1
|
Pires da Silva I, Li I, Ugurel S, Serra-Bellver P, Andhale A, Burnette H, Aya F, Conway JW, Braden J, Carlino MS, Menzies AM, Weichenthal M, Mohr P, Gutzmer R, Arance AM, Johnson DB, Lorigan P, Schadendorf D, Lo SN, Long GV. Anti-PD-1 alone or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 for advanced melanoma patients with liver metastases. Eur J Cancer 2024; 205:114101. [PMID: 38735161 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 has been associated with improvement in response and survival over anti-PD-1 monotherapy in unselected patients with advanced melanoma. Whether patients with liver metastases also benefit from the combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 over anti-PD-1, is unclear. In this study, we sought to assess whether the combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 leads to better response, progression-free survival and overall survival, compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy for patients with liver metastases. METHODS We have conducted an international multicentre retrospective study. Patients with advanced melanoma with liver metastases treated with 1st line anti-PD1 monotherapy or with anti-CTLA-4 were included. The endpoints of this study were: objective response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS With a median follow-up from commencement of anti-PD-1 monotherapy or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 of 47 months (95% CI, 42-51), objective response rate was higher with combination therapy (47%) versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy (35%) (p = 0.0027), while progression-free survival and overall survival were not statistically different between both treatment groups. However, on multivariable analysis with multiple imputation for missing values and adjusting for predefined variables, combination of anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA-4 was associated with higher objective response (OR 2.21, 1.46 - 3.36; p < 0.001), progression-free survival (HR 0.73, 0.57 - 0.92; p = 0.009) and overall survival (HR 0.71, 0.54 - 0.94; p = 0.018) compared to anti-PD1 monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Findings from this study will help guide treatment selection for patients who present with liver metastases, suggesting that combination therapy should be considered for this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Isabel Li
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Selma Ugurel
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Hannah Burnette
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Francisco Aya
- Department of Medical Oncology, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordan W Conway
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jorja Braden
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Weichenthal
- University Skin Cancer Center Kiel, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Peter Mohr
- Elbe-Klinikum Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Ruhr University Bochum Campus Minden, Minden, Germany
| | - Ana M Arance
- Department of Medical Oncology, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Essen, Germany; Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum (WTZ) & National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT-West), Campus Essen & University Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia; Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sacco JJ, Jackson R, Corrie P, Danson S, Evans TRJ, Ochsenreither S, Kumar S, Goodman A, Larkin J, Karydis I, Steven N, Lorigan P, Plummer R, Patel P, Psarelli E, Olsson-Brown A, Shaw H, Leyvraz S, Handley L, Rawcliffe C, Nathan P. A three-arm randomised phase II study of the MEK inhibitor selumetinib alone or in combination with paclitaxel in metastatic uveal melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:114009. [PMID: 38547774 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
AIMS The MAPK pathway is constitutively activated in uveal melanoma (UM). Selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886), a MEK inhibitor, has shown limited activity as monotherapy in metastatic UM. Pre-clinical studies support synergistic cytotoxic activity for MEK inhibitors combined with taxanes, and here we sought to assess the clinical efficacy of combining selumetinib and paclitaxel. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-seven patients with metastatic UM who had not received prior chemotherapy were randomised to selumetinib alone, or combined with paclitaxel with or without interruption in selumetinib two days before paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). After amendment, the combination arms were combined for analysis and the sample size adjusted to detect a hazard ratio (HR): 0.55, 80% power at 1-sided 5% significance level. RESULTS The median PFS in the combination arms was 4.8 months (95% CI: 3.8 - 5.6) compared with 3.4 months (2.0 - 3.9) in the selumetinib arm (HR 0.62 [90% CI 0.41 - 0.92], 1-sided p-value = 0.022). ORR was 14% and 4% in the combination and monotherapy arms respectively. Median OS was 9 months for the combination and was not significantly different from selumetinib alone (10 months) with HR of 0.98 [90% CI 0.58 - 1.66], 1-sided p-value = 0.469. Toxicity was in keeping with the known profiles of the agents involved. CONCLUSIONS SelPac met its primary endpoint, demonstrating an improvement in PFS for combination selumetinib and paclitaxel. No improvement in OS was observed, and the modest improvement in PFS is not practice changing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph J Sacco
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK & University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Richard Jackson
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Pippa Corrie
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah Danson
- Sheffield Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Sheffield & Sheffield Teaching Hospital, UK
| | - T R Jeffry Evans
- University of Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Satish Kumar
- Velindre NHS Trust, Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - James Larkin
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ioannis Karydis
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Neil Steven
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Ruth Plummer
- The Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK
| | - Poulam Patel
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Campus, Nottingham, UK
| | - Eftychia Psarelli
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anna Olsson-Brown
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK & University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Heather Shaw
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Northwood, UK
| | | | - Louise Handley
- Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Charlotte Rawcliffe
- Liverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Paul Nathan
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Northwood, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kennedy OJ, Ali N, Lee R, Monaghan P, Adam S, Cooksley T, Lorigan P. Thyroid dysfunction after immune checkpoint inhibitors in a single-centre UK pan-cancer cohort: A retrospective study. Eur J Cancer 2024; 202:113949. [PMID: 38432099 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated thyroid dysfunction with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in terms of proportions affected, risk factors, thyroid sequelae, and overall survival (OS). METHODS Among patients with normal baseline free T4 (fT4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receiving ICIs at a large cancer centre, proportions of hyperthyroidism/hypothyroidism were determined (any, subclinical [normal fT4, abnormal TSH], overt [abnormal fT4, abnormal TSH], isolated hyperthyroxinaemia/hypothyroxinaemia and secondary) with onset times and subsequent thyroid statuses. Associations of overt dysfunction with OS were estimated using Cox regression and methods robust to immortal time bias (time-dependent Cox regression and 3- and 6-month landmark analyses). Associations of baseline variables with overt hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism were estimated using Fine and Gray regression. RESULTS Of 1349 patients, 34.2% developed hyperthyroidism (10.3% overt), including 54.9% receiving combination ICIs, while 28.2% developed hypothyroidism (overt 9.3%, secondary 0.5%). A third of overt hypothyroidism cases occurred without preceding hyperthyroidism. Subclinical thyroid dysfunction returned directly to normal in up to half. Overt hyperthyroidism progressed to overt hypothyroidism in 55.4% (median 1.6 months). Melanoma treatment in the adjuvant vs. advanced setting caused more overt hyperthyroidism (12.1% vs. 7.5%) and overt hypothyroidism (14.5% vs. 9.7%). Baseline eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR=1.68, 1.07-2.63) was associated with overt hyperthyroidism and sex (HR=0.60, 0.42-0.87) and TSH (4th vs. 1st quartile HR=1.87, 1.10-3.19) with overt hypothyroidism. Overt dysfunction was associated with OS in the Cox analysis (HR=0.65, 0.50-0.85, median follow-up 22.2 months) but not in the time-dependent Cox (HR=0.79, 0.60-1.03) or landmark analyses (3-month HR=0.74, 0.51-1.07; 6-month HR=0.91, 0.66-1.24). CONCLUSION Thyroid dysfunction affects up to half of patients receiving ICIs. The association with OS is unclear after considering immortal time bias. The clinical courses include recovery, thyrotoxicosis and de novo overt hypothyroidism. Adjuvant treatment for melanoma, where longer-term harms are of concern, causes more frequent/aggressive dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver John Kennedy
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Nadia Ali
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Rebecca Lee
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Phillip Monaghan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK; The Christie Pathology Partnership, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Safwaan Adam
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Tim Cooksley
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bai X, Shaheen A, Grieco C, d’Arienzo PD, Mina F, Czapla JA, Lawless AR, Bongiovanni E, Santaniello U, Zappi H, Dulak D, Williamson A, Lee R, Gupta A, Li C, Si L, Ubaldi M, Yamazaki N, Ogata D, Johnson R, Park BC, Jung S, Madonna G, Hochherz J, Umeda Y, Nakamura Y, Gebhardt C, Festino L, Capone M, Ascierto PA, Johnson DB, Lo SN, Long GV, Menzies AM, Namikawa K, Mandala M, Guo J, Lorigan P, Najjar YG, Haydon A, Quaglino P, Boland GM, Sullivan RJ, Furness AJ, Plummer R, Flaherty KT. Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy as adjuvant therapy in BRAF V600-mutant stage III melanoma after definitive surgery: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 71:102564. [PMID: 38572079 PMCID: PMC10990704 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Bai
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, China
- Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | | | | | | | - Florentia Mina
- Skin Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Eleonora Bongiovanni
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Italy
| | - Umberto Santaniello
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Italy
| | | | - Dominika Dulak
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Rebecca Lee
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Caili Li
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, China
| | - Lu Si
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, China
| | | | - Naoya Yamazaki
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dai Ogata
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rebecca Johnson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Benjamin C. Park
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Seungyeon Jung
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gabriele Madonna
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Juliane Hochherz
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), University Skin Cancer Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yoshiyasu Umeda
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Christoffer Gebhardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), University Skin Cancer Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lucia Festino
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Mariaelena Capone
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Douglas B. Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Serigne N. Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M. Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kenjiro Namikawa
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Jun Guo
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, China
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Pietro Quaglino
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kennedy OJ, Glassee N, Kicinski M, Blank CU, Long GV, Atkinson VG, Dalle S, Haydon AM, Meshcheryakov A, Khattak A, Carlino MS, Sandhu S, Larkin J, Puig S, Ascierto PA, Rutkowski P, Schadendorf D, Boers-Sonderen M, Giacomo AMD, van den Eertwegh AJM, Grob JJ, Gutzmer R, Jamal R, van Akkooi ACJ, Gandini S, Buhrer E, Suciu S, Robert C, Eggermont AMM, Mandala M, Lorigan P, Valpione S. Prognostic and predictive value of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 phase III trial of pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected high-risk stage III melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2024; 201:113585. [PMID: 38402687 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain is common in patients with cancer. The World Health Organisation recommends paracetamol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for mild pain and combined with other agents for moderate/severe pain. This study estimated associations of NSAIDs with recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in high-risk patients with resected melanoma in the EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 phase III clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with AJCC7 stage IIIA, IIIB or IIIC resected melanoma were randomized to receive 200 mg of adjuvant pembrolizumab (N = 514) or placebo (N = 505) 3-weekly for one year or until recurrence. As previously reported, pembrolizumab prolonged RFS and DMFS. NSAID use was defined as administration between 7 days pre-randomization and starting treatment. Multivariable Cox and Fine and Gray models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for associations of NSAIDs with RFS, DMFS and irAEs. RESULTS Of 1019 patients randomized, 59 and 44 patients in the pembrolizumab and placebo arms, respectively, used NSAIDs. NSAIDs were not associated with RFS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.58-1.43) or DMFS in the pembrolizumab (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.65-1.66) or placebo arms (for RFS, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.48-1.20; for DMFS, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.49-1.31). NSAIDs were associated with the incidence of irAEs in the placebo arm (HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.45-6.45) but not in the pembrolizumab arm (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.58-1.53). CONCLUSION NSAIDs were not associated with efficacy outcomes nor the risk of irAEs in patients with resected high-risk stage III melanoma receiving adjuvant pembrolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver John Kennedy
- University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Christian U Blank
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, the University of Sydney, and Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Adnan Khattak
- Fiona Stanley Hospital & Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Melanoma Institute Australia and the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Susana Puig
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Spain & Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen, Essen, German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen & University Alliance Ruhr Research Center One Health, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum Campus Minden, Minden, Germany
| | - Rahima Jamal
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Sara Gandini
- IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- Princess Máxima Center and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Technical University Munich & Ludwig Maximiliaan University, Munich, Germany
| | - Mario Mandala
- University of Perugia, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Valpione
- Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Cancer Research UK National Biomarker Centre, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Larkin J, Marais R, Porta N, Gonzalez de Castro D, Parsons L, Messiou C, Stamp G, Thompson L, Edmonds K, Sarker S, Banerji J, Lorigan P, Evans TRJ, Corrie P, Marshall E, Middleton MR, Nathan P, Nicholson S, Ottensmeier C, Plummer R, Bliss J, Valpione S, Turajlic S. Nilotinib in KIT-driven advanced melanoma: Results from the phase II single-arm NICAM trial. Cell Rep Med 2024; 5:101435. [PMID: 38417447 PMCID: PMC10982988 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Mucosal (MM) and acral melanomas (AM) are rare melanoma subtypes of unmet clinical need; 15%-20% harbor KIT mutations potentially targeted by small-molecule inhibitors, but none yet approved in melanoma. This multicenter, single-arm Phase II trial (NICAM) investigates nilotinib safety and activity in KIT mutated metastatic MM and AM. KIT mutations are identified in 39/219 screened patients (18%); of 29/39 treated, 26 are evaluable for primary analysis. Six patients were alive and progression free at 6 months (local radiology review, 25%); 5/26 (19%) had objective response at 12 weeks; median OS was 7.7 months; ddPCR assay correctly identifies KIT alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in 16/17 patients. Nilotinib is active in KIT-mutant AM and MM, comparable to other KIT inhibitors, with demonstrable activity in nonhotspot KIT mutations, supporting broadening of KIT evaluation in AM and MM. Our results endorse further investigations of nilotinib for the treatment of KIT-mutated melanoma. This clinical trial was registered with ISRCTN (ISRCTN39058880) and EudraCT (2009-012945-49).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Larkin
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Melanoma and Kidney Cancer Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Richard Marais
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nuria Porta
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - David Gonzalez de Castro
- Molecular Diagnostics, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lisa Parsons
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; PDD - Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bend, Oregon, USA
| | - Christina Messiou
- Department of Radiology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gordon Stamp
- Department of Histopathology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lisa Thompson
- Centre for Molecular Pathology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kim Edmonds
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sarah Sarker
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jane Banerji
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Unviersity of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Pippa Corrie
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ernest Marshall
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Paul Nathan
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East & North Herts NHS Trust, Northwood, UK
| | - Steve Nicholson
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Foundation Trust, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Ruth Plummer
- Newcastle University and Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Judith Bliss
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sara Valpione
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Samra Turajlic
- Skin and Renal Units, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Melanoma and Kidney Cancer Team, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Cancer Dynamics Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mandalà M, Lorigan P, Sergi MC, Benannoune N, Serra P, Vitale MG, Giannarelli D, Arance AM, Couselo EM, Neyns B, Tucci M, Guida M, Spagnolo F, Rossi E, Occelli M, Queirolo P, Quaglino P, Depenni R, Merelli B, Placzke J, Di Giacomo AM, Del Vecchio M, Indini A, da Silva IP, Menzies AM, Long GV, Robert C, Rutkowski P, Ascierto PA. Combined immunotherapy in melanoma patients with brain metastases: A multicenter international study. Eur J Cancer 2024; 199:113542. [PMID: 38266540 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.113542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ipilimumab plus nivolumab (COMBO) is the standard treatment in asymptomatic patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM). We report a retrospective study aiming to assess the outcome of patients with MBM treated with COMBO outside clinical trials. METHODS Consecutive patients treated with COMBO have been included. Demographics, steroid treatment, Central Nervous System (CNS)-related symptoms, BRAF status, radiotherapy or surgery, response rate (RR), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have been analyzed. RESULTS 376 patients were included: 262 received COMBO as first-line and 114 as a subsequent line of therapy, respectively. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) (≥1 vs 0) [HR 1.97 (1.46-2.66)], extracerebral metastases [HR 1.92 (1.09-3.40)], steroid use at the start of COMBO [HR 1.59 (1.08-2.38)], CNS-related symptoms [HR 1.59 (1.08-2.34)], SRS (Stereotactic radiosurgery) [HR 0.63 (0.45-0.88)] and surgery [HR 0.63 (0.43-0.91)] were associated with OS. At a median follow-up of 30 months, the median OS (mOS) in the overall population was 21.3 months (18.1-24.5), whilst OS was not yet reached in treatment-naive patients, steroid-free at baseline. In patients receiving COMBO after BRAF/MEK inhibitors(i) PFS at 1-year was 15.7%. The dose of steroids (dexamethasone < vs ≥ 4 mg/day) was not prognostic. SRS alongside COMBO vs COMBO alone in asymptomatic patients prolonged survival. (p = 0.013). Toxicities were consistent with previous studies. An independent validation cohort (n = 51) confirmed the findings. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate remarkable long-term survival in treatment-naïve, asymptomatic, steroid-free patients, as well as in those receiving SRS plus COMBO. PFS and OS were poor in patients receiving COMBO after progressing to BRAF/MEKi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Mandalà
