CX-4945 (Silmitasertib) Induces Cell Death by Impairing Lysosomal Utilization in KRAS Mutant Cholangiocarcinoma Cell Lines

BACKGROUND/AIM

Macropinocytosis is a non-selective form of endocytosis that facilitates the uptake of extracellular substances, such as nutrients and macromolecules, into the cells. In KRAS-driven cancers, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, macropinocytosis and subsequent lysosomal utilization are known to be enhanced to overcome metabolic stress. In this study, we investigated the role of Casein Kinase 2 (CK2) inhibition in macropinocytosis and subsequent metabolic processes in KRAS mutant cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) cell lines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The bovine serum albumin (BSA) uptake indicating macropinocytosis was performed by flow cytometry using the HuCCT1 KRAS mutant CCA cell line. To validate macropinosome, the Rab7 and LAMP2 were labeled and analyzed via immunocytochemistry and western blot. The CX-4945 (Silmitasertib), CK2 inhibitor, was used to investigate the role of CK2 in macropinocytosis and subsequent lysosomal metabolism.

RESULTS

The TFK-1, a KRAS wild-type CCA cell line, showed only apoptotic morphological changes. However, the HuCCT1 cell line showed macropinocytosis. Although CX-4945 induced morphological changes accompanied by the accumulation of intracellular vacuoles and cell death, the level of macropinocytosis did not change. These intracellular vacuoles were identified as late macropinosomes, representing Rab7+ vesicles before fusion with lysosomes. In addition, CX-4945 suppressed LAMP2 expression following the inhibition of the Akt-mTOR signaling pathway, which interrupts mature macropinosome and lysosomal metabolic utilization.

CONCLUSION

Macropinocytosis is used as an energy source in the KRAS mutant CCA cell line HuCCT1. The inhibition of CK2 by CX-4945 leads to cell death in HuCCT1 cells through alteration of the lysosome-dependent metabolism.

Clinical outcomes of second-line therapy following disease progression on first-line modified FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) is one of the standard first-line therapies in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC). However, there is no globally accepted second-line therapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX.

METHODS

Patients with BRPC and LAPC (n = 647) treated with first-line mFOLFIRINOX between January 2017 and December 2020 were included in this retrospective analysis. The details of the treatment outcomes and patterns of subsequent therapy after mFOLFIRINOX were reviewed.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up duration of 44.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 42.3-47.6), 322 patients exhibited disease progression on mFOLFIRINOX-locoregional progression only in 177 patients (55.0%) and distant metastasis in 145 patients (45.0%). The locoregional progression group demonstrated significantly longer post-progression survival (PPS) than that of the distant metastasis group (10.1 vs. 7.3 months, p = 0.002). In the locoregional progression group, survival outcomes did not differ between second-line chemoradiation/radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy (progression-free survival with second-line therapy [PFS-2], 3.2 vs. 4.3 months; p = 0.649; PPS, 10.7 vs. 10.2 months; p = 0.791). In patients who received second-line systemic chemotherapy following progression on mFOLFIRINOX (n = 211), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was associated with better disease control rates (69.2% vs. 42.3%, p = 0.005) and PFS-2 (3.8 vs. 1.7 months, p = 0.035) than gemcitabine monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed the real-world practice pattern of subsequent therapy and clinical outcomes following progression on first-line mFOLFIRINOX in BRPC and LAPC. Further investigation is necessary to establish the optimal therapy after failure of mFOLFIRINOX.

Impact of body mass index on the prognosis of unresectable HCC patients receiving first-line Lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab

INTRODUCTION

Overweight is a negative prognostic factor in the general population in the long term. However, the role of body mass index (BMI) in the short-mid term in advanced tumours is unclear. The present analysis investigates the role of BMI weight classes in a large sample of patients affected by HCC and receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib as first-line treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

The cohort included consecutive patients affected by BCLC-c and BCLC-B HCC patients from a multicenter international study group who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib as first-line therapy. Population was stratified according to the BMI in under-, over- and normal-weight according to the conventional thresholds. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the prognostic and predictive impact of BMI in patients affected by advanced or intermediate HCC. Survival curves were estimated using the product-limit method of Kaplan-Meier. The role of stratification factors was analysed with log-rank tests.

RESULTS

1292 consecutive patients with HCC were analysed. 466 (36%) patients were treated with lenvatinib and 826 (64%) patients were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. In the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab arm, 510 (62%) patients were normal-weight, 52 (6%) underweight and 264 (32%) overweight. At the univariate analysis for OS, underweight patients had significantly shorter OS compared to normal-weight patients, whereas no differences were found between normal-weight versus overweight. Multivariate analysis confirmed that underweight patients had significantly shorter OS compared to normal-weight patients (HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.0-2.8; p = .0323). In the lenvatinib arm, 26 patients (5.6%) were categorized as underweight, 256 (54.9%) as normal-weight, and 184 (39.5%) as overweight. At the univariate analysis for OS, no significant differences were found between normal-weight versus underweight and between normal-weight versus overweight, which was confirmed at multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis highlighted a prognostic role of BMI in a cohort of patients with advanced HCC who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, while no prognostic role for low BMI was apparent in patients who received lenvatinib.

Adverse Events as Potential Predictive Factors of Activity in Patients with Advanced HCC Treated with Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab

BACKGROUND

In the context of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with systemic therapy, the correlation between the appearance of adverse events (AEs) and reported efficacy outcomes is well-known and widely investigated. From other pathological settings, we are aware of the prognostic and predictive value of the occurrence of immune-related AEs in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective multicenter real-world study aims to investigate the potential prognostic value of AEs in patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in the first-line setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study population consisted of 823 patients from five countries (Italy, Germany, Portugal, Japan, and the Republic of Korea).

RESULTS

Of the patients, 73.3% presented at least one AE during the study period. The most common AEs were proteinuria (29.6%), arterial hypertension (27.2%), and fatigue (26.0%). In all, 17.3% of the AEs were grade (G) 3. One death due to bleeding was reported. The multivariate analysis confirmed the appearance of decreased appetite G < 2 [versus G ≥ 2; hazard ratio (HR) 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.90; p < 0.01] and immunotoxicity G < 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.70; 95% CI 0.24-0.99; p = 0.04) as independent prognostic factors for overall survival, and the appearance of decreased appetite G < 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.73; 95% CI 0.43-0.95; p = 0.01), diarrhea (yes versus no; HR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.85; p = 0.01), fatigue (yes versus no; HR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.65-0.95; p < 0.01), arterial hypertension G < 2 (versus G ≥ 2; HR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.87; p < 0.01), and proteinuria (yes versus no; HR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.98; p = 0.03) as independent prognostic factors for progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

As demonstrated for other therapies, there is also a correlation between the occurrence of AEs and outcomes for patients with HCC for the combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Practice guidelines for managing extrahepatic biliary tract cancers

Backgrounds/Aims

Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021.

Methods

Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop.

Results

In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing.

Conclusions

The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.

Recent Advances in Systemic Therapy for Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Background

The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCCA) is rising around the world. The disease is becoming a major global health issue. Conventionally, most patients with cholangiocarcinoma present with advanced disease and systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment. This review discusses recent advances in systemic treatments for patients with IHCCA.

Summary

The addition of durvalumab to a gemcitabine plus cisplatin regimen has significantly improved overall survival in the phase 3 TOPAZ-1 trial and is currently recommended as a standard first-line treatment. The phase 3 ABC-06 and phase 2b NIFTY trials have shown the benefit of second-line fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidine plus nanoliposomal irinotecan, respectively. They have provided a treatment option for patients without actionable alterations who progressed to first-line therapy. For patients with actionable genomic alterations, including FGFR2 rearrangement, IDH1 mutation, BRAF mutation, and ERBB2 amplification, targeted agents have shown encouraging efficacy in several phase 2-3 trials, and are recommended as subsequent treatments. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are being investigated for the treatment of previously treated patients, although only a small proportion of patients showed durable responses.

Key Messages

Recent advances in systemic treatments have improved clinical outcomes in patients with advanced IHCCA. However, most patients eventually show resistance to the treatment, and tumor progression occurs within a year. Indeed, there should be further efforts to improve the outcomes of patients with advanced IHCCA.

Incidence and Predictors of Esophagogastric Varices Bleeding in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Lenvatinib

Introduction

Lenvatinib is indicated for the forefront treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC), but its use may be limited by the risk of esophagogastric varices (EGV) bleeding. This study assessed the prevalence, predictors, and complications of EGV in aHCC patients treated with lenvatinib.

Methods

In this multicenter international retrospective study, cirrhotic patients treated with lenvatinib for aHCC, were enrolled if upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy was available within 6 months before treatment. Primary endpoint was the incidence of EGV bleeding during lenvatinib therapy; secondary endpoints were predictors for EGV bleeding, prevalence, and risk factors for the presence of EGV and high-risk EGV at baseline, as well as impact of EGV bleeding on patients' survival.

Results

535 patients were enrolled in the study (median age: 72 years, 78% male, 63% viral etiology, 89% Child-Pugh A, 16% neoplastic portal vein thrombosis [nPVT], 56% Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer-C): 234 had EGV (44%), 70 (30%) were at high risk and 59 were on primary prophylaxis. During lenvatinib treatment, 17 patients bled from EGV (3 grade 5), the 12-month cumulative incidence being 3%. The only baseline independent predictor of EGV bleeding was the presence of baseline high-risk EGV (hazard ratio: 6.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.23-21.57, p = 0.001). In these patients the 12-month risk was 17%. High-risk varices were independently associated with Child-Pugh B score (odds ratio [OR]: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.08-4.17, p = 0.03), nPVT (OR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.40-4.61, p = 0.002), and platelets <150,000/μL (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.35-4.50, p = 0.003).

