1
|
Romine JK, Li H, Coughlin MM, Jones JM, Britton A, Tyner HL, Fuller SB, Bloodworth R, Edwards LJ, Etoule JN, Morrill TC, Newes-Adeyi G, Olsho LEW, Gaglani M, Fowlkes A, Hollister J, Bedrick EJ, Uhrlaub JL, Beitel S, Sprissler RS, Lyski Z, Porter CJ, Rivers P, Lutrick K, Caban-Martinez AJ, Yoon SK, Phillips AL, Naleway AL, Burgess JL, Ellingson KD. Hybrid immunity and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: results of the HEROES-RECOVER prospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 2024:ciae130. [PMID: 38466720 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are limited data on whether hybrid immunity differs by count and order of immunity-conferring events (SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination). From a cohort of health care personnel, first responders, and other frontline workers in six US states, we examined heterogeneity of the effect of hybrid immunity on SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels. METHODS Exposures included event-count (sum of infections and vaccine doses) and event-order, categorized into seven permutations of vaccination and/or infection. Outcome was level of serum binding antibodies against receptor binding domain (RBD) of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (total RBD-binding Ig), measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Mean antibody levels were examined up to 365 days after each of the 1st-7th events. RESULTS Analysis included 5,793 participants measured from August 7, 2020 to April 15, 2023. Hybrid immunity from infection before one or two vaccine doses elicited modestly superior antibody responses after the 2nd and 3rd events (compared to infections or vaccine-doses alone). This superiority was not evident after the 4th and 5th events (additional doses). Among adults infected before vaccination, adjusted geometric mean ratios (95% CI) of anti-RBD early response (versus vaccinated-only) were 1.23 (1.14-1.33), 1.09 (1.03-1.14), 0.87 (0.81-0.94), and 0.99 (0.85-1.15) after the 2nd-5th events, respectively. Post-vaccination infections elicited superior responses: adjusted geometric mean ratios (95% CI) of anti-RBD early response (versus vaccinated-only) were: 0.93 (0.75-1.17), 1.11 (1.06-1.16), 1.17 (1.11-1.24), and 1.20 (1.07-1.34) after the 2nd-5th events, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Findings reflecting heterogeneity in antibody levels by permutations of infection and vaccination history could inform COVID-19 vaccination policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James K Romine
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Huashi Li
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Melissa M Coughlin
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jefferson M Jones
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Amadea Britton
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Harmony L Tyner
- St. Luke's Regional Health Care System, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ashley Fowlkes
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - James Hollister
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Edward J Bedrick
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Jennifer L Uhrlaub
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Shawn Beitel
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Ryan S Sprissler
- University of Arizona Genetics Core, Office for Research, Innovation and Impact, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Zoe Lyski
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Cynthia J Porter
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Patrick Rivers
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Karen Lutrick
- College of Medicine - Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Sarang K Yoon
- University of Utah Health, Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Andrew L Phillips
- University of Utah Health, Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Allison L Naleway
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jefferey L Burgess
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Katherine D Ellingson
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hollister J, Caban-Martinez AJ, Ellingson KD, Beitel S, Fowlkes AL, Lutrick K, Tyner HL, Naleway AL, Yoon SK, Gaglani M, Hunt D, Meece J, Mayo Lamberte J, Schaefer Solle N, Rose S, Dunnigan K, Khan SM, Kuntz JL, Fisher JM, Coleman A, Britton A, Thiese MS, Hegmann KT, Pavuk M, Ramadan FA, Fuller S, Nematollahi A, Sprissler R, Burgess JL. Serum per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance concentrations and longitudinal change in post-infection and post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Environ Res 2023; 239:117297. [PMID: 37816422 PMCID: PMC10842580 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are ubiquitous throughout the United States. Previous studies have shown PFAS exposure to be associated with a reduced immune response. However, the relationship between serum PFAS and antibody levels following SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination has not been examined. We examined differences in peak immune response and the longitudinal decline of antibodies following SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination by serum PFAS levels in a cohort of essential workers in the United States. We measured serum antibodies using an in-house semi-quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Two cohorts contributed blood samples following SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination. We used linear mixed regression models, adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, gender, presence of chronic conditions, location, and occupation, to estimate differences in immune response with respect to serum PFAS levels. Our study populations included 153 unvaccinated participants that contributed 316 blood draws over a 14-month period following infection, and 860 participants and 2451 blood draws over a 12-month period following vaccination. Higher perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) concentrations were associated with a lower peak antibody response after infection (p = 0.009, 0.031, 0.015). Higher PFOS, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), PFHxS, and PFNA concentrations were associated with slower declines in antibodies over time after infection (p = 0.003, 0.014, 0.026, 0.025). PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS, and PFNA serum concentrations prior to vaccination were not associated with differences in peak antibody response after vaccination or with differences in decline of antibodies over time after vaccination. These results suggest that elevated PFAS may impede potential immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection by blunting peak antibody levels following infection; the same finding was not observed for immune response to vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Hollister
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | - Alberto J Caban-Martinez
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, USA
| | - Katherine D Ellingson
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Shawn Beitel
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Karen Lutrick
- College of Medicine - Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Allison L Naleway
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sarang K Yoon
- University of Utah Health, Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, USA
| | - Manjusha Gaglani
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, TX, USA; Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | - Natasha Schaefer Solle
- Department of Public Health Sciences and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, USA
| | | | | | - Sana M Khan
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Jennifer L Kuntz
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Alissa Coleman
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Matthew S Thiese
