yerragolam D, Tahrani AA. Disease Burden and Health Status among People with Severe Obesity Who Do Not Receive Bariatric Surgery: A Retrospective Study. Obes Facts 2023; 16:326-334. [PMID: 37231911 PMCID: PMC10427954 DOI: 10.1159/000531032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to compare eligible individuals who were or were not treated with bariatric surgery and describe disease burden, treatment, and healthcare costs over 3 years in individuals who were not. METHODS Adults with obesity class II and comorbidities, or obesity class III, were identified in IQVIA Ambulatory EMR - US and PharMetrics® Plus administrative claims databases (January 1, 2007-December 31, 2017). Outcomes included demographics, BMI, comorbidities, and per patient per year (PPPY) healthcare costs. RESULTS Of 127,536 eligible individuals, 3,962 (3.1%) underwent surgery. The surgery group was younger, a greater proportion were women, and mean BMI and rates of some comorbidities (obstructive sleep apnea, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and depression) were higher than in the nonsurgery group. Mean healthcare costs PPPY in the baseline year were USD 13,981 in the surgery group and USD 12,024 in the nonsurgery group. In the nonsurgery group, incident comorbidities increased during follow-up. Mean total costs increased by 20.5% from baseline to year 3, mostly driven by an increase in pharmacy costs; however, fewer than 2% of these individuals initiated antiobesity medications. CONCLUSIONS Individuals who did not undergo bariatric surgery showed a progressive worsening of health and increasing healthcare costs, indicating a large unmet need for access to clinically indicated obesity treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamy Ard
- Department of Epidemiology and Prevention and Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Singh P, Adderley NJ, Subramanian A, Gokhale K, Hazlehurst J, Singhal R, Bellary S, Tahrani AA, Nirantharakumar K. Glycemic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery compared with routine care: a population-based, real-world cohort study in the United Kingdom. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2022; 18:1366-1376. [PMID: 36123295 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trials have shown that bariatric surgery (BS) is associated with better glycemic control and diabetes remission in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared with routine care. OBJECTIVE We conducted a real-world population-based study examining the impact of BS on glycemic control and medications in patients with T2D. SETTING AND METHODS This was a retrospective, matched, controlled cohort study conducted between January 1, 1990, and January 31, 2018, using IQVIA Medical Research Data, a primary care electronic records database. Adults with body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 and T2D who had BS (surgical) were matched for age, sex, BMI, and diabetes duration to two controls (with T2D and no BS). RESULTS A total of 1126 patients in the surgical group and 2219 patients in the control group were analyzed. Mean (standard deviation) age was 50.0 (9.3) years, 67.6% were women, baseline glycocylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) was 7.8% (1.7 mmol/mol), and diabetes duration was 4.7 years (range, 2.0-8.4 years). Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 3.6 years (1.7-5.9 years), a higher proportion of patients in the surgical group achieved an HbA1C of ≤6.0% than the control group (65.8% versus 22.8%). The surgical group showed a decrease in mean HbA1C of 1.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4%-1.7%), 1.4% (1.2%-1.5%), and 1.3% (1.1%-1.5%) at 1-, 2-, and 3-year follow-up, respectively, whereas HbA1C increased in the control group. The proportion of patients receiving glucose-lowering medications decreased in the surgical group (92.2% to 66.5%) but increased in the control group (85.3% to 90.2%). CONCLUSION BS is associated with significant improvement in glycemic control, achievement of normal HbA1C levels, and reduced need for glucose-lowering therapy in patients with T2D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pushpa Singh
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola J Adderley
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Anuradhaa Subramanian
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Krishna Gokhale
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Hazlehurst
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rishi Singhal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Srikanth Bellary
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Midlands Health Data Research, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Singhal R, Wiggins T, Pouwels S, Rajeev Y, Madhok B, Hanif W, Tahrani AA, Graham Y, Ludwig C, Mahawar K. Handling of the Covid-19 Pandemic and Its Effects on Bariatric Surgical Practice: Analysis of GENEVA Study Database. Obes Surg 2022; 32:3908-3921. [PMID: 36282429 PMCID: PMC9592878 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06267-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to a worldwide suspension of bariatric and metabolic surgery (BMS) services. The current study analyses data on patterns of service delivery, recovery of practices, and protective measures taken during the COVID-19 pandemic by bariatric teams. MATERIALS AND METHODS The current study is a subset analysis of the GENEVA study which was an international cohort study between 01/05/2020 and 31/10/2020. Data were specifically analysed regarding the timing of BMS suspension, patterns of service recovery, and precautionary measures deployed. RESULTS A total of 527 surgeons from 439 hospitals in 64 countries submitted data regarding their practices and handling of the pandemic. Smaller hospitals (with less than 200 beds) were able to restart BMS programmes more rapidly (time to BMS restart 60.8 ± 38.9 days) than larger institutions (over 2000 beds) (81.3 ± 30.5 days) (p = 0.032). There was a significant difference in the time interval between cessation/reduction and restart of bariatric services between government-funded practices (97.1 ± 76.2 days), combination practices (84.4 ± 47.9 days), and private practices (58.5 ± 38.3 days) (p < 0.001). Precautionary measures adopted included patient segregation, utilisation of personal protective equipment, and preoperative testing. Following service recovery, 40% of the surgeons operated with a reduced capacity. Twenty-two percent gave priority to long waiters, 15.4% gave priority to uncontrolled diabetics, and 7.6% prioritised patients requiring organ transplantation. CONCLUSION This study provides global, real-world data regarding the recovery of BMS services following the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Singhal
- Upper GI Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
| | - Tom Wiggins
- Upper GI Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK
| | - Sjaak Pouwels
- Department of Surgery, Agaplesion Bethanien Krankenhaus, Frankfurt am Main , Hessen, Germany
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Yashasvi Rajeev
- Pediatric Accidents and Emergencies Department, Northwick Park Hospital, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Brijesh Madhok
- East Midlands Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, University Hospital of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Wasim Hanif
- Diabetes Department, University Hospital Birmingham UK and Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Diabetes Department, University Hospital Birmingham UK and Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Clinical Drug Development, Novo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark
| | - Yitka Graham
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
- Facultad de Psycologia, Universidad Anahuac Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
- Bariatric Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Christian Ludwig
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
- Bariatric Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mollan SP, Mitchell JL, Yiangou A, Ottridge RS, Alimajstorovic Z, Cartwright DM, Hickman SJ, Markey KA, Singhal R, Tahrani AA, Frew E, Brock K, Sinclair AJ. Association of Amount of Weight Lost After Bariatric Surgery With Intracranial Pressure in Women With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Neurology 2022; 99:e1090-e1099. [PMID: 35790425 PMCID: PMC9536743 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The idiopathic intracranial hypertension randomized controlled weight trial (IIH:WT) established that weight loss through bariatric surgery significantly reduced intracranial pressure when compared with a community weight management intervention. This substudy aimed to evaluate the amount of weight loss required to reduce intracranial pressure and to explore the effect of different bariatric surgical approaches. METHODS IIH:WT was a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Adult women with active idiopathic intracranial hypertension and a body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 were randomized to bariatric surgery or a community weight management intervention (1:1). This per-protocol analysis evaluated the relationship between intracranial pressure, weight loss, and the weight loss methods. A linear hierarchical regression model was used to fit the trial outcomes, adjusted for time, treatment arm, and weight. RESULTS Sixty-six women were included, of whom 23 had received bariatric surgery by 12 months; the mean age was 31 (SD 8.7) years in the bariatric surgery group and 33.2 (SD 7.4) years in the dietary group. Baseline weight and intracranial pressure were similar in both groups with a mean weight of 119.5 (SD 24.1) and 117.9 (SD 19.5) kg and mean lumbar puncture opening pressure of 34.4 (SD 6.3) and 34.9 (SD 5.3) cmCSF in the bariatric surgery and dietary groups, respectively. Weight loss was significantly associated with reduction in intracranial pressure (R2 = 0.4734, p ≤ 0.0001). Twenty-four percentage of weight loss (weight loss of 13.3 kg [SD 1.76]) was associated with disease remission (intracranial pressure [ICP] ≤ 25 cmCSF). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass achieved greater, more rapid, and sustained ICP reduction compared with other methods. DISCUSSION The greater the weight loss, the greater the reduction in ICP was documented. Twenty four percentage of weight loss was associated with disease remission. Such magnitude of weight loss was unlikely to be achieved without bariatric surgery, and hence, consideration of referral to a bariatric surgery program early for those with active idiopathic intracranial hypertension may be appropriate. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02124486; ISRCTN registry number ISRCTN40152829; doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN40152829. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that weight loss after bariatric surgery results in reduction in intracranial pressure in adult women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. This study is Class II because of the use of a per-protocol analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P Mollan
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| | - James L Mitchell
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Yiangou
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ryan S Ottridge
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Zerin Alimajstorovic
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - David M Cartwright
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Simon J Hickman
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Keira A Markey
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rishi Singhal
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Frew
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Kristian Brock
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra Jean Sinclair
- From the Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology (S.P.M.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Metabolic Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., Z.A., K.A.M., A.J.S.), Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham; Department of Neurology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.J.S.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Endocrinology (J.L.M., A.Y., A.A.T., A.J.S.), Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit (R.S.O.); Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (Z.A., D.M.C., A.A.T., A.J.S.), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Neurology (S.J.H.), Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit (R.S.), Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences (R.S.), University of Birmingham; Department of Endocrinology (A.A.T.), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Health Economics Unit (E.F.), Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham; and Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (K.B.), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yiangou A, Mitchell J, Nicholls M, Chong YJ, Vijay V, ley BW, Lavery G, Tahrani AA, Mollan SP, Sinclair AJ. 082 Obstructive sleep apnoea in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a sub-study of the IIH-WT randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Psychiatry 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-abn2.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Obesity is a risk factor for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). We aimed to determine the prevalence of OSA in IIH and evaluate the diagnostic performance of OSA screening tools in IIH. Additionally, we evaluated the relationship between weight loss, OSA and IIH over 12-months.A sub-study of a multi-centre, randomised controlled parallel group trial comparing the impact of bariatric surgery vs. community weight management intervention (CWI) on IIH (IIH:WT). OSA was assessed using home-based polygraphy at baseline and 12-months.Of the 66 women in the IIH:WT trial, 46 were included in this sub-study. OSA prevalence was 47% (n=19). The STOP-BANG had the highest sensitivity (84%) compared to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (69%) and Berlin (68%) to detect OSA. Bariatric surgery resulted in greater reductions in AHI vs. CWI (-2.8 [-11.9, 0.7], p=0.017). Over 12 months there was a positive association between changes in papilloedema and AHI (r=0.543, p=0.045), despite adjustment for changes in body mass index (R2=0.522, p=0.017).OSA is common in IIH and the STOP-BANG questionnaire was the most sensitive screening tool. Bariatric surgery improved OSA in patients with IIH. The improvement in AHI was associated with improvement in papilloedema independent of weight loss.
