1
|
Zeng C, Kaur MN, Malapati SH, Liu JB, Bryant AS, Meyers PM, Bates DW, McCleary NJ, Pusic AL, Edelen MO. Patterns of Social Needs Predict Quality-of-Life and Healthcare Utilization Outcomes in Patients from a Large Hospital System. J Gen Intern Med 2024:10.1007/s11606-024-08788-6. [PMID: 38710869 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08788-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unmet social needs (SNs) often coexist in distinct patterns within specific population subgroups, yet these patterns are understudied. OBJECTIVE To identify patterns of social needs (PSNs) and characterize their associations with health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) and healthcare utilization (HCU). DESIGN Observational study using data on SNs screening, HRQoL (i.e., low mental and physical health), and 90-day HCU (i.e., emergency visits and hospital admission). Among patients with any SNs, latent class analysis was conducted to identify unique PSNs. For all patients and by race and age subgroups, compared with no SNs, we calculated the risks of poor HRQoL and time to first HCU following SNs screening for each PSN. PATIENTS Adult patients undergoing SNs screening at the Mass General Brigham healthcare system in Massachusetts, United States, between March 2018 and January 2023. MAIN MEASURES SNs included: education, employment, family care, food, housing, medication, transportation, and ability to pay for household utilities. HRQoL was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global-10. KEY RESULTS Six unique PSNs were identified: "high number of social needs," "food and utility access," "employment needs," "interested in education," "housing instability," and "transportation barriers." In 14,230 patients with HRQoL data, PSNs increased the risks of poor mental health, with risk ratios ranging from 1.07(95%CI:1.01-1.13) to 1.80(95%CI:1.74-1.86). Analysis of poor physical health yielded similar findings, except that the "interested in education" showed a mild protective effect (0.97[95%CI:0.94-1.00]). In 105,110 patients, PSNs increased the risk of 90-day HCU, with hazard ratios ranging from 1.09(95%CI:0.99-1.21) to 1.70(95%CI:1.52-1.90). Findings were generally consistent in subgroup analyses by race and age. CONCLUSIONS Certain SNs coexist in distinct patterns and result in poorer HRQoL and more HCU. Understanding PSNs allows policymakers, public health practitioners, and social workers to identify at-risk patients and implement integrated, system-wide, and community-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengbo Zeng
- Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Manraj N Kaur
- Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sri Harshini Malapati
- Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jason B Liu
- Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allison S Bryant
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter M Meyers
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W Bates
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Clinical and Quality Analysis, Information Systems, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea L Pusic
- Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maria O Edelen
- Patient-Reported Outcomes, Value and Experience (PROVE) Center, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Malapati SH, Edelen MO, Kaur MN, Zeng C, Ortega G, McCleary NJ, Hubbell H, Meyers P, Bryant AS, Sisodia RC, Pusic AL. Social Determinants of Health Needs and Health-related Quality of Life Among Surgical Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of 8512 Patients. Ann Surg 2024; 279:443-449. [PMID: 37800351 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess associations between social determinants of health (SDOH) needs and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among surgical patients. BACKGROUND Despite the profound impact of SDOH on health outcomes, studies examining the effect of SDOH needs on HRQOL among surgical patients are limited. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted using responses from the SDOH needs assessment and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems Global Health instrument of adults seen in surgical clinics at a single institution. Patient characteristics including socioeconomic status (insurance type, education level, and employment status) were extracted. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of global health scores. RESULTS A total of 8512 surgical patients (mean age: 55.6±15.8 years) were included. 25.2% of patients reported one or more SDOH needs. The likelihood of reporting at least one SDOH need varied by patient characteristics and socioeconomic status variables. In fully adjusted regression models, food insecurity [odds ratio (OR), 1.53; 95% CI, 1.38-1.70 and OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.22-1.81, respectively], housing instability (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.12-1.43 and OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.13-1.70, respectively) lack of transportation (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.27-1.68 and OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.00-1.57, respectively), and unmet medication needs (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13-1.52 and OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.28-2.03, respectively) were independent predictors of poor physical and mental health. CONCLUSIONS SDOH needs are independent predictors of poor patient-reported physical and mental health among surgical patients. Assessing and addressing SDOH needs should be prioritized in health care settings and by policymakers to improve HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sri Harshini Malapati
- The Patient-Reported Outcome, Value and Experience Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Maria O Edelen
- The Patient-Reported Outcome, Value and Experience Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Manraj N Kaur
- The Patient-Reported Outcome, Value and Experience Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Chengbo Zeng
- The Patient-Reported Outcome, Value and Experience Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Gezzer Ortega
- The Patient-Reported Outcome, Value and Experience Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Harrison Hubbell
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA
| | - Peter Meyers
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA
| | - Allison S Bryant
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rachel C Sisodia
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrea L Pusic
- The Patient-Reported Outcome, Value and Experience Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huffman BM, Singh H, Ali LR, Horick N, Wang SJ, Hoffman MT, Metayer KA, Murray S, Bird A, Abrams TA, Biller LH, Chan JA, Meyerhardt JA, McCleary NJ, Goessling W, Patel AK, Wisch JS, Yurgelun MB, Mouw K, Reardon B, Van Allen EM, Zerillo JA, Clark JW, Parikh A, Mayer RJ, Schlechter B, Ng K, Kumar S, Del Vecchio Fitz C, Kuperwasser C, Hanna GJ, Coveler AL, Rubinson DA, Welsh EL, Pfaff K, Rodig S, Dougan SK, Cleary JM. Biomarkers of pembrolizumab efficacy in advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma: analysis of a phase II clinical trial and a cohort of long-term responders. J Immunother Cancer 2024; 12:e008436. [PMID: 38272561 PMCID: PMC10824013 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent trials suggest that programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-directed immunotherapy may be beneficial for some patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma and biomarkers predictive of response are greatly needed. METHODS This multicenter phase II clinical trial (NCT02919969) enrolled patients with metastatic or locally advanced incurable anal squamous cell carcinoma (n=32). Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint of the trial was objective response rate (ORR). Exploratory objectives included analysis of potential predictive biomarkers including assessment of tumor-associated immune cell populations with multichannel immunofluorescence and analysis of circulating tumor tissue modified viral-human papillomavirus DNA (TTMV-HPV DNA) using serially collected blood samples. To characterize the clinical features of long-term responders, we combined data from our prospective trial with a retrospective cohort of patients with anal cancer treated with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (n=18). RESULTS In the phase II study, the ORR to pembrolizumab monotherapy was 9.4% and the median progression-free survival was 2.2 months. Despite the high level of HPV positivity observed with circulating TTMV-HPV DNA testing, the majority of patients had low levels of tumor-associated CD8+PD-1+ T cells on pretreatment biopsy. Patients who benefited from pembrolizumab had decreasing TTMV-HPV DNA scores and a complete responder's TTMV-HPV DNA became undetectable. Long-term pembrolizumab responses were observed in one patient from the trial (5.3 years) and three patients (2.5, 6, and 8 years) from the retrospective cohort. Long-term responders had HPV-positive tumors, lacked liver metastases, and achieved a radiological complete response. CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab has durable efficacy in a rare subset of anal cancers. However, despite persistence of HPV infection, indicated by circulating HPV DNA, most advanced anal cancers have low numbers of tumor-associated CD8+PD-1+ T cells and are resistant to pembrolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon M Huffman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Harshabad Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lestat R Ali
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nora Horick
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - S Jennifer Wang
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Megan T Hoffman
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katherine A Metayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shayla Murray
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexandra Bird
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas A Abrams
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leah H Biller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer A Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wolfram Goessling
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anuj K Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Wisch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew B Yurgelun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kent Mouw
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Eliezer M Van Allen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica A Zerillo
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Aparna Parikh
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin Schlechter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | - Glenn J Hanna
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew L Coveler
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Douglas A Rubinson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Emma L Welsh
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathleen Pfaff
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Scott Rodig
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephanie K Dougan
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James M Cleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Doolin JW, Haakenstad EK, Neville BA, Lipsitz SR, Zhang S, Cleveland JLF, Hiruy S, Hassett MJ, Revette A, Schrag D, Basch E, McCleary NJ. Feasibility of Weekly Electronic Health Record-Embedded Patient-Reported Outcomes for Patients Starting Oral Cancer-Directed Therapy. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2023; 7:e2300043. [PMID: 37788407 DOI: 10.1200/cci.23.00043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine the feasibility of integrating a symptom management platform into the electronic health record (EHR) using electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) during oral cancer-directed therapy (OCDT) and explore the impact of prompting oncology nurse navigators (ONNs) to respond to severe symptomatic adverse events (SAEs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Adults prescribed OCDT at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute were consecutively invited to participate. Participants received weekly messages to complete ePROs. The first half enrolled in a passive (P) group where ePROs responses could be viewed anytime, but outreach was not expected. The second half enrolled in an active (A) group where severe SAEs prompted emails to ONNs for outreach within 1 business day. Feasibility was the proportion of participants completing ≥2 ePROs during the first 30 days. Participants were followed for up to 90 days. RESULTS From June 25, 2019, to August 18, 2021, 100 participants enrolled, and 96 remained enrolled for at least 30 days. Overall, average age was 59 years, 80% female, and 9% used the platform in Spanish. Twenty-two A (45%) and 27 P (57%) participants met the feasibility threshold (P = .26). ePROs returned at 30 days were similar (P = .50): 0 ePROs 17 A, 13 P; 1 ePRO 10 A, 7 P; 2 ePROs 3 A, 5 P; 3 ePROs 1 A, 4 P; 4 ePROs 7 A, 8 P; and 5 ePROs 11 A, 10 P. Documented telephone encounters at 30 days were similar (109 A, 101 P; P = .86). CONCLUSION EHR-embedded ePROs administered weekly for people on OCDT was feasible, although many went incomplete. ePRO completion was not clearly affected by nursing calls for severe SAEs. Future efforts will investigate improving engagement and addressing symptoms proactively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim W Doolin
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ellana K Haakenstad
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Bridget A Neville
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Womens' Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Stu R Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Womens' Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Sunyi Zhang
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Semegne Hiruy
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Anna Revette
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Ethan Basch
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cardot-Ruffino V, Bollenrucher N, Delius L, Wang SJ, Brais LK, Remland J, Keheler CE, Sullivan KM, Abrams TA, Biller LH, Enzinger PC, McCleary NJ, Patel AK, Rubinson DA, Schlechter B, Slater S, Yurgelun MB, Cleary JM, Perez K, Dougan M, Ng K, Wolpin BM, Singh H, Dougan SK. G-CSF rescue of FOLFIRINOX-induced neutropenia leads to systemic immune suppression in mice and humans. J Immunother Cancer 2023; 11:e006589. [PMID: 37344102 PMCID: PMC10314699 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-006589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is routinely administered for prophylaxis or treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Chronic myelopoiesis and granulopoiesis in patients with cancer has been shown to induce immature monocytes and neutrophils that contribute to both systemic and local immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment. The effect of recombinant G-CSF (pegfilgrastim or filgrastim) on the production of myeloid-derived suppressive cells is unknown. Here we examined patients with pancreatic cancer, a disease known to induce myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and for which pegfilgrastim is routinely administered concurrently with FOLFIRINOX but not with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens. METHODS Serial blood was collected from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma newly starting on FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/n(ab)paclitaxel combination chemotherapy regimens. Neutrophil and monocyte frequencies were determined by flow cytometry from whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cell fractions. Serum cytokines were evaluated pretreatment and on-treatment. Patient serum was used in vitro to differentiate healthy donor monocytes to MDSCs as measured by downregulation of major histocompatibility complex II (HLA-DR) and the ability to suppress T-cell proliferation in vitro. C57BL/6 female mice with pancreatic tumors were treated with FOLFIRINOX with or without recombinant G-CSF to directly assess the role of G-CSF on induction of immunosuppressive neutrophils. RESULTS Patients receiving FOLFIRINOX with pegfilgrastim had increased serum G-CSF that correlated with an induction of granulocytic MDSCs. This increase was not observed in patients receiving gemcitabine/n(ab)paclitaxel without pegfilgrastim. Interleukin-18 also significantly increased in serum on FOLFIRINOX treatment. Patient serum could induce MDSCs as determined by in vitro functional assays, and this suppressive effect increased with on-treatment serum. Induction of MDSCs in vitro could be recapitulated by addition of recombinant G-CSF to healthy serum, indicating that G-CSF is sufficient for MDSC differentiation. In mice, neutrophils isolated from spleen of G-CSF-treated mice were significantly more capable of suppressing T-cell proliferation. CONCLUSIONS Pegfilgrastim use contributes to immune suppression in both humans and mice with pancreatic cancer. These results suggest that use of recombinant G-CSF as supportive care, while critically important for mitigating neutropenia, may complicate efforts to induce antitumor immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoire Cardot-Ruffino
