1
|
Di J, Hickey C, Bumgardner C, Yousif M, Zapata M, Bocklage T, Balzer B, Bui MM, Gardner JM, Pantanowitz L, Qasem SA. Utility of artificial intelligence in a binary classification of soft tissue tumors. J Pathol Inform 2024; 15:100368. [PMID: 38496781 PMCID: PMC10940995 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue tumors (STTs) pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their rarity, complexity, and morphological overlap. Accurate differentiation between benign and malignant STTs is important to set treatment directions, however, this task can be difficult. The integration of machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) models can potentially be helpful in classifying these tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate AI and machine learning tools in the classification of STT into benign and malignant categories. This study consisted of three components: (1) Evaluation of whole-slide images (WSIs) to classify STT into benign and malignant entities. Five specialized soft tissue pathologists from different medical centers independently reviewed 100 WSIs, representing 100 different cases, with limited clinical information and no additional workup. The results showed an overall concordance rate of 70.4% compared to the reference diagnosis. (2) Identification of cell-specific parameters that can distinguish benign and malignant STT. Using an image analysis software (QuPath) and a cohort of 95 cases, several cell-specific parameters were found to be statistically significant, most notably cell count, nucleus/cell area ratio, nucleus hematoxylin density mean, and cell max caliper. (3) Evaluation of machine learning library (Scikit-learn) in differentiating benign and malignant STTs. A total of 195 STT cases (156 cases in the training group and 39 cases in the validation group) achieved approximately 70% sensitivity and specificity, and an AUC of 0.68. Our limited study suggests that the use of WSI and AI in soft tissue pathology has the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and identify parameters that can differentiate between benign and malignant STTs. We envision the integration of AI as a supportive tool to augment the pathologists' diagnostic capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Di
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Caylin Hickey
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Cody Bumgardner
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| | | | | | - Therese Bocklage
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Bonnie Balzer
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Marilyn M. Bui
- Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | | | - Liron Pantanowitz
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Shadi A. Qasem
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, United States
- Baptist Health Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim D, Thrall MJ, Michelow P, Schmitt FC, Vielh PR, Siddiqui MT, Sundling KE, Virk R, Alperstein S, Bui MM, Chen-Yost H, Donnelly AD, Lin O, Liu X, Madrigal E, Zakowski MF, Parwani AV, Jenkins E, Pantanowitz L, Li Z. The current state of digital cytology and artificial intelligence (AI): global survey results from the American Society of Cytopathology Digital Cytology Task Force. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2024:S2213-2945(24)00039-5. [PMID: 38744615 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2024.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The integration of whole slide imaging (WSI) and artificial intelligence (AI) with digital cytology has been growing gradually. Therefore, there is a need to evaluate the current state of digital cytology. This study aimed to determine the current landscape of digital cytology via a survey conducted as part of the American Society of Cytopathology (ASC) Digital Cytology White Paper Task Force. MATERIALS AND METHODS A survey with 43 questions pertaining to the current practices and experiences of WSI and AI in both surgical pathology and cytology was created. The survey was sent to members of the ASC, the International Academy of Cytology (IAC), and the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC). Responses were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS In total, 327 individuals participated in the survey, spanning a diverse array of practice settings, roles, and experiences around the globe. The majority of responses indicated there was routine scanning of surgical pathology slides (n = 134; 61%) with fewer respondents scanning cytology slides (n = 150; 46%). The primary challenge for surgical WSI is the need for faster scanning and cost minimization, whereas image quality is the top issue for cytology WSI. AI tools are not widely utilized, with only 16% of participants using AI for surgical pathology samples and 13% for cytology practice. CONCLUSIONS Utilization of digital pathology is limited in cytology laboratories as compared to surgical pathology. However, as more laboratories are willing to implement digital cytology in the near future, the establishment of practical clinical guidelines is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Kim
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Michael J Thrall
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Pamela Michelow
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa; Division of Anatomical Pathology, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Fernando C Schmitt
- Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty of Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Philippe R Vielh
- Department of Pathology, Medipath and American Hospital of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Momin T Siddiqui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Kaitlin E Sundling
- The Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Renu Virk
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Susan Alperstein
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- The Departments of Pathology and Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Amber D Donnelly
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Cytotechnology Education, College of Allied Health Professions, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Oscar Lin
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Xiaoying Liu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Emilio Madrigal
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maureen F Zakowski
- Department of Pathology, Molecular, and Cell-Based Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Anil V Parwani
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Zaibo Li
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Naghavi AO, Bryant JM, Kim Y, Weygand J, Redler G, Sim AJ, Miller J, Coucoules K, Michael LT, Gloria WE, Yang G, Rosenberg SA, Ahmed K, Bui MM, Henderson-Jackson EB, Lee A, Lee CD, Gonzalez RJ, Feygelman V, Eschrich SA, Scott JG, Torres-Roca J, Latifi K, Parikh N, Costello J. Habitat escalated adaptive therapy (HEAT): a phase 2 trial utilizing radiomic habitat-directed and genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) optimization for high-grade soft tissue sarcoma. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:437. [PMID: 38594603 PMCID: PMC11003059 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12151-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Soft tissue sarcomas (STS), have significant inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, with poor response to standard neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Achieving a favorable pathologic response (FPR ≥ 95%) from RT is associated with improved patient outcome. Genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD), a radiation-specific metric that quantifies the expected RT treatment effect as a function of tumor dose and genomics, proposed that STS is significantly underdosed. STS have significant radiomic heterogeneity, where radiomic habitats can delineate regions of intra-tumoral hypoxia and radioresistance. We designed a novel clinical trial, Habitat Escalated Adaptive Therapy (HEAT), utilizing radiomic habitats to identify areas of radioresistance within the tumor and targeting them with GARD-optimized doses, to improve FPR in high-grade STS. METHODS Phase 2 non-randomized single-arm clinical trial includes non-metastatic, resectable high-grade STS patients. Pre-treatment multiparametric MRIs (mpMRI) delineate three distinct intra-tumoral habitats based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) sequences. GARD estimates that simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) doses of 70 and 60 Gy in 25 fractions to the highest and intermediate radioresistant habitats, while the remaining volume receives standard 50 Gy, would lead to a > 3 fold FPR increase to 24%. Pre-treatment CT guided biopsies of each habitat along with clip placement will be performed for pathologic evaluation, future genomic studies, and response assessment. An mpMRI taken between weeks two and three of treatment will be used for biological plan adaptation to account for tumor response, in addition to an mpMRI after the completion of radiotherapy in addition to pathologic response, toxicity, radiomic response, disease control, and survival will be evaluated as secondary endpoints. Furthermore, liquid biopsy will be performed with mpMRI for future ancillary studies. DISCUSSION This is the first clinical trial to test a novel genomic-based RT dose optimization (GARD) and to utilize radiomic habitats to identify and target radioresistance regions, as a strategy to improve the outcome of RT-treated STS patients. Its success could usher in a new phase in radiation oncology, integrating genomic and radiomic insights into clinical practice and trial designs, and may reveal new radiomic and genomic biomarkers, refining personalized treatment strategies for STS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05301283. TRIAL STATUS The trial started recruitment on March 17, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - J M Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Youngchul Kim
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Joseph Weygand
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Applied Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Gage Redler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Austin J Sim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Justin Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Coucoules
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Lauren Taylor Michael
- Clinical Trials Office, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Warren E Gloria
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - George Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Stephen A Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kamran Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Andrew Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Caitlin D Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ricardo J Gonzalez
- Department of Sarcoma, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vladimir Feygelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Steven A Eschrich
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jacob G Scott
- Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Radiation Oncology Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Javier Torres-Roca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Nainesh Parikh
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - James Costello
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kim D, Sundling KE, Virk R, Thrall MJ, Alperstein S, Bui MM, Chen-Yost H, Donnelly AD, Lin O, Liu X, Madrigal E, Michelow P, Schmitt FC, Vielh PR, Zakowski MF, Parwani AV, Jenkins E, Siddiqui MT, Pantanowitz L, Li Z. Digital cytology part 2: artificial intelligence in cytology: a concept paper with review and recommendations from the American Society of Cytopathology Digital Cytology Task Force. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2024; 13:97-110. [PMID: 38158317 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2023.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Digital cytology and artificial intelligence (AI) are gaining greater adoption in the cytology laboratory. However, peer-reviewed real-world data and literature are lacking in regard to the current clinical landscape. The American Society of Cytopathology in conjunction with the International Academy of Cytology and the Digital Pathology Association established a special task force comprising 20 members with expertise and/or interest in digital cytology. The aim of the group was to investigate the feasibility of incorporating digital cytology, specifically cytology whole slide scanning and AI applications, into the workflow of the laboratory. In turn, the impact on cytopathologists, cytologists (cytotechnologists), and cytology departments were also assessed. The task force reviewed existing literature on digital cytology, conducted a worldwide survey, and held a virtual roundtable discussion on digital cytology and AI with multiple industry corporate representatives. This white paper, presented in 2 parts, summarizes the current state of digital cytology and AI practice in global cytology practice. Part 1 of the white paper is presented as a separate paper which details a review and best practice recommendations for incorporating digital cytology into practice. Part 2 of the white paper presented here provides a comprehensive review of AI in cytology practice along with best practice recommendations and legal considerations. Additionally, the cytology global survey results highlighting current AI practices by various laboratories, as well as current attitudes, are reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Kim
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaitlin E Sundling
- The Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Renu Virk
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Michael J Thrall
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan Alperstein
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- The Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Amber D Donnelly
- Diagnostic Cytology Education, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Allied Health Professions, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Oscar Lin
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Xiaoying Liu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Emilio Madrigal
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pamela Michelow
- Division of Anatomical Pathology, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Pathology, National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Fernando C Schmitt
- Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty of Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Philippe R Vielh
- Department of Pathology, Medipath and American Hospital of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Anil V Parwani
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Momin T Siddiqui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Zaibo Li
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim D, Sundling KE, Virk R, Thrall MJ, Alperstein S, Bui MM, Chen-Yost H, Donnelly AD, Lin O, Liu X, Madrigal E, Michelow P, Schmitt FC, Vielh PR, Zakowski MF, Parwani AV, Jenkins E, Siddiqui MT, Pantanowitz L, Li Z. Digital cytology part 1: digital cytology implementation for practice: a concept paper with review and recommendations from the American Society of Cytopathology Digital Cytology Task Force. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2024; 13:86-96. [PMID: 38158316 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Digital cytology and artificial intelligence (AI) are gaining greater adoption in the cytopathology laboratory. However, peer-reviewed real-world data and literature are lacking regarding the current clinical landscape. The American Society of Cytopathology in conjunction with the International Academy of Cytology and the Digital Pathology Association established a special task force comprising 20 members with expertise and/or interest in digital cytology. The aim of the group was to investigate the feasibility of incorporating digital cytology, specifically cytology whole slide scanning and AI applications, into the workflow of the laboratory. In turn, the impact on cytopathologists, cytologists (cytotechnologists), and cytology departments were also assessed. The task force reviewed existing literature on digital cytology, conducted a worldwide survey, and held a virtual roundtable discussion on digital cytology and AI with multiple industry corporate representatives. This white paper, presented in 2 parts, summarizes the current state of digital cytology and AI practice in global cytology practice. Part 1 of the white paper presented herein is a review and offers best practice recommendations for incorporating digital cytology into practice. Part 2 of the white paper provides a comprehensive review of AI in cytology practice along with best practice recommendations and legal considerations. Additionally, the results of a global survey regarding digital cytology are highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Kim
