Marizomib alone or in combination with bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: Phase I/II clinical trial data

Background

This phase I/II trial in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy of marizomib, an irreversible pan-proteasome inhibitor that crosses the blood–brain barrier.

Methods

Part A assessed the safety and efficacy of marizomib monotherapy. In Part B, escalating doses of marizomib (0.5–0.8 mg/m²) in combination with bevacizumab were evaluated. Part C explored intra-patient dose escalation of marizomib (0.8–1.0 mg/m²) for the combination.

Results

In Part A, 30 patients received marizomib monotherapy. The most common AEs were fatigue (66.7%), headache (46.7%), hallucination (43.3%), and insomnia (43.3%). One patient (3.3%) achieved a partial response. In Part B, the recommended phase II dose of marizomib was 0.8 mg/m² when combined with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg. In Part C, dose escalation to 1.0 mg/m² was not tolerated. Pooled analysis of 67 patients treated with marizomib ≤0.8 mg/m² and bevacizumab showed a nonoverlapping safety profile consistent with the known safety profile of each agent: the most common grade ≥3 AEs were hypertension (16.4%), confusion (13.4%), headache (10.4%), and fatigue (10.4%). The overall response rate was 34.3%, including 2 patients with complete response. Six-month progression-free survival was 29.8%; median overall survival was 9.1 months.

Conclusions

The safety profile of marizomib as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab was consistent with previous observations that marizomib crosses the blood–brain barrier. Preliminary efficacy did not demonstrate a meaningful benefit of the addition of marizomib to bevacizumab for the treatment of recurrent GBM.

Full enrollment results from an extended phase I, multicenter, open label study of marizomib (MRZ) with temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT) in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM)

2021

Background: Proteasome inhibition sensitizes glioma cells to TMZ and RT, providing a novel therapeutic strategy for GBM. MRZ, an irreversible, brain-penetrant, pan-proteasome inhibitor with anti-glioma activity was combined with standard TMZ/RT → TMZ in newly diagnosed GBM (NCT02903069), to determine the recommended dose (RD). The primary endpoint of this expanded phase 1 trial was toxicity, with secondary endpoint of OS. Methods: Patients were enrolled in separate cohorts (TMZ/RT+MRZ→TMZ+MRZ, N=15; TMZ/RT→TMZ+MRZ, N=18) in dose-escalation (3+3 design), followed by dose-expansion (N=20) with TMZ/RT+MRZ at RD → TMZ+MRZ at RD. A separate cohort received TMZ/RT→TMZ+MRZ at RD with Tumor Treating Fields (Optune, N=13). MRZ was infused IV (10 min at 0.55, 0.7, 0.8, and 1.0 mg/m2) on Days 1, 8, 15, 29, 36 (42-day TMZ/RT+MRZ cycle) and Days 1, 8, 15 (28-day TMZ+MRZ cycle). Results: 66 patients treated; median age 58 years, 68% male, 50% receiving corticosteroid at baseline, 52% unmethylated MGMT. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in dose-escalation cohorts: 1 (fatigue) at 0.7 mg/m2 MRZ, 5 (ataxia/diarrhea; ataxia/confusion; myocardial infarction, delirium/ataxia; ataxia/fatigue) in 1.0 mg/m2 cohorts. MRZ demonstrated a steep dose-response with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)/DLTs predominately CNS AEs (Grade ≥3 TEAEs in 12 of 12 patients at 1.0 mg/m2 vs 22 of 41 patients at ≤0.8 mg/m2); the RD for MRZ was determined to be 0.8 mg/m2. Most common TEAEs (all grades): fatigue, nausea (both 70%), hallucination (54%), vomiting (53%), headache (47%), confusional state (33%), ataxia, constipation, muscular weakness (all 29%). Conclusions: CNS TEAEs were short-lasting, reversible and ameliorated by early dose reductions (29% patients dose-reduced), allowing patients to remain on treatment. For patients receiving MRZ with TMZ/RT→TMZ (N=35), the median OS was 14.8 months (17 deaths, median follow-up 14.3 months), and 7 patients remain active (Cycles 11-23). The MRZ RD + TMZ/Optune combination was tolerated, with 4 of 13 patients treated on this arm remaining active. An international Phase 3 trial (EORTC 1709-BTG/CCTG CE.8, NCT03345095) is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02903069.

A phase 1 clinical trial evaluating marizomib, pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (NPI-0052-107): final study results

Marizomib (MRZ) is an irreversible, pan-subunit proteasome inhibitor (PI) in clinical development for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and glioma. This study analysed MRZ, pomalidomide (POM) and low-dose dexamethasone (Lo-DEX) [PMD] in RRMM to evaluate safety and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Intravenous MRZ (0·3-0·5 mg/m² ) was administered over 2 h on days 1, 4, 8, 11; POM (3-4 mg) on days 1-21; and Lo-DEX (5 or 10 mg) on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, 22 and 23 of every 28-day cycle. Thirty-eight patients were enrolled that had received a median of 4 (range 1-10) prior lines of therapy; all patients received prior lenalidomide and bortezomib. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed and 0·5 mg/m² MRZ was determined to be the RP2D. The most common treatment-related ≥Grade 3 adverse events were: neutropenia (11/38 patients: 29%), pneumonia (4/38 patients 11%), anaemia (4/38 patients; 11%) and thrombocytopenia (4/38 patients; 11%). The overall response rate and clinical benefit rate was 53% (19/36) and 64% (23/36), respectively. In conclusion, PMD was well tolerated and demonstrated promising activity in heavily pre-treated, high-risk RRMM patients.