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Immunology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Naima Bollenrucher
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Luisa Delius
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - S Jennifer Wang
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lauren K Brais
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joshua Remland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - C Elizabeth Keheler
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Keri M Sullivan
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas A Abrams
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leah H Biller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter C Enzinger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anuj K Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Douglas A Rubinson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Benjamin Schlechter
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sarah Slater
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew B Yurgelun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James M Cleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kimberly Perez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Dougan
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Harshabad Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stephanie K Dougan
- Department of Cancer Immunology and Virology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Immunology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tian J, Chen JH, Chao SX, Pelka K, Giannakis M, Hess J, Burke K, Jorgji V, Sindurakar P, Braverman J, Mehta A, Oka T, Huang M, Lieb D, Spurrell M, Allen JN, Abrams TA, Clark JW, Enzinger AC, Enzinger PC, Klempner SJ, McCleary NJ, Meyerhardt JA, Ryan DP, Yurgelun MB, Kanter K, Van Seventer EE, Baiev I, Chi G, Jarnagin J, Bradford WB, Wong E, Michel AG, Fetter IJ, Siravegna G, Gemma AJ, Sharpe A, Demehri S, Leary R, Campbell CD, Yilmaz O, Getz GA, Parikh AR, Hacohen N, Corcoran RB. Combined PD-1, BRAF and MEK inhibition in BRAF V600E colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial. Nat Med 2023; 29:458-466. [PMID: 36702949 PMCID: PMC9941044 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-02181-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
While BRAF inhibitor combinations with EGFR and/or MEK inhibitors have improved clinical efficacy in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer (CRC), response rates remain low and lack durability. Preclinical data suggest that BRAF/MAPK pathway inhibition may augment the tumor immune response. We performed a proof-of-concept single-arm phase 2 clinical trial of combined PD-1, BRAF and MEK inhibition with sparatlizumab (PDR001), dabrafenib and trametinib in 37 patients with BRAFV600E CRC. The primary end point was overall response rate, and the secondary end points were progression-free survival, disease control rate, duration of response and overall survival. The study met its primary end point with a confirmed response rate (24.3% in all patients; 25% in microsatellite stable patients) and durability that were favorable relative to historical controls of BRAF-targeted combinations alone. Single-cell RNA sequencing of 23 paired pretreatment and day 15 on-treatment tumor biopsies revealed greater induction of tumor cell-intrinsic immune programs and more complete MAPK inhibition in patients with better clinical outcome. Immune program induction in matched patient-derived organoids correlated with the degree of MAPK inhibition. These data suggest a potential tumor cell-intrinsic mechanism of cooperativity between MAPK inhibition and immune response, warranting further clinical evaluation of optimized targeted and immune combinations in CRC. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03668431.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Tian
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan H Chen
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Sherry X Chao
- The Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Karin Pelka
- The Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Gladstone-UCSF Institute of Genomic Immunology, Gladstone Institutes Department of Microbiology and Immunology, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marios Giannakis
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julian Hess
- The Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Kelly Burke
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Vjola Jorgji
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Princy Sindurakar
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan Braverman
- The Koch Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Arnav Mehta
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- The Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Tomonori Oka
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mei Huang
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Lieb
- The Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Maxwell Spurrell
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jill N Allen
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas A Abrams
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea C Enzinger
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter C Enzinger
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samuel J Klempner
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - David P Ryan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew B Yurgelun
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katie Kanter
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily E Van Seventer
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Islam Baiev
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Gary Chi
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joy Jarnagin
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William B Bradford
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Edmond Wong
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexa G Michel
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Isobel J Fetter
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giulia Siravegna
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Angelo J Gemma
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Arlene Sharpe
- Department of Immunology, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shadmehr Demehri
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rebecca Leary
- Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Omer Yilmaz
- The Koch Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Gad A Getz
- The Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Aparna R Parikh
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nir Hacohen
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- The Broad Institute of Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| | - Ryan B Corcoran
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Keller RB, Mazor T, Sholl L, Aguirre AJ, Singh H, Sethi N, Bass A, Nagaraja AK, Brais LK, Hill E, Hennessey C, Cusick M, Del Vecchio Fitz C, Zwiesler Z, Siegel E, Ovalle A, Trukhanov P, Hansel J, Shapiro GI, Abrams TA, Biller LH, Chan JA, Cleary JM, Corsello SM, Enzinger AC, Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ, McCleary NJ, Meyerhardt JA, Ng K, Patel AK, Perez KJ, Rahma OE, Rubinson DA, Wisch JS, Yurgelun MB, Hassett MJ, MacConaill L, Schrag D, Cerami E, Wolpin BM, Nowak JA, Giannakis M. Programmatic Precision Oncology Decision Support for Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2200342. [PMID: 36634297 PMCID: PMC9929103 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE With the growing number of available targeted therapeutics and molecular biomarkers, the optimal care of patients with cancer now depends on a comprehensive understanding of the rapidly evolving landscape of precision oncology, which can be challenging for oncologists to navigate alone. METHODS We developed and implemented a precision oncology decision support system, GI TARGET, (Gastrointestinal Treatment Assistance Regarding Genomic Evaluation of Tumors) within the Gastrointestinal Cancer Center at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. With a multidisciplinary team, we systematically reviewed tumor molecular profiling for GI tumors and provided molecularly informed clinical recommendations, which included identifying appropriate clinical trials aided by the computational matching platform MatchMiner, suggesting targeted therapy options on or off the US Food and Drug Administration-approved label, and consideration of additional or orthogonal molecular testing. RESULTS We reviewed genomic data and provided clinical recommendations for 506 patients with GI cancer who underwent tumor molecular profiling between January and June 2019 and determined follow-up using the electronic health record. Summary reports were provided to 19 medical oncologists for patients with colorectal (n = 198, 39%), pancreatic (n = 124, 24%), esophagogastric (n = 67, 13%), biliary (n = 40, 8%), and other GI cancers. We recommended ≥ 1 precision medicine clinical trial for 80% (406 of 506) of patients, leading to 24 enrollments. We recommended on-label and off-label targeted therapies for 6% (28 of 506) and 25% (125 of 506) of patients, respectively. Recommendations for additional or orthogonal testing were made for 42% (211 of 506) of patients. CONCLUSION The integration of precision medicine in routine cancer care through a dedicated multidisciplinary molecular tumor board is scalable and sustainable, and implementation of precision oncology recommendations has clinical utility for patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel B. Keller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Tali Mazor
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Lynette Sholl
- Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrew J. Aguirre
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA
| | - Harshabad Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nilay Sethi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Adam Bass
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ankur K. Nagaraja
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Lauren K. Brais
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Emma Hill
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Connor Hennessey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Margaret Cusick
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Zachary Zwiesler
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Ethan Siegel
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Andrea Ovalle
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Pavel Trukhanov
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Jason Hansel
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Geoffrey I. Shapiro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas A. Abrams
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Leah H. Biller
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer A. Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - James M. Cleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Steven M. Corsello
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrea C. Enzinger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Peter C. Enzinger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Robert J. Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nadine J. McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anuj K. Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kimberley J. Perez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Osama E. Rahma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Douglas A. Rubinson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey S. Wisch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew B. Yurgelun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Michael J. Hassett
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Laura MacConaill
- Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ethan Cerami
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Brian M. Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan A. Nowak
- Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, Brigham & Women's Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Marios Giannakis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA,Marios Giannakis, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute & Harvard Medical School, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA 02215; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kimmick G, Sedrak MS, Williams G, McCleary NJ, Rosko AE, Berenberg JL, Freedman RA, Smith ML, Ahmed A, Muss HB, Chow S, Dale W. Infrastructure to Support Accrual of Older Adults to National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2022; 2022:151-158. [PMID: 36519814 PMCID: PMC9753220 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
As part of ongoing efforts to meaningfully improve recruitment, enrollment, and accrual of older adults into cancer clinical trials, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored a workshop with experts across the country entitled Engaging Older Adults in the NCI Clinical Trials Network: Challenges and Opportunities. Three working groups, including Study Design, Infrastructure, and Stakeholders, were formed, who worked together to offer synergistic improvements in the system. Here, we summarize the workshop discussions of the Infrastructure Working Group, whose goal was to address infrastructural challenges, identify underlying resources, and offer solutions to facilitate accrual of older adults into cancer clinical trials. Based on preconference work and workshop discussions, four key recommendations to strengthen NCI infrastructure were proposed: 1) further centralize resources and expertise; 2) provide training for clinical research staff; (3) develop common data elements; and 4) evaluate what works and does not work. These recommendations provide a strategy to improve the infrastructure to enroll more older adults in cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen Kimmick
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center/Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Mina S Sedrak
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Grant Williams
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes & Survivorship and Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ashley E Rosko
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Berenberg
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Hawaii Minority Underserved National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Rachel A Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Amina Ahmed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gyn Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hyman B Muss
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Selina Chow
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - William Dale
- Department of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
McCleary NJ, Haakenstad EK, Cleveland JLF, Manni M, Hassett MJ, Schrag D. Framework for integrating electronic patient-reported data in routine cancer care: an Oncology Intake Questionnaire. JAMIA Open 2022; 5:ooac064. [PMID: 35898610 PMCID: PMC9315161 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
As part of ongoing implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome tools at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, here we describe the development of the electronic New Patient Intake Questionnaire.