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaitlin E Sundling
- The Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Renu Virk
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Michael J Thrall
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Susan Alperstein
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- The Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Amber D Donnelly
- Diagnostic Cytology Education, University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Allied Health Professions, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Oscar Lin
- Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Xiaoying Liu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Emilio Madrigal
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pamela Michelow
- Division of Anatomical Pathology, School of Pathology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Pathology, National Health Laboratory Services, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Fernando C Schmitt
- Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty of Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Philippe R Vielh
- Department of Pathology, Medipath and American Hospital of Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Anil V Parwani
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | - Momin T Siddiqui
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
| | - Zaibo Li
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tozbikian G, Krishnamurthy S, Bui MM, Feldman M, Hicks DG, Jaffer S, Khoury T, Wei S, Wen H, Pohlmann P. Emerging Landscape of Targeted Therapy of Breast Cancers With Low Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Protein Expression. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2024; 148:242-255. [PMID: 37014972 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0335-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer is currently classified as negative or positive for selecting patients for anti-HER2 targeted therapy. The evolution of the HER2 status has included a new HER2-low category defined as an HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification. This new category opens the door to a targetable HER2-low breast cancer population for which new treatments may be effective. OBJECTIVE.— To review the current literature on the emerging category of breast cancers with low HER2 protein expression, including the clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features, and outline the clinical trials and best practice recommendations for identifying HER2-low-expressing breast cancers by immunohistochemistry. DATA SOURCES.— We conducted a literature review based on peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, regulatory communications, ongoing and past clinical trials identified through ClinicalTrials.gov, and the authors' practice experience. CONCLUSIONS.— The availability of new targeted therapy potentially effective for patients with breast cancers with low HER2 protein expression requires multidisciplinary recognition. In particular, pathologists need to recognize and identify this category to allow the optimal selection of patients for targeted therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary Tozbikian
- From the Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (Tozbikian)
| | - Savitri Krishnamurthy
- the Department of Pathology (Krishnamurthy), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- the Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida (Bui)
| | - Michael Feldman
- the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Feldman)
| | - David G Hicks
- the Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York (Hicks)
| | - Shabnam Jaffer
- the Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York (Jaffer)
| | - Thaer Khoury
- the Department of Pathology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York (Khoury)
| | - Shi Wei
- the Department of Pathology, University of Kansas Medical Center; Kansas City (Wei)
| | - Hannah Wen
- the Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, New York (Wen)
| | - Paula Pohlmann
- the Department of Breast Medical Oncology (Pohlmann), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hanna MG, Olson NH, Zarella M, Dash RC, Herrmann MD, Furtado LV, Stram MN, Raciti PM, Hassell L, Mays A, Pantanowitz L, Sirintrapun JS, Krishnamurthy S, Parwani A, Lujan G, Evans A, Glassy EF, Bui MM, Singh R, Souers RJ, de Baca ME, Seheult JN. Recommendations for Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning in Pathology: A Concept Paper From the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023:497389. [PMID: 38041522 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0042-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Machine learning applications in the pathology clinical domain are emerging rapidly. As decision support systems continue to mature, laboratories will increasingly need guidance to evaluate their performance in clinical practice. Currently there are no formal guidelines to assist pathology laboratories in verification and/or validation of such systems. These recommendations are being proposed for the evaluation of machine learning systems in the clinical practice of pathology. OBJECTIVE.— To propose recommendations for performance evaluation of in vitro diagnostic tests on patient samples that incorporate machine learning as part of the preanalytical, analytical, or postanalytical phases of the laboratory workflow. Topics described include considerations for machine learning model evaluation including risk assessment, predeployment requirements, data sourcing and curation, verification and validation, change control management, human-computer interaction, practitioner training, and competency evaluation. DATA SOURCES.— An expert panel performed a review of the literature, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidance, and laboratory and government regulatory frameworks. CONCLUSIONS.— Review of the literature and existing documents enabled the development of proposed recommendations. This white paper pertains to performance evaluation of machine learning systems intended to be implemented for clinical patient testing. Further studies with real-world clinical data are encouraged to support these proposed recommendations. Performance evaluation of machine learning models is critical to verification and/or validation of in vitro diagnostic tests using machine learning intended for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Hanna
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Hanna, Sirintrapun)
| | - Niels H Olson
- The Defense Innovation Unit, Mountain View, California (Olson)
- The Department of Pathology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland (Olson)
| | - Mark Zarella
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Zarella, Seheult)
| | - Rajesh C Dash
- Department of Pathology, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina (Dash)
| | - Markus D Herrmann
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (Herrmann)
| | - Larissa V Furtado
- Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee (Furtado)
| | - Michelle N Stram
- The Department of Forensic Medicine, New York University, and Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York (Stram)
| | | | - Lewis Hassell
- Department of Pathology, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City (Hassell)
| | - Alex Mays
- The MITRE Corporation, McLean, Virginia (Mays)
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology & Clinical Labs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Pantanowitz)
| | - Joseph S Sirintrapun
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Hanna, Sirintrapun)
| | | | - Anil Parwani
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (Parwani, Lujan)
| | - Giovanni Lujan
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (Parwani, Lujan)
| | - Andrew Evans
- Laboratory Medicine, Mackenzie Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Evans)
| | - Eric F Glassy
- Affiliated Pathologists Medical Group, Rancho Dominguez, California (Glassy)
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Departments of Pathology and Machine Learning, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Bui)
| | - Rajendra Singh
- Department of Dermatopathology, Summit Health, Summit Woodland Park, New Jersey (Singh)
| | - Rhona J Souers
- Department of Biostatistics, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Souers)
| | | | - Jansen N Seheult
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Zarella, Seheult)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Miroshnychenko D, Miti T, Kumar P, Miller A, Laurie M, Giraldo N, Bui MM, Altrock PM, Basanta D, Marusyk A. Stroma-Mediated Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation Indirectly Drives Chemoresistance by Accelerating Tumor Recovery between Chemotherapy Cycles. Cancer Res 2023; 83:3681-3692. [PMID: 37791818 PMCID: PMC10646478 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-23-0398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
The ability of tumors to survive therapy reflects both cell-intrinsic and microenvironmental mechanisms. Across many cancers, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a high stroma/tumor ratio correlates with poor survival. In many contexts, this correlation can be explained by the direct reduction of therapy sensitivity induced by stroma-produced paracrine factors. We sought to explore whether this direct effect contributes to the link between stroma and poor responses to chemotherapies. In vitro studies with panels of TNBC cell line models and stromal isolates failed to detect a direct modulation of chemoresistance. At the same time, consistent with prior studies, fibroblast-produced secreted factors stimulated treatment-independent enhancement of tumor cell proliferation. Spatial analyses indicated that proximity to stroma is often associated with enhanced tumor cell proliferation in vivo. These observations suggested an indirect link between stroma and chemoresistance, where stroma-augmented proliferation potentiates the recovery of residual tumors between chemotherapy cycles. To evaluate this hypothesis, a spatial agent-based model of stroma impact on proliferation/death dynamics was developed that was quantitatively parameterized using inferences from histologic analyses and experimental studies. The model demonstrated that the observed enhancement of tumor cell proliferation within stroma-proximal niches could enable tumors to avoid elimination over multiple chemotherapy cycles. Therefore, this study supports the existence of an indirect mechanism of environment-mediated chemoresistance that might contribute to the negative correlation between stromal content and poor therapy outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE Integration of experimental research with mathematical modeling reveals an indirect microenvironmental chemoresistance mechanism by which stromal cells stimulate breast cancer cell proliferation and highlights the importance of consideration of proliferation/death dynamics. See related commentary by Wall and Echeverria, p. 3667.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria Miroshnychenko
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Tatiana Miti
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Pragya Kumar
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
- Cancer Biology PhD Program, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Anna Miller
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Mark Laurie
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Nathalia Giraldo
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Marilyn M. Bui
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Philipp M. Altrock
- Department of Theoretical Biology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, Ploen, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
| | - David Basanta
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Andriy Marusyk
- Department of Metabolism and Physiology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
- Department of Molecular Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Waqas A, Bui MM, Glassy EF, El Naqa I, Borkowski P, Borkowski AA, Rasool G. Revolutionizing Digital Pathology With the Power of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Foundation Models. J Transl Med 2023; 103:100255. [PMID: 37757969 DOI: 10.1016/j.labinv.2023.100255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Digital pathology has transformed the traditional pathology practice of analyzing tissue under a microscope into a computer vision workflow. Whole-slide imaging allows pathologists to view and analyze microscopic images on a computer monitor, enabling computational pathology. By leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), computational pathology has emerged as a promising field in recent years. Recently, task-specific AI/ML (eg, convolutional neural networks) has risen to the forefront, achieving above-human performance in many image-processing and computer vision tasks. The performance of task-specific AI/ML models depends on the availability of many annotated training datasets, which presents a rate-limiting factor for AI/ML development in pathology. Task-specific AI/ML models cannot benefit from multimodal data and lack generalization, eg, the AI models often struggle to generalize to new datasets or unseen variations in image acquisition, staining techniques, or tissue types. The 2020s are witnessing the rise of foundation models and generative AI. A foundation model is a large AI model trained using sizable data, which is later adapted (or fine-tuned) to perform different tasks using a modest amount of task-specific annotated data. These AI models provide in-context learning, can self-correct mistakes, and promptly adjust to user feedback. In this review, we provide a brief overview of recent advances in computational pathology enabled by task-specific AI, their challenges and limitations, and then introduce various foundation models. We propose to create a pathology-specific generative AI based on multimodal foundation models and present its potentially transformative role in digital pathology. We describe different use cases, delineating how it could serve as an expert companion of pathologists and help them efficiently and objectively perform routine laboratory tasks, including quantifying image analysis, generating pathology reports, diagnosis, and prognosis. We also outline the potential role that foundation models and generative AI can play in standardizing the pathology laboratory workflow, education, and training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asim Waqas
- Department of Machine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Machine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Eric F Glassy
- Affiliated Pathologists Medical Group, Inc., Rancho Dominguez, California
| | - Issam El Naqa
- Department of Machine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Piotr Borkowski
- Quest Diagnostics/Ameripath, Tampa, Florida; Center of Excellence for Digital and AI-Empowered Pathology, Quest Diagnostics, Tampa, Florida
| | - Andrew A Borkowski
- University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, Florida; National Artificial Intelligence Institute, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Ghulam Rasool