- Unit of Medical Oncology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Maria Chiara Sergi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Patricio Serra
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Maria Grazia Vitale
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, I.N.T. IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale" Napoli, Naples, Italy
| | - Diana Giannarelli
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Eva Munoz Couselo
- Department of Medical Oncology. Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain & Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bart Neyns
- Department of Medical Oncology, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marco Tucci
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Michele Guida
- Rare Tumors and Melanoma Unit, IRCCS Istituto dei Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II," Bari, Italy
| | | | - Ernesto Rossi
- Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario, A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Pietro Quaglino
- Department of Dermatology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberta Depenni
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Department of Oncology, Hematology, Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
| | | | - Joanna Placzke
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | - Alice Indini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ines Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, and Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics, I.N.T. IRCCS Fondazione "G. Pascale" Napoli, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Björk JR, Bolte LA, Maltez Thomas A, Lee KA, Rossi N, Wind TT, Smit LM, Armanini F, Asnicar F, Blanco-Miguez A, Board R, Calbet-Llopart N, Derosa L, Dhomen N, Brooks K, Harland M, Harries M, Lorigan P, Manghi P, Marais R, Newton-Bishop J, Nezi L, Pinto F, Potrony M, Puig S, Serra-Bellver P, Shaw HM, Tamburini S, Valpione S, Waldron L, Zitvogel L, Zolfo M, de Vries EGE, Nathan P, Fehrmann RSN, Spector TD, Bataille V, Segata N, Hospers GAP, Weersma RK. Longitudinal gut microbiome changes in immune checkpoint blockade-treated advanced melanoma. Nat Med 2024; 30:785-796. [PMID: 38365950 PMCID: PMC10957474 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-02803-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
Multiple clinical trials targeting the gut microbiome are being conducted to optimize treatment outcomes for immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). To improve the success of these interventions, understanding gut microbiome changes during ICB is urgently needed. Here through longitudinal microbiome profiling of 175 patients treated with ICB for advanced melanoma, we show that several microbial species-level genome bins (SGBs) and pathways exhibit distinct patterns from baseline in patients achieving progression-free survival (PFS) of 12 months or longer (PFS ≥12) versus patients with PFS shorter than 12 months (PFS <12). Out of 99 SGBs that could discriminate between these two groups, 20 were differentially abundant only at baseline, while 42 were differentially abundant only after treatment initiation. We identify five and four SGBs that had consistently higher abundances in patients with PFS ≥12 and <12 months, respectively. Constructing a log ratio of these SGBs, we find an association with overall survival. Finally, we find different microbial dynamics in different clinical contexts including the type of ICB regimen, development of immune-related adverse events and concomitant medication use. Insights into the longitudinal dynamics of the gut microbiome in association with host factors and treatment regimens will be critical for guiding rational microbiome-targeted therapies aimed at enhancing ICB efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes R Björk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Laura A Bolte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Andrew Maltez Thomas
- Department of CellularComputational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Karla A Lee
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Niccolo Rossi
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Thijs T Wind
- Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningent, the Netherlands
| | - Lotte M Smit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningent, the Netherlands
| | - Federica Armanini
- Department of CellularComputational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Francesco Asnicar
- Department of CellularComputational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Aitor Blanco-Miguez
- Department of CellularComputational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Ruth Board
- Department of Oncology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Neus Calbet-Llopart
- Department of Dermatology, Melanoma Group, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lisa Derosa
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, U1015 INSERM and Oncobiome Network, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif-Grand-Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Dhomen
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kelly Brooks
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Harland
- Division of Haematology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Mark Harries
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guys Cancer Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
- Biochemical and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona and IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Paolo Manghi
- Department of CellularComputational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Richard Marais
- Molecular Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Julia Newton-Bishop
- Division of Haematology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Luigi Nezi
- European Institute of Oncology (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia), Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Pinto
- Department of CellularComputational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Miriam Potrony
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
- Biochemical and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona and IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Susana Puig
- Department of Dermatology, Melanoma Group, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Heather M Shaw
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Herts NHS Trust, Northwood, UK
| | - Sabrina Tamburini
- European Institute of Oncology (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia), Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Valpione
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Levi Waldron
- Department of CellularComputational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
- Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laurence Zitvogel
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, U1015 INSERM and Oncobiome Network, University Paris Saclay, Villejuif-Grand-Paris, France
| | - Moreno Zolfo
- Department of CellularComputational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningent, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Nathan
- Biochemical and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona and IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Herts NHS Trust, Northwood, UK
| | - Rudolf S N Fehrmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningent, the Netherlands
| | - Tim D Spector
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Véronique Bataille
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Dermatology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
- Department of Dermatology, Hemel Hempstead Hospital, West Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Hemel Hempstead, UK
| | - Nicola Segata
- Department of CellularComputational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
- European Institute of Oncology (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia), Milan, Italy
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Groningen University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningent, the Netherlands
| | - Rinse K Weersma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maul LV, Jamiolkowski D, Lapides RA, Mueller AM, Hauschild A, Garbe C, Lorigan P, Gershenwald JE, Ascierto PA, Long GV, Wang-Evers M, Scolyer RA, Saravi B, Augustin M, Navarini AA, Legge S, Németh IB, Jánosi ÁJ, Mocellin S, Feller A, Manstein D, Zink A, Maul JT, Buja A, Adhikari K, Roider E. Health Economic Consequences Associated With COVID-19-Related Delay in Melanoma Diagnosis in Europe. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2356479. [PMID: 38363565 PMCID: PMC10873772 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in delayed access to medical care. Restrictions to health care specialists, staff shortages, and fear of SARS-CoV-2 infection led to interruptions in routine care, such as early melanoma detection; however, premature mortality and economic burden associated with this postponement have not been studied yet. Objective To determine the premature mortality and economic costs associated with suspended melanoma screenings during COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns by estimating the total burden of delayed melanoma diagnoses for Europe. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter economic evaluation used population-based data from patients aged at least 18 years with invasive primary cutaneous melanomas stages I to IV according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) seventh and eighth editions, including melanomas of unknown primary (T0). Data were collected from January 2017 to December 2021 in Switzerland and from January 2019 to December 2021 in Hungary. Data were used to develop an estimation of melanoma upstaging rates in AJCC stages, which was verified with peripandemic data. Years of life lost (YLL) were calculated and were, together with cost data, used for financial estimations. The total financial burden was assessed through direct and indirect treatment costs. Models were building using data from 50 072 patients aged 18 years and older with invasive primary cutaneous melanomas stages I to IV according to the AJCC seventh and eighth edition, including melanomas of unknown primary (T0) from 2 European tertiary centers. Data from European cancer registries included patient-based direct and indirect cost data, country-level economic indicators, melanoma incidence, and population rates per country. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to September 2022. Exposure COVID-19 lockdown-related delay of melanoma detection and consecutive public health and economic burden. As lockdown restrictions varied by country, lockdown scenario was defined as elimination of routine medical examinations and severely restricted access to follow-up examinations for at least 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were the total burden of a delay in melanoma diagnosis during COVID-19 lockdown periods, measured using the direct (in US$) and indirect (calculated as YLL plus years lost due to disability [YLD] and disability-adjusted life-years [DALYs]) costs for Europe. Secondary outcomes included estimation of upstaging rate, estimated YLD, YLL, and DALY for each European country, absolute direct and indirect treatment costs per European country, proportion of the relative direct and indirect treatment costs for the countries, and European health expenditure. Results There were an estimated 111 464 (range, 52 454-295 051) YLL due to pandemic-associated delay in melanoma diagnosis in Europe, and estimated total additional costs were $7.65 (range, $3.60 to $20.25) billion. Indirect treatment costs were the main cost driver, accounting for 94.5% of total costs. Estimates for YLD in Europe resulted in 15 360 years for the 17% upstaging model, ranging from 7228 years (8% upstaging model) to 40 660 years (45% upstaging model). Together, YLL and YLD constitute the overall disease burden, ranging from 59 682 DALYs (8% upstaging model) to 335 711 DALYs (45% upstaging model), with 126 824 DALYs for the real-world 17% scenario. Conclusions and Relevance This economic analysis emphasizes the importance of continuing secondary skin cancer prevention measures during pandemics. Beyond the personal outcomes of a delayed melanoma diagnosis, the additional economic and public health consequences are underscored, emphasizing the need to include indirect economic costs in future decision-making processes. These estimates on DALYs and the associated financial losses complement previous studies highlighting the cost-effectiveness of screening for melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara V. Maul
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dagmar Jamiolkowski
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Division of Pediatric Dermatology, Children’s Hospital Auf der Bult, Hannover, Germany
| | - Rebecca A. Lapides
- Robert Larner, MD, College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
- Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown
| | - Alina M. Mueller
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Claus Garbe
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael Wang-Evers
- Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown
| | - Richard A. Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Babak Saravi
- Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Stefan Legge
- Institute of Law and Economics, University of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland
| | - István B. Németh
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Szent-Györgyi Albert Medical School, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Ágnes J. Jánosi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Szent-Györgyi Albert Medical School, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Simone Mocellin
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Istituto Oncologico Veneto – IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Anita Feller
- National Agency for Cancer Registration, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Foundation National Institute for Cancer Epidemiology and Registration, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dieter Manstein
- Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown
| | - Alexander Zink
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Julia-Tatjana Maul
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alessandra Buja
- Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Via Loredan, Padova, Italy
| | - Kaustubh Adhikari
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
- Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, and UCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elisabeth Roider
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cooksley T, Weaver J, McNamara M, Lorigan P. Immune checkpoint inhibitor related myasthenia gravis, myositis and myocarditis: A triad but not at the same time? QJM 2024:hcae006. [PMID: 38229249 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Cooksley
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jamie Weaver
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mairead McNamara
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Stratigos AJ, Garbe C, Dessinioti C, Lebbe C, van Akkooi A, Bataille V, Bastholt L, Dreno B, Dummer R, Fargnoli MC, Forsea AM, Harwood CA, Hauschild A, Hoeller C, Kandolf-Sekulovic L, Kaufmann R, Kelleners-Smeets NW, Lallas A, Leiter U, Malvehy J, Del Marmol V, Moreno-Ramirez D, Pellacani G, Peris K, Saiag P, Tagliaferri L, Trakatelli M, Ioannides D, Vieira R, Zalaudek I, Arenberger P, Eggermont AMM, Röcken M, Grob JJ, Lorigan P. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Part 2. Treatment-Update 2023. Eur J Cancer 2023; 193:113252. [PMID: 37708630 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
In order to update recommendations on treatment, supportive care, education, and follow-up of patients with invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), a multidisciplinary panel of experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), and the European Organisation of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed. Recommendations were based on an evidence-based literature review, guidelines, and expert consensus. Treatment recommendations are presented for common primary cSCC (low risk, high risk), locally advanced cSCC, regional metastatic cSCC (operable or inoperable), and distant metastatic cSCC. For common primary cSCC, the first-line treatment is surgical excision with postoperative margin assessment or micrographically controlled surgery. Achieving clear surgical margins is the most important treatment consideration for patients with cSCCs amenable to surgery. Regarding adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with high-risk localised cSCC with clear surgical margins, current evidence has not shown significant benefit for those with at least one high-risk factor. Radiotherapy should be considered as the primary treatment for non-surgical candidates/tumours. For cSCC with cytologically or histologically confirmed regional nodal metastasis, lymph node dissection is recommended. For patients with metastatic or locally advanced cSCC who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiotherapy, anti-PD-1 agents are the first-line systemic treatment, with cemiplimab being the first approved systemic agent for advanced cSCC by the Food and Drugs Administration/European Medicines Agency. Second-line systemic treatments for advanced cSCC, include epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (cetuximab) combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Multidisciplinary board decisions are mandatory for all patients with advanced cSCC, considering the risks of toxicity, the age and frailty of patients, and co-morbidities, including immunosuppression. Patients should be engaged in informed, shared decision-making on management and be provided with the best supportive care to improve symptom management and quality of life. The frequency of follow-up visits and investigations for subsequent new cSCC depends on underlying risk characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Stratigos
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - Claus Garbe
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Clio Dessinioti
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Celeste Lebbe
- Université Paris Cite, Dermato-Oncology AP-HP Hôpital Saint Louis, Cancer Institute APHP. Nord-Université Paris Cite, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - Alexander van Akkooi
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Brigitte Dreno
- Nantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Immunology and New Concepts in ImmunoTherapy, INCIT, UMR 1302/EMR6001, Nantes, France
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- Skin Cancer Centre at University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maria Concetta Fargnoli
- Dermatology Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Ana Maria Forsea
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Department of Oncologic Dermatology, Elias University Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Catherine A Harwood
- Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Hoeller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Roland Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nicole Wj Kelleners-Smeets
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Aimilios Lallas
- First Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Josep Malvehy
- Dermatology Department of Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBER de enfermedades raras, Instituto Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Veronique Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David Moreno-Ramirez
- Department of Medical and Surgical Dermatology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Ketty Peris
- UOC di Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endocrino Metaboliche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Dermatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Philippe Saiag
- Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise-Paré hospital, APHP, and EA 4340 'Biomarkers in Cancerology and Hemato-oncology', UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A, Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Myrto Trakatelli
- Department of Dermatology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University Department of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Ricardo Vieira
- Department of Dermatology, Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Iris Zalaudek
- Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Petr Arenberger
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- University Medical Center Utrecht and Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Technical University Munich and Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Röcken
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bai X, Shaheen A, Grieco C, d’Arienzo PD, Mina F, Czapla JA, Lawless AR, Bongiovanni E, Santaniello U, Zappi H, Dulak D, Williamson A, Lee R, Gupta A, Li C, Si L, Ubaldi M, Yamazaki N, Ogata D, Johnson R, Park BC, Jung S, Madonna G, Hochherz J, Umeda Y, Nakamura Y, Gebhardt C, Festino L, Capone M, Ascierto PA, Johnson DB, Lo SN, Long GV, Menzies AM, Namikawa K, Mandala M, Guo J, Lorigan P, Najjar YG, Haydon A, Quaglino P, Boland GM, Sullivan RJ, Furness AJ, Plummer R, Flaherty KT. Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus anti-PD-1 monotherapy as adjuvant therapy in BRAF V600-mutant stage III melanoma after definitive surgery: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 65:102290. [PMID: 37965433 PMCID: PMC10641479 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Both dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) and anti-PD-1 monotherapy (PD-1) are approved adjuvant therapies for patients with stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. However, there is still a lack of head-to-head comparative data. We aimed to describe efficacy and toxicity outcomes for these two standard therapies across melanoma centers. Methods This multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted in 15 melanoma centers in Australia, China, Germany, Italy, Japan, UK, and US. We included adult patients with resected stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma who received either adjuvant D/T or PD-1 between Jul 2015 and Oct 2022. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), recurrence pattern and toxicity. Findings We included 598 patients with stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma who received either adjuvant D/T (n = 393 [66%]) or PD-1 (n = 205 [34%]) post definitive surgery between Jul 2015 and Oct 2022. At a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 21-43), the median RFS was 51.0 months (95% CI 41.0-not reached [NR]) in the D/T group, significantly longer than PD-1 (44.8 months [95% CI 28.5-NR]) (univariate: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.87, P = 0.003; multivariate: HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.86, P = 0.007), with comparable OS with PD-1 (multivariate, HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.48-1.70, P = 0.75). Similar findings were observed using a restricted-mean-survival-time model. Among those who experienced recurrence, the proportion of distant metastases was higher in the D/T cohort. D/T had a higher incidence of treatment modification due to adverse events (AEs) than PD-1, but fewer persistent AEs. Interpretation In patients with stage III BRAF V600-mutant melanoma post definitive surgery, D/T yielded better RFS than PD-1, with higher transient but lower persistent toxicity, and comparable OS. D/T seems to provide a better outcome compared with PD-1, but a longer follow-up and ideally a large prospective trial are needed. Funding Dr. Xue Bai was supported by the Beijing Hospitals Authority Youth Programme (QMS20211101) for her efforts devoted to this study. Dr. Keith T. Flaherty was funded by Adelson Medical Research Foundation for the efforts devoted to this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Bai
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
- Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | | | | | | | - Florentia Mina
- Skin Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | | | - Eleonora Bongiovanni
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Italy
| | - Umberto Santaniello
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Italy
| | | | - Dominika Dulak
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Rebecca Lee
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Caili Li
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Si
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | | | - Naoya Yamazaki
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Dai Ogata
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rebecca Johnson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Benjamin C. Park
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Seungyeon Jung
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Gabriele Madonna
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Juliane Hochherz
- Department of Dermatology, University Skin Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Yoshiyasu Umeda
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Nakamura
- Department of Skin Oncology/Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Christoffer Gebhardt
- Department of Dermatology, University Skin Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lucia Festino
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Mariaelena Capone
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Department of Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics - Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Douglas B. Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Serigne N. Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M. Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kenjiro Namikawa
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Jun Guo
- Department of Melanoma and Sarcoma, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - Pietro Quaglino
- Dermatologic Clinic, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin Medical School, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stratigos AJ, Garbe C, Dessinioti C, Lebbe C, van Akkooi A, Bataille V, Bastholt L, Dreno B, Dummer R, Fargnoli MC, Forsea AM, Harwood CA, Hauschild A, Hoeller C, Kandolf-Sekulovic L, Kaufmann R, Kelleners-Smeets NW, Lallas A, Leiter U, Malvehy J, Del Marmol V, Moreno-Ramirez D, Pellacani G, Peris K, Saiag P, Tagliaferri L, Trakatelli M, Ioannides D, Vieira R, Zalaudek I, Arenberger P, Eggermont AMM, Röcken M, Grob JJ, Lorigan P. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Part 1: Diagnostics and prevention-Update 2023. Eur J Cancer 2023; 193:113251. [PMID: 37717283 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is one of the most common cancers in white populations, accounting for 20% of all cutaneous malignancies. Overall, cSCC mostly has very good prognosis after treatment, with 5-year cure rates greater than 90%. Despite the overall favourable prognosis and the proportionally rare deaths, cSCC is associated with a high total number of deaths due to its high incidence. A collaboration of multidisciplinary experts from the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), was formed to update recommendations on cSCC, based on current literature and expert consensus. Part 1 of the guidelines addresses the updates on classification, epidemiology, diagnosis, risk stratification, staging and prevention in immunocompetent as well as immunosuppressed patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Stratigos
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - Claus Garbe
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Clio Dessinioti
- First Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Celeste Lebbe
- Université Paris Cite, Dermato-Oncology AP-HP Hôpital Saint Louis, Cancer Institute APHP. Nord-Université Paris Cite, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - Alexander van Akkooi
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Brigitte Dreno
- Nantes Université, INSERM, CNRS, Immunology and New Concepts in ImmunoTherapy, INCIT, UMR 1302/EMR6001, Nantes, France
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- Skin Cancer Centre at University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Maria Concetta Fargnoli
- Dermatology Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Ana Maria Forsea
- Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Department of Oncologic Dermatology, Elias University Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Catherine A Harwood
- Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Hoeller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Roland Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nicole Wj Kelleners-Smeets
- GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Aimilios Lallas
- First Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Josep Malvehy
- Dermatology Department of Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBER de enfermedades raras, Instituto Carlos III, Barcelona Spain
| | - Veronique Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - David Moreno-Ramirez
- Department of Medical and Surgical Dermatology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Ketty Peris
- UOC di Dermatologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Addominali ed Endocrino Metaboliche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Dermatologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Philippe Saiag
- Department of General and Oncologic Dermatology, Ambroise-Paré hospital, APHP, and EA 4340 'Biomarkers in Cancerology and Hemato-oncology', UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Myrto Trakatelli
- Department of Dermatology, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University Department of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Ricardo Vieira
- Department of Dermatology Coimbra Hospital and University Centre, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Iris Zalaudek
- Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Petr Arenberger
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- University Medical Center Utrecht and Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Technical University Munich and Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Martin Röcken
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mallardo D, Woodford R, Menzies AM, Zimmer L, Williamson A, Ramelyte E, Dimitriou F, Wicky A, Wallace R, Mallardo M, Cortellini A, Budillon A, Atkinson V, Sandhu S, Olivier M, Dummer R, Lorigan P, Schadendorf D, Long GV, Simeone E, Ascierto PA. The role of diabetes in metastatic melanoma patients treated with nivolumab plus relatlimab. J Transl Med 2023; 21:753. [PMID: 37880788 PMCID: PMC10601323 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04607-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The combination of nivolumab + relatlimab is superior to nivolumab alone in the treatment of naive patients and has activity in PD-1 refractory melanoma. We had previously observed a reduced expression of LAG3 in melanoma tissue from patients with type 2 diabetes. METHOD To evaluate the impact of diabetes on oncological outcomes of patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab plus the LAG3 inhibitor relatlimab we performed a retrospective multicenter study. RESULTS Overall, 129 patients were included: 88 without diabetes before the treatment, 37 who were diagnosed with type 2 diabetes before the start of treatment, and 4 without diabetes before treatment who developed immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes (ICI-DM). PFS was 21.71 months (95% CI: 15.61-27.81) in patients without diabetes, 10.23 months (95% CI: 5.81-14.66) in patients with type 2 diabetes, and 50.85 months (95% CI: 23.04-78.65) in patients who developed ICI-DM. OS was 37.94 months (95% CI: 31.02-44.85) in patients without diabetes, 22.12 months (95% CI: 14.41-29.85) in those with type 2 diabetes and 57.64 months (95% CI: 42.29-72.99) in those who developed ICI-DM. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of diabetes and LDH was correlated with OS and PFS. The mean OS was 64.63 months in subjects with low levels of glucose (< 137 mg/dl) and 36.27 months in those with high levels (hazard ratio 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04-0.58; p = 0.005). The patients whose glucose blood level increased after 3 months of treatment with nivolumab + relatinib compared to baseline (ratio of blood level at baseline/after 3 months > 1.5) had a worse prognosis than those whose glucose level had not increased. This result was observed also in subgroups treated either in first line or further lines. Patients who developed ICI-DM during the study period had better outcomes than the overall population and patients without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS LAG3 inhibition for treating metastatic or unresectable melanoma has a reduced efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, possibly due to a low expression of LAG3 in tumor tissue. Higher level evidence should be obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Mallardo
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy, and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Rachel Woodford
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa Zimmer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, NCT-West, German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen and University Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, Essen, Germany
| | - Andrew Williamson
- Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Cancer Services, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Egle Ramelyte
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Alexandre Wicky
- Department of Oncology, Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Mario Mallardo
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy, and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessio Cortellini
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London, W120HS, UK
- Operative Research Unit of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Budillon
- Scientific Director, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Victoria Atkinson
- Greenslopes Private Hospital, University of Queensland QLD, Greenslopes, Australia
| | | | - Michielin Olivier
- Department of Oncology, Precision Oncology Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Rue du Bugnon 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Reinhard Dummer
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Cancer Services, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, NCT-West, German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen and University Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, Essen, Germany
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ester Simeone
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy, and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy, and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Via Mariano Semmola, 53, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wong CW, Evangelou C, Sefton KN, Leshem R, Zhang W, Gopalan V, Chattrakarn S, Fernandez Carro ML, Uzuner E, Mole H, Wilcock DJ, Smith MP, Sergiou K, Telfer BA, Isaac DT, Liu C, Perl NR, Marie K, Lorigan P, Williams KJ, Rao PE, Nagaraju RT, Niepel M, Hurlstone AFL. PARP14 inhibition restores PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor response following IFNγ-driven acquired resistance in preclinical cancer models. Nat Commun 2023; 14:5983. [PMID: 37752135 PMCID: PMC10522711 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41737-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint blockade therapy (ICBT) limit its response duration and magnitude. Paradoxically, Interferon γ (IFNγ), a key cytokine for cellular immunity, can promote ICBT resistance. Using syngeneic mouse tumour models, we confirm that chronic IFNγ exposure confers resistance to immunotherapy targeting PD-1 (α-PD-1) in immunocompetent female mice. We observe upregulation of poly-ADP ribosyl polymerase 14 (PARP14) in chronic IFNγ-treated cancer cell models, in patient melanoma with elevated IFNG expression, and in melanoma cell cultures from ICBT-progressing lesions characterised by elevated IFNγ signalling. Effector T cell infiltration is enhanced in tumours derived from cells pre-treated with IFNγ in immunocompetent female mice when PARP14 is pharmacologically inhibited or knocked down, while the presence of regulatory T cells is decreased, leading to restoration of α-PD-1 sensitivity. Finally, we determine that tumours which spontaneously relapse in immunocompetent female mice following α-PD-1 therapy upregulate IFNγ signalling and can also be re-sensitised upon receiving PARP14 inhibitor treatment, establishing PARP14 as an actionable target to reverse IFNγ-driven ICBT resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun Wai Wong
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Christos Evangelou
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Kieran N Sefton
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Rotem Leshem
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Wei Zhang
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Vishaka Gopalan
- Cancer Data Science Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA
| | - Sorayut Chattrakarn
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Macarena Lucia Fernandez Carro
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Erez Uzuner
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Holly Mole
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Daniel J Wilcock
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Michael P Smith
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Kleita Sergiou
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Brian A Telfer
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Dervla T Isaac
- Ribon Therapeutics Inc., 35 Cambridge Park Drive, Suite 300, Cambridge, MA, 02140, USA
| | - Chang Liu
- Ribon Therapeutics Inc., 35 Cambridge Park Drive, Suite 300, Cambridge, MA, 02140, USA
| | - Nicholas R Perl
- Ribon Therapeutics Inc., 35 Cambridge Park Drive, Suite 300, Cambridge, MA, 02140, USA
| | - Kerrie Marie
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Kaye J Williams
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | | | - Raghavendar T Nagaraju
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
- Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester, UK
| | - Mario Niepel
- Ribon Therapeutics Inc., 35 Cambridge Park Drive, Suite 300, Cambridge, MA, 02140, USA
| | - Adam F L Hurlstone
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weaver JM, Dodd K, Knight T, Chaudhri M, Khera R, Lilleker JB, Roberts M, Lorigan P, Cooksley T. Improved outcomes with early immunosuppression in patients with immune-checkpoint inhibitor induced myasthenia gravis, myocarditis and myositis: a case series. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:518. [PMID: 37572133 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07987-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare but life-threatening complication of immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and often co-presents with myositis and myocarditis. Previous case series of ICI-related MG have reported high mortality rates. We present a series of ten patients from a tertiary oncology centre outlining outcomes of an early multi-modal immunosuppression strategy. METHODS We reviewed The Christie Hospital database of immunotherapy-related toxicity from 2017 to 2020. Symptom severity was assessed using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) classification. RESULTS Ten patients with ICI-related MG were identified. All patients presented following 1 (n = 4) or 2 (n = 6) cycles of ICI. Symptom progression was rapid with a median of 3 days from onset of symptoms to admission. Concomitant myositis and myocarditis were observed in nine patients. AChR or MuSK autoantibodies were positive in six patients. All patients received urgent treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) and eight received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). A single patient died from myasthenia-related symptoms; the remaining 9 patients were successfully discharged. CONCLUSION In our cohort, we demonstrate good outcomes associated with early intensive immunosuppressive treatment with IVIG and IVMP. An agreed national treatment protocol or clinical discussion forum would be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Mj Weaver
- Department of Acute Medicine, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road Manchester, Manchester, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katie Dodd
- Manchester centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK
| | - Tom Knight
- Department of Acute Medicine, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Raj Khera
- Department of Acute Medicine, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - James B Lilleker
- Manchester centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Roberts
- Manchester centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Department of Acute Medicine, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road Manchester, Manchester, UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tim Cooksley
- Department of Acute Medicine, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road Manchester, Manchester, UK.
