1
|
Khatri-Chhetri U, Banerjee S, Thompson KA, Quideau SA, Boyce MS, Bork EW, Carlyle CN. Cattle grazing management affects soil microbial diversity and community network complexity in the Northern Great Plains. Sci Total Environ 2024; 912:169353. [PMID: 38104847 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Soil microbial communities play a vital role in the biogeochemical cycling and ecological functioning of grassland, but may be affected by common land uses such as cattle grazing. Changes in microbial diversity and network complexity can affect key ecosystem functions such as nutrient cycling. However, it is not well known how microbial diversity and network complexity respond to grazing in the Northern Great Plains. Consequently, it is important to understand whether variation in grazing management alters the diversity and complexity of grassland microbial communities. We compared the effect of intensive adaptive multi-paddock (AMP) grazing and conventional grazing practices on soil microbial communities using 16S/ITS amplicon sequencing. Samples were collected from grasslands in 13 AMP ranches and 13 neighboring, conventional ranches located across the Canadian prairies. We found that AMP grazing increased fungal diversity and evenness, and led to more complex microbial associations. Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, and Bacteroidetes were keystone taxa associated with AMP grazing, while Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Armatimonadetes were keystone taxa under conventional grazing. Besides overall grazing treatment effects, specific grazing metrics like cattle stocking rate and rest-to-grazing ratio affected microbial richness and diversity. Bacterial and fungal richness increased with elevated stocking rate, and fungal richness and diversity increased directly with the rest-to-grazing ratio. These results suggest that AMP grazing may improve ecosystem by enhancing fungal diversity and increasing microbial network complexity and connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Upama Khatri-Chhetri
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Agriculture/Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada.
| | - Samiran Banerjee
- Department of Microbiological Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA
| | - Karen A Thompson
- Trent School of Environment, Trent University, Peterborough, ON K9L 0G2, Canada
| | - Sylvie A Quideau
- Department of Renewable Resources, Earth Science Building University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada
| | - Mark S Boyce
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
| | - Edward W Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Agriculture/Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Cameron N Carlyle
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Agriculture/Forestry Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith MD, Wilkins KD, Holdrege MC, Wilfahrt P, Collins SL, Knapp AK, Sala OE, Dukes JS, Phillips RP, Yahdjian L, Gherardi LA, Ohlert T, Beier C, Fraser LH, Jentsch A, Loik ME, Maestre FT, Power SA, Yu Q, Felton AJ, Munson SM, Luo Y, Abdoli H, Abedi M, Alados CL, Alberti J, Alon M, An H, Anacker B, Anderson M, Auge H, Bachle S, Bahalkeh K, Bahn M, Batbaatar A, Bauerle T, Beard KH, Behn K, Beil I, Biancari L, Blindow I, Bondaruk VF, Borer ET, Bork EW, Bruschetti CM, Byrne KM, Cahill Jr. JF, Calvo DA, Carbognani M, Cardoni A, Carlyle CN, Castillo-Garcia M, Chang SX, Chieppa J, Cianciaruso MV, Cohen O, Cordeiro AL, Cusack DF, Dahlke S, Daleo P, D'Antonio CM, Dietterich LH, S. Doherty T, Dubbert M, Ebeling A, Eisenhauer N, Fischer FM, Forte TGW, Gebauer T, Gozalo B, Greenville AC, Guidoni-Martins KG, Hannusch HJ, Vatsø Haugum S, Hautier Y, Hefting M, Henry HAL, Hoss D, Ingrisch J, Iribarne O, Isbell F, Johnson Y, Jordan S, Kelly EF, Kimmel K, Kreyling J, Kröel-Dulay G, Kröpfl A, Kübert A, Kulmatiski A, Lamb EG, Larsen KS, Larson J, Lawson J, Leder CV, Linstädter A, Liu J, Liu S, Lodge AG, Longo G, Loydi A, Luan J, Curtis Lubbe F, Macfarlane C, Mackie-Haas K, Malyshev AV, Maturano-Ruiz A, Merchant T, Metcalfe DB, Mori AS, Mudongo E, Newman GS, Nielsen UN, Nimmo D, Niu Y, Nobre P, O'Connor RC, Ogaya R, Oñatibia GR, Orbán I, Osborne B, Otfinowski R, Pärtel M, Penuelas J, Peri PL, Peter G, Petraglia A, Picon-Cochard C, Pillar VD, Piñeiro-Guerra JM, Ploughe LW, Plowes RM, Portales-Reyes C, Prober SM, Pueyo Y, Reed SC, Ritchie EG, Rodríguez DA, Rogers WE, Roscher C, Sánchez AM, Santos BA, Cecilia Scarfó M, Seabloom EW, Shi B, Souza L, Stampfli A, Standish RJ, Sternberg M, Sun W, Sünnemann M, Tedder M, Thorvaldsen P, Tian D, Tielbörger K, Valdecantos A, van den Brink L, Vandvik V, Vankoughnett MR, Guri Velle L, Wang C, Wang Y, Wardle GM, Werner C, Wei C, Wiehl G, Williams JL, Wolf AA, Zeiter M, Zhang F, Zhu J, Zong N, Zuo X. Extreme drought impacts have been underestimated in grasslands and shrublands globally. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2309881120. [PMID: 38190514 PMCID: PMC10823251 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2309881120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of short-term (~1 y) drought events-the most common duration of drought-globally. Yet the impact of this intensification of drought on ecosystem functioning remains poorly resolved. This is due in part to the widely disparate approaches ecologists have employed to study drought, variation in the severity and duration of drought studied, and differences among ecosystems in vegetation, edaphic and climatic attributes that can mediate drought impacts. To overcome these problems and better identify the factors that modulate drought responses, we used a coordinated distributed experiment to quantify the impact of short-term drought on grassland and shrubland ecosystems. With a standardized approach, we imposed ~a single year of drought at 100 sites on six continents. Here we show that loss of a foundational ecosystem function-aboveground net primary production (ANPP)-was 60% greater at sites that experienced statistically extreme drought (1-in-100-y event) vs. those sites where drought was nominal (historically more common) in magnitude (35% vs. 21%, respectively). This reduction in a key carbon cycle process with a single year of extreme drought greatly exceeds previously reported losses for grasslands and shrublands. Our global experiment also revealed high variability in drought response but that relative reductions in ANPP were greater in drier ecosystems and those with fewer plant species. Overall, our results demonstrate with unprecedented rigor that the global impacts of projected increases in drought severity have been significantly underestimated and that drier and less diverse sites are likely to be most vulnerable to extreme drought.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melinda D. Smith
- Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO80523
- Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO80523
| | | | - Martin C. Holdrege
- Department of Wildland Resource and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT84322
| | - Peter Wilfahrt
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN55108
| | - Scott L. Collins
- Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM87131
| | - Alan K. Knapp
- Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO80523
- Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO80523
| | - Osvaldo E. Sala
- School of Life Sciences, Global Drylands Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85281
| | - Jeffrey S. Dukes
- Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA94305
| | | | - Laura Yahdjian
- Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos AiresC1417DSE, Argentina
| | - Laureano A. Gherardi
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, CA94720
| | - Timothy Ohlert
- Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO80523
| | - Claus Beier
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C1958, Denmark
| | - Lauchlan H. Fraser
- Department of Natural Resource Science, Thompson Rivers University, Kamloops, BCV2C 0C8, Canada
| | - Anke Jentsch
- Department of Disturbance Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth95447, Germany
| | - Michael E. Loik
- Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA95064
| | - Fernando T. Maestre
- Departamento de Ecologia, Universidad de Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
- Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio “Ramón Margalef”, Universidad de Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
| | - Sally A. Power
- Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW2751, Australia
| | - Qiang Yu
- School of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing100083, China
| | - Andrew J. Felton
- Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT59717
| | - Seth M. Munson
- U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ86001
| | - Yiqi Luo
- Soil and Crop Sciences Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853
| | - Hamed Abdoli
- Department of Range Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor46417-76489, Iran
| | - Mehdi Abedi
- Department of Range Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor46417-76489, Iran
| | - Concepción L. Alados
- Departamento de Biodiversidad y Restauración, Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Zaragoza50059, Spain
| | - Juan Alberti
- Laboratorio de Ecología, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMdP)-Consejo Nacional de Investigación Ciencia y Técnica (CONICET), CC 1260 Correo Central, Mar del PlataB7600WAG, Argentina
| | - Moshe Alon
- School of Plant Sciences and Food Security, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv69978, Israel
| | - Hui An
- School of Ecology and Environment, Ningxia University, Yinchuan750021, China
| | - Brian Anacker
- City of Boulder Open Space and Mountain Parks, Boulder, CO80301
| | - Maggie Anderson
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN55108
| | - Harald Auge
- Department of Community Ecology, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Halle06120, Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig04103, Germany
| | - Seton Bachle
- Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS66506
- LI-COR Biosciences, 4647 Superior Street, Lincoln, NE68505
| | - Khadijeh Bahalkeh
- Department of Range Management, Faculty of Natural Resources and Marine Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Noor46417-76489, Iran
| | - Michael Bahn
- Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck6020, Austria
| | - Amgaa Batbaatar
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, ABT6G 2E9, Canada
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, ABT6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Taryn Bauerle
- Soil and Crop Sciences Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853
| | - Karen H. Beard
- Department of Wildland Resource and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT84322
| | - Kai Behn
- Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Department of Plant Nutrition, University of Bonn, Bonn53115, Germany
| | - Ilka Beil
- Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Department of Experimental Plant Ecology, University of Greifswald, GreifswaldD-17498, Germany
| | - Lucio Biancari
- Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos AiresC1417DSE, Argentina
| | - Irmgard Blindow
- Biological Station of Hiddensee, Department of Biology, University of Greifswald, KlosterD-18565, Germany
| | - Viviana Florencia Bondaruk
- Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos AiresC1417DSE, Argentina
| | - Elizabeth T. Borer
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN55108
| | - Edward W. Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, ABT6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Carlos Martin Bruschetti
- Laboratorio de Ecología, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMdP)-Consejo Nacional de Investigación Ciencia y Técnica (CONICET), CC 1260 Correo Central, Mar del PlataB7600WAG, Argentina
| | - Kerry M. Byrne
- Department of Environmental Science and Management, California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt, Arcata, CA95521
| | - James F. Cahill Jr.