Conclusion

In hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with lenvatinib, the risk of EGV bleeding was mostly low but significant only in patients with high-risk EGV at baseline.

Multicentre phase II trial of cabozantinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There has been a lack of prospective data on treatment after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We conducted a phase II multicentred study on cabozantinib in HCC after ICI treatment.

METHODS

This is an investigator-initiated single-arm clinical trial involving academic centres in Hong Kong and Korea. Key eligibility criteria include diagnosis of HCC; refractoriness to prior ICI-based treatment; Child-Pugh A liver function. Maximally two prior lines of therapy were allowed. All patients were commenced cabozantinib at 60mg/day. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Total 47 patients were recruited from Oct 2020 to May 2022. The median follow-up was 11.2 months. In the study, 27 and 20 patients received one and two prior therapies. The median PFS was 4.1 months (95%CI:3.3-5.3). The median OS was 9.9 months (95%CI:7.3-14.4), and the 1-year OS rate was 45.3%. Partial response and stable disease occurred in 3 (6.4%) and 36 (76.6%) of patients. When used as a second-line treatment (n=20), cabozantinib was associated with a median PFS and OS of 4.3 (95%CI:3.3-6.7) and 14.3 months (95%CI:8.9-NR). The corresponding median PFS and OS was 4.3 (95%CI:3.3-11.0) and 14.3 months (95%CI:9.0-NR) for those receiving ICI-based regimen with proven benefits (n=17). Commonest grade 3-4 TRAE was thrombocytopenia (6.4%). The median dose of cabozantinib was 40mg/day. The number of prior therapy was an independent prognosticator (one vs. two; HR=0.37; p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Cabozantinib demonstrates efficacy in patients with prior ICI. The survival data of second-line cabozantinib following the first-line ICI regimen provide reference for clinical trial testing post-ICI therapy. The number of prior line of treatment may be considered a stratification factor in randomized study.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

There is a lack of prospective data on systemic therapy following prior immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The current phase II clinical trial reported the efficacy and safety data of cabozantinib in patients with prior ICI-based treatment. Exploratory analyses showed that the performance of cabozantinib differed significantly when used as second or third-line treatment. The above data could be used a reference for clinical practice and design of future clinical trials on subsequent treatment following ICIs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04588051.

α-FAtE: A new predictive score of response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) and lenvatinib can be alternatively used as first-line systemic treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, no direct comparison of the two regimens has been performed in randomized clinical trials, making the identification of baseline differential predictors of response of major relevance to tailor the best therapeutic option to each patient. Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics of real-world AB-treated HCC patients were analyzed in uni- and multivariate analyses to find potential prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). Significant variables were incorporated in a composite score (α-FAtE) and it was tested for specificity and sensitivity in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and in multivariate analysis for OS. The score was applied in uni- and multivariate analyses for OS of a comparable lenvatinib-treated HCC population. Finally, comparison between treatments was performed in patients with low and high α-FAtE scores and predictivity estimated by interaction analysis. Time-to-progression (TTP) was a secondary endpoint. OS of AB-treated HCC patients was statistically longer in those with α-fetoprotein <400 ng/mL (HR 0.62, p = .0407), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) <125 IU/L (HR 0.52, p = .0189) and eosinophil count ≥70/μL (HR 0.46, p = .0013). The α-FAtE score was generated by the sum of single points attributed to each variable among the above reported. In ROC curve analysis, superior sensitivity and specificity were achieved by the score compared to individual variables (AUC 0.794, p < .02). Patients with high score had longer OS (HR 0.44, p = .0009) and TTP (HR 0.34, p < .0001) compared to low score if treated with AB, but not with lenvatinib. Overall, AB was superior to lenvatinib in high score patients (HR 0.55, p = .0043) and inferior in low score ones (HR 1.75, p = .0227). At interaction test, low α-FAtE score resulted as negative predictive factor of response to AB (p = .0004). In conclusion, α-FAtE is a novel prognostic and predictive score of response to first-line AB for HCC patients that, if validated in prospective studies, could drive therapeutic choice between lenvatinib and AB.

Regorafenib plus nivolumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the phase 2 RENOBATE trial

Regorafenib has anti-tumor activity in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) with potential immunomodulatory effects, suggesting that its combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor may have clinically meaningful benefits in patients with uHCC. The multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 RENOBATE trial tested regorafenib-nivolumab as front-line treatment for uHCC. Forty-two patients received nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks and regorafenib 80 mg daily (3-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule). The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. The secondary endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). ORR per RECIST version 1.1 was 31.0%, meeting the primary endpoint. The most common adverse events were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (38.1%), alopecia (26.2%) and skin rash (23.8%). Median PFS was 7.38 months. The 1-year OS rate was 80.5%, and the median OS was not reached. Exploratory single-cell RNA sequencing analyses of peripheral blood mononuclear cells showed that long-term responders exhibited T cell receptor repertoire diversification, enrichment of genes representing immunotherapy responsiveness in MKI67+ proliferating CD8+ T cells and a higher probability of M1-directed monocyte polarization. Our data support further clinical development of the regorafenib-nivolumab combination as front-line treatment for uHCC and provide preliminary insights on immune biomarkers of response. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04310709 .

Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) expression is associated with better clinical outcome and prognosis in rectal neuroendocrine tumors

Somatostatin analogues have recently been used as therapeutic targets for metastatic or surgically unresectable gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), and associated somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression has been well demonstrated in most GEP NETs, with the exception of rectal NETs. SSTR2 immunohistochemical expressions were evaluated in 350 surgically or endoscopically resected rectal NETs and compared to clinicopathologic factors. SSTR2 expression was observed in 234 (66.9%) rectal NET cases and associated tumors with smaller size (p = 0.001), low pT classification (p = 0.030), low AJCC tumor stage (p = 0.012), and absence of chromogranin expression (p = 0.009). Patients with rectal NET and SSTR2 expression had significantly better overall survival than those without SSTR2 expression both by univariable (p = 0.006) and multivariable (p = 0.014) analyses. In summary, approximately two-thirds of rectal NETs expressed SSTR2. SSTR2 expression was significantly associated with favorable behavior and good overall survival in patients with rectal NETs. Furthermore, SSTR2 expression can be used as prognostic factors. When metastatic disease occurs, SSTR2 expression can be used a possible target for somatostatin analogues.

Prediction of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy response using the absorbed dose estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumour

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Personalised dosimetry is crucial to optimise treatment outcomes and minimise adverse events. In this study, we investigated the correlation between the tumour-absorbed dose (TAD) estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT and the therapeutic response.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with advanced well-differentiated NETs grades 1-3 who underwent PRRT and exhibited greater uptake than liver on pre-therapeutic [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT. Target lesions were selected based on the RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST 1.0 criteria using [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT and pre-therapeutic contrast-enhanced CT scans. For anatomical image analysis, the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of the target lesions was measured using the RECIST 1.1 criteria for patient-based analysis and the longest diameter (LD) of the target lesion using the RECIST-L criteria for lesion-based analysis. Standardised uptake values (SUVs) were measured on SPECT/CT images, and TADs were calculated based on the SUVs. Dosimetry was performed using a single SPECT/CT imaging time point at day 4-5 post-therapy. Statistical analyses were conducted to investigate correlations and determine the target lesion responses.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with primary tumour sites and hepatic metastases were included. Fifty-five target lesions, predominantly located in the pancreas and liver, were analysed. The cumulative TAD (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.299-0.301, p = 0.025-0.027), but not the cycle 1 SUV (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.198-0.206, p = 0.131-0.147) or cycle 1 TAD (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.209-0.217, p = 0.112-0.126), exhibited a significant correlation with the change in LD of the target lesion. Binary logistic regression analysis identified the significance of the cumulative TAD in predicting disease control according to the RECIST-L criteria (odds ratio = 1.031-1.051, p = 0.024-0.026).

CONCLUSIONS

The cumulative TAD estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT revealed a significant correlation with change in LD, which was significantly higher for the cumulative TAD than for the cycle 1 SUV or TAD. A higher cumulative TAD was associated with disease control in the target lesion. However, considering the limitations inherent to a confined sample size, careful interpretation of these findings is required. Estimation of the cumulative TAD of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy could guide the platform towards personalised therapy.

Organ-specific response with first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments have become the mainstay of first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there has been a concern that intrahepatic HCC lesions may be less responsive to ICI monotherapy. We aimed to investigate the organ-specific response patterns among unresectable HCC patients treated with first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab or lenvatinib.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 386 patients with Child-Pugh A unresectable HCC who were treated with first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab (n = 217) or lenvatinib (n = 169). The organ-specific response was separately evaluated according to the site of the lesions: liver, lung, lymph node (LN), and intraabdomen based on a radiological evaluation adopted from RECIST v 1.1.