Collapse
|
15
|
Singhal R, Omar I, Madhok B, Ludwig C, Tahrani AA, Mahawar K. SPOD1 Effect of BMI on Safety of Bariatric Surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic, Procedure Choice, and Safety Protocols – an analysis from the GENEVA Study. Br J Surg 2022. [PMCID: PMC9384783 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac246.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Background It has been suggested that patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of >60 kg/m2 should be offered expedited Bariatric Surgery (BS) during the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The main objective of this study was to assess the safety of this approach. Methods We conducted a global study of patients who underwent BS between 1/05/2020 and 31/10/2020. Patients were divided into three groups according to their preoperative BMI - Group I (BMI<50 kg/m2), Group II (BMI 50–60 kg/m2), and Group III (BMI>60 kg/m2). The effect of preoperative BMI on 30-day morbidity and mortality, procedure choice, COVID-19 specific safety protocols, and comorbidities was assessed. Results This study included 7084 patients (5197;73.4% females). The mean preoperative weight and BMI were 119.49±24.4 Kgs and 43.03±6.9 Kg/m2, respectively. Group I included 6024 (85%) patients, whereas Groups II and III included 905 (13%) and 155 (2%) patients, respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was higher in Group III (p=0.001). The complication rate and COVID-19 infection were not different. Comorbidities were significantly more likely in Group III (p=<0.001). A significantly higher proportion of patients in group III received Sleeve Gastrectomy or One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass compared to other groups. Patients with a BMI of >70 kg/m2 had a 30-day mortality of 7.7% (2/26). None of these patients underwent a Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Conclusion The 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with BMI >60 kg/m2. There was, however, no significant difference in complications rates in different BMI groups, probably due to differences in procedure selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Singhal
- Upper GI unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Islam Omar
- General Surgery Department, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Brijesh Madhok
- Upper GI unit, University Hospital of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Christian Ludwig
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK,Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- Bariatric Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK,University of Sunderland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hazlehurst JM, Singh P, Bhogal G, Broughton S, Tahrani AA. How to manage weight loss in women with obesity and PCOS seeking fertility? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2022; 97:208-216. [PMID: 35319122 PMCID: PMC9541741 DOI: 10.1111/cen.14726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Obesity exacerbates the phenotype of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) including infertility as well as reducing the efficacy and access to fertility treatments. Weight management is, therefore, a key component of treatment for women with PCOS and coexistent obesity. Many women with PCOS describe significant difficulty losing weight and treatment options are limited. The first-line treatment is lifestyle interventions though the weight loss and any impact on fertility are limited. No one dietary strategy can be preferentially recommended based on current evidence. While very low energy diets can result in significant weight loss the evidence for impact on fertility is limited. Pharmacotherapy, including a range of treatments can result in marked weight loss and there is some evidence of improved rates of conception including spontaneous and in response to assisted reproduction treatment. As with pharmacotherapy, data regarding bariatric surgery is largely from nonrandomized studies and though the significant weight loss is anticipated to improve fertility the available data prevents firm conclusions. Clinicians and patients must consider the magnitude of weight loss to be targeted as well as the anticipated fertility treatment required and the timeline of treatment when deciding upon the personalized weight loss strategy. Clinicians and patients should be confident in targeting the most appropriate treatment early in the patient's management to avoid unnecessary delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan M. Hazlehurst
- The Medical School, Institute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and MetabolismBirmingham Health PartnersBirminghamUK
- Department of Diabetes and EndocrinologyUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Pushpa Singh
- Department of Diabetes and EndocrinologyUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
- The Medical School, Institute of Metabolism and Systems ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | | | | | - Abd A. Tahrani
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and MetabolismBirmingham Health PartnersBirminghamUK
- Department of Diabetes and EndocrinologyUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
- The Medical School, Institute of Metabolism and Systems ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Alshehri Z, Subramanian A, Adderley NJ, Gokhale KM, Karamat MA, Ray CJ, Kumar P, Nirantharakumar K, Tahrani AA. Risk of incident obstructive sleep apnoea in patients with type 1 diabetes: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Diabetologia 2022; 65:1353-1363. [PMID: 35608616 PMCID: PMC9283161 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-022-05714-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS People with type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of developing obstructive sleep apnoea. However, it is not known whether people with type 1 diabetes are also at an increased risk of obstructive sleep apnoea. This study aimed to examine whether people with type 1 diabetes are at increased risk of incident obstructive sleep apnoea compared with a matched cohort without type 1 diabetes. METHODS We used a UK primary care database, The Health Improvement Network (THIN), to perform a retrospective cohort study between January 1995 and January 2018 comparing sleep apnoea incidence between patients with type 1 diabetes (exposed) and without type 1 diabetes (unexposed) (matched for age, sex, BMI and general practice). The outcome was incidence of obstructive sleep apnoea. Baseline covariates and characteristics were assessed at the start of the study based on the most recent value recorded prior to the index date. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios, based on a complete-case analysis. RESULTS In total, 34,147 exposed and 129,500 matched unexposed patients were included. The median follow-up time was 5.43 years ((IQR 2.19-10.11), and the mean BMI was 25.82 kg/m2 (SD 4.33). The adjusted HR for incident obstructive sleep apnoea in patients with type 1 diabetes vs those without type 1 diabetes was 1.53 (95% CI 1.25, 1.86; p<0.001). Predictors of incident obstructive sleep apnoea in patients with type 1 diabetes were older age, male sex, obesity, being prescribed antihypertensive or lipid-lowering drugs, atrial fibrillation and depression. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION Individuals with type 1 diabetes are at increased risk of obstructive sleep apnoea compared with people without diabetes. Clinicians should suspect obstructive sleep apnoea in patients with type 1 diabetes if they are old, have obesity, are male, have atrial fibrillation or depression, or if they are taking lipid-lowering or antihypertensive drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyad Alshehri
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- Respiratory Therapy Department, Taibah University, Medina, Saudi Arabia.
| | | | - Nicola J Adderley
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Krishna M Gokhale
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Muhammad Ali Karamat
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Clare J Ray
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Prem Kumar
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Abd A Tahrani
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schneider E, Spetter MS, Martin E, Sapey E, Yip KP, Manolopoulos KN, Tahrani AA, Thomas JM, Lee M, Hallschmid M, Rotshtein P, Dourish CT, Higgs S. The effect of intranasal insulin on appetite and mood in women with and without obesity: an experimental medicine study. Int J Obes (Lond) 2022; 46:1319-1327. [PMID: 35397638 PMCID: PMC9239904 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-022-01115-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Intranasal (IN) administration of insulin decreases appetite in humans, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear, and it is unknown whether IN insulin affects the food intake of women with obesity. SUBJECTS/METHODS In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design, participants (35 lean women and 17 women with obesity) were randomized to receive 160 IU/1.6 mL of IN insulin or placebo in a counterbalanced order in the post prandial state. The effects of IN insulin on cookie intake, appetite, mood, food reward, cognition and neural activity were assessed. RESULTS IN insulin in the post prandial state reduced cookie intake, appetite and food reward relative to placebo and these effects were more pronounced for women with obesity compared with lean women. IN insulin also improved mood in women with obesity. In both BMI groups, IN insulin increased neural activity in the insula when viewing food pictures. IN insulin did not affect cognitive function. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that IN insulin decreases palatable food intake when satiated by reducing food reward and that women with obesity may be more sensitive to this effect than lean women. Further investigation of the therapeutic potential of IN insulin for weight management in women with obesity is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Schneider
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Maartje S Spetter
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elizabeth Martin
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elizabeth Sapey
- Birmingham Acute Care Research Group, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kay Por Yip
- Birmingham Acute Care Research Group, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- University of Birmingham Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, Birmingham, UK
| | - Konstantinos N Manolopoulos
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Michelle Lee
- Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Manfred Hallschmid
- Department of Medical Psychology and Behavioural Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), München-Neuherberg, Germany
- Institute for Diabetes Research and Metabolic Diseases of the Helmholtz Center Munich at the University of Tübingen (IDM), Tübingen, Germany
| | - Pia Rotshtein
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Colin T Dourish
- P1vital Ltd., Wallingford, UK
- P1vital Products Ltd, Wallingford, UK
| | - Suzanne Higgs
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Capehorn MS, Hinchliffe N, Cook D, Hill A, O’Kane M, Tahrani AA, Vincent A, Williams S, Feenie J. Recommendations from a Working Group on Obesity Care Competencies for Healthcare Education in the UK: A Report by the Steering Committee. Adv Ther 2022; 39:3019-3030. [PMID: 35451741 PMCID: PMC9027014 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02108-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Obesity significantly increases the risk of developing (or worsening) more than 200 chronic diseases, and it is also a risk factor for severe COVID-19. With the rising prevalence of obesity in the UK, there is a need to develop obesity care competencies that apply to healthcare professionals (HCPs) at all levels of the health service, to increase the capacity for contemporary, evidence-based treatment that is effective, compassionate, and avoids stigmatising patients. Methods A UK Obesity Care Competencies Working Group consisting of experts by profession and experts by experience was created to provide a framework of obesity care competencies for HCPs involved in specialist obesity care (tiers 2–4 in the UK). The framework was adapted from a set of competencies recently published by the USA-based Obesity Medicine Education Collaborative (OMEC) and was intended to be adaptable to nurses and allied health professionals, as well as physicians, owing to the multidisciplinary team approach used in healthcare in the UK. Results The UK Obesity Care Competencies Working Group developed a set of 29 competencies, divided into five focal areas, namely obesity knowledge, patient care and procedural skills, practice-based learning and improvement, professionalism and interpersonal communication skills, and systems-based practice. The working group recommends that the obesity care competencies are targeted at HCPs training as specialists. The competencies could be imported into existing training programmes to help standardise obesity-related medical education and could also be used to direct a new General Practitioner with Extended Role (GPwER) qualification. Conclusion This list of obesity care competencies aims to provide an initial framework to improve education for HCPs and therefore to improve patient care in obesity. The acceptance and integration of these competencies into the healthcare system should provide a stepping stone toward addressing trends in health inequality.