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kurt T Hegmann
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Marian Pavuk
- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ferris A Ramadan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Amy Nematollahi
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Ryan Sprissler
- University of Arizona Genetics Core, Office for Research, Innovation and Impact, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Jefferey L Burgess
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quirk GE, Schoenle MV, Peyton KL, Uhrlaub JL, Lau B, Burgess JL, Ellingson K, Beitel S, Romine J, Lutrick K, Fowlkes A, Britton A, Tyner HL, Caban-Martinez AJ, Naleway A, Gaglani M, Yoon S, Edwards L, Olsho L, Dake M, LaFleur BJ, Nikolich JŽ, Sprissler R, Worobey M, Bhattacharya D. Determinants of de novo B cell responses to drifted epitopes in post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infections. medRxiv 2023:2023.09.12.23295384. [PMID: 37745498 PMCID: PMC10516057 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.12.23295384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Vaccine-induced immunity may impact subsequent de novo responses to drifted epitopes in SARS-CoV-2 variants, but this has been difficult to quantify due to the challenges in recruiting unvaccinated control groups whose first exposure to SARS-CoV-2 is a primary infection. Through local, statewide, and national SARS-CoV-2 testing programs, we were able to recruit cohorts of individuals who had recovered from either primary or post-vaccination infections by either the Delta or Omicron BA.1 variants. Regardless of variant, we observed greater Spike-specific and neutralizing antibody responses in post-vaccination infections than in those who were infected without prior vaccination. Through analysis of variant-specific memory B cells as markers of de novo responses, we observed that Delta and Omicron BA.1 infections led to a marked shift in immunodominance in which some drifted epitopes elicited minimal responses, even in primary infections. Prior immunity through vaccination had a small negative impact on these de novo responses, but this did not correlate with cross-reactive memory B cells, arguing against competitive inhibition of naïve B cells. We conclude that dampened de novo B cell responses against drifted epitopes are mostly a function of altered immunodominance hierarchies that are apparent even in primary infections, with a more modest contribution from pre-existing immunity, perhaps due to accelerated antigen clearance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace E Quirk
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Marta V Schoenle
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Kameron L Peyton
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Jennifer L Uhrlaub
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Branden Lau
- University of Arizona Genomics Core and the Arizona Research Labs, University of Arizona Genetics Core, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Jefferey L Burgess
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Katherine Ellingson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson
| | - Shawn Beitel
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - James Romine
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Karen Lutrick
- College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Ashley Fowlkes
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Amadea Britton
- National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
| | - Harmony L Tyner
- St. Luke's Regional Health Care System, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Allison Naleway
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Manjusha Gaglani
- Baylor Scott & White Health and Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Sarang Yoon
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | | | - Michael Dake
- Office of the Senior Vice-President for Health Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - Janko Ž Nikolich
- BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- University of Arizona Center on Aging, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Ryan Sprissler
- University of Arizona Genomics Core and the Arizona Research Labs, University of Arizona Genetics Core, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Michael Worobey
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Deepta Bhattacharya
- Department of Immunobiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
- BIO5 Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ellingson KD, Hollister J, Porter CJ, Khan SM, Feldstein LR, Naleway AL, Gaglani M, Caban-Martinez AJ, Tyner HL, Lowe AA, Olsho LEW, Meece J, Yoon SK, Mak J, Kuntz JL, Solle NS, Respet K, Baccam Z, Wesley MG, Thiese MS, Yoo YM, Odean MJ, Miiro FN, Pickett SL, Phillips AL, Grant L, Romine JK, Herring MK, Hegmann KT, Lamberte JM, Sokol B, Jovel KS, Thompson MG, Rivers P, Pilishvili T, Lutrick K, Burgess JL, Midgley CM, Fowlkes AL. Risk Factors for Reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant among Previously Infected Frontline Workers. Emerg Infect Dis 2023; 29:599-604. [PMID: 36703252 PMCID: PMC9973698 DOI: 10.3201/eid2903.221314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
In a cohort of essential workers in the United States previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, risk factors for reinfection included being unvaccinated, infrequent mask use, time since first infection, and being non-Hispanic Black. Protecting workers from reinfection requires a multipronged approach including up-to-date vaccination, mask use as recommended, and reduction in underlying health disparities.
Collapse
|
5
|
Herring MK, Romine JK, Wesley MG, Ellingson KD, Yoon SK, Caban-Martinez AJ, Meece J, Gaglani M, Grant L, Olsho LEW, Tyner HL, Naleway AL, Khan SM, Phillips AL, Schaefer Solle N, Rose S, Mak J, Fuller SB, Hunt A, Kuntz JL, Beitel S, Yoo YM, Zheng PQ, Arani G, Mayo Lamberte J, Edwards T, Thompson MG, Sprissler R, Thornburg NJ, Lowe AA, Pilishvili T, Uhrlaub JL, Lutrick K, Burgess JL, Fowlkes AL. SARS-CoV-2 infection history and antibody response to three COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 76:1822-1831. [PMID: 36578137 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Three doses of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines produce robust antibody responses, but data are limited among individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. From a cohort of health care personnel (75.5%), first responders (4.6%), and other frontline workers (19.8%) in 6 US states, we longitudinally assessed antibody waning after dose-2, and response to dose-3, according to SARS-CoV-2 infection history. METHODS Participants submitted sera every three months, after SARS-CoV-2 infection, and after each COVID-19 vaccine dose. Sera were tested for antibodies and reported quantitatively as area under the serial dilution curve (AUC). Changes in the AUC values over time were compared as fold-changes using a linear mixed model. RESULTS Analysis included 388 participants who received dose-3 by November 2021. Three comparison groups: (1) vaccine only with no known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 224); (2) infection prior to dose-1 (n = 123); and (3) infection after dose 2 and before dose-3 (n = 41). The interval from dose 2 and dose 3 was approximately 8-months. After dose-3, antibody levels rose 2.5-fold (95%CI = 2.2-3.0) in group 2, and 2.9-fold (95%CI = 2.6-3.3) in group 1. Those infected within 90 days before dose-3 (and median 233 days (IQR = 213-246) after dose-2) did not increase significantly after dose-3. CONCLUSIONS A third dose of mRNA vaccine typically elicited a robust humoral immune response among those with primary vaccination regardless of SARS-CoV-2 infection >3 months prior to boosting. Those with infection < 3 months prior to boosting did not have a significant increase in antibody concentrations in response to a booster.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - James K Romine