Materials and Methods
The original New Patient Intake Questionnaire includes a review of symptoms, oncology history, family history, health behaviors, health and social status, health literacy and numeracy, which was modified for integration into the EHR using content determination, build and configuration, implementation, analytics, and interventions. The engagement of key stakeholders, including patients, clinical staff, and providers, throughout the development and deployment of the electronic Questionnaire was crucial to producing a successful tool. Continual modifications based on input of stakeholders (such as mode of tool deployment) were made to ensure the utility and usability of the tool for both patients and providers.
Results
Implementation of the EHR-integrated electronic New Patient Intake Questionnaire improved collection of the PRD by increasing questionnaire accessibility for patients, while also providing all available data to clinicians and researchers. Careful consideration of the content and configuration of the questionnaire allowed for a successful, institute-wide implementation of the tool.
Discussion
This effort demonstrates the feasibility of implementation of a system-wide electronic questionnaire, emphasizing the importance of iterative refinement to create a tool that is both patient-centric and usable for clinicians.
Conclusions
The electronic New Patient Intake Questionnaire allows for systematic collection of the PRD, which should benefit cancer care outcomes through innovative care delivery and healthcare interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J McCleary
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Michael Manni
- Information & Analytics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael J Hassett
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deb Schrag
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute , Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Garcia Farina E, Rowell J, Revette A, Haakenstad EK, Cleveland JLF, Allende R, Hassett M, Schrag D, McCleary NJ. Barriers to Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Among Patients with Cancer and Limited English Proficiency. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2223898. [PMID: 35867056 PMCID: PMC9308052 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Often electronic tools are built with English proficient (EP) patients in mind. Cancer patients with limited English proficiency (LEP) experience gaps in care and are at risk for excess toxic effects if they are unable to effectively communicate with their care team. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether electronic patient-reported outcome tools (ePROs) built to improve health outcomes for EP patients might also be acceptable for LEP patients in the context of oral cancer-directed therapies (OCDT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This qualitative study was conducted at a single National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. In 2019, English-speaking and Spanish-speaking LEP patients with cancer receiving oral chemotherapies were recruited to participate in a qualitative focus group examining patient attitudes toward ePROs and electronic tools that are used to manage adherence and symptoms related to oral therapies. Six focus groups were held for EP patients and 1 for Spanish-speaking LEP patients. LEP was defined as patients who self-identified as needing an interpreter to navigate the health care system. Data analysis was performed April through June of 2019. EXPOSURES Enrolled patients participated in a focus group lasting approximately 90 minutes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The perspectives of patients with cancer treated with oral chemotherapies on integrating ePROs into their care management. RESULTS Among the 46 participants included in the study, 46 (100%) were White, 10 (22%) were Latinx Spanish-speaking, 43 (93%) were female, and 37 (80%) were aged at least 50 years or older. Among the 6 focus groups with 6 to 8 EP patients (ranging from 6 to 8 participants) and 1 focus group with 10 Spanish-speaking LEP patients, this qualitative study found that EP and LEP patients had different levels of acceptability of using technology and ePRO tools to manage their OCDT. EP patients felt generally positive toward OCDT and were not generally interested in using electronic tools to manage their care. LEP patients generally disliked OCDT and welcomed the use of technology for health management, particularly when addressing gaps in symptom management by their oncology clinicians. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although most electronic interventions target EP patients, these findings reveal the willingness of LEP patients to participate in technology-based interventions. Expanding ePROs to LEP patients may help to manage gaps in communication about treatment and potential adverse events because of the willingness of LEP patients to use ePRO tools to manage their health. This qualitative assessment is a strategic step in determining the resources needed to narrow the digital health gap and extend the value of PROs to the LEP oncology population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anna Revette
- Survey and Data Management Core, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Rachel Allende
- Social Work, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael Hassett
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brown JC, Brighton E, Campbell N, McCleary NJ, Abrams TA, Cleary JM, Enzinger PC, Ng K, Rubinson D, Wolpin BM, Yurgelun MB, Meyerhardt JA. Physical activity in older adults with metastatic gastrointestinal cancer: a pilot and feasibility study. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2022; 8:e001353. [PMID: 35722047 PMCID: PMC9152931 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study determined the feasibility of delivering a 12-week structured physical activity programme during chemotherapy to older adults recently diagnosed with metastatic gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Methods This study used a single-cohort design. Older adults (aged ≥65 years) diagnosed with metastatic oesophageal, gastric, pancreatic or colorectal cancer who planned to initiate chemotherapy were enrolled. The physical activity programme included a combination of aerobic, flexibility, strength and balance modalities delivered by a certified cancer exercise trainer during chemotherapy infusion appointments, then translated and sustained at home by participants. The co-primary endpoints included: (1) accrual of 20 participants in 12 months and (2) physical activity adherence of ≥50%. Results Between March and October 2018, 29 participants were screened, and 20 were enrolled within 12 months (recruitment rate: 69% (90% CI: 55% to 83%); p<0.001), meeting the first co-primary endpoint. The median age of participants was 73.3 years (IQR: 69.3-77.2). At week 12, 67% (90% CI: 48% to 85%) of participants adhered to ≥50% of the prescribed physical activity (p=0.079 (statistically significant)), meeting the second co-primary endpoint. From baseline to week 12, accelerometer-measured light-intensity and moderate-intensity to vigorous-intensity physical activity increased by 307.4 (95% CI: 152.6 to 462.2; p<0.001) and 25.0 min per week (95% CI: 9.9 to 40.1; p=0.001), respectively. There were no serious or unexpected adverse events. The median overall survival was 16.2 months (8.4-22.4). Conclusion These results establish the feasibility of a larger scale randomised controlled trial that enrols older adults with metastatic GI cancer and delivers a structured physical activity programme during chemotherapy. Trial registration number NCT03331406.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin C Brown
- Cancer Metabolism Program, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA.,Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Elizabeth Brighton
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy Campbell
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas A Abrams
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James M Cleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter C Enzinger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Douglas Rubinson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew B Yurgelun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Odai-Afotey A, Haakenstad E, Zhang S, Neville BA, Lipsitz S, McCleary NJ. Abstract 5939: Feasibility of systemic SDOH collection and associated resource utilization at a large academic cancer center. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-5939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The WHO defines social determinants of health (SDoH) as “the conditions in which people are born, grow, live and age” which includes factors such as housing and food insecurity, employment, and social support and can account for 30-55% of health outcomes. Addressing unmet SDoH needs may reduce interruptions to cancer care caused by ED visits and hospitalizations (EDH). We aimed to determine feasibility of systematic patient-reported SDoH collection at a large academic cancer center and association of unmet SDoH needs with EDH.METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of SDoH needs among new oncology patient (pt) consults from 5/15-9/21at Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DCFI). Pts completed an intake questionnaire including demographic, disease, as well as SDOH needs on a dichotomous or 5-point Likert scale, specifically health literacy (“how confident are you in filling out medical forms?”), health numeracy (“how confident are you in understanding medical statistics?”), financial distress (“how difficult is it for you, or your family, to meet monthly payments on your/your family’s bills?”) and social isolation (“do you currently live alone?”). We ran bivariate and multivariable models on the association between demographics, SDoH and EDH within 30 days of initial oncology visit using robust generalized estimating equations controlling for clustering by consult provider. RESULTS: 125,997new consults were seen from 05/15-09//21, of which 20,913 completed the intake questionnaire and were alive at 30 days of consult. Of those pts, most were female (60%), aged 40-64 (50%), White (90%), non-Hispanic (84%), primarily English-speaking (9%) and 7% had an EDH within 30 days of their 1st outpatient visit. The most reported SDOH need was limited health numeracy (26%). In bivariate analysis, factors associated with ED visits included: limited English proficiency lung or GU/GYN cancer, living > 25 mi.from DFCI, and limited health literacy and numeracy (all p<0.05). Demographics associated with hospitalizations included: White race and English as primary language (EPL) (both p<0.05). Multivariable analysis showed female gender (OR 1.53, p < 0.01), lung (OR 3.22*) and GU/GYN (OR 2.21*) (p < 0.05 for both) cancer, and living > 25 mi from DFCI (OR 2.50, p < 0.0001) were associated with increased likelihood of ED visit while EPL (OR 1.80, p<0.05) and GU/GYN (OR 1.65, p<0.01*) cancer were associated with increased likelihood of hospitalization.CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to systematically screen for unmet SDoH which are associated with increased frequency of ED visits. Differences in characteristics associated with ED vs. hospitalization could indicate possible bias or suggest SDoH needs as a reason for avoidance of costly medical care. Further study will expand both the content and site of SDoH data collection, non-English languages used for data collection, and measure impact of resource matching to reduce disruptions to cancer care.
*Compared to breast cancer
Citation Format: Ashley Odai-Afotey, Ellana Haakenstad, Sunyi Zhang, Bridget A. Neville, Stuart Lipsitz, Nadine J. McCleary. Feasibility of systemic SDOH collection and associated resource utilization at a large academic cancer center [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5939.