- Department of Machine Learning, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida; Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zota V, Siegal GP, Kelly D, Bridge JA, Berglund A, Bui K, Khalil F, R Reed D, Altiok S, Magliocco A, Bui MM. Validation of PRKCB Immunohistochemistry as a Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Ewing Sarcoma. Fetal Pediatr Pathol 2023; 42:241-252. [PMID: 36062956 DOI: 10.1080/15513815.2022.2117579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background: Ewing sarcoma (ES) can be confirmed by identifying the EWSR1-FLI1 fusion transcript. This study is to investigate whether immunostaining (IHC) of PRKCB-a protein directly regulated by EWSR1-FLI1 is a surrogate maker for diagnosing ES in routine practice. Methods: Microarray gene expression analyses were conducted. RKCB IHC was applied to 69 ES confirmed by morphology and molecular methods, and 41 non-Ewing small round cell tumors. EWSR1 rearrangement, EWSR1-FLI1 fusion or t(11;22)(q24;q12) were identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, or cytogenetic analysis, respectively. Results: Gene array analyses showed significant overexpression of the PRKCB in ES. PRKCB IHC was positive in 19 cases of ES with EWSR1-FLI1 fusion, 3 cases with cytogenetic 11:22 translocation and 59 cases with EWSR1 rearrangement while negative in only one EWSR1 rearranged case. PRKCB IHC is sensitive (98%) and specific (96%) in detecting EWSR1 rearranged ES. Conclusions: PRKCB is a reliable antibody for diagnosing ES in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Zota
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Gene P Siegal
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - David Kelly
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory, Children's of Alabama, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Julia A Bridge
- Molecular Pathology, ProPath, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Anders Berglund
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Core, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Katherine Bui
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Farah Khalil
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Damon R Reed
- Department of Individualized Cancer Management, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Soner Altiok
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Anthony Magliocco
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Beauchamp NJ, Bryan RN, Bui MM, Krestin GP, McGinty GB, Meltzer CC, Neumaier M. Integrative diagnostics: the time is now-a report from the International Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology. Insights Imaging 2023; 14:54. [PMID: 36995467 PMCID: PMC10063732 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01379-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Enormous recent progress in diagnostic testing can enable more accurate diagnosis and improved clinical outcomes. Yet these tests are increasingly challenging and frustrating; the volume and diversity of results may overwhelm the diagnostic acumen of even the most dedicated and experienced clinician. Because they are gathered and processed within the "silo" of each diagnostic discipline, diagnostic data are fragmented, and the electronic health record does little to synthesize new and existing data into usable information. Therefore, despite great promise, diagnoses may still be incorrect, delayed, or never made. Integrative diagnostics represents a vision for the future, wherein diagnostic data, together with clinical data from the electronic health record, are aggregated and contextualized by informatics tools to direct clinical action. Integrative diagnostics has the potential to identify correct therapies more quickly, modify treatment when appropriate, and terminate treatment when not effective, ultimately decreasing morbidity, improving outcomes, and avoiding unnecessary costs. Radiology, laboratory medicine, and pathology already play major roles in medical diagnostics. Our specialties can increase the value of our examinations by taking a holistic approach to their selection, interpretation, and application to the patient's care pathway. We have the means and rationale to incorporate integrative diagnostics into our specialties and guide its implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - R Nick Bryan
- University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Gabriel P Krestin
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Carolyn C Meltzer
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Michael Neumaier
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cortes-Ciriano I, Steele CD, Piculell K, Al-Ibraheemi A, Eulo V, Bui MM, Chatzipli A, Dickson BC, Borcherding DC, Feber A, Galor A, Hart J, Jones KB, Jordan JT, Kim RH, Lindsay D, Miller C, Nishida Y, Proszek PZ, Serrano J, Sundby RT, Szymanski JJ, Ullrich NJ, Viskochil D, Wang X, Snuderl M, Park PJ, Flanagan AM, Hirbe AC, Pillay N, Miller DT. Genomic Patterns of Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor (MPNST) Evolution Correlate with Clinical Outcome and Are Detectable in Cell-Free DNA. Cancer Discov 2023; 13:654-671. [PMID: 36598417 PMCID: PMC9983734 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-22-0786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), an aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma, occurs in people with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and sporadically. Whole-genome and multiregional exome sequencing, transcriptomic, and methylation profiling of 95 tumor samples revealed the order of genomic events in tumor evolution. Following biallelic inactivation of NF1, loss of CDKN2A or TP53 with or without inactivation of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) leads to extensive somatic copy-number aberrations (SCNA). Distinct pathways of tumor evolution are associated with inactivation of PRC2 genes and H3K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) status. Tumors with H3K27me3 loss evolve through extensive chromosomal losses followed by whole-genome doubling and chromosome 8 amplification, and show lower levels of immune cell infiltration. Retention of H3K27me3 leads to extensive genomic instability, but an immune cell-rich phenotype. Specific SCNAs detected in both tumor samples and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) act as a surrogate for H3K27me3 loss and immune infiltration, and predict prognosis. SIGNIFICANCE MPNST is the most common cause of death and morbidity for individuals with NF1, a relatively common tumor predisposition syndrome. Our results suggest that somatic copy-number and methylation profiling of tumor or cfDNA could serve as a biomarker for early diagnosis and to stratify patients into prognostic and treatment-related subgroups. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 517.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isidro Cortes-Ciriano
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher D. Steele
- Research Department of Pathology, University College London Cancer Institute, Bloomsbury, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine Piculell
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alyaa Al-Ibraheemi
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Vanessa Eulo
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Marilyn M. Bui
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Aikaterini Chatzipli
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brendan C. Dickson
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dana C. Borcherding
- Division of Oncology, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Andrew Feber
- Clinical Genomics Translational Research, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alon Galor
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jesse Hart
- Department of Pathology, Lifespan Laboratories, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Kevin B. Jones
- Departments of Orthopaedics and Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Justin T. Jordan
- Pappas Center for Neuro-oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Raymond H. Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Lindsay
- Department of Histopathology, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, NHS Trust, Middlesex, United Kingdom
| | - Colin Miller
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Yoshihiro Nishida
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Paula Z. Proszek
- Clinical Genomics Translational Research, Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jonathan Serrano
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | - R. Taylor Sundby
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey J. Szymanski
- Division of Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Nicole J. Ullrich
- Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Viskochil
- Division of Medical Genetics, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Xia Wang
- GeneHome, Department of Individualized Cancer Management, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Matija Snuderl
- Department of Pathology, New York University Langone Health, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | - Peter J. Park
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adrienne M. Flanagan
- Research Department of Pathology, University College London Cancer Institute, Bloomsbury, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Histopathology, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, NHS Trust, Middlesex, United Kingdom
| | - Angela C. Hirbe
- Division of Oncology, Departments of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Nischalan Pillay
- Research Department of Pathology, University College London Cancer Institute, Bloomsbury, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Histopathology, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, NHS Trust, Middlesex, United Kingdom
| | - David T. Miller
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Miroshnychenko D, Miti T, Miller A, Kumar P, Laurie M, Bui MM, Altrock PM, Basanta D, Marusyk A. Paracrine enhancement of tumor cell proliferation provides indirect stroma-mediated chemoresistance via acceleration of tumor recovery between chemotherapy cycles. bioRxiv 2023:2023.02.07.527543. [PMID: 36798328 PMCID: PMC9934626 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.07.527543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
The ability of tumors to survive therapy is mediated not only by cell-intrinsic but also cell-extrinsic, microenvironmental mechanisms. Across many cancers, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a high stroma/tumor ratio correlates with poor survival. In many contexts, this correlation can be explained by the direct reduction of therapy sensitivity by stroma-produced paracrine factors through activating pro-survival signaling and stemness. We sought to explore whether this direct effect contributes to the link between stroma and poor responses to chemotherapies in TNBC. Our in vitro studies with panels of TNBC cell line models and stromal isolates failed to detect a direct modulation of chemoresistance. However, we found that fibroblasts often enhance baseline tumor cell proliferation. Consistent with this in vitro observation, we found evidence of stroma-enhanced TNBC cell proliferation in vivo , in xenograft models and patient samples. Based on these observations, we hypothesized an indirect link between stroma and chemoresistance, where stroma-augmented proliferation potentiates the recovery of residual tumors between chemotherapy cycles. To test this hypothesis, we developed a spatial agent-based model of tumor response to repeated dosing of chemotherapy. The model was quantitatively parameterized from histological analyses and experimental studies. We found that even a slight enhancement of tumor cell proliferation within stroma-proximal niches can strongly enhance the ability of tumors to survive multiple cycles of chemotherapy under biologically and clinically feasible parameters. In summary, our study uncovered a novel, indirect mechanism of chemoresistance. Further, our study highlights the limitations of short-term cytotoxicity assays in understanding chemotherapy responses and supports the integration of experimental and in silico modeling.
Collapse
|
14
|
Beauchamp NJ, Bryan RN, Bui MM, Krestin GP, McGinty GB, Meltzer CC, Neumaier M. Integrative Diagnostics: The Time Is Now-A Report From the International Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 20:455-466. [PMID: 36565973 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Enormous recent progress in diagnostic testing can enable more accurate diagnosis and improved clinical outcomes. Yet these tests are increasingly challenging and frustrating; the volume and diversity of results may overwhelm the diagnostic acumen of even the most dedicated and experienced clinician. Because they are gathered and processed within the "silo" of each diagnostic discipline, diagnostic data are fragmented, and the electronic health record does little to synthesize new and existing data into usable information. Therefore, despite great promise, diagnoses may still be incorrect, delayed, or never made. Integrative diagnostics represents a vision for the future, wherein diagnostic data, together with clinical data from the electronic health record, are aggregated and contextualized by informatics tools to direct clinical action. Integrative diagnostics has the potential to identify correct therapies more quickly, modify treatment when appropriate, and terminate treatment when not effective, ultimately decreasing morbidity, improving outcomes, and avoiding unnecessary costs. Radiology, laboratory medicine, and pathology already play major roles in medical diagnostics. Our specialties can increase the value of our examinations by taking a holistic approach to their selection, interpretation, and application to the patient's care pathway. We have the means and rationale to incorporate integrative diagnostics into our specialties and guide its implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norman J Beauchamp
- Executive Vice President for Health Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
| | - R Nick Bryan
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Gabriel P Krestin
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geraldine B McGinty
- Senior Associate Dean for Clinical Affairs, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Carolyn C Meltzer
- Dean, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Michael Neumaier
- Chairman of Clinical Chemistry, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
von Mehren M, Kane JM, Riedel RF, Sicklick JK, Pollack SM, Agulnik M, Bui MM, Carr-Ascher J, Choy E, Connelly M, Dry S, Ganjoo KN, Gonzalez RJ, Holder A, Homsi J, Keedy V, Kelly CM, Kim E, Liebner D, McCarter M, McGarry SV, Mesko NW, Meyer C, Pappo AS, Parkes AM, Petersen IA, Poppe M, Schuetze S, Shabason J, Spraker MB, Zimel M, Bergman MA, Sundar H, Hang LE. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, Version 2.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:1204-1214. [PMID: 36351335 PMCID: PMC10245542 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common type of soft tissue sarcoma that occur throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Most of these tumors are caused by oncogenic activating mutations in the KIT or PDGFRA genes. The NCCN Guidelines for GIST provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of patients with these tumors. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines, including revised systemic therapy options for unresectable, progressive, or metastatic GIST based on mutational status, and updated recommendations for the management of GIST that develop resistance to specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Seth M Pollack
- 5Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | - Edwin Choy
- 9Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
| | - Mary Connelly
- 10The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Sarah Dry
- 11UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | - Jade Homsi