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | - Katherine D Ellingson
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Sarang K Yoon
- University of Utah Health, Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | | | - Manjusha Gaglani
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, Texas.,Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas
| | - Lauren Grant
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | - Allison L Naleway
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Sana M Khan
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Andrew L Phillips
- University of Utah Health, Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | | | - Josephine Mak
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Angela Hunt
- St. Luke's Regional Health Care System, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Jennifer L Kuntz
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Shawn Beitel
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Young M Yoo
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Gayatri Arani
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Julie Mayo Lamberte
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Taylor Edwards
- University of Arizona Genetics Core, Office for Research, Innovation and Impact, University of Arizona, Tucson, ArizonaUSA
| | - Mark G Thompson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ryan Sprissler
- University of Arizona Genetics Core, Office for Research, Innovation and Impact, University of Arizona, Tucson, ArizonaUSA
| | - Natalie J Thornburg
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ashley A Lowe
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Tamara Pilishvili
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jennifer L Uhrlaub
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Karen Lutrick
- College of Medicine - Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Jefferey L Burgess
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Ashley L Fowlkes
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thompson MG, Yoon SK, Naleway AL, Meece J, Fabrizio TP, Caban-Martinez AJ, Burgess JL, Gaglani M, Olsho LEW, Bateman A, Lundgren J, Grant L, Phillips AL, Groom HC, Stefanski E, Solle NS, Ellingson K, Lutrick K, Dunnigan K, Wesley MG, Guenther K, Hunt A, Mak J, Hegmann KT, Kuntz JL, Bissonnette A, Hollister J, Rose S, Morrill TC, Respet K, Fowlkes AL, Thiese MS, Rivers P, Herring MK, Odean MJ, Yoo YM, Brunner M, Bedrick EJ, Fleary DE, Jones JT, Praggastis J, Romine J, Dickerson M, Khan SM, Lamberte JM, Beitel S, Webby RJ, Tyner HL. Association of mRNA Vaccination With Clinical and Virologic Features of COVID-19 Among US Essential and Frontline Workers. JAMA 2022; 328:1523-1533. [PMID: 36255426 PMCID: PMC9579910 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.18550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Data on the epidemiology of mild to moderately severe COVID-19 are needed to inform public health guidance. Objective To evaluate associations between 2 or 3 doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and attenuation of symptoms and viral RNA load across SARS-CoV-2 viral lineages. Design, Setting, and Participants A prospective cohort study of essential and frontline workers in Arizona, Florida, Minnesota, Oregon, Texas, and Utah with COVID-19 infection confirmed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction testing and lineage classified by whole genome sequencing of specimens self-collected weekly and at COVID-19 illness symptom onset. This analysis was conducted among 1199 participants with SARS-CoV-2 from December 14, 2020, to April 19, 2022, with follow-up until May 9, 2022, reported. Exposures SARS-CoV-2 lineage (origin strain, Delta variant, Omicron variant) and COVID-19 vaccination status. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical outcomes included presence of symptoms, specific symptoms (including fever or chills), illness duration, and medical care seeking. Virologic outcomes included viral load by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction testing along with viral viability. Results Among 1199 participants with COVID-19 infection (714 [59.5%] women; median age, 41 years), 14.0% were infected with the origin strain, 24.0% with the Delta variant, and 62.0% with the Omicron variant. Participants vaccinated with the second vaccine dose 14 to 149 days before Delta infection were significantly less likely to be symptomatic compared with unvaccinated participants (21/27 [77.8%] vs 74/77 [96.1%]; OR, 0.13 [95% CI, 0-0.6]) and, when symptomatic, those vaccinated with the third dose 7 to 149 days before infection were significantly less likely to report fever or chills (5/13 [38.5%] vs 62/73 [84.9%]; OR, 0.07 [95% CI, 0.0-0.3]) and reported significantly fewer days of symptoms (10.2 vs 16.4; difference, -6.1 [95% CI, -11.8 to -0.4] days). Among those with Omicron infection, the risk of symptomatic infection did not differ significantly for the 2-dose vaccination status vs unvaccinated status and was significantly higher for the 3-dose recipients vs those who were unvaccinated (327/370 [88.4%] vs 85/107 [79.4%]; OR, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.1-3.5]). Among symptomatic Omicron infections, those vaccinated with the third dose 7 to 149 days before infection compared with those who were unvaccinated were significantly less likely to report fever or chills (160/311 [51.5%] vs 64/81 [79.0%]; OR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.1-0.5]) or seek medical care (45/308 [14.6%] vs 20/81 [24.7%]; OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.2-0.9]). Participants with Delta and Omicron infections who received the second dose 14 to 149 days before infection had a significantly lower mean viral load compared with unvaccinated participants (3 vs 4.1 log10 copies/μL; difference, -1.0 [95% CI, -1.7 to -0.2] for Delta and 2.8 vs 3.5 log10 copies/μL, difference, -1.0 [95% CI, -1.7 to -0.3] for Omicron). Conclusions and Relevance In a cohort of US essential and frontline workers with SARS-CoV-2 infections, recent vaccination with 2 or 3 mRNA vaccine doses less than 150 days before infection with Delta or Omicron variants, compared with being unvaccinated, was associated with attenuated symptoms, duration of illness, medical care seeking, or viral load for some comparisons, although the precision and statistical significance of specific estimates varied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark G Thompson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sarang K Yoon
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Allison L Naleway
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jennifer Meece
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin
| | | | | | - Jefferey L Burgess
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Manjusha Gaglani
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, Texas
- Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple
| | | | | | | | - Lauren Grant
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Andrew L Phillips
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Holly C Groom
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | - Katherine Ellingson
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Karen Lutrick
- College of Medicine - Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson
| | | | | | | | - Angela Hunt
- St Luke's Regional Health Care System, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Josephine Mak
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kurt T Hegmann
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Jennifer L Kuntz
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - James Hollister
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | | | - Karley Respet
