1
|
Sanchez-Salvador J, Monte M, Negro C, Batchelor W, Garnier G, Blanco A. Dataset for facilitating the calculation of aspect ratio of fibrillated cellulose suspensions based on gel point data. Data Brief 2024; 52:109944. [PMID: 38293579 PMCID: PMC10827384 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
This article describes data related to the research paper "Simplification of gel point characterization of cellulose nano and microfiber suspensions" [1]. The characterization of fibrillated celluloses that include cellulose nano and microfibrils (CMNFs) is a challenge for their production on an industrial scale, requiring easy techniques that control their quality and reproducibility. Gel point is a convenient parameter commonly used to estimate the aspect ratio (AR) of CMNFs. However, this estimation requires many sedimentation experiments, which are tedious and time consuming. The dataset includes all information related to the traditional experiments and to the simplified experiments for estimating gel point and AR based on only one sedimentation experiment. The full data set is useful to select the initial concentration to carry out the experimentation. This dataset also includes the information for the validation of the proposed simplified methodology and shows that the errors are lower than 7% for the gel point calculation and of 3% for the AR estimation. A larger databased of nanocellulose suspensions can be built with the reuse of this data to allow the estimation of nanocellulose properties in a future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J.L. Sanchez-Salvador
- Chemical Engineering and Materials Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Complutense s/n, Madrid 28040 Spain
| | - M.C. Monte
- Chemical Engineering and Materials Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Complutense s/n, Madrid 28040 Spain
| | - C. Negro
- Chemical Engineering and Materials Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Complutense s/n, Madrid 28040 Spain
| | - W. Batchelor
- BioPRIA, Chemical Engineering Department, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - G. Garnier
- BioPRIA, Chemical Engineering Department, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - A. Blanco
- Chemical Engineering and Materials Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Complutense s/n, Madrid 28040 Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schwartz CJ, Khorsandi N, Blanco A, Mukhtar RA, Chen YY, Krings G. Clinicopathologic and genetic analysis of invasive breast carcinomas in women with germline CHEK2 variants. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 204:171-179. [PMID: 38091153 PMCID: PMC10806021 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07176-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline pathogenic variants in checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) are associated with a moderately increased risk of breast cancer (BC). The spectrum of clinicopathologic features and genetics of these tumors has not been fully established. METHODS We characterized the histopathologic and clinicopathologic features of 44 CHEK2-associated BCs from 35 women, and assessed responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A subset of cases (n = 23) was additionally analyzed using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS). RESULTS Most (94%, 33/35) patients were heterozygous carriers for germline CHEK2 variants, and 40% had the c.1100delC allele. Two patients were homozygous, and five had additional germline pathogenic variants in ATM (2), PALB2 (1), RAD50 (1), or MUTYH (1). CHEK2-associated BCs occurred in younger women (median age 45 years, range 25-75) and were often multifocal (20%) or bilateral (11%). Most (86%, 38/44) were invasive ductal carcinomas of no special type (IDC-NST). Almost all (95%, 41/43) BCs were ER + (79% ER + HER2-, 16% ER + HER2 + , 5% ER-HER2 +), and most (69%) were luminal B. Nottingham grade, proliferation index, and results of multiparametric molecular testing were heterogeneous. Biallelic CHEK2 alteration with loss of heterozygosity was identified in most BCs (57%, 13/23) by NGS. Additional recurrent alterations included GATA3 (26%), PIK3CA (226%), CCND1 (22%), FGFR1 (22%), ERBB2 (17%), ZNF703 (17%), TP53 (9%), and PPM1D (9%), among others. Responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were variable, but few patients (21%, 3/14) achieved pathologic complete response. Most patients (85%) were without evidence of disease at time of study (n = 34). Five patients (15%) developed distant metastasis, and one (3%) died (mean follow-up 50 months). CONCLUSION Almost all CHEK2-associated BCs were ER + IDC-NST, with most classified as luminal B with or without HER2 overexpression. NGS supported the luminal-like phenotype and confirmed CHEK2 as an oncogenic driver in the majority of cases. Responses to neoadjuvant chemotherapy were variable but mostly incomplete.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Schwartz
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| | - Nikka Khorsandi
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Amie Blanco
- Department of Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Yunn-Yi Chen
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Gregor Krings
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), 1825 4th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marjon N, Guerra R, Freeman A, Mak J, Cheung S, Gordon K, Blanco A, Ueda S, Chen LM. Same day service: A genetic testing station model to improve germline genetic testing in patients with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 177:53-59. [PMID: 37639903 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Genetic testing for ovarian cancer (OC) patients is essential to consideration of PARP inhibitor therapy. To improve access, we piloted a Genetic Testing Station (GTS) allowing patients to have a same-day genetic testing visit facilitated by Genetic Counselor Assistants (GCAs) under the supervision of Genetic Counselors (GCs). METHODS The GTS was implemented December 2018 and operated through February 2020. Gynecologic Oncologists offered ovarian cancer patients a same-day GTS visit with a GCA. The patient received education via videos designed by GCs and then provided consent, a brief family history, and a sample for a standardized 133-gene panel. Results were provided by a GC. Patients were retrospectively identified by querying the medical record for OC patients seen 12 months prior to and 18 months after GTS implementation. RESULTS A total of 482 patients pre-GTS were compared to 625 patients post-GTS. Genetic testing increased from 68.5% to 75.4% (p = 0.012) after implementation, primarily in patients with epithelial histologies (80% vs 89% in pre-GTS vs post-GTS, p = 0.005). Time from referral for genetic testing to obtaining results was evaluated in the post-GTS cohort, comparing patients who had traditional counseling to those who utilized the GTS. Time to obtaining results was 21 days in the GTS group (95% CI [10, 34]) compared to 56 days (95% CI [41,76]) in the traditional genetic counseling group. CONCLUSIONS The GTS reduces barriers to care and facilitates discussion of precision treatment within a timely fashion while optimizing GC clinic time. Access improvement remains integral to improving uptake of genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Marjon
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecoloigc Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| | - Rosa Guerra
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecoloigc Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Alexandra Freeman
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecoloigc Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Julie Mak
- Department Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | - Stephanie Cheung
- Department Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | - Kelly Gordon
- Department Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | - Amie Blanco
- Department Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | - Stefanie Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecoloigc Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Lee-May Chen
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecoloigc Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Medel-Plaza M, Auñón A, Blanco A, García-Cañete J, Salar-Vidal L, Esteban J. Periprosthetic joint infection caused by Haemophilus parainfluenzae. Case report and literature review. Rev Esp Quimioter 2023; 36:325-328. [PMID: 36924032 DOI: 10.37201/req/127.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - J Esteban
- Jaime Esteban, Dept of Clinical Microbiology. IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, UAM. Av. Reyes Católicos 2. 28040-Madrid (Spain).
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ríos MP, López-Medina DC, Tort CG, Brandariz JR, Lema LV, Santiago-Pérez MI, Candal C, Montes A, López MJ, Dalmau R, Provencio M, Fernández E, Blanco A, Ravina AR. Mortality attributable to environmental tobacco smoke exposure in Spain in 2020. Arch Bronconeumol 2023; 59:305-310. [PMID: 36967344 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2023.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. The objective of this study was to estimate the impact of ETS exposure in Spain on mortality in 2020 in the population aged 35 years and over. METHODS A method of estimating attributable mortality (AM) based on the prevalence of ETS exposure was applied. Prevalence data were obtained from a representative study conducted in Spain and the relative risks were derived from a meta-analysis. AM point estimates are presented along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), calculated using a bootstrap naive procedure. AM, both overall and by smoking habit, was estimated for each combination of sex, age group, and cause of death (lung cancer and ischemic heart disease). A sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS A total of 747 (95% CI 676-825) deaths were attributable to ETS exposure, of which 279 (95% CI 256-306) were caused by lung cancer, and 468 (95% CI 417-523) by ischemic heart disease. Three-quarters (75.1%) of AM occurred in men and 60.9% in non-smokers. When chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cerebrovascular disease are included, the burden of AM is estimated at 2242 deaths. CONCLUSIONS ETS exposure is associated with 1.5% of all deaths from lung cancer and ischemic heart disease in the population aged 35 and over. These data underline the need for health authorities to focus on reducing exposure to ETS in all settings and environments.
Collapse
|
6
|
Thorn A, Gordon K, Tong B, Kwon DH, Dhawan MS, Borno H, Aggarwal RR, Small EJ, Blanco A. Disparities in germline testing by race/ethnicity and preferred language in patients with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
112 Background: A remote Genetic Testing Station (GTS) workflow was implemented at an academic medical institution to expand access to genetic testing for patients with prostate cancer. During a telephone appointment, a genetic counselor assistant collects family history and facilitates genetics education, research consent, and remote sample collection for multi-gene panel testing. We compared testing completion and patient loss from workflow based on race/ethnicity and preferred language to identify disparities. Methods: Metrics were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively for patients with metastatic or high-grade prostate cancer referred to genetics between 3/15/2020 – 6/30/2022. Self-reported race, ethnicity, and preferred language were collected by chart review. Testing completion was compared between groups using Fisher’s exact test, with White non-Hispanic (WNH) and Preferred Language English (PLE) cohorts as controls. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were reported. Patient loss at workflow checkpoints (scheduling, consenting, sample collection, and results release) was summarized for each group. Results: 827 eligible patients were identified: 78 (9%) Asian /Pacific Islander (API), 51 (6%) Black non-Hispanic (BNH), 42 (5%) Hispanic, and 625 (76%) WNH. 31 patients reporting other non-Hispanic race were not included in the analysis. 30 patients (4%) self-reported Preferred Language non-English (PLNE) and 797 (96%) PLE. BNH patients were significantly less likely to complete testing compared to WNH patients (OR 0.320, 95%CI: 0.168, 0.632, p<0.001). There was no difference in testing completion in API (OR 0.918, 95%CI: 0.467, 1.944, p=0.797) or Hispanic (OR 0.743, 95%CI: 0.325, 1.918, p=0.466) compared to WNH patients. PLNE were significantly less likely to complete testing (OR 0.393, 95%CI: 0.171, 0.965, p=0.016) compared to PLE patients. Patient loss occurred primarily at consenting and sample collection. 14% of BNH, and 9% of Hispanic patients did not consent, compared to 4% of WNH. 17% of PLNE did not consent compared to 5% of PLE patients. 13% of BNH did not return a sample, compared to 3% of WNH patients. Conclusions: In remote GTS, BNH and PLNE patients were significantly less likely to complete germline testing than WNH and PLE patients respectively. Disparities in patient loss were most pronounced at consenting and sample collection. Measures to mitigate disparities include assisted consenting (with interpreter as needed) and video-assisted or in-clinic sample collection. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelise Thorn
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kelly Gordon
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Barry Tong
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Daniel H Kwon
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Hala Borno
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Eric Jay Small
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Amie Blanco
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Marsillac PF, Cortez de Almeida RF, Machado CJ, Piraccini BM, Starace M, Tosti A, Vincenzi C, Kobzei K, Iorizzo M, Alves LD, Blanco A, Coelho C, Saceda-Corralo D, D'Atri G, Benez M, Ramos PM, Baja S, Tortelly VD, Frattini S, Melo DF. Clinical, epidemiological, trichoscopic and histopathological features of linear morphea on the scalp. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 36:e892-e895. [PMID: 35694874 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- P F de Marsillac
- Department of Dermatology, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - R F Cortez de Almeida
- Department of Dermatology, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - C J Machado
- Preventive and Social Medicine Department, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - B M Piraccini
- Dermatology - IRCCS Policlinico di Sant'Orsola - Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M Starace
- Dermatology - IRCCS Policlinico di Sant'Orsola - Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - A Tosti
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - C Vincenzi
- Department of Dermatology, Private Hospital Nigrisoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - K Kobzei
- Kyiv Medical University, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - M Iorizzo
- Private Dermatology Practice, Bellinzona, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - L D Alves
- Department of Tropical Medicine and Dermatology, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil
| | - A Blanco
- Department of Dermatology, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, MS, Brazil
| | - C Coelho
- Department of Dermatology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - D Saceda-Corralo
- Dermatology Department, Trichology Unit, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
| | - G D'Atri
- GrupoMCI (Integral Hair Medicine), Private Dermatology Practice, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M Benez
- Department of Dermatology, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - P M Ramos
- Department of Dermatology and Radiotherapy, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
| | - S Baja
- Private Dermatology Practice, Resende, RJ, Brazil
| | - V D Tortelly
- Department of Dermatology, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - S Frattini
- Mental Health Department, Guelph General Hospital, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
| | - D F Melo
- Department of Dermatology, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Llorenç V, Sainz-de-la-Maza M, García-Aparicio Á, Blanco A, Hernando-Hernández C, Cincunegui-Gutiérrez J, Fanlo P, Heras H, García-García O, Hernández-Garfella M, Veroz Gonzalez R, Rodriguez-Melian L, Jovani V. POS1331 CERTOLIZUMAB PEGOL IN UVEITIS. RETENTION PROBABILITY AND CAUSES OF DISCONTINUATION. Ann Rheum Dis 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundA personalized disease-specific treatment for non-infectious uveitis (NIU) is challenging. Around 50% of adults with NIU who required classic DMARDs or adalimumab in clinical trials, failed at 6 months during open label phase [1,2]. Therefore, to investigate treatment alternatives for NIU are most needed.ObjectivesTo study Certolizumab pegol (CZP) retention rate (RR) at 24 months in NIU and susceptibility factors for discontinuation.MethodsAdults with NIU who received CZP for this indication were included. Data were gathered from the BioÚvea Spanish registry, detailed elsewhere[3]. Demographics, clinical, and therapeutic data was recorded from Nov 2016 to Nov 2017. The primary endpoint assessed was CZP RR at 24 months. Causes and susceptibility factors for definitive discontinuation of CZP were analyzed as well. CZP RR was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, Log-rank test was used for the univariate, and the Cox proportional hazard model was implemented for the multivariate analysis.ResultsThirty patients with a median of 41 (IQR 16) years, 18 (60%) females, were included. NIUs were bilateral in 19 (63%) patients and were active at CZP onset in 20 (71%). Half of the patients suffered from non-anterior NIUs, and etiologically 2 (7%) were unclassifiable, 7 (23%) had ocular syndromes, and 21 (70%) were associated to systemic disorders. Seven (23%) patients were bio-naïve, whereas 23 (77%) started CZP as a 2nd (5, 17%) or ≥ 3rd (18, 60%) biologic. With a median follow-up of 21.2 (Range 0.2 to 54.8) months, 12 (40%) patients discontinued CZP, 6 (20%) due to adverse events and 6 (20%) due to lack of efficacy. The overall CZP RR at 24 months was 53.6%, with a median Retention Time (RT) of 27.1 months. In the multivariate analysis, CZP started as a first biologic (HR 0.053, 95%CI 0.003 to 0.809; p = 0.035), and male gender (HR 0.1, 95%CI 0.015 to 0.694; p = 0.02) were protective factors for discontinuation. CZP RR at 24 months as a 1st line biologic was 100% with a median RT of 27.1 months. Conversely, CZP RR at 24 months as a ≥2nd line was 41.1% with a median RT of 17.1 months. When given as a 1st biologic, one (14%) patient discontinued CZP due to loss of efficacy at 27.1 months. Conversely, discontinuation of CZP when administered in ≥2nd line was more frequent, either due to lack or loss of efficacy in 5 (22%) patients or adverse events (AEs) in 6 (26%) (Figure 1).Figure 1.Retention rate of Certolizumab pegol in bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients with non-infectious uveitis.Abbreviations: DRT, Drug Retention Time; LTFU, lost to follow-up; DRR, Drug Retention Rate; PAR, Patients at Risk; AE, adverse event.ConclusionCZP in NIU showed an excellent retention rate at 24 months in bio-naïve patients. However, it was more than halved when CZP was started as a ≥2nd biologic. Discontinuation of CZP in bio-experienced patients was due to lack or loss of efficacy in 22% and to adverse events in an additional 26% of patients.References[1]Rathinam SR, Gonzales JA, Thundikandy R, et al. Effect of Corticosteroid-Sparing Treatment With Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Methotrexate on Inflammation in Patients With Uveitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;322(10):936-945.[2]Jaffe GJ, Dick AD, Brézin AP, et al. Adalimumab in Patients with Active Noninfectious Uveitis. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:932-943.[3]Llorenç V, Cordero-Coma M, Blanco-Esteban A, et al. Drug Retention Rate and Causes of Discontinuation of Adalimumab in Uveitis: Real-World Data from the Biotherapies in Uveitis (BioUvea) Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(6):814-825.Disclosure of InterestsVictor Llorenç Speakers bureau: Optos, Alimera, Consultant of: AbbVie, Alimera, Allergan, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Maite Sainz-de-la-Maza: None declared, Ángel García-Aparicio: None declared, Ana Blanco: None declared, Cristina Hernando-Hernández: None declared, Joseba Cincunegui-Gutiérrez: None declared, Patricia Fanlo: None declared, Henar Heras: None declared, Olga García-García: None declared, Marisa Hernández-Garfella: None declared, Raul Veroz Gonzalez: None declared, Luís Rodriguez-Melian: None declared, Vega Jovani: None declared
Collapse
|
9
|
Blanco A, Rabban J, Devine WP, Rehbein L. P5 Germline testing for endometrial cancer in the age of next generation sequencing. Gynecol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(22)00350-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
10
|
Bañuelos Gimeno J, Blanco A, Díaz J, Linares C, López JA, Navas MA, Sánchez-Martínez G, Luna Y, Hervella B, Belda F, Culqui DR. Air pollution and meteorological variables' effects on COVID-19 first and second waves in Spain. Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran) 2022; 20:2869-2882. [PMID: 35529588 PMCID: PMC9065237 DOI: 10.1007/s13762-022-04190-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The aim of this research is to study the influence of atmospheric pollutants and meteorological variables on the incidence rate of COVID-19 and the rate of hospital admissions due to COVID-19 during the first and second waves in nine Spanish provinces. Numerous studies analyze the effect of environmental and pollution variables separately, but few that include them in the same analysis together, and even fewer that compare their effects between the first and second waves of the virus. This study was conducted in nine of 52 Spanish provinces, using generalized linear models with Poisson link between levels of PM10, NO2 and O3 (independent variables) and maximum temperature and absolute humidity and the rates of incidence and hospital admissions of COVID-19 (dependent variables), establishing a series of significant lags. Using the estimators obtained from the significant multivariate models, the relative risks associated with these variables were calculated for increases of 10 µg/m3 for pollutants, 1 °C for temperature and 1 g/m3 for humidity. The results suggest that NO2 has a greater association than the other air pollution variables and the meteorological variables. There was a greater association with O3 in the first wave and with NO2 in the second. Pollutants showed a homogeneous distribution across the country. We conclude that, compared to other air pollutants and meteorological variables, NO2 is a protagonist that may modulate the incidence and severity of COVID-19, though preventive public health measures such as masking and hand washing are still very important. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13762-022-04190-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Bañuelos Gimeno
- Reference Unit on Climate Change, Health and Urban Environment, National School of Health, Carlos III Health Institute, Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health and Microbiology, Autonomous University of Madrid, Arzobispo Morcillo, 4, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - A. Blanco
- Reference Unit on Climate Change, Health and Urban Environment, National School of Health, Carlos III Health Institute, Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - J. Díaz
- Reference Unit on Climate Change, Health and Urban Environment, National School of Health, Carlos III Health Institute, Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - C. Linares
- Reference Unit on Climate Change, Health and Urban Environment, National School of Health, Carlos III Health Institute, Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - J. A. López
- Reference Unit on Climate Change, Health and Urban Environment, National School of Health, Carlos III Health Institute, Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - M. A. Navas
- Reference Unit on Climate Change, Health and Urban Environment, National School of Health, Carlos III Health Institute, Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Y. Luna
- State Meteorological Agency (AEMET), CALLE RIOS ROSAS, 44, Madrid, Spain
| | - B. Hervella
- State Meteorological Agency (AEMET), CALLE RIOS ROSAS, 44, Madrid, Spain
| | - F. Belda
- State Meteorological Agency (AEMET), CALLE RIOS ROSAS, 44, Madrid, Spain
| | - D. R. Culqui
- Reference Unit on Climate Change, Health and Urban Environment, National School of Health, Carlos III Health Institute, Monforte de Lemos, 5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lewis T, Flores S, Sabacan L, Choy P, Thannickal H, Shieh Y, Tice J, Ziv E, Madlensky L, Eklund M, Yau C, Blanco A, Tong B, Goodman D, Anderson N, Harvey H, Fors S, Park HL, Raouf S, Stewart S, Wernisch J, Koenig B, Kaplan C, Hiatt R, Wenger N, Lee V, Heditsian D, Brain S, Moorehead D, Parker BA, Borowsky A, Anton-Culver H, Naeim A, Kaster A, van ‘t Veer L, LaCroix AZ, Olopade OI, Sheth D, Garcia A, Lancaster R, Plaza M, Fiscalini AS, Esserman L. Abstract P5-19-04: The WISDOM study: Reducing sequential steps and implementing parallel workflows in pragmatic trials. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p5-19-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:The WISDOM Study is a preference-tolerant pragmatic study, comparing annual mammograms to a risk-based screening. Eligibility includes women ages 40-74 years with no history of breast cancer or DCIS. Participants are enrolled to one study arm: annual screening or risk-based screening (includes genetic testing). Pragmatic trials often involve gathering real-time data over multiple time points. Collecting real-time data sequentially can limit enrollment, delay study assignments, and reduce participant engagement. The WISDOM Study has identified such bottlenecks and has implemented parallel workflows, reducing the overall wait time for participants to complete required study steps. These data highlight how moving participants through the study more efficiently can improve enrollment and retention and inform other pragmatic trials. Methods: WISDOM participants have the option to either choose their study arm or be randomized into one as part of the preference tolerant randomized trial design. Participants then complete breast health questionnaires and genetic testing (if in the risk-based arm). This information is analyzed by the WISDOM breast cancer risk assessment algorithm, the result of which is then communicated to the participant through a screening assignment letter (SAL). Specific data elements, such as breast density found participants’ mammogram reports and genetic testing results are required for study randomization process and risk assessment calculations, respectively. The WISDOM randomization algorithm is stratified by several factors, including breast cancer risk estimated using the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) model, which uses mammographic density as a key input variable. The study team changed the workflow to allow participants to proceed to randomization without specific information by imputing both density and risk. Additionally, a parallel workflow improvement process was implemented to obtain mammogram reports while genetic testing was being completed. Results: Before the weighted BCSC and imputed density algorithms were introduced, it took an average of 47 days to randomize participants after completion of the baseline enrollment questionnaires. Now, participants are randomized immediately which has reduced delays by 100%. Prior to implementing the parallel workflow for genetic testing and mammogram ascertainment, genetic testing kits were sent only after mammogram reports were collected and validated. The expected turnaround time for genetic testing results was 30-60 days and on average, results were returned to participants in 42 days. Streamlining the study design to obtain mammogram reports while participants complete their genetic testing has shortened the time for participants to receive their screening assignment letters (SALs) from an average of 160 days to 78 days, a reduction by 49%. In comparison, participants in the annual arm of the study who do not complete genetic testing, receive their SALs after an average of 38 days from enrollment. This is due to long wait times to obtain mammographic densities from outside medical facilities. Conclusions: Creating parallel data ascertainment workflows and reducing sequential steps in the study process has increased completion of individual enrollment activities. Participants now are randomized immediately upon joining the study and have access to their SALs and genetic results more rapidly. This approach eliminated randomization wait times and improved efficiency of the early in the enrollment process. We are evaluating the impact on participant retention going forward. Workflow efficiency is critical to improve the patient experience, and our learnings can inform future trial design, particularly for studies requiring data from outside sources.