- 14UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | - David Liebner
- 10The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | - Nathan W Mesko
- 20Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Christian Meyer
- 21The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | - Alberto S Pappo
- 22St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | - Matthew Poppe
- 25Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | - Jacob Shabason
- 27Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Matthew B Spraker
- 28Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Melissa Zimel
- 29UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; and
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhao X, Boothe P, Hussnain Naqvi SM, Henderson-Jackson E, Mela N, Centeno BA, Tandon A, Bui MM. Assessing ROSE for adequacy of EBUS-TBNA compared with a direct-to-cell block approach as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2022; 11:368-374. [PMID: 35995701 PMCID: PMC9339095 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2022.07.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) has been used during the endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) procedure as standard practice. Because of the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, our institute had had to discontinue ROSE and adopt a direct-to-cell block approach. In the present study, we aimed to determine whether this change has had significant effects on the cytopathology quality. Materials and methods: A total of 1903 EBUS-TBNA cases from 734 patients were collected (1097 cases with ROSE for 452 patients; 806 cases without ROSE but with direct-to-cell block for 282 patients). The clinical and cytology data were analyzed using SAS, version 9.4, software to render calculated standardized residuals and a fitted multivariate generalized linear model. Results: On average, a biopsy from a patient with ROSE was 0.936 (=exp −0.066) times less likely to be reported as satisfactory compared with a biopsy from a patient without ROSE, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.785). The inadequacy rate of EBUS-TBNA was 6.4% higher on average for cases with ROSE compared with a direct-to-cell block approach. However, this difference was also not statistically significant. The proportions of biopsies reported as diagnostic for malignancy and other were significantly different between the ROSE and no-ROSE groups with a standardized residual of 1.80 (P = 0.036) and −2.27 (P = 0.012), respectively. Conclusions Discontinuing ROSE and using a direct-to-cell block approach had no negative effects on cytopathology quality. This practice can be considered acceptable during the COVID-19 pandemic when social distancing and the shortage of staff and supplies have resulted in challenges to delivering quality care to cancer patients whose treatment cannot be postponed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xing Zhao
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Paul Boothe
- Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, Florida 33612, USA
| | | | - Nancy Mela
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Barbara A Centeno
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Amit Tandon
- Department of Pulmonology & Critical Care, AdventHealth Medical Group at Wesley Chapel, Wesley Chapel, Florida
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Russell S, Xu L, Kam Y, Abrahams D, Ordway B, Lopez AS, Bui MM, Johnson J, Epstein T, Ruiz E, Lloyd MC, Swietach P, Verduzco D, Wojtkowiak J, Gillies RJ. Proton export upregulates aerobic glycolysis. BMC Biol 2022; 20:163. [PMID: 35840963 PMCID: PMC9287933 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-022-01340-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Aggressive cancers commonly ferment glucose to lactic acid at high rates, even in the presence of oxygen. This is known as aerobic glycolysis, or the "Warburg Effect." It is widely assumed that this is a consequence of the upregulation of glycolytic enzymes. Oncogenic drivers can increase the expression of most proteins in the glycolytic pathway, including the terminal step of exporting H+ equivalents from the cytoplasm. Proton exporters maintain an alkaline cytoplasmic pH, which can enhance all glycolytic enzyme activities, even in the absence of oncogene-related expression changes. Based on this observation, we hypothesized that increased uptake and fermentative metabolism of glucose could be driven by the expulsion of H+ equivalents from the cell. RESULTS To test this hypothesis, we stably transfected lowly glycolytic MCF-7, U2-OS, and glycolytic HEK293 cells to express proton-exporting systems: either PMA1 (plasma membrane ATPase 1, a yeast H+-ATPase) or CA-IX (carbonic anhydrase 9). The expression of either exporter in vitro enhanced aerobic glycolysis as measured by glucose consumption, lactate production, and extracellular acidification rate. This resulted in an increased intracellular pH, and metabolomic analyses indicated that this was associated with an increased flux of all glycolytic enzymes upstream of pyruvate kinase. These cells also demonstrated increased migratory and invasive phenotypes in vitro, and these were recapitulated in vivo by more aggressive behavior, whereby the acid-producing cells formed higher-grade tumors with higher rates of metastases. Neutralizing tumor acidity with oral buffers reduced the metastatic burden. CONCLUSIONS Therefore, cancer cells which increase export of H+ equivalents subsequently increase intracellular alkalization, even without oncogenic driver mutations, and this is sufficient to alter cancer metabolism towards an upregulation of aerobic glycolysis, a Warburg phenotype. Overall, we have shown that the traditional understanding of cancer cells favoring glycolysis and the subsequent extracellular acidification is not always linear. Cells which can, independent of metabolism, acidify through proton exporter activity can sufficiently drive their metabolism towards glycolysis providing an important fitness advantage for survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shonagh Russell
- Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
- Graduate School, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
| | - Liping Xu
- Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| | - Yoonseok Kam
- Agilent Technologies, 5301 Stevens Creek Blvd, Santa Clara, CA 9505 USA
| | - Dominique Abrahams
- Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| | - Bryce Ordway
- Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
- Graduate School, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
| | - Alex S. Lopez
- Anatomic Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| | - Marilyn M. Bui
- Anatomic Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
- Analytic Microscopy Core, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| | - Joseph Johnson
- Analytic Microscopy Core, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| | | | - Epifanio Ruiz
- Small Animal Imaging Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| | - Mark C. Lloyd
- Inspirata, Inc., One North Dale Mabry Hwy. Suite 600, Tampa, FL 33609 USA
| | - Pawel Swietach
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PT UK
| | - Daniel Verduzco
- Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| | - Jonathan Wojtkowiak
- Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| | - Robert J. Gillies
- Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Dr, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
von Mehren M, Kane JM, Agulnik M, Bui MM, Carr-Ascher J, Choy E, Connelly M, Dry S, Ganjoo KN, Gonzalez RJ, Holder A, Homsi J, Keedy V, Kelly CM, Kim E, Liebner D, McCarter M, McGarry SV, Mesko NW, Meyer C, Pappo AS, Parkes AM, Petersen IA, Pollack SM, Poppe M, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Shabason J, Sicklick JK, Spraker MB, Zimel M, Hang LE, Sundar H, Bergman MA. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:815-833. [PMID: 35830886 PMCID: PMC10186762 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies of mesenchymal cell origin that display a heterogenous mix of clinical and pathologic characteristics. STS can develop from fat, muscle, nerves, blood vessels, and other connective tissues. The evaluation and treatment of patients with STS requires a multidisciplinary team with demonstrated expertise in the management of these tumors. The complete NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Soft Tissue Sarcoma provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of extremity/superficial trunk/head and neck STS, as well as retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal STS, desmoid tumors, and rhabdomyosarcoma. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines discusses general principles for the diagnosis and treatment of retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal STS, outlines treatment recommendations, and reviews the evidence to support the guidelines recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Edwin Choy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
| | - Mary Connelly
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Sarah Dry
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | - Jade Homsi
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Edward Kim
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | - David Liebner
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | - Nathan W Mesko
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | - Christian Meyer
- The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | - Alberto S Pappo
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | - Seth M Pollack
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | - Jacob Shabason
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Matthew B Spraker
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Melissa Zimel
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; and
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pillai S, Mahmud I, Mahar R, Griffith C, Langsen M, Nguyen J, Wojtkowiak JW, Swietach P, Gatenby RA, Bui MM, Merritt ME, McDonald P, Garrett TJ, Gillies RJ. Lipogenesis mediated by OGR1 regulates metabolic adaptation to acid stress in cancer cells via autophagy. Cell Rep 2022; 39:110796. [PMID: 35545051 PMCID: PMC9137419 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant tumors exhibit altered metabolism resulting in a highly acidic extracellular microenvironment. Here, we show that cytoplasmic lipid droplet (LD) accumulation, indicative of a lipogenic phenotype, is a cellular adaption to extracellular acidity. LD marker PLIN2 is strongly associated with poor overall survival in breast cancer patients. Acid-induced LD accumulation is triggered by activation of the acid-sensing G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) OGR1, which is expressed highly in breast tumors. OGR1 depletion inhibits acid-induced lipid accumulation, while activation by a synthetic agonist triggers LD formation. Inhibition of OGR1 downstream signaling abrogates the lipogenic phenotype, which can be rescued with OGR1 ectopic expression. OGR1-depleted cells show growth inhibition under acidic growth conditions in vitro and tumor formation in vivo. Isotope tracing shows that the source of lipid precursors is primarily autophagy-derived ketogenic amino acids. OGR1-depleted cells are defective in endoplasmic reticulum stress response and autophagy and hence fail to accumulate LDs affecting survival under acidic stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Smitha Pillai
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - Iqbal Mahmud
- Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Rohit Mahar
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Crystal Griffith
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Michael Langsen
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan Nguyen
- Analytical Microscopy Core, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jonathan W Wojtkowiak
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Pawel Swietach
- Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK
| | - Robert A Gatenby
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Analytical Microscopy Core, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Matthew E Merritt
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Patricia McDonald
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Timothy J Garrett
- Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Robert J Gillies
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Evans AJ, Brown RW, Bui MM, Chlipala EA, Lacchetti C, Milner DA, Pantanowitz L, Parwani AV, Reid K, Riben MW, Reuter VE, Stephens L, Stewart RL, Thomas NE. Validating Whole Slide Imaging Systems for Diagnostic Purposes in Pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022; 146:440-450. [PMID: 34003251 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0723-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— The original guideline, "Validating Whole Slide Imaging for Diagnostic Purposes in Pathology," was published in 2013 and included 12 guideline statements. The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to update the guideline following standards established by the National Academies of Medicine for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE.— To assess evidence published since the release of the original guideline and provide updated recommendations for validating whole slide imaging (WSI) systems used for diagnostic purposes. DESIGN.— An expert panel performed a systematic review of the literature. Frozen sections, anatomic pathology specimens (biopsies, curettings, and resections), and hematopathology cases were included. Cytology cases were excluded. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, the panel reassessed and updated the original guideline recommendations. RESULTS.— Three strong recommendations and 9 good practice statements are offered to assist laboratories with validating WSI digital pathology systems. CONCLUSIONS.— Systematic review of literature following release of the 2013 guideline reaffirms the use of a validation set of at least 60 cases, establishing intraobserver diagnostic concordance between WSI and glass slides and the use of a 2-week washout period between modalities. Although all discordances between WSI and glass slide diagnoses discovered during validation need to be reconciled, laboratories should be particularly concerned if their overall WSI-glass slide concordance is less than 95%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Evans
- From the Department of Pathology, Mackenzie Health, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada (Evans)
| | - Richard W Brown
- The Department of Pathology, Memorial Hermann Southwest Hospital, Houston, Texas (Brown)
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- The Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Bui)
| | | | - Christina Lacchetti
- Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Lacchetti)
| | - Danny A Milner
- American Society for Clinical Pathology, Chicago, Illinois (Milner)
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- The Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Pantanowitz)
| | - Anil V Parwani
- The Department of Pathology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus (Parwani)
| | | | - Michael W Riben
- The Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Riben)
| | - Victor E Reuter
- The Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York (Reuter)
| | - Lisa Stephens
- The Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (Stephens)
| | - Rachel L Stewart
- Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania (Stewart)
| | - Nicole E Thomas
- Surveys (Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Eloy C, Bychkov A, Pantanowitz L, Fraggetta F, Bui MM, Fukuoka J, Zerbe N, Hassell L, Parwani A. DPA-ESDIP-JSDP Task Force for Worldwide Adoption of Digital Pathology. J Pathol Inform 2022; 12:51. [PMID: 35070480 PMCID: PMC8721866 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_65_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Eloy
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology of University of Porto (IPATIMUP), Porto, Portugal.,Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty of Porto University, Porto, Portugal