- St Luke's Regional Health Care System, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Ashley L Fowlkes
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Matthew S Thiese
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Patrick Rivers
- College of Medicine - Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson
| | | | - Marilyn J Odean
- Whiteside Institute for Clinical Research, St Luke's, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Young M Yoo
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Matthew Brunner
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Edward J Bedrick
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | - John T Jones
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jenna Praggastis
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - James Romine
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Monica Dickerson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sana M Khan
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Julie Mayo Lamberte
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Shawn Beitel
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tyner HL, Burgess JL, Grant L, Gaglani M, Kuntz JL, Naleway AL, Thornburg NJ, Caban-Martinez AJ, Yoon SK, Herring MK, Beitel SC, Blanton L, Nikolich-Zugich J, Thiese MS, Pleasants JF, Fowlkes AL, Lutrick K, Dunnigan K, Yoo YM, Rose S, Groom H, Meece J, Wesley MG, Schaefer-Solle N, Louzado-Feliciano P, Edwards LJ, Olsho LEW, Thompson MG. Neutralizing Antibody Response to Pseudotype Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Differs Between mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccines and by History of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Clin Infect Dis 2022; 75:e827-e837. [PMID: 34928334 PMCID: PMC8755309 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab1038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on the development of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 after SARS-CoV-2 infection and after vaccination with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are limited. METHODS From a prospective cohort of 3975 adult essential and frontline workers tested weekly from August 2020 to March 2021 for SARS-CoV-2 infection by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay irrespective of symptoms, 497 participants had sera drawn after infection (170), vaccination (327), and after both infection and vaccination (50 from the infection population). Serum was collected after infection and each vaccine dose. Serum-neutralizing antibody titers against USA-WA1/2020-spike pseudotype virus were determined by the 50% inhibitory dilution. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) and corresponding fold increases were calculated using t tests and linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS Among 170 unvaccinated participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 158 (93%) developed nAbs with a GMT of 1003 (95% confidence interval, 766-1315). Among 139 previously uninfected participants, 138 (99%) developed nAbs after mRNA vaccine dose 2 with a GMT of 3257 (2596-4052). GMT was higher among those receiving mRNA-1273 vaccine (GMT, 4698; 3186-6926) compared with BNT162b2 vaccine (GMT, 2309; 1825-2919). Among 32 participants with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, GMT was 21 655 (14 766-31 756) after mRNA vaccine dose 1, without further increase after dose 2. CONCLUSIONS A single dose of mRNA vaccine after SARS-CoV-2 infection resulted in the highest observed nAb response. Two doses of mRNA vaccine in previously uninfected participants resulted in higher nAbs to SARS-CoV-2 than after 1 dose of vaccine or SARS-CoV-2 infection alone. nAb response also differed by mRNA vaccine product.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harmony L Tyner
- St. Luke’s Regional Health Care System, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jefferey L Burgess
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health and the College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Lauren Grant
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Manjusha Gaglani
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, Texas, USA
- Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer L Kuntz
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Allison L Naleway
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Natalie J Thornburg
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Sarang K Yoon
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Shawn C Beitel
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health and the College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Lenee Blanton
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Janko Nikolich-Zugich
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health and the College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Matthew S Thiese
- Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Ashley L Fowlkes
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Karen Lutrick
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health and the College of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | | | - Young M Yoo
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Spencer Rose
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Holly Groom
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jennifer Meece
- the Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mark G Thompson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Burns J, Rivers P, LeClair LB, Jovel KS, Rai RP, Lowe AA, Edwards LJ, Khan SM, Mathenge C, Ferraris M, Kuntz JL, Lamberte JM, Hegmann KT, Odean MJ, McLeland-Wieser H, Beitel S, Odame-Bamfo L, Schaefer Solle N, Mak J, Phillips AL, Sokol BE, Hollister J, Ochoa JS, Grant L, Thiese MS, Jacoby KB, Lutrick K, Pubillones FA, Yoo YM, Rentz Hunt D, Ellingson K, Berry MC, Gerald JK, Lopez J, Gerald LB, Wesley MG, Krupp K, Herring MK, Madhivanan P, Caban-Martinez AJ, Tyner HL, Meece JK, Yoon SK, Fowlkes AL, Naleway AL, Gwynn L, Burgess JL, Thompson MG, Olsho LE, Gaglani M. Pediatric Research Observing Trends and Exposures in COVID-19 Timelines (PROTECT): Protocol for a Multisite Longitudinal Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e37929. [PMID: 35635842 PMCID: PMC9377426 DOI: 10.2196/37929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessing the real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and understanding the incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 illness in children are essential to inform policy and guide health care professionals in advising parents and caregivers of children who test positive for SARS-CoV-2. OBJECTIVE This report describes the objectives and methods for conducting the Pediatric Research Observing Trends and Exposures in COVID-19 Timelines (PROTECT) study. PROTECT is a longitudinal prospective pediatric cohort study designed to estimate SARS-CoV-2 incidence and COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against infection among children aged 6 months to 17 years, as well as differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine response between children and adolescents. METHODS The PROTECT multisite network was initiated in July 2021, which aims to enroll approximately 2305 children across four US locations and collect data over a 2-year surveillance period. The enrollment target was based on prospective power calculations and accounts for expected attrition and nonresponse. Study sites recruit parents and legal guardians of age-eligible children participating in the existing Arizona Healthcare, Emergency Response, and Other Essential Workers Surveillance (HEROES)-Research on the Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in Essential Response Personnel (RECOVER) network as well as from surrounding communities. Child demographics, medical history, COVID-19 exposure, vaccination history, and parents/legal guardians' knowledge and attitudes about COVID-19 are collected at baseline and throughout the study. Mid-turbinate