First-in-human trial of an anti-5T4 antibody-monomethylauristatin conjugate, PF-06263507, in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background The antibody-drug conjugate PF-06263507 targets the cell-surface, tumor-associated antigen 5T4 and consists of a humanized IgG1 conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent monomethylauristatin-F by a non-cleavable maleimidocaproyl linker. In this first-in-human, dose-finding trial (NCT01891669), we evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity of PF-06263507 in pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors, unselected for 5T4 expression. starting at 0.05 mg/kg, with 25, 56, and 95% dose increments, depending on observed dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), applying a modified continual reassessment method. Results Twenty-six patients received PF-06263507 at 0.05 to 6.5 mg/kg. The first DLT, grade 3 photophobia, occurred at 4.34 mg/kg and two additional DLTs, grade 2 keratitis and grade 1 limbal stem cell deficiency (> 2-week dosing delay), at 6.5 mg/kg. The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (38.5%), photophobia (26.9%), and decreased appetite, dry eye, nausea, and thrombocytopenia (23.1% each). No treatment-related grade 4-5 AEs were reported. Systemic exposure of PF-06263507 increased in a dose-related manner. At the maximum tolerated dose (MTD, 4.34 mg/kg), mean terminal half-life for PF-06263507 and unconjugated payload were ~6 and 3 days, respectively. Payload serum concentrations were substantially lower compared with PF-06263507. No objective responses were observed. Conclusions The MTD and recommended phase II dose were determined to be 4.34 mg/kg. Ocular toxicities accounted for the DLTs observed, as previously reported with monomethylauristatin-F payloads. Further studies are warranted to investigate clinical activity of this agent in patients with 5T4-expressing tumors.Trial registration ID: NCT01891669.

Marizomib irreversibly inhibits proteasome to overcome compensatory hyperactivation in multiple myeloma and solid tumour patients

Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are highly active in multiple myeloma (MM) but resistance is commonly observed. All clinical stage PIs effectively inhibit chymotrypsin‐like (CT‐L) activity; one possible mechanism of resistance is compensatory hyperactivation of caspase‐like (C‐L) and trypsin‐like (T‐L) subunits, in response to CT‐L blockade. Marizomib (MRZ), an irreversible PI that potently inhibits all three 20S proteasome subunits with a specificity distinct from other PIs, is currently in development for treatment of MM and malignant glioma. The pan‐proteasome pharmacodynamic activity in packed whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells was measured in two studies in patients with advanced solid tumours and haematological malignancies. Functional inhibition of all proteasome subunits was achieved with once‐ or twice‐weekly MRZ dosing; 100% inhibition of CT‐L was frequently achieved within one cycle at therapeutic doses. Concomitantly, C‐L and T‐L activities were either unaffected or increased, suggesting compensatory hyperactivation of these subunits. Importantly, this response was overcome by continued administration of MRZ, with robust inhibition of T‐L and C‐L (up to 80% and 50%, respectively) by the end of Cycle 2 and maintained thereafter. This enhanced proteasome inhibition was independent of tumour type and may underlie the clinical activity of MRZ in patients resistant to other PIs.

Phase I Clinical Trial of Marizomib (NPI-0052) in Patients with Advanced Malignancies Including Multiple Myeloma: Study NPI-0052-102 Final Results

PURPOSE

Marizomib (NPI-0052) is an irreversible proteasome inhibitor, derived from a marine actinomycete, with activity and specificity that is distinct from other proteasome inhibitors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Phase I study (NPI-0052-102) evaluated the MTD, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of marizomib intravenously on two dosing schedules.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with advanced malignancies received Schedule A (0.1-0.9 mg/m(2) over 1-10 minutes on days 1, 8, 15 in 4-week cycles); 44 patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and other hematologic malignancies received Schedule B (0.075-0.6 mg/m(2) over 1 minute to 2 hours on days 1, 4, 8, 11, in 3-week cycles). The Schedule A recommended phase II dose was 0.7 mg/m(2) over 10 minutes; Schedule B was 0.5 mg/m(2) over 2 hours. The most common (>25% of patients) related adverse events were fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, and infusion site pain (Schedule A); and fatigue (Schedule B). Overall response rate of 11% was seen in 27 efficacy-evaluable RRMM Schedule B patients (1 very good partial response, 3 partial responses, 4 minimal responses, and 12 stable disease). One Schedule A patient with transformed marginal zone lymphoma had complete response. Marizomib has a short half-life (<30 minutes), with high volume of distribution (∼15-416 L) and clearance (∼0.9-22 L/minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

Marizomib does not exhibit the severe peripheral neuropathy or hematologic toxicity observed with other proteasome inhibitors. Marizomib was generally well tolerated with low-dose dexamethasone, demonstrated activity in heavily pretreated RRMM patients, and warrants further evaluation. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4559-66. ©2016 AACR.

Evaluating imbalances of adverse events during biosimilar development

Biosimilars are designed to be highly similar to approved or licensed (reference) biologics and are evaluated based on the totality of evidence from extensive analytical, nonclinical and clinical studies. As part of the stepwise approach recommended by regulatory agencies, the first step in the clinical evaluation of biosimilarity is to conduct a pharmacokinetics similarity study in which the potential biosimilar is compared with the reference product. In the context of biosimilar development, a pharmacokinetics similarity study is not necessarily designed for a comparative assessment of safety. Development of PF-05280014, a potential biosimilar to trastuzumab, illustrates how a numerical imbalance in an adverse event in a small pharmacokinetics study can raise questions on safety that may require additional clinical trials.

A randomized phase 1 pharmacokinetic trial comparing the potential biosimilar PF-05280014 with trastuzumab in healthy volunteers (REFLECTIONS B327-01)

AIMS

The pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity between PF-05280014, a proposed trastuzumab biosimilar, trastuzumab sourced from European Union (trastuzumab-EU) or from United States (trastuzumab-US) was evaluated. Safety and immunogenicity were also assessed.