Collapse
|
13
|
McCleary NJ, Zhang S, Ma C, Ou FS, Bainter TM, Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, O'Neil BH, Polite BN, Hochster HS, Atkins JN, Goldberg RM, Ng K, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, O'Reilly EM, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. Age and comorbidity association with survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer: CALGB 80405 analysis. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:469-479. [PMID: 35105521 PMCID: PMC9058225 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the interaction of comorbidities and age on survival outcomes in colorectal cancer (mCRC), nor how comorbidities impact treatment tolerance. METHODS We utilized a cohort of 1345 mCRC patients enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405, a multicenter phase III trial of fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab, cetuximab or both. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 toxicities assessed using NCI CTCAE v.3.0. Participants completed a questionnaire, including a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index. Adjusted Cox and logistic regression models tested associations of comorbidities and age on the endpoints. RESULTS In CALGB/SWOG 80405, 1095 (81%) subjects were < 70 years and >70 250 (19%). Presence of ≥1 comorbidity was not significantly associated with either OS (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.96-1.25) or PFS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91-1.16). Compared to subjects <70 with no comorbidities, OS was non-significantly inferior for ≥70 with no comorbidities (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.98-1.49) and significantly inferior for ≥70 with at least one comorbidity (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.22-1.86). There were no significant associations or interactions between age or comorbidity with PFS. Comorbidities were not associated with treatment-related toxicities. Age ≥ 70 was associated with greater risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicities (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.50-3.09, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Among participants in a clinical trial of combination chemotherapy for mCRC, presence of older age with comorbidities was associated with worse OS but not PFS. The association of age with toxicity suggests additional factors of care should be measured in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J McCleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Sui Zhang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Chao Ma
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Tiffany M Bainter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | | | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Federico Innocenti
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Blase N Polite
- Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Howard S Hochster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Brunswick, NJ, United States of America
| | - James N Atkins
- Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, CCOP, Goldsboro, NC, United States of America
| | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, WV, United States of America
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center and Smillow Cancer Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
McCleary NJ, Harmsen WS, Haakenstad E, Cleary JM, Meyerhardt JA, Zalcberg J, Adams R, Grothey A, Sobrero AF, Van Cutsem E, Goldberg RM, Peeters M, Tabernero J, Seymour M, Saltz LB, Giantonio BJ, Arnold D, Rothenberg ML, Koopman M, Schmoll HJ, Pitot HC, Hoff PM, Tebbutt N, Masi G, Souglakos J, Bokemeyer C, Heinemann V, Yoshino T, Chibaudel B, deGramont A, Shi Q, Lichtman SM. Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Outcomes by Age Among ARCAD First- and Second-Line Clinical Trials. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2022; 6:pkac014. [PMID: 35603849 PMCID: PMC8935011 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkac014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated the time to progression (TTP) and survival outcomes of second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer among adults aged 70 years and older compared with younger adults following progression on first-line clinical trials. METHODS Associations between clinical and disease characteristics, time to initial progression, and rate of receipt of second-line therapy were evaluated. TTP and overall survival (OS) were compared between older and younger adults in first- and second-line trials by Cox regression, adjusting for age, sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, number of metastatic sites and presence of metastasis in the lung, liver, or peritoneum. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Older adults comprised 16.4% of patients on first-line trials (870 total older adults aged >70 years; 4419 total younger adults aged ≤70 years, on first-line trials). Older adults and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status >0 were less likely to receive second-line therapy than younger adults. Odds of receiving second-line therapy decreased by 11% for each additional decade of life in multivariable analysis (odds ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval = 1.02 to 1.21, P = .01). Older and younger adults enrolled in second-line trials experienced similar median TTP and median OS (median TTP = 5.1 vs 5.2 months, respectively; median OS = 11.6 vs 12.4 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Older adults were less likely to receive second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, though we did not observe a statistical difference in survival outcomes vs younger adults following second-line therapy. Further study should examine factors affecting decisions to treat older adults with second-line therapy. Inclusion of geriatric assessment may provide better criteria regarding the risks and benefits of second-line therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J McCleary
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - William S Harmsen
- Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ellana Haakenstad
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James M Cleary
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Richard Adams
- Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - Axel Grothey
- West Cancer Center and Research Institute, OneOncology, Germantown, TN, USA
| | | | | | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Marc Peeters
- Department of Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Josep Tabernero
- Vall d’Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Institute of Oncology Barcelona-Quiron, UVic-UCC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matt Seymour
- NIHR Clinical Research Network, Leeds, UK
- St. James’s Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Bruce J Giantonio
- Perelman School of Medicine Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dirk Arnold
- Instituto CUF de Oncologia, Lisbon, Portugal
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Urtrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hans-Joachim Schmoll
- Klinik fur Innere Med IV, University Clinic Halle (Saale), Halle, Germany
- Martin Luther University, Halle, Germany
| | - Henry C Pitot
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Paulo M Hoff
- Centro de Oncologia de Brasilia do Sirio Libanes-Unidade Lago Sul, Siro Libanes, Brazil
- Universidade de São Paulo Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Niall Tebbutt
- University of Sydney Medical School, Sydney, Australia
- Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gianluca Masi
- Department of Oncology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - John Souglakos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | | | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | | | - Benoist Chibaudel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Franco-Britannique, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - Aimery deGramont
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Franco-Britannique, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - Qian Shi
- Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Stetson PD, McCleary NJ, Osterman T, Ramchandran K, Tevaarwerk A, Wong T, Sugalski JM, Akerley W, Mercurio A, Zachariah FJ, Yamzon J, Stillman RC, Gabriel PE, Heinrichs T, Kerrigan K, Patel SB, Gilbert SM, Weiss E. Adoption of Patient-Generated Health Data in Oncology: A Report From the NCCN EHR Oncology Advisory Group. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2022; 20:jnccn21244. [PMID: 35042190 PMCID: PMC10961646 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Collecting, monitoring, and responding to patient-generated health data (PGHD) are associated with improved quality of life and patient satisfaction, and possibly with improved patient survival in oncology. However, the current state of adoption, types of PGHD collected, and degree of integration into electronic health records (EHRs) is unknown. METHODS The NCCN EHR Oncology Advisory Group formed a Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Workgroup to perform an assessment and provide recommendations for cancer centers, researchers, and EHR vendors to advance the collection and use of PGHD in oncology. The issues were evaluated via a survey of NCCN Member Institutions. Questions were designed to assess the current state of PGHD collection, including how, what, and where PGHD are collected. Additionally, detailed questions about governance and data integration into EHRs were asked. RESULTS Of 28 Member Institutions surveyed, 23 responded. The collection and use of PGHD is widespread among NCCN Members Institutions (96%). Most centers (90%) embed at least some PGHD into the EHR, although challenges remain, as evidenced by 88% of respondents reporting the use of instruments not integrated. Forty-seven percent of respondents are leveraging PGHD for process automation and adherence to best evidence. Content type and integration touchpoints vary among the members, as well as governance maturity. CONCLUSIONS The reported variability regarding PGHD suggests that it may not yet have reached its full potential for oncology care delivery. As the adoption of PGHD in oncology continues to expand, opportunities exist to enhance their utility. Among the recommendations for cancer centers is establishment of a governance process that includes patients. Researchers should consider determining which PGHD instruments confer the highest value. It is recommended that EHR vendors collaborate with cancer centers to develop solutions for the collection, interpretation, visualization, and use of PGHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Amye Tevaarwerk
- 5University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Tracy Wong
- 6Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Wallace Akerley
- 8Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | | | | | - Robert C Stillman
- 10The Ohio State University, James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Peter E Gabriel
- 11Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tricia Heinrichs
- 7National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathleen Kerrigan
- 8Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Shiven B Patel
- 8Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Everett Weiss
- 1Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mehtsun WT, McCleary NJ, Maduekwe UN, Wolpin BM, Schrag D, Wang J. Patterns of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use and Association With Survival in Adults 80 Years and Older With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:88-95. [PMID: 34854874 PMCID: PMC8640950 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Patients 80 years and older with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have not consistently received treatments that have established benefits in younger older adults (aged 60-79 years), yet patients 80 years and older are increasingly being offered surgery. Whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) provides additional benefit among patients 80 years and older with PDAC following surgery is not well understood. OBJECTIVE To describe patterns of AC use in patients 80 years and older following surgical resection of PDAC and to compare overall survival between patients who received AC and those who did not. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cohort study among patients 80 years or older diagnosed with PDAC (stage I-III) between 2004 to 2016 who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy at hospitals across the US reporting to the National Cancer Database. EXPOSURES AC vs no AC 90 days following diagnosis of PDAC. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The proportion of patients who received AC was assessed over the study period. Overall survival was compared between patients who received AC and those who did not using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. A landmark analysis was performed to address immortal time bias. A propensity score analysis was performed to address indication bias. Subgroup analyses were conducted in node-negative, margin-negative, clinically complex, node-positive, and margin-positive cohorts. RESULTS Between 2004 and 2016, 2569 patients 80 years and older (median [IQR] age, 82 [81-84] years; 1427 were women [55.5%]) underwent surgery for PDAC. Of these patients, 1217 (47.4%) received AC. Findings showed an 18.6% (95% CI, 8.0%-29.0%; P = .001) absolute increase in the use of AC among older adults who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy comparing rates in 2004 vs 2016. Receipt of AC was associated with a longer median survival (17.2 months; 95% CI, 16.1-19.0) compared with those who did not receive AC (12.7 months; 95% CI, 11.8-13.6). This association was consistent in propensity and subgroup analyses. In multivariable analysis, receipt of AC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.65-0.79; P < .001), female sex (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96; P < .001), and surgery in the more recent time period (≥2011) (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99; P = .02) were associated with a decreased hazard of death. An increased hazard of death was associated with higher pathologic stage (stage II: HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.43-1.97; P < .001; stage III: HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.88-3.04; P < .001), positive surgical margins (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.34-1.65; P < .001), length of stay greater than median (10 days) (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.07-1.28; P < .001), and receipt of oncologic care at a nonacademic facilities (Community Cancer Program: HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.35; P < .001; Integrated Network Cancer Program: HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.07-1.46; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, the use of AC among patients who underwent resection for PDAC increased over the study period, yet it still was administered to fewer than 50% of patients. Receipt of AC was associated with a longer median survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Winta T. Mehtsun