RESULTS

The median age was 60 years. Hepatitis B infection was the most common etiology (n = 270, 69.9%), and 291 (75.4%) patients had a viral etiology. The proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 30% reduction in the tumor burden for each organ category was overall higher in the atezolizumab-bevacizumab group than that in the lenvatinib group: 20.2% vs. 11.8%, 23.0% vs. 12.2%, 27.9% vs. 17.9% and 33.3% vs. 15.0% for intrahepatic, lung, LN, and intraabdominal lesions, respectively. The corresponding values for the subgroup with a viral etiology were 17.3% vs. 8.1%, 18.8% vs. 13.3%, 28.9% vs. 3.6%, and 36.0% vs. 12.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared to lenvatinib, atezolizumab-bevacizumab was associated with a favorable organ-specific response regardless of the site of the tumor lesions. Unlike anti-PD-1 monotherapy, atezolizumab-bevacizumab had a comparable organ-specific response between intrahepatic and extrahepatic lesions, especially for those with viral etiology HCCs.

Brightline-2: a phase IIa/IIb trial of brigimadlin (BI 907828) in advanced biliary tract cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or other solid tumors

Mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) is a key negative regulator of the tumor suppressor p53. Blocking the MDM2-p53 interaction, and restoring p53 function, is therefore a potential therapeutic strategy in MDM2-amplified, TP53 wild-type tumors. MDM2 is amplified in several tumor types, including biliary tract cancer (BTC), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), lung adenocarcinoma and bladder cancer, all of which have limited treatment options and poor patient outcomes. Brigimadlin (BI 907828) is a highly potent MDM2-p53 antagonist that has shown promising activity in preclinical and early-phase clinical studies. This manuscript describes the rationale and design of an ongoing phase IIa/IIb Brightline-2 trial evaluating brigimadlin as second-line treatment for patients with advanced/metastatic BTC, PDAC, lung adenocarcinoma, or bladder cancer.

Safety and Efficacy of Lenvatinib in Very Old Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Data concerning the use of lenvatinib in very old patients (≥ 80 years) are limited, although the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in this patient population is constantly increasing.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in a large cohort of very old patients (≥ 80 years) with unresectable HCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was conducted on a cohort of 1325 patients from 46 centers in four Western and Eastern countries (Italy, Germany, Japan, and the Republic of Korea) who were undergoing first-line treatment with lenvatinib between July 2010 and February 2022. Patients were stratified according to age as very old (≥ 80 years) and not very old (< 80 years).

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) was 15.7 months for patients < 80 years old and 18.4 months for patients ≥ 80 years old [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.25, p = 0.8281]. Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.3 months for patients < 80 years old and 6.5 months for patients ≥ 80 years old (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.91-1.25, p = 0.3954). No differences between the two study groups were found in terms of disease control rate (DCR; 80.8% versus 78.8%; p = 0.44) and response rate (RR; 38.2% versus 37.9%; p = 0.88). Patients < 80 years old experienced significantly more hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) grade ≥ 2 and decreased appetite grade ≥ 2. Conversely, patients ≥ 80 years old experienced significantly more fatigue grade ≥ 2. In the very old group, parameters associated with prognosis were AFP, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), and Child-Pugh score. BCLC stage was the only independent predictor of overall survival (OS; HR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.11-2.29, p = 0.01115).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights the same efficacy and safety of lenvatinib between very old and not very old patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Lu-177 DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Korea

BACKGROUND

Lutetium (Lu)-177 peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is one of the standard treatments for somatostatin receptor-positive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, limited Asian representation in the pivotal NETTER-1 trial and a lack of real-world data for Lu-177 PRRT from Asian regions exist.

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lu-177 PRRT in Korean patients with advanced NETs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study analyzed 64 patients treated with Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between November 2019 and December 2022. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 55 years. Prior to PRRT, patients received a median of two lines (range 0-6) of systemic therapy. Fifty (78%) patients received the planned four cycles of Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT. The median PFS was 21.7 months (95% confidence interval 16.7-not available) and the ORR was 20%. With a median follow-up of 15.7 months (range 1.0-39.3), the median OS was not reached and the 1-year OS rate was 88%. The median PFS was better in patients with grade 1-2 NETs than in those with grade 3 NET (not reached vs. 14.2 months; hazard ratio 3.15; p = 0.0058). Hematological toxicities were the common adverse events, including grade ≥ 3 anemia (7.8%), neutropenia (10.9%), and thrombocytopenia (9.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

In Korean patients with advanced NETs, Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT showed efficacy and safety outcomes, consistent with those in the NETTER-1 trial and previous Western real-world studies.

PARP Inhibitor Sensitizes BRCA-mutant Pancreatic Cancer to Oxaliplatin by Suppressing the CDK1/BRCA1 Axis

BACKGROUND/AIM

Currently, olaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, has been approved as maintenance therapy for patients with germline BRCA mutations and metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, platinum-based chemotherapy, which induces synthetic lethality with PARP inhibitor treatment, is still controversial. Hence, we aimed to examine a platinum-based drug in combination with a PARP inhibitor and generate data regarding the use of a PARP inhibitor in the overall treatment of pancreatic cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Capan-1 cell line (BRCA2-mutant pancreatic cancer cell line), we evaluated the combinatorial effects of olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, and oxaliplatin by cell viability, combination index, western blotting, immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry, apoptosis assays and in vivo experiments.

RESULTS

Capan-1 cells showed high sensitivity to olaparib due to the alteration in PARP activity, which led to cell death through the accumulation of oxaliplatin-induced DNA damage. Beyond DNA damage, oxaliplatin also suppressed the CDK1/BRCA1 signaling axis, which induced defects in homologous recombination repair. Additionally, inhibition of CDK1, a biomarker for oxaliplatin efficacy, induced cell death regardless of the BRCA mutation profile.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin may be used in combination with olaparib in PDAC patients with DNA damage repair mutations. Our findings highlight CDK1 as a potential therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer.

Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Use of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with Solid Cancer: A Joint Report from KSMO and KSP

In recent years, next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genetic testing has become crucial in cancer care. While its primary objective is to identify actionable genetic alterations to guide treatment decisions, its scope has broadened to encompass aiding in pathological diagnosis and exploring resistance mechanisms. With the ongoing expansion in NGS application and reliance, a compelling necessity arises for expert consensus on its application in solid cancers. To address this demand, the forthcoming recommendations not only provide pragmatic guidance for the clinical use of NGS but also systematically classify actionable genes based on specific cancer types. Additionally, these recommendations will incorporate expert perspectives on crucial biomarkers, ensuring informed decisions regarding circulating tumor DNA panel testing.

Analysis of Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA in Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Modified FOLFIRINOX: Clinical Relevance of DNA Damage Repair Gene Alteration Detection

PURPOSE

There are no reliable biomarkers to guide treatment for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) in the neoadjuvant setting. We used plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing to search biomarkers for patients with BRPC receiving neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in our phase 2 clinical trial (NCT02749136).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among the 44 patients enrolled in the trial, patients with plasma ctDNA sequencing at baseline or post-operation were included in this analysis. Plasma cell-free DNA isolation and sequencing were performed using the Guardant 360 assay. Detection of genomic alterations, including DNA damage repair (DDR) genes, were examined for correlations with survival.

RESULTS

Among the 44 patients, 28 patients had ctDNA sequencing data qualified for the analysis and were included in this study. Among the 25 patients with baseline plasma ctDNA data, 10 patients (40%) had alterations of DDR genes detected at baseline, inclu-ding ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2 and MLH1, and showed significantly better progression-free survival than those without such DDR gene alterations detected (median, 26.6 vs. 13.5 months; log-rank p=0.004). Patients with somatic KRAS mutations detected at baseline (n=6) had significantly worse overall survival (median, 8.5 months vs. not applicable; log-rank p=0.003) than those without. Among 13 patients with post-operative plasma ctDNA data, eight patients (61.5%) had detectable somatic alterations.

CONCLUSION

Detection of DDR gene mutations from plasma ctDNA at baseline was associated with better survival outcomes of pati-ents with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX and may be a prognostic biomarker.

Phase 2 trial of bintrafusp alfa as second-line therapy for patients with locally advanced/metastatic biliary tract cancers

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Biliary tract cancers are rare, heterogeneous cancers with poor prognoses. Bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-βRII (a TGF-β "trap") fused to a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody blocking programmed death ligand 1, was evaluated in patients with locally advanced/metastatic chemorefractory biliary tract cancers.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

This multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study (NCT03833661) enrolled adults with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer that was intolerant to or had failed first-line systemic platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received 1200 mg bintrafusp alfa intravenously Q2W. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 assessed by IRC. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, durable response rate, safety, progression-free survival, and overall survival.Between March 2019 and January 2020, 159 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 16.1 (range, 0.0-19.3) months; 17 patients (10.7%; 95% CI: 6.4%-16.6%) achieved an objective response. Median duration of response was 10.0 (range, 1.9-15.7) months; 10 patients (6.3%; 95% CI: 3.1%-11.3%) had a durable response (≥6 mo). Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.7-1.8 mo); median overall survival was 7.6 months (95% CI: 5.8-9.7 mo). Overall survival rates were 57.9% (6 mo) and 38.8% (12 mo). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 26.4% of patients, including one treatment-related death (hepatic failure). Frequent grade ≥3 adverse events included anemia (3.8%), pruritus (1.9%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (1.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study did not meet its prespecified primary endpoint, bintrafusp alfa demonstrated clinical activity as second-line treatment in this hard-to-treat cancer, with durable responses and a manageable safety profile.

Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors in unresectable or metastatic combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been demonstrated to be effective for unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) in prior prospective trials. However, the clinical outcomes of ICIs in patients with combined HCC-CCA (cHCC-CCA) have not been investigated. Accordingly, we retrospectively evaluated the effectiveness and safety of ICIs in patients with unresectable or metastatic cHCC-CCA.