Citation Format: Tomiyuri Lewis, Stephanie Flores, Leah Sabacan, Patricia Choy, Halle Thannickal, Yiwey Shieh, Jeffrey Tice, Elad Ziv, Lisa Madlensky, Martin Eklund, Christina Yau, Amie Blanco, Barry Tong, Deborah Goodman, Nancy Anderson, Heather Harvey, Steele Fors, Hannah L Park, Samrrah Raouf, Skye Stewart, Janet Wernisch, Barbara Koenig, Celia Kaplan, Robert Hiatt, Neil Wenger, Vivian Lee, Diane Heditsian, Susie Brain, Dolores Moorehead, Barbara A Parker, Alexander Borowsky, Hoda Anton-Culver, Arash Naeim, Andrea Kaster, Laura van ‘t Veer, Andrea Z LaCroix, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Deepa Sheth, Agustin Garcia, Rachel Lancaster, Michael Plaza, Wisdom Study, Athena Breast Health Network Investigators, Advocate Partners, Allison S Fiscalini, Laura Esserman. The WISDOM study: Reducing sequential steps and implementing parallel workflows in pragmatic trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-19-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomiyuri Lewis
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Leah Sabacan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Patricia Choy
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Yiwey Shieh
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jeffrey Tice
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Elad Ziv
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Christina Yau
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Amie Blanco
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Barry Tong
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | - Steele Fors
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Barbara Koenig
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Celia Kaplan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Robert Hiatt
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Neil Wenger
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Vivian Lee
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Susie Brain
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Arash Naeim
- University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura Esserman
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Choy P, Lewis T, Flores S, Sabacan L, Thannickal H, Goodman S, Shieh Y, Madlensky L, Tice JA, Ziv E, Eklund M, Blanco A, Tong B, Goodman D, Anderson N, Harvey H, Fors S, Park HL, Petruse A, Stewart S, Raouf S, Wernisch J, Koenig B, Kaplan C, Hiatt R, Wenger N, Lee V, Heditsian D, Brain S, Moorehead D, Parker BA, Borowsky A, Anton-Culver H, Naeim A, Kaster A, van 't Veer L, LaCroix AZ, Olopade OI, Sheth D, Garcia A, Lancaster R, James J, Joseph G, Study W, Fiscallini AS, Esserman L. Abstract P5-19-01: The impact of streamlined processes and patient-directed messaging to improve enrollment in a remote, pragmatic clinical trial. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-p5-19-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background Recent advances in technology have made it possible to conduct remote clinical trials that allow individuals to participate from home with comfort, privacy, and ease. Despite these advances, challenges persist in running remote trials, such as survey question redundancies, lack of patient-initiated data-sharing tools, and unclear patient communication around critical enrollment steps. The Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures of risk (WISDOM) Study is a pragmatic, preference-tolerant randomized control breast cancer screening trial comparing personalized risk-based screening to traditional, annual screening. The study population includes women ages 40-74 without a history of breast cancer or DCIS. Since 2016, study enrollment has been available to all women in the U.S. who meet study eligibility criteria. Since October 2020, WISDOM has implemented multiple strategies to improve participant experience: participant-initiated data-sharing tools and clear participant messaging. This abstract presents the efficacy of these interventions as they relate to increasing patient enrollment in remote, pragmatic clinical trials. Methods The WISDOM Study online enrollment process includes registration, participant study arm selection or randomization, online consent, and enrollment (submission of multiple study surveys over a secure, online platform). Barriers to online enrollment were uncovered through an internally-conducted needs assessment of participants who enrolled between 2019-2020, and participant feedback obtained through phone interviews conducted by WISDOM’s embedded ethics study. Improvements to our online enrollment procedures were executed in October 2020 and included: improving the clarity of study arm selection options, streamlining data collection surveys, and enacting a secure, patient-initiated online data-sharing tool and an online portal feature with auto-launch of critical information. Study metrics were obtained through Google Analytics and Salesforce. Results Prior to the end of 2020, only 62% of the 30,046 participants who registered for the WISDOM Study completed study enrollment. After improving the enrollment process, of the 5,334 participants registered for the study between Jan-June 2021, 69% completed the enrollment process finishing both the online consent and survey forms. Conversion from consent to enrollment went from 78% in January 2020 to 93% in June 2021. Currently, 56% participants complete enrollment in one day. Streamlining online patient questionnaires led to an increase in completion rates, with 75% of participants completing their yearly surveys, compared to 59% prior to April 2021. A secure patient upload feature for data sharing led to 1,054 participants successfully sharing their mammogram reports with WISDOM between March - June 2021. Previously, mammogram reports were missing for 20% of enrolled participants. This feature has enabled WISDOM to process 300 additional mammogram reports per month. Integration of an auto-launch feature in the participant’s portal in Feb 2021 has led to a 17% increase in participants viewing their screening recommendations in Yr 1. Prior to auto-launch, only 59% (n=6328) of Yr 1 screening recommendations and 61% (n=3681) of genetic testing reports were viewed by participants. Since implementation, the numbers increased to 78% (n=8406) and 85% (n=5160), respectively. Conclusions. Streamlining data to the most essential elements, and minimizing the steps required to share clinical documents, complete questionnaires and open key study notification is essential to improving enrollment rates in virtual, pragmatic trials. Patient-initiated data-sharing tools such as the ability for participants to share documents through secure, online portals is one example of success.
Citation Format: Patricia Choy, Tomiyuri Lewis, Stephanie Flores, Leah Sabacan, Halle Thannickal, Steffanie Goodman, Yiwey Shieh, Lisa Madlensky, Jeffrey A. Tice, Elad Ziv, Martin Eklund, Amie Blanco, Barry Tong, Deborah Goodman, Nancy Anderson, Heather Harvey, Steele Fors, Hannah Lui Park, Antonia Petruse, Skye Stewart, Samrrah Raouf, Janet Wernisch, Barbara Koenig, Celia Kaplan, Robert Hiatt, Neil Wenger, Vivian Lee, Diane Heditsian, Susie Brain, Dolores Moorehead, Barbara A Parker, Alexander Borowsky, Hoda Anton-Culver, Arash Naeim, Andrea Kaster, Laura van 't Veer, Andrea Z LaCroix, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Deepa Sheth, Agustin Garcia, Rachel Lancaster, Jennifer James, Galen Joseph, Wisdom Study, Athena Breast Health Network Investigators and Advocates, Allison Stover Fiscallini, Laura Esserman. The impact of streamlined processes and patient-directed messaging to improve enrollment in a remote, pragmatic clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-19-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Elad Ziv
- UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Esserman L, Eklund M, Veer LV, Shieh Y, Tice J, Ziv E, Blanco A, Kaplan C, Hiatt R, Fiscalini AS, Yau C, Scheuner M, Naeim A, Wenger N, Lee V, Heditsian D, Brain S, Parker BA, LaCroix AZ, Madlensky L, Hogarth M, Borowsky A, Anton-Culver H, Kaster A, Olopade OI, Sheth D, Garcia A, Lancaster R, Plaza M. The WISDOM study: a new approach to screening can and should be tested. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 189:593-598. [PMID: 34529196 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06346-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Esserman
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| | | | | | - Yiwey Shieh
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Jeffrey Tice
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Elad Ziv
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Amie Blanco
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Celia Kaplan
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | - Robert Hiatt
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | | | - Christina Yau
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | | | - Arash Naeim
- University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Neil Wenger
- University of California, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Vivian Lee
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | | | - Susie Brain
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Deepa Sheth
- University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Marinello FG, Jiménez LM, Talavera E, Fraccalvieri D, Alberti P, Ostiz F, Frago R, Blanco A, Pellino G, Espín-Basany E. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in patients with severe low anterior resection syndrome: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2021; 108:380-387. [PMID: 33793754 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 10/31/2020] [Accepted: 12/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is challenging. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) can improve select bowel disorders. An RCT was conducted to assess the efficacy of PTNS compared with sham stimulation in patients with severe LARS. METHOD This was a multicentre, double-blind RCT. Patients with major LARS score were allocated to receive PTNS or sham therapy (needle placement simulation without nerve stimulation). The study included 16 sessions of 30 min once a week for 12 consecutive weeks, followed by four additional sessions once a fortnight for the following 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was efficacy of PTNS defined by the LARS score 12 months after treatment. Secondary endpoints included faecal incontinence, quality of life (QoL), and sexual function. RESULTS Between September 2016 and July 2018, 46 eligible patients were assigned randomly in a 1 : 1 ratio to PTNS or sham therapy. Baseline characteristics were similar. LARS scores were reduced in both groups, but only patients who received PTNS maintained the effect in the long term (mean(s.d.) score 36.4(3.9) at baseline versus 30.7(11.5) at 12 months; P = 0.018; effect size -5.4, 95 per cent c.i. -9.8 to -1.0), with a mean reduction of 15.7 per cent at 12-month follow-up. The faecal incontinence score was improved after 12 months in the PTNS group (mean(s.d.) score 15.4(5.2) at baseline versus 12.5(6.4) at 12 months; P = 0.018). No major changes in QoL and sexual function were observed in either group. There was no therapy-associated morbidity. Three patients discontinued the study, but none owing to study-related issues. CONCLUSION PTNS has positive effects in some patients with major LARS, especially in those with faecal incontinence. Registration number: NCT02517853 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F G Marinello
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - L M Jiménez
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Talavera
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Fraccalvieri
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Alberti
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Ostiz
- Rehabilitation Unit, CAP Sant Andreu, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Frago
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Blanco
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Pellino
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Espín-Basany
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Vall d'Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Herrero-Morant A, Martín-Varillas JL, Castañeda S, González-Mazón I, Maiz O, Blanco A, Sánchez J, Ortego N, Raya E, Olive A, Brandy-Garcia A, Prior-Español Á, Moriano C, Diez Alvarez E, Melero R, Graña J, Seijas-López Á, Urruticoechea-Arana A, Ramos Calvo A, Delgado Beltrán C, Loredo Martínez M, Salgado-Pérez E, Sivera F, Torre-Salaberri I, Narváez J, Andréu Sánchez JL, Martínez González O, Gómez de la Torre R, Fernández S, Romero-Yuste S, Espinosa G, González-Gay MÁ, Blanco R. POS1371 BIOLOGICAL THERAPY IN REFRACTORY NEUROBEHÇET’S DISEASE. MULTICENTER STUDY OF 42 PATIENTS. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.3407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background:Neuro-Behçet’s disease (NBD) is a severe complication of Behcet’s disease (BD). Despite well-established therapies with glucocorticoids and conventional immunosuppressants (cIS), a significant proportion of patients are refractory.Objectives:To assess efficacy and safety of biologic therapy (BT) in NBD refractory to glucocorticoids and at least one cIS.Methods:Open-label multicenter study of refractory NBD from 23 different referral Spanish Hospitals. Main outcome was neurological response. Secondarily, analytical efficacy was measured by Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and Hemoglobin (Hb) at baseline, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.Results:We studied 42 patients (21 women/ 21 men; mean age 40.4±10.8 years). HLA B51 was positive in 15 out of 37 (40.5%) patients tested. Non-neurological manifestations were oral ulcers (n=41, 97.6%), genital ulcers (n=31, 73.8%), skin lesions (n=28, 66.7%), arthralgia (n=27, 64.3%), uveitis (n=21, 50.0%), arthritis (n=9, 21.4%), venous thrombosis (n=9, 21.4%) and arterial thrombosis (n=4, 9.5%). The underlying neurologic manifestation were parenchymal (n=34, 81.0 %) and non-parenchymal (n=17, 40.5%) involvement (Table 1). The first BT used was infliximab (n=20), adalimumab (n=13), golimumab (n=3), tocilizumab (n=3) and etanercept (n=2).After 58.2±51.4 months since initiation of BT, neurological response was complete (n=27; 64.3%), or partial (n=11, 26.1%) (Figure 1). Only 4 (9.5%) patients did not respond. After 6 months of BT, ESR improved from.31.5±25.6 to 15.3±11.9 mm/h (p=0.005), CRP from 1.4 [0.2-12.8] to 0.3[0.1-3] mg/dL (p= 0.002) and Hb from 13.1±1.6 to 13.8±1.3 g/dL (p=0.005).Figure 1.Neurological clinical response to biological therapy.Primary failure was observed in 16 (38.1%) patients due to inefficacy (n=11, 68.8%) or adverse effects (n=5, 31.3%). Similarly, causes of secondary failure (n=6, 14.3%) were inefficacy (n=5, 83.3%) and adverse effects (n=1, 16.7%). No serious adverse effects were observed.Conclusion:BT, especially monoclonal anti-TNF drugs, seems to be effective and safe in refractory NBD.Table 1.Neurologic manifestation of 42 patients with refractory neurobehçet's disease treated with biologic therapy.Parenchymal subtype, n (%)34 (81.0)-Hemiparesis8 (19.1)-Polineuropathy8 (19.1)-Encephalopathy6 (14.3)-Cognitive impairments4 (9.5)-Optic neuropathy4 (9.5)-Ophtalmoparesis4 (9.5)-Other cranial nerve involvement3 (7.1)-Hemihypoesthesia3 (7.1)-Cerebellar dysphasia1 (2.4)-Cerebellar involvement1 (2.4)-Non-steroidal psicosis1 (2.4)Non-parenchymal subtype, n (%)17 (40.5)-Aseptic meningitis12(28.6)-Thrombosis4 (9.5)-Intracranial hypertension1 (2.4)Disclosure of Interests:Alba Herrero-Morant: None declared, José Luis Martín-Varillas Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Lilly, Janssen, and Celgene, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Iñigo González-Mazón: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Ana Blanco Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Julio Sánchez: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Enrique Raya Speakers bureau: MSD, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Alejandro Olive: None declared, Anahy Brandy-Garcia: None declared, Águeda Prior-Español: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Elvira Diez Alvarez: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Jenaro Graña: None declared, Álvaro Seijas-López: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, Angel Ramos Calvo: None declared, Concepción Delgado Beltrán: None declared, Marta Loredo Martínez: None declared, Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Ignacio Torre-Salaberri: None declared, J. Narváez Speakers bureau: Bristol-Myers Squibb, José Luis Andréu Sánchez: None declared, Olga Martínez González: None declared, Ricardo Gómez de la Torre: None declared, Sabela Fernández: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Gerard Espinosa: None declared, Miguel Á. González-Gay Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Sanofi, Lilly and MSD, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche
Collapse
|
16
|
Vegas-Revenga N, Martín-Varillas JL, Calvo-Río V, González-Mazón I, Sanchez-Bilbao L, Beltrán E, Fonollosa A, Maiz-Alonso O, Blanco A, Cordero-Coma M, Ortego N, Torre-Salaberri I, Francisco F, Muñoz Fernandez S, Esteban-Ortega MDM, Díaz-Llopis M, Cañal J, Ventosa JA, Demetrio-Pablo R, Domínguez L, Agudo-Bilbao M, Castañeda S, Ferraz-Amaro I, González-Gay MA, Blanco R. AB0771 HIGH DOSE INTRAVENOUS METHYLPREDNISOLONE INDUCES RAPID IMPROVEMENT OF VISUAL ACUITY IN NON-INFECTIOUS UVEITIS OF DIFFERENT IMMUNE MEDIATED INFLAMMATORY DISEASES. Ann Rheum Dis 2021. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.2159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background:Rapid and effective remission-inducing therapy is mandatory in uveitis to avoid irreversible structural and functional damage. In some severe cases biological agents might be required (1-6).High-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) may achieve prompt control of inflammation in most immune mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), including non-infectious uveitis (NIU).Objectives:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVMP pulse therapy in NIU of different IMID.Methods:Multicentre study of 71 patients with severe uveitis who received IVMP. The underlying diseases were: Vogt Koyanagy Harada disease (VKHD) (n=24), Behçet disease (BD) (19), Sarcoidosis (5) and idiopathic NIU (23). The main outcome variable was Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) estimated using the Snellen chart. BCVA that was assessed at 0 (basal), 2-5, 7, 15 and 30 days after IVMP.The results are expressed as mean ±SD in normally distributed variables, or as median [IQR] when are not. Comparison of continuous variables was performed using the Wilcoxon test.Results:We studied 46♀/ 25♂ patients. The main features are shown in Table 1. IVMP dose ranged from 250 to 1000 mg/day administered for 3-5 consecutive days, the dose was established according to the presence or not of other systemic manifestations apart from uveitis. All of them had active intraocular inflammation at the moment of the study. BCVA values improved considerably after 1 month (Figure 1). No major side effects were observed.Figure 1.Improvement of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA).Conclusion:High-dose IVMP pulse therapy is useful and safe for a prompt control of BCVA regardless of the underlying IMID.References:[1]Vegas-Revenga N, et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019; 200:85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.12.019[2]Calvo-Río V, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(4 Suppl 84): S54-7. PMID: 25005576[3]Santos-Gómez M, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016;34(6 Suppl 102): S34-S40. PMID:27054359[4]Atienza-Mateo B, et al. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018;57(5):856-864. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex480.[5]Atienza-Mateo B, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71(12):2081-2089. doi: 10.1002/art.41026.[6]Martín-Varillas JL, et al. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(9):1444-1451. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.02.020Table 1.Main features of 71 patients with NIU. Data are of affected eyes.VKHD(n=24)Idiophatic(n=23)Behcet’s disease (n=19)Sarcoidosis(n=5)Overall(n=71)Men/Women, n5/199/149/102/371Mean age (years) ±SD42 ±1147 ± 1533±1042 ± 22-Unilateral/Bilateral NIU, n (%)2 (8.3)/22(91.7)10 (43.5)/13(56.5)4 (21)/15 (79)3(60)/2(40)19/52NIU patterns, n (%) Posterior uveitis6 (25)9 (39.1)3 (15.8)1 (20)19 Panuveitis18 (75)14 (60.9)16 (84.2)4 (80)52Laboratory data, n (%) ANA2 (8.34)2 (8.7)0 (0)1 (20)5 HLA B270 (0)4 (17.4)0 (0)0 (0)4 HLA B290 (0)1 (4.3)0 (0)0 (0)1 HLA B510 (0)5 (21.7)8 (42)3 (60)16 Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE)1 (4.17)2 (8.7)0 (0)1 (20)4Disclosure of Interests:None declared
Collapse
|
17
|