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego
| | - Nadine J. McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ugwuji N. Maduekwe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Brian M. Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jiping Wang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
de Klerk LK, Patel AK, Derks S, Pectasides E, Augustin J, Uduman M, Raman N, Akarca FG, McCleary NJ, Cleary JM, Rubinson DA, Clark JW, Fitzpatrick B, Brais LK, Cavanaugh ME, Rode AJ, Jean MG, Lizotte PH, Nazzaro MJ, Severgnini M, Zheng H, Fuchs CS, Enzinger PC, Bass AJ. Phase II study of pembrolizumab in refractory esophageal cancer with correlates of response and survival. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9:e002472. [PMID: 34593617 PMCID: PMC8487210 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment, but the benefits in refractory patients with esophageal cancer have been modest. Predictors of response as well as new targets for novel therapeutic combinations are needed. In this phase 2 clinical trial, we tested single-agent pembrolizumab in patients with advanced esophageal cancer, who received at least one prior line of therapy. METHODS Pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks was tested in 49 patients with refractory esophageal cancer: 39 with adenocarcinoma and 10 with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Major endpoints were radiological response by Immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors and survival. Tumor samples were evaluated for programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and immune contexture by both NanoString mRNA expression analysis and flow cytometry. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and a panel of circulating chemokines were also analyzed. RESULTS The overall response rate (ORR) was 8% (4 of 49 patients; 95% CI 2.3% to 19.6%). Median overall survival (OS) was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.0 to 9.5). ORR and OS were not associated with histology. For PD-L1-positive patients, ORR was 13.3% (95% CI 1.7% to 40.5%) and median OS was 7.9 months (95% CI 4.7 to 15.5). A trend toward improved OS was observed in seven patients with a TMB ≥10 mut/Mb (p=0.086). Tumors with a PD-L1 Combined Positive Score ≥1 showed enrichment of LAG3 (p=0.005) and IDO1 (p=0.04) gene expression. Baseline levels of circulating CXCL10, interleukin 2 (IL2) receptor α (IL2RA) and IL6 were associated with survival: CXCL10 favorably, (HR 0.37, p=0.002 (progression-free survival); HR 0.55, p=0.018 (OS)); IL2RA and IL6 unfavorably (HR 1.57, p=0.020 for IL6 (OS); HR 2.36, p=0.025 for IL2RA (OS)). CONCLUSIONS Pembrolizumab monotherapy was modestly effective in refractory esophageal cancer. Circulating CXCL10 at baseline appeared to be a robust predictor of response. Other T cell exhaustion markers are upregulated in PD-L1-positive patients, suggesting that immunotherapy combinations such as anti-LAG3/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or anti-IDO1/PD-1 may be of promise in refractory esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie K de Klerk
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC - Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anuj K Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sarah Derks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC - Location VUmc, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eirini Pectasides
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeremy Augustin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mohamed Uduman
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nihal Raman
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Fahire G Akarca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James M Cleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Douglas A Rubinson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey W Clark
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Bridget Fitzpatrick
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lauren K Brais
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Megan E Cavanaugh
- Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amanda J Rode
- Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Melissa G Jean
- Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick H Lizotte
- Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew J Nazzaro
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mariano Severgnini
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hui Zheng
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Peter C Enzinger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adam J Bass
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Prensner JR, Putra J, Vargas SO, Church AJ, Janeway KA, McCleary NJ, DuBois SG. A case of metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary in a pediatric patient: Opportunities for precision medicine. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e28780. [PMID: 33314665 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John R Prensner
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Juan Putra
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara O Vargas
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alanna J Church
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Katherine A Janeway
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Center for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts.,Division of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Steven G DuBois
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brown JC, Rosenthal MH, Ma C, Zhang S, Nimeiri HS, McCleary NJ, Abrams TA, Yurgelun MB, Cleary JM, Rubinson DA, Schrag D, Bullock AJ, Allen J, Zuckerman D, Chan E, Chan JA, Wolpin B, Constantine M, Weckstein DJ, Faggen MA, Thomas CA, Kournioti C, Yuan C, Zheng H, Hollis BW, Fuchs CS, Ng K, Meyerhardt JA. Effect of High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Vitamin D 3 Supplementation on Body Composition among Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Trial. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12113451. [PMID: 33233566 PMCID: PMC7699725 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12113451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Skeletal muscle and adipose tissue express the vitamin D receptor and may be a mechanism through which vitamin D supplementation slows cancer progression and reduces cancer death. It is unknown if high-dose vitamin D3 impacts skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, as compared with standard-dose vitamin D3, in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. In this exploratory analysis of a phase II randomized trial, high-dose vitamin D3 did not lead to changes of body weight, body mass index, muscle area, muscle attenuation, visceral adipose tissue area, or subcutaneous adipose tissue area, as compared with standard-dose vitamin D3. High-dose vitamin D3 did not change body composition in patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. Abstract Skeletal muscle and adipose tissue express the vitamin D receptor and may be a mechanism through which vitamin D supplementation slows cancer progression and reduces cancer death. In this exploratory analysis of a double-blind, multicenter, randomized phase II clinical trial, 105 patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer who were receiving chemotherapy were randomized to either high-dose vitamin D3 (4000 IU) or standard-dose (400 IU) vitamin D3. Body composition was measured with abdominal computed tomography at enrollment (baseline) and after cycle 8 of chemotherapy (16 weeks). As compared with standard-dose vitamin D3, high-dose vitamin D3 did not significantly change body weight [−0.7 kg; (95% CI: −3.5, 2.0)], body mass index [−0.2 kg/m2; (95% CI: −1.2, 0.7)], muscle area [−1.7 cm2; (95% CI: −9.6, 6.3)], muscle attenuation [−0.4 HU; (95% CI: −4.2, 3.2)], visceral adipose tissue area [−7.5 cm2; (95% CI: −24.5, 9.6)], or subcutaneous adipose tissue area [−8.3 cm2; (95% CI: −35.5, 18.9)] over the first 8 cycles of chemotherapy. Among patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, the addition of high-dose vitamin D3, vs standard-dose vitamin D3, to standard chemotherapy did not result in any changes in body composition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin C. Brown
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA
- LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70012, USA
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70012, USA
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-225-763-2715
| | - Michael H. Rosenthal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | - Chao Ma
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | - Sui Zhang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | - Halla S. Nimeiri
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA;
| | - Nadine J. McCleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | - Thomas A. Abrams
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | - Matthew B. Yurgelun
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | - James M. Cleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | - Douglas A. Rubinson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | | | - Jill Allen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (J.A.); (H.Z.)
| | - Dan Zuckerman
- St Luke’s Mountain States Tumor Institute, Boise, ID 83712, USA;
| | - Emily Chan
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA;
| | - Jennifer A. Chan
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | - Brian Wolpin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Chen Yuan
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | - Hui Zheng
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (J.A.); (H.Z.)
| | - Bruce W. Hollis
- Department of Pediatrics, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA;
| | | | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| | - Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; (M.H.R.); (C.M.); (S.Z.); (N.J.M.); (T.A.A.); (M.B.Y.); (J.M.C.); (D.A.R.); (D.S.); (J.A.C.); (B.W.); (C.Y.); (K.N.); (J.A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
McCleary NJ, Cleveland J, Zhang S, Upadhyay V, Hassett M. Abstract 4471: Patient-reported outcomes and emergency department (ED) visits among gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients prescribed anti-CTLA4/PD-1/L-1 antibody immunotherapy. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-4471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Leveraging electronic Patient Reported Outcomes (ePRO) improves cancer care delivery by reducing ED visits/hospitalizations and increasing overall survival. Yet little is known patient-reported outcomes or association with ED visits outcomes following immunotherapy. Here, we describe systematic ePRO collection using 15 core symptoms via the validated Patient Reported Outcomes - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) tool among pts prescribed anti-CTLA4/PD-1/L-1 antibody immunotherapy for GI cancer.
Methods: We previously demonstrated feasibility of an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded ePRO collection via iPads for nearly 70% of new and established patients across Dana-Farber Cancer Institute ambulatory oncology practices. ePRO is deployed once weekly to established patients at home via the EHR patient portal or in clinic via tablet. Patient responses are scored using an algorithm, scaled 0-3, with scores of 3 indicating moderate/severe symptomatic adverse events (SAEs; equivalent to CTCAE grade 3+). We examined pt/disease/immunotherapy treatment characteristics, symptom burden at baseline, SAEs for pts prescribed Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, Atezolizumab, Ipilimumab, Durvalumab, or Avelumab between January 2018 - August 2019. Exploratory analysis include frequency of ED visits at 30/60/90/120 days from immunotherapy start among subset reporting moderate/severe SAEs.
Findings: Fifty-one (12.98%) of the 393 eligible pts prescribed immunotherapy used ePRO to report SAEs with median followup of 105 days (interquartile range 43-189). The summary distribution of SAEs across 15 PRO-CTCAE domains shows that moderate/severe SAEs reported were fatigue (19.61%), insomnia (11.76%), and general pain (21.57%); least frequently reported SAEs were fever/rash/vomiting (0%), and nausea (1.96%). In exploratory analysis, 111 (28%) patients had an ED visit, 37(9.40%) occurred within the first 90 days of treatment.
Conclusions: We demonstrate proof-of-principle that ePRO implementation in routine practice is feasible, describes the distribution of patient-reported SAEs, and can be evaluated relative to key clinical outcomes such as ED utilization following immunotherapy. Further analysis will examine pt/disease/treatment characteristics predicting moderate/severe SAEs and inferior clinical outcomes. With increased response rates, we will leverage ePRO to develop targeted population health management interventions for patients prescribed immunotherapy in ambulatory oncology practice.
Citation Format: Nadine J. McCleary, Jessica Cleveland, Sunyi Zhang, Vivek Upadhyay, Michael Hassett. Patient-reported outcomes and emergency department (ED) visits among gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients prescribed anti-CTLA4/PD-1/L-1 antibody immunotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 4471.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ivatury SJ, Hazard-Jenkins HW, Brooks GA, McCleary NJ, Wong SL, Schrag D. Translation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Oncology Clinical Trials to Everyday Practice. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:65-72. [PMID: 31452053 PMCID: PMC6925618 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07749-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical trials in oncology evaluating the effects of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) collection have found that monitoring of symptoms with PROs is associated with improved clinical care through reduced acute care utilization and decreased patient symptom burden. This educational review will evaluate strategies for systematic PRO integration into everyday oncology clinical practice. METHODS We outline key considerations for using PROs in clinical practice, highlighting evidence from published studies. We also discuss the benefits and challenges of PRO implementation in oncology. RESULTS Implementing PRO collection in clinical practice can improve care delivery and facilitate patient-centered clinical research. Considerations for using PROs in clinical practice include choice of instrument, method of delivery, and frequency of query. Challenges with implementing systematic PRO collection include the costs and resources needed for implementation, impact on clinical workflow, and controlling/monitoring physician burnout. CONCLUSIONS While challenges exist in terms of financial resources and staff participation/burnout, patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice provide a number of benefits, including symptom monitoring, clinical research, and potential real-time personalized clinical-decision support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivas Joga Ivatury
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.
- Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA.