Collapse
|
20
|
Shepherd LM, Schmidtke KA, Hazlehurst JM, Melson E, Dretzke J, Hawks N, Arlt W, Tahrani AA, Swift A, Carrick-Sen DM. Interventions for the prevention of adrenal crisis in adults with primary adrenal insufficiency: a systematic review. Eur J Endocrinol 2022; 187:S1-S20. [PMID: 35536876 PMCID: PMC9175553 DOI: 10.1530/eje-21-1248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Objective The incidence of adrenal crisis (AC) remains high, particularly for people with primary adrenal insufficiency, despite the introduction of behavioural interventions. The present study aimed to identify and evaluate available evidence of interventions aiming to prevent AC in primary adrenal insufficiency. Design This study is a systematic review of the literature and theoretical mapping. Methods MEDLINE, MEDLINE in Process, EMBASE, ERIC, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, the Health Management Information Consortium and trial registries were searched from inception to November 2021. Three reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data. Two reviewers appraised the studies for the risk of bias. Results Seven observational or mixed methods studies were identified where interventions were designed to prevent AC in adrenal insufficiency. Patient education was the focus of all interventions and utilised the same two behaviour change techniques, 'instruction on how to perform a behaviour' and 'pharmacological support'. Barrier and facilitator themes aiding or hindering the intervention included knowledge, behaviour, emotions, skills, social influences and environmental context and resources. Most studies did not measure effectiveness, and assessment of knowledge varied across studies. The study quality was moderate. Conclusion This is an emerging field with limited studies available. Further research is required in relation to the development and assessment of different behaviour change interventions to prevent AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Shepherd
- Diabetes & Endocrine Centre, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- School of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Jonathan M Hazlehurst
- Diabetes & Endocrine Centre, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Eka Melson
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Janine Dretzke
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Noel Hawks
- Addison Disease Self-Help Group, Starling House, Bristol, UK
| | - Wiebeke Arlt
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Diabetes & Endocrine Centre, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Amelia Swift
- School of Nursing, Institute of Clinical Sciences
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Singhal R, Omar I, Madhok B, Rajeev Y, Graham Y, Tahrani AA, Ludwig C, Wiggins T, Mahawar K. Safety of Bariatric Surgery in ≥ 65-Year-Old Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Obes Surg 2022; 32:1-13. [PMID: 35513762 PMCID: PMC9071248 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06067-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Age ≥ 65 years is regarded as a relative contraindication for bariatric surgery. Advanced age is also a recognised risk factor for adverse outcomes with Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) which continues to wreak havoc on global populations. This study aimed to assess the safety of bariatric surgery (BS) in this particular age group during the COVID-19 pandemic in comparison with the younger cohort. Methods We conducted a prospective international study of patients who underwent BS between 1/05/2020 and 31/10/2020. Patients were divided into two groups — patients ≥ 65-years-old (Group I) and patients < 65-years-old (Group II). The two groups were compared for 30-day morbidity and mortality. Results There were 149 patients in Group 1 and 6923 patients in Group II. The mean age, preoperative weight, and BMI were 67.6 ± 2.5 years, 119.5 ± 24.5 kg, and 43 ± 7 in Group I and 39.8 ± 11.3 years, 117.7±20.4 kg, and 43.7 ± 7 in Group II, respectively. Approximately, 95% of patients in Group 1 had at least one co-morbidity compared to 68% of patients in Group 2 (p = < 0.001). The 30-day morbidity was significantly higher in Group I (11.4%) compared to Group II (6.6%) (p = 0.022). However, the 30-day mortality and COVID-19 infection rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions Bariatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with a higher complication rate in those ≥ 65 years of age compared to those < 65 years old. However, the mortality and postoperative COVID-19 infection rates are not significantly different between the two groups. Graphical abstract ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Singhal
- Upper GI unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, West Midlands, B9 5SS, UK.
- Healthier Weight, Birmingham, UK.
| | - Islam Omar
- General Surgery Department, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, North West, Wirral, UK
| | - Brijesh Madhok
- Upper GI unit, University Hospital of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, East Midlands, Derby, UK
| | - Yashasvi Rajeev
- Pediatric Accidents and Emergencies Department, London Northwest University Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Yitka Graham
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, North East, Sunderland, UK
- Faculdad de Pyscologia, Universidad Anahuac, Anahuac, Naucalpan de Juárez, Mexico
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
| | - Christian Ludwig
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
| | - Tom Wiggins
- Upper GI unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Bordesley Green East, Birmingham, West Midlands, B9 5SS, UK
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, North East, Sunderland, UK
- Bariatric Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, North East, Sunderland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mostafa SA, Mena SC, Antza C, Balanos G, Nirantharakumar K, Tahrani AA. Sleep behaviours and associated habits and the progression of pre-diabetes to type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2022; 19:14791641221088824. [PMID: 35616501 PMCID: PMC9152198 DOI: 10.1177/14791641221088824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Certain sleep behaviours increase risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the general population, but whether they contribute to the progression from pre-diabetes to T2DM is uncertain. We conducted a systematic review to assess this. METHODS Structured searches were performed on bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) from inception to 26/04/2021 for longitudinal studies/trials consisting of adults⩾18 years with pre-diabetes and sleep behaviours (short or long sleep duration (SD), late chronotype, insomnia, obstructive sleep apnoea, daytime napping and/or night-shift employment) that reported on incident T2DM or glycaemic changes. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for quality assessment. RESULTS Six studies were included. Meta-analysis of three studies (n = 20,139) demonstrated that short SD was associated with greater risk of progression to T2DM, hazard ratio (HR) 1.59 (95% CI 1.29-1.97), I2 heterogeneity score 0%, p < 0.0001, but not for long SD, HR 1.50 (0.86-2.62), I2 heterogeneity 77%, p = 0.15. The systematic review showed insomnia and night-shift duty were associated with higher progression to T2DM. Studies were rated as moderate-to-high quality. CONCLUSIONS Progression from pre-diabetes to T2DM increases with short SD, but only limited data exists for insomnia and night-shift duty. Whether manipulating sleep could reduce progression from pre-diabetes to T2DM needs to be examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samiul A Mostafa
- Department of Diabetes, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partner, Birmingham, UK
- Samiul A Mostafa, Department of Diabetes, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Nuffield House, Birmingham B15 2PR, UK.
| | - Sandra Campos Mena
- Diabetes and Endocrinology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Christina Antza
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, “Papageorgiou” Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar
- Centre of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partner, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Midlands Health Data Research UK, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Department of Diabetes, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partner, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Singhal R, Omar I, Madhok B, Ludwig C, Tahrani AA, Mahawar K. Effect of BMI on safety of bariatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic, procedure choice, and safety protocols - An analysis from the GENEVA Study. Obes Res Clin Pract 2022; 16:249-253. [PMID: 35718696 PMCID: PMC9174153 DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background It has been suggested that patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of > 60 kg/m2 should be offered expedited Bariatric Surgery (BS) during the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The main objective of this study was to assess the safety of this approach. Methods We conducted a global study of patients who underwent BS between 1/05/2020 and 31/10/2020. Patients were divided into three groups according to their preoperative BMI - Group I (BMI<50 kg/m2), Group II (BMI 50–60 kg/m2), and Group III (BMI>60 kg/m2). The effect of preoperative BMI on 30-day morbidity and mortality, procedure choice, COVID-19 specific safety protocols, and comorbidities was assessed. Results This study included 7084 patients (5197;73.4 % females). The mean preoperative weight and BMI were 119.49 ± 24.4 Kgs and 43.03 ± 6.9 Kg/m2, respectively. Group I included 6024 (85 %) patients, whereas Groups II and III included 905 (13 %) and 155 (2 %) patients, respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was higher in Group III (p = 0.001). The complication rate and COVID-19 infection were not different. Comorbidities were significantly more likely in Group III (p = <0.001). A significantly higher proportion of patients in group III received Sleeve Gastrectomy or One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass compared to other groups. Patients with a BMI of > 70 kg/m2 had a 30-day mortality of 7.7 % (2/26). None of these patients underwent a Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Conclusion The 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with BMI > 60 kg/m2. There was, however, no significant difference in complications rates in different BMI groups, probably due to differences in procedure selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rishi Singhal
- Upper GI unit, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | - Islam Omar
- General Surgery Department, Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Brijesh Madhok
- Upper GI unit, University Hospital of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Christian Ludwig
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kamal Mahawar
- Bariatric Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Thaller M, Wakerley BR, Abbott S, Tahrani AA, Mollan SP, Sinclair AJ. Managing idiopathic intracranial hypertension in pregnancy: practical advice. Pract Neurol 2022; 22:295-300. [PMID: 35450962 PMCID: PMC9304112 DOI: 10.1136/practneurol-2021-003152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is more common in women of reproductive age who have obesity, yet there is little information on its management specifically in pregnancy. Women with IIH should plan their pregnancy including discussing contraception before pregnancy, recognising that hormonal contraceptives are not contraindicated. Potentially teratogenic medications including acetazolamide and topiramate are not recommended during pregnancy or in those with immediate plans to conceive; prescribing acetazolamide in pregnancy must only follow discussion with the patient and their obstetrician. Ideally, patients should aim to achieve disease remission or control before pregnancy, through optimising their weight. Although weight gain is expected in pregnancy, excessive weight gain may exacerbate IIH and increase maternal and fetal complications; evidence-based recommendations for non-IIH pregnancies may help in guiding optimal gestational weight gain. The vast majority of women with IIH can have a normal vaginal delivery, with spinal or epidural anaesthesia if needed, provided the papilloedema is stable or the IIH is in remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Thaller
- Metabolic Neurology, University of Birmingham Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, Birmingham, UK .,Neurology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Benjamin R Wakerley
- Metabolic Neurology, University of Birmingham Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, Birmingham, UK.,Neurology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sally Abbott
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.,University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Diabetes and Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Susan P Mollan
- Metabolic Neurology, University of Birmingham Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, Birmingham, UK.,Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, Ophthalmology Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alexandra J Sinclair
- Metabolic Neurology, University of Birmingham Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, Birmingham, UK .,Neurology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Tahrani AA, Morton J. Benefits of weight loss of 10% or more in patients with overweight or obesity: A review. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2022; 30:802-840. [PMID: 35333446 DOI: 10.1002/oby.23371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Modest weight loss (5%-10%) is clinically meaningful in patients with overweight or obesity. However, greater weight loss may be required to achieve improvements in or remission of certain weight-related complications. Therefore, this study reviewed the effect of large weight loss (≥10%). Most studies reporting large weight loss and relevant outcomes used bariatric surgery or lifestyle modifications. RESULTS Benefits of large weight loss were observed in patients with various overweight- or obesity-related complications, including improvements in comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension. Improvements in glucose metabolism and cardiovascular risk factors were observed in patients who achieved large weight loss through lifestyle interventions or pharmacotherapy (phentermine/topiramate 15/92 mg once daily or subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly). Other benefits associated with large weight loss included reduced cancer risk and improvements in knee osteoarthritis, sleep apnea, fertility-related end points, and health-related quality of life. While costly, bariatric surgery is currently the most cost-effective intervention, although most weight-management programs are deemed cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS Overall, large weight loss has a major beneficial impact on overweight- and obesity-related complications. Large weight loss should be the main treatment target when modest weight loss has had insufficient effects on obesity-related complications and for patients with severe obesity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Morton
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Crasto W, Altaf QA, Selvaraj DR, Jack B, Patel V, Nawaz S, Murthy N, Sukumar N, Saravanan P, Tahrani AA. Frequency Rhythmic Electrical Modulation System (FREMS) to alleviate painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A pilot, randomised controlled trial (The FREMSTOP study). Diabet Med 2022; 39:e14710. [PMID: 34605077 DOI: 10.1111/dme.14710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frequency Rhythmic Electrical Modulated System (FREMS) is a non-invasive treatment for chronic pain conditions, but its place in the treatment algorithm for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN) is unknown. METHODS A pilot, open-label, randomised controlled trial in individuals with PDPN inadequately controlled on at least dual neuropathic pain treatments recruited from primary and secondary care. Participants were randomised 1:1 to FREMS + usual care (n = 13) versus usual care (n = 12). Primary outcome was change from baseline in perceived pain (assessed by visual analogue scale) at 12 weeks between treatment groups. RESULTS Of 25 participants, 14 (56%) were men, and 21 (84%) were White Europeans. Median (IQR) age and duration of diabetes were 64 (56, 68) and 14 (10, 20) years, respectively. At 12 weeks, FREMS showed improvements in perceived pain compared with baseline, although the change was not statistically significant from control group (-4.0[-5.0,0.4] vs. 0[-0.3,0.7], p = 0.087). There were significant improvements in pain with FREMS, assessed by McGill Pain questionnaire (p = 0.042) and Douleur neuropathique-4 questionnaire (p = 0.042). More participants on FREMS had greater than 30 percent reductions in perceived pain compared with controls [7/13(54%) vs 0/12(0%), p = 0.042] and significant improvements in Patient Global Impression of Change (p = 0.005). FREMS intervention had moderate benefits in quality of life, sleep, depression and pain medication use, but these were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS FREMS might be used to treat individuals with PDPN inadequately controlled on two classes of neuropathic pain medications and is associated with improvements in pain severity and perceived impact of treatment. A larger, appropriately designed trial assessing its impact in this population is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winston Crasto