Fierro A, Pérez-Rojí G, Blanco A, López P, Andrés M, González-Quintanilla V, Pérez-Pereda S, Fontanillas N, Pascual J. Headache as main reason for consultation to a hospital Emergency Department in Spain: a prospective study. Neurologia 2021; 38:S0213-4853(21)00089-X. [PMID: 34083062 DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2021.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Headache is common in the general population and a frequent reason for medical consultation. OBJECTIVES To describe the characteristics of patients attending the Emergency Department (ED) for headache. METHODS A descriptive study with prospective collection of 100 consecutive patients over 15 years old who attended our ED due to headache as the main complaint. RESULTS Headache accounted for 1,4% of ED visits. The most common age range is between 31 and 45 years and the majority of the patients are females (61%). We diagnosed 67 primary and 33 secondary headaches. The most frequent diagnosis was migraine, with 36% of cases. One out of 3 patients had a history of headache and 4 out of 5 consulted by their own decision. Only a small percentage of patients were admitted as inpatients (12%), and 3 out of 5 were referred to Primary Care. Complementary tests were performed on 84% of the patients. One CT scan was performed for every 3 patients. A total of 80% patients was correctly diagnosed by the ED physicians. CONCLUSIONS Headache is a frequent complaint in the ED, where primary headaches are the most common with migraine being the most frequent reason for consultation. In our setting, there is a good screening and diagnosis of headaches, as well as an adequate use of the available resources in the ED for their diagnosis and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fierro
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla e IDIVAL y Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, España
| | - G Pérez-Rojí
- Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, España
| | - A Blanco
- Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, España
| | - P López
- Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, España
| | - M Andrés
- Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, España
| | - V González-Quintanilla
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla e IDIVAL y Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, España
| | - S Pérez-Pereda
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla e IDIVAL y Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, España
| | | | - J Pascual
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla e IDIVAL y Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, España.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Whitworth GL, Jaramillo-Fernandez J, Pariente JA, Garcia PD, Blanco A, Lopez C, Sotomayor-Torres CM. Simulations of micro-sphere/shell 2D silica photonic crystals for radiative cooling. Opt Express 2021; 29:16857-16866. [PMID: 34154238 DOI: 10.1364/oe.420989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Passive daytime radiative cooling has recently become an attractive approach to address the global energy demand associated with modern refrigeration technologies. One technique to increase the radiative cooling performance is to engineer the surface of a polar dielectric material to enhance its emittance at wavelengths in the atmospheric infrared transparency window (8-13 µm) by outcoupling surface-phonon polaritons (SPhPs) into free-space. Here we present a theoretical investigation of new surface morphologies based upon self-assembled silica photonic crystals (PCs) using an in-house built rigorous coupled-wave analysis (RCWA) code. Simulations predict that silica micro-sphere PCs can reach up to 73 K below ambient temperature, when solar absorption and conductive/convective losses can be neglected. Micro-shell structures are studied to explore the direct outcoupling of the SPhP, resulting in near-unity emittance between 8 and 10 µm. Additionally, the effect of material composition is explored by simulating soda-lime glass micro-shells, which, in turn, exhibit a temperature reduction of 61 K below ambient temperature. The RCWA code was compared to FTIR measurements of silica micro-spheres, self-assembled on microscope slides.
Collapse
|
19
|
Walker EJ, Blanco A, Carnevale JC, Cinar P, Collisson EA, Tempero MA, Ko AH. The marginal diagnostic benefit of pancreatic cancer molecular profiling after germline testing. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.10513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
10513 Background: Germline genetic testing is now universally recommended for patients (pts) with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) for purposes of both familial screening and therapeutic guidance. Treatment selection can be further informed by tumor molecular profiling (TMP) to identify targetable somatic alterations in pts with advanced disease, but this is inconsistently applied. Determination of the rate of actionable findings identified with TMP after germline testing, which we term marginal diagnostic benefit, may inform practice patterns and workflow in this patient population. Methods: This retrospective analysis included all pts with PDAC who underwent germline testing and TMP at UCSF over a 4-yr period. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, disease-specific data, and germline testing/TMP clinical reports. Alterations classified as ‘pathogenic’ or ‘likely pathogenic’ were included, and were deemed ‘actionable’ if there was clinical or preclinical evidence of benefit from targeted therapy in any cancer, as previously described. Results: From 1/2016-1/2020, 144/738 (20%) UCSF pts with PDAC completed both germline testing and TMP. Germline testing identified actionable pathogenic alterations in 10 (7%). TMP confirmed 8/10 of these alterations and identified 3 additional therapeutic targets. Among the 134 pts without actionable germline findings, TMP identified 45 new therapeutic targets in 41 (31%) pts, increasing the overall rate of actionable findings from 7% to 35%. Most (35/58, 60%) actionable alterations involved genes associated with the Homologous Recombination DNA Damage Repair (HR-DDR) pathway (Table). 80% of pts with HR-DDR pathway alterations (9/10 germline, 19/25 somatic) received platinum-based chemotherapy. Four pts were treated with targeted therapy based on test results: PARP-inhibitor (n = 2, germline BRCA1 and PALB2 mutations), PARP-inhibitor + ATR inhibitor (n = 1, somatic ARID1A mutation) and mTOR inhibitor (n = 1, somatic STK11 deletion). Conclusions: In this analysis, PDAC TMP after germline testing increased the detection of actionable alterations (the marginal diagnostic benefit) by five-fold. As more somatic tumor alterations become actionable with the development of targeted therapeutics, TMP is a necessary complement to germline testing to fully inform personalized treatment decisions for all pts with PDAC.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amie Blanco
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Pelin Cinar
- University of California San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Eric Andrew Collisson
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Margaret A. Tempero
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Andrew H. Ko
- University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pitzonka L, Cutler M, Bu Y, Blanco A, Fumero E, Torra A, Smolinski M. 465 Tirbanibulin, a novel anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic agent for the treatment of actinic keratosis. J Invest Dermatol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.02.489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
21
|
Blanco A, Larrinaga AR, Neto JM, Troncoso J, Méndez G, Domínguez-Lapido P, Ovejero A, Pereira L, Mouga TM, Gaspar R, Martínez B, Lemos MFL, Olabarria C. Spotting intruders: Species distribution models for managing invasive intertidal macroalgae. J Environ Manage 2021; 281:111861. [PMID: 33422911 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Revised: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Invasive macroalgae represent one of the major threats to marine biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and structure, as well as being important drivers of ecosystem services depletion. Many such species have become well established along the west coast of the Iberian Peninsula. However, the lack of information about the distribution of the invaders and the factors determining their occurrence make bioinvasions a difficult issue to manage. Such information is key to enabling the design and implementation of effective management plans. The present study aimed to map the current probability of presence of six invasive macroalgae: Grateloupia turuturu, Asparagopsis armata, Colpomenia peregrina, Sargassum muticum, Undaria pinnatifida, and Codium fragile ssp. fragile. For this purpose, an extensive field survey was carried out along the coast of the north-western Iberian Peninsula. Species distribution models (SDMs) were then used to map the presence probability of these invasive species throughout the study region on the basis of environmental and anthropogenic predictor variables. The southern Galician rias were identified as the main hotspots of macroalgal invasion, with a high probability of occurrence for most of the species considered. Conversely, the probability of presence on the Portuguese coast was generally low. Physico-chemical variables were the most important factors for predicting the distribution of invasive macroalgae contributing between 57.27 and 85.24% to the ensemble models. However, anthropogenic factors (including size of vessels, number of shipping lines, distance from ports, population density, etc.) considerably improved the estimates of the probability of occurrence for most of the target species. This study is one of the few to include anthropogenic factors in SDMs for invasive macroalgae. The findings suggest that management actions aimed at controlling these species should strengthen control and surveillance at ports, particularly in southern Galician rias. Early detection should be of main concern for risk assessment plans on the Portuguese coast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Blanco
- Centro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, EcoCost, Facultade de Ciencias do Mar, Edificio CC Experimentais, Campus de Vigo, As Lagoas, Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain; Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Universidade de Vigo, Campus As Lagoas-Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain.
| | - A R Larrinaga
- eNeBaDa, Calle Ponte do Sar, 43C-1F, 15702 Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain; Grupo de Estudo do Medio Mariño (GEMM), Porto deportivo s/n, Santa Uxía de Riveira, A Coruña, Spain
| | - J M Neto
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ESTM, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Peniche, Portugal; Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre (MARE), Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - J Troncoso
- Centro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, EcoCost, Facultade de Ciencias do Mar, Edificio CC Experimentais, Campus de Vigo, As Lagoas, Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain; Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Universidade de Vigo, Campus As Lagoas-Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain
| | - G Méndez
- Departamento de Geociencias Mariñas e Ordenación do Territorio, Universidade de Vigo, Campus As Lagoas-Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain
| | - P Domínguez-Lapido
- eNeBaDa, Calle Ponte do Sar, 43C-1F, 15702 Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain; Grupo de Estudo do Medio Mariño (GEMM), Porto deportivo s/n, Santa Uxía de Riveira, A Coruña, Spain
| | - A Ovejero
- Departamento de Geociencias Mariñas e Ordenación do Territorio, Universidade de Vigo, Campus As Lagoas-Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain
| | - L Pereira
- Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre (MARE), Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - T M Mouga
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ESTM, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Peniche, Portugal
| | - R Gaspar
- Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre (MARE), Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, 3000-456 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - B Martínez
- Biology and Geology Department, Rey Juan Carlos University, Tulipán sn, 28933 Móstoles, Spain
| | - M F L Lemos
- MARE - Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ESTM, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Peniche, Portugal
| | - C Olabarria
- Centro de Investigación Mariña, Universidade de Vigo, EcoCost, Facultade de Ciencias do Mar, Edificio CC Experimentais, Campus de Vigo, As Lagoas, Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain; Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Universidade de Vigo, Campus As Lagoas-Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tong B, Borno H, Alagala F, Gordon K, Small EJ, Lin AM, Blanco A, Dhawan MS. Streamlining the genetics pipeline to increase testing for patients at risk for hereditary prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.6_suppl.66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
66 Background: At UCSF, ~850 men with metastatic prostate cancer are seen annually, all of whom should receive germline genetic testing. Prior to our study, the GU medical oncology program offered a self-pay, take-home genetic testing kit (30-gene panel) to patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Patients with positive test results were referred for genetic counseling. For this study, the UCSF Cancer Genetics and Prevention program partnered with the GU medical oncology program, adapting a Genetic Testing Station (GTS) to expand access and accommodate testing needs. At Prostate GTS, a genetic counselor assistant (GCA) facilitates cancer genetics education by video, enrolls patient in a research registry, collects a family history and saliva sample sent for an 87-gene panel. Our study evaluates the effectiveness of the GTS by comparing prospective performance metrics and testing outcomes of Prostate GTS with retrospective data obtained from the take-home method (“Before GTS”). Methods: Men were ascertained by their treating oncologist and referred for GTS. Indications for genetic testing include: all metastatic prostate cancer, or under age 50 at diagnosis, or with family history, or at clinician discretion. GTS metrics were prospectively collected by clinical staff. “Before GTS” metrics were retrospectively collected through data reporting from commercial lab analysis (test orders dated 01/2017 to 09/2019) and patient chart review. Results: In the first 6 months of Prostate GTS (10/2019-3/2020), 139 patients received testing at the GTS and 91% (127) had received results at censoring. GTS results were distributed as follows: 10% (13) positives, 33% (42) negative no VUS, and 57% (72) negative w/VUS. In the 33 months, “Before GTS”, 218 genetic testing orders had been placed, with 78% (196) reported at censoring, distributed as 11% (22) positive, 68% (134) negative no VUS, and 20% (40) negative w/VUS. The rate of incomplete tests decreased significantly with the GTS, (22% down to 9%, p = 0.0008). "Before GTS", of patients with a positive result, 15/22 (68%) were referred for genetic counseling, of which 8 completed a visit (36% of all positives). In the GTS model, all patients with positive results were seen by a genetic counselor for results disclosure and counseling. Comparing result rates across similar timeframes, 127 results were reported from GTS compared to 40 results from “Before GTS” in the same calendar months the year prior, representing a 218% increase in returned results. Median turnaround time decreased from 16 days to 9 days with GTS. Conclusions: GTS efficiently increased access to genetic testing and counseling for patients with prostate cancer. By leveraging GCAs and video education, this model involves cancer genetics at each step of the process, decreases turnaround time, and increases rates of returned results that can be used by patients to inform treatment and prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hala Borno
- University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Eric Jay Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Amy M. Lin
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Amie Blanco
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mallika Sachdev Dhawan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Acerbi I, Fiscalini AS, Che M, Shieh Y, Madlensky L, Tice J, Ziv E, Eklund M, Blanco A, Tong B, Goodman D, Nassereddine L, Anderson N, Harvey H, Fors S, Park HL, Petruse A, Stewart S, Wernisch J, Risty L, Hurley I, Koenig B, Kaplan C, Hiatt R, Wenger N, Lee V, Heditsian D, Brain S, Sabacan L, Wang T, Parker BA, Borowsky A, Anton-Culver H, Naeim A, Kaster A, Talley M, van 't Veer L, LaCroix AZ, Olopade OI, Sheth D, Garcia A, Lancaster R, Esserman L. Abstract OT-21-01: Personalized breast cancer screening in a population-based study: Women informed to screen depending on measures of risk (WISDOM). Cancer Res 2021. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs20-ot-21-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: WISDOM is a 100,000 healthy women preference-tolerant, pragmatic study comparing traditional annual screening to personalized risk-based breast screening. The novelty of WISDOM personalized screening is the integration of previously validated genetic and clinical risk factors (age, family history, breast biopsy results, ethnicity, mammographic density) into a single risk assessment model that directs the starting age, timing, and frequency of screening. The goal of WISDOM is to determine if personalized screening, compared to annual screening, is as safe, less morbid, enables prevention, and is more accepted by women. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02620852. Methods: Women aged 40-74 years with no history of breast cancer, DCIS or previous double mastectomy can join the study online at wisdomstudy.org. Participants can either elect randomization or self-select a study arm. Then, they provide electronic consent and sign the Release for Medical Information via DocuSign. For all participants, 5-year risk of developing breast cancer is calculated according to the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) model. Participants in the personalized arm undergo panel-based mutation testing (BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, PTEN, STK11, CDH1, ATM, PALB2, and CHEK2), and their 5-year risk is calculated using the BCSC score combined with a Polygenic Risk Score (BCSC-PRS) that includes 229 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) known to increase breast cancer risk. The SNPs and mutations are assessed by saliva-based testing through Color Genomics. Five-year risk level thresholds are used to stratify participants as low-, moderate- and high risk. Risk stratification determines age to start, stop, and frequency of screening in the personalized arm. Accrual: As of July 2020 the WISDOM Study is open to all eligible women in the United States. To date, 38,762 eligible women have registered, and 28,706 women have consented to participate in the trial. The median age is 56 years. Seventy-seven percent of participants are Caucasian, 2% African-American, 5% Asian, and 8% of self-reported Hispanic ethnicity. WISDOM is partnering with Blue Cross Blue Shield Association for regional plan opt-in coverage, self-insured companies (Salesforce, Genentech, Qualcomm, CalPERS) and Medi-Cal (Inland Empire Health Plan) using a coverage with evidence progression approach. Accrual expansion and diversity: To ensure that resulting data are meaningful and potentially practice-changing for all populations of women, the WISDOM Study is enhancing the diversity of our participant population by establishing WISDOM sites in diverse areas with large African-American (Alabama, Louisiana, Illinois) and Latina (Florida) populations. These new recruitment sites, intentionally selected for the diverse communities they serve, have established partnerships with community organizations and outreach navigators. Additionally, we have translated the WISDOM Study to Spanish to facilitate access by Latina communities. With the engagement of patient advocates and community partnerships, expanding diversity in the study population will strengthen our scientific knowledge of breast cancer risk and improve access to personalized breast cancer screening recommendations for all women. Enrollment will continue through 2022. Conclusions: Results of 5 years follow-up will enable us to demonstrate whether personalized screening improves outcomes for future patients and it improves healthcare value by reducing screen volumes and costs without jeopardizing outcomes.