| | | | - Gabriel A Brooks
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | - Sandra L Wong
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
McCleary NJ, Greenberg TL, Barysauskas CM, Guerette EJ, Hassan M, Jacobson JO, Schrag D. Oncology Patient Portal Enrollment at a Comprehensive Cancer Center: A Quality Improvement Initiative. J Oncol Pract 2019; 14:e451-e461. [PMID: 30096276 DOI: 10.1200/jop.17.00008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient portals (PPs) provide patients access to their electronic health record and may facilitate active engagement in their care. Because PP use has not been well studied among patients with cancer, we sought to: understand the willingness of patients with cancer to use the PP, identify barriers to PP use, and improve PP accessibility. MATERIALS AND METHODS As part of an institutional quality improvement initiative, we used a stakeholder-driven approach to examine PP use at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA). We conducted a survey across all ambulatory oncology practices as well as staff and patient focus groups in one ambulatory practice. We deployed three interventions to address barriers: staff education, staff-assisted enrollment support, and independent enrollment support. RESULTS In October 2015, 1,019 (87%) of 1,178 eligible patients completed the survey (PP enrolled, 57%; non-PP enrolled, 43%). PP-enrolled patients reported reviewing test results and appointment schedules. Non-PP-enrolled patients cited difficult PP enrollment, lack of computer access, and concern about sharing data electronically as barriers to PP enrollment. Focus groups (staff, n = 20; patient representatives, n = 5) also identified lack of awareness of PP benefits as a barrier. The interventions, deployed from November to December 2015, increased PP enrollment from 47% to 53% by January 2016. CONCLUSION Patients with cancer want to communicate with their team through the PP, but barriers to enrollment impede use. Straightforward system-level interventions may increase enrollment. Further work is necessary to ascertain the degree to which increased PP enrollment leads to greater engagement and better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J McCleary
- Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care; and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Teresa L Greenberg
- Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care; and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Elissa J Guerette
- Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care; and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Malyun Hassan
- Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care; and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Joseph O Jacobson
- Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care; and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care; and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ng K, Nimeiri HS, McCleary NJ, Abrams TA, Yurgelun MB, Cleary JM, Rubinson DA, Schrag D, Miksad R, Bullock AJ, Allen J, Zuckerman D, Chan E, Chan JA, Wolpin BM, Constantine M, Weckstein DJ, Faggen MA, Thomas CA, Kournioti C, Yuan C, Ganser C, Wilkinson B, Mackintosh C, Zheng H, Hollis BW, Meyerhardt JA, Fuchs CS. Effect of High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Vitamin D3 Supplementation on Progression-Free Survival Among Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The SUNSHINE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019; 321:1370-1379. [PMID: 30964527 PMCID: PMC6459117 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.2402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE In observational studies, higher plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels have been associated with improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). OBJECTIVE To determine if high-dose vitamin D3 added to standard chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with metastatic CRC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Double-blind phase 2 randomized clinical trial of 139 patients with advanced or metastatic CRC conducted at 11 US academic and community cancer centers from March 2012 through November 2016 (database lock: September 2018). INTERVENTIONS mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab chemotherapy every 2 weeks and either high-dose vitamin D3 (n = 69) or standard-dose vitamin D3 (n = 70) daily until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by the log-rank test and a supportive Cox proportional hazards model. Testing was 1-sided. Secondary end points included tumor objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and change in plasma 25(OH)D level. RESULTS Among 139 patients (mean age, 56 years; 60 [43%] women) who completed or discontinued chemotherapy and vitamin D3 (median follow-up, 22.9 months), the median PFS for high-dose vitamin D3 was 13.0 months (95% CI, 10.1 to 14.7; 49 PFS events) vs 11.0 months (95% CI, 9.5 to 14.0; 62 PFS events) for standard-dose vitamin D3 (log-rank P = .07); multivariable hazard ratio for PFS or death was 0.64 (1-sided 95% CI, 0 to 0.90; P = .02). There were no significant differences between high-dose and standard-dose vitamin D3 for tumor ORR (58% vs 63%, respectively; difference, -5% [95% CI, -20% to 100%], P = .27) or OS (median, 24.3 months vs 24.3 months; log-rank P = .43). The median 25(OH)D level at baseline for high-dose vitamin D3 was 16.1 ng/mL vs 18.7 ng/mL for standard-dose vitamin D3 (difference, -2.6 ng/mL [95% CI, -6.6 to 1.4], P = .30); at first restaging, 32.0 ng/mL vs 18.7 ng/mL (difference, 12.8 ng/mL [95% CI, 9.0 to 16.6], P < .001); at second restaging, 35.2 ng/mL vs 18.5 ng/mL (difference, 16.7 ng/mL [95% CI, 10.9 to 22.5], P < .001); and at treatment discontinuation, 34.8 ng/mL vs 18.7 ng/mL (difference, 16.2 ng/mL [95% CI, 9.9 to 22.4], P < .001). The most common grade 3 and higher adverse events for chemotherapy plus high-dose vs standard-dose vitamin D3 were neutropenia (n = 24 [35%] vs n = 21 [31%], respectively) and hypertension (n = 9 [13%] vs n = 11 [16%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with metastatic CRC, addition of high-dose vitamin D3, vs standard-dose vitamin D3, to standard chemotherapy resulted in a difference in median PFS that was not statistically significant, but with a significantly improved supportive hazard ratio. These findings warrant further evaluation in a larger multicenter randomized clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01516216.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Halla S. Nimeiri
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rebecca Miksad
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Dan Zuckerman
- St Luke’s Mountain States Tumor Institute, Boise, Idaho
| | - Emily Chan
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chen Yuan
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Hui Zheng
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Berry DL, Blonquist TM, Nayak MM, Grenon N, Momani TG, McCleary NJ. Self-Care Support for Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: iCancerHealth. Appl Clin Inform 2018; 9:833-840. [PMID: 30463094 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1675810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-centered symptom assessment and management tools allow patients to perform self-assessments and engage in self-symptom management. Efficacious tools exist for reducing symptom distress; however, little is known about feature-specific use. OBJECTIVES This article evaluates the feasibility of the iCancerHealth app as an adjunct to usual patient education regarding cancer symptoms and medication management. METHODS We conducted a single-arm, pilot study grounded in the health outcomes model. Our evaluation included (1) enrollment rates, (2) 2-month utilization rates, (3) patient acceptability, and (4) clinician satisfaction with the provider-side application. English-speaking, adult patients receiving care in the gastrointestinal oncology service of a comprehensive cancer center were invited to participate. Research coordinators enrolled consenting participants who had a personal, Internet-connected device; participants registered and used the platform to complete the baseline symptom assessment in clinic. Participants were reminded weekly to use the app and to perform a symptom report 4 to 6 weeks later. RESULTS A total of 64 patients were approached, of which 57 (89%; 95% exact confidence interval [CI], 79-96%) enrolled. About half were ≥ 60 years old and 40% were women. Fifty-three patients (93%; 95% exact CI, 85-99%) accessed at least one app feature, at least once, from home. The most frequently used (86%) feature was Health Tracker in which participants monitored and reported symptoms; followed by My Inbox (63%) and My Medications features (60%). The mean acceptability score was 24.8 (standard deviation = 4.2), indicating good acceptability. Clinicians reported that the app was most acceptable with regard to facilitating in-person interactions that occurred after app use. CONCLUSION In a sample of adults with various stages of gastrointestinal malignancies, the iCancerHealth app was utilized at a high rate. Features that focused on symptoms and medication side effects plus communication with clinicians were used most frequently. This extends our understanding of preferences and specific feature use with patient-centered technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna L Berry
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Traci M Blonquist
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Manan M Nayak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Nina Grenon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Thaer G Momani
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
McCleary NJ, Healey MJ, Weng S, Song AB, Lederman RI, Ramelson HZ, Wagner AJ, Abel GA. Perceptions of Oncologists About Sharing Clinic Notes with Patients. Oncologist 2018; 24:e46-e48. [PMID: 30254186 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In a large survey (n = 809) conducted to understand how oncologists differ from nononcologists regarding routinely sharing visit notes with patients, oncologists were less likely to agree patient safety would improve (p = .03) or that patients would be offended after reading notes (p = .01); however, they agreed with nononcologists that sharing notes would lead to less candid documentation (69% vs. 73%; p = .39). Oncologists share a high level of worry about the impact of sharing notes on documentation practices, a concern that will need to be addressed as the practice of sharing visit notes expands to cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael J Healey
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shicheng Weng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Ruth I Lederman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Harley Z Ramelson
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Information Systems, Partners HealthCare, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew J Wagner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gregory A Abel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Aguirre AJ, Nowak JA, Camarda ND, Moffitt RA, Ghazani AA, Hazar-Rethinam M, Raghavan S, Kim J, Brais LK, Ragon D, Welch MW, Reilly E, McCabe D, Marini L, Anderka K, Helvie K, Oliver N, Babic A, Da Silva A, Nadres B, Van Seventer EE, Shahzade HA, St Pierre JP, Burke KP, Clancy T, Cleary JM, Doyle LA, Jajoo K, McCleary NJ, Meyerhardt JA, Murphy JE, Ng K, Patel AK, Perez K, Rosenthal MH, Rubinson DA, Ryou M, Shapiro GI, Sicinska E, Silverman SG, Nagy RJ, Lanman RB, Knoerzer D, Welsch DJ, Yurgelun MB, Fuchs CS, Garraway LA, Getz G, Hornick JL, Johnson BE, Kulke MH, Mayer RJ, Miller JW, Shyn PB, Tuveson DA, Wagle N, Yeh JJ, Hahn WC, Corcoran RB, Carter SL, Wolpin BM. Real-time Genomic Characterization of Advanced Pancreatic Cancer to Enable Precision Medicine. Cancer Discov 2018; 8:1096-1111. [PMID: 29903880 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-0275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 218] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Clinically relevant subtypes exist for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but molecular characterization is not yet standard in clinical care. We implemented a biopsy protocol to perform time-sensitive whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing for patients with advanced PDAC. Therapeutically relevant genomic alterations were identified in 48% (34/71) and pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline alterations in 18% (13/71) of patients. Overall, 30% (21/71) of enrolled patients experienced a change in clinical management as a result of genomic data. Twenty-six patients had germline and/or somatic alterations in DNA-damage repair genes, and 5 additional patients had mutational signatures of homologous recombination deficiency but no identified causal genomic alteration. Two patients had oncogenic in-frame BRAF deletions, and we report the first clinical evidence that this alteration confers sensitivity to MAPK pathway inhibition. Moreover, we identified tumor/stroma gene expression signatures with clinical relevance. Collectively, these data demonstrate the feasibility and value of real-time genomic characterization of advanced PDAC.Significance: Molecular analyses of metastatic PDAC tumors are challenging due to the heterogeneous cellular composition of biopsy specimens and rapid progression of the disease. Using an integrated multidisciplinary biopsy program, we demonstrate that real-time genomic characterization of advanced PDAC can identify clinically relevant alterations that inform management of this difficult disease. Cancer Discov; 8(9); 1096-111. ©2018 AACR.See related commentary by Collisson, p. 1062This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1047.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Aguirre
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan A Nowak
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nicholas D Camarda
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Joint Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richard A Moffitt
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Arezou A Ghazani
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Joint Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Srivatsan Raghavan
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jaegil Kim
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Emma Reilly
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Devin McCabe
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Joint Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lori Marini
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Joint Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kristin Anderka
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Karla Helvie
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Joint Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nelly Oliver
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Joint Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ana Babic
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Annacarolina Da Silva
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brandon Nadres
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Kelly P Burke
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thomas Clancy
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - James M Cleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Leona A Doyle
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kunal Jajoo
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Janet E Murphy
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anuj K Patel
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimberly Perez
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael H Rosenthal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas A Rubinson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marvin Ryou
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Gastroenterology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Geoffrey I Shapiro
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ewa Sicinska
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stuart G Silverman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rebecca J Nagy
- Department of Medical Affairs, Guardant Health, Inc., Redwood City, California
| | - Richard B Lanman
- Department of Medical Affairs, Guardant Health, Inc., Redwood City, California
| | | | | | - Matthew B Yurgelun
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Joint Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Levi A Garraway
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Joint Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gad Getz
- Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason L Hornick
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bruce E Johnson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Joint Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew H Kulke
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey W Miller
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul B Shyn
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David A Tuveson
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York; Lustgarten Foundation Pancreatic Cancer Research Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York
| | - Nikhil Wagle
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Joint Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jen Jen Yeh
- Departments of Surgery and Pharmacology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - William C Hahn
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ryan B Corcoran
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Scott L Carter
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Joint Center for Cancer Precision Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
McCleary NJ, Hubbard J, Mahoney MR, Meyerhardt JA, Sargent D, Venook A, Grothey A. Challenges of conducting a prospective clinical trial for older patients: Lessons learned from NCCTG N0949 (alliance). J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 9:24-31. [PMID: 28917648 PMCID: PMC5757827 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Revised: 07/14/2017] [Accepted: 08/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES While the risk of developing colorectal cancer increases with age, there are limited prospective data regarding best treatment in the older adult population. We launched a phase III trial to evaluate difference in treatment outcome for older adults (aged ≥70years) with advanced colorectal cancer. Here we review the challenges faced and reasons for poor accrual to N0949. MATERIALS AND METHODS We describe the conceptualization, development and limited results of N0949, a randomized phase III study of fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab with or without oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX7 or XELOX) as first line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Fluoropyrimidine was physician choice (e.g., 5-FU/LV or capecitabine). RESULTS Of the projected 380 patients, only 32 patients were enrolled between the study activation in January 2011 until its closure in September 2012. Reasons for poor accrual included eligibility criteria that were too stringent, discomfort with randomizing older patients to regimens of varying intensity without considering their physical fitness, and discomfort with the use of bevacizumab in the older patient population. Several efforts were mounted to design a rationale and age-appropriate study, consider toxicities and varying study practices, and be responsive to stakeholder feedback. CONCLUSIONS Challenges were experienced in conducting the first prospective phase III study evaluating progression-free survival of older adults with advanced colorectal cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine/bevacizumab with or without oxaliplatin in the USA. Future efforts to evaluate treatment outcomes in the older adult population should reflect on lessons learned in this large national effort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA, United States.