METHODS

In this phase 1, double-blind trial (NCT01603264), 105 healthy male volunteers were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single 6 mg kg(-1) intravenous dose of PF-05280014, trastuzumab-EU, or trastuzumab-US, and evaluated for 70 days. Drug concentration-time data were analyzed by non-compartmental methods. PK similarity for the comparisons of PF-05280014 to each of trastuzumab-EU and trastuzumab-US, and trastuzumab-EU to trastuzumab-US were determined using the standard 80.00% to 125.00% bioequivalence criteria.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics for the 101 subjects evaluable for PK were similar across all arms. The three products exhibited similar PK profiles with target-mediated disposition. The 90% CIs for the ratios of Cmax , AUC (0 , t last) and AUC(0,∞) were within 80.00% to 125.00% for all three pairwise comparisons. Adverse events (AEs) were similar across all arms with treatment-related AEs reported by 71.4%, 68.6% and 65.7% subjects in the PF-05280014, trastuzumab-EU, and trastuzumab-US arms, respectively. The most common AEs were infusion-related reactions, headache, chills, pyrexia and nausea. The AE term 'pyrexia' was numerically greater in the PF-05280014 arm. All post-dose samples, except 1, tested negative for anti-drug antibodies (ADA).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates PK similarity among PF-05280014, trastuzumab-EU and trastuzumab-US. The safety and immunogenicity profiles observed for the three products in this study are consistent with previous reports for trastuzumab.

A phase I pharmacokinetics trial comparing PF-05280014 (a potential biosimilar) and trastuzumab in healthy volunteers (REFLECTIONS B327-01)

171

Background: PF-05280014, a proposed biosimilar to trastuzumab, has an identical amino acid sequence and similar physicochemical and in vitro functional properties to trastuzumab. This study was designed to demonstrate PK similarity of PF-05280014 to trastuzumab from the US (trastuzumab-US) and EU (trastuzumab-EU), and between the licensed drugs. Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated. Methods: In this double-blind trial (NCT01603264), 105 healthy male volunteers, 18-55 years old were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single 6 mg/kg IV dose of PF-05280014, trastuzumab-US or trastuzumab-EU. All subjects provided informed consent. PK, safety and immunogenicity assessments were conducted for 70 days. PK similarity for a given test-to-reference comparison was considered to be demonstrated if the 90% CI of the test-to-reference ratio of the AUC from time 0 to the last time point (AUCT) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were within 80% – 125%. Results: The baseline demographics for the 101 subjects evaluable for PK were similar among 3 treatment arms. The 3 study drugs exhibited similar characteristics of target-mediated disposition and similar PK parameters (Table). The 90% CI for the ratios of Cmax, AUCT, and AUC0-∞were within 80% – 125% for the comparisons of PF-05280014 to trastuzumab-EU or trastuzumab-US, and trastuzumab-EU to trastuzumab-US. Adverse events (AE) were similar for the 3 arms with treatment-related AEs reported by 71.4%, 68.6%, and 65.7% subjects in the PF-05280014, trastuzumab-EU and trastuzumab-US, respectively. No serious AEs were reported. Only 4 subjects had treatment interruptions; 2 discontinued. Only 1 subject (trastuzumab-EU) developed anti-drug antibodies after dosing. Conclusions: This study demonstrates PK similarity of PF-05280014 to both trastuzumab-US and trastuzumab-EU and of trastuzumab-EU to trastuzumab-US. The 3 study drugs also showed similar safety profiles. Clinical trial information: NCT01603264. [Table: see text]

A non-comparative randomized phase II study of 2 doses of ATN-224, a copper/zinc superoxide dismutase inhibitor, in patients with biochemically recurrent hormone-naïve prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

ATN-224 (choline tetrathiomolybdate) is an oral Cu(2+)/Zn(2+)-superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) inhibitor with preclinical antitumor activity. We hypothesized that ATN-224 may induce antitumor effects as an antiangiogenic agent at low dose-levels while possessing direct antitumor activity at higher dose-levels. The objective of this study was to screen its clinical activity in patients with biochemically recurrent hormone-naïve prostate cancer.

METHODS

Biochemically-recurrent prostate cancer patients with prostate specific antigen doubling times (PSADT) < 12 months, no radiographic evidence of metastasis, and no hormonal therapy within 6 months (with serum testosterone levels > 150 ng/dl) were eligible. ATN-224 was administered at 2 dose-levels, 300 mg (n = 23) or 30 mg (n = 24) daily, by way of randomization. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 50% increase (and >5 ng/ml) in PSA from baseline or post-treatment nadir. Endpoints included the proportion of patients who were free of PSA progression at 24 weeks, changes in PSA slope/PSADT, and safety. The study was not powered to detect differences between the 2 treatment groups.

RESULTS

At 24 weeks, 59% (95% CI 33%-82%) of men in the low-dose arm and 45% (95% CI 17%-77%) in the high-dose arm were PSA progression-free. Median PSA progression-free survival was 30 weeks (95% CI 21-40(+)) and 26 weeks (95% CI 24-39(+)) in the low-dose and high-dose groups, respectively. Pre- and on-treatment PSA kinetics analyses showed a significant mean PSA slope decrease (P = 0.006) and a significant mean PSADT increase (P = 0.032) in the low-dose arm only. Serum ceruloplasmin levels, a biomarker for ATN-224 activity, were lowered in the high-dose group, but did not correlate with PSA changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose ATN-224 (30 mg daily) may have biologic activity in men with biochemically-recurrent prostate cancer, as suggested by an improvement in PSA kinetics. However, the clinical significance of PSA kinetics changes in this patient population remains uncertain. The absence of a dose-response effect also reduces enthusiasm, and there are currently no plans to further develop this agent in prostate cancer.