Citation Format: Irene Acerbi, Allison Stover Fiscalini, Mandy Che, Yiwey Shieh, Lisa Madlensky, Jeffrey Tice, Elad Ziv, Martin Eklund, Amie Blanco, Barry Tong, Deborah Goodman, Lamees Nassereddine, Nancy Anderson, Heather Harvey, Steele Fors, Hannah L Park, Antonia Petruse, Skye Stewart, Janet Wernisch, Larissa Risty, Ian Hurley, Barbara Koenig, Celia Kaplan, Robert Hiatt, Neil Wenger, Vivian Lee, Diane Heditsian, Susie Brain, Leah Sabacan, Tianyi Wang, Barbara A Parker, Alexander Borowsky, Hoda Anton-Culver, Arash Naeim, Andrea Kaster, Melinda Talley, Laura van 't Veer, Andrea Z LaCroix, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Deepa Sheth, Augustin Garcia, Rachel Lancaster, Wisdom Study and Athena Breast Health Network Investigators and Advocate Partners, Laura Esserman. Personalized breast cancer screening in a population-based study: Women informed to screen depending on measures of risk (WISDOM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-21-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Acerbi
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Mandy Che
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Yiwey Shieh
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Jeffrey Tice
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Elad Ziv
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Amie Blanco
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Barry Tong
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Steele Fors
- 2University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Hannah L Park
- 7University of California, Irvine, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Barbara Koenig
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Celia Kaplan
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Robert Hiatt
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Neil Wenger
- 5University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Vivian Lee
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Susie Brain
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Leah Sabacan
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Tianyi Wang
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | - Arash Naeim
- 5University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura Esserman
- 1University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Blanco A, Rocha-de-Lossada C, Navarro P, Lerner SF, Perrone L, Soler Ferrández FL. "White-puncture": A simple technique to prevent tearing of the anterior capsule during capsulorhexis in intumescent white cataracts. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) 2021; 96:97-101. [PMID: 32873477 DOI: 10.1016/j.oftal.2020.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
In order to avoid radial tearing of the anterior capsule while performing continuous circular capsulorhexis (CCC) in a white intumescent cataract, called the "Argentinian flag sign" when CCC is associated with a previous capsular stain with trypan blue, an initial puncture of the anterior capsule is performed with a 30G needle as the first step of the surgical procedure, that means, prior to any previous aperture of the anterior chamber. This act seems to allow the pressure of the intracrystalline space and the pressure of the anterior chamber to be equalized, as the liquefied content of the intumescent white cataract is released into a presumably hermetic anterior chamber, avoiding the dreaded anterior capsular radial tear. This technique, called "white-puncture", has been used in 174 cases without any associated complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Blanco
- Departamento de Oftalmología, Hospital Oftalmológico Santa Ana, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - C Rocha-de-Lossada
- Departamento de Oftalmología, Hospital Costa del Sol , Marbella , España.
| | - P Navarro
- Departamento de Oftalmología, Instituto de Oftalmología de Bariloche, Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina
| | - S F Lerner
- Departamento de Oftalmología, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - L Perrone
- Departamento de Oftalmología, Centro de ojos Quilmes, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - F L Soler Ferrández
- Departamento de Oftalmología, Innova Ocular Clínica Dr. Soler, Elche, Alicante, España
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Adamczewski-Musch J, Arnold O, Behnke C, Belounnas A, Belyaev A, Berger-Chen JC, Blanco A, Blume C, Böhmer M, Bordalo P, Chernenko S, Chlad L, Ciepal I, Deveaux C, Dreyer J, Epple E, Fabbietti L, Fateev O, Filip P, Fonte P, Franco C, Friese J, Fröhlich I, Galatyuk T, Garzón JA, Gernhäuser R, Golosov O, Golubeva M, Greifenhagen R, Guber F, Gumberidze M, Harabasz S, Heinz T, Hennino T, Hlavac S, Höhne C, Holzmann R, Ierusalimov A, Ivashkin A, Kämpfer B, Karavicheva T, Kardan B, Koenig I, Koenig W, Kohls M, Kolb BW, Korcyl G, Kornakov G, Kornas F, Kotte R, Kugler A, Kunz T, Kurepin A, Kurilkin A, Kurilkin P, Ladygin V, Lalik R, Lapidus K, Lebedev A, Lopes L, Lorenz M, Mahmoud T, Maier L, Malige A, Mamaev M, Mangiarotti A, Markert J, Matulewicz T, Maurus S, Metag V, Michel J, Mihaylov DM, Morozov S, Müntz C, Münzer R, Naumann L, Nowakowski K, Parpottas Y, Pechenov V, Pechenova O, Petukhov O, Piasecki K, Pietraszko J, Przygoda W, Pysz K, Ramos S, Ramstein B, Rathod N, Reshetin A, Rodriguez-Ramos P, Rosier P, Rost A, Rustamov A, Sadovsky A, Salabura P, Scheib T, Schuldes H, Schwab E, Scozzi F, Seck F, Sellheim P, Selyuzhenkov I, Siebenson J, Silva L, Singh U, Smyrski J, Sobolev YG, Spataro S, Spies S, Ströbele H, Stroth J, Sturm C, Svoboda O, Szala M, Tlusty P, Traxler M, Tsertos H, Usenko E, Wagner V, Wendisch C, Wiebusch MG, Wirth J, Wójcik D, Zanevsky Y, Zumbruch P. Directed, Elliptic, and Higher Order Flow Harmonics of Protons, Deuterons, and Tritons in Au+Au Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=2.4 GeV. Phys Rev Lett 2020; 125:262301. [PMID: 33449792 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.262301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Flow coefficients v_{n} of the orders n=1-6 are measured with the High-Acceptance DiElectron Spectrometer (HADES) at GSI for protons, deuterons, and tritons as a function of centrality, transverse momentum, and rapidity in Au+Au collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=2.4 GeV. Combining the information from the flow coefficients of all orders allows us to construct for the first time, at collision energies of a few GeV, a multidifferential picture of the angular emission pattern of these particles. It reflects the complicated interplay between the effect of the central fireball pressure on the emission of particles and their subsequent interaction with spectator matter. The high precision information on higher order flow coefficients is a major step forward in constraining the equation of state of dense baryonic matter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Adamczewski-Musch
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - O Arnold
- Excellence Cluster "Origin and Structure of the Universe," 85748 Garching, Germany
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - C Behnke
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - A Belounnas
- Laboratoire de Physique des 2 infinis Irène Joliot-Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS-IN2P3, F-91405 Orsay, France
| | - A Belyaev
- Joint Institute of Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - J C Berger-Chen
- Excellence Cluster "Origin and Structure of the Universe," 85748 Garching, Germany
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - A Blanco
- LIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - C Blume
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - M Böhmer
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - P Bordalo
- LIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - S Chernenko
- Joint Institute of Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - L Chlad
- Nuclear Physics Institute, The Czech Academy of Sciences, 25068 Rez, Czech Republic
| | - I Ciepal
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31342 Kraków, Poland
| | - C Deveaux
- II.Physikalisches Institut, Justus Liebig Universität Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - J Dreyer
- Institut für Strahlenphysik, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01314 Dresden, Germany
| | - E Epple
- Excellence Cluster "Origin and Structure of the Universe," 85748 Garching, Germany
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - L Fabbietti
- Excellence Cluster "Origin and Structure of the Universe," 85748 Garching, Germany
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - O Fateev
- Joint Institute of Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - P Filip
- Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 84228 Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - P Fonte
- LIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - C Franco
- LIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - J Friese
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - I Fröhlich
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - T Galatyuk
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - J A Garzón
- LabCAF. F. Física, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - R Gernhäuser
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - O Golosov
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - M Golubeva
- Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Science, 117312 Moscow, Russia
| | - R Greifenhagen
- Institut für Strahlenphysik, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01314 Dresden, Germany
| | - F Guber
- Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Science, 117312 Moscow, Russia
| | - M Gumberidze
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - S Harabasz
- Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Cracow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - T Heinz
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - T Hennino
- Laboratoire de Physique des 2 infinis Irène Joliot-Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS-IN2P3, F-91405 Orsay, France
| | - S Hlavac
- Institute of Physics, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 84228 Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - C Höhne
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- II.Physikalisches Institut, Justus Liebig Universität Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - R Holzmann
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - A Ierusalimov
- Joint Institute of Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - A Ivashkin
- Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Science, 117312 Moscow, Russia
| | - B Kämpfer
- Institut für Strahlenphysik, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01314 Dresden, Germany
| | - T Karavicheva
- Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Science, 117312 Moscow, Russia
| | - B Kardan
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - I Koenig
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - W Koenig
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - M Kohls
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - B W Kolb
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - G Korcyl
- Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Cracow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
| | - G Kornakov
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - F Kornas
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - R Kotte
- Institut für Strahlenphysik, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01314 Dresden, Germany
| | - A Kugler
- Nuclear Physics Institute, The Czech Academy of Sciences, 25068 Rez, Czech Republic
| | - T Kunz
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - A Kurepin
- Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Science, 117312 Moscow, Russia
| | - A Kurilkin
- Joint Institute of Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - P Kurilkin
- Joint Institute of Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - V Ladygin
- Joint Institute of Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - R Lalik
- Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Cracow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
| | - K Lapidus
- Excellence Cluster "Origin and Structure of the Universe," 85748 Garching, Germany
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - A Lebedev
- Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 117218 Moscow, Russia
| | - L Lopes
- LIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - M Lorenz
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - T Mahmoud
- II.Physikalisches Institut, Justus Liebig Universität Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - L Maier
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - A Malige
- Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Cracow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
| | - M Mamaev
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - A Mangiarotti
- LIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - J Markert
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - T Matulewicz
- Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Fizyki, Instytut Fizyki Doświadczalnej, 02-093 Warszawa, Poland
| | - S Maurus
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - V Metag
- II.Physikalisches Institut, Justus Liebig Universität Giessen, 35392 Giessen, Germany
| | - J Michel
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - D M Mihaylov
- Excellence Cluster "Origin and Structure of the Universe," 85748 Garching, Germany
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - S Morozov
- Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Science, 117312 Moscow, Russia
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - C Müntz
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - R Münzer
- Excellence Cluster "Origin and Structure of the Universe," 85748 Garching, Germany
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - L Naumann
- Institut für Strahlenphysik, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01314 Dresden, Germany
| | - K Nowakowski
- Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Cracow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
| | - Y Parpottas
- Department of Physics, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - V Pechenov
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - O Pechenova
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - O Petukhov
- Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Science, 117312 Moscow, Russia
| | - K Piasecki
- Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Fizyki, Instytut Fizyki Doświadczalnej, 02-093 Warszawa, Poland
| | - J Pietraszko
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - W Przygoda
- Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Cracow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
| | - K Pysz
- Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31342 Kraków, Poland
| | - S Ramos
- LIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - B Ramstein
- Laboratoire de Physique des 2 infinis Irène Joliot-Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS-IN2P3, F-91405 Orsay, France
| | - N Rathod
- Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Cracow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
| | - A Reshetin
- Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Science, 117312 Moscow, Russia
| | - P Rodriguez-Ramos
- Nuclear Physics Institute, The Czech Academy of Sciences, 25068 Rez, Czech Republic
| | - P Rosier
- Laboratoire de Physique des 2 infinis Irène Joliot-Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS-IN2P3, F-91405 Orsay, France
| | - A Rost
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - A Rustamov
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - A Sadovsky
- Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Science, 117312 Moscow, Russia
| | - P Salabura
- Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Cracow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
| | - T Scheib
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - H Schuldes
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - E Schwab
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - F Scozzi
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
- Laboratoire de Physique des 2 infinis Irène Joliot-Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS-IN2P3, F-91405 Orsay, France
| | - F Seck
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - P Sellheim
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - I Selyuzhenkov
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - J Siebenson
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - L Silva
- LIP-Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas, 3004-516 Coimbra, Portugal
| | - U Singh
- Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Cracow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
| | - J Smyrski
- Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University of Cracow, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
| | - Yu G Sobolev
- Nuclear Physics Institute, The Czech Academy of Sciences, 25068 Rez, Czech Republic
| | - S Spataro
- Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Università di Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy
| | - S Spies
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - H Ströbele
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - J Stroth
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - C Sturm
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - O Svoboda
- Nuclear Physics Institute, The Czech Academy of Sciences, 25068 Rez, Czech Republic
| | - M Szala
- Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universität, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - P Tlusty
- Nuclear Physics Institute, The Czech Academy of Sciences, 25068 Rez, Czech Republic
| | - M Traxler
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - H Tsertos
- Department of Physics, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - E Usenko
- Institute for Nuclear Research, Russian Academy of Science, 117312 Moscow, Russia
| | - V Wagner
- Nuclear Physics Institute, The Czech Academy of Sciences, 25068 Rez, Czech Republic
| | - C Wendisch
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - M G Wiebusch
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - J Wirth
- Excellence Cluster "Origin and Structure of the Universe," 85748 Garching, Germany
- Physik Department E62, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - D Wójcik
- Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Fizyki, Instytut Fizyki Doświadczalnej, 02-093 Warszawa, Poland
| | - Y Zanevsky
- Joint Institute of Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - P Zumbruch
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lincoln SE, Nussbaum RL, Kurian AW, Nielsen SM, Das K, Michalski S, Yang S, Ngo N, Blanco A, Esplin ED. Yield and Utility of Germline Testing Following Tumor Sequencing in Patients With Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2019452. [PMID: 33026450 PMCID: PMC7542302 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Both germline genetic testing and tumor DNA sequencing are increasingly used in cancer care. The indications for testing and utility of these 2 tests differ, and guidelines recommend that germline analysis follow tumor sequencing in certain patients to determine whether particular variants are of somatic or germline origin. Broad clinical experience with such follow-up testing has not yet been thoroughly described. OBJECTIVE To examine the yield and utility of germline testing following tumor DNA sequencing in a large, diverse patient population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective cohort study examined germline testing through a laboratory supporting multiple academic and community clinics. Participants included 2023 patients with cancer who received germline testing and previously underwent tumor DNA sequencing. These patients received germline testing between January 5, 2015, and January 31, 2020, although most (81% of patients) received testing between January 2, 2018, and January 31, 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) was calculated by gene, cancer type, and age at diagnosis. Potential actionability of these findings was determined based on current management guidelines, precision therapy labels, and clinical trial eligibility criteria. Patient records were reviewed to determine whether germline follow-up testing would have been recommended by current guidelines. RESULTS Among 2023 eligible patients, 1085 were female (53.6%), and the median age at cancer diagnosis was 56 (range, 0-92) years. Pathogenic germline variants were detected in 617 patients (30.5%; 95% CI, 28.5%-32.6%) and were prevalent across patient ages (1-85 years) and cancer types, including cancers known to be strongly associated with germline variance (eg, breast, colorectal) as well as others (eg, renal, lung, and bladder). Many patients (78%-82%) with PGVs met criteria for germline follow-up testing, and 8.1% of PGVs were missed by tumor sequencing. Among those with germline-positive findings, 69 patients (11.2%) had PGVs identified only after presenting with a second primary cancer that possibly could have been detected earlier or prevented given current gene-specific surveillance and risk-reduction recommendations. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest that germline analysis following tumor sequencing often produces findings that may impact patient care by influencing systemic therapy choices, surgical decisions, additional cancer screening, and genetic counseling in families. Current guidelines and tumor testing approaches appear to capture many, but not all, of these germline findings, reinforcing the utility of both expanded germline follow-up testing as well as germline analysis independent of tumor sequencing in appropriate patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Shan Yang
- Invitae Corp, San Francisco, California
| | - Nhu Ngo
- Invitae Corp, San Francisco, California
| | - Amie Blanco
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Salabura P, Adamczewski-Musch J, Arnoldi-Meadows B, Belounnas A, Belyaev A, Blanco A, Blume C, Böhmer M, Borisenko S, Chlad L, Chudoba P, Ciepał I, Dittert D, Dreyer J, Esmail W, Dürr M, Fabbietti L, Fateev S, Fonte P, Friese J, Fröhlich I, Förtsch J, Galatyuk T, Gernhäuser R, Golosov O, Golubeva M, Greifenhagen R, Guber F, Gumberidze M, Harabasz S, Hensch R, Höhne C, Holzmann R, Huck H, Ierusalimov A, Ivashkin A, Kämpfer B, Kampert KH, Kardan B, Koenig I, Koenig W, Kornakov G, Kornas F, Kotte R, Kozela A, Kres I, Kuboś J, Kugler A, Kulesa P, Ladygin V, Lalik R, Lebedev A, Lebedev S, Linev S, Lopes L, Lorenz M, Lykasov G, Mahmoud T, Malige A, Markert J, Matulewicz T, Maurus S, Metag V, Michel J, Morozov S, Müntz C, Naumann L, Nowakowski K, Otto JH, Patel V, Pauly C, Pechenov V, Pechenova O, Petukhov O, Pfeifer D, Piasecki K, Pietraszko J, Prozorov A, Przygoda W, Pysz K, Ramstein B, Rathod N, Reshetin A, Ritman L, Rodriguez-Ramos P, Rost A, Salabura P, Scozzi F, Seck F, Selyuzhenkov I, Shabanov I, Singh US, Smyrski J, Spies S, Ströbele H, Stroth J, Stumm J, Svoboda O, Szala M, Tlusty P, Traxler M, Ungethüm C, Vazquez-Doce O, Wagner V, Weber A, Wendisch C, Wiebusch M, Wintz P, Wirth J, Zhilin A, Zumbruch P. Exploring time like tranistions in pp, πp and AA reactions with HADES. EPJ Web Conf 2020. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/202024101013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiative transition of an excited baryon to a nucleon with emission of a virtual massive photon converting to dielectron pair (Dalitz decays) provides important information about baryon-photon coupling at low q2 in timelike region. A prominent enhancement in the respective electromagnetic transition Form Factors (etFF) at q2 near vector mesons ρ/ω poles has been predicted by various calculations reflecting strong baryon-vector meson couplings. The understanding of these couplings is also of primary importance for the interpretation of the emissivity of QCD matter studied in heavy ion collisions via dilepton emission. Dedicated measurements of baryon Dalitz decays in proton-proton and pion-proton scattering with HADES detector at GSI/FAIR are presented and discussed. The relevance of these studies for the interpretation of results obtained from heavy ion reactions is elucidated on the example of the HADES results.