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kennedy OJ, Kicinski M, Valpione S, Gandini S, Suciu S, Blank CU, Long GV, Atkinson VG, Dalle S, Haydon AM, Meshcheryakov A, Khattak A, Carlino MS, Sandhu S, Larkin J, Puig S, Ascierto PA, Rutkowski P, Schadendorf D, Boers-Sonderen M, Di Giacomo AM, van den Eertwegh AJM, Grob JJ, Gutzmer R, Jamal R, van Akkooi ACJ, Robert C, Eggermont AMM, Lorigan P, Mandala M. Prognostic and predictive value of metformin in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 1325/KEYNOTE-054 phase III trial of pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected high-risk stage III melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2023; 189:112900. [PMID: 37277264 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metformin is a commonly prescribed and well-tolerated medication. In laboratory studies, metformin suppresses BRAF wild-type melanoma cells but accelerates the growth of BRAF-mutated cells. This study investigated the prognostic and predictive value of metformin, including with respect to BRAF mutation status, in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 1325/KEYNOTE-054 randomised controlled trial. METHODS Patients with resected high-risk stage IIIA, IIIB, or IIIC melanoma received 200 mg of pembrolizumab (n = 514) or placebo (n = 505) every 3 weeks for twelve months. Pembrolizumab prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) at approximately 42 months median follow-up (Eggermont et al., TLO, 2021). Multivariable Cox regression was used to estimate associations of metformin with RFS and DMFS. Interaction terms were used to model effect modification by treatment and BRAF mutation. RESULTS Fifty-four patients (0.5%) used metformin at baseline. Metformin was not significantly associated with RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-1.45) and DMFS (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.47-1.44). The interaction between metformin and the treatment arm was not significant for either RFS (p = 0.92) or DMFS (p = 0.93). Among patients with mutated BRAF, the association of metformin with RFS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.37-1.33) was greater in magnitude though not significantly different to those without mutated BRAF (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.56-1.69). CONCLUSIONS There was no significant impact of metformin use on pembrolizumab efficacy in resected high-risk stage III melanoma. However, larger studies or pooled analyses are needed, particularly to explore a possible effect of metformin in BRAF-mutated melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver John Kennedy
- University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom; Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Sara Valpione
- Division of Immunology, Immunity to Infection and Respiratory Medicine, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Christian U Blank
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, the University of Sydney, and Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Adnan Khattak
- Fiona Stanley Hospital & Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Melanoma Institute Australia and the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Susana Puig
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, and Spain &Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen, Essen, German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen & University Alliance Ruhr Research Center One Health, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Department of Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum Campus Minden, Minden, Germany
| | - Rahima Jamal
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- Princess Máxima Center and University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CS Utrecht, the Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Technical University Munich & Ludwig Maximiliaan University, Munich, Germany
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, Wilmslow Rd, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mario Mandala
- University of Perugia, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lee R, Mandala M, Long GV, Eggermont AMM, van Akkooi ACJ, Sandhu S, Garbe C, Lorigan P. Adjuvant therapy for stage II melanoma: the need for further studies. Eur J Cancer 2023; 189:112914. [PMID: 37301717 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionised the outcomes for melanoma patients. In the metastatic setting, patients treated with nivolumab and ipilimumab have an expected 5-year survival of> 50%. For patients with resected high-risk stage III disease, adjuvant pembrolizumab, nivolumab or dabrafenib and trametinib are associated with a significant improvement in both relapse-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). More recently neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown very promising outcomes in patients with clinically detectable nodal disease and is likely to become a new standard of care. For stage IIB/C disease, two pivotal adjuvant trials of pembrolizumab and nivolumab have also reported a significant improvement in both RFS and DMFS. However, the absolute benefit is low and there are concerns about the risk of severe toxicities as well as long-term morbidity from endocrine toxicity. Ongoing registration phase III trials are currently evaluating newer immunotherapy combinations and the role of BRAF/MEK-directed targeted therapy for stage II melanoma. However, our ability to personalise therapy based on molecular risk stratification has lagged behind the development of novel immune therapies. There is a critical need to evaluate the use of tissue and blood-based biomarkers, to better select patients that will recur and avoid unnecessary treatment for the majority of patients cured by surgery alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Lee
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Oncology, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, UK
| | - Mario Mandala
- University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy; Ospedale Papa Givoanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- University Medical Center Utrecht & Princess Maxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Comprehensive Cancer Center München, Technical University München & Ludwig Maximiliaan University, München, Germany
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Comprehensive Cancer Center München, Technical University München & Ludwig Maximiliaan University, München, Germany; Melanoma Institute Australia, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claus Garbe
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Oncology, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rasco DW, Medina T, Corrie P, Pavlick AC, Middleton MR, Lorigan P, Hebert C, Plummer R, Larkin J, Agarwala SS, Daud AI, Qiu J, Bozon V, Kneissl M, Barry E, Olszanski AJ. Phase 1 study of the pan-RAF inhibitor tovorafenib in patients with advanced solid tumors followed by dose expansion in patients with metastatic melanoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2023; 92:15-28. [PMID: 37219686 PMCID: PMC10261210 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-023-04544-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Genomic alterations of BRAF and NRAS are oncogenic drivers in malignant melanoma and other solid tumors. Tovorafenib is an investigational, oral, selective, CNS-penetrant, small molecule, type II pan‑RAF inhibitor. This first-in-human phase 1 study explored the safety and antitumor activity of tovorafenib. METHODS This two-part study in adult patients with relapsed or refractory advanced solid tumors included a dose escalation phase and a dose expansion phase including molecularly defined cohorts of patients with melanoma. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety of tovorafenib administered once every other day (Q2D) or once weekly (QW), and to determine the maximum-tolerated and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) on these schedules. Secondary objectives included evaluation of antitumor activity and tovorafenib pharmacokinetics. RESULTS Tovorafenib was administered to 149 patients (Q2D n = 110, QW n = 39). The RP2D of tovorafenib was defined as 200 mg Q2D or 600 mg QW. In the dose expansion phase, 58 (73%) of 80 patients in Q2D cohorts and 9 (47%) of 19 in the QW cohort had grade ≥ 3 adverse events. The most common of these overall were anemia (14 patients, 14%) and maculo-papular rash (8 patients, 8%). Responses were seen in 10 (15%) of 68 evaluable patients in the Q2D expansion phase, including in 8 of 16 (50%) patients with BRAF mutation-positive melanoma naïve to RAF and MEK inhibitors. In the QW dose expansion phase, there were no responses in 17 evaluable patients with NRAS mutation-positive melanoma naïve to RAF and MEK inhibitors; 9 patients (53%) had a best response of stable disease. QW dose administration was associated with minimal accumulation of tovorafenib in systemic circulation in the dose range of 400-800 mg. CONCLUSIONS The safety profile of both schedules was acceptable, with QW dosing at the RP2D of 600 mg QW preferred for future clinical studies. Antitumor activity of tovorafenib in BRAF-mutated melanoma was promising and justifies continued clinical development across multiple settings. CLINICALTRIALS GOV IDENTIFIER NCT01425008.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drew W Rasco
- South Texas Accelerated Research Therapeutics, LLC, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | - Pippa Corrie
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anna C Pavlick
- Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark R Middleton
- Department of Oncology, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Chris Hebert
- Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, UK
| | - Ruth Plummer
- The Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | - Adil I Daud
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jiaheng Qiu
- Day One Biopharmaceuticals, 2000 Sierra Point Parkway, Suite 501, Brisbane, CA, 94005, USA
| | - Viviana Bozon
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Michelle Kneissl
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Elly Barry
- Day One Biopharmaceuticals, 2000 Sierra Point Parkway, Suite 501, Brisbane, CA, 94005, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Visconti A, Rossi N, Deriš H, Lee KA, Hanić M, Trbojević-Akmačić I, Thomas AM, Bolte LA, Björk JR, Hooiveld-Noeken JS, Board R, Harland M, Newton-Bishop J, Harries M, Sacco JJ, Lorigan P, Shaw HM, de Vries EGE, Fehrmann RSN, Weersma RK, Spector TD, Nathan P, Hospers GAP, Sasieni P, Bataille V, Lauc G, Falchi M. Total serum N-glycans associate with response to immune checkpoint inhibition therapy and survival in patients with advanced melanoma. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:166. [PMID: 36805683 PMCID: PMC9938582 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10511-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of melanoma and other cancers. However, no reliable biomarker of survival or response has entered the clinic to identify those patients with melanoma who are most likely to benefit from ICIs. Glycosylation affects proteins and lipids' structure and functions. Tumours are characterized by aberrant glycosylation which may contribute to their progression and hinder an effective antitumour immune response. METHODS We aim at identifying novel glyco-markers of response and survival by leveraging the N-glycome of total serum proteins collected in 88 ICI-naive patients with advanced melanoma from two European countries. Samples were collected before and during ICI treatment. RESULTS We observe that responders to ICIs present with a pre-treatment N-glycome profile significantly shifted towards higher abundancy of low-branched structures containing lower abundances of antennary fucose, and that this profile is positively associated with survival and a better predictor of response than clinical variables alone. CONCLUSION While changes in serum protein glycosylation have been previously implicated in a pro-metastatic melanoma behaviour, we show here that they are also associated with response to ICI, opening new avenues for the stratification of patients and the design of adjunct therapies aiming at improving immune response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Visconti
- Department of Twins Research & Genetics Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Niccolò Rossi
- Department of Twins Research & Genetics Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Helena Deriš
- Genos Glycoscience Research Laboratory, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Karla A Lee
- Department of Twins Research & Genetics Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Maja Hanić
- Genos Glycoscience Research Laboratory, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | | | - Laura A Bolte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes R Björk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ruth Board
- Department of Oncology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Chorley, UK
| | - Mark Harland
- Division of Haematology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Research at St. James', University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Julia Newton-Bishop
- Division of Haematology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Research at St. James', University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Mark Harries
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph J Sacco
- Liverpool Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Heather M Shaw
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rudolf S N Fehrmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rinse K Weersma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tim D Spector
- Department of Twins Research & Genetics Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Nathan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Sasieni
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Veronique Bataille
- Department of Twins Research & Genetics Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK.
- Department of Dermatology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
- Department of Dermatology, West Herts NHS Trust, Herts, UK.
| | - Gordan Lauc
- Genos Glycoscience Research Laboratory, Zagreb, Croatia
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Mario Falchi
- Department of Twins Research & Genetics Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bolte LA, Lee KA, Björk JR, Leeming ER, Campmans-Kuijpers MJE, de Haan JJ, Vila AV, Maltez-Thomas A, Segata N, Board R, Harries M, Lorigan P, de Vries EGE, Nathan P, Fehrmann R, Bataille V, Spector TD, Hospers GAP, Weersma RK. Association of a Mediterranean Diet With Outcomes for Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Advanced Melanoma. JAMA Oncol 2023; 9:705-709. [PMID: 36795408 PMCID: PMC9936383 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Importance Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has improved the survival of patients with advanced melanoma. Durable responses are observed for 40% to 60% of patients, depending on treatment regimens. However, there is still large variability in the response to treatment with ICB, and patients experience a range of immune-related adverse events of differing severity. Nutrition, through its association with the immune system and gut microbiome, is a poorly explored but appealing target with potential to improve the efficacy and tolerability of ICB. Objective To investigate the association between habitual diet and response to treatment with ICB. Design, Setting, and Participants This multicenter cohort study (the PRIMM study) was conducted in cancer centers in the Netherlands and UK and included 91 ICB-naive patients with advanced melanoma who were receiving ICB between 2018 and 2021. Exposures Patients were treated with anti-programmed cell death 1 and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 monotherapy or combination therapy. Dietary intake was assessed through food frequency questionnaires before treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures Clinical end points were defined as overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival at 12 months (PFS-12), and immune-related adverse events that were grade 2 or higher. Results There were a total of 44 Dutch participants (mean [SD] age, 59.43 [12.74] years; 22 women [50%]) and 47 British participants (mean [SD] age, 66.21 [16.63] years; 15 women [32%]). Dietary and clinical data were prospectively collected from 91 patients receiving ICB between 2018 and 2021 for advanced melanoma in the UK and the Netherlands. Logistic generalized additive models revealed positive linear associations between a Mediterranean dietary pattern that was high in whole grains, fish, nuts, fruit, and vegetables and the probability of ORR and PFS-12 (probability of 0.77 for ORR; P = .02; false discovery rate, 0.032; effective degrees of freedom, 0.83; probability of 0.74 for PFS-12; P = .01; false discovery rate, 0.021; effective degrees of freedom, 1.54). Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study found a positive association between a Mediterranean diet, a widely recommended model of healthy eating, and response to treatment with ICB. Large prospective studies from different geographies are needed to confirm the findings and further elucidate the role of diet in the context of ICB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A. Bolte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,Department of Genetics, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Karla A. Lee
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, England
| | - Johannes R. Björk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,Department of Genetics, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Emily R. Leeming
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, England
| | - Marjo J. E. Campmans-Kuijpers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jacco J. de Haan
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Arnau Vich Vila
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands,Department of Genetics, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Andrew Maltez-Thomas
- Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Nicola Segata
- Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy,European Institute of Oncology, IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruth Board
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Fulwood, England
| | - Mark Harries
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guys Cancer Centre, Guys, and St Thomas’s NHS Trust, London, England
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
| | - Elisabeth G. E. de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Nathan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, England
| | - Rudolf Fehrmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Véronique Bataille
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, England,Department of Dermatology, West Hertfordshire NHS Trust, England
| | - Tim D. Spector
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, England
| | - Geke A. P. Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Rinse K. Weersma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Eden M, Lyons S, Lorigan P, Payne K, Green AC, Epton T. Reasons for using indoor tanning devices: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Br J Health Psychol 2023; 28:22-46. [PMID: 35808920 PMCID: PMC10084128 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the established causal links to skin cancer, skin ageing and eye inflammation, people continue to use indoor tanning devices (hereafter 'sunbeds'). Understanding the reasons underlying the use of sunbeds is essential for developing effective interventions. The purpose of this study was to collate all existing evidence from qualitative papers published to date that had assessed motivations for using sunbeds. METHODS Six databases were searched from inception to February 2020 for qualitative studies that explored adults' experiences of using sunbeds. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria, and a narrative evidence synthesis was used to collate findings from each primary study. RESULTS Users of sunbeds were motivated primarily by aesthetic concerns but also by perceived psychological benefits (well-being, confidence and 'fitting in') and physical benefits (improvement in skin conditions such as acne, acquiring vitamin D and preventing sunburn). People also chose indoor tanning over alternatives such as fake tans because they considered the alternatives unacceptable and did not consider indoor tanning a serious health risk. To date, no studies have explored alternatives to meeting non-aesthetic needs related to the use of sunbeds. CONCLUSIONS This comprehensive explanation for the practice of indoor tanning provides the basis for development of complex interventions to reduce the harm caused by using sunbeds. Effective interventions should include promotion of alternatives, such as different methods of relaxing, to satisfy underlying motivations, changing social norms and correcting misperceptions about health benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Eden
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Stephanie Lyons
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Adele C Green
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Tracy Epton
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Ambulatory emergency care forms a fundamental part of the strategy of trying to ensure safe and sustainable acute care services. Immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI)-mediated hypophysitis is an important life-threatening complication of therapy. Patients presenting with clinical features and findings consistent with ICI-mediated hypophysitis were considered in the current study. In the absence of severe features (sodium <125 mmol/L, hypotension, reduced consciousness, hypoglycaemia and/or visual field defect), patients were administered a single intravenous dose of hydrocortisone (100 mg), observed for at least 4 h and then discharged on oral hydrocortisone (20 mg, 10 mg and 10 mg). Patients were then seen urgently in the endocrinology outpatient setting for further management. Fourteen patients (median age 64, 10 male) were managed using the pathway. All patients had biochemically confirmed adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) deficiency. Seven of the 14 were treated with combination ICI therapy, with four having pan-anterior hypopituitarism. There were no 30-day readmissions or any associated hypophysitis-related mortality. All patients continued ICI therapy without interruption.