- Academic Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, UK
| | - Quratul-Ain Altaf
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Centre of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | - Dhiraj Ravindran Selvaraj
- Academic Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, UK
| | - Bukola Jack
- Academic Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, UK
| | - Vinod Patel
- Academic Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, UK
- Warwick Medical school, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Sarfaraz Nawaz
- Academic Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, UK
| | - Narasimha Murthy
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| | - Nithya Sukumar
- Academic Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, UK
- Populations, Evidence and Technologies, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical school, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Ponnusamy Saravanan
- Academic Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust, Nuneaton, UK
- Populations, Evidence and Technologies, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical school, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Centre of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ajjan RA, Hensor EMA, Del Galdo F, Shams K, Abbas A, Fairclough RJ, Webber L, Pegg L, Freeman A, Taylor AE, Arlt W, Morgan AW, Tahrani AA, Stewart PM, Russell DA, Tiganescu A. Oral 11β-HSD1 inhibitor AZD4017 improves wound healing and skin integrity in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Eur J Endocrinol 2022; 186:441-455. [PMID: 35113805 PMCID: PMC8942338 DOI: 10.1530/eje-21-1197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic wounds (e.g. diabetic foot ulcers) reduce the quality of life, yet treatments remain limited. Glucocorticoids (activated by the enzyme 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1, 11β-HSD1) impair wound healing. OBJECTIVES Efficacy, safety, and feasibility of 11β-HSD1 inhibition for skin function and wound healing. DESIGN Investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase 2b pilot trial. METHODS Single-center secondary care setting. Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus without foot ulcers were administered 400 mg oral 11β-HSD1 inhibitor AZD4017 (n = 14) or placebo (n = 14) bi-daily for 35 days. Participants underwent 3-mm full-thickness punch skin biopsies at baseline and on day 28; wound healing was monitored after 2 and 7 days. Computer-generated 1:1 randomization was pharmacy-administered. Analysis was descriptive and focused on CI estimation. Of the 36 participants screened, 28 were randomized. RESULTS Exploratory proof-of-concept efficacy analysis suggested AZD4017 did not inhibit 24-h ex vivoskin 11β-HSD1 activity (primary outcome; difference in percentage conversion per 24 h 1.1% (90% CI: -3.4 to 5.5) but reduced systemic 11β-HSD1 activity by 87% (69-104%). Wound diameter was 34% (7-63%) smaller with AZD4017 at day 2, and 48% (12-85%) smaller after repeat wounding at day 30. AZD4017 improved epidermal integrity but modestly impaired barrier function. Minimal adverse events were comparable to placebo. Recruitment rate, retention, and data completeness were 2.9/month, 27/28, and 95.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION A phase 2 trial is feasible, and preliminary proof-of-concept data suggests AZD4017 warrants further investigation in conditions of delayed healing, for example in diabetic foot ulcers. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Stress hormone activation by the enzyme 11β-HSD type 1 impairs skin function (e.g. integrity) and delays wound healing in animal models of diabetes, but effects in human skin were previously unknown. Skin function was evaluated in response to treatment with a 11β-HSD type 1 inhibitor (AZD4017), or placebo, in people with type 2 diabetes. Importantly, AZD4017 was safe and well tolerated. This first-in-human randomized, controlled, clinical trial found novel evidence that 11β-HSD type 1 regulates skin function in humans, including improved wound healing, epidermal integrity, and increased water loss. Results warrant further studies in conditions of impaired wound healing, for example, diabetic foot ulcers to evaluate 11β-HSD type 1 as a novel therapeutic target forchronic wounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R A Ajjan
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - E M A Hensor
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - F Del Galdo
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - K Shams
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - A Abbas
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - R J Fairclough
- Emerging Innovations Unit, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D
| | - L Webber
- Emerging Portfolio Development, Late Oncology, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - L Pegg
- Emerging Portfolio Development, Late Oncology, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - A Freeman
- Emerging Innovations Unit, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D
| | - A E Taylor
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | - W Arlt
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - A W Morgan
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - A A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - P M Stewart
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - D A Russell
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Vascular Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - A Tiganescu
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Center, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Correspondence should be addressed to A Tiganescu;
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kodsi R, Chimoriya R, Medveczky D, Grudzinskas K, Atlantis E, Tahrani AA, Kormas N, Piya MK. Clinical Use of the Edmonton Obesity Staging System for the Assessment of Weight Management Outcomes in People with Class 3 Obesity. Nutrients 2022; 14:967. [PMID: 35267942 PMCID: PMC8912843 DOI: 10.3390/nu14050967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to assess weight loss and metabolic outcomes by severity of weight-related complications following an intensive non-surgical weight management program (WMP) in an Australian public hospital. A retrospective cohort study of all patients aged ≥18 years with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 enrolled in the WMP during March 2018−March 2019 with 12-month follow-up information were stratified using the Edmonton Obesity Staging System (EOSS). Of 178 patients enrolled in the WMP, 112 (62.9%) completed at least 12 months’ treatment. Most patients (96.6%) met EOSS-2 (56.7%) or EOSS-3 (39.9%) criteria for analysis. Both groups lost significant weight from baseline to 12 months; EOSS-2: 139.4 ± 31.8 kg vs. 131.8 ± 31.8 kg (p < 0.001) and EOSS-3: 141.4 ± 24.2 kg vs. 129.8 ± 24.3 kg (p < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline age, sex and employment status, mean weight loss was similar but a greater proportion of EOSS-3 achieved >10% weight loss compared to EOSS-2, (40% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.024). Changes in metabolic parameters including HbA1c, BP and lipids did not differ between EOSS-2 and 3. Despite increased clinical severity, adult patients with class 3 obesity achieved clinically meaningful weight loss and similar improvements in metabolic parameters compared to patients with less severe complications after 12 months in an intensive non-surgical WMP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Kodsi
- South Western Sydney Metabolic Rehabilitation and Bariatric Program (SWS MRBP), Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia; (R.K.); (K.G.); (N.K.)
| | - Ritesh Chimoriya
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia; (R.C.); (D.M.)
| | - David Medveczky
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia; (R.C.); (D.M.)
| | - Kathy Grudzinskas
- South Western Sydney Metabolic Rehabilitation and Bariatric Program (SWS MRBP), Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia; (R.K.); (K.G.); (N.K.)
| | - Evan Atlantis
- School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia;
- Discipline of Medicine, Nepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Nepean, NSW 2747, Australia
| | - Abd A. Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK;
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Nic Kormas
- South Western Sydney Metabolic Rehabilitation and Bariatric Program (SWS MRBP), Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia; (R.K.); (K.G.); (N.K.)
| | - Milan K. Piya
- South Western Sydney Metabolic Rehabilitation and Bariatric Program (SWS MRBP), Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia; (R.K.); (K.G.); (N.K.)
- School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW 2560, Australia; (R.C.); (D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Almulhem M, Thayakaran R, Hanif S, Gooden T, Thomas N, Hazlehurst J, Tahrani AA, Hanif W, Nirantharakumar K. Ramadan is not associated with increased infection risk in Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations: Findings from controlled interrupted time series analysis of UK primary care data. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0262530. [PMID: 35025960 PMCID: PMC8757987 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The effect of fasting on immunity is unclear. Prolonged fasting is thought to increase the risk of infection due to dehydration. This study describes antibiotic prescribing patterns before, during, and after Ramadan in a primary care setting within the Pakistani and Bangladeshi populations in the UK, most of whom are Muslims, compared to those who do not observe Ramadan. Method Retrospective controlled interrupted time series analysis of electronic health record data from primary care practices. The study consists of two groups: Pakistanis/Bangladeshis and white populations. For each group, we constructed a series of aggregated, daily prescription data from 2007 to 2017 for the 30 days preceding, during, and after Ramadan, respectively. Findings Controlling for the rate in the white population, there was no evidence of increased antibiotic prescription in the Pakistani/Bangladeshi population during Ramadan, as compared to before Ramadan (IRR: 0.994; 95% CI: 0.988–1.001, p = 0.082) or after Ramadan (IRR: 1.006; 95% CI: 0.999–1.013, p = 0.082). Interpretation In this large, population-based study, we did not find any evidence to suggest that fasting was associated with an increased susceptibility to infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munerah Almulhem
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rasiah Thayakaran
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Shahjehan Hanif
- Life and Medical Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tiffany Gooden
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Thomas
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Hazlehurst
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Abd A. Tahrani
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Wasim Hanif
- Diabetes Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- * E-mail: (KN); (WH)
| | - Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- * E-mail: (KN); (WH)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gokhale K, Mostafa SA, Wang J, Tahrani AA, Sainsbury CA, Toulis KA, Thomas GN, Hassan-Smith Z, Sapey E, Gallier S, Adderley NJ, Narendran P, Bellary S, Taverner T, Ghosh S, Nirantharakumar K, Hanif W. The clinical profile and associated mortality in people with and without diabetes with Coronavirus disease 2019 on admission to acute hospital services. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2022; 5:e00309. [PMID: 34859617 PMCID: PMC8754243 DOI: 10.1002/edm2.309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Revised: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To assess if in adults with COVID-19, whether those with diabetes and complications (DM+C) present with a more severe clinical profile and if that relates to increased mortality, compared to those with diabetes with no complications (DM-NC) and those without diabetes. METHODS Service-level data was used from 996 adults with laboratory confirmed COVID-19 who presented to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UK, from March to June 2020. All individuals were categorized into DM+C, DM-NC, and non-diabetes groups. Physiological and laboratory measurements in the first 5 days after admission were collated and compared among groups. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate associations between diabetes status and the risk of mortality. RESULTS Among the 996 individuals, 104 (10.4%) were DM+C, 295 (29.6%) DM-NC and 597 (59.9%) non-diabetes. There were 309 (31.0%) in-hospital deaths documented, 40 (4.0% of total cohort) were DM+C, 99 (9.9%) DM-NC and 170 (17.0%) non-diabetes. Individuals with DM+C were more likely to present with high anion gap/metabolic acidosis, features of renal impairment, and low albumin/lymphocyte count than those with DM-NC or those without diabetes. There was no significant difference in mortality rates among the groups: compared to individuals without diabetes, the adjusted HRs were 1.39 (95% CI 0.95-2.03, p = 0.093) and 1.18 (95% CI 0.90-1.54, p = 0.226) in DM+C and DM-C, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Those with COVID-19 and DM+C presented with a more severe clinical and biochemical profile, but this did not associate with increased mortality in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishna Gokhale
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- School of Computer Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Midlands Health Data Research UK, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samiul A Mostafa
- Department of Diabetes Medicine, University Hospitals of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jingya Wang
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS, Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - G Neil Thomas
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Zaki Hassan-Smith
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | - Elizabeth Sapey
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Midlands Health Data Research UK, Birmingham, UK
| | - Suzy Gallier
- Midlands Health Data Research UK, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Parth Narendran
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Srikanth Bellary
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS, Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tom Taverner
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sandip Ghosh
- Department of Diabetes Medicine, University Hospitals of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Midlands Health Data Research UK, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS, Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Wasim Hanif
- Department of Diabetes Medicine, University Hospitals of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wang Z, Hazlehurst J, Subramanian A, Tahrani AA, Hanif W, Thomas N, Singh P, Wang J, Sainsbury C, Nirantharakumar K, Crowe FL. Diabetic Foot Risk Classification at the Time of Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis and Subsequent Risk of Mortality: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:888924. [PMID: 35898465 PMCID: PMC9309507 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.888924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM We aimed to compare the mortality of individuals at low, moderate, and high risk of diabetic foot disease (DFD) in the context of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, before developing active diabetic foot problem. METHODS This was a population-based cohort study of adults with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes utilizing IQVIA Medical Research Data. The outcome was all-cause mortality among individuals with low, moderate, and high risk of DFD, and also in those with no record of foot assessment and those who declined foot examination. RESULTS Of 225,787 individuals with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, 34,061 (15.1%) died during the study period from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2019. Moderate risk and high risk of DFD were associated with increased mortality risk compared to low risk of DFD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.50, 95% CI 1.42, 1.58; aHR 2.01, 95% CI 1.84, 2.20, respectively). Individuals who declined foot examination or who had no record also had increased mortality risk of 75% and 25% vs. those at low risk of DFD, respectively (aHR 1.75, 95% CI 1.51, 2.04; aHR 1.25, 95% CI 1.20, 1.30). CONCLUSION Individuals with new-onset type 2 diabetes who had moderate to high risk of DFD were more likely to die compared to those at low risk of DFD. The associations between declined foot examination and absence of foot examinations, and increased risk of mortality further highlight the importance of assessing foot risk as it identifies not only patients at risk of diabetic foot ulceration but also mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaonan Wang