Collapse
|
28
|
Aab A, Abreu P, Aglietta M, Albury JM, Allekotte I, Almela A, Alvarez Castillo J, Alvarez-Muñiz J, Alves Batista R, Anastasi GA, Anchordoqui L, Andrada B, Andringa S, Aramo C, Araújo Ferreira PR, Asorey H, Assis P, Avila G, Badescu AM, Bakalova A, Balaceanu A, Barbato F, Barreira Luz RJ, Becker KH, Bellido JA, Berat C, Bertaina ME, Bertou X, Biermann PL, Bister T, Biteau J, Blanco A, Blazek J, Bleve C, Boháčová M, Boncioli D, Bonifazi C, Bonneau Arbeletche L, Borodai N, Botti AM, Brack J, Bretz T, Briechle FL, Buchholz P, Bueno A, Buitink S, Buscemi M, Caballero-Mora KS, Caccianiga L, Calcagni L, Cancio A, Canfora F, Caracas I, Carceller JM, Caruso R, Castellina A, Catalani F, Cataldi G, Cazon L, Cerda M, Chinellato JA, Choi K, Chudoba J, Chytka L, Clay RW, Cobos Cerutti AC, Colalillo R, Coleman A, Coluccia MR, Conceição R, Condorelli A, Consolati G, Contreras F, Convenga F, Covault CE, Dasso S, Daumiller K, Dawson BR, Day JA, de Almeida RM, de Jesús J, de Jong SJ, De Mauro G, de Mello Neto JRT, De Mitri I, de Oliveira J, de Oliveira Franco D, de Souza V, De Vito E, Debatin J, Del Río M, Deligny O, Dembinski H, Dhital N, Di Giulio C, Di Matteo A, Díaz Castro ML, Dobrigkeit C, D'Olivo JC, Dorosti Q, Dos Anjos RC, Dova MT, Ebr J, Engel R, Epicoco I, Erdmann M, Escobar CO, Etchegoyen A, Falcke H, Farmer J, Farrar G, Fauth AC, Fazzini N, Feldbusch F, Fenu F, Fick B, Figueira JM, Filipčič A, Fodran T, Freire MM, Fujii T, Fuster A, Galea C, Galelli C, García B, Garcia Vegas AL, Gemmeke H, Gesualdi F, Gherghel-Lascu A, Ghia PL, Giaccari U, Giammarchi M, Giller M, Glombitza J, Gobbi F, Gollan F, Golup G, Gómez Berisso M, Gómez Vitale PF, Gongora JP, González N, Goos I, Góra D, Gorgi A, Gottowik M, Grubb TD, Guarino F, Guedes GP, Guido E, Hahn S, Halliday R, Hampel MR, Hansen P, Harari D, Harvey VM, Haungs A, Hebbeker T, Heck D, Hill GC, Hojvat C, Hörandel JR, Horvath P, Hrabovský M, Huege T, Hulsman J, Insolia A, Isar PG, Johnsen JA, Jurysek J, Kääpä A, Kampert KH, Keilhauer B, Kemp J, Klages HO, Kleifges M, Kleinfeller J, Köpke M, Kukec Mezek G, Lago BL, LaHurd D, Lang RG, Leigui de Oliveira MA, Lenok V, Letessier-Selvon A, Lhenry-Yvon I, Lo Presti D, Lopes L, López R, Lorek R, Luce Q, Lucero A, Machado Payeras A, Malacari M, Mancarella G, Mandat D, Manning BC, Manshanden J, Mantsch P, Marafico S, Mariazzi AG, Mariş IC, Marsella G, Martello D, Martinez H, Martínez Bravo O, Mastrodicasa M, Mathes HJ, Matthews J, Matthiae G, Mayotte E, Mazur PO, Medina-Tanco G, Melo D, Menshikov A, Merenda KD, Michal S, Micheletti MI, Miramonti L, Mockler D, Mollerach S, Montanet F, Morello C, Mostafá M, Müller AL, Muller MA, Mulrey K, Mussa R, Muzio M, Namasaka WM, Nellen L, Nguyen PH, Niculescu-Oglinzanu M, Niechciol M, Nitz D, Nosek D, Novotny V, Nožka L, Nucita A, Núñez LA, Palatka M, Pallotta J, Panetta MP, Papenbreer P, Parente G, Parra A, Pech M, Pedreira F, Pȩkala J, Pelayo R, Peña-Rodriguez J, Perez Armand J, Perlin M, Perrone L, Peters C, Petrera S, Pierog T, Pimenta M, Pirronello V, Platino M, Pont B, Pothast M, Privitera P, Prouza M, Puyleart A, Querchfeld S, Rautenberg J, Ravignani D, Reininghaus M, Ridky J, Riehn F, Risse M, Ristori P, Rizi V, Rodrigues de Carvalho W, Rodriguez Fernandez G, Rodriguez Rojo J, Roncoroni MJ, Roth M, Roulet E, Rovero AC, Ruehl P, Saffi SJ, Saftoiu A, Salamida F, Salazar H, Salina G, Sanabria Gomez JD, Sánchez F, Santos EM, Santos E, Sarazin F, Sarmento R, Sarmiento-Cano C, Sato R, Savina P, Schäfer C, Scherini V, Schieler H, Schimassek M, Schimp M, Schlüter F, Schmidt D, Scholten O, Schovánek P, Schröder FG, Schröder S, Schulz A, Sciutto SJ, Scornavacche M, Shellard RC, Sigl G, Silli G, Sima O, Šmída R, Sommers P, Soriano JF, Souchard J, Squartini R, Stadelmaier M, Stanca D, Stanič S, Stasielak J, Stassi P, Streich A, Suárez-Durán M, Sudholz T, Suomijärvi T, Supanitsky AD, Šupík J, Szadkowski Z, Taboada A, Tapia A, Timmermans C, Tkachenko O, Tobiska P, Todero Peixoto CJ, Tomé B, Torralba Elipe G, Travaini A, Travnicek P, Trimarelli C, Trini M, Tueros M, Ulrich R, Unger M, Urban M, Vaclavek L, Vacula M, Valdés Galicia JF, Valiño I, Valore L, van Vliet A, Varela E, Vargas Cárdenas B, Vásquez-Ramírez A, Veberič D, Ventura C, Vergara Quispe ID, Verzi V, Vicha J, Villaseñor L, Vink J, Vorobiov S, Wahlberg H, Watson AA, Weber M, Weindl A, Wiencke L, Wilczyński H, Winchen T, Wirtz M, Wittkowski D, Wundheiler B, Yushkov A, Zapparrata O, Zas E, Zavrtanik D, Zavrtanik M, Zehrer L, Zepeda A, Ziolkowski M, Zuccarello F. Features of the Energy Spectrum of Cosmic Rays above 2.5×10^{18} eV Using the Pierre Auger Observatory. Phys Rev Lett 2020; 125:121106. [PMID: 33016715 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.121106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
We report a measurement of the energy spectrum of cosmic rays above 2.5×10^{18} eV based on 215 030 events. New results are presented: at about 1.3×10^{19} eV, the spectral index changes from 2.51±0.03(stat)±0.05(syst) to 3.05±0.05(stat)±0.10(syst), evolving to 5.1±0.3(stat)±0.1(syst) beyond 5×10^{19} eV, while no significant dependence of spectral features on the declination is seen in the accessible range. These features of the spectrum can be reproduced in models with energy-dependent mass composition. The energy density in cosmic rays above 5×10^{18} eV is [5.66±0.03(stat)±1.40(syst)]×10^{53} erg Mpc^{-3}.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Aab
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - P Abreu
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas-LIP and Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - M Aglietta
- Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino (INAF), Torino, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - J M Albury
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
| | - I Allekotte
- Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro (CNEA-UNCuyo-CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
| | - A Almela
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Universidad Tecnológica Nacional-Facultad Regional Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - J Alvarez-Muñiz
- Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - R Alves Batista
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G A Anastasi
- INFN, Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy
- Università Torino, Dipartimento di Fisica, Torino, Italy
| | - L Anchordoqui
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Lehman College, City University of New York, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - B Andrada
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - S Andringa
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas-LIP and Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - C Aramo
- INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
| | | | - H Asorey
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - P Assis
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas-LIP and Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - G Avila
- Observatorio Pierre Auger, Malargüe, Argentina
- Observatorio Pierre Auger and Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Malargüe, Argentina
| | - A M Badescu
- University Politehnica of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - A Bakalova
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - A Balaceanu
- "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - F Barbato
- INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
- Università di Napoli "Federico II", Dipartimento di Fisica "Ettore Pancini", Napoli, Italy
| | - R J Barreira Luz
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas-LIP and Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - K H Becker
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - J A Bellido
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
| | - C Berat
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble Institute of Engineering Université Grenoble Alpes, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France, France
| | - M E Bertaina
- INFN, Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy
- Università Torino, Dipartimento di Fisica, Torino, Italy
| | - X Bertou
- Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro (CNEA-UNCuyo-CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
| | - P L Biermann
- Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Bonn, Germany
| | - T Bister
- RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany
| | - J Biteau
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France, France
| | - A Blanco
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas-LIP and Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - J Blazek
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - C Bleve
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble Institute of Engineering Université Grenoble Alpes, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France, France
| | - M Boháčová
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - D Boncioli
- Università dell'Aquila, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, L'Aquila, Italy
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Assergi (L'Aquila), Italy
| | - C Bonifazi
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Física, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - N Borodai
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Krakow, Poland
| | - A M Botti
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - J Brack
- Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - T Bretz
- RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany
| | - F L Briechle
- RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany
| | - P Buchholz
- Universität Siegen, Fachbereich 7 Physik-Experimentelle Teilchenphysik, Siegen, Germany
| | - A Bueno
- Universidad de Granada and C.A.F.P.E., Granada, Spain
| | - S Buitink
- Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Buscemi
- Università di Catania, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Catania, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | | | - L Caccianiga
- Università di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - L Calcagni
- IFLP, Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | - A Cancio
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Universidad Tecnológica Nacional-Facultad Regional Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - F Canfora
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Nationaal Instituut voor Kernfysica en Hoge Energie Fysica (NIKHEF), Science Park, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Caracas
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - J M Carceller
- Universidad de Granada and C.A.F.P.E., Granada, Spain
| | - R Caruso
- Università di Catania, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Catania, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - A Castellina
- Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino (INAF), Torino, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - F Catalani
- Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Lorena, SP, Brazil
| | - G Cataldi
- INFN, Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy
| | - L Cazon
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas-LIP and Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - M Cerda
- Observatorio Pierre Auger, Malargüe, Argentina
| | - J A Chinellato
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, IFGW, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - K Choi
- Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - J Chudoba
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Chytka
- Palacky University, RCPTM, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - R W Clay
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
| | - A C Cobos Cerutti
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), and Universidad Tecnológica Nacional-Facultad Regional Mendoza (CONICET/CNEA), Mendoza, Argentina
| | - R Colalillo
- INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
- Università di Napoli "Federico II", Dipartimento di Fisica "Ettore Pancini", Napoli, Italy
| | - A Coleman
- University of Delaware, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Bartol Research Institute, Newark, DE, USA
| | - M R Coluccia
- INFN, Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy
- Università del Salento, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica "E. De Giorgi", Lecce, Italy
| | - R Conceição
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas-LIP and Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - A Condorelli
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Assergi (L'Aquila), Italy
- Gran Sasso Science Institute, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - G Consolati
- INFN, Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
- Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, Milano, Italy
| | - F Contreras
- Observatorio Pierre Auger, Malargüe, Argentina
- Observatorio Pierre Auger and Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Malargüe, Argentina
| | - F Convenga
- INFN, Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy
- Università del Salento, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica "E. De Giorgi", Lecce, Italy
| | - C E Covault
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- also at Radboud Universtiy Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - S Dasso
- Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio (IAFE, CONICET-UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Departamento de Física and Departamento de Ciencias de la Atmósfera y los Océanos, FCEyN, Universidad de Buenos Aires and CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - K Daumiller
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - B R Dawson
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
| | - J A Day
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
| | - R M de Almeida
- Universidade Federal Fluminense, EEIMVR, Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil
| | - J de Jesús
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - S J de Jong
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Nationaal Instituut voor Kernfysica en Hoge Energie Fysica (NIKHEF), Science Park, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G De Mauro
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Nationaal Instituut voor Kernfysica en Hoge Energie Fysica (NIKHEF), Science Park, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J R T de Mello Neto
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Física, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Observatório do Valongo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - I De Mitri
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Assergi (L'Aquila), Italy
- Gran Sasso Science Institute, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - J de Oliveira
- Universidade Federal Fluminense, EEIMVR, Volta Redonda, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - V de Souza
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Física de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil
| | - E De Vito
- INFN, Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy
- Università del Salento, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica "E. De Giorgi", Lecce, Italy
| | - J Debatin
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Experimental Particle Physics (ETP), Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - M Del Río
- Observatorio Pierre Auger and Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Malargüe, Argentina
| | - O Deligny
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France, France
| | - H Dembinski
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - N Dhital
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Krakow, Poland
| | - C Di Giulio
- Università di Roma "Tor Vergata", Dipartimento di Fisica, Roma, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Roma "Tor Vergata", Roma, Italy
| | | | - M L Díaz Castro
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, IFGW, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - C Dobrigkeit
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, IFGW, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - J C D'Olivo
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., México
| | - Q Dorosti
- Universität Siegen, Fachbereich 7 Physik-Experimentelle Teilchenphysik, Siegen, Germany
| | - R C Dos Anjos
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor Palotina, Palotina, Brazil
| | - M T Dova
- IFLP, Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | - J Ebr
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - R Engel
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Experimental Particle Physics (ETP), Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - I Epicoco
- INFN, Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy
- Università del Salento, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica "E. De Giorgi", Lecce, Italy
| | - M Erdmann
- RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - A Etchegoyen
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Universidad Tecnológica Nacional-Facultad Regional Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - H Falcke
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Nationaal Instituut voor Kernfysica en Hoge Energie Fysica (NIKHEF), Science Park, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Stichting Astronomisch Onderzoek in Nederland (ASTRON), Dwingeloo, The Netherlands
| | - J Farmer
- University of Chicago, Enrico Fermi Institute, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - G Farrar
- New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - A C Fauth
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, IFGW, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - N Fazzini
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, USA
| | - F Feldbusch
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Prozessdatenverarbeitung und Elektronik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - F Fenu
- INFN, Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy
- Università Torino, Dipartimento di Fisica, Torino, Italy
| | - B Fick
- Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
| | - J M Figueira
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - A Filipčič
- Experimental Particle Physics Department, J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Center for Astrophysics and Cosmology (CAC), University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
| | - T Fodran
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M M Freire
- Instituto de Física de Rosario (IFIR)-CONICET/U.N.R. and Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas U.N.R., Rosario, Argentina
| | - T Fujii
- University of Chicago, Enrico Fermi Institute, Chicago, IL, USA
- now at Hakubi Center for Advanced Research and Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - A Fuster
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Universidad Tecnológica Nacional-Facultad Regional Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - C Galea
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - C Galelli
- Università di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - B García
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), and Universidad Tecnológica Nacional-Facultad Regional Mendoza (CONICET/CNEA), Mendoza, Argentina
| | - A L Garcia Vegas
- RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany
| | - H Gemmeke
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Prozessdatenverarbeitung und Elektronik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - F Gesualdi
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - A Gherghel-Lascu
- "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - P L Ghia
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France, France
| | - U Giaccari
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Giller
- University of Łódź, Faculty of Astrophysics, Łódź, Poland
| | - J Glombitza
- RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany
| | - F Gobbi
- Observatorio Pierre Auger, Malargüe, Argentina
| | - F Gollan
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - G Golup
- Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro (CNEA-UNCuyo-CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
| | - M Gómez Berisso
- Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro (CNEA-UNCuyo-CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
| | - P F Gómez Vitale
- Observatorio Pierre Auger, Malargüe, Argentina
- Observatorio Pierre Auger and Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Malargüe, Argentina
| | - J P Gongora
- Observatorio Pierre Auger, Malargüe, Argentina
| | - N González
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - I Goos
- Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro (CNEA-UNCuyo-CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - D Góra
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Krakow, Poland
| | - A Gorgi
- Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino (INAF), Torino, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - M Gottowik
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - T D Grubb
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
| | - F Guarino
- INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
- Università di Napoli "Federico II", Dipartimento di Fisica "Ettore Pancini", Napoli, Italy
| | - G P Guedes
- Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Feira de Santana, Brazil
| | - E Guido
- INFN, Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy
- Università Torino, Dipartimento di Fisica, Torino, Italy
| | - S Hahn
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - R Halliday
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - M R Hampel
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - P Hansen
- IFLP, Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | - D Harari
- Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro (CNEA-UNCuyo-CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
| | - V M Harvey
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
| | - A Haungs
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - T Hebbeker
- RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany
| | - D Heck
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - G C Hill
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
| | - C Hojvat
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, USA
| | - J R Hörandel
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Nationaal Instituut voor Kernfysica en Hoge Energie Fysica (NIKHEF), Science Park, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Horvath
- Palacky University, RCPTM, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - M Hrabovský
- Palacky University, RCPTM, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - T Huege
- Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - J Hulsman
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - A Insolia
- Università di Catania, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Catania, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - P G Isar
- Institute of Space Science, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | | | - J Jurysek
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - A Kääpä
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - K H Kampert
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - B Keilhauer
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - J Kemp
- RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany
| | - H O Klages
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - M Kleifges
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Prozessdatenverarbeitung und Elektronik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | - M Köpke
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Experimental Particle Physics (ETP), Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - G Kukec Mezek
- Center for Astrophysics and Cosmology (CAC), University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
| | - B L Lago
- Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca, Nova Friburgo, Brazil
| | - D LaHurd
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - R G Lang
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Física de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil
| | | | - V Lenok
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - A Letessier-Selvon
- Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Hautes Energies (LPNHE), Universités Paris 6 et Paris 7, CNRS-IN2P3, Paris, France
| | - I Lhenry-Yvon
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France, France
| | - D Lo Presti
- Università di Catania, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Catania, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - L Lopes
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas-LIP and Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - R López
- Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, México
| | - R Lorek
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Q Luce
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Experimental Particle Physics (ETP), Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - A Lucero
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - M Malacari
- University of Chicago, Enrico Fermi Institute, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - G Mancarella
- INFN, Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy
- Università del Salento, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica "E. De Giorgi", Lecce, Italy
| | - D Mandat
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - B C Manning
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
| | - J Manshanden
- Universität Hamburg, II. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - P Mantsch
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, USA
| | - S Marafico
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France, France
| | - A G Mariazzi
- IFLP, Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | - I C Mariş
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - G Marsella
- INFN, Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy
- Università del Salento, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica "E. De Giorgi", Lecce, Italy
| | - D Martello
- INFN, Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy
- Università del Salento, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica "E. De Giorgi", Lecce, Italy
| | - H Martinez
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Física de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil
| | | | - M Mastrodicasa
- Università dell'Aquila, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, L'Aquila, Italy
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Assergi (L'Aquila), Italy
| | - H J Mathes
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - J Matthews
- Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - G Matthiae
- Università di Roma "Tor Vergata", Dipartimento di Fisica, Roma, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Roma "Tor Vergata", Roma, Italy
| | - E Mayotte
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - P O Mazur
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, USA
| | - G Medina-Tanco
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., México
| | - D Melo
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - A Menshikov
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Prozessdatenverarbeitung und Elektronik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | - S Michal
- Palacky University, RCPTM, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - M I Micheletti
- Instituto de Física de Rosario (IFIR)-CONICET/U.N.R. and Facultad de Ciencias Bioquímicas y Farmacéuticas U.N.R., Rosario, Argentina
| | - L Miramonti
- Università di Milano, Dipartimento di Fisica, Milano, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - D Mockler
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Mollerach
- Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro (CNEA-UNCuyo-CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
| | - F Montanet
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble Institute of Engineering Université Grenoble Alpes, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France, France
| | - C Morello
- Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino (INAF), Torino, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - M Mostafá
- Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - A L Müller
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - M A Muller
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Física, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, IFGW, Campinas, SP, Brazil
- Universidade Federal de Alfenas, Poços de Caldas, Brazil
| | - K Mulrey
- Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Mussa
- INFN, Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - M Muzio
- New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - W M Namasaka
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - L Nellen
- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., México
| | - P H Nguyen
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
| | - M Niculescu-Oglinzanu
- "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - M Niechciol
- Universität Siegen, Fachbereich 7 Physik-Experimentelle Teilchenphysik, Siegen, Germany
| | - D Nitz
- Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - D Nosek
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - V Novotny
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Institute of Particle and Nuclear Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Nožka
- Palacky University, RCPTM, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - A Nucita
- INFN, Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy
- Università del Salento, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica "E. De Giorgi", Lecce, Italy
| | - L A Núñez
- Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | - M Palatka
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J Pallotta