Collapse
|
24
|
Eden M, Hainsworth R, Gordon LG, Epton T, Lorigan P, Rhodes LE, Marais R, Green AC, Payne K. On the potential beneficial effects of indoor tanning: reply from the authors. Br J Dermatol 2022; 187:1057-1058. [PMID: 36113867 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.21854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Eden
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rob Hainsworth
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Louisa G Gordon
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Tracy Epton
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lesley E Rhodes
- Centre for Dermatology Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Marais
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Adele C Green
- Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Valpione S, Campana LG, Weightman J, Salih Z, Galvani E, Mundra PA, De Rosa F, Gupta A, Serra-Bellver P, Lorigan P, Germetaki T, Dynowski M, Kitcatt S, Sahoo S, Lee D, Dhomen N, Lord G, Marais R. Tumour infiltrating B cells discriminate checkpoint blockade-induced responses. Eur J Cancer 2022; 177:164-174. [PMID: 36347135 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune cell-driven anti-cancer activity is paramount for effective responses to checkpoint inhibitors (ICB). However, the contribution of the different immune cell subsets in the circulation and within the tumour is poorly understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS To elucidate the role of the different cell subsets in anti-tumour responses elicited by ICB, we performed single-cell analysis of the transcriptome and surface proteome of paired pre- and early on-treatment metastatic melanoma tumour biopsies and matched peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples. We next compared the survival of metastatic melanoma patients treated with ICB according to the abundance of pre-treatment tumour-infiltrating B cell clonotypes. RESULTS We identified cell clusters associated with disease control or progression, defined differential expression of biological pathways likely involved in the immune awakening against the tumour and examined how cell-cell communication patterns between the tumour cell subsets change during treatment. Furthermore, we discovered that B cells (immunoglobulin expression and abundance of B cell clonotypes) discriminate the clinical response after ICB and propose that B cells likely contribute to anti-tumour immunity by antigen presentation through major histocompatibility complex molecules. Finally, we demonstrated that the abundance of tumour-infiltrating B cell clonotypes at baseline identifies two distinct risk groups, a finding that we confirmed in an independent cohort. CONCLUSIONS Our exploratory translational study provides new insights on the mechanistic role of B cells in anti-melanoma immunity during treatment with ICB. Additionally, we support pre-treatment B cell tumour infiltration as a promising prognostic biomarker to be further validated as a tool for clinical risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Valpione
- Molecular Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park SK10 4TG, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom.
| | - Luca G Campana
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - John Weightman
- Molecular Biology Core Facility, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park SK10 4TG, United Kingdom
| | - Zena Salih
- Molecular Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park SK10 4TG, United Kingdom; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Galvani
- Molecular Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park SK10 4TG, United Kingdom
| | - Piyushkumar A Mundra
- Molecular Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park SK10 4TG, United Kingdom
| | - Francesco De Rosa
- Immunotherapy and Rare Tumours Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per Lo Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori" IRCCS, Meldola (FC) 47014, Italy
| | - Avinash Gupta
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Patricio Serra-Bellver
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Theodora Germetaki
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, 550 Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Marek Dynowski
- Scientific Computing, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park SK10 4TG, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Kitcatt
- Scientific Computing, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park SK10 4TG, United Kingdom
| | - Sudhakar Sahoo
- Computational Biology Support Team, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park SK10 4TG, United Kingdom
| | - Dave Lee
- Computational Biology Support Team, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park SK10 4TG, United Kingdom
| | - Nathalie Dhomen
- Molecular Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park SK10 4TG, United Kingdom
| | - Graham Lord
- School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Marais
- Molecular Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park SK10 4TG, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kawsar A, Edwards C, Patel P, Heywood RM, Gupta A, Mann J, Harland C, Heelan K, Larkin J, Lorigan P, Harwood CA, Matin RN, Fearfield L. Checkpoint inhibitor-associated bullous cutaneous immune-related adverse events: a multicentre observational study. Br J Dermatol 2022; 187:981-987. [PMID: 35976170 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.21836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy has significantly improved overall survival in several cancers including metastatic melanoma (MM) and in the adjuvant setting. Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) secondary to CPIs are commonly observed; however, autoimmune blistering disorders such as bullous pemphigoid (BP) are rare. OBJECTIVES To review the prevalence, incidence risk, clinicopathological features and management of toxicity in bullous cutaneous irAEs associated with CPI therapy. METHODS A multicentre, retrospective, observational study of CPI-associated bullous irAEs in adults with all cancers across four UK specialist centres between 2006 and 2019. RESULTS In total, 7391 patients were identified. CPI-associated bullous irAEs including BP (n = 16) occurred in 0·3% (n = 22). The median age of onset was 76 years, and there was a male predominance. Most patients had cutaneous melanoma (73%, n = 16), of which 81% (13 of 16) were BRAF wildtype. Grade 1, 2, 3 and 4 skin toxicity occurred in 9%, 45%, 41% and 5%, respectively. The mucosae were involved in 27%, and 25% of confirmed cases of BP did not present with bullae. The median time to onset of bullous irAEs was 12 months, with a median total symptom duration of 6 months. Single PD-1/PD-L1 agents had a longer time to onset of symptoms than combination therapy (median 12 vs. 7 months, respectively). Overall, 91%, 64% and 9% of patients required one, two or three lines of treatment, respectively. Two cases occurred after completion of CPIs (1 and 3 months). Of the 20 cases that presented while on CPIs this was permanently discontinued in 55% (11 of 20) and temporarily held in 20% (four of 20). In the four held cases of CPI, bullous eruption reflared in 50%. CONCLUSIONS CPI-associated bullous skin toxicity is a rare cutaneous irAE occurring in approximately 0·3% of cases over 13 years of treated patients in this series. Not all cases are diagnostic of BP, but management remains the same. There is a prolonged latency of onset compared with other cutaneous irAEs, with a median time of 12 months, and they can occur after cessation of therapy. Discontinuation of CPIs may be required. Recognizing bullous irAEs promptly and referral to dermatology are essential to optimize management and improve patient outcomes and tumour responses. What is already known about this topic? Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-associated bullous pemphigoid is a rare dermatological immune-related adverse event (irAE) that has been reported in small case series and reports. What does this study add? This is the largest multicentre, observational study conducted in the UK over the longest period of 13 years, which demonstrates an overall incidence of bullous cutaneous irAEs secondary to CPIs of 0·3%. Clinical presentation is variable, with one-quarter of patients with bullous pemphigoid presenting without bullae, and mucosal involvement was noted in 27%. Prolonged pruritus is frequently a prodromal symptom. The median time to diagnosis is 12 months and irAEs rarely present after cessation of treatment. Time to onset of symptoms is longer with a single CPI, but with a shorter duration of symptoms compared with combination CPI therapy. Most patients had cutaneous melanoma, of which 81% were BRAF wildtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anusuya Kawsar
- Department of Dermatology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Dermatology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Edwards
- Department of Dermatology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Dermatology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Pooja Patel
- Department of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Richard M Heywood
- Department of Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Aakriti Gupta
- Department of Dermatology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Jasmine Mann
- Department of Dermatology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Christopher Harland
- Department of Dermatology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kara Heelan
- Department of Dermatology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - James Larkin
- Department of Dermatology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Department of Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Catherine A Harwood
- Department of Dermatology, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Rubeta N Matin
- Department of Dermatology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Louise Fearfield
- Department of Dermatology, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Dermatology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Eggermont AMM, Kicinski M, Blank CU, Mandala M, Long GV, Atkinson V, Dalle S, Haydon A, Meshcheryakov A, Khattak A, Carlino MS, Sandhu S, Larkin J, Puig S, Ascierto PA, Rutkowski P, Schadendorf D, Boers-Sonderen M, Di Giacomo AM, van den Eertwegh AJM, Grob JJ, Gutzmer R, Jamal R, van Akkooi ACJ, Lorigan P, Grebennik D, Krepler C, Marreaud S, Suciu S, Robert C. Five-Year Analysis of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo in Stage III Melanoma. NEJM Evidence 2022; 1:EVIDoa2200214. [PMID: 38319852 DOI: 10.1056/evidoa2200214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
Pembrolizumab or Placebo in Stage III MelanomaPatients with stage III melanoma randomly received adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo. Five-year recurrence-free survival was 55.4% (95% CI, 50.8 to 59.8) versus 38.3% (33.9 to 42.7) and 5-year metastasis-free survival was 60.6% (56.0 to 64.9) versus 44.5% (39.9 to 48.9) for adjuvant pembrolizumab and placebo, respectively. No new safety signals were associated with adjuvant pembrolizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M M Eggermont
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, München, Germany
- Princess Máxima Center and University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Michal Kicinski
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian U Blank
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mario Mandala
- University of Perugia, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Italy
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, VIC, Australia
| | - Victoria Atkinson
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Stéphane Dalle
- Lyon Civic Hospital Cancer Institute, Cancer Research Centre of Lyon, Lyon University, France
| | | | - Andrey Meshcheryakov
- Federal State Budgetary Institution "Russian Oncology Scientific Centre named after N.N. Blokhin RAMS," Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Adnan Khattak
- Fiona Stanley Hospital/University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Melanoma Institute Australia, and University of Sydney, Sydney, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Susana Puig
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale," Naples, Italy
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute-Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Anna Maria Di Giacomo
- Center for Immuno-Oncology and Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy Unit, University Hospital of Siena, Italy
| | | | - Jean-Jacques Grob
- Aix-Marseille University, Hôpital de la Timone, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, France
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum Campus Minden, Germany
| | - Rahima Jamal
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Centre de Recherche du CHUM, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | | | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Sandrine Marreaud
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stefan Suciu
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris and University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Serra-Bellver P, Versluis JM, Oberoi HK, Zhou C, Slattery TD, Khan Y, Patrinely JR, Pires da Silva I, Martínez-Vila C, Cook N, Graham DM, Carlino MS, Menzies AM, Arance AM, Johnson DB, Long GV, Pickering L, Larkin JMG, Blank CU, Lorigan P. Real-world outcomes with ipilimumab and nivolumab in advanced melanoma: a multicentre retrospective study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 176:121-132. [PMID: 36215945 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess efficacy and toxicity of combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab in routine practice in a retrospective multicentre cohort of patients with advanced melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective analysis included patients with advanced melanoma treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab between October 2015 and January 2020 at six centres in Australia, Europe and the United States of America. We describe efficacy outcomes (overall survival [OS], progression-free survival [PFS] and objective response rate [ORR]) in treatment-naïve and pre-treated patients, with and without brain metastases, plus treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) in all patients treated. RESULTS A total of 697 patients were identified; 472 were treatment-naïve of which 138 (29.2%) had brain metastases, and 225 were previously treated of which 102 (45.3%) had brain metastases. At baseline, 32.3% had stage M1c and 34.4% stage M1d disease. Lactate dehydrogenase was high in 280 patients (40.2%). With a median follow-up of 25.9 months, median OS in the 334 treatment-naïve patients without brain metastases was 53.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 40.8-NR) and 38.7 months (95% CI 18.6-NR) for the 138 treatment-naïve patients with brain metastases. For the entire cohort the ORR was 48%, for treatment-naïve patients without brain metastases ORR was 56.6% with a median PFS of was 13.7 months (95% CI 9.6-26.5). Median PFS was 7.9 months (95% CI 5.8-10.4) and OS 38 months (95% CI 31-NR) for the entire cohort. Grade 3-4 trAE were reported in 44% of patients, and 4 (0.7%) treatment-related deaths (1 pneumonitis, 2 myocarditis and 1 colitis) were recorded. CONCLUSION The outcome and toxicity of combination immunotherapy with ipilimumab and nivolumab in a real-world patient population are similar to those reported in pivotal trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricio Serra-Bellver
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
| | - Judith M Versluis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Honey K Oberoi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cong Zhou
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute Cancer Biomarker Centre, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy D Slattery
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yasir Khan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - James R Patrinely
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Inês Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney and the Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead and Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Martínez-Vila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Natalie Cook
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Donna M Graham
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney and the Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead and Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney and the Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ana M Arance
- Institut D'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney and the Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lisa Pickering
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - James M G Larkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christian U Blank
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
van Akkooi A, Hauschild A, Long G, Mandala M, Kicinski M, Govaerts AS, Klauck I, Ouali M, Lorigan P, Eggermont A. 464TiP Phase III study of adjuvant encorafenib plus binimetinib vs placebo in fully resected stage IIB/C BRAFV600-mutated melanoma: COLUMBUS-AD study design. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
|
30
|
Eggermont A, Kicinski M, Blank C, Mandala M, Long G, Atkinson V, Dalle S, Haydon A, Meshcheryakov A, Khattak A, Carlino M, Sandhu S, Puig Sarda S, Ascierto P, Lorigan P, Grebennik D, Ibrahim N, Marreaud S, Suciu S, Robert C. 804P Pembrolizumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma: 5-year results of the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote-054 double-blinded phase III trial. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
31
|
Bottomley A, Kicinski M, Long G, Mandala M, Atkinson V, Blank C, Haydon A, Dalle S, Khattak A, Carlino M, Meshcheryakov A, Sandhu S, Sarda SP, Coens C, Suciu S, Grebennik D, Krepler C, Lorigan P, Robert C, Eggermont A. LBA44 Pembrolizumab versus placebo after complete resection of high-risk stage III melanoma: Long-term quality of life analysis results of the EORTC 1325-MG/Keynote-054 double-blinded phase III trial. Ann Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.08.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
32
|
Rossi N, Lee KA, Bermudez MV, Visconti A, Thomas AM, Bolte LA, Björk JR, de Ruijter LK, Newton-Bishop J, Harland M, Shaw HM, Harries M, Sacco J, Board R, Lorigan P, de Vries EGE, Segata N, Taams L, Papa S, Spector TD, Nathan P, Weersma RK, Hospers GAP, Fehrmann RSN, Bataille V, Falchi M. Circulating inflammatory proteins associate with response to immune checkpoint inhibition therapy in patients with advanced melanoma. EBioMedicine 2022; 83:104235. [PMID: 36007304 PMCID: PMC9421308 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammation can modulate tumour growth and progression, and influence clinical response to treatment. We investigated the potential of circulating inflammatory proteins for response stratification of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced melanoma. METHODS Study subjects were 87 patients with unresectable stage III or IV cutaneous melanoma from the multiple centres across the United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) who received ipilimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab, or a combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab. Serum samples were collected before and during ICI therapy at follow-up visits scheduled every third week over a 12-week period. We performed targeted quantification of 92 proteins involved in inflammation and tested for association of their pre-treatment and on-treatment levels, as well as longitudinal changes, with overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. FINDINGS We observed consistently higher pre-treatment levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and monocyte chemotactic protein 2 (MCP-2), in non-responders compared to responders (meta-analysis p=3.31 × 10-4, 2.29 × 10-4, and 1.02 × 10-3, respectively). Patients' stratification according to the median value of IL-6, HGF, and MCP-2 highlighted a cumulative negative effect of pre-treatment levels of the three proteins on response (p=1.13 × 10-2), with overall response rate among patients presenting with combined elevated IL-6, HGF, and MCP-2 levels being three-fold lower (26.7%) compared to patients with none of the three proteins elevated (80.0%, p=9.22 × 10-3). Longitudinal data analysis showed that on-treatment changes in circulating inflammatory proteins are not correlated with response. INTERPRETATION Our findings are in line with an increasing body of evidence that the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 can influence response to ICI in advanced melanoma, and further support a role of circulating HGF and MCP-2 levels as prognostic biomarkers as suggested by previous smaller studies. Inflammatory proteins may serve as predictive biomarkers of ICI response and valuable targets for combination therapy. FUNDING This work was supported by the Seerave Foundation and Dutch Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niccolò Rossi
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, UK
| | - Karla A Lee
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, UK
| | - Maria V Bermudez
- Centre for Inflammation Biology and Cancer Immunology, King's College London, UK
| | - Alessia Visconti
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, UK
| | | | - Laura A Bolte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes R Björk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Laura Kist de Ruijter
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Julia Newton-Bishop
- Division of Haematology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Mark Harland
- Division of Haematology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Heather M Shaw
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Mark Harries
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joseph Sacco
- Liverpool Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ruth Board
- Department of Oncology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Nicola Segata
- Department CIBIO, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Leonie Taams
- Centre for Inflammation Biology and Cancer Immunology, King's College London, UK
| | - Sophie Papa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Studies, King's College London, UK
| | - Tim D Spector
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, UK
| | - Paul Nathan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Rinse K Weersma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Rudolf S N Fehrmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Veronique Bataille
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.