A phase I pharmacokinetics trial comparing PF-05280014 (a potential biosimilar) and trastuzumab in healthy volunteers (REFLECTIONS B327-01)

612

Background: PF-05280014, a proposed biosimilar to trastuzumab, has an identical amino acid sequence and similar physicochemical and in vitro functional properties to trastuzumab. This study was designed to demonstrate PK similarity of PF-05280014 to trastuzumab from the US (trastuzumab-US) and EU (trastuzumab-EU), and between the licensed drugs. Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated. Methods: In this double-blind trial (NCT01603264), 105 healthy male volunteers, 18-55 years old were randomized 1:1:1 to receive a single 6 mg/kg IV dose of PF-05280014, trastuzumab-US or trastuzumab-EU. All subjects provided informed consent. PK, safety, and immunogenicity assessments were conducted for 70 days. PK similarity for a given test-to-reference comparison was considered to be demonstrated if the 90% CI of the test-to-reference ratio of the AUC from time 0 to the last time point (AUCT) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were within 80% – 125%. Results: The baseline demographics for the 101 subjects evaluable for PK were similar among 3 treatment arms. The 3 study drugs exhibited similar characteristics of target-mediated disposition and similar PK parameters (Table). The 90% CI for the ratios of Cmax, AUCT, and AUC0-∞were within 80% – 125% for the comparisons of PF-05280014 to trastuzumab-EU or trastuzumab-US, and trastuzumab-EU to trastuzumab-US. Adverse events (AE) were similar for the 3 arms with treatment-related AEs reported by 71.4%, 68.6%, and 65.7% subjects in the PF-05280014, trastuzumab-EU and trastuzumab-US, respectively. No serious AEs were reported. Only 4 subjects had treatment interruptions; 2 discontinued. Only 1 subject (trastuzumab-EU) developed anti-drug antibodies after dosing. Conclusions: This study demonstrates PK similarity of PF-05280014 to both trastuzumab-US and trastuzumab-EU and of trastuzumab-EU to trastuzumab-US. The three study drugs also showed similar safety profiles. Clinical trial information: NCT01603264. [Table: see text]

Abstract OT1-1-05: A Phase I pharmacokinetics trial comparing PF-05280014 and trastuzumab in healthy volunteers (REFLECTIONS B327-01)

Background: Trastuzumab is a humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody that selectively binds the extracellular domain of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and is approved for treatment of breast and gastric cancers. PF05280014 is being developed as a potential biosimilar to trastuzumab. In nonclinical evaluations, PF-05280014 has an identical amino acid sequence to trastuzumab and similar physicochemical and in vitro functional properties. The goal of this phase I trial is to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic similarity of PF-05280014 to trastuzumab sourced from both the United States (trastuzumab-US) and European Union (trastuzumab-EU).

Trial design: In this double-blind, parallel group, single dose trial, subjects will be randomized 1:1:1 into 3 arms: PF-05280014; trastuzumab-US, and trastuzumab-EU (NCT01603264).

Eligibility: Healthy male volunteers, 18–55 years of age with normal left ventricular ejection fraction are eligible. Multiple exclusion criteria common to Phase 1 trials are in effect. All subjects must provide informed consent.

Aims: The primary objectives are to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic similarity of PF-05280014 to trastuzumab-US and trastuzumab-EU. Secondary objectives include evaluating the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of PF-05280014 compared with US-licensed and EU-approved trastuzumab products.

Statistical methods: Pharmacokinetic similarity will be demonstrated if the 90% confidence interval of the ratio of the area under the concentration-versus-time curve from time 0 to the last time point with quantifiable concentration (AUCT) and maximum concentration (Cmax) of PF-05280014 to both trastuzumab-US and trastuzumab-EU are within 80%–125%. At least 93 subjects, 31/arm, will be needed to provide &gt;81% power to demonstrate pharmacokinetic similarity for all comparisons. The planned enrolment is 105 subjects to account for subjects who may not complete the full follow-up period. The intent-to-treat (ITT) population is defined as all subjects who are randomized to receive treatment. The modified ITT population is defined as all subjects who are randomized and receive at least one dose of treatment and will be used to assess safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity. The per-protocol population is defined as all subjects who are randomized to and receive treatment and do not have any major protocol violations and will be used for the primary evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters.

Accrual: The target accrual is 105 subjects; present accrual is 17subjects.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-1-05.

Phase 1 first-in-human trial of the vascular disrupting agent plinabulin(NPI-2358) in patients with solid tumors or lymphomas

PURPOSE

Plinabulin (NPI-2358) is a vascular disrupting agent that elicits tumor vascular endothelial architectural destabilization leading to selective collapse of established tumor vasculature. Preclinical data indicated plinabulin has favorable safety and antitumor activity profiles, leading to initiation of this clinical trial to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and biologic activity of plinabulin in patients with advanced malignancies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients received a weekly infusion of plinabulin for 3 of every 4 weeks. A dynamic accelerated dose titration method was used to escalate the dose from 2 mg/m² to the RP2D, followed by enrollment of an RP2D cohort. Safety, pharmacokinetic, and cardiovascular assessments were conducted, and Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) scans were performed to estimate changes in tumor blood flow.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled. A dose of 30 mg/m² was selected as the RP2D based on the adverse events of nausea, vomiting, fatigue, fever, tumor pain, and transient blood pressure elevations, with DCE-MRI indicating decreases in tumor blood flow (Ktrans) from 13.5 mg/m² (defining a biologically effective dose) with a 16% to 82% decrease in patients evaluated at 30 mg/m². Half-life was 6.06 ± 3.03 hours, clearance was 30.50 ± 22.88 L/h, and distributive volume was 211 ± 67.9 L.