| | - Andrey Bychkov
- Department of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa, Japan
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Junya Fukuoka
- Department of Pathology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Norman Zerbe
- Charité - University Medicine Berlin & Research IT Services, Berlin Institute of Health & Institute of Pathology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lewis Hassell
- Department of Pathology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Anil Parwani
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fusco MJ, Knepper TC, Balliu J, Del Cueto A, Laborde JM, Hooda SM, Brohl AS, Bui MM, Hicks JK. OUP accepted manuscript. Oncologist 2022; 27:e9-e17. [PMID: 35305098 PMCID: PMC8842368 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) comprises a heterogeneous collection of malignancies that are typically associated with a poor prognosis and a lack of effective treatment options. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical utility of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) among CUP patients to assist with diagnosis and identify opportunities for molecularly guided therapy. Patients and Methods Patients with a CUP at Moffitt Cancer Center who underwent NGS between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019, were eligible for study inclusion. Next-generation sequencing results were assessed to determine the frequency of clinically actionable molecular alterations, and chart reviews were performed to ascertain the number of patients receiving molecularly guided therapy. Results Ninety-five CUP patients were identified for analysis. Next-generation sequencing testing identified options for molecularly guided therapy for 55% (n = 52) of patients. Among patients with molecularly guided therapy options, 33% (n = 17) were prescribed a molecularly guided therapy. The median overall survival for those receiving molecularly guided therapy was 23.6 months. Among the evaluable patients, the median duration of treatment for CUP patients (n = 7) receiving molecular-guided therapy as a first-line therapy was 39 weeks. The median duration of treatment for CUP patients (n = 8) treated with molecularly guided therapy in the second- or later-line setting was 13 weeks. Next-generation sequencing results were found to be suggestive of a likely primary tumor type for 15% (n = 14) of patients. Conclusion Next-generation sequencing results enabled the identification of treatment options in a majority of patients and assisted with the identification of a likely primary tumor type in a clinically meaningful subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Fusco
- Department of Individualized Cancer Management, Section for Precision Oncology, Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Todd C Knepper
- Department of Individualized Cancer Management, Section for Precision Oncology, Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Juliana Balliu
- Department of Individualized Cancer Management, Section for Precision Oncology, Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Alex Del Cueto
- Department of Individualized Cancer Management, Section for Precision Oncology, Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jose M Laborde
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sharjeel M Hooda
- Department of Satellite and Community Oncology, Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Andrew S Brohl
- Sarcoma Department, Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - J Kevin Hicks
- Department of Individualized Cancer Management, Section for Precision Oncology, Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Corresponding author: J. Kevin Hicks, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, MRC-CANCONT, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Tel: +1 813 745 4673;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kearney SJ, Lowe A, Lennerz JK, Parwani A, Bui MM, Wack K, Giannini G, Abels E. Bridging the Gap: The Critical Role of Regulatory Affairs and Clinical Affairs in the Total Product Life Cycle of Pathology Imaging Devices and Software. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:765385. [PMID: 34869473 PMCID: PMC8635712 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.765385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Manufacturers of pathology imaging devices and associated software engage regulatory affairs and clinical affairs (RACA) throughout the Total Product Life Cycle (TPLC) of regulated products. A number of manufacturers, pathologists, and end users are not familiar with how RACA involvement benefits each stage of the TPLC. RACA professionals are important contributors to product development and deployment strategies because these professionals maintain an understanding of the scientific, technical, and clinical aspects of biomedical product regulation, as well as the relevant knowledge of regulatory requirements, policies, and market trends for both local and global regulations and standards. Defining a regulatory and clinical strategy at the beginning of product design enables early evaluation of risks and provides assurance that the collected evidence supports the product's clinical claims (e.g., in a marketing application), its safe and effective use, and potential reimbursement strategies. It is recommended to involve RACA early and throughout the TPLC to assist with navigating changes in the regulatory environment and dynamic diagnostic market. Here we outline how various stakeholders can utilize RACA to navigate the nuanced landscape behind the development and use of clinical diagnostic products. Collectively, this work emphasizes the critical importance of RACA as an integral part of product development and, thereby, sustained innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Staci J Kearney
- Elevation Strategic Development, Morrison, CO, United States
| | | | - Jochen K Lennerz
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Center for Integrated Diagnostics, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Anil Parwani
- Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Pathology and Biomedical Informatics, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bui MM, Zhang LLJ, Wang HP. Updates and Diagnostic Challenges in Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 145:1355-1357. [PMID: 34673909 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0375-ed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn M Bui
- From the Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida (Bui)
| | - Lanjing L J Zhang
- The Department of Pathology, Princeton Medical Center, Plainsboro, New Jersey (Zhang).,The Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey (Zhang).,The Department of Chemical Biology, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Piscataway, New Jersey (Zhang).,Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey (Zhang)
| | - He Peter Wang
- The Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (Wang)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lara H, Li Z, Abels E, Aeffner F, Bui MM, ElGabry EA, Kozlowski C, Montalto MC, Parwani AV, Zarella MD, Bowman D, Rimm D, Pantanowitz L. Quantitative Image Analysis for Tissue Biomarker Use: A White Paper From the Digital Pathology Association. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2021; 29:479-493. [PMID: 33734106 PMCID: PMC8354563 DOI: 10.1097/pai.0000000000000930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Tissue biomarkers have been of increasing utility for scientific research, diagnosing disease, and treatment response prediction. There has been a steady shift away from qualitative assessment toward providing more quantitative scores for these biomarkers. The application of quantitative image analysis has thus become an indispensable tool for in-depth tissue biomarker interrogation in these contexts. This white paper reviews current technologies being employed for quantitative image analysis, their application and pitfalls, regulatory framework demands, and guidelines established for promoting their safe adoption in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haydee Lara
- GlaxoSmithKline-R&D, Cellular Biomarkers, Collegeville, PA
| | - Zaibo Li
- The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Famke Aeffner
- Translational Safety and Bioanalytical Sciences, Amgen Research, Amgen Inc
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - David Rimm
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nelson J, Mousa MS, Diaz J, Bui MM, Caracciolo JT. Unusual Presentation of Widely Metastatic Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma: Case Report. J Radiol Case Rep 2021; 15:7-16. [PMID: 34276871 DOI: 10.3941/jrcr.v15i4.4147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Extraskeletal osteosarcoma is a highly aggressive malignant osteoid forming mesenchymal neoplasm arising from soft tissues which accounts for 1% of all soft tissue sarcomas. We report the case of a 46-year-old female with no significant past medical history presenting to an emergency department with a right lateral thigh mass following minor trauma. She was eventually found to have high grade extraskeletal osteosarcoma with rapid progression of disease resulting in patient demise. Differentiation of these lesions from alternative processes relies on specific imaging and pathologic features. Differential diagnoses include both benign and malignant etiologies such as myositis ossificans, soft tissue hemangiomas, and other malignant soft tissue neoplasms such as epithelial and synovial sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay Nelson
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Mina S Mousa
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Joana Diaz
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jamie T Caracciolo
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jardim-Perassi BV, Mu W, Huang S, Tomaszewski MR, Poleszczuk J, Abdalah MA, Budzevich MM, Dominguez-Viqueira W, Reed DR, Bui MM, Johnson JO, Martinez GV, Gillies RJ. Deep-learning and MR images to target hypoxic habitats with evofosfamide in preclinical models of sarcoma. Theranostics 2021; 11:5313-5329. [PMID: 33859749 PMCID: PMC8039958 DOI: 10.7150/thno.56595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale: Hypoxic regions (habitats) within tumors are heterogeneously distributed and can be widely variant. Hypoxic habitats are generally pan-therapy resistant. For this reason, hypoxia-activated prodrugs (HAPs) have been developed to target these resistant volumes. The HAP evofosfamide (TH-302) has shown promise in preclinical and early clinical trials of sarcoma. However, in a phase III clinical trial of non-resectable soft tissue sarcomas, TH-302 did not improve survival in combination with doxorubicin (Dox), possibly due to a lack of patient stratification based on hypoxic status. Therefore, we used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify hypoxic habitats and non-invasively follow therapies response in sarcoma mouse models. Methods: We developed deep-learning (DL) models to identify hypoxia, using multiparametric MRI and co-registered histology, and monitored response to TH-302 in a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) of rhabdomyosarcoma and a syngeneic model of fibrosarcoma (radiation-induced fibrosarcoma, RIF-1). Results: A DL convolutional neural network showed strong correlations (>0.76) between the true hypoxia fraction in histology and the predicted hypoxia fraction in multiparametric MRI. TH-302 monotherapy or in combination with Dox delayed tumor growth and increased survival in the hypoxic PDX model (p<0.05), but not in the RIF-1 model, which had a lower volume of hypoxic habitats. Control studies showed that RIF-1 resistance was due to hypoxia and not other causes. Notably, PDX tumors developed resistance to TH-302 under prolonged treatment that was not due to a reduction in hypoxic volumes. Conclusion: Artificial intelligence analysis of pre-therapy MR images can predict hypoxia and subsequent response to HAPs. This approach can be used to monitor therapy response and adapt schedules to forestall the emergence of resistance.
Collapse
|
28
|
Miroshnychenko D, Baratchart E, Ferrall-Fairbanks MC, Velde RV, Laurie MA, Bui MM, Tan AC, Altrock PM, Basanta D, Marusyk A. Spontaneous cell fusions as a mechanism of parasexual recombination in tumour cell populations. Nat Ecol Evol 2021; 5:379-391. [PMID: 33462489 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-01367-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
The initiation and progression of cancers reflect the underlying process of somatic evolution, in which the diversification of heritable phenotypes provides a substrate for natural selection, resulting in the outgrowth of the most fit subpopulations. Although somatic evolution can tap into multiple sources of diversification, it is assumed to lack access to (para)sexual recombination-a key diversification mechanism throughout all strata of life. On the basis of observations of spontaneous fusions involving cancer cells, the reported genetic instability of polypoid cells and the precedence of fusion-mediated parasexual recombination in fungi, we asked whether cell fusions between genetically distinct cancer cells could produce parasexual recombination. Using differentially labelled tumour cells, we found evidence of low-frequency, spontaneous cell fusions between carcinoma cells in multiple cell line models of breast cancer both in vitro and in vivo. While some hybrids remained polyploid, many displayed partial ploidy reduction, generating diverse progeny with heterogeneous inheritance of parental alleles, indicative of partial recombination. Hybrid cells also displayed elevated levels of phenotypic plasticity, which may further amplify the impact of cell fusions on the diversification of phenotypic traits. Using mathematical modelling, we demonstrated that the observed rates of spontaneous somatic cell fusions may enable populations of tumour cells to amplify clonal heterogeneity, thus facilitating the exploration of larger areas of the adaptive landscape (relative to strictly asexual populations), which may substantially accelerate a tumour's ability to adapt to new selective pressures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria Miroshnychenko
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Etienne Baratchart
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Meghan C Ferrall-Fairbanks
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Robert Vander Velde
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Molecular Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Mark A Laurie
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Aik Choon Tan
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Philipp M Altrock
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - David Basanta
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Andriy Marusyk
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA. .,Department of Molecular Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ibrahim-Hashim A, Luddy K, Abrahams D, Enriquez-Navas P, Damgaci S, Yao J, Chen T, Bui MM, Gillies RJ, O'Farrelly C, Richards CL, Brown JS, Gatenby RA. Artificial selection for host resistance to tumour growth and subsequent cancer cell adaptations: an evolutionary arms race. Br J Cancer 2021; 124:455-465. [PMID: 33024265 PMCID: PMC7852689 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-01110-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer progression is governed by evolutionary dynamics in both the tumour population and its host. Since cancers die with the host, each new population of cancer cells must reinvent strategies to overcome the host's heritable defences. In contrast, host species evolve defence strategies over generations if tumour development limits procreation. METHODS We investigate this "evolutionary arms race" through intentional breeding of immunodeficient SCID and immunocompetent Black/6 mice to evolve increased tumour suppression. Over 10 generations, we injected Lewis lung mouse carcinoma cells [LL/2-Luc-M38] and selectively bred the two individuals with the slowest tumour growth at day 11. Their male progeny were hosts in the subsequent round. RESULTS The evolved SCID mice suppressed tumour growth through biomechanical restriction from increased mesenchymal proliferation, and the evolved Black/6 mice suppressed tumour growth by increasing immune-mediated killing of cancer cells. However, transcriptomic changes of multicellular tissue organisation and function genes allowed LL/2-Luc-M38 cells to adapt through increased matrix remodelling in SCID mice, and reduced angiogenesis, increased energy utilisation and accelerated proliferation in Black/6 mice. CONCLUSION Host species can rapidly evolve both immunologic and non-immunologic tumour defences. However, cancer cell plasticity allows effective phenotypic and population-based counter strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arig Ibrahim-Hashim