| | - Mario Falchi
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Eden M, Hainsworth R, Gordon LG, Epton T, Lorigan P, Rhodes LE, Marais R, Green AC, Payne K. Cost-effectiveness of a policy-based intervention to reduce melanoma and other skin cancers associated with indoor tanning. Br J Dermatol 2022; 187:105-114. [PMID: 35141876 PMCID: PMC9541204 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.21046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of indoor tanning devices causes melanoma and other skin cancers with resulting morbidity, mortality and increased healthcare costs. Policymakers require robust economic evidence to inform decisions about a possible ban of such devices to mitigate these burdens. OBJECTIVES To assess the health costs and consequences of introducing a policy-based intervention across England to ban commercial indoor tanning with an accompanying public information campaign. METHODS A cost-effectiveness analysis, adopting a healthcare system perspective, was conducted using a decision model to track a national cohort of 18-year-olds over a lifetime time horizon. A nationwide ban on commercial indoor tanning combined with a public information campaign (the policy-based intervention) was compared with the status quo of availability of commercial indoor tanning. The expected costs (currency, GBP; price year, 2019) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated. Net monetary benefit (NMB) (net benefit measured in cost compared with an accepted threshold) and net health benefit (NHB) (net gain in QALYs compared with an accepted threshold) of implementation were calculated. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was used to calculate the probability that the intervention was cost-effective. RESULTS Compared with the current situation, a ban on commercial indoor tanning combined with a public information campaign would result in 1206 avoided cases of melanoma, 207 fewer melanoma deaths and 3987 averted cases of keratinocyte cancers over the lifetime of all 18-year-olds (n = 618 873) living in England in 2019. An additional 497 QALYs would be realized along with healthcare cost-savings of £697 858. This intervention would result in an NMB of £10.6m and an NHB of 530 QALYS. Multiple sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20 000, there is a 99% likelihood of this policy-based intervention being cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS The implementation of a ban on commercial indoor tanning across England with an accompanying public information campaign would be an effective use of healthcare resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Eden
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health SciencesThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Rob Hainsworth
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health SciencesThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Louisa G. Gordon
- Population Health DepartmentQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneAustralia
- School of NursingQueensland University of Technology (QUT)BrisbaneAustralia
- School of Public HealthUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Tracy Epton
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health SciencesThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical SciencesThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Lesley E. Rhodes
- Centre for Dermatology Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and HealthThe University of Manchester and Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science CentreManchesterUK
| | - Richard Marais
- Cancer Research UK Manchester InstituteThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Adele C. Green
- Population Health DepartmentQIMR Berghofer Medical Research InstituteBrisbaneAustralia
- Cancer Research UK Manchester InstituteThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Katherine Payne
- Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health SciencesThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Garbe C, Amaral T, Peris K, Hauschild A, Arenberger P, Basset-Seguin N, Bastholt L, Bataille V, Del Marmol V, Dréno B, Fargnoli MC, Forsea AM, Grob JJ, Höller C, Kaufmann R, Kelleners-Smeets N, Lallas A, Lebbé C, Lytvynenko B, Malvehy J, Moreno-Ramirez D, Nathan P, Pellacani G, Saiag P, Stratigos AJ, Van Akkooi ACJ, Vieira R, Zalaudek I, Lorigan P. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics: Update 2022. Eur J Cancer 2022; 170:236-255. [PMID: 35570085 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma (CM) is potentially the most dangerous form of skin tumor and causes 90% of skin cancer mortality. A unique collaboration of multi-disciplinary experts from the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on CM diagnosis and treatment, based on systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. The diagnosis of melanoma can be made clinically and shall always be confirmed with dermatoscopy. If a melanoma is suspected, a histopathological examination is always required. Sequential digital dermatoscopy and full body photography can be used in high-risk patients to improve the detection of early melanoma. Where available, confocal reflectance microscopy can also improve clinical diagnosis in special cases. Melanoma shall be classified according to the 8th version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer classification. Thin melanomas up to 0.8 mm tumor thickness do not require further imaging diagnostics. From stage IB onwards, examinations with lymph node sonography are recommended, but no further imaging examinations. From stage IIC onwards whole-body examinations with computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT) in combination with brain magnetic resonance imaging are recommended. From stage III and higher, mutation testing is recommended, particularly for BRAF V600 mutation. It is important to provide a structured follow-up to detect relapses and secondary primary melanomas as early as possible. There is no evidence to define the frequency and extent of examinations. A stage-based follow-up scheme is proposed which, according to the experience of the guideline group, covers the optimal requirements, but further studies may be considered. This guideline is valid until the end of 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claus Garbe
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Teresa Amaral
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ketty Peris
- Institute of Dermatology, Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Petr Arenberger
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Nicole Basset-Seguin
- Université Paris Cite, AP-HP Department of Dermatology INSERM U 976 Hôpital Saint Louis Paris France
| | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Veronique Bataille
- Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| | - Veronique Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Brigitte Dréno
- Dermatology Department, CHU Nantes, CIC 1413, CRCINA, University Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Maria C Fargnoli
- Dermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Ana-Maria Forsea
- Dermatology Department, Elias University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Christoph Höller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Roland Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nicole Kelleners-Smeets
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Aimilios Lallas
- First Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Celeste Lebbé
- Université Paris Cite, AP-HP Department of Dermatology INSERM U 976 Hôpital Saint Louis Paris France
| | - Bohdan Lytvynenko
- Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - Josep Malvehy
- Melanoma Unit, Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Moreno-Ramirez
- Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Paul Nathan
- Mount-Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood United Kingdom
| | | | - Philippe Saiag
- University Department of Dermatology, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin en Yvelines, APHP, Boulogne, France
| | - Alexander J Stratigos
- 1st Department of Dermatology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexander C J Van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ricardo Vieira
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Iris Zalaudek
- Dermatology Clinic, Maggiore Hospital, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Garbe C, Amaral T, Peris K, Hauschild A, Arenberger P, Basset-Seguin N, Bastholt L, Bataille V, Del Marmol V, Dréno B, Fargnoli MC, Forsea AM, Grob JJ, Hoeller C, Kaufmann R, Kelleners-Smeets N, Lallas A, Lebbé C, Lytvynenko B, Malvehy J, Moreno-Ramirez D, Nathan P, Pellacani G, Saiag P, Stratigos AJ, Van Akkooi ACJ, Vieira R, Zalaudek I, Lorigan P. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 2: Treatment - Update 2022. Eur J Cancer 2022; 170:256-284. [PMID: 35623961 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
A unique collaboration of multidisciplinary experts from the European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO), and the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) was formed to make recommendations on cutaneous melanoma diagnosis and treatment, based on the systematic literature reviews and the experts' experience. Cutaneous melanomas are excised with one to 2-cm safety margins. Sentinel lymph node dissection shall be performed as a staging procedure in patients with tumor thickness ≥1.0 mm or ≥0.8 mm with additional histological risk factors, although there is as yet no clear survival benefit for this approach. Therapeutic decisions in stage III/IV patients should be primarily made by an interdisciplinary oncology team ("tumor board"). Adjuvant therapies can be proposed in stage III/completely resected stage IV patients and are primarily anti-PD-1, independent of mutational status, or alternatively dabrafenib plus trametinib for BRAF mutant patients. In distant metastases (stage IV), either resected or not, systemic treatment is always indicated. For first-line treatment particularly in BRAF wild-type patients, immunotherapy with PD-1 antibodies alone or in combination with CTLA-4 antibodies shall be considered. In stage IV melanoma with a BRAF-V600 E/K mutation, first-line therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be offered as an alternative to immunotherapy. In patients with primary resistance to immunotherapy and harboring a BRAF-V600 E/K mutation, this therapy shall be offered as second-line therapy. Systemic therapy in stage III/IV melanoma is a rapidly changing landscape, and it is likely that these recommendations may change in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claus Garbe
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Teresa Amaral
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ketty Peris
- Institute of Dermatology, Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Axel Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Petr Arenberger
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Nicole Basset-Seguin
- Université Paris Cite, AP-HP, Department of Dermatology INSERM U 976 Hôpital, Saint Louis Paris France
| | - Lars Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Veronique Bataille
- Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology Unit, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
| | - Veronique Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Brigitte Dréno
- Dermatology Department, CHU Nantes, CIC 1413, CRCINA, University Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Maria C Fargnoli
- Dermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Ana-Maria Forsea
- Dermatology Department, Elias University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Romania
| | | | | | - Roland Kaufmann
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Aimilios Lallas
- First Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Celeste Lebbé
- Université Paris Cite, AP-HP, Department of Dermatology INSERM U 976 Hôpital, Saint Louis Paris France
| | - Bodhan Lytvynenko
- Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kiev, Ukraine
| | - Josep Malvehy
- Melanoma Unit, Department of Dermatology, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Moreno-Ramirez
- Medical-&-Surgical Dermatology Service, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Paul Nathan
- Mount-Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood United Kingdom
| | | | - Philippe Saiag
- University Department of Dermatology, Université de Versailles-Saint Quentin en Yvelines, APHP, Boulogne, France
| | - Alexander J Stratigos
- First Department of Dermatology, University of Athens School of Medicine, Andreas Sygros Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexander C J Van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ricardo Vieira
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Iris Zalaudek
- Dermatology Clinic, Maggiore Hospital, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The University of Manchester, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wilcock DJ, Badrock AP, Wong CW, Owen R, Guerin M, Southam AD, Johnston H, Telfer BA, Fullwood P, Watson J, Ferguson H, Ferguson J, Lloyd GR, Jankevics A, Dunn WB, Wellbrock C, Lorigan P, Ceol C, Francavilla C, Smith MP, Hurlstone AFL. Oxidative stress from DGAT1 oncoprotein inhibition in melanoma suppresses tumor growth when ROS defenses are also breached. Cell Rep 2022; 39:110995. [PMID: 35732120 PMCID: PMC9638004 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Dysregulated cellular metabolism is a cancer hallmark for which few druggable oncoprotein targets have been identified. Increased fatty acid (FA) acquisition allows cancer cells to meet their heightened membrane biogenesis, bioenergy, and signaling needs. Excess FAs are toxic to non-transformed cells but surprisingly not to cancer cells. Molecules underlying this cancer adaptation may provide alternative drug targets. Here, we demonstrate that diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 (DGAT1), an enzyme integral to triacylglyceride synthesis and lipid droplet formation, is frequently up-regulated in melanoma, allowing melanoma cells to tolerate excess FA. DGAT1 over-expression alone transforms p53-mutant zebrafish melanocytes and co-operates with oncogenic BRAF or NRAS for more rapid melanoma formation. Antagonism of DGAT1 induces oxidative stress in melanoma cells, which adapt by up-regulating cellular reactive oxygen species defenses. We show that inhibiting both DGAT1 and superoxide dismutase 1 profoundly suppress tumor growth through eliciting intolerable oxidative stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Wilcock
- Division of Cancer Studies, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Andrew P Badrock
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Function, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Dover Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Chun W Wong
- Division of Infection Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Dover Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Rhys Owen
- Division of Cancer Studies, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Melissa Guerin
- Program in Molecular Medicine, Department of Molecular, Cell and Cancer Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA
| | - Andrew D Southam
- School of Biosciences, Edgbaston, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Phenome Centre Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Hannah Johnston
- Division of Cancer Studies, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Brian A Telfer
- Division of Cancer Studies, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Paul Fullwood
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Function, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Dover Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Joanne Watson
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Function, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Dover Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Harriet Ferguson
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Function, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Dover Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Jennifer Ferguson
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Function, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Dover Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Gavin R Lloyd
- School of Biosciences, Edgbaston, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Phenome Centre Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Andris Jankevics
- School of Biosciences, Edgbaston, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Phenome Centre Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Warwick B Dunn
- School of Biosciences, Edgbaston, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Phenome Centre Birmingham, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Claudia Wellbrock
- Division of Cancer Studies, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Studies, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Craig Ceol
- Program in Molecular Medicine, Department of Molecular, Cell and Cancer Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA
| | - Chiara Francavilla
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Function, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Dover Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Michael P Smith
- Division of Molecular and Cellular Function, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Dover Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
| | - Adam F L Hurlstone
- Division of Infection Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Dover Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK; Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology, The University of Manchester, Dover Street, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fusi A, Gupta A, Lorigan P, Smith PL, Bowles M. A phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IMM-101 in combination with checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced melanoma: Final results of the IMM-101-015 trial. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.9554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9554 Background: IMM-101 is a suspension of heat-killed whole cell Mycobacterium obuense (NCTC 13365), which enhances the innate immune response and dendritic cell maturation. In animal models, it increases antigen specific responses and number of CD8+ CTL and CD4 + Th1 cells. The clinical studies with IMM-101 have shown promising efficacy signals in pancreatic cancer when combined with gemcitabine and in melanoma as adjunctive or single agent. Methods: IMM-101-015 is an open-label Phase 2a study to investigate the safety and efficacy of IMM-101 in combination with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma who were either treatment-naive (cohort A), or whose disease had progressed during PD-1 blockade (cohort B). Pts with evaluable lesions, adequate performance status and organ function were eligible. Pts received 1.0 mg of IMM-101 every 2 weeks for the first 3 doses followed by a rest period of 4 weeks, then every 2 weeks for the next 3 doses, and thereafter every 4 weeks. Nivolumab was given every 2 or 4 weeks (dependent on Investigator choice). Pts in cohort B had the option to change to ipilimumab and IMM-101 if their disease continued to progress. Biopsies and blood samples were obtained at baseline and during treatment for assessment of tumor biomarkers and immune correlatives. The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) after a maximum of 18 months of treatment by RECIST 1.1 and to assess the safety and tolerability of the combination of IMM-101 + CPIs. Results: Sixteen pts (11 Cohort A and 5 Cohort B) were treated between October 2018 and May 2021. The median age was 68.5 yrs (range 36-92) and 11 (69%) were male. The ECOG ps was 0 in 9 (56%) and 1 in 7 (44%) pts. Four (25%) had unresectable stage III melanoma and 12 (75%) stage IV. In Cohort A (3 stage III, 5 stage IV M1b and 3 M1c) 3 pts (27%) had an elevated baseline LDH, 6 (55%) a positive PD-L1 status and 3 (27%) a BRAF mutation. Pts in cohort A were on study for a median time of 8.5 months (range 1.5 - 19.1) and those in cohort B for 3.0 months (range 1.5 - 7.4). All pts were evaluated for response. The ORR was 73% (95% CI 39.03, 93.98) in cohort A whereas all pts in cohort B reported progressive disease. With respect to cohort A, 2 (18%) pts had CR, 6 (55%) PR and 1 (9%) SD. The median progression-free survival time was 10.2 months (95% CI 2.50, NE) with 41% of the pts progression-free at 18 months. The most frequent treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were injection site reaction (63%), pruritus (44%), fatigue (38%), skin rash (25%), hypothyroidism (25%) and diarrhoea (19%). There were no grade 4 TEAEs. Grade 3 TEAEs occured in 10 patients (63%), mostly skin toxicity (19%) and lab abnormalities (13%). Conclusions: IMM-101 in combination with nivolumab is safe and shows encouraging antitumor activity in treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03711188.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Fusi