CONCLUSIONS

At the RP2D of 30 mg/m², plinabulin showed a favorable safety profile, while eliciting biological effects as evidenced by decreases in tumor blood flow, tumor pain, and other mechanistically relevant adverse events. On the basis of these results additional clinical trials were initiated with plinabulin in combination with standard chemotherapy agents.

The anti-angiogenesis agent, AG-013736, has minimal activity in elderly patients with poor prognosis acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)

AG-013736 is an oral anti-angiogenesis agent with activity against a variety of receptor tyrosine kinases, including VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, c-kit, and PDGFR-beta. A phase 2 study was conducted in patients with poor prognosis AML or MDS. Twelve patients (six AML; six MDS) were treated with AG-013736 at a dose of 10mg orally daily for a median of 56 days (range, 1-248 days). Median age was 80 years (range, 58-88 years). Grade 3 or 4 drug-related toxicities included hypertension (42%), mucositis (8%) and deep venous thrombosis (8%). No objective responses occurred; two patients with MDS had stable disease for 8.3 and 6.2 months, respectively. Bone marrow expression of VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 was observed in 11% and 0% of patients, respectively. Sustained decreases in soluble VEGFR-2 plasma levels with concomitant elevation in plasma VEGF and placental growth factor levels were obtained during the course of therapy with AG-013736. AG-01736 had minimal biologic or clinical activity in this elderly patient population.

Phase I Trial of the Oral Antiangiogenesis Agent AG-013736 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Results

Purpose

We studied the safety, clinical activity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AG-013736, an oral receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial cell growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, and c-Kit, in patients with advanced cancer.

Patients and Methods

Patients received fixed doses of AG-013736 orally in 28-day cycles. In the first cohort, patients initially received two single test doses of AG-013736 (10 and 30 mg); subsequent dosing was determined by individual PK parameters. Doses in subsequent cohorts were assigned by using a traditional dose-escalation/de-escalation rule based on observed toxicities in the current and previous cohorts. PK analysis included evaluation of the effect of food and antacid.

Results

Thirty-six patients received AG-013736 at doses ranging from 5 to 30 mg by mouth twice daily. The dose-limiting toxicities observed included hypertension, hemoptysis, and stomatitis and were seen primarily at the higher dose levels. The observed hypertension was manageable with medication. Stomatitis was generally tolerable and managed by dose reduction or drug holidays. AG-013736 was absorbed rapidly, with peak plasma concentrations observed within 2 to 6 hours after dosing. The maximum-tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose of AG-013736 is 5 mg, twice daily, administered in the fasted state. No significant drug interaction with antacid was seen. There were three confirmed partial responses and other evidence of clinical activity.

Conclusion

In this study, we have demonstrated clinical activity and safety of AG-013736 in patients with advanced solid tumors and identified the dose for phase II testing. The unique phase I study design allowed early identification of important absorption and metabolic issues critical to phase II testing of this agent.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as a pharmacodynamic measure of response after acute dosing of AG-013736, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors: results from a phase I study

PURPOSE

Identifying suitable markers of biologic activity is important when assessing novel compounds such as angiogenesis inhibitors to optimize the dose and schedule of therapy. Here we present the pharmacodynamic response to acute dosing of AG-013736 measured by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients with advanced solid tumors were treated with various doses of AG-013736. In addition to standard measures of objective disease response and pharmacokinetic analysis, DCE-MRI scans were acquired at baseline and repeated at cycle 1--day 2 after the scheduled morning dose of the AG-013736 in 26 patients. Indicators of a vascular response, such as the volume transfer constant (K(trans)) and initial area under the curve (IAUC), were calculated to assess the effect of treatment on tumor vascular function.

RESULTS

Evaluable vascular response data were obtained in 17 (65%) of 26 patients. A linear correlation was found in which the percentage change from baseline to day 2 in K(trans) and IAUC was inversely proportional to AG-013736 exposure. Using a conservative a priori assumption that a > or = 50% decrease in K(trans) was indicative of an objective vascular response, a 50% decrease in K(trans) was achieved and corresponded to a plasma AUC(0-24) of > 200 ng . h/mL.

CONCLUSION

A sufficient decrease in tumor vascular parameters was observed at a dose chosen for additional phase II testing by conventional toxicity criteria. In addition, the day 2 vascular response measured using DCE-MRI seems to be a useful indicator of drug pharmacology, and additional research is needed to determine if it is a suitable marker for predicting clinical activity.

Topical bexarotene therapy for patients with refractory or persistent early-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma: results of the phase III clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of topical bexarotene (Targretin; Ligand Pharmaceuticals, La Jolla, Calif) gel 1% in patients with refractory or persistent early-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

METHODS

We conducted a multinational, open-label, phase III study of 50 patients with stage IA to IIA cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. The primary end point classification was the overall complete and partial response rate by the higher of 2 measures: the Physician's Global Assessment of Clinical Condition or the Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity.

RESULTS

The overall response rates for the Physician's Global Assessment of Clinical Condition, Composite Assessment of Index Lesion Disease Severity, and primary end point classification were 44%, 46%, and 54%, respectively. The most common adverse events possibly related to study medication were mild to moderate irritant dermatitis, pruritus, pain (ie, primarily burning at application site), and skin disorder (eg, skin inflammation, excoriation, and new lesions). There were no serious treatment-related adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical bexarotene gel was generally well tolerated and demonstrated substantial efficacy in patients with refractory or persistent early-stage cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.