- Centro de Investigaciones en Láseres y Aplicaciones, CITEDEF and CONICET, Villa Martelli, Argentina
| | - M P Panetta
- INFN, Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy
- Università del Salento, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica "E. De Giorgi", Lecce, Italy
| | - P Papenbreer
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - G Parente
- Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - A Parra
- Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, México
| | - M Pech
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - F Pedreira
- Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - J Pȩkala
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Krakow, Poland
| | - R Pelayo
- Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria en Ingeniería y Tecnologías Avanzadas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (UPIITA-IPN), México, D.F., México
| | | | - J Perez Armand
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Física, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - M Perlin
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - L Perrone
- INFN, Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy
- Università del Salento, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica "E. De Giorgi", Lecce, Italy
| | - C Peters
- RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany
| | - S Petrera
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Assergi (L'Aquila), Italy
- Gran Sasso Science Institute, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - T Pierog
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - M Pimenta
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas-LIP and Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - V Pirronello
- Università di Catania, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Catania, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - M Platino
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - B Pont
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M Pothast
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Nationaal Instituut voor Kernfysica en Hoge Energie Fysica (NIKHEF), Science Park, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P Privitera
- University of Chicago, Enrico Fermi Institute, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - M Prouza
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - A Puyleart
- Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA
| | - S Querchfeld
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - J Rautenberg
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - D Ravignani
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M Reininghaus
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - J Ridky
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - F Riehn
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas-LIP and Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - M Risse
- Universität Siegen, Fachbereich 7 Physik-Experimentelle Teilchenphysik, Siegen, Germany
| | - P Ristori
- Centro de Investigaciones en Láseres y Aplicaciones, CITEDEF and CONICET, Villa Martelli, Argentina
| | - V Rizi
- Università dell'Aquila, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, L'Aquila, Italy
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Assergi (L'Aquila), Italy
| | | | - G Rodriguez Fernandez
- Università di Roma "Tor Vergata", Dipartimento di Fisica, Roma, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Roma "Tor Vergata", Roma, Italy
| | | | - M J Roncoroni
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M Roth
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - E Roulet
- Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto Balseiro (CNEA-UNCuyo-CONICET), San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina
| | - A C Rovero
- Instituto de Astronomía y Física del Espacio (IAFE, CONICET-UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - P Ruehl
- Universität Siegen, Fachbereich 7 Physik-Experimentelle Teilchenphysik, Siegen, Germany
| | - S J Saffi
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
| | - A Saftoiu
- "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - F Salamida
- Università dell'Aquila, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, L'Aquila, Italy
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Assergi (L'Aquila), Italy
| | - H Salazar
- Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, México
| | - G Salina
- INFN, Sezione di Roma "Tor Vergata", Roma, Italy
| | | | - F Sánchez
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - E M Santos
- Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Física, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - E Santos
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - F Sarazin
- Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA
| | - R Sarmento
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas-LIP and Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - C Sarmiento-Cano
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - R Sato
- Observatorio Pierre Auger, Malargüe, Argentina
| | - P Savina
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France, France
- INFN, Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy
- Università del Salento, Dipartimento di Matematica e Fisica "E. De Giorgi", Lecce, Italy
| | - C Schäfer
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | - H Schieler
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - M Schimassek
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Experimental Particle Physics (ETP), Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - M Schimp
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - F Schlüter
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - D Schmidt
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Experimental Particle Physics (ETP), Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - O Scholten
- Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
- KVI-Center for Advanced Radiation Technology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - P Schovánek
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - F G Schröder
- University of Delaware, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Bartol Research Institute, Newark, DE, USA
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - S Schröder
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - A Schulz
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - S J Sciutto
- IFLP, Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | - M Scornavacche
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - R C Shellard
- Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - G Sigl
- Universität Hamburg, II. Institut für Theoretische Physik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - G Silli
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - O Sima
- "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
- also at Radboud Universtiy Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R Šmída
- University of Chicago, Enrico Fermi Institute, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - P Sommers
- Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - J F Soriano
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Lehman College, City University of New York, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - J Souchard
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble Institute of Engineering Université Grenoble Alpes, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France, France
| | - R Squartini
- Observatorio Pierre Auger, Malargüe, Argentina
| | - M Stadelmaier
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - D Stanca
- "Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania
| | - S Stanič
- Center for Astrophysics and Cosmology (CAC), University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
| | - J Stasielak
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Krakow, Poland
| | - P Stassi
- Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble Institute of Engineering Université Grenoble Alpes, LPSC-IN2P3, 38000 Grenoble, France, France
| | - A Streich
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Experimental Particle Physics (ETP), Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - M Suárez-Durán
- Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia
| | - T Sudholz
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S.A., Australia
| | - T Suomijärvi
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, Orsay, France, France
| | - A D Supanitsky
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - J Šupík
- Palacky University, RCPTM, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Z Szadkowski
- University of Łódź, Faculty of High-Energy Astrophysics,Łódź, Poland
| | - A Taboada
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Experimental Particle Physics (ETP), Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - A Tapia
- Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
| | - C Timmermans
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Nationaal Instituut voor Kernfysica en Hoge Energie Fysica (NIKHEF), Science Park, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O Tkachenko
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - P Tobiska
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - C J Todero Peixoto
- Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Lorena, SP, Brazil
| | - B Tomé
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas-LIP and Instituto Superior Técnico-IST, Universidade de Lisboa-UL, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - G Torralba Elipe
- Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - A Travaini
- Observatorio Pierre Auger, Malargüe, Argentina
| | - P Travnicek
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - C Trimarelli
- Università dell'Aquila, Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, L'Aquila, Italy
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Assergi (L'Aquila), Italy
| | - M Trini
- Center for Astrophysics and Cosmology (CAC), University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
| | - M Tueros
- IFLP, Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | - R Ulrich
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - M Unger
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - M Urban
- RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany
| | - L Vaclavek
- Palacky University, RCPTM, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - M Vacula
- Palacky University, RCPTM, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | | | - I Valiño
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Assergi (L'Aquila), Italy
- Gran Sasso Science Institute, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - L Valore
- INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Napoli, Italy
- Università di Napoli "Federico II", Dipartimento di Fisica "Ettore Pancini", Napoli, Italy
| | - A van Vliet
- IMAPP, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E Varela
- Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, México
| | | | | | - D Veberič
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - C Ventura
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Observatório do Valongo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | | | - V Verzi
- INFN, Sezione di Roma "Tor Vergata", Roma, Italy
| | - J Vicha
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Villaseñor
- Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, México
| | - J Vink
- Universiteit van Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Vorobiov
- Center for Astrophysics and Cosmology (CAC), University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
| | - H Wahlberg
- IFLP, Universidad Nacional de La Plata and CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
| | - A A Watson
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - M Weber
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Prozessdatenverarbeitung und Elektronik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - A Weindl
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - L Wiencke
- Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, USA
| | - H Wilczyński
- Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Krakow, Poland
| | - T Winchen
- Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Wirtz
- RWTH Aachen University, III. Physikalisches Institut A, Aachen, Germany
| | - D Wittkowski
- Bergische Universität Wuppertal, Department of Physics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - B Wundheiler
- Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (CNEA, CONICET, UNSAM), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - A Yushkov
- Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - O Zapparrata
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - E Zas
- Instituto Galego de Física de Altas Enerxías (IGFAE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - D Zavrtanik
- Experimental Particle Physics Department, J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Center for Astrophysics and Cosmology (CAC), University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
| | - M Zavrtanik
- Experimental Particle Physics Department, J. Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Center for Astrophysics and Cosmology (CAC), University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
| | - L Zehrer
- Center for Astrophysics and Cosmology (CAC), University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
| | - A Zepeda
- Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del IPN (CINVESTAV), México, D.F., México
| | - M Ziolkowski
- Universität Siegen, Fachbereich 7 Physik-Experimentelle Teilchenphysik, Siegen, Germany
| | - F Zuccarello
- Università di Catania, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Catania, Italy
- INFN, Sezione di Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Giri VN, Knudsen KE, Kelly WK, Cheng HH, Cooney KA, Cookson MS, Dahut W, Weissman S, Soule HR, Petrylak DP, Dicker AP, AlDubayan SH, Toland AE, Pritchard CC, Pettaway CA, Daly MB, Mohler JL, Parsons JK, Carroll PR, Pilarski R, Blanco A, Woodson A, Rahm A, Taplin ME, Polascik TJ, Helfand BT, Hyatt C, Morgans AK, Feng F, Mullane M, Powers J, Concepcion R, Lin DW, Wender R, Mark JR, Costello A, Burnett AL, Sartor O, Isaacs WB, Xu J, Weitzel J, Andriole GL, Beltran H, Briganti A, Byrne L, Calvaresi A, Chandrasekar T, Chen DYT, Den RB, Dobi A, Crawford ED, Eastham J, Eggener S, Freedman ML, Garnick M, Gomella PT, Handley N, Hurwitz MD, Izes J, Karnes RJ, Lallas C, Languino L, Loeb S, Lopez AM, Loughlin KR, Lu-Yao G, Malkowicz SB, Mann M, Mille P, Miner MM, Morgan T, Moreno J, Mucci L, Myers RE, Nielsen SM, O’Neil B, Pinover W, Pinto P, Poage W, Raj GV, Rebbeck TR, Ryan C, Sandler H, Schiewer M, Scott EMD, Szymaniak B, Tester W, Trabulsi EJ, Vapiwala N, Yu EY, Zeigler-Johnson C, Gomella LG. Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2798-2811. [PMID: 32516092 PMCID: PMC7430215 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.00046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline testing (GT) is a central feature of prostate cancer (PCA) treatment, management, and hereditary cancer assessment. Critical needs include optimized multigene testing strategies that incorporate evolving genetic data, consistency in GT indications and management, and alternate genetic evaluation models that address the rising demand for genetic services. METHODS A multidisciplinary consensus conference that included experts, stakeholders, and national organization leaders was convened in response to current practice challenges and to develop a genetic implementation framework. Evidence review informed questions using the modified Delphi model. The final framework included criteria with strong (> 75%) agreement (Recommend) or moderate (50% to 74%) agreement (Consider). RESULTS Large germline panels and somatic testing were recommended for metastatic PCA. Reflex testing-initial testing of priority genes followed by expanded testing-was suggested for multiple scenarios. Metastatic disease or family history suggestive of hereditary PCA was recommended for GT. Additional family history and pathologic criteria garnered moderate consensus. Priority genes to test for metastatic disease treatment included BRCA2, BRCA1, and mismatch repair genes, with broader testing, such as ATM, for clinical trial eligibility. BRCA2 was recommended for active surveillance discussions. Screening starting at age 40 years or 10 years before the youngest PCA diagnosis in a family was recommended for BRCA2 carriers, with consideration in HOXB13, BRCA1, ATM, and mismatch repair carriers. Collaborative (point-of-care) evaluation models between health care and genetic providers was endorsed to address the genetic counseling shortage. The genetic evaluation framework included optimal pretest informed consent, post-test discussion, cascade testing, and technology-based approaches. CONCLUSION This multidisciplinary, consensus-driven PCA genetic implementation framework provides novel guidance to clinicians and patients tailored to the precision era. Multiple research, education, and policy needs remain of importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veda N. Giri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Karen E. Knudsen
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - William K. Kelly
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Heather H. Cheng
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Clinical Research, Seattle, WA
| | - Kathleen A. Cooney
- Duke University School of Medicine and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| | | | - William Dahut
- Genitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | | | | | | | - Adam P. Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Amanda E. Toland
- Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Colin C. Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | | - Peter R. Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Robert Pilarski
- James Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Amie Blanco
- University of California, San Francisco, Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ashley Woodson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Alanna Rahm
- Center for Health Research, Genomic Medicine Institute, Geisinger, Danville, PA
| | | | | | | | - Colette Hyatt
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Felix Feng
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Urology, and Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Jacqueline Powers
- University of Pennsylvania, Basser Center for BRCA, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - James Ryan Mark
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Anthony Costello
- Urology at Royal Melbourne Hospital, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Jianfeng Xu
- North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL
| | | | | | - Himisha Beltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Anne Calvaresi
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Thenappan Chandrasekar
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Robert B. Den
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Albert Dobi
- Henry Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Center for Prostate Disease Research, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University and the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - James Eastham
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Marc Garnick
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Nathan Handley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mark D. Hurwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joseph Izes
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Costas Lallas
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Lucia Languino
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Stacy Loeb
- Department of Urology and Population Health, New York University and Manhattan Veterans Affairs, New York, NY
| | - Ana Maria Lopez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Grace Lu-Yao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Mark Mann
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Patrick Mille
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | - Lorelei Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston MA
| | - Ronald E. Myers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Brock O’Neil
- University of Utah, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Peter Pinto
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Wendy Poage
- Prostate Conditions Education Council, Elizabeth, CO
| | - Ganesh V. Raj
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX
| | - Timothy R. Rebbeck
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston MA
| | - Charles Ryan
- University of Minnesota and Masonic Cancer Center, Madison, WI
| | | | - Matthew Schiewer
- Department of Cancer Biology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - William Tester
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Edouard J. Trabulsi
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Evan Y. Yu
- University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Charnita Zeigler-Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Leonard G. Gomella
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Herrero Morant A, Álvarez Reguera C, Calvo del Rio V, Maíz Alonso O, Blanco A, Narváez J, Castañeda S, Vicente E, Romero-Yuste S, Demetrio-Pablo R, Urruticoechea-Arana A, García Serrano JL, Callejas Rubio JL, Ortego N, Sánchez J, Estrada P, Rua-Figueroa I, Martínez-López D, Martín-Varillas JL, González-Gay MÁ, Blanco R. SAT0523 BIOLOGICAL THERAPY IN REFRACTORY ATYPICAL OPTIC NEURITIS. MULTICENTER STUDY. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.5122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Background:Optic Neuritis (ON) is an inflammation of the optic nerve. Its most common presentation is demyelinating typical ON. Atypical ON is rare, severe, non-demyelinating and can be isolated or associated to different diseases including autoimmune diseases. If it is not treated, it can lead to devastating visual results. Conventional treatment includes systemic corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressants (CIS).Objectives:Our aim was to assess the efficacy of biological therapy in atypical ON refractory to conventional treatment.Methods:Open-label multicenter study including 19 patients diagnosed with atypical ON refractory to systemic corticosteroids and at least one CIS. The main outcomes assessed were Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) and optic nerve and ganglionar cells Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). These outcome variables were recorded at baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months and 1 year after biological therapy onset.FIGUREResults:We studied 19 patients (12 women/7 men); mean age of 34.8 ± 13.9 years. The underlying diseases were idiopathic (n=7), Behçet´s disease (n=5), systemic lupus erythematosus (n=2), neuromyelitis optica (n=3), sarcoidosis (n=1) and relapsing polychondritis (n=1)(TABLE).Before biological therapy and besides systemic corticosteroids, patients had received different CIS. Biological therapy was adalimumab (n=6), rituximab (n=6), infliximab (n=5) and tocilizumab (n=4). After biological therapy, an improvement in ocular parameters was observed: BCVA [0.7±0.3 to 0.8±0.3; p= 0.03], optic nerve OCT [123.2±58.3 to 190.5±175.4; p= 0.11], and ganglionar cells OCT [369.6±137.4 to 270.7±23.2; p= 0.03] at one year(FIGURE). After a mean follow-up of 29.1 ±19.2 months, there were no severe adverse effects observed.Conclusion:Biological therapy may be effective in patients with refractory atypical ON.TABLECaseGender/ AgeUnderlying diseaseLateralityIV steroids dose (g)Maximum prednisone oral dose (g)Conventional immunosuppressantsBiological therapyAdverse effects1F/29IdiopathicUnilateral460AZATCZNo2F/26IdiopathicBilateral5.530AZATCZNo3F/13IdiopathicBilateral-10MTXADANo4F/25IdiopathicBilateral460MTXIFX, TCZNo5F/24IdiopathicBilateral0.560MTX, AZAADANo6M/14IdiopathicBilateral-10MTXADANo7F/30Vasculitis ANCA+Unilateral360AZA, MMF, LFM, CFMRTXYes8M/21BehçetBilateral-60MTX, AZAADANausea Vomits9M/25BehçetUnilateral0.560MTX, CyAADANo10M/39BehçetUnilateral380MTX, MMFIFXNo11M/40BehçetUnilateral-80MMFIFXNo12M/37BehçetUnilateral-60CyAIFXNo13F/68NMOUnilateral2.530CFM, AZARTXNo14F/41NMOUnilateral360CFMRTXInfection15F/43NMOBilateral560AZARTXInfusion reaction16F/56SLEUnilateral-60HCQ, MMF, CFMRTXNo17F/47SLEUnilateral560HCQ, MMFRTXNo18F/43Relapsing polychondritisBilateral360MTX, CFMIFX, TCZNo19M/41SarcoidosisBilateral340AZAADANoDisclosure of Interests:Alba Herrero Morant: None declared, Carmen Álvarez Reguera: None declared, Vanesa Calvo del Rio Grant/research support from: MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Lilly, Celgene, Grünenthal, UCB Pharma, Olga Maíz Alonso: None declared, Ana Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, J. Narváez: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Esther Vicente Speakers bureau: BMS, Roche., Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Rosalía Demetrio-Pablo: None declared, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared, J. L. García Serrano: None declared, J. L. Callejas Rubio: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Julio Sánchez: None declared, Paula Estrada: None declared, Iñigo Rua-Figueroa: None declared, David Martínez-López: None declared, José Luis Martín-Varillas Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Janssen and Celgene, Speakers bureau: Pfizer and Lilly, Miguel Á. González-Gay Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche, Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen and MSD, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD
Collapse
|
31
|
Tong B, Borno H, Small EJ, Alagala F, Blanco A, Dhawan MS. Streamlining the genetics pipeline to increase testing for patients at risk for hereditary prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.1590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1590 Background: Metastatic prostate Cancer (mPCa) is increasingly recognized as a heritable disease and germline genetic testing has increasingly become a part of standard of care. At the University of California at San Francisco (UCSF) Genitourinary (GU) Medical Oncology clinic, approximately 850 new patients with mPCa are seen annually. A feasibility pilot Genetic Testing Station (GTS) was developed to expand access to genetic testing among this high-risk population. GTS is facilitated by Genetic Counselor Assistants (GCA) under the supervision of genetic counselors. Methods: This is a feasibility pilot of a GTS model among patients with mPCa. In this model, all patients with mPCa are offered a same day GTS visit with a GCA. At the GTS, the patient receives pre-test education via videos developed by genetic counselors. The patient provides informed consent, a family history, and a saliva sample for Invitae’s 87-gene panel. All positive results trigger a genetic counselor visit while non-positive results either receive a letter or a genetic counselor visit (in person or via telehealth). To evaluate the model, testing frequency and laboratory turnaround time (TAT) was assessed before and after the pilot. Results: In the first four months of the GTS pilot (10/14/2019 – 02/10/2020), 94 patients were referred and received genetic testing. Eight germline positives were identified (BRCA2, CHEK2, HOXB13 MSH6, RECQL4). The average TAT was 8 days. 9.3% of patients were found to have pathogenic mutations through the prostate GTS which is comparable to previously published rates of germline mutations in metastatic prostate cancer patients. In a 4-month time frame the prior to the intervention (10/01/2018-1/31/2019), 26 genetic testing orders were placed. The average laboratory TAT in this prior process was 17 days. Rates of positive germline mutations in the prior model was 8.6%. Conclusions: The GTS is a feasible method to increase access to germline genetic testing among a high-risk population. It may reduce barriers to testing and facilitate real-time discussion of treatment and prevention strategies with patients and family members. As a result, we will continue to operate the GTS. This model provides a framework for scaling access for and cascade testing in other high-risk patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hala Borno
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Eric Jay Small
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Amie Blanco
- University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mallika Sachdev Dhawan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Che M, Fiscallini AS, Acerbi I, Shieh Y, Madlensky L, Tice J, Ziv E, Eklund M, Blanco A, Tong B, Goodman D, Nassereddine L, Anderson N, Harvey H, Fors S, Park HL, Petruse A, Stewart S, Wernisch J, Risty L, Hurley I, Koenig B, Kaplan C, Hiatt R, Wenger N, Lee V, Heditsian D, Brain S, Sabacan L, Parker B, Borowsky A, Anton-Culver H, Anton-Culver H, Naeim A, Kaster A, Talley M, van't Veer L, LaCroix A, Olopade OI, Sheth D. Abstract OT3-03-02: Personalized breast cancer screening in a population-based study: Women informed to screen depending on measures of risk (WISDOM). Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs19-ot3-03-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: WISDOM is a 100,000 healthy women preference-tolerant, pragmatic study comparing traditional annual screening to personalized risk-based breast screening. The novelty of WISDOM personalized screening is the integration of previously validated genetic and clinical risk factors (age, family history, breast biopsy results, ethnicity, mammographic density) into a single risk assessment model that directs the starting age, timing, and frequency of screening. The goal of WISDOM is to determine if personalized screening, compared to annual screening, is as safe, less morbid, enables prevention, and is more accepted by women. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02620852.