- St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Avinash Gupta
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Division of Cancer Sciences University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Peter L Smith
- St. George's University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mike Bowles
- Immodulon Therapeutics Ltd, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lee R, Rothwell DG, Jackson R, Smith N, Wong SQ, Kelso N, Burghel G, Hewitt C, Clarke H, Mitchell J, Jones K, Muinonen-Martin A, Turajlic S, Corrie PG, Marais R, Middleton MR, Dawson SJ, Sandhu S, Dive C, Lorigan P. DETECTION phase II/III trial: Circulating tumor DNA–guided therapy for stage IIB/C melanoma after surgical resection. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.tps9603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS9603 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA; the tumor derived fraction of circulating free DNA in the blood) is a well recognized, minimally-invasive biomarker of tumor burden/progression in many cancers. We have previously shown in retrospective and prospective cohorts of patients with melanoma that ctDNA analysis of serial blood samples following curative intent surgery can identify minimal residual disease (MRD) or molecular relapse. The majority of patients with resected stage II melanoma do not recur, therefore better strategies to identify high risk patients are required. Furthermore, a consistent finding in studies of immune therapy in stage IV melanoma is that patients with small volume disease have the best outcome. We aim to test whether early relapse can be identified by ctDNA analysis and acted upon in a clinically relevant timeframe, and if early treatment of molecular recurrence with immune therapy improves outcomes for patients with resected stage IIB/C melanoma. Methods: We designed a phase II/III multicenter study across 21 UK and 4 Australian sites with a tumor informed approach employed for ctDNA detection. Droplet digital assays for BRAF/NRAS/TERT promoter mutations were validated for sensitive ctDNA detection across two accredited clinical testing laboratories. Patients with stage IIB/C melanoma, BRAF/NRAS/TERT promoter mutant cutaneous melanoma, ECOG 0/1, adequate organ function, with complete resection (including sentinel lymph node biopsy) performed within 12 weeks and radiological/clinical disease-free status confirmed within 4 weeks prior to registration, no prior immune/targeted therapy will be followed up with blinded ctDNA sampling in addition to clinical follow-up. Patients with ctDNA detected will be randomised 1:1 in a double blind fashion to continue routine follow-up with investigators choice treatment if they develop disease recurrence, or unblinded and treated with nivolumab 480mg IV Q4-weekly. Primary objectives include i) whether MRD/molecular relapse following curative intent surgery can be identified earlier than clinical relapse, ii) whether early treatment of molecular recurrence with nivolumab improves overall survival. 1050 patients are planned to be enrolled. The study opened in the UK in November 2021 and will open in Australia in Spring 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04901988.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Lee
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Dominic G. Rothwell
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute Cancer Biomarker Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Nigel Smith
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute Cancer Biomarker Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Noel Kelso
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute Cancer Biomarker Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - George Burghel
- Manchester Foundation Trust, North West Genomic Laboratory Hub, Manchestter, United Kingdom
| | | | - Harry Clarke
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute Cancer Biomarker Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Jackie Mitchell
- Cancer Biomarker Centre, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Kate Jones
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Samra Turajlic
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Philippa Gail Corrie
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Marais
- Molecular Oncology Group, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Shahneen Sandhu
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Caroline Dive
- CRUK Manchester Institute, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Division of Cancer Sciences University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Woof VG, Lee RJ, Lorigan P, French DP. Circulating tumour DNA monitoring and early treatment for relapse: views from patients with early-stage melanoma. Br J Cancer 2022; 126:1450-1456. [PMID: 35301436 PMCID: PMC8927744 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01766-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) monitoring is a new technology that detects cancer DNA fragments in blood circulation. Regular monitoring with ctDNA has the potential to detect and treat cancer relapse earlier, but there is little evidence on patient acceptability. This study examines the views of patients with early-stage melanoma on the acceptability of the test and early treatment. METHODS A qualitative cross-sectional design using one-to-one semi-structured telephone interviews was employed. Twenty-five patients diagnosed with early-stage melanoma (Stage IA-IIC) were asked for their views on ctDNA monitoring and early treatment for relapse. Interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS Two themes were generated: ctDNA monitoring would add service value where participants described regular ctDNA monitoring in follow-up care as more reassuring, more "scientific" than skin checks and preferable to scans. Test results provide opportunity and knowledge focuses on how participants wanted to know when to expect results to manage anxiety, with a positive result seen as an opportunity to receive treatment early. CONCLUSIONS Participants were positive about ctDNA monitoring and early treatment and would welcome extra surveillance, as well as trust ctDNA tests. This indicates the feasibility of the wider implementation of ctDNA tests, which have applicability for many tumour types and disease stages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria G Woof
- Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Rebecca J Lee
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, M20 4BX, Manchester, UK
- Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, M20 4BX, Manchester, UK
- Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK
| | - David P French
- Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dummer R, Long GV, Tawbi HA, Flaherty K, Ascierto PA, Nathan PD, Rutkowski P, Leonov O, Mandalà M, Lorigan P, Ferrucci PF, Grob JJ, Meyer N, Gogas H, Stroyakovskiy D, Arance AM, Pakhle N, Waters S, Ribas A, Schadendorf D. Dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) plus spartalizumab (S) in patients (pts) with previously untreated BRAF V600–mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma: Three-year overall survival (OS) data from the randomized part 3 of the phase III COMBI-i trial. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.9527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
9527 Background: Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy may produce durable and deep response in a higher proportion of pts with BRAF V600–mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma. A recent report from the randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled Part 3 of the Phase 3 COMBI-i trial (NCT02967692) failed to show a statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66‒1.03, p=.042)). Here, we report 3-year OS data from COMBI-i part 3. Methods: Eligible pts were randomized 1:1 to receive either S+D+T (n = 267; S 400 mg IV Q4W + D 150 mg orally BID + T 2 mg orally QD) or PBO+D+T (n = 265), until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Although the primary endpoint of PFS was not met, exploratory OS and safety analyses were performed. OS was summarized descriptively using Kaplan–Meier methods and HR was estimated using a stratified cox regression model. Results: As of October 19, 2021 (median follow-up, 42.8 months), the median OS was not reached in S+D+T arm and was 40.4 months with PBO+D+T (HR 0.796; 95% CI, 0.615‒1.029). There were 113 (42.3%) deaths in the S+D+T and 126 (47.5%) in the PBO+D+T. Estimated 2-year and 3-year OS rates were 67.7% (95% CI 61.6‒73.1) and 60.1% (95% CI 53.8‒65.8) with S+D+T vs 61.9% (95% CI 55.6‒67.5) and 52.9% (95% CI 46.6‒58.9) with PBO+D+T, respectively. An OS benefit was observed with S+D+T in these prespecified subgroups – Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 1 (HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32‒0.8), age ≥65 years (HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36‒0.94), PD-L1 negative ( < 1%) (HR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42‒0.91), sum of lesion diameters ≥ 66 mm at baseline (HR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43‒0.91) and metastatic sites ≥ 3 (HR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47‒0.94). Adverse events (AEs) irrespective of study treatment relationship were observed in 99.3% of pts in S+D+T vs 97.3% in PBO+D+T. The most common AEs (in > 30%; all grades) were pyrexia, diarrhea, and nausea. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 56.9% vs 35.2% of pts treated with S+D+T vs PBO+D+T, respectively. Dose reductions of D and T due to AEs were more frequent in the S+D+T arm than PBO+D+T arm (47.2% vs 25.4% and 45.7% vs 25.4%, respectively), contributing to a lower relative dose intensity; the TRAEs leading to discontinuation of all 3 study drugs occurred in 13.5% vs 8% of pts, respectively. Conclusions: Results from this landmark 3-year OS analysis from COMBI-i- part 3 was consistent with the primary analysis, while the PBO+D+T showed a higher OS rate than previously observed for D+T alone in COMBI D/V studies, with a longer median follow-up. Subgroup analyses showed that ECOG PS 1, age ≥65 years, negative PD-L1 status and high tumor burden were associated with better OS in S+D+T in terms of HR. Clinical trial information: NCT02967692.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Georgina V. Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Keith Flaherty
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Paolo Antonio Ascierto
- Melanoma, Cancer Immunotherapy and Development Therapeutics Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | | | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Oleg Leonov
- Omsk Region Oncology Center, Omsk, Russian Federation
| | - Mario Mandalà
- Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Division of Cancer Sciences University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Nicolas Meyer
- Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU), Toulouse, France
| | - Helen Gogas
- First Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Daniil Stroyakovskiy
- Moscow City Oncology Hospital #62 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | | | - Neha Pakhle
- Novartis Healthcare Private Limited, Hyderabad, India
| | | | - Antoni Ribas
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University of Essen and the German Cancer Consortium, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Middleton MR, Hamid O, Shoushtari AN, Meier FE, Bauer TM, Salama AK, Kirkwood JM, Ascierto PA, Lorigan P, Mauch C, Orloff MM, Evans TJ, Abdullah SE, Yuan Y, Mitchell J, Hassel JC. Updated overall survival (OS) data from the phase 1b study of tebentafusp (tebe) as monotherapy or combination therapy with durvalumab (durva) and/or tremelimumab (treme) in metastatic cutaneous melanoma (mCM). J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
104 Background: Tebe is a T-cell receptor bispecific (gp100 x CD3) against gp100 peptide-HLA-A2 complexes that are overexpressed in uveal (UM)/cutaneous melanoma (CM). Tebe is the only therapy to show an OS benefit (HR 0.51) in a phase (Ph) 3 trial in previously untreated metastatic UM. In a prior Ph 1 trial, tebe demonstrated monotherapy activity in anti-PD1 naïve mCM (1-yr OS, approx. 74%). The safety and initial activity of tebe with dose escalation of durva and/or treme in previously treated mCM has been reported. Here, we present updated OS in the subset of mCM patients (pts) relapsed or refractory to prior anti-PD1, a population where recent reports suggest a benchmark 1-yr OS of approximately 55% and median OS of approximately 14 months (mos). Methods: Patients with HLA-A2+, pre-treated mCM received weekly tebe (IV) monotherapy in Arm 4a or in combination with dose escalation of durva and/or treme (IV) on day 15 of each cycle (Arms 1-3). Primary objective was RP2D, secondary objectives were safety and efficacy. Subgroup analyses were performed for durva doses ≥10 mg/kg, a threshold previously defined by Bavarel et al, 2018. Analysis performed on data cut-off 04 January 2022 with median follow up for 14.3 mos. [NCT02535078] Results: 112 pts were treated with median age 59, 23% were ECOG = 1, 37% were BRAFm (73% received prior BRAFi/MEKi), 55% had LDH > ULN. 92% of pts were 2L+ and 74% 3L+; median 3 prior lines. The safety profile of all therapy arms within this study therapy remains very favorable with no new safety signals identified. 97 of 112 pts were documented as relapsed or refractory to prior anti-PD1 (80% also received ipilimumab). Of these 97 pts, 32 received tebe + durva (Arm 1), 13 received tebe + treme (Arm 2), 26 received triplet therapy (Arm 3), and 20 received tebe monotherapy (Arm 4a). 33 of 97 pts in any arm received durva ≥ 10 mg/kg with 1-yr OS of 79%, 2-yr OS of 34%, and median OS of 20 mos. 64 of 97 pts received durva < 10 mg/kg with 1-yr OS of 53%, 2-yr OS of 24%, and median OS of 13 mos. Tebe + durva doublet therapy had similar OS to triplet therapy with tebe + durva + treme: 1-yr OS of 74% vs. 76%, and 2-yr OS of 32% vs. 27%, respectively. Conclusions: Promising OS is seen in mCM similar to mUM, with both tumor types overexpressing gp100. In mCM relapsed or refractory to prior anti-PD1, tebe with anti–PD-L1 continues to demonstrate promising OS (1-yr, approx. 75%) compared to recent benchmarks (1-yr, approx. 55%). These data provide rationale for a randomized study of tebe with anti-PD(L)1 in mCM. Clinical trial information: NCT02535078.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, A Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Weaver J, Dodd K, Hameed H, Roberts M, Lilleker J, Lorigan P, Cooksley T. Good outcomes after aggressive treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor related myasthenia gravis: a case series. J Neurol Psychiatry 2022. [DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-abn.311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
IntroductionMyasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication of immune- checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and often co-presents with myositis and myocarditis. We present a series of six patients from a tertiary oncology center.MethodsWe reviewed The Christie Hospital database of immunotherapy-related toxicity from 2017–2020. Symptom severity was assessed using the MGFA classification.ResultsSix patients with ICI-related MG were identified. The median number of preceding immunotherapy doses was 2. Common initial presenting complaints were ptosis (100%) and diplopia (50%) with 2/6 patients showing severe (MGFA > II) symptoms. Five patients had concomitant myositis and myocarditis. AChR or MuSK autoantibodies were positive in three patients. Two patients required advanced respiratory support.All patients received urgent treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone and mycophenolate. Five also received intravenous immunoglobulin and a single patient was treated additionally with abatacept and rituximab. No patient died from MG-related complications. All were successfully discharged following the acute episode.DiscussionPrevious case series of ICI-related MG have reported high mortality rates, particularly in those with overlapping myositis/myocarditis. In our cohort we demonstrate good outcomes associated with early aggressive treatment with IVIG, IVMP, and mycophenolate. An agreed national treatment protocol or clinical discussion forum would be beneficial.jamweaver75@gmail.com17
Collapse
|
43
|
Tinsley N, Zhou C, Nahm S, Rack S, Tan GCL, Lorigan P, Blackhall F, Cook N. Antibiotic use reduces efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100430. [PMID: 35489288 PMCID: PMC9271482 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Antibiotic (ABX) use can reduce the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapeutics. The effect for patients treated with targeted therapies, namely, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), is less known. Patients and methods Retrospective data were analysed for TKI-treated patients with advanced melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between January 2015 and April 2017 at The Christie NHS Foundation Trust. Data on demographics, disease burden, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, presence of brain metastases, ECOG performance status (PS) and ABX use were collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the ABX+ group (ABX within 2 weeks of TKI initiation-6 weeks after) and the ABX– group (no ABX during the same period). Results A total of 168 patients were included; 89 (53%) with NSCLC and 79 (47%) with melanoma. 55- (33%) patients received ABX. On univariable analysis, ABX+ patients demonstrated shorter PFS (208 versus 357 days; P = 0.008) and OS (294 versus 438 days; P = 0.024). Increased age, poorer PS and higher LDH were associated with shorter PFS and OS. On multivariable analysis, ABX use was independently associated with shorter PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.34, P = 0.028] and OS (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.44-3.32, P = 0.0002). The negative impact of ABX on OS was particularly pronounced for patients with PS of ≥2 (HR 3.82, 95% CI 1.18-12.36, P = 0.025). Conclusion For patients treated with TKIs, ABX use is independently associated with reduced PFS and OS and judicious use is warranted, particularly in patients with poorer PS. Antibiotic use can reduce the efficacy of some systemic anticancer therapies. The effect for patients treated with TKIs is less known. This is a retrospective review of 168 patients with advanced melanoma and NSCLC treated with TKIs. Patients on ABXs showed shorter progression-free (208 versus 357 days) and overall survival (294 versus 438 days). ABX use was independently associated with shorter PFS (HR 1.57, P = 0.028) and OS (HR 2.19, P = 0.0002).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Tinsley
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - C Zhou
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Cancer Biomarker Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - S Nahm
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - S Rack
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - G C L Tan
- Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - F Blackhall
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - N Cook
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kennedy OJ, Kicinski M, Valpione S, Gandini S, Suciu S, Blank CU, Long GV, Atkinson VG, Dalle S, Haydon AM, Meshcheryakov A, Khattak A, Carlino MS, Sandhu S, Larkin J, Puig S, Ascierto PA, Rutkowski P, Schadendorf D, Koornstra R, Hernandez-Aya L, Di Giacomo AM, van den Eertwegh AJM, Grob JJ, Gutzmer R, Jamal R, van Akkooi ACJ, Robert C, Eggermont AMM, Lorigan P, Mandala M. Prognostic and predictive value of β-blockers in the EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 phase III trial of pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected high-risk stage III melanoma. Eur J Cancer 2022; 165:97-112. [PMID: 35220182 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND β-adrenergic receptors are upregulated in melanoma cells and contribute to an immunosuppressive, pro-tumorigenic microenvironment. This study investigated the prognostic and predictive value of β-adrenoreceptor blockade by β-blockers in the EORTC1325/KEYNOTE-054 randomised controlled trial. METHODS Patients with resected stage IIIA, IIIB or IIIC melanoma and regional lymphadenectomy received 200 mg of adjuvant pembrolizumab (n = 514) or placebo (n = 505) every three weeks for one year or until recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. At a median follow-up of 3 years, pembrolizumab prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared to placebo (hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.68). β-blocker use was defined as oral administration of any β-blocker within 30 days of randomisation. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the HR for the association between the use of β-blockers and RFS. RESULTS Ninety-nine (10%) of 1019 randomised patients used β-blockers at baseline. β-blockers had no independent prognostic effect on RFS: HR 0.96 (95% CI 0.70-1.31). The HRs of RFS associated with β-blocker use were 0.67 (95% CI 0.38-1.19) in the pembrolizumab arm and 1.15 (95% CI 0.80-1.66) in the placebo arm. The HR of RFS associated with pembrolizumab compared to placebo was 0.34 (95% CI 0.18-0.65) among β-blocker users and 0.59 (95% CI 0.48-0.71) among those not using β-blockers. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests no prognostic effect of β-blockers in resected high-risk stage III melanoma. However, β-blockers may predict improved efficacy of adjuvant pembrolizumab treatment. The combination of immunotherapy with β-blockers merits further investigation. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02362594, and EudraCT, 2014-004944-37.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver J Kennedy