| | - Joleen Hubbard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Michelle R Mahoney
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer Care, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Daniel Sargent
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Alan Venook
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Axel Grothey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Enzinger AC, Wind JK, Frank E, McCleary NJ, Porter L, Cushing H, Abbott C, Cronin C, Enzinger PC, Meropol NJ, Schrag D. A stakeholder-driven approach to improve the informed consent process for palliative chemotherapy. Patient Educ Couns 2017; 100:1527-1536. [PMID: 28359659 PMCID: PMC5492511 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2016] [Revised: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 03/17/2017] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients often anticipate cure from palliative chemotherapy. Better resources are needed to convey its risks and benefits. We describe the stakeholder-driven development and acceptability testing of a prototype video and companion booklet supporting informed consent (IC) for a common palliative chemotherapy regimen. METHODS Our multidisciplinary team (researchers, advocates, clinicians) employed a multistep process of content development, production, critical evaluation, and iterative revisions. Patient/clinician stakeholders were engaged throughout using stakeholder advisory panels, featuring their voices within the intervention, conducting surveys and qualitative interviews. A national panel of 57 patient advocates, and 25 oncologists from nine US practices critiqued the intervention and rated its clarity, accuracy, balance, tone, and utility. Participants also reported satisfaction with existing chemotherapy IC materials. RESULTS Few oncologists (5/25, 20%) or advocates (10/22, 45%) were satisfied with existing IC materials. In contrast, most rated our intervention highly, with 89-96% agreeing it would be useful and promote informed decisions. Patient voices were considered a key strength. Every oncologist indicated they would use the intervention regularly. CONCLUSION Our intervention was acceptable to advocates and oncologists. A randomized trial is evaluating its impact on the chemotherapy IC process. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Stakeholder-driven methods can be valuable for developing patient educational interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea C Enzinger
- McGraw Patterson Center for Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Jennifer K Wind
- McGraw Patterson Center for Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Frank
- Susan F. Smith Center for Women's Cancers, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Heather Cushing
- Department of Nursing, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Caroline Abbott
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
| | - Christine Cronin
- McGraw Patterson Center for Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter C Enzinger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neal J Meropol
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- McGraw Patterson Center for Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
McCleary NJ, Sato K, Nishihara R, Inamura K, Morikawa T, Zhang X, Wu K, Yamauchi M, Kim SA, Sukawa Y, Mima K, Qian ZR, Fuchs CS, Ogino S, Meyerhardt JA. Prognostic Utility of Molecular Factors by Age at Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 22:1489-98. [PMID: 26490308 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-0946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2015] [Accepted: 10/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We hypothesized that adverse prognostic associations of specific tumor molecular factors vary by patient age at colorectal cancer diagnosis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We examined the prognostic associations and interactions by age at colorectal cancer diagnosis (<60 vs. 60-74 vs. ≥75 years old) of key molecular factors-CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), microsatellite instability (MSI), KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations, and nuclear CTNNB1 expression status-on colorectal cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), using 1,280 incident colorectal cancer cases (median age, 69 years; range, 38-91 years) within the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study cohorts. RESULTS MSI-high was associated with better survival, whereas BRAF mutation was associated with worse survival, but these associations did not appreciably differ by age group. Status of CIMP, KRAS mutation, or PIK3CA mutation was not associated with prognosis regardless of age. Nuclear CTNNB1 expression was associated with a trend toward worse prognosis among older adults [age ≥ 75 years; multivariate HR, 1.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.89-3.13 (for CSS); multivariate HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.93-2.24 (for OS)] but not among younger patients, and there was a statistically significant interaction by age (Pinteraction = 0.03 for CSS; Pinteraction = 0.007 for OS). CONCLUSIONS Tumor nuclear CTNNB1 expression may be associated with higher mortality among older patients with colorectal cancer but not among younger patients. Our findings need to be confirmed in independent datasets. Detailed exploration of tumor molecular signatures in older patients with colorectal cancer in large populations is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Kaori Sato
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Reiko Nishihara
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kentaro Inamura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Teppei Morikawa
- Department of Pathology, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Xuehong Zhang
- Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kana Wu
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mai Yamauchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sun A Kim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yasutaka Sukawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kosuke Mima
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Zhi Rong Qian
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shuji Ogino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Shah SM, Rosenthal MH, Griffin GK, Jacobsen ED, McCleary NJ. An Aggressive Presentation of Colorectal Cancer With an Atypical Lymphoproliferative Pattern of Metastatic Disease: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2014; 13:e5-e11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2014.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2014] [Revised: 05/06/2014] [Accepted: 05/19/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
31
|
Abstract
Population studies support an increased incidence of most cancers among older adults. Colorectal cancer has high prevalence in the aging population, with a median age of 69 years at diagnosis and 74 years at death. The vast majority of patients with colon cancer (CC) will require chemotherapy treatments during their disease course, challenging oncologists with the task of tailoring therapy for older patients with CC in the face of limited evidence-based data to guide them. Factors such as comorbidity, performance status, cognitive function, and social support may affect decision making and complicate tolerance of any recommended therapy. In recent years, attention to the specific needs of the aging population with cancer has given rise to the field of geriatric oncology in general, and has generated an increasing fund of knowledge on which to base chemotherapy delivery for this specific population of patients with CC. This article will review the available data specifically for chemotherapy management of older patients with CC in the postoperative and metastatic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J. McCleary
- Nadine J. McCleary, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA; Efrat Dotan, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; and Ilene Browner, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Nadine J. McCleary, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA; Efrat Dotan, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; and Ilene Browner, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ilene Browner
- Nadine J. McCleary, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA; Efrat Dotan, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; and Ilene Browner, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wolpin BM, Rubinson DA, Wang X, Chan JA, Cleary JM, Enzinger PC, Fuchs CS, McCleary NJ, Meyerhardt JA, Ng K, Schrag D, Sikora AL, Spicer BA, Killion L, Mamon H, Kimmelman AC. Phase II and pharmacodynamic study of autophagy inhibition using hydroxychloroquine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Oncologist 2014; 19:637-8. [PMID: 24821822 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 263] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Autophagy is a catabolic pathway that permits cells to recycle intracellular macromolecules, and its inhibition reduces pancreatic cancer growth in model systems. We evaluated hydoxychloroquine (HCQ), an inhibitor of autophagy, in patients with pancreatic cancer and analyzed pharmacodynamic markers in treated patients and mice. METHODS Patients with previously treated metastatic pancreatic cancer were administered HCQ at 400 mg (n = 10) or 600 mg (n = 10) twice daily. The primary endpoint was 2-month progression-free survival (PFS). We analyzed peripheral lymphocytes from treated mice to identify pharmacodynamic markers of autophagy inhibition that were then assessed in peripheral lymphocytes from patients. RESULTS Among 20 patients enrolled, 2 (10%) were without progressive disease at 2 months. Median PFS and overall survival were 46.5 and 69.0 days, respectively. Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events were lymphopenia (n = 1) and elevated alanine aminotransferase (n = 1). Tolerability and efficacy were similar at the two dose levels. Analysis of treated murine lymphocytes suggested that LC3-II expression by Western blot is a reliable marker for autophagy inhibition. Analysis of LC3-II in patient lymphocytes demonstrated inconsistent autophagy inhibition. CONCLUSION Mouse studies identified LC3-II levels in peripheral lymphocytes as a potential pharmacodynamic marker of autophagy inhibition. In patients with previously treated metastatic pancreatic cancer, HCQ monotherapy achieved inconsistent autophagy inhibition and demonstrated negligible therapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Wolpin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Douglas A Rubinson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Xiaoxu Wang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer A Chan
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - James M Cleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter C Enzinger
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Deborah Schrag
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Allison L Sikora
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Beverly A Spicer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Leah Killion
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Harvey Mamon
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alec C Kimmelman
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ogino S, Liao X, Imamura Y, Yamauchi M, McCleary NJ, Ng K, Niedzwiecki D, Saltz LB, Mayer RJ, Whittom R, Hantel A, Benson AB, Mowat RB, Spiegelman D, Goldberg RM, Bertagnolli MM, Meyerhardt JA, Fuchs CS. Predictive and prognostic analysis of PIK3CA mutation in stage III colon cancer intergroup trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013; 105:1789-98. [PMID: 24231454 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djt298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Somatic mutations in PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphonate 3-kinase [PI3K], catalytic subunit alpha gene) activate the PI3K-AKT signaling pathway and contribute to pathogenesis of various malignancies, including colorectal cancer. METHODS We examined associations of PIK3CA oncogene mutation with relapse, survival, and treatment efficacy in 627 stage III colon carcinoma case subjects within a randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial (5-fluorouracil and leucovorin [FU/LV] vs irinotecan [CPT11], fluorouracil and leucovorin [IFL]; Cancer and Leukemia Group B 89803 [Alliance]). We detected PIK3CA mutation in exons 9 and 20 by polymerase chain reaction and pyrosequencing. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess prognostic and predictive role of PIK3CA mutation, adjusting for clinical features and status of routine standard molecular pathology features, including KRAS and BRAF mutations and microsatellite instability (mismatch repair deficiency). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Compared with PIK3CA wild-type cases, overall status of PIK3CA mutation positivity or the presence of PIK3CA mutation in either exon 9 or 20 alone was not statistically significantly associated with recurrence-free, disease-free, or overall survival (log-rank P > .70; P > .40 in multivariable regression models). There was no statistically significant interaction between PIK3CA and KRAS (or BRAF) mutation status in survival analysis (P(interaction) > .18). PIK3CA mutation status did not appear to predict better or worse response to IFL therapy compared with FU/LV therapy (P(interaction) > .16). CONCLUSIONS Overall tumor PIK3CA mutation status is not associated with stage III colon cancer prognosis. PIK3CA mutation does not appear to serve as a predictive tumor molecular biomarker for response to irinotecan-based adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuji Ogino