nasal specimens are self-collected or collected by parents/legal guardians weekly, regardless of symptoms, for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza testing via reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay, and the presence of COVID-like illness (CLI) is reported. Children who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 or influenza, or report CLI are monitored weekly by online surveys to report exposure and medical utilization until no longer ill. Children, with permission of their parents/legal guardians, may elect to contribute blood at enrollment, following SARS-CoV-2 infection, following COVID-19 vaccination, and at the end of the study period. PROTECT uses electronic medical record (EMR) linkages where available, and verifies COVID-19 and influenza vaccinations through EMR or state vaccine registries. RESULTS Data collection began in July 2021 and is expected to continue through the spring of 2023. As of April 13, 2022, 2371 children are enrolled in PROTECT. Enrollment is ongoing at all study sites. CONCLUSIONS As COVID-19 vaccine products are authorized for use in pediatric populations, PROTECT study data will provide real-world estimates of VE in preventing infection. In addition, this prospective cohort provides a unique opportunity to further understand SARS-CoV-2 incidence, clinical course, and key knowledge gaps that may inform public health. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/37929.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy Burns
- Abt Associates, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Patrick Rivers
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | | | - Krystal S Jovel
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | | | - Ashley A Lowe
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | | | - Sana M Khan
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Clare Mathenge
- College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Temple, TX, United States
| | - Maria Ferraris
- Leonard M Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Jennifer L Kuntz
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Julie Mayo Lamberte
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Kurt T Hegmann
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Marilyn J Odean
- St. Luke's Regional Health Care System, Duluth, MN, United States
- Whiteside Institute for Clinical Research, St. Luke's, Duluth, MN, United States
| | | | - Shawn Beitel
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Leah Odame-Bamfo
- College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Temple, TX, United States
| | | | - Josephine Mak
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Andrew L Phillips
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | | | - James Hollister
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Jezahel S Ochoa
- Leonard M Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Lauren Grant
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Matthew S Thiese
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | | | - Karen Lutrick
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Felipe A Pubillones
- Leonard M Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Young M Yoo
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Katherine Ellingson
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | | | - Joe K Gerald
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | | | - Lynn B Gerald
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | | | - Karl Krupp
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | | | - Purnima Madhivanan
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | | | - Harmony L Tyner
- St. Luke's Regional Health Care System, Duluth, MN, United States
| | - Jennifer K Meece
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States
| | - Sarang K Yoon
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Ashley L Fowlkes
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Allison L Naleway
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Lisa Gwynn
- Leonard M Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Jefferey L Burgess
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Mark G Thompson
- COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Manjusha Gaglani
- College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Temple, TX, United States
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Veguilla V, Fowlkes AL, Bissonnette A, Beitel S, Gaglani M, Porucznik CA, Stockwell MS, Tyner HL, Naleway AL, Yoon SK, Caban-Martinez AJ, Wesley MG, Duque J, Jeddy Z, Stanford JB, Daugherty M, Dixon A, Burgess JL, Odean M, Groom HC, Phillips AL, Schaefer-Solle N, Mistry P, Rolfes MA, Thompson M, Dawood FS, Meece J. Detection and Stability of SARS-CoV-2 in Three Self-Collected Specimen Types: Flocked Midturbinate Swab (MTS) in Viral Transport Media, Foam MTS, and Saliva. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e0103322. [PMID: 35665629 PMCID: PMC9241800 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01033-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Respiratory specimen collection materials shortages hampers severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing. We compared specimen alternatives and evaluated SARS-CoV-2 RNA stability under simulated shipping conditions. We compared concordance of RT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 from flocked midturbinate swabs (MTS) in viral transport media (VTM), foam MTS without VTM, and saliva. Specimens were collected between August 2020 and April 2021 from three prospective cohorts. We compared RT-PCR cycle quantification (Cq) for Spike (S), Nucleocapsid (N), and the Open Reading Frame 1ab (ORF) genes for flocked MTS and saliva specimens tested before and after exposure to a range of storage temperatures (4-30°C) and times (2, 3, and 7 days). Of 1,900 illnesses with ≥2 specimen types tested, 335 (18%) had SARS-CoV-2 detected in ≥1 specimen; 304 (91%) were concordant across specimen types. Among illnesses with SARS-CoV-2 detection, 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94-98%) were positive on flocked MTS, 99% (95% CI: 97-100%) on saliva, and 89% (95% CI: 84-93%) on foam MTS. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in flocked MTS and saliva stored up to 30°C for 7 days. All specimen types provided highly concordant SARS-CoV-2 results. These findings support a range of viable options for specimen types, collection, and transport methods that may facilitate SARS-CoV-2 testing during supply and personnel shortages. IMPORTANCE Findings from this analysis indicate that (1) self-collection of flocked and foam MTS and saliva samples is feasible in both adults and children, (2) foam MTS with VTM and saliva are both viable and reasonable alternatives to traditional flocked MTS in VTM for SARS-CoV-2 detection, and (3) these sample types may be stored and transported at ambient temperatures for up to 7 days without compromising sample quality. These findings support methods of sample collection for SARS-CoV-2 detection that may facilitate widespread community testing in the setting of supply and personnel shortages during the current pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vic Veguilla
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Adam Bissonnette
- Integrated Research & Development Laboratory, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Shawn Beitel
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Manjusha Gaglani
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, Texas, USA
- Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Christina A. Porucznik
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Melissa S. Stockwell
- Division of Child and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Population and Family Health, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Allison L. Naleway
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Sarang K. Yoon