- University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Sara Valpione
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Manchester and the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Gandini
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Christian U Blank
- Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, And Mater and Royal North Shore Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Adnan Khattak
- Fiona Stanley Hospital & Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Melanoma Institute Australia and the University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Susana Puig
- Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain &Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen, Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rutger Koornstra
- Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Anna M Di Giacomo
- Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | | | | | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, and Department of Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Ruhr University Bochum, Minden, Germany
| | - Rahima Jamal
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany; Princess Máxima Center and University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Paul Lorigan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Mario Mandala
- University of Perugia, Santa Maria Misericordia Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Nahm SH, Heywood R, Callaghan S, Serra-Bellver P, Gupta A, Cooksley T, Lorigan P. Patient and treatment characteristics of emergency presentations due to immune-mediated toxicities. Eur J Cancer 2022; 164:62-69. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
46
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Liquid biopsies, including circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), can inform a variety of clinical questions. This review examines the potential role of ctDNA as a clinical tool to inform clinical decision-making from early to late stage cutaneous melanoma. RECENT FINDINGS In pre-clinical studies, ctDNA has been shown to detect minimal residual disease and molecular relapse; predict and monitor response to therapy; and identify key resistance mechanisms. Here, we examine the potential utility of ctDNA and discuss its limitations for use in patients with melanoma. We present novel clinical trials, which are testing its value as a tool to augment clinical decision-making. Finally, we discuss the steps that are needed to ensure that ctDNA is used optimally in order to improve outcomes for patients with melanoma. Preclinical studies have shown that ctDNA has huge potential to provide real-time information about disease status in patients with melanoma. It is now time to test it rigorously within clinical trials to assess how it can be optimally used to benefit patients in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann Tivey
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Fiona Britton
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Julie-Ann Scott
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Dominic Rothwell
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- Nucleic Acids Biomarker Team, Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, Cancer Biomarker Centre, The University of Manchester, Alderley Park, SK10 4TG, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Rebecca Lee
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lee KA, Thomas AM, Bolte LA, Björk JR, de Ruijter LK, Armanini F, Asnicar F, Blanco-Miguez A, Board R, Calbet-Llopart N, Derosa L, Dhomen N, Brooks K, Harland M, Harries M, Leeming ER, Lorigan P, Manghi P, Marais R, Newton-Bishop J, Nezi L, Pinto F, Potrony M, Puig S, Serra-Bellver P, Shaw HM, Tamburini S, Valpione S, Vijay A, Waldron L, Zitvogel L, Zolfo M, de Vries EGE, Nathan P, Fehrmann RSN, Bataille V, Hospers GAP, Spector TD, Weersma RK, Segata N. Cross-cohort gut microbiome associations with immune checkpoint inhibitor response in advanced melanoma. Nat Med 2022; 28:535-544. [PMID: 35228751 PMCID: PMC8938272 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01695-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The composition of the gut microbiome has been associated with clinical responses to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment, but there is limited consensus on the specific microbiome characteristics linked to the clinical benefits of ICIs. We performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing of stool samples collected before ICI initiation from five observational cohorts recruiting ICI-naive patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma (n = 165). Integrating the dataset with 147 metagenomic samples from previously published studies, we found that the gut microbiome has a relevant, but cohort-dependent, association with the response to ICIs. A machine learning analysis confirmed the link between the microbiome and overall response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) with ICIs but also revealed limited reproducibility of microbiome-based signatures across cohorts. Accordingly, a panel of species, including Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, Roseburia spp. and Akkermansia muciniphila, associated with responders was identified, but no single species could be regarded as a fully consistent biomarker across studies. Overall, the role of the human gut microbiome in ICI response appears more complex than previously thought, extending beyond differing microbial species simply present or absent in responders and nonresponders. Future studies should adopt larger sample sizes and take into account the complex interplay of clinical factors with the gut microbiome over the treatment course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karla A Lee
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Laura A Bolte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes R Björk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Laura Kist de Ruijter
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Ruth Board
- Department of Oncology, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Neus Calbet-Llopart
- Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lisa Derosa
- U1015 INSERM, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center and Oncobiome Network, Villejuif-Grand-Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Dhomen
- Molecular Oncology Group, CRUK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kelly Brooks
- Molecular Oncology Group, CRUK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mark Harland
- Division of Haematology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Mark Harries
- Biochemical and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS and University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Guys Cancer Centre, Guys and St Thomas's NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Emily R Leeming
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Paolo Manghi
- Department CIBIO, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Richard Marais
- Molecular Oncology Group, CRUK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Julia Newton-Bishop
- Division of Haematology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Luigi Nezi
- European Institute of Oncology (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCSS), Milan, Italy
| | | | - Miriam Potrony
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
- Biochemical and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS and University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Susana Puig
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Raras, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
- Biochemical and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS and University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Heather M Shaw
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Sabrina Tamburini
- European Institute of Oncology (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCSS), Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Valpione
- Molecular Oncology Group, CRUK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Amrita Vijay
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
- Rheumatology & Orthopaedics Division, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Levi Waldron
- Department CIBIO, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
- Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laurence Zitvogel
- U1015 INSERM, University Paris Saclay, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center and Oncobiome Network, Villejuif-Grand-Paris, France
| | - Moreno Zolfo
- Department CIBIO, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Elisabeth G E de Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Nathan
- Biochemical and Molecular Genetics Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS and University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rudolf S N Fehrmann
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Véronique Bataille
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Dermatology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Geke A P Hospers
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Tim D Spector
- Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Rinse K Weersma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Nicola Segata
- Department CIBIO, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
- European Institute of Oncology (Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCSS), Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Pires da Silva I, Ahmed T, McQuade JL, Nebhan CA, Park JJ, Versluis JM, Serra-Bellver P, Khan Y, Slattery T, Oberoi HK, Ugurel S, Haydu LE, Herbst R, Utikal J, Pföhler C, Terheyden P, Weichenthal M, Gutzmer R, Mohr P, Rai R, Smith JL, Scolyer RA, Arance AM, Pickering L, Larkin J, Lorigan P, Blank CU, Schadendorf D, Davies MA, Carlino MS, Johnson DB, Long GV, Lo SN, Menzies AM. Clinical Models to Define Response and Survival With Anti-PD-1 Antibodies Alone or Combined With Ipilimumab in Metastatic Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1068-1080. [PMID: 35143285 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Currently, there are no robust biomarkers that predict immunotherapy outcomes in metastatic melanoma. We sought to build multivariable predictive models for response and survival to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) monotherapy or in combination with anticytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 (ipilimumab [IPI]; anti-PD-1 ± IPI) by including routine clinical data available at the point of treatment initiation. METHODS One thousand six hundred forty-four patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 ± IPI at 16 centers from Australia, the United States, and Europe were included. Demographics, disease characteristics, and baseline blood parameters were analyzed. The end points of this study were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The final predictive models for ORR, PFS, and OS were determined through penalized regression methodology (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method) to select the most significant predictors for all three outcomes (discovery cohort, N = 633). Each model was validated internally and externally in two independent cohorts (validation-1 [N = 419] and validation-2 [N = 592]) and nomograms were created. RESULTS The final model for predicting ORR (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.71) in immunotherapy-treated patients included the following clinical parameters: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, presence/absence of liver and lung metastases, serum lactate dehydrogenase, blood neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, therapy (monotherapy/combination), and line of treatment. The final predictive models for PFS (AUC = 0.68) and OS (AUC = 0.77) included the same variables as those in the ORR model (except for presence/absence of lung metastases), and included presence/absence of brain metastases and blood hemoglobin. Nomogram calculators were developed from the clinical models to predict outcomes for patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD-1 ± IPI. CONCLUSION Newly developed combinations of routinely collected baseline clinical factors predict the response and survival outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy and may serve as valuable tools for clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inês Pires da Silva
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tasnia Ahmed
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - John J Park
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Yasir Khan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Tim Slattery
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Selma Ugurel
- University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Jochen Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Weichenthal
- University Skin Cancer Center Kiel, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Ralf Gutzmer
- Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, Mühlenkreiskliniken, Ruhr University Bochum Campus Minden, Minden, Germany
| | - Peter Mohr
- Elbe-Klinikum Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany
| | - Rajat Rai
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ana M Arance
- Hospital Clinic, Barcelona & IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lisa Pickering
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - James Larkin
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Dummer R, Long GV, Robert C, Tawbi HA, Flaherty KT, Ascierto PA, Nathan PD, Rutkowski P, Leonov O, Dutriaux C, Mandalà M, Lorigan P, Ferrucci PF, Grob JJ, Meyer N, Gogas H, Stroyakovskiy D, Arance A, Brase JC, Green S, Haas T, Masood A, Gasal E, Ribas A, Schadendorf D. Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating Spartalizumab Plus Dabrafenib and Trametinib for BRAF V600-Mutant Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1428-1438. [PMID: 35030011 PMCID: PMC9061149 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Preclinical data suggest the combination of an anti-programmed death receptor 1 antibody plus dabrafenib and trametinib to have superior antitumor activity compared with dabrafenib plus trametinib alone. These observations are supported by translational evidence suggesting that immune checkpoint inhibitors plus targeted therapy may improve treatment outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma. COMBI-i is a phase III trial evaluating spartalizumab, an anti-programmed death receptor 1 antibody, in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib (sparta-DabTram), versus placebo plus dabrafenib and trametinib (placebo-DabTram) in patients with BRAF V600-mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma. METHODS Patients received spartalizumab 400 mg intravenously every 4 weeks plus dabrafenib 150 mg orally twice daily and trametinib 2 mg orally once daily or placebo-DabTram. Participants were age ≥ 18 years with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Overall survival was a key secondary end point (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02967692). RESULTS At data cutoff (July 1, 2020), the median progression-free survival was 16.2 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 23.9 months) in the sparta-DabTram arm versus 12.0 months (95% CI, 10.2 to 15.4 months) in the placebo-DabTram arm (hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.03]; P = .042 [one-sided; nonsignificant]). The objective response rates were 69% (183 of 267 patients) versus 64% (170 of 265 patients), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55% (146 of 267) of patients in the sparta-DabTram arm and 33% (88 of 264) in the placebo-DabTram arm. CONCLUSION The study did not meet its primary end point; broad first-line use of sparta-DabTram is not supported by these results. Further biomarker-driven investigation may identify patient subpopulations who could benefit from checkpoint inhibitor plus targeted therapy combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinhard Dummer
- University Hospital Zürich Skin Cancer Center, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Caroline Robert
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, and Paris-Saclay University, Orsay, France
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Keith T Flaherty
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Paolo A Ascierto
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Fondazione "G. Pascale," Naples, Italy
| | - Paul D Nathan
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Oleg Leonov
- Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Omsk, Russia
| | - Caroline Dutriaux
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
| | - Mario Mandalà
- Unit of Medical Oncology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.,Unit of Medical Oncology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Paul Lorigan
- University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jean Jacques Grob
- Timone Hospital AP-HM and Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Nicolas Meyer
- Université Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité Mixte de Recherche 1037-CRCT, Toulouse, France
| | - Helen Gogas
- Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Ana Arance
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Aisha Masood
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ
| | - Eduard Gasal
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ
| | - Antoni Ribas
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Dirk Schadendorf
- University Hospital Essen, Essen, and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bi Y, Adam S, Chatzimavridou V, Lorigan P, Huang Y. Potential pitfalls in diagnosis of immunotherapy-induced hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis abnormalities: a clinical case. Endocr Oncol 2022; 2:K5-K9. [PMID: 37435468 PMCID: PMC10259291 DOI: 10.1530/eo-21-0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
SUMMARY Short synacthen tests (SST) are frequently used for assessing adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) deficiency. In this study, we present the case of a 53-year-old man receiving immunotherapy for metastatic melanoma, who subsequently developed immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced hypothyroidism and was investigated for the presence of ICI-induced hypocortisolaemia on different occasions. Despite two reassuring SSTs, he subsequently developed clinical and biochemical evidence of ACTH deficiency. The ACTH on local measurement was not conclusive in keeping with ICI-related ACTH deficiency but when repeated using an alternative assay confirmed the diagnosis. The case illustrates the evolution of ACTH deficiency and exposes the potential pitfalls of screening strategies. Two important lessons may be gleaned from this case: (i) SSTs can be normal in early cases of secondary adrenal insufficiency, for example, hypophysitis due to adrenal reserve and (ii) when there is mismatch between the clinical and biochemical presentation, the ACTH should be repeated using a different assay. LEARNING POINTS Short synacthen tests, useful for ruling out adrenalitis and primary adrenal failure, may be normal in early adrenocorticotrophic hormone deficiency and secondary adrenal failure due to residual adrenal reserve.If clinical suspicion of adrenal insufficiency persists despite an initial satisfactory SST, it is important to recognise the need for re-assessment of cortisol levels.Insulin tolerance test remains a useful tool in the investigation of secondary adrenal insufficiency.Levothyroxine replacement may accelerate the metabolism of cortisol in cases of concurrent hypothyroidism and hypoadrenalism, and therefore, glucocorticoid replacement must precede levothyroxine treatment, to avoid adrenal crisis.The prevalence of immunotherapy-related endocrinopathies is likely to increase with increasing use of ICI and it is crucial that clinicians are alert to their subtle symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixi Bi
- The Christie’s NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Safwaan Adam
- The Christie’s NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Paul Lorigan
- The Christie’s NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Yinglai Huang
- Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Borås Hospital, Borås, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|