- Affiliations of authors: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (SO, XL, YI, MY, NJM, KN, RJM, JAM, CSF); Department of Pathology (SO), Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine (DS, CSF), and Department of Surgery (MMB), Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (SO); Department of Epidemiology (SO, DS) and Department of Biostatistics (DS) , Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (DN); Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (LBS); Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montreal, Canada (RW); Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL (AH); current: Edward Cancer Center, Naperville, IL (AH); Northwestern University, Chicago, IL (ABB); Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program, Toledo, OH (RBM); Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH (RMG)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wo JY, Childs SK, Szymonifka J, Mamon HJ, Ryan DP, Blaszkowsky LS, Kwak EL, Ferrone CR, Allen JN, Zhu AX, Wolpin BM, Chan JA, Abrams TA, McCleary NJ, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Hong TS. Delaying chemoradiation until after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer may not impact local control. Pract Radiat Oncol 2013; 4:e117-e123. [PMID: 24890357 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2013] [Revised: 06/30/2013] [Accepted: 07/03/2013] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timing of administration of adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) for pancreatic cancer has varied across studies. To date, the impact of timing of adjuvant CRT on long-term outcomes has not been evaluated. This study evaluates the effect of timing of adjuvant CRT on locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS). METHODS AND MATERIALS We performed a review of 159 patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received adjuvant CRT between 1998 and 2010. Median dose of CRT was 50.4 Gy. The primary study variable was timing of CRT, dichotomized as immediate CRT versus delayed CRT. Consistent with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9704, immediate chemoradiation was defined as after ≤1 cycle of chemotherapy, whereas delayed CRT was defined as after >1 cycle. Cox multivariate analysis (MVA) was performed. RESULTS Median follow-up was 55 months. Seventy-four percent of patients received immediate CRT, and 26% patients received delayed CRT. Patients treated with delayed CRT were more likely to receive adjuvant gemcitabine (100% vs 53%; P < .001). Timing of adjuvant CRT was not associated with LRC or OS on univariate or MVA. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen ≥1.3 ng/mL (hazard ratio, 3.18; P = .017) and positive margins (hazard ratio, 5.35; P < .001) were associated with lower rates LRC on MVA. Higher lymph node positivity ratio and not receiving adjuvant gemcitabine were independently associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS Timing of adjuvant CRT for resectable pancreatic cancer may not significantly affect LRC or OS. These findings support the ongoing RTOG 0848 trial design, and provide reassurance that delaying CRT until completion of chemotherapy should not significantly impact LRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | | | - Jackie Szymonifka
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Harvey J Mamon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David P Ryan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lawrence S Blaszkowsky
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eunice L Kwak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Cristina R Ferrone
- Department of General Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jill N Allen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew X Zhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brian M Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer A Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thomas A Abrams
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nadine J McCleary
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
McCleary NJ, Meyerhardt JA, Green E, Yothers G, de Gramont A, Van Cutsem E, O'Connell M, Twelves CJ, Saltz LB, Haller DG, Sargent DJ. Impact of age on the efficacy of newer adjuvant therapies in patients with stage II/III colon cancer: findings from the ACCENT database. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:2600-6. [PMID: 23733765 PMCID: PMC3699725 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.49.6638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 162] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Prior studies have suggested that patients with stage II/III colon cancer receive similar benefit from intravenous (IV) fluoropyrimidine adjuvant therapy regardless of age. Combination regimens and oral fluorouracil (FU) therapy are now standard. We examined the impact of age on colon cancer recurrence and mortality after adjuvant therapy with these newer options. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed 11,953 patients age < 70 and 2,575 age ≥ 70 years from seven adjuvant therapy trials comparing IV FU with oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine, uracil, or tegafur) or combinations of fluoropyrimidines with oxaliplatin or irinotecan in stage II/III colon cancer. End points were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and time to recurrence (TTR). RESULTS In three studies comparing oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy with IV FU, statistically significant interactions were not observed between treatment arm and age (P interaction = .09 for DFS, .05 for OS, and .36 for TTR), although the stratified point estimates suggested limited benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin in elderly patients (DFS hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.13; OS HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.27). No significant interactions by age were detected with oral fluoropyrimidine therapy compared with IV FU; noninferiority was supported in both age populations. CONCLUSION Patients age ≥ 70 years seemed to experience reduced benefit from adding oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidines in the adjuvant setting, although statistically, there was not a significant effect modification by age, whereas oral fluoropyrimidines retained their efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J McCleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wolpin BM, Ng K, Zhu AX, Abrams T, Enzinger PC, McCleary NJ, Schrag D, Kwak EL, Allen JN, Bhargava P, Chan JA, Goessling W, Blaszkowsky LS, Supko JG, Elliot M, Sato K, Regan E, Meyerhardt JA, Fuchs CS. Multicenter phase II study of tivozanib (AV-951) and everolimus (RAD001) for patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncologist 2013; 18:377-8. [PMID: 23580238 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatments that target the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway have efficacy in colorectal cancer. We evaluated tolerability and efficacy of tivozanib (an oral VEGF receptor-1, -2, -3 inhibitor) plus everolimus (an oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor). METHODS The phase Ib study followed a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with three dose levels. The primary objective in the follow-on phase II study was improvement in 2-month progression-free survival (PFS) from 30% (historical benchmark) to 50% in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer. RESULTS Dose-limiting toxicities in the phase Ib study were grade 3 fatigue and dehydration. Oral tivozanib (1 mg daily for 3 of 4 weeks) and oral everolimus (10 mg daily continuously) were advanced to a 40-patient phase II study. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia and hypophosphatemia. The 2-month PFS rate was 50%, with 20 of 40 patients having stable disease (SD). Seven (18%) patients were treated for ≥6 months. Median PFS and overall survival (OS) times were 3.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-3.6 months) and 5.6 months (95% CI: 4.4-10.6 months), respectively. Patients who developed grade 1+ hypertension had increased SD rates (65.2% vs. 29.4%) and longer OS times (10.6 vs. 3.7 months). CONCLUSIONS The oral combination of tivozanib and everolimus was well tolerated, with stable disease achieved in 50% of patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian M Wolpin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
McCleary NJ, Wigler D, Berry D, Sato K, Abrams T, Chan J, Enzinger P, Ng K, Wolpin B, Schrag D, Fuchs CS, Hurria A, Meyerhardt JA. Feasibility of computer-based self-administered cancer-specific geriatric assessment in older patients with gastrointestinal malignancy. Oncologist 2013; 18:64-72. [PMID: 23287880 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Cancer-Specific Geriatric Assessment (CSGA) is a primarily self-administered paper survey of validated measures. METHODS We developed and tested the feasibility of a computer-based CSGA in patients ≥70 years of age who were receiving treatment for gastrointestinal malignancies at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. From December 2009 to June 2011, patients were invited to complete the CSGA at baseline (start of new treatment) and follow-up (at the first of 4 months later or within 4 weeks of completing treatment). Feasibility endpoints were proportion of eligible patients consented, proportion completing CSGA at baseline and follow-up, time to complete CSGA, and proportion of physicians reporting CSGA results that led to a change in clinical decision-making. RESULTS Of the 49 eligible patients, 38 consented (76% were treatment naive). Median age was 77 years (range: 70-89 years), and 48% were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Mean physician-rated Karnofsky Performance Status was 87.5 at baseline (SD 8.4) and 83.5 at follow-up (SD 8). At baseline, 92% used a touchscreen computer; 97% completed the CSGA (51% independently). At follow-up, all patients used a touchscreen computer; 71% completed the CSGA (41% independently). Mean time to completion was 23 minutes at baseline (SD 8.4) and 20 minutes at follow-up (SD 5.1). The CSGA added information to clinical assessment for 75% at baseline (n = 27) and 65% at follow-up (n = 17), but it did not alter immediate clinical decision-making. CONCLUSION The computer-based CSGA feasibility endpoints were met, although approximately half of patients required assistance. The CSGA added information to clinical assessment but did not affect clinical decision-making, possibly due to limited alternate treatment options in this subset of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J McCleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ogino S, Shima K, Meyerhardt JA, McCleary NJ, Ng K, Hollis D, Saltz LB, Mayer RJ, Schaefer P, Whittom R, Hantel A, Benson AB, Spiegelman D, Goldberg RM, Bertagnolli MM, Fuchs CS. Predictive and prognostic roles of BRAF mutation in stage III colon cancer: results from intergroup trial CALGB 89803. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18:890-900. [PMID: 22147942 PMCID: PMC3271172 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-2246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 219] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Alterations in the RAS-RAF-MAP2K (MEK)-MAPK signaling pathway are major drivers in colorectal carcinogenesis. In colorectal cancer, BRAF mutation is associated with microsatellite instability (MSI), and typically predicts inferior prognosis. We examined the effect of BRAF mutation on survival and treatment efficacy in patients with stage III colon cancer. METHODS We assessed status of BRAF c.1799T>A (p.V600E) mutation and MSI in 506 stage III colon cancer patients enrolled in a randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial [5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FU/LV) vs. irinotecan (CPT11), FU and LV (IFL); CALGB 89803]. Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the prognostic role of BRAF mutation, adjusting for clinical features, adjuvant chemotherapy arm, and MSI status. RESULTS Compared with 431 BRAF wild-type patients, 75 BRAF-mutated patients experienced significantly worse overall survival [OS; log-rank P = 0.015; multivariate HR = 1.66; 95% CI: 1.05-2.63]. By assessing combined status of BRAF and MSI, it seemed that BRAF-mutated MSS (microsatellite stable) tumor was an unfavorable subtype, whereas BRAF wild-type MSI-high tumor was a favorable subtype, and BRAF-mutated MSI-high tumor and BRAF wild-type MSS tumor were intermediate subtypes. Among patients with BRAF-mutated tumors, a nonsignificant trend toward improved OS was observed for IFL versus FU/LV arm (multivariate HR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.25-1.10). Among patients with BRAF wild-type cancer, IFL conferred no suggestion of benefit beyond FU/LV alone (multivariate HR = 1.02; 95% CI: 0.72-1.46). CONCLUSIONS BRAF mutation is associated with inferior survival in stage III colon cancer. Additional studies are necessary to assess whether there is any predictive role of BRAF mutation for irinotecan-based therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuji Ogino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|