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | | | - Jazmin Duque
- Abt Associates, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Zuha Jeddy
- Abt Associates, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joseph B. Stanford
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Ashton Dixon
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jefferey L. Burgess
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Marilyn Odean
- St. Luke’s Regional Health Care System, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
- The Whiteside Institute for Clinical Research, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
| | - Holly C. Groom
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Andrew L. Phillips
- Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | | | | | - Mark Thompson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Jennifer Meece
- Integrated Research & Development Laboratory, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Naleway AL, Grant L, Caban‐Martinez AJ, Wesley MG, Burgess JL, Groover K, Gaglani M, Yoon SK, Tyner HL, Meece J, Kuntz JL, Yoo YM, Schaefer‐Solle N, Olsho LEW, Gerald JK, Rose S, Thiese MS, Lundgren J, Groom HC, Mak J, Louzado Feliciano P, Edwards LJ, Lutrick K, Dunnigan K, Phillips AL, Lamberte JM, Noriega R, Sokol BE, Odean M, Ellingson KD, Smith M, Hegmann KT, Respet K, Dickerson M, Cruz A, Fleary DE, Murthy K, Hunt A, Azziz‐Baumgartner E, Gallimore‐Wilson D, Harder JA, Odame‐Bamfo L, Viergutz J, Arvay M, Jones JM, Mistry P, Thompson MG, Fowlkes AL. Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated healthcare personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers: Eight US locations, January-September 2021. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2022; 16:585-593. [PMID: 35023288 PMCID: PMC8983896 DOI: 10.1111/irv.12956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to evaluate the impact of changes in estimates of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness on the incidence of laboratory-confirmed infection among frontline workers at high risk for SARS-CoV-2. METHODS We analyzed data from a prospective frontline worker cohort to estimate the incidence of COVID-19 by month as well as the association of COVID-19 vaccination, occupation, demographics, physical distancing, and mask use with infection risk. Participants completed baseline and quarterly surveys, and each week self-collected mid-turbinate nasal swabs and reported symptoms. RESULTS Among 1018 unvaccinated and 3531 fully vaccinated workers, the monthly incidence of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in January 2021 was 13.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.4-17.4), declining to 0.5 (95% CI -0.4-1.4) per 1000 person-weeks in June. By September 2021, when the Delta variant predominated, incidence had once again risen to 13.6 (95% CI 7.8-19.4) per 1000 person-weeks. In contrast, there was no reportable incidence among fully vaccinated participants at the end of January 2021, and incidence remained low until September 2021 when it rose modestly to 4.1 (95% CI 1.9-3.8) per 1000. Below average facemask use was associated with a higher risk of infection for unvaccinated participants during exposure to persons who may have COVID-19 and vaccinated participants during hours in the community. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 vaccination was significantly associated with a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection despite Delta variant predominance. Our data demonstrate the added protective benefit of facemask use among both unvaccinated and vaccinated frontline workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lauren Grant
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID‐19 Response TeamAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | | | | - Jefferey L. Burgess
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public HealthUniversity of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | | | - Manjusha Gaglani
- Baylor Scott and White HealthTempleTexasUSA
- Texas A&M University College of MedicineTempleTexasUSA
| | - Sarang K. Yoon
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive MedicineUniversity of Utah HealthSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | | | - Jennifer Meece
- Marshfield Clinic Research InstituteMarshfieldWisconsinUSA
| | - Jennifer L. Kuntz
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health ResearchPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Young M. Yoo
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID‐19 Response TeamAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | | | | - Joe K. Gerald
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public HealthUniversity of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - Spencer Rose
- Baylor Scott and White HealthTempleTexasUSA
- Texas A&M University College of MedicineTempleTexasUSA
| | - Matthew S. Thiese
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive MedicineUniversity of Utah HealthSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | | | - Holly C. Groom
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health ResearchPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Josephine Mak
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID‐19 Response TeamAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | | | | | - Karen Lutrick
- Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public HealthUniversity of ArizonaTucsonArizonaUSA
| | - Kayan Dunnigan
- Baylor Scott and White HealthTempleTexasUSA
- Texas A&M University College of MedicineTempleTexasUSA
| | - Andrew L. Phillips
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive MedicineUniversity of Utah HealthSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Julie Mayo Lamberte
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID‐19 Response TeamAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Roger Noriega
- Leonard M. Miller School of MedicineUniversity of MiamiMiamiFloridaUSA
| | | | - Marilyn Odean
- Whiteside Institute for Clinical Research, St. Luke'sDuluthMinnesotaUSA
| | | | | | - Kurt T. Hegmann
- Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Department of Family and Preventive MedicineUniversity of Utah HealthSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | - Karley Respet
- St. Luke's Regional Health Care SystemDuluthMinnesotaUSA
| | - Monica Dickerson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID‐19 Response TeamAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Alexandra Cruz
- Leonard M. Miller School of MedicineUniversity of MiamiMiamiFloridaUSA
| | | | | | - Angela Hunt
- St. Luke's Regional Health Care SystemDuluthMinnesotaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Melissa Arvay
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID‐19 Response TeamAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - John M. Jones
- Leonard M. Miller School of MedicineUniversity of MiamiMiamiFloridaUSA
| | | | - Mark G. Thompson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID‐19 Response TeamAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Ashley L. Fowlkes
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID‐19 Response TeamAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fowlkes AL, Yoon SK, Lutrick K, Gwynn L, Burns J, Grant L, Phillips AL, Ellingson K, Ferraris MV, LeClair LB, Mathenge C, Yoo YM, Thiese MS, Gerald LB, Solle NS, Jeddy Z, Odame-Bamfo L, Mak J, Hegmann KT, Gerald JK, Ochoa JS, Berry M, Rose S, Lamberte JM, Madhivanan P, Pubillones FA, Rai RP, Dunnigan K, Jones JT, Krupp K, Edwards LJ, Bedrick EJ, Sokol BE, Lowe A, McLeland-Wieser H, Jovel KS, Fleary DE, Khan SM, Poe B, Hollister J, Lopez J, Rivers P, Beitel S, Tyner HL, Naleway AL, Olsho LE, Caban-Martinez AJ, Burgess JL, Thompson MG, Gaglani M. Effectiveness of 2-Dose BNT162b2 (Pfizer BioNTech) mRNA Vaccine in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Children Aged 5-11 Years and Adolescents Aged 12-15 Years - PROTECT Cohort, July 2021-February 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022; 71:422-428. [PMID: 35298453 PMCID: PMC8942308 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7111e1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 49.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