- Cancer Biology and Evolution Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kimberly Luddy
- Cancer Biology and Evolution Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Dominique Abrahams
- Cancer Biology and Evolution Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Pedro Enriquez-Navas
- Cancer Biology and Evolution Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sultan Damgaci
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jiqiang Yao
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Tingan Chen
- Analytic Microscopy Core, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Analytic Microscopy Core, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Robert J Gillies
- Cancer Biology and Evolution Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Cliona O'Farrelly
- School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Joel S Brown
- Cancer Biology and Evolution Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois, at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Robert A Gatenby
- Cancer Biology and Evolution Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
- Department of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
- Department of Integrated Mathematical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
von Mehren M, Kane JM, Bui MM, Choy E, Connelly M, Dry S, Ganjoo KN, George S, Gonzalez RJ, Heslin MJ, Homsi J, Keedy V, Kelly CM, Kim E, Liebner D, McCarter M, McGarry SV, Meyer C, Pappo AS, Parkes AM, Paz IB, Petersen IA, Poppe M, Riedel RF, Rubin B, Schuetze S, Shabason J, Sicklick JK, Spraker MB, Zimel M, Bergman MA, George GV. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:1604-1612. [PMID: 33285515 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Soft Tissue Sarcoma provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with soft tissue sarcomas. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines, including the development of a separate and distinct guideline for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs); reconception of the management of desmoid tumors; inclusion of further recommendations for the diagnosis and management of extremity/body wall, head/neck sarcomas, and retroperitoneal sarcomas; modification and addition of systemic therapy regimens for sarcoma subtypes; and revision of the principles of radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Edwin Choy
- 4Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
| | - Mary Connelly
- 5The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Sarah Dry
- 6UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Jade Homsi
- 10UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | - Edward Kim
- 13Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | - David Liebner
- 5The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | | | | | - Christian Meyer
- 16The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | - Alberto S Pappo
- 17St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | | | - Matthew Poppe
- 21Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
| | | | - Brian Rubin
- 23Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | - Jacob Shabason
- 25Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Matthew B Spraker
- 27Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Melissa Zimel
- 28UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; and
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gong L, Bui MM, Zhang W, Sun X, Zhang M, Yi D. H3F3A G34 mutation DNA sequencing and G34W immunohistochemistry analysis in 366 cases of giant cell tumors of bone and other bone tumors. Histol Histopathol 2020; 36:61-68. [PMID: 33021329 DOI: 10.14670/hh-18-264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
H3F3A mutations and the expression of glycine 34 to tryptophan (G34W) mutants in giant cell tumors of bone (GCTBs) and other bone tumors were detected to compare H3F3A mutation types and the expression of G34W-mutant protein in order to provide a theoretical basis for using H3F3A mutations as a diagnostic and differential-diagnostic tool for GCTBs. A total of 366 bone tumor cases were investigated. The cases involved 215 men and 151 women, whose median age was 29 years (3-84). The cases included GCTB (n=180), recurrent GCTB (n=19), GCTB with lung metastasis (n=5), pediatric GCTB (n=15), primary malignant GCTB (n=5), chondroblastoma (CB, n=61), chondrosarcoma grade II (n=15), dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (n=17), chondromyxoid fibroma (n=9), aneurysmal bone cyst (n=9), nonossifying fibroma (n=9), osteosarcoma (n=16), and undifferentiated sarcoma (n=6). Sanger DNA sequencing analysis was used to detect H3F3A mutations. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess the expression of the G34W-mutated protein in these bone tumors. DNA sequencing results revealed H3F3A mutations in 95.00% of GCTBs (171/180), including glycine 34 to tryptophan (G34W, 163/180, 90.56%), glycine 34 to leucine (G34L, 3/180, 1.67%), glycine 34 to valine (G34V, 3/180, 1.67%), and glycine 34 to arginine (G34R, 2/180, 1.11%). Recurrent GCTBs mostly had the H3F3A G34W mutation (18/19, 94.74%), and GCTBs with lung metastasis all had the H3F3A G34W mutation (5/5, 100%). Pediatric GCTBs had a mutation rate of 93.33% (14/15), including one case with G34L. Four cases of primary malignant GCTB showed the H3F3A G34W mutation (4/5, 80.00%), and the classical GCTB component and malignant component showed consistent mutation types. Immunohistochemistry showed that GCTBs harboring G34W also expressed the mutant protein in tumor cell nuclei. Furthermore, one case of GCTB and one case of recurrent GCTB showed positive G34W immunostaining results despite being negative for the genetic mutation. Other bone tumors all showed wild-type expression in both DNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Our large-sample DNA sequencing analysis detected four different forms of mutations in GCTBs, including three rare mutation forms. The most common mutation of H3F3A was G34W, which was in accordance with the expression of G34W in GCTBs detected by immunohistochemistry. Although DNA sequencing analysis detected rare mutation types of H3F3A, false-negative results were also present due to the small number of cells in the samples. Detection of the most common (G34W) mutant protein by immunohistochemistry was more convenient. Given the high prevalence of these driver mutations, the detection of H3F3A mutant proteins can assist in the diagnosis of GCTB and its differential diagnosis from other bone tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lihua Gong
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Wen Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoqi Sun
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ding Yi
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Ganjoo KN, George S, Gonzalez RJ, Heslin MJ, Kane JM, Keedy V, Kim E, Koon H, Mayerson J, McCarter M, McGarry SV, Meyer C, Morris ZS, O'Donnell RJ, Pappo AS, Paz IB, Petersen IA, Pfeifer JD, Riedel RF, Ruo B, Schuetze S, Tap WD, Wayne JD, Bergman MA, Scavone JL. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2019; 16:536-563. [PMID: 29752328 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 400] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare solid tumors of mesenchymal cell origin that display a heterogenous mix of clinical and pathologic characteristics. STS can develop from fat, muscle, nerves, blood vessels, and other connective tissues. The evaluation and treatment of patients with STS requires a multidisciplinary team with demonstrated expertise in the management of these tumors. The complete NCCN Guidelines for STS provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of extremity/superficial trunk/head and neck STS, as well as intra-abdominal/retroperitoneal STS, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, desmoid tumors, and rhabdomyosarcoma. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines discusses general principles for the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of STS of the extremities, superficial trunk, or head and neck; outlines treatment recommendations by disease stage; and reviews the evidence to support the guidelines recommendations.
Collapse
|
33
|
Bridge JA, Sumegi J, Druta M, Bui MM, Henderson-Jackson E, Linos K, Baker M, Walko CM, Millis S, Brohl AS. Clinical, pathological, and genomic features of EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion sarcoma. Mod Pathol 2019; 32:1593-1604. [PMID: 31189996 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-019-0301-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Revised: 05/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Molecular diagnostics of sarcoma subtypes commonly involve the identification of characteristic oncogenic fusions. EWSR1-PATZ1 is a rare fusion partnering in sarcoma, with few cases reported in the literature. In the current study, a series of 11 cases of EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion positive malignancies are described. EWSR1-PATZ1-related sarcomas occur across a wide age range and have a strong predilection for chest wall primary site. Secondary driver mutations in cell-cycle genes, and in particular CDKN2A (71%), are common in EWSR1-PATZ1 sarcomas in this series. In a subset of cases, an extended clinical and histopathological review was performed, as was confirmation and characterization of the fusion breakpoint revealing a novel intronic pseudoexon sequence insertion. Unified by a shared gene fusion, EWSR1-PATZ1 sarcomas otherwise appear to exhibit divergent morphology, a polyphenotypic immunoprofile, and variable clinical behavior posing challenges for precise classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia A Bridge
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Translational Genomics Research Institute/Ashion, Phoenix, AZ, USA. .,Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
| | - Janos Sumegi
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Translational Genomics Research Institute/Ashion, Phoenix, AZ, USA.,Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Mihaela Druta
- Sarcoma Department, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Sarcoma Department, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Evita Henderson-Jackson
- Sarcoma Department, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.,Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Konstantinos Linos
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Michael Baker
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Christine M Walko
- Personalized Medicine Institute, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Andrew S Brohl
- Sarcoma Department, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.,Chemical Biology and Molecular Medicine Program, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bui MM, Riben MW, Allison KH, Chlipala E, Colasacco C, Kahn AG, Lacchetti C, Madabhushi A, Pantanowitz L, Salama ME, Stewart RL, Thomas NE, Tomaszewski JE, Hammond ME. Quantitative Image Analysis of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Immunohistochemistry for Breast Cancer: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2019; 143:1180-1195. [PMID: 30645156 PMCID: PMC6629520 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0378-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Advancements in genomic, computing, and imaging technology have spurred new opportunities to use quantitative image analysis (QIA) for diagnostic testing. OBJECTIVE.— To develop evidence-based recommendations to improve accuracy, precision, and reproducibility in the interpretation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) for breast cancer where QIA is used. DESIGN.— The College of American Pathologists (CAP) convened a panel of pathologists, histotechnologists, and computer scientists with expertise in image analysis, immunohistochemistry, quality management, and breast pathology to develop recommendations for QIA of HER2 IHC in breast cancer. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to address 5 key questions. Final recommendations were derived from strength of evidence, open comment feedback, expert panel consensus, and advisory panel review. RESULTS.— Eleven recommendations were drafted: 7 based on CAP laboratory accreditation requirements and 4 based on expert consensus opinions. A 3-week open comment period received 180 comments from more than 150 participants. CONCLUSIONS.— To improve accurate, precise, and reproducible interpretation of HER2 IHC results for breast cancer, QIA and procedures must be validated before implementation, followed by regular maintenance and ongoing evaluation of quality control and quality assurance. HER2 QIA performance, interpretation, and reporting should be supervised by pathologists with expertise in QIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn M Bui
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - Michael W Riben
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - Kimberly H Allison
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - Elizabeth Chlipala
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - Carol Colasacco
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - Andrea G Kahn
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - Christina Lacchetti
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - Anant Madabhushi
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - Mohamed E Salama
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - Rachel L Stewart
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - Nicole E Thomas
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - John E Tomaszewski
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| | - M Elizabeth Hammond
- From the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston (Dr Riben); the Department of Pathology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California (Dr Allison); Premier Laboratory, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Chlipala); Surveys (Mses Colasacco and Thomas), College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois; the Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile (Dr Kahn); Policy and Advocacy, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Lacchetti); the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (Dr Madabhushi); the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz); the Department of Pathology, University of Utah/ARUP Laboratories Inc, Salt Lake City (Dr Salama); the Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Stewart); the Department of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo (Dr Tomaszewski); and the Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City (Dr Hammond)
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Al-Husseinawi E, Bui MM, Ahmed AA. Grb2-associated binding protein-1 as a biomarker in bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Pathology 2019; 51:610-614. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
36
|
Abstract
Sarcomas are connective tissue tumors accounting for only 1% of all adult malignancies. Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a sarcoma arising from smooth muscle cells, and accounts for 10-20% of all sarcomas. A subtype of LMS are those originating from the smooth muscle of blood vessels. Leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava is a sarcomatous tumor, with less than 350 cases described in the literature. It carries a poor prognosis, with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 31.4% and 7.4%, respectively. We present a case of a 46-year-old female with no significant past medical history presented to the emergency department with mild abdominal pain and distention, early satiety, and weight loss for three weeks, found to have unresectable metastatic leiomyosarcoma of the inferior vena cava.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Sephien