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Hazlehurst
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospital Birmingham Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Anuradhaa Subramanian
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Abd A. Tahrani
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospital Birmingham Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Wasim Hanif
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospital Birmingham Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Thomas
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Pushpa Singh
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospital Birmingham Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Jingya Wang
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Sainsbury
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Diabetes, Gartnavel General Hospital, National Health Service Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Health Data Research UK, London, United Kingdom
| | - Francesca L. Crowe
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Francesca L. Crowe,
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Faulx M, Mehra R, Geovanini GR, Ando SI, Arzt M, Drager L, Fu M, Hoyos CM, Hai J, Hwang JJ, Karaoguz R, Kimoff J, Lee PL, Mediano O, Patel S, Peker Y, Pepin JL, Sanchez-de-la-Torre M, Series F, Stadler S, Strollo P, Tahrani AA, Thunstrom E, Yamauchi M, Redline S, Phillips CL. Obstructive Sleep Apnea and its Management in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: An International Collaboration of Sleep Apnea Cardiovascular Trialists (INCOSACT)) Global Survey of Practicing Cardiologists. SSRN Journal 2022. [DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4105038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
|
33
|
Kumarendran B, O'Reilly MW, Subramanian A, Šumilo D, Toulis K, Gokhale KM, Wijeratne CN, Coomarasamy A, Tahrani AA, Azoulay L, Arlt W, Nirantharakumar K. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Combined Oral Contraceptives, and the Risk of Dysglycemia: A Population-Based Cohort Study With a Nested Pharmacoepidemiological Case-Control Study. Diabetes Care 2021; 44:2758-2766. [PMID: 34649997 PMCID: PMC8669537 DOI: 10.2337/dc21-0437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Irregular menstrual cycles are associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is characterized by androgen excess and irregular menses; androgens are drivers of increased metabolic risk in women with PCOS. Combined oral contraceptive pills (COCPs) are used in PCOS both for cycle regulation and to reduce the biologically active androgen fraction. We examined COCP use and risk of dysglycemia (prediabetes and type 2 diabetes) in women with PCOS. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Using a large U.K. primary care database (The Health Improvement Network [THIN]; 3.7 million patients from 787 practices), we carried out a retrospective population-based cohort study to determine dysglycemia risk (64,051 women with PCOS and 123,545 matched control subjects), as well as a nested pharmacoepidemiological case-control study to investigate COCP use in relation to dysglycemia risk (2,407 women with PCOS with [case subjects] and without [control subjects] a diagnosis of dysglycemia during follow-up). Cox models were used to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratio, and conditional logistic regression was used to obtain adjusted odds ratios (aORs). RESULTS The adjusted hazard ratio for dysglycemia in women with PCOS was 1.87 (95% CI 1.78-1.97, P < 0.001; adjustment for age, social deprivation, BMI, ethnicity, and smoking), with increased rates of dysglycemia in all BMI subgroups. Women with PCOS and COCP use had a reduced dysglycemia risk (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.87). CONCLUSIONS In this study, limited by its retrospective nature and the use of routinely collected electronic general practice record data, which does not allow for exclusion of the impact of prescription-by-indication bias, women with PCOS exposed to COCPs had a reduced risk of dysglycemia across all BMI subgroups. Future prospective studies should be considered for further understanding of these observations and potential causality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balachandran Kumarendran
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, U.K
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Jaffna, Kokkuvil, Sri Lanka
| | - Michael W O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Anuradhaa Subramanian
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Dana Šumilo
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Konstantinos Toulis
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Krishna M Gokhale
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Chandrika N Wijeratne
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | - Arri Coomarasamy
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Laurent Azoulay
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health and Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University, Toronto, Canada
| | - Wiebke Arlt
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, U.K.
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Flint SW, Brown A, Sanders G, Tahrani AA. Exploring the awareness, attitudes, and actions (AAA) of UK adults at high risk of severe illness from COVID-19. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0259376. [PMID: 34762659 PMCID: PMC8584659 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background People at high risk of severe illness from COVID-19 have experienced greater restrictions during the pandemic, yet there is a paucity of research exploring their lived experience. Objectives This study explored the impact of COVID-19 on people identified as at high risk of severe illness by UK Government, and in particular, the impact of the first lockdown on access to healthcare, medications and use of technological platforms. Methods 1038 UK adults who identified as at high risk of severe illness from COVID-19 in line with UK Government guidance or self-identified with acute or other chronic health conditions, completed the Awareness, Attitudes and Actions survey which explored the impact of COVID-19 on access to healthcare, management of long-term health condition, mental health, and health behaviours. Results Most participants reported feelings of vulnerability, anxiety and isolation, noticed that other people changed their behaviour towards them including a feeling of being stigmatised by people not categorised as high risk. Participants described the largely negative impact that the COVID-19 lockdown had on to health-related behaviours and access to healthcare, which had resulted in large declines in mental health and wellbeing. Participants also indicated disappointment at the UK Governments response and handling of the COVID-19 lockdown. Implications This study provides novel evidence of the lived experience of the first COVID-19 lockdown for people identified as at high risk of severe illness. In the context of behavioural health interventions, the ubiquity of digital technologies and their adoption into day-to-day life translates into greater potential reach than traditional interventions, and consequently, greater potential for positive public health impact. Findings should be considered by policymakers and healthcare professionals to support people now and as we transition through the recovery phase with a particular emphasis on supporting mental health and changes to the management of long-term health conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart W. Flint
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Scaled Insights, Nexus, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Adrian Brown
- Centre for Obesity Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- National Institute of Health Research, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - George Sanders
- School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Abd A. Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Singh P, Adderley NJ, Hazlehurst J, Price M, Tahrani AA, Nirantharakumar K, Bellary S. Prognostic Models for Predicting Remission of Diabetes Following Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2021; 44:2626-2641. [PMID: 34670787 DOI: 10.2337/dc21-0166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Remission of type 2 diabetes following bariatric surgery is well established, but identifying patients who will go into remission is challenging. PURPOSE To perform a systematic review of currently available diabetes remission prediction models, compare their performance, and evaluate their applicability in clinical settings. DATA SOURCES A comprehensive systematic literature search of MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) was undertaken. The search was restricted to studies published in the last 15 years and in the English language. STUDY SELECTION All studies developing or validating a prediction model for diabetes remission in adults after bariatric surgery were included. DATA EXTRACTION The search identified 4,165 references, of which 38 were included for data extraction. We identified 16 model development and 22 validation studies. DATA SYNTHESIS Of the 16 model development studies, 11 developed scoring systems and 5 proposed logistic regression models. In model development studies, 10 models showed excellent discrimination with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve ≥0.800. Two of these prediction models, ABCD and DiaRem, were widely externally validated in different populations, in a variety of bariatric procedures, and for both short- and long-term diabetes remission. Newer prediction models showed excellent discrimination in test studies, but external validation was limited. LIMITATIONS While the key messages were consistent, a large proportion of the studies were conducted in small cohorts of patients with short duration of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Among the prediction models identified, the ABCD and DiaRem models were the most widely validated and showed acceptable to excellent discrimination. More studies validating newer models and focusing on long-term diabetes remission are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pushpa Singh
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.,Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Nicola J Adderley
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Jonathan Hazlehurst
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.,Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Malcolm Price
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.,Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, U.K.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, U.K. .,Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, U.K.,Midlands Health Data Research, Birmingham, U.K
| | - Srikanth Bellary
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, U.K.,School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Grech O, Clouter A, Mitchell JL, Alimajstorovic Z, Ottridge RS, Yiangou A, Roque M, Tahrani AA, Nicholls M, Taylor AE, Shaheen F, Arlt W, Lavery GG, Shapiro K, Mollan SP, Sinclair AJ. Cognitive performance in idiopathic intracranial hypertension and relevance of intracranial pressure. Brain Commun 2021; 3:fcab202. [PMID: 34704028 PMCID: PMC8421706 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Cognitive impairments have been reported in idiopathic intracranial hypertension; however, evidence supporting these deficits is scarce and contributing factors have not been defined. Using a case-control prospective study, we identified multiple domains of deficiency in a cohort of 66 female adult idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients. We identified significantly impaired attention networks (executive function) and sustained attention compared to a body mass index and age matched control group of 25 healthy female participants. We aimed to investigate how cognitive function changed over time and demonstrated that deficits were not permanent. Participants exhibited improvement in several domains including executive function, sustained attention and verbal short-term memory over 12-month follow-up. Improved cognition over time was associated with reduction in intracranial pressure but not body weight. We then evaluated cognition before and after a lumbar puncture with acute reduction in intracranial pressure and noted significant improvement in sustained attention to response task performance. The impact of comorbidities (headache, depression, adiposity and obstructive sleep apnoea) was also explored. We observed that body mass index and the obesity associated cytokine interleukin-6 (serum and cerebrospinal fluid) were not associated with cognitive performance. Headache severity during cognitive testing, co-morbid depression and markers of obstructive sleep apnoea were adversely associated with cognitive performance. Dysregulation of the cortisol generating enzyme 11β hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 has been observed in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Elevated cortisol has been associated with impaired cognition. Here, we utilized liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for multi-steroid profiling in serum and cerebrospinal fluid in idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients. We noted that reduction in the serum cortisol:cortisone ratio in those undergoing bariatric surgery at 12 months was associated with improving verbal working memory. The clinical relevance of cognitive deficits was noted in their significant association with impaired reliability to perform visual field tests, the cornerstone of monitoring vision in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Our findings propose that cognitive impairment should be accepted as a clinical manifestation of idiopathic intracranial hypertension and impairs the ability to perform visual field testing reliably. Importantly, cognitive deficits can improve over time and with reduction of intracranial pressure. Treating comorbid depression, obstructive sleep apnoea and headache could improve cognitive performance in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Grech
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK
| | - Andrew Clouter
- Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG1 5LT, UK
| | - James L Mitchell
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK
| | - Zerin Alimajstorovic
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK
| | - Ryan S Ottridge
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Andreas Yiangou
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK
| | - Marianne Roque
- Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Matthew Nicholls
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Angela E Taylor
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Fozia Shaheen
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Wiebke Arlt
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Gareth G Lavery
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Kimron Shapiro
- Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Susan P Mollan
- Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK
| | - Alexandra J Sinclair
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Singh P, Adderley NJ, Hazlehurst J, Price M, Tahrani AA, Nirantharakumar K, Bellary S. Prognostic Models for Predicting Remission of Diabetes Following Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.. [DOI: 10.2337/figshare.15173232.v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
<p>Background</p>
<p>Remission of type 2 diabetes following bariatric
surgery is well established but identifying patients who will go into remission
is challenging. </p>
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>To perform a systematic review of currently available
diabetes remission prediction models, compare their performance, and evaluate
their applicability in clinical settings.</p>
<p>Data sources</p>
<p>A comprehensive systematic literature search of
MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE and
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was undertaken. The search was
restricted to studies published in the last 15 years and in the English
language. </p>
<p>Study selection and data extraction</p>
<p>All studies
developing or validating a prediction model for diabetes remission in adults
after bariatric surgery were included. The search identified 4165 references of
which 38 were included for data extraction. We identified 16 model development
and 22 validation studies. </p>
<p>Data synthesis</p>
<p>Of the 16 model development
studies, 11 developed scoring systems and 5 proposed logistic regression models.