12
|
Edwards LJ, Fowlkes AL, Wesley MG, Kuntz JL, Odean MJ, Caban-Martinez AJ, Dunnigan K, Phillips AL, Grant L, Herring MK, Groom HC, Respet K, Beitel S, Zunie T, Hegmann KT, Kumar A, Joseph G, Poe B, Louzado-Feliciano P, Smith ME, Thiese MS, Schaefer-Solle N, Yoo YM, Silvera CA, Mayo Lamberte J, Mak J, McDonald LC, Stuckey MJ, Kutty P, Arvay ML, Yoon SK, Tyner HL, Burgess JL, Hunt DR, Meece J, Gaglani M, Naleway AL, Thompson MG. Research on the Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in Essential Response Personnel (RECOVER): Protocol for a Multisite Longitudinal Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2021; 10:e31574. [PMID: 34662287 PMCID: PMC8647972 DOI: 10.2196/31574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Workers critical to emergency response and continuity of essential services during the COVID-19 pandemic are at a disproportionally high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Prospective cohort studies are needed for enhancing the understanding of the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, identifying risk factors, assessing clinical outcomes, and determining the effectiveness of vaccination. OBJECTIVE The Research on the Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 in Essential Response Personnel (RECOVER) prospective cohort study was designed to estimate the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections, examine the risk factors for infection and clinical spectrum of illness, and assess the effectiveness of vaccination among essential workers. METHODS The RECOVER multisite network was initiated in August 2020 and aims to enroll 3000 health care personnel (HCP), first responders, and other essential and frontline workers (EFWs) at 6 US locations. Data on participant demographics, medical history, and vaccination history are collected at baseline and throughout the study. Active surveillance for the symptoms of COVID-19-like illness (CLI), access of medical care, and symptom duration is performed by text messages, emails, and direct participant or medical record reports. Participants self-collect a mid-turbinate nasal swab weekly, regardless of symptoms, and 2 additional respiratory specimens at the onset of CLI. Blood is collected upon enrollment, every 3 months, approximately 28 days after a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 14 to 28 days after a dose of any COVID-19 vaccine. From February 2021, household members of RT-PCR-confirmed participants are self-collecting mid-turbinate nasal swabs daily for 10 days. RESULTS The study observation period began in August 2020 and is expected to continue through spring 2022. There are 2623 actively enrolled RECOVER participants, including 280 participants who have been found to be positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. Enrollment is ongoing at 3 of the 6 study sites. CONCLUSIONS Data collected through the cohort are expected to provide important public health information for essential workers at high risk for occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and allow early evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/31574.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ashley L Fowlkes
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Jennifer L Kuntz
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Marilyn J Odean
- Whiteside Institute for Clinical Research, Duluth, MN, United States
- St. Luke's Regional Health Care System, Duluth, MN, United States
| | | | - Kayan Dunnigan
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, TX, United States
| | | | - Lauren Grant
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Holly C Groom
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Karley Respet
- St. Luke's Regional Health Care System, Duluth, MN, United States
| | - Shawn Beitel
- University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Tnelda Zunie
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, TX, United States
| | | | - Archana Kumar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Gregory Joseph
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Brandon Poe
- Abt Associates, Inc, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Young M Yoo
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | | | - Josephine Mak
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | | | - Matthew J Stuckey
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Preeta Kutty
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Melissa L Arvay
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Sarang K Yoon
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | - Harmony L Tyner
- St. Luke's Regional Health Care System, Duluth, MN, United States
| | | | | | - Jennifer Meece
- Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, United States
| | - Manjusha Gaglani
- Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, TX, United States
- Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple, TX, United States
| | - Allison L Naleway
- Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Mark G Thompson
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thompson MG, Burgess JL, Naleway AL, Tyner HL, Yoon SK, Meece J, Olsho LEW, Caban-Martinez AJ, Fowlkes A, Lutrick K, Kuntz JL, Dunnigan K, Odean MJ, Hegmann KT, Stefanski E, Edwards LJ, Schaefer-Solle N, Grant L, Ellingson K, Groom HC, Zunie T, Thiese MS, Ivacic L, Wesley MG, Lamberte JM, Sun X, Smith ME, Phillips AL, Groover KD, Yoo YM, Gerald J, Brown RT, Herring MK, Joseph G, Beitel S, Morrill TC, Mak J, Rivers P, Harris KM, Hunt DR, Arvay ML, Kutty P, Fry AM, Gaglani M. Interim Estimates of Vaccine Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Personnel, First Responders, and Other Essential and Frontline Workers - Eight U.S. Locations, December 2020-March 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70:495-500. [PMID: 33793460 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e3externalicon] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Messenger RNA (mRNA) BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to be effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 in randomized placebo-controlled Phase III trials (1,2); however, the benefits of these vaccines for preventing asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection, particularly when administered in real-world conditions, is less well understood. Using prospective cohorts of health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers* in eight U.S. locations during December 14, 2020-March 13, 2021, CDC routinely tested for SARS-CoV-2 infections every week regardless of symptom status and at the onset of symptoms consistent with COVID-19-associated illness. Among 3,950 participants with no previous laboratory documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 2,479 (62.8%) received both recommended mRNA doses and 477 (12.1%) received only one dose of mRNA vaccine.† Among unvaccinated participants, 1.38 SARS-CoV-2 infections were confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) per 1,000 person-days.§ In contrast, among fully immunized (≥14 days after second dose) persons, 0.04 infections per 1,000 person-days were reported, and among partially immunized (≥14 days after first dose and before second dose) persons, 0.19 infections per 1,000 person-days were reported. Estimated mRNA vaccine effectiveness for prevention of infection, adjusted for study site, was 90% for full immunization and 80% for partial immunization. These findings indicate that authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of symptom status, among working-age adults in real-world conditions. COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all eligible persons.