METHODS

Among 101 patients with histologically documented cHCC-CCA who received systemic therapy, 25 received ICIs between January 2015 and September 2021 and were included in the current analysis. Overall response rate (ORR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The median age was 64 years (range 38-83) and 84% (n = 21) of patients were males. Most patients had Child-Pugh A liver function (n = 22, 88%) and hepatitis B virus infection (17, 68%). Nivolumab (n = 17, 68%) was the most frequently used ICI, followed by pembrolizumab (n = 5, 20%), atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (n = 2, 8%), and ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 1, 4%). All patients, except one, had previously received systemic therapy; median two lines (1-5 lines) of systemic therapy were administered prior to ICIs. With a median follow-up duration of 20.1 months (95% CI 4.9-35.2 months), the median PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI 2.4-4.8 months), and the median OS was 8.3 months (95% CI 6.8-9.8 months). The ORR was 20.0% (n = 5, nivolumab for 2 patients, pembrolizumab for 1, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for 1, and ipilimumab plus nivolumab for 1) and the duration of response was 11.6 months (95% CI 11.2-12.0 months).

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs displayed clinical anti-cancer effectiveness, aligning with the results of prior prospective studies for HCC or CCA. Further international studies are required to define the optimal strategies for managing unresectable or metastatic cHCC-CCA.

Sequential therapies after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib first-line treatments in hepatocellular carcinoma patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this retrospective proof-of-concept study was to compare different second-line treatments for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and progressive disease (PD) after first-line lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1381 patients had PD at first-line therapy. 917 patients received lenvatinib as first-line treatment, and 464 patients atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line.

RESULTS

49.6% of PD patients received a second-line therapy without any statistical difference in overall survival (OS) between lenvatinib (20.6months) and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab first-line (15.7months; p = 0.12; hazard ratio [HR]= 0.80). After lenvatinib first-line, there wasn't any statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p = 0.27; sorafenib HR: 1; immunotherapy HR: 0.69; other therapies HR: 0.85). Patients who underwent trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE) had a significative longer OS than patients who received sorafenib (24.7 versus 15.8months, p < 0.01; HR=0.64). After atezolizumab plus bevacizumab first-line, there was a statistical difference between second-line therapy subgroups (p < 0.01; sorafenib HR: 1; lenvatinib HR: 0.50; cabozantinib HR: 1.29; other therapies HR: 0.54). Patients who received lenvatinib (17.0months) and those who underwent TACE (15.9months) had a significative longer OS than patients treated with sorafenib (14.2months; respectively, p = 0.01; HR=0.45, and p < 0.05; HR=0.46).

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of patients receiving first-line lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab access second-line treatment. Our data suggest that in patients progressed to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is lenvatinib, while in patients progressed to lenvatinib, the systemic therapy able to achieve the longest survival is immunotherapy.

Clinical outcomes with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter real-world study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare response rates of lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, in first-line real-world setting.

METHODS

Overall cohort included Western and Eastern hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patient populations from 46 centres in 4 countries (Italy, Germany, Japan, and Republic of Korea).

RESULTS

1312 patients were treated with lenvatinib, and 823 patients were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Objective response rate (ORR) was 38.6% for patients receiving lenvatinib, and 27.3% for patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (p < 0.01; odds ratio 0.60). For patients who achieved complete response (CR), overall survival (OS) was not reached in both arms, but the result from univariate Cox regression model showed 62% reduction of death risk for patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (p = 0.05). In all multivariate analyses, treatment arm was not found to be an independent factor conditioning OS. Comparing ORR achieved in the two arms, there was a statistically significant difference in favor of lenvatinib compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in all subgroups except for Eastern patients, Child-Pugh B patients, presence of portal vein thrombosis, α-feto-protein ≥ 400 ng/mL, presence of extrahepatic disease, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 2, and no previous locoregional procedures.

CONCLUSION

Lenvatinib achieves higher ORR in all patient subgroups. Patients who achieve CR with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab can achieve OS so far never recorded in HCC patients. This study did not highlight any factors that could identify patient subgroups capable of obtaining CR.

A randomised phase 2 study of continuous or intermittent dosing schedule of imatinib re-challenge in patients with tyrosine kinase inhibitor-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumours

BACKGROUND

Imatinib re-challenge is one of the available therapeutic options for patients with treatment-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Intermittent dosing of imatinib was suggested to delay outgrow of the imatinib-resistant clones in a preclinical study, and it could potentially reduce the adverse events.

METHODS

A randomised phase 2 study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a continuous or intermittent imatinib schedule in GIST patients whose disease had progressed to at least imatinib and sunitinib.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were included in the full analysis set. The disease control rate at 12 weeks was 34.8% and 43.5%, and median progression-free survival was 1.68 and 1.57 months in the continuous and intermittent groups, respectively. The frequency of diarrhoea, anorexia, decreased neutrophil, or dysphagia was lower in the intermittent group. The scores for global health status/quality of life was not significantly deteriorated over the 8 weeks in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The intermittent dosage did not improve the efficacy outcomes as compared to the continuous dosage, but showed slightly better safety profiles. Given the limited efficacy of imatinib re-challenge, intermittent dosage may also be considered in clinical circumstances where standard fourth-line agent is unavailable or all other viable treatments failed.

FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-based Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable and Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Multi-institutional, Patient-Level, Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer often presents as locally advanced (LAPC) or borderline resectable (BRPC). Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is recommended as initial treatment. It is currently unclear what chemotherapy should be preferred for patients with BRPC or LAPC.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and multi-institutional meta-analysis of patient-level data regarding the use of initial systemic therapy for BRPC and LAPC. Outcomes were reported separately for tumor entity and by chemotherapy regimen including FOLFIRINOX (FIO) or gemcitabine-based.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies comprising 2930 patients were analyzed for overall survival (OS) calculated from the beginning of systemic treatment. OS for patients with BRPC was 22.0 months with FIO, 16.9 months with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (Gem/nab), 21.6 months with gemcitabine/cisplatin or oxaliplatin or docetaxel or capecitabine (GemX), and 10 months with gemcitabine monotherapy (Gem-mono) (p < 0.0001). In patients with LAPC, OS also was higher with FIO (17.1 months) compared with Gem/nab (12.5 months), GemX (12.3 months), and Gem-mono (9.4 months; p < 0.0001). This difference was driven by the patients who did not undergo surgery, where FIO was superior to other regimens. The resection rates for patients with BRPC were 0.55 for gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and 0.53 with FIO. In patients with LAPC, resection rates were 0.19 with Gemcitabine and 0.28 with FIO. In resected patients, OS for patients with BRPC was 32.9 months with FIO and not different compared to Gem/nab, (28.6 months, p = 0.285), GemX (38.8 months, p = 0.1), or Gem-mono (23.1 months, p = 0.083). A similar trend was observed in resected patients converted from LAPC.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with BRPC or LAPC, primary treatment with FOLFIRINOX compared with Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy appears to provide a survival benefit for patients that are ultimately unresectable. For patients that undergo surgical resection, outcomes are similar between GEM+ and FOLFIRINOX when delivered in the neoadjuvant setting.

Safety and efficacy of trastuzumab biosimilar plus irinotecan or gemcitabine in patients with previously treated HER2 (ERBB2)-positive non-breast/non-gastric solid tumors: a phase II basket trial with circulating tumor DNA analysis

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) (ERBB2)-directed agents are standard treatments for patients with HER2-positive breast and gastric cancer. Herein, we report the results of an open-label, single-center, phase II basket trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab biosimilar (Samfenet®) plus treatment of physician's choice for patients with previously treated HER2-positive advanced solid tumors, along with biomarker analysis employing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing.

METHODS

Patients with HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic non-breast, non-gastric solid tumors who failed at least one prior treatment were included in this study conducted at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Patients received trastuzumab combined with irinotecan or gemcitabine at the treating physicians' discretion. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate as per RECIST version 1.1. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and at the time of disease progression for ctDNA analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were screened from 31 December 2019 to 17 September 2021, and 20 were enrolled in this study. Their median age was 64 years (30-84 years), and 13 patients (65.0%) were male. The most common primary tumor was hepatobiliary cancer (seven patients, 35.0%), followed by colorectal cancer (six patients, 30.0%). Among 18 patients with an available response evaluation, the objective response rate was 11.1% (95% confidence interval 3.1% to 32.8%). ERBB2 amplification was detected from ctDNA analysis of baseline plasma samples in 85% of patients (n = 17), and the ERBB2 copy number from ctDNA analysis showed a significant correlation with the results from tissue sequencing. Among 16 patients with post-progression ctDNA analysis, 7 (43.8%) developed new alterations. None of the patients discontinued the study due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Trastuzumab plus irinotecan or gemcitabine was safe and feasible for patients with previously treated HER2-positive advanced solid tumors with modest efficacy outcomes, and ctDNA analysis was useful for detecting HER2 amplification.

Pembrolizumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (KEYNOTE-966): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Biliary tract cancers, which arise from the intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts and the gallbladder, generally have a poor prognosis and are rising in incidence worldwide. The standard-of-care treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer is chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Because most biliary tract cancers have an immune-suppressed microenvironment, immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy is associated with a low objective response rate. We aimed to assess whether adding the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin would improve outcomes compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

KEYNOTE-966 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 175 medical centres globally. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older; had previously untreated, unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer; had disease measurable per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1; and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, both administered intravenously every 3 weeks (maximum 35 cycles), in combination with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; no maximum duration) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks; maximum 8 cycles). Randomisation was done using a central interactive voice-response system and stratified by geographical region, disease stage, and site of origin in block sizes of four. The primary endpoint of overall survival was evaluated in the intention-to-treat population. The secondary endpoint of safety was evaluated in the as-treated population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04003636.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 4, 2019, and June 8, 2021, 1564 patients were screened for eligibility, 1069 of whom were randomly assigned to pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (pembrolizumab group; n=533) or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (placebo group; n=536). Median study follow-up at final analysis was 25·6 months (IQR 21·7-30·4). Median overall survival was 12·7 months (95% CI 11·5-13·6) in the pembrolizumab group versus 10·9 months (9·9-11·6) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·83 [95% CI 0·72-0·95]; one-sided p=0·0034 [significance threshold, p=0·0200]). In the as-treated population, the maximum adverse event grade was 3 to 4 in 420 (79%) of 529 participants in the pembrolizumab group and 400 (75%) of 534 in the placebo group; 369 (70%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 367 (69%) in the placebo group had treatment-related adverse events with a maximum grade of 3 to 4. 31 (6%) participants in the pembrolizumab group and 49 (9%) in the placebo group died due to adverse events, including eight (2%) in the pembrolizumab group and three (1%) in the placebo group who died due to treatment-related adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

Based on a statistically significant, clinically meaningful improvement in overall survival compared with gemcitabine and cisplatin without any new safety signals, pembrolizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin could be a new treatment option for patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable biliary tract cancer.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.

Integrative analysis of risk factors for immune-related adverse events of checkpoint blockade therapy in cancer

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by checkpoint inhibitors involve a multitude of different risk factors. Here, to interrogate the multifaceted underlying mechanisms, we compiled germline exomes and blood transcriptomes with clinical data, before and after checkpoint inhibitor treatment, from 672 patients with cancer. Overall, irAE samples showed a substantially lower contribution of neutrophils in terms of baseline and on-therapy cell counts and gene expression markers related to neutrophil function. Allelic variation of HLA-B correlated with overall irAE risk. Analysis of germline coding variants identified a nonsense mutation in an immunoglobulin superfamily protein, TMEM162. In our cohort and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data, TMEM162 alteration was associated with higher peripheral and tumor-infiltrating B cell counts and suppression of regulatory T cells in response to therapy. We developed machine learning models for irAE prediction, validated using additional data from 169 patients. Our results provide valuable insights into risk factors of irAE and their clinical utility.

Treatment With Liposomal Irinotecan Plus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: The Phase 2b NIFTY Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The NIFTY trial demonstrated the benefit of treatment with second-line liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC).

Objective

To report the updated efficacy outcomes from the NIFTY trial with extended follow-up of 1.3 years with reperformed masked independent central review (MICR) with 3 newly invited radiologists.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The NIFTY trial was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 2b clinical trial conducted between September 5, 2018, and December 31, 2021, at 5 tertiary referral centers in South Korea. Patients with advanced BTC whose disease progressed while receiving first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin with at least 1 measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, were eligible. Data analysis was completed on May 9, 2022.

Interventions

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive LV, 400 mg/m2, bolus and FU, 2400 mg/m2, for a 46-hour infusion intravenously every 2 weeks with or without nal-IRI, 70 mg/m2, before LV intravenously. Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by MICR. Secondary end points were PFS as assessed by the investigator, overall survival, and objective response rate.

Results

A total of 178 patients (75 women [42.1%]; median [IQR] age, 64 [38-84] years) were randomly assigned, and 174 patients were included in the full analysis set (88 patients [50.6%] in the nal-IRI plus FU/LV group vs 86 patients [49.4%] in the FU/LV alone group). In this updated analysis, the median MICR-assessed PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.8-5.3) for the nal-IRI plus FU/LV group and 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.4-2.6) for the FU/LV alone group (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44-0.86; P = .004), in contrast to the 7.1 and 1.4 months reported in the previous study, respectively. The discordance rate for tumor progression date between the MICR and investigators was 17.8% (vs 30% in the previous study).

Conclusions and Relevance

The NIFTY randomized clinical trial demonstrated significant improvement in PFS with treatment with nal-IRI plus FU/LV compared with FU/LV alone for patients with advanced BTC after progression to gemcitabine plus cisplatin. The combination of nal-IRI plus FU/LV could be considered as a second-line treatment option for patients with previously treated advanced BTC.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03524508.

Adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine in node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the STAMP randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The effectiveness of gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear in cholangiocarcinoma. We investigated the role of adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) in a homogeneous group of high-risk patients with resected, lymph node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Adenocarcinoma of perihilar or distal bile duct with regional lymph node metastasis who underwent curative-intent surgery (R0/R1) was eligible. Patients were randomized to receive GemCis (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, cisplatin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) or capecitabine (1250 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14) every 3 weeks for 8 cycles. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and safety. All p values are 1 sided and were considered significant if <0.1. Between July 2017 and November 2020, 101 patients (50 in the GemCis and 51 in the capecitabine group) were included in the intention-to-treat population. Perihilar and distal bile ducts were the primary sites in 45 (44.6%) and 56 (55.4%) patients, respectively, and 32 (31.7%) had R1 resections. Median (1-sided 90% CI) follow-up duration was 33.4 (30.5-35.8) months. In the GemCis and capecitabine group, 2-year disease-free survival rates were 38.5% (29.5%-47.4%) and 25.1% (17.4%-33.5%) [HR=0.96 (CI, 0.71-1.30), p=0.430], and median overall survival was 35.7 months (29.5-not estimated) and 35.7 months (30.9-not estimated) [HR=1.08 (CI, 0.71-1.64), 1-sided p=0.404], respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 42 (84.0%) and 8 patients (16.0%) in the GemCis and capecitabine groups, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In resected lymph node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, adjuvant GemCis did not improve survival outcomes compared with capecitabine.

Abstract 3238: Integrative biomarker analysis of regorafenib plus nivolumab (RegoNivo) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A multicenter phase 2 RENOBATE trial

RegoNivo combination has shown promising anti-cancer activity in multiple cancer types. REBNOBATE is a single-arm multicenter phase 2 trial of first-line RegoNivo in patients (pts) with uHCC (NCT04310709). In this study, we present the final clinical outcomes of RENOBATE and integrative biomarker analysis. Pts with &gt;19 years, ECOG PS 0 or 1, BCLC stage B or C, and no prior systemic therapy were eligible. Pts received Nivo 480 mg iv, every 4 wks, and Rego 80 mg daily po, 3 wks on/1 wk off, every 4 wks. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST v1.1 every 8 wks. ctDNA analysis was performed using the Guardant 360 CDx platform (n=42). scRNA-seq was performed using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) at baseline (e.g., C1D1, n=28) and C1D15 (n=19) from early progression (EP) group (pts with PD or tumor burden increases towards PD on the first evaluation) and long-term response (LR) group (pts with PR or SD &gt; 6 months). A total of 42 pts was enrolled. Response rates were 31.0% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.4 mo (95% CI, 4.2-13.0) and 1-year OS rate was 80.5% (95% CI, 63.0-90.3%). Aberrations of Wnt/β-Catenin and PI3K/mTOR pathways identified in ctDNA were not associated with efficacy outcomes. scRNA-seq revealed that genes upregulated in immune cells on C1D15 (vs. baseline) were associated with immune activation and regulation of angiogenesis. Unsupervised clustering identified 13 immune subets; among them, classical monocyte showed most prominent changes in their proportion and gene expression profiles. After RegoNivo treatment, CD8 T cell clusters had enhanced expressions of genes related to cytoxicity, tissue homing (i.e., CXCR6, CX3CR1, and CXCR3) and proliferation (MKI67), and monophaghocyte clusters showed an enrichment of the gene signatures representing polarization towards M1-related features. Importantly, enrichment of cytotoxic features of the T cell clusters and M1-polarizing features of monophagocyte clusters were more pronounced in LR group than in EP group. From the analysis of differentially expressed genes monophagocyte clusters between the EP and LR groups, a surface molecule ‘X’ was identified as a potential biomarker involved in resistance to RegoNivo. RegoNivo showed promising efficacy outcomes in pts with uHCC. Through scRNA-seq of serial PBMCs, we identified enhanced cellular immune responses induced by RegoNivo and found a potential predictive marker for immunotherapy in pts with uHCC. Our study highlighted that Rego, a multikinase inhibitor, might synergize with anti-PD-1 in pts with uHCC. Association between differential features of T cell and monophagocyte clusters induced by this combination and distinct clinical outcomes highlights the importance of immune-modulation in HCC pts and suggests a potential to further harness these signals.

Citation Format: Hyung-Don Kim, Seyoung Jung, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Min-Hee Ryu, Beodeul Kang, Hong Jae Chon, Jung Yong Hong, Ho Yeong Lim, Jeong Seok Lee, June-Young Koh, Changhoon Yoo. Integrative biomarker analysis of regorafenib plus nivolumab (RegoNivo) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A multicenter phase 2 RENOBATE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3238.

Abstract 1392: Integrative biomarker analysis of regorafenib plus nivolumab (RegoNivo) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A multicenter phase 2 RENOBATE trial

Regorafenib plus nivolumab (RegoNivo) combination has shown promising anti-cancer activity in multiple cancer types. REBNOBATE trial is a single-arm multicenter phase 2 trial of first-line RegoNivo in patients (pts) with uHCC (NCT04310709). Here we report the clinical outcomes of the RENOBATE study and integrative biomarker analysis using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis.