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Mina S Mousa
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Rajendra Kedar
- Department of Radiology, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kerry Thomas
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abels E, Pantanowitz L, Aeffner F, Zarella MD, van der Laak J, Bui MM, Vemuri VN, Parwani AV, Gibbs J, Agosto-Arroyo E, Beck AH, Kozlowski C. Computational pathology definitions, best practices, and recommendations for regulatory guidance: a white paper from the Digital Pathology Association. J Pathol 2019; 249:286-294. [PMID: 31355445 PMCID: PMC6852275 DOI: 10.1002/path.5331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 190] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
In this white paper, experts from the Digital Pathology Association (DPA) define terminology and concepts in the emerging field of computational pathology, with a focus on its application to histology images analyzed together with their associated patient data to extract information. This review offers a historical perspective and describes the potential clinical benefits from research and applications in this field, as well as significant obstacles to adoption. Best practices for implementing computational pathology workflows are presented. These include infrastructure considerations, acquisition of training data, quality assessments, as well as regulatory, ethical, and cyber-security concerns. Recommendations are provided for regulators, vendors, and computational pathology practitioners in order to facilitate progress in the field. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Abels
- Regulatory and Clinical Affairs, PathAI, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liron Pantanowitz
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Famke Aeffner
- Amgen Research, Comparative Biology and Safety Sciences, Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mark D Zarella
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jeroen van der Laak
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Venkata Np Vemuri
- Data Science Department, Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anil V Parwani
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jeff Gibbs
- Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Cleopatra Kozlowski
- Department of Development Sciences, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Li L, Bui MM, Zhang M, Sun X, Han G, Zhang T, Huang X, Ding Y. Validation of Fluorescence in situ Hybridization Testing of USP6 Gene Rearrangement for Diagnosis of Primary Aneurysmal Bone Cyst. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2019; 49:590-597. [PMID: 31611201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
GOALS Ubiquitin specific protease 6 (USP6) gene rearrangement has been reported in approximately 70%-75% of aneurysmal bone cyst cases. We hypothesize that fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing of this marker will be useful in the pathological differentiation of primary aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC), secondary ABC, giant cell tumor of bone (GCT), and telangiectatic osteosarcoma (TOS) which are morphologically similar. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of this test and validate it for diagnostic use. PROCEDURES FISH was performed in primary ABC, secondary ABC, GCT and TOS using dual color USP6 gene break apart probes. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS Primary ABC demonstrates USP6 rearrangement. All secondary ABC, GCT and TOS were negative. The test sensitivity and specificity in primary ABC were 53% (9/17) and 100% (18/18), respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 100% (9/9) and 69% (18/26), respectively. CONCLUSION The USP6 gene break apart detected by FISH is validated as a novel diagnostic tool for primary ABC in our laboratory. This test could be used to study the predictive value of USP6 targeted therapy for primary ABC in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Li
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ming Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoqi Sun
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Gang Han
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
| | - Tingting Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyuan Huang
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Ding
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The Fourth Medical College of Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jardim-Perassi BV, Huang S, Dominguez-Viqueira W, Poleszczuk J, Budzevich MM, Abdalah MA, Pillai SR, Ruiz E, Bui MM, Zuccari DAPC, Gillies RJ, Martinez GV. Multiparametric MRI and Coregistered Histology Identify Tumor Habitats in Breast Cancer Mouse Models. Cancer Res 2019; 79:3952-3964. [PMID: 31186232 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-0213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Revised: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 06/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
It is well-recognized that solid tumors are genomically, anatomically, and physiologically heterogeneous. In general, more heterogeneous tumors have poorer outcomes, likely due to the increased probability of harboring therapy-resistant cells and regions. It is hypothesized that the genomic and physiologic heterogeneity are related, because physiologically distinct regions will exert variable selection pressures leading to the outgrowth of clones with variable genomic/proteomic profiles. To investigate this, methods must be in place to interrogate and define, at the microscopic scale, the cytotypes that exist within physiologically distinct subregions ("habitats") that are present at mesoscopic scales. MRI provides a noninvasive approach to interrogate physiologically distinct local environments, due to the biophysical principles that govern MRI signal generation. Here, we interrogate different physiologic parameters, such as perfusion, cell density, and edema, using multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Signals from six different acquisition schema were combined voxel-by-voxel into four clusters identified using a Gaussian mixture model. These were compared with histologic and IHC characterizations of sections that were coregistered using MRI-guided 3D printed tumor molds. Specifically, we identified a specific set of MRI parameters to classify viable-normoxic, viable-hypoxic, nonviable-hypoxic, and nonviable-normoxic tissue types within orthotopic 4T1 and MDA-MB-231 breast tumors. This is the first coregistered study to show that mpMRI can be used to define physiologically distinct tumor habitats within breast tumor models. SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that noninvasive imaging metrics can be used to distinguish subregions within heterogeneous tumors with histopathologic correlation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruna V Jardim-Perassi
- Department of Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.,Faculdade de Medicina de Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
| | - Suning Huang
- Department of Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.,Guangxi Tumor Hospital, Nanning Guangxi, China
| | | | - Jan Poleszczuk
- Department of Integrative Mathematical Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Mahmoud A Abdalah
- Image Response Assessment Team, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Smitha R Pillai
- Department of Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Epifanio Ruiz
- Small Animal Imaging Laboratory, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Robert J Gillies
- Department of Cancer Physiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
| | - Gary V Martinez
- Small Animal Imaging Laboratory, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ding Y, Bui MM, Wang Q, Sun X, Zhang M, Niu X, Tian W. ADAM10 Is a Potential Novel Prognostic Biomarker for Sacral Chordoma. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2019; 49:309-316. [PMID: 31308029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The ADAM (A Disintegrin and Metalloprotease) is a zinc-dependent family of transmembrane proteins upregulated in cancers. As the most frequent member, ADAM10's potential prognostic role in chordoma is unknown. OBJECTIVE We investigated the expression of ADAM10 protein and its prognostic value in sacral chordoma. DESIGN Clinical information of patients with sacral chordoma diagnosis during a 7-year period and their archived pathology were retrieved. Immunohistochemistry study of the expression of ADAM10 protein in sacral chordoma and control samples was conducted. The ADAM10 expression was correlated with the patients' clinicopathological information and analyzed by statistical methods. RESULTS The average age of 64 patients was 57.6 years (range, 35-83 years). Follow-up ranged from 12 to 141 months (mean, 72 months). The histological type included 47 classic, 6 chondroid, and 11 dedifferentiated chordomas. The expression level of ADAM10 was significantly correlated with the histological type (χ 2=11.345, P=0.003), metastasis (χ 2=10.149, P=0.001), overall survival (log-rank test: χ 2=8.177, P=0.004) and disease free survival (log-rank test: χ 2=6.805, P=0.009). The average survival time of patients with weak expression of ADAM10 was longer than that of strong expression. CONCLUSION The expression of ADAM10 protein is related to the histologic type and the prognosis of sacral chordoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Ding
- School of Clinical Medicine, Tshinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Qianqian Wang
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoqi Sun
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Ming Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaohui Niu
- Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Tian
- School of Clinical Medicine, Tshinghua University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Aeffner F, Zarella MD, Buchbinder N, Bui MM, Goodman MR, Hartman DJ, Lujan GM, Molani MA, Parwani AV, Lillard K, Turner OC, Vemuri VNP, Yuil-Valdes AG, Bowman D. Introduction to Digital Image Analysis in Whole-slide Imaging: A White Paper from the Digital Pathology Association. J Pathol Inform 2019; 10:9. [PMID: 30984469 PMCID: PMC6437786 DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_82_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 176] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The advent of whole-slide imaging in digital pathology has brought about the advancement of computer-aided examination of tissue via digital image analysis. Digitized slides can now be easily annotated and analyzed via a variety of algorithms. This study reviews the fundamentals of tissue image analysis and aims to provide pathologists with basic information regarding the features, applications, and general workflow of these new tools. The review gives an overview of the basic categories of software solutions available, potential analysis strategies, technical considerations, and general algorithm readouts. Advantages and limitations of tissue image analysis are discussed, and emerging concepts, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, are introduced. Finally, examples of how digital image analysis tools are currently being used in diagnostic laboratories, translational research, and drug development are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Famke Aeffner
- Amgen Inc., Amgen Research, Comparative Biology and Safety Sciences, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mark D Zarella
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Drexel University, College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Mariam A Molani
- Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Anil V Parwani
- The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | - Oliver C Turner
- Novartis, Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Preclinical Safety, East Hannover, NJ, USA
| | | | - Ana G Yuil-Valdes
- Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Perkins AR, Macaulay RJB, Bui MM, Bridge JA, Etame AB. A Frontal Dural-Based Lesion in a 63-Year Old Male. Brain Pathol 2019; 29:301-302. [PMID: 30821029 DOI: 10.1111/bpa.12682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley R Perkins
- Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Julia A Bridge
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.,Department of Pathology/Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Arnold B Etame
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wu H, Bui MM, Zhou L, Li D, Zhang H, Zhong D. Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor with an admixture of epithelial and mesenchymal elements in the jaws: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of 22 cases with literature review. Mod Pathol 2019; 32:189-204. [PMID: 30206408 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0100-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2017] [Revised: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Information on the heterogeneity of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor, a rare entity associated with tumor-induced osteomalacia, is limited. In this retrospective analysis of 222 phosphaturic mesenchymal tumors, 22 cases exhibited mixed mesenchymal and epithelial elements, which we propose to term "phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor, mixed epithelial, and connective tissue type." Phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor of the mixed epithelial and connective tissue type showed a distinctive and significant male predominance (male:female = 2.67:1), with most patients diagnosed at <40 years old. Moreover, all tumors were mainly located in the alveolar bone with focal invasion into surrounding soft tissue and oral mucosa, which could be detected preoperatively by oral examination. The mesenchymal component, composed of spindled cells resembling fibroblasts or myofibroblasts arranged in a storiform or fascicular pattern, exhibited a less prominent vasculature and lower cellularity than the typical phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (mixed connective tissue type). The epithelial component was typically haphazardly and diffusely distributed throughout the tumor, forming small, irregular nests resembling odontogenic epithelial nests. All cases were immunoreactive for fibroblast growth factor-23, somatostatin receptor 2A, and NSE in both components. Mostly also demonstrated positive staining for CD99 (21/22, 96%), CD56 (16/22, 73%), Bcl-2 (21/22, 96%), and D2-40 (19/22, 86%) in one or both components. S100 was positive in both components in one of seven cases. Interestingly, immunoreactivity was typically stronger and more diffuse in the epithelial than in the paired mesenchymal components. The mesenchymal component was also diffusely positive for CD68 (17/17, 100%) and showed variable focal staining for SMA (15/22, 68%) and CD34 (9/19, 47 %). These results indicate that phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor of the mixed epithelial and connective tissue type has distinctive clinicopathological characteristics and a polyimmunophenotypic profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanwen Wu
- Department of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Lian Zhou
- Department of Stomatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Dongmei Li
- Department of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Dingrong Zhong