Multi-Institutional Phase I/II Trial of Oral Bexarotene in Combination With Cisplatin and Vinorelbine in Previously Untreated Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE: Bexarotene (Targretin; Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA) is a retinoid-X-receptor (RXR)-selective retinoid with preclinical antitumor activity in squamous cell cancers. In this phase I/II trial, we combined bexarotene with cisplatin and vinorelbine in the treatment of patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients who had stage IIIB NSCLC with pleural effusion or stage IV NSCLC and had received no prior therapy received bexarotene in combination with cisplatin (100 mg/m2) and vinorelbine (alternating doses of 30 mg/m2 and 15 mg/m2). In the phase I portion, the daily dose of bexarotene was escalated in cohorts of three patients from 150 mg/m2 to 600 mg/m2, beginning 1 week before the start of the cisplatin-vinorelbine regimen. Once the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of bexarotene was determined, the study entered the phase II portion. Response rate was the primary end point; median survival time and 1-year survival rate were secondary end points.

RESULTS: In the phase I portion, the daily MTD of bexarotene was determined to be 400 mg/m2. Eight of 43 patients exhibited major responses. Seven (25%) of the 28 patients in the phase II portion responded to treatment. The median survival time in the phase II portion was 14 months; nine (32%) of the 28 patients were still alive at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. One-year and projected 3-year survival rates were 61% and 30%, respectively. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were hyperlipemia, leukopenia, nausea, vomiting, pneumonia, dyspnea, anemia, and asthenia. Grade 3 and 4 laboratory abnormalities with incidences greater than 5% were decreased hemoglobin levels and WBC, absolute neutrophil, and absolute lymphocyte counts and increased prothrombin time and creatinine and amylase levels. Of the two cases of pancreatitis, one required hospitalization and both were associated with increased triglyceride levels. There was one death secondary to renal insufficiency unrelated to bexarotene treatment.

CONCLUSION: In patients with advanced NSCLC, bexarotene with cisplatin and vinorelbine yielded acceptable phase II response rates (25%) and was associated with better-than-expected survival (14-month median survival time; 61% 1-year, 32% 2-year, and 30% projected 3-year survival rates). The regimen should be studied in larger clinical trials.

Placebo-Controlled Trial of Bexarotene, a Retinoid X Receptor Agonist, as Maintenance Therapy for Patients Treated with Chemotherapy for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

This study was designed as a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomized by center to placebo (16 patients, 31%), oral bexarotene 300 mg/m2/day (21 patients, 40%), or oral bexarotene 600 mg/m2/day (15 patients, 29%) following demonstration of stable or responsive disease after first-line chemotherapy. The study was prematurely terminated because of slow accrual after 54 patients enrolled. Median time to progression (TTP) from the beginning of study drug treatment was 56 days for placebo, 82 days for moderate-dose bexarotene (300 mg/m2/day), and 128 days for high-dose bexarotene (600 mg/m2/day) (P = 0.56, log-rank test). For prior chemotherapy responders only, median TTP from the beginning of study drug treatment was 56 days for placebo, 146 days for moderate-dose bexarotene, and 177 days for high-dose bexarotene. Of note, there were more chemotherapy responders randomized to the placebo group (63%) than the bexarotene treatment arms (48% and 47%), further supporting a bexarotene-related improvement in TTP. Bexarotene-related toxicity was manageable and consisted primarily of elevated serum triglycerides and asthenia, skin toxicity (dryness, peeling, flaking), thyroid dysfunction, and headache. Because this study was closed prematurely, it does not have the statistical power to detect differences among the treatment groups. This study shows that patients can tolerate bexarotene at initial doses up to 600 mg/m2/day after platinum-based chemotherapy and that bexarotene may have the potential to delay disease progression in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with previously stable or responsive disease following platinum-based chemotherapy.

A phase II study of the efficacy of recombinant interferon gamma in relapsing ovarian adenocarcinoma

Fourteen patients with relapsing ovarian cancer were treated with a regimen of intravenous interferon gamma (IFN gamma). During an initial induction phase, patients received 2 mg/m2 IFN gamma intravenously over 2 h daily for 5 days, repeated every 2 weeks for six courses. Patients who responded were continued on a maintenance phase, receiving 3 mg/m2 intravenously over 2 h, twice weekly every 2 weeks for 2 to 6 months. All patients had received prior cisplatin containing chemotherapy regimens. Of the 14 patients entered, 7 completed the six courses of the induction treatment. Four patients were clinical responders and continued on maintenance therapy. The most commonly reported toxicities included malaise, fever, and deteriorating performance status. There appears to be some clinically apparent antitumor activity demonstrated by this dosing schedule of interferon gamma in ovarian cancers.

Phase I/II study of recombinant interferon gamma in advanced renal cell carcinoma

A phase I and II evaluation of 42 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with recombinant interferon gamma was done. Patients were treated with either a daily 2-hour infusion or 24-hour infusion for 7 days every 3 weeks for at least 2 cycles. Patients who demonstrated stable disease or improvement on therapy then were continued on a maintenance program of 5 days of recombinant interferon gamma administered every 3 to 4 weeks. The initial starting dose was 10 mcg. per m.2 per day with escalations to 30, 100, 300, 1,000 and 3,000 mcg. per m.2. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at 1,000 to 3,000 mcg. per m.2, and included leukopenia, chills, fevers, rigors and hepatotoxicity as manifested by elevation in the transaminase and bilirubin levels. Tumor responses were seen initially at the 300 mcg. per m.2 dose level. Over-all, of 41 patients evaluable for therapeutic effectiveness 1 demonstrated a complete response 6 months in duration and 3 demonstrated partial responses 2, 9 and 13 months in duration. However, 6 patients demonstrated organ site responsiveness, including resolution of pulmonary lesions (2 complete and 1 partial responses), lymphadenopathy (1 complete and 1 partial responses), a pleural-based lesion in 1 patient with a partial response and complete resolution of hepatic metastases in 1 patient. We conclude that recombinant interferon gamma at a dose of 1,000 to 3,000 mcg. per m.2 for 7 days and repeated every 2 to 3 weeks had demonstrable anticancer activity in patients with metastatic renal carcinoma.