Method: Adult pts with ECOG PS 0 or 1, BCLC stage B or C, and no prior systemic therapy were eligible for the study. Pts received nivolumab 480 mg iv, every 4 wks, and regorafenib 80 mg daily po, 3 wks on/1 wk off, every 4 wks. Tumor response was assessed according to RECIST v1.1 every 8 wks. ctDNA analysis was performed using the Guardant 360 CDx (n=42). scRNA-seq was performed using PBMCs at baseline (e.g., C1D1) and on treatment (eg., C1D15) from early progression (EP) group (14 pts with PD or tumor burden increases towards PD on the 1st evaluation) and long-term response (LR) group (15 pts with PR or SD &gt; 6 months).

Results: 42 pts were enrolled. Response rates were 31.0% and median progression-free survival (was 7.4 mo (95% CI, 4.2-13.0) and 1-year OS rate was 80.5% (95% CI, 63.0-90.3%). Aberrations of Wnt/β-Catenin and PI3K/mTOR pathways identified in ctDNA were not associated with efficacy outcomes. scRNA-seq revealed that genes upregulated in immune cells on C1D15 (vs. C1D1) were associated with immune activation and regulation of angiogenesis. Unsupervised clustering identified 13 immune subsets; among them, classical monocyte showed the most prominent changes in their proportion and gene expression profiles. After RegoNivo treatment, CD8 clusters had enhanced expressions of genes related to cytotoxicity, tissue homing (i.e., CXCR6, CX3CR1, and CXCR3) and proliferation (MKI67), and monocyte clusters showed an enrichment of the gene signatures representing polarization towards M1-related features. Importantly, the enrichment of cytotoxic features of the T cell clusters and M1-polarizing features of monocyte clusters were more pronounced in LR group than in EP group. From the analysis of differentially expressed genes monocyte clusters between the EP and LR groups, a surface molecule ‘X’ was identified as a potential biomarker involved in resistance to RegoNivo. RegoNivo showed promising efficacy outcomes in pts with uHCC. Through scRNA-seq of serial PBMCs, we identified enhanced cellular immune responses induced by RegoNivo and a potential predictive marker for immunotherapy in pts with uHCC. Our study highlighted that regorafenib might synergize with anti-PD-1 in pts with uHCC. Association between differential features of T cell and monocyte clusters induced by this combination and distinct clinical outcomes highlights the importance of immune-modulation in HCC pts suggesting a potential to further harness these signals

Citation Format: Hyung-Don Kim, Seyoung Jung Jung, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Min-Hee Ryu, Beodeul Kang, Hong Jae Chon, Jung Yong Hong, Ho Yeong Lim, Jeong Seok Lee, June-Young Koh, Changhoon Yoo. Integrative biomarker analysis of regorafenib plus nivolumab (RegoNivo) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A multicenter phase 2 RENOBATE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1392.

Identification of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Prognostic Index via Recursive Partitioning Analysis in HCC: The ABE Index

BACKGROUND/AIM

The purpose of this study was to ascertain a novel prognostic index via recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients being treated with the combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ABE) in first-line setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 784 patients with HCC were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

RPA identified three groups of patients: high-risk [Child-Pugh B (CP-B) patients; CP-A and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI)-2 patients; CP-A and ALBI-1 patients with macrovascular invasion (MVI), and alpha-fetoprotein (α-FP) ≥400 ng/ml]; intermediate-risk [CP-A and ALBI-1 patients with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) normal value (NV), and αFP ≥400 ng/ml, but without MVI; CP-A and ALBI-1 patients with AST increased value (IV), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≥3, but without MVI]; low-risk (CP-A and ALBI-1 patients with AST NV, and αFP <400 ng/ml, but without MVI; CP-A and ALBI-1 patients with AST IV, and NLR <3, but without MVI; CP-A and ALBI-1 patients with MVI, and αFP <400 ng/ml). Overall survival was 7.0 months in high-risk patients (20.8%), 14.2 months in intermediate-risk patients (19.1%), and 22.5 months in low-risk patients (60.1%).

CONCLUSION

The ABE index allows for easy stratification of HCC patients treated with the combination of ABE in first-line setting.

Real-World Data for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: How Does Adherence to the IMbrave150 Trial Inclusion Criteria Impact Prognosis?

BACKGROUND

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has recently been approved as a new first-line standard of care for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

OBJECTIVE

We performed a real-world study to evaluate the impact of the IMbrave150 trial inclusion criteria on the safety and efficacy of treatment outside of clinical trials.

METHODS

We analyzed patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for unresectable HCC from four different countries. No specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, except for the absence of previous systemic therapies for HCC. The entire population was split into two groups according to concordance with the inclusion criteria as reported in the IMbrave150 trial in 'IMbrave150-in' and 'IMbrave150-out' patients, and safety and efficacy in the two groups of patients were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 766 patients were included in the analysis: 561/766 (73%) in the 'IMbrave150-in' group and 205/766 (27%) in the 'IMbrave150-out' group. Median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 16.3 versus 14.3 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.65; p < 0.0001] and 8.3 versus 6.0 months (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99; p = 0.0431) in 'IMbrave150-in' and 'IMbrave150-out' patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients included in the 'IMbrave150-in' group had significantly longer OS compared with patients included in the 'IMbrave150-out' group (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47-0.97; p = 0.0195). In 'IMbrave150-in' patients, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade was not associated with OS, whereas in 'IMbrave150-out' patients, those with ALBI grade 1 reported a significant benefit in terms of OS compared with those with ALBI grade 2 (16.7 vs. 5.9 months; HR 4.40, 95% CI 2.40-8.08; p > 0.0001). No statistically significant differences were reported in the 'IMbrave150-in' and 'IMbrave150-out' groups in terms of safety profile.

CONCLUSION

Adherence to the IMbrave150 trial inclusion criteria favorably impacts the prognosis of patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Among patients who did not meet the IMbrave150 inclusion criteria, those with ALBI grade 1 could benefit from the treatment.

Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Who Underwent Surgery Following Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX

Purpose

The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy following curative-intent surgery in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients who had received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX is unclear. This study aimed to assess the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in this patient population.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective study included 218 patients with localized non-metastatic PDAC who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX and underwent curative-intent surgery (R0 or R1) between January 2017 and December 2020. The association of adjuvant chemotherapy with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated in overall patients and in the propensity score matched (PSM) cohort. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the pathology-proven lymph node status.

Results

Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 149 (68.3%) patients. In the overall cohort, the adjuvant chemotherapy group had significantly improved DFS and OS compared to the observation group (DFS: median 13.8 months [95% CI, 11.0-19.1] vs. 8.2 months [95% CI, 6.5-12.0], p<0.001; and OS: median 38.0 months [95% CI, 32.2-not assessable] vs. 25.7 months [95% CI, 18.3-not assessable], p=0.005). In the PSM cohort of 57 matched pairs of patients, DFS and OS were better in the adjuvant chemotherapy group than in the observation group (p<0.001 and p=0.038, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was a significant favorable prognostic factor (vs observation; DFS, hazard ratio [HR] 0.51 (95% CI, 0.36-0.71, p<0.001); OS, HR 0.45 (95% CI, 0.29-0.71, p<0.001).

Conclusion

Among PDAC patients who underwent surgery following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX, adjuvant chemotherapy may be associated with improved survival. Randomized studies should be conducted to validate this finding.

Phase II trial of second-line regorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after progression on first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: REGONEXT trial

TPS634

Background: Atezolizumab-bevacizumab (Ate/Bev) has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the phase III trial, and is the new standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced HCC. However, the optimal sequence of therapy after failure of Ate/Bev is unknown. Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that blocks the activity of protein kinases involved in angiogenesis, oncogenesis, metastasis, and tumour immunity. Although regorafenib showed survival benefit as subsequent treatment in patients with advanced HCC after progression on sorafenib, the efficacy and safety of regorafenib as subsequent therapy after Ate/Bev has not been investigated yet. Therefore, we designed a phase II trial investigating the efficacy and safety of regorafenib as second-line therapy in patients with advanced HCC who progressed on first-line Ate/Bev. Methods: This is a phase II, multicenter, single-arm study in patients with advanced HCC who had progression on first-line Ate/Bev. Additional key eligibility criteria include with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1, Child-Pugh score of 5 or 6, evaluable disease per RECIST v1.1, prior administration of at least 2 cycles of Ate/Bev, and adequate organ function. Key exclusion criteria include fibrolamellar carcinoma or mixed hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma, prior regorafenib treatment, clinically significant bleeding within 28 days of enrollment and untreated or symptomatic CNS or leptomeningeal metastasis. Eligible patients will receive oral regorafenib 160 mg daily for 3 weeks of every 4-week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, time to progression, overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate and safety. ORR and PFS is assessed per RECIST v 1.1. This study is ongoing and 18 of planned 40 patients have been enrolled. This study is prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT5134532.