- Department of Pathology, Molecular Pathology Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Boddu S, Walko CM, Bienasz S, Bui MM, Henderson-Jackson E, Naghavi AO, Mullinax JE, Joyce DM, Binitie O, Letson GD, Gonzalez RJ, Reed DR, Druta M, Brohl AS. Clinical Utility of Genomic Profiling in the Treatment of Advanced Sarcomas: A Single-Center Experience. JCO Precis Oncol 2018; 2:1-8. [DOI: 10.1200/po.18.00096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Sarcomas are a diverse group of malignant tumors that arise from soft tissues or bone. For most advanced cases, there is a substantial need for improved therapeutic options and, therefore, a desire to more precisely tailor therapy in individual cases. In this study, we review our institutional experience with next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based molecular profiling for non–GI stromal tumors sarcomas, with a focus on the clinical utility of the results. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed results of NGS performed on tumors from 114 patients with a diagnosis of sarcoma. A chart review was conducted to review the clinical impact of NGS findings. Results A median of three putatively oncogenic gene alterations were identified per tumor sample (range, 0 to 19) and at least one mutation was detected in 96.7% of tumors. Fifty-six patients (49.1%) harbored a finding that was felt to be actionable after review by a molecular tumor board. Five patients (4.4%) had a diagnosis change as a result of NGS findings. In 15 patients (13.2%), therapeutic selection was influenced by NGS findings. Four of 15 (26.7%) of the NGS-influenced systemic therapies resulted in clinical benefit. Conclusion Putatively oncogenic mutations are readily detected in the majority of sarcomas. Genetic profiling affected the diagnosis and/or treatment approach in a sizeable minority of patients with sarcoma treated at our center. Additional study is required to determine if genetic profiling leads to improved clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spandana Boddu
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Christine M. Walko
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Stephanie Bienasz
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Marilyn M. Bui
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Evita Henderson-Jackson
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Arash O. Naghavi
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - John E. Mullinax
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - David M. Joyce
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Odion Binitie
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - G. Douglas Letson
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Ricardo J. Gonzalez
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Damon R. Reed
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Mihaela Druta
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Andrew S. Brohl
- Spandana Boddu and Stephanie Bienasz, University of South Florida; Christine M. Walko, Marilyn M. Bui, Evita Henderson-Jackson, Arash O. Naghavi, John E. Mullinax, David M. Joyce, Odion Binitie, G. Douglas Letson, Ricardo J. Gonzalez, Damon R. Reed, Mihaela Druta, and Andrew S. Brohl, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pillai SR, Wojtkowiak JW, Nguyen J, Damaghi M, Bui MM, Garrett T, Gillies RJ. Abstract 2395: Acid-induced autophagic protein products are stored as adiposomes in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-2395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Malignant tumors exhibit altered metabolism and consume higher levels of glucose compared to surrounding normal tissue, resulting in an acidic extracellular microenvironment. Adaptation to acidic conditions is a pre-requisite for tumor cells to survive and to out-compete the stroma into which they invade. Our previous studies demonstrated that acid adaptation is associated with survival mechanisms like chronic activation of autophagy and redistribution of the lysosomal proteins to the plasma membrane. When grown under acidic pH, breast cancer cells accumulate lipids as revealed by staining with Nile Red and perilipin 2, a protein that coats lipid droplets (adiposomes). Adiposomes are dynamic organelles that store neutral lipids surrounded by a shell of proteins and phospholipid monolayer. The lipids stored in adiposomes are produced de novo, as acid-induced lipogenic phenotype is maintained, even if cells are grown with de-lipidated serum. Fatty acid synthesis inhibition was selectively toxic under acidic conditions as compared to neutral pH and attenuated acid-induced adiposome accumulation. Using 13C isotopomer analysis, we observed a major shift in glucose metabolism from Embden Meyerhof to the Pentose Phosphate Pathway, resulting in increased production of NADPH, necessary for de novo lipid synthesis. To identify the carbon source of the lipid precursors in adiposomes, we employed 13C tracer analysis using [UL] 13C Glucose, 13C3 Leucine (labeled to steady-state) 13C2 Acetate and [UL] 13C glutamine as sources of lipids in the media. 13C label incorporation was determined by LC-MS/MS from adiposomes isolated from cells grown in media containing delipidated serum at pH 6.5. Label incorporation to glycerol backbone and acyl chains of lipids was observed when 13C glucose was used as the source. We could detect (M+1 ~6% of total) labeled 13C in triglycerides from adiposomes isolated from 13C3 leucine labeled MCF7, T47D and ZR75.1 cells. These data indicate that ketogenic amino acids arising from the autophagic breakdown of proteins are the major source of carbons in adiposomal lipids. Additionally, adiposome accumulation was significantly inhibited when cells were treated with autophagy inhibitors indicating that acid induced adiposomogenesis depends on autophagy. Further, we investigated the role of various acid-sensing GPCRs such as OGR1 and TDAG8 in transducing the acid signal. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated depletion of these receptors demonstrated that only OGR1 depletion abrogated acid induced adiposome accumulation and were defective in autophagy. In addition, acid-induced adiposomogenesis required PI3K and pAkt signaling. Hence, accumulation of adiposomes is a highly regulated metabolic process related to storing autophagic products, and appears to be important in cell survival under acidosis. This increased dependence on lipid metabolism reveals novel therapeutic vulnerabilities.
Citation Format: Smitha R. Pillai, Jonathan W. Wojtkowiak, Jonathan Nguyen, Mehdi Damaghi, Marilyn M. Bui, Timothy Garrett, Robert J. Gillies. Acid-induced autophagic protein products are stored as adiposomes in breast cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2395.
Collapse
|
46
|
Evans AJ, Bauer TW, Bui MM, Cornish TC, Duncan H, Glassy EF, Hipp J, McGee RS, Murphy D, Myers C, O'Neill DG, Parwani AV, Rampy BA, Salama ME, Pantanowitz L. US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Whole Slide Imaging for Primary Diagnosis: A Key Milestone Is Reached and New Questions Are Raised. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018; 142:1383-1387. [PMID: 29708429 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0496-cp] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
April 12, 2017 marked a significant day in the evolution of digital pathology in the United States, when the US Food and Drug Administration announced its approval of the Philips IntelliSite Pathology Solution for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology. Although this event is expected to facilitate more widespread adoption of whole slide imaging for clinical applications in the United States, it also raises a number of questions as to the means by which pathologists might choose to incorporate this technology into their clinical practice. This article from the College of American Pathologists Digital Pathology Committee reviews frequently asked questions on this topic and provides answers based on currently available information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Liron Pantanowitz
- From the Laboratory Medicine Program, Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (Dr Evans); the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York (Dr Bauer); the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida (Dr Bui); the Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora (Dr Cornish); Economic and Regulatory Affairs, College of American Pathologists, Washington, DC (Ms Duncan); Affiliated Pathologists Medical Group, Rancho Dominguez, California (Dr Glassy); the Medical Brain Team, Google, San Francisco, California (Dr Hipp); Covance, Indianapolis, Indiana (Dr McGee); the Surveys Department, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois (Mr Murphy); the Department of Pathology, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia (Dr Myers); the Department of Pathology, Manchester Memorial Hospital, Manchester, Connecticut (Dr O'Neill); the Department of Pathology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus (Dr Parwani); the Department of Pathology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin (Dr Rampy); ARUP Laboratories Incorporated, Salt Lake City, Utah (Dr Salama); and the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Pantanowitz)
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Liu Y, Bui MM, Xu B. Urothelial Carcinoma with Squamous Differentiation is Associated with High Tumor Stage and Pelvic Lymph-Node Metastasis. Cancer Control 2018; 24:78-82. [DOI: 10.1177/107327481702400113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yunguang Liu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
- Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, Cytopathology Fellowship Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
- Indian River Medical Center, Vero Beach, Florida
| | - Marilyn M. Bui
- University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, and the Department of Anatomic Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Bo Xu
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Soliman H, Khambati F, Han HS, Ismail-Khan R, Bui MM, Sullivan DM, Antonia S. A phase-1/2 study of adenovirus-p53 transduced dendritic cell vaccine in combination with indoximod in metastatic solid tumors and invasive breast cancer. Oncotarget 2018. [PMID: 29515795 PMCID: PMC5839376 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.24118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase is an enzyme that causes immunosuppression in tumors. Indoximod inhibits the indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase pathway and enhances immunologic responses to dendritic cell (DC) vaccines preclinically. Adenovirus p53 (Ad.p53) is used to generate DC vaccines against p53. A phase-1/2 trial of indoximod with Ad.p53-DC vaccine was conducted. Materials and Methods The phase-1 study combined 7 indoximod dose levels with < 6 Ad.p53-DC vaccinations every 2 weeks. Primary endpoints were maximum-tolerated dose in phase 1 and objective response in phase 2. Flow cytometry measured immune responses. Results Thirty-nine patients were treated. In combination with Ad.p53-DC vaccine, the maximum-tolerated dose of indoximod was 1600 mg twice daily. Attributable toxicities were grade 1–2. Best response was stable disease in 4 patients. Immunologic responses were detected in 7 out of 23 evaluable patients. Median progression-free survival was 13.3 weeks (95% confidence interval, 12.97–21.85) and median overall survival was 20.71 weeks (95% confidence interval, 25.75–46.15). Nine out of 22 patients (40%) benefitted from chemotherapy after vaccination. Median overall survival in chemotherapy responders was 69.4 weeks (30.1–122.1). Conclusions Indoximod 1600 mg twice daily with Ad.p53-DC was well tolerated. There may have been a chemosensitization effect. Future trials should explore combining this treatment with chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hatem Soliman
- Breast Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.,Immunology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Fatema Khambati
- Immunology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hyo S Han
- Breast Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Roohi Ismail-Khan
- Breast Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Anatomic Pathology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Daniel M Sullivan
- Malignant Hematology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Scott Antonia
- Immunology Department, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.,Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Conrad EU, Ganjoo KN, George S, Gonzalez RJ, Heslin MJ, Kane JM, Koon H, Mayerson J, McCarter M, McGarry SV, Meyer C, O'Donnell RJ, Pappo AS, Paz IB, Petersen IA, Pfeifer JD, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Schupak KD, Schwartz HS, Tap WD, Wayne JD, Bergman MA, Scavone J. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2017; 14:758-86. [PMID: 27283169 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare solid tumors of mesenchymal cell origin that display a heterogenous mix of clinical and pathologic characteristics. STS can develop from fat, muscle, nerves, blood vessels, and other connective tissues. The evaluation and treatment of patients with STS requires a multidisciplinary team with demonstrated expertise in the management of these tumors. The complete NCCN Guidelines for Soft Tissue Sarcoma (available at NCCN.org) provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of extremity/superficial trunk/head and neck STS, as well as intra-abdominal/retroperitoneal STS, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, desmoid tumors, and rhabdomyosarcoma. This manuscript discusses guiding principles for the diagnosis and staging of STS and evidence for treatment modalities that include surgery, radiation, chemoradiation, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy.
Collapse
|
50
|
Wei S, Henderson-Jackson E, Qian X, Bui MM. Soft Tissue Tumor Immunohistochemistry Update: Illustrative Examples of Diagnostic Pearls to Avoid Pitfalls. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 141:1072-1091. [PMID: 28745570 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0417-ra] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT - Current 2013 World Health Organization classification of tumors of soft tissue arranges these tumors into 12 groups according to their histogenesis. Tumor behavior is classified as benign, intermediate (locally aggressive), intermediate (rarely metastasizing), and malignant. In our practice, a general approach to reaching a definitive diagnosis of soft tissue tumors is to first evaluate clinicoradiologic, histomorphologic, and cytomorphologic features of the tumor to generate some pertinent differential diagnoses. These include the potential line of histogenesis and whether the tumor is benign or malignant, and low or high grade. Although molecular/genetic testing is increasingly finding its applications in characterizing soft tissue tumors, currently immunohistochemistry still not only plays an indispensable role in defining tumor histogenesis, but also serves as a surrogate for underlining molecular/genetic alterations. Objective- To provide an overview focusing on the current concepts in the classification and diagnosis of soft tissue tumors, incorporating immunohistochemistry. This article uses examples to discuss how to use the traditional and new immunohistochemical markers for the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Practical diagnostic pearls, summary tables, and figures are used to show how to avoid diagnostic pitfalls. DATA SOURCES - Data were obtained from pertinent peer-reviewed English-language literature and the authors' first-hand experience as bone and soft tissue pathologists. CONCLUSIONS - -The ultimate goal for a pathologist is to render a specific diagnosis that provides diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic information to guide patient care. Immunohistochemistry is integral to the diagnosis and management of soft tissue tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Marilyn M Bui
- From the Department of Pathology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (Dr Wei); the Departments of Anatomic Pathology (Drs Henderson-Jackson and Bui) and Sarcoma (Dr Bui), Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida; Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Qian); and the Department of Cytopathology Fellowship, Morsani College of Medicine at the University of South Florida, Tampa (Dr Bui)
| |
Collapse
|