Collapse
|
14
|
Thompson MG, Burgess JL, Naleway AL, Tyner HL, Yoon SK, Meece J, Olsho LE, Caban-Martinez AJ, Fowlkes A, Lutrick K, Kuntz JL, Dunnigan K, Odean MJ, Hegmann KT, Stefanski E, Edwards LJ, Schaefer-Solle N, Grant L, Ellingson K, Groom HC, Zunie T, Thiese MS, Ivacic L, Wesley MG, Lamberte JM, Sun X, Smith ME, Phillips AL, Groover KD, Yoo YM, Gerald J, Brown RT, Herring MK, Joseph G, Beitel S, Morrill TC, Mak J, Rivers P, Harris KM, Hunt DR, Arvay ML, Kutty P, Fry AM, Gaglani M. Interim Estimates of Vaccine Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Personnel, First Responders, and Other Essential and Frontline Workers - Eight U.S. Locations, December 2020-March 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021; 70:495-500. [PMID: 33793460 PMCID: PMC8022879 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 488] [Impact Index Per Article: 162.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Messenger RNA (mRNA) BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (Moderna) COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to be effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 in randomized placebo-controlled Phase III trials (1,2); however, the benefits of these vaccines for preventing asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection, particularly when administered in real-world conditions, is less well understood. Using prospective cohorts of health care personnel, first responders, and other essential and frontline workers* in eight U.S. locations during December 14, 2020-March 13, 2021, CDC routinely tested for SARS-CoV-2 infections every week regardless of symptom status and at the onset of symptoms consistent with COVID-19-associated illness. Among 3,950 participants with no previous laboratory documentation of SARS-CoV-2 infection, 2,479 (62.8%) received both recommended mRNA doses and 477 (12.1%) received only one dose of mRNA vaccine.† Among unvaccinated participants, 1.38 SARS-CoV-2 infections were confirmed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) per 1,000 person-days.§ In contrast, among fully immunized (≥14 days after second dose) persons, 0.04 infections per 1,000 person-days were reported, and among partially immunized (≥14 days after first dose and before second dose) persons, 0.19 infections per 1,000 person-days were reported. Estimated mRNA vaccine effectiveness for prevention of infection, adjusted for study site, was 90% for full immunization and 80% for partial immunization. These findings indicate that authorized mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of symptom status, among working-age adults in real-world conditions. COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all eligible persons.
Collapse
|
15
|
Tyner HL, Wilson JW. Fifteen-year clinical experience with Mycobacterium haemophilum at the Mayo Clinic: A case series. J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis 2017; 8:26-32. [PMID: 31723708 PMCID: PMC6850245 DOI: 10.1016/j.jctube.2017.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Revised: 06/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Mycobacterium haemophilum is an uncommonly encountered acid-fast staining bacillus (AFB) that can cause a broad range of infections. We describe a tertiary care center's experience with M. haemophilum infections identified from 2000 to 2015. Ten adult patients were identified with M. haemophilum infections, and most had immunocompromising conditions. M. haemophilum presented in one of two syndromes: a peripheral cutaneous infection presenting with skin nodularity and local invasion, and a cervicofacial infection involving regional lymph nodes. Duration of therapy was variable (0–18 months) and was dependent on the underlying syndrome and immunological status of the patient. Treatment responses were favorable in all patients. During therapy, three patients developed culture-negative aseptic cutaneous lesions, consistent with immunologic reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS); we postulate that such reactions may not be uncommon with select M. haemophilum infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harmony L Tyner
- St. Luke's Infectious Disease Associates, 920 First St., Duluth, MN 55805, United States
| | - John W Wilson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St., Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wanta BT, Tyner HL, Bohman JK, Baddour LM. Successful Treatment of Refractory Hypoxemia Secondary to Disseminated Histoplasmosis Using Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 7:161-164. [PMID: 27258180 DOI: 10.1213/xaa.0000000000000374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Refractory hypoxemia secondary to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high mortality. Extracorporeal membraneoxygenation (ECMO) is an accepted strategy for treating refractory hypoxemia in patients with ARDS but is relatively contraindicated in the setting of systemic infections. We present a case of successful ECMO use in a host with refractory hypoxemia secondary to disseminated histoplasmosis with fungemia and discuss our management approach to this difficult patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan T Wanta
- From the *Division of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, †Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, and ‡Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tyner HL, Baddour LM. 26-Year-Old Man With Nausea, Delirium, and Fever. Mayo Clin Proc 2016; 91:e137-e141. [PMID: 27321918 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.03.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2016] [Revised: 03/07/2016] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Harmony L Tyner
- Resident in Internal Medicine, Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, MN.
| | - Larry M Baddour
- Advisor to resident and Consultant in Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kipp BR, Tyner HL, Campion MB, Voss JS, Karnes RJ, Sebo TJ, Halling KC, Zhang J. Chromosomal alterations detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization in urothelial carcinoma and rarer histologic variants of bladder cancer. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 130:552-9. [PMID: 18794047 DOI: 10.1309/dfjuhy3wpc9guu2w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with the UroVysion probe set (Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL) was used to assess 31 bladder cancers for chromosomal abnormalities, including 4 adenocarcinomas, 5 urachal adenocarcinomas, 6 small cell carcinomas, 7 squamous cell carcinomas, and 9 typical urothelial carcinomas. FISH was also used to assess the benign urothelium in 4 cases. There was a significant increase (P < .001) in the mean number of chromosome 3 (2.64 vs 1.51), chromosome 7 (2.61 vs 1.48), and chromosome 17 (2.41 vs 1.41) centromeric signals observed in cells from patients with cancer compared with patients without cancer. Of the 31 tumors, 29 (94%) demonstrated polysomic signal patterns in more than 10% of cells. In the 2 remaining tumor specimens, there was a high percentage of cells (>75%) demonstrating homozygous 9p21 deletion. The data from this study suggest that chromosomal abnormalities detectable by FISH in urothelial carcinoma are also common in rarer histologic variants of bladder cancer.
Collapse
|