A randomized phase I/II study of continuous versus intermittent intravenous interferon gamma in patients with metastatic melanoma

Thirty patients with documented metastatic melanoma were randomly assigned to receive recombinant DNA-produced gamma-interferon (specific activity approximately, 20 MU/mg) intravenously (IV) over either two or 24 hours at dosages of 3, 30, 300, 1,000, or 3,000 micrograms/m2. Objective toxicity resembled that of alpha-interferon and included fever, chills, myalgias, headache, and fatigue. Neutropenia, elevations in liver enzymes, tachyarrhythmias, and CNS changes also were noted. Dose-limiting toxicity included neutropenia, liver enzyme abnormality, constitutional symptoms, and a change in mental status. The incidence of toxicity was qualitatively similar in both two- and 24-hour treatment arms, but was quantitatively more severe in the 24-hour continuous infusion arm. Maximum tolerated dose was 1,000 micrograms/m2 in both schedules. Pharmacokinetic studies showed a half-life of six to nine hours. One patient had a complete response after two cycles of therapy and an additional patient entered partial remission after three cycles. Recombinant gamma-interferon (rIRN-gamma) is tolerated at dosages of 1,000 micrograms/m2 administered daily either by two or 24 hour infusion for 14 days in patients with metastatic melanoma. The responses documented in this early trial warrant further evaluation for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Recombinant gamma interferon in advanced breast cancer: a phase II trial

Fifteen patients with advanced carcinoma of the breast who had failed prior chemotherapy, were treated with recombinant gamma interferon at a dose of 2mg/m2 (1mg = 2.4 X 10(7) international units) intravenously for five consecutive days every other week. The median patient age was 51 and all patients had a performance status of 0-2 (Karnofsky greater than or equal to 50). Thirteen patients had two or three sites of metastatic disease and seven were estrogen receptor positive. No complete or partial responses were noted. Although some patients had brief periods of stable disease, almost all patients progressed after one or two courses. Only one patient was able to receive six courses of induction therapy and a brief course of maintenance. Flu-like symptoms and nausea were seen in all patients; vomiting and anorexia were frequent. Hepatic toxicity manifested by enzyme elevation was common and was most severe in patients with liver metastases. In this study a highly purified biologically active gamma interferon was not associated with anti-tumor activity in previously treated women with metastatic breast cancer.

Hyponatremia and other toxic effects during a phase I trial of recombinant human gamma interferon and vinblastine

Recombinant human gamma interferon (Biogen) and vinblastine were administered in a phase I study. Side effects included fever and chills, nausea and vomiting, acute symptomatic hyponatremia, reversible myelosuppression, hepatitis, transient hypotension, congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, and nonselective proteinuria. In most patients, additional host factors contributed to these toxic effects. Side effects occurred despite dose reduction; therefore, protocol accrual was prematurely closed. No correlation between serum concentrations and toxicity was noted. Median serum vinblastine concentration was 1.04 ng/ml; median serum interferon concentration was 17.3 IU/ml.

Clinical pharmacology of intraperitoneal cisplatin

The clinical pharmacology of cisplatin was determined in six patients with malignant ascites secondary to ovarian cancer, and in one patient with peritoneal mesothelioma, following intraperitoneal administration of cisplatin (25-60 mg/m2). The drug was administered in 1 liter of normal saline as a 15- to 30-min infusion. Total, and in some patients free (ultrafilterable), platinum concentrations were determined in plasma, urine, and ascitic fluid by flameless atomic absorption spectrometry. The peak total platinum concentrations in ascitic fluid at the end of infusion were related to dose, a 50 mg/m2 dose producing a 20 to 80 micrograms cisplatin/ml concentration. Filterable platinum represented between 3 and 59% of total platinum in the peritoneum at 4 to 6.5 hr following its administration. Plasma platinum concentrations ranged between 0.2 to 1.6 micrograms/ml 4 hr following administration, and reached a plateau for the next 24 to 48 hr largely in the form of protein-bound platinum. The urinary excretion of cisplatin was consistent with variation in absorption from the peritoneum. Minimal gastrointestinal, bone marrow, and renal toxicities during therapy suggest that sustained free platinum concentrations in ascites may be obtained without significant toxicity and support the intraperitoneal route of administration as an effective strategy for cisplatin therapy of intra-abdominal malignancies.

Predictive testing with the subrenal capsule assay

Measurement of drug activity as an oncolytic effect, use of the control only to monitor the quality of tissue implanted, and the rapid clearance of necrotic tissue from the subcapsular site, as significant factors incorporated into the design of the assay, have permitted use of a simple tumor size parameter for evaluating drug activity. The simplicity and economy of such a parameter, the predictability and reproducibility of the 6-day assay observed thus far, and evidence that the assay does measure a biological property of the tumor apart from host response, have warranted the continued use of the 6-day time frame and the normal immunocompetent CDF1 mouse as xenograft host. These studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using human tumor explants obtained from a variety of solid human malignancies in a straightforward, short term, in vivo predictive assay system. Preliminary correlations between in vivo (assay) tumor sensitivity and clinical response have given reasonable concurrence. This crucial point will require further study, with larger numbers of patients, under more rigid conditions. Final validation of this, and other, predictive assays will require a prospective, randomized study in large numbers of patients. Our present prospective study is being continued, therefore, with expansion to a multi-institutional design over a broader geographic area.