A phase II clinical trial to study the use of cabozantinib (cabo) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) post immunotherapy treatment

571

Background: There has been a lack of prospective clinical trial data on subsequent treatment after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment in HCC. To address this question, we designed and completed a phase II multicentred study to evaluate the use of cabo in HCC after prior ICI-based treatment. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated clinical trial involving 3 academic centres in Hong Kong and Korea. Key eligibility criteria include confirmed diagnosis of HCC; refractoriness to prior ICI-based treatment; duration of prior ICI-based treatment ≥2 months; Child's A liver function; ECOG performance status 0-2; maximal 2 lines of therapy. All patients (pts) were started cabo at 60mg once daily to progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Other secondary endpoints including response rate (RR) according to the RECIST, overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). Total sample size is 48 (one-sided alpha 0.05; power 80%). Results: Total 48 pts were recruited from Oct 2020 to May 2022. Data were frozen on 1 Aug 2022 for analyses. The median follow-up was 11.2m. Seven (14.9%) pts remained on treatment; 1pt was found to ineligible and excluded from the analysis. The median age is 61 (Range 36-83). Aetiology of HCC: HBV 34 (72.3%); HCV 2 (4.3%); alcoholic 8 (17%); Most pts have BCLC stage C (93.6%). All pts have Child’s A liver function. Total 39 (83%) pts receive ICI-based first-line therapy, and 19 (40.4%) pts have prior atezolizumab-bevacizumab (AB) treatment. The median PFS is 4.1m (95% CI 3.3-5.3). Regarding RR, PR and SD occurs in 3 (6.4%) and 36 (76.6%) pts, respectively. The median OS is 9.9m (95% CI 7.3-14.4) and the 1-year survival rate is 45.3%. Amongst the 19 pts receiving prior AB treatment, the median OS is 14.3m (95% CI: 5.5-14.4) with 1-year survival rate of 50.7%. For non-AB regimen, the median OS is 8.9m (95% CI 6.1-NR) with 1-year survival rate of 42.0%. Commonest G3-4 TRAE is thrombocytopenia (6%); hypertension (4%) and ALT elevation (4%).The median dose of cabo is 41.6mg per day (range: 24.3-60.0 mg). Conclusions: Post-ICI use of cabo is associated with a median PFS of 4.1m and median OS of 9.9m. AB-cabo sequence appears to have more favourable outcome than non-AB-cabo sequence. No new safety signals were observed. This clinical trial reports the first prospective post-ICI survival data on TKI. Clinical trial information: NCT04588051 .

Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Phenotype and Peritumoral Immune Cell Infiltration in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study evaluated the clinical implications of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers and peritumoral immune cell infiltration in patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC) treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients with advanced BTC who received GemCis were included as the study population. We conducted multiplex immunohistochemistry and examined EMT markers and their correlations with immune cell infiltrate at the invasive tumor margin. Study population was subdivided into two groups: twenty-four patients with overall survival (OS) less than 10 months (short-term survivor group, SS) and 21 with OS of 20 months or longer (long-term survivor group, LS).

RESULTS

The density of tumor cells expressing epithelial marker E-cadherin (E-cadherin⁺ CK⁺) at the invasive tumor margin tended to be higher in the LS group than that in the SS group (p=0.065). The density of tumor cells expressing mesenchymal marker vimentin (vimentin⁺ CK⁺) was significantly higher in the SS group than that in the LS group (p=0.021). The density of E-cadherin- vimentin⁺ tumor cells (E-cadherin- vimentin⁺ CK⁺) was also significantly higher in the SS group (p=0.020). The density of OX40 expressing cells was significantly higher in the SS group compared to that in the LS group (p=0.006). The density of vimentin-expressing tumor cells was positively correlated with FoxP3⁺ CD4⁺ regulatory T-cells (r=0.29, p=0.047) and OX40⁺ cells (r=0.48, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

EMT-related features were enriched in BTC patients with poor survival outcomes and associated with regulatory T-cell infiltration.

Analysis of plasma circulating tumor DNA in borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX: Clinical relevance of DNA damage repair gene alterations

737

Background: There is no reliable biomarker to guide treatment for patient with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treated with neoadjuvant modified (m)FOLFIRINOX. We investigated the role of plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing to discover potential biomarkers for patients treated with neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX in our phase 2 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02749136). Methods: Among 44 patients enrolled in the trial, patients with plasma ctDNA analysis performed at baseline or post-operative period were included in the analysis. Plasma cell-free DNA isolation and sequencing of ctDNA were performed using the Guardant 360 assay. Association of clinical outcomes with germline or somatic mutations of DNA damage repair (DDR) genes was analyzed. Somatic alterations other than DDR genes were also analyzed to find potential biomarkers of neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX. Progression free-survival (PFS) was defined as time from the initiation of mFOLFIRINOX to disease progression or any cause of death. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the initiation of mFOLFIRINOX to any cause of death. Results: Among 44 patients, 28 patients had ctDNA sequencing data qualified for the analysis and were included in this study (15 patients with baseline data only, 3 patients with post-operative data only, and 10 patients with both baseline and post-operative data). Median age was 59 (range, 41-73) years and 15 patients (53.6%) were male. Among 25 patients with baseline plasma ctDNA data, 11 patients (44%) had somatic or germline alteration of DDR genes detected at baseline including ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2 and MLH1, and showed significantly better PFS than those without such DDR gene alterations (median 26.6 vs. 13.5 months, log-rank p = 0.004). Although there was a trend for better OS in patients with DDR gene alterations, this was not statistically significant (log-rank p = 0.29). The most observed baseline somatic alteration was TP53 (n = 7, 28%), followed by KRAS (n = 6, 24%). Patients with somatic KRAS mutation at baseline had significantly worse OS (median 8.5 months vs. not applicable, log-rank p = 0.003) than those without. Among 13 patients with post-operative plasma ctDNA data, 8 patients (61.5%) had detectable somatic alterations. Conclusions: Detection of germline or somatic mutations of DDR genes from plasma ctDNA at baseline was associated with better survival outcomes of patients with borderline resectable PDAC treated with neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX. Detection of DDR gene alterations from plasma ctDNA may have a potential role as biomarker for prognosis in patients with borderline resectable PDAC treated with mFOLFIRINOX.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a large real-life worldwide population

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib have not been compared in a randomised controlled trial. We conducted a retrospective multi-centre study to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and atezolizumab with bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable HCC in the real-world scenario.

METHODS

Clinical features of lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab patients were balanced through inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methodology, which weights patients' characteristics and measured outcomes of each patient in both treatment arms. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end-point.

RESULTS

The analysis included 1341 patients who received lenvatinib, and 864 patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. After IPTW adjustment, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab did not show a survival advantage over lenvatinib HR 0.97 (p = 0.739). OS was prolonged by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab over lenvatinib in viral patients (HR: 0.76; p = 0.024). Conversely, OS was prolonged by lenvatinib in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis/non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (HR: 1.88; p = 0.014). In the IPTW-adjusted population, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab provided better safety profile for most of the recorded adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Our study did not identify any meaningful difference in OS between atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib. Although some hints are provided suggesting that patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis/non-alcoholic fatty liver disease might benefit more from lenvatinib therapy and patients with viral aetiology more from atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Serum vitamin D3 levels and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC): Analysis of the NIFTY trial cohort

613

Background: Although growing number of studies have explored the role of vitamin D3 on various cancer types, no study has been conducted in the prospective cohort of advanced BTC. This analysis aimed to evaluate the predictive or prognostic implication of serum vitamin D3 in pts with advanced BTC treated with second-line chemotherapy. Methods: The analysis is the preplanned subgroup analysis of the NIFTY trial, a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 2b study which compared the second-line liposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/leucovorin and 5-FU/leucovorin in pts with advanced BTC. Serum vitamin D3 (25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]) levels were measured at baseline (i.e., C1D1) in a total of 176 pts out of 178 pts in the ITT population and were included in the current analysis. Correlation between OS and serum vitamin D3 as a continuous variable was analyzed for linear and non-linear associations. Results: The median age was 64 years (range, 37–84) and 75 patients (42.6%) were women. The baseline serum vitamin D3 levels ranged from 1.39 ng/ml to 140.02 ng/ml in the overall pts. There was no significant difference in the mean vitamin D3 concentration according to the sex (male vs. female: 24.1 vs. 26.7; p=0.43), body mass index (BMI) (<25 vs. 25-29.99 vs. ≥30: 24.0 vs. 30.0 vs 15.9; p=0.18), previous surgery (no vs. yes: 24.1 vs. 27.4; p=0.40), ECOG performance status (0 vs. 1: 24.1 vs. 25.5; p=0.66), and primary tumor site (intrahepatic vs. extrahepatic vs. gallbladder: 25.7 vs. 23.2 vs. 26.2; p=0.74). After adjustment for key prognostic factors including chemotherapy regimens, metastatic sites, or baseline CA 19-9 levels, there was no significant association between baseline serum vitamin D3 and OS (HR=1.06 per 10 increase; 95% CI, 0.97–1.15; p=0.22). In addition, there was no non-linear association between vitamin D3 and OS (p=0.52 for the linear model and p=0.62 for the model with restricted cubic splines). In the subgroup analysis, higher vitamin D3 levels were associated with poorer OS (HR=1.16 per 10 increase; 95% CI, 1.04–1.30; p=0.0072) in female pts. Conclusions: Serum vitamin D3 levels did not show significant relationship with survival in pts with advanced BTC treated with second-line chemotherapy. High vitamin D3 levels might be associated with poorer survival in female pts. Further larger studies are needed.