In model development studies, 10 models showed excellent discrimination with area
under curve (AUC) ≥ 0.800. Two of
these prediction models, ABCD and DiaRem, were widely externally validated in
different populations, a variety of bariatric procedures, and for both short-
and long-term diabetes remission. Newer prediction models showed excellent
discrimination in test studies, but external validation was limited.</p>
<p>Limitations
and Conclusions</p>
Amongst the prediction models identified, the ABCD
and DiaRem models were the most widely validated and showed acceptable to
excellent discrimination. More studies validating newer models and focusing on
long-term diabetes remission are needed.
Collapse
|
38
|
Singh P, Adderley NJ, Hazlehurst J, Price M, Tahrani AA, Nirantharakumar K, Bellary S. Prognostic Models for Predicting Remission of Diabetes Following Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.. [DOI: 10.2337/figshare.15173232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
<p>Background</p>
<p>Remission of type 2 diabetes following bariatric
surgery is well established but identifying patients who will go into remission
is challenging. </p>
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>To perform a systematic review of currently available
diabetes remission prediction models, compare their performance, and evaluate
their applicability in clinical settings.</p>
<p>Data sources</p>
<p>A comprehensive systematic literature search of
MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, EMBASE and
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was undertaken. The search was
restricted to studies published in the last 15 years and in the English
language. </p>
<p>Study selection and data extraction</p>
<p>All studies
developing or validating a prediction model for diabetes remission in adults
after bariatric surgery were included. The search identified 4165 references of
which 38 were included for data extraction. We identified 16 model development
and 22 validation studies. </p>
<p>Data synthesis</p>
<p>Of the 16 model development
studies, 11 developed scoring systems and 5 proposed logistic regression models.
In model development studies, 10 models showed excellent discrimination with area
under curve (AUC) ≥ 0.800. Two of
these prediction models, ABCD and DiaRem, were widely externally validated in
different populations, a variety of bariatric procedures, and for both short-
and long-term diabetes remission. Newer prediction models showed excellent
discrimination in test studies, but external validation was limited.</p>
<p>Limitations
and Conclusions</p>
Amongst the prediction models identified, the ABCD
and DiaRem models were the most widely validated and showed acceptable to
excellent discrimination. More studies validating newer models and focusing on
long-term diabetes remission are needed.
Collapse
|
39
|
Kumarendran B, O'reilly MW, Subramanian A, Šumilo D, Toulis K, Gokhale KM, Wijeratne CN, Coomarasamy A, Tahrani AA, Azoulay L, Arlt W, Nirantharakumar K. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Combined Oral Contraceptives, and the Risk of Dysglycemia: A Population-Based Cohort Study With a Nested Pharmacoepidemiological Case-Control Study.. [DOI: 10.2337/figshare.16608068.v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
<b>Objectives:
</b>Irregular menstrual cycles are
associated with increased cardiovascular mortality. Polycystic ovary syndrome
(PCOS) is characterized by androgen excess and irregular menses; androgens are
drivers of increased metabolic risk in women with PCOS. Combined oral
contraceptives (COCPs) are used in PCOS both for cycle regulation and to reduce
the biologically active androgen fraction. We examined COCP use and risk of
dysglycemia (pre-diabetes and type 2 diabetes) in women with PCOS.
<p><b>Research
Design and Methods: </b>Utilizing
a large UK primary care database (The Health Improvement Network, THIN; 3.7
million patients from 787 practices), we carried out a retrospective
population-based cohort study to determine dysglycemia risk (64,051 women with
PCOS, 123,545 matched controls), as well as a nested pharmaco-epidemiological
case-control study to investigate COCP use in relation to dysglycemia risk
(2407 women with PCOS with [=cases] and without [=controls] a diagnosis of
dysglycemia during follow-up).<b> </b>Cox
models were used to estimate the unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratio and
conditional logistic regression was used to obtain adjusted odds ratios
(aORs). </p>
<p><b>Results:
</b>The adjusted hazard ratio for
dysglycemia in women with PCOS was 1.87 (95% CI 1.78-1.97, p<0.001;
adjustment for age, social deprivation, BMI, ethnicity, and smoking), with
increased rates of dysglycemia in all BMI subgroups. Women with PCOS and COCP
use had a reduced dysglycemia risk (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.87).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions:
</b>In
this study limited by its retrospective nature and the use of routinely
collected electronic general practice record data, which does not allow to
exclude the impact of prescription-by-indication bias, women<b> </b>with PCOS exposed to COCPs had a reduced risk of dysglycemia across all
BMI subgroups. Future prospective studies should be considered to further
understand these observations and potential causality. </p>
Collapse
|
40
|
Cantley NW, Lonnen K, Kyrou I, Tahrani AA, Kahal H. The association between overweight/obesity and double diabetes in adults with type 1 diabetes; a cross-sectional study. BMC Endocr Disord 2021; 21:187. [PMID: 34530819 PMCID: PMC8447500 DOI: 10.1186/s12902-021-00851-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Double Diabetes (DD), type 1 diabetes (T1DM) + insulin resistance (IR), is associated with increased risk of micro/macro-vascular complications and mortality. Obesity can contribute to the development of DD. This study explored the prevalence of overweight/obesity and their association with DD in adults with T1DM. METHODS Cross-sectional study of consecutive adults with T1DM attending diabetes clinics in a secondary care hospital (January-November 2019). Estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) was used as a marker of IR, and an eGDR < 8 was used to identify individuals with DD. RESULTS One hundred seven adults with T1DM were included; female/male: 51/56; age [median (inter-quartile range): 30.0 (23-51) years]; BMI 25.4 (22.8-30.0) kg/m2. Overweight/obesity prevalence was 57/107 (53.3 %) [overweight: 30/107 (28 %); obesity: 27/107 (25.2 %)]. Compared to those with normal BMI, individuals with T1DM and overweight/obesity had longer diabetes duration; higher total daily insulin dose; and higher DD prevalence: 48/57 (84.2 %) vs. 14/50 (28 %) (p < 0.01); with similar HbA1c. BMI correlated with total daily insulin dose (rho = 0.55; p < 0.01). Individuals with DD were older, had longer duration of diabetes, higher HbA1c, and more adverse lipid profile and microalbuminuria compared to those without DD. CONCLUSIONS Overweight/obesity is very common in adults with T1DM, and is associated with double diabetes. BMI is positively associated with total insulin dose. Double diabetes is associated with adverse cardiovascular risk profile and is also common in lean individuals with T1DM. Further research is needed to examine the impact of overweight/obesity in people with T1DM and whether weight loss in this population can improve diabetes-related outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Wp Cantley
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, BS10 5NB, Bristol, UK
| | - Kathryn Lonnen
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, BS10 5NB, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Weight Management and Bariatric Service, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, BS10 5NB, Bristol, UK
| | - Ioannis Kyrou
- Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, Research Institute for Health & Wellbeing, Coventry University, CV1 5FB, Coventry, UK
- Warwickshire Institute for the Study of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (WISDEM), University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, CV2 2DX, Coventry, UK
- Aston Medical School, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston Medical Research Institute, Aston University, B4 7ET, Birmingham, UK
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, CV4 7AL, Coventry, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | - Hassan Kahal
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, BS10 5NB, Bristol, UK.