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, ABT6G 2E9, Canada
| | - Dianela A. Calvo
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Centro de Estudios Ambientales desde la NorPatagonia (CEANPa), Sede Atlántica–CONICET, Viedma8500, Argentina
| | - Michele Carbognani
- Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, ParmaI-43124, Italy
| | - Augusto Cardoni
- Laboratorio de Ecología, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMdP)-Consejo Nacional de Investigación Ciencia y Técnica (CONICET), CC 1260 Correo Central, Mar del PlataB7600WAG, Argentina
| | - Cameron N. Carlyle
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, ABT6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Miguel Castillo-Garcia
- Departamento de Biodiversidad y Restauración, Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Zaragoza50059, Spain
| | - Scott X. Chang
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, ABT6G 2E3, Canada
| | - Jeff Chieppa
- Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW2751, Australia
| | | | - Ofer Cohen
- School of Plant Sciences and Food Security, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv69978, Israel
| | - Amanda L. Cordeiro
- Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO80523
| | - Daniela F. Cusack
- Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO80523
| | - Sven Dahlke
- Biological Station of Hiddensee, Department of Biology, University of Greifswald, KlosterD-18565, Germany
| | - Pedro Daleo
- Laboratorio de Ecología, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMdP)-Consejo Nacional de Investigación Ciencia y Técnica (CONICET), CC 1260 Correo Central, Mar del PlataB7600WAG, Argentina
| | - Carla M. D'Antonio
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA93106
| | - Lee H. Dietterich
- Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO80523
- US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS39180
| | - Tim S. Doherty
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW2006, Australia
| | - Maren Dubbert
- Isotope Biogeochemistry and GasFluxes, Leibniz-Zentrum fürAgrarlandschaftsforschung (ZALF), Müncheberg15374, Germany
| | - Anne Ebeling
- Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena07743, Germany
| | - Nico Eisenhauer
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig04103, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig04103, Germany
| | - Felícia M. Fischer
- Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig04103, Germany
- Centro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)-Universitat Valencia (UV) - Generalitat Valenciana (GV),Valencia46113, Spain
| | - T'ai G. W. Forte
- Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, ParmaI-43124, Italy
| | - Tobias Gebauer
- Geobotany, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, FreiburgD-79104, Germany
| | - Beatriz Gozalo
- Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio “Ramón Margalef”, Universidad de Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
| | - Aaron C. Greenville
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW2006, Australia
| | | | - Heather J. Hannusch
- Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX77843
| | - Siri Vatsø Haugum
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen5007, Norway
| | - Yann Hautier
- Ecology and Biodiversity Group, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584 CH, Netherlands
| | - Mariet Hefting
- Ecology and Biodiversity Group, Department of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584 CH, Netherlands
| | - Hugh A. L. Henry
- Department of Biology, University of Western Ontario, London, ONN6A 5B7, Canada
| | - Daniela Hoss
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig04103, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig04103, Germany
- Department of Ecology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre91501-970, Brazil
| | - Johannes Ingrisch
- Department of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck6020, Austria
| | - Oscar Iribarne
- Laboratorio de Ecología, Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMdP)-Consejo Nacional de Investigación Ciencia y Técnica (CONICET), CC 1260 Correo Central, Mar del PlataB7600WAG, Argentina
| | - Forest Isbell
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN55108
| | - Yari Johnson
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento, CA95814
| | - Samuel Jordan
- School of Life Sciences, Global Drylands Center, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85281
| | - Eugene F. Kelly
- Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO80523
| | - Kaitlin Kimmel
- Global Water Security Center, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL35487
| | - Juergen Kreyling
- Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Department of Experimental Plant Ecology, University of Greifswald, GreifswaldD-17498, Germany
| | - György Kröel-Dulay
- Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót2163, Hungary
| | - Alicia Kröpfl
- Departamento de Gestión Agropecuaria, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Centro Universitario Regional Zona Atlántica, Viedma85009, Argentina
| | - Angelika Kübert
- Ecosystem Physiology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Albert-Ludwig-University of Freiburg, Freiburg79110, Germany
| | - Andrew Kulmatiski
- Department of Wildland Resource and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT84322
| | - Eric G. Lamb
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SKS7N5A8, Canada
| | - Klaus Steenberg Larsen
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C1958, Denmark
| | - Julie Larson
- Range and Meadow Forage Management Research, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, US Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Agricultural Research Service, Burns, OR97720
| | - Jason Lawson
- Brackenridge Field Laboratory, University of Texas, Austin, TX78747
| | - Cintia V. Leder
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Centro de Estudios Ambientales desde la NorPatagonia (CEANPa), Sede Atlántica–CONICET, Viedma8500, Argentina
| | - Anja Linstädter
- Department of Biodiversity Research and Systematic Botany, University of Potsdam, Potsdam14469, Germany
| | - Jielin Liu
- Prataculture Research Institute, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haerbin150086, China
| | - Shirong Liu
- Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Ecology and Nature Conservation Institute, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing100091, China
| | - Alexandra G. Lodge
- Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX77843
| | - Grisel Longo
- Programa de Posgrado en Desarrollo y Medio Ambiente–Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Cidade Universitária, Castelo Branco, João Pessoa, PB58051-900, Brazil
| | - Alejandro Loydi
- Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida–CONICET, Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur,Bahía Blanca8000FTN, Argentina
| | - Junwei Luan
- Institute of Resources and Environment, International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan, Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration and Beijing for Bamboo and Rattan Science and Technology, Beijing100102, China
| | | | - Craig Macfarlane
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Environment, Wembley, WA6913, Australia
| | - Kathleen Mackie-Haas
- School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Bern University of Applied Sciences,Zollikofen3052, Switzerland
| | - Andrey V. Malyshev
- Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Department of Experimental Plant Ecology, University of Greifswald, GreifswaldD-17498, Germany
| | - Adrián Maturano-Ruiz
- Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio “Ramón Margalef”, Universidad de Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
| | - Thomas Merchant
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Institute for Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado,Boulder, CO80309
| | - Daniel B. Metcalfe
- Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, UmeåS-901 87, Sweden
| | - Akira S. Mori
- Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Tokyo,Meguro, Tokyo153-8904, Japan
- Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences, Yokohama National University, Yokohama240-8501, Japan
| | - Edwin Mudongo
- Conservancy-Communities Living Among Wildlife Sustainably (CLAWS) Botswana, Seronga00000, Botswana
| | - Gregory S. Newman
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK73019
| | - Uffe N. Nielsen
- Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW2751, Australia
| | - Dale Nimmo
- Gulbali Institute, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW2640, Australia
| | - Yujie Niu
- Department of Disturbance Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth95447, Germany
| | - Paola Nobre
- Department of Ecology, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO74690-900, Brazil
| | - Rory C. O'Connor
- Range and Meadow Forage Management Research, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, US Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Agricultural Research Service, Burns, OR97720
| | - Romà Ogaya
- Global Ecology Unit Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF)-National Research Council (CSIC)-Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), National Research Council (CSIC), Bellaterra, Catalonia08194, Spain
- Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Catalonia08193, Spain
| | - Gastón R. Oñatibia
- Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos AiresC1417DSE, Argentina
| | - Ildikó Orbán
- Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót2163, Hungary
- Department of Biodiversity Research and Systematic Botany, University of Potsdam, Potsdam14469, Germany
| | - Brooke Osborne
- Department of Environment and Society, Utah State University, Moab, UT84532
| | - Rafael Otfinowski