Methods: Women aged 40-74 years with no history of breast cancer or DCIS, and no previous double mastectomy can join the study online at wisdomstudy.org. Participants can either elect randomization or self-select a study arm. Then, they can provide electronic consent and sign the Release for Medical Information via DocuSign. For all participants, 5-year risk of developing breast cancer is calculated according to the Breast Cancer Screening Consortium (BCSC) model. Participants in the personalized arm undergo panel-based mutation testing (BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, PTEN, STK11, CDH1, ATM, PALB2, and CHEK2), and their 5-year risk is calculated using the BCSC score combined with a Polygenic Risk Score (BCSC-PRS) that includes 75 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) known to increase breast cancer risk (will increase to 229). The SNPs and mutations are assessed by saliva-based testing through Color Genomics. 5-year risk level thresholds are used to stratify for low-, moderate- and high risk. Risk stratification determines age to start, stop, and frequency of screening.
Accrual: As of July 2019, the WISDOM study is open to all eligible women in California, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, and New Jersey. To date, 30,392 eligible women have registered, and 21,392 women have consented to participate in the trial. The median age was 56 years. 85% of participants were Caucasian, 2% African-American, and 5% Asian. 6% self-reported Hispanic ethnicity. WISDOM is actively partnering with Blue Cross Blue Shield Association for national coverage, self-insured companies (Salesforce, Genentech, Qualcomm, CalPERS) and Medi-Cal (Inland Empire Health Plan) using a coverage with evidence progression approach.
Accrual expansion and diversity: To strengthen generalizability, the WISDOM Study is enhancing the diversity of our potential participant population by expanding to other states (Alabama, Louisiana), and partnering with other health insurers and self-insured companies. Future expansion regions include Texas, Florida, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Montana, and New Mexico. Additionally, we have translated the whole study experience to Spanish to further reach Spanish-speaking communities. With the engagement of patient advocates and community partnerships, expanding diversity recruitment will strengthen our scientific knowledge of breast cancer risk and increase access to personalized breast cancer screening recommendations for all women. WISDOM enrollment will continue through 2020.
Conclusions: Results at 5 years will enable us to demonstrate that personalized screening improves healthcare value by reducing screen volumes and costs without jeopardizing outcomes.
Citation Format: Mandy Che, Allison Stover Fiscallini, Irene Acerbi, Yiweh Shieh, Lisa Madlensky, Jeffrey Tice, Elad Ziv, Martin Eklund, Amie Blanco, Barry Tong, Deborah Goodman, Lamees Nassereddine, Nancy Anderson, Heather Harvey, Steele Fors, Hannah L Park, Antonia Petruse, Skye Stewart, Janet Wernisch, Larissa Risty, Ian Hurley, Barbara Koenig, Celia Kaplan, Robert Hiatt, Neil Wenger, Vivian Lee, Diane Heditsian, Susie Brain, Leah Sabacan, Barbara Parker, Alexander Borowsky, Hoda Anton-Culver, Hoda Anton-Culver, Arash Naeim, Andrea Kaster, Melinda Talley, Laura van't Veer, Andrea LaCroix, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Deepa Sheth, WISDOM Study and Athena Breast Health Network Investigators and Advocate Partners and Laura Esserman. Personalized breast cancer screening in a population-based study: Women informed to screen depending on measures of risk (WISDOM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-03-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandy Che
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Irene Acerbi
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | - Yiweh Shieh
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | - Lisa Madlensky
- 2University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | - Jeffrey Tice
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | - Elad Ziv
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Amie Blanco
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | - Barry Tong
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Steele Fors
- 2University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | | | - Antonia Petruse
- 5University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA
| | - Skye Stewart
- 7University of California-Davis (UCD), Sacramento, CA
| | | | | | | | - Barbara Koenig
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | - Celia Kaplan
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | - Robert Hiatt
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | - Neil Wenger
- 5University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA
| | - Vivian Lee
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | - Diane Heditsian
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | - Susie Brain
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | - Leah Sabacan
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | - Barbara Parker
- 2University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | | - Arash Naeim
- 5University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Laura van't Veer
- 1University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA
| | - Andrea LaCroix
- 2University of California-San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Brennan K, Martin K, FitzGerald SP, O'Sullivan J, Wu Y, Blanco A, Richardson C, Mc Gee MM. A comparison of methods for the isolation and separation of extracellular vesicles from protein and lipid particles in human serum. Sci Rep 2020; 10:1039. [PMID: 31974468 PMCID: PMC6978318 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-57497-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 406] [Impact Index Per Article: 101.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nano-sized vesicles containing nucleic acid and protein cargo that are released from a multitude of cell types and have gained significant interest as potential diagnostic biomarkers. Human serum is a rich source of readily accessible EVs; however, the separation of EVs from serum proteins and non-EV lipid particles represents a considerable challenge. In this study, we compared the most commonly used isolation techniques, either alone or in combination, for the isolation of EVs from 200 µl of human serum and their separation from non-EV protein and lipid particles present in serum. The size and yield of particles isolated by each method was determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis, with the variation in particle size distribution being used to determine the relative impact of lipoproteins and protein aggregates on the isolated EV population. Purification of EVs from soluble protein was determined by calculating the ratio of EV particle count to protein concentration. Finally, lipoprotein particles co-isolated with EVs was determined by Western blot analysis of lipoprotein markers APOB and APOE. Overall, this study reveals that the choice of EV isolation procedure significantly impacts EV yield from human serum, together with the presence of lipoprotein and protein contaminants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Brennan
- UCD School of Biomolecular & Biomedical Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin (UCD), Belfield, Dublin, 4, Ireland.
| | - K Martin
- Randox Teoranta, Meenmore, Dungloe, Donegal, Ireland
| | - S P FitzGerald
- Randox Laboratories Ltd., Crumlin, Antrim, United Kingdom
| | - J O'Sullivan
- Trinity Translational Medicine Institute (TTMI), Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Y Wu
- UCD School of Biomolecular & Biomedical Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin (UCD), Belfield, Dublin, 4, Ireland
| | - A Blanco
- UCD Conway Flow Cytometry Core, Conway Institute, University College Dublin (UCD), Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Richardson
- Randox Teoranta, Meenmore, Dungloe, Donegal, Ireland
| | - M M Mc Gee
- UCD School of Biomolecular & Biomedical Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin (UCD), Belfield, Dublin, 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Olszewska DA, Fallon EM, Pastores GM, Murphy K, Blanco A, Lynch T, Murphy SM. Autosomal Dominant Gene Negative Frontotemporal Dementia-Think of SCA17. Cerebellum 2019; 18:654-658. [PMID: 30617627 DOI: 10.1007/s12311-018-0998-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
SCA 17 is a rare, autosomal dominant disorder caused by TBP gene CAG/CAA repeat expansion. Ataxia and dementia are common. The presence of frontal dysfunction at outset of the disease may mimic frontotemporal dementia (FTD). Parkinsonism, chorea, dystonia, and pyramidal signs may occur. We report an Irish family with autosomal dominant partially penetrant frontal dementia with cerebellar atrophy due to SCA17 and present detailed neuropsychological assessment for the first time. A 44-year-old doctor presented with 18-month history of behavioral problems. She slowed down, became apathetic, and unable to multitask. She became more irritable and short tempered, and her work performance deteriorated. Brain MRI showed cerebellar atrophy and cerebellar hypometabolism was noted on FDG-PET. A sister developed personality changes at age 45 with apathy, and had problems with memory and social skills; another sister at age 39 became dysarthric and unsteady. A brother at age 52 demonstrated emotional lability, and became dysarthric, unsteady, and slowed down. Their mother aged 73 had an abnormal antalgic gait due to arthritis; their father was jocular and disinhibited. MAPT testing detected an exon 9 c.726C>T variant in the proband. Subsequent testing in nine siblings and both parents failed to show co-segregation with disease. SCA17 testing revealed a TBP gene 43 repeat expansion that co-segregated in all affected siblings and in the mother whose gait problems were initially attributed to arthritis. In over 80% of cases of FTD with clear autosomal dominant inheritance, causative gene defects involve MAPT, GRN, or C9orf72 mutations. A minority involves VCP, FUS, and CHMP2B. As evident from our case, SCA17 testing should also be considered, especially if cerebellar atrophy if found on imaging. Segregation analysis is crucial. MAPT variant (c.726C>T exon 9) detected in the family was deemed a polymorphism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Angelika Olszewska
- Department of Neurology, Dublin Neurological Institute, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, 57 Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland.
| | - E M Fallon
- Department of Neurology, Dublin Neurological Institute, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, 57 Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - G M Pastores
- National Centre for Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - K Murphy
- Department of Neurology, Sligo University Hospital, Sligo, Ireland
| | - A Blanco
- Department of Neuropsychology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - T Lynch
- Department of Neurology, Dublin Neurological Institute, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, 57 Eccles Street, Dublin 7, Ireland
| | - S M Murphy
- Department of Neurology, The Adelaide and Meath Hospitals, Tallaght, Dublin, Ireland.,Academic Unit of Neurology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Aab A, Abreu P, Aglietta M, Albuquerque I, Albury J, Allekotte I, Almela A, Alvarez Castillo J, Alvarez-Muñiz J, Anastasi G, Anchordoqui L, Andrada B, Andringa S, Aramo C, Asorey H, Assis P, Avila G, Badescu A, Bakalova A, Balaceanu A, Barbato F, Barreira Luz R, Baur S, Becker K, Bellido J, Berat C, Bertaina M, Bertou X, Biermann P, Biteau J, Blaess S, Blanco A, Blazek J, Bleve C, Boháčová M, Boncioli D, Bonifazi C, Borodai N, Botti A, Brack J, Bretz T, Bridgeman A, Briechle F, Buchholz P, Bueno A, Buitink S, Buscemi M, Caballero-Mora K, Caccianiga L, Calcagni L, Cancio A, Canfora F, Carceller J, Caruso R, Castellina A, Catalani F, Cataldi G, Cazon L, Cerda M, Chinellato J, Chudoba J, Chytka L, Clay R, Cobos Cerutti A, Colalillo R, Coleman A, Coluccia M, Conceição R, Condorelli A, Consolati G, Contreras F, Convenga F, Cooper M, Coutu S, Covault C, Daniel B, Dasso S, Daumiller K, Dawson B, Day J, de Almeida R, de Jong S, De Mauro G, de Mello Neto J, De Mitri I, de Oliveira J, de Oliveira Salles F, de Souza V, Debatin J, del Río M, Deligny O, Dhital N, Díaz Castro M, Diogo F, Dobrigkeit C, D’Olivo J, Dorosti Q, dos Anjos R, Dova M, Dundovic A, Ebr J, Engel R, Erdmann M, Escobar C, Etchegoyen A, Falcke H, Farmer J, Farrar G, Fauth A, Fazzini N, Feldbusch F, Fenu F, Ferreyro L, Figueira J, Filipčič A, Freire M, Fujii T, Fuster A, García B, Gemmeke H, Gherghel-Lascu A, Ghia P, Giaccari U, Giammarchi M, Giller M, Głas D, Glombitza J, Gobbi F, Golup G, Gómez Berisso M, Gómez Vitale P, Gongora J, González N, Goos I, Góra D, Gorgi A, Gottowik M, Grubb T, Guarino F, Guedes G, Guido E, Halliday R, Hampel M, Hansen P, Harari D, Harrison T, Harvey V, Haungs A, Hebbeker T, Heck D, Heimann P, Hill G, Hojvat C, Holt E, Homola P, Hörandel J, Horvath P, Hrabovský M, Huege T, Hulsman J, Insolia A, Isar P, Jandt I, Johnsen J, Josebachuili M, Jurysek J, Kääpä A, Kampert K, Keilhauer B, Kemmerich N, Kemp J, Klages H, Kleifges M, Kleinfeller J, Krause R, Kuempel D, Kukec Mezek G, Kuotb Awad A, Lago B, LaHurd D, Lang R, Legumina R, Leigui de Oliveira M, Lenok V, Letessier-Selvon A, Lhenry-Yvon I, Lippmann O, Lo Presti D, Lopes L, López R, López Casado A, Lorek R, Luce Q, Lucero A, Malacari M, Mancarella G, Mandat D, Manning B, Mantsch P, Mariazzi A, Mariş I, Marsella G, Martello D, Martinez H, Martínez Bravo O, Mastrodicasa M, Mathes H, Mathys S, Matthews J, Matthiae G, Mayotte E, Mazur P, Medina-Tanco G, Melo D, Menshikov A, Merenda KD, Michal S, Micheletti M, Middendorf L, Miramonti L, Mitrica B, Mockler D, Mollerach S, Montanet F, Morello C, Morlino G, Mostafá M, Müller A, Muller M, Müller S, Mussa R, Nellen L, Nguyen P, Niculescu-Oglinzanu M, Niechciol M, Nitz D, Nosek D, Novotny V, Nožka L, Nucita A, Núñez L, Olinto A, Palatka M, Pallotta J, Panetta M, Papenbreer P, Parente G, Parra A, Pech M, Pedreira F, Pȩkala J, Pelayo R, Peña-Rodriguez J, Pereira L, Perlin M, Perrone L, Peters C, Petrera S, Phuntsok J, Pierog T, Pimenta M, Pirronello V, Platino M, Poh J, Pont B, Porowski C, Prado R, Privitera P, Prouza M, Puyleart A, Querchfeld S, Quinn S, Ramos-Pollan R, Rautenberg J, Ravignani D, Reininghaus M, Ridky J, Riehn F, Risse M, Ristori P, Rizi V, Rodrigues de Carvalho W, Rodriguez Rojo J, Roncoroni M, Roth M, Roulet E, Rovero A, Ruehl P, Saffi S, Saftoiu A, Salamida F, Salazar H, Salina G, Sanabria Gomez J, Sánchez F, Santos E, Santos E, Sarazin F, Sarmento R, Sarmiento-Cano C, Sato R, Savina P, Schauer M, Scherini V, Schieler H, Schimassek M, Schimp M, Schlüter F, Schmidt D, Scholten O, Schovánek P, Schröder F, Schröder S, Schumacher J, Sciutto S, Scornavacche M, Shellard R, Sigl G, Silli G, Sima O, Šmída R, Snow G, Sommers P, Soriano J, Souchard J, Squartini R, Stanca D, Stanič S, Stasielak J, Stassi P, Stolpovskiy M, Streich A, Suarez F, Suárez-Durán M, Sudholz T, Suomijärvi T, Supanitsky A, Šupík J, Szadkowski Z, Taboada A, Taborda O, Tapia A, Timmermans C, Todero Peixoto C, Tomé B, Torralba Elipe G, Travaini A, Travnicek P, Trini M, Tueros M, Ulrich R, Unger M, Urban M, Valdés Galicia J, Valiño I, Valore L, van Bodegom P, van den Berg A, van Vliet A, Varela E, Vargas Cárdenas B, Veberič D, Ventura C, Vergara Quispe I, Verzi V, Vicha J, Villaseñor L, Vink J, Vorobiov S, Wahlberg H, Watson A, Weber M, Weindl A, Wiedeński M, Wiencke L, Wilczyński H, Winchen T, Wirtz M, Wittkowski D, Wundheiler B, Yang L, Yushkov A, Zas E, Zavrtanik D, Zavrtanik M, Zehrer L, Zepeda A, Zimmermann B, Ziolkowski M, Zong Z, Zuccarello F. Data-driven estimation of the invisible energy of cosmic ray showers with the Pierre Auger Observatory. Int J Clin Exp Med 2019. [DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.100.082003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
36
|
Sharib J, Cao C, Bracci P, Blanco A, Goldberg D, Esserman L, Kirkwood K. Abdominal Imaging Does Not Detect Higher Rates of Pancreatic Cysts or Cyst-Associated Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in BRCA Mutation Carriers. J Am Coll Surg 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.08.372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
37
|
Ciruela P, Broner S, Izquierdo C, Pallarés R, Muñoz-Almagro C, Hernández S, Grau I, Domínguez A, Jané M, Ciruela P, Izquierdo C, Broner S, Hernández S, Jané M, Muñoz-Almagro C, Esteva C, de Sevilla M, Henares D, Pallarés R, Ardanuy C, Grau I, Marco F, Margall N, González-Cuevas A, Díaz A, Martin M, Llaberia J, Curriu M, Gallés C, Capdevila E, Gassiot P, Martínez-Zurita M, Martí C, Morta M, Sauca G, Gassós A, Sanfeliu E, Ballester F, Pujol I, Olsina M, Raga X, Gómez-Bertomeu F, Pérez-Moreno M, Vilamala A, Navarro M, Ribelles M, Garcia M, Padilla E, Prim N, Fontanals D, Sanfeliu I, Benitez M, Jou E, Sanjosé C, Giménez M, Quesada M, de la Fuente J, Calderon A, Ayala P, Vega L, Pérez-Jové J, Blanco A, Balado C, Valle I, Bastida M, Gonzalez-Moreno O, Ubanell A, Fenoll A, Yuste J. Indirect effects of paediatric conjugate vaccines on invasive pneumococcal disease in older adults. Int J Infect Dis 2019; 86:122-130. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2019.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
|
38
|
Walker EJ, Carnevale J, Pedley C, Blanco A, Chan S, Collisson EA, Tempero MA, Ko AH. Referral frequency, attrition rate, and outcomes of germline testing in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Fam Cancer 2019; 18:241-251. [PMID: 30267352 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-018-0106-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary predisposition is estimated to account for 10% of all pancreatic cancer cases. However, referral patterns and clinical workflow for germline testing in this disease differ significantly by institution, and many at-risk patients may not undergo appropriate counseling and testing. We undertook an analysis of patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (PDAC) who were referred to the Clinical Genetics program of a high-volume academic center over a 3-year period to assess referral frequency, evaluate the yield of germline testing in this selected patient cohort, and elucidate the reasons individuals did not undergo recommended germline testing. Medical records of patients with PDAC referred for genetic counseling between January 2015 and October 2017 were reviewed for demographic, medical/family history, and disease-specific data. If testing did not occur, reasons were documented. Genetic test results were categorized as negative, variants of unknown significance, or established pathogenic mutations. Descriptive statistics included means with standard deviations; associations were analyzed with t test and Fisher's exact test. 32% (137 of 432) of PDAC patients were referred for genetic counseling, but only 64% attended their appointment and 60% ultimately underwent germline testing. Common reasons for attrition included worsening disease severity, lack of patient follow-up, insurance concerns, and logistic/travel challenges. Pathogenic germline mutations were detected in 20% (16 of 82) of patients tested, distributed across races/ethnicities, and significantly associated with younger age and positive family history of breast cancer. PDAC patients frequently do not undergo genetic counseling/germline testing despite appropriate referrals, highlighting a need to develop streamlined processes to engage more patients in testing, especially those with high-risk features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan J Walker
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Julia Carnevale
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Christina Pedley
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.,Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Amie Blanco
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.,Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Salina Chan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.,Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Eric A Collisson
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Margaret A Tempero
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Andrew H Ko