Initial clinical trials of the subrenal capsule assay as a predictor of tumor response to chemotherapy

Retrospective and prospective clinical trials were performed to determine the usefulness of the 6-day subrenal capsule (SRC) assay for the prediction of response to chemotherapy. Evaluable assays were obtained in 86% of 1000 consecutive specimens obtained from a variety of solid malignancies. Analysis of chemotherapeutic sensitivity in this assay gave reproducible and consistent results. The overall predictive accuracy of the assay in 62 retrospective clinical trials in 55 patients was 85%. Of 37 evaluable patients with chemotherapy refractory cancers treated in a prospective trial with single agent chemotherapy as determined by the assay, 14 (38%) responded. Greater degrees of tumor regression in the assay were associated with a higher probability of clinical response. The SRC assay shows potential value as a rapid predictive test for chemotherapeutic selection on an individual patient basis. However, additional prospective clinical trials are necessary to document its ultimate utility.

Murine metabolism and disposition of iron:adriamycin complexes

Previous studies have reported antitumor activity and reduced cardiotoxicity for a putative 3:1 complex of iron:Adriamycin (ADR). We have studied the tissue distribution and metabolism of a wide variety of freshly prepared and lyophilized iron:ADR preparations after administration to BALB/c mice (ADR, 16 mg/kg i.v.). Tissue concentrations of ADR given without iron were initially highest in kidney and liver, and ADR fluorescence was lost from all tissues except the spleen with a t1/2 of 15 to 18 hr. ADR remained the major fluorescent species in liver and kidney from 0.5 to 72 hr after treatment. Freshly prepared iron:ADR (1:1) behaved similarly to ADR except for a slightly longer tissue t1/2 in heart, liver, and kidney. The tissue distribution of freshly prepared 2:1 and 3:1 iron:ADR was very different from that of ADR without iron; lung containing the highest concentrations of ADR fluorescence. Administration of freshly prepared 1:1, 2:1, and 3:1 iron:ADR resulted in some increase in adriamycinol in the liver, but ADR was always the major fluorescent species present. The tissue distribution of 1:1 iron:ADR that had been aged for 48 or 96 hr was similar to that of fresh 2:1 and 3:1 iron:ADR rather than ADR or fresh 1:1 iron:ADR. When lyophilized iron:ADR preparations were reconstituted and administered, the 0.5-hr tissue distribution of 0.1:1, 0.2:1, 0.25:1, and 0.33:1 iron:ADR was the same as ADR alone, but 0.5:1, 1:1, 2:1, and 3:1 iron:ADR were all accumulated primarily in the lung. Physicochemical studies confirm the production of microaggregated iron:ADR complexes and light microscopy allows visualization and sizing of these aggregates. We feel that trapping of these iron:ADR aggregates in the pulmonary vascular bed accounts for the observed dramatic alteration in tissue distribution. Light and electron microscopic studies confirm the intravascular sequestration of iron in pulmonary capillaries.

Chemotherapy responsiveness of human breast tumors in the 6-day subrenal capsule assay: an update

Feasibility of utilizing the 6-day subrenal capsule (SRC) assay to screen drugs against fresh surgical explants of human tumors was confirmed by testing six clinically active chemotherapeutic agents against 141 human breast cancers. Response rates of the six drugs obtained in the assay compared favorably with clinical response rates for the same drugs as reported by Carter (5). The evaluable assay rate for breast tumors was 92% as compared to 89% for gynecologic tumors. Innate drug resistance was indicated with 16 of 57 tumors (28%) which did not respond to any of the six agents tested. Differences in responsiveness of tumors to each agent in a potential three-drug combination of either CMF or CAF suggest that the effectiveness of multiagent therapy might be enhanced if the individual agents of a potential drug combination were selected on the basis of tumor sensitivity to each of the agents in a predictive assay. Although cross-resistance between L-PAM and cytoxan was demonstrated and was statistically significant, 31% of these tumors responded individually to either one or the other agent, suggesting caution in extrapolating concomitance in activity between these two alkylators.

Activity of two phase I drugs N-methylformamide (NSC-3051) and Echinomycin (NSC-526417) against fresh surgical explants of human tumors in the 6-day subrenal capsule (SRC) assay

The potential clinical activity of the new phase I drugs N-methylformamide (N-MF) and Echinomycin (ECH) was examined while still undergoing clinical toxicology trials by testing against fresh surgical explants of human tumors in the 6-day in vivo SRC Assay. Sixty-nine tumors representing different histologic types including breast, lung, colon, ovarian, and cervical, as well as neoplasms of undiagnosed origin, were screened against N-MF (NSC-3051) and ECH (NSC-526417) simultaneously with five standard chemotherapeutic agents used clinically for treatment of the specific type of cancer. Thus, activity of N-MF and ECH could be compared directly with that of standard agents tested in the same assay. Treatment schedule was QD1-5, and the criterion for drug activity was tumor graft regression greater than 20%. N-MF was active against 15/69 tumors with a response rate of 22%. ECH was also active against 15/69 tumors, yielding the same response rate. Although the response rates for N-MF and ECH were the same, indicating a similar degree of general anti-tumor activity as evaluated by the assay, N-MF showed greatest activity against lung tumors whereas ECH was more active against ovarian tumors. Twenty-six of 69 tumors (38%) were unresponsive to all drugs tested, only one tumor was responsive to both N-MF and ECH and no tumors were responsive to either N-MF or ECH alone. Cytoxan, one of the standard agents tested concurrently with both phase I drugs yielded a response rate of 35%, one and one-half times greater. Cervical and renal cancers and lymphomas were relatively unresponsive to both drugs.