- Department of Biology, The University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MBR3B 2E9, Canada
| | - Meelis Pärtel
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, TartuEE50409, Estonia
| | - Josep Penuelas
- Global Ecology Unit Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF)-National Research Council (CSIC)-Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), National Research Council (CSIC), Bellaterra, Catalonia08194, Spain
- Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Catalonia08193, Spain
| | - Pablo L. Peri
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria–Universidad Nacional d ela Patagonia Austral–CONICET, Río Gallegos, Caleta OliviaZ9011, Argentina
| | - Guadalupe Peter
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Centro de Estudios Ambientales desde la NorPatagonia (CEANPa), Sede Atlántica–CONICET, Viedma8500, Argentina
| | - Alessandro Petraglia
- Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma, ParmaI-43124, Italy
| | - Catherine Picon-Cochard
- Université Clermont Auvergne, National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment, VetAgro Sup, Research Unit for Grassland Ecosystems, Clermont-Ferrand63000, France
| | - Valério D. Pillar
- Department of Ecology, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre91501-970, Brazil
| | - Juan Manuel Piñeiro-Guerra
- Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos AiresC1417DSE, Argentina
- Laboratório de Ecologia Aplicada e Conservação, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Cidade Universitária, Castelo Branco, João Pessoa, PB58051-900, Brazil
| | - Laura W. Ploughe
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN47907
| | - Robert M. Plowes
- Brackenridge Field Laboratory, University of Texas, Austin, TX78747
| | | | - Suzanne M. Prober
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Environment, Wembley, WA6913, Australia
| | - Yolanda Pueyo
- Departamento de Biodiversidad y Restauración, Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Zaragoza50059, Spain
| | - Sasha C. Reed
- U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Moab, UT84532
| | - Euan G. Ritchie
- Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC3125, Australia
| | - Dana Aylén Rodríguez
- Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida–CONICET, Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur,Bahía Blanca8000FTN, Argentina
| | - William E. Rogers
- Department of Ecology and Conservation Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX77843
| | - Christiane Roscher
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig04103, Germany
- Department of Physiological Diversity, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Leipzig04318, Germany
| | - Ana M. Sánchez
- Department of Biology and Geology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid28032, Spain
| | - Bráulio A. Santos
- Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Cidade Universitária, Castelo Branco, João Pessoa, PB58051-900, Brazil
| | - María Cecilia Scarfó
- Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida–CONICET, Departamento de Biología, Bioquímica y Farmacia, Universidad Nacional del Sur,Bahía Blanca8000FTN, Argentina
| | - Eric W. Seabloom
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN55108
| | - Baoku Shi
- Institute of Grassland Science, Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology of the Ministry of Education, Jilin Songnen Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Northeast Normal University, Changchun130024, China
| | - Lara Souza
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK73019
- Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK73019
| | - Andreas Stampfli
- School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Bern University of Applied Sciences,Zollikofen3052, Switzerland
- Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern3013, Switzerland
- Oeschger Center for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern3012, Switzerland
| | - Rachel J. Standish
- Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern3013, Switzerland
- Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University,Murdoch, WA6150, Australia
| | - Marcelo Sternberg
- School of Plant Sciences and Food Security, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv69978, Israel
| | - Wei Sun
- Institute of Grassland Science, Key Laboratory of Vegetation Ecology of the Ministry of Education, Jilin Songnen Grassland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Northeast Normal University, Changchun130024, China
| | - Marie Sünnemann
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig04103, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig04103, Germany
| | - Michelle Tedder
- School of Life Sciences, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg3201, South Africa
| | - Pål Thorvaldsen
- Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Department of Landscape and Biodiversity, Tjøtta8860, Norway
| | - Dashuan Tian
- Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100101, China
| | - Katja Tielbörger
- Plant Ecology Group, Department of Biology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen72076, Germany
| | - Alejandro Valdecantos
- Departamento de Ecologia, Universidad de Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
- Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio “Ramón Margalef”, Universidad de Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
| | - Liesbeth van den Brink
- Plant Ecology Group, Department of Biology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen72076, Germany
| | - Vigdis Vandvik
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen5007, Norway
| | - Mathew R. Vankoughnett
- Nova Scotia Community College, Annapolis Valley Campus, Applied Research, Middleton,NSB0S 1P0, Canada
| | | | - Changhui Wang
- College of Grassland Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong030801, China
| | - Yi Wang
- Institute of Resources and Environment, International Centre for Bamboo and Rattan, Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration and Beijing for Bamboo and Rattan Science and Technology, Beijing100102, China
| | - Glenda M. Wardle
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW2006, Australia
| | - Christiane Werner
- Ecosystem Physiology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Albert-Ludwig-University of Freiburg, Freiburg79110, Germany
| | - Cunzheng Wei
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100093, China
| | - Georg Wiehl
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) Environment, Wembley, WA6913, Australia
| | - Jennifer L. Williams
- Department of Geography and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCV6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Amelia A. Wolf
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas, Austin, TX78712
| | - Michaela Zeiter
- School of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, Bern University of Applied Sciences,Zollikofen3052, Switzerland
- Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern3013, Switzerland
- Oeschger Center for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern3012, Switzerland
| | - Fawei Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, Qinghai810008, China
| | - Juntao Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100101, China
| | - Ning Zong
- Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100101, China
| | - Xiaoan Zuo
- Urat Desert-grassland Research Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou730000, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bork EW, Hewins DB, Lamb EG, Carlyle CN, Lyseng MP, Chang SX, Alexander MJ, Willms WD, Iravani M. Light to moderate long-term grazing enhances ecosystem carbon across a broad climatic gradient in northern temperate grasslands. Sci Total Environ 2023:164978. [PMID: 37336416 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
Grasslands are globally abundant and provide many ecosystem services, including carbon (C) storage. While grasslands are widely subject to livestock grazing, the influence of grazing on grassland ecosystem C remains unclear. We studied the effect of long-term livestock grazing on C densities of different ecosystem components in 110 northern temperate grasslands across a broad agroclimatic gradient in Alberta, Canada. These grasslands stored 50 to 180 t ha-1C in live and dead vegetation, as well as soil C to 30 cm depth, with the majority as soil organic C (SOC). The mulch layer comprised a large amount of C (~18 t ha-1C) especially within humid grasslands. Although grazing reduced C densities in litter mass, total ecosystem C was 8.5 % greater under grazing (127.8 t ha-1) compared to those non-grazed (117.8 t ha-1), primarily due to increases in SOC and roots. Increases in SOC were consistently observed in the 0-15 cm layer across all climatic conditions, with changes in SOC of the 15-30 cm layer inversely related to aridity. A structural equation model revealed that increased SOC under grazing was indirectly attributed to increases in eudicot rather than graminoid biomass. In addition, SOC increased with graminoid quality (i.e., a reduced carbon to nitrogen ratio), which together with elevated eudicots, increased litter and mulch C, and ultimately enhanced SOC densities. When applied to spatial maps of habitat type and land use (livestock grazing) activity across the region, an area of ~3.8 M ha of grassland was projected to contain an additional 17.1 M t of C under grazing, primarily in mesic grasslands, worth an estimated $3.1 B (Cdn.) under current C valuation guidelines in Canada. Overall, these results highlight the importance of grasslands for C storage and establishing policies that maintain and promote their sustainable use, including light to moderate grazing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward W Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 4-10 Agriculture and Forestry Center, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P5, Canada.