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. .,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Masana L, López-Miranda J, Civeira F, Reinares L, Maraver J, Plana N, Cuenca R, Sanchez D, Hernandez J, Andres R, Blanco A, Villamayor S. Evolocumab Is Mainly Prescribed In Fh Patients With/Without Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (Ascvd) In Lipid/Internal Medicine Units In Spain: A Retrospective, Observational Study (Retoss-Imu). Atherosclerosis 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.06.602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
40
|
Adamczewski-Musch J, Arnold O, Atomssa ET, Behnke C, Belounnas A, Belyaev A, Berger-Chen JC, Biernat J, Blanco A, Blume C, Böhmer M, Chernenko S, Chlad L, Chudoba P, Ciepał I, Deveaux C, Dittert D, Dreyer J, Epple E, Fabbietti L, Fateev O, Fonte P, Franco C, Friese J, Fröhlich I, Galatyuk T, Garzón JA, Gernhäuser R, Golubeva M, Greifenhagen R, Guber F, Gumberidze M, Harabasz S, Heinz T, Hennino T, Höhne C, Holzmann R, Ierusalimov A, Ivashkin A, Kämpfer B, Kardan B, Koenig I, Koenig W, Kolb BW, Korcyl G, Kornakov G, Kornas F, Kotte R, Kuboś J, Kugler A, Kunz T, Kurepin A, Kurilkin A, Kurilkin P, Ladygin V, Lalik R, Lapidus K, Lebedev A, Linev S, Lopes L, Lorenz M, Mahmoud T, Maier L, Malige A, Markert J, Maurus S, Metag V, Michel J, Mihaylov DM, Mikhaylov V, Morozov S, Müntz C, Münzer R, Naumann L, Nowakowski K, Parpottas Y, Pechenov V, Pechenova O, Petukhov O, Pietraszko J, Prozorov AP, Przygoda W, Ramstein B, Rathod N, Reshetin A, Rodriguez-Ramos P, Rost A, Sadovsky A, Salabura P, Scheib T, Schmidt-Sommerfeld K, Schuldes H, Schwab E, Scozzi F, Seck F, Sellheim P, Siebenson J, Silva L, Smyrski J, Spataro S, Spies S, Ströbele H, Stroth J, Strzempek P, Sturm C, Svoboda O, Szala M, Tlusty P, Traxler M, Tsertos H, Ungethüm C, Vázquez Doce O, Wagner V, Wendisch C, Wiebusch MG, Wirth J, Wójcik D, Zanevsky Y, Zumbruch P, Curceanu C, Piscicchia K, Scordo A. Strong Absorption of Hadrons with Hidden and Open Strangeness in Nuclear Matter. Phys Rev Lett 2019; 123:022002. [PMID: 31386541 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.123.022002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
We present the first observation of K^{-} and ϕ absorption within nuclear matter by means of π^{-}-induced reactions on C and W targets at an incident beam momentum of 1.7 GeV/c studied with HADES at SIS18/GSI. The double ratio (K^{-}/K^{+})_{W}/(K^{-}/K^{+})_{C} is found to be 0.319±0.009(stat)_{-0.012}^{+0.014}(syst) indicating a larger absorption of K^{-} in heavier targets as compared to lighter ones. The measured ϕ/K^{-} ratios in π^{-}+C and π^{-}+W reactions within the HADES acceptance are found to be equal to 0.55±0.04(stat)_{-0.07}^{+0.06}(syst) and to 0.63±0.06(stat)_{-0.11}^{+0.11}(syst), respectively. The similar ratios measured in the two different reactions demonstrate for the first time experimentally that the dynamics of the ϕ meson in nuclear medium is strongly coupled to the K^{-} dynamics. The large difference in the ϕ production off C and W nuclei is discussed in terms of a strong ϕN in-medium coupling. These results are relevant for the description of heavy-ion collisions and the structure of neutron stars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - C Curceanu
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, 00044 Frascati, Italy
| | - K Piscicchia
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, 00044 Frascati, Italy
- CENTRO FERMI - Museo Storico della Fisica e Centro Studi e Ricerche "Enrico Fermi", 00184 Rome, Italy
| | - A Scordo
- INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, 00044 Frascati, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Varela-Eirín M, Varela-Vázquez A, Blanco A, Caeiro JR, Mayán MD. Regulación de la plasticidad celular y senescencia en condrocitos articulares: conexina 43 como diana terapéutica para el tratamiento de la artrosis. Rev Osteoporos Metab Miner 2019. [DOI: 10.4321/s1889-836x2019000200003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
42
|
Guemra M, Gabriel P, Villena Y, Blanco A, Rando A, Martínez RL, Frías FR. Alanine aminotransferase: Upper limit of normal must be questioned. Clin Chim Acta 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.03.767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
43
|
Blanco A, de Bustamante I, Pascual-Aguilar JA. Using old cartography for the inventory of a forgotten heritage: The hydraulic heritage of the Community of Madrid. Sci Total Environ 2019; 665:314-328. [PMID: 30772561 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Revised: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Hydraulic heritage is a legacy that has generally been forgotten in territorial management and protective actions. This heritage expresses the way in which inhabitants have used their water resources and related structures for centuries. For proper management, it is necessary to draw up an inventory. Using Geographical Information System (GIS) tools, we have created a spatial and thematic inventory of the hydraulic heritage located in the Community of Madrid. This inventory shows the good conditions, both in abundance (more than 5800 point type entities) and diversity (28 categories in the point entities type layer), of historical hydraulic elements in the region. All the information in this work has been extracted from old maps (1870-1960). A database was designed to provide spatial, thematic and temporal information on this heritage. Element distribution was concentrated mainly in the river plains and the metropolitan areas of the region, and it has been proven how hydraulic elements are endangered due to increasing urban pressure. This phenomenon and agricultural modernisation are the main factors influencing the survival of this type of assets. Thanks to this methodology, it should be possible to analyse the status of the heritage ensemble included in the inventory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Blanco
- IMDEA Water Institute, Avda. Punto Com 2, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
| | - I de Bustamante
- IMDEA Water Institute, Avda. Punto Com 2, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain; University of Alcalá, Geology, Geography and Environment Department, Crta. A-II, km 33.6, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
| | - J A Pascual-Aguilar
- IMDEA Water Institute, Avda. Punto Com 2, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain; CIDE CSIC UV GV, Landscape Chem & Environm Forens Grp, Carretera Moncada, km 4-5, 46113, Valencia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gavalda A, Casals-Diaz L, Martinez R, Blanco A, Godessart N. 679 Pharmacological validation of a mouse model of atopic dermatitis induced by topical calcipotriol. J Invest Dermatol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.03.755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
45
|
Nigro D, Gadaleta A, Mangini G, Colasuonno P, Marcotuli I, Giancaspro A, Giove SL, Simeone R, Blanco A. Candidate genes and genome-wide association study of grain protein content and protein deviation in durum wheat. Planta 2019; 249:1157-1175. [PMID: 30603787 DOI: 10.1007/s00425-018-03075-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Stable QTL for grain protein content co-migrating with nitrogen-related genes have been identified by the candidate genes and genome-wide association mapping approaches useful for marker-assisted selection. Grain protein content (GPC) is one of the most important quality traits in wheat, defining the nutritional and end-use properties and rheological characteristics. Over the years, a number of breeding programs have been developed aimed to improving GPC, most of them having been prevented by the negative correlation with grain yield. To overcome this issue, a collection of durum wheat germplasm was evaluated for both GPC and grain protein deviation (GPD) in seven field trials. Fourteen candidate genes involved in several processes related to nitrogen metabolism were precisely located on two high-density consensus maps of common and durum wheat, and six of them were found to be highly associated with both traits. The wheat collection was genotyped using the 90 K iSelect array, and 11 stable quantitative trait loci (QTL) for GPC were detected in at least three environments and the mean across environments by the genome-wide association mapping. Interestingly, seven QTL were co-migrating with N-related candidate genes. Four QTL were found to be significantly associated to increases of GPD, indicating that selecting for GPC could not affect final grain yield per spike. The combined approaches of candidate genes and genome-wide association mapping led to a better understanding of the genetic relationships between grain storage proteins and grain yield per spike, and provided useful information for marker-assisted selection programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Nigro
- Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, Genetics and Plant Breeding Section, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - A Gadaleta
- Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Research Unit of "Genetics and Plant Biotechnology", University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
| | - G Mangini
- Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, Genetics and Plant Breeding Section, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - P Colasuonno
- Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Research Unit of "Genetics and Plant Biotechnology", University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - I Marcotuli
- Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Research Unit of "Genetics and Plant Biotechnology", University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - A Giancaspro
- Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Research Unit of "Genetics and Plant Biotechnology", University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - S L Giove
- Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Research Unit of "Genetics and Plant Biotechnology", University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - R Simeone
- Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, Genetics and Plant Breeding Section, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - A Blanco
- Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, Genetics and Plant Breeding Section, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Acerbi I, Shieh Y, Madlensky L, Tice J, Ziv E, Eklund M, Blanco A, DeRosa D, Tong B, Goodman D, Nassereddine L, Anderson N, Harvey H, Layton T, Park HL, Petruse A, Stewart S, Wernisch J, Risty L, Koenig B, Sarrafan S, Firouzian R, Kaplan C, Hiatt R, Parker BA, Wenger N, Lee V, Heditsian D, Brain S, Stover Fiscalini A, Borowsky AD, Anton-Culver H, Naeim A, Kaster A, Talley M, van 't Veer LJ, LaCroix A, Esserman LJ. Abstract OT2-08-01: Personalized breast cancer screening in a population based study: Women Informed to Screen Depending On Measures of risk (WISDOM). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-ot2-08-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: WISDOM is a 100,000 healthy women preference-tolerant, pragmatic study comparing annual to personalized risk-based breast screening. The novelty of WISDOM personalized screening is the integration of previously validated genetic and clinical risk factors (age, family history, breast biopsy results, ethnicity, mammographic density) into a single risk assessment model that directs the starting age, timing, and frequency of screening. The goal of WISDOM is to determine if personalized screening, compared to annual screening, is as safe, less morbid, enables prevention, and is preferred by women. The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02620852.
Methods: Women aged 40-74 years with no history of breast cancer or DCIS, and no previous double mastectomy can join the study online at wisdomstudy.org. Participants can elect randomization or self-select a study arm, and provide electronic consent and Release for Medical Information using DocuSign. For all participants, 5-year risk of developing breast cancer is calculated according to the Breast Cancer Screening Consortium (BCSC) model. Participants in the personalized arm undergo panel-based mutation testing, and their 5-year risk is calculated using the BCSC score combined with a Polygenic Risk Score (BCSC-PRS) that includes 75 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, increase to 229) known to increase breast cancer risk. SNPs and mutations (BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, PTEN, STK11, CDH1, ATM, PALB2, and CHEK2) are assessed by saliva-based testing through Color Genomics. 5-year risk level thresholds are used to stratify for low-, moderate- and high risk. Risk stratification determines age to start, stop, and frequency of screening.
Enrollment: As of July 2018, the WISDOM study is open to all eligible women in California, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota and Iowa. To date, 23,329 eligible women have registered and 14,393 women have consented to participate in the trial. We analyzed 3,255 participants who have completed risk assessment in the personalized arm. The median age was 56 years. 82% were Caucasian, 1% African-American, and 6% Asian. 9% self-reported as Hispanic. We are partnering with health insurers and self-insured companies using coverage with evidence progression. To strengthen generalizability, we are expanding to other states. WISDOM enrollment will continue past 2019.
Feasibility: To evaluate the addition of PRS, we used paired statistical tests (McNemar) to compare the distributions of BCSC, and BCSC-PRS risk estimates around low-risk (<1.3%), and very-high risk (>6%) thresholds, the latter corresponding to 5-year risk of a BRCA mutation carrier. The median 5-year risk was 1.5% (IQR 1.0-2.1%) using the BCSC model, and 1.4% (IQR 0.8-2.5%) using the BCSC-PRS model. The BCSC-PRS model classified more women into the low (<1%) and very high (≥6%) risk categories compared to the BCSC model (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that incorporating genetic variants into a validated clinical model is feasible and impacts risk classification compared to a model without genetic risk factors. Results at 5 years will reveal if this classification improves healthcare value by reducing screen volumes and costs without jeopardizing outcomes.
Citation Format: Acerbi I, Shieh Y, Madlensky L, Tice J, Ziv E, Eklund M, Blanco A, DeRosa D, Tong B, Goodman D, Nassereddine L, Anderson N, Harvey H, Layton T, Park HL, Petruse A, Stewart S, Wernisch J, Risty L, Koenig B, Sarrafan S, Firouzian R, Kaplan C, Hiatt R, Parker BA, Wenger N, Lee V, Heditsian D, Brain S, Stover Fiscalini A, Borowsky AD, Anton-Culver H, Naeim A, Kaster A, Talley M, van 't Veer LJ, LaCroix A, Wisdom Study and Athena Breast Health Network Investigators and Advocate Partners, Esserman LJ. Personalized breast cancer screening in a population based study: Women Informed to Screen Depending On Measures of risk (WISDOM) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-08-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Acerbi
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Y Shieh
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Madlensky
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Tice
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - E Ziv
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Eklund
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Blanco
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D DeRosa
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - B Tong
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Goodman
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Nassereddine
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - N Anderson
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Harvey
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - T Layton
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - HL Park
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Petruse
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Stewart
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Wernisch
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Risty
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - B Koenig
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Sarrafan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R Firouzian
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C Kaplan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R Hiatt
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - BA Parker
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - N Wenger
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - V Lee
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Heditsian
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Brain
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Stover Fiscalini
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - AD Borowsky
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - H Anton-Culver
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Naeim
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Kaster
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Talley
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - LJ van 't Veer
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A LaCroix
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - LJ Esserman
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA; University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD; Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Ramstein B, Adamczewski-Musch J, Arnold O, Arnoldi-Meadows B, Belounnas A, Belyaev A, Biernat J, Blanco A, Blume C, Böhmer M, Bordalo P, Chlad L, Chudoba P, Ciepał I, Deveaux C, Dittert D, Dreyer J, Fabbietti L, Fateev O, Fonte P, Franco C, Friese J, Fröhlich I, Galatyuk T, Garzón JA, Gernhäuser R, Gillitzer A, Golubeva M, Greifenhagen R, Guber F, Gumberidze M, Harabasz S, Heinz T, Hennino T, Himmelreich M, Höhne C, Holzmann R, Ierusalimov A, Ivanov V, Ivashkin A, Kämpfer B, Kajetanowicz M, Kampert KH, Karavicheva T, Kardan B, Khomyakov V, Koenig I, Koenig W, Korcyl G, Kornakov G, Kornas F, Kotte R, Kozela A, Kuboś J, Kugler A, Kunz T, Kurepin A, Kurilkin P, Kushpil V, Ladygin V, Lalik R, Lebedev A, Linev S, Liu M, Lopes L, Lorenz M, Lykasov G, Mahmoud T, Malakhov A, Markert J, Maurus S, Metag V, Michel J, Mihaylov D, Mikhaylov V, Morozov S, Müntz C, Naumann L, Nowakowski K, Parpottas Y, Patel V, Pauly C, Pechenov V, Pechenova O, Pereira A, Petousis V, Petukhov O, Pfeifer D, Pietraszko J, Przygoda W, Pysz K, Ramos S, Reshetin A, Ritman L, Rodriguez-Ramos P, Rost A, Sadovsky A, Salabura P, Scheib T, Schuldes H, Schwab E, Scozzi F, Seck F, Sellheim P, Selyuzhenkov I, Silva L, Smyrski J, Sobiella M, Spataro S, Spies S, Ströbele H, Stroth J, Strzempek P, Svoboda O, Szala M, Taranenko A, Tlusty P, Traxler M, Troyan A, Tsertos H, Wagner V, Wendisch C, Wiebusch M, Wintz P, Wirth J, Włoch B, Zhilin A, Zinchenko A, Zumbruch P, Zuschke M. Time-Like Baryon Transitions studies with HADES. EPJ Web Conf 2019. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201919901008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The HADES collaboration uses the e+e− production as a probe of the resonance matter produced in collisions at incident energies of 1-3.5 GeV/nucleon at GSI. Elementary reactions provide useful references for these studies and give information on resonance Dalitz decays (R→Ne+e−). Such processes are sensitive to the structure of time-like electromagnetic baryon transitions in a kinematic range where (off-shell) vector mesons play a crucial role. Results obtained in proton-proton reactions and in a commissioning pion-beam experiment are reported and prospects for future pion beam experiments and for first hyperon Dalitz decay measurements are described. The connection with the investigations of medium effects to be continued with HADES in the next years at SIS18 and SIS100 is also discussed.
Collapse
|
48
|
Blanco A, Lacoste E, Albinet V, Godessart N, Gavaldà A. Murine models relevant to acne: Ear sebaceous gland and Rhino comedone models. J Comp Pathol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2018.10.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
49
|
Sepúlveda-Hermosilla G, Blanco A, Lizana R, Ramos L, Freire M, Spencer M, Chernilo S, Aren O, Perez P, Armisen R. PD.1.05 Molecular Characterization of EGFR Somatic Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinoma Tumors from Chilean Patients. J Thorac Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
50
|
Freire M, Lizana R, Ramos L, Sepúlveda-Hermosilla G, Blanco A, Perez P, Aren O, Chernilo S, Fernández C, Armisen R. P07 Preliminary Orthogonal Analysis of EML4-ALK Gene Fusion Detection Methods in Chilean Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.07.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|