- Bristol Weight Management and Bariatric Service, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, BS10 5NB, Bristol, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Yiangou A, Mitchell JL, Nicholls M, Chong YJ, Vijay V, Wakerley BR, Lavery GG, Tahrani AA, Mollan SP, Sinclair AJ. Obstructive sleep apnoea in women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a sub-study of the idiopathic intracranial hypertension weight randomised controlled trial (IIH: WT). J Neurol 2021; 269:1945-1956. [PMID: 34420064 PMCID: PMC8940816 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10700-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective Obesity is a risk factor for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). We aimed to determine the prevalence of OSA in IIH and evaluate the diagnostic performance of OSA screening tools in IIH. Additionally, we evaluated the relationship between weight loss, OSA and IIH over 12 months. Methods A sub-study of a multi-centre, randomised controlled parallel group trial comparing the impact of bariatric surgery vs. community weight management intervention (CWI) on IIH-related outcomes over 12 months (IIH:WT). OSA was assessed using home-based polygraphy (ApneaLink Air, ResMed) at baseline and 12 months. OSA was defined as an apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥ 15 or ≥ 5 with excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale ≥11 ). Results Of the 66 women in the IIH: WT trial, 46 were included in the OSA sub-study. OSA prevalence was 47% (n = 19). The STOP-BANG had the highest sensitivity (84%) compared to the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (69%) and Berlin (68%) to detect OSA. Bariatric surgery resulted in greater reductions in AHI vs. CWI (median [95%CI] AHI reduction of – 2.8 [ – 11.9, 0.7], p = 0.017). Over 12 months there was a positive association between changes in papilloedema and AHI (r = 0.543, p = 0.045), despite adjustment for changes in the body mass index (R2 = 0.522, p = 0.017). Conclusion OSA is common in IIH and the STOP-BANG questionnaire was the most sensitive screening tool. Bariatric surgery improved OSA in patients with IIH. The improvement in AHI was associated with improvement in papilloedema independent of weight loss. Whether OSA treatment has beneficial impact on papilloedema warrants further evaluation. Trial registration number IIH: WT is registered as ISRCTN40152829 and on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02124486 (28/04/2014). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-021-10700-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Yiangou
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - James L Mitchell
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Matthew Nicholls
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Yu Jeat Chong
- Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Vivek Vijay
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Benjamin R Wakerley
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Gareth G Lavery
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.,Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Susan P Mollan
- Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, Ophthalmology Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK
| | - Alexandra J Sinclair
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. .,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK. .,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Elliot L, Frew E, Mollan SP, Mitchell JL, Yiangou A, Alimajstorovic Z, Ottridge RS, Wakerley BR, Thaller M, Grech O, Singhal R, Tahrani AA, Harrison M, Sinclair AJ, Aguiar M. Cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery versus community weight management to treat obesity-related idiopathic intracranial hypertension: evidence from a single-payer healthcare system. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2021; 17:1310-1316. [PMID: 33952427 PMCID: PMC8241428 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is associated with significant morbidity, predominantly affecting women of childbearing age living with obesity. Weight loss has demonstrated successful disease-modifying effects; however, the long-term cost-effectiveness of weight loss interventions for the treatment of IIH has not yet been established. OBJECTIVES To estimate the cost-effectiveness of weight-loss treatments for IIH. SETTING Single-payer healthcare system (National Health Service, England). METHODS A Markov model was developed comparing bariatric surgery with a community weight management intervention over 5-, 10-, and 20-year time horizons. Transition probabilities, utilities, and resource use were informed by the IIH Weight Trial (IIH:WT), alongside the published literature. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to characterize uncertainty within the model. RESULTS In the base case analysis, over a 20-year time horizon, bariatric surgery was "dominant," led to cost savings of £49,500, and generated an additional 1.16 quality-adjusted life years in comparison to the community weight management intervention. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a probability of 98% that bariatric surgery is the dominant option in terms of cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSION This economic modeling study has shown that when compared to community weight management, bariatric surgery is a highly cost-effective treatment option for IIH in women living with obesity. The model shows that surgery leads to long-term cost savings and health benefits, but that these do not occur until after 5 years post surgery, and then gradually increase over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Elliot
- Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Frew
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| | - Susan P Mollan
- Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - James L Mitchell
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Yiangou
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Zerin Alimajstorovic
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ryan S Ottridge
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ben R Wakerley
- Department of Neurology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Thaller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Grech
- Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rishi Singhal
- Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Harrison
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Alexandra J Sinclair
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Magda Aguiar
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Almulhem M, Chandan JS, Gokhale K, Adderley NJ, Thayakaran R, Khunti K, Tahrani AA, Hanif W, Nirantharakumar K. Cardio-metabolic outcomes in South Asians compared to White Europeans in the United Kingdom: a matched controlled population-based cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2021; 21:320. [PMID: 34193052 PMCID: PMC8244230 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02133-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There appears to be an inequality in the risk of cardio-metabolic disease between those from a South Asian (SA) background when compared to those of White Europeans (WE) descendance, however, this association has not been explored in a large European cohort. This population-based open retrospective cohort explores the incidence of cardio-metabolic disease in those without pre-existing cardiometabolic disease taken from a large UK primary care database from 1st January 2007 to 31st December 2017. METHODS A retrospective open cohort matched population-based study using The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. The outcomes of this study were the incidences of cardio-metabolic events (type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, stroke, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation). RESULTS A total of 94,870 SA patients were matched with 189,740 WE patients. SA were at an increased risk of developing: T2DM (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 3.1; 95% CI 2.97-3.23); HTN (1.34; 95% CI: 1.29-1.39); ischaemic heart disease (IHD) (1.81; 95% CI: 1.68-1.93) and heart failure (HF) (1.11; 95% CI: 1.003-1.24). However, they were at a lower risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) (0.53; 95% CI: 0.48-0.59) when compared to WE. Of those of SA origin, the Bangladeshi community were at the greatest risk of T2DM, HTN, IHD and HF, but were at the lowest risk of AF in when compared to Indians and Pakistanis. CONCLUSION Considering the high risk of cardio-metabolic diseases in the SA cohort, differential public health measures should be considered in these patients to reduce their risk of disease, which may be furthered tailored depending on their country of origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munerah Almulhem
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK
| | - Joht Singh Chandan
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK
| | - Krishna Gokhale
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK
| | - Nicola J Adderley
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK
| | - Rasiah Thayakaran
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
| | - Wasim Hanif
- Diabetes Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B152TT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Super J, Charalampakis V, Tahrani AA, Kumar S, Bankenahally R, Raghuraman G, Jambulingam PS, Kelly J, Ammori BJ, Singhal R. Safety and feasibility of revisional bariatric surgery following Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band - Outcomes from a large UK private practice. Obes Res Clin Pract 2021; 15:381-386. [PMID: 34147378 DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2021.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Revisional bariatric surgery is unavoidable in a proportion of patients. Despite its need, the development of this speciality has been hampered by its complexity and preferred delivery in institutional set ups. Although primary bariatric surgery can be delivered in the private sector; safety and feasibility of revisional bariatric surgery remains unexplored in this setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients undergoing revisional bariatric surgery following previous Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band (LAGB) between 2008 and 2019 at a single private bariatric unit with a minimum follow up of at least 6 months were included. The primary aim was safety outcomes and 30-day morbidity. RESULTS 178 patients with BMI of 45.6 ± 8.2 kg/m2 underwent revisional bariatric surgery. One stage conversion was performed for 86.5% of the cases. At 9.5 ± 5.3 months follow up, BMI and percentage excess BMI loss were 31.8 ± 6.2 kg/m2 and 62.6 ± 40% respectively. There was no mortality, and the major complication rate was 2.8%. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications based on one-stage vs. two-stage conversion (p = 0.52). There were no differences in weight loss outcomes post-revisional surgery according to the indication for revision (p = 0.446) or weight loss following primary surgery (p = 0.12). CONCLUSION Revisional bariatric surgery can be delivered safely in the private sector with good outcomes. One-stage conversions are feasible and do not detrimentally affect the morbidity of the procedure or the weight loss outcomes. More importantly, success following revisional surgery is independent of the indication for revision and weight loss outcomes following primary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Super
- Department of Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK
| | - Vasileios Charalampakis
- Department of General and GI Surgery, Warwick Hospital, South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Diabetes and Weight Management, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Sajith Kumar
- Department of Anaesthesia, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Rajneesh Bankenahally
- Department of Anaesthesia, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Govindan Raghuraman
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - P S Jambulingam
- Department of Upper GI & Bariatric Surgery, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Luton and Dunstable University Hospital, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Jamie Kelly
- Dept. of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, UK; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Basil J Ammori
- Department of Surgery, Salford Royal Hospital, Manchester, UK; Burjeel Hospital, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; Healthier Weight, UK
| | - Rishi Singhal
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Healthier Weight, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wang J, Niratharakumar K, Gokhale K, Tahrani AA, Taverner T, Thomas GN, Dasgupta I. Obesity Without Metabolic Abnormality and Incident CKD: A Population-Based British Cohort Study. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 79:24-35.e1. [PMID: 34146618 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Metabolically healthy obesity (obesity without any metabolic abnormality) is not considered to be associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. We examined and quantified the association between metabolically healthy overweight/obesity and the risk of incident chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a British primary care population. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective population-based cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS 4,447,955 of the 5,182,908 adults in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database (United Kingdom, 1995-2015) with a recorded body mass index (BMI) at the time of registration date who were free of CKD and cardiovascular disease. EXPOSURE 11 body size phenotypes were created, defined by BMI categories (underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obesity) and 3 metabolic abnormalities (diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia). OUTCOME Incident CKD defined as a recorded code for kidney replacement therapy, a recorded diagnosis of CKD, or by an estimated glomerular filtration rate of<60mL/min/1.73m2 for≥90 days, or a urinary albumin-creatinine ratio>3mg/mmol for≥90 days. RESULTS Of the 4.5 million individuals, 1,040,921 (23.4%) and 588,909 (13.2%) had metabolically healthy overweight and metabolically healthy obesity, respectively. During a mean follow-up interval of 5.4±4.3 (SD) years, compared with individuals with a metabolically healthy normal weight (n=1,656,231), there was a higher risk of incident CKD among those who had metabolically healthy overweight (adjusted HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.28-1.33]) and metabolically healthy obesity (adjusted HR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.62-1.70]). The association was stronger in those younger than 65 years of age. In all BMI categories, there was greater risk of incident CKD with a greater number of metabolic abnormalities in a graded manner. LIMITATIONS Potential misclassification of metabolic status due to delayed diagnosis and residual confounding due to unmeasured factors. CONCLUSIONS Overweight and obesity without metabolic abnormality are associated with a higher risk of incident CKD compared with those with normal body weight and no metabolic abnormality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingya Wang
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Krishna Gokhale
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Taverner
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - G Neil Thomas
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
| | - Indranil Dasgupta
- Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Parretti HM, Subramanian A, Adderley NJ, Abbott S, Tahrani AA, Nirantharakumar K. Post-bariatric surgery nutritional follow-up in primary care: a population-based cohort study. Br J Gen Pract 2021; 71:e441-e449. [PMID: 33824163 PMCID: PMC8041293 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20x714161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity. However, without recommended follow-up it has long-term risks. AIM To investigate whether nutritional and weight monitoring in primary care meets current clinical guidance, after patients are discharged from specialist bariatric care. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective cohort study in primary care practices contributing to IQVIA Medical Research Data in the UK (1 January 2000 to 17 January 2018). METHOD Participants were adults who had had bariatric surgery with a minimum of 3 years' follow-up post-surgery, as this study focused on patients discharged from specialist care (at 2 years post-surgery). Outcomes were the annual proportion of patients from 2 years post-surgery with a record of recommended nutritional screening blood tests, weight measurement, and prescription of nutritional supplements, and the proportions with nutritional deficiencies based on blood tests. RESULTS A total of 3137 participants were included in the study, and median follow-up post-surgery was 5.7 (4.2-7.6) years. Between 45% and 59% of these patients had an annual weight measurement. The greatest proportions of patients with a record of annual nutritional blood tests were for tests routinely conducted in primary care, for example, recorded haemoglobin measurement varied between 44.9% (n = 629/1400) and 61.2% (n = 653/1067). Annual proportions of blood tests specific to bariatric surgery were low, for example, recorded copper measurement varied between 1.2% (n = 10/818) and 1.5% (n = 16/1067) where recommended. Results indicated that the most common deficiency was anaemia. Annual proportions of patients with prescriptions for recommended nutritional supplements were low. CONCLUSION This study suggests that patients who have bariatric surgery are not receiving the recommended nutritional monitoring after discharge from specialist care. GPs and patients should be supported to engage with follow-up care. Future research should aim to understand the reasons underpinning these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen M Parretti
- Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich
| | | | - Nicola J Adderley
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - Sally Abbott
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Weight Management, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Centre for Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham; Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Weight Management, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham
| | - Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; CEDAM, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham; Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Weight Management, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Midlands Health Data Research UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mollan SP, Mitchell JL, Ottridge RS, Aguiar M, Yiangou A, Alimajstorovic Z, Cartwright DM, Grech O, Lavery GG, Westgate CSJ, Vijay V, Scotton W, Wakerley BR, Matthews TD, Ansons A, Hickman SJ, Benzimra J, Rick C, Singhal R, Tahrani AA, Brock K, Frew E, Sinclair AJ. Effectiveness of Bariatric Surgery vs Community Weight Management Intervention for the Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol 2021; 78:678-686. [PMID: 33900360 PMCID: PMC8077040 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Question Is bariatric surgery superior to a community weight management intervention in sustaining the weight loss necessary to achieve sustained remission among patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension? Findings In this randomized clinical trial of 66 women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and a body mass index of 35 or higher, bariatric surgery was superior to a community weight management intervention in decreasing intracranial pressure, with continued improvement at 2 years. Meaning The study’s findings indicate that, among women with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and a body mass index of 35 or higher, bariatric surgery is an effective treatment to reduce intracranial pressure and for sustained disease remission. Importance Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) causes headaches, vision loss, and reduced quality of life. Sustained weight loss among patients with IIH is necessary to modify the disease and prevent relapse. Objective To compare the effectiveness of bariatric surgery with that of a community weight management (CWM) intervention for the treatment of patients with active IIH. Design, Setting, and Participants This 5-year randomized clinical trial (Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial) enrolled women with active IIH and a body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 35 or higher at 5 National Health Service hospitals in the UK between March 1, 2014, and May 25, 2017. Of 74 women assessed for eligibility, 6 did not meet study criteria and 2 declined to participate; 66 women were randomized. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2018, to May 14, 2020. Interventions Bariatric surgery (n = 33) or CWM intervention (Weight Watchers) (n = 33). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was change in intracranial pressure measured by lumbar puncture opening pressure at 12 months, as assessed in an intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included lumbar puncture opening pressure at 24 months as well as visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, perimetric mean deviation, and quality of life (measured by the 36-item Short Form Health Survey) at 12 and 24 months. Because the difference in continuous outcomes between groups is presented, the null effect was at 0. Results Of the 66 female participants (mean [SD] age, 32.0 [7.8] years), 64 (97.0%) remained in the clinical trial at 12 months and 54 women (81.8%) were included in the primary outcome analysis. Intracranial pressure was significantly lower in the bariatric surgery arm at 12 months (adjusted mean [SE] difference, −6.0 [1.8] cm cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]; 95% CI, −9.5 to −2.4 cm CSF; P = .001) and at 24 months (adjusted mean [SE] difference, −8.2 [2.0] cm CSF; 95% CI, −12.2 to −4.2 cm CSF; P < .001) compared with the CWM arm. In the per protocol analysis, intracranial pressure was significantly lower in the bariatric surgery arm at 12 months (adjusted mean [SE] difference, −7.2 [1.8] cm CSF; 95% CI, −10.6 to −3.7 cm CSF; P < .001) and at 24 months (adjusted mean [SE] difference, −8.7 [2.0] cm CSF; 95% CI, −12.7 to −4.8 cm CSF; P < .001). Weight was significantly lower in the bariatric surgery arm at 12 months (adjusted mean [SE] difference, −21.4 [5.4] kg; 95% CI, −32.1 to −10.7 kg; P < .001) and at 24 months (adjusted mean [SE] difference, −26.6 [5.6] kg; 95% CI, −37.5 to −15.7 kg; P < .001). Quality of life was significantly improved at 12 months (adjusted mean [SE] difference, 7.3 [3.6]; 95% CI, 0.2-14.4; P = .04) and 24 months (adjusted mean [SE] difference, 10.4 [3.8]; 95% CI, 3.0-17.9; P = .006) in the bariatric surgery arm. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, bariatric surgery was superior to a CWM intervention in lowering intracranial pressure. The continued improvement over the course of 2 years shows the impact of this intervention with regard to sustained disease remission. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02124486
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P Mollan
- Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - James L Mitchell
- Department of Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ryan S Ottridge
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Magda Aguiar
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Andreas Yiangou
- Department of Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Zerin Alimajstorovic
- Department of Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - David M Cartwright
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Olivia Grech
- Department of Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth G Lavery
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Connar S J Westgate
- Department of Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Vivek Vijay
- Department of Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - William Scotton
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ben R Wakerley
- Department of Neurology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, United Kingdom
| | - Tim D Matthews
- Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Alec Ansons
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Simon J Hickman
- Department of Neurology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - James Benzimra
- Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Rick
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rishi Singhal
- Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Kristian Brock
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Frew
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra J Sinclair
- Department of Metabolic Neurology, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.,Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Kale S, Tahrani AA. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without established cardiovascular disease: Do they have a role in primary prevention? Metabol Open 2021; 10:100082. [PMID: 33817616 PMCID: PMC8010211 DOI: 10.1016/j.metop.2021.100082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Most guidelines and cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) focus on secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients with T2DM without established CVD (eCVD) also form a critical cohort, for whom primary prevention with timely pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions can effectively prevent or delay the onset of CVD. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have demonstrated a promising role for primary prevention of CVD in CVOTs and real-world studies. The 2019 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on primary prevention of CVD recommend SGLT2i as one of the add-on treatment options to metformin for adults with T2DM and glycated hemoglobin >7% who have cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. The outcomes with maximal response to SGLT2i use in primary prevention are hospitalization for heart failure and chronic kidney disease. The cardiorenal benefits with SGLT2i are attributed to pleiotropic effects on CV risk factors, and interference with glucose and sodium handling in kidneys, independent of their glycemic benefits. Results therefore support a role for SGLT2i not only in patients with T2DM and eCVD but also in patients with T2DM without eCVD. This review examines the evidence for potential role of SGLT2i for primary prevention of CVD in T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shailaja Kale
- Dr Shailaja Kale’s Diabetes & Speciality Clinic, Pune, India
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Charalampakis V, Giet L, Daskalakis M, Richardson M, Tahrani AA, Mahawar K, Singhal R. Publication output of National Health Service Bariatric centres in England. Obes Res Clin Pract 2021; 15:287-288. [PMID: 33965362 DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2021.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Revised: 03/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Obesity has been identified as an independent risk factor for a wide range of health conditions. Therefore, there is a clear need for high quality Bariatric research in order to improve patient selection, outcomes and safety for patients with obesity. We sought to identify and compare the quantitative and qualitative publication output from Bariatric centres in England. We identified 42 National Health Service (NHS) Trusts and 162 surgeons providing Bariatric services in England. A median of 4 (range 1-7) Bariatric surgeons were identified per centre. Eight NHS Trusts (19%) and 75 surgeons (46.3%) had no Bariatric publications during the study period, while 87 surgeons published a total of 432 Bariatric papers. Only 15 surgeons (9%) had ≥10 publications within the study period. However, these surgeons produced >50% of all Bariatric publications. Departments with more than 4 surgeons produced a significantly higher number of Bariatric publications (median 8.5 vs 2, p = 0.01). There is significant variation in research contribution amongst Bariatric centres in England. Academia should be encouraged and promoted across all bariatric services in order to broaden our understanding on Bariatric outcomes by expanding the service and proportional increase in funding. Given that a number of health conditions can afflict individuals living with obesity, bariatric surgery research becomes all the more important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasileios Charalampakis
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Warwick Hospital, South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | | | - Markos Daskalakis
- Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Martin Richardson
- Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abd A Tahrani
- Centre of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (CEDAM), Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK; Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), University of Bimingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Rishi Singhal
- Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Aguiar M, Frew E, Mollan SP, Mitchell JL, Ottridge RS, Alimajstorovic Z, Yiangou A, Singhal R, Tahrani AA, Sinclair AJ. The Health Economic Evaluation of Bariatric Surgery Versus a Community Weight Management Intervention Analysis from the Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT). Life (Basel) 2021; 11:409. [PMID: 33946177 PMCID: PMC8146846 DOI: 10.3390/life11050409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Weight Trial (IIH:WT) established the efficacy of bariatric surgery as compared to a community weight management intervention in reducing intracranial pressure in active IIH. The aim of this cost-effectiveness analysis was to evaluate the economic impact of these weight loss treatments for IIH. METHODS IIH:WT was a five-year randomised, controlled, parallel group, multicentre trial in the United Kingdom, where participants with active IIH and a body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive access to bariatric surgery or a community weight management intervention. All clinical and quality of life data was recorded at baseline, 12 and 24 months. Economic evaluation was performed to assess health-care costs and cost-effectiveness. Evaluations were established on an intention to treat principle, followed by a sensitivity analysis using a per protocol analysis. RESULTS The mean total health care costs were GBP 1353 for the community weight management arm and GBP 5400 for the bariatric surgery arm over 24 months. The majority of costs for the bariatric surgery arm relate to the surgical procedure itself. The 85% who underwent bariatric surgery achieved a 12.5% reduction in intracranial pressure at 24 months as compared to 39% in the community weight management arm; a mean difference of 45% in favour of bariatric surgery. The cost effectiveness of bariatric surgery improved over time. CONCLUSIONS The IIH:WT was the first to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery with community weight management interventions in the setting of a randomised control trial. The cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery improved over time and therefore the incremental cost of surgery when offset against the incremental reduction of intracranial pressure improved after 24 months, as compared with 12 months follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magda Aguiar
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B12 2TT, UK; (M.A.); (E.F.)
| | - Emma Frew
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B12 2TT, UK; (M.A.); (E.F.)
| | - Susan P. Mollan
- Birmingham Neuro-Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK
| | - James L. Mitchell
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (J.L.M.); (Z.A.); (A.Y.); (A.A.T.); (A.J.S.)
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK
| | - Ryan S. Ottridge
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK;
| | - Zerin Alimajstorovic
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (J.L.M.); (Z.A.); (A.Y.); (A.A.T.); (A.J.S.)
- Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK;
| | - Andreas Yiangou
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (J.L.M.); (Z.A.); (A.Y.); (A.A.T.); (A.J.S.)
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK
| | - Rishi Singhal
- Upper GI Unit and Minimally Invasive Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK;
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Abd A. Tahrani
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (J.L.M.); (Z.A.); (A.Y.); (A.A.T.); (A.J.S.)
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK
| | - Alex J. Sinclair
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; (J.L.M.); (Z.A.); (A.Y.); (A.A.T.); (A.J.S.)
- Department of Neurology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2WB, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham B15 2GW, UK
| |
Collapse
|