| | - Daniel B Hewins
- Biology Department, Rhode Island College, 600 Mount Pleasant Ave., Providence, RI 02908, USA
| | - Eric G Lamb
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 51 Campus Dr., Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A8, Canada
| | - Cameron N Carlyle
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 4-10 Agriculture and Forestry Center, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Mark P Lyseng
- Alberta Beef Producers, Government Relations and Policy, Lead 165, 6815-8(th) Street NE, Calgary, AB T2E 7H7, Canada
| | - Scott X Chang
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E3
| | - Michael J Alexander
- Alberta Environment and Parks, Government of Alberta, 2(nd) Floor Provincial Building, 200-5 Avenue South, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J4L1, Canada
| | - Walter D Willms
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (Retired), 5403 1(st) Avenue South, Lethbridge, Alberta T1J 4B1, Canada
| | - Majid Iravani
- Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gross CD, Bork EW, Carlyle CN, Chang SX. Agroforestry perennials reduce nitrous oxide emissions and their live and dead trees increase ecosystem carbon storage. Glob Chang Biol 2022; 28:5956-5972. [PMID: 35841134 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Agroforestry systems (AFS) contribute to carbon (C) sequestration and reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural lands. However, previously understudied differences among AFS may underestimate their climate change mitigation potential. In this 3-year field study, we assessed various C stocks and greenhouse gas emissions across two common AFS (hedgerows and shelterbelts) and their component land uses: perennial vegetated areas with and without trees (woodland and grassland, respectively), newly planted saplings in grassland, and adjacent annual cropland in central Alberta, Canada. Between 2018 and 2020 (~April-October), nitrous oxide emissions were 89% lower under perennial vegetation relative to the cropland (0.02 and 0.18 g N m-2 year-1 , respectively). In 2020, heterotrophic respiration in the woodland was 53% lower in shelterbelts relative to hedgerows (279 and 600 g C m-2 year-1 , respectively). Within the woodland, deadwood C stock was particularly important in hedgerows (35 Mg C ha-1 or 7% of ecosystem C) relative to shelterbelts (2 Mg C ha-1 or <1% of ecosystem C), and likely affected C cycling differences between the woodland types by enhancing soil labile C and microbial biomass in hedgerows. Deadwood C stock was positively correlated with annual heterotrophic respiration and total (to ~100 cm depth) soil organic C, water-soluble organic C, and microbial biomass C. Total ecosystem C was 1.90-2.55 times greater within the woodland than all other land uses, with 176, 234, 237, and 449 Mg C ha-1 found in the cropland, grassland, planted saplings treatment, and woodland, respectively. Shelterbelt and hedgerow woodlands contained 2.09 and 3.03 times more C, respectively, than adjacent cropland. Our findings emphasize the importance of AFS for fostering C sequestration and reducing greenhouse gas emissions and, in particular, retaining hedgerows (legacy woodland) and their associated deadwood across temperate agroecosystems will help mitigate climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cole D Gross
- Department of Renewable Resources, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Edward W Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cameron N Carlyle
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Scott X Chang
- Department of Renewable Resources, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grenke JSJ, Bork EW, Carlyle CN, Boyce MS, Cahill JF. Limited impacts of adaptive multi‐paddock grazing systems on plant diversity in the Northern Great Plains. J Appl Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Edward W. Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
| | - Cameron N. Carlyle
- Department of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
| | - Mark S. Boyce
- Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
| | - James F. Cahill
- Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thompson KA, James KS, Carlyle CN, Quideau S, Bork EW. Timing and duration of access mat use impacts their mitigation of compaction effects from industrial traffic. J Environ Manage 2022; 303:114263. [PMID: 34906831 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Revised: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Grasslands are declining worldwide and are often impacted by industrial activities, including infrastructure development. Current best management practices for low-disturbance development on grasslands include the use of wooden access mats as temporary work platforms and roadways to mitigate soil compaction and rutting due to heavy traffic. We assessed the impacts of heavy traffic (TON), and the impacts of the same heavy equipment driven over top of access mats (AM), on soil physical, hydrological, and nutrient responses in sandy and loamy soils in the Dry Mixedgrass prairies over a 2-year period. We also assessed how the timing (early vs. late in the growing season) and duration (6 vs. 12 vs. 24 weeks) of AM and TON affected the same metrics. Compared to undisturbed soils, TON increased soil penetration resistance (15 cm depth) up to 93% in loamy and up to 101% in sandy soils, and decreased water infiltration rates from 53 to 71%, respectively. Notably, the negative impacts of TON on soil physical characteristics and hydrology were larger in sandy vs. loamy soils, and when moist soils were exposed to traffic early in the growing season. AMs were effective at mitigating soil compaction from industrial traffic when used on sandy soils. However, AM use increased the supply of total nitrogen and other plant macro- and micro-nutrients, particularly in soils subject to longer (12-24 wk) mat placement. Results indicate TON may have long-lasting effects on grassland (particularly sandy) soils, and that AM use represents an effective tool to mitigate traffic impacts. Further, early-season traffic should be avoided when soils are moist (whether with AM or not), and AMs should be placed on soils for limited durations (≤6 wk) to minimize potential nutrient losses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen A Thompson
- Trent School of Environment, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, ON, K9L 0G2, Canada.
| | - Kassia S James
- Cariboo-Chilcotin Natural Resource District, Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development, 200-640 Borland Street, Williams Lake, B.C, V2G 4T1, Canada.
| | - Cameron N Carlyle
- Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada.
| | - Sylvie Quideau
- Department of Renewable Resources, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.
| | - Edward W Bork
- Cariboo-Chilcotin Natural Resource District, Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development, 200-640 Borland Street, Williams Lake, B.C, V2G 4T1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gross CD, Bork EW, Carlyle CN, Chang SX. Biochar and its manure-based feedstock have divergent effects on soil organic carbon and greenhouse gas emissions in croplands. Sci Total Environ 2022; 806:151337. [PMID: 34743889 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Applying organic amendments to soil can increase soil organic carbon (SOC) storage and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions generated by agriculture, helping to mitigate climate change. However, it is necessary to determine which type of amendment produces the most desirable results. We conducted a 3-y field study comparing one-time addition of manure compost and its biochar derivative to a control to assess their effects on SOC and GHG emissions at ten annually cropped sites in central Alberta, Canada. Manure compost and biochar were applied at equivalent carbon rates (7 Mg ha-1) and tilled into the surface 10 cm of soil. Two years post-treatment, biochar addition increased surface (0-10 cm) SOC by 12 and 10 Mg ha-1 relative to the control and manure addition, respectively. Therefore, biochar addition led to the sequestration of SOC at a rate of 2.5 Mg ha-1 y-1 relative to the control. No treatment effect on deeper (10-100 cm) or cumulative SOC was found. In 2018 and 2019, manure addition increased cumulative GHG (sum of CO2, CH4, and N2O) emissions by 33%, on average, due to greater CO2 emissions relative to both the control and biochar addition. In contrast, in 2020, biochar addition reduced cumulative GHG emissions by an average of 21% due to lower CO2 emissions relative to both the control and manure addition. Our study shows that the application of biochar, rather than its manure compost feedstock, increased surface SOC sequestration and had either no effect on (first two years) or reduced GHG emissions (year three) relative to the control. We recommend that policy and carbon sequestration initiatives focus on optimizing biochar production-application systems to fully realize the potential of biochar application as a viable climate change mitigation practice in agriculture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cole D Gross
- Department of Renewable Resources, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada.
| | - Edward W Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, 410 Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada.
| | - Cameron N Carlyle
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, 410 Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada.
| | - Scott X Chang
- Department of Renewable Resources, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ma Z, Shrestha BM, Bork EW, Chang SX, Carlyle CN, Döbert TF, Sobrinho LS, Boyce MS. Soil greenhouse gas emissions and grazing management in northern temperate grasslands. Sci Total Environ 2021; 796:148975. [PMID: 34271393 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Adaptive multi-paddock (AMP) grazing, a grazing system in which individual paddocks are grazed for a short duration at a high stock density and followed by a long rest period, is claimed to be an effective tool to sustainably manage and improve grasslands and enhance their ecosystem services. However, whether AMP grazing is superior to conventional grazing (n-AMP) in reducing soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is unclear. Here, we measured CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes between August 2017 and August 2019 in 12 pairs of AMP vs. n-AMP ranches distributed across an agro-climatic gradient in Alberta, Canada. We found that field GHG fluxes did not differ between AMP and n-AMP grazing systems, but instead were regulated by specific management attributes, environmental conditions, and soil properties, including cattle stocking rate, cultivation history, soil moisture content, and soil bulk density. Specifically, we found that seasonal mean CO2 emissions increased with increasing cattle stocking rates, while CH4 uptake was lower in grasslands with a history of cultivation. Seasonal mean CO2 emissions increased while CH4 uptake decreased with increasing soil moisture content. In addition, CH4 uptake decreased with increasing soil bulk density. Observed N2O emissions were poorly predicted by the management, environmental conditions, and soil properties investigated in our study. We conclude that AMP grazing does not have an advantage over n-AMP grazing in reducing GHG fluxes from grasslands. Future efforts to develop optimal management strategies (e.g., the use of sustainable stocking rates and avoided cultivation) that reduce GHG emissions should also consider the environmental conditions and soil properties unique to every grassland ecosystem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zilong Ma
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada; State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Ecology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
| | - Bharat M Shrestha
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada
| | - Edward W Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Scott X Chang
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada.
| | - Cameron N Carlyle
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Timm F Döbert
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
| | - Laio Silva Sobrinho
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada
| | - Mark S Boyce
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dahl R, Dalgaard T, Bork EW. Shrub Encroachment Following Wetland Creation in Mixedgrass Prairie Alters Grassland Vegetation and Soil. Environ Manage 2020; 66:1120-1132. [PMID: 33128111 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-020-01386-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Wetland decline under post-European settlement and land use change across western Canada has led to mitigation strategies, including wetland creation. Created wetlands can trigger environmental change, including woody species encroachment, in turn altering vegetation and soil. We quantify changes in shrub abundance from prior to wetland creation (1949) until 60 years later (2012) within a Mixedgrass ecosystem of the Verger watershed in Alberta, Canada. In addition, we compare remaining grassland with areas colonized by shrubland on similar ecosites for differences in (1) plant composition, including native and introduced flora, (2) herbage yield and forage accessibility for livestock, and (3) soil properties (surface organic depth, bulk density, mineral nitrogen (N), and carbon (C) concentration). Repeat photos show Shepherdia argentea shrublands increased from 0 to 88 ha (to 1.15% of study area) following wetland creation, with the greatest increase in the last 20 years. Relative to grasslands, shrublands had lower total plant diversity but greater presence of introduced plant species. Shrub patches were 94% lower in herbaceous production, with 77% of shrublands non-utilized by cattle, collectively leading to reduced grazing capacity. Relative to grasslands, shrublands had a thicker soil surface mulch layer, and where cattle were present, had increased mineral soil N and C. Overall, shrub encroachment following wetland creation has markedly altered vegetation and soils in this once grassland landscape, with negative impacts on native plant diversity, herbage production and forage accessibility, and has implications for the management of shrub encroachment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tommy Dalgaard
- Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, Postboks 50, DK-8830, Tjele, Denmark
| | - Edward W Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 410E Agriculture/Forestry Center, T6G 2P5, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ma Z, Chang SX, Bork EW, Steinaker DF, Wilson SD, White SR, Cahill JF. Climate change and defoliation interact to affect root length across northern temperate grasslands. Funct Ecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zilong Ma
- Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
| | - Scott X. Chang
- Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
| | - Edward W. Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food, and Nutritional Science University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
| | | | | | - Shannon R. White
- Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
| | - James F. Cahill
- Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang J, Li Y, Bork EW, Richter GM, Eum HI, Chen C, Shah SHH, Mezbahuddin S. Modelling spatio-temporal patterns of soil carbon and greenhouse gas emissions in grazing lands: Current status and prospects. Sci Total Environ 2020; 739:139092. [PMID: 32521338 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The sustainability of grazing lands lies in the nexus of human consumption behavior, livestock productivity, and environmental footprint. Due to fast growing global food demands, many grazing lands have suffered from overgrazing, leading to soil degradation, air and water pollution, and biodiversity losses. Multidisciplinary efforts are required to understand how these lands can be better assessed and managed to attain predictable outcomes of optimal benefit to society. This paper synthesizes our understanding based on previous work done on modelling the influences of grazing of soil carbon (SC) and greenhouse gas emissions to identify current knowledge gaps and research priorities. We revisit three widely-used process-based models: DeNitrification DeComposition (DNDC), DayCent, and the Pasture Simulation model (PaSim) and two watershed models: The Soil & Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and Variable Infiltration Capacity Model (VIC), which are widely used to simulate C, nutrient and water cycles. We review their structures and ability as process-based models in representing key feedbacks among grazing management, SOM decomposition and hydrological processes in grazing lands. Then we review some significant advances in the use of models combining biogeochemical and hydrological processes. Finally, we examine challenges of incorporating spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability into modelling C and nutrient cycling in grazing lands and discuss their weakness and strengths. We also highlight key research direction for improving the knowledge base and code structure in modelling C and nutrient cycling in grazing lands, which are essential to conserve grazing lands and maintain their ecosystem goods and services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junye Wang
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Athabasca University, 1 University Drive, Athabasca, Alberta T9S 3A3, Canada.
| | - Yumei Li
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Athabasca University, 1 University Drive, Athabasca, Alberta T9S 3A3, Canada; College of Earth Science, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Rd, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, PR China
| | - Edward W Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 410 Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
| | - Goetz M Richter
- Department of Sustainable Agriculture Sciences, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom
| | - Hyung-Il Eum
- Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP), Environmental Monitoring and Science Division, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Changchun Chen
- School of Geography & Remote Sensing, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, PR China
| | - Syed Hamid Hussain Shah
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Athabasca University, 1 University Drive, Athabasca, Alberta T9S 3A3, Canada
| | - Symon Mezbahuddin
- Environmental Stewardship Branch, Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, Edmonton, AB, Canada; Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Li P, Lang M, Zhu S, Bork EW, Carlyle CN, Chang SX. Greenhouse gas emissions are affected by land use type in two agroforestry systems: Results from an incubation experiment. Ecol Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/1440-1703.12162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Li
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology Nanjing China
- Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
| | - Man Lang
- Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology Nanjing China
- Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
| | - Sixi Zhu
- Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
- School of Eco‐environmental Engineering Guizhou Minzu University Guiyang China
| | - Edward W. Bork
- Department of Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
| | - Cameron N. Carlyle
- Department of Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
| | - Scott X. Chang
- Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chuan X, Carlyle CN, Bork EW, Chang SX, Hewins DB. Extracellular enzyme activity in grass litter varies with grazing history, environment and plant species in temperate grasslands. Sci Total Environ 2020; 702:134562. [PMID: 31731122 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2019] [Revised: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Long-term livestock grazing (here after 'grazing') affects carbon (C) and nutrient cycling in grassland ecosystems, in part by altering the quantity and quality of litter inputs. Despite their spatial extent and size of carbon and nutrient stocks, the effect of grazing on grassland biogeochemical cycling through the mediation of microbial activity remains poorly understood. To better understand the relationship between grazing and C and nutrient cycling in litter, we conducted an 18-month long study in paired grasslands previously grazed and nongrazed by cattle for 25 years, measuring extracellular enzyme activity (EEA) in various plant litter samples. Litter sources, including seven grass species dominant in one or more subregions and possessing divergent responses to grazing, as well as a community mix of litter sourced from each site, were tested at 15 sites spanning three grassland subregions in Alberta, Canada. We quantified EEAs associated with C cycling (β-glucosidase, β-Cellobiosidase and β-xylosidase), nitrogen (N) cycling (N-acetyl-glucosaminidase) and phosphorus (P) cycling (phosphatase). In general, litter in grasslands exposed to grazing had greater activity of C-liberating and P-liberating enzyme (β-xylosidase and phosphatase) in the mesic grasslands of the Foothills Fescue subregion (P ≤ 0.10). Observed EEAs were strongly mediated by litter type, with greater EEAs in litter of grass species known to increase in abundance under long-term grazing, including Poa pratensis in the Foothills Fescue subregion, and Bouteloua gracilis in arid grasslands of the Mixedgrass Prairie. In contrast, Pascopyrum smithii litter had the lowest enzyme activities in all subregions. We also found that EEAs changed through time (0-18 months) with consistently high levels detected at 1 (June 2014), 6 (October 2014) and 18 months (October 2015) after placement. Overall, these findings indicate grazing enhances EEA, and thus C and N-cycling, in northern temperate grasslands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaozhu Chuan
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Cameron N Carlyle
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Edward W Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Scott X Chang
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H1, Canada
| | - Daniel B Hewins
- Biology Department, Fogarty Life Science, Rhode Island College, Providence, Rhode Island 02908, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bao T, Carlyle CN, Bork EW, Becker M, Alexander MJ, DeMaere C, de Souza DM, Farr D, McAllister TA, Selin C, Weber M, Cahill JF. Survey of cattle and pasture management practices on focal pastures in Alberta. Can J Anim Sci 2019. [DOI: 10.1139/cjas-2018-0110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
A survey of Alberta beef producers was conducted at sites overlapping with a province-wide network of permanent biodiversity monitoring plots to characterize focal pastures and their management, including estimates of stocking rates. Overall, greater stocking rates were reported in the boreal compared with the parkland and grassland natural regions, coinciding with an increased reliance on tame forage on relatively small land areas of largely deeded land. Higher stocking rates were also associated with earlier starting dates of grazing in the season, higher mean annual precipitation, and lower mean annual temperature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tan Bao
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, CW 405 Biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 410 Ag/For Center, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Cameron N. Carlyle
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 410 Ag/For Center, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Edward W. Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 410 Ag/For Center, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Marcus Becker
- Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, CW 405 Biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
| | - Mike J. Alexander
- Rangeland Resource Management, Alberta Environment and Parks, Box 1420, Pincher Creek, AB T0K 1W0, Canada
| | - Craig DeMaere
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 410 Ag/For Center, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
- Rangeland Resource Management, Alberta Environment and Parks, Box 1420, Pincher Creek, AB T0K 1W0, Canada
| | - Danielle Maia de Souza
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 410 Ag/For Center, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Dan Farr
- Biodiversity and Ecosystem Health Sciences, Environmental Monitoring and Science Division, Alberta Environment and Parks, 9888 Jasper Avenue, Edmonton, AB T5J 5C6, Canada
| | - Tim A. McAllister
- Ruminant Nutrition and Microbiology, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403 — 1st Avenue South, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
| | - Carrie Selin
- Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, CW 405 Biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
| | - Marian Weber
- Environmental Planning and Economics Program, InnoTech Alberta, 250 Karl Clark Road, Edmonton, AB T6N 1E4, Canada
| | - James F. Cahill
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, CW 405 Biological Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Najafi F, Thompson KA, Carlyle CN, Quideau SA, Bork EW. Access Matting Reduces Mixedgrass Prairie Soil and Vegetation Responses to Industrial Disturbance. Environ Manage 2019; 64:497-508. [PMID: 31418077 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-019-01193-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Substantial interest exists in understanding the role of low-disturbance construction methods in mitigating industrial impacts to native grassland soils and vegetation. We assessed soil and vegetation responses to conventional high-disturbance sod-stripping and revegetation on sandy soils, and the alternative practice of low-disturbance access matting to provide a temporary work surface on sandy and loamy soils. Treatments were associated with high-voltage transmission tower construction during 2014 within the Mixedgrass Prairie. High-disturbance sites were hydroseeded in May of 2015, while low-disturbance sites recovered naturally. We assessed soil physical (bulk density, water infiltration) and chemical properties (organic matter, pH, and electrical conductivity) after construction and herbage biomass for three growing seasons. Sod-stripping led to 53% greater soil bulk density and 51% less organic matter than nondisturbed controls, while water infiltration increased by 32% in these high-sand (>80%) soils. In contrast, access matting led to minimal soil property changes regardless of the texture. While total herbage biomass was unaffected by all construction treatments, sod-stripping reduced grass biomass by 80% during the first growing season, which coincided with a 119% increase in forb mass. Root biomass (0-15 cm) also declined 77% with sod-stripping. Vegetation biomass on sites with access matting remained largely unaffected by the disturbance. Overall, low-disturbance construction methods using access matting were more effective than sod-stripping in mitigating the negative impacts of industrial development on Mixedgrass soil properties, as well as vegetation biomass, and are recommended as a best management practice during industrial disturbance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Najafi
- University of Alberta, 410 Agriculture/Forestry Center, Edmonton, T6G 2P5, Alberta, Canada
| | - K A Thompson
- Trent School of Environment, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, K9L 0G2, Ontario, Canada
| | - C N Carlyle
- University of Alberta, 410 Agriculture/Forestry Center, Edmonton, T6G 2P5, Alberta, Canada
| | - S A Quideau
- University of Alberta, 751 General Services Building, Edmonton, T6G 2H1, Alberta, Canada
| | - E W Bork
- University of Alberta, 410 Agriculture/Forestry Center, Edmonton, T6G 2P5, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kwak JH, Lim SS, Baah-Acheamfour M, Choi WJ, Fatemi F, Carlyle CN, Bork EW, Chang SX. Introducing trees to agricultural lands increases greenhouse gas emission during spring thaw in Canadian agroforestry systems. Sci Total Environ 2019; 652:800-809. [PMID: 30380487 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The role of agroforestry systems in mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emission from agricultural soils during spring thaw (early April to mid-May) has been poorly studied. Soil CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes were measured from treed areas and adjacent herblands (areas without trees) during spring thaw in 2014 and 2015 at 36 agroforestry sites (12 hedgerow, 12 shelterbelt and 12 silvopasture) in central Alberta, Canada. Fluxes of those GHGs varied with agroforestry systems and land-cover types. We found greater CO2 emission (P < 0.001) and CH4 uptake (P < 0.05), but lower N2O emission (P < 0.01) in the silvopasture than in the hedgerow and shelterbelt systems, with no difference between the last two systems. Treed areas in general had greater CO2 emissions (P < 0.001) and CH4 uptake (P < 0.01), and lower N2O emissions (P < 0.001) than the herblands. Soil temperature, moisture content, organic C content and soil available N concentration affected GHG fluxes. The global warming potential (GWP) was greater (P < 0.05) in the silvopasture than in the hedgerow or shelterbelt systems over the two spring thaw seasons examined, and greater (P < 0.05) in the treed areas than in the herblands during the cool spring in 2015. However, the GWP per unit soil organic C was lower in the treed areas (0.004-0.101%) than in the herblands (0.005-0.225%). As compared to previously reported mean growing season GHG emission (15.4 g CO2-eq m-2 day-1), the GWP of these land uses during spring thaw was small (<5% of the annual GWP) due to the short spring period (6 weeks) and the small GHG emission (2.5 g CO2-eq m-2 day-1). Although GHG emissions during spring thaw were small compared to those in the growing season, they should not be ignored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Hyeob Kwak
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada
| | - Sang-Sun Lim
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada; Bio R&D Center, CJ Cheiljedang, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do 16495, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark Baah-Acheamfour
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada
| | - Woo-Jung Choi
- Department of Rural & Biosystems Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Republic of Korea
| | - Farrah Fatemi
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada
| | - Cameron N Carlyle
- Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
| | - Edward W Bork
- Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
| | - Scott X Chang
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wilcox KR, Tredennick AT, Koerner SE, Grman E, Hallett LM, Avolio ML, La Pierre KJ, Houseman GR, Isbell F, Johnson DS, Alatalo JM, Baldwin AH, Bork EW, Boughton EH, Bowman WD, Britton AJ, Cahill JF, Collins SL, Du G, Eskelinen A, Gough L, Jentsch A, Kern C, Klanderud K, Knapp AK, Kreyling J, Luo Y, McLaren JR, Megonigal P, Onipchenko V, Prevéy J, Price JN, Robinson CH, Sala OE, Smith MD, Soudzilovskaia NA, Souza L, Tilman D, White SR, Xu Z, Yahdjian L, Yu Q, Zhang P, Zhang Y. Asynchrony among local communities stabilises ecosystem function of metacommunities. Ecol Lett 2017; 20:1534-1545. [PMID: 29067791 PMCID: PMC6849522 DOI: 10.1111/ele.12861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2017] [Revised: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Temporal stability of ecosystem functioning increases the predictability and reliability of ecosystem services, and understanding the drivers of stability across spatial scales is important for land management and policy decisions. We used species‐level abundance data from 62 plant communities across five continents to assess mechanisms of temporal stability across spatial scales. We assessed how asynchrony (i.e. different units responding dissimilarly through time) of species and local communities stabilised metacommunity ecosystem function. Asynchrony of species increased stability of local communities, and asynchrony among local communities enhanced metacommunity stability by a wide range of magnitudes (1–315%); this range was positively correlated with the size of the metacommunity. Additionally, asynchronous responses among local communities were linked with species’ populations fluctuating asynchronously across space, perhaps stemming from physical and/or competitive differences among local communities. Accordingly, we suggest spatial heterogeneity should be a major focus for maintaining the stability of ecosystem services at larger spatial scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin R Wilcox
- Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, 770 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, OK, 73019, USA
| | - Andrew T Tredennick
- Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, 5230 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84321, USA
| | - Sally E Koerner
- Department of Biology, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, 27412, USA
| | - Emily Grman
- Biology Department, Eastern Michigan University, 441 Mark Jefferson Science Complex, Ypsilanti, MI, 48197, USA
| | - Lauren M Hallett
- Environmental Studies Program and Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA
| | - Meghan L Avolio
- Morton K. Blaustein Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, 301 Olin Hall 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
| | - Kimberly J La Pierre
- Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, 647 Contees Wharf Road, Edgewater, MD, 21037, USA
| | - Gregory R Houseman
- Department of Biological Sciences, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, 67260, USA
| | - Forest Isbell
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA
| | | | - Juha M Alatalo
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar
| | - Andrew H Baldwin
- Department of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA
| | - Edward W Bork
- Agriculture/Forestry Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2P5
| | - Elizabeth H Boughton
- Archbold Biological Station, MacArthur Agroecology Research Center, 300 Buck Island Ranch Road, Lake Placid, FL, 33852, USA
| | - William D Bowman
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Mountain Research Station, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA
| | - Andrea J Britton
- The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK
| | - James F Cahill
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada
| | - Scott L Collins
- Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA
| | - Guozhen Du
- School of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Anu Eskelinen
- Department of Physiological Diversity, Helmholtz Center for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstr. 15, D-04318, Leipzig, Germany.,German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena- Leipzig, Deutscher Platz 5e, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Ecology, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland
| | - Laura Gough
- Department of Biological Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD, 21252, USA
| | - Anke Jentsch
- Department of Disturbance Ecology, University of Bayreuth, D-95440, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Christel Kern
- Northern Research Station, US Forest Service, 5985 Highway K, Rhinelander, WI, 54501, USA
| | - Kari Klanderud
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432, Aas, Norway
| | - Alan K Knapp
- Department of Biology, Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
| | - Juergen Kreyling
- Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, Experimental Plant Ecology, Greifswald University, Soldmannstrasse 15, D-17487, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Yiqi Luo
- Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, 770 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.,Department of Biological Sciences, Center for Ecosystem Science and Society (Ecoss), Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA.,Department for Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Jennie R McLaren
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, 79968, USA
| | - Patrick Megonigal
- Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, MD, 20754, USA
| | - Vladimir Onipchenko
- Department of Geobotany, Moscow State Lomonosov University, Leninskie gory 1-12, 119234, Moscow, Russia
| | - Janet Prevéy
- USFS Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3625 93rd Ave SW, Olympia, WA, 98512, USA
| | - Jodi N Price
- Institute of Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, 2640, Australia
| | - Clare H Robinson
- School of Earth & Environmental Sciences, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Osvaldo E Sala
- School of Life Sciences and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287, USA
| | - Melinda D Smith
- Department of Biology, Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA
| | - Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia
- Conservation Biology Department, Institute of Environmental Sciences, CML, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 2, 2333 CC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lara Souza
- Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, University of Oklahoma, 770 Van Vleet Oval, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.,Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA
| | - David Tilman
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, College of Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, 55108, USA
| | - Shannon R White
- Environment and Parks, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T5K 2M4, Canada
| | - Zhuwen Xu
- Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110016, China
| | - Laura Yahdjian
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA), Facultad de Agronomía, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Qiang Yu
- National Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Observation and Research Station/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China
| | - Pengfei Zhang
- School of Life Science, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Yunhai Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.,Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, 8830, Tjele, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bork EW, Hewins DB, Tannas S, Willms WD. Festuca campestris
density and defoliation regulate abundance of the rhizomatous grass Poa pratensis
in a fallow field. Restor Ecol 2017. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.12532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Edward W. Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science; University of Alberta, 410 Agriculture/Forestry Centre; Edmonton Alberta T6G 2P5 Canada
| | - Daniel B. Hewins
- Biology Department; Rhode Island College, 251 Fogarty Life Science Building; Providence RI 02908 U.S.A
| | - Steven Tannas
- Tannas Conservation Services, Box 31; Cremona Alberta T0M 0R0 Canada
| | - Walter D. Willms
- Lethbridge Research Center; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403 1st Avenue South; Lethbridge Alberta T1J 4P4 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Baah-Acheamfour M, Carlyle CN, Lim SS, Bork EW, Chang SX. Forest and grassland cover types reduce net greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils. Sci Total Environ 2016; 571:1115-1127. [PMID: 27450260 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2016] [Revised: 07/13/2016] [Accepted: 07/15/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Western Canada's prairie region is extensively cultivated for agricultural production, which is a large source of greenhouse gas emissions. Agroforestry systems are common land uses across Canada, which integrate trees into the agricultural landscape and could play a substantial role in sequestering carbon and mitigating increases in atmospheric GHG concentrations. We measured soil CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes and the global warming potential of microbe-mediated net greenhouse gas emissions (GWPm) in forest and herbland (areas without trees) soils of three agroforestry systems (hedgerow, shelterbelt and silvopasture) over two growing seasons (May through September in 2013 and 2014). We measured greenhouse gas fluxes and environmental conditions at 36 agroforestry sites (12 sites for each system) located along a south-north oriented soil/climate gradient of increasing moisture availability in central Alberta, Canada. The temperature sensitivity of soil CO2 emissions was greater in herbland (4.4) than in forest (3.1), but was not different among agroforestry systems. Over the two seasons, forest soils had 3.4% greater CO2 emission, 36% higher CH4 uptake, and 66% lower N2O emission than adjacent herbland soils. Combining the CO2 equivalents of soil CH4 and N2O fluxes with the CO2 emitted via heterotrophic (microbial) respiration, forest soils had a smaller GWPm than herbland soils (68 and 89kgCO2ha(-1), respectively). While emissions of total CO2 were silvopasture>hedgerow>shelterbelt, soils under silvopasture had 5% lower heterotrophic respiration, 15% greater CH4 uptake, and 44% lower N2O emission as compared with the other two agroforestry systems. Overall, the GWPm of greenhouse gas emissions was greater in hedgerow (88) and shelterbelt (85) than in the silvopasture system (76kgCO2ha(-1)). High GWPm in the hedgerow and shelterbelt systems reflects the greater contribution from the monoculture annual crops within these systems. Opportunities exist for reducing soil greenhouse gas emissions and mitigating climate change by promoting the establishment of perennial vegetation in the agricultural landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Baah-Acheamfour
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Science Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada
| | - Cameron N Carlyle
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 410 Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Sang-Sun Lim
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Science Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada
| | - Edward W Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, 410 Agriculture/Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2P5, Canada
| | - Scott X Chang
- Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, 442 Earth Science Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada,.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shunina A, Osko TJ, Foote L, Bork EW. Comparison of Site Preparation and Revegetation Strategies Within a Sphagnum-dominated Peatland Following Removal of an Oil Well Pad. ECOL RESTOR 2016. [DOI: 10.3368/er.34.3.225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
21
|
Banerjee S, Baah-Acheamfour M, Carlyle CN, Bissett A, Richardson AE, Siddique T, Bork EW, Chang SX. Determinants of bacterial communities in Canadian agroforestry systems. Environ Microbiol 2015; 18:1805-16. [DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 07/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Samiran Banerjee
- Department of Renewable Resources; University of Alberta; 442 Earth Science Building Edmonton Alberta T6G 2E3 Canada
- CSIRO Agriculture Flagship; Crace ACT 2911 Australia
| | - Mark Baah-Acheamfour
- Department of Renewable Resources; University of Alberta; 442 Earth Science Building Edmonton Alberta T6G 2E3 Canada
| | - Cameron N. Carlyle
- Department of Agricultural; Food and Nutritional Science; University of Alberta; 410 Agriculture/Forestry Centre Edmonton Alberta T6G 2H1 Canada
| | | | | | - Tariq Siddique
- Department of Renewable Resources; University of Alberta; 442 Earth Science Building Edmonton Alberta T6G 2E3 Canada
| | - Edward W. Bork
- Department of Agricultural; Food and Nutritional Science; University of Alberta; 410 Agriculture/Forestry Centre Edmonton Alberta T6G 2H1 Canada
| | - Scott X. Chang
- Department of Renewable Resources; University of Alberta; 442 Earth Science Building Edmonton Alberta T6G 2E3 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tannas S, Hewins DB, Bork EW. Isolating the role of soil resources, defoliation, and interspecific competition on early establishment of the late successional bunchgrassFestuca campestris. Restor Ecol 2015. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.12207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Tannas
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science; University of Alberta; 410 Agriculture/Forestry Centre Edmonton AB Canada T6G 2P5
| | - Daniel B. Hewins
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science; University of Alberta; 410 Agriculture/Forestry Centre Edmonton AB Canada T6G 2P5
| | - Edward W. Bork
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science; University of Alberta; 410 Agriculture/Forestry Centre Edmonton AB Canada T6G 2P5
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
White SR, Bork EW, Cahill JF. Direct and indirect drivers of plant diversity responses to climate and clipping across northern temperate grassland. Ecology 2014. [DOI: 10.1890/14-0144.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
24
|
White SR, Tannas S, Bao T, Bennett JA, Bork EW, Cahill JF. Using structural equation modelling to test the passenger, driver and opportunist concepts in aPoa pratensisinvasion. OIKOS 2012. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20951.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
25
|
|
26
|
Asamoah SA, Bork EW, Thompson JE. Effects of Flood Seasonality and Frequency on Northern Pintails and other Breeding Ducks in Managed Prairie Wetlands. WEST N AM NATURALIST 2011. [DOI: 10.3398/064.071.0303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
27
|
Chapman GA, Bork EW, Donkor NT, Hudson RJ. Effects of supplemental dietary tannins on the performance of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2010; 94:65-73. [PMID: 19364384 DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2008.00883.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Tannins are natural and nutritionally significant components of the diets of browsing ungulates. In trials on supplemented pastures and in drylots, we estimated dry matter intake (DMI), weight gain, and urea N, potassium, cortisol and creatinine in urine of captive white-tailed deer fed pelleted diets that differed only in the respective quebracho tannin (QT) content. The low control, medium and high QT rations were 3.6, 63 and 152 g/kg DM respectively. There was no tannin-free pellet option. Trials were divided into winter pasture, restricted choice and spring growth. In winter pasture trial on pasture using QT, deer reduced QT intake relative to that expected under random foraging. This aversion was also apparent during the spring growth trial. While DMI in the winter pasture trial remained similar among treatments (p > 0.05), averaging 130 g/kg(0.75)/day, deer gained more weight (p < 0.05) when given a choice that included the high QT ration. During subsequent spring growth, DMI and weight gains generally exceeded those of the winter period. Unlike the winter pasture trial, weight gains in spring growth trial were higher (p < 0.05) in the low-control QT treatment. In the restricted choice trial, weight gain was again higher (p < 0.05) for deer fed a low-control QT diet. The urea N/creatinine ratio of deer fed the low-control QT diet (0.0357) was over three times that of deer fed the high QT diet (0.0107). Neither potassium/creatinine nor cortisol/creatinine ratios were affected by diet (p > 0.05). Collectively, these results suggest that although deer do not avoid tannins, and even ingested up to 5% under the choice options in these trials, the effect of tannins on deer performance may vary by season as well as by foraging opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G A Chapman
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chapman GA, Bork EW, Donkor NT, Hudson RJ. Performance and dietary preferences of white-tailed deer grazing chicory, birdsfoot trefoil or alfalfa in north central Alberta. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2009; 93:794-801. [PMID: 19138349 DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2008.00872.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Little information exists on the performance of deer on alternative forage species in northern temperate environments during summer and fall, the period of inherent maximum growth in deer. In performance and choice experiments, we compared live weight gain (g/kg(0.75)/day), absolute [kg/ha dry matter (DM)] and relative (% DM) herbage utilization, relative preference index (RPI) as well as plant community visitation of white-tailed deer grazing alfalfa (Medicago sativa), birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus) or chicory (Cichorium intybus) in north central Alberta, Canada. Herbage phytomass and quality was also measured on the grazed pastures. Alfalfa had higher dry matter yields and crude protein concentrations than chicory and trefoil. Chicory had lower neutral detergent fiber concentrations than the other forages. Tannin concentrations were greatest in birds foot trefoil (nearly 55 g/kg DM), well above those in the other forages (<5 g/kg DM). Live weight gain was similar among deer feeding within the paddocks seeded to birds foot trefoil and chicory, and more than two times higher (p < 0.05) than deer feeding in paddocks seeded to alfalfa. Deer spent more grazing time (about 40%) on chicory pastures than on alfalfa and birds foot trefoil pastures. RPI values were greatest for birds foot trefoil at 2.11, intermediate for chicory at 1.40, and lowest for alfalfa at <0.60. Absolute herbage utilization remained similar (p > 0.05) among the three forage species. In contrast, relative herbage utilization was greater from birds foot trefoil (52% DM) than chicory (40% DM) or alfalfa (25% DM). These results suggest that the use of alfalfa with other alternative forages may prove beneficial to deer production, rather than using alfalfa pasture alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G A Chapman
- Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Burkinshaw AM, Bork EW. Shrub encroachment impacts the potential for multiple use conflicts on public land. Environ Manage 2009; 44:493-504. [PMID: 19588191 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-009-9328-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2008] [Revised: 01/29/2009] [Accepted: 06/03/2009] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Public rangelands in North America are typically managed under a multiple use policy that includes livestock grazing and wildlife management. In this article we report on the landscape level extent of grassland loss to shrub encroachment in a portion of the Rocky Mountain Forest Reserve in southwestern Alberta, Canada, and review the associated implications for simultaneously supporting livestock and wildlife populations while maintaining range health on this diminishing vegetation type. Digitized aerial photographs of 12 km of valley bottom from 1958 and 1974 were co-registered to ortho-rectified digital imagery taken in 1998, and an un-supervised classification used to determine areas associated with grassland and shrubland in each year. Field data from 2002 were over-layed using GPS coordinates to refine the classification using a calibration-validation procedure. Over the 40-year study period, open grasslands declined from 1,111 ha in 1958 to 465 ha in 1998, representing a 58% decrease. Using mean production data for grass and shrub dominated areas we then quantified aggregate changes in grazing capacity of both primary (grassland) and secondary (shrubland) habitats for livestock and wildlife. Total declines in grazing capacity from 1958 to 1998 totaled 2,744 Animal Unit Months (AUMs) of forage (-39%), including a 58% decrease in primary (i.e., open grassland) range, which was only partly offset by the availability of 1,357 AUMs within less productive and less accessible shrubland habitats. Our results indicate shrub encroachment has been extensive and significantly reduced forage availability to domestic livestock and wildlife, and will increase the difficulty of conserving remaining grasslands. Although current grazing capacities remain marginally above those specified by regulated grazing policies, it is clear that continued habitat change and decreases in forage availability are likely to threaten the condition of remaining grasslands. Unless shrub encroachment is arrested or grassland restoration initiated, reductions in aggregate ungulate numbers may be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela M Burkinshaw
- Rangeland Management Branch, Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, #211 4920-51 Street, Red Deer, AB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Page HN, Bork EW. Effect of Planting Season, Bunchgrass Species, and Neighbor Control on the Success of Transplants for Grassland Restoration. Restor Ecol 2005. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2005.00083.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
31
|
Moisey DM, Bork EW, Willms WD. Non-destructive assessment of cattle forage selection: A test of skim grazing in fescue grassland. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005. [DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
32
|
|
33
|
|
34
|
|
35
|
Bork EW, West NE, Doolittle JA, Boettinger JL. Soil Depth Assessment of Sagebrush Grazing Treatments Using Electromagnetic Induction. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1998. [DOI: 10.2307/4003336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
36
|
Bork EW, West NE, Walker JW. Cover Components on Long-Term Seasonal Sheep Grazing Treatments in Three-Tip Sagebrush Steppe. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1998. [DOI: 10.2307/4003414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|
37
|
Bork EW, Hudson RJ, Bailey AW. Populus forest characterization in Elk Island National Park relative to herbivory, prescribed fire, and topography. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1997. [DOI: 10.1139/b97-866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Wild ungulate herbivory and prescribed fire can modify the vegetational characteristics of Populus forest plant communities and alter their potential to meet conservation objectives. Effective management of these areas depends on understanding the impact of these disturbances across natural landscapes. Our objective was to quantify various overstory and understory plant community characteristics in the Populus forests in and around Elk Island National Park, Alberta, under different disturbance regimes. Vegetation from 36 sites, stratified by four topographic positions and three historical treatment combinations of fire and native ungulate herbivory, were sampled. In these sites, we quantified tree density, basal area and cover, understory species richness and diversity, shrub density and height, as well as grass, forb, and browse annual net primary production (ANPP). Although tree canopy characteristics were similar under all three disturbances, small-diameter trees (< 5 cm) were nearly absent within the Park. The reference area outside the Park had greater browse-leaf and -twig ANPP, as well as shrub height, but lower grass ANPP. Inside the Park, burned areas had greater shrub density and ANPP of grass and forb components. Topographically, tree stand basal area, cover, and shrub height were greatest on the northern slope, as was browse-leaf ANPP. Species diversity and richness were relatively greater on the toe slope. Within the plant community variables examined, the disturbances and positions frequently interacted, particularly the burned treatment with the crest position and level of herbivory with the south-facing and north-facing slopes. The structure, composition, and ANPP of Populus forest in Elk Island National Park has been significantly affected by both ungulate herbivory and prescribed burning. These factors, along with topography, influence the vegetation and are consequently important for management of the park's habitat and ungulate populations. Key words: ANPP, national park, prescribed fire, structure, topography, ungulate herbivory.
Collapse
|