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A large, real-life, worldwide population

579

Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib have not been compared in a randomized controlled trial. We conducted a retrospective multi-center study to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and atezolizumab with bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable HCC in the real-world scenario. Methods: Clinical features of lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab patients were balanced through inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methodology, which weights patients' characteristics and measured outcomes of each patient in both treatment arms. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. Results: The analysis included 1,341 patients who received lenvatinib, and 864 patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. After IPTW adjustment, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab did not show a survival advantage over lenvatinib HR 0.97 (p=0.739). OS was prolonged by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab over lenvatinib in viral patients (HR: 0.76; p=0.024). Conversely, OS was prolonged by lenvatinib in patients with NASH/NAFLD (HR: 1.88; p=0.014). In the IPTW-adjusted population, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab provided better safety profile for most of the recorded adverse events. Conclusions: Our study did not identify any meaningful difference in overall survival between atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib. Although some hints are provided suggesting that patients with NASH/NAFLD might benefit more from lenvatinib therapy and patients with viral etiology more from atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

CTX-009 (ABL001), a bispecific antibody targeting DLL4 and VEGF A, in combination with paclitaxel in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC): A phase 2 study

540

Background: CTX-009 is a novel bispecific antibody that simultaneously inhibits Delta-like ligand 4/Notch-1 (DLL4) and VEGF A, two signaling molecules which play an important role in angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment. DLL4 is induced by VEGF and acts to the downstream of VEGF, and synergistic effect for dual blockade of both DLL4 and VEGF was evaluated in preclinical models. A phase 1b study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of CTX-009 in combination with paclitaxel or irinotecan in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Encouraging results in the Phase 1b in BTC pts, including two durable Partial Responses (PRs) out of 3 pts, prompted the expansion of the study to include a Phase 2 cohort in which BTC pts are treated in 2L or 3L setting. We present preliminary results from this Phase 2 study. Methods: This open-label, multi-center, single-arm Phase 2 study investigated pts with unresectable advanced, metastatic or recurrent BTC in advanced 2L or 3L setting. Eligible pts were treated with CTX-009 (10 mg/kg IV biweekly) in combination with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 IV on Day 1, 8, 15 q4-weekly). The primary objective was to assess the objective response rate (ORR) based on RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure (TTF), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Overall, 24 pts have been enrolled (IHCC: 9, EHCC: 3, GB: 7, AoV: 5) and as of the data cut-off date (August 12, 2022), the median follow-up duration was 11.8 months (m) (range: 1.6-16.4) and 3 pts remained on treatment. 11 pts were treated in 2L and 13 pts treated in 3L. There were 9 confirmed PRs by investigator’s assessment and ORR was 37.5% (95% CI: 18.8-59.4; 2L: 63.6%, 3L: 15.4%). Median DOR and PFS were 9.4 m (95% CI: 3.5–NE) and 9.4 m (95% CI: 5.4-11.1), respectively. Median TTF was 5.9 m (95% CI: 3.9-9.8) and median OS has not been reached (95% CI: 11.0–NE); the OS rate at 12 m was 53.0% (95% CI: 29.8–71.7). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade were reported in 100% of pts and TRAEs of ≥ grade 3 were reported in 75% of pts (including one grade 5 pneumonia). The most frequent TRAEs of ≥ grade 3 were neutropenia (50.0%), hypertension (16.7%), anemia (12.5%), and thrombocytopenia (8.3%). Six pts (25.0%) experienced treatment-emergent AEs (confusional state, pulmonary embolism, blood creatinine increased, pneumonia, biliary fistula, and large intestine perforation) that led to discontinuation of the study treatment. Conclusions: This Phase 2 study has shown promising efficacy in BTC pts treated in 2L or 3L setting. TRAE rate based on mode of action was high, but DLL4/VEGF targeting in BTC has a potential of development. Further investigation of safety and efficacy of this regimen is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT04492033 .

Dynamic changes in peripheral blood monocytes early after anti-PD-1 therapy predict clinical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but there remains a need for peripheral blood biomarkers to predict the clinical response. Here, we analyzed the peripheral blood of 45 patients with advanced HCC who underwent nivolumab. During treatment, frequency of classical monocytes (CD14+CD16-) was increased on day 7, and the fold increase in the frequency on day 7 over day 0 (cMonocyteD7/D0) was significantly higher in patients with durable clinical benefit (DCB) than in patients with non-DCB (NDB). When we analyzed transcriptomes of classical monocytes, CD274, gene encoding PD-L1, was upregulated in NDB patients compared to DCB patients at day 7. Notably, gene signature of suppressive tumor-associated macrophages, or IL4l1+PD-L1+IDO1+ macrophages, was enriched after treatment in NDB patients, but not in DCB patients. Accordingly, the fold increase in the frequency of PD-L1+ classical monocytes at day 7 over day 0 (cMonocyte-PDL1D7/D0) was higher in NDB patients than DCB patients. The combined biomarker cMonocyteD7/D0/cMonocyte-PDL1D7/D0 was termed the "monocyte index", which was significantly higher in DCB patients than NDB patients. Moreover, the monocyte index was an independent prognostic factor for survival. Overall, our results suggest that early changes of circulating classical monocytes, represented as a monocyte index, could predict clinical outcomes of advanced HCC patients undergoing anti-PD-1 therapy.

Role of the prognostic nutritional index in predicting survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab

INTRODUCTION

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is a multiparametric score introduced by Onodera based on the blood levels of lymphocytes and albumin in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Regarding hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), its prognostic role has been demonstrated in patients treated with sorafenib and lenvatinib. The aim of this real-world study is to investigate the association between clinical outcomes and PNI in patients being treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

METHODS

The overall cohort of this multicentric study included 871 consecutive HCC patients from 4 countries treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in first-line therapy. The PNI was calculated as follows: 10 × serum albumin concentration (g/dL) + 0.005 × peripheral lymphocyte count (number/mm3).

RESULTS

For only 773 patients, data regarding lymphocyte counts and albumin levels were available, so only these patients were included in the final analysis. The cut-off point of the PNI was determined to be 41 by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. 268 patients (34.7%) were categorized as the PNI-low group, while the remaining 505 (65.3%) patients as the PNI-high group. At the univariate analysis, high PNI was associated with longer overall survival (OS) (22.5 vs. 10.1 months, HR 0.34, p < 0.01) and progression-free survival (PFS) (8.7 vs. 5.8 months, HR 0.63, p < 0.01) compared to patients with low PNI. At the multivariate analysis, high versus low PNI resulted as an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 0.49 , p < 0.01) and PFS (HR 0.82, p = 0.01). There was no difference in objective response rate (ORR) between the two groups (high 26.1% vs. low 19.8%, p = 0.09), while disease control rate (DCR) was significantly higher in the PNI-high group (76.8% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

PNI is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in HCC patients on first-line treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Establishing Patient-Derived Cancer Cell Cultures and Xenografts in Biliary Tract Cancer

PURPOSE

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare and show a dismal prognosis with limited treatment options. To improve our understanding of these heterogeneous tumors and develop effective therapeutic agents, suitable preclinical models reflecting diverse tumor characteristics are needed. We established and characterized new patient-derived cancer cell cultures and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models using malignant ascites from five patients with BTC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five patient-derived cancer cell cultures and three PDX models derived from malignant ascites of five patients with BTC, AMCBTC-01, -02, -03, -04, and -05, were established. To characterize the models histogenetically and confirm whether characteristics of the primary tumor were maintained, targeted sequencing and histopathological comparison between primary tissue and xenograft tumors were performed.

RESULTS

From malignant ascites of five BTC patients, five patient-derived cancer cell cultures (100% success rate), and three PDXs (60% success rate) were established. The morphological characteristics of three primary xenograft tumors were compared with those of matched primary tumors, and they displayed a similar morphology. The mutated genes in samples (models, primary tumor tissue, or both) from more than one patient were TP53 (n=2), KRAS (n=2), and STK11 (n=2). Overall, the pattern of commonly mutated genes in BTC cell cultures was different from that in commercially available BTC cell lines.

CONCLUSION

We successfully established the patient-derived cancer cell cultures and xenograft models derived from malignant ascites in BTC patients. These models accompanied by different genetic characteristics from commercially available models will help better understand BTC biology.

Randomized phase II study of capecitabine plus cisplatin with or without sorafenib in patients with metastatic gastric cancer (STARGATE)

BACKGROUND

In this randomized phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in combination with capecitabine and cisplatin (XP) as first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were randomized (1:1) to receive either sorafenib plus XP (S + XP) or XP alone. In cases of disease progression in the XP arm, crossover to sorafenib alone was allowed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), response rates, safety profiles, and biomarkers, and the response rates and PFS with secondline sorafenib alone after progression in the XP arm.

RESULTS

Between Jan 2011 and Feb 2013, a total of 195 patients were accrued (97 in the S + XP arm and 98 in the XP alone arm). The overall response rate was 54% with S + XP, and 52% with XP alone (p = 0.83). With a median follow-up of 12.6 months (range, 0.1-29.2), the median PFS assessed by independent review was 5.6 months in the S + XP arm and 5.3 months in the XP arm (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.27, p = 0.61). Overall survival was not different between the two arms (median 11.7 vs. 10.8 months; HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.65-1.31, p = 0.66). Frequencies of grade 3/4 toxicities were similar between the S + XP and XP alone arms, except for neutropenia (21% vs. 37%), anorexia (0% vs. 5%), and hand-foot skin reaction (7% vs. 1%). Among 51 patients who crossed over to sorafenib alone after disease progression in the XP arm, there was no objective response and their median PFS was 1.3 months (95% CI, 1.2-1.7).

CONCLUSION

The addition of sorafenib to XP chemotherapy was safe but not more effective than XP alone for first-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer.